Fear for his life? Why, was he worried that the argument he'd just constructed out of nothing might potentially escalate into something he couldn't handle without murdering someone?
What's the difference? And what's the problem with texting, anyway? Assuming that the phone doesn't beep/click with every key press, or when replies turn up. Is it just the screen lighting up? Do people get shot to death for eating popcorn/snacks noisily too?
> during my stay in India last month there where records of polio outbreak in Pakistan
India is not Pakistan. Unless you're suggesting that it was because you in India that Pakistan has an outbreak. Or perhaps you thought was important to tell us which country you were in when you heard the news. I'm in the UK, and this seems to be good news, but I imagine it's also good news if you hear about it anywhere.
He works at Google on AI, and this problem is both amusing and interesting. Having two monitors is totally normal.
Slashdot really has gone to the dogs, hasn't it. Would be great if there were some sort of technical test one could take here; the results of which could be used to filter out all the - for want of a better word - users.
Simple. You just have to understand that what you're trying to restrict is the duplication of numbers; that numbers can be duplicated perfectly and trivially by computers; that many people want to duplicate those numbers; that many people are sharing those numbers all the time; that it takes time and effort to identify where the numbers are being shared from; that each time you remove a site which faciliates the location of that number, or a list of people who are sharing the numbers, it'll get replaced immediately; that the numbers are much easier to obtain via downloading than via traditional methods; that we're in a recession and buying/renting these numbers is a lower priority than buying food/fuel/paying rent; that there's no technical way of preventing the copying or transmission of these numbers.
Also, many people who create `digital media` (I guess you mean `numbers`) do not find it in the least offensive.
> The problem here is that those show-offs draws the attention of the law enforcement > from the ones working silently. Some of the silent ones can be even more > dangerous because you don't know who they are and where they will strike.
So...there's no problem then. The silent ones aren't drawing any attention because no-one knows they're doing it. The police won't know about it until, typically, someone tells them about it, at which point they'll know about it. Then again, the police are largely concerned with manipulation of crime figures, making people feel safe, protecting - typically - the rich from - typically - the poor. These show-offs are just a free ride for the police; they might as well turn up at the police station and hand themselves in.
How long do you think it'll take them to come back with feedback? They'll need to work out whose fault it was, who they can blame, what they're going to do about it, the impact of blaming the people whose fault it wasn't, and all the time looking good to upper management. Lessons will be learnt, and this will definitely not happen again, just like always.
Yes, the Americans certainly seem very sensible with their understanding of the purpose of copyright. Just think, without a bizarre and constantly changing set of rules, material such as Happy Birthday and Mickey Mouse would be in the public domain, resulting in an ugly free-for-all which will strike at the heart of the creators of content everywhere. But specially in America.
You clearly aren't a developer who needs quick answers to edge-case problems which have affected a hangful of other people (including your client), or someone stalking their...uh...forget that - go with the programmer thingy.
Fortunately, with science you don't have to believe. Belief is for when you want the same warm fuzzy feeling your parents have about whatever religion is popular in that particular region. Science is for when you want the right answer.
Slashdot Mirror
CPU with its own memory,eh? Hmmm.
http://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=3554
> If his appearence had been different then there would be obstacles to overcome that
> he did not have to face.
You're both right! Or wrong! One of them, probably. Or a bit of both?
Now, get back to work!
Fear for his life? Why, was he worried that the argument he'd just constructed out of nothing might potentially escalate into something he couldn't handle without murdering someone?
What's the difference? And what's the problem with texting, anyway? Assuming that the phone doesn't beep/click with every key press, or when replies turn up. Is it just the screen lighting up? Do people get shot to death for eating popcorn/snacks noisily too?
> during my stay in India last month there where records of polio outbreak in Pakistan
India is not Pakistan. Unless you're suggesting that it was because you in India that Pakistan has an outbreak. Or perhaps you thought was important to tell us which country you were in when you heard the news. I'm in the UK, and this seems to be good news, but I imagine it's also good news if you hear about it anywhere.
He works at Google on AI, and this problem is both amusing and interesting. Having two monitors is totally normal.
Slashdot really has gone to the dogs, hasn't it. Would be great if there were some sort of technical test one could take here; the results of which could be used to filter out all the - for want of a better word - users.
Simple. You just have to understand that what you're trying to restrict is the duplication of numbers; that numbers can be duplicated perfectly and trivially by computers; that many people want to duplicate those numbers; that many people are sharing those numbers all the time; that it takes time and effort to identify where the numbers are being shared from; that each time you remove a site which faciliates the location of that number, or a list of people who are sharing the numbers, it'll get replaced immediately; that the numbers are much easier to obtain via downloading than via traditional methods; that we're in a recession and buying/renting these numbers is a lower priority than buying food/fuel/paying rent; that there's no technical way of preventing the copying or transmission of these numbers.
Also, many people who create `digital media` (I guess you mean `numbers`) do not find it in the least offensive.
> The problem here is that those show-offs draws the attention of the law enforcement
> from the ones working silently. Some of the silent ones can be even more
> dangerous because you don't know who they are and where they will strike.
So...there's no problem then. The silent ones aren't drawing any attention because no-one knows they're doing it. The police won't know about it until, typically, someone tells them about it, at which point they'll know about it. Then again, the police are largely concerned with manipulation of crime figures, making people feel safe, protecting - typically - the rich from - typically - the poor. These show-offs are just a free ride for the police; they might as well turn up at the police station and hand themselves in.
How long do you think it'll take them to come back with feedback? They'll need to work out whose fault it was, who they can blame, what they're going to do about it, the impact of blaming the people whose fault it wasn't, and all the time looking good to upper management. Lessons will be learnt, and this will definitely not happen again, just like always.
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
I get through a million virtual dollars in a single session of online poker. And you should have seem my driving on RollCage.
What's the point here?
Not everyone agrees:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-08/yelp-reaches-record-as-jpmorgan-says-ad-growth-will-lift-shares.html
One person? All the crime?
Personally, next day is too vaporous for me - it's same day, or it's as if it didn't exist.
And I want one in green.
> Case dismissed.
Just stall the case until Blackberry goes out of business.
"I definitely thought the crop circle was manmade, given...." ...that they all are?
Yes, the Americans certainly seem very sensible with their understanding of the purpose of copyright. Just think, without a bizarre and constantly changing set of rules, material such as Happy Birthday and Mickey Mouse would be in the public domain, resulting in an ugly free-for-all which will strike at the heart of the creators of content everywhere. But specially in America.
Is there one for Perl, but the other way around - where it's clear what the code is actually doing?
> google searches are near worthless
You clearly aren't a developer who needs quick answers to edge-case problems which have affected a hangful of other people (including your client), or someone stalking their...uh...forget that - go with the programmer thingy.
I meant in his post
It was but one syllable
That's why it don't scan
Reminds me of: http://www.haveabit.com/feynman/2
Fortunately, with science you don't have to believe. Belief is for when you want the same warm fuzzy feeling your parents have about whatever religion is popular in that particular region. Science is for when you want the right answer.
Think your problem mate
Is futile's one syllable
Though your point still stands
Blamed by who? To what end? Who cares? Change the password and move on. Probably a lame "social engineering" attack a la Onion. Nothing to see here.
A general in a US-backed dictatorship approves of US actions? That changes everything!