Slashdot Mirror


Beta Ogg Vorbis Firmware For The Neuros [updated]

volsung writes "It's finally here! Xiph.org has made a beta release of firmware with Ogg Vorbis support for the Neuros portable music player. You can grab the firmware from the Neurosetta site. Note that this beta release only plays Vorbis files, and may skip on very high quality files, like average bitrates above 200 kbps. Also, you'll need to head over to the positron website for instructions on how to upload Vorbis files. Big thanks go out to Monty all of his hard work, and Digital Innovations for supporting the project. (See the DI press release here.)" Update: 07/01 15:26 GMT by T : Stan Seibert writes with an update: if you'd like to get one of these players, visit open.neurosaudio.com to find them on sale.

147 comments

  1. High Quality? by Mirell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What sort of portable system are you going to play it on that over 200 Kbps would even make a difference?

    --
    We have so much time, and so little to do - strike that! Reverse it. Tryn Mirell
    1. Re:High Quality? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      192 Kbps mp3s sound as good as i need em to, I can't imagine needing more than that.

      I was also under the impression that Ogg Vorbis encoded ones sounded better at slightly lower bitrates. Should be a non-issue IMHO.

      What a convoluted way to say I agree.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    2. Re:High Quality? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Especially given that the Vorbis format supports bitrate peeling.

    3. Re:High Quality? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What sort of portable system are you going to play it on that over 200 Kbps would even make a difference?

      While on the move: Not much.

      But if you plug your player into a badass n-thousand-watt PA system it just might. HIFI applications could be another example.

      I don't know about the quality of the Neuros's DA-converters though, they would have significant impact, that's for sure.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    4. Re:High Quality? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      To be honest, you probably don't need much more than 128Kbps on a portable player. However, all of my Vorbis music is encoded at quality 8 (ABR 256Kbps). In order to use any of it I would need to peel it back to <200. It would be nice if it came with some kind of syncing utility that did this automatically.

      Anyway, I still have a small pot of money waiting for Apple to release a Vorbis compatible iPod (or an iPod SDK so someone else can do it)

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:High Quality? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Especially given that the Vorbis format supports bitrate peeling.

      The page linked from the /. page you linked states that bitrate peeling isn't implemented yet... Are you is or is you aint?

      Anyone have an update? The info is dated Nov. 7th 2002.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    6. Re:High Quality? by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A "small" pot? 400-500$ isn't so small :(

      --
      ^_^
    7. Re:High Quality? by afidel · · Score: 1

      My mp3's and ogg's average around 200-220 kbps. This to me is archival quality as I can almost never pick the files out from the source (occassionally I find a problem with ogg, but thats more rare every release). I use Sennheiser headphones even with my iPod so I DO hear the difference.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:High Quality? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Oops, my mistake.

    9. Re:High Quality? by krath · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to Ogg Traffic from April 2003 they are still working on it...

      Quoted from the above URL: "... The bottom line is that Version 1.0 files don't peel very well due to how the packets are organized."

      "... He is convinced that this can be done [peeling], but that takes time, which is something he doesn't have in excess. Of course, if somebody offered him a contract to implement bitrate peeling for money, the process could be accelerated a lot. Oh, and did I mention that donations to Xiph.org are now tax-deductible?"

    10. Re:High Quality? by eugene_roux · · Score: 2, Funny

      192 Kbps mp3s sound as good as i need em to, I can't imagine needing more than that. -- 3.5 stripes

      "640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates, chairman and founder of Microsoft

      "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." -- Thomas Watson, former chairman of IBM

      There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." -- Ken Olson, former president, former chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation

      Yep, prophets all... <grin>

      --
      Part Time Philosopher, Oft Times Romantic, Full Time Unix Geek
    11. Re:High Quality? by croddy · · Score: 1

      almost all of my vorbis are encoded at least -q 8 (~256kbps) because I like to be able to listen to them on my home stereo too. it's absolutely true that anything above 160 is irrelevant for a portable player, but I encode them for things besides portables...

    12. Re:High Quality? by Alan · · Score: 1

      Because some of us use high quality oggs to back up our CDs, and re-sampling or downsamping or converting to a different format would be a PITA to put onto a portable.

    13. Re:High Quality? by n8willis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I for one have neither time nor a contract, but I'm so interested in bitrate peeling that I'm hereby willing to donate the name BitWhittler to the first program that gets off the ground and produces some working code.

      I don't think that that name has been taken by anything else, so I think I made it up. In the Intellectual Property Era, that should be worth a serious tax deduction, too, right?

      N

      --
      -- Watch the REAL Jon Katz.
    14. Re:High Quality? by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what will come of it, but Linux runs on an iPod, and they have Vorbis playback at 80% real time. So it should be possible.

    15. Re:High Quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well one idea could be that you can encode at a lower bitrate to get the same quality as a higher bitrate mp3, thus allowing you to fit more tracks onto your device? (I suppose this would only be useful for solid-state memory devices where space is at a premium)

    16. Re:High Quality? by kasperd · · Score: 1

      I was also under the impression that Ogg Vorbis encoded ones sounded better at slightly lower bitrates.

