Slashdot Mirror


Seinfeld-Windows TV Ad Anything But 'Delicious'

CWmike writes "Microsoft's $300-million ad campaign for Windows starring comedian Jerry Seinfeld launched Thursday with a long TV commercial almost entirely devoid of any talk of Windows, Microsoft or anything, really. With co-star Bill Gates, the scene is set in a shopping mall. Seinfeld, who did most of the talking, helps Gates buy a pair of shoes called the Conquistador. The commercial ends with Seinfeld asking Gates if Microsoft will "come out with something that makes our computers moist and chewy like cake so we can just eat them while we're working." Gates wiggles his rear to answer in the affirmative. The commercial ends (see video inside the story) with the Windows logo and the phrase 'Delicious.' Preston Gralla writes, 'I just saw Microsoft's much ballyhooed Jerry Seinfeld ad, and can say without equivocation it's one of the worst, most pointless ads in history. If this is Microsoft's response to the 'I'm a Mac' ads, it should fold up its tent and tell the world to switch to Apple."

893 comments

  1. What Are You Talking About? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seinfeld-Windows TV Ad Anything But 'Delicious'

    Are you crazy? I found that ad effective & informative.

    I can't wait to get down to my local shoe store to try out a pair of "The Conquistador" although everyone knows they 'run tight.' I can't wait to finally have shoes I can wear in my shower!

    Well, there goes my ability to watch any reruns of Seinfeld ... starring a Microsoft shill & a racist.

    I caught this ad on TV with my non-technical retail employed roommate. And, acknowledging my predisposition to the big evil, I turned and atonally inquired what he thought of the commercial. "What?" he replied, "I don't think when I watch commercials, I just watch them." My god, it's worse than I thought, normal people just might digest this!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:What Are You Talking About? by djdavetrouble · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it is actually an ad for churros. I anticipate huge churro sales spike following this campaign.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    2. Re:What Are You Talking About? by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's far worse than you think, or fear even.

      'normal' people (are there really such creatures?) will see that it is from MICROSOFT, and think "it must be good, all their stuff is really technical, and they know what they are doing ... if it wasn't for Microsoft, we'd not have any computers or Intarwebtubes or anything"
      http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12558-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=44459&messageID=820843&start=0

      You only need look as far as what passes for entertainment on television in the USA to figure out that you should be considered special if you have an 8th grade education! http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.asp

      Disclaimer: I have yet to watch any episode of Seinfeld. I wasn't impressed with him before Gates conned him into this.

    3. Re:What Are You Talking About? by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 5, Funny

      dammit now im hungry. thanks ass.

    4. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Churros.. mmmm.. moist and chewy like my computer.

    5. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You only need look as far as what passes for entertainment on television in the USA to figure out that you should be considered special if you have an 8th grade education!

      Have you ever watched TV in other countries? If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol. Entertainment is bad on a global scale.

      The bulk of stuff you will find in basic programming is going to suck everywhere for a long time to come, because, well, it has to cater to the 50% of us who are under average.

    6. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Khisanth+Magus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I will have you know that TV programming in Japan is quite different than anything you will find in the US, since I think that they give all the people who come up with the shows drugs for inspiration.

    7. Re:What Are You Talking About? by WPIDalamar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wasn't American Idol a knockoff of a British show?

    8. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Shoes are so last century. Retro is in! I'm running barefoot since spring.

      Guess my OS!
      (Hey, that rhymes!)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:What Are You Talking About? by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The bulk of stuff you will find in basic programming is going to suck everywhere for a long time to come, because, well, it has to cater to the 50% of us who are under average.

      Um, no. This is just basic economics, really. Why put forth any more than a minimum level of effort when you have plenty of demand for your most craptastic halfassery?

      Intellect not-withstanding, so long as it sells ads, TV isn't going to be getting any better any time soon.

    10. Re:What Are You Talking About? by sjaguar · · Score: 1

      I also found the ad effective. I am now seriously craving churros.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
    11. Re:What Are You Talking About? by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Informative

      They copy back and forth, each worse than the last. But it doesn't matter, because the "original" TV shows were knock-offs of radio shows which were knock-offs of vaudeville acts.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Wasn't American Idol a knockoff of a British show?"

      Yes...it was knocked off by Simon Cowell..who incidently created and hosts the British version...

      This is off-topic.

    13. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you and your roommate are out delivering pizzas tonight you can have a long conversation with him over it.

      frankly you disgust me. you're a hateful person.

    14. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Let me know how you're feeling about that retro style when you discover what a foot crack is.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    15. Re:What Are You Talking About? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      no shoes = hippie = HURD

    16. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Aranykai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just saw it for myself today. I was convinced it was an add for the shoe store until the very end when the windows logo flashed...

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    17. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That may be one of the oddest and most horrifying things I've ever seen. Gates shaking his ass.

      YOU ARE NOT BEYONCE!

    18. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Funny

      > If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs...

      I know, it's unbelievable how many American shows were stolen by the Brits! The Office, Coupling, The Weakest Link (they even stole the host), Whose Line is it Anyway?, and on and on.

      Like you mentioned, they even stole American Idol and called it Pop Idol! In fact, they took a bunch of American shows and just changed the names so we wouldn't know. Instead of Three's Company, they called it Man About the House. And when they made a spin-off of Three's Company (Three's a Crowd), they copied that too (Robin's Nest).

      Is nothing they do original?

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    19. Re:What Are You Talking About? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      so are shoes analogy to Windows... it doesn't quite fit but if you bend it up long enough you can squeeze your feet into it?

    20. Re:What Are You Talking About? by dotancohen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it is actually an ad for churros. I anticipate huge churro sales spike following this campaign.

      Actually, I think it's an ad for ads.

      The ESB and T3 ended exactly as this commercial ended: a set up for the next one. This is going to be a chain of commercials and obviously the first one is out of context and sucks.

      Just wait for commercial 3.11^w 95^w 98^w 2000^w xp^w vista^w 7: it won't suck. It will be delicious.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    21. Re:What Are You Talking About? by stewbacca · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pop Idol, complete with the same producer and Simon Cowell. The original singer (the gay tooth-talker, forget his name now) is still popular over there as well.

    22. Re:What Are You Talking About? by QuantumHobbit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft will make churros?
      Clippy: "It looks like you are about to eat a churro. Can I help you with that?"

    23. Re:What Are You Talking About? by JimNTonik · · Score: 1

      Not to be picky, but "[insert country here] Idol" knock-offs, originate somewhere other than the good 'ol USA something like 75% of the time... not that this fact changes that entertainment is bad on a global scale, it just means that not all the crap is originating in the USA.

    24. Re:What Are You Talking About? by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Funny

      At the moment, parent is modded +1, Informative.

      I'm hereby modding the moderator -1, Moron, and -2, No Detectable Sense of Humor.

    25. Re:What Are You Talking About? by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      Have you ever watched TV in other countries? If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol. Entertainment is bad on a global scale.

      American Idol is, itself, a knock-off. The original's called Pop Idol, and it runs/ran in the UK. Simon Cowell had at least five years of fun with us before he got to torture you.

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    26. Re:What Are You Talking About? by squisher · · Score: 1

      Who the heck modded the parent "informative"?

      May I suggest the non-existant mod "ironic"... come on, even if you know none of the shows, the tone should have made it a bit obvious!

    27. Re:What Are You Talking About? by jhfry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, there goes my ability to watch any reruns of Seinfeld ... starring a Microsoft shill & a racist

      Actually, if I could be paid to create a pointless and counter productive ad for MS I would do it to... and I hate MS. Perhaps Jerry actually hates MS too and he intentionally accepted Millions and intentionally created a bad ad.

      Maybe Jerry is like Oskar Schindler, profiting off the enemy while doing nothing to further their cause.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    28. Re:What Are You Talking About? by bluephone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      starring a Microsoft shill & a racist.

      First, he wasn't an MS schill back then, in the later years he was an American Express schill. Second, so he's doing pitches for MS, so what? It's not like he's getting up there staring into the camera and saying, "Windows Vista is the greatest thing since penicillin." He's a comedian and he's being paid to do some ads. He's not a business ethicist or technologist, he probably knows as much on MS's business practices or technical stances as your average person, which is next to none.

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    29. Re:What Are You Talking About? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Um, no. This is just basic economics, really. Why put forth any more than a minimum level of effort when you have plenty of demand for your most craptastic halfassery?

      Do I really have to explain capitalism to you?

      Fine, here goes:

      Certain products sell better than others. Whether a particular product sells better because of quality, customer ignorance, or advertising is largely irrelevant. Companies which put in minimal effort generally see lower profits than those which put in more effort.

      Any further questions?

    30. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      shaking? Nay. That was a taunt. "Y'all can kiss my 49 billion dollar ass. Now. Where was I, ah yes, going back to doing whateverthehell I want to until I die."

    31. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American Idol is a knock-off of the British version. I think it was called "Pop Idol".

    32. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Nithron · · Score: 1

      I don't think when I watch commercials, I just watch them."

      Oh no. There's no hope left for this species.

      I propose we create evacuation ships, with a basic puzzle on the door to keep the mindless consumer drones out. Something that says:

      "Should you buy the hyper-deluxe Nike Air ExtraSmooooveWalkers or the Adidas Classic AllStars for your weekly jog at the Virgin Mega-Gym?"

      Of course, the correct answer is "No."

    33. Re:What Are You Talking About? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      He's not, Kramer is.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    34. Re:What Are You Talking About? by waffledoodle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Parent is referring to Michael Richards' embarrassing tirade from awhile back. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15816126/

    35. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad example. American Idol is actually a knockoff of a British show called Pop Idol. American Idol is but one of a series of syndications/knockoffs of it.

      Not all entertainment originates in the US, although I'm fairly proud to say that Pop/American Idol is not an American creation. Unfortunately, the MIcrosoft ad is. All I really got out of it was that Bill Gates buys cheap-ass shoes and likes churros. Who doesn't, really?

    36. Re:What Are You Talking About? by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I have yet to watch any episode of Seinfeld. I wasn't impressed with him before Gates conned him into this.

      In other words, you're not the target demo. You're obviously not a fan of Bill Gates, or of Jerry Seinfeld. Yeah, what's *not* to like for you in this commercial?

      I think it's kind of amusing how much coverage and talk I'm seeing today all around the net about how "ineffective" these ads are. Think about that for a second.

    37. Re:What Are You Talking About? by aetherworld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you have to explain your ad to the world you should know you have done something seriously wrong.

      It's funny that a lot of advertising agencies believe that they can actually duplicate the hype that has started around several services or products. And Microsofts advertising company just joined the club!

    38. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's thinking of the other guy with the whacked out hair and giant nose.

    39. Re:What Are You Talking About? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, there goes my ability to watch any reruns of Seinfeld ... starring a Microsoft shill & a racist.

      You, sir, are a moron. I strongly suggest you go look up the word "shill" - it doesn't mean what you think it means. As for a "racist" - who cares. The guy made some idiotic comments in a night club. Wait, I know, it's a good opportunity for you to expound on how much of an anti-racist you are and at the same time mention racism and Microsoft in the same sentence. Double dweeb win!

    40. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Altus · · Score: 1

      the guy who played kramer got in some hot water for making some off color jokes a while back.

      here is a video:
      http://www.metacafe.com/watch/307809/seinfelds_kramers_racist_tirade_of_craziness/

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    41. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The British version of "The Office" aired from 2001 to 2003... The US version started in 2005. Get your facts straight.

    42. Re:What Are You Talking About? by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      I don't think Seinfeld is hurting for money either. His show got picked up again for another season of syndication and they are also doing the Seinfeld Campus Tour trying to get a younger generation to attach to the show.

      I worked as a camera operator on the Campus Tour when it came through Jacksonville, FL and the marketing guy for Seinfeld said that it is the 3rd highest ranked show of any comedy show out there today, new or syndicated. That's pretty amazing for a show that has been off the air for a decade.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    43. Re:What Are You Talking About? by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Law of diminishing returns applies here. Putting more money/effort/etc in isn't always worth it. It's quite possible that the point where unit gain is less than unit cost is fairly low in the TV programming market.

    44. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Office was a British show first, as well as Whose Line.

    45. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      Kramer is the racist.

    46. Re:What Are You Talking About? by llamafirst · · Score: 3, Funny

      so are shoes analogy to Windows... it doesn't quite fit but if you bend it up long enough you can squeeze your feet into it?

      Their next Windows campaign: The Procrustean Bed of Operating Systems

      "he had an iron bed into which he invited every passerby to lie down. If the guest proved too tall, he would amputate the excess length; victims who were too short were stretched on the rack until they were long enough."

      and the kicker? .... "Nobody ever fit in the bed because it was secretly adjustable: Procrustes would stretch or shrink it upon sizing his victims from afar."

    47. Re:What Are You Talking About? by fgelias · · Score: 5, Informative

      it has to cater to the 50% of us who are under average.

      technically 50% are below the median. if the distribution is skewed, then it is not clear what fraction would be below average.

    48. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs...

      I know, it's unbelievable how many American shows were stolen by the Brits! The Office, Coupling, The Weakest Link (they even stole the host), Whose Line is it Anyway?, and on and on.

      I think "coupling" was actually a British version of "Friends" and when Friends ended its run in the US, NBC had nothing decent to replace it and made a US version of "Coupling". So... Coupling (US) is a knock off of a British show "Coupling", which is itself a copy of Friends. How f'd up is that?

    49. Re:What Are You Talking About? by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Have you ever watched TV in other countries? If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol.

      Not sure we should admit to this, but [insert country here] Idol is actually a franchise of the British TV show Pop Idol...

      ...and I'd like to apologise on behalf of the nation for this vile plague we've unleashed upon the world.

      With that said, I agree with your point that, generally, broadcast entertainment is abysmal worldwide.

    50. Re:What Are You Talking About? by wellingj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Irony can be informative if you recognize that it is irony...

    51. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You should be right, this is only a teaser.

      And IT'S WORKING, since everybody is talking about it.

      Open your eyes people !

    52. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Richards... Kramer had a rather... unique outburst during a show he was doing...

    53. Re:What Are You Talking About? by pcgabe · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have been modded +5 by people who have never lived in Japan and think you are joking.

      I don't know whether to pity them for never witnessing the wonder that is Japanese television, or envy them for never witnessing the horror that is Japanese television...

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    54. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      The bulk of stuff you will find in basic programming is going to suck everywhere for a long time to come, because, well, it has to cater to the 50% of us who are under average.

      I beg of you not to confuse "average" and "median".

      What's the average of the following values? [10, 20, 25, 30, 100]

      How many of the elements in the list above are below the average value?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    55. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      What in the world is a "tooth-talker"?

    56. Re:What Are You Talking About? by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

      It's a commercial about nothing. Didn't you ever watch Seinfeld, the show about nothing? What a great way to create random buzz about something by making a clever nudge at the very essence of the comedian's show with of all things, an inside joke. If you watched Seinfeld you would know that as the show progressed, the inside jokes became more and more obscure and this just about tops it. Sure, random buzz may not be good buzz but any publicity is good publicity these days. I know ridiculous amounts of people using Vista (yuck) despite the bad reviews, just because of all the buzz and if you don't, you probably live in your mom's basement.

    57. Re:What Are You Talking About? by wildstoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Close. Simon Fuller created Pop Idol. Simon Cowell was a judge on Pop Idol. Simon Cowell now produces and hosts The X Factor, which is indeed a knockoff of Pop Idol.

      ...and I just realised I'm correcting someone on Slashdot in an offtopic thread about a show that I hate. Self-loathing has now taken over and I'm off to scrub myself with steel wool and some powerful bleach.

    58. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Panseh · · Score: 1

      About the racist bit, I think he's referring to Michael Richards and his tirade at the Laugh Factory two years ago.

    59. Re:What Are You Talking About? by el+cisne · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speaking of ass...

      The sight of Gates wiggling his butt followed by the tagline "Delicious" is...well,... I want to gouge my eyes out, scrape my brain out with a spork, pray for self spontaneous combustion.

      Those words and images should never be even on the same page much less in such conjunction.

    60. Re:What Are You Talking About? by couchslug · · Score: 5, Funny

      "YOU ARE NOT BEYONCE!"

      Well, maybe after a few beers.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    61. Re:What Are You Talking About? by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhhh, I really can't describe "tooth-talker" to Americans, because we don't have them, but when I lived in the UK, my wife and I noticed an odd speech impediment that many Brits have. We call it tooth-talking, for lack of a better term...it's where you can see them curling their tongue and really sticking it way out over their front teeth, causing them to lisp. Will Young, the pop star who won season one of Pop Idol, does it really bad. Jamie Oliver is the first person we noticed that does it. I don't mean to sound mean, but an American school-aged speech therapist told me there is no emphasis in the UK to fix the impediment in children (around the age of 4 or 5) like we do in the States. Not saying we are better or anything, just that we don't have it here, and a lot of people will have no idea what I mean when I say tooth-talker.

    62. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      I believe the racist comment refers to Michael Richards.

    63. Re:What Are You Talking About? by mbone · · Score: 1

      All of those were British shows first.

    64. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In deference to today's XKCD, here is the House of Opinion. I watched[1] it[2]. I want to see the next one.[3] You may flame me now.[4] 1. Actually I caught it in the middle and backed up the DVR to see the whole thing. Come on, it's Bill Gates and Seinfeld. Something funny is going to happen. Some of the Visual Studio ads have been quite amusing. 2. It being the commercial, not the fishtank full of Tilapia that hungrily circled around the auto-feeder as they waited for the click of their next meal. 3. At least one of the fish will not see it though, as they are tasty and go well with ketchup. 4. And I will laugh at your comments as my filet knife slides down the cartilaginous backbone. Perhaps breaded and fried?

    65. Re:What Are You Talking About? by blamanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I thought the whole thing was about stroking Gates and sucking up to him.

      "You're a 10, Bill"

      "The Conquistador."

      "Let me get down on my knees and serve you, Bill."

    66. Re:What Are You Talking About? by billcopc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tooth-talker: A TV-magic-queer with a lisp so fake even gay people want to choke him.

      It's like a human version of Sylvester the cat, only gay and pretentious.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    67. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not to mention stealing the American colonies awhile back...

    68. Re:What Are You Talking About? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I don't think when commercials are on either. This one in particular made me shut down my brain in defense.

      Commercials usually rely on putting the product in front of your shut off mind. This one might make you want a pair of shoes, or perhaps something-on-a-stick (what WERE those anyway?), or even cake, but they won't make you want something to do with your computer.

    69. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The racist he referred to wasn't Jerry, it was Michael Richards:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amjUNF_R_PY

    70. Re:What Are You Talking About? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Yeap... though even as a Seinfeld fan, I found the ad a bit too random and empty. There was nothing memorable in this one, but it is obvious they are setting the stage for a series of ads that will (hopefully) have half of us in stitches and repeating silly catchphrases around the office, while the other half watch their Nascar and WWF.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    71. Re:What Are You Talking About? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      To prove your point you link to a troll post at zdnet? Damn, you win, sir.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    72. Re:What Are You Talking About? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but in this case the value 100 is not quite but almost two standard deviations away from the mean, which suggests it may be an anomalous data point that should be discarded. If you do discard it, the median and the mean are practically the same.

      Hey, you started it.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    73. Re:What Are You Talking About? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in contrast, he related himself to the common man when he gave Seinfeld that "what the fuck?" look for talking about showering with clothes on.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    74. Re:What Are You Talking About? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I don't watch TV.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    75. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great example to use when trying to say other countries just show US knock-offs. Pop Idol is British. Years of CCTV have made us need to be on TV. Britain's Got Talent - wait for "Louisiana's Got Talent" yeah? That'll be awesome. Well, round 1 will be awesome.

    76. Re:What Are You Talking About? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Wehell I have to say, comedy clubs can get real sketchy (*rimshot*). So he said a few things he shouldn't have, but then so did the hecklers he insulted. Everyone's going to point the finger because he dropped the holy N-word, but no one should ever chastise Dave Chappelle, Eddie Griffin, Eddit Murphy and the godfather himself Richard Pryor for calling everyone crackers, faggots and bitches. Oh noes!

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again: The people who are the most offended by racism are white people, meanwhile the rest of the world's nations are happily killing each other over land, language and religion. I'm not saying racism is a good thing, but we shouldn't blow it out of proportion either.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    77. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the racist reference is to Michael Richards...

    78. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I am always baffled by the difference in reaction that this gets over this. Well, not really, but I really want to have more faith in humanity.

    79. Re:What Are You Talking About? by hattig · · Score: 1

      I know what Windows is, it's a pair of walking boots that you get when you are 14. Initially they seem okay, comfortable even, and they're a nice dark brown leather with padded ankles.

      It's when you actually start using it that you realise that it's all a lie. You go on a walk ... three miles down the road you start to feel them rubbing against your skin.

      Eight miles and you have a really painful blister and every step makes you want to scream in pain and frustration, but you have to keep on walking because you're stuck with it.

      Around the twelfth mile the blister bursts, and it feels great despite having all this gunk welding your socks to your feet. Relatively your feet still hurt and feel icky, but all you can remember was the great pain you felt earlier, and how much better it is now.

    80. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was farking awesome (and I hate Seinfeld). Tremble in fear slashdot!

    81. Re:What Are You Talking About? by GPS+Tracking · · Score: 1

      I never thought Seinfeld was funny.

      --
      Work smarter, not harder, with gps tracking
    82. Re:What Are You Talking About? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Yeap... though even as a Seinfeld fan, I found the ad a bit too random and empty. There was nothing memorable in this one, but it is obvious they are setting the stage for a series of ads that will (hopefully) have half of us in stitches and repeating silly catchphrases around the office, while the other half watch their Nascar and WWF.

      You're not really better than those you mock.

      I might be a part of that other half, but my time is spent well.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    83. Re:What Are You Talking About? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Slightly OT: I was in Egypt two years ago and watched "Arabic Idol" on TV. It was exactly like American Idol (same graphics, same style, everything) except the singing was all in Arabic. I couldn't look away.

      Oh, that and "Home Improvement" dubbed into German.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    84. Re:What Are You Talking About? by dukeofurl01 · · Score: 1

      If you mean a highly successful duplication of a highly successful original idea, then yes.

    85. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's referring to Michael Richards aka Kramer's infamous racist tirade made against two black hecklers during one of his stand up routines.

    86. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Oh, that and "Home Improvement" dubbed into German.

      OH GOD. That sounds terrible and possibly funny, depending on how bad of a dubbing it was.

    87. Re:What Are You Talking About? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

      I remember when Top Gear was a vaudeville act. That James May can sure dance.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    88. Re:What Are You Talking About? by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      Worst. Ad. Ever. I mean, it caused me physical pain as I spun around on the couch.

    89. Re:What Are You Talking About? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      ah but he runs an Operating system. hURD isn't yet able to run it can only walk.

      My guess would be FreeBSD. Since it is dying someone has probably stolen it's shoes .

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    90. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Krater76 · · Score: 1

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      He's an anti-dentite.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    91. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm fairly sure the "racist" moniker applies to Kramer, but to be frank, we all already knew HE was batshit anyway...

    92. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, except they're going to use non-standard cinnamon that may cause stains if you use non-Microsoft napkins. It will be touted as being better regular cinnamon in some way, but the difference won't really be noticeable except for the 30% of the time where it turns red and tastes like tuna fish (a phenomenon that will be dubbed "The Red Cinnamon of Death" or "RCoD" for short by Microsoft's critics.)

    93. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there goes my ability to watch any reruns of Seinfeld ... starring a Microsoft shill & a racist.

      You know, when a racist person says something funny that isn't racist, you can still laugh. it's allowed.

      In fact, when someone who's in the business of being funny says something funny that -is- racist, you can still laugh. Because in reality, he's probably not racist. Just funny. And if he is truly racist? Still funny. You're allowed to laugh.

      The world would be a far better place if the genuinely racist folk and the political correctness folk were round up and shot.

    94. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Can we blame 'X' "with the Stars" on the USA? Please?

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    95. Re:What Are You Talking About? by catwh0re · · Score: 1
    96. Re:What Are You Talking About? by nicolasmendo · · Score: 1

      Yes, and all vadeuville acts come from one mythical act called "The Aristocrats"

    97. Re:What Are You Talking About? by nicolasmendo · · Score: 1

      Not only from the Brits. Ugly Betty, for instance is actually a rip off from a colombian show from the 90Âs

    98. Re:What Are You Talking About? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I doubt your ass will be thanking him.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    99. Re:What Are You Talking About? by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

      Doesn't qualify as irony. Sarcastacy* maybe. The GGP would be ill-informacy*, which would qualify the GP as informance*, had it ended with a note affirming that all those shows were, indeed, British to begin with. So the "informative" mod is almost right.

      *Go Bush!

      --
      Here's your sig.
    100. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is nothing they do original?

      Believe it or not, they actually have done some original shows, it's just that no one wants to watch them. What's really sad is that all those shows you mentioned are some of the worst things on TV (except for Whose Line is it Anyway?). You'd think if they're going to steal our ideas, they would at least steal the decent ones.

    101. Re:What Are You Talking About? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Money and effort aren't the same thing.

      In the TV business, as in all forms of art, "novelty" is usually the biggest draw. The effort involved in creating a novel product/show doesn't actually cost much - the problem is that large companies see anything new as risky. They generally consider it much safer to stick to the same formulas which have worked in the past.

    102. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Myrddin+Wyllt · · Score: 1

      I beg of you not to confuse "average" and "median".

      This has come up before. "average" is an indistinct term covering any number of measures of central tendancy (including the median). It does not specifically refer to the arithmetic mean, however much some people would like it to. News reports quoting "average" house prices and salaries almost always refer to median values.

      --
      [ ]Half Empty [ ]Half Full [x]Twice as big as it needs to be
    103. Re:What Are You Talking About? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Jerry Seinfeld had no part in Michael Richard's tirade unless one believes that we must immediately abandon our long time friends whenever they make mistakes or screw up in public. Personally, I believe that guilt by association is not the way to go and certainly not when a long time friend makes an uncharacteristic mistake and then subsequently makes a genuine apology for it.

    104. Re:What Are You Talking About? by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      Yeah...where exactly in there did you explain capitalism? The economic system where the means of production belong to individuals in a free market, as opposed to the state, in a command economy?

      Whether or not the market rewards increased efforts depends on the product, and the market. The sad reality is that, if something is better but costs more then people don't bother with it. We want our stuff cheap, consequences be damned.

      Also, I don't know if you realize this, but the people who watch TV aren't the studios' customers. They are the product. And they love crappy reality shows.

    105. Re:What Are You Talking About? by zunicron · · Score: 1

      A very large part of my non-existent soul died after witnessing the ass-taunt.

    106. Re:What Are You Talking About? by zunicron · · Score: 1

      I would not want to sleep on an iron bed. Think how bad it would be for my back! Geez.

    107. Re:What Are You Talking About? by tigerbody1 · · Score: 1


      just for a piece of useless info:
      "American Idol" aint the first one.
      "Pop Star" and "Pop Idol" are the first one.
      check out the wikipedia for all your useless info.

    108. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's the goatse for the new generation. That's what this ad is about.

    109. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Zwicky · · Score: 1

      Be glad it wasn't Ballmer ;)

      Now you have that image in your head, don't you? Sorry.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    110. Re:What Are You Talking About? by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Actually most advertising has "prisoner dilemma" features about it.

      As you say, the returns aren't often proportionate to the investment. The problem is that the elimination of advertising is generally thought to lead to a reduction in market share. So let's suppose you have two competitors who can each choose between the "advertise" and the "don't advertise" strategy. If both players choose not to advertise, they both save a lot of money and don't lose share to each other. The problem is that both parties have an incentive to "defect" and advertise to gain share from the other company. So the result is that both players advertise, but neither really sees great returns from the decision to do so, and on net both players are worse off.

      The solution is to have a third party, like the government, intervene and ban advertising by both parties. Some people argue the tobacco industry accepted the ban on advertising its product on television for this reason.

    111. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever watched TV in other countries? If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol.

      American Idol is a knockoff of the British show Pop Idol.

    112. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Obyron · · Score: 1

      Michael Richards (aka Kramer).

      --
      --Obyron
    113. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, on top of this, according to TFA, this was just a "teaser". Soon we'll se Bill Gates in some german hardcore.

    114. Re:What Are You Talking About? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I just saw it for myself today. I was convinced it was an add for the shoe store until the very end when the windows logo flashed...

      You think that's bad? I've actually shopped there. Shoe Carnival, complete with circus theme. Normally it's the kind of store I'd protest by not patronizing but I can't really think of any shoe store I'd patronize by choice and there's a really good diner in the same plaza. But they do the whole circus theme and everything.

      It's scary when the banality of Seinfeld intersects with my own life.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    115. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      The parent poster was referring to the show as having a MS shill and a racist, not the Jerry Seinfeld was a racist and an MS shill.

    116. Re:What Are You Talking About? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Lacks subtlety? What Japanese stuff are you watching? I am currently in Tokyo, and those shows often annoy me because they all contain the same type of subtlety. Yes they try to be over the top with loud sounds and bright colors that make me want to go blind. Yet there's this constant running undertone of subtlety in almost everything. Didn't really notice it until I finally got off my ass & started speaking this hellish language. I still don't understand the subtle crap that underpins almost everything, but I at least know how to deal with it. Hell, even ordering my flipping food has that underpinning.

    117. Re:What Are You Talking About? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      It's all a big, sneaky preview. First, you were close but I think they're gonna come out with a USB churro cooker. Hard to do with 0.5A which results in 6 watts but that's why it's so amazing lol. Windows 7 is going to be called Windows Conquistador or something else from the commercial and we pretty much already know they'll be on touchscreen tablets we can use in the shower. And along with the churro cooker, it's gonna have a cake maker too using the same technology. It might actually be powered by USB and user bodyheat due to frustration. But the end of that summary pisses me off. Yeah, everyone hates Vista cuz it's flashy and pretty and new but as for functionality, it's crap so we should all switch to Apple? WHAT?! Have they ever owned an Apple product? Oh boy, let's all buya n iPhone so we can be douchebags but we won't be able to actually access data with it most of the time and it'll break within weeks. I say we all go to Linux and stop wasting money on arrogant, dickish companies.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    118. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... I think you'll find that [insert country here] Idol actually originated in the UK as Pop Idol, and American Idol was the first of the many knock-offs. A good number of the other garbage knock-off shows originate there (Who wants to be a millionaire, for example), or elsewhere in Europe (Big Brother originated in the Netherlands). The rest of the world isn't just copying bad American TV - it's originating a lot of it as well.

      You're right though - most of it is crap. I think the problem is that the non-lowest-common-denominator stuff can not possibly appeal to more than 20% or so of the population, while the LCD stuff can probably be made to appeal to upwards of 50%. It's also cheaper, and a hell of a lot easier to make.

    119. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes...

      One time, a man walked up to me, and asked if he could violate me anally, participating in anal sex until he achieved orgasm.

      Until this day, that was the gayest thing I'd ever seen or heard.

      (Yes, I turned him down)

    120. Re:What Are You Talking About? by corychristison · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the words of Cartman:
      "No Clippy it's my chicken pot pie!! ^W^W^W churro!"

    121. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm blind! You insensitive clod.

    122. Re:What Are You Talking About? by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Inthhenthhive clod!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    123. Re:What Are You Talking About? by archkittens · · Score: 2, Funny

      i guess that means that windows RG was actually just a preview of Windows 7.

      i cant wait to get the error message: "Windows 7 has performed an illegal operation: murdered a churro vending paperclip, and will now be arrested"

    124. Re:What Are You Talking About? by shma · · Score: 1

      Well, there goes my ability to watch any reruns of Seinfeld ... starring a Microsoft shill & a racist.

      ...Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      Seinfeld is the shill, Richards is the racist.

      --
      I came here for a good argument
    125. Re:What Are You Talking About? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I saw Doogie Howser MD dubbed into German. (This was a long time ago.) Doogie sounded like a 44-year-old baritone who smoked 60 a day. We all cracked up the moment he opened his mouth.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    126. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Conquistador reference is racist against native Americans who were brutalised by European invaders?

