i don't see any Federal mandates about which brands of cars I can drive on the public roads, or how much I can drive, or what (legal) things I can carry in my car, or where I am coming from or going to. As long as a vehicle is declared safe (standards compliant you might say?) I can register it and take it for a drive.
Your girlfriend won't let you keep it once you marry her and move in to her place anyway (to save a total of 5 keys, 3 for your place, 1 for the motorbike, 1 for the postbox). Leave the roof unlocked unless you're worried about paratrooper assaults (lose one more key), ride your bicycle everywhere and get rid of the car (if it's nice, your new wife probably won't let you keep that either), let your new wife stay home all the time and raise the kids allowing you to drop the three keys for her place (-3 keys), and finally just leave the office key on the premises so you won't forget it some day (-1 key). That leaves you with 1 key for the bike lock and one knife to worry about. If you get a cheaper bike lock, you can toss the bike key and just jimmy it with your knife.
I think you are confused. The inquisition as well as the witch hunts and crusades (as there were many inside and outside of religion) and so on were not the status quo per religion, it was the workings of man claiming to be in duty of the religion. This differs from the accounts in the bible where it claims that God ordered things to be done in itself because they were attempting to interpret their own meanings instead of being directly told.
So what good is a religion so easily subverted by the whims of despots, tyrants, and even petty sadists?
So lets see if we agree about a few things or not. The Ten Commandments were set and in "force" at these times right? No one claimed God told them to do the crusades, witch hunts, or inquisition, the claims were in the name of their religion, but it was something they interpreted themselves somehow, right? Or is there some documentation where someone claims god told them to do something?
Are you referring to the ten commandments that are next to the "suffer not a witch to live" part or the "slaughter all the men, women, and children to get your holy land" parts? It might be a little hard, without modern literary criticism and the advent of naturalistic reason and relatively liberal readings of scriptures, to tell the commandments from the history in terms of their application to daily life in the middle ages.
In my experience with the D945GCLF2 (using an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B), it will only send about 400 Gbit/s and receive 720 Gbit/s. The CPU is pegged in both cases. Sending and receiving on the loopback device yields 720 Gbit/s too.
I thought alcoholism was basically the main industry of Ireland. Nothing wrong with Guinness! Can't the bankers just sit down in a pub and agree to print some more money to pay for the beer or something?
Are you claiming that Perelman is schizophrenic? A schizophrenic person may not have a sound mind if they perceive imaginary people and voices as real, and they may have unsound judgment if they persist in a belief that the hallucinations are real despite evidence to the contrary. I don't see any evidence for that in Perelman's case.
Disable trust in the root certificates so that your browser always prompts you to verify an SSL certificate until you mark it as trusted. The first time you visit a site, hit it from a few different IP addresses and make sure the SSL cert matches on all the different connections to rule out a MITM attack, then verify the chain of trust up to the now-untrusted root CAs. If you think you can still trust whichever root CA signed the cert, mark the site's cert as fully trusted and the browser won't bug you until the cert changes (either due to legitimate replacement or a MITM attack).
Of course this is mostly a moot point because just about any company will happily comply with law enforcement requests to intercept your connections through a legitimate SSL session.
Sanity is defined as having "soundness of mind and judgment." Being able to prove the Poincaré conjecture implies at least sound judgment in a logical sense in order to understand the proof, and clearly enough soundness of mind to compose a readable paper describing the proof. Perhaps you are confusing arbitrary personal lifestyle choices and a refusal to adhere to common social norms with some form of insanity. At worst, you might call it "asocial" or "antisocial", but that is hardly insane.
Yes, unlike countries where broadband is regulated (Japan, Korea, Canada, etc.), the U.S. has the cheapest and fastest Internet connections available everywhere due to the power of the free market!
Absurd? In a nation that needs a "No child left behind" policy to try to catch up to international testing standards? In a nation where a huge percentage of the population thinks organisms don't evolve? Right. My point is that people *won't* learn, because it' s a well established trend.
The simple reason is that the government already has trouble finding people when they have 1) a picture, 2) a last known address, and 3) their DNA on file from previous crimes. You know that whole FBI most wanted list? That would still be around if every one of the people on it had their DNA fingerprinted when they were born.
Expect to routinely get pricked at every security checkpoint or if you're declared a "person of interest", because the only way that DNA fingerprints help law enforcement identify fugitives is if they randomly sample anyone who might be a fugitive.
In short, yes. Anyone who can make such a serious mistake once is probably still capable of making it again. The consequences are *so* severe that anyone who couldn't imagine them in the first place probably won't remember the actual results the next time they're "too tired" or "too distracted" to secure a gun after they're done using it.
The first time I find myself leaving a gun unsecured, I'll sell it.
Re:Was it a cause of his legal trouble?
on
Our Low-Tech Tax Code
·
· Score: 4, Informative
As the son of the IRS employee who was killed in this incident said, "if he [Stack] has a house and a plane he can pay his taxes." (Austin American-Statesman, 2/21/2010).
Corporations with multiple headquarters and Lear jets don't end up paying the taxes Joe was required to pay.
Slashdot Mirror
i don't see any Federal mandates about which brands of cars I can drive on the public roads, or how much I can drive, or what (legal) things I can carry in my car, or where I am coming from or going to. As long as a vehicle is declared safe (standards compliant you might say?) I can register it and take it for a drive.
There are some VxWorks routers around too. Probably some others.