      I can hardly tell the difference between 48kbps Ogg Vorbis and the original uncompressed music.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  2. Wonderful by salimma · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've been planning to buy a portable audio player for a while now - for those rare moments in the gym - and this should be the clincher.

    Hope it's available in the UK...

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
    1. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!!

      Your comment was marked Redundant!!!11

  3. beta functionality by pytheron · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to neurosaudio, this beta firmware upgrade will disable mp3 playback support. You can have one, but not the other. Looks like it would be better to wait until the beta stage has been passed before upgrading your firmware, since this will be resolved in later releases.

    --
    "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" [William Shakespeare]
    1. Re:beta functionality by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Unless all you have are oggs.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    2. Re:beta functionality by Trogre · · Score: 1

      No problems here. I stopped using mp3 a long time ago.

      I just couldn't justify having to make payments to the Fraunhofer institute, who holds the patent on mp3.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:beta functionality by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      mp3 is so 20th century. Worrying about mp3 support is like worrying about 8-track tape support. ;-)

      What I'm more worried about is that my files are oggenced with "-q 7" so the beta might stutter when trying to play 'em. And I can't find a peeler tool. Might have to rerip/reencode a few things for the short-term...

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  4. Re:Slashdot Store needed?? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Informative

    With such things like Personal Submarines, Personal Rockets, Z80 based webservers etc., can't we have a Slashdot store or something?

    The would probably be a little redundant, taken that thinkgeek already exists.

    I'm all for competition, but running a store takes some serious logistics.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  5. Sanity Check by thelandp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Beta Ogg Vorbis Firmware For The Neuros
    Is it just me, or does it seem a bit wierd the fact that we understand what this sentence means...

    --

    -- the only thing we have to fear is really scary things
    1. Re:Sanity Check by thanjee · · Score: 5, Funny

      I asked my girlfriend what she thought and all I got was a blank stare. I offered to decipher it, but she declined on technical grounds.

      --
      Saying your OS is the best because more people use it is like saying MacDonalds make the best food
    2. Re:Sanity Check by thelandp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently in Uzbekistan it means "Please fondle my buttocks."
      You don't want to know what it means in Tajhikstan.

      --

      -- the only thing we have to fear is really scary things
    3. Re:Sanity Check by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
      "I asked my girlfriend what she thought and all I got was a blank stare."

      Around here, when you tell people you have a girlfriend, you usually get a blank stare too.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    4. Re:Sanity Check by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it just me, or does it seem a bit wierd the fact that we understand what this sentence means...

      I'd like to know what "for" and "the" are supposed to mean, are they TLA's or something?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    5. Re:Sanity Check by nightsweat · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Tajik, isn't it "Drop your panties, Sir William, I cannot wait until lunchtime"?

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    6. Re:Sanity Check by sean23007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I asked my girlfriend what she thought and all I got was a blank stare.That, however, is her typical response, seeing as how she's just a picture and all. Oh, did you mean -- riiiight. For a second I thought this was Slashdot...

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    7. Re:Sanity Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just old style spelling of "4" and "teh". ;)

    8. Re:Sanity Check by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Well color me lucky, my wife understood it without a pause.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    9. Re:Sanity Check by thelandp · · Score: 1

      You got me, I confess.
      It was meant to be Open Source comedy wasn't it? Or at least, hopefully the copyright has expired by now...

      --

      -- the only thing we have to fear is really scary things
    10. Re:Sanity Check by nightsweat · · Score: 1
      #include My hovercraft is full of eels.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  6. This is great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ogg Vorbis truly is a superior format. In some circles, it has already gained an enormous amount of mindshare. I did end-to-end tests on my PC comparing MP3 and Ogg files, and I found out that Ogg files were smaller, and of higher quality, than MP3 files that were equivalently-encoded from the same WAV file. As much as 20% of your disk space can be saved by using Ogg Vorbis instead of MP3. Also, Ogg Vorbis is free from dodgy commercial patents and general legal cloudiness. The quality of Ogg Vorbis is beyond question. Ogg Vorbis is taking over in South Africa. Several people I've talked to have been moaning about the lack of car Ogg Vorbis players, stating that the current MP3 front-loaders are no longer sufficient, and that they would rather have Ogg Vorbis players in their cars. Whether manufacturers take note of this or not isn't even the question. The question is: WHEN is it going to happen? Pretty soon, I'd say.

    1. Re:This is great. by lvdrproject · · Score: 1
      and I found out that Ogg files were smaller, and of higher quality, than MP3 files that were equivalently-encoded from the same WAV file

      Um... what are you talking about? Vorbis files are as small as you make them. You would assume that if they were "equivalently-encoded", they would be approximately the same bit rate (and thus roughly the same average file size). Quality is another story, but to say that the Ogg files were of a higher quality, you would almost invariably assume that that means it's smaller, considering you're discussing lossy codecs. If i said MP3 was of a "higher quality" when compared to Ogg, you would obviously assume i meant at the same bit rate. If i meant "MP3 is higher quality at 320 kbps than Ogg at 16 kbps", that would be retarded.