    127. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      OR you could be slowly losing your sanity.

    128. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post was referring to Jerry Seinfeld (as "a Microsoft shill") and Michael Richards (as "a racist"), not a single person.

      -Lee

    129. Re:What Are You Talking About? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      <WHINING>
      Mom! Clippy's being a douchebag!
      </WHINING>

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    130. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you should be careful not to wear them any longer than you have to or you'll get nasty blisters.

    131. Re:What Are You Talking About? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      No Clippy, that's a bad Clippy!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    132. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man hands on misery to man
      It deepens like a coastal shelf
      So get out quickly while you can
      And don't be televised yourself

    133. Re:What Are You Talking About? by masterzora · · Score: 1

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      Well, he got it from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Richards#Laugh_Factory_incident. Incidentally, I think the racism claim may be a little strong here, since the given explanation is actually pretty plausible (before you dispute it, I would like to point out that most people on /b/ are not *actually* racist).

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    134. Re:What Are You Talking About? by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      Well, there goes my ability to watch any reruns of Seinfeld ... starring a Microsoft shill & a racist

      Actually, if I could be paid to create a pointless and counter productive ad for MS I would do it to... and I hate MS. Perhaps Jerry actually hates MS too and he intentionally accepted Millions and intentionally created a bad ad.

      Maybe Jerry is like Oskar Schindler, profiting off the enemy while doing nothing to further their cause.

      First, Jerry Seinfeld is quite rich from 'Seinfeld'. He doesn't need any more money.

      Second, it's not likely he is sabotaging the campaign. It's unprofessional and would give him a bad name in the industry, as well as people associated with him (who might not be so rich as to not need work) and with this ad.

    135. Re:What Are You Talking About? by ozphx · · Score: 1

      I saw Bill Gates acting in that one. It was.... enlightening. You just don't fully understand it until they bring out the donkey.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    136. Re:What Are You Talking About? by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it does.

    137. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Richards is the racist, ass.

    138. Re:What Are You Talking About? by jhfry · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm... just sarcasm.

      I was simply responding the the GP and arguing that just because Jerry is in a MS ad, it doesn't mean that Jerry is pro MS. More than likely, he has no real opinion on the matter.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    139. Re:What Are You Talking About? by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      Hmm, went totally over my head, I guess :)

    140. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Daengbo · · Score: 1
      Median is a kind of average, those being:
      • mean
      • median
      • mode

      Hand in your geek card.

    141. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >the "original" TV shows were knock-offs of radio shows which were knock-offs of vaudeville acts.
      Which was a knockoff of british theater that evolved from renaissance theater that harks back to the Oedipus trilogy from which all modern acting is derived.
      And there the trail stops -- not because that was original, it wasn't. Greek theater was the distillation of a thousand years of prior art. That's just where we lose the trail into history.

    142. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Draek · · Score: 4, Funny

      *shudders* stupid sexy Gates!

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    143. Re:What Are You Talking About? by neonux · · Score: 1

      it would be funny to watch an ad response by Apple using this argument :)

      The Mac guy and the Windows guy in a shoe store, the Windows shoe doesn't fit ecetaera...

      Hopefully the ad would not end with Steve Jobs shaking his ass!

      --
      @neonux
    144. Re:What Are You Talking About? by dr.dynamics · · Score: 1

      I expect he was referring to Michael Richards (Kramer), Seinfeld's co-star on the show.

    145. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does this fit with the fact that 85% are morons?

    146. Re:What Are You Talking About? by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Much like Flanders' "nothing at all."

    147. Re:What Are You Talking About? by the_womble · · Score: 1
      Actually, the median is a type of average.

      What you mean is that it is not clear what fraction would be below the mean (the arithmetic mean to be exact).

      You might (but probably not) be referring to the mode or the geometric mean.

      If you want more explanation try the site linked to in my sig.

    148. Re:What Are You Talking About? by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I hadn't thought of the tobacco advertising ban as a good thing for the tobacco companies, but I think you're right.

    149. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol"

      It's American Idol that's the knock-off of Pop Idol, which debuted in the UK in 2001, whereas American Idol was first shown in 2002. Now you know why guns are outlawed in the UK...

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    150. Re:What Are You Talking About? by largesnike · · Score: 1

      Never...just never!

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
    151. Re:What Are You Talking About? by lewko · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure "America's Next Top Model" was a hit on radio... I can see why they knocked it off for television.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    152. Re:What Are You Talking About? by eccenthink · · Score: 1

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      Grandparent is likely talking about this incident involving Michael Richards when he said racist. I don't think he means Seinfeld. Saying, "starring a Microsoft shill & a racist" I'm guessing refers to two people rather than to two traits of one person.

    153. Re:What Are You Talking About? by one_red_eye · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe after a few HUNDRED beers.

    154. Re:What Are You Talking About? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      In other words, typical Microsoft: "The next version is going to be the one that fixes all the problems" ad infinitum.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    155. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      One of the other guys on the show was later doing a stand up comedy act and responded to some heckling from the crowd with a racist "attack" on the heckler. He had been drinking and did apologize later.

      I'm not a Seinfeld watcher and I'm not sure which of the guys did that.

    156. Re:What Are You Talking About? by craagz · · Score: 1

      How many takes did Bill take to get the stupid wiggle "right"? Man that was disgusting. He doesn't even have a proper ass. HAHAHA

    157. Re:What Are You Talking About? by craagz · · Score: 1

      Takeshi's Castle is one program that airs in india if that is the quality of japanese programming, I would like to watch more of it.

    158. Re:What Are You Talking About? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      Parent was referring to Michael Richards.

      --
      Property is theft.
    159. Re:What Are You Talking About? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that's a pre-requisite to learning this language. I think I remember checking a box regarding that in the TOS.

    160. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure they'd actually be in a shoe store, but yeah, would be funny if PC bought new shoes and the ad turned around that.

    161. Re:What Are You Talking About? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Seinfeld (AKA Stinkfeld) and Vista (AKA pile of p00p known as Vista) have two things in common - can't stand either one of them.

    162. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Much like Who Wants to be a Millionaire.
      American Idol stems from the British Pop Idol.

    163. Re:What Are You Talking About? by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      I just saw it for myself today. I was convinced it was an add for the shoe store until the very end when the windows logo flashed...

      that was before the BSOD, right?

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    164. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seinfeld-Windows TV Ad Anything But 'Delicious'

      Are you crazy? I found that ad effective & informative.

      I can't wait to get down to my local shoe store to try out a pair of "The Conquistador" although everyone knows they 'run tight.' I can't wait to finally have shoes I can wear in my shower!

      Well, there goes my ability to watch any reruns of Seinfeld ... starring a Microsoft shill & a racist.

      I caught this ad on TV with my non-technical retail employed roommate. And, acknowledging my predisposition to the big evil, I turned and atonally inquired what he thought of the commercial. "What?" he replied, "I don't think when I watch commercials, I just watch them." My god, it's worse than I thought, normal people just might digest this!

      "with my non-technical retail employed roommate" so is he less of a person because he works in retail? secondly if you understood the nature of advertising, you would understand that the purpose of this commercial was to get people talking at first. and it has done just that. now if most people weren't so anti-MS they might have an open mind towards this ad. i personally and at work use Apple, MS, and Linux. And I've never had a problem with either of these operating systems. those who complain about Windows always crashing, might need to revert to a pen and paper.

    165. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you got it all backwards. But, for coupling all the shows were copied from the brits.

    166. Re:What Are You Talking About? by somewhatAmused · · Score: 1

      that was the worst commercial for cake ever.

    167. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should have gotten kramer to make it more explicit for you

    168. Re:What Are You Talking About? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Don't they air Takeshi's Castle on SpikeTV under the name "Most Extreme Elimination Challenge"?

    169. Re:What Are You Talking About? by kklein · · Score: 1

      I live in Japan. The TV here is both more banal and pointless than that of the US, and infinitely more entertaining, without making me feel dirty afterward. I can sit down for an hour of London Boots or Downtown Deluxe or Toneruzu (Tunnels) and when it's up, I'm like, "whoah, nothing happened in the last hour, the TV station spent about $1.27 on the show, and I giggled and guffawed and sometimes felt real empathy for the people I was watching."

      While they don't have the sometimes fantastic episodic storytelling we've developed in the US, they have talk shows and other unscripted TV down pat.

    170. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates is a master marketer.
      He doesn't always have the best software, but has an amazing ability to market the goods. I think he is sitting back laughing at us, because we are being manipulated in a way we do not understand...yet anyway. He's not the richest man in the world by accident.

    171. Re:What Are You Talking About? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      I am always numbed when I am there by the sheer number of shows that just show people eating food. Cooking shows in the U.S. talk about the process of cooking, and there is a lot of talking, but there, it seems to be people standing around eating, going, "mmmm hmmmm" and agreeing how delicious everything is.

    172. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You got me thinking - would a speech therapist be able to help an adult get rid of a foreign accent? What about a child?

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    173. Re:What Are You Talking About? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 4, Funny

      640 should be enough for anybody.

    174. Re:What Are You Talking About? by zonker · · Score: 0

      All I got from the commercial is Jerry Seinfeld has turned into Al Bundy and Bill Gates like things with a circus theme. Not sure what it has to do with Microsoft though.

    175. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Simmeh · · Score: 1

      Pop Idol it was called, one of Simon Cowells evil creations...

    176. Re:What Are You Talking About? by luwain · · Score: 1

      I actually thought the commercial was about shoes. I was thinking "this is the worst shoe commercial I've ever seen" when the Windows logo flashed on the screen. Who thought this was an acceptable ad?? -- Oh, the same people who brought us Vista. The Mojave project ads are pretty bad, too (reminds me of IBM's old OS2 Warp ads). To be sure, advertisement for an Operating System is hard, since most people really don't know what an OS is. But was this an OS ad?? A Microsoft Ad?? A Bill Gates for VP ad?? What is this ad's purpose?? To show how weird Bill Gates is?

    177. Re:What Are You Talking About? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Speech therapists have no interest in removing an accent, because there is nothing wrong with an accent. They only are interested in fixing speech problems, like the inability to form certain sounds. In the US, the emphasis in speech therapy goes hand-in-hand with early childhood development. You don't see too much work with adults.

    178. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Being unable (or finding it difficult) to pronounce a consonant in a certain way sounds to me very similar to what speech therapists deal with.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    179. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      I think it's because of the *white* Mac that was in his show.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    180. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      You only need look as far as what passes for entertainment on television in the USA to figure out that you should be considered special if you have an 8th grade education!

      Have you ever watched TV in other countries? If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol. Entertainment is bad on a global scale.

      The bulk of stuff you will find in basic programming is going to suck everywhere for a long time to come, because, well, it has to cater to the 50% of us who are under average.

      This is true of commercial channels here in Oz (Australia) but not of our government channels, abc1 & abc2, and the SBS (multicultural channel) they carry a lot of great stuff documentaries, comedy and lots more.

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    181. Re:What Are You Talking About? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      As long as there is some sort of developmental or physical problem. An accent is a regional/cultural phenomena, far outside the realm of speech therapy.

    182. Re:What Are You Talking About? by PHPFr33k · · Score: 1

      Lol, so true. I found the commercial entirely pointless, how is it going to convince anybody to buy Vista?

    183. Re:What Are You Talking About? by drpt · · Score: 1

      like 37

      --
      Proudly Butchering code for 20 years
    184. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      technically 50% are below the median.

      1,2,2,4

      You were saying?

      Why does no one take into account that some people are exactly average :-P

    185. Re:What Are You Talking About? by aug24 · · Score: 1

      What the fuck does that have to do with Jerry Seinfeld? 'They appear on the same show' is quite irrelevent compared to 'they have different names and faces'.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    186. Re:What Are You Talking About? by skaimauve · · Score: 0

      so are shoes analogy to Windows... it doesn't quite fit but if you bend it up long enough you can squeeze your feet into it?

      Not exactly... what it means is that for Vista to feel better, you must, before installing it, flex five or six time the install CD to soften it a little.

    187. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Curly · · Score: 1

      starring a Microsoft shill & a racist.

      Third, RACIST? What the hell? Can you PLEASE explain that, because I REALLY don't get that one. Honestly, I haven't a clue where you got that and really want to know.

      The gp didn't mean that Seinfeld was a racist, but that the show starred Seinfeld *and* a racist, referring to the Michael Richards (Kramer) incident described here:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Richards#Laugh_Factory_incident

    188. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill? If you were in a German scheisse video, y-you'd tell me, right?

    189. Re:What Are You Talking About? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, The Office was British originally as was The Weakest Link and Pop Idol. Do your fucking homework, idiot.

    190. Re:What Are You Talking About? by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol.

      The '[insert country here] Idol' knock-offs are all based on a UK show.
      It's not only the US that pollutes foreign airwaves. UK television is filling with homespun shite that somehow becomes popular, then gets sold off to other countries, Pop Idol and X-Factor being two prime examples.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    191. Re:What Are You Talking About? by sufijazz · · Score: 1

      Have you ever watched TV in other countries? If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol. Entertainment is bad on a global scale.

      Before you take too much misplaced patriotic pride in the silliness of American Idol, you should know that it's a ripoff from a British show. But it's too late for that I guess.

      --
      2+2=5 for very large values of 2.
  2. I thought... by KeatonMill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... that it was kind of hilarious in a post-modern "we're Microsoft, what the fuck are we gonna do?" sort of way.

    1. Re:I thought... by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... that it was kind of hilarious in a post-modern "we're Microsoft, what the fuck are we gonna do?" sort of way.

      You mean, "Where do we want to go today?" sort of way?

      Sounds like Microsoft with Alzheimer's.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    2. Re:I thought... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The add made little sense. It didn't mention computers at all until the last 10 seconds.

      It was kinda funny, but not even typical Seinfeld humor.

      I think Microsoft should get a refund from the ad agency.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    3. Re:I thought... by KeatonMill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I should specify that I was watching it with some buddies of mine and had (up until this point) been quite raucous throughout the football game. But this commercial confused the hell out of us.

      "Is it for charity?"

      "Is it for shoes?"

      "Is it for some sort of policy initiative?"

      Nope. Windows. ...delicious.

    4. Re:I thought... by azav · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But the end... the end... that setup, the punch line/butt wiggle and Jerry's response? Uhhh, just non funny, dumb and baffling. There are many things about Bill Gates that are not funny. The body he inhabits and all parts contained within qualify under that designation.
       
      Just. Bad.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    5. Re:I thought... by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I saw it as, "We took the money we got from every computer you ever bought, and used it to make this crappy commercial!"

      Bill Gates can wiggle his flabby ass all he wants -- I will never forgive them for Internet Explorer.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    6. Re:I thought... by philspear · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It was at least better than the annoying "I'm a Mac" ad. I'd rather have nonsense.

    7. Re:I thought... by toyboat · · Score: 0

      The fact that you put that much thought into it probably means that it's an effective advertisement, from Microsoft's point of view.

      Personally, I don't know that I would watch this then run out and drop $500 on Vista, or whatever it costs these days, but it was interesting to watch. I wouldn't be opposed to more commercials featuring the richest man on earth just bumbling around suburbia like an idiot. Spilling coffee on his pants, microwaving a pizza at 7-11 or trying to activate Windows. You know? The normal bullshit that Joe Sixpack deals with.

    8. Re:I thought... by zullnero · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, I can think of something worse. They could have had Ballmer shaking his ass. That would have made me and anyone else subjected to that commercial wretch, and I would feel nauseous whenever I see a churro from there on out.

      I saw an ad recently with Ballmer's face, and it scared the hell out of me. I realized that Microsoft gained its fame because Bill Gates looks to average people as a trustworthy geek who might help them with their modem or spreadsheets. Ballmer, however, looks like someone who might scream at you for making his coffee wrong or not doing your spreadsheets correctly.

    9. Re:I thought... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought it was quite clever actually.

      You have to understand what they're going for...When was the last time you saw a Mac commercial that was really about something technical? They just don't do that, they sell this fun "image", this personified "I'm your buddy" thing which has little or nothing to do with your computer.

      That's what MS is trying to counter. They're trying to humanize their image, build up some emotional investment in their brand.

      I saw it cold actually, on TV, but I'd heard about it and I was geared up to scream "BULLSHIT!!!!" when the stupid claims started, which kinda threw me when they never did, I must admit.

      Despite that knee jerk, and despite all my MS related baggage, I was semi-amused at various points. It was clever. Surreal, yes, but amusing.

      And they're getting mad play, jesus, everyone looking at the ad online. I think it may play somewhat for them in the long run, but it's too early to tell.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    10. Re:I thought... by uniquename72 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wish I had mod points today.

      While this ad didn't make me want to go out and buy a Windows computer, neither did it make me actively want to avoid having anything to do with the company responsible for it, as the "I'm a Mac" ads did. From that point of view, I'd call this a success.

    11. Re:I thought... by David+Gould · · Score: 0

      Besides, what has Bill Gates got to do with Microsoft? He doesn't even work there!

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    12. Re:I thought... by Otto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I first saw it in a bar, last night, during a football game. The entire bar went quiet to watch it, laughed at the right spots, everyone laughed out loud at the end, and some applauded.

      Sorry, but you're simply wrong, as is the original article. That ad was absolutely effective. It worked on every level.

      Cope.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    13. Re:I thought... by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Funny
      As bad as personifying your product as a cool, trendy person and the competitor's product as a nerdy, socially awkward person?

      T- Hello, I'm a Toyota. [Looks cool]
      H- And I'm a Honda. [Doesn't]
      T- Boy, you sure do suck Honda.
      H- Yep, I sure do!
      [Toyota logo appears]

      Computer/software TV ads always suck. Especially the dumbed-down ones. Remember the "rebate" ad starring Bill Cosby?

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    14. Re:I thought... by boredhacker · · Score: 1

      Same here; watched it during the football game too. Given Seinfeld's previous work as a spokesperson... I thought it was an ad for American Express.

    15. Re:I thought... by jgarra23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While this ad didn't make me want to go out and buy a Windows computer, neither did it make me actively want to avoid having anything to do with the company responsible for it, as the "I'm a Mac" ads did. From that point of view, I'd call this a success.

      I gotta agree. THe skinny "hip" kid actor in the mac commercials is about as faux-cool as you can get and still manage to look like you're trying way too hard + john hodgeman, well what has he done than write a strange book? Mr. Hodgeman is still much cooler than that kid, any day of the week- at least he's on the daily show from time to time.

    16. Re:I thought... by Lothsahn · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you mean, "Where the hell am I?" and "How the hell did I get here?"

      Actually, quite fitting for Vista...

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    17. Re:I thought... by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      I first saw it in a bar, last night, during a football game. The entire bar went quiet to watch it, laughed at the right spots, everyone laughed out loud at the end, and some applauded. Sorry, but you're simply wrong, as is the original article. That ad was absolutely effective. It worked on every level.

      Certainly audience attention is one measure of the effectiveness of an ad, but by no means is it the only one. Were people watching intently because the ad just wanted to fill an aching need in their life with wads of cash, or was it perhaps the novelty factor of seeing two very, very rich people act like average folk (buying shoes at a small store, showing their customer loyalty cards, eating churros and then walking into a parking lot filled with Hondas)? Certainly humanizing in the face of rumors like Jerry Seinfeld parking on 5th ave in NYC because he didn't give a damn about his porsche getting towed, etc. So ok, the ad gets your attention, maybe a chuckle at the (extra) nerdy pic of young Gates.

      Does it tell you why you should buy Vista? Nope. Sure, it's part of a continuing series, but so are the PC-Mac ads, and yet each one clearly sends out a message WHILE being entertaining. IMO, this series is going to wear thin very fast and I'll be willing to place a sizable bet that in a few months your sports bar won't be all a-chuckles at the next Seinfeld/Gates ad.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    18. Re:I thought... by FredFredrickson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What the hell kind of bar does that? If it's not football, nobody's watching. But applauding, in a bar, at something that's not a touchdown? That would get you some wierd looks at bars around here...

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    19. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Waa waa. You guys would criticize their ad no matter how they did it. Slashdotters are so predictable you guys bore me to death. Every day it's the same old tired thing, over and over and over. I used to be able to read through all the comments here under a given topic, but nowadays I find myself bailing after the first dozen or so. What's left of the general community here is that dull and uninteresting. Forget the CAPTCHA's before posting, implement questions from IQ tests, and timed, to filter out the dullard majority here and the uselessly repetitive. Then maybe the intelligent would return and the dot would go back to being a worthwhile read (instead of just a page view numbers whore).

    20. Re:I thought... by superdave80 · · Score: 4, Funny

      People... at a bar... watching a football game... applauded a commercial? About software?

      So, what part of the Microsoft campus is this bar located at?

    21. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ad", not "Add".

    22. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The add made little sense.

      Agreed. I think it will divide the audience at best, and in the worst case will subtract from the value of their product.

    23. Re:I thought... by nsayer · · Score: 0, Troll

      I certainly know where I want to go today.

    24. Re:I thought... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Heh, it reminds me of E*Trade's SUperBowl TV ad.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    25. Re:I thought... by wellingj · · Score: 1

      What no chair? Stay classy Slashdot...

    26. Re:I thought... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      What kind of weird bar was this, where they applaud commercials?

      Actually, forget that, please answer this instead: What were the "right spots" at which to laugh? I sure missed those.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    27. Re:I thought... by nsayer · · Score: 1

      The entire bar went quiet to watch it

      Wait. An entire bar paid more attention to a Microsoft commercial than a football game? Was this, perchance, a gay bar?

    28. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have received countless thumbs down for this kind of comment on YouTube. That system was put in place in place on YouTube to avoid abuses and trolls but it can clearly be abused.

    29. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought: Don't be fooled! Microsoft Cake is a LIE!

    30. Re:I thought... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      When was the last time you saw a Mac commercial that was really about something technical?

      The current Mac campaign advertises both software and service:
      - it is asserted that OS X is a better operating system than Vista
      - information is provided on a file migration service offered at Apple Stores

    31. Re:I thought... by Dorkmaster+Flek · · Score: 1

      And yet, for all its hipness, at least the "I'm a Mac" ads gave you reasons why you should purchase a Mac over a PC, especially to their target audience, Joe Public who knows next to nothing about computers. I see plenty of ads that make me laugh, but I don't want to go buy their product because they didn't give me any good reason to. This ad wasn't informative at all. I see that as a key difference.

      --
      I like to think of online DRM as something akin to a college -- you pay for lessons until you learn something.
    32. Re:I thought... by lazyforker · · Score: 1

      I wasted a lot of cycles on this goddamned ad. The only reason I watched it was because I was intrigued by the idea that this was to counter the "I'm a Mac" ads. (Which incidentally I find appealing.)

      I too was scratching my head and saying "WTF?".

      The only explanation I had for this bizarre ad was this: later in the series of ads we're going to be told that Macs are "one size fits all"; but beautiful, delicious Vista fits *you* - like a beautiful, delicious pleather Conquistador shoe (in size 10) with flexible soles but strong, resilient uppers.

      I hope I'm wrong - because that would make this the cheesiest waste of time and money ever.

      BTW - some people have bitched about Seinfeld doing the ad. Why shouldn't he? He's an actor FFS.

    33. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pathetic

    34. Re:I thought... by philspear · · Score: 1

      Hmm... That got modded "overrated" despite the fact that it had not been mode-rated yet. I can imagine four explanations:

      1. It's a self-fulfilling moderation. "This post will be unnecessarily moderated. Down."

      2. Someone was trying to agree with me and point out that the "I'm a mac ads are overrated," but got confused.

      3. A mac-user logged onto daddy's slashdot account and was very upset by what he read

      4. The "I'm a mac" guy got mod points.

    35. Re:I thought... by MeBot · · Score: 1

      It's an ad from Crispin Porter + Bogusky, the same company that brought back "the king" in the BK ads. What was your response the first time you saw one of those? Like most people probably "WTF?"
      Were the BK ads eventually successful? Well, BK went from loses quarter after quarter to multiple quarters of continual growth after the ads ran. Granted the ads themselves weren't the only reason for BK success, but BK did experience positive results. Not saying I like this campaign (yet), but if it's got tons of people going out to look at the ad and having a conversation that doesn't start with "I hate Microsoft"... then it's not all bad.

    36. Re:I thought... by Spaham · · Score: 1

      naaah they'll wait for the upgrade patiently :D

    37. Re:I thought... by Vohar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm glad someone else made the point about Mac commercials. I remember one several years ago that just featured a blonde girl saying something along the lines of, "Yeah with Windows it was all...bleh. But then I got a Mac and it was sooo much better!" I was actually insulted by that one. Was -that- supposed to sway me?

    38. Re:I thought... by GoodNicksAreTaken · · Score: 1
      Let me fix that for you

      I first saw it in a bar...everyone laughed out loud at the end, and some applauded. That ad was absolutely effective. It worked on every level while intoxicated.

    39. Re:I thought... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      the punch line/butt wiggle

      I watched the video only because I wanted to see bill wiggle is butt. And boy, was I disappointed! I mean seriously, if you shell out a billion-or-so dollars for a national TV-ad, can't you at least afford a friggin butt-wiggle-stuntman?

      I mean, seriously... WHAT WAS THAT?
      This doesn't even look like an intentional move at all. At best this looks as if he stopped for half a second to fart or because of an itch in his crack.

      Bill, look here for a fellow billionaire wiggling it for real. I'm sure he can teach you if you ask him nicely.

    40. Re:I thought... by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Pretty much how I feel about it too.

      It was neither the best ad in the world, nor was it particularly outstanding in any way.

      If anything it was marginally less annoying and considerably less condescending than the "I'm a Mac" ads.

      Was it worth $300M? No. Was it OK as tech ads go? Yep.

    41. Re:I thought... by registrar · · Score: 1

      It did another interesting thing: gave me a lot of respect for Bill Gates as an actor. Maybe it wasn't the hardest part of all time, but he did it really well. It might give Microsoft a human face.

      Even so. It will be a really easy target for Apple's "I'm a Mac" campaign. And it won't make me want to buy a PC.

    42. Re:I thought... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      It certainly fit in with the original Sienfeld "show about nothing". Now we have a commercial about nothing paid by MSFT.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    43. Re:I thought... by gosand · · Score: 1

      ... that it was kind of hilarious in a post-modern "we're Microsoft, what the fuck are we gonna do?" sort of way.

      Moe: Welcome to "m," hah? Heh, heh. So, what do you think of
              the new joint?
      Lenny: Wow, this place looks like it's from the not-too-distant
              future.
      Moe: Yeah. You like it, Homer?
      Homer: [looking at live rabbits wiggling in harnesses suspended
              from the ceiling] Um, the rabbits are cute.
      Lenny: Eh, that one ain't moving. [points to a still rabbit]
      Moe: [snaps, summoning an aide] Uh, change number 7.
      Carl: I don't get all this eyeball stuff. Uh, what are they
              supposed to represent? Uh, eyeballs?
      Moe: It's po-mo! [blank stares from all]
              Post-modern! [more staring]
              Yeah, all right -- weird for the sake of weird.
      Guys: Oooh!

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    44. Re:I thought... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Come on, that's a long way to go to bash Apple. Every ad mentions some feature and compares it between the two platforms. You might disagree with the features they choose, or the accuracy of their assessment of them, but every commercial talks about the product, very directly.

      The old dancing silhouette commercials for iPods were a little less specific, but they were still showing the product, and showing people having fun with it.

      This commercial doesn't talk about or show any Microsoft product at all, except a vague mention at the very end vaguely comparing a computer (MS doesn't make computers) to cake.

    45. Re:I thought... by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      If you want informative, you search the web. If you want to learn about new products and get teasers, you watch TV commercials. Informative ads suck. Nobody wants to sit through the reading of a white paper. Also they are also currently running the mojave ads, which are a little more informative. And really, where is the informative mac ad?

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    46. Re:I thought... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      You must have bought that low UID on craigslist.

      Bill Gates is Microsoft. Whether he "works" there or not, it's his company. He started it, he made it big, and just about everyone in the world recognizes his name and likeness. Like it or not, in the eyes of Joe Random he is the Alpha Geek Overlord.

      Fack... every time I meet new people and they find out I'm a tech freak, they say "Bill, just like Bill Gates ?".. Yeah, I'm the other Bill, the broke one!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    47. Re:I thought... by Ralish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you are both misunderstanding the content of the ad and what it aims to achieve.

      The fact that it barely mentions Microsoft or Windows directly at all, save for a very brief logo at the end, is definitely not unintentional. It's plainly obvious that the ad in no way is aiming to make you buy Vista by virtue of technical persuasion, nor does it bash Apple directly. I think the aim of the ad is primarily to create an association: Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates. It's aiming to make you put them together mentally and recognise them as somewhat related. Really, that's what the ad is ultimately doing, creating a friendship between them. Jerry meets Bill, helps him buy shoes, they walk away eating, ad ends.

      That being said, there are some subtle references I think to both Apple and Windows in the ad, but they will likely only be picked up by geeks. Once again, intentional. There's no way that your average non-techy is going to analyze this ad to the extent required to really pick up on these. Some examples:
      "Quality shoes at discount prices, why pay more?" --- Stab at Apple's expensive hardware/software costs?
      The Shoe Circus card with Bill Gates mugshot --- Definitely aimed at geeks, probably an intentional nod to them, I loved it personally.

      But saying Microsoft should get a refund is just jumping the gun in a huge way. This isn't an isolated ad, it's part of a whole advertising campaign. This is Part 1 of god knows how many ads. I doubt they all follow in this surreal sort of vein, and become far more direct. But more so, as many posters have noted, everyone is talking about it. It's practically going viral. That's every ad agency's dream. And even if the response from many/most/all is "WTF???" right now, they're baited for the next advertisement. Once again, much like a viral campaign. I really think Microsoft and its agency has achieved what they are aiming for in this first segment, and maybe even exceeded them. I'm definitely reserving judgement until more ads are out and I can better guage the direction they are taking, and the response.

    48. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was awesome. All the Mac commercials do is convince me that Macs, Apple, and anyone who owns one are a bunch of self righteous know nothing creeps.

    49. Re:I thought... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even care to guess what the "right spots" to laugh at are.

      I like Seinfeld (watched every episode), and would laugh at him riffing off Gates if it was funny... but it just wasn't.

      I honestly couldn't guess what was meant to be funny about it, or worse yet how it was meant to be related to anything about Microsoft.

    50. Re:I thought... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry, but the Mac ads do say stuff. Every single one of the ads mentions a feature that differentiates between the 2 products, and it does so by humanizing the company, being clever, and NOT being technical all at the same time. It's a brilliant marketing campaign.

      When a marketing campaign has to have you "understand what they're going for," then it's a failure. It doesn't talk about anything related to the company, and when it does it's for 10 seconds and completely non-specific. There is no difference between this ad This ad was bound to fail among the linux community no matter what it was, but I didn't think it was gonna be as bad as it was.

      Microsoft has gotten a lot of shit the past few years over Vista. My girlfriend who is as far from a techie as you can get told me she doesn't want Vista because she heard it was bad. They addressed the problem of Vista getting bad press by insulting their target audience with the Mojave campaign, and now they've failed with an ad that doesn't say anything or get anyone excited about anything. This wasn't humanizing the company, it's the equivalent of an old nerdy guy trying to ingratiate himself to a younger crowd by calling them "dude" and thinking he's being cool.

      Over 20 years ago, Apple targeted IBM with their Big Brother ad. Now, 2 decades later, Apple is taking on the Big Brother vibe with their constricting Developer EULAs and vendor lock-outs. If you ask anybody on the street, though, Apple is still the new cool kid in town because they know how to advertise and make a brand image - or at least hire the people who do.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    51. Re:I thought... by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Denial: "That can't possibly be Seinfeld with Bill Gates."
      Anger: "WTF?! That made no sense at all!!"
      Bargaining: "Okay, just give me a few weeks to set up a counter-ad. I'll email Steve Jobs!"
      Depression: "Aw crap. The rest of the bar's laughing."
      Acceptance: See sig.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    52. Re:I thought... by nicolasmendo · · Score: 1

      ...and i have mod points but am feeling lazy so i donÂt think i will be using them!

