My understanding is that your OEM license is not applicable to VM installations. Is that not the case?
I understand that it's stupid, and that the license _should_ allow it, but if you're violating the license anyway you may as well just grab a copy online.
The global-warming-believers have convinced us that harmless old carbon dioxide is a great evil, leading us to, of all things, manufacture big honkin' batteries, requiring the use of who-knows-what actual dangerous substances that end up who-knows-where. Thanks guys.
That's quite fascinating! (I hope the condition isn't too serious, of course.) The idea of a brain processing garbage data is certainly thought-provoking. Do you have any buffer overflow vulnerabilities that could lead to an exploit?
Can you be specific about how the vendor compiling Perl is inherently worse than anyone else doing so?
This is what distributions are for: to package and/or compile software so that users don't have to. What makes Perl so special that it's suddenly "inferior" when handled that way?
The GPL is not an EULA. The GPL is simply the only thing allowing you to make copies. You can reject the GPL entirely and still install and use the software, no questions asked.
Slashdot Mirror
My understanding is that your OEM license is not applicable to VM installations. Is that not the case?
I understand that it's stupid, and that the license _should_ allow it, but if you're violating the license anyway you may as well just grab a copy online.
for getting the kinks ironed out before they hit the rest of us!
Is a pretty messy business.
The global-warming-believers have convinced us that harmless old carbon dioxide is a great evil, leading us to, of all things, manufacture big honkin' batteries, requiring the use of who-knows-what actual dangerous substances that end up who-knows-where. Thanks guys.
Doesn't seem like that low a number. What's the big deal?
Well, on the list of system requirements, I bet it says "Windows". I don't think it says "an implementation of the Windows environment".
It's totally stupid for it not to work, but if you go by what's on the box...
This is intriguing. Are the study's methodology and results available anywhere?
If I'd just made a billion-dollar deal for my company, I'd sure look long and hard at not working anymore.
That's quite fascinating! (I hope the condition isn't too serious, of course.) The idea of a brain processing garbage data is certainly thought-provoking. Do you have any buffer overflow vulnerabilities that could lead to an exploit?
The best was the Abit BP6. 2x300MHz Celerys at 450. Server-class power for the masses!
Those Celery 300As (GREAT chips) had 128KB L2 cache. But it was nice and fast since it was on-die, a novelty at the time.
This means that the speed of the chip is reduced as it canâ(TM)t handle as many processes as processors with a larger cache.
hmm, pretty technical stuff...
Title should read "Crime Unit Domain", not "Crime Unit Website".
Because of the ScummVM guys, we can play these fantastic older games in completely modern environments. Can anything beat Monkey Island, I ask you?
An HTML entity shouldn't be required. It's 2008; we should be able to stick Unicode into these boxes.
Aren't orbital trajectories pretty well known? How is there a 1 in 72 chance that the thing will make a sudden mile-long jog and hit the station?
Although that can be so difficult it's a nationwide sport.
I can see why they'd start at the front of the alphabet, and why those folks would tend to get more spam.
But wouldn't numbers sort even in front of the letter A?
You're recalling the Osborne Effect. I sure hope that doesn't befall Perl.
I would say it's because lead-based solder actually works properly, but according to this story that doesn't seem likely to be their motivation.
Can you be specific about how the vendor compiling Perl is inherently worse than anyone else doing so?
This is what distributions are for: to package and/or compile software so that users don't have to. What makes Perl so special that it's suddenly "inferior" when handled that way?
Home server for my folks. Works great. Was way ahead of its time.
Why would you encrypt when you could just write randomness?
10 write zeros.
20 write randomness.
30 GOTO 10 (as many times as you like)
You can be sued for anything, but that doesn't mean it'll stick.
The GPL is not an EULA. The GPL is simply the only thing allowing you to make copies. You can reject the GPL entirely and still install and use the software, no questions asked.
Time to sell short?