Slashdot Mirror


Chimera Twins Story

skelley writes "Below is an audio link on this morning's story on NPR about Chimera twins, or people with two sets of DNA. It turns out that every once in a while a set of fraternal twin eggs merge into one embryo. The resulting person has two sets of DNA. The story says it is possible for a Chimera to have different sets of DNA in different body parts. This can cause complication for body identification, DNA typing for organ transplants, crime investigation, etc. Researchers have no idea how common this is, but suppose that it is a reasonable percentage of all fraternal twin pregnancies, which would mean millions worldwide. No text version. NPR often doesn't publish one. "

483 comments

  1. crime investigation problems by afex · · Score: 4, Funny

    so now when your liver commits a crime, it can be convicted seperately?

    1. Re:crime investigation problems by timbloid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find Gin to be a fitting punishment for a criminal liver...

    2. Re:crime investigation problems by grug0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really? I prefer fava beans and a nice chianti.

    3. Re:crime investigation problems by SunPin · · Score: 1, Funny

      Continuing the cycle of violence solves nothing. :)

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    4. Re:crime investigation problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of my body has been known to commit crimes against my liver from time to time.

    5. Re:crime investigation problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so now when your liver commits a crime, it can be convicted seperately?

      If the liver doesn't fit, you must acquit!
    6. Re:crime investigation problems by jd · · Score: 1

      On that basis, the Queen Mother was sentanced to 120 years.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:crime investigation problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and in order not to subject the rest of you to punishment you don't deserve, it will be incarcerated separately from the rest of you.

    8. Re:crime investigation problems by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      • Continuing the cycle of violence solves nothing. :)

      Sure it does! It solves the problem "how do I really hork off those wankers over there?"

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  2. Hmm by pantycrickets · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would like to be able to decide which of the two sets of DNA are set as 'active' at a given time. That would be nice for things like murdering my wife and whoever she is sleeping with outside of our house, and then getting away with the crime.

    If the DNA don't fit.. well.. uhh.. ahh shit.

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That would be nice for things like murdering my wife and whoever she is sleeping with

      But what if she was sleeping with your Chimera twin?!

    2. Re:Hmm by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well if you are a guy, it would still be easy to get a DNA match, as the Y Cromisome comes only from the father with no recombination, so that will be uniform. Even if other stuff won't be. And since both sets of DNA come from the same parents they are going to look rather similar. More so now that labs know to look for this stuff.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    3. Re:Hmm by parnasus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to be totally pedantic, but being fraternal twins could mean that two fathers impregnated two eggs at nearly the same time. If it were possible for these two zygotes to merge, which I _highly_ doubt, then the resulting Chimera twin could have seperate Y-chromosomes from two fathers.

      --
      --If you code for the exceptions, the rules fall into place
    4. Re:Hmm by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Mr. Dufresne, I presume?

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    5. Re:Hmm by Cunk · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Caught by process of elimination.

      --

      I am the inventor of the hilarious refrigerator alarm.
    6. Re:Hmm by Adam+Schumacher · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a movie trailer I saw a few years ago... a mullet-sporting redneck is talking to his irlfriend about their new baby... "He has your eyes... and the facial features of several of my friends. HEY!" (Paraphrased)

      Anyone remember the name of the movie? It's escaping me at the moment.

    7. Re:Hmm by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      Well, Mitochondrial DNA only comes from the mother, and it can potentially be a better idenfication, because it works on both males and females.

    8. Re:Hmm by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      Similarly, whether you're a guy or not, the mitochondrial DNA comes only from the mother and should be uniform.

      The problem is that if you restrict the RFLPS analysis to a single chromosome or to mitochondrial DNA alone, the statistical weight is significantly diminished.

      For instance, your Y chromosome would be, aside from spontaneous mutations, identical to the Y chromosomes of all your great-great-great-...-great grandfather's descendents along a purely male line of descent. Since spontaneous mutation rates are quite small, over time this produces a huge population whose Y chromosomes have identical distributions of DNA fragment lengths, thus reducing the statistical weight of a Y-chromosome match trememdously compared to the weight of a match of fragments from all 46 chromosomes.

      The same argument holds for mitochondrial DNA.

    9. Re:Hmm by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Much more likely, it could mean the same father impregnated two eggs
      at the same time, but it should be noted that one of the resulting
      sets of DNA might have a Y chromosome, and the other might not. The
      implications of this possibility are left as an exercise to the reader.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    10. Re:Hmm by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 0, Interesting
      Actually no.

      You aren't a mix of your parent's genes, you are a mix of your grandparent's genes. Sex cells go through a process called meiosis whereby 1 cell splits into 4 cells, each with half the genetic content.

      The mother's ovum are formed shortly after conception. A woman is born with every ovum she will ever produce, they just leave the final assembly steps for ovulation. Men form sperm throughout their lives, but these cells are all decendents from the cells that were set aside during the developmental process.

      Now how is it that you are actually a combination of your grandparent's genes? Well every human actually has 2 complete sets of DNA. Even the Y chromosome. Only half are expressed at a time. During sex-cell production, all genes come into play. During Metaphase I the chromosomes pair up and swap genes.

      If you think of Mendel's experiments, hybrids of a dominant and recessive gene don't express the recessive trait until the second generation. This is why.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    11. Re:Hmm by ars · · Score: 1

      The implications of this are quite simple: the child will be female. And fertile too.

      Providing female hormones to a fetus will make it female regardless of what the DNA says, it's basic - although quite interesting - biology. And since the DNA is male, which has both side of the chromosome, then child is fertile.

      A bigger problem is if not enough hormones are produced, then you have mixed genders, but in a chimera this doesn't typically happen.

      Usually mixed genders occur on the other side of the hormone equation: the receptors for the hormone.

      If the receptors don't 'receive' the hormones properly they don't 'feminize'. If they receive no hormones at all the child is male, but sterile, since it only has female chromosomes. If they work partially then you have a mix, usually sterile, but possibly self fertilizing (not very likely though)!

      If you are interested in this subject there is quite a bit of info out there, just look for chimera to get you started (and ignore the info about chimera in cows :) where it is apparently quite common.

      --
      -Ariel
    12. Re:Hmm by robolemon · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think you're oversimplifying the issue and in the process coming to some false conclusions. Sure, each human has 46 chromosomes... 23 from each parent.

      You wrote:

      "Well every human actually has 2 complete sets of DNA. Even the Y chromosome. Only half are expressed at a time."
      Every human has two copies of each kind of chomosome, making a total of 46, which is ONE complete set! For some traits, one of the chromosomes has a dominant gene that is expressed, in many cases. However, sometimes neither gene dominates and they are both partially expressed.

      Also, a man has one X chromosome and one Y chromosome, not two of each. Half of his sperm cells will have a copy of the X, and the other half a copy of the Y. And a female's DNA is finalized when the sperm meets the egg in the mother! Any egg cells produced contain merely half of the 46 chromosomes already present in the zygote at conception! Since the grandfather's Y chromosome could never be present in a mother's DNA, she will never pass a Y to her children, which is why we never see a YY-gendered person.

      --

      I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

    13. Re:Hmm by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      What about having kids and say you aren't the dad.

      "Your honor, it's not my DNA".

      The left ball produce the first set of DNA, the right one the other set.

      How cool is that?

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    14. Re:Hmm by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it's also asexual, and only mutations modify it. That would make it a poor marker, or an expensive one to get enough resolution (accuracy) with.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    15. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, if you're male (or in rare instances appear female outwardly but are actually genetically male, or some combination (XXY)) you'll only have one Y chromosome, it pairs with the X from your mom. but when the paired chromosomes split, they can swap chunks, etc, so two fraternal twins are not going to have the same DNA, and i would bet that you don't really have any chromosome that is a direct copy of any of your mom's or dad's, or grandparents for that mater. re: crime investigation, they don't sequence the whole genome of what they've found, just cut it up & compare what they get for fragments. do that in enough places & you get a fairly individual pattern with a relatively small number or cuts. maybe it wouldn't be a problem, if every cell of a chimera twin had double the amount of DNA, then they'd actually be much easier to single out (the pattern would look really weird, obviously too much DNA), kind of like the mutilated fingerprints database that the FBI has....

    16. Re:Hmm by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      It wasn't me -- it was my Dad!!

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    17. Re:Hmm by russotto · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've got it backwards. It's exposure to testosterone which makes a (human) fetus male. However IIRC the sex organs form first. So you can have your XY female caused by not responding to testosterone; she can have apparently-normal external sexual characteristics (the testes will remain inside) but she's sterile (no ovaries). She also can't legally compete in the Olympics.

      I suppose a mixed-sex-chromosome chimera could come out any way -- two testes, two ovaries, one of each, and with sexual characteristics of either or mixed gender.

    18. Re:Hmm by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well keep an eye on this:

      http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns9 99 92716

      "Muscle biopsies showed that about 90 per cent of his mitochondria came from his father. However, the mitochondria in his blood, hair roots and fibroblasts came entirely from his mother. "

      --
    19. Re:Hmm by ars · · Score: 1

      Bah! You are right. I did know this once upon a time, but I got the genders reversed in my head.

      However a female caused by non response to testosterone is fertile actually. See the second to last paragraph below.

      Let me repost the whole thing correctly this time:

      The implications of this are quite simple: the mixed chimera child will be male, fertility will depend on if the sex organs have male of female DNA.

      Providing male hormones to a fetus will make it male regardless of what the DNA says, it's basic - although quite interesting - biology. And since the DNA is female, which has only one side of the chromosome, then child is sterile.

      A bigger problem is if not enough hormones are produced, then you have mixed genders, but in a chimera this doesn't typically happen, since there is some testosterone.

      Usually mixed genders occur on the other side of the hormone equation - the reverse of the above: the receptors for the hormone.

      If the receptors don't 'receive' the hormones properly they don't 'masculize'. If they receive no hormones at all the child is female, and fertile! If they work partially then you have a mix, usually sterile, but possibly self fertilizing (not very likely though)!

      The type of problem (no receptors at all) usually runs in families. Since the child is female and fertile, they go on to have more kids with the same problem. But the DNA of the kids is male half the time! Usually you will see this a family with all female kids, some of them possibly with some male characteristics. Where their mother was also from a family with all female kids, etc. going back up the chain.

      It's interesting that such a person can not compete in the olympics - and quite unfair, since for all purposes they are female (but only if they have total failure of the receptors). It is interesting that this subject is discussed in the Talmud! Both the case of mixed organs and neither. The ruling there is you go by the external apperence, so in the case above the child is female, irregardless of what the DNA says (even though that can be measured today it's not used). If you are curious look up tumtum which is the aramaic word for a person with ambiguous genital signs.

      --
      -Ariel
    20. Re:Hmm by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      So you can have your XY female caused by not responding to testosterone

      You just know there is a joke somewhere in there...

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  3. There goes my number-one excuse by hard2spell · · Score: 5, Funny

    "My evil twin brother did it. Honest."

    1. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by lysander · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read Stephen King's The Dark Half. :)

      --
      GET YOUR WEAPONS READY! --DR.LIGHT
    2. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't laugh too soon. I was supposed to be a twin, but suddenly the ultrasounds stop picking up the second heartbeat while i was in utero. I wonder if I'm a chimera? Two of my children are fraternal twins (boy & girl) and fraternal and identical twins run in the family.

    3. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by haydon4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      But you get a new one.

      "I AM my own evil twin."

      How many other kids on the playground can say that?

    4. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whenever you see someone who wears half of a goatee, it's a dead giveaway you're dealing with of these chimera twins. I don't see any issues with identifying them.

    5. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 1

      thought that was called schizophrenia.

      --
      Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    6. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be 'both of me are evil twins'.

    7. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      props for megaman 2!!!

    8. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How many other kids on the playground can say that?

      All of them. That's you all ride the short bus.

    9. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > thought that was called schizophrenia.

      Actually, that's multiple personality disorder -- Schizophrenia doesn't entail multiple personalities.

      (Yeah, I can ruin any joke.)

    10. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I call it, 'Being a Gemini'. If you believe in that astrology crap, which I certainly don't want to imply I do & invoke the wrath of God fearing Christians.

    11. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever you see someone who wears half of a goatee, it's a dead giveaway you're dealing with of these chimera twins.


      Either that, or they're a Wunderland aristocrat from Known Space.
    12. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by jonadab · · Score: 1

      It used to be called schizophrenia. Then it was called multiple
      personality disorder. Then it was dissociative disorder. I'm not
      sure what they're calling it these days.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    13. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Jesse Venture is a Chimera Twin. He's always saying "I'm my own person!"

    14. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you said that remark, I was literally beside myself.

    15. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually dissociative dissorder is when a person is incapable of realising the results of their actions. Like beating someone in the head with a sharp axe without trying to kill them.

    16. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Twitch42 · · Score: 1

      A goatee is just the chin (Shaggy).
      What many people call a goatee is really a Van Dyke (the Green Arrow).

    17. Re:There goes my number-one excuse by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      How many other kids on the playground can say that?

      Any of them, but if you start explaining DNA they'll beat you up.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  4. For some reason... by Valar · · Score: 0, Funny

    I read the headline and thought... that must be a video game title. I think it's time for sleep.

    1. Re:For some reason... by Evil+Al · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...but do they have +2 attack strength?

      --
      Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
    2. Re:For some reason... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a TV show about the life of that singer. You know, "Chimera Twin's Story".

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:For some reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. +2 bonus to To-Hit dice result, plus Splash damage effect.

  5. Gonna be more common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The interesting thing is that since invitro fertilization has a much higher probability of twins (or more), chimeras will become more common.

    1. Re:Gonna be more common. by timbloid · · Score: 1

      like Dead Ringers without the Special effects...

    2. Re:Gonna be more common. by grug0 · · Score: 1

      I'm not too sure if chimeras have mutant giners. But I'm interested to find out!

    3. Re:Gonna be more common. by hellbunnie · · Score: 1
      The interesting thing is that since invitro fertilization has a much higher probability of twins (or more), chimeras will become more common.

      Um, not sure about this. Invitro embryos are implanted after they've divided a number of times already, it may well be too late for them to merge in this fashion.

    4. Re:Gonna be more common. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Forget invitro. The increasing use of fertility drugs in the past 15-20 years has caused a massive increase in multiple births, and likely increased the number of Chimeras as well.

    5. Re:Gonna be more common. by Ugot2BkidNme · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that they are all Gemini's?

    6. Re:Gonna be more common. by Nightpaw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Gemini's what?

    7. Re:Gonna be more common. by pmz · · Score: 1

      The increasing use of fertility drugs in the past 15-20 years has caused a massive increase in multiple births, and likely increased the number of Chimeras as well.

      Well, if a couple is so desparate to reproduce that they will risk having six or eight children at one time, why not take advantage of this situation to make all eight kids physically one (an eight-way chimera, for example).

    8. Re:Gonna be more common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people who would rather have eight deformed and suffering kids instead of only four, because they don't want an abortion are evil in my book, but I love your solution.

    9. Re:Gonna be more common. by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      I'm father to 3.5 month old twin girls. My wife recently joined a local mothers-of-twins-club, of the 11 people joining the club that night, 10 used drugs to conceive, one (my wife) did not... The club has grown because of these drugs, and the pediatrician made it clear that the rate of multiple births has doubled because of them!

      Does the doubling of the multiples birth rate because of these drugs imply a doubling of the chimera twinning rate?

  6. Slashdotting streaming audio by KillerHamster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What have you got against NPR? This is cruel and unusual punishment for any web server.

  7. Chimera Twins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it Camino Twins? (The Way Twins... sort of catchy.)

  8. finally, a valid excuse by whorfin · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is perfect for /. It's impossible to RTFA

    --
    Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    1. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but now we'll have people saying 'LttFA' (Listen to the Friendly Article)

    2. Re:finally, a valid excuse by trikberg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Despair not. This topic if any deserves a dupe. Wait 4-5 hours and their will be a submission which hopefully includes a text version for you to ignore.

      --
      This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    3. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      strange, I always thought it was the was for f*king

    4. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forking ?

    5. Re:finally, a valid excuse by socrates32 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try this explanation.

      --

      -- "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
      - Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
    6. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despair not. This topic if any deserves a dupe

      Which means it won't get one.

    7. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What idiot modded this "Troll"? The acronym does stand for "Read The Fucking Manual". Look here.

    8. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "F" stands for "Fucking," seriously.

    9. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Pray_4_Mojo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't it highly funny that a "public" radio station has choosen an exclusive, proprietary solution?

      There are open source streaming servers (shoutcast, Quicktime streaming server) and plenty of other, commercial servers that rely on open-standards (just like real radio) so that choice of client is irrelevant and up to the user.

      My other sig was /.'d

    10. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only because there are no widely accepted and widely known Open Source alternatives.

