It was the largest in terms of slave holding population, and white population, and one of the smallest in franchised population. But again, you knew that.
There aren't enough facepalms in the world. Seeing as you forgot what your were replying to.
For a goofy slavery era system it worked pretty damn well.
It prevented one state from throwing the election with corrupt voting exactly as designed.
Going further on
I'm well aware what the Virginia Plan is, why it was made, and how it has nothing to do with presidential elections. But again, *you knew that*.
Nope you aren't
The Constitutional Convention in 1787 used the Virginia Plan as the basis for discussions, as the Virginia delegation had proposed it first. The Virginia Plan called for the Congress to elect the president.[15] Delegates from a majority of states agreed to this mode of election.[16] However, a committee formed to work out various details including the mode of election of the president, recommended instead the election be by a group of people apportioned among the states in the same numbers as their representatives in Congress (the formula for which had been resolved in lengthy debates resulting in the Connecticut Compromise and Three-Fifths Compromise), but chosen by each state "in such manner as its Legislature may direct." Committee member Gouverneur Morris explained the reasons for the change; among others, there were fears of "intrigue" if the president were chosen by a small group of men who met together regularly, as well as concerns for the independence of the president if he was elected by the Congress.[17]
Ironic since you just posted something with zero content. Just give it up spam boy if you are unable to address the topic.
::Looks up:: You are complaining about no content personal attacks ? What is this for you the 6th or 7th in a row ? Was it your obvious lack of knowledge of the topic that stopped you talking about it ? Come on why don't you try and salvage your expertise on Israel again. I am sure the world wants to know more about your scout master, or your valiant outreach to the Australian Israeli community.
Anyway I have had enough fun and you have taken this far too far offtopic and far to away from the site's rules. Since I have a modicum of politeness, unless you can actually say something relating to Trump's inauguration or his supposed to antisemitism, I'll leave this where it is. Have fun with the last word I am sure you will come up with something as humorous as the rest of your posts.
You know damn well I never implied anything about the correctness of what the DNC did
Sure you didn't
The DNC gave the nomination to the winner of the primaries and caucuses. Sure, the process was biased in her favor, but the raw vote spoke for itself as well.
I mean hell all those people that didn't get to vote in primaries don't matter. The DNC sabotaging their own candidate completely irrelevant.. Nope nope those polls were accurate and unbiased.
Where does corrupt votes from other states come in? The clear intent of the elector system was to give slave-holders electoral power for their slave holdings because they had less free-voting power than the northern states.
That's the population of the colonies. Now if you can pull your head out your rear you might notice Virginia had over 20% of the nations population by itself. When he was talking about states with diffuse populations he wasn't talking about the economically dominant and population dominant states like Virginia.
Speaking of Virginia not only was it the largest, and wealthiest state at the time, it also proposed the form of of the representative government, and the electoral college. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Gee if you knew a little history you might have figured out why I picked Virginia specifically.
So everything is about you spamboy? If was so shallow as to try payback would it have been a mild comment on the topic that did not put you in any sort of bad light or even disagree with you?
Tell me is all your expertise of this quality
Reality versus a google lookup? I prefer the former spamboy.
That's real good stuff you got there. Real persuasive, strikes home it does. I particularly enjoy the way you have marshaled facts in defense of your argument and then fleshed it out with chains of unassailable logic.
Forgive my failed education, but why would Virginia worry about any state throwing the election, when the proposed rule gave them the largest collection of electoral votes in the union, in spite of having one of the smaller voting populations? You'll notice he clearly stated the reason for electors, and it wasn't about some state throwing the election.
".The right of suffrage was much more diffusive in the Northern than the Southern States"
It's amazing you go and find the passage that explains the situation and then fail to comprehend what is being said because you have absolutely no knowledge of American history.. What's more you were even pointed at the exact cause and were unable to ask the question why it would be
Amazing.
The DNC gave the nomination to the winner of the primaries and caucuses. Sure, the process was biased in her favor
Here let me fix that for you
Liberal democrats cheat only for the greater, their shit doesn't stink
I would accuse of lying but from what I see you just don't have the intelligence to understand you're wrong. I guess a lifetime of participation prizes will do that to someone.
