Slashdot Mirror


What's Happening As The University of California Tries To Outsource IT Jobs To India (pressreader.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader Nova Express shares an epic column by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Michael Hiltzik. It details what's happening now as the University of California tries to outsources dozens of IT jobs -- about 20% of their IT workforce -- by February 28th. Some of the highlights:
  • The CEO of UCSF's Medical Center says he expects their security to be at least as good as it is now, but acknowledges "there are no guarantees."
  • Nine workers have filed a complaint with the state's Department of Fair Employment and Housing arguing they're facing discrimination.
  • California Senator Feinstein is already complaining that the university is tapping $8.5 billion in federal funding "to replace Californian IT workers with foreign workers or labor performed abroad."
  • Representative Zoe Lofgren (from a district in Silicon Valley) is arguing that the university "is training software engineers at the same time they're outsourcing their own software engineers. What message are they sending their own students?"
  • 57-year-old sys-admin Kurt Ho says his replacement spent just two days with him, then "told me he would go back to India and train his team, and would be sending me emails with questions."
  • The university's actions will ultimately lower their annual $5.83 billion budget by just 0.1%.

483 comments

  1. This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Universities have never been more than a bottom-line for-profit business that uses cult-like recruiting tactics and has absolutely no shame or loyalty to anything or anyone but themselves.

    I hope this is becoming a bit clearer to everyone now, as in the past I've been ridiculed for blasting universities as money-driven cults.

    They provide very little value in the modern world and should be used sparingly.

    1. Re:This is a surprise? by sabri · · Score: 1, Informative

      Universities have never been more than a bottom-line for-profit business that uses cult-like recruiting tactics and has absolutely no shame or loyalty to anything or anyone but themselves.

      Just like the folks in Washington, representing this government funded university. Read this article to see how Feinstein responded to pleas for help from affected workers.

      A University of California IT employee whose job is being outsourced to India recently wrote Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) for help. Feinstein's office sent back a letter ... and offered the worker no assistance.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    2. Re:This is a surprise? by gumbright · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is likely the dumbest thing I will read today. Assuming, of course, that you aren't going to post a followup.

    3. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Universities == hedge funds with huge tax cuts.

    4. Re:This is a surprise? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A University of California IT employee whose job is being outsourced to India recently wrote Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) for help. Feinstein's office sent back a letter ... and offered the worker no assistance.

      If you send a letter to the Washington, D.C., office, you will get back a form letter. If you send a letter to the local or state office, you will get personal response (most of the time). If you want to be effective in politics, it starts at the grassroots.

    5. Re:This is a surprise? by Goldsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wouldn't be as... caustic in my critique of universities as the OP, but I can definitely understand the sentiment.

      I think the problem is that many people think that universities should all act like non-profit educational institutions. In reality, the "best" universities act like (for-profit) partnerships performing professional research services, and they are very, very good at this. Certainly, this is where the majority of UC funding comes from.

      If you paid for an undergrad degree at a research institution, and didn't understand that you should have been working in some famous professor's lab to actually get your education, you're going to be pretty upset when you get out.

    6. Re:This is a surprise? by saloomy · · Score: 2

      The university's actions will ultimately lower their annual $5.83 billion budget by just 0.1%.

      But the bonuses and profits of the outsourcing operation and the key stakeholders in the universities will enjoy their kickbacks and high end dinners.

    7. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fine, it's dumb, so it should be easy to debunk. For example, why do universities push EE so hard?

      https://www.bls.gov/ooh/archit...

      Universities, if they were honest, would scale down their EE departments and relax on the hype and nonsense "careers" they promise prospective students, right?

      Because they're not about profit, right?

    8. Re:This is a surprise? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...and the key stakeholders in the universities will enjoy their kickbacks and high end dinners.

      With corruption the return of invested capital is humongous. Corrupt idiots selling out for a diner and the feeling of being privileged.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    9. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by your UID, you must be around the same age as me, let's call it middle age. Perhaps when you were young you believed the shiny PR nonsense from universities, but I take it you don't anymore?

    10. Re:This is a surprise? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      This is likely the dumbest thing I will read today.

      I have read something dumber: TFA. The headline and the very first sentence contradict each other. The headline says the jobs are going TO India. The first sentence says they are going to immigrants FROM India. Which is it? TFA is obviously biased smear journalism, but geez, at least the basic facts should be clearly stated.

    11. Re:This is a surprise? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Universities have never been more than a bottom-line for-profit business that uses cult-like recruiting tactics and has absolutely no shame or loyalty to anything or anyone but themselves.

      I hope this is becoming a bit clearer to everyone now, as in the past I've been ridiculed for blasting universities as money-driven cults.

      They provide very little value in the modern world and should be used sparingly.

      In your above comment I agree and frankly I'm a bit shocked that you did not suggest finding the ass-hat that gets a bonus for this grand money making scheme. Since, as the illustrious Senator pointed out, there are federal tax dollars involved, it would be nice to know if a company of foreign origin has imparted any finders fee, gift, promise of future employment, etc. to an ass-hat currently working for the Great State of California, or a contractor thereof...

      Sorry we pile on so often, but you must admit the name Anonymous Coward frequently has a certain barnyard perfume associated with it...
      Happy to see you with FP so we get a reminder that you sometimes seem to be someone else completely. You nailed this one.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    12. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is UC a state university, though? State universities absolutely should act like non-profit educational institutions. Otherwise what is the public interest in being involved?

    13. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " in the past I've been ridiculed for blasting universities as money-driven cults."

      I don't think that ended today mr tinfoil. But enjoy your echo chamber.

    14. Re:This is a surprise? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's part of the shuffle going on here. First, they bring in the immigrants to train in California. Some might stay. The University is still tweaking the plan IRT. Some Indians are going back to India to train "their own teams". Some might stay here. So, it's both. No one seemed to notice that it's ONE GUY in the US, and will become a WHOLE TEAM in India.

      This is going to be a disaster. You can't learn a system in two days. Even with perfect documentation, you need way more time. This isn't some coding project. The sys admin mention probably manages dozens of undocumented systems. Stuff will work for a while, but after the first power outage, time change, etc...someone4 is going to be calling these guys up constantly getting information from them for the rest of their lives.

    15. Re:This is a surprise? by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

      "...but I was dashed if I could see why he couldn't do it with a bright and cheerful smile."

      (Nice to encounter another Bertie Wooster fan!)

      --
      "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    16. Re:This is a surprise? by Bongo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you paid for an undergrad degree at a research institution, and didn't understand that you should have been working in some famous professor's lab to actually get your education, you're going to be pretty upset when you get out.

      And didn't understand... because someone should have taught you that when you were 14, so this basically blames the schools for not properly educating kids about the ways of the world. Fair enough.

      I'd suggest it goes a little further though. The left has a bias or belief that problems are the fault of society, whereas the right tends to bias to the belief that problems are the fault of the individual. Now, the problem is that, the left tends to be more associated with education (because if society and its institutions are the problem, then those are the institutions which need to be improved, and education needs to be improved). So the left is more idealistic about the role of education. See it is implicit. But what you're saying is, from more of a right wing point of view, hey nobody should be an idiot, or ignorant, to the fact that the world is competitive and selfish place, and that individuals have to learn to handle this, mostly via self control and character building and smarts (so don't come crying when you become a victim).

      And that, I think, is fair enough, as there is no real difference between the "individual" and "society", as ideological categories, because we are always both, we are all individuals and we all live in society and are part of social institutions. Individuals have agency. Groups have communion. And we always act and function in both. So the problems are often found in both places. (A way forward for politics is to become both left and right wing).

      So I would just add that, I agree in the sense that, our society needs to spend more time acclimatising kids to "how the world works", as by nature, humans are both competitive and cooperative. And we need to be educated to understand when and where each one is the dominant driver. So I do agree, it is right to tell people that they need to wise up about American universities. But I wouldn't blame kids for not knowing that already, if they haven't been taught.

    17. Re:This is a surprise? by execthis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Universities have never been more than a bottom-line for-profit business that uses cult-like recruiting tactics and has absolutely no shame or loyalty to anything or anyone but themselves.

      Not all. I take courses at an urban community college and these classes are inexpensive and high quality. The college offers 2-year associate degrees to many people who would otherwise find it difficult to get any degree, as well as offering numerous certificates and types of training, not to mention cultural and artistic enrichment which are also very important.

      They are always struggling financially but they serve a vital function in the community.

    18. Re:This is a surprise? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 0

      We will build a great firewall -- and nobody builds firewalls better than us, believe me --and we'll build them very inexpensively. We will build a great, great firewall in our IT department, and we will make India pay for that firewall. Mark my words.

    19. Re:This is a surprise? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "The first sentence says they are going to immigrants FROM India."

      The headline does not contradict the article. These people are not immigrants in the conventional sense, who come to the US to acculturate and become a part of our society. H-1B is a special peonage deal for chintzy employers, by which the worker gets a temporary visa, good only for a specific employer, and then must return home. India gets a trained IT worker while California's own workers, immigrant and otherwise, get unemployment.

    20. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare the mod on my comment to yours. Maybe it's a dumb comment, but it bears investigating, don't you think. I mean, you obviously went to university to learn to think, right? So, start thinking: why did I get positive mods?

    21. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it did. Look at the mods.

    22. Re:This is a surprise? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 0

      Maybe, although I do wonder how many people with foreign allegiance and/or which hate white people were involved in the decision making.

      Fifth columns are a reality in the multicultural society.

    23. Re:This is a surprise? by rfengr · · Score: 1

      I dunno. My yearly salary as an EE is 3x what my entire undergrad education cost; grad school was free. I know this is anecdotal, and I graduated 20 years ago, but it has certainly been a worthwhile investment.

    24. Re:This is a surprise? by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

      If you paid for an undergrad degree at a research institution, and didn't understand that you should have been working in some famous professor's lab to actually get your education, you're going to be pretty upset when you get out.

      And didn't understand... because someone should have taught you that when you were 14, so this basically blames the schools for not properly educating kids about the ways of the world. Fair enough.

      I'd suggest it goes a little further though. The left has a bias or belief that problems are the fault of society, whereas the right tends to bias to the belief that problems are the fault of the individual. Now, the problem is that, the left tends to be more associated with education (because if society and its institutions are the problem, then those are the institutions which need to be improved, and education needs to be improved). So the left is more idealistic about the role of education. See it is implicit. But what you're saying is, from more of a right wing point of view, hey nobody should be an idiot, or ignorant, to the fact that the world is competitive and selfish place, and that individuals have to learn to handle this, mostly via self control and character building and smarts (so don't come crying when you become a victim).

      And that, I think, is fair enough, as there is no real difference between the "individual" and "society", as ideological categories, because we are always both, we are all individuals and we all live in society and are part of social institutions. Individuals have agency. Groups have communion. And we always act and function in both. So the problems are often found in both places. (A way forward for politics is to become both left and right wing).

      So I would just add that, I agree in the sense that, our society needs to spend more time acclimatising kids to "how the world works", as by nature, humans are both competitive and cooperative. And we need to be educated to understand when and where each one is the dominant driver. So I do agree, it is right to tell people that they need to wise up about American universities. But I wouldn't blame kids for not knowing that already, if they haven't been taught.

      Sure sounds like someone advocating the smart middle instead of ideological lefts and rights. Yay!

    25. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution: Don't answer questions you're not paid to answer.

      Then start making demands of higher salary or contract-work.

      You can either do the paperwork yourself or contact an agency that do it for you. The latter is pricier, but very easy for the contractor, almost like a regular paycheck.

    26. Re:This is a surprise? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      ...And nobody will be able to blame the Indians, because their contract will clearly outline and limit their responsibilities to only those things known to the signees at the time. I have yet to meet an Indian IT person who thinks for himself.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    27. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay. Let's fight corruption with racism. Because two wrongs make a right.

      You dumbshit. Keep your brain-drool to yourself.

    28. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but let's be honest, you're on your way out. 20 years ago there was still a bit of activity in the West in EE, and the boom in RF was just happening. By 2001, the bottom fell out of the RF world in the West and I was working in it, so I know.

      Would you seriously recommend to a young person in the West to pursue EE? Really?

    29. Re:This is a surprise? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      Why SHOULD they think for themselves? They're explicitly paid to perform a specified job, so if they start questioning it, they'll just get replaced with someone who will just shut up and get on with it.

      After all, they get paid to write code and then get paid to write the code that should have been specified in the first place.

      Don't blame them for poorly/short-sighted written contracts.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    30. Re:This is a surprise? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Put another way, saving the cost of $5.8 million is like saving the cost of 355 minimum-wage jobs. In the span of 1-3 years, the labor force will shift around--early retirement, longer time spent in school, less immigration for H1B work due to less demand for workers--and the job losses will be buffed out; meanwhile, across 2-10 years, the span of $5.8 million annually that Americans spend on going to this school will instead be spent on shoes, phones, hamburgers, and other things.

      In other words: the end result is a null impact on American employment rate and an increase in the wealth of individual Americans--particularly, in the wealth of those Americans who buy some sort of service from this school (I assume tuition).

    31. Re:This is a surprise? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      In many states government employees are not allowed to receive "gifts" (including meals) from outside vendors unless it's of negligible value, or something offered to any customer. To that end as far as lavish meals are concerned the most the vendors can provide is maybe two mozzarella sticks off a shared appetizer plate, unless literally every customer of the company had been invited to that specific meal.

    32. Re:This is a surprise? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bahahahaha, they thought Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), was going to effectively intercede with Janet Napolitano to help rich American white guys keep their jobs, from being outsourced to poor brown guys, due to financial realities of the reduced care reimbursements to providers under Obamacare and increased demand from illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities!

      Those IT guys should get the buttercup award for being a special kind of snowflake!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    33. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it funny how the only people that criticize institutions of higher education like this are people who have little or no actual experience with them? It's like a lifelong atheist telling you just how church services are. Sure dude.

    34. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a fine distinction, but I think there is a marked difference between community colleges and major, name-brand universities.

      As you indicated, community colleges provide inexpensive, high-quality classes. They serve the intended purpose of educating the community.

      As the OP indicated, big-name universities provide a name to drop on your resume and the sense of prestige they've worked hard to associate with that name. It has more to do with tribal elitism and dollar bills than actual education.

      In summary, I don't think your post and the original post are in conflict. While you're both talking about fruit, you're comparing apples to pears.

    35. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump better make good on his promise requiring H1B's to be paid the same wage as their domestic counterparts.

    36. Re:This is a surprise? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the only way for Indians to produce the code you need is to specify it to the point where you've just written the entire code yourself.

      I've seen this numerous times; their inability to think of reality is insane. I've once been asked to produce a mock object for a simple currency converter so they could test their components. The mock converter just had a list of static conversion rates for each currency. The code they returned (the code that was supposed to use the real currency converter) relied on the currency converter always returning the same conversion rates. Turns out they were using a substring()-like function to extract the rates from an XML message, so if the rate had a different number of digits or the XML was different in any insignificant and perfectly valid way, it would fail hard. Since their code handled no exceptions at all, failing meant exiting the entire application.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    37. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Stuff will work for a while, but after the first power outage, time change, etc...someone4 is going to be calling these guys up constantly getting information from them for the rest of their lives.

      No, it won't be that long. The contact is for 5 years. After 5 years (or possibly shorter) someone at UC will realize the whole thing was a massive mistake, and quietly kill the contract. Then they'll scramble to hire replacements.

      This has all happened before in the private world.

    38. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares. This is California.

      In California we believe you should train your replacements then find a higher paying job else where at Google or Apple.

      Don't forget we didn't vote Trump.

      Fuck your bluish white collar jobs cos we deserve so much better!

    39. Re:This is a surprise? by sycodon · · Score: 2

      A-Fucking-Men.

      These universities are ultimately under the control of the Legislature. The CA Government is swarming with Democrats, yet none of them seem to give a fuck about good jobs being sent out of the country. Why is that?

      Seriously...it wasn't all that long ago they'd be all over this like bees on an open soda can.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    40. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really not about money. Who wants to do mind numbing low skill tech jobs like these? Nobody want wants these jobs so if you can't find people to do it what do you do? Yes give it to the Indians and I say all the better cos we don't want those shitty work.

      It's mostly the idiots left behind who has no motivation and no ambition who want to do mind numbing stupid work who are complaining. This is America and we should lean towards people who believe in the American dream, we're not some socialist European asshole.

    41. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those idiots left behind are the same idiots left behind like Detroit.

      It's fucking Californians like you that pushed the rest of the country to Trump with your extreme leftish bullshit.

    42. Re:This is a surprise? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Universities have never been more than a bottom-line for-profit business that uses cult-like recruiting tactics and has absolutely no shame or loyalty to anything or anyone but themselves.

      I hope this is becoming a bit clearer to everyone now, as in the past I've been ridiculed for blasting universities as money-driven cults.

      They provide very little value in the modern world and should be used sparingly.

      Perhaps the cult will realize what they've done when they find enrollment in the highly-profitable CS curriculum is reduced to damn near zero.

      In fact, sounds like a solid justification for a boycott towards any University that pulls this shit.

    43. Re:This is a surprise? by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

      Well, if you refuse to sufficiently fund your state schools then it turns out they start acting like for-profit enterprises...

    44. Re: This is a surprise? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      If they work in India, they aren't H1Bs. It's a true offshoring effort. H1B only applies to workers brought over to the states to replace you.

    45. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know my experience with higher education? Maybe there is a god and he actually talks back to you?

      Sure dude.

      I'm a lifelong abstainer from eating dog shit, but I can tell you how it smells.

    46. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have the entire transport sector to electrify, and a big chunk of industry, so... Yes.

    47. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it be yuge?

    48. Re:This is a surprise? by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

      If their entire budget is 5.83 billion, how can they be "tapping $8.5 billion in federal funding" as per the summary?

    49. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what turned computing into boring experience - having to deal with indo-chimps on daily basis. Kill them - save the industry.

    50. Re:This is a surprise? by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      They can't win. At this point, no matter what they do, some people will say they are corrupt for not acting like a proper non-profit, and some people will say they are idiots for not acting like a grown up business. With feedback like that, the only rational choice is to do what their "boss" wants -- in this case the CA legislature cares more about shaving costs than a few local jobs.

    51. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, have you taken a look at what it might cost to receive the same degrees at the same institution today? Sounds like you might have been able to get a scholarship, and you might get one if you were to go today instead of then to defray the sticker cost. But for an additional level of insight, maybe add scholarship probability factored for incoming student % on scholarship and demographic breakouts? A lot of universities post those numbers for the previous academic year, but you might not be able to find the historical data to benchmark your odds back then.

      I'd lay good odds that you'd find the results troubling.. What was a good investment in the mid-80s might not be anymore. Kind of like putting all your savings into a Savings and Loans institution in 1985 because of those awesome returns..

    52. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed this part of the paragraph.

