The fact that you cannot measure the momentum and location of a particle exactly is NOT a limitation imposed by measuring apparatus. The fact is that a quantum particle HAS no exact momentum and location, as a result of its wave function.
Your explanation of Heisenberg with the inability to observe is incorrect. That's a RESULT of Heisenberg.
Heisenberg's Principle comes out of the wave/particle duality. To localize a particle, you have to add waves of differing frequency to its wave function (ala Fourier). The more you localize it, the more waves of higher frequency you add. Momentum is derived from the wave frequency. Therefore, when you localize a particle, you are increasing the uncertainty of the momentum (by adding more and more higher frequency waves).
This is the argument that Heisenberg used (yes, I've read his book).
Let's look at it another way. Some Aztlan nutjobs somehow manage to set up a base of operations in Tijuana, and say that they want California "back".
They start by sending in suicide bombers to San Diego. The Mexican government does nothing to stop them. They launch rockets into San Diego and Orange County. The Mexican government does nothing to stop them.
Assuming this scenario, what should/would the US government do?
Let's assume the following hypothetical. A bunch of the Aztlan nutjobs somehow manage to assume some power in Tijuana. They decide that they want California "back".
They start sending suicide bombers into So Cal. The Mexican government does nothing. They start launching rockets into So Cal. The Mexican government does nothing.
What should the US Government do in this situation?
Thank you. For once, this would be a legitimate use of the Interstate Commerce Clause.
Clearly, this *is* the purview of Congress, not the President, but all that the White House needs to do to make the petitioners happy is have one of its pet Congresscritters introduce legislation.
It seems to me that the state regulations banning such sales are an intrusion upon the prerogatives of Congress.
Funny.... But I actually complained about that when they did it on 24 with the "magic ATC hacking box". Pilots aren't robots, if they see they're about to collide, they'll avoid it. Now there's another mechanism for the 3vil h4xx0rz to use.
But seriously. What happens when the video crashes (I guess the plane will, too), or gets hacked (and don't give me any bullshit about "airgapped")?
Slashdot Mirror
It may sound like treason to you, but it's not.
Treason is specifically defined in the Constitution.
While it's not treason, it sounds like multiple felonies to me.
That's not treason. Treason is specifically defined in the Constitution.
However, why isn't he being charged with multiple felonies, including perjury, etc...?
Follow up to my own post.
The fact that you cannot measure the momentum and location of a particle exactly is NOT a limitation imposed by measuring apparatus. The fact is that a quantum particle HAS no exact momentum and location, as a result of its wave function.
Your explanation of Heisenberg with the inability to observe is incorrect. That's a RESULT of Heisenberg.
Heisenberg's Principle comes out of the wave/particle duality. To localize a particle, you have to add waves of differing frequency to its wave function (ala Fourier). The more you localize it, the more waves of higher frequency you add. Momentum is derived from the wave frequency. Therefore, when you localize a particle, you are increasing the uncertainty of the momentum (by adding more and more higher frequency waves).
This is the argument that Heisenberg used (yes, I've read his book).
Why is he talking about Faramir? Faramir isn't even BORN yet!!!
Let's look at it another way. Some Aztlan nutjobs somehow manage to set up a base of operations in Tijuana, and say that they want California "back".
They start by sending in suicide bombers to San Diego. The Mexican government does nothing to stop them. They launch rockets into San Diego and Orange County. The Mexican government does nothing to stop them.
Assuming this scenario, what should/would the US government do?
Hey, AC. I'm going to assume you live in the US.
Let's assume the following hypothetical. A bunch of the Aztlan nutjobs somehow manage to assume some power in Tijuana. They decide that they want California "back".
They start sending suicide bombers into So Cal. The Mexican government does nothing. They start launching rockets into So Cal. The Mexican government does nothing.
What should the US Government do in this situation?
My late wife could have used something like that for her BIPAP.
Try PRK.
Plus, they have immensely improved the way they correct astigmatism using lasers.
Netflix series. "Orange is the new black".
I was six. At a friend's house. I had sprained my ankle, so his dad carried me downstairs so I could watch it on TV with everyone.
Where is the Doctor when we need him?
Been there, done that.
Why am I cancelling? Because Comcast has assholes like you in customer service!
Thank you. For once, this would be a legitimate use of the Interstate Commerce Clause.
Clearly, this *is* the purview of Congress, not the President, but all that the White House needs to do to make the petitioners happy is have one of its pet Congresscritters introduce legislation.
It seems to me that the state regulations banning such sales are an intrusion upon the prerogatives of Congress.
He does so have to shoot me now, so SHOOT ME NOW!!!!!
[BANG]
You're dettttthhpicable!!!
Shoot him now! shoot him now!
At least they didn't give you the "I don't care, you still have to register" bureaucratic BS.
Won't be there. Boris and Natasha were Potsylvanian, not Russian.
Nope. That was Brian Kernighan and Dennis Ritchie.
Sure they can. They can license it out for this particular statue. Once it's licensed, there's no dilution.
And yes, I know 24 is fictional (and *bad* fiction, when it comes to tech)
Funny.... But I actually complained about that when they did it on 24 with the "magic ATC hacking box". Pilots aren't robots, if they see they're about to collide, they'll avoid it. Now there's another mechanism for the 3vil h4xx0rz to use.
But seriously. What happens when the video crashes (I guess the plane will, too), or gets hacked (and don't give me any bullshit about "airgapped")?
I actually did some minor volunteer work for the Anderson campaign in '80. He ran as an Independent, not as a Libertarian.
For all intents and purposes, "all intensive purposes" is illiterate. Which begs the question, "is anyone literate enough to notice, much less care?
There. FTFY.