Slashdot Mirror


Perelman Urged To Accept $1m Prize

krou writes "The Warm Home charity in St. Petersburg, Grigory Perelman's home-town, has urged the math genius and recluse to accept the $1m Millennium Prize for solving the Poincaré conjecture, and donate it to charities. Perelman has refused to accept the award, telling one reporter through the closed door of his flat, 'I have all I want,' and another who managed to call him on his mobile, 'You are disturbing me. I am picking mushrooms.'"

421 comments

  1. This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Patron saint of basement dwellers everywhere.

    1. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I suspect his disposition is what enabled him to make this discovery. Human progress can't all be achieved by preppie facebook overachievers. Some crazy is needed for the truly genius results.

    2. Re:This is hilarious by Kitkoan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I suspect his disposition is what enabled him to make this discovery. Human progress can't all be achieved by preppie facebook overachievers. Some crazy is needed for the truly genius results.

      Yeah, just remember that genius and madness are only separated by a thin line.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    3. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually I read a interview with him at some point (I think in the New Yorker), and he really doesn't want the limelight.

      Since his discovery, he's had offers from major universities to work, and he's turned them all down.

      He really didn't do this for the glory. He is one of those few, rare individuals who achieved great things solely because they were there. Humble. Strange. Special in some way.

      I honestly admire this man. He has solved one of the most important problems of our time (and others' time) and his only wish is that other people take it further, purely for the sake of knowledge and understanding. Not for awards. Not for riches. Not for fame. Simply for knowledge.

      We may not understand him. Quite likely he doesn't understand us.

      He may not accept our riches, but he has given us something far far greater than mere money. Leave him be.

    4. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a free man, and says 'I spit on your money!'

    5. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, just remember that genius and madness are only separated by a thin line.

      Some people aren't as fixated on money or socializing and gossip as journalists and Trolls are. Not wanting to be part of the In-Crowd does NOT make a person insane, or on the verge of insanity. Some people, like me, program for a hobby. Some people even write poetry without the intent of having it published. It makes us weird compared to the Trolls and socialites out there. But it doesn't make us crazy.

    6. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And it tastes delicious.

    7. Re:This is hilarious by nazsco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Yeah, just remember that genius and madness are only separated by a thin line.

      In this case it isnt so.

      He is genius. he knows more math then you do. and he knows more about a good life then you do.

      because you dont understand him, considers him a madman on both accounts probably. Only so in the math part someone already told you to belive that he is a genius. not that you would understand it too. as you do not understand his views on a good life.

    8. Re:This is hilarious by blahplusplus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Patron saint of basement dwellers everywhere."

      I disagree, I think he's being a douchebag. Anyone with a head would take a million dollars and use it to alleviate suffering of others if he was a decent man. This is where I think his principles have blinded him to the fact that their are still a lot of problems in the world and he could be helping out people who need it with that million.

    9. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Then and than you fucking moron! Seriously, how fucking hard is it!? They are two totally different words that sound totally different! Jez Christ!

      First I called you a fucking moron then I pointed out then & than are two totally different words.

      You're a bigger moron than you realise.

    10. Re:This is hilarious by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just remember that genius and madness are only separated by a thin line.

      Isn't it "The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success"?

    11. Re:This is hilarious by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1, Interesting

      He lives in a small apartment with his mother and doesn't talk to anyone. This is not a good life by any measure. He didn't behave like this before either - he went recluse as a response to the alleged behaviour of others in the mathematical community.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    12. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Fuck off.

      It's *his* prize and *his* money. *He* can do whatever the hell he wants with it. It's *his* money. As the Russian minister said, and I'm paraphrasing, it is not decent to count others money in their pockets.

    13. Re:This is hilarious by blahplusplus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't think you get the point, he's denying it out of principle of being a decent human being, but he's not, he's just being a typical nerdy brat who doesn't get it.

    14. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I suspect his disposition is what enabled him to make this discovery. Human progress can't all be achieved by preppie facebook overachievers. Some crazy is needed for the truly genius results.

      Yeah, just remember that genius and madness are only separated by a thin line.

      Tell me, did you find that pearl of wisdom in a fortune cookie or in a box of wheeties?