      "university is tapping $8.5 billion in federal funding "

      The school is properly funded and I'd say maybe over funded.

    53. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious it's the same platform that claims to care about those people. But then doesnt, because they're idiots. Well, what is it? Only care about smart poor people (who don't stay poor) now or all people ?

    54. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my termination papers say that I have to be available forever to help out, I'm not terminated, and I'll see you in court if you try to enforce that without paying me. If I'm working for you, you have to pay me. Oh, and consulting fees tend to be higher than sysadmin state salary.

    55. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you send a letter to the local or state office of a DC officeholder, you may or may not get a personal response, but it won't matter, because they don't give 2 craps about what you think. They have probably outsourced the response writing to India, anyway. There are only 3 ways to effect change in the US: 1. Be rich. 2. Start a movement. 3. Get the press interested.

    56. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they thought that Feinstein cares about more things than ranting about scary black plastic "assault" weapons.

    57. Re:This is a surprise? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The system of education in India works, at the lowest level, to install rote learning. There's no room for imagination or real problem solving of any sort in that system. In fact, stepping "out of line" is dealt with swiftly. And trying to think of the bigger picture is very much stepping out of line in their educational system. That's the source of the problem. It is, in effect, an insurmountable cultural gap. It's the same thing that Feynman observed in Brazil.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    58. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "whereas the right tends to bias to the belief that problems are the fault of the individual"

      Unless of course they are speaking about themselves, then its the fault of mexicans, SJWs, millenials, libtards, etc.

    59. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even given the BLS statistic of zero growth for the foreseeable future? The problem with EE is that once the problem is solved, it's just copy-paste from there, and that's when the shift to outsourcing happens.

    60. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >help rich American white guys keep their jobs

      > sys-admin Kurt Ho

      Is Kurt Ho a white american?

    61. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1: Some of us voted for Trump but were outnumbered by the city folks.

      2: Some of us voted for Bernie too when he came around.

      What the press refuses to acknowledge is that some of us felt that it really wasn't Hillary's turn.

    62. Re: This is a surprise? by mrchew1982 · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like our taxes are going down so we'll have more disposable income, this is not the case. The school will stay at the same funding level (probably get an annual increase even), and will still charge the same rediculous rates for tuition. The only place this money will go is to the deans paycheck or a bonus for one of their lackeys. When I left DADDY (another worthless california state school) they had just hired a new Dean at 3.5 million dollars per year.

    63. Re: This is a surprise? by Raseri · · Score: 1

      we don't want those shitty work

      Found the Indian.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    64. Re: This is a surprise? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like our taxes are going down so we'll have more disposable income

      Oh, no, you'll still pay the same taxes.

      The school will simply not grow its prices as rapidly, as its costs won't escalate as fast to shave down its profit margins below what they'll tolerate (which, barring brutal competition, is going to be at least slightly higher than what's required to buffer against risks--and will be a point value dependent on the time and circumstances).

      What do you think would happen if that school had $683 billion of operating expenses? Do you think they'd take a $100 billion loss every year charging the current tuition? Of course not; they'd raise prices, and then either fold due to sheer incompetence (everyone else operates at a lower cost per student-hour, why can't they?) or continue to compete in a market that just is (everyone else's operating expenses are also 17% higher, so they haven't lost any competitive advantage).

      This is the opposite effect. It's slower; the pressure mounts over time--they'll try to not lower their margins as long as they can, but even an extra 0.1% of profit over what they'd normally make can't endure for more than a few years, assuming it can make it out a few months. For a school selling services on the order of months and years, it probably can endure for a year or two.

      This is why, for example, food was 40% of median-income-household consumer expenses in 1900, 33% in 1950, and about 12% today: it got cheaper to make, and it's basically impossible to keep enormous margins. Farmers complain because they believe they should have a 20% profit margin, and instead operate in 8%-10% because market forces kick them in the balls repeatedly if they try to charge more. (An enormous amount of the price of goods comes from domestic shipping; even importing e.g. pants from China costs 6 cents per pair in trans-Atlantic shipping, while getting them from the pier to WalMart is half the price of the damned pants).

      That is how the past 6,000 years of history has operated--as in, the past 6,000 years right up to today, now, currently. That's not a projection from ancient history ending a hundred years ago, or from some trend that we have data on for a 40-year window of history; it's how every economy has always behaved. These basic economic behaviors can abstract even to biology and describe higher evolution, although that gets into loopy land (mind you, explaining how dogs and humans co-evolved for maximal economy is often fun, because dogs are awesome).

    65. Re:This is a surprise? by NCamero · · Score: 1

      Universities have never been more than a bottom-line for-profit business that uses cult-like recruiting tactics and has absolutely no shame or loyalty to anything or anyone but themselves.

      I hope this is becoming a bit clearer to everyone now, as in the past I've been ridiculed for blasting universities as money-driven cults.

      They provide very little value in the modern world and should be used sparingly.

      Mod parent anon coward down.

      Dude, I am a professional engineer. It is a requirement to have an engineering degree. I believe doctors, accountants, business men like Trump Inc, even lawyers, are useful. And I am biased to thinking engineers are useful.

    66. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's take everything on the internet literally, and on top of that feed the trolls.

      Then post our fake outrage so everyone can see how smug we can be while virtue signalling.

      Should we all get together and throw you a parade for your superior moral compass?

    67. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. This is a management problem. And no matter how much planning comes in to play there are still misunderstandings. Add distance, culture, and language barriers and the problems is just magnified exponentially.

    68. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bigly

    69. Re:This is a surprise? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      >help rich American white guys keep their jobs

      > sys-admin Kurt Ho

      Is Kurt Ho a white american?

      Touch`e, the only thing worst than a rich American white guy, a successful self-sufficient minority guy!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    70. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing there says that amount of money is "properly funded", Try again, noob

    71. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here! Here! Hear! Hear!

      You beat me to it. That is simply because they're hypocrites. They ALWAYS do everything right.

    72. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "Keep your brain-drool to yourself". Follow goddamned instructions!

    73. Re:This is a surprise? by execthis · · Score: 1

      Lower class people like myself who struggle to survive cannot even imagine many of the warped ways the entitled classes waste their money. But it doesn't surprise me. America is mostly fucked and getting worse.

    74. Re:This is a surprise? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Also, starting at the federal level is the wrong level. The fed Senator can, at best, work to change H1-B practices (slow and lower probability). A state Senator can, at best, cut funding to the state school if they outsource work (more likely, and faster to do), effectively forcing the schools to hire locally.

      Asking the wrong person the wrong question will get you the wrong answer 100% of the time.

    75. Re:This is a surprise? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The left has a bias or belief that problems are the fault of society, whereas the right tends to bias to the belief that problems are the fault of the individual.

      That's what the right says. But tell me again how the right assigns terrorism to the individual criminals, and not the entire Islamic population? Broad religious and racial blame is laid by the right all the time. Personal responsibility is fine, so long as you don't have to take personal responsibility for improperly storing guns, or spewing pollutants, or anything like that.

      The libertarian right believes in dictatorships as the only valid government. Every landowner is a dictator on their land, and there should be no "public" land. Though, they recognize the need for government, in that local people will work together to build roads and collectively pay for them (regardless of whether they are individually or collectively owned), but refuse to recognize this congress of people forming rules to be a government.

      So I would just add that, I agree in the sense that, our society needs to spend more time acclimatising kids to "how the world works", as by nature, humans are both competitive and cooperative.

      The biggest disconnect is that "how the world should work" and "how the world does work" are vastly different, and there's nobody trying to bring them together. Playing on the differences is why there is so much divisiveness in politics.

    76. Re:This is a surprise? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1
      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    77. Re: This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unoriginal, fuck off brown nose.

      And no, that's no racism, I'm saying your nose is up the other poster's asshole.
      Just in case you misunderstood and got excited.

    78. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many years ago, a friend of mine was studying CS at a private college, and had to take a course taught by a visiting lecturer from India.

      The lecturer made some point in class that was technically wrong, and my friend corrected him on it. The lecturer fumed and told my friend to stay after class. He told him, "In my country, you do not contradict the teacher - it's disrespectful!"

      My friend simply said, "Well, we're not in your country, are we? If you're wrong, I'm going to call you on it." That did not sit well with the Indian, but he couldn't do anything about it.

    79. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " in the past I've been ridiculed for blasting universities as money-driven cults."

      I don't think that ended today mr tinfoil. But enjoy your echo chamber.

      No, the change was subtle, so you might have missed it:

      Universities aren't "money-driven cults," they're "bottom-line for-profit businesses that use cult-like recruiting tactics."

      And he isn't "gay," he just sucks dick every now and then!

    80. Re:This is a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Middle class' people like myself who 'struggle' to advance cannot even imagine many of the warped ways the entitled class waste their money either. But it doesn't surprise me. The 'lower' class produces nothing but doesn't effectively pay taxes. Entitled class produces nothing but doesn't effectively pay taxes (as far as actual value related to production). America IS mostly fucked and getting worse.

      We (middle class, at least I) don't hate you. Can you 'lowers' not abuse the system buying 'food' with EBT then while in the same line as a second transaction buy crap with cash? Can you 'elites' not abuse the system and accept smaller 'returns' on a quarterly bonus in exchange for playing on the same team? A+ for creativity but, both groups, but stop biting the hand that feeds you via low-end friendly extreme legislation or high-end friendly legislation.

      I don't want a fight nor am I going to say 'please'. Does everyone (anyone) get it yet?

  2. Awesome by barrywalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now your IT department will be trying to fleece the faculty and students with scam phone calls about how their computers are infected with viruses.

    Bravo, nitwits.

    1. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      They are just doing the needful on priority and at the earliest. They will revert when complete.

    2. Re:Awesome by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

      What happens when Indian IT people in the US get scam computer virus calls from India? Does it create some kind of singularity that causes both of them to move to another dimension?

      Or is it more like:

      "I am calling from the Microsoft support center and I wish to tell you your computer has a virus"

      "Nilesh? What are you doing? I thought you were going to work in the civil service section your family controls."

      "Premal, since Modi has withdrawn the large rupee notes my uncle can no longer give me a job in the civil service and I must work at the call center and to tell you your computer has a virus."

    3. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that command would do much on all the Windows servers the Pajeets will be inheriting.

    4. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already done by South Park:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhFKzJNpLDQ

    5. Re:Awesome by ghoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Scams were not invented in India. In fact scam calling is just another form of outsourcing where US based criminals use low paid foreign workers to do the grunt work. So if no singularity happened when Americans were scamming Americans none will happen when Indians scam Indians.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    6. Re: Awesome by saloomy · · Score: 4, Funny

      The time when we were your bosses has come and gone. We replaced you guys with shell scripts and automation ages ago.

    7. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, scam calls are not called Boiler Room Scams for nothing. India doesn't have boiler rooms under their buildings, they don't need heating.

    8. Re:Awesome by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      why go to that when you have students with unlimited loans you get for that and more.

    9. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, now THAT was funny. :)

    10. Re: Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not your Boss, I am the highly paid consultant who comes in and recommends you can be replaced by a chimpanzee. I stay at your company for 6 months make 4 times what you do, fix what you've screwed up and then move on leaving your boss and your wife wanting more...

    11. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everyone realizes that, but we were laughing at the joke.

    12. Re:Awesome by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that command would do much on all the Windows servers the Pajeets will be inheriting.

      That's even better. Gazing into my Mumbai Trading Company Finest Kind Translucent Sphere, I see a giant hack in UC's future.

    13. Re: Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're also the guy who gets cancer from his anger issues.

    14. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am calling from the Microsoft support center and I wish to tell you your computer has a virus"

      "Nilesh? What are you doing? I thought you were going to work in the civil service section your family controls."

      What sort of racist jackassery makes you think that everyone knows everyone else in a country with a population of 1.2 billion people?

    15. Re:Awesome by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      I have always wondered if the individuals (aka the Indians) who call from "Windows" and so on actually know that they are taking part in a scam or not. I hope they do considering the amount of verbal abuse I give them every time they try to call but still I do wonder because it would be quite easy to just post job offers to unemployed people and tell them to call these numbers and say these things without ever explaining exactly what they are doing.

    16. Re:Awesome by mjwx · · Score: 0

      Scams were not invented in India. In fact scam calling is just another form of outsourcing where US based criminals use low paid foreign workers to do the grunt work. So if no singularity happened when Americans were scamming Americans none will happen when Indians scam Indians.

      Damn Fureners, taking all the scamming jerbs from Hard Working 'Mericans. #MakeAmericaScamAgain

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    17. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some know what they are doing; I learned this after engaging one in a long phone call.

      I joked around at the start about how I didn't use Microsoft windows,couldn't have a virus, Microsoft shouldn't have my contact info. We have a fun phone call about his job, he didn't want to tell me who he really worked for. He seemed to not hate his job. We talked about my job. He seemed envious. He said it would be easy for me to come there and work. I declined and he lamented the fact he couldn't get a job in the US. At some point his coworkers discovered he was way off script and they were piling up to listen to our call. IT was fun.

    18. Re:Awesome by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me... Southpark already did it? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpsons_Already_Did_It)

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    19. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when Indian IT people in the US get scam computer virus calls from India? Does it create some kind of singularity that causes both of them to move to another dimension?

      Or is it more like:

      "I am calling from the Microsoft support center and I wish to tell you your computer has a virus"

      "Nilesh? What are you doing? I thought you were going to work in the civil service section your family controls."

      "Premal, since Modi has withdrawn the large rupee notes my uncle can no longer give me a job in the civil service and I must work at the call center and to tell you your computer has a virus."

      its not exaclty a simgularity, its called a Vindaloop

    20. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As other posters have pointed out, this will just get you arrested.

      No, the correct answer is to never count on money you don't have yet. That way, when they announce that they're outsourcing your job, you simply quit. If they bitch at you about "two weeks' notice", just point out that you're giving them the same notice they would have given you if you committed a fireable offense, and that you find their outsourcing efforts enough to be a fireable offense. They're fired as your employer and you're leaving. Now.

      If you're as indispensable as you think you are, their offshoring process just took an arrow, and possibly a nuke, to the knee. And if you're not, well, you weren't going to last long at that job anyway, so you're still better off.

    21. Re:Awesome by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. One other thing that I wonder is why Microsoft is not doing more about this, not that I think that they have a responsibility to do it but that it would be in their best interest to not tarnish their company name. Since they have a large pool of employees in India as well one would think that they would also have some leverage with politicians and law enforcement (prejudice tells me that corruption is wide spread in India which should work in Microsoft:s favor).

    22. Re:Awesome by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      When I was a grad student I was sysadmin for my high-performance computing research lab. Every few months we were adding more nodes to our cluster, so I'd be assembling, say, 32 new servers, and invariably we'd get a bad motherboard or something in the mix. Since I've got the guts of 32 identical machines in front of me, it's pretty easy to troubleshoot and figure out what the problem is, but when calling for an RMA you'd still always have to work through the whole tech support script. Thankfully a few of my lab mates were Indian.

      Intel: (in heavy Indian accent) "Hello, thank you for calling Intel, this is Josh, how may I help you?"

      Me: "Hi, Josh, is it? Please speak to my friend Rajagopal."

      And then Raj would rapid fire something in Hindi at "Josh" and we'd get our RMA without the 30 minutes of plodding through the troubleshooting script.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    23. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But .. but.. we can't afford to pay the M$ tax and run Linux anyway... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    24. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And go to prison for CFAA violations. This only makes companies more willing to offshore because the Indians fresh off the boat wouldn't be inclined to do this stuff, as they know they would be deported for good.

      Best thing to do is, if a company decides to offshore, create a list of passwords and core things (so one can't say anything was kept locked away). When the place demands a replacement be trained, refuse. If they fire you, collect unemployment. I've done this before, because I'm not going to make it easy for offshoring to take place.

    25. Re:Awesome by budgenator · · Score: 1

      There was a guy I was yacking with who refused to admit he was calling from India, about some kind of support issue; until I made some obtuse comment about a championship cricket match between India and Australia that lasted for three days, then the floodgates burst.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    26. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only glitch: in most states, if you're fired you can't collect unemployment.

    27. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a rather funny YouTube video where someone managed to forward these scammers to other people in the very same call center, sometimes the next desk over even, and record the hilarity that ensues when they start talking to each other.

    28. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to be proudy.

    29. Re:Awesome by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If you're planning ahead, thinking in terms of WHEN that next disaster is going to happen rather than IF, then you won't have that problem.

      The unemployment line is really for ditch diggers who can't help living pay check to pay check.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    30. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have that email, in my inbox, right this second. I can't stop laughing.

    31. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your funny bone is apparently defective

    32. Re: Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only get sued / arrested if someone can PROVE, you DELIBERATELY sabotaged the system. But everyone I know would never be so foolish as to do something like that. But accidents do happen. Hard drives go bad. Sometimes it's hard to explain. Solar flares maybe. Managers don't allocate significant budget to avoid disaster. Just because we won't document things for you does not mean we don't document things. Criminal negligence? All depends on how the judge sees it. Certainly the stockholders have a lower threshold. We don't want to be your bosses. You're too stupid to work for us.

    33. Re:Awesome by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      For these, a mass delete would be too gentle and too easy. Admins should instead open up the firewalls and disable antiviruses. Fate worse than death.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    34. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure to use an exploit that's already open on the system.

      Then use the exploit remotely through Tor and/or a VPN and elevate your privileges before doing the dirty deeds.

  3. Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shouldn't be any discussion about this. If a UNIVERSITY is outsourcing. They should instantly lose all federal and state funding.

    Wanna behave like a private company? Get treated like one. No taxpayer soup for you.

    1. Re:Automatic. by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More than that- this is a state university. Not a private one like Harvard. Its basically owned by the government. So its the government outsourcing these jobs.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re: Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's what you get for making the university politically independent. Suddenly they start having ideas.

      Then you cut off their revenue stream, and then they just spend millions on a football team instead of education.

      Ps, what's with the forward to http://you-gift-cards.pw/? Does Slashdot not care?

    3. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I used to be an H1B, and this is indeed inexcusable. It's not even just about jobs lost, but what happened to matters such as national pride and the associated symbolism? If the universities of the country - the institutions that educate and train workers for its industries - are refusing to hire those very workers to perform jobs that the universities need, that says a lot about either the usefulness of the degrees that they teach, or the quality of their education. If they're claiming that Indian workers (with Indian degrees) are really "good enough", why even bother with expensive American education? And make no mistake, it's not just a message for the citizens; people abroad will notice as well.

    4. Re: Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "millions on a football team"

      To be more specific, millions on advertising to kids. Kids grow up watching the local college team with their dad, and then they want to go to that school. The only sports this works on are football and basketball, and in very rare cases, hockey. Hardly any money is spent on other sports because they do not provide proper advertising.