      NOTE: to be considered "widely known", a large number of people that don't read slashdot have to know what it is when you say its name so "ogg" doesn't count.

      To be "widely accepted", it has to be so simple that all the average user needs to do is click one button and it's working.

    11. Re:finally, a valid excuse by connsmythe96 · · Score: 1

      The newest winamp plays ogg, and that's very widely distributed. "Widely known" doesn't have to mean that they have HEARD of it, but only that they can play it. I think it's safe to say that the majority of users have winamp, realplayer, or quicktime. It doesn't matter if they know what the format is, they do have the ability to play it.

      --
      if(!cool) exit(-1);
    12. Re:finally, a valid excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Highly funny? I bet you're not even a member of public radio.

      The White House uses an exclusive proprietary solutions for Bush's speeches. I do pay lots of taxes and he wants people to hear his speeches (maybe?). I've yet to find a place to get a State of the Union speech I can burn to CD and listen in my car. Yes, I did fill out there online e-mail form.

    13. Re:finally, a valid excuse by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I think it's safe to say that the majority of users have winamp,
      > realplayer, or quicktime.

      I don't think that's a safe assumption at all. 84.3% of users don't
      have *anything* that wasn't either preinstalled when they bought the
      computer or automatically installed when they inserted the disk the
      ISP sent them in the Connection Kit. QT comes preinstalled on Mac,
      which gives it 4.7% share or so. Real and Winamp are AFAIK only
      used by people who install things. So, 4.7% for Mac users, plus
      the 15.7% who install things, but there's some overlap there, so
      only about 19.2% of users have any of these things installed.

      OTOH, among slashdot readers the percentages are very different,
      since 98.4% of slashdot readers install software (and indeed
      almost 70% are not afraid to install entire operating systems).
      So among slashdot readers it is very likely that the majority
      are using one or another of the above-listed applications.
      (That said, I don't have or want any of them... I have timidity
      and xmms and what else do I need?)

      Additionally, it is worth considering that 84.3% of users in
      the US are still on dialup (though, again, the number is lower
      on slashdot), which makes downloading audio news stories a
      somewhat less exciting proposition.

      Of course, 98.675% of all statistics are made up.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    14. Re:finally, a valid excuse by connsmythe96 · · Score: 1

      I think your last comment about sums it up. I don't know where those numbers came from or if any of them are legitimate. I haven't met anyone who would listen to online media streams and don't have either realplayer, quicktime, or winamp. I think people who don't know how to install a program are also unlikely to be listening to streaming media. It does happen, but it's not the target audience.

      --
      if(!cool) exit(-1);
    15. Re:finally, a valid excuse by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      But in this case, it's bound to be an *evil* duplicate.

  9. Looks like by The+Terrorists · · Score: 2, Interesting

    we should study this so we can give different parts of ourselves different DNA. If it is to be appropriated as a universal identification and control technology, we have to give it up if we want to remain sovereign. It is not that far away to have DNA identified radio tagging of people and, thus, near-absolute control.

    1. Re:Looks like by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2

      Ooh, yes, such scary prospects. Perhaps eventually we can have stealth-DNA installed that morphs constantly to avoid detection.

      But maybe that's not such a good idea... if you can't quite reach your beverage, you could suddenly evolve into a creature with far longer arms, but it would probably be quite incapable of drinking it.

    2. Re:Looks like by t · · Score: 1

      It's sad that very few people will catch this reference.

  10. Heehee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No text version. NPR often doesn't publish one.

    Oh ho ho, methinks they'll change their mind very shortly.

    1. Re:Heehee by Ratphace · · Score: 1, Redundant

      No text version. NPR often doesn't publish one.

      Yeah, well, after a high quality ./ hammering of their site, they might consider a lower bandwidth text version *cackle*

    2. Re:Heehee by Kalak · · Score: 1

      I'm currently pulling down a 44k stream. Your contribution dollars at work, all to survive /.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    3. Re:Heehee by enthused+i+swear · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure that NPR will publish text articles from all of their shows, because they obviously have the funds and staff to do so, since the government gives them so much money. /sarcasm

    4. Re:Heehee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's sure a shame that our government doesn't spend more money subsidizing a media company. It works for China, why not the US?

    5. Re:Heehee by killthiskid · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're a dipshit spreading FUD.

      From http://www.npr.org/about/place/corpsupport/financi als.html

      NPR's annual revenues come primarily from member station dues and programming fees, contributions from private foundations, and corporate underwriting. A long-standing board policy prohibits NPR from soliciting listeners directly: on-air fund raising, direct mail, and telephone solicitations remain a prerogative of member stations.

      The only direct government funding NPR receives is through competitive grants from government agencies for specific projects. Such grants are awarded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the National Science Foundation, and the National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities, and typically represent only 2% of total revenues.

      There is no 'budget line' for NPR in the fedral budget.

    6. Re:Heehee by Igmuth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Other media outlets manage to do their job without mooching off the taxpayers.

      Are these the same media outlets the barrage you with commercials every 30 seconds?
    7. Re:Heehee by orulz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, you will probably find NPR stations run by public colleges, that obtain some portion of their revenue from the college's budget - which in turn may come partially from taxes.

      In this case, I don't begrudge NPR my tax dollars. They have some truly interesting programming that probably wouldn't survive if it depended on commercials (not to mention that we'd have to listen to the commercials - bleh.) Whine as much as you like about government subsidy of media or a particular point of view. But as for me, I refuse to depend on Fox News et al for intelligent, balanced news coverage and information.

    8. Re:Heehee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Other media outlets do NOT manage to do their job without mooching off the taxpayers; they manage to sell their soulds without mooching of the taxpayers. But what would one expect from somebody who puts a quote from uber-racist Anne Coulter in his sig?

    9. Re:Heehee by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      You mean like Voice of America or Armed Forces Network? However to be fair, they aren't any more propaganda than, say, Foxnews.

    10. Re:Heehee by 2short · · Score: 1

      "However, you will probably find NPR stations run by public colleges, that obtain some portion of their revenue from the college's budget - which in turn may come partially from taxes"

      That's pretty tenuous (and not the case for any of the 5 NPR member stations that I know the organization of). Those same colleges undoubtably run all sorts of programs that pay dues to various non-profit orgs. That doesn't make the non-profits government programs. Heck, the big public university in my town gives free rent to several big technology corporations, mostly just for locating their R&D departments on the campus. It's undoubtably worth it in part-time jobs for grad students, access to lab equipment, etc.

    11. Re:Heehee by spRed · · Score: 1
      The only direct government funding NPR receives is through ... [a bunch of people including] the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

      From the Corp for Public Broadcasting about page http://www.cpb.org/about/
      • "[CPB] receives an annual appropriation from Congress, representing 12% of public broadcasting's revenues"
      • "[CPB] provides the largest source of funds for radio programming and television programming for broadcast on NPR and PBS"
      So NPR receives a portion of its money indirectly from the Govt. They quickest way to find out how much is to cut them off and see if they can swim.

      --
      .sig Karma out the wazoo, better to spend points elsewhere if this is above 2 or below 0
    12. Re:Heehee by killthiskid · · Score: 1

      If you take the 2% of NPR 200 million dollar budget you get 4 mil. Take and divided by three (they mention it takes 3 groups to build up that 2%), then you have 1.33 million from CPB (estimate). CPB's total budget is $386 mil. So take the 12 million they get from the feds and you end up with 3.11% of CPB's budget is from the feds... take that 3.11% times the $1.33 they give to NPR, and you get $96,000. That's the rought amount of money from congress that actually makes it to NPR. Not a whole lot for a 200 million dollar budget. While I don't think they'd like it, I'm sure you could yank CPB's funding and it wouldn't matter much to NPR's ultimate survival.

      For an interesting break down of what CPB actually funds, go to: http://www.cpb.org/programs/pr.php?prn=332

    13. Re:Heehee by mike_the_kid · · Score: 1
      (Then again, since when was any government operation known for saving money?)


      I don't think NPR is a government operation. NPR is a non-profit that recieves grants from the government, but it is not the same. There is no Department of Media (thank God). NPR does a great job, and its more money that is not being spent on bombs, which is a good thing, in my opinion.
      --
      Troll Like a Champion Today
    14. Re:Heehee by spRed · · Score: 1

      Multiplying rough numbers from different sources accumulates a high amount of error quickly. Also, at least some government funding comes indirectly through non-CPB channels. Does NPR pay for paly rights to programs that CPB funds? Who knows, there is only one way to find out:

      If NPR doesn't need any goverment money they shouldn't take any of it. It would shut up their detractors and the much-talked-about liberal private radio station would be born. That is why I said above the only way to really see how much funding they get from goverment entities is to cut them off entirely (or if NPR refused them entirely, same effect).

      --
      .sig Karma out the wazoo, better to spend points elsewhere if this is above 2 or below 0
    15. Re:Heehee by killthiskid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Multiplying rough numbers from different sources accumulates a high amount of error quickly.

      Agreed. It is a rough estimate, but I still think that it shows that the amount of federal money that actually makes it to NPR is low.

      If NPR doesn't need any goverment money they shouldn't take any of it. It would shut up their detractors and the much-talked-about liberal private radio station would be born.

      Two points: agreed... if they don't need the cash, they shouldn't take it... but I do think they need it, and I highly doubt you would find them saying otherwise, too... but when we are spending a 4 billion a month (a little over a 1000 dollars a second) on the war in Iraq, it kinda puts that small sum of money that NPR gets into perspective, doesn't it?

      As for equating the theoretical fall of NPR with a theoretical rise of liberal radio, you're just attacking.

  11. Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't DNA to some extent at least determine blood type? Would it be possible to have two blood types? Surely not, but as I do not have any way to listen to the link I will never know until some kind soul gives us the gist of it.

    1. Re:Odd by Hentai · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, IANAMB (I am not a molecular biologist), but I would assume that if the blood or tissue types were incompatable, the embryo would very quickly become non-viable, and the body would take care of it in the normal way (remember - only about 15% of all inception results in birth; the rest are spontaneously aborted.)

      I would imagine that the number of viable chimeric embryos is much lower than the total number of chimeric embryos; in fact, you could probably graph something like an inverse logistic curve of surviving chimeric embryos vs. days of pregnancy.

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    2. Re:Odd by timbloid · · Score: 1

      I guess if one of your blood types is O, then it shouldn't matter what your other one is...

      If one is A, and the other B, then chances are you'd die before birth...

    3. Re:Odd by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2, Informative

      A good resource about Identical v. Fraternal twins states that fraternal twins develop when two separate eggs are fertilized and implant in the uterus. The genetic connection is no more or less the same as siblings born at separate times. They may look alike, or they may not.

      Chimera twins would contain both complete sets of "sibling" DNA, which could theoretically be female and male DNA combined, let alone multiple blood types.

      One might assume that multiple blood types would result in a (naturally) aborted fetus, and thus the person would not be born.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    4. Re:Odd by squarefish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Listen to it, it's very interesting. Basically the woman they interview had a kidney issue and needed a donor- when they tested her sons they said that it was impossible for them to be her sons. her blood type is from one egg and other parts of her are from the other egg.

      A detective talks about the possiblity of someone like this commiting murder where there is a blood sample left at the scene, but when they take a swap sample from the inside of the suspects mouth it shows a completely different dna.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    5. Re:Odd by MadBiologist · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Finally!!!!! I can say IAAMB! I am a Molecular Biologist! Yeah ME!

      Now that I've got that out of the way... I'd say that quite often since differentiation of cell occures very early on, and that often the other allele in the pair is inactivated, it may be that one tissue type is derived from the one set of genes, and another type is derived from the other set of genes. That person may be a a higher risk of developing auto-immune diseases. Your proposition of spontanious abortion is quite possible... but remember Jurassic Park (life will find a way!).

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    6. Re:Odd by timbloid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but remember Jurassic Park

      Hee hee, a molecular biologist quoting Jurrassic Park?

    7. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Multiple blood types would in fact happin, but an effective blood type would exist which is simply the sum of given blood types. As all possible blood types actually occur already, no new blood types would appear in this manner.

      The problem with mixing multiple blood types is that the immune system will target all foreign biological material, including unknown blood types. However, the method by which the immune system bootstraps itself involves sampling all material in the fetus, insuring that anything already present will not touch off the immune system.

      In conclusion, mixed DNA does not have blood type problems.

    8. Re:Odd by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Remember - only about 15% of all inception results in birth; the rest are spontaneously aborted.

      And that leads to us to those wonderful few days women have every month. Gee, thanks god. I really appreciate that. /sarcasm

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    9. Re:Odd by niko9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, IANAMB (I am not a molecular biologist), but..

      Well, IANAAA (I Am Not A Acronym Abuser) but what was the point of you using an obscure acronym if you had to spell it out for everybody anyways? ;) /me make jokey joke/

    10. Re:Odd by mikeee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      IANAMBBMWI (I am not a molecular biologist, but my wife is).

      This isn't as big a problem as you'ld think; as long as the two embryos merge before the cells start to differentate it could work.

      There are some really creepy experiments with mice where they did this on purpose with white and black mice, and got striped (!) mice that always had exactly 13 stripes (well, sometimes adjacent stripes were the same color, but if you made enough mice you could tell) - this told them that the skin developed from 13 cells, etc.

      Presumably if you're mixing siblings you won't get stripes...

    11. Re:Odd by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      Duh. I should have finished that biology degree instead of switching to CompSci in the 4th year :(

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    12. Re:Odd by timbloid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Presumably if you're mixing siblings you won't get stripes...

      Sometimes you do

    13. Re:Odd by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 1

      According to this (and since it's on the internet, it must be true, right?):

      Human chimeras were first discovered with the advent of blood typing when it was found that some people had more than one blood type. Most of them proved to be "blood chimeras" -- non-identical twins who shared a blood supply in the uterus. Those who were not twins are thought to have blood cells from a twin that died early in gestation. Twin embryos often share a blood supply in the placenta, allowing blood stem cells to pass from one and settle in the bone marrow of the other.
      So it looks like the answer is yes, people can have more than one blood type.
    14. Re:Odd by Mr+D.+Logan · · Score: 1

      Well, if you remember your immunology, the embyro goes through a stage where it inactivates the genes coding for antibodies that attack self cells or anything else that it is directly exposed to.

    15. Re:Odd by MadBiologist · · Score: 1
      But during B cell and T cell differentiation, double screening will tend to weed out self specific antigens on the B cell surface, and I'd bet that it's possible to have cells from both sets of DNA involved in the screening.

      Besides which, lots of immune cells that have markers for self antigens are produced, but as long as they don't come into contact with the cells that they code against, we're fine. I remember that there are auto-immune diseases like lupus that target you own DNA.

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    16. Re:Odd by indead · · Score: 1

      I know you were being sarcastics, but you're still wrong. That has nothing to do with inception.

    17. Re:Odd by azzy · · Score: 1

      Note that the 85% 'spontaneous abortions' mentioned above does NOT lead to those wonderful few days women have every month. The parent was referring to 15% of all inception, i.e. 15% of all ovum that become fertilised. Those wonderful days occur every month without ovum being fertlised, and 85% of months that the ovum are fertlised. Well, sometimes they can also occur when pregnancy successfully occurs, and other times will not occur even when there is no pregnancy.

      NB: No idea if percentages are correct, following numbers of above post.

    18. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus you have to remember to account for crossing over on the parental sides, where chromosomes 'swap' sequences during mitosis or meiosis. Even identical twins can have slightly different DNA as a result of this.

    19. Re:Odd by fred_sanford · · Score: 1

      that's why i suggest a new format. either:
      IANAAC (Acronym Creator)
      or
      IANA Acronym Creator.

    20. Re:Odd by 2logic · · Score: 1
      I would assume that if the blood or tissue types were incompatable

      Well, IANAMB. Neither am I, but blood types from the twins couldn't be incompatible since they would both be in their mother's woom, which means that they would share their mother's blood stream, which means that they would have compatible blood types.

      I'm not a blood expert, nor a transplant expert, but from what I understand, they were simply saying that two of her sons had a blood type that was impossible to have, based on their mother's type. They did not say their blood type was incompatible (as in death in the woom).

      --
      // TODO
    21. Re:Odd by snilloc · · Score: 1

      Fraternal twins also share an important environment for 9 months - the womb. Genetically, they would be "normal" siblings, but environmental factors in the womb affect development and gene expression.

    22. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IANAMBBMWI (I am not a molecular biologist, but my wife is).

      IANAMBAIMTCBSSG

      I am not a molecular biologist, and I managed to circumvent biology since seventh grade. Physics, chemistry or both always snuck me by. It helped me avoid many icky situations.

