MySQL 5 may be worth a look. I'm not saying it's at the level of the other databases, but it does now support I believe all the features you mentioned. And if you set strict SQL mode, a lot of the other gripes about data handling go away as well.
What you say is true for MyISAM tables, but MySQL's InnoDB tables fully support row-level locking. And I believe their BDB tables support page-level locking.
The OP succinctly and humorously made several valid points:
1) Global warming is occurring everywhere in the solar system due to increased solar activity.
2) This fact is completely unknown to most everybody who "believes" (as you put it) that global warming is a crisis.
3) The fact of extraterrestrial warming is glossed over entirely by scientists and media presenting information to the public because it would "damage the cause".
Your "unbiased" "scientific" mindset causes you to be ready to jump down the throats of anyone who voices a contrary opinion. It apparently has deleterious effects on the sense of humor as well.
You're certainly right about that. But in a case like this where the "dictatorship" gives us an awful lot of software while oppressing nobody, I'm okay with letting the dreamers dream and letting the "temporary" system keep working.
He said the future is in unlicensed software. Which, IIRC, was the end-game goal for GPL. GPL is a temporary system to enforce freedom in an age of copyright restrictions. If software in the future becomes truly unlicensed, then there's no need for GPL.
The only way that POTBS is newsworthy, is if they got off their asses and added ninjas and robots to the mix. And blackjack and hookers. In fact, forget the pirates, ninjas, and robots.
Fortunately, you renew for several years AND the last time you renewed was not while this bug was affecting Debian! With your method you'd be really screwed if it were.
The only time you should serve XHTML as text/html is when it's XHTML 1.0, with special care taken to keep backward compatibility in mind.
And as for 88 errors, well, if you're not going to be valid, why declare a document type? This isn't difficult stuff. That's 88 more errors than there should be.
Yes, who would do business with such an entity. Probably about as many as would trust their business hosting to a company who declares its home page to be XHTML 1.1 but then serves it as text/html. Not to mention the 88 validation errors.
The point is you can't jump straight for the "nuclear" option. Although to be honest I wouldn't use such a Web host.
So after the problems with thalidomide were discovered, people would have continued to clamor for it, had it not been against the law?
You haven't cited anything the FDA does to prevent antibiotic resistance, only asserted that it exists. I guess it's a good thing we have an FDA, or people would get antibiotics for a common cold, and antibiotics would be put in animal feeds. Oh wait.
Well, I would say that carbon caps and trading would fall under category a) above. Such policies would be government artificially and arbitrarily adding costs, according to the political winds.
Some people insist on using whatever environmentalists say as the final quantification of all things, despite the fact that there are many things they cannot measure responsibly.
Slashdot Mirror
It's a series of tubes.
I have a PC, but as a Linux user I'm left out too! You mean it's only for Windows, not for "PC".
Brilliant paper; thank you for linking it.
Febtober!
Ah, Dvorak gibberish. I'd recognize it anywhere. Lovely layout, isn't it?
...the submitter picks up on the worst one. There's plenty of landfill space. Really. There are plenty of other ways this is a terrible idea.
MySQL 5 may be worth a look. I'm not saying it's at the level of the other databases, but it does now support I believe all the features you mentioned. And if you set strict SQL mode, a lot of the other gripes about data handling go away as well.
What you say is true for MyISAM tables, but MySQL's InnoDB tables fully support row-level locking. And I believe their BDB tables support page-level locking.
This is one of those cases where "effect" is a verb.
That appears to be a parked domain...
The OP succinctly and humorously made several valid points:
1) Global warming is occurring everywhere in the solar system due to increased solar activity.
2) This fact is completely unknown to most everybody who "believes" (as you put it) that global warming is a crisis.
3) The fact of extraterrestrial warming is glossed over entirely by scientists and media presenting information to the public because it would "damage the cause".
Your "unbiased" "scientific" mindset causes you to be ready to jump down the throats of anyone who voices a contrary opinion. It apparently has deleterious effects on the sense of humor as well.
You're certainly right about that. But in a case like this where the "dictatorship" gives us an awful lot of software while oppressing nobody, I'm okay with letting the dreamers dream and letting the "temporary" system keep working.
He said the future is in unlicensed software. Which, IIRC, was the end-game goal for GPL. GPL is a temporary system to enforce freedom in an age of copyright restrictions. If software in the future becomes truly unlicensed, then there's no need for GPL.
Imagine what Fedora 9 would have done to UbuntuDupe's hard drive!!
Fortunately, you renew for several years AND the last time you renewed was not while this bug was affecting Debian! With your method you'd be really screwed if it were.
This should have been in the advisory. Under the circumstances I don't want to assume that I know what I'm doing.
Sorry, that's wrong: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary
The only time you should serve XHTML as text/html is when it's XHTML 1.0, with special care taken to keep backward compatibility in mind.
And as for 88 errors, well, if you're not going to be valid, why declare a document type? This isn't difficult stuff. That's 88 more errors than there should be.
Yes, who would do business with such an entity. Probably about as many as would trust their business hosting to a company who declares its home page to be XHTML 1.1 but then serves it as text/html. Not to mention the 88 validation errors.
The point is you can't jump straight for the "nuclear" option. Although to be honest I wouldn't use such a Web host.
(And the last two are somewhat at odds with each other...)
So after the problems with thalidomide were discovered, people would have continued to clamor for it, had it not been against the law?
You haven't cited anything the FDA does to prevent antibiotic resistance, only asserted that it exists. I guess it's a good thing we have an FDA, or people would get antibiotics for a common cold, and antibiotics would be put in animal feeds. Oh wait.
This fellow has the solution. Why can the government override me and my doctor on deciding whether it's safe for me to take a drug?
I think this calls for some field research!
Well, I would say that carbon caps and trading would fall under category a) above. Such policies would be government artificially and arbitrarily adding costs, according to the political winds.
Some people insist on using whatever environmentalists say as the final quantification of all things, despite the fact that there are many things they cannot measure responsibly.