    5. Re:Automatic. by ghoul · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you want public money to be used to overpay govt employees instead of getting the best value for the money by using the lower cost private sector provider. No wonder taxes are so high in California.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    6. Re:Automatic. by ghoul · · Score: 0

      IT jobs are not that complicated. With a college full of grad students there is really no need for a an IT dept. Grad students will do it for a pittance.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    7. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have never worked IT at a large uni like UCB with tens of thousands of employees.

      They have more employees than Google, do you think google doesn't need IT? The engineers can just do it.

      Right?

    8. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean do I want American tax payer dollars recycled back into the US economy and not send to India?

      Yes.

    9. Re:Automatic. by EmeraldBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you want public money to be used to overpay govt employees instead of getting the best value for the money by using the lower cost private sector provider. No wonder taxes are so high in California.

      That's also why California has beautiful national parks, expansive and well maintained roads, and is the center of no less than three major industries. Oklahoma has low taxes, and that's about all it has. What good is cheap if it's absolutely worthless?

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    10. Re:Automatic. by rossz · · Score: 1

      well maintained roads

      What the hell have you been smoking?

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    11. Re: Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when Universities are run like businesses.
      The Chancellor hires all their buddies, then cuts budgets and jobs, no raises for the staff, enforced no pay days, and so on.

    12. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us apply your analogy to physical goods as well. If a university is buying foreign goods, they should lose all federal and state funding. Since all universities do, let us have all universities lose federal and state funding. Since 90+ percentage non-profit university can't function without federal or state funding, we should shut them down and send all our students to Trump university.

    13. Re:Automatic. by EmeraldBot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      well maintained roads

      What the hell have you been smoking?

      If you think California's roads are bad, I advise you to try New Hampshire's sometime. So granite is the state that we still use gravel and dirt roads, and when there's any asphalt to be seen, it's 35 years old and has fissures the size of the Grand Canyon. And yes, I've lived in both of these states. I think it's fair to say that California has a well maintained road network for its size, and if we're talking about a low tax state like New Hampshire or Indiana, you'd realize the difference almost immediately.

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    14. Re:Automatic. by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "expansive and well maintained roads"

      Non-Californian detected!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re:Automatic. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The roads are maintained by prison labor in California.

      I doubt NH has any sort of sizable prison population to make such an endeavor possible.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Hamster has winters, Californica doesn't.

      Winters are hell on roads. I'd bet NH spends more on road maintenance than CA does -- and I don't mean per-mile.

    17. Re:Automatic. by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      But that, of course, is the debate. Is it really "the best value for the money"? I call your homily with a truism "you get what you pay for".

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    18. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live at a border between NH and MA. You can clearly see and feel the decreased road quality as you pass from NH to MA. Not only are the MA roads more damaged, they're also narrower. MA has far higher taxes than NH. I've never been to CA nor do I want to.

    19. Re:Automatic. by EmeraldBot · · Score: 2

      "expansive and well maintained roads"

      Non-Californian detected!

      I assure you, I have lived in Cali for several continuous years, and I have the Soup Plantation receipts to prove it. California's road system is pretty decent, and when you look at its size, it's impressive. Even on the death hills by my house, there are railguards at the edges, no cracks in the roads, and they actually repair roads from wear and tear. Trying to navigate a mountain in New Hampshire is a nightmare, as is trying to get almost anywhere else; Californians are a lucky people (well, admittedly more so if the trees weren't dying, I suppose).

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    20. Re:Automatic. by afmstuff · · Score: 1

      Irrespective of the present issue, please know that the fraction of funding derived from state sources is 11%. [1]
      The fraction of government funding has ramped down over the years, and as of now is 89% private, 11% public. It is notable that there is debate within UC whether or not the remaining 11% is worth the associated restrictions.

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    21. Re: Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "millions on a football team"

      To be more specific, millions on advertising to kids. Kids grow up watching the local college team with their dad, and then they want to go to that school. The only sports this works on are football and basketball, and in very rare cases, hockey. Hardly any money is spent on other sports because they do not provide proper advertising.

      Yes, that is the belief. There are a lot of articles out there claiming that it doesn't actually work out in a revenue postive way, though. i.e. except for like 4 schools, they'd be better of not having the football team. The lower (projected) demand would be offset by the massive savings on the construction and maintenance of the sports temples.

    22. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait wait wait wait...
      "Wanna behave like a private company? Get treated like one. No taxpayer soup for you."

      You do realize what happens is just the opposite right? What do you think republican tax cuts are all about? Giving tax payer money to businesses. Are you not from the US, or are you really young, or did you vote for trump, or do you have brain damage?

    23. Re: Automatic. by CGordy · · Score: 1

      Coming from a country where university teams are barely funded and play in the local leagues, I had always found the level funding of college sport in the US bizarre.
      Thank you for explaining it to me.

    24. Re:Automatic. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Losing jobs in America for essentially zero benefit. That's basically why.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    25. Re:Automatic. by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      What do you think republican tax cuts are all about? Giving tax payer money to businesses.

      This is so hilariously bass-ackwards I have to wonder if this was satire.

      The government not confiscating under threat of deadly force wealth it did not earn, in the form of taxes, from those who created said wealth is *not* giving that wealth away to anyone as it was never government's wealth in the first place. A tax cut is not a 'subsidy' as so many seem to want to (deliberately) misconstrue it. A mugger that lets you keep some of your money is not subsidizing you by the amount he left you.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    26. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grad students cannot "do it."

      Student employees are like a box of chocolates; you never know what you are going to get. Sure there are some things like end-user support that you can drop in the hands of a student, but above the students you need full-time professionals that not only know their shit very well but also know how to work with students under them.

      You see there is thing called "institutional knowledge" - it helps things run much smoother. With students you wind up with a significant amount of churn and lose said knowledge.

    27. Re:Automatic. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Can you explain to me why they shouldn't they move the jobs abroad?

      Because you come back with fucking shit like you just posted.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    28. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your new Leader has commanded that everyone will 'make America Great'.
      He's wrong. All his policies will do is 'Make India/China/Russia/Indonesia/etc great'.
      If he can't stop UC from doing this then what hope to the metal bashers of the rust belt have eh?
      The answer is none. Trump is just a windbag, full of hot air and empty promises.

    29. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because they are a fucking publically funded school and sending jobs overseas has exactly zero benifit - and in most cases negatives?

    30. Re: Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitter much, nerdinho?

    31. Re:Automatic. by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      If a UNIVERSITY is outsourcing. They should instantly lose all federal and state funding.

      What about if they buy a microscope that was made in China instead of the USA?
      What about if they buy paper to print on that came from logs in South America instead of the USA?

    32. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public funding of "state" universities has been falling for the past 40 years. Used to be that the states would pay 60-80% of the per-student cost of instruction; these days it's closer to 30%. The more prestigious of those schools turned to expanding federal research programs to pay their faculty, pay for graduate tuition, and other operating expenses.

      They've also turned to out-of-state and international students, whose tuition is not subsidized or controlled by the state, to raise revenues. If you've been on a campus recently and wondered why you hear so much Mandarin and Hindi, it's because your state has stopped subsidizing domestic students. The point is: UC takes a lot of money from Indians to teach them STEM. Few of them are allowed to immigrate permanently, but end up back in India where they work for outsourcing companies, like the one that UC has hired to do their IT. They're creating demand for their own graduates.

    33. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, it hurts the local economy. Why your question is +4 insightful (at this time) is puzzling.

    34. Re:Automatic. by orlanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As you can see from the responses you have gotten, most people can't explain it. Even if it is "obvious" to them, they should be adult enough to realize that there might be many visitors to this site that seriously have your question even if they believe you don't. They could have used this as an opportunity to explain their side, but instead did such a huge disservice by their replies.

      Anyway, I personally don't have anything against hiring the most cost effective solution. Although I doubt it will be as good or ok as the business case suggests. In the end, the university will survive and move on.

      What I DO have a problem with is the abuse of the H1-B system. A system that was designed to allow our companies to hire abroad when they can't find the talent locally. It isn't a system designed to drive costs down. I have rarely seen H1-B positions that I felt didn't have local talent. Probably 1/5. In this case, clearly, if the current employees have to train their replacements, then there is no question that there is a more suitable local talent than foreign.

      If I had it my way, I wouldn't tie the H1-B visa to the company. 2 years in, the H1-B should belong to the employee to go where ever he feels his talent is most appreciated. If the company fires him after 11 months, the visa still belongs to them. The US could still limit the number of visas issued, and actively maintained. The employee would still need to maintain their visa by having employment 6 out of the last 12 months. I also don't think the permanent residency process be tied to the company. Companies shouldn't be allowed to petition that. Only the individual with backing from a US citizen should be able to.

      Fix the H1-B system and we can talk about a fair playing field. Thou, I doubt many companies would be as enthusiastic about it.

    35. Re:Automatic. by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      A university should be working at the cutting edge. In the 60s, they were there inventing networking and email, but those are well established technologies now. There's no reason of a university to spend its resources on routine infrastructure when corporate entities can do it cheaper. Look at the prevalence of Microsoft, Google, and Oracle in the daily operations of any major university. If foreign corps can out-compete the domestic corps, why should the government subsidize an uncompetitive business?

      Keep in mind that a lot of those Indian workers will have US degrees - US universities have been admitting more and more, partly to make up for declining state support. Many of those students come to the US hoping to turn a student visa into a green card, but most of them end up back home.

    36. Re:Automatic. by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From a capitalist perspective, they are selling a product ("an education") in which the very promise is vocational advancement. Yet their own actions demonstrate they are selling a product which doesn't actually do what it claims.

      State Universities also exist outside the realm of profit and loss and were established to accomplish a specific social goal -- advancing the practical arts and sciences outside the realm of the traditional liberal arts education. By pushing their own jobs overseas they seem to be undermining that as well.

      If they need to save money to meet their operating costs and income, then why not cut costs elsewhere? So many have huge investments in athletics which kind of appear to be paid for by a handful of top tier revenue sports, but at my local University the athletics facilities (a block-sized tennis facility) seem to exceed what could be considered reasonable spending associated with those sports and also fails to take into account for most state Universities' ability to use their quasi-government status for bonding to obtain money for athletic facilities average students will never use.

      Plus you can't tell me that any state University in the US couldn't cut a whole laundry list of internal "programs" that mostly exist to create internal empires. And that's without even asking many political questions as to which of these programs are really advocacy programs designed to push ideological agendas.

    37. Re: Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a wonder volleyball isn't more popular . . .

    38. Re:Automatic. by bogeuh · · Score: 1

      businesses are part of society, they have to contribute to the society and not leech as much as they can and let the working class foot the bill for maintaining said society if you are right, that "creator of wealth" should be able do to the same anywhere...

    39. Re:Automatic. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      My wife went to UCSF. It's a medical college - there are, to my knowledge, no other majors there and they run a major medical center. They do not teach IT, and IT is not their core competency. I think in this case, they are trying to fulfill their mission to train medical personnel and the question of who is doing their IT is (no offense meant) only technically different then what company comes to pick up their trash. I don't really know if outsourcing makes sense from a political standpoint, but from the narrow perspective of maximizing your education dollars used to fulfill your stated mission, it is completely rational. If we as a society want to force all government agencies to use only domestic labor and services, that's a reasonable thing. I will point out that most of their computer equipment likely comes from East Asia, all built by East Asians - so drawing the line at services seems somewhat arbitrary.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    40. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a guy who lives in NH, given the frost heaves we deal with, I think the roads are pretty good. What surprises me is how bad the roads in MA are given how much they pay in taxes down there. I can tell to the inch when I'm driving and have crossed the border into MA - the road goes to hell.

    41. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Professor here. Universities also create those internal empires for business reasons: there surely is a lot of ideology in universities, but never underestimate the almighty dollar's ability to trump ideology. The biggest internal empires, and not coincidentally some of the biggest money-makers, are the housing and food domains. These are areas that most governments tend not to tread, but universities often require students to buy food and shelter from them for at least one year: the university, like a totalitarian state, creeps into every aspect of a student's life. The revenue from housing and food (both are now often outsourced to private dorm and catering companies) supposedly pays into the university's general funds. They also provide employment to students (RAs, cashiers, etc), as do many of the other internal empires (secretary in the office of multicultural baskwetweaving, etc), which satisfies a requirement that students work in order to receive tuition reduction. Hospitals are another major internal empire for big schools, and they are ginormous money-makers whose budget offices have, between the cushions of their waiting room couches, multiples of the funds available to the academic wing of the university. Finally, you have empires that exist to employ former students who got their PhDs and never got real jobs in academia or outside: here you have the Diversity Officers and Campus Liaison Officers and other vague titles that cover up how worthless some degrees are, because a bunch of unemployed basketweavers would look bad and reduce applications, which might hurt revenue. Law schools are getting famous for this - it's hard to make it in the world with a law degree nowadays, so some schools are hiring their graduates to avoid having to admit how few of them get real jobs. In the end, somewhere in all that, there are a few professors still, although mostly replaced by non-tenured, lower-paid adjuncts who make less money than an elementary school teacher despite being far more qualified and often teaching more students. The most obvious cost-cutting measure in place is the elimination of actual professorships by attrition - a retiring professor will be replaced by an adjunct with no hope of ever achieving the same pay rate. It's all about the money.

    42. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if they don't offer jobs, then their product (education) is basically a scam?
      Or is it because they are shipping taxpayer's money out of the country?
      Or inherent lack of security of outsourcing infrastructure?

      Take your pick!

    43. Re:Automatic. by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      This is also why California is currently $452 Billion in debt vs Oklahoma's $18 Billion :|
      ( Pssst: Quit spending what you don't have )

    44. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How's this for a good reason? Because the university pays for this with public tax dollars. Public tax dollars should be spent on the US since it came from the US with the express purpose of making the US a better place to live. Instead, they're taking public tax dollars and sending them overseas. Toss in that these sorts of moves typically cost more in the long run, and it also becomes a waste of public tax dollars.

    45. Re:Automatic. by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >Wanna behave like a private company? Get treated like one. No taxpayer soup for you.

      This is America, they are more likely to get INCREASED taxpayer soup by acting like a private company - considering vast chunk of America's taxes that get used to pay favours to big corporations. BP and Wallmart get far more of your taxes than their welfare dependent workers ever did.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    46. Re:Automatic. by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Actually - I would add - that getting to pay workers so little that they need welfare to eat AFTER earning a paycheck - is itself another form of corporate welfare. It's allowing the wallmarts' of America to outsource a huge chunk of their wagebill to taxpayers. Which raises valid questions about whether they are really cheaper - considering that you're paying a chunk of the price difference in taxes so the people who work there can eat.

      No wonder so few businesses can compete with them - the other businesses have to pay their workers a living wage in order to have workers, they don't get to make you pay their wages for them like wallmart does.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    47. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you explain to me why I can't have the cost of living of an Indian?

    48. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you explain to me why they shouldn't they move the jobs abroad?

      You know what? You're right. They should ship those fucking seats abroad. Who gives a shit about society.

      In fact? Why the fuck is society even paying for this "University" bullshit? Fuck that noise. Cut that budget!!

      Free fucking education? Medicare? Tax cuts for you?! Fuck off. Government pays for nothing and charges everyone whatever taxes it like. Why the fuck not? Outsource every job going to India or whatever and use all the money to, I don't know, bomb Russia or build bases on the Moon or make everyone a Stage actor or whatever.

      It'll all work out. The Free Market will find a Bottom eventually.

    49. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most people can't explain it

      Because we haven't been indoctrinated into internalising gross abuses of the Public Trust? Maybe we didn't read enough Ayn Rand books, or spend enough time writing microtransaction Apps, or absorbing the wisdom of the likes of Ken "Just Fuck My Excel Sheet Up" Rogoff on the virtues of burning our children's futures to keep ourselves warm.

      Just kidding. I don't have any children. Neither do a lot of people now away. Outsource away comrade!

    50. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than Oklahoma's if you consider miles of road per person. It's big, so we get a bye on shitty roads? No, bullshit, stop lying.

    51. Re:Automatic. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      This stuff is so clueless. I live in the very low tax state of Tennessee, and our roads are at least as good as California's. Indiana and New Hampshire have horrible freeze/thaw cycles all winter long (I spent my first 30 years living in Indiana) that destroys asphalt. We don't have this here or in CA, and road maintenance is simple in comparison.

      Our sales tax is about what CA's sales tax is but we have no income tax. With proper spending it can work.

    52. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Canada, and believe me, I can tell when I've crossed into the USA. The "Trans-Canada Highway", the equivalent to your interstates, has traffic lights and two-lane highway stretches. Many Canadian cities have side streets that haven't been paved in decades, and guess what? In a freeze-thaw climate, that's long enough you could pick up chunks of the asphalt for souvenirs. New Zealand has country roads where the main highways narrow to single-lane bridges (wait for oncoming traffic to clear) because there's not enough money. Australia, the outback roads have a stick beside them so you can tell when they're flooded how deep the water is, so you don't get swept away.

      You don't know how good your US roads are. I've been to California and what I saw was excellent... just too full of cars.

    53. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure where you live but New Hampshire doesn't have more gravel or dirt roads and no less asphalt than anywhere else. Just like every other state NH doesn't pave and maintain back roads that serve a small number of people which I'm guessing is where you live.

    54. Re:Automatic. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I assure you, I have lived in Cali for several continuous years, and I have the Soup Plantation receipts to prove it."

      Souplantation is an Irvine-area chain restaurant. Now go out into the Inland Empire, away from the beach areas, and tell me the same thing about the roads once you pass the I-10/91/215 junction.

      Several years seems to pale in comparison to my decade+ of life here, and I've driven it all, from San Bernardino down to Imperial county, and everything west.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    55. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To put it more plainly: The University of California are producing CS graduates they don't deem worthy of hiring. Why would anybody else want to hire a CS grad from that university?

    56. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to live in New Hampshire, but I think the difference is the weather; where I was the winters were far harsher than California and did a lot of damage to roads (hence all the frost heaves warning signs in NH!). NH roads require far more frequent repair than a similar road in California.

    57. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California's GDP is approximately $2.4 Trillion.
      Oklahoma's GDP is approximately $180 Billion.

      Using your debt numbers, California's debt to GDP ratio is about 19%. Oklahoma's is about 10%. Hardly what I would call egregious differences.

    58. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most civilized countries gas tax is used to pay for roads. I doubt it's any different in California. Paying for road upkeep with capital gains, income tax or VAT would be a little silly :)

    59. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison labor? What have YOU been smoking? Yes, there have been times when low-security prisoners were used to clean up the mess the taxpayers leave - filling garbage trucks per mile - but the roads are built by private contractors and it's been some time since prisoners were even used for cleanup on any scale.