    15. Re:This is hilarious by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

      This is complete conjecture on my part but maybe he is trying to make a point that instead of holding on to this prize money for x years the University should have been using it for a better purpose.

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    16. Re:This is hilarious by blahplusplus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He could simply state that openly, take the million dollars and give it away and chastize them for having prizes in the first place. If that was his goal it's the worst way to be doing it.

    17. Re:This is hilarious by Mr+Abstracto · · Score: 1

      Why does he have to take the money in order for it to be given to charity? If he doesn't want it why can't the Clay Mathematics Institute just donate it directly to charity?

    18. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think YOU get it. He's denying the money because he hates society, not because he's trying to be decent or nice in any way. Frankly, I'd do the same.

    19. Re:This is hilarious by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "Why does he have to take the money in order for it to be given to charity? If he doesn't want it why can't the Clay Mathematics Institute just donate it directly to charity?"

      My point is just finding a way to make them look bad either by telling them to give it away or taking it himself and giving it away would be enough. That's my main problem he hasn't said anything, and I doubt the clay institute is just going to get up and give it away arbitrarily.

      If his point is to make them look bad he's not doing it right, his cryptic response is likely not going to do anything.

    20. Re:This is hilarious by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, just remember that genius and madness are only separated by a thin line.

      The poor bloke just wants to do math and pick mushrooms. There's nothing wrong with him just because he doesn't fit into the "nuclear" society mould.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    21. Re:This is hilarious by palegray.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is not a good life by any measure.

      Precisely who the hell are you to make that call? You're certainly not him.

    22. Re:This is hilarious by oldhack · · Score: 2

      Or at least blow it on hookers. And blow.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    23. Re:This is hilarious by wmac · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not anyone. He does not speak to reporters and paparazzis which have taken him as a attention monger actors.

      A few Chinese mathematicians tried to downplay his work and advertise their own work instead and he did not expected to see such dirty behaviors in scientific community.

      I myself went back to university to become a scientist because I could not bear politics in business environments. I went to academics because I thought there is more ethics there.

      Now about Chinese. They have conquered scientific journals as editors and reviewers. Now they invent theories (sometimes false, sometimes terrible in quality) and they send those craps to conquered journals. They have conquered the whole scientific publishing chain and they do whatever unethical things you may think of.

    24. Re:This is hilarious by wmac · · Score: 1

      Incorrect.

      He has been a lecturer and researcher in many US and Russian universities. He just turned down the last offer by a US university to return to his own university in Russia.

      You can read more in wikipedia page about him.

    25. Re:This is hilarious by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      This guy, though, actually is insane, as anyone who read up on his life and habits knows.

    26. Re:This is hilarious by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps I should turn in my geek card for not knowing or caring who he is but ...

      Really, sounds like the guy just wants to be left alone ... bugging him really isn't going to do anyone any good and he seems to be being awfully nice to people bugging the shit out of him and being otherwise very inconsiderate (stereotypical of reporters and the public at large).

      Stereotypical of geeks it may be, but I can certainly sympathize with him.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    27. Re:This is hilarious by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree, I think he's being a douchebag. Anyone with a head would take a million dollars and use it to alleviate suffering of others if he was a decent man.

      Well, supposedly that $1M is in the committee now. What's stopping them from giving it away to charities? It's not like, if Perelman refuses it, it magically disappears in a puff of smoke.

      I believe that his point is that he doesn't want that money as an award. Accepting it would come with strings attached - namely, the recognition of the practice, and the authority of those people to hand out such awards.

    28. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! You admitted it! You program for a hobby! Weirdo. ;-P

    29. Re:This is hilarious by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Precisely who the hell are you to make that call? You're certainly not him.

      Well spotted.

      I'm all for living life the way you want but sometimes people need help rather than being left alone - despite the fact that they insist this to be the case. If this happened to anyone I knew and cared about I would certainly make that call.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    30. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's rejected the offers made after his discovery though.

    31. Re:This is hilarious by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      You're criticising his choice to abstain from accepting a monetary award by arguing that the money could be going to whatever causes you deem to be appropriate. If you understood your own reasoning, you would be critical of the organisation offering the prize, rather than awarding the money to whatever causes you deem to be appropriate, and you would be applauding the man for refusing to participate in their undertaking.

