Destroyed by the Muslim terrorists? My you have drunk deep of the kool aid. We are destroying ourselves, in part by the stupidity you so eloquently express.
Maybe you can explain who was coddled by whom? This may follow from their religion, but for the life of me I can't figure out what 'coddling' has occured to encourge this.
If this is "slashtard" then why exactly are you here reading and posting? Are you admitting to being a "tard"? Good job, I believe that in this you are correct.
I'll never understand so-called environmentalists who go out and have 5 or 6 kids. I can think of nothing quite so environmentally irresponsible...
-S
Just how many "environmentalists who go out and have 5 or 6 kids" are there? You sound like you made a study of this, what was the conclusion? That we are being over-run by the children of "environmentalists who go out and have 5 or 6 kids"?
Surely they can think of a better reason to research this other than flying around looking for debris.
We all know the 'better' reason: to look for people to kill. However, looking for people to kill would upset some people, so we call it 'looking for debris'.
Slashdot Mirror
the 'Anthropocene', we have changed the surface of the earth so much.
Will you be mad if I mod your post 'depressing'?
Are we all going to die?
why humans always insist that all animal behavior is instinctual and not thoughtful.
"This is Slashdot, which is full of Communists,"
And yet you come here to read and post, can you explain that?
Destroyed by the Muslim terrorists? My you have drunk deep of the kool aid. We are destroying ourselves, in part by the stupidity you so eloquently express.
The right hates science and it's conclusions, and the problem with these satellites is that they promote science and the conclusions scientists reach.
I'm waiting for the censored version of the Oxygen-Boron layer: OBscene.
who needs laws in a country ruled by money?
It has seemed like society has been going down hill as more and more people are dishonest.
Et tu, pope?
to work for TSA you have to be mentally disturbed.
Here's a hint: you and I are not doing the sticking.
There is no proof by analogy.
This is true because 'analogy' is not a mathematical tool, and proofs only exist in mathematics.
Analogies are better: they can convey knowledge instead of proof.
this person shouldn't just be shot outright?
I explain how I try to keep in mind the limits of knowledge, and it gets me modded down to 1?
It's really a matter of not making assumptions; of trying to keep in mind what one actually knows as distinct from what one assumes to be true.
Maybe you can explain who was coddled by whom?
This may follow from their religion, but for the life of me I can't figure out what 'coddling' has occured to encourge this.
How about because the article mentions no religion?
The French were using english words?
If this is "slashtard" then why exactly are you here reading and posting? Are you admitting to being a "tard"? Good job, I believe that in this you are correct.
Refresh my memory: how many years did Dick Cheney do?
By the same logic I can call myself a toddler.
If that was your profession, go for it.
I'll never understand so-called environmentalists who go out and have 5 or 6 kids. I can think of nothing quite so environmentally irresponsible...
-S
Just how many "environmentalists who go out and have 5 or 6 kids" are there? You sound like you made a study of this, what was the conclusion? That we are being over-run by the children of "environmentalists who go out and have 5 or 6 kids"?
Except that the heat, which a rattlesnake perceives, would not be in the fluff but in the body of the tail.
Surely they can think of a better reason to research this other than flying around looking for debris.
We all know the 'better' reason: to look for people to kill. However, looking for people to kill would upset some people, so we call it 'looking for debris'.