      OTOH, Calif does rate well into the lower half for road quality and top 10 for traffic congestion in the US, mainly because the gas taxes (state and federal) that pay for maintenance and repairs haven't been adjusted for inflation in over 20 years so there's little money to do more than pothole patches. Band-aids for the finances have been used, but they are pretty much all worn off and no more are coming. Besides, it's more fun to build new stuff when a short spurt of money comes around than to fix up what's there. And it's easier to do; one recent reconstruction job (on a 50-year-old freeway), that as a new project would have taken perhaps 2-3 years to build, actually took almost 6 because of the need to keep traffic moving (poorly) while the old road was essentially demolished and replaced (adding a lane and fixing ramps, too).

      Oh yes, regarding the gravel roads, several rural counties in CA have started "de-paving" roads converting them to gravel. Roads with little traffic are cheaper to maintain by blading them a couple of times a year than by patching potholes continuously. Nothing wrong with that.

      Now what's the connection between this and a state-supported university (UC) outsourcing existing US jobs to India?

    60. Re:Automatic. by twotacocombo · · Score: 2

      I think it's fair to say that California has a well maintained road network for its size,

      The interstates are generally well maintained. The freeways in and around the LA/OC area are a fucking travesty. Potholes everywhere. Some roads are crumbling and coming apart in chunks. They only fix the worst of the worst, and it takes them several years to get to it. I work in the north SFV area, and I've only seen them repave 4 streets in the ~5 miles around my office in the last decade, and only just recently. Meanwhile, the freeways are constantly "under construction" but you rarely see them working on them, even late at night. They like to start 15 projects, tear everything to shit, then spend the next 6 years slowly putting one of them back together. For such a car-centric metro area, our roads are in a totally unacceptable level of disrepair. This isn't New Hampshire, this is Car City USA. Fix the fucking roads. And don't even get me started on the sidewalks.

    61. Re:Automatic. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The President of UC that came up with this idea is Janet Napolitano and is hardly a member of team Trump.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    62. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Does it? Depends on what the laid off people do.

    63. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely they already did lose state funding and this is how they're trying to save money.

      States have been cutting into higher ed. for a long time now and the politicians who make the cuts use the increased tuition fees that result as means to fund the universities even less.

    64. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Hi, I've asked about H1-B issues before and gotten a similarly low quality of responses. I appreciate your taking the time to give me a thoughtful response on a question I have had. I like your policy proposals as well.

    65. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      hmm, I'm not seeing it.

      I don't get the scam thing. I'd say a system that relies on employing your own students is far more of a scam. I'd love to see universities employ the best person for the job, regardless of nation of origin.

      If their students don't get hired, I'd say it is on the prospective students to notice that. No, I'd support helping them see that, but that's where I think you're most likely to see a good response to low employment outcomes.

      As for cost cutting, as a student or parent I appreciate a university trying to recuse its costs--they cost way too much. If there are other opportunities, they should take advantage of all of them. But athletics are a huge revenue source for universities. It's the #1 source for my state's biggest university, ahead of the state itself.

      I don't get your internal empire comment. Are you saying that they lose money on them? Because I highly doubt that but I'd be open to seeing information about that. If they make money on them, then, presumably, you see that they would have less money after cutting them.

    66. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Fucktard, National Parks are paid for by the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. You mean STATE PARKS.

    67. Re:Automatic. by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      While I have driven in NH roads and not Cali, a small point to make. Cali is huge, while NH is tiny. I would expect the northern portion of Cali roads to be worse than the south part, just like NH is far north of most of Cali. Frost and frost heave destroy roads, particularly those without enough gravel base. It is the gravel base that prevents the asphalt from flexing too much and breaking apart. Up here in Canada, a lot of gravel base needs to be used otherwise the lifespan of a highway won't be very long. I've seen examples in Cali that use almost none, though I expect that is in the south. It is so long N/S that they probably have to use graduated standards from top to bottom so to speak. As a whole all NH roads would be subject to much more severe winter weather than Cali. Anyway to quote that song from a few years ago from Megan Trainor, its all about the base.

    68. Re:Automatic. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Wow, just wow, he said "institutional knowledge" in a thread about in house IT, with considerable institutional history getting replaced by H1B!

      With students you wind up with a significant amount of churn and lose said knowledge.

      as opposed to temporary H1B's that are issued 3 years at a shot?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    69. Re:Automatic. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Oklahoma has low taxes, and that's about all it has. What good is cheap if it's absolutely worthless?

      No most Cali expats in IT move to Austin TX Area.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    70. Re:Automatic. by WDot · · Score: 1

      Maybe undergrads (there are undergraduate IT workers in my school), but I doubt grad students. Grad students' measure of success is their publications, and you don't get many publications through systems administration.

    71. Re:Automatic. by swb · · Score: 1

      This isn't about the University not wanting to hire its own graduates, its about the University wanting to hire cheap foreigners for careers it trains students in.

      Prospective students already have spoken about low employment outcomes, and flocked to high wage education tracks like business, law and engineering. This is why the entire liberal arts faculty shares the 2 oldest and worst buildings on campus and business, law and engineering have giant, new buildings.

      I would question just how profitable "college" athletics actually is if it took into account hidden subsidies from the rest of the University, like security, sub-rate bonding authority, management and so on. I think college athletics economics are funny money, structured to show a "profit" by showing lots of high-profile income while masking quiet subsidies they obtain from the larger institution in the form of facilities, utilities and other ancillary services they obtain at discounts that only exist because they're necessary for the operation of the larger entity.

      The internal empire refers to the internal administrators. How is a University administrator judged? Ultimately by the size of the departments, programs and staff they manage. They have an incentive to grow the areas and budgets which they manage as it increases their apparent abilities and responsibilities. None of these areas they control show profit-loss. And this same perverse motivation works up and down the staff.

      The person hired to administer a specific program may have been hired to administer the program as the sole employee responsible. Well, they decide they could administer it better if they had a student worker. So their budget is increased to accommodate a student worker. Now their work space is too small, so they gain additional budget to take over adjacent office space. They find they could be even more efficient with a full-time employee rather than a cyclical student employee, but since student employment is considered a good, they get a FTE and a student employee. Now they have excess labor, so they sell their boss on expanding their program to include more services, presumably because it will provide better service to under-served segments. In the next budget cycle they petition for more office equipment or office space to perform the task more efficiently. Soon they find that they need more labor.

      Ad nauseum, until they now control an empire, an entity with a substantial budget, office space, equipment and broad multi-service program (and likely ill-defined and overlapping with another empire, elsewhere on campus) that begins to be taken for granted. Nobody really questions what its purpose is anymore, and like any good bureaucracy, it's growth is beneficial to the people up the ladder who get to count ALL the budgets, facilities and employees as part of THEIR administration. Nobody loses by growing, everybody wins, and there is no financial accountability.

    72. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound Indian.

    73. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're part of the problem, not the solution. You're just like those Mexican hating Mexicans who bitch about the illegals coming over when they did the same thing. You're a hypocrite.

    74. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because those foreign corps have no interests here besides money. They do not get to suffer the fallout of their bad practices and they do not have to care about the unemployed people who are affected. These unemployed folks are the ones I have to worry about stealing my stuff. The unemployed Indian stealing stuff in India from other Indians does not affect me. That's their problem.

    75. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, many universities do use profit/loss accounting in dividing up funding between departments. I worked at a large, state university that looked at the amount of funding coming in (tuition from students) and going out (salaries to professors, research costs, lab fees, etc). The classics department had a phenomenally good income (many students in general-requirement large lecture classes, that more than balanced out the smaller classes for its own grad students and the few people actually majoring in ancient languages) and almost no expenses beyond a few cheap salaries (certainly no materials or lab costs) of which some salaries were paid out of internal department funds (big donors endowed chairs). The administrators loved them, because they were a massive profit center for the university. That's why you see so much of the humanities getting big bucks, while engineering suffers: the humanities are profit centers, while engineering departments often cost more to operate.

    76. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point.

      WE. The us taxpayer pays that university to educate people to a level capable of doing 'job'.

      They have failed at that so completely by their own admission.

      So why are WE paying them still? They're not doing what we paid them to do.

      Bad deal...

    77. Re:Automatic. by psmoot · · Score: 1

      For fun, I looked up the UC budget. Something like 10-15% comes direct from the state (10% state general funds, 4% UC general funds, whatever that is). Tuition is around 11%.

      Most of the money comes from "Medical Centers" and "Other sales and services", that's a hair north of 40%.

      I had absolutely no idea. I thought state general funding would be over 50% of the budget. You learn something new every day.

      http://www.ucop.edu/operating-...

    78. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microscope: If there is an equivalent option made in the USA, yes. Can you show me an example? Very hard if not impossible because microscopes have already been off-shored.

      Paper: If there is an equivalent option made in the USA, yes. Can you show me an example? Very hard if not impossible because paper has already been off-shored.

      Steele: Same thing.

      Microprocessors: Same thing.

      I don't agree with absolute protectionism but I also don't agree with absolute globalism either. Both can and either have caused or are causing major problems for the USA and other nations. The government and all of its subsidiaries, including institutions that accept federal/state money, should be working in the best interests of those that pay those federal/state funds. The payer isn't the government itself - it is the people.

      One thing I've learned through many examples I've experienced personally or witnessed in my life is this: One MUST always help themselves before they can help others. This isn't entirely selfish. If you spend your efforts helping others first, sooner or later you won't be able to help yourself anymore. At that point you can't help others either. As a nation, the USA and many others are not helping themselves first. I sure want to help other nations rise up and be equals with the powerful economies of the world. However, like both Winthorp AND Billy Ray, I've no interest in simply 'Trading Places'.

      Captcha: Kiloton. Reminds me of a saying I'll have to paraphrase: "The most dangerous nations have a powerful military and a weak economy at home." The USA has the most powerful military on the planet and its economy is weak at home. We continue to offshore so global business interests can stay competitive in the short/medium term. The more we off-shore, the weaker the economy gets. Draw your own conclusions but these conditions can, have and will foreshadow revolts and wars.

    79. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can agree with your mugger example. However, that doesn't really fit with the GP's statement. To give another example, and to speak for the GP (I apologize), consider:

      1.) Business: That is the mob boss
      2.) Government: That is the extortion enforcer
      3.) Tax-payer: That is the person/business being extorted.

      If the government has effectively been turned into an enforcer of business interest through lobbying/bought and paid for legislation (business does write a good deal of the significant bills that come up for a vote and can assumed to be subject to extortion themselves), who is the worst villain? I don't excuse the 'enforcer' but I absolutely blame the 'boss'.

      In your mugger example, you listed no 'boss' and if there was none, then you are correct - it was entirely the mugger. However, the mugger, when it comes to tax cuts and larger issues, wasn't acting alone - the 'mugger' was the agent of the 'boss'. So, the 'boss', ie: business, allowed you to keep some money - government was following orders lest they ruin their career/'get shot in the head by 'Tony'. Follow the money. The trail doesn't stop with government - it continues to who funds elections and that is big (global) business, rich people and large labor organizations which are slowly dying.

    80. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Who says they failed? Maybe their grads have better options.

    81. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Do universities have accountant geniuses who can hide a huge loss as a huge gain for athletics or are they total morons and can't figure out that some dean is building an empire of ditch diggers / fillers in?

    82. Re:Automatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... if you are right, that "creator of wealth" should be able do to the same anywhere...

      ...And so you've explained one of the major reasons for the mass exodus of industries from the US over the past few decades.

    83. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      but, my original question was, "Can you explain to me why they shouldn't they move the jobs abroad?" and you said, "... they are selling a product ("an education") in which the very promise is vocational advancement. Yet their own actions demonstrate they are selling a product which doesn't actually do what it claims." I replied, "I don't get the scam thing. I'd say a system that relies on employing your own students is far more of a scam. I'd love to see universities employ the best person for the job, regardless of nation of origin." and you came back with "This isn't about the University not wanting to hire its own graduates, its about the University wanting to hire cheap foreigners for careers it trains students in." Would this be just as scandalous if Stanford hired MIT grads? What is wrong with foreigners wanting to have a job?

    84. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      In my view society includes foreigners and we are all one people.

    85. Re:Automatic. by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Is that a terrible thing to be?

  4. surprise surprise by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    My surprise is that anyone is still surprised. Since the dawn of any kind of technology, people you didn't expect have taken it for the purpose of achieving the same thing that you have achieve - financial gain and security. Whether it's a person, company, university, or country. Is it really surprising that all of our innovations around knowledge work, IT, etc are being consumed by other more eager people to find jobs that they can fill for lower cost than we desire?? If anything, the new part of it is the kind of jobs that are at stake, but even that's not worth reacting to.

    1. Re:surprise surprise by coofercat · · Score: 1

      I am surprised by this, actually.

      I'm not American, but I'm wondering what sort of University is this? Does it not have any students that need jobs to pay for their excessive drinking? Do none of them want a few hours a week working on the support desk or fixing up desktops? It may just be something that happens in other countries, but learning some related-but-not-exactly-what-you-want-to-do-with-your-life skills can be useful (and probably more useful than learning how to flip burgers or tend a bar), even if you're not getting paid what you would when you graduate.

      As for everything else, I realise Unis aren't charities, but as they get some/all of their money from the government, they should probably be following the intent of the government. As I understand it, your new government is trying to stop outsourcing being quite so cheap/easy, so I wonder if this decision will be reversed in the coming weeks after some PR work by the uni involved...?

    2. Re:surprise surprise by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The President of the university is Janet Napoliano, the former US Attorney General under President Obama, she's probably not to concerned with Trump's agenda other than to oppose in anyway she can. Strangely her salary as President of UC is larger than Obama's or Trump's as President of the US.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  5. Senator Feinstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Senator Feinstein heal thyself! H1-B increase after H1-B increase.

  6. $5.83 Billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the federal .gov was really concerned about improving things internally, surely this would impact the GDP of the country in some way, .e.g. dollars out of country, rather than cirulating within it.... unless the savings outweigh the GDP benefits, they should clamp down on international outsourcing ... Just Saying ;)

  7. "lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Nutria · · Score: 3, Funny

    Working in IT, I'm not too thrilled by this, but that one statement shows a complete lack of thought.

    To paraphrase not-Everett Dirksen, "A tenth of a percent here, a tenth of a percent there, pretty soon you're talking real savings."

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by iCEBaLM · · Score: 0

      Until you realize that 0.1% on $5.83 billion is $58.3 million. That's not chump change.

    2. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're doing all this to save six fucking million dollars. are they building a lee majors we don't know about?

      just have the balls to raise the 'technology fee' by like $50 a semester and eliminate some actual justifiable frivolous expenditures. done.

    3. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Steffan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Until you realize that 0.1% on $5.83 billion is $58.3 million. That's not chump change.

      0.1% of $5.83 Billion is actually $5.83 Million. Closer to chump change in a nearly-$6 Billion budget.

    4. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      0.1% of $5.83 Billion is actually $5.83 Million. Closer to chump change in a nearly-$6 Billion budget.

      It's barely even a rounding error, but look at how many American workers will bite the dust for this shameless bullshit. It's an epic fuck-up by the university on every level.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by ghoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most times outsourcing is not done for saving costs (that just the excuse). its done because the current team has become too set in its ways and pissed off one too many administrator.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    6. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Working in IT, I'm not too thrilled by this, but that one statement shows a complete lack of thought.

      That's nothing. I worked for a Fortune 500 company that demanded that the help desk providers provide twice the performance for half the cost. When a provider couldn't deliver, they gave the contract to a different provider. Each time the help desk staff got smaller and smaller. When I checked several years ago, they still haven't achieved twice the performance for half the cost after turning over providers three or four times.

    7. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Nutria · · Score: 1

      It's barely a rounding error in the nearly-$6bn budget, but individual departments don't care about the nearly-$6bn budget. They care about their own little budget.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    8. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All other things being equal enough, paying one group of people a high wage when a different group of people will do the same work for a low wage would be irrational.

      If the security of your job depends in your employer continuing to make irrational decisions, then you absolutely should re-think your strategy.

      Lobbying the government to make it force your employer to continue acting against his own best interest only works if you are a member of the elite wealthy. You are much more likely to succeed if you simply find a different employer, or a different line of work.

      There is no moral obligation to favor local jobs over more distant jobs. It's all just people either way.

      Seriously, adapt or die.

    9. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      "All other things being equal enough". Who gets to decide?

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    10. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by dbIII · · Score: 2

      its done because the current team has become too set in its ways and pissed off one too many administrator.

      That's typically the bullshit excuse used to implement a fad read about in Forbes and outsource to a bunch feeding off that fad.
      If it really is the case that the management thinks the current team is too set in its ways then either whoever leads or manages the team is given instructions to change or is replaced by someone who will implement changes.
      A radical move just because "one too many administrator is pissed off" is a sign of poor management and that administrator is doomed to be very frequently pissed off.

      I'm not speaking from ignorance, I've been part of a team that came in after the "new broom" went through a few times because a contracting company I worked for did that kind of stuff. It's wasteful and expensive and typically could be done with just a few key staff along with nearly all of the old bunch instead of a group of expensive contractors. Why pay hundreds per hour for something the original bunch could be doing while the contractors are doing the new stuff? After I'd changed a few systems, added some more and devised new workflows the bunch that was brought in to keep things running after the "cleanout" may as well have been the old bunch as far as their qualifications and capabilities went. All they really needed were some contractors to come in for a couple of months to set up what was missing and show them how to use it.


      If you think a team is crap you get a new coach.

    11. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by dbIII · · Score: 1

      BTW weren't you claiming to work for an Australian Coal mine

      Resource exploration including coal - something that requires a shitload of computing power.
      Why the fuck are you following me around? What is your problem and why and you using me as your scratching post today?

    12. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Crashmarik · · Score: 0

      BTW weren't you claiming to work for an Australian Coal mine

      Resource exploration including coal - something that requires a shitload of computing power.
      Why the fuck are you following me around? What is your problem and why and you using me as your scratching post today?

      Don't try to pull that crap. You post a load of b.s. in a thread expect to be called on it.

    13. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by dbIII · · Score: 0

      So I've picked up a petty bully who wants to spam me into silence.
      Do you do balloon animals too Pogo?

    14. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as an impartial observer, you do appear to be stalking this man. It is creepy.

    15. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, works for Wal-Mart and Sears, too. (and Macys). It's amazing how much money you can save by eliminating half the staff and paying less. People have to spend that money somewhere, and if there's no competition, they'll still spend it with you.

      the problem is that "bodies at desks" does not equal "job done". That takes talent to manage and talent to perform the job, whether it's retail or IT. Good old bureaucracy. I've worked with morons in IT who struggled for days with a problem that could be solved in half an hour. Guess what? They got paid the same as the guy who could fix it in half an hour. When morale tanked, the ones who quit and moved on were the young bright ones. The morons stayed. Some of us good ones stayed because after 20 years, with a pension only 10 years away, it made no sense to go. I got my pension now. Guess what? Pension is no longer an issue in the industry, thanks to cost-cutting. Management tactics have only helped motivate job mobility.