    23. Re:Odd by Darby · · Score: 1

      And that leads to us to those wonderful few days women have every month. Gee, thanks god. I really appreciate that. /sarcasm

      There is an easy way around that whole business.
      My wife has had about 3 of those sets of days since we met.
      You know those green pills in birth control packs (color may vary, and some don't even have them, but regardless) those are placebos. If, rather than taking the placebos for 5 days, they just start a new pack, then voila no more periods.

      It kicks ass, let me tell you.

    24. Re:Odd by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      One of my friends' significant other's did that, and got majorly sick from it for about 2 weeks... all the cramps and bad attitude, but no period to show for it. I don't have any details, and I don't particularly want them...

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    25. Re:Odd by syberanarchy · · Score: 1

      IANAMBBIPOOTV

      I am not a molecular biologist, but I play one on TV.

    26. Re:Odd by Darby · · Score: 1

      I don't have any details, and I don't particularly want them..

      Yikes.
      My wife doesn't have those probs. She started doing it long before I met her though, so maybe it's something that only happens at first.

    27. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAIFACTBIANAMBAMWUTPOAMBOTVBHSGCANSDI

      I am, in fact, a chimera twin, but I am not a molecular biologist, although my wife used to play one (a molecular biologist) on TV, but her show got cancelled and now she does infomercials.

    28. Re:Odd by Gumber · · Score: 1

      Given that the immune system learns "self" by experiencing "self" durring its development (this same mechanism is exploited with "allergy shots" in adults), I think I'll assign a lower gestational mortality rate to chimera's due to auto-immue issues than you do. Still, it does seem to add to the opportunity for things to go wrong.

      On the flip side though, I wonder if a chimera would stand a better chance of normal development in situations where one of the original embryos had a double recessive defect.

    29. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So THAT's what BMW stands for! I always figured those POS cars had something to do with women! :)

    30. Re:Odd by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when my uncle drinks a lot his blood type becomes XO positive. ;).

      --
  12. Women already do this. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the X chromosomes is mostly disabled a little bit past conception (after the cells have divided a good amount though). However, which one is disabled is random at this time, which means different regions of the body derived from the original cell will have different X chromosomes disabled (into what's called a Barr body). This is all very screwy which is why females are very screwy.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Women already do this. by johnstein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This isn't directly related to what you said. but what happens if the fraternal twins that merge to become a single chimera twin are male and female? is this a possible explaination for hermaphrodites?

      Again, as I said elsewhere in another reply to this article. I am not a biologist, please be kind if this question has an obvious, or easily googlable, answer. :)

      -John

      --
      "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    2. Re:Women already do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is why females are very screwy.

      /. reader alert!

    3. Re:Women already do this. by wwest4 · · Score: 4, Informative

      they mention this in the audio. apparently chimerism can manifest itself in a hermaphroditic fashion - they mention a (mostly) male chimera who apparently had ovarian tissue.

    4. Re:Women already do this. by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1

      This implicates all chimera males would have Klinefelter's syndrome and as a consequence would be incapable of producing sperm and suffer gynecomastia (have breasts). This is of course not very screwy.

    5. Re:Women already do this. by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      is this a possible explaination for hermaphrodites?

      Take this question one step further? Has it ever been recorded where one set of DNA contains a genetic disorder and the other does not?

      IANAB, I just find the idea insteresting and maybe a possiblity for treatment (Find the problem early enough, then introduce an extra set of DNA to reduce the impact of the disease; though this idea definitely has some ethics baggage attached.)

      -B

    6. Re:Women already do this. by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 2, Funny
      a (mostly) male chimera who apparently had ovarian tissue

      That would be a pretty freaky thing to discover about yourself. "Egad, I'm part female!" Gives a whole new meaning to, "getting in touch with your feminine side".

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    7. Re:Women already do this. by azzy · · Score: 1

      It's probable that most of us have some sort of genetic 'disorder'. It depends what you regard as a disorder.

    8. Re:Women already do this. by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      Cats show this deactivation clearly ... the orange and black colors are on the X chromosome in them. The blotched black/orange (or cream/grey) coloration of a tortoiseshell or calico shows that the two X chromosomes were inactivated separately and randomly.

    9. Re:Women already do this. by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Informative
      "is this a possible explaination for hermaphrodites? "

      No. Most hermaphrodites have DNA for one person - not two distinct cell populations from two separately fertilized eggs.

      Usually cases of "ambiguous gender" are the result of "testicular feminization", ... genetically they are XY males, but because of an inherited trait on the X chromosome from their mom, they develop physically as female ... partially or to the extent that only their gynecologist could tell the difference.

      The two I remember from doing lab tests in a fertility clinic were very "female" looking. And no, we didn't say "guess what, you are really a man" when the chromosome testing came back because they aren't. The default state for humans is female unless testesterone is produced by the fetus AND the fetus responds to it.

    10. Re:Women already do this. by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 1

      Extra 23rd chromosome was the first thing that came to my mind.

      -B

    11. Re:Women already do this. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      In 7th grade in science class the frog me and my partner got had both ovies and testes.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    12. Re:Women already do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. chimeras still receive male and female genes. however, studies of chimeras with only paternal OR only maternal genes (eg. by 'fertilising' the egg with an egg nucleus, then fusing with a standard embryo) show interesting effects.

    13. Re:Women already do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many amphibians have a no sex chromosomes but a temperature-dependant sex determination mechanism. If the temperature is not stable as the egg develops, you can easily produce an intersex/hermaphroditic frog.

    14. Re:Women already do this. by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      "is this a possible explaination for hermaphrodites? "

      No. Most hermaphrodites have DNA for one person - not two distinct cell populations from two separately fertilized eggs.

      Actually, yes: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/338/3/ 166, it's just not the *only* explanation.

    15. Re:Women already do this. by kapok_tree · · Score: 1

      A chimeric person can have tissue that tests is of both genders - and, as has been demonstrated, this tissue can even be gonadal tissue. However, the secondary sex characteristics are determined hormonally. Hence, there are instances of people who are in fact genetically one gender but wholly expressed as the other gender. This is generally dscovered when the unexpressed gonads begin to necrotize at the beginning of adolescence. My point is that although the boy is a hermaphrodite I'd say he's a male who has some female tissue; there shouldn't be any question which bathroom he should use.

    16. Re:Women already do this. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Extra 23rd chromosome was the first thing that came to my mind.

      Really? First thing that came to my mind was a giant, hideously mutated freak.

    17. Re:Women already do this. by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      Gives a whole new meaning to, "getting in touch with your feminine side".

      Especially when your feminine side if your entire left side.

    18. Re:Women already do this. by Nels · · Score: 1

      Sorry buddy, but according to a page referenced above (http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/Biology Pages/M/Mosaics.html#TetragameticHuman), you aren't quite right and this is a possible way for a hermaphrodite to be born. However, you may be right about the majority of hermaphrodites.
      quote from page:
      In some cases, this mosaic pattern results in a hermaphrodite

    19. Re:Women already do this. by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      The various degrees of testicular feminization were much more common than any of the other causes of ambiguous genitalia (what most non-medical would call "hermaphrodite") in the cases we diagnosed. They were followed by the various XY number problems. I don't recall a true somatic hermaphrodite mosaic, and one of them would have caused a memorable stampede of interns to the lab to look at the slides, and been the subject of some in-house presentations.

      It's partly genetic and partly hormone controlled - the wonder is that so many people are anatomically normal. In a tetragamete mammal, the merging happens at a very early stage (the multicell blob stage), so the cells are quite jumbled. As they organize and differentiate, it would be quite rare to have both XX and XY cells end up in the right areas, and have the XX cells be unaffected by the early testosterone release from the XY ones and continue to develop into ovaries and a uterus. (that said, one person from Canada was reportedly male enough to have traditional male/female sex, and female enough to become pregnant, although it resulted in a stillbirth ... this kind of case is so rare it gets presented at medical conferences)

      http://www.urologyhealth.org/pediatric/index.cfm ?cat=01&topic=110
      http://www.gfmer.ch/Books/Reproductive_health/Hu man_sexual_differentiation.html

    20. Re:Women already do this. by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1
      what happens if the fraternal twins that merge to become a single chimera twin are male and female?

      You get Tuck....

  13. Bad times for TIA style efforts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, why not take these people into custody?

    As this seems to become "common practice" for all cases that do not fit "into the plan"...

  14. Oh God... by mschoolbus · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I thought images were bad when getting /.ed...

  15. Physical issues resulting from this? by Blackbox42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any known birth defects/oddities arrise from this which manifest themselves in the physical sence? IE if your trying to test someone's DNA and realise they have blond hair on one half of there skull and black on the other you would know something was up.

    1. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Yes, an overbearing personality and insane love of pepper and fast cars, not to mention a penchant for Dalmatian-fur coats.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by larkost · · Score: 3, Informative

      The main thrust of the segment is about a woman who was told that her children could not be hers according to a blood typing. What was eventually discovered was that she is a Chimera, with the blood and eggs stemming from two different genetic strains (they would have been fraternal twins).

    3. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Funny
      I know a girl similar to that - collars and cuffs don't match.

      I never realised she was a chimera!

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    4. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Any known birth defects/oddities arrise from this which manifest themselves in the physical sence?

      Yes, a chronic inability to type and/or spell is quite common. Why do you ask?

    5. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, that woman. She is a "blood chimera" ... the red blood cells in her body have a population from her and one from her twin because of merged blood vessels in the placentas. This can sometimes give some misleading tests when ordinary ABO/rH testing is used. She was not a "tissue chimera", which would be an individual with mixed populations in the other tissues, such as ovaries, skin, heart, etc.

    6. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There was a brutal serial killer in Russia, or maybe the old Soviet Union, who proved very difficult to catch, because DNA tests of his blood and semen didn't match. At the time I wondered how his DNA could fail to match. I guess this could be the explanation.

      Did an anomalous genotype contribute to his mental pathology? No obvious mechanism comes to mind.

    7. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by p4ul13 · · Score: 0

      In soviet Russia; DNA doesn't match you?

      Ahhh I dunno; in any case, do you have any more info on that case?

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    8. Re:Physical issues resulting from this? by jmb_no · · Score: 1

      I tried growing a beard once, but gave up when I discovered that my beard had four different colours. Maybe I should get a DNA test.... ;-)

  16. I **KNEW** it! by DangerTenor · · Score: 5, Funny

    O.J. is INNOCENT! It was my.... uhh.... other DNA...

    --
    Check out our infosecurity industry blog: http://securitymusings.com/
  17. Complications by Upright+Joe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The story says it is possible for a Chimera to have different sets of DNA in different body parts. This can cause complication for body identification, DNA typing for organ transplants, crime investigation, etc.

    Wouldn't this cause complications a little more important to the individual than those listed? Like say, stuff not fitting together right? I mean, I wouldn't want to try and build a working car from half Ford Explorer parts and half Ford Focus parts.

    I wonder how many people with this condition die before birth or at a very young age.

    1. Re:Complications by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Funny

      ONE PIECE AT A TIME
      Written by W. Kemp
      Recorded by Johnny Cash on 3/5/76
      Number one - County Chart; Number 29 - Pop Chart

      Well, I left Kentucky back in '49
      An' went to Detroit workin' on a 'sembly line
      The first year they had me puttin' wheels on cadillacs

      Every day I'd watch them beauties roll by
      And sometimes I'd hang my head and cry
      'Cause I always wanted me one that was long and black.

      One day I devised myself a plan
      That should be the envy of most any man
      I'd sneak it out of there in a lunchbox in my hand
      Now gettin' caught meant gettin' fired
      But I figured I'd have it all by the time I retired
      I'd have me a car worth at least a hundred grand.

      CHORUS
      I'd get it one piece at a time
      And it wouldn't cost me a dime
      You'll know it's me when I come through your town
      I'm gonna ride around in style
      I'm gonna drive everybody wild
      'Cause I'll have the only one there is a round.

      So the very next day when I punched in
      With my big lunchbox and with help from my friends
      I left that day with a lunch box full of gears
      Now, I never considered myself a thief
      GM wouldn't miss just one little piece
      Especially if I strung it out over several years.

      The first day I got me a fuel pump
      And the next day I got me an engine and a trunk
      Then I got me a transmission and all of the chrome
      The little things I could get in my big lunchbox
      Like nuts, an' bolts, and all four shocks
      But the big stuff we snuck out in my buddy's mobile home.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Complications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's more like parts of a Ford Explorer and parts of a Mercury Mountaneer

    3. Re:Complications by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I'm building a car right now with part Ford Explorer parts (rear Axle), part Chevy Astrovan parts (4.3L vortec engine), part Jeep Cherokee parts (New transmission), and mainly Jeep Wrangeler parts (frame and body). With a little help from Advance Adapters it all goes to gether fairly nice.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Complications by Little+Brother · · Score: 2, Funny

      The transmission was a '53
      And the motor turned out to be a '73
      And when we tried to put in the bolts all the holes were gone.

      So we drilled it out so that it would fit
      And with a little bit of help with an A-daptor kit
      We had that engine runnin' just like a song
      Now the headlight' was another sight
      We had two on the left and one on the right
      But when we pulled out the switch all three of 'em come on.

      The back end looked kinda funny too
      But we put it together and when we got thru
      Well, that's when we noticed that we only had one tail-fin
      About that time my wife walked out
      And I could see in her eyes that she had her doubts
      But she opened the door and said "Honey, take me for a spin."

      So we drove up town just to get the tags
      And I headed her right on down main drag
      I could hear everybody laughin' for blocks around
      But up there at the court house they didn't laugh
      'Cause to type it up it took the whole staff
      And when they got through the title weighed sixty pounds

      From Johnny Cash's "One Piece at a Time"

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    5. Re:Complications by sapped · · Score: 1

      There was actually a bunch of workers that did this at the BMW assembly plant in South Africa. They smuggled the parts out in the tanker which housed all the cleaning fluids for the factory.

      The plant owners became a bit suspicious when their records showed that they were missing 3 entire BMWs and then an assortment of other little pieces.

    6. Re:Complications by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      State inspection found that the only problem with that car was a loose nut behind the wheel.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  18. It's not uncommon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nature published a short article on this a couple of years ago that we covered in our Journal Club meeting at my lab. The only one people detect right now are chimeric male/female twin pairs because its so easy but they had lots of cool shots under UV light where you can actally see like tiger striping of the two chimeric skin types. That was my favorite part.

    1. Re:It's not uncommon by timbloid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Was it this one?

    2. Re:It's not uncommon by nucal · · Score: 1

      A photo of Blaschko's lines is here.

    3. Re:It's not uncommon by cheese_wallet · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nature published a short article on this a couple of years ago that we covered in our Journal Club meeting at my lab.

      A short while later, God published an article calling bullshit on Nature, basically saying she was a sensationalist.

    4. Re:It's not uncommon by ajs · · Score: 1

      And it is important to not that Blaschko's Lines may or may not have any relation to Chimerism. They are generally caused by a birth defect that results from a very early cell-division. That is to say, only some percentage of the cells in the body get the defect, the rest are unaffected. Pigmentation striping (Blaschko's Lines) is an obvious result of this condition, which is called Mosaicism.

    5. Re:It's not uncommon by kapok_tree · · Score: 1

      In a way, odds are thereabouts everyone is to some degree chimeric. The more cells split, the greater chance of genetic degredation. Hence, your skin cells, which by your 40s have undergone mitosis hundreds of times, probably have at least a few errors from the original DNA in your stem cells. Not that this actually makes much difference or is even detectable in most cases.

  19. Another great article by Blangopolis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anther great aricle about Chimera twins that I was reading eariler is here. Man this stuff is really interesting. It actually says that about 8% of non-identical twins are chimera twins. That's actually pretty high.

    1. Re:Another great article by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1
      It actually says that about 8% of non-identical twins are chimera twins. That's actually pretty high.

      Not Quite right. This linkhas a lot more information (yes, I just copied the link from another post here). Here's the relevant text:
      Twin embryos often share a blood supply in the placenta, allowing blood stem cells to pass from one embryo and settle in the bone marrow of the other, seeding a lasting source of blood. As a result, as many as 8% of non-identical twin pairs have chimaeric blood.

      This is quite different than the chimeras formed from two different egg/sperm pairs combining into one.

      The other interesting thing is frequently a mother will never know that she had twins. One will be naturally aborted, but not before some of the blood from it starts circulating through the placenta. The other child will have those blood cells settle in the bone marrow, and will, for the rest of his life, carry blood from the unknown twin who died.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
  20. Since you can't RT{F}A by zubernerd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since NPR only provides an audio link, here are some text sites with info on chimeric twins (genetic mosaics).
    [Genetic Mosaics] http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyP ages/M/Mosaics.html
    Google search for Genetic Mosaics
    And for the non-biologists

    --
    Accentuate the positive, don't waste your mod points on the negative.
    1. Re:Since you can't RT{F}A by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mosaics aren't Chimeras.