      I don't know where i'm going with this, but what you said seemed dumb at the time. :/

    2. Re:This is great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

    3. Re:This is great. by Bilange · · Score: 1

      I did end-to-end tests on my PC comparing MP3 and Ogg files, and I found out that Ogg files were smaller, and of higher quality, than MP3 files that were equivalently-encoded from the same WAV file.

      An Ogg Vorbis file encoded at 64kbps sounds exactly like an MP3 encoded at 128kpbs. Now thats a good point, considering the space restrictions on portable (memory and card based) devices.

      If you want to test the sound quality for yourself, heres a page where you can listen to ogg vorbis compared to mp3pro, mp3, wma, and others, all of them compressed at 64kbps. Click here to start comparing.

      --
      "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
    4. Re:This is great. by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      There is a good deal of hardware support for Vorbis, including a Vorbis player for your car (PhatAudio). See the VorbisHardware wiki for more details.

  7. Annihilation issues? by grahamlee · · Score: 2, Funny
    positron

    This is the home of positron, the synchronization manager for the Neuros Audio Computer. This software is primarily intended to support Linux, but will probably be portable to other POSIX systems such as OS X and the BSDs. Currently there are USB protocol issues with OS X, so please don't try it there yet.

    The above was taken from a link in the above story. Now, the problem I have is that I own three of these, Acorn Electrons. Can I simultaneously use an Electron and Positron, or am I going to end up annihilating something?

    TIA LOL Me too!!!! etc.

    1. Re:Annihilation issues? by Tet · · Score: 1
      Now, the problem I have is that I own three of these, Acorn Electrons. Can I simultaneously use an Electron and Positron, or am I going to end up annihilating something?

      I think you're safe. I too had (actually, still have) an Electron. I also had the Micro Power Positron game. So far, I haven't annihilated anything (well, apart from a few alien invaders anyway).

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    2. Re:Annihilation issues? by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      Of course, I forgot to mention the 13.6 electron Volts of free energy one can get by putting one's Electron near to a BBC Model B (obscure, but funny enough to mention ;-)

  8. but ... by mountain_penguin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does it play oggs?
    Ill only buy it if it plays oggs
    oh wait damit need another reasons umm... its too exspensive yeah thats it

    1. Re:but ... by luzrek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Price wise, the Neuros is no worse than the ipod, and while the hard-disk backpack version is larger, it does substantially more (including the possiblity of hardware upgrades). The big selling point for me is the built in FM Transmitter. A close second is the (beta) Linux support. The Ipod has neither of these. Although several of the (relatively) cheaper Archos Jukebox devices have offered good GNU/Linux support for some time now (because they are fundamentally external harddisks).

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    2. Re:but ... by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The iPod is fully usable under linux, has been for some time. Mounting to add and delete files was easy since it's just a firewire disk, the db support to actually list the songs took a little while, but since Ephpod was open source all that work was easy to replicate on linux.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:but ... by luzrek · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was unaware of GTKPod (nice of you to mention it 8-P ). A little while ago, the IPod was only supported via linux through a fairly aquard mechanism which involved running windows software under Wine. Additionally, the old Ipods didn't have the ability to generate their own playlists, the database issue was a major hangup.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  9. Open Standard by luzrek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not that everyone cares, but a major selling point for the OGG/Vorbis format is that it is an open standard (MP3 is not). Want to learn more (or about the other projects by the same people/groups) check out their website.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    1. Re:Open Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary.. MP3 is the open standard (ISO MPEG1-layer3).
      Ogg Vorbis is no standard at all. That's what is Vorbis' biggest deficiency at the moment.

    2. Re:Open Standard by addaon · · Score: 1

      Galium Arsenide? Perhaps you refer to Gallium Arsenide?

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    3. Re:Open Standard by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think the grandparent is referring to the fact that the MP3 standard is patented by Fraunhofer IIS and licensed by Thompson, in a "non-open-source" kind of way.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  10. Apple, now it's your turn... by Ogger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    to support Ogg Vorbis with the next release of iPod firmware.

  11. Having Vorbis support has guaranteed a sale to me by Quizo69 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since changing to Ogg Vorbis encoding early this year I've been very impressed with the space savings and quality over MP3. I have since re-encoded most of my CDs into Ogg format and thanks to the team at Neuros supporting Ogg, I plan to buy one of the 128MB units with the addon 20GB hard drive in the near future based on that feature alone.

    With its FM transmitter as well, I look forward to taking my entire 8GB of music on the road with me to listen to non-stop on long journeys.

    This is a clear example of the customer buying a product because it offers what WE want, not what corporations dictate we should have.

    Well done to Neuros Audio, for looking after the geeks, because it is our recommendations that often lead to many others buying a tech product that otherwise may not get so much exposure.

  12. Yay hooray, it's your birthday by lvdrproject · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yay for this. I've been waiting for this (and so have a few friends) for a long time. I don't care for the Neuros, but i'm hoping this will lead to Vorbis support for something that's not retarded, like the (now-dead) Rio or the iRiver. My RioVolt is starting to wear out on me, but i'm hanging on to it until a good Vorbis/MP3 (gotta have both) hardware solution is available. I can't really say i have a lot of high hopes for that, though. People don't really seem too interested in Vorbis, and AAC is obviously "supposed to be" the next-generation audio format. Sigh.

