Even if you tried really hard to pretend you didn't believe there'd be a bit at the back of your mind that did believe - it's what causes you to not forget that you're trying not to believe. Or something.
The link doesn't go to anything specific, which leaves me puzzled as to whether this is a framework as in rails or something sort of like a procedure but more conceptual.
The content is buzzword laden twaddle. I reckon the whole thing is just a puff piece.
Slashdot Mirror
Any particular reason why you chose to add exactly one wrong apostrophe to the bit you copied?
Yes. Even with death panels pruning out the no-hopers socialised medicine is so expensive that even 2 is stretching the budget.
And of course all TV channels are government run, which is what happens if everybody doesn't have a gun.
How about the one where if there's an s, there has to be an apostrophe before it?
A pretentious ponce who can dish it out but can't take it.
Brought to you by DNA (National Dyslexics Association).
OMG, that's totally disproportionate!
Well, it would be if they were percentages of the same thing.
I wouldn't count a wirecutter, an induction coil or a loudspeaker as weapons.
Even if you tried really hard to pretend you didn't believe there'd be a bit at the back of your mind that did believe - it's what causes you to not forget that you're trying not to believe. Or something.
A = 100,000 (from the article)
B = 6,000 (from the book of Genesis)
Divide A by B. Round to the nearest whole number.
Yeah, it's not like you can dig it out of the ground or anything.
And lots of other minerals are useful for lots of other things.
Unicorns don't exist. Hang on, maybe they do.
Look everyone, I'm as smart as Einstein!
[holds up mirror]
Are you being wilfully obtuse, trying to be funny, or are you just genuinely stupid?
Hint: Per implies division. Division is not commutative. Hence the position of the "per" makes a difference.
Nice strawman. He forgot to explicitly mention that they should be alive too, why didn't you pick up on that?
Nah, needs Nazis in it somewhere.
Netcraft does not confirm it.
Of course it is.
Oh, sorry, I thought I was at Wikipedia.
The key phrase is "anonymously-charged".
Anonymously - the accused doesn't get to face and question the accuser.
Charged. Which isn't the same as proved.
If he'd blocked it (assuming he even can) you'd be complaining about him interfering with the market.
I'd expect fractional releases to fix bugs, but not redo a broken concept.
Copyright holders are worse than the Nazis!
Can we go home now?
It's a plan to avoid complaints about the UI by not having one.
The orbiter (Rosetta) worked fine. The lander, not so much. Though it wasn't the total washout that the herp-derp-yerp crowd are claiming.
The link doesn't go to anything specific, which leaves me puzzled as to whether this is a framework as in rails or something sort of like a procedure but more conceptual.
The content is buzzword laden twaddle. I reckon the whole thing is just a puff piece.
I always thought the UI was so dumb and retarded that it must have been done on purpose.