Admit it - you are just attempting to play the man instead of the ball just like last time are you not? The actual issue does not appear to matter to you, just someone to shout at.
You did not point out what you see as an error Crash. Disappointing. All you have is spamming and stock phrases. Why bother to comment at all?
that wasn't what it was designed to do. You lie when you say that. Do you even care?
I care that the education system failed you. That is specifically what the system was designed to do and the state in question was Virginia
I can claim that states with politics different than mine disenfranchise millions of legal voters by closing down polling locations based on voting demographics
That would be how the DNC gave Hillary the nomination ? Projecting your sins onto others I see.
Hasn't stopped you before Crash and perhaps you should try try it on this one. This is like talking to an Eliza bot - you've gone and told me I am not correct about something but not pointed out what it is - utterly fucking useless. It's clearly just one of your stock insults.
And yet you somehow haven't managed to correct your errors ? The rockets have killed Israelis and visitors to the country and they do serve a purpose.
The rockets make it popular to oppose the idiots setting off rockets - thus counterproductive
That would be the same rockets that according to you don't do anything.
Now why don't you at least crack the wikipedia on the history of modern Israel, you only need to go back to WWI. Hint start with the Balfour declaration. That way the next time you sound out on this, you can at least get the parameters of the conflict correct.
I'm calling them ineffective because they are actively harming the Palestinian cause, providing an excuse for retalatory airstrikes and the psychos who launch those old missiles don't even get the bloodthirsty satisfaction of killing people.
It would serve you well to at least google a topic before you pretend expertise.
As for those "large amounts", it comes out of US military aid and helps reinforce the aid supply (which is not going to be cut off as long as those rockets keep flying). "Defending against terrorist rockets" is a pretty damned good reason to help out another country and even isolationists are going to think twice about cutting off that aid. Meanwhile our "friends" in Saudi Arabia are paying for these rockets.
Yes because the U.S. needed rocket attacks to provide aid to Israel and the aid will stop if the rockets stop.
So what would that make rocket attacks, firing mortars at a apartment complexes and playgrounds ?
Pretty fucking ineffective but it makes the Saudis and Iranians who paid for those old inaccurate Shah era rockets to be shipped over feel warm inside for contributing to the "struggle". It is fucked up on many levels with not just a few utter pieces of shit on both sides but also outsiders egging things on.
Seeing as Israel spends large amounts dealing with these:ineffective attacks", calling them ineffective sounds like wishful thinking on your part, or perhaps failure to understand the goal.
Back in November there was a poll of over 100, million people you seem exceptionally willing to discount it. Then there was that poll about whether or not the UK should remain in the EU Then there was that poll in Italy.
It seems the polls that actually matter don't go your way.
I'm with you. I left my sys admin job with everything documented and in good order. Because I was actually good at my job. And I knew I wouldn't be fired or have a hard time finding a job.
Just be good at your job.
Good at your job is fine if you are leaving and looking for another job. When you get sideswiped by idiots a few rungs up on you it's a different story. When they view contracts as challenges in how hard they can screw you, that's even worse.
I know I can't think of any internet connected system that doesn't have potential vulnerabilities. Why would anyone think medical devices were some sort of magical exception ?
Slashdot Mirror
Irrelevant doesn't mean right.
Because excluding people from voting against Hillary renders the poll valid.
Are you even capable of making a rational argument,
Your history is wrong, your reasoning is faulty and all you have is name calling. With opposition like you no wonder Trump won.
It was the largest in terms of slave holding population, and white population, and one of the smallest in franchised population. But again, you knew that.
There aren't enough facepalms in the world. Seeing as you forgot what your were replying to.
For a goofy slavery era system it worked pretty damn well.
It prevented one state from throwing the election with corrupt voting exactly as designed.
Going further on
I'm well aware what the Virginia Plan is, why it was made, and how it has nothing to do with presidential elections. But again, *you knew that*.