      I don't know the man or his motivations, so I have no interest in judging neither. I do find it preposterous, however, that you deem yourself in a position to not only interpret the situation, but also apply your interpretation in a manner so patently contrary to the basis you take in your criticism.

    32. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you are a self-righteous twit and if I were the friend you were trying to "help", I'd smash your face in.

    33. Re:This is hilarious by rdelcueto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What exactly you mean by "This is not a good life by any measure", and just how the hell are you "measuring" his life? The guy says he has everything he wants. The fact that you don't understand or want his way of life (or what you've read he's life is), doesn't mean there's something wrong with it. People need to mind their own shit, and help by keeping their mouth shut and not doing this void judgments on others.

    34. Re:This is hilarious by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Some people, like me, program for a hobby. Some people even write poetry without the intent of having it published. It makes us weird compared to the Trolls and socialites out there. But it doesn't make us crazy.

      I am guessing that the main difference between you and Grigory Perelman though, is that he is really good at his hobby. Like idiot-savant good. In fact, he can make a shitload of money instantaneously just by saying "Yes please."

      And I don't necessarily mean that as an insult, because he can't do other important things like read /.

    35. Re:This is hilarious by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sanity is defined as having "soundness of mind and judgment." Being able to prove the Poincaré conjecture implies at least sound judgment in a logical sense in order to understand the proof, and clearly enough soundness of mind to compose a readable paper describing the proof. Perhaps you are confusing arbitrary personal lifestyle choices and a refusal to adhere to common social norms with some form of insanity. At worst, you might call it "asocial" or "antisocial", but that is hardly insane.

    36. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He lives in a small apartment with his mother and doesn't talk to anyone. This is not a good life by any measure.

      I'm the AC near the top of this thread. I'm in my 40's and live in my parents basement (yeah I know, I'm a living stereotype of how not to turn out). I try to avoid talking to people (except for the occasional comment on Slashdot). I was going to ignore your comment before you got up-moderated. I wish people like you would be able to have the intellectual ability to realize that what you say is not only offensive, prejudiced, biased, illogical, and outright wrong; but has absolutely no basis in reality. Not wanting to socialize with people is a GOOD thing, it isn't a bad thing. But, like usual, assholes like you will judge me by my ability and willingness to socialize, instead of by my intelligence, logic, or morality. The ironic thing about you and your type is that it just re-enforces my beliefs that actually talking to people is a waste of time and will likely end up in people insulting me because I live in my mothers basement trying to improve my mind by doing programming assignments, practicing Mathematics, reading psychology, instead of socializing and gossiping and making value judgments on people.

    37. Re:This is hilarious by jpate · · Score: 2, Funny

      are you sure you would not be too busy picking mushrooms to smash his face in?

    38. Re:This is hilarious by dangitman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ironic thing about you and your type is that it just re-enforces my beliefs that actually talking to people is a waste of time and will likely end up in people insulting me because I live in my mothers basement trying to improve my mind by doing programming assignments, practicing Mathematics, reading psychology, instead of socializing and gossiping and making value judgments on people.

      No, the really ironic thing is that you decry the judgment of other people, while you are highly judgmental of others.

      Not wanting to socialize with people is a GOOD thing, it isn't a bad thing. But, like usual, assholes like you will judge me by my ability and willingness to socialize, instead of by my intelligence, logic, or morality.

      You make it sound like intelligence and is somehow the opposite of socializing. It's not. Humans are social creatures. That's not a very intelligent thing to ignore. You live on a planet full of other people, and you depend on those other people for your continued survival.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    39. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps he wants his work to receive the limelight, or maybe not even that. He's proven something that others can build upon and take even further. His part is done, he doesn't want a parade. Take his work and celebrate that. Leave the man be.

      I'm not a big fan of people either. Most are boring shallow malicious twats. In that sense I understand him perfectly. Leave him be. He doesn't need the money, he doesn't need you. Why force all this on him? For his glory? Or for ours?

    40. Re:This is hilarious by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Well, supposedly that $1M is in the committee now. What's stopping them from giving it away to charities? It's not like, if Perelman refuses it, it magically disappears in a puff of smoke.

      Most likely they have some ethics rule or constitution which prevents them from using it for anything other than awarding to the winner of the prize.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    41. Re:This is hilarious by DarkIye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had to read through 50 comments of confused, juvenile bullshit and slapfighting to get at this succinct summary of everything in it worth reading?