  13. Creative Labs too... by axxackall · · Score: 1
    to add ogg support according to the current product info:

    Future Proof Design:
    The NOMAD II MG supports standard MP3, WMA, and WAV formats and its upgradeable technology allows new features and enhancements to be downloaded to it from NOMADWorld.com. With the NOMAD II MG, you can be on the cutting edge of MP3 music technology.

    That's right. Give me that cutting edge NOW! :)

    --

    Less is more !
  14. This infringes on SCO property by Chris+Sontag · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am sorry to inform you that "Ogg Vorbis" infringes on SCO copyright. We believe it was developed on the illegal Unix system "Linux" and under our EULA it belongs to us. We plan to file suit immediately.

    --

    Chris Sontag - Senior Vice President and General Manager, SCOsource
    1. Re:This infringes on SCO property by tylers · · Score: 0

      Immediately!? No! We're only beginning the discovery phase of researching our il^h^hlegal options.

      Darl

  15. Low quality is *not* okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " To be honest, you probably don't need much more than 128Kbps on a portable player."

    To be honest with who? Your ear doctor?

    128kb is *bad quality*. Only apple fanatics defending the iTunes kingdom say otherwise.

    Let me repeat that... *128kb is bad quality*.

    Even with Ogg, you need to go 192 to get decent quality.

    1. Re:Low quality is *not* okay by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, 128K is bad quality, but so are headphones. 128K Vorbis or aac is higher quality than tape, and tape or more or less acceptable for listening to on the go.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Low quality is *not* okay by Hatta · · Score: 1

      To you perhaps. This isn't just for jogging. Those with high quality car audio systems will love this.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Low quality is *not* okay by bogie · · Score: 1

      "but so are headphones."

      That's assuming everyone uses the crap that the OEM's put out. Trust me, a lot of people who have portable mp3 players are listening on Grado's or Sennheiser's with or without an amp.

      I'd say bitrate becomes way more important with regards to headphones versus home/computer speaking. A good set of headphone will easily spank speakers that cost thousands of dollars.

      Since you don't seem to have a high opinion of headphones, do yourself a favor and spend a little money on a set. It will change your view dramatically and you'll hear things your never heard before.

      Of course if ultimate portablity is needed, then you gotta use what you gotta use. I just wanted to correct your statement where you implied using headphone equals bad sound quality. Most people who have bought good pair of cans would disagree.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    4. Re:Low quality is *not* okay by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Tape can be bad, but it can be very good too. Since it's analog, it depends a lot more on the quality of the recording equipment. I wouldn't say 128K digital is always better than tape. Personally I find the analog noise of a bad tape less annoying than the compression artifacts in a low bitrate file. Still, I agree either one is good enough for portable use.

    5. Re:Low quality is *not* okay by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "'d say bitrate becomes way more important with regards to headphones versus home/computer speaking. A good set of headphone will easily spank speakers that cost thousands of dollars."

      Whoa there....yep, I've had good luck with Sennheisers in the past....great for mp3 player use...at office..places where you need to listen privately..

      But for home listening...not a pair of headphones will 'spank' a quality speaker...I'll keep my Klipschorns....thank you...

      :-)

      However, I'll grant you...listening us purely subjective...what ever sounds the best to you..is what you should use...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  16. Availability in Europe? by jrepin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this great product available in Europe? Or any other portable player that has support for excellent Ogg Vorbis?

    --
    Live long and propser!
    1. Re:Availability in Europe? by u38cg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      No, European rollout is supposed to be about August/September this year.

      Personally, I can't wait. I used the Creative Jukebox for about a year, but it's become so buggy it's essentially unusable any more.

      What I'd really like is a small portable stereo, w/ built-in speakers and a nice big hard-drive. It should be cheaper to make, as it wouldn't require woowoo miniatiurised batteries and amazing low-power dongles. Anyone know of something like this? I'm not after the hard drive hi-fi seperates, I want something entirely self contained.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Availability in Europe? by toasted_calamari · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i dunno if you have a need for a multi-gigabyte audioplayer, but if you get yourself a palmpilot, such as the palm Tungsten|T you can get a program called aeroplayer for that which plays mp3 and ogg. the ogg part is free, but the mp3 ability expires after 14 days and costs ~US$20

      compared to a standalone audioplayer, the Tungsten is rather pricy, but keep in mind its really designed as a PDA. besides, your average audioplayer doesn't have a 320x320 color screen.

  17. Re:Slashdot Store needed?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sorry but with Slashdot's known security problems resulting from its lunatic fringe open-source code... I would not trust them with my credit card.

  18. This is great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ogg won't make a big difference unless MP3's are not supported anymore. Once they drop MP3's, these players can get cheaper. Nevertheless, this is one mother of a step in the right direction.