      To quote the nature article that's been mentioned several times here:
      Mosaicism is more common than chimaerism and is also better studied. Human mosaics arise when a mistake during cell division in the early embryo stops the correct number of chromosomes segregating to each cell, or creates a mutation in a single gene.

      Chimaerism, on the other hand is "people carrying tissues that originated in two separate embryos."

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:Since you can't RT{F}A by lukesl · · Score: 2, Informative

      That might be the definition used by human geneticists, but for a mouse in the lab composed of cells from two different mice, molecular biologists would call that a mosaic, hence the confusion. "Chimeric" usually refers to involving cells from two different organisms, IIRC. Interesting, anyway.

  21. criminal uses? by johnstein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    DNA typing for... crime investigation

    Interesting phenomena in itself, but I wonder if there are people who would (or already) exploit this sort of pseudo-anonymitity. Does anyone know how far this dual-DNA goes? can individual hairs have differing DNA? or will the blood have different DNA than the hair or skin? (I am not a biologist, so please be kind regarding these questions)

    -John

    --
    "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    1. Re:criminal uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      it'll be cell-by-cell initially, although as the fetus grows the initial cells will divide and give patchyness

      RE the Ford assembly issues discussed above, no problem at all unless the genomes conflict (i.e. one is saying "we're male" and the other says "we're female") - we're talking adaptive self-assembly here, the parts remake themselves as necessary. If you have a functioning immune system you're partly chimeric anyway, as (the short version) your immune cells mutate themselves randomly to be able to evolve new antibodies to new threats real time.

      this concept is used all the time in making knockout mice (start with a normal mouse embryo, add some KO ES cells to get a chimera) they use cells from mice with different coat colours so when it works the mouse can be identified as it looks a bit like a Jersey cow in terms of coat patterns (but note as the next generation offspring come from single gametes they are one or the other, and so you can pick the mouse that came from your ES cells)

    2. Re:criminal uses? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't really matter all that much does it? If this is a large enough occurance then you simply must match blood found to blood from the suspect, hairs found to hairs from the suspect. Or am I missing something here?

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    3. Re:criminal uses? by NotJeff · · Score: 1

      Usually, the differences will not be intrasystemic, with some big exceptions like skin and hair - the reason is that early on, cells differentiate into the precursors for the various systems. Each system could have only one or a very few ultimate precursor cells. So, most systems are made up of one DNA-type, if people are like chimeric mice, which I know just a bit more about.

  22. Does this mean... by Alkarismi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can reconstitute the absorbed brother/sister through cloning the right cell?

    Could he/she then sue their sibling for attempted murder?

    1. Re:Does this mean... by Alkarismi · · Score: 1

      Or maybe just for extremely poor dietary habits...

    2. Re:Does this mean... by shreak · · Score: 1

      There is no "Absorbed" sibling. The two embryos merge. You could clone two individuals from the chimera. One for each DNA type of the original two embryos. All three resulting people would be different from each other.

      The really interesting thing is that this renders invalid any concept that DNA totally defines or identifies and individual.

      =Shreak

    3. Re:Does this mean... by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

      >Could he/she then sue their sibling for attempted murder?

      Only if he grows up to become a SCO employee or lawyer.

      But maybe the partially clonned "source" sibbling can sue the generated one first based on the DMCA - "You see, I have this mixed DNA, and I choose to use it as a mechanism to protect the copyright on my genepool."

      --
      -><- no .sig is good sig.
  23. Instead of hitting the link in in CA by Microsift · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not try this, turn on the radio, the story should be on again shortly after 8:30 PDT.

    No need to slashdot when the show is still available over the air.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Instead of hitting the link in in CA by abelsson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming you live in the US of course..

  24. New dialogues by el_flynn · · Score: 1

    Heheh.. i wonder if mr. bruckheimer will get his scripters to put this into some episode of CSI...

    --
    The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
    1. Re:New dialogues by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Hmm - this sounds like the more bizarro mock-supervillain stuf that ends up in Law and Order: Criminal Intent.

  25. Re:The Chinese and population control by GearheadX · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Pardon me, Sir.

    But what in the name of Hawking are you babbling about?

  26. What about transplant patients? by UncleBiggims · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Greek mythology the Chimera was part lion, goat and serpent. This is why people with organ or limb transplants are sometimes referred to as a Chimera. So my question... do these people also present the same identification complications?

    1. Re:What about transplant patients? by redfenix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if they leave liver deposits on the gun handle.

      --
      "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
    2. Re:What about transplant patients? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      of course, however for accident type identification the first thing that is done is to request medical details of persons believed to be involved in the crash. Something like a heart transplant is hard to miss in a medical history especially since transplant patients have to keep swallowing medicine to keep their body from rejecting the transplant. Also it must be a pretty horrific incident for something like the heart/liver/kidney to become a seperate part that is the only thing wich can be used for identification. In real life accident identification it is often a case of scooping up the bits, determining if all those believed missing are indeed among the bits and no bits left unaccounted for, then to divide the bits into the number of victims and bury them. We got a war cemetery here that just has a number of monuments with skeletons in them, if future researchers ever find them they must think WWII was the first mutant war.

      For criminal identification. Almost all transplants are on the inside. Again it must be pretty nasty crime scene for a suspect to leave traces of internal organs. Skin transplants might of course leave false dna, so could a wig for that matter. But skin transplants are meant to be replaced by youre own skin and people are unlikely to commit an offence while recovering from whatever that required them to get an alien skin transplant.

      Okay I just grossed myself out.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    3. Re:What about transplant patients? by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Quick Answer:

      Yes they do. However the same would apply to someone who received a blood transfusion. The DNA of the blood cells or organ do not get 'rewritten' to match the recipients DNA. So a sample of the transfused blood or donated organ would result in a mismatch with the recipients uncontaminated DNA.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    4. Re:What about transplant patients? by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      Thats a good question I hadn't even considered. IANA biologist; but I'm nearly certain that a transplanted limb would still retain the DNA of the donor. Over time, the DNA may be replaced as new cells replace the tissue; but I would think that it wouldn't ever be completely replaced. Hmmm interesting...

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    5. Re:What about transplant patients? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      However the same would apply to someone who received a blood transfusion. Nope. For starters, most blood transfusions involve no transfer of DNA, only packed red blood cells. In the cases where DNA transfer does take place, you would temporarily have mixed DNA. However, all blood cells die off eventually (about every 4 months, as I recall) and get replaced, so eventually your blood DNA would purify itself. The only think that would change your blood DNA permanently would be a bone marrow transplant.

    6. Re:What about transplant patients? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nope. For starters, read this.

      I trust it more than I trust someone called Lord Kronos.

    7. Re:What about transplant patients? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      That article talks mostly about Chimeras, and pre-birth blood sharing. The only other mention it has is of blood that persists from a transfusion. As I said, DNA is sometimes transfused with the blood, and it may linger around for a while, but it will all eventually die out and be replaced by new cells produced by your own marrow.

      I trust it more than I trust someone called Lord Kronos

      You want to poke at my name, yet you posted as an Anonymous Coward? Whatever. Don't trust me if you want, but I happen to have been the recipient of a aortic valve transplant. This was a very real concern for my mother, and she asked the doctor about it, and the above is the answer he gave us.

    8. Re:What about transplant patients? by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Yes you are correct that the blood cells will die off, so such a Chimera would only be temporary but still potentially noticeable.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  27. so the answer is by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

    to take multiple DNA samples from a suspect.

    hair, blood, cheek, and perhaps ejaculatory(if it is a male)

    then compare them, if they al match, then the DNA should be considered accurate.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:so the answer is by CausticWindow · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Using DNA to test for a positive match is a sham. The National Research Council have admitted that much (remember the New York Times controversy when NRC released their report on DNA profiling in investigative work?)

      After heavy pressure from various law enforcement agencies, they revised their report to say that it might be appropriate if the labs doing the tests were under strict national quality assurance (which they still aren't).

      There have been several cases where a positive DNA match later turned out to indicate nothing more than that a person belonged to a certain group of the population. And there have been convictions that have been revoked because of this.

      But imagine what would happen if the NRC published their original report? Thousands of convicts would want their cases retrialed. So that isn't going to happen. And dna profiling continues to be court admissable evidence.

      For a good book on the topic, look for "Biologhy as Ideology: The Doctrine Of DNA" by Richard C. Lewontin, professor of biology at Harvard University.

      Btw, did you know that the US is one of the few countries in the world where a lie detector test is court admissable?

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    2. Re:so the answer is by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

      hair,
      *riiiiipppp* *aaauuuuggghh*

      blood,
      *ssshhlliitt* *auuuggghhhhhhh*

      cheek,
      *swipe* *auuuwwwgghhh*

      and perhaps ejaculatory

      "No, please don't.. *auuuuuuuuggggggghhhhhh*"

      (I don't want some cop grappling with my cojones)

      --
      "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
    3. Re:so the answer is by Tet · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And dna profiling continues to be court admissable evidence.

      IIRC (from speaking to my mcirobiologist ex), DNA profiling can only guarantee negatives, never positives, and thus in the UK cannot be used to convict someone, only to acquit them.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    4. Re:so the answer is by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      It's my opinion that the US legal system is a prosecutors dream. It's tailormade to get swift convictions.

      Why they would allow something as (proven) unreliable as lie detector tests, is beyond me.

      On the other hand, if you have the money to buy the good lawyers, you get plenty of drama and close scrutiny of the technicalities.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    5. Re:so the answer is by Brainboy · · Score: 1

      Btw, did you know that the US is one of the few countries in the world where a lie detector test is court admissable?

      This smells of bullshit. So I googled and found.

      This
      And This

      I've found that they almost never admitted into court, and certainly no case was made on just polygraphs tests.

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    6. Re:so the answer is by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      From the linked article:

      and is not always judicially acceptable

      So? Most countries have banned them as court admissable at all.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    7. Re:so the answer is by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 0, Troll

      lie detectors are not allowed in the court, they are merely used in certain investigations because they are reliable enough to put investigators on to leads.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  28. Oh, great... by garymcg · · Score: 1

    I wish researchers would stop giving bad movie plot ideas to hack screenwriters. Now it's just a matter of time before the "Phantom Twin Killer" is playing at the local cineplex.

    --
    --If 50,000 people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
    1. Re:Oh, great... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      And you know the scriptwriter will be hailed as a great Brainiac, and have all sorts of mad-scientist cool about him at all the parties, when all he did was read a magazine (not online) article.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Oh, great... by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I heard Donald Kaufman already picked this one up.

      He will be hard pressed to beat his blockbusting "The 3" though.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  29. Guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if life begins with fertilization, as many fundamentalists believe, does this means that this women should be guilty of murder of an "unborn person"?

    1. Re:Guilty by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      What woman? I'm not sure what you're talking about, but for murder there have been either an intention to kill, or at the very least, a willfull involvement in an action that is known have a very high chance of leading to another's death. Do either of these situations qualify? Was it a willfull act? I don't think so. I'm not sure since I'm not completly sure which "this women"(sic) you're talking about.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    2. Re:Guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I believe the idea here is the vagueness of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act. It was introduced in the Congress in 1999, with the purpose of making it a crime if an individual causes death or injury to "a member of the species homo sapiens at all stages of development," including zygotes.

      The confusion here is that tetragametic woman discussed on the NPR program is the product of two fused zygotes. This creates an interesting dilemma, since two eggs are fertilized but only one child is born. If the vagueness of the UVVA where to be upheld, it could be (naively) asserted that since the pregnancy began as two "unborn" members of the human species but ended in only one, that death or injury was caused to one of the zygotes.

      While such arguments are poorly constructed, as is the religously-driven legislation, it can have legal ramifications for women who have had unviable fetuses naturally aborted. Such considerations belittle the complexity of human life in return for a simple minded religious explanation. Along with the quasi-legal arguments, much "deeper" philosophical issues relating to identity and self remain unsettling.

      Nonetheless, it is an extremely interesting situation which only works to make life all the more interesting.

  30. we need a new mod type... by Malor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where's "-1, Evil"?

    1. Re:we need a new mod type... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be +1, Evil?
      -1, Stupid would fit this case, though

  31. Account for people with misshapen bodies? by swb · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know the people I'm talking about, the ones whose bodies are somehow demented and just don't seem to fit together. Torso too big for the legs,legs too long for the torso, head too big, and so on.

    Probably not, but there's got to be an explanation for this phenomena.

    1. Re:Account for people with misshapen bodies? by jonabbey · · Score: 1

      I believe that sort of thing is usually due to problems in the hormonal growth regulation system.

    2. Re:Account for people with misshapen bodies? by soundofthemoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I know of one case where this was so. I used to work with a guy who was a chimeric twin. He volunteered for some genetic research at Stanford and they came back and said he had two sets of DNA. He had one of the oddest shaped bodies I've ever seen. Looked kind of like something from Star Wars - like a ball perched on top of really long legs.

    3. Re:Account for people with misshapen bodies? by gfody · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      that "phenomena" is technically referred to as being smacked in the face with the ugly stick. aka falling from the ugly tree (and hitting every branch on the way down)

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    4. Re:Account for people with misshapen bodies? by LeiGong · · Score: 1

      Did he look anything like Wally?

    5. Re:Account for people with misshapen bodies? by Guano_Jim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks for telling everybody where I used to work, you insensitive clod!

      Now my stilt-man career is over!

    6. Re:Account for people with misshapen bodies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heheheh ... is the oogily moogily moderator offended? ...heheheh

    7. Re:Account for people with misshapen bodies? by XO · · Score: 1

      Like this girl that I know, that's got the body of a supermodel, skinny all the way around, muscular, but has hips the size of a Greyhound? (the bus, not the animal) ..

      Yeah, I know exactly what you mean.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  32. Re:Mark: here you go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what is it? Who took the time to figure it out. Uudecoding gives you animav3.gif, a 961 byte file. What is it?

  33. Bone marrow transplants by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    When I heard the story this morning, I thought of bone marrow transplants. In that case, aren't you getting someone else's blood-generating cells? And wouldn't your blood cells then contain someone else's DNA?

    It seems like they'd make a Law & Order or CSI episode from this: a career criminal arranges to get a bone marrow transplant from someone whose DNA is known to authorities, but who hasn't yet been apprehended (ooh, big word!). Then, the real bad guy can leave all the blood he wants at the crime scene, and never worry about being tracked.

    Of course, the side effects would probably make a lifestyle of violent crime a bit more difficult than, say, the odd embezzlement here and there.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Bone marrow transplants by sgb235 · · Score: 1

      I know of a genetic depository that was scolded for messing up the records when a sample from an individual didn't match an earlier sample from the same individual. Turns out the individual had gotten a bone marrow transplant in the meantime.

      No word on whether the individual was fleeing from or planning a life of crime, though.

    2. Re:Bone marrow transplants by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      Nice thought, and bone marrow transplants are matched for blood and some tissue types. You would have to be careful to not leave hair, semen or skin cells because they would have the "old" DNA in them.

  34. The Innocence Project by niko9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's an organizitaion called the The Innocence Project headed by Barry Scheck which prides itself on freeing prisoners who didn't have the technology of DNA testing avaible to them during their trials.

    In light of this article, I wonder how many guilty people have been set free. I'm sure there are guilty parties that proclaim their innocence and see no harm or foul in having the DNA testing done by said non profit organization, in hopes of some fluke in their favor.

    1. Re:The Innocence Project by whit3 · · Score: 1

      Chimeric DNA confusion is unlikely to explain
      the high incidence of proven innocence; in Illinois, something like 20% of the death row population got freed (leading the governor to so distrust the judicial process that he took the extreme step of commuting all death sentences to lesser punishment).
      It's very unlikely that the chimeric population is high enough to account for that. If one in a few
      thousand is chimeric, and one tenth of those are chimeric in a way that matters to the evidence, and there are 100 executions in a year... a century could pass before a guilty party is acquittted.

  35. Micheal Jackson now makes sense by Alcimedes · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's just his white Chimera brother finally coming out after all these years.

    1. Re:Micheal Jackson now makes sense by Herg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you mean Chimera sister?

    2. Re:Micheal Jackson now makes sense by magsymp · · Score: 0

      I know this was meant as a joke, but it's not because he likes little boys and monkeys that we should make fun of him...

      wait a minute...

    3. Re:Micheal Jackson now makes sense by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It's just his white Chimera brother..

      I thought his Chimera twin was a Grey from Roswell?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Micheal Jackson now makes sense by cheesedog · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Funny. Truly.