    16. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does almost nothing to an overall budget... So it won't alter anything there.

      But it DOES make a tidy sum for the pockets of the small handful who set that all up, who have this "savings bonus" they're about to give themselves for a job well done.

    17. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, maybe you need to go back to school or outsource your maths. .1% of 5.83 billion is only $583,000.00, not $5.83 Million. $5.83 Million would be 1%

    18. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by sexconker · · Score: 1

      As an impartial observer, you do appear to be correct in calling dbill out on his bullshit.
      And no, it's not stalking or bullying to recall some bullshit someone posted when you see their username come up again.

    19. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct response is not "We can't deliver", it's "You are a fucking moron, and I will inform your stakeholders as much."

    20. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      The floggings will continue until morale improves.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    21. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ironic. I've heard that people from India are good at maths though so probably no biggie.

    22. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Cause you usually lose your shit and fly off the handle when I call you out. It happens frequently.

    23. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The correct response is not "We can't deliver", it's "You are a fucking moron, and I will inform your stakeholders as much."

      The stakeholders were the ones who were driving this nonsense.

    24. Re:"lower their annual ... budget by just 0.1%" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and what was the cause of said administrator being pissed off? Was it:
      1.) Fast/Good/Cheap - administrator refused to (or couldn't) pick two?
      2.) Scope Creep - Administrator refused to police this or allow the IT staff to police this?
      3.) Failure to understand that technology functions based on logic rather than emotion/personal ambition of said administrator?
      4.) Other that isn't necessarily the fault of the administrator of of the IT staff such as budget changes, other more senior administrators?
      5.) CYA/Blame Game? (IE: technical reality couldn't and was never able to hide item 1-4?)

      Basically, outsourcing is a consequence of Napoleon Complex/Tiny Dick Syndrome/God Complex on the part of the administrator(s) you mentioned? Is that what you meant to say? Have you considered that the 'current team', 'set in its ways', is so because they have been their done that many times before? Perhaps, as distasteful as it may be, they are trying to avoid repeating the mistake of the past and sometimes that means having a willingness to say no to power? Maybe the IT staff the administrators hate are tasked with delivering systems that directly conflict with one another and said pissed off administrator 'just' asked some stupid dashboard that 'just' gives specific information they need that depends on someone else providing other information they refuse to provide? These people of course don't talk to each other, they communicate through the IT people who are now messengers that get shot - have you considered that? Sure, an outsourcing firm may just say yes, but is that the answer you really needed or it is the answer you merely though you wanted? Re-framing the argument makes it no more or less accurate - both perspectives are but what is the actually goal?.

      I know you are correct in many cases - some teams ARE like that - they just drag feet for no reason and act as a barrier. That isn't always the case though. Systems involve technology, networks, people, politics and all sorts of other stuff most of which is crap and none of it is entirely the responsibility of any single group. When a company off-shores or outsources, there are often good reasons (dedicated expertise, offloading liability, cost, etc.,...). When a company makes a technical decision that costs technical jobs (or any jobs for that matter) because a non-technical person ignored/doesn't understand options factors 1-5, that person, the person who hired/continues to employ them on up the chain can go fuck themselves.

  8. Will lower their budget? Nope by maugle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The university's actions will ultimately lower their annual $5.83 billion budget by just 0.1%.

    It doesn't take a fortune teller to see how this will end. Anyone with experience with low-cost offshore replacements knows that after the painful transition and a slow degradation of IT performance (with all the slowness, bugs, and embarrassing security breaches that come with it), the fallout of the university's decision will ultimately cost a hell of a lot more to fix than what is saved up front.

    1. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      you left out the best part, where identity information from the University systems are sold to scammers, spammers, etc.

    2. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $5.83 billion. That is more than the GDP of some countries. Why the fucking fuck is it so high? It isn't for salaries if 20% of staff only amounts to 0.1% of the budget, assuming the Indian IT gets paid $0.0000000001 per hour.

    3. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft. It will cost the new students. Don't worry though, its California, the new students can take out second student loans to cover it.

    4. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5.83B is the total university budget.
      Outsourcing 20% of the IT staff saves 6M

      Numbers make more sense now? Very little of the total budget is spent on IT payroll.

      * The CEO of UCSF's Medical Center says he expects their security to be at least as good as it is now, but acknowledges "there are no guarantees."
      -- Are there ever guarantees? Meaningless.
      * Nine workers have filed a complaint with the state's Department of Fair Employment and Housing arguing they're facing discrimination.
      -- Good luck. If they were hiring in country H1B you might have a case but outsourcing is settled.
      * California Senator Feinstein is already complaining that the university is tapping $8.5 billion in federal funding "to replace Californian IT workers with foreign workers or labor performed abroad."
      -- This is Feinstein, not believing she is telling the whole truth here. What is the federal money for? If it is for training people and securing systems then we have a problem. If it is a general university funding handout, no issue.
      * Representative Zoe Lofgren (from a district in Silicon Valley) is arguing that the university "is training software engineers at the same time they're outsourcing their own software engineers. What message are they sending their own students?"
      -- Exactly the right one. That is how things work, be ready.
      * 57-year-old Sys-admin Kurt Ho says his replacement spent just two days with him, then "told me he would go back to India and train his team, and would be sending me emails with questions."
      -- Ominous, the only real point in this list.
      * The university's actions will ultimately lower their annual $5.83 billion budget by just 0.1%.
      -- see above

    5. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1

      By which time the people who made the decision will have used it's short-term side effects as proof of their "skill", and moved on to higher-paying jobs. Patterns like this occur again and again and again across the US, because our culture and laws are broken. The warpage is so entrenched that it won't change until the whole thing collapses.

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    6. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      In our department - fortunately somewhat north of California - the vast majority of the total salary expenses (95% when I last checked a couple years ago) go towards faculty salaries. But those are basically sacrosanct... so trying to save even a small percentage of the overall salary budget requires significant cuts to staff levels.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, the Regent who approved this doing well after it, one way or the other. I'm sure they've figured out how to make it worth his while to approve the contract while trying to keep things above the board, understanding all the legal time limits, etc.

      Yes, I'm anonymously impugning his character and integrity.

    8. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm retired from UC. Three decades on salary, with an average ~60 work week...
      The asshat who is implementing this is Joe R. Bengfort, ex-Dell, ex-Perot. He was brought into UC specifically for his skills in downsizing and outsourcing. UCSF is just the start.
      Most of the folks at UC are actually pretty good at what they do, except for the usual vermin that gravitate to HR. But the Board Of Regents... never has such foul excuses for Humanity were ever gathered together for the sole purpose of personal plunder; a tradition a century in the making. What those bastards have done to the once exemplary Retirement System... and those that stood up and complained were swiftly not only "Let Go", but Blackballed, (Patricia Smalls).
      Although much of the damage has been historically done by Republican appointees, (Connerly), Feinstein's ethically-challenged husband, Richard Blum, is currently serving a second term, which goes far in explaining her silence on the issue.

    9. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by L4m3rthanyou · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, this is still an improvement over the current state of affairs, in which identity information of University students/faculty/staff is somewhat regularly distributed to scammers and spammers free of charge.

      --
      One of these days, I'm going to cut you into little pieces.
    10. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Higaran · · Score: 1

      You forget that someone at the university will probably get the exact same amount saved, as their, or added to their bonus next year.

    11. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution: Jail-time for security breach for top leaders and key decisionmakers.

    12. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      If I worked in that IT department, I would make sure they knew I would be willing to come back and fix things as a contractor @ $250 / hour. :D

    13. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. If you work at a US university, it is paying at least half of all salary to administration, and that share is growing every year.

    14. Re:Will lower their budget? Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. If you work at a US university, it is paying at least half of all salary to administration, and that share is growing every year.

      He said "In our department", so he's talking about a narrow slice of the University and is probably being accurate for that narrow case. I find his comment misleading for that reason so I agree with your "I call bullshit".

  9. Screw outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Budget should be 75% lower. For the benefit of a very few, jobs in OUR country are being given to foreigners. It's disgusting.
    If the US dealt with the outsourcing problem as the root of all other monetary issues, there would be enough available jobs for everybody in the states.
    How greedy can corps get? They sacrifice our jobs so that they can pay a foreigner often half the cost. These are multi million/billion dollar corporations, yet they're the actual root of the problem. Make outsourcing so damn expensive, that corporations can ONLY lose a shit-ton of money.

  10. I'm no fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm no fan of Donald Trump, but I wonder if anyone has gotten this on the president elect's radar. With all the noise he has been making about saving jobs being shipped over sears, maybe he would apply some pressure to the situation.

    1. Re:I'm no fan by sysrammer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For California? A blue state? The Donald has a well-known penchant for vengeance. I expect that any benefits for Cal. will be a side-effect of policies benefiting one of his or his crony's businesses.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  11. They hate us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why make a huge move that requires training a large amount people, cause huge amount of political strife, and barely save any money. The answer is obvious: they hate Americans.

  12. Napolitano is the UC President? by aaronb1138 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Color me shocked! Shocked I say. It blows my mind she has an entire history built around how amazing she is to hold so many high positions as a woman, but it doesn't take much work to see, it's a history of failures and exceptional levels of mediocrity. I don't know why the democratic party an their insiders keep backing her and getting her jobs.

    1. Re:Napolitano is the UC President? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that this originated at the top level of UC management, but President Napolitano can squash it like a bug.

    2. Re:Napolitano is the UC President? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as far as politicians go, she's pretty good. The reason you can't tell is because everyone is so incompetent, corrupt, and awful that it is hard for most people to make these comparisons.

    3. Re:Napolitano is the UC President? by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      For the same reason they backed Hillary, who also had a history of failures.

      (Tokenism)

  13. chicom philosopher sezz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a few dead ducks propose no quack economic medicine . How many is a few cement-booted globalists? Count the outsourcers yachts at Marira Del Rey and you'll have your answer. Good hunting sez that chicom guru to Ca. nationalists!

  14. What about globalism? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Shouldn't be any discussion about this. If a UNIVERSITY is outsourcing. They should instantly lose all federal and state funding.

    Wanna behave like a private company? Get treated like one. No taxpayer soup for you.

    It's a fine position, but how about the rest of the debate?

    California was four-square against the recent election outcome, which was in large part *against* globalism. Lots and lots of supporters here and in the MSM were arguing the benefits of this sort of thing from every viewpoint. Some people lose their jobs, but the economy prospers overall. Those jobs are never coming back. We'll be losing all of them to AI anyway.

    California is so much against the populist uprising that they are implementing sanctuary cities (and sanctuary universities), giving illegal immigrants drivers licenses and the ability to vote, and generally planning to oppose any new federal mandates and changes (such as deportation of illegals).

    And yes, it's the California cities which are [politically] deep blue, while the rest is generally red.

    So how does this position fit into the rest of the debate? How can one show outrage over this situation and still support the [generally accepted as] liberal Californian viewpoint which embraces globalism?

    1. Re:What about globalism? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      the recent election outcome, which was in large part *against* globalism.

      You stupid sonofabitch. Do you really think this election was about globalism?

      http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/28/...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      And just to go along with your super coherent debate style, you stupid son of a bitch.

      Because apparently that strengthens one;s argument. Or something....

    3. Re: What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I encourage everybody to move out of California. And people are moving out. It will be interesting to see what tax base they will use to pay all their retired overpaid state workers.

    4. Re:What about globalism? by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      giving illegal immigrants drivers licenses and the ability to vote

      Just like the old days when your grandpa came over, only he wouldn't have been called illegal unless he was Chinese.
      California can't stop them and the Feds are not even trying so why not accept reality instead of fucking about. Those cut-price illegal workers the Republicans love to have babysitting their kids need to drive to do their below minimum wage work so they are allowed licences no matter who is Governor of the state. Decades of government constipation on the issue has just resulted in millions of quasi-citizens who have neither been turned back or made citizens. It's been going on for so long that they are citizens in all but name, plus California used to be part of Mexico FFS so what the fuck is the problem?

    5. Re:What about globalism? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      plus California used to be part of Mexico FFS so what the fuck is the problem?

      This part of your rant is irrelevant. People don't get to automatically become citizens just because their home nation used to own some land, centuries ago, that is now owned by some other nation. I'm pretty sure citizens of Belgium do not get to automatically become citizens of the Netherlands if they wish it, just because Belgium used to be part of the Netherlands centuries ago. Citizens of Italy sure as hell don't get to automatically become citizens of England just because the Roman Empire used to own Britain 2000 years ago.

      The people who lived in California at the time the US took it over from Mexico became US citizens at that time. Anyone else, from parts of Mexico much farther south, ~175 years later, are not part of that deal.

      Your other points make some sense, but this one is just dumb. The only thing that's relevant is modern borders, not borders from centuries ago. Mexico used to be the property of Spain. Should Spanish citizens get automatic Mexican citizenship if they decide to move there? Or should Spanish citizens get automatic US citizenship if they move to New Orleans?

    6. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, dummy. That's what MAGA was focused on. Making America great. Not pouring money and infrastructure and jobs into other countries like has been going on for the past 20 years now. Imagine that, a gov't actually saying it's going to focus on improving conditions for its own citizens. Somehow, in bizzaro world, this is portrayed as a bad thing.

      Now, whether or not it actually comes to pass is another story, but it's the advertised feature of Trump's election and why he was voted in. Clinton, on the other hand, told you right up front that she'd be for more of the status-quo.

      When given a slim chance of improvement vs no chance, I'll go for slim every time.

    7. Re:What about globalism? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      This part of your rant is irrelevant.

      So ignore it. It's a throwaway line about things changing over time and nothing more.

    8. Re:What about globalism? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only person that called it that. I also use communist news network

    9. Re: What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by 'citizens' you mean billionaires, then yes, there is hope for improvement.

    10. Re:What about globalism? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      giving illegal immigrants drivers licenses and the ability to vote

      Just like the old days when your grandpa came over, only he wouldn't have been called illegal unless he was Chinese.
      California can't stop them and the Feds are not even trying so why not accept reality instead of fucking about. Those cut-price illegal workers the Republicans love to have babysitting their kids need to drive to do their below minimum wage work so they are allowed licences no matter who is Governor of the state. Decades of government constipation on the issue has just resulted in millions of quasi-citizens who have neither been turned back or made citizens. It's been going on for so long that they are citizens in all but name, plus California used to be part of Mexico FFS so what the fuck is the problem?

      It's really amazing just how much talking out your ass in this thread are you going to do ? First I see you making crap up about a fmr sec def's academics now I just see you pulling crap out of your ass completely. But lets look at it, if you came here in the 1800s and were Irish you got your citizenship more likely than not by fighting in the Civil War. If you came here in the early 20th century you had to go through naturalization.

      In either case you didn't get welfare benefits or the right to vote without actually becoming a citizen.

      So as I read down am I going to find more of you pulling shit out your ass ?

    11. Re:What about globalism? by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      If you can convince the Israelis of that you could win the Nobel Peace Prize...

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
    12. Re:What about globalism? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Apparently you're not allowed to read comments on articles he posts senseless shit on from what I see

    13. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spain has this deal with Argentina

    14. Re: What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baloney. All of New England, WA, OR, CO, NM and others are deep blue. All that happened in this election is Trump motivated the racists and mysogynists to come out. You can read the UMass study that proves this...

    15. Re:What about globalism? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      The easy fix for California's arrogance is this:

      Turn off Federal Funding for the entire State until they decide to play ball.
      If not, they can fund their little Utopia on their own.

      They'll defiantly hold out until the next disaster shows up, then they'll be
      begging for Federal Aid and blame everyone else when no Federal Funds
      are dumped on them.

      To be honest, that fix works for ANY State that decides not to play the
      game according to the rules. Only those States that have a budget surplus
      and don't require Federal Funding are immune to it. ( Which are few, if any )

    16. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > giving illegal immigrants...the ability to vote

      Holy shit, where do you get this crap?

    17. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, CNN, the people who claimed that Trump using the word "globalism" was somehow anti-Semitic?

    18. Re:What about globalism? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's more complicated than that. They basically bought up some land after WWI, and also were given some (as I understand), by the British, who had won control of all of that area formerly owned by the Ottoman Empire which lost the war to them. They didn't just move into some place and then demand citizenship from the nation currently governing it; they took it over through various legal means. That's not *that* different from how the US took over California: it won a war against Mexico, and also I believe paid them out a lot as part of the terms of the treaty ending the war.

      Like it or not, but winning land in a war and also buying it are valid ways of acquiring territory that other people are already living on. If you disagree, look at Crimea and the world's (non-)response to its recent takeover by Russia. And takeovers which happened generations ago are done now; if you want to question them now, after so long, then almost every spot on Earth is now able to be contested, because it was previously owned by someone else.

    19. Re:What about globalism? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's fine if two nations want to negotiate such a deal on their own. EU member have negotiated a less drastic deal wherein any EU citizen is able to go work in any other EU nation without having to be a citizen or apply for a visa or anything like that, like normal immigrants would. But no person can *expect* this of a nation which hasn't already agreed to such a deal.

    20. Re:What about globalism? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When given a slim chance of improvement vs no chance, I'll go for slim every time.

      Thou hath been useful peasant, now get thee back to thine hovel.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    21. Re:What about globalism? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Get a room, you two.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the future they chose :p

      I can live with this.

    23. Re:What about globalism? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      That's been recently changed to Comedy News Network after the lefts tantrum over Trump.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    24. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who lived in California at the time the US took it over from Mexico became US citizens at that time. Anyone else, from parts of
      Mexico much farther south, ~175 years later, are not part of that deal.

      Love that "took it over", you mean took it, or in other words fuck you Mexico this is ours now.

    25. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People don't get to automatically become citizens just because their home nation used to own some land, centuries ago..."

      Wasn't that the entire basis for Israel's claim to exist?

    26. Re: What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I encourage them to stay in California, PLEASE! Far, far too many of them leave California and then promptly start working to turn their new state of residence into California.

    27. Re:What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unlike everything you wrote.

    28. Re:What about globalism? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only person that called it that. I also use communist news network

      No all the False News Site followers I know call it that. His point might have been more impressive if he went over to Fox and cherry-picked something Geraldo said though.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    29. Re:What about globalism? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Or should Spanish citizens get automatic US citizenship if they move to New Orleans?

      I think that French should be there, not Spanish.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    30. Re: What about globalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you had to rephrase took it over ? He already said acquired by war. Do you just constantly have to prove you are more SJW than everyone else ?

    31. Re:What about globalism? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, Spanish is correct, though putting French in here would also be correct. The French founded the city in 1718, but it went to Spain in 1763, then back to France very briefly in 1803 until Napoleon sold it to the US as part of the Louisiana Purchase.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    32. Re:What about globalism? by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I was just reading an article that seemed to show that California is a net contributor to the federal budget. So your plan would backfire here in that they would be better off keeping the money and either reducing their taxes or increasing the amount they can spend. The additional danger of your suggestion is that it could result in individual states sorting themselves out and taking the additional steps to secede from the union. I mean if you've already cut them out of the union fiscally how do you expect to retain their loyalty?