    1. Re:This is great, but... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      If you check, this beta software actually disables mp3 support. I'm sure this is only temporary, however. But it would be nice to be able to buy a unit without paying the MP3 tax.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  19. HAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOL OOH MY SIDES HURT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to say "M$", that would get you mod points for sure

  20. Mod Parent - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is a troll

  21. I put my money where my mouth is by squarooticus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As I said long ago, I would buy the first portable player to have Ogg Vorbis support. Just 5 minutes ago, I ordered by Neuros. Sorry iRiver, you lose.

    Cheers,
    Kyle

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by mofochickamo · · Score: 1

      I agree. I won't support a patented format (MP3) when I have the option of using a patent free one (Ogg Vorbis).

      --
      Honk if you're horny.
    2. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by hvatum · · Score: 0

      Yup looks like the IHP-100 is just YAMP (yet another MP3 player.) iRiver has really stuck their foot in their mouth, gave hints about Ogg vorbis being supported, and in the end always failed on delivery. I'm happy that companies like Digital innovations are really intrested in what their customers think.

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    3. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by volsung · · Score: 1
      Anyone else looking to buy a player should check out the discount announced this morning (after I submitted the story):

      http://open.neurosaudio.com/

    4. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I ordered mine Sunday and it got here today (Five minutes after I rolled out of bed even). Then I went to the Neuros site...wow, Ogg Vorbis firmware was released this morning. A quick mounting of my neuros and firmware upgrade later, and I'm syncing all of my music to it. I (heart) Digital Innovations. I could have saved $50 if I had waited until today, but oh well. $50 isn't really all that much really. It is nice that they will be giving everyone a free upgrade to the USB 2.0 backpack when it is released (I got the 128MB + 20GB player with the car kit and stuff).

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    5. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Add another unit bought. Bought the bundle. Looking forward to delivery. Jeez, I wish I could just run over and grab one. They're about a mile from me.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    6. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by pbryan · · Score: 1

      I would buy the first portable player to have Ogg Vorbis support. Just 5 minutes ago, I ordered by Neuros.

      You probably should have bought the Sharp Zaurus SL-5500, which has had support for Ogg Vorbis now for some time.

      --

      My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

    7. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by squarooticus · · Score: 1

      Why would I want a portable player that can hold maybe 1-1/2 albums? A hard drive is a prerequisite IMO, though with the Neuros, I get the best of both worlds by being able to detach the HD and use NVRAM storage when I need ultimate portability.

      Kyle

      --
      [ home ]
    8. Re:I put my money where my mouth is by Zigg · · Score: 1

      $50 isn't really all that much really.

      May I have $50, then? :-)

  22. What about iRiver? by Dougal2 · · Score: 1
    iRiver claimed that their players would include support for new codecs via a firmware upgrade (Ogg Vorbis was mentioned in particular). There have been several firmware upgrades, but no Vorbis support yet.

    Which is a shame, because iRiver make the sexiest MP3 portables IMHO.

    1. Re:What about iRiver? by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 1

      I'd worry about them not having a HD based recorder first. "Sexy" though they may be, having to swap flash cards, CDs, or data disks is annoying.

  23. Desktop integration by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
    First to make a PositronGTK (you'd need a better name) gets a collective round of beer!

    Even better, make a PositronFS using LUFS so it's possible to just drag and drop files in and out of it (don't use kio or gnome-vfs though), with automounting etc.

    Finally, integrate it with RhythmBox/XMMS/JuK/whatever. Hopefully Neuros owners won't be stuck with the command line UI for long.

    Now I just have to ponder whether I can really afford one....

  24. holy dear lord baby jesus by AssFace · · Score: 1

    That thing is cool as hell. I personally don't have any real use for it, but I still have this urge to buy about 40 of them and then just roll around in them.

    My dad is travelling and living out of his car right now and writing a book. He could really make use of a lot of the features of this thing.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  25. Maybe wait for USB2 by Trebonius · · Score: 4, Informative

    I love my Neuros dearly. It's a part of the family now. It sits at the dinner table and has its own bedroom.

    But it's a bit slow. At around 2 gigs per hour, it takes 10 hours to fill all 20 gigs. Those of you itching to buy one might do better to wait a couple months for the release of the USB2 HD backpack. Those of us who bought early will be recieving a free (or nearly free) upgrade to USB2, but I don't think that applies if you buy one right now.
    It might, though. You should ask. Those guys are great.

    1. Re:Maybe wait for USB2 by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Those of you itching to buy one might do better to wait a couple months for the release of the USB2 HD backpack
      But surely within two months, my files would have finally finished transferring over USB1. ;-)
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Maybe wait for USB2 by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      USB2? Is that High speed or full speed?

    3. Re:Maybe wait for USB2 by uhoreg · · Score: 1

      The upgrade offer is good until July 31.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    4. Re:Maybe wait for USB2 by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Those of you itching to buy one might do better to wait a couple months for the release of the USB2 HD backpack.

      Just remember to ensure that you get "High-Speed" (480MiB/Sec) USB 2.0, and not "Full-Speed"(12MiB/Sec) USB 2.0.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  26. PHB, Market Analysts and Decision Makers take note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is a good example of why an Ogg Vorbis player just isn't hip with the people who sell portable digital audio players:

    When a portable player appears in an article on Slashdot, an onslaught of comments from SlashDrones ensue. "If the *insert player name* only had Ogg Vorbis...".