    53. Re:I thought... by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

      I first saw it in a bar, last night, during a football game. The entire bar went quiet to watch it, laughed at the right spots, everyone laughed out loud at the end, and some applauded.

      Sorry, but you're simply wrong, as is the original article. That ad was absolutely effective. It worked on every level.

      Cope.

      "Every level" needs to include actual sales. MS doesn't need brand awareness. Well, maybe they do. Has there been an upsurge in people buying PCs, getting them home, then asking where Windows is?

      --
      Here's your sig.
    54. Re:I thought... by TomSawyer · · Score: 1

      I first saw it in a bar, last night, during a football game. The entire bar went quiet to watch it, laughed at the right spots, everyone laughed out loud at the end, and some applauded.

      I was at a bar last night watching the same Giants vs. Redskins game. For the people that didn't run out for a smoke during the commercials I'd say "WTF" was the general reaction.

      --
      If you disagree then it must be overrated, redundant or trolling.
    55. Re:I thought... by David+Gould · · Score: 1

      You must have bought that low UID on craigslist.

      Guess again. But even yours seems low enough that you should understand the term "Whoosh!"

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    56. Re:I thought... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      More like a "where were you in 1977" kind of way, judging by Bill's mug shot the on his discount card, cropped to just leave his face. I've got to admit, that part made me laugh, even though I didn't want to.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    57. Re:I thought... by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if Microsoft talked about Vista, it would ruin the commercial. ;)

    58. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The entire bar went quiet to watch it, laughed at the right spots, everyone laughed out loud at the end, and some applauded."

      There's a difference between "laughing with," and "laughing at."

    59. Re:I thought... by tchiseen · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. What does it matter what a Microsoft ad says? At least they didn't lie through their teeth and try to tell us Vista is the Best Windows ever, or some other crap like that.

    60. Re:I thought... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      That was cute, but the one part I found amusing was the onlookers commenting about the Conquistadors... "They run tight."

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    61. Re:I thought... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but we intelligent people are really ticked off at Microsoft, too. We've just spent way too many hours suffering way too many frustrations that were unnecessary to the point of ludicrousness. Buying a laptop for my wife that came with Vista and could barely boot and was so slow as to be completely unusable (click on an icon, 30 seconds before the hourglass... not the app launching, the hourglass) was an insult from Microsoft beyond the pale. Frankly, they deserve all the animus they get, and more. I'm sorry, it bores you.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    62. Re:I thought... by dark+whole · · Score: 1

      or throw a chair?

      --
      CORPORATION, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility.
    63. Re:I thought... by zunicron · · Score: 1

      By 'bar' he meant 'nursing home'.

    64. Re:I thought... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I must really be dense, because even after the commercial was over, I STILL thought it was for a shoe store. I thought it was for Payless as a matter of fact. I thought it was pretty clever how they showed that even a rich guy like Bill Gates is still thrifty about buying shoes. Even so much as to get a frequent shopper discount card. Now that is a rich guy who wants to STAY rich.
      But I guess that is not what the commercial is about.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    65. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sell shoes?

    66. Re:I thought... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I will complain about any company's advertising if they are a company whose products or services I use. Instead of spending the money on advertising, they could be spending the money on making the product or service better or cheaper. Spending money on advertising only make sense if the profit from the increase in sales overcomes the cost of the ad, which despite what marketers tell you, I am not convinced that this is ever the case.
      The most obvious case is when my neighborhood utility or phone monopoly advertises when they could be lowering my rates instead.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    67. Re:I thought... by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Well, actually I was quite shocked. I am not a friend of Microsoft in particular but it made me feel very sad for them. What happened to that company. Look, I browsed the Channel 9 website yesterday, the only website where I believed Microsoft understood the net and its now turned into a crappy platform. It was really good and they just messed it up. Then there was this Seinfielf video posted. I don't know Seinfeld and whether he is funny or was funny or whatever (you don't see him on TV here), a friend of mine has a dvd collection with some seasons but I actually have no idea what this Seinfeld humour is about, I read on slashdot that they would hire this comedian to do some spots to turn the Vista image and the agency was praised as beeing really good by the media.

      And then this! It's horrible. It is even worse than the worst you would imagine. I don't understand the puns but the acting is awful.

      What happened to that company? It is burning from many sides. And this video is like the PR agency was paid to make complete fools of them. I don't get the shoe Vista connection. What is funny here? People don't recognize Bill Gates but know the shoe. Hahaha. Bill Gates is platinum card owner of the shoe shop. hahaha. The card shows this old picture, hahahahaha.

      I mean honestly, it made me depressed. I sent an email to friends sayzing this was surreal. I wrote a blogpost about but then stopped. This is mad.

      I once say a dvd about Belgium history and in the 90th it was about the child abuse scandal demonstrations and that one prankster put a cake in his face. Today Microsoft does it on its own.

      This company is autistic and faces a domino effect. They bullied so many groups, business partners, customers and persons, just think of ISO and open XML and so many people are fed up with their products. They delivered Vista late and it kind of failed. They did one stupid campaign saying: "Vista does not suck, your peers just want to make you believe", and all Pr professionals laughed at them. And then they hired Seinfeld and made even more shit. We are the retards of computers. Computers are boring and nerdy and we are good at this. We hire over the hill comedians to tell the world we suck. Ah, and then there is this Bill Gates we told you before was retired but he just came back, the person everyone like Seinfeld believes is the super brain, and bought new shoes. We don't speak about Vista but about shoes. You don't like Vista? Nobody does. You have the choice and our customers -- corny joke ahead - shoes our stuff.

      You think we are bullies, corrupt your government and sent the most ruthless tobacco lobbyists to your policy makers, but in reality we are just autistic nerds, the computer guys with no attachment to reality, come and hug us. Apple and KDE4 is shiny and fun but we are for the boring rest. We aim for the below mediocre market. Come and join us.

    68. Re:I thought... by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      All ads are about image, but clearly the Mac ads have a lot more technical content compared to this new MS ad. At least in the Apple ads they talk about their product features, quality and other aspects meant to be compared and contrasted with PC (competitors), presented in a clever, playful way. This MS ad didn't have anything to do with MS products at all. It's just... weird.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    69. Re:I thought... by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      I'll try to be drunk next time I see it... maybe that will help.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    70. Re:I thought... by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 1

      This ad was bound to fail among the linux community no matter what it was, but I didn't think it was gonna be as bad as it was.

      I don't know about that.

      I've written some small Linux software and use Linux (yes, I know this is just the kernel for some people) at home and at university as a student. I thought the ad was hilarious, especially the "clown card" part.

      It is possible to not use Microsoft's products and still appreciate the work Bill Gates has done, not all in software. His talking up promotion of science (although only engineering), for example, makes it difficult for me to write a Microsoft bashing post specifically mentioning Bill Gates. Steve Ballmer though... if they put him on the ad it would be a different story.

    71. Re:I thought... by Wo1ke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It says things, yes, but when was the last time you saw a truly honest statement in a mac advert?
      Maybe before Jobs moved in again? The 'tech' facts that they brag about are debetable, to say the least. The whole point of the mac ads is that they aren't the geeky programmer dudes, but rather the 'cool' programmers who are amazing at everything.
      This ad is awesome as a response, as, in contrast to Mac's superficial "we're better than you" image, it gives a "we're just like you" image. Plus, it's entertaining in a wtf kind of way.
      Anyways, this is probably the set-up commercial for a series; an introduction to the cast and theme.

    72. Re:I thought... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. I don't know where you are (Utah perhaps?) but in every bar I've ever been in, it NEVER gets quiet for ANYTHING. Maybe for the final pitch of the World Series or the last play in a close Superbowl, but even that is stretching it.

      Were there, perhaps, only 5 people in this bar?

      I'm just baffled and out of ideas here.

      To put my 2 cents in? I was confused about the commercial, I gave it a chance, and I did not find it funny, endearing, surreal or anything. It felt like someone was given a camera with the impossible task of turning MS's career around and thought "wtf, mate?" and proceeded to do a lot of cocaine and shoot a terrible ad.

      Maybe it's the start of a longer-running campaign, but I'm not impressed yet.

      --
      -
    73. Re:I thought... by BrowncoatJedi · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the astroturf!

    74. Re:I thought... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I agree - and in general, it seems that Apple adverts focus at solely criticising Windows, as opposed to telling us anything good about Macs. I'm not sure what TFS is on about - the "I'm a Mac" adverts were quite poor, just making petty jabs at Windows, relying on insulting decades old stereotypes of PCs being associated with business users, and failing to promote the Mac in any way.

    75. Re:I thought... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      And yet, for all its hipness, at least the "I'm a Mac" ads gave you reasons why you should purchase a Mac over a PC

      No they didn't - they just ridiculed and stereotyped PC users, i.e., their target audience.

      Anyhow, Macs are a subset of PCs (even Apple themselves admit this, with their false "first 64 bit PC" claims a few years before), so their advert makes no sense, not to mention that Linux runs on PCs, so their claims about viruses are plain fraudulent advertising. We all know they meant to say Windows, but they were too chicken to say so.

      Good adverts promote the product, as opposed to resorting to just slagging off the competition.

    76. Re:I thought... by ozphx · · Score: 1

      OMG YOU M$ LOVER!!

      You know that he was encouraging buying PATENT leather shoes!!! Patents are evil! M$ i$ evil$! You are evil! You am teh suxxors!

      From the dark depths of my parents basement I STAB AT THEE!

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    77. Re:I thought... by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 1

      No shit. Must've been a yuppie bar or someplace that only serves $24 martinis. Try to get a Coors in there... "I'm sorry sir, we only have Heineken and Amstel Light..."

    78. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the new windows will be called conquistador!

      --
      Hatem Nassrat

    79. Re:I thought... by tooth · · Score: 1

      missed the joke

    80. Re:I thought... by Mex · · Score: 1

      "This commercial doesn't talk about or show any Microsoft product at all, except a vague mention at the very end vaguely comparing a computer (MS doesn't make computers) to cake."

      And yet, it has been on Digg, Slashdot, Fark and every major website the day it launched.

      As a brand awareness commercial, it even got you, most likely a Linux geek (this is Slashdot after all) talking about the ad, and the MS brand.

      Thus, they succedeed, brilliantly, and they win.

    81. Re:I thought... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They succeeded in what? Getting people laughing at them?

      I guess you buy into the any publicity is good publicity thing, hey? You should ask Sony and the RIAA about that. And Microsoft, for that matter. Vista gets talked about a LOT. It's turned out to be a big hit.

    82. Re:I thought... by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "My girlfriend who is as far from a techie as you can get told me she doesn't want Vista because she heard it was bad."

      It's the same with my wife's two 20-something daughters and their friends: they haven't seen or used Vista (and the more bimboish friends don't seem to have any really clear idea of what it is), but they all "know it's rubbish because everyone says so".

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    83. Re:I thought... by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Was this, perchance, a gay bar?"

      None of the gays I've met would give Gates or Seinfeld a second glance, especially if they're sandwiched between images of big guys in tight lower garments jumping on top of one another.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    84. Re:I thought... by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Because, like its namesake, it's a shiny shell wrapped around a vicious bastard.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    85. Re:I thought... by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      I first saw it in a bar, last night, during a football game. The entire bar went quiet to watch it, laughed at the right spots, everyone laughed out loud at the end, and some applauded.

      Any ad that is best understood by drunken sports fans is likely to be very successful. I guess I'll never "get it".

    86. Re:I thought... by craagz · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Alzheimer's Bill gates looks so old in this Ad. So does Jerry. Maybe that ass wiggle wasn't anything he tried to say, but was a ass itch accomplished with two occupied hands!!

    87. Re:I thought... by Xybre · · Score: 1

      You mean "Wait.. where were we going anyway?"

      --
      Eternity is a time bomb.
    88. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I laughed when he busted out his Shoe Circus Platinum Discount card, complete with young Bill mugshot.

    89. Re:I thought... by azav · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Windows has a reputation for sucking and people not liking it. Toyota/Honda don't. Windows representatives making an ad that also sucks in a lame disappointing way shows, "we're pathetically trying to be cool and STILL, even IF we get it, don't know how to do it." It's so deep, it's distressingly pathetic.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    90. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Hodgeman is still much cooler than that kid, any day of the week...

      In case you didn't know, Mr. Hodgeman is a fervent Mac user.

    91. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you saw a Mac commercial that was really about something technical? They just don't do that, they sell this fun "image", this personified "I'm your buddy" thing which has little or nothing to do with your computer.

      Except when they're just ripping on Vista, the Mac ads almost always talk about specific features and benefits of Macs over Windows PCs, they just do so in non-technical terms (for a non-technical audience). This commercial had virtually no connection to computers whatsoever.

    92. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. Every blogger out there had their guns loaded and was ready to blast it before it ever came out.

      Shoot first ask questions later.....

      The commercial was pointless, but it wasn't awful. It's just become so cool to flame Microsoft that I think people are anxious for any opportunity.

    93. Re:I thought... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Some bar patrons applauded the ad?

      Really?

      In what parallel Earth?

      Either this is some kind of joke, or Microsoft has really gone downhill in that they hire such poor astroturfers as you.

    94. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Did Internet Explorer personally kill your parents or something? I mean, you take it so personally, I figured there must be some definite thing IE did to you specifically for you to hate it so much.

    95. Re:I thought... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      I think they were trying to reproduce the quite-successful joke video about Bill Gates leaving Microsoft (where he put all his stuff in a cardboard box and drove off in his beater car). That really worked, and showed that he could laugh at himself, and humanize himself.

      The problem is that they probably threw too much money and thought at this version, and the spontaneity was lost.

    96. Re:I thought... by Mex · · Score: 1

      How is this bad publicity?

      THIS is bad publicity: http://venturebeat.com/2008/09/05/xbox-360-defects-an-inside-history-of-microsofts-video-game-console-woes/

      The Jerry Seinfeld ad just puts them in the spotlight again. With a kind of strange set-up ("A commercial about nothing"), but it works for what they intended - keep MS in the public eye. And associate them with Churros and "we have a sense of humor".

    97. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kicker is that "Delicious".... should be an apple add campaign:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Delicious

    98. Re:I thought... by initialE · · Score: 1

      Better than taking your money to buy laws, like the current trend in American business.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    99. Re:I thought... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      With a few exceptions, most of the posts are about not getting it, MS employing an over the hill public figure to go with their over the hill former CEO, and quite a few who have realized that MS wasted 300 million dollars on this.

      That's not good publicity. There's more to advertising than flashing your logo on TV.

    100. Re:I thought... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Yes, in point of fact, they did. And I've seen it several times since then and everybody I've met likes it and thinks it's funny.

      Not everybody is a technogeek, you know.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    101. Re:I thought... by ce25254 · · Score: 1

      And they're getting mad play, jesus, everyone looking at the ad online. I think it may play somewhat for them in the long run, but it's too early to tell.

      Crowds gawk at the scene of a horrible accident, and watch videos of those online, too. So?

    102. Re:I thought... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Funny I can believe. I just cannot see anybody applauding in a bar, for anything. It just sounds impossibly surreal.

      Are you really really saying they hit their hands against each other to make noise in response to a commercial?

    103. Re:I thought... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Well, the only thing I can think of to say to that is to ask what sort of crap bars do you go to?

      The bar in question had about 30 people in it, and I personally know perhaps 80% of them by name. A local neighborhood bar, in other words.

      I guess I can understand this sort of thing if you live in the suburbs, go to bars alone or with small groups, and don't talk to anybody else at all while there, but in the more urban neighborhood environments, the local bar (or "pub" if you prefer) is a gathering place for the entire neighborhood. It's not at all unusual to have cheering during the game or to laugh loudly or to make any sort of noises.

      There's nothing surreal about it, it's a party. That's kind of the whole point of going to a bar.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    104. Re:I thought... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Slow down grandpa... "whoosh" is a neologism!

      Back in 2004, we didn't have whooshes. What we did have is a 15-mile walk to the shared terminal, uphill both ways, so we could refresh the home page on the big fast ISDN line.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    105. Re:I thought... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Hardly. It's the kind of place where you can write on the bar with Sharpies, and which serves Old Style in cans during Cubs games and PBR on draft.

      Don't make stupid assumptions in the future. It's possible for somebody to disagree with you and still not be wrong.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    106. Re:I thought... by Otto · · Score: 1

      If you've been paying attention, you'd know that the commercial was not about software.

      And by applaud, understand that I mean "clapped while laughing out loud". It's not like they stood up and clapped while saying "bravo, good chap" or anything like that.

      If the thought doesn't fit, then your head is in the wrong shape.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    107. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you know what Old Style is, then even you have to admit that the scene you witnessed of patrons clapping for a vague-at-best commercial is strangely odd. I would've expected a scene like that in St. Paul, but only during last week when the regulars stayed the hell out and let the pundits have their spot.

       

      Don't make stupid assumptions in the future. It's possible for somebody to disagree with you and still not be wrong.

      Yeah, I'll keep that in mind, thanks. You've sold me, now only a million other Slashdotters to go...

    108. Re:I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an ad from Crispin Porter + Bogusky, the same company that brought back "the king" in the BK ads.

      So they're going to start running queer ads?

    109. Re:I thought... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Sorry my typing dropped a word. I meant I can't see anybody applauding for a *commercial*. Yes bars are very noisy and will respond to lots of events on the tv and will laugh at commercials sometimes, but applause for one just still seems completely unreal to me.

    110. Re:I thought... by David+Gould · · Score: 1

      Grandpa? Well, at least you're no longer accusing me of having bought this account. If I'd had any intention of selling it when I created it, would I have used my full name? Besides, for my first couple years on /., we didn't even have accounts -- we had to paste in our name, email, and sig every time... AND WE LIKED IT! (And the only reason my ID is so high is that, the right to anonymity being one of the big political arguments we had going at the time when they introduced accounts, I held out for a few months before creating one.) Now get off my lawn!

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    111. Re:I thought... by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      The basic principal of advertising is:
      If everyone is talking about it, it worked.

  3. I only laughed at one part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I did a half snicker at Jerry's comments about clothing and showering. And that laugh was a stretch.

    I guess when you have the comedian from the "show about nothing", you'll get a "commercial about nothing".

  4. Its Marketing ... no information required by Merlin42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Clearly the OP does not really understand what advertising is usually about. Most mass market advertising does not try to provide information, it is providing associations. It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable) and then presents the branding that they want to be associated with that enjoyable feeling. The crazy part is that this works, and in a weird way can be suggested as actually improving the product. Since the next time the subject of the advertising uses/sees the product, they will subconsiously access that association with enjoyment ... therefore the product is more enjoyable as a result of the advertising.

    I am not saying that this is a good thing, but it is how things work in the real world.

    Now you can argue either way as to whether Seinfeld+Gates=Delicious ... I didn't actually watch the comercial myself ... but they might be reaching as far a transitive association all the way back to the Seinfeld show, which almost everyone agrees was enjoyable. In any case I don't think there was ever any intent to have actual informative content in the comercial ... they are just "building the brand".

    See Seth Godin's book "All Marketers Are Liars"
    http://sethgodin.typepad.com/all_marketers_are_liars/

    or a quick review of it here:
    http://www.businesspundit.com/lying-marketing-and-perception/

    1. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable) and then presents the branding that they want to be associated with that enjoyable feeling.

      How is this bad? It's roughly equivalent to making their user interface a pleasure to work with so that the pleasure will be associated with their brand. They want you to like them, and they're showing you that they're willing to do what it takes to get you to like them.

      Put another way, this is like my company getting my department lunch every friday. It doesn't directly relate to my job or my paycheck (the actual reason that I'm there), but it makes me like the company more and shows me that they care about making my life a little more enjoyable. Everything a business does to make its customers happy is really an attempt to get them to like the product so they buy more of it, why should marketing be different?

    2. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by garett_spencley · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No offense but you are completely wrong in every possible way.

      Seinfeld was a HORRIBLE show! :(

    3. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Did you watch the ad? It... it just.. it doesn't even contain a product. Rather, contains several products that Microsoft doesn't make and couldn't be metaphors. I am so much stupider thanks to that ad, maybe that is the secret purpose. I think that ad caused a stroke.

    4. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Clearly the OP does not really understand what advertising is usually about. Most mass market advertising does not try to provide information, it is providing associations. It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable) and then presents the branding that they want to be associated with that enjoyable feeling.

      So what I'm getting from this is that sponsors aren't getting enough credit for sponsoring the programming (you like the show we sponsor, so buy our products), so they've gone to sponsoring their own ads (you like our little vignette we paid to insert into the show you like, so buy our products).

      What's next: breaking up entertaining ads with more commercials from subsidiaries, or commercial breaks that are just one big blipvert of company logos? (I.e. more meta levels or a collapse of them?)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by ragethehotey · · Score: 1

      You really hit the nail on the head...

      Nerdy viewers who think that this was supposed to be aimed at them are missing the point so badly its not even funny.

      To the average computer user, Gates IS Windows so why would you shove messages down the viewers throats when the real point is to make windows seem more cool? (even if the apparent intended method is in a semi-ironic-but-still-self-aware-of-it kind of way)

    6. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by jmpeax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seinfeld was a HORRIBLE show!

      Sorry but I have to disagree. Seinfeld was brilliant: it was like a modern theatre of the absurd. It didn't play to people's desire for a warm fuzzy feeling, it acted on the cold reality of what its creators portray as futile, cyclical, absurd modern life. And it does it in a way that makes people laugh.

      Its comedy is so incredibly clever. I still find it hard to not have my mind blown when I watch it.

    7. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by kat_skan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly the OP does not really understand what advertising is usually about. Most mass market advertising does not try to provide information, it is providing associations. It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable) and then presents the branding that they want to be associated with that enjoyable feeling. The crazy part is that this works, and in a weird way can be suggested as actually improving the product. Since the next time the subject of the advertising uses/sees the product, they will subconsiously access that association with enjoyment ... therefore the product is more enjoyable as a result of the advertising.

      I am not saying that this is a good thing, but it is how things work in the real world.

      Having seen the ad, and thinking of others that have been defended in this way, I've come to suspect that this in fact doesn't work at all, and that what you're repeating actually originated as marketing for marketing. "Don't worry. It's supposed to be horrible!"

      I mean, it ended with Bill Gates coyly wiggling his ass for chrissake!

    8. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by GregGardner · · Score: 1

      I think the OP does understand that there was purposefully no information provided in the commercial, I think he or she was attempting to contrast this fluff Microsoft commercial with the Apple "I'm a Mac" commercials which are both entertaining *and* informational. (OK, not everyone finds the "I'm a Mac" commercials entertaining, but it's hard to argue that they aren't informational)

    9. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am so much stupider thanks to that ad, maybe that is the secret purpose.

      Of course that is the ad's secret purpose. Would anyone in their right mind purchase anything from Microsoft?

      I just have to figure out how Vista can be associated with the word "delicious". A delicious view? Doesn't compute.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    10. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Hatta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Congratulations, you don't get it. I'm not going to try to make you get it, since you probably don't want to anyway. It probably just makes you feel good to dislike something popular, like you know better than everyone else. Good for you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This ad appears to be about winning industry awards rather than selling something. British ad agencies are particularly susceptible to this, but US ones are far from immune.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    12. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by russotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just have to figure out how Vista can be associated with the word "delicious". A delicious view? Doesn't compute.

      "Delicious" is a variety of apple. So Gates is trying to say that Vista is pretty much the same as Apple :-)

    13. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Awesome explanation. From now on I will associate Microsoft with two old guys with wardrobe problems.

      I can understand beer ads that don't mention the product but instead show a scantily clad model ringing the doorbell and saying, "Wazzup". I can understand ads that show a scantily clad hitchhiker leaning into the window and saying, "Can I have a ride?" and after the ad is over a logo for some jeans company pops up. I can even understand the ad of three fat, balding guys watching a neighbor get thrown out the house and saying, "Yup" while drinking a beer.

      But two old guys in a mall talking about shoes???

       

    14. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Kneo24 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Welcome to the fail boat. You are passenger number 1 on this particular variant. Your punishment? Reread what they wrote until you understand what "almost everyone" means. Otherwise you can keep your subjective and useless vitriol to yourself.

    15. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Informative

      You figured out that it was a Microsoft ad, didn't you? Since this is Slashdot I will spell it out. They are not selling a specific product. They are attempting to create positive feelings about Microsoft in general. They are also trying to get people to discuss the ad. In that they clearly succeeded.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    16. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      To the average computer user, Gates IS Windows

      No wonder us Mac fanbois like Jobs.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    17. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by brainstyle · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's only one kind of ad. There are a bunch of different basic types, not all of which attempt to work on subconscious associations. Check it out: http://www.slate.com/id/2170872/nav/tap1/

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
    18. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I personally was put-off the show while it was on the air because I was convinced it was about 20 minutes of "What is the deal with THAT?" jokes, which I've never cared for.

      However, once watching the show for a while, and noting in different episodes that everyone makes fun of Seinfeld's comedy style hooked me.

      Plus, I think George Costanza has a big draw to the types of minds on a site like this.

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    19. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by omnipresentbob · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of the Streisand effect? Same idea, part of most marketing strategies is just getting something frickin' out there.

    20. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > What's next: breaking up entertaining ads with more commercials from subsidiaries, or
      > commercial breaks that are just one big blipvert of company logos? (I.e. more meta
      > levels or a collapse of them?)

      Back in the last century some ad people at a business school did an experiment that indicated that thirty seconds of the name of the product being repeated in a loud, obnoxious voice was just as effective as an entertaining ad.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    21. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, advertising is NOT like your company buying you lunch every Friday. This is like your company showing you a picture of a nice lunch every Friday, then showing you a picture of their logo, and expecting that, since you like lunch, you will associate the positive feelings you get from seeing a picture of lunch with positive feelings towards your employer.

      If, instead of using money for marketing, companies actually bought you stuff, or lowered the price of the product, THAT would be similar to your analogy.

      A better analogy for marketing would be, every Friday your boss comes into your office, hits you over the head with a frying pan, jerks off into your eyes, and steals your wallet.

      P.S. If you are in marketing or advertising, I'm sorry. Sorry you chose the most useless, dishonest career legally available. Take Bill Hicks advice and kill yourself. You'd be doing the whole world a favor.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    22. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by default+luser · · Score: 1

      I have to agree: the ad was way too long to advertise anything concrete, and felt like it had no direction. Seinfeld even looked uncomfortable delivering his usual offbeat remarks, and the build-up to the punchline felt stale. Cheap plastic shoes? Is THAT what technology and our future are all about? Please DON'T sign me up.

      The closest analogy I can make is: it was like watching a painful skit on SNL, written by one of the crappier writers. You know it will be over in two minutes, but you just FEEL THE URGE TO SWITCH THE CHANNEL, or maybe EVEN DESTROY YOUR TV WITH A BLUNT OBJECT!

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    23. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by tbannist · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched it and won't go out of my way to watch it. Most likely it's supposed to be a teaser. Later ads will "continue the story" and reveal the product they're specifically selling.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    24. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you people are fucking awful. These masturbation sessions are so disgustingly predictable and stupid that I just can't look away.

    25. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by archen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it is providing associations. It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable

      I suppose that's one take on it. But this got me thinking about how Microsoft is really trying to ride the coattails of something else. Microsoft, the company that makes billions of dollars cannot come up with their own defining sense of brand? I suppose maybe it's always been like that. The Madonna XP campaign, and everyone remembers Start Me Up.

      It's just interesting how Apple makes ads which are themselves considered to be innovative which works well with the products they are tying market, while Microsoft rides on Seinfeld in a directionless add that isn't really about anything. Once again MS is out of touch and lacks focus.

    26. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is not in Microsoft's interest to inform users.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    27. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      So long as the stroke isn't you stroking Bill's gyrating ass...

      There you go, bastards, ENJOY THAT MENTAL IMAGE!

      I think the ad agency behind this must be secretly owned by Steve Jobs. "Mwahaha... First we'll spend ten million on a comedian who ceased being funny or relevant a decade ago... Then... Oh what can we do... Let's have Bill shake his booty on national TV. YES! YES! GOD YES!"

    28. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by tknd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've come to suspect that this in fact doesn't work at all

      It may not work for you, but step back for a second and consider your background. You're knowledgeable about computers, probably a geek of some sort, and tend to be subjective of anything. Given that, this ad may not have targeted you at all. Instead, depending on the show, time, location, and where the commercial aired, will give you hint as to who they are targeting. If it was during a mid-day soap opera then they are probably targeting stay-home wives. If it was during an American football game on ESPN then they're probably targeting low to mid income men. My guess (I can't watch the commercial right now) is they are targeting the average Joe who gets his computer from Best Buy. If that's the case, this may already be a success. We'll have to see how sales of computer manufacturers like Apple, HP, Dell, etc fair after this ad campaign to see how effective it really was.

    29. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is like your company showing you a picture of a nice lunch every Friday, then showing you a picture of their logo, and expecting that, since you like lunch, you will associate the positive feelings you get from seeing a picture of lunch with positive feelings towards your employer

      Not quite, since they're genuinely trying to entertain you. If they failed, then they also failed to create the association.

      A better analogy for marketing would be, every Friday your boss comes into your office, hits you over the head with a frying pan, jerks off into your eyes, and steals your wallet.

      Not quite, because I have what scienticians call a "brain", and I use this to make my own decisions about what products to buy. If marketing is so effective against people that it's equivalent to stealing their wallet, whose fault is that?

    30. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in the last century some ad people at a business school did an experiment that indicated that thirty seconds of the name of the product being repeated in a loud, obnoxious voice was just as effective as an entertaining ad.

      I've got something to apply directly to your forehead for bringing back that memory.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    31. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by JeTmAn81 · · Score: 1

      Ah, the irony of criticizing Seinfeld's show while sporting a sig which links to the grade school scribblings of Luvrgeeks. Delicious.

      --
      "Me? Lady, I'm your worst nightmare -- a pumpkin with a gun."
    32. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      But using Jerry Seinfeld "show about nothing" to advertise Windows "OS about nothing" makes no sense. All of Seinfeld's jokes would be on the wrong side... that's why the Apple ads are so funny because Windows IS absurd... the things people do to make it work.

      I think Gates doing what Gates does best working with small groups: kids, elderly, minorities, small business owners to show what Microsoft Software helps out in the world would have been much better. To poke a counter point at the Mac ads, say "we are business" and really good at it.

      The commercial makes me want to install Ubuntu on something just to feel "clean".

    33. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      They are also trying to get people to discuss the ad. In that they clearly succeeded.

      My dysfunctional 12 year-old child "succeeds" in the same way as Microsoft--the whole "negative attention is better than no attention" bit and all that...

    34. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Clearly the OP does not really understand what advertising is usually about. Most mass market advertising does not try to provide information, it is providing associations. It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable) and then presents the branding that they want to be associated with that enjoyable feeling.

      And that goes a long way to explain the commercial. Jerry Seinfeld for a bit of comedic glue to set the absurd scene. Shoe shopping. Churros. And a promise to offer computing so enjoyable that its like eating moist cake as you work. Which ties in to the churros and also sets itself up to be compared to someone else's "lickable" interface.

    35. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      Back in the last century some ad people at a business school did an experiment that indicated that thirty seconds of the name of the product being repeated in a loud, obnoxious voice was just as effective as an entertaining ad.

      Not surprising. There's a Burger King (or something) ad I saw recently where they go to Wendy's to compare their product to Wendy's product. After the commercial, all I could think was, "Mmmmmm...Wendy's."

      Also kinda like how all McCain ads, because they focus on Obama, make me think of Obama rather than McCain.

    36. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      It just goes to show how much Microsoft just doesn't get "it" (and by it, I mean, well life in general) and why I have a hard time associating myself with any product they produce. If they don't even have the ability to recognize their commercial is shit, how are the going to recognize their Zune is shit, or their OS is shit?

    37. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're totally right, people just don't get it. It was exactly like a superbowl ad, in which many of them are ridiculous and some don't even mention the product in question. We watched the second richest man in the world shake his rear end promising that Windows will be like cake. That's funny if you aren't drunk on haterade and vodka.