Nope you aren't
The Constitutional Convention in 1787 used the Virginia Plan as the basis for discussions, as the Virginia delegation had proposed it first. The Virginia Plan called for the Congress to elect the president.[15] Delegates from a majority of states agreed to this mode of election.[16] However, a committee formed to work out various details including the mode of election of the president, recommended instead the election be by a group of people apportioned among the states in the same numbers as their representatives in Congress (the formula for which had been resolved in lengthy debates resulting in the Connecticut Compromise and Three-Fifths Compromise), but chosen by each state "in such manner as its Legislature may direct." Committee member Gouverneur Morris explained the reasons for the change; among others, there were fears of "intrigue" if the president were chosen by a small group of men who met together regularly, as well as concerns for the independence of the president if he was elected by the Congress.[17]
Ironic since you just posted something with zero content. Just give it up spam boy if you are unable to address the topic.
::Looks up:: You are complaining about no content personal attacks ? What is this for you the 6th or 7th in a row ? Was it your obvious lack of knowledge of the topic that stopped you talking about it ? Come on why don't you try and salvage your expertise on Israel again. I am sure the world wants to know more about your scout master, or your valiant outreach to the Australian Israeli community.
Anyway I have had enough fun and you have taken this far too far offtopic and far to away from the site's rules. Since I have a modicum of politeness, unless you can actually say something relating to Trump's inauguration or his supposed to antisemitism, I'll leave this where it is. Have fun with the last word I am sure you will come up with something as humorous as the rest of your posts.
You know damn well I never implied anything about the correctness of what the DNC did
Sure you didn't
The DNC gave the nomination to the winner of the primaries and caucuses. Sure, the process was biased in her favor, but the raw vote spoke for itself as well.
I mean hell all those people that didn't get to vote in primaries don't matter. The DNC sabotaging their own candidate completely irrelevant.. Nope nope those polls were accurate and unbiased.
Where does corrupt votes from other states come in? The clear intent of the elector system was to give slave-holders electoral power for their slave holdings because they had less free-voting power than the northern states.
https://web.viu.ca/davies/h320...
That's the population of the colonies. Now if you can pull your head out your rear you might notice Virginia had over 20% of the nations population by itself. When he was talking about states with diffuse populations he wasn't talking about the economically dominant and population dominant states like Virginia.
Speaking of Virginia not only was it the largest, and wealthiest state at the time, it also proposed the form of of the representative government, and the electoral college. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Gee if you knew a little history you might have figured out why I picked Virginia specifically.
Yah but Obama championed internet privacy and freedoms, no??
The one that expanded NSA Spying ?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/...
So everything is about you spamboy? If was so shallow as to try payback would it have been a mild comment on the topic that did not put you in any sort of bad light or even disagree with you?
Reality versus a google lookup? I prefer the former spamboy.
That's real good stuff you got there. Real persuasive, strikes home it does. I particularly enjoy the way you have marshaled facts in defense of your argument and then fleshed it out with chains of unassailable logic.
Forgive my failed education, but why would Virginia worry about any state throwing the election, when the proposed rule gave them the largest collection of electoral votes in the union, in spite of having one of the smaller voting populations? You'll notice he clearly stated the reason for electors, and it wasn't about some state throwing the election.
".The right of suffrage was much more diffusive in the Northern than the Southern States"
It's amazing you go and find the passage that explains the situation and then fail to comprehend what is being said because you have absolutely no knowledge of American history.. What's more you were even pointed at the exact cause and were unable to ask the question why it would be
Amazing.
The DNC gave the nomination to the winner of the primaries and caucuses. Sure, the process was biased in her favor
Here let me fix that for you
Liberal democrats cheat only for the greater, their shit doesn't stink
I would accuse of lying but from what I see you just don't have the intelligence to understand you're wrong. I guess a lifetime of participation prizes will do that to someone.
Project? You were the spam boy Crash.
Oh I see now, this you trying to get payback. Tsk Tsk
It's extremely telling that you wrote "google it" instead of suggesting I talk to someone who is actually from Israel,
Large Israeli population in Australia ? Now I am going to have to suggest you have google sampling methods and bias.
Perhaps instead of trivilizing this topic you apply your failures of the Turing Test to things that are less important.
Says the guy who talked to someone from Israel. Tell me is all your expertise of this quality ?