    42. Re:This is hilarious by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      That's absolutely true. Why could he not have submitted it anonymously?

    43. Re:This is hilarious by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You make it sound like intelligence and is somehow the opposite of socializing. It's not. Humans are social creatures. That's not a very intelligent thing to ignore. You live on a planet full of other people, and you depend on those other people for your continued survival.

      And apparently this gentleman has found that the only other people he really needs is his mother and whoever he has contact with through non-meatspace methods.

      We are not all the same. Spending 1 week on slashdot alone should show you that. And so long as noone is hurting themselves or others...who gives a shit?

      Let's live and let live, shall we?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    44. Re:This is hilarious by somersault · · Score: 1

      I suspect his disposition is what enabled him to make this discovery

      Well, that and the mushrooms..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    45. Re:This is hilarious by dangitman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And apparently this gentleman has found that the only other people he really needs is his mother and whoever he has contact with through non-meatspace methods.

      That's simply not true. He needs the people who grow his food. He needs the people who help stabilize society, so he is not murdered or killed in a war.

      Let's live and let live, shall we?

      Did I ever say anything about not letting him live? All I did was note the irony of his condemning other people (calling them assholes, amongst other things) while at the same time bemoaning somebody passing less offensive judgment on somebody else.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    46. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the really ironic thing is that you decry the judgment of other people, while you are highly judgmental of others.

      Listen and learn, don't just reply to defend your biases. I am against people who insult merely for the sake that it is against their lifestyle choice and tradition. I judge people of course, but I judge people on the merits of their logic and NOT on whether they engage in social activity.

      You make it sound like intelligence and is somehow the opposite of socializing. It's not. Humans are social creatures. That's not a very intelligent thing to ignore.

      Again with the prejudice and insults. I'm not ignoring anything and yet it is obvious that you are using the propaganda technique of attempting to "put words in my mouth". And you obviously don't know the difference (or are deliberately Trolling?) between social co-operation (pretty much a necessary evil in modern society... for the past few thousands years really) and socialization, and by socialization I mean the deliberate act of gossiping, attending football riots, engaging in office/factory politics, etc and every willful and unnecessary thing that humans do to make themselves social creatures (outside of the necessities of fulfilling base economic needs).

      For good measure (and in case your idea of "socialization" may be based on folklore instead of reality), I will give you this quote from the Wikipedia; "Socialization, however, is not a normative term: it describes a process which may or may not affect the reflexive agent, and which may or may not lead to desirable, or 'moral', outcomes.".

      And War of course, where people really get to socialize a lot with each other (Funny thing, I was in the infantry myself... a real learning experience. I was socialized there too. Ever watched Full Metal Jacket?... Though I wasn't in Vietnam, the boot camp part was almost as fucked up for me [all of us really...]). War, it's more common and prevalent than your (presumably) middle class Western lifestyle will lead you to believe. Genocide and War Crimes are (merely) things of history books and cable TV (to most people, and the taxpayers who fund "Black Operations").

      Anybody who has a good understanding of Sociology (or any of the other social sciences) will tell you that most socialization/communication has to do with lying, stealing and cheating. People like me don't have to read psychology books to know this because we are perceptive enough to see this ourselves and not pretend-away any social misgivings. The science and scholarship just re-enforces my experiences. People are more interested in money and status than anything else, which I have always found disheartening.

      And yes I will tell people they are being an asshole when they are insulting people who are different from them. This is an observation. If people feel insulted by the fact that negative terms are used against them then they shouldn't make arbitrary illogical judgments about the lifestyles of other people.

      In terms of socializing (to repeat what you said, "You make it sound like intelligence and is somehow the opposite of socializing." Yes. The social sciences are on my side. It's sooo very obvious it isn't worth mentioning. But at least I know what I am talking about (I've got the formal education on my side here too). For example, ask an Englishman if they've read 1984 (written by an English author) and chances are they will tell you that they have read it when in fact they have not read it. It's the same just about everywhere. The vast majority of people will tell at least one lie in the first 10 minutes of a conversation. The disheartening thing for me is that people will just assume I'm as dishonest and as ego and status centric as themselves, and will exaggerate and lie to make myself look good. The truth is that I live in my mother's basement (at least partly because I don't lie on my resume and I'm competing with the majority who use friends as references, etc). I'd rather stick to

    47. Re:This is hilarious by eulernet · · Score: 1

      I suppose that you consider that Bobby Fischer was insane.