      They're not fighting back against the Mac ads, like everyone says they are, that's stupid. Macs have only grown 1.8% of the PC market in the past year during this "revolution" and they're the #2 contender. Microsoft is working on getting the mainstream Windows XP user to stop worrying about all the Vista-hate coming from the Microsoft haters, and instead enjoy a Microsoft commercial because it's kinda witty, and feel comfortable with Microsoft products again. That way, they'll be more likely to convert from XP to Vista.

      The funny part is going to be when all the people slamming this marketing campaign for the content, for the choice of Seinfeld, etc, get humiliated by the fact that it WILL end up causing an increase in XP to Vista conversions, which is Microsoft's sole goal. Microsoft will make a huge return on the campaign due to the XP -> Vista conversions, and all the anti-Microsoft mouthpieces will continue to rant about the Macintosh Revolution and the Year Of The Linux Desktop, both of which we've been waiting on for the past, what, 15-20 years?

      While I'm already in sure-to-get-modded-down territory, I love how the anti-MS group is jumping on the Google Chrome (aka WebKit in a box) bandwagon since Firefox is still creeping towards that 20% mark despite the "world record" release of FF3 at a snail-with-down-syndrome pace.

      If everyone would focus more on the positives and less on the "fight the evil empire!", we could all chose the best software available without the zealotry. Some of it would be Microsoft software. Some of it would be Apple software. Some would be OSS software. Learn to choose what's best for you by its merits, not by what you read on Slashdot and Digg.

      BT

    38. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by LandDolphin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I prefer a career over a job

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    39. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      This ad definitely fits #10 on that list...

    40. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by catmistake · · Score: 1

      it acted on the cold reality of what its creators portray as futile, cyclical, absurd modern life.

      don't forget existential (though only the first season had that Fellini feeling)

    41. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Most mass market advertising does not try to provide information, it is providing associations. It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable) and then presents the branding that they want to be associated with that enjoyable feeling.

      Yes, this would be why marketting people should just off themselves.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    42. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      You should watch Curb your Enthusiasm if you haven't. Basically R rated Seinfeld.

    43. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      ...Bill Gates coyly wiggling his ass...

      *shudders*

      NEVER use that fucking phrase again for as long as you live.

    44. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      What? Why are you masturbating to SlashDot?!

    45. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      One point: Seinfeld never was funny.

      You should see his "I get lost in malls because they are confusing" joke. Right up there with great classics like "What's with airport security, it takes so long, it is inconvenient."

    46. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad that Microsoft has to build a brand.

    47. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by CalSolt · · Score: 1

      Are you saying every ad you have ever seen contains a product? What about ads from companies like Boeing and Lockheed? Nonspecific ads from companies like Nike and Adidas? Hell, the Visa ads narrated by Morgan Freeman that ran during the olympics? None of them tell you to buy anything specific. Instead, they all convey an image and associate the brand with that image.

      I thought Slashdot users were capable of looking at things objectively. I guess I was wrong.

    48. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A long time ago I participated in a number of experiments involving hypnosis.

      Among those experiments was one involving using hypnosis to make someone resistant to hypnosis, so that without a code word further hypnosis would be impossible. This wasn't a government project or anything spooky. Honest.

      We had some success with this however there was a side effect.

      The subjects became unable to bear watching advertising on television. It set off the hypnosis resistant defences. Other forms of advertising such as bill boards, newspaper or web banner ads didn't set this off.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    49. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nice, but too subtle for the mods in all likelihood.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    50. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by spun · · Score: 1

      Cynically trying to manipulate my emotions for profit is NOT the same as trying to entertain me. Entertaining me isn't the goal. Getting me to like the product is the goal, entertainment is the means. They are TRYING to get me to like the product.

      And the fact is, marketing doesn't work on people like you and I, but it does on most people, and that is not their fault. It's like convincing a retarded kid to screw a mudkip doll. Its not cool, and its not the retarded kid's fault.

      Not everyone has the 'think for yourself' gene. Most people get the 'do what your society tells you' gene. If everyone got the gene for thinking for yourself, there would be little conservation of what actually works. Everyone would be off trying new things, most of which wouldn't work no matter how smart everyone was. Society functions because there is a solid majority of people who just do what worked for their ancestors, don't rock the boat, and don't try new things. It isn't fair, just, or moral to institutionalize the manipulation of people like that, and it is counterproductive to try to breed those people out of the gene pool.

      Marketing and advertising are a complete waste of time. If all that money and effort went into actually creating things of value to people, the world would be a much better place.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    51. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by wellingj · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should have put more time in making the OS enjoyable rather than the questionably enjoyable commercial. The direct approach almost always works better when you have access to it. Unless they came to the realization that Vista is the pinnacle of Microsoft OS achievement and decided to take an indirect approach to boost what they can...

    52. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      They are also trying to get people to discuss the ad. In that they clearly succeeded.

      In that case, they could have just shown a close-up of a steaming pile of dog turds for 90 seconds, then closed with the Microsoft logo. You can bet people would have talked about that.

      Surely they wanted more for their money than a little attention. You don't hire Jerry Seinfeld and pay for minute-and-a-half spots just to get people discussing whether or not you have a good ad.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    53. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by wellingj · · Score: 1

      Taken as a parody of modern life, it was indeed funny. But most people I knew saw it and expressed a desire for their lives to be as interesting. So maybe I don't despise the show... Just people...

    54. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      What about ads from companies like Boeing and Lockheed? Nonspecific ads from companies like Nike and Adidas? Hell, the Visa ads narrated by Morgan Freeman that ran during the olympics? None of them tell you to buy anything specific. Instead, they all convey an image and associate the brand with that image.

      Exactly. Interview Joe Sixpack after he watches one of those new-agey Boeing ads, and ask him to give you some quick bullet-point reactions. You'll get "high-tech", "futuristic", "exciting", "global", etc.

      Now show him this Microsoft ad. You'll get "cheap shoes", "Bill Gates' saggy ass", and "what the fuck?"

      Quite a different story.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    55. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by wellingj · · Score: 1

      I would actually hope the shorter commercials would advertise non-concrete things.Generally concrete objects deserve the time to explain what they are and why they are better.

      MS would have done better to just toss up Bill G. and Seinfeld handing out laptops for 15 seconds to a group of inner city school kids with a Microsoft logo in the corner. Nothing else, that's it. Then when every one asks why so short, they could say "We were going to use 30 seconds but we had to pay for handing out laptops."

      I don't agree with altruism in general (especially redistribution of wealth by the government), but even that would have made me stop and think.

    56. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by FuckTheModerators · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      Seinfeld wasn't funny. Existential? Ha. Godot it ain't. Absurdist? Nah.

      Artaud's Theatre of Pain, maybe.

      God only knows why it was so well-liked. To those saying it's something of an acquired taste, I would imagine after enough exposure to dogshit you'd find variety there too.

    57. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by chalkmarrow · · Score: 1

      /agree. When I read the summary, I thought, "Wow. I guess Slashdot-types don't get it." But when I read the responses I felt a little better. I'm no fan of Microsoft, and clearly the Ad could have been cut a little tighter, but overall it's on target. I'm amazed that there are people who still think ads are about information transfer.

    58. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      Everytime I see ads on TV, I think to myself "Ugh, disgusting. Obnoxious ads!" Then I hit the mute button, read a couple pages of my book or read a few comments and check back on the visual vomit to see if the show is back on.

      But mostly, I watch my TV online.

    59. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      So, the product is Gates?

      There WAS no product in the commercial. You can't form an association with something you don't show.

      Maybe Gates is going to run for president and he's cleverly fooled MS into advertising for him.

    60. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm always suspicious of people who don't like the Seinfeld TV show (not referring to his standup) in much the same way that I am of people who don't like dogs.

    61. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it really was a horrible show.

    62. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It reminded me of a lot of car ads I've seen. There was one a while back which started with a close-up of an iPod in a dock in the car. I saw it a dozen times, and right up until the end thought it was advertising iPods. Now, I can remember the iPod, but I have no idea what brand of car it was advertising. I almost wish I could remember, so I could make a point of never hiring the company responsible for it if I ever find myself in a position to commission adverts.

      Microsoft already has a lot of brand recognition in my mind (I recognise them as a company that's been making shoddy products that I used for twenty years before realising that I didn't have to - what can I say? I'm a slow learner). Because of this, I'll remember it was a Microsoft ad. If they hadn't already had this presence in my mind - and they don't for most people who don't work with computers closely - then I'd remember it as a shoe advert. The second time I saw it, I'd wonder why Bill Gates was in a shoe advert.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    63. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Possibly the parent is not from the USA. Adverts in the rest of the world tend not to be quite so dumbed down, and are expected to convey at least a small amount of information.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    64. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, U!

    65. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by RandomWordGenerator · · Score: 1

      It presents something enjoyable (here it is assumed that Seinfeld+Gates==Enjoyable) and then presents the branding that they want to be associated with

      Anyone who finds this combination of people enjoyable is mentally troubled. When Seinfeld bounces his sitcom wit off Jason Alexander, we understand that 'George' is a fictional social maladroit and Jason Alexander's skills make the interplay humorous. Put Seinfeld's gregarious wit directly next to a real-life socially inept character and we have, not comedy, but tragedy. It's like watching Dad dancing, on stage, next to a breakdance champion.
      The message we take away is : Gregarious + awkward = cringeworthy

    66. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ad worked perfectly, because here we are talking about it.

      You don't know anything about memetic imprinting do you?

    67. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by timster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a question -- do you seriously think that marketing is not effective against you? If so, that's sort of like trying to block a punch by refusing to believe in it.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    68. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      That's just it, though. Being more knowledgable about computers than the average Joe doesn't give me any advantage, since they didn't make any claims for a savvy consumer to see right through. The entire ad is nothing but a series of non-sequiturs. Worse, it's dull. Even when they get around to talking about Windows, nobody's going to be paying attention.

      Microsoft basically just wasted $300,000,000.

    69. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like they say in advertising...

      If you have nothing to say about your product, sing it.

    70. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Not quite, because I have what scienticians call a "brain", and I use this to make my own decisions about what products to buy.

      That's what they want you to think.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    71. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please.
      If this were an Ubuntu ad, you'd be saying that it's absolutely brilliant. Slashdotters aren't exactly *objective* when it comes to anything Microsoft. I predicted weeks ago that slashdot would declare these ads to be terrible regardless of whether they were or not, and i've been proven correct.

    72. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by jackbird · · Score: 1

      If they could finagle Bill Gates into wiggling his ass in an Ubuntu ad, that would indeed be fucking brilliant.

    73. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Who is Chrissake and why is Bill Gates wiggling his ass for them? Is Chrissake something like when Chris Griffin became Christobel, the artist? Or perhaps Chrissake is Sake made by some guy named Chris?

    74. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Wo1ke · · Score: 1

      If you restrict yourself to slashdot, anything with the words Microsoft is instanyly 'horrible' but go out into the real world and you'll see that this ad, like most of their products, was a success.

    75. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by roadsider · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but you must have forgotten the original Infiniti ads that rolled out back way back when to introduce Nissan's new luxury line. Everyone talked about the ads. No one bought the cars. Lexus, which launched about the same time, trounced Infiniti. Complaint? No mention of the cars. No pictures of the cars. No product. In fact, the ads were all about associations -- associations with peace, tranquility, happiness. Wha...? The follow up to this better get busy with product, or else Microsloth will have made a whole lot of ad executives richer and a whole lot of stockholders pissed.

    76. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the other way round - dumbed-down adverts only convey information, because subtlety requires brains. UK advertising is full of meaningless adverts, but I wouldn't call them dumbed-down. They're just advertising types wanking off. Stuff like this.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    77. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Merlin42 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about a similar thing ... I think the whole association thing works if the viewer already has (or knows) the product. The vague association works well as a reinforcer, but not as well at creating initial familiarity.

      When we look at the Apple adds we get information (or at least stories) that teach us why we should decide to switch to apple, since most people don't own or use apple computers already.

      With MS they can assume that viewers already know and use Windows. So their job is to build on that existing familiarity, and give it a positive association.

    78. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I just have to figure out how Vista can be associated with the word "delicious". A delicious view? Doesn't compute.

      "Delicious" is a variety of apple. So Gates is trying to say that Vista is pretty much the same as Apple :-)

      In that case, he's saying Vista is a variety of Apple.
      Ever since I became a Mac user... let me tell you, Windows is nothing like Apple.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    79. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by pcutilisateur · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much advertisement will affect on me. I am a full-time Linux user (at home). My 2nd main computer is Mac. I used to be a Windows users -- that was five years ago, so I have not switch back to Windows. I do have Windows XP Pro in my Laptop due to office application, and required by College. Otherwise, you wouldn't never see me using Microsoft. As far this advertisement, I believe it's a part 1 of whatever they will throw at us in future.

    80. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      I'm not the GP but advertising only works on me in two different ways. It shows that a company is established enough to afford airtime and thus probably has a decent product. Or it annoys me so much that I note it down and actively avoid their product. But I'm not an average guy and I tend to go for fringe stuff.

    81. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see one positive reaction to the ad anywhere (other than a minority of posts here)--and slashdot is the last place I expect to get news like this anyway.

    82. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by bitRAKE · · Score: 1

      The Ad is basically saying Windows is the comfortable OS - the shoe and food associations are about comfort more so than joy.

    83. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the above, but the commercial should try to provide some sort of meaningful link to the product it is trying to endorse. Is this a Windows advertisement, Microsoft Office, or Microsoft in general. Sure, it has Jerry Seinfeld, but nothing that is said or done in the commercial seems to even link to computers. Although you don't have to give me information about the product, you have to provide a reason for me to link the message to the product. Leather shoes and butt wiggles are not enough.

    84. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Which ties in to the churros and also sets itself up to be compared to someone else's "lickable" interface.

      Girlfriend 2.0 or is this a new Apple product?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    85. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Hehe. I didn't have Girlfriend 2.0 in mind. It was a reference to Apple's Aqua. I suspect that it is a subtle part of OSX's draw.

      I realize there's a mindset of no-thrills utility in some of our fellow readers. I can understand that. I like my terminal window.

      But I'm also inclined to some flash. I want my terminal window looking like a sheet of smokey glass hovering over my desktop. I like that almost visceral feel of interaction with my environment.

      Apple does that. Linux does that. Windows does that now too. I suspect this is the angle of the marketing campaign.

      If you relate this to Girlfriend 2.0... well... that's always been a welcomed angle in advertising as well.

    86. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by nilbog · · Score: 1

      What kind of person won't take 45 seconds to watch an advertisement, but then spend 20 minutes writing up an analysis of it complete with references?

      I'm sorry, you sounded like you might know what you were talking about but I stopped reading at "I didn't actually watch the commercial..."

      --
      or else!
    87. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks - great post, well written
      the hilarious thing is, the geeks on /., even after they "understand" this still don't understand why techies don't rule..

    88. Re:Its Marketing ... no information required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have a insight into marketing that most people don't have, but one insight is not here. In today's economy, if you don't have the money to purchase, you do without.

  5. Mug shot by UnixRawks · · Score: 5, Funny

    I did find it humorous that they used his mug shot for his photo on his membership(?) card for the shoe store.

    --
    I
    1. Re:Mug shot by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 0

      What the hell was this modded down for!?! Parent was telling the facts. Bill Gates' 'Platinum Member' card used his '70s mug shot as the photo ID in the commercial. It was the one laugh it got from me.

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    2. Re:Mug shot by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

      Jumped the gun there before checking the history. Sorry.

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    3. Re:Mug shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell was this modded down for!?! Parent was telling the facts. Bill Gates' 'Platinum Member' card used his '70s mug shot as the photo ID in the commercial. It was the one laugh it got from me.

      GP wasn't modded down. GP just has seriously bad karma.

    4. Re:Mug shot by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Inside jokes are only funny if you are on the inside, though.

    5. Re:Mug shot by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is Bill Gates just not very likable? Forget Microsoft and all the supposed "evil" he has done, it seems to me that he's just really hard to like.

      He's a really big nerd, but in a bad, unfunny way. Nerds can be funny, but Gates seems to really lack style, personality, or something. It makes me embarassed for him whenever I see him.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    6. Re:Mug shot by craagz · · Score: 1

      I thot the same too. And I think they removed the number plates in the ad.

  6. The Goggles by B4light · · Score: 1, Funny

    They do nothing

  7. Simpsons did it. by unhooked · · Score: 1

    Err, I mean we already saw this on Robot Chicken.

  8. don't fold the tent yet. by skreeech · · Score: 1

    "If this is Microsoft's response to the 'I'm a Mac' ads, it should fold up its tent and tell the world to switch to Apple."

    No matter how bad their promotion is they still sell a product. Actually, other companies sell their product for them.

    --
    [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
    1. Re:don't fold the tent yet. by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is a direct shot back at the MAC/PC ads. I do thin that they want to lose the stigma that Vista is a bad product. Simply.

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    2. Re:don't fold the tent yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They could try... making Vista into a good product?

  9. Totally Agree, Practially Worthless Ad by BigAssRat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I didn't know that it was Bill gates I would have had just about no idea what that commercial was about. It was pretty stupid and pointless in my opinion.

    1. Re:Totally Agree, Practially Worthless Ad by siufish · · Score: 1

      Those who don't know what Bill Gates looks like are probably not the target audience of the ad.

    2. Re:Totally Agree, Practially Worthless Ad by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      BillyG just wants the whole world to like him. That's all.

      The users of /. probably confuse the fuck out of him. In a "Why do they hate me so much?" kind of way.

    3. Re:Totally Agree, Practially Worthless Ad by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      A commercial about nothing!

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  10. "Gates wiggles his rear." by Izabael_DaJinn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank god I can finally scratch that off my list of things to see before I die.

    --
    Careful What You Wish For....
    1. Re:"Gates wiggles his rear." by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 2, Funny

      i don't think that was a wiggle. in fact at his age I doubt there's much of anything to wiggle back there.

    2. Re:"Gates wiggles his rear." by evil+agent · · Score: 1

      Thank God?? I think we should thank Satan for this one...

      --
      End transmission.
    3. Re:"Gates wiggles his rear." by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did anyone notice: the photo on his club discount shoe card or whatever...is his mug shot from when he was arrested in Albuqurque?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:"Gates wiggles his rear." by ThinkTwicePostOnce · · Score: 1

      To quote George Michael's 1992 song "Freedom"

                When you shake your ass
                They notice fast
                Some mistakes are built to last.

      Could that one second of footage become the new Goatse?

      I hereby dub it Gates-e!

      --
      Hide all sigs: Click HELP+Prefs (top), VIEWING (last on right), DISABLE SIGS (3rd on left) and SAVE (hidden at bottom).
  11. Congratulations by garett_spencley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot ... you win first prize. You just fell for, and greatly aided, Microsoft's viral marketing campaign.

    1. Re:Congratulations by Osurak · · Score: 1

      Slashdot ... you win first prize. You just fell for, and greatly aided, Microsoft's viral marketing campaign.

      Yeah, because articles that complain about Windows, Microsoft, and Bill Gates are so out-of-place on Slashdot. If your UID wasn't so low, I'd just assume that you were new here :)

    2. Re:Congratulations by jaymz666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly! Everybody is talking about it! Even non-techies.

    3. Re:Congratulations by Zordak · · Score: 1

      If your UID wasn't so low, I'd just assume that you were new here :)

      He is.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    4. Re:Congratulations by iknowcss · · Score: 1

      Oh right because Microsoft is one of those companies that very few people outside of tech circles know about. They're really making progress, aren't they! Reaching out to new markets!

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    5. Re:Congratulations by CaptKeen · · Score: 1

      If your UID wasn't so low

      That's a low UID nowadays?

      --
      --
    6. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They really did. I never even knew about the commercial until this post.

      Edit: Just after typing that, a Windows Vista commercial came on the TV. Not the one the article mentioned, though

    7. Re:Congratulations by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      As far as I am aware, it's not about reaching new markets as much as it is about bolstering current opinions on the company and its products. There's a whirlwind of criticism flying around about Vista right now, though I am sure you are aware of that.

    8. Re:Congratulations by winmine · · Score: 1

      I agree. I've been on Slashdot for years and this is the first time I've heard of this "Micro Soft". They are probably just a patent troll company hawking some 'new' product of theirs that doesn't improve on anything already released.

    9. Re:Congratulations by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't know about this company Microsoft until this ad was posted on Slashdot. Now I'm intrigued.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    10. Re:Congratulations by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

      Amen.

    11. Re:Congratulations by lewko · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Even more amusingly, all the fools on this page talking (yes talking) about the ad campaign and what a failure it must have been.

      No doubt they will tell their friends tomorrow...

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    12. Re:Congratulations by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. If it weren't for this article, slashdoters wouldn't have realized that Microsoft exists and has products for sale. This has really raised awareness.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    13. Re:Congratulations by Lueseiseki · · Score: 1

      Ugh, anyone will call anything remotely advertising something viral marketing if it's "new and "fresh".

    14. Re:Congratulations by alexwt · · Score: 1

      We'll have to see if this is a case of marketing successfully making the product sell, or just making the ad popular.

      Many of the wildly popular ads (Budwesier "Whassup", "Yo Quero Taco Bell", etc) were very effective at making their themes popular, but in the end still did not have a positive effect on the sales of the products they were for.

  12. Thats the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you ever watched Jerrys show, it was obvious there was "no point" I'm pretty sure this is how they were playing off this ad.

  13. WHAT THE FUCK? by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=seinfeld%20windows&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wv#

    I'm... I don't know... um... WHAT THE FUCK? Intelligent response in maybe 15 minutes when I've recovered.

    1. Re:WHAT THE FUCK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it will take more than 15 minutes to figure out an intelligent response.

      But, man, those Conquistadores do look cool.

    2. Re:WHAT THE FUCK? by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      It has been way more than 15 minutes...where is the response?

    3. Re:WHAT THE FUCK? by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is taking longer than I estimated. Check back tomorrow.

    4. Re:WHAT THE FUCK? by Zwicky · · Score: 1

      Still nothing? I'm going to have to go ahead and ask you to come in Saturday.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    5. Re:WHAT THE FUCK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So It's tomorrow now. What's your response? Are you OK? Do you need a hug?

  14. It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by oddman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's got everyone even remotely connected to technology talking about Microsoft.

    1. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, it has just about everyone connected to technology talking about Microsoft in close proximity to the letters "WTF".

    2. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Talking about how much they hate microsoft. How clueless they are. How shitty vista is unless you drop a ton of cash on all new hardware to maintain your current speed you're used to with xp. And buy the most expensive version to get all the stuff that xp already has for much much less....

      then yes. it got people talking.

    3. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by edalytical · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the only thing I could think the whole time. It's the only response I could possibly give. The only comment I can make. WTF There are no other words. This is it, there is nothing left. Article summary: WTF. Sum of all comments: WTF. The only thought that can take place when viewing: WTF.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    4. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      If by talking about, you mean saying that it was the worst commercial in the history of television and that even Linux folks produce better ads---much better ads---did I mention better ads? Then yes.

      No matter how you look at it, Windows is just not funny. Funny looking, perhaps---the whole Teletubbies UI and all---but not funny.... Of course, I guess it's a match made in heaven. Seinfeld isn't funny, either.... It can't be any more perfect than that....

      Lame.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      So what's new?

    6. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahhh. Viral advertising, yes? That makes sense. I'm definitely feeling nauseous and disoriented after having watched the ad.

    7. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's not to understand?
      It's a Vision Statement!
      Bill has The Vision, and he's walking away with it,
      and all the dumb bastards watching him (or using Windows) are getting mooned

    8. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Did you watch any of the links you just provided?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hJ10Dr9_og&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x35AIGJaM5M

      is the best of the bunch, but it's a bad bunch.

    9. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      (Fucking shit, Slashdot's software sucks ass. Let's try again.)

      Did you watch any of the links you just provided?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hJ10Dr9_og&NR=1 - This is a better ad? Seriously!?

      The vast majority of those you linked were simply spoofs of the Mac vs. PC ads, used stolen footage, were far too long (3:40 for one, and over 4 minutes on another), or were made by IBM. I hate IBM. This ad:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x35AIGJaM5M

      is the best of the bunch, but it's a bad bunch.

      (Attention Slashdot developers: I was DRAWING AN ARROW with a less-than and dash, I wasn't trying to insert a HTML tag! Any parser that isn't made of Fail would figure that out, yours sucks shit and always has.)

    10. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet ... that's better then where they they were.

    11. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      All I thought as I watched was that MS had FINALLY lost it's collective mind. Old and senile.

      I've never been convinced that there's no such thing as bad publicity.

    12. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      (Fucking shit, Slashdot's software sucks ass. Let's try again.)

      Yeah, I wondered how you could possibly have called that the best of the bunch....

      They were almost all better ads. At least they all mentioned the product/company/technology more than just as a passing reference at the end of the ad, and most were at least slightly entertaining (as opposed to just stupid---wearing clothes in the shower!?!)....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by g0at · · Score: 1

      It's got everyone even remotely connected to technology talking about Microsoft.

      Sure, but what's new? Anybody remotely connected to technology is already familiar with Microsoft, and probably addresses them in conversation once in awhile.

      If "getting people to acknowledge the existence of Microsoft's brand" is the only goal with this campaign, nothing new has been achieved.

    14. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it has just about everyone connected to technology talking about Microsoft in close proximity to the letters "WTF".

      No, it's even worse than that. Microsoft is a company known for being able to market things that are badly made and make lots of money off them, and they just proved they forgot how to make a successful commercial.

      What happens to a company that can't do anything right besides sell itself when they start failing at that too?

    15. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by chunkyq · · Score: 1

      That may be, but this is the first Microsoft advertisement I've seen or read in at least six years that I didn't react to with a comment along the lines of, "Fuck you Microsoft."

      Wow. Run-on sentence.

    16. Re:It did exactly what it was supposed to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a computer was something to impulse buy then this kind of ad might be ok but when I go to buy a computer I know it is a large purchase and my first thought it price and my second is usability. I promise you no amount of advertising will change my opinion as I use the products and know what they are like. As a developer I seriously want a change in career because I HATE working with the MS stuff I have been working with for the last nearly 15 years. It has all been down hill since MSVC 1.52 though I did have hope for .NET for awhile.

      When MS become a technically oriented company instead of a Windows marketing agency and I see real improvements and innovation in their products I will rethink but until then I will buy Macs or linux machines and only use Windows for gaming.

  15. (no subject) by woodchip · · Score: 1

    I saw the commercial during the Giants game last night. To be honest, if it wasn't for the Microsoft logo at the end, i wouldn't even know what the commercial was for. To be honest I still don't know. I think it was for the shoe carnival store or whatever it was called. Sadly I don't think they have one around here.

  16. Worked for me! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I now want a delicious churro. Clearly they're coming out with Microsoft Churros. It's a logical step up from the X-Box... who doesn't snack while they play?

    What? That wasn't the point of the ad? I can't imagine what else it would be.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Worked for me! by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Seems the add worked then. You will now think of warm and delicious churro's when you think about Windows. This will give you a slight since of euphoria when you see the Windows logo.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  17. Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

    A large table dominates the room. Sleek metal chairs are located around the table, all of which sits on a raised platform above a large pool full of sharks. Various nervous looking henchmen sit in the chairs, watching their beloved leader. A squeaking whiny voice speaks:

    Bill Gates (for it is he): Now, I've been thinking about our advertising, how we get the message out that Vista is the best operating system ever written, and I was watching TV last night.

    Steve Ballmer: Oh, excellent my master! Excellent!

    Steve chortles uncontrollably

    Bill Gates: Shut up number 2. Now, I noticed two things. First of all, there is a hilarious comedian on the television called Jerry Seinfeld.

    Various flunkies nod.

    Number 8: Oh yes, he's very funny

    Number 9: I agree my master. We were all talking about his hilarious show around our water cooler earlier today.

    Number 5: Indeed. In my department, I couldn't get to the water cooler because of the number of people talking about his show. It is the funniest show on television. You are so right number one, you are...

    Bill Gates sighs

    Gates: Silence! Now, the other thing I noticed was a theme to many of the advertisements. Let me show you.

    The table turns around, with the chairs parting to form a straight line parallel to and facing a giant unfolding screen. The lights dim, and an image appears on screen.

    McCain: I'm John McCain, and I approve this message. Barack Obama says he's for the common man. But he's actually just a typical liberal elitist.

    Obama: Poor people suck. I'm a big dofus. Look at me with my big car and fancy house.

    McCain: Do you really want this person becoming President, or would you rather that a real American be in the White House?

    The screen changes to show a new ad. This time the word "Hope" appears in big letters on the screen.

    Obama: I know what it's like to be at the bottom. I grew up in a family so poor we used to have to live in a paper bag. Every morning, we used to have to get up before we went to bed, lick road clean, and every night our parents would beat us, bury us, and dance on our graves. But my opponent John McCain was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, listen to his real world experience:

    McCain: Look at me, I'm an old person who doesn't even know how to use an Interweb. I have sixteen houses because I keep forgetting where they all are and so have to keep buying new ones to live in.

    Obama: Do you really think that guy can relate to us? Do you really want him to become President? Vote for me, change you can believe in. I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message.

    The lights come back on and the table and chairs go back into position.

    Gates: You see, I'm noticing a common theme. What the common people want is to know their leaders aren't elitist, whatever that means.

    Number 17: Er, Mr Gates. I don't want to talk out of turn, but those are election ads, they're not trying to sell computer operating systems.

    There is a deathly hush. Gates motions to Balmer:

    Gates: Number 2...

    Balmer picks up a chair. Number 17 gets up and starts to back away.

    Number 17: Please! I meant no disrespect! I was just trying to help! No! Please!

    Balmer coldly follows 17 and carefully aims the chair. Finally, with a single thrust of the arms, the chair is thrown. All four legblades hit 17 together. He staggers backwards, bleeding profusely, and falls off of the platform into the shark tank, screaming as he goes.

    Gates: As I was saying. The people want to know that their leaders are not elitists, that we can relate to the comm

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      (A few days later, this [multiply.com] appears)

      That site requires signing up, and its entry has been taken off of bugmenot.com's list by request.

      Do you have a site that doesn't suck with the same content?

    2. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by edalytical · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want to give you "+5 Creative Writing", but somehow this is the only possible way MS could have come up with this ad. So it's either "+5 Corporate Meeting Spy" or "+5 Psychic".

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    3. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by everdred · · Score: 1

      That site requires signing up

      The link works, without registration, if it was linked correctly (no https).

    4. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by everdred · · Score: 1

      That site requires signing up

      Oh, you're whining about the second link.

      Did you read the error? It doesn't "require signing up"... the poster chose to only share it with their contacts.

    5. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      It's a link to a blog entry with the video of the ad. I suggest reading this discussion to find equivalent links. I guess that user's blog entry was set as "friends only" or something.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Or +5, He's #9

    7. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by extrasolar · · Score: 1

      He's just mad because he was the one beaten to a pulp by an office chair.

      Sure, some smart ass is going to ask me how he knew about what happened after he fell into the shark tank.

      Obviously, the sharks told him.

    8. Re:Shamelessly crossposed from my journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A large table dominates the room. Sleek metal chairs are located around the table, all of which sits on a raised platform above a large pool full of sharks. Various nervous looking henchmen sit in the chairs, watching their beloved leader. A squeaking whiny voice speaks:

        Bill Gates (for it is he): Now, I've been thinking about our advertising, how we get the message out that Vista is the best operating system ever written, and I was watching TV last night.

       

      Why does this seem vaguely Shavian to me??

  18. Let me be one of the first to say by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want my damn minute back!

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Like you would spend it on something better~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by Cocoa+Radix · · Score: 1

      When I watched it, it was about a minute and a half long.

      Which thirty seconds of that video did you not violently hate?

    3. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Well, it would have taken me an additional couple of seconds to go back and see how much time it had actually wasted, and by that point, I already wanted to shoot the screen of my laptop and throw it into the Grand Canyon.

      Which pisses me off, because I like my laptop!

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      he could have watched a minute of porno. I say he sues bill & jerry because they stole from him that minute where he could have been watching Jenna Jamison gorfing some huge wang-doodle.

    5. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by olclops · · Score: 1

      Don't shortchange your life, man. That was a 90 second ad.