  15. Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Representative Zoe Lofgren (from a district in Silicon Valley) is arguing that the university "is training software engineers at the same time they're outsourcing their own software engineers. What message are they sending their own students?"

    Same message as the law schools: "We're happy to take your money. If you can't find a job after you graduate, tough shit. You should have thought carefully about your major's future potential before taking on $100K in student loans."

    1. Re:Schools are corporations too... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Representative Zoe Lofgren (from a district in Silicon Valley) is arguing that the university "is training software engineers at the same time they're outsourcing their own software engineers. What message are they sending their own students?"

      Same message as the law schools: "We're happy to take your money. If you can't find a job after you graduate, tough shit. You should have thought carefully about your major's future potential before taking on $100K in student loans."

      To be really clear, though, this is only UCSF, not the entire UC system. UCSF does not train software engineers--UCSF is a medical school. They only trains doctors, pharmacists, nurses, and dentists.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    2. Re:Schools are corporations too... by ram.loss · · Score: 1

      A valid point, but you have to think carefully before taking a $100K loan for anything, especially if you don't have a good plan for paying it.

    3. Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      A valid point, but you have to think carefully before taking a $100K loan for anything, especially if you don't have a good plan for paying it.

      The problem is that people don't think.

    4. Re:Schools are corporations too... by psmoot · · Score: 1

      I've been emailing the author. I still can't figure out why anyone cares what Rep. Lorgren thinks about this. It isn't in her district and it isn't a federal issue. Her opinion is about as useful as mine. Ditto Senator Feinstein.

      TFA mentioned Rep. Nancy Pelosi but at least this is happening in her district.

    5. Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I still can't figure out why anyone cares what Rep. Lorgren thinks about this. It isn't in her district and it isn't a federal issue.

      Lorgren sits on the House subcommittees for intellectual properties and immigration enforcement. Immigration in general, and enforcement in particular, is considered to be a federal issue.

      Ditto Senator Feinstein.

      Feinstein also sits on Senate subcommittees for technology and immigration.

    6. Re:Schools are corporations too... by psmoot · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks for the context.

      Lorgren sits on the House subcommittees for intellectual properties and immigration enforcement. Immigration in general, and enforcement in particular, is considered to be a federal issue.

      So what's weird is her quote has nothing to do with the immigration issue. It has everything to do with the perceived messages of UCSF outsourcing jobs. If she thought that was illegal in some form, isn't that what she should be quoted on?

      Feinstein also sits on Senate subcommittees for technology and immigration.

      Similarly, Senator Feinstein's letter was all about UC's civic responsibilities and the wisdom of outsourcing jobs. That's not really about technology or immigration, it's a labor issue more than anything else. As such, I don't see why I would consider her opinion any more important than mine. Remember, we live in a federal republic. California and UC can do whatever it wants. Until it crosses a state border, the feds have no say in the matter. As such, I'd prefer the honorables restrict their comments to the immigration issues, which I understand is questionable.

      Here's the thing: opinions are like a**holes, everyone has one. I've got an opinion on this, DiFi has, Zoe has, you have, everyone has. As a UC parent and taxpayer, I think my opinion matters at least a little but not all that much. I don't think Lofgrin's or Feinstein's opinions matter any more than mine (maybe less, do they have kids at UC?) I think the opinion of the director of IT at UC matters a lot. I think the opinions of the IT people being outsourced matters quite a bit, at least in terms of whether this is a feasible activity (but they'd have to be saints not to be biased against it).

      Does that make sense?

  16. Let's wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carrier was scared. Ford was spooked. Toyota was scolded.

    I wonder what will happen here, presumably at the heart of American innovation and ingenuity. How is the PEOTUS going to threaten against this drain of American jobs?

  17. Poorly Managed UC IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most UC campuses have decentralized, highly inefficient IT, some supporting administrative staff, some supporting faculty, and some supporting research. Funding varies by department. Outsourcing won't fix problems or reduce waste; it's just moving the problem around, as anyone with experience in outsourcing IT will tell you.

    1. Re:Poorly Managed UC IT by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Most UC campuses have decentralized, highly inefficient IT, some supporting administrative staff, some supporting faculty, and some supporting research.

      Stanford University has a central IT department to set the university-wide standard, but each school has a dedicated IT team. I did four or five interviews at different schools a few years ago. A very different experience than interviewing at a Fortune 500 company.

  18. Incredibly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming that the original article is correct (always a subject to be examined), this is an incredibly stupid thing for UC to do. Bad on the substance, bad on the optics, negligible effect on the budget. Whoever thought this up needs to be replaced.

  19. So much Wrong with This by wisnoskij · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why is their budget bigger than most countries?
    They will save 60 million dollars by outsourced 20% of the workforce? I have worked in IT in one of the highest internationally acclaimed universities, it was just 2 full time guys with 2 student helpers for 1/5th of the university. I really doubt that the total yearly salaries exceeded 200K.

    Keeping a few thousand computers and a few server rooms running is really not that big of a job.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:So much Wrong with This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But after many years of successful empire building the IT staff is now 65 people who do very little. You have to understand how universities work. The new guy was brought in to cut costs and has his bonus tied to cutting these costs. Once he has a bonus or two he is out of there, and who cares if it works or not. Once he has left he will be able to say he shrank the IT budget by 60% and others will be lining up to pay him.

    2. Re:So much Wrong with This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Something's fishy here. Did you also have a helpdesk? Did you respond to user requests like data recovery, programming help, custom computer build requests, and so forth? Did you set up, maintain, and fix printers and copiers? What about software licensing administration and deployment? What about responding to custom programming requests? What about implementing CMS, or were you also the webmasters? What about user training for things like productivity software, website design or CMS use, homework systems, and grade submission systems? What about setting up and maintaining the homework and grading systems used for classes? What about network engineering and wiring? What about ISP contracts and maintenance? What about local and remote backup systems? What about e-mail systems or contracts? What about wireless network design, deployment, and maintenance? What about A/V conference rooms? What about multimedia classroom installation and daily problem response? What about conference and event A/V set up and tear-down? What about responding to security problems?

      I strongly suspect that, either there was actually alot more "IT" going on than just you maintaining computers (in house or outsourced, it's still being done) or most of the university was totally left on their own in a big way, to make their own IT work.

    3. Re:So much Wrong with This by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      > Did you also have a helpdesk? YES
      > Did you respond to user requests like data recovery, programming help, custom computer build requests, and so forth? YES
      > Did you set up, maintain, and fix printers and copiers? YES
      > What about software licensing administration and deployment? YES
      > What about responding to custom programming requests? YES
      > What about implementing CMS, or were you also the webmasters?
      Read the summery on Wikipedia, still not sure exactly what this is. The head honcho did a lot of web stuff, and managed a lot of web resources, like the system that allowed profs to post web surveys, but I am not sure if the actual web servers were under his control or not, I suspect that was managed centrally.
      > What about user training for things like productivity software, website design or CMS use, homework systems, and grade submission systems? YES
      Anything that the thousands of users had trouble with, they brought us in. At no time while I was employed their did they get some new software system, and set out to teach everyone how to use it. But, any trouble anyone had any trouble with software, programming, computers sent for us (for example: "I am writing HTML and I cannot get the '%' symbol to appear").

      > What about setting up and maintaining the homework and grading systems used for classes?
      Probably managed centrally.
      > What about network engineering and wiring? YES
      > What about ISP contracts and maintenance?
      Probably managed centrally.
      > What about local and remote backup systems?
      This might of been managed centrally. We managed the battery backups that every single computer had.
      > What about e-mail systems or contracts?
      Probably managed centrally.
      > What about wireless network design, deployment, and maintenance?
      I never worked with any of that, Not sure if we even had a department wireless, or how much the departments would be in charge of their slice of the campus wireless network.
      > What about A/V conference rooms? YES
      > What about multimedia classroom installation and daily problem response? YES
      > What about conference and event A/V set up and tear-down? YES
      > What about responding to security problems?
      No idea.

      A lot of things were heavily automated. Most of the job was running shell scripts to automagically solve your problem. And it seemed like the boss had had a long time to educate users to be self sufficient, there were not a lot of requests for help. There was this one instance, where some proffs had hired this student to setup a survey for them, he had no idea what he was doing and tried to get us to do everything. The boss made sure that that was not likely to happen again before we did it for them.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    4. Re:So much Wrong with This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the things you said "yes" to are really true, the users you were taking care of were not "self-sufficent," they were going to / paying other or external sources for help. That is fine, it's a way I've seen universities organized as well, but you should know how that works if you're called on to design an organization-wide IT structure. If you're understaffed centrally, the money still gets spent to obtain the needed IT resources, but comes from grant and department budgets rather than college budgets.

    5. Re:So much Wrong with This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is their budget bigger than most countries?
      They will save 60 million dollars by outsourced 20% of the workforce? I have worked in IT in one of the highest internationally acclaimed universities, it was just 2 full time guys with 2 student helpers for 1/5th of the university. I really doubt that the total yearly salaries exceeded 200K.

      Keeping a few thousand computers and a few server rooms running is really not that big of a job.

      Yeah, I work at a University myself (as a researcher without a PhD). Our IT staff is very slim and heavily student reliant. California is turning into a toilet bowl.

    6. Re:So much Wrong with This by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Yes, the teachers/researchers were responsible for designing their own stuff, we were there to help, and troubleshoot; not as their personal assistants. They could not put in a request to have an IT guy go work with them 9-5 for the semester.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    7. Re:So much Wrong with This by andydouble07 · · Score: 1

      0.1% of 6 billion is 6 million, not 60 million. I'd guess their IT dept was probably in the 100 person range, sounds like you worked for a very small one or had a limited view of what "IT" encompasses.

    8. Re:So much Wrong with This by budgenator · · Score: 1

      This maybe a little bigger than that, from what I know of Wayne State/Detroit Medical Center, they now have 3 campuses, one of which contains 4 hospitals, the other two have two hospitals, each hospital has hospital networks for accounting, patient care, medical equipment, administration, academics and research. Lots of things were probably jerry-riggered in the heat of battle with intentions of going back later to apply permanent fixes that never happened and were never documented.
        Makes you wonder how many Windows servers are running on developer licenses waiting to expire in 4 to 6 months.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    9. Re:So much Wrong with This by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When I went to Texas A&M, your entire IT department in a university you refuse to name was smaller than the IT department in a single computer lab. There were multiple people in the lab to deal with the constant problems with the computers. One full-time person per printer was not uncommon, though the belt-fed dot matrix printers were prone to jamming, and required a human to separate the printouts, and sort and deliver them. And that was on of a number of labs, and doesn't include the actual IT department, just counts what ends up being an extension of the help desk. Unless your IT department was highly automated, and does no project work, I find your assessment to be dubious.

  20. Re:Not by insults by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Us Alt-Right nut faces don't generally insult the other side of the debate.

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  21. Re:Maybe Peter Thiel Was Right by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    And where will all the engineers and researchers come from if there aren't people going into higher education? Guys like Thiel and Trump may be able to amass large amounts of capital, but without the academic, science and technical expertise working for them, they'd be nothing.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  22. Re:Not by insults by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Us Alt-Right nut faces don't generally insult the other side of the debate.

    Who else would use the word "libtard" in political comments?

  23. Re:Maybe Peter Thiel Was Right by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    And where will all the engineers and researchers come from if there aren't people going into higher education?

    Those are the workers who aren't smart enough to own the corporate ladder. They're happy to climb the corporate ladder, pay the highest tax rates and make someone else rich.

  24. UCSF != UC by unixisc · · Score: 2

    The headline makes it look like the entire University of California is outsourcing their IT to India. Everyone - San Francisco, Berkeley, Santa Cruz, Riverside, Irvine, San Diego, Davis, LA, et al

    Is that really the case? I was under the impression that the only people doing that was UCSF. It also brings to mind one question - why can't UCSF outsource that job to UCB, which is just across the Bay Bridge? Let the descendants of the BSD inventors manage their IT

    1. Re:UCSF != UC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that UCSF is indeed just the start:

      "According to notes from an Aug. 5 meeting of UC's IT Architecture Committee, chief information officers at other campuses are happy to let UCSF act as a guinea pig and will "wait for a year before jumping in with HCL" in order to gauge UCSF's experience.

      https://www.pressreader.com/

    2. Re:UCSF != UC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT at UCB is a bit stretched thin

    3. Re:UCSF != UC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TFA, it is a UC program and UCSF is the first one to opt-in. The others are likely waiting to see how it goes with UCSF, and if it goes well, they may follow suit.

    4. Re:UCSF != UC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is only happening at UCSF. No plans (thank goodness) to do this anywhere else. I'm and UCI and there'd be a riot here if they did!

    5. Re:UCSF != UC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UCSF is the pilot. When some numbers are appropriate cooked to show it reduced some costs (while conveniently ignoring offsetting increases elsewhere like the boss' bonus), it will go system-wide. Watch.

  25. No way security is as good by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can they say with a straight face that security will be "as good as it is now" when they have just introduced a massive attack vector into the system?

    Along with the factor of "Oh network traffic from India is just fine, let that all pass right on through".

    Glad I"m not on their payroll or enrolled as a student (to be more specific glad they don't have my SSN).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No way security is as good by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I'll qft you here: "How can they say with a straight face that security will be "as good as it is now" when they have just introduced a massive attack vector into the system?"

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:No way security is as good by dbIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Along with the factor of "Oh network traffic from India is just fine, let that all pass right on through".

      Did you hear about the Australian online census failure?

      One of the long string of fuckups as a consequence of going for a bargain basement IBM service was that the computer was administered from China and logs were sent to the US for performance analysis. Of course they didn't tell their customer this.
      The system crumbled under the load of millions of people logging in at once (due to the advertising of "census night" instead of any time over a few weeks, which is how estimated load had been calculated), IBM were not answering the calls at night so the spooks were called in to see if that site hired by the government was being hacked. The spooks found a bit of traffic from China (the system administrators at work on other virtual machines on the same host - discount plan remember) and a continuous stream of data going to the USA (performance logging). GeoIP blocking was put in place which locked the sysadmins out, the thing fell over completely under the load and the final consequence was the site being down for well over a week. Officials went on TV saying it was hacked by Chinese and US hackers but that was bullshit, they had just fucked up and didn't put a system in place that could cope with the load.

      The point? Currently the situation is network traffic from China, from people working from home, is seen to be fine in a lot of cases let alone traffic from India.
      Those massive attack vectors are already there and that's part of the reason we are neck deep in a malware swamp.
      Adding to it is of course as stupid as you suggest.

    3. Re:No way security is as good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't administration done over a VPN only?

    4. Re:No way security is as good by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Please reputable sources or it didn't happen.

    5. Re:No way security is as good by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck are you posting irrelevant shit on all my recent posts on different topics?

    6. Re:No way security is as good by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck are you posting irrelevant shit on all my recent posts on different topics?

      the spooks found a bit of traffic from China

      Shit you're posting tinfoil hat crap without anything to back it and you call the question irrelevant.

    7. Re:No way security is as good by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Defence Signals Directorate = Spooks in a short description.
      http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/hacking/who-is-the-mysterious-signals-directorate-tasked-with-investigating-the-census-fail/news-story/4d9def0f4ab2eac4269aae196c464f36

    8. Re:No way security is as good by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      LOL that doesn't say what you think it does. More tinfoil.

    9. Re:No way security is as good by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Tell me then. What do I think it does say in your opinion?
      How is the an intelligence agency not an intelligence agency?

    10. Re:No way security is as good by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      What it doesn't say is none of this

      , IBM were not answering the calls at night so the spooks were called in to see if that site hired by the government was being hacked. The spooks found a bit of traffic from China (the system administrators at work on other virtual machines on the same host - discount plan remember) and a continuous stream of data going to the USA (performance logging). GeoIP blocking was put in place which locked the sysadmins out, the thing fell over completely under the load and the final consequence was the site being down for well over a week. Officials went on TV saying it was hacked by Chinese and US hackers but that was bullshit, they had just fucked up and didn't put a system in place that could cope with the load.

      What it does say is the Signals directorate looked into it thought it was one thing, then said it was another.

      So who is it you're out to smear here ? The signals directorate, IBM, or both ?

    11. Re:No way security is as good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not familiar with newer stuff by Massive Attack. Is Vector as good as Mezzanine? If so I'll probably give it a listen...

    12. Re:No way security is as good by sexconker · · Score: 1

      He's looking to smear is personal brand of BS all over /., apparently. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy doing the same.

    13. Re:No way security is as good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod that insightful and honest.

    14. Re:No way security is as good by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm not smearing any of the two, as you would know if you had read and comprehended what I wrote before posting.
      IBM had outsourced to China and nobody told the DSD. The DSD saw traffic bound for China. The ABS people panicked and the Minister said something stupid to the press.

  26. Change of wording by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Instead of the old standby "Have you tried turning it off and on again?" IT support can now come back with "Have you tried reincarnating the OS instance?"

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Change of wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Have you tried reincarnating the OS instance?": ...and when it comes back up, the whole universe will shake, angels will sing and flowers will fall down from heaven.

    2. Re:Change of wording by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately sir, your O.S. seems to have come back as Windows Vista. You must have done something especially bad with your laptop last night.".

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Change of wording by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      How do you know my porn preferences?

      --
      Time to offend someone
  27. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not general. That's specific.

  28. Do you really want to work for the state anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The state utilizes violence and coercion to extract money from innocent people. The government should stay out of education and social welfare programs. As hilarious as this situation is people in IT have little to complain about. No one should be guaranteed employment- but the government should also not hinder people from working through various licenses including drivers licenses. They justify it based on safety when in reality it is about corporations wanting to make a buck, control, and limiting competition.

    There are lots of employment opportunities for those willing to move and those unwilling should be prepared to suffer the consequences. When you end the nanny sate and taxes go down or get eliminated altogether you'll find that your worth doubles. The government steals so much money (and then wastes on administration and inefficiencies much of that because there is no free market competition) that most of us could afford private security, private schools, private health care, and so on, and would be able to once again resurrect an American tradition of donating 10% of ones income to charity. We're poor and living in one bedroom apartments with room mates because of the ridicules amount of social welfare (public schools, welfare, social security, etc) and insufficient local resources. If you would rather take responsibility for your own life and join people who think like you consider moving to New Hampshire and taking part in the liberty migration movement. With enough people in one geographic region we can easily fight the state and are already routinely getting politicians elected at state and local levels for the first time anywhere- that is principled libertarians. Libertarians as most people know are just republicans in sheep clothing- they're evil. Real principled libertarians, or the types that are moving to NH are not democrats nor republicans, even if we're forced to get elected as such due to laws restricting third party candidates. Principled libertarians don't believe in the use of violence, theft, fraud, or coercion to achieve political or social goals. You have the right to put whatever you like in your body, to make agreements with others free of government coercion (be it tax or marriage, even polygamy and gay marriage). Principled libertarians are socially liberal and fiscally conservative and just want government out of their life.