      So it is with some reluctance that I have to be a wet blanket... I know a sweet little girl who suffers from the same pigmentation disease as Jackson. It is called vitiligo, and although not health-threatening, it can be somewhat difficult for children who get labeled as "different" because of the light splotches that appear on the skin, and then spread. When it grows to cover more than 50% of the body, many opt to bleach the remaining <50% so that they are at least all one tone. I believe such is the case with Jackson.

      Of course, it doesn't help that Jackson is a freak in many other ways, but there are thousands and thousands of people in this country, many of them children, who suffer from this condition without being freaks in any other way.

      They are lucky when compared to the diseases that afflict many other people, but the disease is relatively unknown, so I thought I'd add a few words here in their defense (but not in Jackson's -- he's on his own :)

    5. Re:Micheal Jackson now makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convince his light skin is entirely because of vitiligo. Wouldn't it make more sence to dye the light patches. Anyway, here's a good read about all his excuses. The nose jobs was just to help him breath better. Riiiight.

  36. Inevitable by pjdoland · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is a CSI episode waiting to happen.

    --
    -- "The reward of suffering is experience." - Aeschylus
  37. No, we should boycott broadcast radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet radio, and internet communication in general, is initiated at the convience of you and me, the people communicating.

    The sooner media companies realize that most of their listeners / consumers use that method, the sooner spectrum prices will come down. When that happens, more spectrum will be freed up for real uses -- i.e., whatever we want at the moment, as it will all be wireless internet.

    Please don't feed the dinosaurs.

    1. Re:No, we should boycott broadcast radio by Microsift · · Score: 1

      Internet spell checkers might also be of some "convenience" :)

      --
      My other sig is extremely clever...
  38. 1 Car, 1 Part Source by Mars+Ultor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The human genome isn't like the automarket...That is you're still building 1 car, but all the parts can be slightly different, but come from 1 supplier. After all, in a normal diploid animal (ie. humans) half of the chromosome content is from the mother, the other half from the father. As far as liver, heart, skin, etc. all working together, there is no problem with this.

    There is a problem though with the immune system. Since each organism's cells contain a unique combination of cell surface receptors that let's their body know the difference between "self" and a bug or virus, then depending which copy of DNA founded the cells of the thymus (where "self" is first determined), a chimera's immune system could see cells with the other DNA set as foreign - causing a massive systemic allergic reaction. The good news is that chimeras with this problem would spontaneously abort within the first few months of the pregnancy, so if a chimeric human is born, they probably don't have to worry to much about such genetic mismatches.

    --
    "Nokia is not a country, it's the capital of Finland!" -Moderated "Informative". Yeesh.
    1. Re:1 Car, 1 Part Source by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems to me that if they can find out how those two sets of genes get along with each other in a chimera, then that knowledge might lead to better immune-response-suppression techniques, during organ transplants!

    2. Re:1 Car, 1 Part Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The good news is that chimeras with this problem would spontaneously abort within the first few months of the pregnancy

      I'm sorry, but your son was half Canyonero

    3. Re:1 Car, 1 Part Source by baz00f · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, as the chimeric embryo develops, the immune system would become tolerized to ALL self-antigens present. This is part of the normal development of a young immune system. The process is called "anergy", which makes immune cells unresponsive to self antigens. Since the two selfs are merged earlier than when the immune system develops, I doubt that autoimmunity is a problem.

    4. Re:1 Car, 1 Part Source by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 2, Informative

      The immune system will tolerate any antigens that it is exposed to at an early stage of fetal development. At a point that varies with each species, the immune system appears to take an inventory of "my cells and their surface antigens" and from then on it will attack anything not recognized as "self".

    5. Re:1 Car, 1 Part Source by NotJeff · · Score: 2, Informative

      I _am_ a biologist, though this isn't my specialty. The way the body learns to distinguish self from non-self is by defining the set of things that the immune system sees pre- and neo-natally as "self", and all else as "non-self". This means that chimerism should, theoretically, not prompt an immune response.

      -NotJeff

  39. problem with NPrs explanation by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    two sets of dna produce two different sets of oragn, tissue, cell, antigens that identify these parts as belonging to body..

    Chimera embryo would not survie due too much body rejection of the parts of body that has the different dna..

    The only case where thsi cannot happen and regualr occurs is the difference between human cell dan..or human genome nuclear and mitochrondia dna which produce no antigens but is diferent from the nuclear dna in that is the mother inherited mitochroindia dna form mother of the offspring..

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:problem with NPrs explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderate : -5 incomprehensible

    2. Re:problem with NPrs explanation by mikeee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not a problem in this case; the immune system hasn't 'initialized' at that point, and so would imprint both types as self when it comes online.

      This is why people are interested in freezing fetal blood samples; the theory is that you keep a backup of the immune system install media to reinstall if it goes bad. Um, except that we have no idea how to do that yet... works in theory, though.

    3. Re:problem with NPrs explanation by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      NO ... The antigens you are exposed to in utero are "self" and would not cause a problem at all. The developing fetus "takes an inventory" late in the development process and everything that is there at that time is not attacked by the immune system. This would be months after the two fertilized eggs or early multi-cell blobs merged.

    4. Re:problem with NPrs explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the ... system hasn't 'initialized' at that point, ... when it comes online. ... the theory is that you keep a backup of the ... system install media to reinstall if it goes bad. Um, except that we have no idea how to do that yet... works in theory, though."

      Dude, you watched to much of Terminator and Matrix.

  40. Maybee the story of by KMAPSRULE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dr. Jeckle(sp?) and Mr. Hyde isn't too far fetched after all. The "formula" Jeckle drinks to become Hyde simple turns on the alternate DNA sequence.

    --

    --Im an oven mitt, not an engineer! (SLArbys Radio Commercial)
  41. wow, a totally worthless thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a single reply by somebody that has actaully listened to the story. Ah, it appears NPR is too good for slashdot click-n-spew.

  42. Re:morons insist we are all made of the same stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir,
    It is difficult for me to find your posts, which I find very enlightening. If you would sign up for an account, I could just go directly to your user page ahd check for new posts. Alternatively, perhaps you could create your own story here: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?op=user_created_in dex
    and link to your posts from there.

    A big fan,

    Trollaxor

  43. Couldn't find any pictures by sharkey · · Score: 1

    But here is an artists sketch of what one of these Chimera twins might look like.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  44. Y chromosome by nucal · · Score: 1

    The Y chromosome is pretty screwy in its own right.

  45. Inherited? by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

    I've been told that the propensity to produce fraternal twins is an inherited trait, unlike identical twins. Is this Chimera twin state also inherited, or is it a random mutation?

    1. Re:Inherited? by dodell · · Score: 1

      No, it is not. Like with identical twins (caused by a fissure in the ovum), it is an anomaly. For more information see this page.

  46. asking slashdotters by pauly_thumbs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    where do YOU keep Your extra chromosome?? In your Pocket? Under your Pillow? In your glovebox?

    Mr. XYY

    1. Re:asking slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I copy mine directly to CD.

  47. Chimerism doesn't create false positves by Microsift · · Score: 1

    I realize you're making a joke, but Chimera's would have different DNA in different parts of the body. A swab from the mouth might have different DNA then a blood sample. However, if there was a match, this would still indicate that the person who gave the sample and the sample found at the scene were almost certainly the same person.

    A Chimera would create a false negative, because the DNA extracted from the cells in the mouth would not match the DNA of the blood at the scene.

    It might be a best practice to test the same type of cells when doing a DNA test(gross for rape cases), especially considering that no one knows how many chimerae there are out there(Especially since each Chimera hides an occurence of fraternal twins, so our estimates on the frequency of fraternal twins are now less accurate).

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Chimerism doesn't create false positves by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      There was, in fact, a case in England some years ago which hung on the fact that the rapist was a blood chimera: his blood test came back negative for a match. It was only when the investigators got a sperm sample that they could find a DNA match.

      Did anybody notice that the original submittor managed to get this onto the front page by ignoring the fact that chimerism would decrease the likelihood of a match, rather than increasing it? -1, troll submission.

  48. Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions.. by Cackmobile · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't get me wrong I like dogs as well. YOu need to get to know a cat (not all of them but usally) before it is affectionate. Then it will be your best mate. Dogs are instantly your best mate. Cats are definately smarter (not mine, it still hasn't worked out glass doors).

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  49. MOD PARENT UP! by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Sometimes somebody actually posts something that deserves +5 funny.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  50. Brain DNA... this solves the femme fatale problem by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 1
    I think my gorgious wife must have double DNA.

    Apparently the brain got the bad half (thank god she can't read my /. log)

  51. Twin Chimeras by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who read the title and thought, "Finally! All this messing with genes has produced something useful, a fire-breathing Chimera with a lion's head and a goat's body"? On a more serious note, the nature article in a similiar vein is here.

  52. grand admiral thrawn taken down a notch by wwest4 · · Score: 1

    now that i know what a chimera is, it makes the star destroyer of the same name seem less bad-ass. oh well.

  53. Question by TheDredd · · Score: 1

    The resulting person has two sets of DNA. The story says it is possible for a Chimera to have different sets of DNA in different body parts. This can cause complication for body identification, DNA typing for organ transplants

    Wouldn't the body be compatible with boths sets of dna? Otherwise how would the current bodyparts communicate with eachother? That would mean Chimera Twins will have a broader range of organs to choose from.
    If not the solution would be to extract dna from the part that needs to be replaced

    1. Re:Question by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "Wouldn't the body be compatible with boths sets of dna?"

      Yes. Whatever cell antigens are around during fetal development are tolerated in adulthood. And you don't DNA type for transplants, you use cell surface antigens. It might or might not make them easier to find donors for.

      These chimeras and mosaics have the two cell lines from th etow fertile eggs intermingled throughout their bodies - it's not a case of having a heart from one, a liver from the other. They merge WAY earlier than that.

  54. Re:Mark: here you go by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

    not a gif :)

  55. Re:Mark: here you go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and is the gif encoded with something else hidden in it ?

  56. More common is CALICO-CAT style DNA ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More common is CALICO-CAT style DNA in famale mammal whereby two sets of dna alternate in their expression in the animal in large regions of cells from when the embryo is first forming.

    in a calico cat it creates a semi-infertile female with large splotches of color.

    In a human female it creates the magical ability for a left eye retina to sometimes have a different set of color cones than the right eye....

    this then gives the chimera female ULTRA-VISION !!!!

    She is able to see things we cannot with our measly 3 color cones and one-hue rods.

    In fact these freaks are able to see astoundingly minute differences in shading and color.

    A typical car would have off-color panels or trim to them, any repaired home would have non-matching paint.

    Manking typically can create double-hybrids of chromosomes in most of the fruits and vegetables we eat (larger, firmer, typically less tasty though)

    but double and wuad hybrids are not the only odd thing about dna. Eons ago, i think i read the banana ended up with 3 sets of chromosomes or something like that. (not the plantain, the nromal banana). It is highly resistant to tampering by cultivation and breeding. It is the worls only "perfect" fruit because the banana was the banana over 500 hundred years ago, unchanged. No other fruit from 500 years ago would be tasty to today's spoiled pallete.

  57. legal issues by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is going to cause problems with using DNA as evidence in criminal causes. If scientists claim that people may have mixed DNA, then it's not going to be long before some defense attorney uses that to get his client acquitted, or some shady DA uses that to get a conviction that s/he wanted.

  58. Robert DeNiro said it best in "Meet the Parents" by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Something along the lines of "cats, although they are more advanced upstairs, they are so independant they dont give a crap about you, theyll just find a home elsewhere, they're elite animals indeed, dogs, while less advanced, are loyal and dependant of their owner/master, some people suppose that dog people need the assurance a dog supposedly gives you, being the "emotionally shallow" animal the dog, supposedly, is."

    When Focker (Stiller) claims that he's more of a dog-person, a disgruntled Jack (DeNiro) asks, "So you prefer an emotionally shallow animal, do you?"

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  59. Different Colored Eyes by MonkeyBoyo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I had always heard that a person that has eyes of different colors is really a chimeral twin.

    1. Re:Different Colored Eyes by Little+Brother · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or could it be that they lost one contact lens? Hmmm.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    2. Re:Different Colored Eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eye color is a multi-gene trait; what is more likely is that one gene in one eye is not expressed or not expressed enough to get the matched phenotype.

    3. Re:Different Colored Eyes by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

      Ithought that that was usually cause by the same thing that causes birthmarks, only on the eye.

      --
      All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    4. Re:Different Colored Eyes by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      No. It's a single-point mutation in the eye color gene in the cells that make up the eye ... it can appear as just a radiating patch of the color in one eye all the way to being truly odd-eyed depending on when in the eye's development the mutation happened.

  60. This explains... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    ...that lone white glove.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  61. Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But cats are cuter and have a more consistent interface !

  62. another story of twins merging. by Q-Branch · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Slightly OT:

    Here is a pretty freaky story of a boy who seems to have assumed his twin in the womb. No one knew until when,at age seven, he had a stomach ache and surgeons removed his brother.

    1. Re:another story of twins merging. by Giggles+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

      There was a dude on FOX's "101 Things Removed From the Human Body" that was about 30 with this condition. Really wish I had a link, but those of you who caught it will know it was pretty incredible. The "twin" was dead, of course, but very well formed.

      --
      "A coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave but one."
    2. Re:another story of twins merging. by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
      There was a Reader's Digest story many years ago of a guy who had a headache, and doctor's removed a subsumed twin from his brain.

      I know someone who had their subsumed twin removed from their pancreas (and general area) in their mid-40s. It didn't develop, just grew tumor-like.

      I wonder if more people who think they have cancer actually have a subsumed twin instead? Probably not that common. Do they check the genetics?

  63. Double Take by tds67 · · Score: 2, Funny
    It turns out that every once in a while a set of fraternal twin eggs merge into one embryo. The resulting person has two sets of DNA.

    Technically, then, these people are actually two people rolled into one. They should get to vote twice at the voting booth, and should pay double to get into the movies.

    In addition, their Slashdot posts should be modded up or down at double the normal amount.

  64. Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions.. by klevin · · Score: 2

    Part of your problem is that you're dealing with a Siamese. All cats are psychotic, granted, (and I love cats), but Siamese cats really take the cake.

  65. Doctors can't leave us alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I don't know for sure if I am a chimera, I was born with XX/XY sex chromosomes, something I only found out in my early 20s.

    For many of us born this way we don't appear to be completely male or female and like most I was surgically "repaired" very soon after birth. This means I had what appeared to be testicles removed, testicles which MAY have permitted me to have children one day. Part of my body was stolen because I looked different. I was raised female, always felt that didn't quite fit, and it took me a lot of messing through courts to obtain my birth records. As I am now I have to settle with knowing where I fit originally, why I am like I am, and can accept living as a mostly normal female. By nature however, I was born part male part female. That's me. The chance to live and develop naturally was stolen from me.

    It's fucked. Science continues to find so many variations on human development but society so often manages to force decisions on people. How odd that I was considered unnatural enough when I was born that doctors decided surgery was the only acceptable option, when my birth and very existence is just one more facet of nature.

    For more info on how intersexed kids (chimeric or any other variation) are treated, see isna.org

    1. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

      I always found it interesting that the origin for Hermaphrodite is a mix of the Greek Gods Hermes (the interpreter/trickster) and Aphrodite (love/sexual rapture). Just FYI for those not In The Know.

    2. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      Do you prefer boys or girls?

      Sorry to find that question interesting...

      (If you prefer boys, then maybe making you looking like a girl was the right choice, don't you think? If you prefer girls... well... sue them! :) )

    3. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I've read about this from a few sources. I don't know why the physicians really care or why they'd try to force their agendas and their theories of humanity on others. I am curious why they do this.

      From what I understand, one major respected medical association has even adopted a stance of forcing a change based on rigid criteria, and that it would be "fixed" sometimes without the parent's knowledge or consent.

    4. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Hermaphrodite was the son of Hermes and Aphrodite. Echo (a nymph) fell in love with him and asked (and was granted) that they be joined into one. Hence, Hermaphrodite = man & woman. It's in Ovid's ``Metamorphoses''.

    5. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by TamaraCravit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was even a story on Discovery Channel recently about a doctor who, after putting huge pressure on the parents of an intersexed child (with one testicle and one ovary), surgically and without consent removed the testicle under the pretense of a "biopsy". I don't get what it is about the idea that makes a surgeon willing to risk his medical license for something like that.

    6. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's quite possible that it's an attempt to cover up realities that fly in the face of some people's interpretation of the Bible-- all that supposed Biblical prohibition of homosexuality and that defense of marriage stuff is dependent on the erroneous assumption that everyone is either 100% male or 100% female. I've heard some people try to write it off because the number of intersexuals is supposedly very small-- as if you can just ignore their existence because there aren't very many of them (which remains to be seen as well). It's evidence of a bankrupt philosophy unable to deal with truths that are contradictory-- and a continued insistence on such coverups would simply be further evidence of a corrupt nature, if that is what is going on.