    6. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by liquidf · · Score: 1

      pfft. you'd probably waste it anyway.

      --
      i've had just about enough of your vassar bashing.
    7. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um..er...I thought it was like 90 seconds! How could you miss half minute in your calculation! And I thought you were geek. Get off my SlashDot :P

    8. Re:Let me be one of the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, this was a waste of my time... Unlike every other ad on television???

  19. It's a show about nothing. by psyopper · · Score: 1

    "one of the most pointless ads in history" seems appropriate from the guy who starred in the self admittedly "Show about nothing" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjDnGBrhhaQ

  20. I get it! by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's an "Ad about Nothing"!

    1. Re:I get it! by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      It's an "Ad about Nothing"!

      Precisely. Though it took me a while to figure that out. I saw the ad last night and though "what the hell was that"? Except unlike the show, the ad wasn't funny, didn't relate to life as I ever knew it, and didn't make me want to see more.

      I wonder if perhaps Microsoft hired the same marketing geniuses from IBM that used the old ladies saying "I just totally warped my files" as an ad for OS/2?

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:I get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an "Ad about Nothing"!

      You got that right!

    3. Re:I get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an "Ad about Nothing"!

      yes, you get it.

    4. Re:I get it! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      It's an "Ad about Nothing"!

      You get a gold star for that one!

      I have just one more question:
      When did Jerry Seinfeld turn into Andy Kaufman?

      I mean, yeah it's clever, but the only person who is going to find this funny is the person who created it. It makes the audience feel like the outside man on an inside joke.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    5. Re:I get it! by plopez · · Score: 1

      "No soup for you!"

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:I get it! by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's deeper than that. The original show was about characters with no redeeming value and that didn't care about anyone but themselves. That appears to be tailor-made for a Vista ad.

                Brett

    7. Re:I get it! by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      It is an OS upgrade about nothing...

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    8. Re:I get it! by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      original show was about characters with no redeeming value and that didn't care about anyone but themselves

      As opposed to all those other sitcoms that were filled with selfless characters of great value and valor.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    9. Re:I get it! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It's an attempt to cash in on Seinfeld (the show, not the actor/comedian). It's an ad about nothing all right, but ten years too late, the ad writers don't have the mojo of the Seinfeld writers and instead of a funny cast it has Bill Gates. Oh, and instead of watching Elaine wiggle, we get to watch Bill.

    10. Re:I get it! by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

              Actually Seinfeld was somewhat unique in *intentionally* creating characters that really didn't have any particular endearing qualities. Most sitcoms have people that are supposed to have some sort of engaging characterstics. The fact that they don't is an accident.

              Brett

    11. Re:I get it! by BitHive · · Score: 1

      Ever watched King of the Hill or Married with Children?

    12. Re:I get it! by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Even Al Bundy cared for his wife, deep down. (Admittedly, you had to dig pretty deep.)

      The characters on Seinfeld routinely sell each other out for practically nothing.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    13. Re:I get it! by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Actually Seinfeld was somewhat unique in *intentionally* creating characters that really didn't have any particular endearing qualities."

      Unique in the US maybe, but the British New Wave started making sitcoms with characters that had no redeeming features in the early 1980s, e.g. The Young Ones (1982) and the first series of The Black Adder (sadly, subsequent series gradually changed the formula).

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    14. Re:I get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, someone got the crux of the ad. Seinfeld was in fact, a show about nothing.

  21. Comment by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't Macs personal computers too?

    Aren't Macs using the same x86 architecture as PCs?

    What's the difference between a Mac and PC besides the operating system?

    1. Re:Comment by davmoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      What the fuck...I've got karma out the ass.

      What's the difference between a Mac and PC besides the operating system?

      The price.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    2. Re:Comment by spire3661 · · Score: 0

      THe defacto naming convention, thats what. While technically you are right, common usage in this context has altered the meaning a bit. What most people call Linux is really GNu/Hurd.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Comment by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's the difference between a Mac and PC besides the operating system?

      About twenty years or so of arbitrary nomenclature. "PC" = x86 with Windows. Stupid but hey what's new in English?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Comment by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Hype

    5. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What most people call Linux is really GNu/Hurd.

      Wait... what? Seriously... fucking... what the fuck?

    6. Re:Comment by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Style. Quality.

      You can not buy a PC with the same specs for less then a Mac.

      You can certianly buy cheaply made crap for less money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Comment by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You can not buy a PC with the same specs for less then a Mac.

      I sure can. I just have to assemble it myself.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:Comment by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Funny

      THe defacto naming convention, thats what. While technically you are right, common usage in this context has altered the meaning a bit. What most people call Linux is really GNu/Hurd.

      What? Hurd has not been heard (haha) from for over a decade. Linux is the kernel, and gnu/linux is the way debian folk identify one another. Distros take linux (debian folks: that's gnu/linux), bundle it with gnome||kde||xkcd and firefox||iceweasel||plasmapussy, then send it out the door with no acpi support and call it a day.

      Sheesh.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    9. Re:Comment by everphilski · · Score: 1

      The cash saved when I bought my PC nicely pads my ass.

    10. Re:Comment by davmoo · · Score: 1

      Yep, I knew it would get modded troll. I dared to disparage a product of His Holiness Lord Steve and his loyal subjects.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    11. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A beret and a rainbow flag.

    12. Re:Comment by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      How did this get modded Informative?

      WTF?

      I think the geek/luddy ratio is getting a little low here.

    13. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC is not the subject here. The subject is Microsoft. Apple's Mac it's nice, a pc with linux it's efficient, a PC o Mac with Microsoft it's just like a churro, you think you're enjoying it, but later your body will feel regret.

    14. Re:Comment by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Wheres my "-1 Fanboi" mod point when I need them!

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    15. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the price, and the cool design factor ;) have you ever tried walking up to the Genius Bar with your Windows laptop??

    16. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Increased levels of awesome.

    17. Re:Comment by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > What's the difference between a Mac and PC besides the operating system?

      Price.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    18. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the difference between a Mac and PC besides the operating system?

      Mac fans start to whine after a while.

    19. Re:Comment by edalytical · · Score: 1

      Well, being troll for that is just stupid. On the other hand there isn't a demonstrable price difference if one compares very similar hardware configurations. The thing that causes the misunderstanding is that Apple doesn't sell hardware that isn't feature complete like some manufactures.

      The real difference between a Mac and a PC is marketing. A Mac is still just a PC, but Apple marketing calls it a Mac. I should know I'm a Mac users and have been for many years. I could just as easily call myself an Apple PC user or simply a PC user. Any misunderstanding that arises would be an indication that Apple marketing is doing its job, which is to make you believe there is a difference between an Apple PC and a PC.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    20. Re:Comment by nsayer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Since I actually have a life, my time is not free, so I would not have saved money on that deal.

    21. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EFI, a restricted set of hardware and therefore the drivers requiring official support, and the ability to add random shit as you see fit.

      Oh, and a few hundred bucks just so Steve and the boys don't "break-a you knees". I have 7 of the damn things and my knees have never been broken. It just works!

    22. Re:Comment by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh burn. You sure got me there.

      If you can't find 45 minutes of free time, you don't have any sort of life worth living.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    23. Re:Comment by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Wow. What do you make, $150/hour?

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    24. Re:Comment by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Indicator of the "style over substance" and "elitist" genes?

      My karma is doing pretty good too.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    25. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Macintosh" is a type of Apple.
      "PC" is short for "IBM compatible Personal Computer".
      Before IBM called it's answer to the Apple ][ a "PC", any personal computer might be called a "PC".

    26. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a couple hundred dollars

    27. Re:Comment by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Mac fans start to whine after a while.

      Their cooling systems get noisier, too.

    28. Re:Comment by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      About $500, give or take?

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    29. Re:Comment by extrasolar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simple:

      One's a young "cool" alpha male who wonders at times about his counterpart.

      The other is an older, larger gentleman in a business suit with glasses who is insecure about his lack of popularity and features.

      I don't understand you though. What does the x86 architecture have to do with computers?

    30. Re:Comment by Detritus · · Score: 1

      With a PC, "Evil goes in before the name goes on".

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    31. Re:Comment by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Because IBM made the "PC", which ironically did not use an IBM processor, but the "mac" did up until the end of the "G5-era".

    32. Re:Comment by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between a Mac and PC besides the operating system?

      about a thousand bucks. *rimshot*

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    33. Re:Comment by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Apple ties their OS to their approved hardware. If you want to run the Mac OS, you need an Apple-made computer to run it on. Those computers are also notorious for having few upgrade options.

      Of course there are individuals who have hacked Mac's OS to run on any PC... but Apple doesn't like those people for some reason... >_>

    34. Re:Comment by ZerdZerd · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be a Mac fanboi to know. Do you really want to know?

      --
      I'm not insane! My mother had me tested.
    35. Re:Comment by Swampash · · Score: 1

      This post deserves to be modded up simply for "plasmapussy"

    36. Re:Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are gonna get attacked by the mac mafia now. every post will be modded troll to oblivion.

    37. Re:Comment by mqduck · · Score: 1

      You turned out alright this time, but don't go throwing your karma away. That's what I did (I don't think anyone understands what the Offtopic mod is for) and once your bonus is gone, it doesn't seem to ever come back.

      --
      Property is theft.
    38. Re:Comment by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Actually you can't. I'm building a MythTV box and over the counter prices are higher than OEM discounts for buying direct and in bulk. So you are going to end up with a machine that's going to cost you at least $500 more out of pocket if you are building it yourself.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    39. Re:Comment by nsayer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah. About that.

  22. It already succeeded by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ad was a complete success. Can you believe that, after reading about it on Google News, I actually sought out and watched the commercial? Can you believe that right this very moment you are reading some unimportant commentary by someone whose opinion doesn't matter whatsoever about a TV commercial?

    Score one for Microsoft.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:It already succeeded by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Thing is, the only people reading that are people who already know about Microsoft. Is someone reading an article about a company spending lots of money to say "Our product isn't as bad as everyone except us says it is! Really!" really going to be convinced by said commercial? I watched it the same way I watch a train wreck. It's bad, but I just can't take my eyes off of it...

    2. Re:It already succeeded by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is only if you accept the idea that all publicity is good publicity, which seems to be a popular idea these days, but always seemed kinda dubious to me.

      I saw the ad, and I'm not going to buy Windows. Anyone to whom I link to the ad, I will enclose said link in language making fun of Microsoft, so likely they will also not buy Windows. In fact, this ad is so bad that most who see it will actually want to buy something else, which in this case would be a Mac, or at least anything but the product which it purports to advertise.

      Score one for Microsoft in making it easier for those who already don't like them to make fun of them, and for those who weren't sure to take a step back and think, "Wow, these guys are out of touch."

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:It already succeeded by danieltdp · · Score: 0

      An ad doesn't have to be funny or entertaining to be a success. If everyone starts talking about it, it has done its job.

      --
      -- dnl
    4. Re:It already succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately M$FT is discussed everyday for various reasons. this is on a geek board and therefore is getting reviews of people who actually went out and looked to watch the ad. Considering absolutely NO message was delivered on the ad, it failed with flying colors. The ad agency is the same one that did the extremely popular and successful VW ads with Peter Storemare in "pimp your auto".

      Here's what I got from this MSFT commercial:
      Shoes at the circus shoe store are made of leather and you wear them in the shower. Jerry likes bread sticks with cinnamon on it, and.... well that's it.

    5. Re:It already succeeded by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      Was it enjoyable enough that you're looking forward to watching it again like one of the old Gap ads or the current and hilarious Mac ads? Was it something that you sent to your friends and family, once you found it on the web? Was it something that created a memorable _and positive_ memory that immediately makes you think of the brand being advertised? No? I guess it wasn't quite as successful as you think. Just because you're a geek (as am I) and wanted to seek it out, because of your geek-curiosity, does not make it a successful ad.

    6. Re:It already succeeded by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      Are you interested in buying Vista? Are you going to buy Vista? Has your opinion on Vista or Microsoft has a company changed?

      If not, then the ad has failed its purpose.

      If an ad is detrimental to a company or a product, then having more people see the add isn't a benefit to the company or the product.

    7. Re:It already succeeded by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The question isn't that you as a technical person would pay attention to the commercial; it's whether the general public would pay attention and remember the ad. Just like you are aware of the shortcomings of the Zune and the iPod. Ask an average person about the shortcomings of the Zune and the iPod. The most likely answer to the iPod would "I don't know" but they know about iPods. The answer to the Zune would be "What's a Zune?" Several years after the launch of the Zune, most people still don't know what it is. This is only the first commercial but it is very different from the Apple ads. Some may not like the Apple ads, but the vast majority of consumers know about them and about Apple. Most people would see this ad and forget about it or that it was Microsoft.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    8. Re:It already succeeded by johneee · · Score: 1

      And not only are you talking about Microsoft, but you're doing it in response to an ad from Microsoft. Which was their goal (if you read the memo that's been going around)

      For the last little while, the ONLY people who have been talking about Windows in advertisments is Apple. This is (from MS's perspective) not good. This ad wasn't to start telling people how good Windows is, this is a contentless piece that is made to start taking control of the dialogue.

      If you respond to metaphors, here it is: Previously, everyone was gathered around Apple listening to them talk about "PCs". Microsoft has been talking, but nobody was listening because their attention was taken up by Apple talking constantly. This ad is the equivalent of Microsoft yelling "HEY, LISTEN TO US!" so that people will glance over in their direction.

      Now they have a few seconds to do something that keeps people's attention and allows the dialogue to take place. Will they do it? We'll have to see, but remember that this ad is from the same company that did the initially just as derided Burger King ads which have now completely revitalized the BK brand so I wouldn't count them out just yet.

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    9. Re:It already succeeded by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      This is only if you accept the idea that all publicity is good publicity

      Ah, the ole P.T. Barnum theory of advertising. Vista has been getting plenty of bad press lately. It should be selling like hotcakes!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    10. Re:It already succeeded by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ad was a complete success. Can you believe that, after reading about it on Google News, I actually sought out and watched the commercial? Can you believe that right this very moment you are reading some unimportant commentary by someone whose opinion doesn't matter whatsoever about a TV commercial?

      Score one for Microsoft.

      Yeah, but did you watch it on CHROME?!?

      Got to get the whole interwebs buzzing about something else this week.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    11. Re:It already succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Score one for Microsoft."

      What? What are you talking about? No, score one for "Shoe Circus" and "The Conquistador". What a coup! I didn't realize that Gates and Seinfield were so short on cash that they'd start endorsing shoe stores like other celebrities do. I mean, I can sort of understand Seinfield, and I knew Gates was out of a job recently, but who'd have thought he'd have to stoop to this to pay the bills!?

      Dang, I hope Shoe Circus have an outlet store in the local mall around here. That Conquistador looks really cool.

    12. Re:It already succeeded by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      I don't think MS has a problem with brand recognition, as everyone and their brother knows who Microsoft is. If the point is to sell their products, they missed the mark. There was nothing informative in the commercial at all that would make me want to buy anything they make.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    13. Re:It already succeeded by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      >all publicity is good publicity, which seems to be a popular idea these days, but always seemed kinda dubious to me.

      Consider: if you don't hear about something you're not going to buy it. If you DO hear about something, you *might* buy it. Any coverage whatsoever increases the probability of a purchase.

      Now, the question is: what happens when people have, in fact, heard of something already, and see an ad campaign about it -- then it is possible to lose sales from a bad ad campaign. However, with something like Windows, the chances are that 95% of the people who see the ad already have Windows. In that case, it might just be reinforcement of an already-made decision, to keep people from looking around. There have been many ad campaigns, particularly for expensive cars, that are only intended to make people who already have one feel good about their purchase (reduce buyer's remorse, in other words) so they'll buy again later.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    14. Re:It already succeeded by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Yes, because negative attention is better than no attention, after all. Because making something that works well is so much more work than just making bad commercials that get a lot of press...sigh.

    15. Re:It already succeeded by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      This is only if you accept the idea that all publicity is good publicity, which seems to be a popular idea these days, but always seemed kinda dubious to me.

      That's IT! Microsoft is tapping into the Lindsay Lohanisization/Britney Spearsification of America trend. When you've got no substance, turn yourself into a crack-whore and churn out crap--as long as the paparazzi are filming your slow demise, it's all good for a few million bucks and a few years more. (Submit Lilly Allen and Amy Winehouse for my UK friends).

    16. Re:It already succeeded by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I, for one, don't measure success by people talking about what is quite possibly the worst, most off-target commercial of this century. I do expect many pink-slips and hurt advertising agency feelings, however.

    17. Re:It already succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that type of commercial typically done when a company is a relative unknown, and has a product that people want; not a company that is widely known, and has a product that few want?

    18. Re:It already succeeded by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Oh, and you have this supposed "memo", do you?

    19. Re:It already succeeded by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Remember that we are talking about success of a marketing campaign, not just general success on something. The whole idea is to make people notice your product and this can be done with weird add too.

      --
      -- dnl
    20. Re:It already succeeded by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Oh, I hear you. I'm just saying, in a year from now, this will go down as one of the biggest flaming failure of an ad campaign ever. Seinfeld, while one of the greatest shows ever, is very 90s--10 years late and a dollar short.

    21. Re:It already succeeded by fair+use · · Score: 1

      All the ad needed to succeed was to have Seinfeld in it. They are paying Seinfeld a large amount of money and he is a super famous guy so the ad is successful no matter what the content is. IMHO, the ad was awful and it succeeded despite the lousy content.

    22. Re:It already succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ad was a complete success

      A determination of success requires knowing what the goal is. That's the problem with this pointless commercial. Surely one of the most widely recognized brands in the world didn't need to raise its profile any. There was no specific product mentioned so my guess is that they felt the need to create a positive vibe about Windows and it is too early to advertise Windows 7 so lets have Bill Gates do a "buddy flick" with Jerry Seinfeld in a shoe store. I call that looking old, feeble and confused, not successful marketing or branding.

    23. Re:It already succeeded by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Ask Sony about all publicity being good publicity. Or the RIAA for that matter.

    24. Re:It already succeeded by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      But...we're all talking about how bad it was, and what a poor reflection it was on Microsoft.

      This whole "there's no such thing as bad publicity!" thing is bullshit. Worked out real well for Michael Richards, didn't it?

      Here's a tip for you, Dan. If you a open a burrito shop, you can get a lot of free publicity by lighting yourself on fire and running in front of the presidential motorcade. A LOT of publicity.

      But not because people want to buy your burritos.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    25. Re:It already succeeded by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      This can be true and *this* campaign could be a failure. It is still possible for an advertising campaign to be sucessfull with ads that are not entertaining or mainstream.

      I remember one case here in my country that the ad began looking like a tv tuned to a dead channel. After one or two seconds it went back to normal and a guy gets to talk about the product. The ad on it self wasn't funny or specially well done, but that little stunt kept taking everyone's attentions all the time and the ad was beyond doubt a success even though it was pretty weird.

      --
      -- dnl
    26. Re:It already succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree to that. Plus if you read these comments the flow seems very similar, its short, goofy, funny kindof, but ultimately is meaningless in the big picture. I think they nailed us.

    27. Re:It already succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only score if you actually buy Vista.

      The pathetic part is that Vista actually has marketable features--DirectX 10, the broadest hardware and software support around, a shiny new interface. I'm really surprised that they didn't bother to mention a single selling point for the product ostensibly in question. I guess they're probably following up this ad with an array of others with the intent of telling a story, since this alone isn't likely to sell a single copy of Vista.

    28. Re:It already succeeded by joeasian · · Score: 1

      Can you believe that, after reading about it on Google News, I actually sought out and watched the commercial?

      Because you're a fucking nerd. Just like everyone else here. Do you really think the common person (i.e. non-nerds) would seek out the ad if they happened to hear/read about it?

    29. Re:It already succeeded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Success of the ad is not based on how many people watch it, but on product sales. If you had to pay to watch the ad, then it would be a success.

    30. Re:It already succeeded by slamorte · · Score: 1

      people talk about plane crashes all the time, too. but that doesn't inspire confidence in buying an airbus or boing.

  23. Oh Please.... by Sounder40 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It wasn't like the first "I'm a Mac" was funny or anything... That was M$'s first one. Let's see a few more before we label the whole thing a bomb.

    And please don't tell my friends I said anything that sounded like a defense of M$... I have a reputation to uphold!

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    1. Re:Oh Please.... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I find John Hodgman a riot, but that but the that little scruffy Mac guy just comes across like some beatnik who posts on Mac forums between fixing bitter-ass lattes at his Starbucks job.

      As for this Microsoft commercial, it's not really good or bad, imo. I did like the old picture on his store ID card. The rest was kind of blah, but nowhere near the worst major brand advertising I've ever seen.

      There's a mountain of bad ads including commercials for Feminine hygiene products, dick drugs, American Idol, Invest in gold or buy this cheapass coin from South America ads.

      At least the Microsoft ads are kind of quiet and mellow. No OH SHIT like when whatever that horrible commercial is that starts off with the Hendrix version of the Star Spangled Banner thundering over the THX system at 3am when I am watching an otherwise quiet show.

      I guess we are in the same boat. These are likely the two most positive comments any Microsoft ad will get here. Mind you, I bet the tone would have been completely different had Mac picked up Seinfeld. "OMG How chic campy!" or "Wow, good plan to target middle aged people!" and so on would dominate the thread and we all know it.

    2. Re:Oh Please.... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too late. You should have checked that "Post Anonymously" mark if you care for... what remains of your tattered reputation.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  24. I'm a Mac guy, and I thought it was funny by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Really, I did find it quite funny. Bill Gates pulled off the role of straight man (with a few exceptions) much better than I imagined he would. Unfortunately, as another poster said, if it wasn't for the Windows logo at the end I wouldn't have known what product it was "selling".

    If this had been a short comedy sketch for television, I'd give it an A. As an ad, and an answer to the "I'm a Mac" ads, I'd give it a D minus.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I'm a Mac guy, and I thought it was funny by pbhj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if it wasn't for the Windows logo at the end I wouldn't have known what product it was "selling"

      It's not selling a product, yet. It's a hook you're supposed to think "moist, w-t-flip??". That then gives them space in your brain, you're slightly confused as you expect MS to tout their technology, spout off with some of the usual FUD, but no - they haven't even tried to sell you anything ... yet. Now you anticipate round 2, your curious ... curiosity is a killer, it's also a very good marketing tool: if you're in a room with 2 doors and one says "danger to life, do not enter" you couldn't care less what's behind the other one you just want to open the dangerous one!

      IMO it's a good advert, we just have to see if the marketeers can make good of that advantage.

    2. Re:I'm a Mac guy, and I thought it was funny by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I disagree. To my mind the spot was self-contained, and didn't trigger any sense of anticipation at all - there's nothing in that ad that left us hanging, waiting for some resolution that will come with the next ad. As a tech geek I'm curious to see how this plays out; but I doubt the general public is waiting with bated breath for ad #2. But time will tell which of us is closer to the mark.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:I'm a Mac guy, and I thought it was funny by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I liked it and I too am a Mac user. I wonder if there's any correlation?

      Not only did I like it, but it worked. I think of Bill Gates as less of a prick than I used to and by extension Microsoft as less of a prickish company than I used to. Not by a lot, and I'm technical enough that I generally choose my products on merit rather than gut feeling, but if their plan was to make Microsoft look like less of a faceless corporation the ad did its job.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  25. For 300million.... by Narnie · · Score: 1
    ...I thought Microsoft was going to advertise a product. Instead, we got a Bill and Jerry commercial that's trying to sell us shoes or eating PCs (I haven't quite decided yet... but I now have a craving to eat soggy shoes after inserting a Vista disk in the toe).

    I doubt that MS needs a company recognition commercial at this point, considering that they're on about 90% of all the desktops in the world. What ever happened to Seinfeld being witty or MS trying to establish Vista as a viable product? Is MS that conceded or aloof to not need a decent commercial? My.02

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
    1. Re:For 300million.... by Butisol · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that Microsoft managed to botch the commercial for Vista as much as Vista itself. The last thing I want to see is lemmings come running to this OS, giving it critical mass, and making it mandatory for stuff like distance education courses for professional continuing education credits. Could you imagine a syllabus stating "You will be required to have Windows Vista and MS Office 2007 to complete the work in this course." Screw that.

    2. Re:For 300million.... by Narnie · · Score: 1

      The last thing I want to see is lemmings come running to this OS, giving it critical mass, and making it mandatory for stuff like distance education courses for professional continuing education credits.

      Now that could have made a good commercial... a bunch of people rushing into a Big Box Store (ie BestBuy) and crowding to buy a copy of Vista and then running out the door and falling off a cliff. "Windows Vista, because you have to have it like everyone else."

      --
      greed@All_Evils:~#
  26. cake by Afrix · · Score: 1, Funny

    the cake is a lie :O

    1. Re:cake by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      that's okay. "Vista ready" is too. Microsoft's been lying a long time.

  27. It's a commercial about nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kinda like the really popular show that was on a while back.

    Don't be so dense, people.

    1. Re:It's a commercial about nothing... by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      A commercial about nothing, from a guy with a show about nothing, and a company with an OS that does nothing.

      Seems appropriate.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    2. Re:It's a commercial about nothing... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Oh, it does lots of stuff. It just does it poorly, slowly, and for any twelve-year-old anywhere in the world who happens to scan your IP.

  28. Pointless Commercials? by morari · · Score: 1

    [...]it's one of the worst, most pointless ads in history.

    Obviously this person has never seen any of Nike's commercials.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    1. Re:Pointless Commercials? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except you know what Nike sells from watching the ad.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Pointless Commercials? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      [...]it's one of the worst, most pointless ads in history.

      Obviously this person has never seen any of Nike's commercials.

      So says the 450 pound computer nerd still living in his parents' basement!

    3. Re:Pointless Commercials? by morari · · Score: 1

      No, you don't. That's the point. Nike pioneered esoteric commercials.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  29. Simply inane by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    That is the dumbest thing I've ever seen, and as a Youtube junkie, that's saying a lot. Seriously, how much cash did they blow on that stupid thing?

    I'm gonna go try to find Paris Hilton insulting someone to wash the taste of pointlessness out of my brain.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  30. And my impression was... I thought that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought that Seinfeld was acting like he just smoked a whole bag full of weed and Gates was just annoyed with him.

    1. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by McFly69 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Explains why he was all over the place, including wearing shoes in the shower. Then wanting a cake few minutes later.

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    2. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up for hilarity.

      Is Gates high in the mughshot photo they pasted on his shoe card id?

    3. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Nah, just under arrest, in Mexico, in 1977.

      http://www.mugshots.org/misc/bill-gates.html

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    4. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Nah, just under arrest, in Mexico, in 1977.

      Wrong country there, chief. It was New Mexico. (Although from what I understand, there are some ignorant doofs in the U.S. who think New Mexico is not part of the United States. Go figure.)

    5. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the cake is a lie

    6. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      ...and why would you know what it's like to smoke a whole bag of weed, hmmmm?

      Yeah, Offtopic, I know, I know.

      --
      -
    7. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, completely realised that right after checking my URLs and for spelling errors. Still, I think I should be allowed a little leeway since I'm an entire Atlantic Ocean away from either :)

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    8. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in some places, that's not a crime...

    9. Re:And my impression was... I thought that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that Seinfeld was acting like he just smoked a whole bag full of weed and Gates was just annoyed with him.

      I think you're onto something here.
      "We were going to make a great OS....but then we got high"

  31. Cell phone implant joke punch line by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    Gates wiggles his rear to answer in the affirmative

    I thought that meant he was receiving a "fax." Isn't that how that old joke goes?

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  32. Redundant by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    If this is Microsoft's response to the 'I'm a Mac' ads, it should fold up its tent and tell the world to switch to Apple."

    Wait, I thought that was why they made Vista?

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  33. Great.... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    *Buys a box of Cake-dows Vista*

    *Bakes in the oven*

    *Pfffffffpppppppptttt!* Damn crashes...

    *Serves Vista Pancakes*

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  34. Yum Yum by MisterSquirrel · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but Bill Gates wiggling his rear does not sound the least bit "delicious" to me.

  35. I have seen Bill Gates wiggle his ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please kill me.

    1. Re:I have seen Bill Gates wiggle his ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please kill me.

      Just dig your eyeballs out with a fork and you'll be ok.

  36. MS Kaka by nostriluu · · Score: 1

    I find it difficult to glean anything other than "enjoy eating Bill Gates' delicious posteriorly ejected waste product" from the ad (they forgot the "and die" part). Basically, if there is something deeper to this campaign, I don't want to know. One thing seems clear, they don't consider the computing experience and associated values to be very important to their target audience.

    1. Re:MS Kaka by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Now I understand! This is why he shakes his ass. Delicious meal and the outcome will be.. but sorry... I mean this company can do better. What will be the next episode? Angry German kid applies for Ballmer's job and Bill buys new chairs? Seinfeld says he quits the job as the company ruins his reputation?

      The video makes me really depressed.

  37. Pull My Finger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you honestly think that this pathetic commercial is more important to report on than...

    - Apple banning a 'pull my finger' app on grounds that it would be 'of little use' to iPhone/iPod Touch users
    http://www.macrumors.com/iphone/2008/09/04/apple-rejecting-applications-based-on-limited-utility/

    ( as opposed to the Koi Pond, or the plurality of 'Flashlight' apps )

    okay, yeah, it probably is.

  38. Bill's new job by usrerco · · Score: 1

    I didn't hear all the dialog at first, so I thought this was showing Bill's "new job" working at a shoe store, vis a vis Al in Married With Children.

    I thought this was hilarious, since I'd been wondering what Bill's new daily job would be.

    But then I could hear the dialog, and it was kinda down hill from there.

    Arrest photo was a nice touch though. Maybe the cash register should have been a Microsoft POS system, and he'd have to ask the store manager how to work it and get a BSOD. "It always does that, just reboot..". When he goes out to his car, he should have hopped into a parked bulldozer instead, and continuing to talk to Jerry while hot-wiring it..

  39. Just more of the same. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These adds are just suppose to make people think that Microsoft knows the average Joe, that they are a approachable friendly company. Kinda like how Exon Mobile has those commercials to show their R&D in alternative energy aka "not placing all your eggs in one basket" The goal isn't to switch Mac or Linux people to Windows but keep Windows people on Windows. Most likely Seinfeld (a 1990s star during Microsoft PR heyday period, where they were considered to be the most innovative products out there, by many people) help bring back the feeling of the 1990's where running Windows was considered the cool thing to do, and running Mac or Unix was just prolonging the death of an obsolete platform, and Linux was just a Fad OS that will go away once Windows 95 is released.

    It is kinda like see how good things use to be when Microsoft was your favorite OS.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Just more of the same. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >Most likely Seinfeld (a 1990s star during Microsoft PR heyday period,...

      Exactly, TV, just like Windows is for old people who do things the same way they did in the last millennium.

    2. Re:Just more of the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but the amusing part is during their "heydey" period Jerry Seinfeld was doing Mac commercials. This just reeks of desperation.

    3. Re:Just more of the same. by ChrisMounce · · Score: 1

      It is kinda like see how good things use to be when Microsoft was your favorite OS.

      Nuh-uh. My favorite OS was Netscape Navigator 3!

      ...or was the company/OS mixup on your part intentional (to give some idea of how the typical user sees things)?

    4. Re:Just more of the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I do things like I did in the last millenium. For example, I'm posting this from a Linux desktop using an open-source browser.

    5. Re:Just more of the same. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      dude, windows 95 was the version that drove me to using free open source software in the first place (i went with BSD because at the time, it had the more straight forward install) windows 98 fixed a few bugs, but it wasn't until NT/XP that windows had a solid winner of an OS on their hands.

      but then, the whole not having 'security' by default bit me in the ass and i'll never quite trust windows again. keep in mind i was running a very minimal configuration of XP and behind a basic wireless router, but i got bit with a nasty polymorphic rootkit in 06' and now use a foss firewall standard. plus there are a few applications i don't trust anymore with internet, and have a non-internet windows XP machine.