    Check out http://www.freekeene.com/ for NH liberty news and http://www.freestateproject.org/ for Free State Project (migration effort to drive people to one region for the purpose of forming a free society) info and http://www.nhlibertyforum.com/ for a winter NH liberty conference happening from Feb 2nd-4th (Free State Project event). Check out the Shire Society forum to meet other people like yourself online. Check out http://www.freetalklive.com for the biggest liberty oriented talk radio show and http://lrn.fm/ for the Liberty Radio Network. Check out Derick Js entertaining Victimless Crime Spree film shot in New Hampshire (civil disobedience and government corruption) http://www.victimlesscrimespree.com/ and 101 Reasons Liberty Lives in New Hampshire film from http://101reasonsfilm.com/

  29. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Us Alt-Right nut faces don't generally insult the other side of the debate.

    Is that all you got? I haven't met a lefty yet that could rub two words together to make a coherent argument.

    It's always "herp derp you're so stupid herp derp".

    So you're going for hypocritical sanctimony in the same three sentences, is that it then?

    Couldn't you do it in one?

  30. America isn't the only place that this is going on by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    I lost my last job due to lack of University funding.
    Big middle finger to everyone involved.

    http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-n...

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  31. Pot Outsource Kettle by orin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot on manufacturing jobs being sent offshore: "Suck it up and smell the future. You are just like the buggy whip manufacturers!"
    Slashdot on IT jobs being sent offshore: "This Is An Outrage!!!!!"

    1. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Indeed - the "libertarian" mindset of "I've got mine - fuck you" is strong here.
      Maybe I'd be one of those fucked up people too if I didn't work in manufacturing before IT.

      You have to come back chief to explain how a government run university paid for with tax dollars and guaranteed loans exporting jobs has anything to do with libertarians ? Or is just more of you making things up ?

      I do have to thank you I thought this thread wasn't going to be interesting but fisking is always enjoyable.

    2. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by dbIII · · Score: 1

      If you had read the post I replied to before posting you wouldn't have written something that sounds so idiotic.
      What I wrote obviously had nothing at all to do with "a government run university paid for with tax dollars and guaranteed loans exporting jobs" but only to do with the post I replied to.

    3. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by Crashmarik · · Score: 0

      If you had read the post I replied to before posting you wouldn't have written something that sounds so idiotic.
      What I wrote obviously had nothing at all to do with "a government run university paid for with tax dollars and guaranteed loans exporting jobs" but only to do with the post I replied to.

      Oh so you just decided to attack libertarians to be off topic ?

    4. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not govt run, the student are charged almost $30k/year. Whaa whaaa.

    5. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by houghi · · Score: 1

      First they came for the manufacturing jobs, but I did not say anything, because ...
      OTOH many people keep saying that Capitalism will sort it out. Hint: it won't.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot on manufacturing jobs being sent offshore: "Suck it up and smell the future. You are just like the buggy whip manufacturers!"

      Slashdot on IT jobs being sent offshore: "This Is An Outrage!!!!!"

      Private enterprise and advancement in technology vs state government institution seeking to reduce costs at the expense of American jobs via a method that doesn't have a great track record of lowering costs long term. You're comparing low skill jobs with skilled jobs, so not exactly apples to apples so your smug title isn't really as clever as you think. Factory workers aren't having their severance tied up with training their outsourced replacements either.

      Most low skill jobs will be automated within the next few decades, so whether manufacturing jobs are lost ot outsourcing or automation it is just an inevitability. IT jobs on the otherhand are a bit different in that without some advanced AI you're only going to be able to automate small portions of the work. Additionally, the track record for outsourcing as a long term cost reduction method is very spotty and frequently turns out to be more expensive in the long run, often resulting in those very jobs coming back to the US.

      Next up, how people can be pro-choice and against the capital punishment...

    7. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I wrote obviously had nothing at all to do with "a government run university paid for with tax dollars and guaranteed loans exporting jobs" but only to do with the post I replied to.

      And yet the post you replied to was idiotic because it is making a comparison that is invalid due to the very point that you claim is idiotic.

    8. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is exporting jobs. People in other countries are out-competing locals for the jobs by offering better prices.

      Americans in the 80s and 90s spoke to the world about competition, working hard and all that. The world listened.

    9. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by budgenator · · Score: 1

      So the outsourcing of IT jobs to a foreign business using the misapplication of Federal Government legislated H1B visa program from a State Government Land Grant Public University receiving government funds from multiple State and Federal agencies is somehow a failure of Capitalism, that's your story?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's the thread topic. Please try to keep up instead of senselessly spamming every post with my name on it Pogo.

    11. Re:Pot Outsource Kettle by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Oh so you just decided to attack libertarians to be off topic

      it's the thread topic. Please try to keep up instead of senselessly spamming every post with my name on it Pogo.

      What's Happening As The University of California Tries To Outsource IT Jobs To India

      I only fisk truly outlandish shit. Seems you managed to concentrate lots of bs in a thread

  32. pressreader.com layout hurts my eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was the publication outsourced too?

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Everyone loses except bosses bonus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    With personal experience outsourcing IT teams let me explain how it works.
    1. - C-levels (CEO, CFO, CIO, etc..) and upper management look to outsource IT teams as on paper they appear to save up to 10%-30% that year. As most C-levels and upper management are rewarded only from year to year, this is a good way to get a good bonus for one year. But after the first year, the costs increase so long term it costs more.
    2. - India's outsourcing teams purposely offer services significantly (and sometimes at a "loss") cheaper to get your business. As they know once they have your business it is hard to change and any future changes they will be able to charge at full price.
    3. - India's outsourcing teams use your staff to train their team, then once they are trained, they actually replace their skilled/trained staff with cheap indian "freshmen" so they always maximise their profits even if they provide poor service.
    4. - The outsourcers know they have you once you are signed up and will find ways and tricks to increase prices each year, that you end up paying the same amount or more before you outsourced
    5. - The risk of the information in overseas hands is actually greater than, not outsourcing. So incidents increase, insurance costs increase more than the actual savings. Most organisations find the risk buffer money (money put aside for risks), increases so much it costs more than the money they save from outsourcing.
    6. - You are taking money directly from the country / market that gives you money, so you actually reduce the amount of income your business receives
    7. - Between handovers information is lost and productivity is reduced. Did you know many offshore outsources still use small 15" and 17" monitors which are substantially less productive then larger screens. Also there are some that quote 50% of information is lost between each handover. This is very true with offshore outsourcing.
    8. - They make it sound like providing more people for a cheaper price which sounds like it will improve productivity, but the truth is it is less productive because the people they provide are unskilled.
    9. - Digital disruption is real. Every business is dependant on IT. Leading companies use IT to take their business forward (e.g. google, amazon). Yet, many companies continue to offshore their IT capabilities and reduce productivity and then wonder why they lose market share and aren't as competitive.

    We need to look past the short term savings, and look at the long term costs and business benefit. If your IT team isn't bringing in the business, maybe you need new management rather than outsource IT.

  35. Re:Not by insults by sysrammer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "You pedantic twit!"

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  36. Move to India by sinc7 · · Score: 1

    So.. are their students supposed to move to India after graduation to get a job? Not sure what kind of marketing strategy this is. While you ask someone to pay you to train him on a job, you show him that there is no request for the position here.

  37. Re: Sad to see what Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are already dead.

  38. Re:Not by insults by dbIII · · Score: 2

    Fuck - a United States where people who push shit like that are running the place. It makes Rumsfeld look like an intellectual in comparison.
    Maybe it's time to start learning Mandarin.

  39. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful, when you call out the lefties here you get modded down into oblivion and disparaged as being a nut.

    Clearly the inner city sewers like Chicago and Baltimore, after generations of exclusive lefty control, will show what the outcome looks like if you leave those folks in charge of anything for long.

  40. OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's over. Mr. Trump is someone else's POTUS. But not mine.

    Sorry to inform you, if you're a citizen of the US, then he's gong to be your president unless something extraordinary happens. Period, full stop, the end. You might not have voted for him, you might hate his guts and politics and wish him ill, and until he takes to oath of office he ISN'T your president -- but once he does, he is.

    *I* didn't vote for Obama and didn't like a lot of things that he did (and didn't do.) But looks like his hopey changie thing is finally working itself out.

    Then again, if you really don't want him to be your president, you can always renounce your U.S. citizenship and pick exactly who you'd like. Once, anyway. I suggest you move to Canada like these people AREN'T. Or you could join Cher, I'm sure she's going to be lonely on (in?) Jupiter.

    And by the way, I'm curious: are you on either coast? I'm in flyover country. (Well actually not, I'm not even that close to the aerial lanes.)

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    1. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's over. Mr. Trump is someone else's POTUS. But not mine.

      Your comment on my signature block is off-topic for this discussion. But you already know that.

      Sorry to inform you, if you're a citizen of the US, then he's gong to be your president unless something extraordinary happens. Period, full stop, the end. You might not have voted for him, you might hate his guts and politics and wish him ill, and until he takes to oath of office he ISN'T your president -- but once he does, he is.

      I'm giving Mr. Trump the same level of respect that the Republicans gave President Obama for eight years.

      Then again, if you really don't want him to be your president, you can always renounce your U.S. citizenship and pick exactly who you'd like.

      I'm still waiting for Rush Limbaugh to move to Costa Rica after ObamaCare became law.

      http://www.politicususa.com/2010/03/22/limbaugh-costa-rica.html

      And by the way, I'm curious: are you on either coast? I'm in flyover country.

      I'm a moderate conservative in California. Yes, I voted for Hillary. At least she was the real deal. I still don't under how the Republicans nominated someone who was neither a conservative nor a Republican, and, until a few short years ago, was a Clinton Democrat.

    2. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Your comment on my signature block is off-topic for this discussion. But you already know that.

      Don't want to discuss it, don't post it.

      >I'm giving Mr. Trump the same level of respect that the Republicans gave President Obama for eight years.

      Proof that the Republicans said Obama was not president of the USA or GTFO.

      >I'm still waiting for Rush Limbaugh to move to Costa Rica after ObamaCare became law.

      Yep, a lot of retards out there. You're working on joining them by lying about who is your president.

    3. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Don't want to discuss it, don't post it.

      You don't like it, don't comment on it.

      Proof that the Republicans said Obama was not president of the USA or GTFO.

      The right-wing echo chamber for the last eight years.

      You're working on joining them by lying about who is your president.

      No, I'm joining the resistance against The Friends of Putin Club.

    4. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm giving Mr. Trump the same level of respect that the Republicans gave President Obama for eight years."

      So you looked at the worst people on the other side of the aisle and said:

      "That is what I want to be!"

    5. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      So you looked at the worst people on the other side of the aisle and said:

      "That is what I want to be!"

      Nope. I'm not advocating that Mr. Trump be lynched from a tree.

    6. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I voted for Hillary. At least she was the real deal

      HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    7. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Remember that Trump is neither a conservative nor a Republican, and, just a few short years ago, a Clinton Democrat. If you're going to put a Clinton Democrat in the White House, it should be Hillary.

    8. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by swillden · · Score: 1

      I'm giving Mr. Trump the same level of respect that the Republicans gave President Obama for eight years.

      I often told my right-wing friends who said the same thing about Obama that they were wrong, and that left-wingers might be elitists but they at least recognized that their president was their president whether they liked him or not. But your comment is one (of many!) examples that the left is no more rational or measured than the right.

      Post-rational, post-truth politics, that's what we've got. On both sides.

      As my mom taught me: "Two wrongs don't make a right!"

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      But your comment is one (of many!) examples that the left is no more rational or measured than the right.

      I'm a moderate conservative and I don't represent the left. I find it interesting that the Republicans who derided Obama all these years are hyperventilating that Trump will get the same treatment by the Democrats.

      As my mom taught me: "Two wrongs don't make a right!"

      As my father taught me: "What goes around comes around."

    10. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like Trump's supporters are closer to renouncing their citizenship than those of us who are prepared to resist him given his demonstrated ties to a hostile foreign power.

    11. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by swillden · · Score: 1

      But your comment is one (of many!) examples that the left is no more rational or measured than the right.

      I'm a moderate conservative and I don't represent the left.

      Interesting. Either your comments on /. disagree with your self-perspective or I'm confusing you with someone else (the latter is not at all unlikely; I'm bad with names).

      I find it interesting that the Republicans who derided Obama all these years are hyperventilating that Trump will get the same treatment by the Democrats.

      I haven't seen that dynamic. I have seen many on the left refusing to admit that Trump will be the nation's president. I haven't yet seen anything equivalent to the "birther" crap, but I won't be surprised if it arises. The closest I've seen so far is Democrats decrying the electoral college for "not doing its job", which they think is to refuse to elect a manifestly bad candidate.

      I certainly understand their emotional position. I'm fairly terrified of President Trump myself. Not so much his domestic agenda (though I expect the result to be bad insofar as he follows through with his campaign promises, especially his protectionism), but as commander in chief and the man in position to push The Button. I'm also concerned with the likelihood that his election will exacerbate racial and ethnic tensions, though I suspect he's already done all the damage that he's going to do in that respect.

      But, regardless of my fears, Trump will be the president, and I will respect the office, though not the man in it. That doesn't mean I'll hesitate to cricitize, or to outright oppose any illegal actions he might take.

      As my mom taught me: "Two wrongs don't make a right!"

      As my father taught me: "What goes around comes around."

      Yeah, because cycles of vengeance end well.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I haven't yet seen anything equivalent to the "birther" crap, but I won't be surprised if it arises.

      I call it The Friends of Putin Club. Until Trump releases his tax returns, we don't know how much money he owes the Russian. The only person Trump ever talks about with admiration and respect is former KGB agent Putin. I grew up in the Cold War. Kissing Putin's ass makes me suspicious about what's really going on with Trump.

    13. Re:OT - Re:Schools are corporations too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to inform you, but go fuck yourself.

  41. Norman Matloff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can imagine what Matloff (author of The Art of R Programming) had to say about it.

  42. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rumsfeld went to Princeton on a scholarship and is probably much more an intellectual than anyone on this website.

  43. There is always more to this than meet the eyes. by pjv936 · · Score: 1

    A lot of this outsourcing is not just about cutting cost. Some of it is driven by kickback money provided by the outsourcing firms. Most of these outsourcing firms don't have a problem bribing IT executives.

  44. Re:Not by insults by dbIII · · Score: 1

    A wrestling scholarship - you lose.

  45. But, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    California is the champion of diversity. Now they are complaining? Why? Oh yeah, diversity for all unless it affects me.

  46. Re:Not by insults by Crashmarik · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    A wrestling scholarship - you lose. -DBIII

    Sorry he won, and you lost before you even started playing the game

    Rumsfeld attended Baker Demonstration School,[11] and later graduated[12] from New Trier High School. He attended Princeton University on academic and NROTC partial scholarships*

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    And from his book

    https://books.google.com/books...

    Why is it every time I run into you on this site you're making stuff up ?

    *NROTC = is the naval reserve officer program not national wRestling something or other

  47. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Us Alt-Right nut faces don't generally insult the other side of the debate.

    Who else would use the word "libtard" in political comments?

    Anyone with experience of the extreme left ?

  48. Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsourcing is about getting rid of people, and the hiring process.
    When you outsource you will get half as many indian people, each performing like 0.25 local employees. So you end up with 10-15% of the work you had before. Then you pay consultancy fees to get anything done, ending up getting worse results for higher costs. The net result is the cost is higher, and since money goes to india, less of it is returned in local taxes, and for both the customer and the country it will cost more.

    A university has plenty of students that can work at a relatively low pay, yet perform very well. This is the last place I would expect to outsource.

    If they want to downsize operations to what they get from India, just fire 80% of the staff. Indians are hired to piss on the server if there is a fire. Only incidents can trigger any action. Or payment.

    One thing to think about: Many companies outsource, and lots of training is needed. Some companies has started to insource. How much training is needed for the local staff ? Usually nothing. Why ? Because everybody, including management, knows the staff the outsourcing partner puts on the daily job are worthless.

    I am in a company that outsourced about 100 people to IBM, who slowly migrated it all to India. Now our IT staff is much larger than before. We still need specialists in all areas, architects, project managers to follow up on indian project managers etc. There just is no savings. But it is easier for the managers to just point the the outsourcing partner they picked themself.

  49. Re:boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    poor displaced Americans

    Enjoy your next president. He's the consequence of throwing your working class under the bus.

  50. Re:Not by insults by dbIII · · Score: 0

    So I was wrong about the wrestling, looks like I was misled by a thing I read way back when Rumsfled was fucking up the armed forces the first time. The AC said Rumsfeld was better than all of us here academically. Some people here have a long list of published papers and doctorates - the AC is an idiot and a total loser.

  51. Re:Not by insults by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Us Alt-Right nut faces don't generally insult the other side of the debate.

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/...

    That has to be a pisstake article! God I hope so.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  52. Re:Not by insults by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    So I was wrong about the wrestling,

    the AC said Rumsfeld was better than all of us here academically.

    vs

    Fuck - a United States where people who push shit like that are running the place. It makes Rumsfeld look like an intellectual in comparison.
    Maybe it's time to start learning Mandarin..

    Yeah he's the guy who brought Rumsfeld up and didn't know what he was talking about not you.

  53. 'Diversity' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anybody tell me why they aren't outsourcing I.T. to AFRICA?
    Can anybody tell me why NO company or university is outsourcing I.T. to AFRICA?
    Could it possibly have anything to do with genes and IQ? Say it ain't so!
    The University of California is going to collapse very soon, due to the endless lies of 'diversity' and the Bolshevik bullshit they have been peddling for their Jewish masters for the past two decades. They already have huge funding issues and yet are spending millions on their 'diversity' department. Soon there won't be any white people left in California, then what will their 'diversity' department actually do? It will have already achieved its goal - to permanently remove ALL white people from the university.

    1. Re:'Diversity' by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No, that's the beauty of it, once the diversity dept has driven out all of the white people to increase diversity, they can bring them back in to further increase diversity.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:'Diversity' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Can anybody tell me why they aren't outsourcing I.T. to AFRICA?
      > Can anybody tell me why NO company or university is outsourcing I.T. to AFRICA?

      Maybe they would, if Africa had enough wealthy families to send their best and brightest to American universities and bring that know-how back to Africa. For at least 20 years we've been educating students from China, Taiwan, Japan and India in the fields that are now being offshored.

      > Could it possibly have anything to do with genes and IQ? Say it ain't so!

