Might it have something to do with people abusing google images to come up with pictures of the Iraqi information minister, Arafat, Osama's sons, et. al to pass around in stupid email messages and politically minded weblogs?
Dead links in search engine? eetc.etc. etc.
Sounds like a reaction to an onslaught of abuse of the site to me (whether unintentional, purposeful, DdoS, or systemic)
Intel won't do it for some time because they don't want to make corporate customers feel like idiots for buying Itanium or Itanium 2.
Intel's 64-bit processor will be hotter and slower clock for clock, and will use YET ANOTHER x86 instruction set extension, if ever implemented. (I would be presently surprised if they also supported amd64 extensions, however).
Yuck.
And if you don't think there isn't and 64-bit software out there right now (there is a ton!), or software that needs to take advantage of it (MATLAB anyone? DRAGGING THEIR FEET), then you'll probably NEVER need it for the next 5 years.
I'm pretty sure I've heard this post a few times before, or there are a lot of butterfinger tinkers out there.
Proud owner of two AMD systems, builder of 5, all of them no issues. Current is 2500Barton OC'd to 3000. Not to mention the 10 servers at work.
I guess it pays to review the motherboards and coolers before you buy them (this makes a ton of difference), and pick out the chips with the lowest thermal output per CPU clock available (less issues later on).
So as long as you filter out the CCD-sensitive and visible light ranges, you can do it stealthily with a strobe light. But strobe lights are unwieldly. I understand most CCDs (even monochrome) start really cutting at out 900.
1) S-boxes are the only cryptographic structure that is fundamentally non-attackable (make them bigger or use them more intelligently to defeat parallelism/analysis).
2) TSC uses block-based and stream ciphers just like anything else. For example, KG-75s, CORNFIELD MCM, etc. There are even TSC approved software packages that you can install on a standard PC to create secure links. These are all commercially developed products, Motorola, Harris-Intersil, etc. (but are CCI, so you can only get them through a controlling agency like the NSA).
3) encryption that's neither stream nor block, neural implants?
heh. hardly. maybe in a testing lab at NRL in a decade. heh.
Then only contribute more heat to your thermal problem (as do excessive fans).
Think about it like this: peltier coolers only serve to create a temperature gradient, but you can't transfer heat out of your CPU faster than the "slowest" part of your thermal solution. This slowest part is almost always the heatsink/air interface.
The chip/heatsink interface is usually good enough, especially if you don't overdo it with thermal grease, and the chips are designed to work with a heatsink anyway. They don't need assistance getting the heat off the chip. The interface between a peltier cooling plate/chip will not be better than a properly machined copper heatsink/chip interface; if it was, the heatsink manufacturer would just copy the peltier cooler manufacturer.
Again, all the peltier does is create a temperature gradient. It's designed to cool things that have trouble getting rid of the heat by surface transfer (which is not characteristic of even overclocked CPUs). If the heatsink can't remove the heat properly, the peltier will just make it hotter; the chip and peltier "cool" side will enter into equilbrium, forcing the "hot" side to get REALLY hot.
If you were to leave the peltier out of it (but keep the packaged heatsink), then you would just be interfacing the chip directly, and not have to deal with the additional heat generated by the peltier's inefficency. If attaching a peltier makes your CPU temp. cooler, that just means the heatsink you were using before sucked.:-)
So do yourself a favor, and spend the money on a big heatsink with lots of surface area, and don't apply too much thermal grease. Get a big, slow turning fan, and place it nearby. You'll get maximum cooling without the noise.
Or you could spend some money getting a case where thermal currents carry heat away efficiently without fans (or with just one or two). It's not easy, but it's possible. Your ears will thank you.
The IBM Desktar line do not have a stellar performance record. It is likely that it has deteriorated to the point where it is trying in frustration to figure out how to remap bad sectors, but failing at it, as it doesn't have enough free where it needs them.
Thus, it recommends you wipe the disk and start afresh, where it can mark off entire blocks of the disk as do-not-enter territory. This will reduce the reported size of your disk. Since it can't make any guarantees as to where it will have to remove writable addresses, your data cannot be realistically preserved (filesystem generally doesn't like having data being magically moved around with some gone missing.)