      There was an article in an L.A. paper a few months back, that included photos and an interview of an individual who's hormones would cause enough variation day-to-day that the individual would seem more male on one day and more female on the next (including the genitalia). If "marriage" is defined as a union between a "man" and a "woman," I suppose such an individual isn't then legally allowed to marry *anyone*.

      Other individuals are "categorized" at birth only to find out at puberty or sometime later that the categorization was arbitrary or incorrect-- XY individuals with testes (or at least that had them at birth) that have always believed they were female, is fairly common for example. How do you suppose a "defence of marriage act" should be applied to them?

    7. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is it that doctors are so interested in what your genitals look like? And if your penis looks normal they are totally uninterested.

      When I was in my mid-twenties I started getting cramps in my lower abdomen. Turns out I had a small uterus, and had developed endometriosis. You wouldn't believe how many idiot doctors told me this was 'irritable bowel syndrome'.

    8. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely! I'm a man with boobs and the stupid doctors keep telling me to exercise and change my diet.

      [I'm sorry. I realize that the original post was serious and my self-deprecating attempt at humor was inappropriate but in addition to the need to lose a few pounds I also suffer from immaturity. "What's my age again?"]

    9. Re:Doctors can't leave us alone. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      While all you seem to hold this as evil or something, have you ever considered that maybe the surgeon cares about the child.

      Regardless of the personal feelings of the grandparent poster, (s)he doesn't have any experience in the other side of the coin. Eg. what kind of life (s)he would have had if they'd allowed him/her to be multisexed.

      I'm quite certain that 99.9% of a time, person like that would be treated as a freak by everyone if anyone at all found out about it, and his/her life would be a social nightmare, doesn't sound very inviting to me. Better to feel slighly different than to be forever laughed and tormented by others.

  66. Rejection not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Regarding organ rejection: rejection is a "trained" response. Fetuses/embryos can recieve organs without fear of rejection, because the immune response is not trained against the offending organ. That's why some people can have two different blood types: they recieved some blood of a different blood type before they were born, and their immune system adapted to this other type of blood and accepted it as part of the body. That's why chimeras can exist.

  67. Big deal! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    I have the DNA of 50 people in my chromosomes.

    I am legion.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  68. Grammar Nazi Time by FrankoBoy · · Score: 1

    That's Jekyll ;) Here's the book for those interested.

    1. Re:Grammar Nazi Time by KMAPSRULE · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir, its been a while since I have read the story

      --

      --Im an oven mitt, not an engineer! (SLArbys Radio Commercial)
  69. More information on Chimeras by b-baggins · · Score: 3, Informative

    This link has some good information on Chimeras. Including a discussion of the lady featured in NPR.

    http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/Biolog yP ages/M/Mosaics.html

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  70. Is it possible? by Infernon · · Score: 1

    Could it be possible that this is evolution taking over and protecting us from the various different tracking measures that will one day soon be put in place?
    I know it sounds paranoid. It's really just dumb speculation. But, what if...

  71. And I though Chimera was a web browser for OS X... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boy was I wrong.

  72. And another genetic anomaly heard from by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 5, Informative
    It doesn't take "chimerism" to get this effect. The well-known variations in the number of sex chromosomes can also do it, and they can happen in the cell division process.
    Normal male = Xy (any extra "X" are abnormal, but even a XXXXy is still male - all but one X gets deactivated - but usually has serious medical problems). Normal female = XX (extra "X"s do not create supermodels, it creates medical problems)

    Take a look at any calico or tortoise shell cat. What you are seeing is the result of random deactivation of one of the X chromosome early in the development of the embryo, and the random appearance of the colors (black or orange) on that chromosome. Humans have few easily testable traits that are testible for chimerism: one blood group is all I can think of at the moment, that "lives" on the X chromosome.

    For calico or tortie males (yes, they exist, and no they are not valuable) the division between the colors is a good indicator of how badly screwed up their sex chromosomes are. A male that is mostly orange with one small black patch probably acts like a tomcat and will show very few cells of the XXY pattern, and might even have that abnormality limited to that spot. One that is well-mottled with black and orange is probably not interested in breeding and will show mnay more abnormal XXY cells.

    In order to test this for the possibility to screw up DNA identification, they could start by testing the known chimeras - cats.

    1. Re:And another genetic anomaly heard from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      extra "X"s do not create supermodels, it creates medical problems

      one extra X does, however, produce porn stars

    2. Re:And another genetic anomaly heard from by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      No ... the typical XXX female is short, dumpy and with facial malformations and extra skin folds on the neck.

      Many female porn stars have has minor plastic surgery to make their clitoris look longer. (the things surgeons will chat about over coffee!)

    3. Re:And another genetic anomaly heard from by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

      My error ... that's females with a single X no "X" = no chance of developing into a human

  73. Poor Geena Davis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She could have been a nice Chimera of Brundlefly/Davis/Foetus! Just think of the sequels, oh wait...

  74. Re:Mark: here you go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I figured, but I was too lazy to figure out the rest. I don't know gif format very well, but if we look that up we can find if it's a legit gif.. If it is there are several well known techniques for hiding data within image files that could be used to mine the file for the data.. If it's not then we need to figure out what it is. If you remove the first bytes with the GIF identification you'll get a binary file but it's not gzipped and not bzipped.. There are no strings, no gif comments.. hmm.. WHAT IS IT!!!

  75. Oh come on now... by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
    IAB (I am a biologist(ok, neurologist, actually)), and quite frankly, your DNA testing info is just plain wrong.

    Any court appointed expert worth his salt will give the jury a detailed, precise p-value for the probability that the DNA came from some other person. A simple t-test is all that is needed for this.

    Given the known variability of the population of DNA, it is not uncommon to have a p-value of 1E-8. That means there's a 1 in 100,000,000 chance that someone else committed the crime. In other words, there's about 3 people in the U.S. who match that DNA. Reasonable doubt? Your call.

    Now admittedly, if you have p-values of anything less that 1E-3 or 4 being admitted into court, you should laugh the "expert" out of the courtroom.

    1. Re:Oh come on now... by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Given the known variability of the population of DNA

      Which is one of the major flaws. Lewontin cites a case where a native american was convicted for murder based on dna evidence. A more thorough examination revealed that the "known variability" of the population didn't coincide with the variability of dna in this geographic area.

      Also the main point made by the NRC wasn't that the theoretic basis of the tests were flawed, but that the conditions of the tests vary from lab to lab, and that there is no national standard assuring the quality of the results. That is, there is a standard of course, but it's up to the labs to follow it.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  76. Finally, an explanation for bisexuals! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be that bisexuals have part homosexual genes and part heterosexual genes? I remember reading an article in Discover magazine that noted that fraternal twins have a higher incidence of bisexuality than identical twins and the population as a whole.

  77. Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've gotten to know many cats over the years. More recently, I've gotten to know my crazy neighbour's 6 cats.

    From all I've learned, my conclusion is that a cat is a useless, annoying and stupid creature.

    Much like my neighbour. She doesn't kill as many birds, though.

    Interestingly enough, my dogs have come to the very same conclusion as I have without the benefit of years of accrued knowledge, but I wonder why it is that nutty middle-aged women always have lots of cats.

  78. Great by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    Gee - either I have to load up the sucky real media player to hear it, or I have to agree to let MS onto my system any thime they want via the EULA for windows media player nine.

    Guess I won't be listening to NPR on the web anytime soon.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:Great by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Actually, the new one isn't so bad. It's kind of nice.

  79. 8% is way off for this phenomena by Microsift · · Score: 1
    The article describes a completely different phenomena
    Twin embryos often share a blood supply in the placenta, allowing blood stem cells to pass from one and settle in the bone marrow of the other. About 8% of non-identical twin pairs are chimeras.
    So, there are two individuals. The woman in the NPR story is the product of the fusion of two embryos. Different parts of her body have different DNA (IANAMD) Anyway Googling for Chimera and posting a link without thoroughly reading it should not be rewarded!
    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  80. Simple solution by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    The solution to this problem is obvious.

    Simply require id chip implants at birth.

    Problem solved.

    Nothing else left to discuss here.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Simple solution by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
      I wish there was a mod for +1 Scary Orwellian Overtones.

      You know THEY would use this as an excuse to do all the fun tracking and profiling with RFID. Can we chip just the chimeras instead? :)

      The first thing I thought was there would be an episode of CSI:X this fall with a chimera criminal. But which one would get the case and not be able to solve it?

      And talk about your early childhood profiling! "We're sorry, little Susie, but you have mixed-up chromosomes, so we're going to remove all criminal tendencies from your brain. Just swallow this pill..."

  81. I've watched enough CSI... by smelroy · · Score: 1

    I've watched enough CSI to know that they could figure out that the two different DNA's were similar enough to do a little more snooping. I imagine it would look at first like it was a close relative.

    --
    Switching to Linux can be an adventure!
  82. Possible Medical implications by bobKali · · Score: 1
    Since Chimera embryos obviously do survive then there must be some way they cope with rejection. D'ya think this could be applied to organ transplant recepients?

    Discussing a woman found to be a chimera, an article on Mosaics found that:
    Laboratory tests confirmed that she was unable to generate T cells able to react against the cells of either brother or her mother.
    Since they don't simply state that she is incapable of producing t-cells, then there may be something in there to allow for selectively suppressing an immunoresponse (sp?) that could be valuable.

    I think I oughta patent it now before someone with the ability to actually find it does.
    1. Re:Possible Medical implications by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "then there may be something in there to allow for selectively suppressing an immunoresponse (sp?) that could be valuable."

      No. It's the well-known fetal tolerance effect ... she was thoroughly exposed to her brother's cells during gestation, and has some of her brothers cells even now. From the description, prehaps some of her mum's too.

      More interesting to immunologists and transplant surgeons: why doesn't the mother's body detect the developing placenta/fetus and KILL it? They would kill transplants later. There are some problems (erythroblastosis foetalis) but most come through with no problems.

  83. The perfect crime by Robawesome · · Score: 1

    Does anybody else here see someone with two sets of dna becoming a supercriminal? I know I would.

    --

    I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    1. Re:The perfect crime by JDBrechtel · · Score: 1

      Right, because no one knows about this (except people who read /.) and DNA evidence is the only thing that can link you to a crime (they didn't solve crimes 20 years ago...they just let everyone go).

    2. Re:The perfect crime by Robawesome · · Score: 1

      using modern technology, a supercriminal, with money and time and brains, could engineer a crime where the only evidence is DNA, then get away with it based on contradictory evidence.

      --

      I did NOT learn everything I need to know in kindergarten.

    3. Re:The perfect crime by JDBrechtel · · Score: 1

      I had two points to my comment. Apparently you only read one of them.

  84. This shouldn't cause health problems by bgackle · · Score: 1

    These people have two sets of DNA, but the other set comes from their fraternal twin... at worst, the other set of DNA is as closely related to them as a brother or sister. And in all cases, they would still have half of their DNA from their mother, and half from the father -- just like anyone else. It wouldn't seem that this would cause much of a problem in terms of body part mismatch, since the situation is not that much different from a normal single baby.

    --
    What we really need is a ten day waiting period and a background check before you can buy a congressman.
  85. Life begins at fertilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or what?

    Are these "chimeras" then one or two persons? Should they have two votes? Can one go to hell and the other to heaven?

    Pro-lifers may have good arguments against abortion (Considered off-topic in this thread) but this one just weakened.

    1. Re:Life begins at fertilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just how does this weaken the argument?

  86. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evolution favors people who have more children. It doesn't protect us from governement tracking or anticipate problems.

  87. A Tetragametic Human by gooru · · Score: 3, Informative

    Reading the post but refusing to listen to the audio clip got me interested in searching Google for all of this. I came across one link in particular, which is very interesting:

    Genetic Mosaics

    The writer discusesses a tetraparental mouse and a tetragametic human.

  88. We all have different sets of DNA in body parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In a sense a non-chimeras already have different sets of DNA in different body parts. The DNA expresses differently in a liver cell vs. skin or some other cell type. These differences appear to be controlled epigenetically: not in the DNA sequence itself, but in the run-time environment particular to any given cell type. Just because these differences are epigenetic, doesn't mean they are not structural and important.

    DNA Methylation and chromatin structure appear to control the epigenetic regulation of the DNA. These issues appear the be the reason behind cloning problems, where taking DNA expressing run-time environment appropriate for an adult cell doesn't always work in a embryo.

  89. RFID Uber Alles ? by FrankoBoy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the advice, Herr Himmler ;)

    1. Re:RFID Uber Alles ? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. But not too welcome, as I'm going to patent the idea and sell it to the government. :-)

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  90. Two blood types: YES! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "Would it be possible to have two blood types? Surely not, but as I do not have any way to listen to the link I will never know until some kind soul gives us the gist of it."

    IANAL, but IUTWIBB ... I used to work in blood banks doing crossmatches. A small number of people have two different ABO blood types. They are not "AB", they have some red blood cells that are pure "A" and some that are pure "B" and that is violating Mendelian genetics. The same mechanism that creates this could easily create other "blood chimeras" with the other several hundred lesser-known blood types. And a third mechanism (sex chromosome abnormalities) can create a kind of blood chimera that has nothing to do with twins.

    Apparently, most of these blood chimera individuals shared a blood supply with a non-identical twin before birth (the cells that make blood and populate your bone marrow float around the fetal blood supply while waiting for bones to develop to give them a place to settle, and the placentas and their blood vessels can merge without producing conjoined twins). In some cases, people are unaware that they had a twin because he or she died early in gestation and was spontaneously aborted (or disintegrated by the mother's defense mechanisms, or walled off in the mother or living twin). They show up in the National Enquirer when someone is operated on for a cyst and it has bits of the encysted twin in it.

    As many as 8% of non-identical twins may have chimeric blood. Some people are microchimeric--they have a small amount of blood of a different type in their system that has persisted from a blood transfusion or passed across the placental barrier from their mother before birth.

    "Blood chimerism" does NOT cause a problem for the person with the chimerism as far as receiving blood in a transfusion ... they will tolerate any phenotype they possess if you transfuse it - they have had it since they were fetuses and it is "self" in the immunological sense of the word.

    It can, however, be hell on blood banks trying to figure out what the heck is wrong with the blood during the initial typing and screening in a transfusion where the blood chimera is the donor. The potential recipient is not at risk because the tech says &^$^$#%@!!!, sets the donor unit back in the frig with a "do not use" note and sends it off to a research lab to find out what's going on. That's how you usually find blood chimeras and new blood types ... anomalous results in what should be a routine crossmatch.

    1. Re:Two blood types: YES! by kapok_tree · · Score: 1

      Based on this, I'm curious as to how the immune system determiens what antigens it responds to. It sounds like that's something that is programmed during the embryonic stage, as opposed to being determined genetically. Thinking about wht I recall about the immune system, that makes sense. In turn, what this implies is that mismatched blood types would not cause autoabortion, as others have suggested.

    2. Re:Two blood types: YES! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      "It sounds like that's something that is programmed during the embryonic stage, as opposed to being determined genetically."

      Exactly. I don't have my immunology books handy, but before a certain stage of development the developing mammal is immunologically "naive" (mayb fish and birds too - we didn't discuss them). If researchers make a transplant of tissue from another animal during this stage, it's accepted just as if it came from the recipient, and after birth, the mammal will not attack other transplants from that donor. It's as if they take an "inventory" at a certain point, and anything not in the inventory will be attacked as foreign.

    3. Re:Two blood types: YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> the tech says &^$^$#%@!!!, sets the donor unit back in the frig with a "do not use" note

      Actually he puts it back with a name tag, which reads "Abby Normal"

  91. Perhaps most are stillborn..? by adrenaline_junky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apologies if this is mentioned in the radio program (I have not listened to it), but it seems to me that even if there are theoretically "millions" of these multiple DNA chimera born each year, is it not likely that a very large percentage of them are stillborn due to complications brought on by their condition? The number of *living* chimera may be much smaller.

  92. Spoiler.... by TygerFish · · Score: 1

    I find your biological comments interesting but I have to say that if you are going to use a latin tag as your sig, you might consider running your note through a spell-checker. Sudden discoveries like 'Occures' works hard to spoil the effect.

    This, by the way, is by no means a flame. I like your note. It makes me want to know more.

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
    1. Re:Spoiler.... by MadBiologist · · Score: 1

      Whoops.... how'd that get there :>. The sig was on an e-mail that I received from a friend, and then appropriated for my own use....

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
  93. fraternal male/female twins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this would be one thing that produces a gay/lesbian individual?

  94. cool I am like that by mAineAc · · Score: 1

    Me and my brother was born with a merged placenta. My mother tells us how when we were conceived we were to separate eggs but that we were so close to being alike that our placentas merged so we were born like identical twins. Where can I find more research on this? Any slashdotters know?