    Well, here's your Ogg Vorbis player. Yes, it's beta, but so wasn't the Neuros when it was first sold. I can report that the Neuros is a solid player now, though it's not perfect, it's close. They have taken some of the love they have shown their customers and dedicated it to their products. And the response?

    I'm all for Slashdot, you make me laugh, you make me think, you make me come back several times a day. Damn you! But, sometimes, you make me think this is a perfect example of why a better *insert anything here* does not exist. The world, as I see it from an American perspective, is full of vain, unreliable, pompous individuals who only care about what's in it for them. In this case, the small corner of the world I speak of is Slashdot.

    What's next? When Vorbis support comes out of beta, has been through testing by a large user base, you're not going to buy one why?

    1) It does not support Beowolf clusters?
    2) In Soviet Russia, Neuros buys you?
    3) ?
    4) Profit

    Give me a break.

  27. That's all well and good ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but I'm not buying a portable music player until it plays ogg files ...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:That's all well and good ... by dara · · Score: 1

      ... and I'm not buying another portable music player until it plays and records ogg files (which my current device can do with mp3). Last time I looked at this project there is no goal of getting an encoder to work. So I'll just wait and save my money for a hard drive based pocket computer which has no limitations (hopefully within a year or two, someone will make something interesting).

  28. Don't make me laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    APPLE?!

    Go over to Apple's iPod forums and check out the humongous, multi-page petition for Ogg support. It has been growing for a long time now. And you know what? Apple does NOT care.

    I sent them many requests on their feature improvement page as well, and so did many others. The end result? AAC. Funny, I don't remember anyone asking for AAC, certainly not with a huge petition. But DRM is all the rage these days...

    I said "screw Apple" and got a Neuros. It just arrived this week, and now I see the Ogg beta firmware is available...I literally canNOT wait to try this. I've been waiting so long for something like this!

    Apple missed this boat deliberately. To hell with 'em. The Neuros is one cool device, even if is a bit bigger than the iPod. But Apple doesn't have Emmett Plant working for them either!

    1. Re:Don't make me laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd been waiting for MPEG-4 AAC support on the iPod since the release of QuickTime 6 over 12 months ago, as had anyone else that actually had a clue about professional audio standards.

      Vorbis is the toy the open source kids like. MPEG-4 AAC is the standard the real world is moving towards.

    2. Re:Don't make me laugh. by squarooticus · · Score: 1

      Are good MPEG-4 encoders and decoders guaranteed to be freely available (i.e., none of this RAND crap; "free" is the key word), with the potential for development of a fully free (as in speech) software version for the lifetime of the codec?

      No?

      Then MPEG-4 AAC has a fundamental weakness compared to Ogg Vorbis, and I for one will not be using it.

      Cheers,
      Kyle

      --
      [ home ]
    3. Re:Don't make me laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the comment you replied to said:

      Vorbis is the toy the open source kids like. MPEG-4 AAC is the standard the real world is moving towards.

      The real world couldn't care less about what squarooticus and company over on Slashdot think. Everyone in the industry is standardising on the MPEG-4 codecs.

      Sure, your music collection at home is encoded with Vorbis. Sure, those XivD videos (which is MPEG-4 complient video, by the way. Free with a big F) you have may be using Vorbis in the audio layer. That's great. However that doesn't change the fact that the people in the industry whose opinions count are using the entire suite of MPEG-4 media standards.

      Vorbis is a toy. No respect in the film and audio industries at all. The MPEG-4 standards are where people are moving to. If you think otherwise, you really need a news source other than just Slashdot.

    4. Re:Don't make me laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod is hardly "professional gear" anyways. 99% of iPod buyers won't give a shit about AAC. Vorbis sounds better than AAC at similar bitrates, is free and totally open. Why would the end user want some crippled, DRM riddled, patented format like AAC?

    5. Re:Don't make me laugh. by squarooticus · · Score: 1

      : Vorbis is a toy. No respect in the film and audio
      : industries at all. The MPEG-4 standards are where
      : people are moving to. If you think otherwise, you
      : really need a news source other than just Slashdot.

      But why should I care? I care only about being able to play the music I myself ripped. Whoever is willing to provide me with that capability is going to get my business. Period. I'm really not all that interested in which format is more "popular."

      Kyle

      --
      [ home ]
    6. Re:Don't make me laugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      DRM ridden? Vorbis is every bit as capable of having DRM applied to it as MPEG-4 AAC is.

      Yes, Apple have used a form of DRM on MPEG-4 AAC encoded files with their iTunes Music Store. That is irrelevant. The codec itself is completely free of DRM. Hell, Apple's own QuickTime and iTunes software let their users produce DRM-free MPEG-4 AAC files.

      And remember all those freedoms attached to Vorbis; they let anyone who wants to use Vorbis in a DRM situation do so.

      This whole discussion is irrelevant - both codecs are capable of being used in a DRM scenario.

  29. Re:Having Vorbis support has guaranteed a sale to by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And to me as well.

    I recently bought a stereo for my car and bought the only deck that the shop sold with an aux input specifically for the neuros once ogg is supported.