      Linux is finally getting to the point where it can realistically take the place of windows, but you need to teach people to no longer go out and 'buy' programs but instead to search their repositories, and when that fails search sourceforge.. otherwise they'll just complain about limited functionality.

      the one downside though is games compatibility, but many people i know who play video games play consoles exclusively. windows itself can be a huge headache trying to play games. ah well.

  40. Actually... by Bullfish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MS need not fold it's tent, they hold a market share that almost any company in any other industry would kill for... and while the ad may be crappy, so what? They really don't even need to advertise, people know who they are anyway and will likely keep buying MS for the forseable future. Like them or not, their brand recognition is huge.

    1. Re:Actually... by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      So maybe that's the point? " We could have spent this money on making a good commercial instead , but ya know? We don't really have to..."

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    2. Re:Actually... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      A few billion on Vista, 300 million on this ad. That's how you build up huge corporate debt. Huge corporate debt is how you become non-competitive.

  41. Apple commercials ROX! MS FTL by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 0

    lol - you guys are probably going to mod me down for my subject line. Cause you just can't deal... Anyway, I have been waiting to see the Jerry-Windows commercials and I can say. "WTF?" When I saw it last night I wasn't even sure I was watching a commercial. MS just can't seem to get advertising right. Use Jerry's wit and insight to elaborate on Vista's good qualities. Use his signature line "Did you ever...."

    1. Re:Apple commercials ROX! MS FTL by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      I think that posted to the wrong site. I think here is where you wanted to post. LOL OMG!!!!!11onehundredandone!

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  42. Not good by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's new ad was just like Windows - a few good bits, and loads of very expensive and pointless bits, made with parts that don't necessarily go together.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  43. i used to like his TV series by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    after viewing Seinfeld's advertisements for MS-Vista i do not like Jerry Seinfeld anymore...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:i used to like his TV series by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      It's just like Michael Richards, Michael Richards isn't Kramer, and guess what? The guy who is making the vista commercials isn't really the same character called "Jerry Seinfeld" , so lucky me I can still enjoy the shows after all this garbage... I just hope Jason Alexandoe doesn't become the Creationists' spokesman or something like that...

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  44. Another Mac Idea Stolen by The+Moof · · Score: 1

    Bad commercials?
    Yet another thing stolen from Mac.

    1. Re:Another Mac Idea Stolen by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      Please, the 1984 commercial is probably one of the best of all time.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  45. we're not laughing with you; we're laughing at you by soybean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we're not laughing with you; we're laughing at you.

  46. What "delicious" means by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Delicious, butt-wagging, Seinfeld, cheap shoe stores being abhorrent, poking fun at Mexicans...what do all these things have in common?

    Look at your common PHB. Likes "delicious food" as opposed to what the Mac guy eats, probably raw food or wheat grass or something. Thinks butt-wagging and slapstick are funny. Probably laughs at Seinfeld re-runs. Is glad he doesn't shop at the cheap shoe store for athletic shoes, but probably gets his dress shoes there, because who can tell. Has Mexican neighbors, is uncomfortable knowing he's in the same class they are.

    This ad is brilliantly tarteted as a sort of subconscious reminder that PHB doesn't have to be a Mac guy, darnit, and he's good enough. Microsoft is here to shove more Applebees cake down his throat.

    1. Re:What "delicious" means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... subconscious reminder that PHB doesn't have to be a Mac guy, darnit, and he's good enough"

      Mod this up. It is the *only* explanation/parsing that makes any sort of sense - and actually I think it must be right.

      MS aren't dumb, I couldn't figure out why they are running an ad that is just so mind-numbingly dumb.

      But you have explained it perfectly.

      Thanks

    2. Re:What "delicious" means by solferino · · Score: 1

      I agree with your analysis of the target demographic - the middle-aged, mediocre multitude.

      However, the danger for MS is that this ad won't appeal to the younger demographic. It has no 'cool' factor. And if MS loses this demographic and they increasingly "don't do Windows", who will the target demographic turn to when the inevitable problems that arise when running a Windows PC need fixing?

    3. Re:What "delicious" means by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

      I agree that there's something wrong with their approach. When I work with marketing teams who come up with tightly spec'd campaigns that are based on unwise or outright stupid ideas of who should be targeted, it often means that there's a good deal of micromanaging going on by their superiors. I'm not familiar with MS enough to say so, but that's the feeling I get - an ad agency that put this together to fit the MS culture or worked under severe pressure from above (while using Macs, most likely).

  47. Maybe it is an awful commercial, but... by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    I think we can all agree that it is nice to see the director of "The Star Wars Holiday Special" working again.

    I jest, but how many of you are going to check the IMDb now?

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  48. Effective at generating buzz. by sidragon.net · · Score: 1

    We are all talking it about, right?

  49. Wow by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

    Jesus Christ, they paid money for that?

    --
    Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
  50. Relevant Slashdot Car Analogy by Nymz · · Score: 1

    Television commercials for cars are mostly selling a feeling, and often display a stunt driver, driving fast, as the only car on the road. No facts or tech sheets required. Apparently, this type of marketing suggests that an operating systems is something a non-nerd might buy.

    1. Re:Relevant Slashdot Car Analogy by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you still see the car during the ad and generally know what it's about.

    2. Re:Relevant Slashdot Car Analogy by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      At least you get to see the cars in action, which is more than the churro munching and the shoe bending in this tripe of a commercial. I can look up the stats on a car I see on tv quite easily. I have no idea what Microsoft wants me to look up after that garbage.

    3. Re:Relevant Slashdot Car Analogy by Nymz · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you still see the car during the ad and generally know what it's about.

      I think I've only seen 2 Seinfeld episodes, but isn't that what the show was about... not knowing what it was about, but still being entertained?

    4. Re:Relevant Slashdot Car Analogy by Nymz · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what Microsoft wants me to look up after that garbage.

      Perhaps you saw the commercial during one of your favorite shows, which may mean that next time you are looking at a computer good or service, you'll think positively of the one with Microsoft's name on it.

    5. Re:Relevant Slashdot Car Analogy by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what was the show selling? Nothing. The point of an ad is to sell something.

  51. Commercial 1: The Introduction by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

    You notice at the end, Bill and Jerry go walking off into the sunset with a new pair of shoes.

    Clearly, they met each other, liked each other, and are now going off on an adventure.

    So what adventure comes next?

    This reads like a comic book intro, and knowing Seinfeld, that's means we can probably expect adventures and arch-villains to follow.

    Doesn't The Steve wear a lot of black?

    1. Re:Commercial 1: The Introduction by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      Not not not.... THE JOBBER!!!

      Send for the em-ballmer! Only he can save us

    2. Re:Commercial 1: The Introduction by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The strongest answer to your question in my mind? Drinking some ovaltine and discussing the rhumatiz.

  52. Circus Shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Imagine Circus Shoes getting both Gates and Seinfeld to do a commercial for them!

    I thought Jerry was going to work for Microsoft, but I must have misunderstood ;-)

  53. What? by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's the message? "Vista is hard, let's go shopping!"

    I toldja, they shoulda gone with a tried and tested comedic genius. http://tinyurl.com/5c3r6y

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:What? by ricegf · · Score: 1

      No, it's "Vista is like taking a shower with your clothes on". Pretty accurate analogy, come to think of it.

    2. Re:What? by tritter · · Score: 0

      I don't want to appear rude, but those URL brackets are meant to show where a link is pointing at... and... how am I going to say it... [tinyurl.com] is not exactly *helpful*, I fear.

    3. Re:What? by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      You can go to preview.tinyurl.com with the same ending if you don't like mystery meat urls. The full url is as long as yr arm.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yes.

      http://notnews.today.com/2008/08/21/30/

      is the longest URL I've ever seen, full of useless session IDs and tracking values and languages and... and...

      http://tinyurl.com/5c3r6y ...it's not even twice as long!

    5. Re:What? by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      ok ok ;-) That one was Wordpress misbehaving. Most of 'em are too long.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  54. Obviously. by AJWM · · Score: 1

    The Windows 7 version they're frantically working on to replace Vista will be released as Windows Conquistador. It'll run tight. (As in, like somebody whose blood alcohol level is way over the legal limit.)

    --
    -- Alastair
  55. Non-nerds don't buy operating systems. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Apparently, this type of marketing suggests that an operating systems is something a non-nerd might buy.

    Which is nonsense, right? Why would a non-nerd buy an operating system? He doesn't know how to install it, so what's he going to do, buy it so his cat can sit on it and lick its nuts?

    1. Re:Non-nerds don't buy operating systems. by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      Why would a non-nerd buy an operating system?

      Perhaps because it came bundled with the shiny new computer that the non-nerd bought? Don't forget, every time the non-nerds buy a computer from the local Worst Buy or Circuit Shitty, they are buying an OS with it. Just because they aren't billed separate, it doesn't mean that it is not being purchased.

    2. Re:Non-nerds don't buy operating systems. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      They are not making a decision as to which OS to buy. They can't: they don't know what an OS is.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  56. Losing the stigma. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 0, Troll

    I do think that they want to lose the stigma that Vista is a bad product.

    Not likely. I think there's a better chance of rehabilitating Hitler's image than there is of making Vista look good. (Oh, yeah, I went there.)

    1. Re:Losing the stigma. by nsayer · · Score: 1

      You fail it. And no, pointing it out yourself doesn't help.

    2. Re:Losing the stigma. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      You know it would have happened eventually. I just made 'eventually' happen a hell of a lot sooner. Now that Godwin's Law has been invoked and dealt with, everybody else can have a nice productive discussion. I'm just doing my part for the cause.

  57. The pic on his shoe card by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    Hey, didn't that look like the pic from when Bill got arrested for speeding?

    In fact I think it was! I thought the commercial was kind of amusing, esp with that speeding pic in there. HAW HAW (Doesn't do anything to push product, but I guess they must not care about that)

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  58. They should do a soup nazi ad makeing fun of the l by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    They should do a soup nazi ad makeing fun of the lack of choice on mac hardware.

    Can I get get a headless mac tower

    MAC TOWER $2300!

    Can I get a NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB

    NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB EXTRA $150.00

    Can I get get a 15" laptop

    15" LAPTOP $2000

    Can I run mac osx on my custom build tower

    NO MAC OS X FOR YOU NEXT!

    Can I run mac osx on my dell

    NO MAC OS X FOR YOU NEXT!

    and so on.

  59. The message? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, so Bill Gates is buying shoes but instead of getting advice from a trained professional he follows what he is told by some joker who just happens to be walking down the street. What does this say?

    1. Re:The message? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That's how they get their customers. Everyone who recommends Windows other than grudgingly for a specific application is a comedian or clueless.

  60. Conqistador by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

    Apparently the shoes hold up well in water. I may have to get myself a pair since I do a fair amount of walking in the rain.

  61. Please tell me this is a teaser ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell me this is designed to make me go "WTF" now, but that they have cleverly lined up additional ads in this series that will build on this to make some sort of series that actually talks about their product. Or themselves as a company. Or just about anything other than shoes as a non-metaphor.

    'Cause right now, I'm asking "Why did you make this ad? Why did you spend millions of dollars to tell me this?"

    (Unless they're just trying to say, "We're Microsoft. You know us already -- we don't have to tell you anything about ourselves. We trust that you'll buy our products because it's what you've always done." In which case... ::shrug::)

  62. funny by Rossjman1 · · Score: 1

    Although the commercial had nothing to do with Windows, I thought it was quite hilarious. I especially liked the part when Bill flashed his Shoe Circus club member card. Priceless.

  63. It's a commercial about nothing? by digital_rich · · Score: 0

    Not that there's anything wrong with that.

  64. It's VERY effective! by gary_7vn · · Score: 0

    I haven't even bothered to look at the ad yet, but I will. As for it being "pointless" or "ineffective" - are you all kidding? Dozens of nerds on Slashdot going on and on about it, telling their friend(s) too, and watching the video. Damn right it worked. And anyone who sees Bill Gates on TV and doesn't think "computers" is not their market anyway, as they are almost certainly dead.

    1. Re:It's VERY effective! by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      It only works if it convinces people to buy a Microsoft product when they otherwise wouldn't. That's the true metric of the success of an ad, not the popularity of the ad.

      If the ad is as bad as the summary says, this could actually hurt the Microsoft brand, not boost it. The more we talk about how bad it is, the worse the effect on the brand will be.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    2. Re:It's VERY effective! by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is doing this for the same reason that Coca Cola signs and ads are ubiquitous, they are not selling coke, they are maintaining brand profile. This is not advertising, this is marketing and branding which is an entirely different animal. Gates is raising awareness, creating a buzz and getting people to talk about Microsoft. This is what marketing is all about. Not everyone here is talking about how "bad" MS is anyway. But they are talking about Microsoft, and again, to a marketer it's all about brand awareness.

    3. Re:It's VERY effective! by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      I agree, but brand awareness isn't a good thing for a company if it's also accompanied by brand erosion. It doesn't help a company if whenever you think of their product, all you can think about is how shitty it is.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. Windows eXtra Pair. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    Made me want to buy a pair of shoes. Wonder if they run Linux?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  67. You Joke... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    But it's just that kind of silly advertising that American consumers just eat up.

  68. Ok I get it by hoofinasia · · Score: 1

    Not happy with a simple poll, some jokster posted this to make sure we actually find out who has the worst fanboys ( I direct your attention to the first two winners ).

    You are all officially repeats.

    1. Re:Ok I get it by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I was going to vote for Microsoft having the worst fanboys, but then I realized they don't have any...

  69. I just installed Ubuntu on my new Vista laptop by vistahator · · Score: 0

    Too bad I didn't see the ad first or it might have changed my mind, right?

    1. Re:I just installed Ubuntu on my new Vista laptop by Locutus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The ad was about the PC users being able to go out and you can get have your cake and eat it too. Granted, they think Windows gives you that but as you really know, GNU and Linux get you that in spades. It's all about choice and what YOU want.

      Sorry Bill, Jerry, that ad just didn't work IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  70. Nuh-uh by M$Apologist · · Score: 1

    I actually found that ad hilarious. I like Bill Gates, I like Jerry Seinfeld, apparently I like pointless Microsoft commercials. Far more entertaining than yet another stupid 'Im a Mac' commercial. Yes, we get it. You are hip. Woo. That being said, I prefer to avoid commercials entirely, except for the Super Bowl of course.

  71. Poke Fun at Mac Ad by Luthair · · Score: 1

    I think the intent of the commercial is to poke fun at the Mac ads.

    Commercials from both campaigns don't have a 'point', and involve a 'trendy' person having a bizarre conversation.

    I imagine they're also hoping to capture Gates as being likable. (I seem to recall previously reading that audiences often preferred the MS guy in the Mac adverts.)

    1. Re:Poke Fun at Mac Ad by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Huh? The Mac ads targeted specific features. PC in a wheelchair to push the mag-safe adapter, PC with a cold to push the lack of viruses, etc.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  72. Quite a stir by Devir · · Score: 1

    The commercial caused quite a stir. When it was released I got an email sent to a bunch of us at work with the video.

    It's plastered all over news sites, and it's being talked about quite a bit. While the message told us a few important things:
    - Bill gates wears leather shoes
    - Seinfield wears cloths in the shower
    - Seinfield makes a great shoe salesman
    - Gates is a Platinum Circus shoe member
    - Gates looks beat up, tired, chunky and old
    - MS has gone into the cake business. Probably designing a cake/frosting mix that can be eaten at the keyboard without getting your fingers or keys sticky.

    regardless of the confusing or lacking message the commercial brough to us it schieved the curiosity factor. People will wander into Bestbuy or Walmart, or quite comicaly a shoe store or bakery section of Shaws asking for Microsoft products.

  73. I'm Keith Hernandez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was great. Microsoft just had it's "Screw it I'm Keith Hernandez" moment..

    They just released an operating system that completely flopped and they are still doing fine. I guess they just figured, what the hell, let's do something even wackier

  74. Countdown to mashup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before someone mashes the Apple and Microsoft campaigns into a "who gives a fuck what operating system you use" type thing.

  75. Come on you guys, it says a lot about Vista by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    That commercial is like Windows in many ways:

    - It costs a lot of money.

    - Much of it is pointless.

    - More than half the time it doesn't work.

    Now if that doesn't describe Vista, then nothing does.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  76. Obviously it's a Seinfeld style advert by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    It's an ad about nothing! In the next episode they'll debate whether a peanut is a pea or a nut.

  77. Re:Needs more Larry David by coren2000 · · Score: 1

    Should have hired Kramer to yell racist obscenities.

  78. a big zero by KernelMuncher · · Score: 1

    I was at a bar drinking with a bunch of tech friends watching the Giants game. We couldn't hear the conversation but recognized it as the Seinfeld add right away. As an aside, man does Gates look old in that thing - like somebody's Grandfather. Anyway the add finished and we all looked at each other and said WTF?

    If the add is trying to target young, tech savvy people, it failed miserably. In fact it had the opposite effect. Most of the crowd thought it was a desperate attempt to gain attention. And the choice of Seinfeld and Gates could not have been weirder.

    If our group was any kind of a representative sample, the add was a colossal failure.

  79. It is a TV Commercial by Slash.Poop · · Score: 0

    You know I found it weird that slashDot has not had a Microsoft bashing article in more than a few days. Clearly they found it weird as well so in a desperate search to bash Microsoft we get this story posted. How this qualifies for news, no one knows. It is obvious it was posted so fanbois can jiz.

    But since slashDot did post I will comment on it:

    1, Seinfeld-Windows TV Ad Anything But 'Delicious'
    Opinion shaping through headlines. slashDot does it all the time.

    2, with a long TV commercial almost entirely devoid of any talk of Windows, Microsoft or anything, really
    Ever seen a Nike commercial? Ever seen a Budweiser commercial?

    3, and can say without equivocation it's one of the worst, most pointless ads in history
    Seems to have worked to me. You are talking about it.

    4, If this is Microsoft's response to the 'I'm a Mac' ads, it should fold up its tent and tell the world to
    switch to Apple
    Why is that?

    Mod away, that is if you have any jiz left
    Oh and have a good weekend.

    1. Re:It is a TV Commercial by longacre · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a Budweiser commercial?

      Yes, they usually replace the product with big boobs, or horses, or big boobs on horseback. I dunno about you, but seeing two of the geekiest men in American pop culture hanging out with Al Bundy doesn't have the same effect.

    2. Re:It is a TV Commercial by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      What's with the Nike commercial bashing? Usually it's a really fit guy or girl doing something really athletic (biking, running, swimming, hell, even wheel-chair(ing). Considering Nike is selling stuff for the athletic lifestyle, I fail to see the problem. Maybe it's because most of you on here don't really know what being athletic entails? (I kid, I kid...kinda).

    3. Re:It is a TV Commercial by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Considering Nike is selling stuff for the athletic lifestyle."

      The fact that you see so many vastly overweight people wearing Nikes while stuffing enough junk food calories to support a small third world nation into their maws is an indication that they're selling the athletic image, not the life style.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    4. Re:It is a TV Commercial by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Well, I worked at Nike for a while in college, and all I can say is you don't understand their corporate culture if you think they are just selling an image. That's the nature of the clothing industry..it's part functionality, part fashion. Nike does both quite well.

    5. Re:It is a TV Commercial by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Well, I worked at Nike for a while in college, and all I can say is you don't understand their corporate culture if you think they are just selling an image."

      I respectfully disagree, because Nike make their goods in the same third-world sweatshops as the companies who make $20 sports shoes, but are able to charge vastly more because of their carefully cultivates image.

      "That's the nature of the clothing industry..it's part functionality, part fashion."

      But the difference in price between an expensive brand and a cheap no-name import made at the same factories using the same materials and processes is image.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    6. Re:It is a TV Commercial by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      You are so very wrong. Have you the slightest idea what goes into the development of, let's say, a high-end running shoe? There is a reason that world-class atheletes use $200 running shoes (be it Nike, Saucony, whatever) and not $20 Roos. And while it is easy to pick on Nike for oursourcing their manufacturing, you should probably look at, oh, I dunno, the ENTIRE TEXTILES INDUSTRY in the US. They all do it. But Nike are the big dogs, so yeah, it's easy to pick on them to try to look all holy and smart and all. Besides, what's wrong with building an image--especially when it is an image that is good for society (being fit has what downside again?) and that millions of people can feel good about?

    7. Re:It is a TV Commercial by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "You are so very wrong."

      If you say so.

      "Have you the slightest idea what goes into the development of, let's say, a high-end running shoe?"

      No, but I doubt that its costs show up in the rounding errors of Nike's 3.2 billion dollars of annual revenue.

      "There is a reason that world-class atheletes use $200 running shoes (be it Nike, Saucony, whatever) and not $20 Roos."

      And that reason is called sponsorship.

      "And while it is easy to pick on Nike for oursourcing their manufacturing, you should probably look at, oh, I dunno, the ENTIRE TEXTILES INDUSTRY in the US. "

      "Everyone else does it" is an excuse, not a justification. Note also New Balance, who are considered to be the manufacturer of the best running shoes bar none (they don't make any other type of shoe) by athletes who aren't paid to say otherwise still do a great deal of their manufacturing in the US.

      "But Nike are the big dogs, so yeah, it's easy to pick on them to try to look all holy and smart and all."

      I did not "pick on" Nike. You were the one who answered Slash.Poop's post about a Nike ad, and I answered your post.

      "Besides, what's wrong with building an image"

      Where did I say that there was anything wrong with it?

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    8. Re:It is a TV Commercial by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      No, but I doubt that its costs show up in the rounding errors of Nike's 3.2 billion dollars of annual revenue.

      And herein lies the problem of your argument. Overt biases against capitalism, when arguing about the merits of capitalism aren't a very persuasive device.

      Sponsorship? If you actually pushed yourself away from the computer once in a while, you might notice that the overwhelming majority of hobbyist runners, bikers, and fitness oriented people actually have to BUY their own shoes. You don't get 3.2 billion dollars of revenue by giving shit away for free.

      Everyone does it is an excuse? Then quit picking on just Nike, you freakin' hypocrite. "I answered your post" is not a justification, it's an excuse.

    9. Re:It is a TV Commercial by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      " herein lies the problem of your argument. Overt biases against capitalism, when arguing about the merits of capitalism aren't a very persuasive device."

      And the problem with your response is that it's a straw man.

      "Sponsorship? If you actually pushed yourself away from the computer once in a while, you might notice that the overwhelming majority of hobbyist runners, bikers, and fitness oriented people actually have to BUY their own shoes. "

      Another straw man that has no relevance whatsoever to your point about _world class athletes wearing $200 shoes_.

      "Everyone does it is an excuse? Then quit picking on just Nike, you freakin' hypocrite. "I answered your post" is not a justification, it's an excuse."

      This sad attempt at a clever riposte is a fitting close to a post that had already established such notable intellectual low-points as transparently obvious attempts to build very shaky straw men and a childish proclivity to stereotype people you've never met.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    10. Re:It is a TV Commercial by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I love it when some faux-intellectual peruses the wikipedia entry on "logical fallacies", then choose the one they've seen used on slashdot before. Pray tell, in what way have I misinterpreted the premise of your argument, you know, the definition of "strawman".

      You obviously don't understand the culture at Nike and I do. I don't come to your house and piss in your pool. Not only did I work there, I also fit within the demographic. You obviously don't, didn't, and don't. There's your ad hominem/red herring/strawman for ya. In other news, there are legitimate ways to deconstruct the actions of Nike over the years, but coming on a nerd site and complaining about "image" carries no credibility whatsoever.

    11. Re:It is a TV Commercial by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Pray tell, in what way have I misinterpreted the premise of your argument, you know, the definition of "strawman".

      That is not _the_ definition of a straw man, as you well know. I'm sure you also know that this deliberate attempt to (a) pretend it has a single definition, and (b) put forward a subtly incorrect one is in itself a straw man.

      Here are your straw men:

      1) Claiming that a sentence contained overt biases against capitalism (which it didn't) instead of answering the point.

      2) Taking an answer directed at one of your points, and responding with a different one.

      "You obviously don't understand the culture at Nike and I do."

      Claiming to understand something isn't the same as actually understanding it.

      "Not only did I work there"

      For a while in college (your words). You obviously believe that this qualifies you as an expert on a three billion dollar a year multination corporation, but believing something doesn't mean it's true.

      "I also fit within the demographic"

      Congratulations.

      "You obviously don't, didn't, and don't. "

      The utter inaccuracy of every other observation you've made about the way I live serve as ample indication of how worthless your estimates about the demographics groups that I do or do not belong in are.

      "In other news, there are legitimate ways to deconstruct the actions of Nike over the years, but coming on a nerd site and complaining about "image" carries no credibility whatsoever."

      I know your mind has difficulty in dealing with definitions, so I will clarify this one for your edification: saying that Nike are selling image is an assertion, not a complaint.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  80. Cmon guys, this isn't that hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shopping for shoes is a metaphore for shopping for a computer.

    Gates is trying a shoe that doesn't really fit, but there aren't any other sizes available (Mac). Fortunately, there are tons of other choices available (PC)...

    1. Re:Cmon guys, this isn't that hard by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Is that really their pitch? It would make sense if Microsoft hadn't pretty much stopped much of the OEM customization and product differentiation when Windows 95 shipped some 13 years ago. So, although one can go to any number of stores and see a number of products from different hardware vendors, you are stuck with the same human interface system on all of them. And what is worst, it is Windows Vista.

      Last I checked, there weren't too many complaints about Apple hardware nor the interface which is Mac OS-X.

      So is a Microsoft ad about choice really any kind of shot at Apple or really going to make people feel all warm and fuzzy? I doubt it.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  81. Obama the Yorkshireman? by vistic · · Score: 1

    Obama: I know what it's like to be at the bottom. I grew up in a family so poor we used to have to live in a paper bag. Every morning, we used to have to get up before we went to bed, lick road clean, and every night our parents would beat us, bury us, and dance on our graves. But my opponent John McCain was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, listen to his real world experience:

    So here it is... obligatory:

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: Aye, very passable, that, very passable bit of risotto.

    SECOND YORKSHIREMAN: Nothing like a good glass of Château de Chasselas, eh, Josiah?

    THIRD YORKSHIREMAN: You're right there, Obadiah.

    FOURTH YORKSHIREMAN: Who'd have thought thirty year ago we'd all be sittin' here drinking Château de Chasselas, eh?

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: In them days we was glad to have the price of a cup o' tea.

    SECOND YORKSHIREMAN: A cup o' cold tea.

    FOURTH YORKSHIREMAN: Without milk or sugar.

    THIRD YORKSHIREMAN: Or tea.

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: In a cracked cup, an' all.

    FOURTH YORKSHIREMAN: Oh, we never had a cup. We used to have to drink out of a rolled up newspaper.

    SECOND YORKSHIREMAN: The best we could manage was to suck on a piece of damp cloth.

    THIRD YORKSHIREMAN: But you know, we were happy in those days, though we were poor.

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: Because we were poor. My old Dad used to say to me, "Money doesn't buy you happiness, son".

    FOURTH YORKSHIREMAN: Aye, 'e was right.

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: Aye, 'e was.

    FOURTH YORKSHIREMAN: I was happier then and I had nothin'. We used to live in this tiny old house with great big holes in the roof.

    SECOND YORKSHIREMAN: House! You were lucky to live in a house! We used to live in one room, all twenty-six of us, no furniture, 'alf the floor was missing, and we were all 'uddled together in one corner for fear of falling.

    THIRD YORKSHIREMAN: Eh, you were lucky to have a room! We used to have to live in t' corridor!

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: Oh, we used to dream of livin' in a corridor! Would ha' been a palace to us. We used to live in an old water tank on a rubbish tip. We got woke up every morning by having a load of rotting fish dumped all over us! House? Huh.

    FOURTH YORKSHIREMAN: Well, when I say 'house' it was only a hole in the ground covered by a sheet of tarpaulin, but it was a house to us.

    SECOND YORKSHIREMAN: We were evicted from our 'ole in the ground; we 'ad to go and live in a lake.

    THIRD YORKSHIREMAN: You were lucky to have a lake! There were a hundred and fifty of us living in t' shoebox in t' middle o' road.

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: Cardboard box?

    THIRD YORKSHIREMAN: Aye.

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: You were lucky. We lived for three months in a paper bag in a septic tank. We used to have to get up at six in the morning, clean the paper bag, eat a crust of stale bread, go to work down t' mill, fourteen hours a day, week-in week-out, for sixpence a week, and when we got home our Dad would thrash us to sleep wi' his belt.

    SECOND YORKSHIREMAN: Luxury. We used to have to get out of the lake at six o'clock in the morning, clean the lake, eat a handful of 'ot gravel, work twenty hour day at mill for tuppence a month, come home, and Dad would thrash us to sleep with a broken bottle, if we were lucky!

    THIRD YORKSHIREMAN: Well, of course, we had it tough. We used to 'ave to get up out of shoebox at twelve o'clock at night and lick road clean wit' tongue. We had two bits of cold gravel, worked twenty-four hours a day at mill for sixpence every four years, and when we got home our Dad would slice us in two wit' bread knife.

    FOURTH YORKSHIREMAN: Right. I had to get up in the morning at ten o'clock at night half an hour before I went to bed, drink a cup of sulphuric acid, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill, and pay mill owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our Dad and our mother would kill us and dance about on our graves singing Hallelujah.

    FIRST YORKSHIREMAN: And you try and tell the young people of today that ..... they won't believe you.

    ALL: They won't!

  82. Delicious? by devotedlhasa · · Score: 1

    ...or just bad taste?

  83. The advertisment is working by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    How many news articles do we have about television advertisement? Close to zero, except during the Superbowl.

    Today, you posted a story about an advertisement. People here are clicking on the advertisement and are watching video. Their campaign seems to be working, even if it is an "Ad about nothing".

    And it's just the first ad in the campaign. Just wait until Microsoft releases the sequel.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  84. WORSE THAN GOATSE!!! by dotancohen · · Score: 0

    Don't look at that picture! It is worse than Goatse! Ze googles..........

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  85. What amusing line of thought I saw... by Junta · · Score: 1

    "Nothing will convince me to switch to Vista!"

    Ok, then we'll have commercials about nothing, brilliant!

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  86. Funny is relative by Etrias · · Score: 1

    Interesting that when I first saw the parent post of this, it was marked insightful and now when I reply, it's marked Troll.

    I can't say I enjoyed the show myself. I know it was hugely popular, I know a lot of people loved the show...it just didn't float my boat, so to speak. A couple of episodes I found enjoyable such as the marble rye episode.

    The thing is, funny is relative. You either find something funny or you don't. My father never thought that the Monty Python I watched growing up was funny, but then I didn't find some of the stuff he liked funny either (he was much more of a joke/punch line kind of guy where I liked my humor to be a bit more layered and obscure).

    What I do find funny is all the replies saying how stupid the parent post was for not liking Seinfeld. Not "ha-ha" funny, but still...

  87. If this was an Apple TV ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Featuring Jobs and Seinfeld, most of the people here would be lapping it up with a spoon.

    1. Re:If this was an Apple TV ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody wants to see Steve Jobs shake his ass, either. Maybe the Mac Genius on one of the recent Get a Mac ads, though.

  88. Don't you get it? by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    After failing in their attempt to buy Yahoo!

    This is Microsoft's way to announce that they intend to buy del.ic.us

    Now's your chance to invest stock before the official announcement and make your fortune $$$.

  89. Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we're supposed to feel sorry that BillG is "losing" development money on the development of Vista and now he has to buy discount shoes :).

    And no, I'm not serious.

  90. Coke - It's The Real Thing by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I will have you know that TV programming in Japan is quite different than anything you will find in the US, since I think that they give all the people who come up with the shows drugs for inspiration.

    I was going to say they do that with US TV too. Except in that case the drug is cocaine and the only thing it inspires is crap TV as a means to get more money to get more cocaine...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Coke - It's The Real Thing by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      "[C]ocaine is damned expensive, makes you greedy and sociopathic, gives you a sense of entitlemant, makes you stupid, and makes you think it makes you smart." -- sm62704 (957197)

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    2. Re:Coke - It's The Real Thing by phatvw · · Score: 1

      Cocaine... is a helluva drug.