I think your blowing this way out of proportion. This kind of thing has never been reported on Slashdot before AFAIK, so how can you say how we would have reacted? And there's plenty of posts here criticizing Mandrake, so suck it Alec.
Because lots of us run Windows, and we know just as well as anyone else that they use ATAPI just like the rest of the fucking world to talk to the drive.
So, if the drive dies when you run GearPro with packet-write support, or the UDF CDR feature of explorer, but no other drive dies when you use it, then would you blame GearPro, Microsoft, or LG?
Sure, there'd be some jokes made, yadayada, but no moreso than usual-> no one would seriously blame MS (and stay modded up). Slashdotters want to know the real cause of their technological troubles, no matter who's involved.
CHS is always translated into a linear sector address at some point, every drive manufacturered since like 6 years ago accepts LBA directly anyway. And moreover, internally it has another translation layer that helps it protect you from bad sectors (it detects and relocates them on the fly). Ever since you've started seeing "255 heads" or other absurd things in your drive geometry, it's pretty much impossible to destroy them even with vendor-specific commands, let alone normal ATAPI commands.
otherwise the network/download install wouldn't have any reason to blow up the drive. It's just the act of getting extended status information from it (probably to decide whether you need to be set up for burning CDs) during the install process that kills it.
Did LG do this to prevent people from using the drive to duplicate copy-protected CDs?
that EVERYONE knows CleverNickName is Wil Wheaton, what with all the slashdot interviews and the wilwheaton.net URL.
Which is fine. It makes the AC look stupid. Why? The parent of your post didn't realize Wil was reproducing a hypothetical letter to Gator, which would be incomplete without his name at the bottom.
The process of opening a window in javascript gives you two distinct ways to make that window behind everything else, a (large) negative z-index, or by sending it to the back directly.
These event handlers and interpretations of parameters were programmed in specifically, they are not an artifact of some grander scheme or natural phenomena. Clearly, the designers had the idea of a window opening up behind it in mind at the time the language specification was designed.
I have a hard time believing you can patent the idea of putting an ad onto an existing media and calling that a business process.
Could I patent selling and printing ads in the background pattern of dixie cups and disposable paper plates?
That's what I see in this situation. Maybe you CAN do that, in which case (throws hands up).
The OS is in charge now. How the motherboard presents this discretionary interface (if a manual switch is provided) to the meatspace user is subject to case/motherboard designers' whims.
Usually a pin header on the board provides a physical way to pull down the RESET pin on the CPU, but you might have to add your own. Otherwise, just slide open the cover and jab a screwdriver in.;-)
Otherwise the juxtaposition of all your noise (and anti-noise) sources will move, path lengths will change, and you'll lose your perfectly balanced superposition. Just a change of a few centimeters will destroy any cancellation at something like 60Hz and greater (right in there with AC motor fundamental freqs), a foot and all the audible frequencies are present... And it never gets back into phase (unless somehow all the distances were exact multiples of some common factor? nahhhh)
Intelligent scanners pick that up. Some even use the IE ActiveX control to pick up embedded javascript (document.write shenanigans). That way they see what you eventually see. makes all those tricks useless.
Is there anybody here who's having difficulty using google or dealtime? I mean, this is RIGHT UP THERE too... About.com YOPY 3700 review
If you are having trouble and are still relying on Sir Haxalot for clickage, for a mere $10.00 plus ($250 S/H) I will send you a beautifully embossed 7 CD portofolio to will instruct you, STEP BY STEP, on how to use Google and the Internet in general. Satisifaction guaranteed!
Slashdot Mirror
Apple the most recognized/relevant brand?
Bullshit. It's Puffy, and we all know it.
So when are the Sean Combs Ghetto-pokeblasters cummin out?
Might it have something to do with people abusing google images to come up with pictures of the Iraqi information minister, Arafat, Osama's sons, et. al to pass around in stupid email messages and politically minded weblogs?
Dead links in search engine? eetc.etc. etc.
Sounds like a reaction to an onslaught of abuse of the site to me (whether unintentional, purposeful, DdoS, or systemic)
And seats 6 comfortably. Thank you Subaru.
Intel won't do it for some time because they don't want to make corporate customers feel like idiots for buying Itanium or Itanium 2.