    OK Neuros, I've got RCA cables dangling on my floorboard that are just waiting to be plugged into one of your devices. However, as I've been waiting long enough, I will actually buy any portable device that plays oggs, so the race is on...

  30. Re:Having Vorbis support has guaranteed a sale to by Drathos · · Score: 1

    ...I plan to buy one of the 128MB units with the addon 20GB hard drive in the near future...

    just checked the site for neuros.. the 128mb unit ($229) costs more than the 256mb iriver ifp ($185) i bought in jan. the 20gb hd addon is a cool feature tho, and the bundle is a great deal.. hd addon is $399, bundle $418..

    personally, i'd rather have an iriver w/ vorbis support, because the design of the device (of any iriver, not just the flash based) is so much better..

    --
    End of line..
  31. Only people who care about Ogg Vorbis are geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With AAC, I can't really see any consumer value to Ogg -- other than to confuse confuse consumers and diffuse the popularity of AAC.

    Ogg needs some marketing oomph. It doesn't have to ubiquiteousness of MP3, or the Dolby-related caché of AAC.

    So what if it's slightly better than AAC?

    1. Re:Only people who care about Ogg Vorbis are geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      actually, it's a lot better than AAC. even MP3 is better than AAC. if anything, AAC has less consumer value because it's currently being used mostly for its DRM capability.

      yes, iTMS fanfolk, that's right. the only reason it's using AAC is because it's DRM-able.

  32. hd based iriver by Drathos · · Score: 1

    check out this. ihp-100 coming soon to a retailer near you..

    --
    End of line..
  33. Re:What about NEX IIe by jester · · Score: 1

    Frontier Labs have likewise stated that they will be supporting Ogg very soon. The Neuros looks nice but it doesnt fulfil ALL of what I need
    a). Uses normal AA rechargeable batteries
    b). Compact Flash, so I can interchange with digital camera and have sizes the order of 500Mb

    it does the first part, but not the second - but congrats on supporting Ogg

  34. Does it record OGG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    On the website it says:

    'Recording to MP3 format from internal microphone, FM tuner, and line input'

    So will this upgrade make it possible to record to OGG?

    1. Re:Does it record OGG? by volsung · · Score: 1

      No, this only plays Vorbis.

  35. Re:Having Vorbis support has guaranteed a sale to by volsung · · Score: 1
    I just found out that there is a discount on the Neuros as well:

    http://open.neurosaudio.com

  36. Awesome timing by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    In spite of my earlier words of caution, I got overexcited and instead of thinking about baseball (the 'topes have been such losers), I prematurely ordered my Neuros a few days ago. (With the unveiled threat that if it ain't playing Vorbis files by the end of the 90-day trial, I'm going to send it back.) According to the tracking, my Neuros arrived in my town this morning and is on the truck for delivery. So I'm gonna get my Neuros on the same day that the firmware (well, the beta) is released. Perfect.

    Damn, radio has sucked so much. A couple of weeks ago I bought a car that only has radio, gambling that Neuros' MyFi feature would be all I need. Geez, half the time it's commercials, and the other half of the time, it's just the same bands over and over again, no diversity at all. By tonight, that'll all be behind me! Woohoo!

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  37. Re:What about NEX IIe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You WANT it to use AA rechargable batteries? Or did I misread that?

    The Neuros 20Gig has a LiIon battery and believe me, it lasts. I'm really impressed with how power efficient the whole thing is.

  38. By the way... by Emmettfish · · Score: 2, Informative
    open.neurosaudio.com has more relevant information, and a discount code for Open Source folks.

    Emmett

  39. Live music by Hatta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you listen to a lot of live music, you need high quality compression. Live music sources often have a lot of crowd noise. Compressing the crowd noise means you can't compress the music as well. Lossy stereo coupling can add artifacts when there's a lot of noise. Also, the acoustics in a concert setting are different from a studio. From my experience q6 ogg is the minimum necessary for good sound. That's roughly 192kbps. But really, until somebody tweaks a codec for the peculiarities of live audio, lossless is the way to go.

    P.S. See furthurnet, etree and The Live Music Archive. For tons of high quality live audio from many of todays best bands. (Phish, Medeski, Martin, and Wood, Particle, Yonder Mountain String Band, and lots lots more.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  40. Re:PHB, Market Analysts and Decision Makers take n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be buying a Neuros as soon as it's available in the UK.

    I was waiting for the for Ogg portable player, and it looks like this is going to be it.

  41. FLAC and Shorten by Hatta · · Score: 1

    As an active member of the live music community, I get a lot of losslessly compressed audio in these formats. With its 20gb backpack the neuros would be ideal for me. Yes, I could compress to ogg now. This is almost good enough. But live music does not compress very well. q6 ogg is the minimum for acceptable quality. Crowd noise detracts from the signal, lossy stereo coupling can cause noticible artifacts when there's noise on each channel that's not correlated. Plus, it takes me about 20 minutes to encode something to ogg. Why should I have to wait? Lastly, if I can haul around my lossless audio and listen to it, it's a lot easier to spread the music around.

