Slashdot Mirror


User: fnj

fnj's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,577
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,577

  1. Re:May the Lord have mercy on us all on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Trump is a survivable event. Hillary would have spelled the end of the United States.

    Shrillary would have been an extreme danger to end the human race via WW III.

  2. Re:Disappointed but not surprised on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 2

    Bush (the first) was the only exception

    Flat-out wrong. In addition to Bush I, Carter was 4 years between two R's.

  3. Re:We Cut Off Our Nose To Spite Our Face! on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Congress MAY agree to build a wall, but the actual result would probably make the F-35 program look like something inexpensive and effective.

  4. Re:And to think the DNC wanted to face Trump... on Donald Trump Wins US Presidency (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Every single person in the US agrees that right around half the people are idiots. They just do not agree on who the idiots are.

  5. A cruise missile can hit a 1 square meter target. This can only hit a 50 square meter target.

    It's worse than that. An accuracy of 50 m means a circle of 50 m radius, which is 7900 m^2, not 50 m^2. If the cruise missile does indeed have an accuracy of 1 m (dubious), that would be 3 m^2.

  6. Re:Want to know why we don't have flying cars yet? on Long-Range Projectiles For Navy's Newest Ship Too Expensive To Shoot (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 2

    Imagining a military invasion from overseas is ludicrous. You couldn't possibly support an amphibious assault against opposition with that length of highly vulnerable and spectacularly expensive oceanic supply train. It is, however, easy to imagine invading South America from overseas, building up bases there, and marching north.

    But it's silly to worry about that. First, because of nuclear deterrence. And more importantly, because who the fuck wants a gigantic banana republic with no industrial base anyway. And finally, because we have invited the hordes to culturally invade us and wipe out our identity, so there is no more "us".

  7. Re: Want to know why we don't have flying cars yet on Long-Range Projectiles For Navy's Newest Ship Too Expensive To Shoot (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't NEED a VA if there was no defense spending, because that would mean you had no defense and no veterans.

  8. Re:Cost of the target. on Long-Range Projectiles For Navy's Newest Ship Too Expensive To Shoot (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 2

    The big naval guns of WW1 were 12-14" and fired projectiles weighing 500-900 kg. The big naval guns of WW2 were 16" and fired projectiles weighing 1000-1200 kg. And those projectiles cost practically nothing.

    This piece of useless junk with its 100 kg projectiles is a pipsqueak.

  9. Re:IIS Server resume bug on User Forks FileZilla FTP Client After Getting Hacked (filezillasecure.com) · · Score: 1

    IIS server

    PIN number
    ATM machine
    nothing says "stupid" like redundant labeling

  10. Re:Phill Schill on Phil Schiller Says the MacBook Pro Doesn't Need an SD Card Slot (theverge.com) · · Score: 1

    Um, wouldn't you need a USB connector for that?

    Indeed you do. Good thing the machine has 4 of them (or 2 if you get the low end model).

    No it doesn't, Sparky. Not regular Type A USB connectors, which are the kind that everybody's card readers and flash drivers have. How much goddam room would a fucking micro-SD slot take up? Close to zero. I agree a full-size SD slot would be non-trivial to support in thee pygmy paper-thin toys, but micro-SD is what everybody has.

  11. It's more fun to calculate 1%/annum exponential growth to a very modest (even in terms of human history) years. I'll do it for you.
    1 year: 1.01
    10 years: 1.10
    100 years: 2.70
    1000 years: 21,000
    10,000 years: 1.64E+43
    100,000 years: 1.4E+432
    1,000,000 years: 2.4E+4321

  12. Re:If Amazon loses... on Family Sues Amazon After Counterfeit Hoverboard Catches Fire, Destroys Home (wtsp.com) · · Score: 2

    If they don't validate their 3rd party partners, how are they any different from Ebay?

    Only in that they POSE as a store, not an agent. False advertising.

  13. Re:Sue for what exactly? on Family Sues Amazon After Counterfeit Hoverboard Catches Fire, Destroys Home (wtsp.com) · · Score: 1

    They likely have home insurance and will be reimbursed.

    But you don't know that they do. Many do not.