Admit it - you are just attempting to play the man instead of the ball just like last time are you not? The actual issue does not appear to matter to you, just someone to shout at.
You did not point out what you see as an error Crash.
Disappointing. All you have is spamming and stock phrases. Why bother to comment at all?
Project much ?
Even Lenin abandoned it for the New Economic Policy/plan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
When Lenin thinks your idea is too communist, it's probably a bad idea.
that wasn't what it was designed to do. You lie when you say that. Do you even care?
I care that the education system failed you. That is specifically what the system was designed to do and the state in question was Virginia
I can claim that states with politics different than mine disenfranchise millions of legal voters by closing down polling locations based on voting demographics
That would be how the DNC gave Hillary the nomination ? Projecting your sins onto others I see.
For a goofy slavery era system it worked pretty damn well.
It prevented one state from throwing the election with corrupt voting exactly as designed.
Or do you think illegal aliens should get a vote ?
Hasn't stopped you before Crash and perhaps you should try try it on this one.
This is like talking to an Eliza bot - you've gone and told me I am not correct about something but not pointed out what it is - utterly fucking useless. It's clearly just one of your stock insults.
And yet you somehow haven't managed to correct your errors ? The rockets have killed Israelis and visitors to the country and they do serve a purpose.
The rockets make it popular to oppose the idiots setting off rockets - thus counterproductive
That would be the same rockets that according to you don't do anything.
Now why don't you at least crack the wikipedia on the history of modern Israel, you only need to go back to WWI. Hint start with the Balfour declaration. That way the next time you sound out on this, you can at least get the parameters of the conflict correct.
I'm calling them ineffective because they are actively harming the Palestinian cause, providing an excuse for retalatory airstrikes and the psychos who launch those old missiles don't even get the bloodthirsty satisfaction of killing people.
It would serve you well to at least google a topic before you pretend expertise.
As for those "large amounts", it comes out of US military aid and helps reinforce the aid supply (which is not going to be cut off as long as those rockets keep flying). "Defending against terrorist rockets" is a pretty damned good reason to help out another country and even isolationists are going to think twice about cutting off that aid.
Meanwhile our "friends" in Saudi Arabia are paying for these rockets.
Yes because the U.S. needed rocket attacks to provide aid to Israel and the aid will stop if the rockets stop.
I am still waiting for FORTH and SMALLTALK to rule the world.
Pretty fucking ineffective but it makes the Saudis and Iranians who paid for those old inaccurate Shah era rockets to be shipped over feel warm inside for contributing to the "struggle".
It is fucked up on many levels with not just a few utter pieces of shit on both sides but also outsiders egging things on.
Seeing as Israel spends large amounts dealing with these :ineffective attacks", calling them ineffective sounds like wishful thinking on your part, or perhaps failure to understand the goal.
Committing indefensible outrages against a population is an excellent way to turn that population to violence.
So what would that make rocket attacks, firing mortars at a apartment complexes and playgrounds ?
Back in November there was a poll of over 100, million people you seem exceptionally willing to discount it.
Then there was that poll about whether or not the UK should remain in the EU
Then there was that poll in Italy.
It seems the polls that actually matter don't go your way.
I'm with you. I left my sys admin job with everything documented and in good order. Because I was actually good at my job. And I knew I wouldn't be fired or have a hard time finding a job.
Just be good at your job.
Good at your job is fine if you are leaving and looking for another job. When you get sideswiped by idiots a few rungs up on you it's a different story. When they view contracts as challenges in how hard they can screw you, that's even worse.
http://www.npr.org/sections/he...
https://mises.org/blog/lack-ep...
They repeatedly stopped competitors
Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men at them until they reached their limit and shut down. Kif, show them the medal I won."
--Zap Brannigan
I know I can't think of any internet connected system that doesn't have potential vulnerabilities. Why would anyone think medical devices were some sort of magical exception ?
Well that or super powers if you get exposed to radiation
Oh so you just decided to attack libertarians to be off topic
it's the thread topic. Please try to keep up instead of senselessly spamming every post with my name on it Pogo.
What's Happening As The University of California Tries To Outsource IT Jobs To India
I only fisk truly outlandish shit. Seems you managed to concentrate lots of bs in a thread