Intel's 64-bit processor will be hotter and slower clock for clock, and will use YET ANOTHER x86 instruction set extension, if ever implemented. (I would be presently surprised if they also supported amd64 extensions, however).
Yuck.
And if you don't think there isn't and 64-bit software out there right now (there is a ton!), or software that needs to take advantage of it (MATLAB anyone? DRAGGING THEIR FEET), then you'll probably NEVER need it for the next 5 years.
I'm pretty sure I've heard this post a few times before, or there are a lot of butterfinger tinkers out there.
Proud owner of two AMD systems, builder of 5, all of them no issues. Current is 2500Barton OC'd to 3000. Not to mention the 10 servers at work.
I guess it pays to review the motherboards and coolers before you buy them (this makes a ton of difference), and pick out the chips with the lowest thermal output per CPU clock available (less issues later on).
But that's just me.
So as long as you filter out the CCD-sensitive and visible light ranges, you can do it stealthily with a strobe light. But strobe lights are unwieldly. I understand most CCDs (even monochrome) start really cutting at out 900.
I would try with an IR diode at about 1000nm
And you're running to a meeting instead of chatting with your coworkers.
1) S-boxes are the only cryptographic structure that is fundamentally non-attackable (make them bigger or use them more intelligently to defeat parallelism/analysis).
2) TSC uses block-based and stream ciphers just like anything else. For example, KG-75s, CORNFIELD MCM, etc. There are even TSC approved software packages that you can install on a standard PC to create secure links. These are all commercially developed products, Motorola, Harris-Intersil, etc. (but are CCI, so you can only get them through a controlling agency like the NSA).
3) encryption that's neither stream nor block, neural implants?
heh. hardly. maybe in a testing lab at NRL in a decade. heh.
Then only contribute more heat to your thermal problem (as do excessive fans).
:-)
Think about it like this: peltier coolers only serve to create a temperature gradient, but you can't transfer heat out of your CPU faster than the "slowest" part of your thermal solution. This slowest part is almost always the heatsink/air interface.
The chip/heatsink interface is usually good enough, especially if you don't overdo it with thermal grease, and the chips are designed to work with a heatsink anyway. They don't need assistance getting the heat off the chip. The interface between a peltier cooling plate/chip will not be better than a properly machined copper heatsink/chip interface; if it was, the heatsink manufacturer would just copy the peltier cooler manufacturer.
Again, all the peltier does is create a temperature gradient. It's designed to cool things that have trouble getting rid of the heat by surface transfer (which is not characteristic of even overclocked CPUs). If the heatsink can't remove the heat properly, the peltier will just make it hotter; the chip and peltier "cool" side will enter into equilbrium, forcing the "hot" side to get REALLY hot.
If you were to leave the peltier out of it (but keep the packaged heatsink), then you would just be interfacing the chip directly, and not have to deal with the additional heat generated by the peltier's inefficency. If attaching a peltier makes your CPU temp. cooler, that just means the heatsink you were using before sucked.
So do yourself a favor, and spend the money on a big heatsink with lots of surface area, and don't apply too much thermal grease. Get a big, slow turning fan, and place it nearby. You'll get maximum cooling without the noise.
Or you could spend some money getting a case where thermal currents carry heat away efficiently without fans (or with just one or two). It's not easy, but it's possible. Your ears will thank you.
Yankees lost.
C# to also feature T-expressions.
That's fucking funny.
Please, don't get me wrong, I'm not such a nasty person all the time. This is my chew-people-out-with-interdespersed-cusswords account.
I have an image to uphold, dog!
The IBM Desktar line do not have a stellar performance record. It is likely that it has deteriorated to the point where it is trying in frustration to figure out how to remap bad sectors, but failing at it, as it doesn't have enough free where it needs them.
Thus, it recommends you wipe the disk and start afresh, where it can mark off entire blocks of the disk as do-not-enter territory. This will reduce the reported size of your disk. Since it can't make any guarantees as to where it will have to remove writable addresses, your data cannot be realistically preserved (filesystem generally doesn't like having data being magically moved around with some gone missing.)
Is the chip on your shoulder that big?