  14. Re:amzon may have to stop selling in Tennessee on Family Sues Amazon After Counterfeit Hoverboard Catches Fire, Destroys Home (wtsp.com) · · Score: 1

    Go ahead, define "selling in Tennessee", I dare you. I don't think you can; not with any sincerity. If I order something from a webpage of some Chinese based outfit, and tell them to ship it to Massachusetts, are they "selling it in Massachusetts"? No rational person would think so.

  15. Re:Misguided attempts to fight thought-crimes on Facebook Lets Advertisers Exclude Users By Race (propublica.org) · · Score: 1

    You have poor reading comprehension. Does not targeting group X with advertising:
    * abridge any citizen's privileges or immunities? NO.
    * deprive any citizen of life, liberty, or property? NO.
    * deny any person equal protection of the law? NO.

    Does it have anything whatever to do with proportional apportionment of representation? NO.

    Does it have anything whatever to do with eligibility of candidates for President, Vice President, Senator, Representative, or holding civil or military office? NO.

    In case you're talking about "civil rights" rather than the subject of this article, the Fourteeth Amendment has absolutely squat to say about personal or business discrimination. All laws based on that absurd premise are VOID on their face.

  16. No, it's not self-explanatory. It's some kind of hipster language. Movies and TV shows have always had producers and directors, and that pretty well covers "running" the show. The fact is that a "show runner" is actually an executive producer who is also a writer. So just CALL him that.

  17. Re:in asia nobody uses iMessaging. on Apple Has Created 'Detailed Mockups' of iMessage For Android (macrumors.com) · · Score: 1

    All right, I'll bite. Why in the Christ don't they use plain SMS, for God's sake? Things that make you go "WTF".

  18. Re:It's the only reason on Apple Has Created 'Detailed Mockups' of iMessage For Android (macrumors.com) · · Score: 1

    Only a chump would even think of PAYING for SMS. I certainly get unlimited SMS for my measly $35/month Virgin no-contract "plan".

  19. There were been rumors on Apple Has Created 'Detailed Mockups' of iMessage For Android (macrumors.com) · · Score: 1

    "There were been rumors" - nice grammar there. NOT.

  20. And it was utter CRAP. The NiCads had miserable energy capacity. Battery capacity started to plummet after the first cycle. There was no provision for balance charging the individual cells, or cutting off the discharge when one of the cells discharged before the others and was driven into destructive reverse charge. Memory effect was just awful. Self discharge rate was prodigious.

  21. Re:electricity cost on First New US Nuclear Reactor In 20 Years Goes Live (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Take an economics course and study up on "time value of money".

    Paying off an investment of $6.8 billion over 40 years, even at only 3% per annum interest is a total expenditure of over $11.6 billion. So that takes your 1.5 cents to 2.6 cents, and then you have to add staggering amounts for very highly trained operating personnel, security, insurance, decommissioning at EOL, waste disposal, etc. And the fuel does cost SOMETHING. Before you know it, your costs are up to at least the going rate for wholesale electricity.

  22. Re:From the article on First New US Nuclear Reactor In 20 Years Goes Live (cnn.com) · · Score: 2

    Rubbish. Steam engines produce steam.

    And gasoline engines produce gasoline. And fire engines produce fire.

  23. Re:He was right, it was a state sponsored actor on Ecuador Acknowledges Limiting Julian Assange's Web Access (reuters.com) · · Score: 1

    Well, of COURSE they're not going to come out and SAY "Kerry threatened and scared us, so we caved in". Sheesh.

  24. Re:And yet on Ecuador Acknowledges Limiting Julian Assange's Web Access (reuters.com) · · Score: 1

    The population is close to a 50-50 ideological split, but the media is well over 90% in the bag for one side, with a constant drumbeat of support. The debates are ALWAYS hosted by these agents working tirelessly for one side. The TV and print news is ALL grossly slanted. The entertainment industry is practically a solid cheering section. Twisted "comedians" spend all their time sneering viciously at one side.

    A single agent stands up and tries to fight back and provide a little balance and you have the temerity to call THAT one-sided?

  25. Re: And yet on Ecuador Acknowledges Limiting Julian Assange's Web Access (reuters.com) · · Score: 1

    Your party line talking points are tired.