Several things are wrong with that line of bullshit. First, the atmosphere is shrinking because CO2 is trapping heat closer to the surface. Second, the pressure at the surface is essentially the weight of a column of the overlying atmosphere divided by the area of surface that column is lying on. Since the mass of the atmosphere isn't appreciably changing, the average pressure won't change much either.
So we should endanger the planet because of your sense of incredulity? Because of your obviously wrong notions of how much CO2 we've produced? Because you've overestimated the amount of variation in the power provided by the sun, which varies so little it is called the Solar Constant?
In the 1970s scientists floated the premise we were on the cusp of an ice age, and to mitigate that threat proposed melting the polar ice caps by spreading lampblack over them.
This was a tiny minority of the scientists studying climate, and nobody now would even remember this except that the mainstream media of the time picked up on it and ran with it, perhaps because the average citizen would conflate this with another big problem back then, the concept of nuclear winter. Fast forward a few decades and cretinous turds with a few dozen brain cells are trying to present this as if the majority of climate scientists bought into this concept, that the whole community flipped from believing in cooling to believing in warming, and that somehow this is fucking relevant despite the huge advances in technology and data acquisition since then.
Good strawman argument. OP points out that GMO are not fully tested with respect to how they'll affect the ecosystem, and you respond with a rant specifically about toxicity in humans.
I'm developing an algorithm to estimate the I.Q. of posters based on a single post. You start at 100 and lose 10 points for use of the word "snowflake" when referring to a person. You lose 5 more points for not being able to type an apostrophe.
They were eating seabirds, which are famous for fertilizing shorelines with their excreta. There may be a population explosion of seabirds, but since their feeding occurs out in a vast ocean, their increased presence will be a drop in the bucket.
The Great Barrier Reef is 18 million years old. If you get this basic number wrong by two orders of magnitude, why should we listen to anything else you have to say?
Peer-reviewed literature backing up your idea? Or are you about to publish it? 'Cause otherwise the shouting suggests you are a garden-variety crackpot.
So far all you have shown is that there is an underwater volcano. You are about twenty steps away from proving that it killed half of the Great Barrier reef. I'm sure you're not going to find any peer-reviewed scientific literature showing this link, so please let us know when you have published your own peer-reviewed study. Until then, STFU.
Slashdot Mirror
Because there's no way a former employer could ruin your chances of re-employment by giving you a bad reference. Oh, wait...
Because one prediction was wrong, all future predictions are wrong. WWWWWRRRRROOOONNNNGGGG!!!!
Several things are wrong with that line of bullshit. First, the atmosphere is shrinking because CO2 is trapping heat closer to the surface. Second, the pressure at the surface is essentially the weight of a column of the overlying atmosphere divided by the area of surface that column is lying on. Since the mass of the atmosphere isn't appreciably changing, the average pressure won't change much either.
Your sarcasm detector is broken.
Since I actually RTFA, I'd love to take that bet.
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the AC that will believe everything a troll writes.
And apparently, bats, although being blind, are bothered by streetlights.
Bats aren't blind.
So we should endanger the planet because of your sense of incredulity? Because of your obviously wrong notions of how much CO2 we've produced? Because you've overestimated the amount of variation in the power provided by the sun, which varies so little it is called the Solar Constant?
Classic. An AC claiming that 2720 -1390 = 0. And then calling someone else out for "third grade arithmetic skills." Run along, little second-grader.
Stop trying to imagine how atheists feel or think. You're just fucking wrong.
In the 1970s scientists floated the premise we were on the cusp of an ice age, and to mitigate that threat proposed melting the polar ice caps by spreading lampblack over them.
This was a tiny minority of the scientists studying climate, and nobody now would even remember this except that the mainstream media of the time picked up on it and ran with it, perhaps because the average citizen would conflate this with another big problem back then, the concept of nuclear winter. Fast forward a few decades and cretinous turds with a few dozen brain cells are trying to present this as if the majority of climate scientists bought into this concept, that the whole community flipped from believing in cooling to believing in warming, and that somehow this is fucking relevant despite the huge advances in technology and data acquisition since then.
58%? Citation needed.
No. The moon will also slow its rotation and move further away so that the period of its orbit is much longer than 28 days.
Good strawman argument. OP points out that GMO are not fully tested with respect to how they'll affect the ecosystem, and you respond with a rant specifically about toxicity in humans.
... cryptocurrency intentionally paid to the operators of ransomware? And yeah, I didn't RTFA.
I'm developing an algorithm to estimate the I.Q. of posters based on a single post. You start at 100 and lose 10 points for use of the word "snowflake" when referring to a person. You lose 5 more points for not being able to type an apostrophe.
Slimy pieces of shit like you normally post as Anonymous Coward. Forgot to log out?
They were eating seabirds, which are famous for fertilizing shorelines with their excreta. There may be a population explosion of seabirds, but since their feeding occurs out in a vast ocean, their increased presence will be a drop in the bucket.
Usually some pretty stupid shit.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1...
Notepad++ has that. ...
Edit -> EOL Conversion ->
Maybe you wanted that in Notepad?
Spam musubi is basically sushi with spam. It's delicious.
The Great Barrier Reef is 18 million years old. If you get this basic number wrong by two orders of magnitude, why should we listen to anything else you have to say?
Indeed. After all the humans are dead, evolution will keep marching on.
Peer-reviewed literature backing up your idea? Or are you about to publish it? 'Cause otherwise the shouting suggests you are a garden-variety crackpot.
So far all you have shown is that there is an underwater volcano. You are about twenty steps away from proving that it killed half of the Great Barrier reef. I'm sure you're not going to find any peer-reviewed scientific literature showing this link, so please let us know when you have published your own peer-reviewed study. Until then, STFU.