I think your blowing this way out of proportion. This kind of thing has never been reported on Slashdot before AFAIK, so how can you say how we would have reacted?
And there's plenty of posts here criticizing Mandrake, so suck it Alec.
Of course not. We'd still be bashing LG.
Because lots of us run Windows, and we know just as well as anyone else that they use ATAPI just like the rest of the fucking world to talk to the drive.
So, if the drive dies when you run GearPro with packet-write support, or the UDF CDR feature of explorer, but no other drive dies when you use it, then would you blame GearPro, Microsoft, or LG?
Sure, there'd be some jokes made, yadayada, but no moreso than usual-> no one would seriously blame MS (and stay modded up). Slashdotters want to know the real cause of their technological troubles, no matter who's involved.
CHS is always translated into a linear sector address at some point, every drive manufacturered since like 6 years ago accepts LBA directly anyway. And moreover, internally it has another translation layer that helps it protect you from bad sectors (it detects and relocates them on the fly).
Ever since you've started seeing "255 heads" or other absurd things in your drive geometry, it's pretty much impossible to destroy them even with vendor-specific commands, let alone normal ATAPI commands.
otherwise the network/download install wouldn't have any reason to blow up the drive. It's just the act of getting extended status information from it (probably to decide whether you need to be set up for burning CDs) during the install process that kills it.
Did LG do this to prevent people from using the drive to duplicate copy-protected CDs?
(be kind, simulated)
/opt/orahome/bin/oracler mcap.so
/opt/orahome/bin/oracle
$ ldd `which bash`
/lib64/libc.so
/lib64/libreadline.so
...
$ file `which bash`
ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86_64, stripped
$ ldd
/lib/libc.so
/lib/libte
/opt/orahome/lib/blahla
...
$ file
ELF 32-bit LSB executabe, Intel 80386, stripped
Q = charge (columbs)
E = electromotive force (volts)
D = distance (meters)
So Q.E.D actually means "Columb Volt Meters", or more compactly, charge squared. QED
that EVERYONE knows CleverNickName is Wil Wheaton, what with all the slashdot interviews and the wilwheaton.net URL.
Which is fine. It makes the AC look stupid. Why?
The parent of your post didn't realize Wil was reproducing a hypothetical letter to Gator, which would be incomplete without his name at the bottom.
The process of opening a window in javascript gives you two distinct ways to make that window behind everything else, a (large) negative z-index, or by sending it to the back directly.
These event handlers and interpretations of parameters were programmed in specifically, they are not an artifact of some grander scheme or natural phenomena. Clearly, the designers had the idea of a window opening up behind it in mind at the time the language specification was designed.
I have a hard time believing you can patent the idea of putting an ad onto an existing media and calling that a business process.
Could I patent selling and printing ads in the background pattern of dixie cups and disposable paper plates?
That's what I see in this situation. Maybe you CAN do that, in which case (throws hands up).
ACPI
;-)
The OS is in charge now.
How the motherboard presents this discretionary interface (if a manual switch is provided) to the meatspace user is subject to case/motherboard designers' whims.
Usually a pin header on the board provides a physical way to pull down the RESET pin on the CPU, but you might have to add your own. Otherwise, just slide open the cover and jab a screwdriver in.
Otherwise the juxtaposition of all your noise (and anti-noise) sources will move, path lengths will change, and you'll lose your perfectly balanced superposition. Just a change of a few centimeters will destroy any cancellation at something like 60Hz and greater (right in there with AC motor fundamental freqs), a foot and all the audible frequencies are present... And it never gets back into phase (unless somehow all the distances were exact multiples of some common factor? nahhhh)
Intelligent scanners pick that up. Some even use the IE ActiveX control to pick up embedded javascript (document.write shenanigans). That way they see what you eventually see. makes all those tricks useless.
Is there anybody here who's having difficulty using google or dealtime?
I mean, this is RIGHT UP THERE too...
About.com YOPY 3700 review
If you are having trouble and are still relying on Sir Haxalot for clickage, for a mere $10.00 plus ($250 S/H) I will send you a beautifully embossed 7 CD portofolio to will instruct you, STEP BY STEP, on how to use Google and the Internet in general. Satisifaction guaranteed!