she did fuck up but also she did learn her lesson and is now a wonderful surgeon
My dad was treated by an oncologist in Michigan for cancer. I'm sure he'll learn his lesson, but he should NEVER be allowed to practice again. https://www.cnn.com/2015/07/10...
If you read the article you linked to, it points out that Adams correctly states that Trump wasn't referring to the supremacists, but to people who were pro and anti statue. So, you're doing exactly what Adams points out...taking it out of context.
“I mean, my favorite example is Charlottesville,” Adams said. “When there was a protest about pro- and anti-statues and the president said that there were fine people on both sides, that was reported as he says there were fine people in the racist group, you know, the white supremacists.” “That wasn’t really the context. The context was pro-statue, anti-statue,” Adams continued.
Just to be clear, knowing how to negotiate without offending the other person is a skill that needs to be developed. I've more than once made the person I was negotiating with very angry.
Agreed, but then it can be okay to make the other person angry depending upon the relationship you need to maintain with them. If it's a one-off negotiation (new car purchase for example), who cares. But if it's your future boss, well that's a entirely different story.
that's assuming the men were even made to negotiate. good chance they just walked in and got given their wage
Typical comment from someone who clearly doesn't understand how to negotiate. If you were one of the ones who "walked in and got given their wage" then you're clueless and deserve what you were given. Nobody forced you to accept it.
It would appear that there's plenty of blame to go around. And while it's all fun and games to point the finger at the big corporation, WTF are you going to do to fix the problem when it's a highly regulated public utility? Sorry, but CA brought this upon itself with screwed up laws, regulations, lawsuits, lack of proper forest management, etc. Do you think some other utility is suddenly going to pop up to replace them? All of these lawsuits end up being effectively paid for by the taxpayers because the cost gets passed along.
Yup, just like any large company, there are always some assholes. IMO it would be "hilarious, awesome, and valuable" if they had done it on their own time. Not so much when they implicate the business they work for.
How many different companies did Elizabeth Warren submit her DNA to before she could claim to be a Native American?
FWIW, my daughter did only one, and it showed a sliver of Native American, which was most definitely an error...anticipating the jokers here to comment. Her other half is 100% Korean, and I have no Native American lineage. Our guess is that there's some commonality between Koreans and Native Americans that's too close to call for them.
Certainly that's your choice, and nobody should argue against it.
In my old age, I've become more interested in my family genealogy, so doing an Ancestry kit about a year ago was very enlightening. My folks were divorced when I was still in diapers, so I knew next to nothing about my father's side since there was no contact. And, what I thought I knew about my mother's side was quickly tossed out the window. I knew her parents had German ancestry, but after getting my results back and spending just a few hours of searching back, I discovered French, Irish, Scottish, English and Polish lineage along with the German all the way back to the 1400s, and documentation to go with it. Along with a couple of Civil War officers buried about a hundred miles south of me, and some Scottish lords and ladies. Does it really mean anything...no, but it's kinda fun.
FWIW, I'm 100% American, but it doesn't make me any less of a mutt who was curious where he came from.
While I agree that we should upvote well argued comments in spite of disagreeing with them, I may disagree with you on the downvoting of offensive language post. IMO, for something to be offensive, there must also be intent to offend...if that's what you're point is, then we're in agreement. However, far too often, we see people taking offense to wording such as Washington Redskins. If you find that offensive, it's on you, not the source of the words.
Your credit card vendor has a legal obligation to make payment. A random website has no legal obligation to you. Apples v. Hockey Sticks
Well you've made a great case for censorship.
Censorship isn't always inappropriate. And FWIW, I'm fine with someone wanting to yell and scream or hold up signs for ANY cause on the steps of the capital, because...free speech! Conversely, I think the courts overstepped when they allowed the Westboro Baptist Church members to protest and interrupt funeral ceremonies...your rights stop where they interfere with the rights of others IMO. I'm very much against censorship of ideas in any forum run by the government, but open to it by any place, site, business etc. .