    3. Re:Coke - It's The Real Thing by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Heroin too. You obviously haven't seen Permanent Midnight.

    4. Re:Coke - It's The Real Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now we know what happened to ba'rock

  91. It combats the Apple Ad by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    In the Apple Ad the PC guy looks geeky, so he gives the face of MS / Bill Gates.

    What they did by releasing this commercial is let us know that this (Bill Gates)
    is the real face of MS and that he is really cheap while buying shoes.

    Seinfeld is just there to distract us.

  92. weird by delong · · Score: 1

    That was just bizarre. What ad agency came up with this flat-out weird commercial?

  93. Flash! by pagaboy · · Score: 1

    I was sure it wasn't going to work under Linux/Firefox, using Silverlight or something. But no, it's in Flash, like they want people to watch it.

  94. what's an ad got to do with the OS functionality? by putch · · Score: 1

    the ability of an OS to perform to expectations has little to nothing to do with marketing drivel. especially when it comes to television ads--how are you supposed to explain an OS in 30 seconds anyway?

    i'm not trying to defend vista (i still refuse to use it) or MS but at least they weren't slinging some "it just works" horseshit.

    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  95. I found it effective by PJ1216 · · Score: 1

    As this is obviously the launching point of a series of commercials, I'm actually curious as to what Gates and Seinfeld are going to do together. It had about as much useful and/or factual information as a mac ad does... which, is near to none. Its all about just being entertaining and then putting your name on it. Commercials don't have to give tech specs or reasons to buy it. Sprite had a commercial with a friggin' talking bottle of a fake sunny d bottle that scared a family to death. It had no factual information about Sprite, but to this day, I remember that commercial and it puts Sprite in a good light for me. I don't drink Sprite, but they at least put a good step forward. Thats all a commercial is. It's not supposed to MAKE you buy the product, its supposed to make you THINK about buying the product and put you in a positive mood while doing so. The only reason people don't like this commercial is because its Microsoft. If this were any other product that did this, it probably wouldn't even been a story... just another commercial on TV.

  96. Clever Seinfeld plot by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    This is all just an evil plot by Seinfeld. Not only did he convince Microsoft to give him ten million bucks, he then convinced them that this would be a good campaign. Maybe Apple is slipping him some extra dough on the side.

  97. Makes sense... by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's $300-million ad campaign for Windows starring comedian Jerry Seinfeld

    I'd ask for 300 million dollars too to staple my good name to the dogshit that is Vista.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  98. Apple has imagination. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    You didn't expect something innovative, did you? I mean, the Apple ads, not to be one of those pestering fanboys like the poll showed, but the Apple ads speak to you in a manner that is humorous and informative, and you get the message. And you don't have to be some computer genius to get it. In fact, it targets people who are not some assembly-coding black magic gurus who grok the difference between a SLUB allocator and a SLAB allocator. They get across the message that using a "PC" (which has come to mean a computer running Windblows -- Linux/*BSD users call their computers a "box," not a PC) is the suxx0rz, while using a Mac is easy, fun, and gets what you want done plainly, simply, without any hassle. Everyone out there who isn't the aforementioned guru knows that using a PC means you sit around all day waiting for the hard drive to grind its platters into dust while looking at spam and popups, giving your personal information to thieves via spyware, getting your files deleted via viruses, and just plain having problems all the time. Those who use Macs know that despite the cute animations and graphical shit, they're still quick and mostly reliable, and being that they're based on the UNIX philosophy and run on billions of lines of F/OSS code (which many Mac users either don't know or don't care), the risk of the aforementioned malware is much reduced (which all Mac users know AND care about). For mortal lusers, it's a great thing; for *NIX lovers, it's *NIX, and for those that buy VMware or Parallels (or use Sun's virtual box although I'm not familiar with it except in knowing that it exists), a Mac can run any program for any OS, and it looks damn stylish doing it. On the other hand, a PC is the suxx0rz for mortal lusers. Yeah, using nLite, you can make Brick Walls XP SP2 install in such a manner that it is ALMOST a joy to use it (by changing ALL options to the opposite of their default), but most lusers buy a box with that thing preinstalled in such a manner that it's a burden rather than a tool. In many ways, you can compare Microsoft and Apple and come to a simple conclusion. That's left as an exercise for the reader.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  99. A Bad Ad Is NOT M$ Fault, But Their Ad Company's by dwye · · Score: 1

    "If this is Microsoft's response to the 'I'm a Mac' ads, it should fold up its tent and tell the world to switch to Apple."

    Or at least switch to Chiat-Day, Apple's firm, previously famous for airing the Mac 1984 ad ONCE, and letting the networks replay it for weeks.

    I saw it last night, and I didn't even realize that it was a MS ad; I thought it might be for something else that Seinfeld has done. In any case, it was the least interesting ad since feminine hygiene products started appearing in commercials. Unless ad number 2 is much better, MS should fire their agency, fast.

  100. Delicious Computers by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I've read this and other discussions on the commercial and I think that most of us missed the joke.

    Think about it... edible computers? That's STUPID... who would ever want a ... ooooohhhhh, an APPLE Computer! I get it.

    It's just dissing on the name Apple. Also it's attempting to make us subconsciously associate food in relation to computers as absurd. After all how many times has Apple used themes such as "lickable" and "don't eat iPod shuffle" in their commercials? This is training us to reject that.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Delicious Computers by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      First of all, if most people didn't get it, the joke failed.

      Next, edible computers? Yes, it is ridiculous! Apple won that battle years ago. When most people hear "Apple Computer", they don't think think of the fruit, they think of the computer.

      And finally, if Microsoft do want to have a dig at the literal meaning of the name, they might do well to realise that their own name equates to "tiny and flaccid". People in glass houses, you know...

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  101. Well... Hell. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    If BillG and Seinfeld was going to do a commercial skit, just do it on one of the best scenes...

    Billg as the Patron in SoupNazi's business, but as MacNazi.

    "But I want windows programs on it..."
    "NO MAC FOR YOU".

    Of course, MacNazi looks exactly like Jobs...

    --
  102. Mugshot photo by eples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did anyone catch that his photo on the membership card was his old Arizona mugshot photo (arrested for speeding, IIRC).

    That part did make me laugh.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:Mugshot photo by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No, you must have been the only one who noticed that.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  103. Butt double. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Don't get too hot and bothered, gents, they're clearly using a butt double.

  104. There's one thing they *didn't* do that stands out by merreborn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I, too, was throughly unimpressed by the ad, but there is one thing they didn't do: Play Apple's mud slinging game.

    I enjoy the "I'm a mac" ads -- they're just about the only commercials I'll intentionally watch -- but they're pretty aggressive. They blatantly, and actively attempt to belittle their competition. The latest two show "PC" resting on his laurels, and trying to deceive people into purchasing him -- both suggesting that "PC" doesn't have his users' best interests at heart.

    This commercial doesn't do that at all. Some have speculated that was the goal: making it clear that they feel that they don't have to insult their competition. Whether they're just trying to win points for being the nice guy, or they're trying to suggest that they don't have to stoop to Apple's level because they're just that superior, I don't know.

  105. Isn't it obvious? by rpp3po · · Score: 1

    This is going the way against "one size fits all". Microsoft's operating systems try to be compatible to a magnitude of hardware configurations in contrast to Apple forcing control over a very limited hardware range.

    Microsoft's operating systems also come in different versions for different needs and budgets. The spot is supposed to make you think about exactly that point, without mentioning it specifically. It's against Apple's limited few sizes fit all dogma. I'm surprised that such few Slashdot readers have got the message yet. The spot was pretty clever, it makes people take about it what's it supposed to mean.

    Sadly no commercial could make me switch back right now. Leopard is a fantastic platform to work with every day. I've never been more satisfied with a computing platform.

  106. I find it appropriately ironic that 'without equivocation one of the worst ads in history' finds itself as a topic of discussion on the front page of one of the largest internet news sites in the world.

    Yes, it's such a horrible ad that everyone is talking about it.

    How dare they.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    1. Re:Hmm by astrocrack · · Score: 1

      It's a $300-million ad campaign. It is being talked about indeed. However, I think if Microsoft wanted to be talked about in such a negative way they could at least have figured out a cheaper way to do that.

    2. Re:Hmm by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      Only Microsoft haters make these absurd allegations. These are hardly the first commericals in history to barely acknowledge their product, and yet they are labeled as 'without equivocation the worst commerical in history'. Apparently everyone who is complaining so much hasn't seen that some very high dollar ad campaigns do the exact same thing. Just off the top of my head...razors, axe body spray, and miller high life...And I'm sure those are just a few of the MANY.

      LMAO @ the typical nerdrage response.

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  107. You mean... by paniq · · Score: 1

    ..."Much Ad About Nothing"?

    --
    Do not trust this signature.
  108. I wanted to see him wiggle his ears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn misreading.

  109. TV becomes reality by usul294 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else remember the episode of Seinfeld where Jerry argues with his girlfriend about that Docker's commercial where they don't mention the pants, but they just stand there in the pants. Its all I could think of during the commercial, and the slight hint of hypocrisy if Seinfeld wrote that piece in the show and the commercial.

  110. Eric by dk3d · · Score: 1

    Gates looked totally embarrassed to be in that commercial and I can't blame him. I prefer PC's (but love the Mac vs PC ads) but that has got to be the worst commercial for ANYthing I've ever seen. What is wrong with some of these ad agencies these days? Its like they're living in some abstract reality thinking up totally stupid ideas and believe it's funny. Fire that company now. Fire Seinfeld if he had any part of it. I love Sein, but my god, he's gotten twisted in his old age if he wrote that.

  111. Just setup, not the punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The instant I heard affordable and heard talk about trying things on I thought, "I see, they are going to say that if you want Apple you have to pay a lot and only have one choice, no "sizes" or "configurations.""

    That is somewhat in line with how a good portion of the people and I feel about Apple. Pay a premium to have limited options.

    Is that where this is going?

  112. Something's working... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

    You're all talking about it. That's the point of any advertising.

  113. The ad is not about you by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    A lot of the comments here reflect the inwardly focused Geek world that thinks the ad is all about them or all for them. The ad was not intended to make people who visit Slashdot laugh, never intended to make people who visit here buy Vista or anything Microsoft. In fact, the ad bypasses Slashdot entirely. You might call it the Anti-Slashdot ad or the Slashdot-is-Irrelevant ad. In fact, the success of the ad is likely in inverse proportion to Slashdot's negative reactions. The more negative we are here, the more successful the ad.

    The ad builds brand-awareness by using celebrity (just like OJ and Avis). It's targeted at consumers who buy PCs one at a time, not anybody in the industry. It shows Bill Gates making fun of himself--again. It's a 'show about nothing' with Seinfeld--again. It suggests the future will have even more friendly computers with whatever follows Vista. That's all it is supposed to do.

    Think of it this way. Bill Gates is to Microsoft as the Clydsdales are to Budweiser. Instant brand recognition. When you see a Clydsdale ad, or even just a Clydsdale somewhere else, your brain thinks, "Budweiser." The more times your brain thinks 'Budweiser' the more likely it is that you'll pick up a six-pack of Budweiser next time you go shopping. With all the crazy beer names on the shelf in a bewildering array of attempted marketing fancy names, there's one I recognize: Budweiser. I'll take that.

    So what if it's one of the worst beers out there on the market. It sells.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  114. Reminds me of "knocked up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When that guy from the TV station says "Wow, you actually made Steve Carell look like an asshole"

  115. I can see it now by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    Seinfeld: We at Vandelay Industries just love Windows Vista Business!

  116. Mac's counter-ad . . . by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . will show a black screen with the following phrase:

    The cake is a lie.

    1. Re:Mac's counter-ad . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out of my head....

  117. FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by wsanders · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep - a boring, middle of the road public figure shilling for a boring, middle of the road, operating system. It's an OS about - nothing!

    I'm much more interested in seeing what OS Larry David or Frank Costanza would shill for.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Seinfeld used a Mac on his show.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I'd say Larry David is cranky enough to be a BSD kind of guy, but he live in Hollywood, so non-mainstream computing is out. OS X is probably a good compromise for him.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Funny
      My only explanation for this is ad is as follows:

      Microsoft approached Jerry and said 'We'll give you a huge pile of money if you do an ad for us.' Jerry said 'you know I use a Mac, right?' Microsoft's person said 'Did I mention the really big pile of money?' Jerry said 'I'll do it if I can write the script' Microsoft's guy said 'We get your writing talent and your performing talent? Ideal!' Jerry thought 'Now, how do I make Microsoft look really bad without them noticing and not paying me. I know, Bill Gates! They'll love anything with Bill Gates in it, even if it's really terrible!'

      In fact, it just reminds me of this comic.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago there was a rumor that a character from Seinfeld was going to participate in a Linux TV ad, but he decided not to because he thought Linus was an anti-semite. I wonder who that was...

    5. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by Squozen · · Score: 1

      That would depend on who Larry David was married to at the time, surely?

    6. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's probably just not an OS zealot.

    7. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by Zey · · Score: 1

      Jerry said 'you know I use a Mac, right?'

      What makes you think he uses a Mac? You have heard of paid product placement, right?

      Apple is especially aggressive at product placement. In popular TV shows and higher budget movies, the only time you won't see a Mac on the desk is if the computer is evil or is scripted to fail in some way.

    8. Re:FestivOS - the OS for the Rest of Us! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I laugh when I see what's obviously a Mac on Mythbusters, but they have a piece of duct tape over the light-up Apple on the back.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  118. Re:what's an ad got to do with the OS functionalit by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    You make a good point, but this is the same company that a few years ago touted how many millions of dollars companies were saving by "switching" to Server 2003. All they were doing to save money was buying fewer faster, newer computers with 2003 on them instead of NT 4 or 2000. MS is not above "it just works" at all. They just didn't use it in this ad.

  119. soft and cuddly gates by CottonThePirate · · Score: 1

    This is like those political ads that try to make us think some guy with huge incomes and power is "just like us". In the time it took to try on those shoes bill gates probably made enough money to buy the entire store, if not the chain.

  120. Say Cheese! by Nabeel_co · · Score: 1

    That was hilarious! Don't you think? Or was I the only one who notices that Bill's club card (0:57) had his mug shot from when he was arrested on it?

  121. Have you SEEN the MSFT Marketing Team? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    I mean, come on! Who AREEEE these people?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Have you SEEN the MSFT Marketing Team? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, come on! Who AREEEE these people?

      These are the people

      http://cpbgroup.com/

  122. wtf!@ by acecamaro666 · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates shaking his butt.

  123. Re:Knock offs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, a Brit (Simon Fuller) came up with the *idol show.

    Actually, I think many of you would be surprised how many of US TV program formats are actually owned by Endemol and similar companies.

  124. Alzheimer's setting in at Microsoft by Locutus · · Score: 1

    what else could explain how this could be accepted as worth $10 to Seinfeld, how many millions to Gates and all that on top of what the ad agency is being paid.

    Quick, put GPS tracking systems on them because they've totally lost it. Surely they are bound to just start wandering the halls.

    We laughed quite loudly after the disgusting Gates butt shot.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  125. I hope that didn't cost a lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Bill running for office, because other than making him seem human, that was just stupid. I agree with the other guy can I have my minute back.

  126. We're Microsoft by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    We can put out crappy ads that make no sense and still own most of the market.

    Sigh. True, too.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  127. He's right - Jerry Seinfeld is a known... by lanky+nibbs · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...anti-dentite.

    --
    "Have you heard of some type of thing?" -- anon
  128. Is it really that bad? by lbredeso · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm reading into it a bit too much, but I thought it made sense. I thought they intended the "Conquistador" shoe to be Vista, which, though initially perceived to be a poor fit, just needed some "breaking in" first (i.e. Vista Service Pack 1).

  129. I can gaurentee 1 million copies of Vista be sold by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    For $300m I can promise Microsoft that they will sell 1 million copies of Vista this year.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  130. Hmm by jshackney · · Score: 1

    I think I missed the pitch. But I would like to try a churro now. Where do I get one of those?

  131. Clearly it is the setup for a series. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    The first ad doesn't need to convey any real information. I thought it was reasonably amusing.

    I expect the meat is further down the road.

    That said I don't really care about adverstising, but the 300 Million toward getting a better windows 7 out the door sooner.

  132. I try to interpret the ad in this way ... by tonysu · · Score: 1

    I try to interpret the ad in this way: Jerry Seinfeld is Mac, Bill represents Microsoft. Mac is more knowledgeable, and Microsoft learned from Mac (see how Bill learned to bend the shoe as Jerry), but in the end, they walked out together, and Jerry asked that cool question (typical Mac), which means Mac not practical? Bill was quite down to earth, and warm -- Microsoft is not evil? Mac found Microsoft, gave the advice, and followed Microsoft out, without getting paid ... Vista is like that pair of shoes, they didn't fit well at the beginning, but if you bend it, work on it, it eventually will fit in just fine ... Ha Ha!

  133. They are being polite! by Gerzel · · Score: 1

    Remember, if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

  134. How Does It Rank... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    ...it's one of the worst, most pointless ads in history.

    How does rank with the original Infiniti Rocks & Trees ads?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  135. Love it!! by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Apparently, every Slasdotter's raging hatred of all things Microsoft has also left them with no sense of humor. I thought it was funny as hell. I loved the ancient picture of him from the early 80's that was on his frequent buyer card. Cute and funny. And yes, about as purposeful as any other commercial... you people really need to lighten up.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  136. Tooth-talker, in scientific terms: by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oromyofunctional disorder, aka, Tongue Thrust. I like "tooth-talker" better, because if you are a tooth-talker, you have a hell of a time saying tooth-talker, which really brings out the tooth-talker in you.

    1. Re:Tooth-talker, in scientific terms: by PsychoElf · · Score: 1

      I saw some videos of tongue thrusters on the interwebs!

  137. It wasn't *that* bad... by Chibi · · Score: 1
    I got the impression that the commercial was a mix of:
    1. Attempt of Seinfeld-like humor. The running joke of how popular the "Conquistador" shoe is. I didn't think the Mexican family was particularly racist or insulting. It seemed to be fairly in-tune with some of the ridiculous situations that came up in Seinfeld's show. The churro was probably a bit of a tie-in to the family, but it could have just as easily been some other food/ethnic group.
    2. A bit of relational humor, i.e., Jerry Seinfeld had a ridiculously successful show, "retired," and now he's got plenty of time on his hands to do stuff that "normal" people do. Bill Gates had a ridiculously successful company (remember, he retired), and now he's got plenty of time on his hands to do stuff that "normal" people do.
    3. Mention of something big coming from Microsoft. That was probably supposed to be a real kicker in the commercial, and I'm going to assume that "Delicious" ties into whatever they will be releasing. Also, Jerry specifically asks Bill to "give him a signal... adjust your shorts." I'll agree, though, the visual of seeing Bill Gates shake his butt was lame, but there are plenty of lame commercials out there.
    4. And let us not forget, churros really are delicious...
    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  138. Who's not going to watch the next one? by twothyme2000 · · Score: 1

    This is probably a series of ads. Each one will have the option to build on the previous installment - lots of Seinfeld-esque self-referential humor and inside jokes are possible in this sort of format. At the very least they can set up a final episode that is genuinely funny and makes the sale. ... Or not. That was really bad.

  139. Really? by darrenkopp · · Score: 1

    Wow, people at slashdot don't like a microsoft ad? didn't see that coming. I personally thought it was pretty funny. And why does microsoft have to do attack ads against apple?

  140. Reminds Me of BASF by Wingsy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember those old BASF commercials? Kinda reminds me of those, where at the end I'm left wondering just what it is I'm supposed to buy. Shoes? Chips? Hula lessons?

    --
    If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    1. Re:Reminds Me of BASF by Detritus · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to forget about their involvement in two world wars, and some very nasty bits of German history.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  141. So... by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

    mod me redundant, because its likely already here if not previously on /., but yeah, Seinfeld had a MAC on set...odd, no?

    Seinfeld: "Hello, I'm a Mac user."
    Gates: "And I have no sense of humor, or acting for that matter. But, I do have money."
    Seinfeld: "Delicious"

    But really, what about the Mohave commercials? We don't ever get to see the "new" OS that is in all reality Vista, and we don't know anything about these people. It can work for Hardee's and for Pizza Hut, but not for M$. What if you put someone who has actually used Vista, likely on a machine not up to spec to run it in its most, ugh, pure form, in a session where they can use the Vista setup as-seen-on-the-microsoft-bus, with top-notch hardware and settings pumped and yeah, you'd have an impressed person. Did they mention the price tag? The DRM? The hardware necessary to get the "Mohave" experience? I doubt it - I've "impressed" a number of friends with various Linux desktops because they "look neat," but it takes real use, day after day, to honestly gauge an OS.

    But a thickburger? Now that is delicious.

  142. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  143. What else has John Hodgman done? by Bemopolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He was Bruce Campbell's literary agent. All else is epilogue.

    Now go shred your cool card application — you have been pre-denied.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  144. It may be anything but delicious, however... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    Everyone here is talking about it. I guess that means I'm talking about it too, which means I should st%!@^(#$~NO CARRIER

  145. Link? by XanC · · Score: 1

    This is intriguing. Are the study's methodology and results available anywhere?

    1. Re:Link? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      It was private research done back in the early/mid '80s.

      Nope, not available anywhere that I'm aware of.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  146. I found it cute by veenstr · · Score: 1

    I guess I am not the regular slashdotter. I found the add quite cute. It made me smile. It made Bill feel human in some odd way. And Jerry was Jerry. Felt a bit like a Seinfeld episode. Guess I am the crazy one.

  147. I love the one where Jerry and Bill run around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the parking garage for hours...

  148. Delicious by CallsignBaron · · Score: 1

    I don't know what good this commercial will do Microsoft but Hostess and Little Debbie could see their stock go up. I think I'm gonna go buy a box of Twinkies, brb...

    --
    "I reject your reality and substitue my own." ~ Adam Savage, Mythbuster extraordinaire.
  149. NO WAY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has posted something negative about Microsoft! The end is near!!

  150. Hit or miss? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    The question is, will it induce an impulse-buy of Vista? I think it won't: people have tasted the sweet taste of not-upgrading-immediately-to-the-latest-Windows, and survived. The economy is not great, and buying anything takes a wee bit more thinking.

    It's a tough time for witty commercials, especially when the product they try to sell is Vista.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  151. Conquistadores: Bring it On! by xactuary · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, the use of the term Conquistador is telling. The conquistadors killed more natives with their viruses than with their guns. Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. I might also ad that throwing chairs will not help in this situation.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  152. What a waste by AnnonUSA · · Score: 1

    Worst Ad Ever. LOL. There is now no doubt that Windows Vista and Office are way overpriced. If Microsoft has disposable cash for commercials like this, they are gouging more than the oil companies.

  153. It's a good ad, actually. by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, I think what a lot of people have missed here is something basic: The market. Microsoft is not selling their product to the same people that Apple is selling to. Microsoft has to please a lot more middle-aged corporate types, and a lot of common types. Even the place this ad premiered reflects that - NFL football game. Not the Oscars, MTV Music awards, American Idol - NFL football game. Domain of white guys.

    Second, the point of the ad is not to advertise the product. Microsoft and their ad agency have probably done quite a bit of research and realized that the brand perception of Microsoft is mostly large, faceless, corporate machine. Insert 'evil' in there, if you'd like. The point of the ad is to put a human face on the company. "Oh look, Microsoft's founder has to buy shoes just like me!" Jerry's contribution is to be annoyingly quirky, which allows Bill to be tolerant and 'humor' Jerry. The whole ad is Bill playing along even though you suspect he thinks Jerry is quite odd (also making Bill look not-so-odd by comparison.)

    The ad is effective for what Microsoft is trying to accomplish with it. Hell, even proving Bill isn't ACTUALLY equipped with a Borg eye is worth a few million.

    1. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by k1e0x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bill looks incredibly odd.. because he is. Socially inept I think its called.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    2. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why advertise to people who are already buying your product. The people who are old and stuck in their ways wouldn't switch from Windows anyway, so there's not point in targetting them. They need to target the younger crowd, both those who have switched, so that they switch back, and those who haven't switched yet, but are getting annoyed with releases like Vista, and may switch in the next 5 years.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by Scroatzilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know... I really don't care about the human face of the founder of any companies I do business with, especially huge corporate entities. I can *sort of* connect with a guy who hand crafts his beer, or grows the potatoes for his potato chips, but I'm not sure that this kind of connection is relevant when you see the world's richest man who founded a company that, for all intents and purposes, does something that most people don't really even understand.

      I have a degree in communications (which includes advertising), and I simply don't see how this distinguishes the Microsoft brand in any way other than the fact that they can afford a commercial. A baffling and painfully awkward one at that.

      Okay, what I'm really trying to say is that I'd love to see Jeff Goldblum kick Jerry Seinfeld's ass all over silicon valley. Ummm.

    4. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by asylumx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      NFL fooball game. Domain of white guys.

      Yeah, cuz black people obviously HATE football...

    5. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The point of the ad is to put a human face on the company."

      And the commercial succeeded in putting a human ass on the company. How like Microsoft.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    6. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because those people are seriously considering other products for the next round of purchases. If you hadn't noticed, a lot of people are fleeing Vista for *shudder* another, even worse monopolistic company: Apple. I'd prefer they move to Linux, but I've not found any advertising, beside word-of-mouth, to put Linux on the forefront. It would be a good time for Ubuntu to do what the Mozilla foundation did with Firefox (full page WSJ ad).

    7. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by diesel66 · · Score: 1

      I had mod points, but they only go to +5...

      Either you're in the marketing field, or you're in the wrong line of work. Spot on analysis.

      You should be producing commercials.

      Having been through a fair amount of TV production myself, I've gotten used to looking at this stuff differently, but it seems most folks just swallow...

      (He doesn't have the Borg eye? Well this sure changes my lineup in the fantasy CEO league I play in!)

      --



      eleven plus two / twelve plus one
    8. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not as much as they hate basketball though.

    9. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the commercial succeeded in putting a human ass on the company.

      C'mon! Give them points for truth in advertising at least! ;-)

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    10. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by Deathlizard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just to add onto this...

      This Ad seems like it's starting some sort of theme here. Think about it. Why would one of the richest men in the world shop at a discount shoe store? And to top it off, Not even get correctly fitting shoes until Jerry Bails him out with the size 10's? I'm seeing a pattern of "Cheap isn't always good" and "Don't buy something smaller than what you need". Both of these things are definitely true with Vista. A cheap and small PC with low specs will run Vista, but it's better to go with a higher end PC that fits your needs.

      As for the Ad being a failure, Say what you will, but I can't really say it's a failure because we're talking about it right now on Slashdot. Sure it's in a negative light here, but you know you want to see the next one just for the simple reason of figuring out where Microsoft is trying to go with this campaign. It's been all over the net too, so it's getting the exposure. Now the question remains if the campaign as a whole can deliver.

    11. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by phyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      as someone who helps out on ubuntu forums from time to time, that idea scares the crap out of me.

      --
      Don't point that gun at him, he's an unpaid intern!
    12. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by mrjb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hell, even proving Bill isn't ACTUALLY equipped with a Borg eye is worth a few million.

      Isn't it amazing what they can do with computer graphics nowadays? Even if it cost a few million to edit his Borg eye away, it really looks as if it was never there.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    13. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bill Gates doesn't even work at MS anymore, IIRC, so that just makes it all the more pointless. And how is this supposed to show those middle-aged corporate types that MS is going to fix Vista? They don't want something that is "delicious" -- if they wanted that, they'd buy an Apple. They want to know that the next version of Windows won't be another Vista, or that Vista is going to get fixed. The ad does nothing to reassure anyone of that.

    14. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by u38cg · · Score: 1

      The problem Microsoft have is their brand is so intimately connected with everyone's lives. When you brand MacDonalds, or Sony, or Citibank, your interaction with the brand can be defined and controlled by marketing. You can teach your reps to speak and communicate in a certain way, you can manipulate the perception of the product as Apple does, you can ensure that when people walk in the door they get the same, bland, tasteless burger with acceptable service you get everywhere else. I use Microsoft's product for fifty or sixty hours a week, and every second of that influences my perception of the brand. What can their marketing department do to positively influence my perception of the Microsoft brand? How can they make me feel that if I buy something with that logo on it, it will be snappy, fresh, easy to use, and solve my problems for me?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    15. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      I think the bigger danger here for MS, is that no one will buy their latest and greatest OS release when it comes out. The same people you mentioned that have a resistance to switching to Linux or Apple also have a resistance to upgrading for the same reasons.

      MS Needs to convince them that their new products are worth it.

    16. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      Hell, even proving Bill isn't ACTUALLY equipped with a Borg eye is worth a few million.

      nah, he has the borg implants. The advertisers just used a stand in and/or android of Gates to circumvent said fact.

    17. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by house_of_cards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As for the Ad being a failure, Say what you will, but I can't really say it's a failure because we're talking about it right now on Slashdot. Sure it's in a negative light here, but you know you want to see the next one just for the simple reason of figuring out where Microsoft is trying to go with this campaign. It's been all over the net too, so it's getting the exposure. Now the question remains if the campaign as a whole can deliver.

      Wrong - the ad is newsworthy and being discussed so much because of:

      - the well-publicized $300 million price tag associated with the campaign

      - the also well-publicized dismal reputation Vista has resulting in such an expensive campaign

      - the failed effort Microsoft has made getting people to switch to Vista resulting in the campaign

      - because Microsoft themselves and the OEMs had to offer a downgrade path to placate home and business users who actually wanted, no - DEMANDED to downgrade to XP from Vista due to the endless compatibility problems and performance issues

      - because another recent Microsoft ad campaign ("Mojave") even went so far as to con users into using the product and then doing a "Pepsi taste test" style switcheroo, as if to say "Yeah, we know Vista's reputation is awful, but once you eliminate the negative stigma associated with the Vista name and trick people into using it, it's not so bad", even though the people in the Mojave commercials aren't actually forced to use Vista on a daily basis and do something as simple as install a new device or program, or drag a file to their desktop without being UAC-prompted to death.

      No, the whole reason this commercial is newsworthy is not due to the content of the commercial itself, but due to the steep price tag, the hiring the star of the most successful sit-com of the past 20 years as well as the "Eternal Sunshine" director and the appearance of Gates himself, all in an attempt to shore up the sagging Vista brand which is not nearly as successful as the company hoped it would be.

    18. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by lightversusdark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely disgusting misuse of moderation.

      --
      "There is nothing nice about Steve Jobs and nothing evil about Bill Gates." - Chuck Peddle
    19. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by DuctTape · · Score: 1

      And the commercial succeeded in putting a human ass on the company

      Actually, I was hoping to see Ballmer in there somewhere doing a dance or shouting, "Developers!". That would have made me switch to Windows!

      DT

      --
      Is this thing on? Hello?
    20. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      First, I think what a lot of people have missed here is something basic: The market. Microsoft is not selling their product to the same people that Apple is selling to.

      Your right, Apple buyers are not common folk. They are the elite of society. Buy a mac now and join them.

      Microsoft has to please a lot more middle-aged corporate types,

      But not 20 something start up companies, that they have nothing to do with.

      and a lot of common types.

      vote Obama.

      Even the place this ad premiered reflects that - NFL football game. Not the Oscars, MTV Music awards, American Idol - NFL football game. Domain of white guys.

      NFL... common people. Thank the stars they didn't air in during NASCAR their stock would be through the roof! Seriously are you for real? NFL, American Idol, and MTV=White guys to you? White guys are common folk?

      Second, the point of the ad is not to advertise the product. Microsoft and their ad agency have probably done quite a bit of research and realized that the brand perception of Microsoft is mostly large, faceless, corporate machine.

      Like Coke. Or... MTV... or the NFL... @#$@#$ I'm so white!

      Insert 'evil' in there,

      Exactly NFL, American Idol, MTV, and Microsoft, the Axis of EVIL! EVIL! EVIL!... Where the hell are my sharks with LASERS?

      if you'd like.

      I like.. I like...

      The point of the ad is to put a human face on the company. "Oh look, Microsoft's founder has to buy shoes just like me!"

