Webcams suck for CCTV work. Now there are IP cameras that are ment for monitoring but you're looking at a much higher price range. If you want a controlable (PTZ) camera prepare to shell out alot more. And if you want more then one, then get a number of analogue cameras and find a company that makes a capture card and software. There are a number of them that have software that support web access, e-mail on motion, ect....
They said they are going to have some stuff in the next patch to try to deal with that. News of it has sent the prices of some items they camp alot have dropped signifgantly.
I hate how they show PC's being used in forensics work on TV. I work for a company that does DVRs for CCTV systems and a ton of people call up wanting a system that will take a compressed file and let you Zoom it 50x and read newsprint at 200 ft away.
The FFXI event doesn't work that way. While you're in that form you can't do anything that requires targeting. But it was funny as heck to see players freaking out. People were screaming about an invasion.
I've found FFXI to be pretty good. I like the way it handles PvP, as a sport between nations, fought in a certain setting and prearanged. PvP for those that want it, none for those that don't.
Range. You don't need refill on fuel, nor do you have surface to generate electricy and air. So you can stay at sea longer. In this age of satillites, it's pretty easy to spot a tender ship so if you have to refuel your subs then the other side has a pretty good idea of where they are. And if you know where the sub it's not the most useful weapon.
Um, let me make sure I'm reading this right. I looked at your chart, and went from left to right. It doesn't look like an increase at all but a downward trend. The numbers are the number of listeners per hundred people, correct? If so, the smaller numbers would indicate that there is a downward trend? I may be reading that chart wrong but it doesn't look like it supports your statement.
Overkill. I work for a company that makes DVRs for CCTV systems. From talking to installers, just using the RCA-out and a dummy VCR seems to trick most criminals.
Your right but it's a bad comparison for the current situation. A better one would be you trying to do that to someone who was renting a room from you. The courts may have to put a bit more thought into a situation like that.
Not really. You can pick up a decent CCTV camera for about $200 (cheaper if you're willing to accept a cheap bullet type or lower). It would be cheaper in the long run to just place the cameras and have the cable runs then it would be to move the cameras.
Give the U.S. Torturers these styles of weapons, and whats gonna happen
Not a thing. This weapon takes someone from awake to out like a light. Kinda hard to torture someone when they are out cold. Or maybe you're afraid that they will use the electricity to torture, because using bare wires would be so much harder.
Um, except that by using your defination of people "not in thier right mind" we're violent crime free right now. Perhaps your defination of "people not in thier right mind" needs to be a bit more clear?
Federal law requires one-party consent for recording of converstations (which is what I think you mean.) Most states are one party states as well, but some like Maryland and Vermont are two party states, which requires both parties agree to it.
Except that criminals generally have citizenship too. So for your theory to work the mugger/thief/MSSalesrep has to walk up to the citzen and say "Give me all of your money" without drawing thier own gun. And the average person is going to do what when the criminal has the drop on them? The same thing they do now, give up thier purse/wallet/PC. Or perhaps you mean to prohibt street crime like a purse snatcher just grabbing and running. I can see that working well. Purse snatcher grabs, runs, person takes a potshot at a moving target, misses and wings the school child running near by. Maybe such a system would be a more polite society, but it wouldn't be crime free.
Slashdot Mirror
*Permanent*...Lief's Vinland didn't last long enough to be permanent.
Not really, you can change a machines MAC address within software pretty easily.
Webcams suck for CCTV work. Now there are IP cameras that are ment for monitoring but you're looking at a much higher price range. If you want a controlable (PTZ) camera prepare to shell out alot more. And if you want more then one, then get a number of analogue cameras and find a company that makes a capture card and software. There are a number of them that have software that support web access, e-mail on motion, ect....
Depends on what he's doing. Our Devs here work with a number of video codecs and encoders. Quicktime isn't an outragous request.
Wanting Grand Thief Auto is good...but lets be honest, why would you want BMX XXX? Are you that hard up for porn?
They said they are going to have some stuff in the next patch to try to deal with that. News of it has sent the prices of some items they camp alot have dropped signifgantly.
I hate how they show PC's being used in forensics work on TV. I work for a company that does DVRs for CCTV systems and a ton of people call up wanting a system that will take a compressed file and let you Zoom it 50x and read newsprint at 200 ft away.
So you're going to arrest all of the trash collectors? Good call.
The FFXI event doesn't work that way. While you're in that form you can't do anything that requires targeting. But it was funny as heck to see players freaking out. People were screaming about an invasion.
I've found FFXI to be pretty good. I like the way it handles PvP, as a sport between nations, fought in a certain setting and prearanged. PvP for those that want it, none for those that don't.
Range. You don't need refill on fuel, nor do you have surface to generate electricy and air. So you can stay at sea longer. In this age of satillites, it's pretty easy to spot a tender ship so if you have to refuel your subs then the other side has a pretty good idea of where they are. And if you know where the sub it's not the most useful weapon.
It looks like it's more of an HBO model then a cable TV-Model.
Um, let me make sure I'm reading this right. I looked at your chart, and went from left to right. It doesn't look like an increase at all but a downward trend. The numbers are the number of listeners per hundred people, correct? If so, the smaller numbers would indicate that there is a downward trend? I may be reading that chart wrong but it doesn't look like it supports your statement.
Um...bad math. It's the top ten vulnerabilities for each. Not just that both of them have just ten major vulnerabilities.
Not really. But it will show if it's been viewed or tampered with, so you can declare the transmission null and void.
Overkill. I work for a company that makes DVRs for CCTV systems. From talking to installers, just using the RCA-out and a dummy VCR seems to trick most criminals.
Your right but it's a bad comparison for the current situation. A better one would be you trying to do that to someone who was renting a room from you. The courts may have to put a bit more thought into a situation like that.
Not really. You can pick up a decent CCTV camera for about $200 (cheaper if you're willing to accept a cheap bullet type or lower). It would be cheaper in the long run to just place the cameras and have the cable runs then it would be to move the cameras.
You ask why you can't reach a site and why a second one is slow...but then you mention slashdotting a site...
Not a thing. This weapon takes someone from awake to out like a light. Kinda hard to torture someone when they are out cold. Or maybe you're afraid that they will use the electricity to torture, because using bare wires would be so much harder.
Link Has the info on how to get past that.
Yep, and the mugger isn't going to say that if the citizen doesn't get the gun out of his back he'll simply shoot the muggie?
Um, except that by using your defination of people "not in thier right mind" we're violent crime free right now. Perhaps your defination of "people not in thier right mind" needs to be a bit more clear?
Federal law requires one-party consent for recording of converstations (which is what I think you mean.) Most states are one party states as well, but some like Maryland and Vermont are two party states, which requires both parties agree to it.
Except that criminals generally have citizenship too. So for your theory to work the mugger/thief/MSSalesrep has to walk up to the citzen and say "Give me all of your money" without drawing thier own gun. And the average person is going to do what when the criminal has the drop on them? The same thing they do now, give up thier purse/wallet/PC. Or perhaps you mean to prohibt street crime like a purse snatcher just grabbing and running. I can see that working well. Purse snatcher grabs, runs, person takes a potshot at a moving target, misses and wings the school child running near by. Maybe such a system would be a more polite society, but it wouldn't be crime free.