Thank goodness we're in a place that respects free speech and would never consider censoring someones posts.
Your free speech rights don't cross the line into a web site owned and operated by someone else who doesn't like what you have to say. You're completely free to create your own though.
I'm sure you would feel differently if your credit card vendor decided they did not like what you were purchasing and decided to cancel the transaction. You would be completely free to create your own though.
Your credit card vendor has a legal obligation to make payment. A random website has no legal obligation to you. Apples v. Hockey Sticks
Air Traffic Control (ATC) tells the pilot what four digit code to put into their transponder in order to identify them when compared to other aircraft. The pilot can push a button known as "Squawking your ident" in order for them to show up better on ATC's screens. There are some special codes for emergencies. But your comment about disabling a transponder is pointless because it's a simple matter of flying low enough for most radars to not see you. I can tell you this from personal experience because I was on "flight following" while working on my first solo "cross country" at ~1800 feet ASL when I had a close call with an A10, and got on my radio to complain about no warning from ATC. I was told that I was flying kind of low for them to see, and that was with military grade radar.
Thank goodness we're in a place that respects free speech and would never consider censoring someones posts.
Your free speech rights don't cross the line into a web site owned and operated by someone else who doesn't like what you have to say. You're completely free to create your own though.
Slashdot Mirror
Google already is able to decide I am not allowed to watch porn images by default, so it is clearly playing judge and juror.
Giving you a tool to turn on/off those images in no way makes them "judge and juror". The option is yours.
she did fuck up but also she did learn her lesson and is now a wonderful surgeon
My dad was treated by an oncologist in Michigan for cancer. I'm sure he'll learn his lesson, but he should NEVER be allowed to practice again.
https://www.cnn.com/2015/07/10...
but the American population as a whole had it pretty good (relatively speaking)
"Relatively speaking" does not do justice to the words "pretty good".
But what if I do a Dark Web Triple Scan?
Oh, and FU Experian
If you read the article you linked to, it points out that Adams correctly states that Trump wasn't referring to the supremacists, but to people who were pro and anti statue. So, you're doing exactly what Adams points out...taking it out of context.
“I mean, my favorite example is Charlottesville,” Adams said. “When there was a protest about pro- and anti-statues and the president said that there were fine people on both sides, that was reported as he says there were fine people in the racist group, you know, the white supremacists.” “That wasn’t really the context. The context was pro-statue, anti-statue,” Adams continued.
https://news.psu.edu/story/199...
Grabbing popcorn while I wait for the feedback on "100-inch Hooker telescope".
Just to be clear, knowing how to negotiate without offending the other person is a skill that needs to be developed. I've more than once made the person I was negotiating with very angry.
Agreed, but then it can be okay to make the other person angry depending upon the relationship you need to maintain with them. If it's a one-off negotiation (new car purchase for example), who cares. But if it's your future boss, well that's a entirely different story.
that's assuming the men were even made to negotiate. good chance they just walked in and got given their wage
Typical comment from someone who clearly doesn't understand how to negotiate. If you were one of the ones who "walked in and got given their wage" then you're clueless and deserve what you were given. Nobody forced you to accept it.
Much of California's forest is owned and managed by the fed. Get your MAGA rake out and manage it.
So, have policies changed for fed lands since Trump...you brought up MAGA, so I'm assuming you're blaming him.
Are the percentage of fires different between fed controlled and CA lands? If so, you might have a case, otherwise you're just political trolling.
It would appear that there's plenty of blame to go around. And while it's all fun and games to point the finger at the big corporation, WTF are you going to do to fix the problem when it's a highly regulated public utility? Sorry, but CA brought this upon itself with screwed up laws, regulations, lawsuits, lack of proper forest management, etc. Do you think some other utility is suddenly going to pop up to replace them? All of these lawsuits end up being effectively paid for by the taxpayers because the cost gets passed along.
You've misread my comments and made faulty interpretations of my statements. I'm done with you.