    1. Re:cool I am like that by mAineAc · · Score: 1

      my bad I misread it the whole individual is fused not just the pleacenta.

    2. Re:cool I am like that by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      (you male or female?) It is quite possible you are a "blood chimera" ... the fetal cells that became what now makes your blood could easily have moved between the two of you. (if you are a blood chimera, it's quite likely he is too).

      Get your twin to volunteer for studies done on fraternal and identical twins with you. Otherwise, it's not something anyone worries about.

  95. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by daBum · · Score: 1

    Um, it was a farcical joke dude. Not necessarily a good one, but still.

    If it was any warmer around here, I'd die of frostbite...

    --
    I am dyslexia of borg - your ass will be laminated.
  96. picture by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool! I found a picture of those striped mice. Some more pictures:

    Closeup before eyes are formed.
    In-vitro development in the lab.
    Displaying remarkable inteligence as they swarm and are about to devour their much-bigger and unsuspecting prey (apparently striped mice are carnivorous)

    1. Re:picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, eh, why did this get modded as +5 interesting?

    2. Re:picture by cemaco · · Score: 1

      If interested, check this link. It has real info. http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyP ages/M/Mosaics.html

  97. genetic superiors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our chimeric overlords...

  98. May be MUCH more common ... by tkjtkj · · Score: 1

    Attend to the fact that if one of a set of fraternal twins dies ('blighted ovum' might be the term used)
    then it could have 'died' because of assimilation of its DNA into the 'surviving twin' , and there would therefore be NO evidence that the resulting singleton birth ever was one of a pair ..
    So , any search for the prevelance of thi Chimera condition must include analysis of ALL births, not just obvious fraternal twins.

    --
    "There are 11 kinds of people: those who know binary, those who don't, and those who could not care less!"
  99. Something similar? by MP*Birdman · · Score: 1

    In females, one of the X chromosomes becomes a barr body, and the other one is used for things like mitochondria. Because it's random which is used, you can get patches of different chromosomes being used in different areas, giving rise to things to things like calico patterned cats (almost always female), slightly different skin in different areas of the body, and so on..

    (I think.. I'm not a biologist)

  100. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What you witnessed is no different than what everyone else "witnesses" while on an acid trip. You gotta try to not freak out and go running to the Baptists everytime demons start eating your eyelids.

  101. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by bman08 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at the bright side. It provided you with an excellent chance to crow about Jesus.

  102. Re:Brain DNA... this solves the femme fatale probl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, can't I?

  103. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by afex · · Score: 1, Funny

    and thats exactly the reason its my sig :)

  104. IPv6 by RevMike · · Score: 1

    I guess this will accelerate the need for IPv6, since Chimeric Twins will needs twice as many IP addresses. Sure, they can use NAT, but what is the point to having the extra DNA if you can't independantly address it.

  105. Laboratory Chimeras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW, human chimeras and human-monkey hybrid chimeras are being produced in laboratories for research purposes.

  106. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Ten bucks says you are either latino or filipino.

    Why is that people who's ancestors where brutally converted through torture and mass executions today have such a undying love for Jesus?

  107. Relevant human-chimera link on nature.com by displague · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Marques Johansson
  108. Chimera is now Camino by koi88 · · Score: 1

    But should still be easy to clone. Just use "cp".
    Yes, mod me off-topic. See if I care.

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  109. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Psmylie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably it was just a joke. The statement: "Thank god I'm an atheist" implies that the person believes in god.

    Then again, maybe its because he is an atheist and wants people to be aware that there are differing viewpoints. A great many Christians in the US seem to think that everyone else in the country is also a Christian. Stating that you're an atheist is similar to driving around with a Jesus fish on your car.

    And, just as an FYI, warning an atheist about hell has about as much effect as telling the average adult that if they misbehave, Santa won't bring them any presents. In other words, none.

    --

    psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  110. NPR's transript posting times. by mledford · · Score: 1

    From NPR's FAQ about transcripts.

    When are transcripts available?

    Weekday programs:
    Morning Edition
    By 9 p.m. ET on the day the show airs

    Day to Day (Monday through Friday)
    By 9 p.m ET on the day the show airs

    All Things Considered (Monday through Friday)
    By 7 a.m. ET the morning after the show airs

    Talk of the Nation
    By 1 a.m. ET the day after the show airs

    The Tavis Smiley Show
    By 9 p.m. ET the day after the show airs

    Weekend programs:
    All Things Considered (Saturday and Sunday)
    Weekend Edition Saturday
    Weekend Edition Sunday
    By 3 p.m. ET the day after the show airs

    Transcription availability times may vary because of NPR News special coverage or other non-news events.

  111. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by afex · · Score: 0

    and on a sidenote, if satan is 'scary as hell'...i should be 'scary as wisconsin'

  112. human females are chimeras by peter303 · · Score: 1

    According the recnt book "The X Chromosome" , the second "X" chromosome in females is 95% deactivated because it is redundant. These become "Barr bodies" which float about independently of the other DNA. An X chromosome is contributed from the mother and father to a female child. In human females, either can be deactivated in a cell. (In other species, sometimes one parental X is only deactivated.)
    It is suggested that the higher incidence of auto-immune conditions in females, e.g. lupus, chronic fatigue, etc. may be the immune system reacting againts one of the parental X. (The are alternative hypotheses for auto-immune problems.)
    Humans can exist with as few as one X and no Y, up to three or four X's, due the deactivations of the extras X's. Most other chromosome miscounts cause miscarriages. X/Y miscounts happen about one in every 300 births.

    1. Re:human females are chimeras by bluepinstripe · · Score: 1
      human females are chimeras

      This is not the case, and understanding the difference is what makes the research important. Human somatic (non-germ line) cells are genetically identical -- they all have the same two X chromosomes, one of the two just happens to be deactivated.

      Human chimera somatic cells are not genetically identical -- each one derives its genetic complement from one of the two original embryos.

      Also of note is the fact that these human chimeras are not tetraploid (have four times the number of chromosomes).

  113. Re:I'm a Chimera twin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You ate your twin before birth. Guilty!

  114. NPR Funding by Avihson · · Score: 1

    With all that "lack of funding" it is interesting how the top 3 people at WQED in Pittsburgh can be pulling down over $400K combined. When that came out in the local scandal sheet a few years ago, I quit contributing to their pledge drives.

    As far as a balanced news coverage.... Forget NPR. They have an slant to the left as bad as Rush Limbaugh has to the right. Their accuracy in reporting leaves a lot to be desired also.

    I believe that as long as the Gov't supports them in any way, they should be held accountable for unbiased, accurate reporting of events.
    But then again, in a perfect world like that, Apple, Microsoft, SCO, IBM and Sun would all be looking out for the customer's best interest!

    1. Re:NPR Funding by _krimson_ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Forget NPR. They have an slant to the left as bad as Rush Limbaugh has to the right.

      You can only believe that if you listen exclusively to Rush, and he told you so.

      If you actually listened to NPR, you would realize that they are the only organization besides the BBC that is anywhere near "fair and balanced."

    2. Re:NPR Funding by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      If you actually listened to NPR, you would realize that they are the only organization besides the BBC that is anywhere near "fair and balanced."

      Absolute horseshit. I have listen to NPR from 1 to 3 hours every day (including BBC am report here on the east coast) for years. I also listen to Rush a few hours a week, plus other programs (everything but music on radio).

      NPR is as left as BBC. Thats fine, I don't expect them to NOT be. Ironically, more Republicans listen to NPR than Democrats (not my opinion, recent study, could be googled I guess). But it IS left of center, just as Rush is right of center. This fact is not news, and not a recent event even. They do have some good programming, I just take their opinions with a grain of salt. I am a conservative, but I have no problem hearing how the left thinks (or feels, rather). I am secure enough in my beliefs that I have no issue with anyone questioning them or disagreeing. NPR is not as left as it used to be, they will at least acknowlege that there is more than one reasonable opinion on some matters now.

      But to think NPR and BBC is center, is just plain silly. Perhaps closer to center than your own opinions, but that is relative.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  115. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because the ones who didn't died?

  116. Re:Mark: here you go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got it out of /dev/random. sorry to bug you.

  117. um...mod parent funny? by aastanna · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's kind of odd this got modded interesting when the pictures are of chocolate mice. I suspect the moderators didn't bother to follow the links.

    1. Re:um...mod parent funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just the standard Slashdot moderator crack working. You can usually get insightful/informative mods just with obfuscated goatse urls (especially ones that seem to lead to reputable sites). Once you actually manage to get the post to +2 or over, you're all set - only a few mods will actually have the courage to mod those down.

    2. Re:um...mod parent funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, moderator crack. It's also interesting I got an off-topic. It's prenatal development of striped mice, totally on-topic. I understand if they don't think it's funny... that's ok - there is an "overrated" moderation for those cases.

  118. at least this solves by kraksmoka · · Score: 1

    that damn browser pronunciation problem.

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  119. I take it female only? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    So that's a way to know the cat's female too?

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:I take it female only? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      No, but your chances are really good, like many hundreds to one.

      Male cats with the XXY (abnormal) chromosome count can be calico or tortoise shell if they got the right color genes from the parents. There was a BIG research study on them in the 1970s (AFAIK, at Duke) and the amount of the second color ranged from the usual 50/50 split to a few animals that only had a small blotch of the second color. What surprised the researchers was that there were a LOT of them, and they weren't all sterile wimps. The lower the amount the secondary color, the more likely they were to act like normal males ... some had even sired kittens.

  120. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and here i thought holy wars were supposed to be stuff like "mac vs pc" or "xml vs. rdb" thank microsoft i'm a linux user

  121. Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions.. by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why cats are better than men:
    1. A cat always comes in SOBER after being out all night.
    2. When a cat goes to the toilet he tries not to leave a trace.
    3. You can put a bell around a cat's neck so you know exactly where he is.
    4. If you stroke a cat he won't leap on you for sex.
    5. You don't mind that much if a cat brings a bird home every night.
    6. When a cat comes in at mid-night it doesn't wake you up by smashing into every item of furniture.
    7. Cats never pretend they know how to fix the video.
    8. Cats don't care what size your boobs are.
    9. Cats still love you even when your perm goes wrong.
    10. Cats love rubbing up to your legs however much cellulite you have.
    11. Cats can be neutered if they stray.
    12. If a cat jumps into your lap, a little light petting will satisfy him.
    13. It's okay if a cat rubs up against your best friend.
    14. If you ask enough times, a cat may actually listen to you.
    15. You never have to spend time with your cat's mother.
    16. Better chance of training a cat.
    17. Cats are cute.
    18. A cat is never late for dinner.
    19. Cats love to see you come home from shopping with lots of bags!
    20. You'll never get a call from your cat's ex-wife.
    21. A cat would never leave you for a younger women.
    22. Cats treat your mom with respect.
    23. Cats don't worry about hair loss.
    24. It feels nice to stroke a cats soft, fluffy fur.
    25. A cat's friend is less likely to be annoying.
    26. Cats can't show love without meaning it.
    27. To buy a fancy dinner for a cat only costs 40p
    28. Cats actually think with their heads.
    29. Unlike a man, a cat can fend for itself.
    30. It is legal in all states to neuter a cat.
    31. Cats comfort you when you are sick.
    32. When a cat sleeps all day it's natural, not annoying.

    Why cats are better than women:
    You don't have to contend with mothers in law.
    Cats dont use your credit cards.
    Cats don't hog the bathroom for hours.
    Cats don't need a new dress every time they go out.
    Cats don't have PMS. (whoever wrote this clearly never had an unaltered female cat)
    Cats always look good first thing in the morning.
    Cats never question your decisions.
    Cats don't complain about how much you eat or the way you dress.
    A cat won't scream if it sees a mouse in the house.
    Cats don't ask "Am I getting fat?" and expect you to lie.
    Cats don't call the lawyers if you sleep with another cat.
    Cats dont object to kisses just because you haven't shaved.
    Cats don't expect expensive presents on their birthday.
    Cats never make you sleep in the spare bedroom.

  122. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by fireweaver · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anonymous Coward wrote: "I believe in god".

    I feel sorry for you. Your life must be a living hell what with constantly looking over your shoulder hoping the boogeyman doesn't get you for some minor infraction of long obsolete rules and regulations and constantly having to remind the chief boss fairy what a worthless piece of shit you are. If he's out there floating around somewhere, he probably already knows it with out you having to remind him.

    I sincerely hope that someday, you will grow up and realise that all there is is nature and that we are merely parts of that nature. Boogeymen and hobgoblins like the religious believe in simply do not exist.

  123. Does that mean that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For these Chimera's, masturbation is incest?

  124. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Cunk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heh heh. Hell is as scary as hell. Who woulda thunk it?

    --

    I am the inventor of the hilarious refrigerator alarm.
  125. Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by LenE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More often than not, things don't go right.

    Everyone has heard of Downs syndrome, when a child has an "extra" chromosome. Well, think of having twenty three extra pairs.

    I am a fraternal twin, and I don't know if I am a chimera or not, but my wife and I have had trouble with a similar situation of too much DNA. Last year, we had a molar pregnancy.

    "What is that?" you may ask. A molar pregnancy happens when an egg is fertilized, but no baby is formed. It happens when the egg "looses" the genetic information from the mother (complete molar), or has three sets of chromosomes (69 total, partial molar). Molar pregnancies are about 1 in 1500 births, with 98% of those being the complete type.

    Either way, it is a horrific experience, and should be considered cancerous. The mother's hormone levels will climb to dangerous levels as the mass of cells that should have been an embryo rapidly grow and divide inside the womb. She will become extremely pregnant, without a child, and morning sickness becomes a 24 hour a day nightmare. Relief only comes with complete removal of all molar tissue. After this, the mother has to be monitored and be "pregnancy free" for a year, to tell if any of the molar tissue has become cancerous.

    Our case was a partial molar. If things would have gone right, we would now have a set of identical twins, but it didn't. DNA is a funny and powerful thing and too much is never good.

    -- Len

    1. Re:Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is any implication at all for fertility. Even if you are a chimera, and even if you happen to have multiple germlines, any individual sperm cell will be from a single line. (i.e. normal) But IANAD.

    2. Re:Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by LenE · · Score: 1

      I was just showing that things can and do go wrong with extra or multiple sets of chromosomes. In our case, we had normal (mother + father) and abnormal (father + father) chromosomal pairings. This created two different genetic materials in the embryo, or what should have been an embryo.

      As for myself and my sister, we are probably partial chimeras. We both have auto-immune problems that can't be easily explained. At times, our bodies become allergic to themselves. My sister has it worse though. Sometimes she gets spontaneous blood clots in her legs.

      -- Len

    3. Re:Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by LenE · · Score: 1

      One other addition.

      The molar pregnancy could start from one screwed up egg, or it could be from a screwed up mitosis. The Chimera thing is from combining multiple fertilized eggs, or multiple clumps of different DNA cells into common tissue of an embryo, very early on.

      The point being that either one could become "unviable" at any time after conception, but the molar case is wrong within each cell.

      -- Len

    4. Re:Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense dude, but maybe you should do the gene pool a favor and try not to have kids. Adoption is always an option.

    5. Re:Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      asshole.

      'nuff said.

    6. Re:Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It happens when the egg "looses" the genetic information from the mother

      How does genetic information become loose? What would make genetic information for one egg tighter than another?

      What a load of BS!

    7. Re:Yes, this chimera assumes things go correctly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never heard of loose genetic info? You must not get out much. Just the other day I banged my head into something and knocked most of my genetic info loose.

  126. IM curious. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    THis is a nosy queston, so feel free to tell me to go to hell, but which do you feel you should have been? A man, a woman, or somewhat a mix of both?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  127. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A great many Christians in the US seem to think that everyone else in the country is also a Christian.

    I agree with the rest of your post, but not this point. I think it's more accurate to say that a lot of Christians think others who believe themselves to be so are not really, and many who call themselves Christians are not.

    If you read that sentence several times, it will hopefully make sense. If not, drink a few beers and try again.

  128. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read that sentence several times, it will hopefully make sense. If not, drink a few beers and try again.
    What does it say about me if I understood the sentence on the first reading? :)

  129. I like gay sexxxxxx too by RedSynapse · · Score: 0, Troll

    Especially with one of those Chimera dudes. Oh man, that's gotta be cool, it would be like a threesome, wouldn't it?

  130. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said that because "Scary as Iowa" simply doesn't have the same ring to it.

  131. Can a Chimera have two fathers? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    Assuming two eggs released, each fertilized by a spermazoa from a different man, could a Chimera form? (Probably a higher chance complications, but it seems possible.)