      Nope. It has to do with money.

      I know a black guy from Ivory Coast whom most would look at and think 'thug.' He's probably smarter than you and I put together.

  54. They voted for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every single one of those IT workers who vote for Democrats have been voting for this shit. This is what 'globalization' means - a handful of Democrat elites get to have high paying jobs while everyone else's wages and standard of living race to the bottom to compete with third world nations.

    It's not the Democrats talking about cutting back on H1B visas and preventing US companies from moving jobs outside the US.

    1. Re:They voted for this by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I am HARDLY a Democrat. But it is ALSO true that Republicans have been voting for this shit, too.

  55. Re:Not by insults by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

    "Careful, when you call out the lefties here you get modded down into oblivion and disparaged as being a nut."

    That's what karma accumulation is for.

  56. Re:Not by insults by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    Rumsfeld is an intellectual.

    That's what made him so dangerous. He developed intellectual theories (e. g., "Shock and Awe") and some fool was idiot enough to allow him to run experiments on them. And that's a large part of why Iraq is the mess it is today and why it has been fertile ground for ISIS.

    And, if I'm not mistaken, he retired to become a university professor.

  57. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're going for hypocritical sanctimony in the same three sentences, is that it then?

    Couldn't you do it in one?

    What do you take him for? Some sort of pointy-headed libtard intellectual?

  58. Fair enough. Though not necessarily fault, overcom by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > The left has a bias or belief that problems are the fault of society, whereas the right tends to bias to the belief that problems are the fault of the individual.

    That's reasonably fair and I realize this is a bit of a tangent to your main point, but I don't know that "fault" is necessarily the right word. I believe that my daughter, who is black and of course female, can become a supreme court justice, president, or chairwoman of the joint chiefs DESPITE whatever is wrong with society, and that it's easier for her to change her own actions than to change all of society. I'm sure Colin Powell encountered some racism; he went right ahead and became Secretary of State *anyway*. He was then in a position to affect society. He didn't whine about the problems in society, he overcame them.

  59. it's a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On one hand, you can't help but feel for people whose jobs are displaced. On the other hand, you have somebody willing to do the same job for a fraction of the money. Consider that there are people on both sides.

    The principles of modern capitalism - notably free trade - mean that acess to markets that rich countries have devastate local industries. On the flipside, poorer countries experience brain-drain, but also benefit from jobs moving into their lower-wage markets.

    There is no silver bullet that will solve this. You can't prevent outsourcing, the economy would stop being competitive. But considering that there are people on both sides is a must. At the very least, the on-shore people should be given training and severance to ease the transition, and off-shore pay must be regulated in relation to the original pay.

  60. The #1 reason I think this is a dumb move: by sabbede · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's a university. If they want cheap labor, they have it right there in the dorms. The only jobs that would make any sense to outsource are in support, and I know from personal experience that students will do those jobs for very little. Hell, pick a job and there are going to be dozens of students that would leap at the chance for some real-worldish experience.

    Outsourcing IT jobs is going to reduce opportunities for financial aid and job training for the students; undermining the basic mission of universities. Dumb move UC.

    1. Re:The #1 reason I think this is a dumb move: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! Many students need part-time jobs, outside of burger-flipping they're hard to get. Used to be that there were all sorts of minimum-wage or nearly so jobs on campus that could be used to help pay for school supplies or beer, but now there's a "work-study" bureaucracy controlling that and costs have risen. Yes, there's still a cost - find a corner of an unused warehouse or old classroom building, install cubies and data lines etc., provide a modicum of training on how to read the script, then hire students at, say, minimum wage + a penny (which is what my pay was when doing on-campus part-time in school). Frankly, everybody's happy except for possibly an administrator hoping for a bonus for eliminating some employees, and the support couldn't be any worse that what happens when the calls end up in Elbonia.

    2. Re:The #1 reason I think this is a dumb move: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real world experience for WHAT JOBS? Are they going to be students forever so they can keep those jobs?

    3. Re:The #1 reason I think this is a dumb move: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I last worked IT it was while getting my degree at the school I worked at. Pretty much only the managers and a few specialists were full-time staff, the rest of the IT staff was made up of students working part-time for some experience and a bit of spending money.

  61. Obamacare killed US IT by davide+marney · · Score: 0

    "The red ink was partially the result of an increased caseload from Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program, which was expanded under the Affordable Care Act. Medi-Cal reimbursements are so low that UCSF loses 40 cents on every dollar it spends on those patients’ treatment, he says."

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    1. Re:Obamacare killed US IT by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Don't buy it, they are a non-profit, the entire system is designed to lose money or more accurately look like they are losing money. Losing money is you know how they stay non-profit. The real question isn't "Do you lose 40 cents of every dollars providing treatment?" but is "How much of that 40 cents would you save by not providing treatment?"; the answer is likely none to even more.

      Hospitals really like those medicaid patients, there is usually nothing really wrong with them, at least nothing urgent, you can let them sit and wait until your waiting room clears of Patients with better insurance, them call them in to give your staff something to do besides sitting around telling stories. Then you're getting a little bit of something instead of all of nothing.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Obamacare killed US IT by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Medicaid most certainly does suck if you are a provider. They don't pay squat. They tend to pay about 25% - 33% of what real "healthcare" would pay.

      Too much of this kind of stuff will KILL an independent hospital. It will just fold and close.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  62. Re:Automatic. - LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In CA, judges often assign mildly criminal idiots public service hours instead of jail time which often means picking up trash on the side of the road.

    Road repairs require actual skill and are performed by state employees or sometimes municipal depending on the road.

    Fucking moron.

  63. 0 sympathy by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    Dunno how to say this, but I have no sympathy for the companies and people involved.... been saying for the longest time that all this IoT crap are not only security and privacy nightmares, they also only make stuff needlessly more complicated and prone to errors and glitches.
    Guess you get what you deserve. Too bad.

    1. Re: 0 sympathy by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

      Duh, this went to the wrong post, sorry.

    2. Re: 0 sympathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, replace 'IoT' with 'outsourcing' and your comment is still valid, even if it is in the wrong post ;)

  64. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's still an asshole.

  65. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rumsfeld is an intellectual. That's what made him so dangerous.

    They high five each other as they put another one over the populous.

  66. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have never met a leftist who could make a coherent argument? You must not get out much. Do you even know what a leftist is?

  67. I decided to take an outsourced job, then... by cj9er · · Score: 2

    I ended up working for a place that wins these contracts for IT services. A group of around 400 of us had to make the decision to go or not, pretty standard. What we didn't know in the next 12-18 months was that they were moving most of those jobs to offshore locations like Brazil, Argentina, India. I was asked to go to one of these countries to train the team there, said no and started looking for another job. They were going to be laying of most of the outsourced team in the US it turned out and leave 1-2 people in the US to oversee them. Fast-forward 5 years later and that same shop did not re-sign that contract and brought everything back in-house. It would appear that the typical offshore/outsource scenario happened - they move the work to offshore, those people implement a few changes, a mistake is made, they get their ass handed to them over a few conference calls, they stop making ANY changes and call the 1-2 people still in the US non-stop 24/7/365 to have THEM make the changes or berate them into doing it until those people burn out and leave thus rendering the offshore/outsourcer useless because they won't do anything. The original outsourced company doesn't care because they have made their nut and know that if said company cancels the contract, the outsourcer reaps a fat termination fee. The tact of most outsourcing companies is to undercut everyone else's bid, make sure the company doing the outsourcing doesn't add a provision into their contract that all jobs must be kept in the US or Canada (which is a valid provision and costs more) and then offshore it all as fast as possible without trying to piss off the company that just signed the contract to get past any cancellation period then bam, they have them. This same scenario continues to play out until these companies wise up and see that outsourcing ends up costing them more in the long-run as they burn up their own employees that oversee either the outsourced contract, admins or both.

  68. A small savings equals big bonus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saving .1% of total bonus equals millions, that the CEO gets added to his bonus.
    Plus all the dinners and perks the Tata Consulting can fund.

  69. Email someone about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ucop.edu/president/index.html

  70. lower annual $5.83 billion budget by just 0.1% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The university's actions will ultimately lower their annual $5.83 billion budget by just 0.1%.

    58 million is nothing to sneeze at! That's at least 12-15 new do-nothing VPs they can now hire.

  71. Re:Not by insults by pellik · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people will miss the irony of your global anti-left insult following a statement about not generally insulting the other side and instead take you at face value.

  72. They were caught out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably thought there would be a Hilary win. And then the republicans would have stopped the government from doing anything, because they can't have a woman be successful any more than they can let a ni gger be in charge.

  73. This a deserves a threatening tweet from Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UC system outsourcing jobs to India. Bad! Keep jobs in US or lose federal funding!

  74. the component is not the system by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    And that, I think, is fair enough, as there is no real difference between the "individual" and "society", as ideological categories, because we are always both, we are all individuals and we all live in society and are part of social institutions.

    And there's no real difference between a "spark plug" and an "automobile," because a spark plug is part of both, it is an individual spark plug and it also lives in an automobile and is part of automobile systems.

    A society is composed of individuals, but a society and an individual are not the same thing.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  75. Consider a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have long suspected that a major part of the EU Privacy laws is really to protect their jobs.

    If the US had a similar privacy law, or even just parts of it, we would stop outsourcing of IT to low wage countries. We could also bring back the check processing and mortgage loan processing and other jobs.

    Universities on public assistance and connected to government networks should also have security concerns.

    Let's have a serious investigation as to the problems with IT outsourcing for security AND privacy.

  76. Great Business move by jethr0211 · · Score: 1

    > The university's actions will ultimately lower their annual $5.83 billion budget by just 0.1%. well, I can certainly see why they would risk the unavoidable disruptions, loss of direct control, loss of continuity, loss of institutional knowledge, etc

  77. That sounds EXACTLY like Trump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except with fewer catastrophes and less false hair.

  78. Re:Fair enough. Though not necessarily fault, over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't whine about the problems in society, he overcame them.

    THIS.

    Every inch of progress that has been made over the decades has been from people who do exactly that. Who forge ahead regardless of the difficulties, blazing a new path forward for others. Whining and complaining about inequality doesn't fix anything. Overcoming it does.

    I mean, sure, people can complain too. They just shouldn't let that be the totality of their contributions.

  79. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not the only article based on this template: "A study - an actual study! - concludes that..." What I like about it is that it's stupid enough to make clear that the template itself is basically worthless if you're interested in what's true.

  80. So no offshoring, no importing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because YOU are an American tax payer, and YOU give your cash to an international corporation that moves the money out of the USA, so YOU should be against offshore tax havens, imports and offshored jobs in the private sector that you pay to get goods from too.

    No, because you don't know what the fuck you're on about, you only know "gubming bad, dey takes mi munny!".

    Tell me, are you one of those assholes who claim taxation is theft? Because if so you need to realise something: a thief isn't required to give money back to the local economy. If you think the government has to, then it's not theft.

  81. Accountability for security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how do you hold folks accountable for security problems?
        US workers can be called into court for civil and criminal proceedings.

    If my medical records are stolen by a foreign worker, what is the recourse other than firing them?
    Seems like a loophole in HIPPA.

  82. Re:Automatic. - LIAR by Khyber · · Score: 0

    Road repairs do not require actual skill unless you're on a bridge, and even then, potholes are simply filled with a fucking asphalt patch unless it's caused by a water line leaking, in which case, it's not a ROAD CREW, but a water maintenance crew doing the work.

    But morons like you that have never worked in concrete wouldn't have a fucking clue.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  83. Medical University by WDot · · Score: 1

    So, while I don't agree with this offshoring plan, people should keep in mind UCSF only offers degrees in various medical fields. They don't have an Engineering, CS, or IT college. So while this might screw over other IT workers out of jobs, it doesn't screw over UCSF alumni and students specifically.

    1. Re:Medical University by CaseCrash · · Score: 1

      Thank you for explaining this. This one fact invalidates like 95% of the posts on this story.

      --
      No, that link you posted to a web comic we've all seen a hundred times is not "obligatory."
  84. 0.1% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're complaining that they're only saving 5.8 million?

  85. say it. SAY IT. SAY IT! by Texmaize · · Score: 1

    Funny, many on slashdot have reflexively ridiculed Trump. Instead of listening to ideas and discussing around merit, there as been a tendency for people to fall into the Republican Bad, Democrat good mantra. So, when he runs a campaign and starts making initial policies that emphasize protecting U.S. workers and economy, the stupidly smug among us decried it as unworthy and juvenile. But, oh, the very moment when YOUR jobs are being thoughtlessly removed for short term gain by the company/University, suddenly you are crying for the very protections and actions that Trump was espousing.

    Both sides have their share of good and bad ideas. Don't you think it past time to grow up get over the childish notion that politics is a team sport? You can agree with an idea, even if it is from "the other side" if it is a good one. It's ok. Honest. You can even agree with a leader sometimes, and then disagree on another issue later. If you can achieve this one simple idea, the country will improve immensely.

    So, take your first bold step. So far on this thread, no one else seemed to link this issue to Trump's platform in a positive way. Yet, nearly every post has unwittingly agreed with him. Now, take a deep breath and say it.

    "On this issue, Trump was right, we should find ways to work with him to protect our workers"
    Say it.
    SAY IT
    SAYYYYYY ITTT!!!!!!

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
    1. Re:say it. SAY IT. SAY IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trumps success is built upon outsourcing to China. For you to believe what he says (when hes a proven liar) speaks more to your lack of intelligence than anything else.

      The Government telling businesses who they should and shouldn't hire. Telling businesses which other companies they should and shouldn't use for goods and services. Hmm.. is this the same free market that the US keeps forcing upon the rest of the world?? Heh...

      captcha:slighted

    2. Re:say it. SAY IT. SAY IT! by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I hate tRumpf as much as anyone else but I have always felt that on this issue he was right. The problem with tRumpf is that, given his cabinet choices, taking care of the USian worker without turning him/her/it into a pauper isn't really a priority. I have never been a free-tradist and the best decades for this country where in an era of protectionism, like what China and the EU practice. This is why I was never enthusiastic about Shillary and didn't really care that she lost, for me the battle ended when Bernie threw in the towel.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  86. This is a USA problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elsewhere the system works much less rapaciously. The problem isn't the university, it's the merkin mindset.

  87. People wanted diversity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now they're getting it.

  88. Re:Fair enough. Though not necessarily fault, over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah because God forbid they try to change them rather than just 'overcoming' them. MLK shoulda just overcame and not whined.

  89. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the extreme left? Do you mean the people that assassinate (literally, not figuratively) those with whom they disagree? Or those who advocate assassination of those with whom they disagree?

  90. FTFY by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    US Universities have never been more than a bottom-line for-profit business that uses cult-like recruiting tactics and has absolutely no shame or loyalty to anything or anyone but themselves.

    FTFY.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  91. Mexicans are in, jobs are out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so expensive to keep up with California's trends!

  92. Diversity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diversity!

    I bet all the progressive Californians are just LOVING it.

  93. MLK, Phd titled his speech "We shall overcome" by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Like Colin Powell, Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr first overcame racism is own life, achieving personal success in the face of these challenges, in order to put him in a position to affect societal change. He didn't whine, he earned two bachelor degrees and a phd before becoming president of the the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

    Here's what Doctor King had to say about whether you should overcome whatever challenges you encounter:
    --
    We shall overcome. We shall overcome. Deep in my heart I do believe we shall overcome. And I believe it because somehow the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.

    We shall overcome because Carlisle is right; no lie can live forever.

    We shall overcome because William Cullen Bryant is right; truth crushed to earth will rise again.

    We shall overcome because James Russell Lowell is right:

    Truth forever on the scaffold,
    Wrong forever on the throne.
    Yet that scaffold sways the future,
    And behind the dim unknown
    Stands God, within the shadow,
    Keeping watch above His own.
    --
    From Doctor King's speech "We Shall Overcome".

  94. What I wanna know is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when are they going to outsource varsity sports????!!! Sheesh, all those CS majors and grad students oughtta unionize or just give up and help reelect Trump!

  95. Embarrassed by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Having graduated UCLA, I am embarrassed about this behavior. l agree entirely with the summary, what message are they sending their students?

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  96. King had a dream: This = raymorris' nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't shoot my mouth off without knowing what I'm talking about" - by raymorris ( 2726007 ) on Thursday December 31, 2015 @09:29AM (#51215379)

    I catch you shooting your mouth off fucking up constantly: 2 raymorris security fuckups https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5351503&cid=47379233/ & https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5351503&cid=47374033/ + raymorris = script kiddie https://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8895203&cid=51726265/

    &

    Tell us how ONLY 'newer script kiddie tools' have stringlength built in (when PASCAL had it for ages - my fav tool) https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8472509&cid=51114383/ YOU BLUNDERING WANNABE!

    APK

    P.S.=> You like to talk behind others' backs like the gossiping bitch TROLL you are raymorris https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9880997&cid=53312265/ well, here I am letting YOU TALK in those links, showing your FAILS wannabe ... apk

  97. Re:boo hoo by losfromla · · Score: 1

    And me without mod points. Troll.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  98. Has outsourcing/offshoring really worked out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, has anyone seen a case where outsourcing/offshoring really had the result of improving anything or actually saving money in the long run? In my experience, it hasn't. Why does management continue to believe that their case is going to be different?

  99. UC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its already a huge monster. Too big to fail. Patients complain about it being too expensive. UCSF doesn't care

  100. Re:Fair enough. Though not necessarily fault, over by thomn8r · · Score: 1
    Every inch of progress that has been made over the decades has been from people who do exactly that. Who forge ahead regardless of the difficulties, blazing a new path forward for others.

    While the Conservatives on the Right have fought them every single step of the way.

  101. Sends a message by DigiAngel69 · · Score: 1

    "Come to UCSF to get an education to get a great job that will be outsourced anyway"

  102. Re:Automatic. - LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you HAVE to be an insufferable dick all the time?

  103. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone with experience of the extreme left ?

    Is not an American

  104. Re:Not by insults by skam240 · · Score: 1

    The Alt-Right doesnt insult the other side in a debate? Please.

    How many Alt-Righters have I seen parrot in mongoloid fashion "snowflake" for those who disagree with them. It's practically a mantra.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  105. This is great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I hear liberal tears? Time for some protectionism? Nah. California should become its own country; a country with outrageous home prices and no jobs.

  106. Re:Automatic. - LIAR by Khyber · · Score: 0

    Because my experience gives me the fucking privilege and the majority of you are insufferable faggots, so it all works out.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  107. Re:Not by insults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I'm sorry-- I thought in America, we were free to think and speak and vote as we please.

    I must be thinking of some other country.

    (funny enough, the first time I tried to post this, Slashcrap told me to "slow down" - evidently I'm speaking too often in this forum. Thank goodness for Tor!)

  108. Re:boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry. I got it covered.