Yup, just like any large company, there are always some assholes. IMO it would be "hilarious, awesome, and valuable" if they had done it on their own time. Not so much when they implicate the business they work for.
How many different companies did Elizabeth Warren submit her DNA to before she could claim to be a Native American?
FWIW, my daughter did only one, and it showed a sliver of Native American, which was most definitely an error...anticipating the jokers here to comment. Her other half is 100% Korean, and I have no Native American lineage. Our guess is that there's some commonality between Koreans and Native Americans that's too close to call for them.
Did their insurance companies store all 10 results to deny both of them cover in the future?
While I won't attempt to minimize the possibility, has there been any evidence that such a thing has actually occurred?
Certainly that's your choice, and nobody should argue against it.
In my old age, I've become more interested in my family genealogy, so doing an Ancestry kit about a year ago was very enlightening. My folks were divorced when I was still in diapers, so I knew next to nothing about my father's side since there was no contact. And, what I thought I knew about my mother's side was quickly tossed out the window. I knew her parents had German ancestry, but after getting my results back and spending just a few hours of searching back, I discovered French, Irish, Scottish, English and Polish lineage along with the German all the way back to the 1400s, and documentation to go with it. Along with a couple of Civil War officers buried about a hundred miles south of me, and some Scottish lords and ladies. Does it really mean anything...no, but it's kinda fun.
FWIW, I'm 100% American, but it doesn't make me any less of a mutt who was curious where he came from.
Link some evidence or go away.
While I agree that we should upvote well argued comments in spite of disagreeing with them, I may disagree with you on the downvoting of offensive language post. IMO, for something to be offensive, there must also be intent to offend...if that's what you're point is, then we're in agreement. However, far too often, we see people taking offense to wording such as Washington Redskins. If you find that offensive, it's on you, not the source of the words.
Your credit card vendor has a legal obligation to make payment. A random website has no legal obligation to you. Apples v. Hockey Sticks
Well you've made a great case for censorship.
Censorship isn't always inappropriate. And FWIW, I'm fine with someone wanting to yell and scream or hold up signs for ANY cause on the steps of the capital, because...free speech! Conversely, I think the courts overstepped when they allowed the Westboro Baptist Church members to protest and interrupt funeral ceremonies...your rights stop where they interfere with the rights of others IMO. I'm very much against censorship of ideas in any forum run by the government, but open to it by any place, site, business etc. .
Thank goodness we're in a place that respects free speech and would never consider censoring someones posts.
Your free speech rights don't cross the line into a web site owned and operated by someone else who doesn't like what you have to say. You're completely free to create your own though.
I'm sure you would feel differently if your credit card vendor decided they did not like what you were purchasing and decided to cancel the transaction. You would be completely free to create your own though.
Your credit card vendor has a legal obligation to make payment. A random website has no legal obligation to you. Apples v. Hockey Sticks
Air Traffic Control (ATC) tells the pilot what four digit code to put into their transponder in order to identify them when compared to other aircraft. The pilot can push a button known as "Squawking your ident" in order for them to show up better on ATC's screens. There are some special codes for emergencies. But your comment about disabling a transponder is pointless because it's a simple matter of flying low enough for most radars to not see you. I can tell you this from personal experience because I was on "flight following" while working on my first solo "cross country" at ~1800 feet ASL when I had a close call with an A10, and got on my radio to complain about no warning from ATC. I was told that I was flying kind of low for them to see, and that was with military grade radar.
Agreed, it's time to get tough on suicide. Might I suggest a no tolerance policy? Or at least a 3 strikes and you are out?
It would take a lot of balls to get three strikes, or two for that matter.
Thank goodness we're in a place that respects free speech and would never consider censoring someones posts.
Your free speech rights don't cross the line into a web site owned and operated by someone else who doesn't like what you have to say. You're completely free to create your own though.
I think it's good to filter the stupid from society.
Agreed, what would you like done with your body?
This is before black-hats figure out how to trivially botnet them into a superweapon
Yup, that's happened a lot. Better stay in mom's basement just to be safe.