Your girlfriend won't let you keep it once you marry her and move in to her place anyway (to save a total of 5 keys, 3 for your place, 1 for the motorbike, 1 for the postbox). Leave the roof unlocked unless you're worried about paratrooper assaults (lose one more key), ride your bicycle everywhere and get rid of the car (if it's nice, your new wife probably won't let you keep that either), let your new wife stay home all the time and raise the kids allowing you to drop the three keys for her place (-3 keys), and finally just leave the office key on the premises so you won't forget it some day (-1 key). That leaves you with 1 key for the bike lock and one knife to worry about. If you get a cheaper bike lock, you can toss the bike key and just jimmy it with your knife.
Might be time to invest my money in something a little more solid, like canned food and ammunition.
nah, once the economy turns around your investment will lose 90% of its value.
Are you *really* going to eat 4,312 cans of ravioli when you retire?
That's gotta suck for the (at least) 7,300 people falsely convicted who are sitting in jail right now.
I knew I was fucking something up with the units...
s/Gbit/Mbit/g
Does your ISP throttle your HTTPS banking sessions too? If not, there's your answer.
I think you are confused. The inquisition as well as the witch hunts and crusades (as there were many inside and outside of religion) and so on were not the status quo per religion, it was the workings of man claiming to be in duty of the religion. This differs from the accounts in the bible where it claims that God ordered things to be done in itself because they were attempting to interpret their own meanings instead of being directly told.
So what good is a religion so easily subverted by the whims of despots, tyrants, and even petty sadists?
So lets see if we agree about a few things or not. The Ten Commandments were set and in "force" at these times right? No one claimed God told them to do the crusades, witch hunts, or inquisition, the claims were in the name of their religion, but it was something they interpreted themselves somehow, right? Or is there some documentation where someone claims god told them to do something?
Are you referring to the ten commandments that are next to the "suffer not a witch to live" part or the "slaughter all the men, women, and children to get your holy land" parts? It might be a little hard, without modern literary criticism and the advent of naturalistic reason and relatively liberal readings of scriptures, to tell the commandments from the history in terms of their application to daily life in the middle ages.
In my experience with the D945GCLF2 (using an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B), it will only send about 400 Gbit/s and receive 720 Gbit/s. The CPU is pegged in both cases. Sending and receiving on the loopback device yields 720 Gbit/s too.
"You have chosen to look at an accident. Would you like to join the accident?"
I thought alcoholism was basically the main industry of Ireland. Nothing wrong with Guinness! Can't the bankers just sit down in a pub and agree to print some more money to pay for the beer or something?
Preemptive condolences on your imminent heart attack/stroke/nervous breakdown.
Until, of course, someone modifies the proof of concept to use the /L!unch functionality you just added.
A bullet.
Are you claiming that Perelman is schizophrenic? A schizophrenic person may not have a sound mind if they perceive imaginary people and voices as real, and they may have unsound judgment if they persist in a belief that the hallucinations are real despite evidence to the contrary. I don't see any evidence for that in Perelman's case.
Disable trust in the root certificates so that your browser always prompts you to verify an SSL certificate until you mark it as trusted. The first time you visit a site, hit it from a few different IP addresses and make sure the SSL cert matches on all the different connections to rule out a MITM attack, then verify the chain of trust up to the now-untrusted root CAs. If you think you can still trust whichever root CA signed the cert, mark the site's cert as fully trusted and the browser won't bug you until the cert changes (either due to legitimate replacement or a MITM attack).
Of course this is mostly a moot point because just about any company will happily comply with law enforcement requests to intercept your connections through a legitimate SSL session.
Sanity is defined as having "soundness of mind and judgment." Being able to prove the Poincaré conjecture implies at least sound judgment in a logical sense in order to understand the proof, and clearly enough soundness of mind to compose a readable paper describing the proof. Perhaps you are confusing arbitrary personal lifestyle choices and a refusal to adhere to common social norms with some form of insanity. At worst, you might call it "asocial" or "antisocial", but that is hardly insane.
News flash, that's how biology already works. It's organics and enzyme soup with brownian motion to do the rest.
By mass producing chili and beef stew and then canning it, I can eat for just over $1 per meal.
Yes, unlike countries where broadband is regulated (Japan, Korea, Canada, etc.), the U.S. has the cheapest and fastest Internet connections available everywhere due to the power of the free market!
So call them out. If you don't, you're just a part of the problem you describe.
Absurd? In a nation that needs a "No child left behind" policy to try to catch up to international testing standards? In a nation where a huge percentage of the population thinks organisms don't evolve? Right. My point is that people *won't* learn, because it' s a well established trend.
The simple reason is that the government already has trouble finding people when they have 1) a picture, 2) a last known address, and 3) their DNA on file from previous crimes. You know that whole FBI most wanted list? That would still be around if every one of the people on it had their DNA fingerprinted when they were born.
Expect to routinely get pricked at every security checkpoint or if you're declared a "person of interest", because the only way that DNA fingerprints help law enforcement identify fugitives is if they randomly sample anyone who might be a fugitive.
In short, yes. Anyone who can make such a serious mistake once is probably still capable of making it again. The consequences are *so* severe that anyone who couldn't imagine them in the first place probably won't remember the actual results the next time they're "too tired" or "too distracted" to secure a gun after they're done using it. The first time I find myself leaving a gun unsecured, I'll sell it.
As the son of the IRS employee who was killed in this incident said, "if he [Stack] has a house and a plane he can pay his taxes." (Austin American-Statesman, 2/21/2010).
Corporations with multiple headquarters and Lear jets don't end up paying the taxes Joe was required to pay.