good point, it sucks because it is played constantly on the radio and becomes quite annoying after a short time because it uses repetitive themes to get it stuck in your head, so when you are browsing at the CD store your are likely to remember it and buy it.
piracy is the future! people are just going to have to get used to the fact that things are easily copied on computers. change is hard i know but quit your bitchin' that's just how it is now. IT'S A FACT and you can't change it.
besides the only music that you can get reliably on P2P is popular stuff that is made for profit/market saturation and it sucks!
awww is your highly sold albulm getting traded like crazy on kazaa? too bad music that is written for profit/market saturation all shares the same atribute: it sucks!
and on the software side of things.. closed software is just going to have to try better copyright protection methods. if you want to keep your stuff from being copied why do you write it on disks and sell them? duh..
the software would slow down the router and have to be updated all the time and wouldn't even stop viruses!!! virus software doesn't stop new viruses! the only ones that matter! damn, I can't even express how stupid this is.
No one is going to buy a router in the scenerio the article is talking about this will never happen.
This is just some paranoid rambling. companies would figure out how to stream line this and make it viable for consumers, because no one is going to buy into it when you still have old routers available. The only way it would catch on is if it these routers where better then old ones at the same price. No one is going to pay more for a router just to have to pay *even more* for software and such. pure BS
besides this would be a pain in the ass to use because the software would slow down the router and have to be updated all the time and wouldn't even stop viruses!!! virus software doesn't stop new viruses! the only ones that matter! damn, I can't even express how stupid this is.
the problem is windows is so much junk compaired to the up-to-date alternatives. It is entirley possible to make an OS that is virus-proof from the internet. it just has to not execute every bit of code it recieves with out permission. virus software dosn't block *new* viruses, the only ones that count. I don't use virus software and I use windows 98. I just don't run executables and net side code that is questionable.
No one is going to buy a router in the scenerio the article is talking about this will never happen. This is just some paranoid rambling.
companies would figure out how to stream line this and make it viable for consumers, because no one is going to buy into it when you still have old routers available. The only way it would catch on is if it these routers where better then old ones at the same price. No one is going to pay more for a router just to have to pay *even more* for software and such. pure BS
it is intirely possible to make an OS virus-proof with out having to install 3rd party software.. anti-virus software today sucks anyway cause it can't catch new viruses, the only ones that really count.
i guess you havn't seen it, if you got a cable modem i highly suggest you download the 600 meg video demo. Gaming will never be the same. get it here, gamespy free
Ahem, BS! just look at the success of the GBA!
This has SNES style graphics and the games are so much more fun then most newer 3d games. I'm pretty sure Nintendo is "staying afloat"
Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions..
on
Chimera Twins Story
·
· Score: 1
why did you edit out some of the "why cats are better then women" ?
i guess you don't know alot about MS's history, IE DrDoss, Xerox's windows, The Taskbar, etc. MS didn't have a much marketing at all that i've noticed until Windows 95
Creating an even more closed system will cut off the hand that feeds microsoft. There will be no more small developers in windows, which means MS will have no one to rip fresh ideas from! They seem to forget where they came from. Thank god they finnally will paint themselves into a corner.
I thought that review was very accurate to previous Lindows versions, atleast from the point of view of the ignorant. Lindows 4.0 is a decient step up but it still has more work to go.
so kazaa wants to be the 'money' of online trading? to bad their protocall sucks.. corrupt downloads and participation hacks arn't a good way to start a standard.
If you want high-end software there is closed software that will run on an open OS, right?
Open software less secure then closed? eh, bullshit! Microsoft may have easily left backdoors for themselves in any software they publish. but we all know bout BSD. I wonder if the UK does?
The north poll sucks.
glad you asked
in my expirence, yes. prove me wrong
besides the only music that you can get reliably on P2P is popular stuff that is made for profit/market saturation and it sucks!
music that is written for profit/market saturation all shares the same atribute: it sucks!
and on the software side of things.. closed software is just going to have to try better copyright protection methods. if you want to keep your stuff from being copied why do you write it on disks and sell them? duh..
the software would slow down the router and have to be updated all the time and wouldn't even stop viruses!!! virus software doesn't stop new viruses! the only ones that matter! damn, I can't even express how stupid this is.
This is just some paranoid rambling.
companies would figure out how to stream line this and make it viable for consumers, because no one is going to buy into it when you still have old routers available. The only way it would catch on is if it these routers where better then old ones at the same price. No one is going to pay more for a router just to have to pay *even more* for software and such. pure BS
besides this would be a pain in the ass to use because the software would slow down the router and have to be updated all the time and wouldn't even stop viruses!!! virus software doesn't stop new viruses! the only ones that matter! damn, I can't even express how stupid this is.
the problem is windows is so much junk compaired to the up-to-date alternatives. It is entirley possible to make an OS that is virus-proof from the internet. it just has to not execute every bit of code it recieves with out permission. virus software dosn't block *new* viruses, the only ones that count. I don't use virus software and I use windows 98. I just don't run executables and net side code that is questionable.
the poster of that article is a paranoid freak. No one is goign to buy a router in the senerio he is talking about. It just wouldn't happen.
companies would figure out how to stream line this and make it viable for consumers, because no one is going to buy into it when you still have old routers available. The only way it would catch on is if it these routers where better then old ones at the same price. No one is going to pay more for a router just to have to pay *even more* for software and such. pure BS
it is intirely possible to make an OS virus-proof with out having to install 3rd party software.. anti-virus software today sucks anyway cause it can't catch new viruses, the only ones that really count.
It's IBM! and whats that in it's hands? It's a chain saw! They're taking them both out in one fowl swoop. What a grisley display.
it's nice to see IBM is so generous to the community. It's espcially good PR when you consider the hole Nazi computer number thing.
Whats with all the ill wind towards GBA lately? But, perhaps I'm a little biased since i own three SPs..
i guess you havn't seen it, if you got a cable modem i highly suggest you download the 600 meg video demo. Gaming will never be the same. get it here, gamespy free
Ahem, BS! just look at the success of the GBA!
This has SNES style graphics and the games are so much more fun then most newer 3d games. I'm pretty sure Nintendo is "staying afloat"
why did you edit out some of the "why cats are better then women" ?
finally a Ogg player for my brain! now i just gotta figure out where to plug it in..
640k quote replacment:
USA TODAY: Is there a scenario by which you would at some point consider porting Microsoft applications into Linux?
BG: There's no consideration of that at this point.
what a sad, blind man. Linux is FREE!
i guess you don't know alot about MS's history, IE DrDoss, Xerox's windows, The Taskbar, etc. MS didn't have a much marketing at all that i've noticed until Windows 95
Creating an even more closed system will cut off the hand that feeds microsoft. There will be no more small developers in windows, which means MS will have no one to rip fresh ideas from! They seem to forget where they came from. Thank god they finnally will paint themselves into a corner.
I thought that review was very accurate to previous Lindows versions, atleast from the point of view of the ignorant. Lindows 4.0 is a decient step up but it still has more work to go.
so kazaa wants to be the 'money' of online trading? to bad their protocall sucks.. corrupt downloads and participation hacks arn't a good way to start a standard.
If you want high-end software there is closed software that will run on an open OS, right?
Open software less secure then closed? eh, bullshit! Microsoft may have easily left backdoors for themselves in any software they publish. but we all know bout BSD. I wonder if the UK does?