As a Brit, my first thought was that they were getting military vehicles, perhaps because the probe might provoke violence.
Clearly that's silly, when you reflect on it. I'm sure there are whole websites devoted to ambiguous headlines, and I'm pretty certain some of them are deliberately written that way either for publicity or just 4 lulz.
The Sun will have expanded nearly to Mars by them, won't it?
Not really any point in panicking one way or the other. I know my medical insurance won't cover me at even half that age, especially against things like being totally fucking burnt to fuck.
Some of us aged under 35 would love to have fully paid off homes, however we have to contend with average house prices of $1 million dollars in Melbourne and an Average wage of $60,000 Australian dollars/year.
The difference is, Apple GOT approval, so they met all the zoning and environmental requirements.
If someone was able to block it, through legal process, then by definition there was something they didn't comply with. If it was otherwise, the case would have failed.
Stupid Apple, they should have retained you as their counsel.
What if the AyYay decides that the policy to stop them thar AyRainyYuns building noocler mussels actually worked, by applying advanced statistical maths and all that sort of shit to the evidence that while aforesaid policy to stop the AyRainyYuns building noocler missiles them thar AyRainyYuns did not, in fact, build any noocler mussels?
But has nothing to do with "shorting" unless you want to say a put option is a shot, too.
By definition it is. The option gives you, in return for a non-refundable premium, the right (you may choose not to exercise it) to sell some asset at a specific price X (until date Y, yada yada). You might not in fact even own even own that asset - that's a naked put.
So, the asset goes down to W, which is below X. My counterparty is legally obligated to buy at X. I can buy on the open market at W, and I pocket X - W.
The asset goes up. I don't oblige the counterparty to do anything. I lose my premium.
It's amazing how many people rant about seeing the source code for breathalysers (in case there's some hidden DWB routine or something) while actually believing in field sobriety tests which are purely subjective and also totally fucking rubbish. Disclaimer: I can't stand on one leg for more than two seconds if I'm stone cold sober two hours & three coffees after waking from the best night's sleep ever.
The article is flag-waving piffle. It presumes that NK will want to use them for something later and that the bombardment will go on for some time.
But if their aim is a futile and stupid gesture or they hope to win by intimidation then neither of those applies. If they pre-cache plenty of ammo, have reserve loaders ready and take out the bridges first (a lot of the city is on the wrong side of a river) they can cause mayhem long before any counterstrike is even ordered.
As for shelters, they do fuck all against nerve agents. Not always great against incendiaries either.
You gave "being alive" as your evidence that you knew "enough about gene therapy" to give an informed opinion.
Which is true.
I also know enough about flying to have not killed myself in a plane crash and enough about nuclear bombs to have not irradiated myself because a screwdriver slipped.
Slashdot Mirror
As a Brit, my first thought was that they were getting military vehicles, perhaps because the probe might provoke violence.
Clearly that's silly, when you reflect on it. I'm sure there are whole websites devoted to ambiguous headlines, and I'm pretty certain some of them are deliberately written that way either for publicity or just 4 lulz.
An expert on countries he couldn't even point to on a map wrote:
There's more than one rebel group, and they aren't all Islamists. Not even close.
Also, why do you assume that the opponent of someone secular automatically religious?
Money laundering is taking proceeds of crime and funnelling them through an otherwise legitimate business in order to disguise their origin.
That's everywhere except the US.
There it's become a thing that they just tag onto other offences to get a higher sentence and/or pressure the defendant into a plea bargain.
Or Christine...
How will they be able to do the needfuls if they R having one doubt and wish 2 revert the same?
The Sun will have expanded nearly to Mars by them, won't it?
Not really any point in panicking one way or the other. I know my medical insurance won't cover me at even half that age, especially against things like being totally fucking burnt to fuck.
Fiiiiix bayonets!
Momma always said: millennial is as millennial does.
Giap never won a patched battle.
To be fair, asian trans-gender people usually look better than not-asian trans-gender people.
Look at that Kardashian abomination. Face like a bricklayer's elbow.
Or a brothel review writer or a quality inspector in a brewery.
Protip: if you split them part-time it's important to get the sequencing right.
You should have picked your parents better.
Like Trump did.
If someone was able to block it, through legal process, then by definition there was something they didn't comply with. If it was otherwise, the case would have failed.
Stupid Apple, they should have retained you as their counsel.
And even if one doesn't, there's always George Lucas.
Purely from academic interest and in the cause of like research and al that, which 26%?
What if the AyYay decides that the policy to stop them thar AyRainyYuns building noocler mussels actually worked, by applying advanced statistical maths and all that sort of shit to the evidence that while aforesaid policy to stop the AyRainyYuns building noocler missiles them thar AyRainyYuns did not, in fact, build any noocler mussels?
Oh look, some faggots!
By definition it is. The option gives you, in return for a non-refundable premium, the right (you may choose not to exercise it) to sell some asset at a specific price X (until date Y, yada yada). You might not in fact even own even own that asset - that's a naked put.
So, the asset goes down to W, which is below X. My counterparty is legally obligated to buy at X. I can buy on the open market at W, and I pocket X - W.
The asset goes up. I don't oblige the counterparty to do anything. I lose my premium.
All civilised countries do.
It's amazing how many people rant about seeing the source code for breathalysers (in case there's some hidden DWB routine or something) while actually believing in field sobriety tests which are purely subjective and also totally fucking rubbish. Disclaimer: I can't stand on one leg for more than two seconds if I'm stone cold sober two hours & three coffees after waking from the best night's sleep ever.
But what if there is a wreck?
That's a novelty.
The article is flag-waving piffle. It presumes that NK will want to use them for something later and that the bombardment will go on for some time.
But if their aim is a futile and stupid gesture or they hope to win by intimidation then neither of those applies. If they pre-cache plenty of ammo, have reserve loaders ready and take out the bridges first (a lot of the city is on the wrong side of a river) they can cause mayhem long before any counterstrike is even ordered.
As for shelters, they do fuck all against nerve agents. Not always great against incendiaries either.
You're right. Lose the headphone jack!
Which is true.
I also know enough about flying to have not killed myself in a plane crash and enough about nuclear bombs to have not irradiated myself because a screwdriver slipped.
Of course if they wanted to build it next to your house you'd be completely happy with the idea.
Because the needs of the many should overrule the rights of a few individuals, right?
He said it would be volatile ... and it was.
I say I'm going to stick my finger up my nose ... and I do.
Why does he get a fuckton of money and I don't?
On top of already being victims just by having Drupal.