      Or it's irony.. as in he no one really believes Bill $$$$ Gates actually shops at a discount store for shoes. It's funny get it? No? Well it wasn't that funny.

      Jerry's contribution is to be annoyingly quirky, which allows Bill to be tolerant and 'humor' Jerry. The whole ad is Bill playing along even though you suspect he thinks Jerry is quite odd (also making Bill look not-so-odd by comparison.)

      Jerry Seinfeld is not humored, he humors you, you don't humor Jerry Seinfeld.

      Or it could just be that Bill Gates is tragically unfunny, and needs someone funny in a corporately provable way. The most financially successful sitcom in history fits the Bill.. get it... fit's the Bill... never mind.

      The ad is effective for what Microsoft is trying to accomplish with it.

      Which is what exactly? To win an election by putting a human side to Bill Gates?

      I'm not sure what the goal of this commercial was, other than the setup for what they hope will be a series of commercials as memorable as Apples "I'm a PC" series. But their not off to a roaring start.

      Except with us white guys... we just loved it!

      Keep up the stereo types dude! Not sure where we'd be without those pearls of wisdom to carry us through the ages. Excuse me now, I'm going to go drink beer until I'm in a stupor, beat my wife, and get some sleep for my soulless corporate job tomorrow.

    21. Re:It's a good ad, actually. by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel better, I thought your comment was funny.

  154. Yet Another Opinion by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    The weakness of this particular ad is that it's trying too hard to be funny and it has very little to do with the actual product. It's just...well, weird. And not all that engaging.

    There are lots of ads like this--you see the ad and you can't remember what it was for but you remember the "stunt."

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  155. CBC National News just 'promoed" the ad by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

    CBC National News Radio here in Canada, just did a piece on the ad (at 6PM! the drive show). It was about the negative reception the ad was getting, but then they directed people to the MS site to read MS's explanation that the ad is just a teaser and to get people talking again. I wish my ads were 1/1000 as "ineffective". Watch for a lot more talk about what they'll do next.

  156. What's really weird... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    ... is throughout the Seinfeld TV series, one of the iconic elements of Jerry's apartment was the continual presence of a Macintosh in varying forms. The only item in his apartment that might have been far more recognizable is the Superman figurine on one the shelf in the background.

    It's a really weird disconnect to see Seinfeld hanging out with Bill Gates in a shopping mall knowing this.

    Besides, Batman was far cooler than Superman... so I guess this would make Bill seem cool by comparison.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  157. Re:There's one thing they *didn't* do that stands by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

    That's absolutely true, but when you have 90% marketshare or whatever it is MS has, you are in the position of power. As others have pointed out, MS needs only to keep people from switching and their growth will be whatever the growth in the PC industry is. Apple needs to convince people that their OS is the "better" one, which means they need to steal market share from MS. So, they put out attack ads. I hate to say it, but it works for politicians quite well, why shouldn't it work for computers?

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
  158. First goal of brand advertising: remember the ad by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    There are actually several kinds of ads. Some aim to be informative (notice of a sale for instance), whereas others are "brand" advertising that simply seek to make you aware of a certain product or company.

    The first goal of brand advertising is that the viewer should remember the ad. Without that there is no point in it at all.

    The second goal is that the viewer should remember the company or brand being advertised. Again--no point in it without that.

    The third goal is that the ad become the subject of conversations (aka going viral). This extends your advertising dollar since other people spread it for free. And, some studies seem to indicate that you will be more receptive to the same ad if it is conveyed by your friend rather than viewed cold.

    The fourth goal is that the ad creates a positive feeling about the product. It seems weird that this would be so low but it is honestly not that important from a brand advertising point of view. Of course you don't want to create or reinforce a negative opinion about the product or service, but that is a pretty low bar. As long as you don't do that, ads can be weird, pointless, or even unpleasant, just so long as they are memorable and chattable.

    So by those criteria, with their first new ad Microsoft has scored very well on items 1, 2, and 3, and have not violated number 4. So far so good (we're all talking about it after all). I think later ads in the series will go harder for number 4.

    [Note: here on /. we have no shortage of knowledge or memory of Microsoft, so we're not really the target audience. The random people in sports bars and watching TV at home are.]

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  159. Silly Gates... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

    It's Apples that are delicious. Windows are transparent.

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
  160. I meant this as a joke, but... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    I meant this as a joke, but I actually think the vista ad I created
    http://algorithman.de/storage/new_vista_ad.jpg
    will sell more vista copies than THIS piece of crap...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  161. errrrr... by redcore · · Score: 1

    I'm no MS crony...but I didn't think it was nearly that bad. I, for one, realized that they're not trying to sell the MS product...but rather associate it with being fun and light-hearted. I know that MS has a history (habit?) of blatantly ripping things off - and most of you seem pretty surprised that it's not a direct rip off of the Apple/Mac commercials (I suppose I can't blame you there) - but I didn't expect some big punch to the face badass ad or something. Even if it was, most of you would hate it regardless...so, how is your opinion really THAT credible? Bias undermines a reasonable review.

    I picked up all the jokes - and even thought the "leather" one was pretty funny and delivered well by Gates himself. I think a lot of you wanted it to say "Hey, you hate us - but we're sorry!" or something...which would be retarded anyways. Repairing their reputation is going to take more than one commercial, that's for sure...but this one isn't a bad first step.

  162. Windows sucks ass!!! (SCNR!) by flnca · · Score: 1

    I couldn't stop laughing after seeing that commercial!! Bill Gates in a circus (as if to say "it's all a big show, you know, being rich and famous is mainly useful for the press"), and if we want something nice and chewy, the answer is Bill Gates' ass! And Windows!

    (BTW, perhaps that meant to say "kiss my ass, I'm not working for Microsoft anymore, I spend my time shopping now.")

    I'll give Gates a couple of smart points for doing that ad, but it certainly won't make me buy Windows now ... only a flawless, well-designed OS can. I hope I'll live to see that. Aah, a nice delicious, bug-free Windows ... the stuff of dreams ...

  163. I suspect its supposed to be an introduction by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    I think it might just be the beginning of a $300,000,000 story arc, starring Seinfeld with cameo appearances made by Vista, and possibly MS Bob as the real comic relief.
    Just a hunch really, I have nothing to back this up other than the initial add which would make No Fucking Sense otherwise.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    1. Re:I suspect its supposed to be an introduction by flnca · · Score: 1

      I think it might just be the beginning of a $300,000,000 story arc,

      Man, don't remind me of that, what a waste of money! It would've been better invested in Windows development, or generally, in software (or other) development.

  164. booty shake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looked like a fart to me.

  165. Brilliant. by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    For everyone that doesn't "get it", here's the explanation.

    Microsoft has a giant turd called Vista, and everyone knows it (apparently even the higher ups at Microsoft). So any mention of Vista at this point will be a colossal mistake. With this ad, Microsoft is trying to change its image by being funny. People like funny. (I thought the ad was actually quite funny, and I don't even like Microsoft).

    What this ad tells me is that Microsoft knows Vista is a failure, and they aren't going to change that. Microsoft has taken the longer term approach and is trying to change their image. Windows is now a commodity (in the broader definition of the word), and you don't sell commodities by telling people how great they are. You sell commodities through Brand, and Microsoft is trying to identify its brand with upbeat, funny, and not as serious. I doubt it's going to sell them more Vista machines, but if they keep it up it might save them from being seen as an also-ran.

    --
    AccountKiller
  166. Re:Needs more Larry David by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A commercial that lacks depth? Do you really know what a commercial is, and what the meaning of advertising is?

  167. Paging Ed McMahon by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to Star Search?

  168. I'm pretty sure I'm dumber now. by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure I'm dumber now from watching that..

    I think its safe to say Microsoft has fallen flat on its face yet again. Bill Gates demeanor in the add is just off.. its not funny, and its main point is what? "Bill Gates is the smartest guy on the planet and he thinks hes rubbing off on people??" .. I don't know its just utterly confusing.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  169. A lot of people here... by stubear · · Score: 1

    ...are missing the bigger picture. This is ad #1 of a series that will unfold to tell a larger story about Vista. The ads are done by Crispin Porter + Bogusky who have developed some of the best and most memorable ads in the industry. I'm holding off judgement until ad #2 or 3 at the very least. Also remember that any publicity is good publicity and while it's no surprise people on Slashdot didn't like the ad (or aren't admitting it anyway - CP+B could have done the PC v Mac ads only in reverse and you guys would still be a bunch of haters) you are talking about and distributing the ad to potentially millions of internet viewers, many of whom might not be so rabid anti-ms weenies.

    1. Re:A lot of people here... by flnca · · Score: 1

      many of whom might not be so rabid anti-ms weenies.

      My weenie went limp when I saw that ad ...

      My primary gripe with Windows as a user is that Vista always dies when you try doing something useful with it (like multi-booting with various types of UNIX). God, they fucked even that up.

      My gripe with it as a software developer is that the sheer number and complexity of its APIs has increased so much that it's impossible to be a complete programming expert for Windows anymore. Most people either do a bit of Win32 or .NET, but seeing the big picture of Windows programming has become increasingly difficult in the past decades.

      Fuck that, I'm using UNIX-type systems only now, whenever possible, they're clean, clear and logical compared to Windows, and in some aspects far easier to program. Especially when it comes to speed.

      The GNU project should launch an ad about GNU/Linux: You see something like a city and black things are flitting about almost too fast to see them. Nothing else happens. Then, the ground quakes, and a giant dinosaur slowly stomps into the scene, observing it. Then the view starts to slow down, and you recognize that all the black things flitting about were actually Tuxes, the Linux mascot. And then the dinosaur says with a slow voice: "Damn, I didn't think they would be so fast!"

  170. Same ol', same ol' by deets101 · · Score: 1

    But Seinfeld is funny, right? A show about nothing, thats funny, right? Maybe back in the 90's, a.k.a. Last decade.
    This is just like Microsoft, jumping on the bandwagon a little too late. TCP/IP, Internet browsing, web advertising, sound familiar anyone?

    --

    --
    My parents went to Slashdot and all I got was this lousy sig.
  171. I'm not sure what you would expect... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    We're talking Jerry Seinfeld here. I've never understood what anyone sees in that guy-- I've tried to sit through his stuff now and then and I don't find it the least bit funny. Obviously he appeals to something in people that I just don't have. I've found it most peculiar because I usually find most comedians who make it to TV funny. He seems like someone's little brother trying to be funny but just isn't quite bad enough to be funny-corny, funny-awful or even funny-pathetic, he's just boring.

    And the bass-guitar punctuation of the show I find unusually annoying as well. I can't sit through that for more than a few moments, and can't change the channel or pop in a DVD fast enough. I guess I just don't have the Seinfeld gene.

  172. Re:Needs more Larry David by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    No, I'm sorry, I don't think Larry David is enough to make Seinfeld funny. And I don't think his stand-up act is either. The only think I've ever found Seinfeld to be is utterly boring...

  173. Re:Needs more Larry David by fartmasterB · · Score: 1

    I used to think Jerry Seinfeld was a weak actor based on his TV performance, but he looks like Daniel Day Lewis compared to Bill Gates.

  174. I've got it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I've got it.

    The Conquistador is Mojave (is... a Windows product currently available for you).
    When you first see it in the store, it looks like it's going to be a great fit, but then when you walk around in it for a while, it might pinch a little. Not a lot, just enough to be subtly annoying.

    But that's all okay, because Jerry Seinfeld is here to show us how to make it fit us. Because it's a good product, it just "runs tight".

    (Um... yeah. I still don't want to think about how Gates' ass factors in...)

    Wow. I haven't had that much trouble figuring out an ad since I saw Mike Gravel's campaign ad about "a rock".

  175. Infinity - Absurditi (Boomer's Song) by argent · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the funkiest ad since the "Infiniti" intro that David Horsey skewered so effectively in "Boomer's Song"... Stanley Doobie bought an "Absurditi" and ended up with a Bonsai plant that represented "the idea of the car".

    Vista isn't an operating system... it's the *idea* of an operating system.

  176. so whats the deal with microsoft? by mojo1517 · · Score: 1

    I thought it was funny...but then again I'm a Seinfeld fan. Of course I could do without Bill Gates shaking his ass at the end.

  177. Very Effective Advertising... by sitarlo · · Score: 1

    If people are blogging about a stupid TV commercial then the commercial itself is effective. This is a brand commercial so they don't need to talk about specific products or even the company. The commercial is designed to make people write and talk about the Microsoft brand and from what I can see it's working quite well.

  178. $300m wasted. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    If they have $300M to burn, perhaps they should have used that to make better cooler products. It just shows that they have too much money from too expensive products.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  179. Wow by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has just obsoleted every single FAIL pic on bchan. No more fat kids, crashed cars, train wrecks, fat chicks falling off of horses, etc. Now when anyone wants to post FAIL, they're going to have to link to screencaps of this episode with a caption saying "Microsoft spent $300 million trying to convince you Vista doesn't suck instead of fixing it."

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  180. Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, tell me I'm not the first on Slashdot to have noticed that reference.

  181. Format my brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bad imagery: Bill Gates in the shower. Why!

  182. Kinda funny by chrispycreeme · · Score: 1

    I know I am probably in the minority here in hate-microsoft.central but I thought the ad was kinda funny. Normally Bill is kind of a dick I hear but I guess he can be funny too.

  183. switch to apple?? what about ubuntu?? by nairbv · · Score: 0, Troll

    "it should fold up its tent and tell the world to switch to Apple." ?!?!? what about ubuntu??

  184. That'll teach me not to preview. by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Damn.

    I meant "dildo", not "douchebag".

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  185. I learned on Slashdot... by SuperMonkeyCube · · Score: 1
    that there is no such thing as a bad commercial. Back when I was newer here... funny, I don't see it in my history...Anyway, I got told that if I didn't understand a commercial or the mechanism whereby the commercial was supposed to work was so transparent to me as to be laughable, it's not because it's a bad commercial - it's because I'm not who the commercial is targeted to.

    Mind you, I was told that by that "A.C." guy, and most of the rest of his response was inflammatory, but I have grown up a little after having received that beatdown.

    The only conclusion I can draw from having watched the Jerry & Bill show, is either they're not marketing to me, so I'm free to go get another copy of Hardy Heron, or there must be another part to the commercial that we haven't seen yet and this first commercial is just warming us up to the dynamic between our two characters.

    (Oops. It's after 11. I must go mindlessly buy everything they advertise on Adult Swim.)

  186. Just a starter by speedingant · · Score: 1

    I think this ad was just meant to be an introduction to the characters. They will release more of them, probably more to the point, and *I'm hoping* funnier.

    It didn't really strike me as being imaginative though, and it did leave me a little bemused as to what it was about. I prefer the Apple ones personally ; )

  187. They need a better writer... by dskoll · · Score: 1

    ... someone who can capture some of the original Seinfeld show:

    Jerry: So, why do you think they used blue for the Windows Blue Screen of Death?

    George: What? How the heck do I know? Weren't you buying shoes the other day with Bill Gates? Why didn't you ask?

    Jerry: Hmm... I dunno. Could've been awkward, don't you think? I just met the guy; do I really want to mention Blue Screen of Death?

    George: Why not? You're not on a date. If anyone knows, he knows. Ask him!

    Jerry: I dunno...

    George: Well, do you want to know or not? Ask him; he knows! He knows!

    (Elaine enters)

    Elaine: Who knows?

    Jerry: The screen of death.

    Elaine: Is that a new movie?

    George: No, no, the screen of death. The blue one. You know, Windows.

    Elaine: I would've preferred it in pink. Much more flattering.

    George: You want a flattering screen of death? What the heck is that? I can't believe it.

    (Kramer bursts in)

    Kramer:: HWOAH!!! Jerry, you know what I heard? Bill Gates hired Newman to infiltrate this Linux thing and change it's screen of death to orange! It's supposed to be the most psychologically-disturbing color!

    Elaine: What? Where did you hear that?

    Kramer:: It's true!

    Jerry: So, did it work?

    Kramer:: I dunno. It seems no-one's gotten this Linux thing to crash.

  188. Apologies to Shaq by writermike · · Score: 1

    "Jerry, tell me how my ass tastes."

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  189. i dunno... by mustardayonnaise · · Score: 1

    ...i liked it.

  190. Slow, unfocused, and what's the point? by smchris · · Score: 1

    Yup, it's Microsoft.

  191. Re:There's one thing they *didn't* do that stands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'cept in ad number two, Gates will drop trou and take a giant steaming dump on an iPod.

  192. Hilarious video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this was absolutely hilarious. I know this is being hated on just because it's a Microsoft ad. If Apple had done it we'd have people praising it up and down. It felt like I was watching an episode of Seinfeld but with a lot of jokes crammed together which I didn't mind.

  193. I get it by emaname · · Score: 1

    Billy is the 'Conquistador' or literally 'the Conqueror.' Jerry is the bumbling public, ignorant and undirected. Jerry brings a sacrifice to the great conquistador to pay homage, gain an audience with the conqueror, and seek guidance.

    After asking for enlightenment re new computers, Billy shakes (blech!) his butt. What this really means is 'All your dollars and business and computers are owned by me and now you can kiss my posterior.'

    The reference to computers like cake is this. Billy's perception is that we the public are ignorant, living in a void, lacking any technical skill and understanding whatsoever. He, being a legend in his own mind, has great clarity of thought and can foresee the future of technology. And so he has created the greatest of all operating systems which is called Vista. BUT, we have scorned it. So now he figuratively says, 'Let them eat cake.' (I know HE doesn't actually say that, that's why it's figurative. It's the point in the... ah, dialog? ...and implies the true meaning within the message.

    It was a brilliantly disguised slap in the face to all of us. And the bonus is that an incredibly mediocre 'comedian' (and I use that term loosely) gets $10 million for it. Hey Jerry, it's time to write your memoirs.

    --
    An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
  194. Then they are going after the wrong market by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They GOT the white football fan. You do NOT suck up to your existing customers, you just give them good deals but not fancy smancy ads because they are already buying your product.

    You aim a new commercial campaign setup to change the opinion of a product with the group who needs its opinion changed. That is the mac-whores, the linux-nerds and the XP-lusers. The middle age white guy who uses Vista because that is what came with his dell doesn't need to be convinced to buy Vista.

    No, I think this case is far simpler. Advertising companies don't sell products, they sell ads. This advertisement company sold itself to Microsoft and this ad was just the by-product of it. It has no more aim then to get money out of MS and if that is done by convincing Bill Gates that he should shake his ass to the camera with an tv-star who hasn't starred in years, then so be it.

    This ad has an audience of one and its name is Gates.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Then they are going after the wrong market by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that you've never worked in advertising. Image advertising is a significant and valuable part of an overall marketing strategy, even for a well-known and well-established company like Microsoft. Heck, especially for a company like Microsoft, which at this point could only worsen its public image by actively murdering its customers.

      I also have to disagree with your statement "You do NOT suck up to your existing customers, you just give them good deals but not fancy smancy ads because they are already buying your product." Disregarding your current customers in your marketing campaign is a ruinous idea- even more so when your current customers make up over 90% of the market and your market share is being steadily eroded by a competitor who is perceived as cool and sexy and whose products are generally regarded as superior (I'm speaking in generalities of public perception here, not making a claim either way regarding reality).

      Apple recently had their highest sales quarter ever - something which happens so frequently now that it's no longer considered noteworthy. Presumably the consistent sales increases aren't because their established customer base has decided to start buying 2 or 3 new Macs every 3 months. Those new customers are coming from the very group that you suggest Microsoft should disregard in its advertising.

      Now don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that I think that the ad is good. Personally (and I fully admit that I have a strong bias against Microsoft), the nicest thing I can say about the ad is that people can no longer point to Vista as the most pointless waste of money to come out of Redmond. ;-)

      I do agree with you that the ad was likely written with an eye toward amusing Bill by letting him appear on TV with Seinfeld and shake his ass at the world.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    2. Re:Then they are going after the wrong market by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Mmm, well you work in advertising?

      That is really my point, it is advertising companies who claim that brand image is important and that ads like these are the way to improve it. Well, excuse me for being a bit doubtfull about the bias.

      Has Apple increased its sales because of advertising OR because it simply made good products? Did the iPod ads sell iPods or did iPods sell iPods? The answer seems clear to me, first off, Apple hasn't always done well but always done those brand image ads. So it always done the ads, but not always had success with them. Yet word of mouth about the quality of its products has increased sales when the products were good and descreased it when they were bad.

      Brand image is important and the right ad can help re-inforce it but I think that if you got a bad image any ad, especially one like this, is just going to re-inforce peoples negative image of your company as someone who is trying to sell shit in a fancy wrapper.

      Yes, ads work, to build on what is already there. If people are buying your crap, your ads can make them buy more, but if people see your crap for the crap it is, you ad will just be throwing good money away.

      Say I punch you in the stomach, then I put up an ad campaign to lure you back in range. Will you fall for it? Ever? No, of course not.

      On the other hand, if I gave you a cake, and then advertised that I got another cake, you probably would come around AND tell your friends that this guy advertising cake to your cake seeking friends.

      That is what Apple has done, it started selling quality and now when it advertises a new item, their existing customers buy it because of their previous reputation and don't hestitate recommending it to others.

      I have had to deal with this type of advertising, the rebranding or Telfort (dutch telecom) to o2 and back to telfort again, lot of marketing crap about brand image. The guy in the street didn't give a shit. All the talk about O2 and oxygen and breath of fresh air was completly and utterly wasted.

      I seen advertising and worked in it, as the guy who had to implement a specific font because that font represented what the company stood for despite the fact that no OS in the world had it natively so we either had to get users to install a new font for our site OR render all text as images.

      There is a lot of money to be made in the brand advertising market, but I feel better selling porn.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  195. Take 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it would have worked better with Ballmer and Seinfeld....

  196. Microsoft: Save $200m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's really funny about this? It's a $400 million marketing campaign and it's going to do the reverse of what's intended: it's going to turn people off of the brand. That's a waste of money.
    I could do that for half as much. Microsoft: pay me $200m and I'll do nothing. People will be turned off by the brand. The product speaks for itself. See? You saved money!

  197. Why cake? by onemorechip · · Score: 1

    Why not a Junior Mint? It's peppermint, it's chocolate, it's delicious!

    --
    But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  198. This ad really does work... by symbolset · · Score: 0, Troll

    Actually, this ad does work...

    _

    .

    ÿ

    About as well as their software.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  199. Dumbest ad ever by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Starring an asshole and a has been. I'll leave it up to you to figure out which one is which. Seinfeld was a mediocre comedian and his show was the most over-rated in the history of television.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  200. I am not rickrolling you I swear... by ipX · · Score: 1
  201. Bill Gates is believed by many to be EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone sees Microsoft as pure EVIL... and everyone associates Bill Gates with Microsoft in the same way Steve Jobs is related to Apple.... maybe more.

    The ad portraits Bill Gates as a cool down to earth guy that goes and buys shoes where most people buys... and eats churros... and uses discount cards, etc etc....

    So.... Bill Gates is attempting to portray an image of "the good humble guy".... in a world where Steve Jobs have this clear super ego and rock star status, and that image like he feeds himself from babies... it does quite make sense for me as the first step of a MS campaign.

    By making Bill Gates look like a "cool guy" they make Microsoft look as a "cool company".... and while at that... they make Apple look as a bad company... because you know that the guy that attacks the good humble guy is just plain bad and evil...

    And since the Apple campaign is based on attacking Windows defects, the outcome of this campaign will be either Apple looking evil... or forcing Apple to change their strategy and stop attacking MS.... on either case MS wins.... because by association people will stop looking at them as a BAD EVIL MONOPOLISTIC COMPANY... and will start perceiving them "the good guys" (even if they are not).

    IMHO the ad is a hit, and is a good first step for a good campaign to develop.

  202. It caught your attention though, didn't it? by master_p · · Score: 1

    Ads don't have to be good. They can be stupid, but as long as they get the audience's attention, they've done their job. And, judging from the article on /. and the reactions, it did.

  203. Not an anti-Mac ad by dud83 · · Score: 1

    This isn't an anti-mac ad, that's how you can't make sense of it... It's trying to tell you "if you buy cheap (Asus Eee, Aspire One etc), you get crap".
    Buy cheap shoes, they don't fit. You get a stupid discount which everyone knows is so minute it doesn't matter in the long run. Buy cheap OS they don't work blah blah blah. IMO this ad is almost helping sell Macintosh, as it's even more expensive than Microsoft. But I don't think MS cares so much about Apple now because they shifted towards iPod, iPhone and other integrated products...

  204. Microsoft + Seinfeld Commercial: by Donovon · · Score: 1

    Epic Fail.

  205. Is this a first??? One actor paying the other?? by tkjtkj · · Score: 1

    I cant recall any commercial ive ever seen that had one of the actors paying the other ... or perhaps there's some 'higher level accounting methodologies' that could be used to obfuscate the reality of it?? CPA's ...! Tell us !

    --
    "There are 11 kinds of people: those who know binary, those who don't, and those who could not care less!"
  206. The public is dumb, not the ad by swissfondue · · Score: 1

    Obviously the public is just too stupid to get the ad. That is why Microsoft had to explain it to everyone: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/windows/featureStories.aspx?story=660dee9e-9606-4e77-843e-ed81d83c0bfe

    --
    Rubies and Pearls are not what you think.
  207. Reading ass gestures by uebernoob · · Score: 1

    Gates wiggles his rear to answer in the affirmative

    I thought that was a very obvious 'NO'. To affirm to the question he should have 'nodded' his ass. But even a 49 billion dollar man does not have the muscles to do that.

  208. It's a 10! by juggledean · · Score: 1
    It's a setup. All those associations. Those knowing head nods. It's leather.

    Speak softly and carry a big churro.

    Did you notice before the resemblance between the windows logo and the del.ico.us logo.

    http://delicious.com/tag/gates

  209. Hi, I am a ... by satyakam · · Score: 1

    Mac (Masterful Apple Commercial) and I am a PC (Pointless Commercial)

  210. Amused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha, can you people that bash this ad see what your doing. Like it or not, the ad has this place buzzing. If you don't like the ad, stop writing about, that how Microsoft will tell if there ad was a success. They will look out on the internet, and see all these posts and articles about it, big success to Microsoft. You people amuse me.

  211. UK not US by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Have you ever watched TV in other countries? If it's not reruns of old stuff from the US, It's knock-offs like [insert country here] Idol.

    Sorry to burst your bubble but it is the other way around. The US shows are knock-offs of programs in the UK: The Office, Who Wants to be a Millionaire, Weakest Link,... etc. Even American Idol started as 'Pop Idol' in the UK...although there are certain similarities to the US presidential election procedure so perhaps we could give you that one.

  212. Good grief... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked the ad. It was what it was and actually made me think Microsoft might be more thoughtful, sensible, and creative than I thought they were. I'm an Apple user but might consider a non-Apple, in part based upon this ad.

  213. Forgiveness... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    I will never forgive them for Internet Explorer.

    You should - why else do you think Firefox is so popular that companies have to make their websites work with it?

  214. Suggestion for next Ad by maestroX · · Score: 1
    • furniture store with Steve Ballmer
    • RMS walks in and does suggestion.

    Most people can relate to that.

  215. People are wayyyy too serious.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of you are way too uptight. It is a commercial for Heaven sakes.

    Everybody is soooo anti-MS. Give them a brake. I never really understood what all the bitchin was about over Vista anyways. Works rock solid on my laptop.

    Some of you are just anti everything. Sometimes, blind brand-loyalty is referred to as stupidity.

  216. Re:Needs more Larry David by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 1

    No, needs more cowbell.

  217. So...why does Preston Gralla's opinion matter? by notaprguy · · Score: 1

    This whole debate on one TV ad is really funny. We have hundreds of tech journalists and geeks trolling blogs providing their insightful commentary on whether the ad is effective or not. Ever pause to wonder whether (1) tech journalists or geeks are good judges of advertising and (2) whether tech journalists and geeks are the target audience for the ads? To me the ads are mildly funny but that's really not the point. The point, I'm guessing, is to show Microsoft's human side. Most consumers experience Microsoft only through products, features, technology. This is a way of showing a different side of the company. They're also telling a fairly subtle story around PC's as a device for the people...not the elites. I'm sure they'll go on to show some of the ways that people can use PC's to do interesting things and actually mention Windows. But if you wanted or expected them to start talking speeds and feeds then you're clearly missing the point. Regarding direct compete with Apple...Microsoft would have been really dumb to try to out-cool Apple. Nobody can do that. Apple is a company of cool people making products for people who are or who think they're cool. Apple produces great products that are used by a relatively small number of people. Microsoft is a company of geeks producing products that are used by the masses...hundreds of milliions or billions of people. Microsoft is not trying to be cool. They're trying to be relevant. Whether they'll be successful is hard to say.

  218. What the..... by Mind+H4x0r · · Score: 1

    At least with the Apple ads you knew what you were watching.... I really had no idea what I was looking at with this commercial.

  219. Future is Chewable Delicious Apples by leezJohn · · Score: 1

    I think what they meant with the add is the Future will be Chewable Delicious Apples.

  220. HUH??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ah to lazy to log in.
    so just watched the ad and
    WHAT THE HELL was that supposed to be ???
    and yep I now want a churro
    blast it all. tasty treat.

  221. Jason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The choice of a discount shoestore is to send the message that Microsoft is "putting itself in people's shoes." You can see that the initial pair (old Windows) did not quite fit, yet the salesman (old Microsoft) gave an excuse ("they'll stretch.) Then Microsoft listened to expert opinion (Seinfeld the shoe expert), and the result was a 10 for the consumer. To recap, Jerry asked Microsoft to give a signal whether they'll ever listen to consumers' complaints, to which Bill gave a positive answer: with this ad and with the wiggling of his butt.

  222. Lickable vs. Delicious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had trouble finding a source, but wasn't Steve Jobs quoted years ago as wanting an OS interface that was "lickable" or something like that?

    Now Microsoft is describing an OS experience as "delicious"?

    Is this poking fun or is MS copying?

  223. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  224. Re: MS mind control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jerry plays a quirky but insignificant role in this ad. The real message here is that which typifies the tremendous damage that MS has done to what could have been an enlightened and educational experience with the PC and in a larger sense the tech-world around us.

    Instead, BG and minions have eviscerated the mind of our youth and taught them to sit mindlessly in front of "cute" little ads such as this one. The result is a population that neither knows nor cares about how or why anything gets done. All they care about is whether a product is "new" or when they push a virtual button do some pretty colors appear or does an mp3 start playing.

    MS introduced personal computing to the world and then proceeded to bastardize, soil and defile all the hard work done by the real pioneers from whom they stole all this technology.

    The ad does precisely what intended.....distract the user from the actual efficacy of the product and give them a "cutesy" mindless 90 seconds of ignorant bliss. The only thing the average PC user will remember is - cute ad, Windows Logo, something to eat and the word "future". In two days they will mysteriously find themselves at the nearest big box store swiping their Mastercard ....buying a new Vista PC.

  225. Perfect Vista Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who intentionally purchase Vista find themselves asking WTF they did that for.

    Those who intentionally watch this commercial find themsevles asking WTF they did that for.

    Its Microsoft saying, 'Look we're so big and have so much control that not only can we turn out a shitty operating system and people will buy it, but we can advertise it with an equally worthless commercial and sell a ton of copies thanks to the free press when everyone says the commercial was lame. Its nice to have morons for customers'

  226. Jerry allows us to mock Vista by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    It's obvious that Jerry doesn't know anything about computers or he wouldn't be asking the question at the end, and if he knew about the utter crap in Vista he'd probably have refused to do the add campaign.

    This whole campaign is idiotic and will provide lambs for the slaughter. They more they praise it the more people will poke holes and create even worse public impression.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  227. huh... haha... ha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't get it at all, but I still laughed. The funniest I've seen Seinfeld since... Seinfeld. :(

  228. i thought it was for abstenence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i anticipate a shortlived spike in abstenence.

  229. Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 19 year old son who saw the Gates/Seinfeld ad set in the shoe store. He watched the entire ad and asked me this question. "Is Bill Gates gay?" My son watched the ad and thought his question was valid. He was not making fun, he now has a question as to weatger Bill Gates is gay. I don't think that was the intended message.