    Yes, this is a niche. But niches are why we need open source. I don't expect a company to cater to every odd use someone my have for their device. But I do expect them to empower users to help themselves. This is why the neuros needs an extensible plug in architechture that's open for everyone to use.

    Digital out would be nice too.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  42. Archos has the killer app by indole · · Score: 1

    Sorry to say, any multi-gig portable player just cannot cut it without USB2.0 What reasonable person will wait ten hours to upload or backup his music?

    That being said, Archos' AV320 (capable of playing DIVX, XVID, MP3 as well as recording MPEG4 video and MP3, w/USB2 and FW) really kills everything in the category. I've had mine for about 3 weeks now, and its insane. Combined with a TV-capture card (WinTV) I can record shows to DivX and watch them while eating lunch, traveling home, taking a ****.

    Point being all this masterbating over free formats is fun, but its not quite the most important feature, especially when most people already have large collections of mp3s.

    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
    1. Re:Archos has the killer app by MikeCamel · · Score: 2, Informative

      USB 2.0 support's coming - and you get a free hardware upgrade if you buy before the 31st of July.

  43. Thoughts by 101percent · · Score: 2

    I just think it's wonderful to see a company and a free software project working together so closely and actually coming up with the goods. Neuros might not be getting my money just yet (I'm broke), but they do have my respect for their work on free software. The FM transmitter really is the seller for me. I know that the their are some mini-jack to transmitter adapters available that are sold for the ipod, but this just doesn't match the internal transmitter. Also the FM RDS is neat (station/song auto display for you non-radio junkies). Does anyone know of any other portable audio players with a transmitter feature?

    Yay! This how means I can listen to my RMS ogg vorbis files on the road.

  44. Re:Having Vorbis support has guaranteed a sale to by Zigg · · Score: 1

    You didn't have to do that. The Neuros will play over your FM radio. :-)

  45. my nipples explode with delight by adimarco · · Score: 1

    want to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy?

    --

    "I think any time you expose vulnerabilities it's a good thing." -Attorney General Janet Reno
  46. Too late, adopted iPod on linux by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1
    Sorry Neuros, time waits for no man. I have discovered (courtesy of other /.'s) that iPod can work on linux with a little work. Not only is the iPod the best music player out there, but the Neuros USB 1 connection can't touch firewire.

    Yeah yeah, I know USB 2 is coming, but when?

    1. Re:Too late, adopted iPod on linux by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Yeah yeah, I know USB 2 is coming, but when?

      August. And it's a free upgrade if you buy before July 31st.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  47. Archos Jukeboxes by onree · · Score: 1
    The Archos jukeboxes have the other benefit of having a fully functional open source firmware replacement called Rockbox. Also the older Archos models run on AA NIMHs; IIRC, the Neuros has a proprietary battery.

    Love the Neuros backpacking and built-in transmitter though. Great ideas.

  48. Re:What about NEX IIe by jester · · Score: 1

    Yese I DO prefer NORMAL AA batteries to a lithium ion battery that you have to carry around a recharger for etc. I can share NORMAL batteries with other devices ... I cant do that with Lithium Ion. I can buy them in many places, I cant do that with Lithium Ion. I actually get the order of 20 (or more) hours of use out of a pair of AA with the NEX IIe .... more than I've seen with any Li-Ion.

  49. Re:PHB, Market Analysts and Decision Makers take n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why'd you waste your time on this completely unfounded rant? There are dozens of posts from people who are buying one now because of this!

    You deserve to be modded (-1, Self-Righteous).

  50. More info on Vorbis hardware by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
    There isn't much hardware that plays Vorbis, but there's more than people think. For example, there are already car-based Vorbis players, PDAs, and DVD players. Please be nice to the Wiki:

    http://wiki.xiph.org/VorbisHardware

  51. Re:Having Vorbis support has guaranteed a sale to by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    FM is pretty low quality, especially since the dynamic range is squashed so much.

  52. 200 kbps? No prob! by sahonen · · Score: 1

    I'm a musician with the good ears that come with it (and studio quality headphones), I rip my music at an ABR of approx 128 kbps in OGG, and 160 in MP3. I can tell the difference side by side, but OGG's artifacting is so unobtrusive (it generally manifests itself as a slightly "airy" quality, as if the high frequencies are being slightly accentuated) that I don't notice it when I'm just listening.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  53. Linux only for now by nightsweat · · Score: 1
    NSM doesn't recognize ogg files. Positron, the Linux manager is the only way to move your files over for now.

    Windows loses.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  54. Bad joke by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    finally a Ogg player for my brain! now i just gotta figure out where to plug it in..

  55. Looks like it's time to buy a player... by Dogun · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna be buying one of these in the next week unless some other product jumps to the fore - and even then...

    Plus, the neuros looks sexy.

    Granted, it's got that slow connection thing going on - but as I have less than 20 gigs of mp3's total, it's not too troublesome for me.

  56. Re:Having Vorbis support has guaranteed a sale to by Zigg · · Score: 1

    Granted, but for me it'd make little difference as the sound system needs to compete with the car noise anyway. I've found that pretty much kills any (reasonably priced) sound quality.