    Wow, can you imagine the fun on one of those idiotic Paternity Test TV shows when they bring the results? "Uhmm, you're both the father!" Or introductions? "I'd like you to meet my liver's dad, and this is the dad of the rest of me..." (Answer that Miss Manners!)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  132. So if the RIAA comes for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if the RIAA comes after me can I claim that it wasn't me who downloaded all those files onto my computer...

  133. Quite a Problem by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1

    This mucks up the whole crime lab and paternity mess quite a bit. What if one of a pair of twins is a chimera, part identical twin and part not (not looking identical)? With triplets and quadruplets ... the combinatorics might be insane. A female twin with a long lost male brother being convicted of rape on DNA evidence?

  134. Re:Two blood types:? by lostinchicago · · Score: 1

    if one had 2 blood types could they give themselves aids?

  135. And triplets? by Alver · · Score: 1

    What about triplets then? If it's possible to have a Chimera twin, I don't see a reason why triplets wouldn't be possible too. "Well sir, according to our DNA tests, you're an entire family on your own."

  136. Re:Mark: here you go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not true.
    It has a proper GIF header in the file.
    Do you really expect us to believe that came out of /dev/random?

    LIES!!

  137. Re:Why tell us you are an atheist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The appallingly narrowminded fundementalist religious belief patterns are not the only way(s) of believing in god.

    My experience [1] leads me to affirm "I believe in god [2]", but your parody of the fundementalist parody of religious belief doesn't match up with my belief patterns.

    [1] Yes rational arguments come in to it as well, but I'd guess that for 99% of people, it's environmental and experiential factors that dominate.
    [2] Most of the time. (But that's a different fish kettle.)

  138. Immune system problems by Efreet · · Score: 1

    Actually, there aren't any immune system problems. The knowledge of which protiens are "other" and which are "us" isn't stricktly geneticly encoded, so the immune cells grow up recognizing all the protiens that the person's body produces. I expect that massibly chimeric (hundreds of genetic sources) organisms might run into problems as the number of protiens recognized as "self" greatly exceeds normal, and might grow to encompass all the protiens produced by some random disease (at which point the organism is f***ed) but there don't seem to be any problems for two part chimeras.

    --
    This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
  139. A couple of nice things in the article by Thagg · · Score: 1

    I heard this article this morning, it was amazing. The woman was shocked to hear that she couldn't possibly be the mother of the children she distinctly remembered giving birth to. They tested the father as well, and it was clear that he was indeed the father -- so it wasn't a case of kids being switched at birth. It took quite a while for them to determine that she was a chimera. [That's KY-mer-a, I had always pronounced it SHIM-er-a].

    She was somewhat worried that her kids wouldn't think of her as her mother, but now that she understands it better she sees that she's both the mother and aunt of her kids.

    The article said that scientists make chimeras of other animals all the time, and sometimes even between one species and another. There are 'geeps' which are chimeras of goats and sheep, for example.

    As other people mention, they have found larger percentages of chimeras in in vitro conceived children; which makes sense because they usually implant multiple embryos.

    Anyway, it's one of those articles that makes NPR worthwhile :)

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  140. Sea Quest by Efreet · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else here, upon learning of Chimeras, immdediatly think of the Daggers in Seaquest?

    I mean, they've got the striped skin, they don't breed true, they're a perfect example of what a human chimera with strongly disparate genetic sources would look like. Of course, natural chimeras get all they're genes from the same set, and from only two sources too, so they don't look as interesting, but ain't-it-cool?

    --
    This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
  141. The Chimera Twins by kensai · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a really cheesy end-boss to an 80s video game.

    1. Re:The Chimera Twins by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      I'm actually a Chimera of a set of identical twins.

  142. Mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Chimera on my mac for a while, but mozilla is better.

  143. Worst. Joke. Ever. by JimRay · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mosaics aren't Chimeras.

    However, before the launch of Safari, I was using Chimera, a descendent of Mosaic.

    Told ya. Worst joke evar.

    --
    My other computer is your Windows box
  144. MR NEROPAT, TELL ME THIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you think this planet has come from? TELL ME THAT! All the planets in the sky and the sun??? WHERE DID THEY COME FROM??? Is that just imagination??? WHO DESIGNED HUMAN BRAINS??? what??? THINK BEFORE YOU TALK!!!

    1. Re:MR NEROPAT, TELL ME THIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody designed them, except through the choices made by individuals over the last billions of years.
      Can you even conceive of billions? That's hundreds of millions of generations of the shorter lived creatures we evolved from.
      Your blind faith disturbs me.

    2. Re:MR NEROPAT, TELL ME THIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blind faith in anything (including science) is still blind faith.

    3. Re:MR NEROPAT, TELL ME THIS! by Nick_dm · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that science isn't "blind", you can't be 100% sure what is/isn't true, but fundamentaly you are basing your decision on evidence. Any good scientist should realise that any theories could be wrong, plenty end up going back on their own ideas/work because someone else comes up with evidence to refute it.

      If you are calling support of scientific principles "blind faith" then I'd disagree as fundamentally they are just common sence, weigh up evidence for an against, and if there is none either way than don't make any assumptions.

  145. Some of us have known all along.... by loserbert · · Score: 1

    When I use my left hand it feels like someone else!!! Coincidence, I think not.

  146. This sounds alot like... by I+Like+Swords!!! · · Score: 0

    Fuuuuuuuuuuuuu... SION! ...HAAAAAAAA!!! Only... BEFORE birth.

    --
    .unsigged
  147. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondered what was up with David Bowie's eyes.

  148. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by RaptorGeek · · Score: 1

    You've already drank a few beers?

  149. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Satan is for real. I've witnessed it and it was scary as hell.

    So have I, but I found him quite funny. Especially the bit where he gets buggered by Sadam Hussein.

  150. What about identical twin chimeras? by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    Wait! Why do they limit discussion of this phenomenon to just the merging of fraternal twins? Why, I could be the product of a merger between myself and my own identical twin. And, the implications of that are... uh... well, something.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
    1. Re:What about identical twin chimeras? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Everyone is an identical twin chimera. One cell becomes 2 and they stick together to form 4, then 8, then 16...

      Okay, okay, if the re-joining takes place beyond the first few cell division they become conjoined twins.

      * - All things being equal.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  151. blood types by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

    Actually, blood types of a baby can be incommpatible with mom. They don't share the bloodstream, they have the placenta as a nutrient exchange interface that theoretically should swap no blood. Think about it: Mother is Ao - A from one parent, o from the other - which makes her blood type A, and the father is, say Bo, B from one parent and o from the other. An o sperm could fertilize and o egg, creating a oo genotype, which would be blood type O - this child would be killed if mom's blood got into his body. Many other crosses also generate incompatible mother/baby blood types in one direction or the other.

  152. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > "Scary as Iowa"

    AAAAAGGH!!!! Geez, man, warn us next time! You scared the New Jersey out of me!

  153. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    "and on a sidenote, if satan is 'scary as hell'...i should be 'scary as wisconsin'"

    brrr... You just gave me the willies!

  154. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    "Now come on, was Wisconsin that bad?"

  155. Picture of Chimera Lobster by MushMouth · · Score: 1

    There is a good picture of Lobster which displays this caught in Nova Scotia there are also lobsters that are blue and red like a checkerboard (only four squares), but I couldn't find photos of them so easily

  156. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Psmylie · · Score: 1

    Just make sure to use some Wyoming to wipe that Jersey off of your Utah.

    --

    psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  157. Is there a doctor in the house? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    I tried searching some info on the web about Chimeras but apart from the same definitions, theres nothing.

    I'm curious, are there any obvious signs a person is heavily a chimera as in Downs Syndrome or Autism? What are the DNA percentages.... I suspect theyre around 1% outside DNA for bone marrows and the like, is there a chimera person with more than 30% outside DNA? Is there someone with chimera in his brain and what are the syndromes?

    Lastly, has there ever been siamese twins who are not identical... ie 50% chimera?

    So little is known...

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  158. mod parent up by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    Thanks... this is what I was actually looking for, but kept running into those damn chocolate mice. parent's link. Too bad it's only one "stripe", but still neat.

  159. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    haha that's only half true. I ate the most shrooms in my life in may and proved God's existence to myself. I didn't talk to anyone, I just had a moment of clear thought. I'm not sure how I did it but it made perfect sense at the time :)

    Either way, a quarter of purple shrooms and two blunts is not the way to effectively prepare for a final the next day!

    PS people bitching about atheism: there's no such thing as atheism, it's just as extreme as believing in an intangible (G)(g)od. Both require a substantial amount of illogic, but that's what makes us all interesting. But seriously, he was joking.

  160. Re:Two blood types:? by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > if one had 2 blood types could they give themselves aids?

    I feel stupid that I have to ask if you are serious.

  161. You Insensitive Clod by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

    I resemble that remark!

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  162. Why stop at two sets of DNA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If two sets of DNA in one person is possible then presumably more are possible. Of course the probability of having three sets of DNA is likely to be much less than the probability of having two sets of DNA. And of course the probability of having four sets of DNA is likely to be much less than having three sets of DNA. I wonder if there is any theoretical limit to the number of sets of DNA a single person could have?

  163. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Satan is for real. I've witnessed it

    I've seen Satan too, and once upon a time it was the definitive tool in this class, but honestly, there are much better tools out there these days. Still, at least Satan is still slightly alive, which is more than can be said for god.

  164. That would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe Dirt. Quite a classic. *cough cough*

  165. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

    It was a joke, idiot. And it was in his sig, it wasn't part of the message.

    Read it again: "Thank god I'm atheist". Why would an atheist be thanking god? Because it's a joke.

    --
    There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
  166. implications for organ donation and rejection by zejackal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This brings up some interesting questions. First off, what are the implications for the present organ donation system? The radio story talks about a women who discovered her condition when she needed a kidney, and her own children were tested as incompatable. It turns out that they inherited genes from one of her sets and that was not the genome responsible for her blood supply. But what about the other possibility. I need a kidney, my sister tests as a viable donor, but it turns out her kidney has a different genome then the one that tested positive for a match. The kidney gets transplanted and my body rejects it. How often does this happen in real life?

    Also, is anyone studying the way the body's immune system handles having two omnipresent genomes? What implications, if any, does this have for the study of drugs that could help lower the threat of organ rejection?

    Does anyone know the answers to these questions, and if not, is anyone looking into them?

  167. Or tell me that. Whatever. by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    So I was reading this chimera twins story...

    What? You want me to give away the ending?


    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  168. OT: Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15%? Yeah right. Tell that to the three accidents my wife and I are raising.

    Hey people. The rhythm method? Early withdrawal? When they said back in school that those methods don't work ... THEY WEREN'T KIDDING!!

    [Actually I'm kidding. Only two were accidents. One was actually planned. But, of course, all are loved.]

  169. Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions.. by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    why did you edit out some of the "why cats are better then women" ?

  170. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Toutatis · · Score: 2

    "Thank god I'm an atheist" is a quote from surrealist director Luis Bunuel.

    I think he meant that because of his religious education he was atheist.

  171. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how!
    *fart*

  172. Mixed Parts by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's all we need. You look at a girl, and you're like "damn! you're fine", then she turns and you see she has her sister's ass...

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  173. Re:This Raises Some Interesting Questions.. by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

    bad cut and paste?

  174. Re:WHY TELL US YOU ARE ATHEIST??? by kaltkalt · · Score: 0

    Do you believe in the purple 6 legged reptile-giraffe living in my asshole that created the universe (which I will never show you; you must have faith that it is there)? Huh, no? You don't? I'd call your lack of faith substantially illogical, but then *I* would be the moron.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  175. Re:REDUNDANT post on calicos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This topic of calico cats was discussed in a +0 rated anonymous post BEFORE your +5 rated post.

    Why was yours not marked redundant, or at least the other post modded to +1 informative or higher?

    because no one MODS posts anymore from anonymous sources... thoughat times some of the most amazing posts were from anonymous sources on slashdot.

    but this post was not the first to discuss calico cats, though it was well written and was informative.

    http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/Biolog yP ages/M/Mosaics.html

    is a good link on true FULL CHROMOSONAL SET chimeras in humans

  176. Transgenderism by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    My wife had an interesting idea, Could it be possible that transgenderism is caused by a female (or male) twin stuck in the others body? A simple sample or two of DNA from the brain and... um.. genitals would let you know if transgendered people are in fact chimeras.

    --
    meh
  177. The Rostov Ripper by geoswan · · Score: 1
    Google helped. Searching for 'Soviet "serial killer" DNA' turned up links to the Rostov Ripper. However the links were contradictory. Some saying that the DNA of his blood and semen didn't match, as I recalled.

    Others, like the one below, state that initial tests that cleared him were "errors".

    The Rostov Ripper

    By September 1983 ... They watched and noticed as Chikatilo tried to pick up girls. The police never approached him. Weeks later after they caught Chikatilo fondling an intoxicated girl they finally approached him, asked for his papers and arrested him.

    Fetisov hired Victor Burakov, who was an experienced crime investigator and took DNA samples from the sperm left on the bodies. They then took a blood sample from Chikatilo and since it did not match he was released. It later revealed the it did match his blood type. And they also later released him for lack of evidence.

    This link says:

    Although he was twice suspected, he got away from arrest when his Sperm blood tests did not match his victims. Little did the Russian detectives know, such a case is rare in few people, whose blood DNA doesnt match their sperm DNA.

    Apparently HBO made a movie, Citizen X about this case. I haven't seen it, so I don't know how it deals with the DNA aspect.

  178. Nature's version of RAID by tloh · · Score: 1

    If the organs or systems of one chromosome set fails for whatever reason, the other one automatically takes over.

    *duck*

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  179. Mirror twins by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

    This is unlikely to occur without active medical intervention, but in theory you could get twins who are genetically 'unrelated' by taking the two halves of each parental zygote (XX and xy) and cross-fertilizing them (Xx and Xy). I am not a geneticist, and this came originally from an offhand comment by a character in a Robert Heinlein story.

    1. Re:Mirror twins by russotto · · Score: 1

      Yep, if you could mature spermatocytes in vitro you could split them up after the first division and have a complementary pair (each of which would yield two sperm). Unfortunately (for us mad scientist types) you couldn't do the same with the egg because it doesn't split evenly. You'd have to do some sort of cloning-type thing to save the other half of the genetic material.

      The mirror twins could be XY and XX or both XX, assuming normal parents.

  180. Re:REDUNDANT post on calicos by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
    Dear anonymous coward: I realize you are anguished by your post being ignored, but few will waste mod points on an anonymous post unless it's truly earthshattering. I didn't see your post, because unless I have mod points, I have the threshold set to "1". Setting it to "0" shows too many AC flamer posts.

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=6665 839&sid=74320 for the curious.

    Also, you have to depend on your post being seen by someone who understands what you are saying. And here is your third obstacle:

    It would also help if your story had some scientific accuracy to it, not tabloid-style hyperbole.

  181. TELL ME WHY THEY ARE OUT TO GET HIM!!!!! by tim_bissell · · Score: 1


    It was a joke, idiot. And it was in his sig, it wasn't part of the message.

    Read it again: "Thank god I'm atheist". Why would an atheist be thanking god? Because it's a joke.

    Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not really out to get you.


    TELL ME WHY THEY ARE OUT TO GET HIM!!!!!

    Thank God I'm paranoid!

  182. Chimeric twins- not a new issue by whit3 · · Score: 1

    For a fine exposition on the legal implications, in the old-science view, I'd recommend the Mark Twain novel _Pudd'nhead_Wilson_ It's of some interest, too, to the enthusiasts who are trying to get DNA data on all felons, and would like to get it on all citizens and visitors as well. They can't claim to have a magic bullet anymore (but the more important issue, for crime solving, is whether there'd be any false positive matches, and twins are the big issue there).

  183. ObSimpson by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Mmmmmm.... Chimera Twin.....

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:ObSimpson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drat.. when I read "ObSimpson" I assumed your post was going to be about finding 'the real killers.'

  184. Re:isn't this against the law? by taped2thedesk · · Score: 1
    Doesn't that go against Section 508 standards for tax-funded institutions?
    I don't even know why I'm bothering to reply to this, but NPR posts archives of their radio shows on the internet for listener convenience. I think it's a bit much for them to transcribe every single radio show they do, and make it available on the internet for free. They do transcribe and/or summarize a great deal of their stories and make them available on the web. If you really want a copy of a story, you can order a transcript.

    They don't have to make the archives available on the web, and if they had to transcribe everything they posted, I'd imagine they would just remove the archives.

    Like NPR cares about that; they don't let their 501(c)3 status interfere with their journalism.
    I'm glad you're so 'concerned' about the rights of the disabled (which is very evident from your 'nprsucks.com' link). If you're mad because you think NPR has a liberal bias (or whatever your reason might be), then just say it.