      Perelman is eccentric, but not insane.

    48. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, at worst you could say that he exhibits many symptoms of several serious mental disorders. He is well beyond the range of just being called asocial.

      To suggest otherwise is to be wilfully obtuse. In this situation it is fairly clear that he has a serious mental disorder. He would almost certainly benefit from treatment, but he appears to be functional enough that intervention is not warranted unless he requests it.

    49. Re:This is hilarious by algormortis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your definition of sanity does not apply simply because the man is intelligent. For example, think of John Nash, the Nobel Prize Winner with schizophrenia. That guy hallucinated to the point where he thought he had a roommate throughout college, even though he lived in a single by himself.

    50. Re:This is hilarious by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Boy, your quick emotional reaction to defend Perelman is amusing, but completely misguided. If you actually studied up on the field of psychiatry or psychology, you would realize the idea of humans being "social animals" has no exceptions. Those who attempt hermetic lifestyles gradually become mentally unstable and unable to cope with the daily or common changes in our lives that we normally encounter.

    51. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said.

      not meaning too much of a misplaced rant, but 2/3 of what gets us on this rock is having our personalities measured by some outside standard that has nothing to do with our standard of meaningful interaction with the same outside, were they to not prejudice our work with their opinion of our personalities...

      i like this guy. but i think he probably is the patron saint of basement dwellers. he can be my patron saint if he wants...

    52. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could simply state that openly, take the million dollars and give it away and chastize them for having prizes in the first place. If that was his goal it's the worst way to be doing it.

      What part of his "leave me alone" don't you get ? The guy offered us way more than we can offer him. We should at least leave him be, if he wants it. In fact this seems to be his only request from us.

    53. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are a fundamentalist.

      I find it funny how Americans are quick to label someone who does not fall within their ranges of "normal" as freaks, crazy, stupid,weird, etc. This is not specific for the slashdot crowd but it is the typical sentiment of people in the USA. That's why you look funny at the guy who built his house out of cob and is living without electricity. That's why it just blows your mind how a guy who lives a happy life does not want a bunch of money.

      I am a Mexican who lived in the UK and now living in East Germany (not Berlin), in one of the "poorer" German states. After living in the UK where people strive to buy/get/acquire things in order to feel "successful", living in Germany is a fresh breath of clean air.

      People here in East Germany learnt to live with few things. In a way they are detached from things and appreciate more subtle things.

      To finish, let me quote this parable I found here:

      The investment banker and the Mexican

      An American investment banker was at the pier of a small coastal Mexican village when a small boat with just one fisherman docked.
      Inside the small boat were several large yellow fin tuna.
      The American complimented the Mexican on the quality of his fish and asked, "How long does it take to catch them?"
      The Mexican replied: "Only a little while".

      The American then asked why didn't he stay out longer and catch more fish?
      The Mexican said he had enough to support his family's immediate needs.
      The American then asked, "But what do you do with the rest of your time?"
      The Mexican fisherman said, "I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, take siesta with my wife, Maria, stroll into the village each evening where I sip wine and play guitar with my amigos, I have a full and busy life."

      The American scoffed, "I am a Harvard MBA and could help you. You should spend more time fishing and with the proceeds, buy a bigger boat with the proceeds from the bigger boat you could buy several boats, eventually you would have a fleet of fishing boats. Instead of selling your catch to a middleman you would sell directly to the processor, eventually opening your own cannery. You would control the product, processing and distribution. You would need to leave this small coastal fishing village and move to Mexico City, then LA and eventually NYC where you will run your expanding enterprise."

      The Mexican fisherman asked, "But, how long will this all take?"
      To which the American replied, "15-20 years."

      "But what then?"
      The American laughed and said that's the best part. "When the time is right you would announce an IPO and sell your company stock to the
      public and become very rich, you would make millions."

      "Millions.. Then what?"
      The American said, "Then you would retire. Move to a small coastal fishing village where you would sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take siesta with your wife, stroll to the village in the evenings where you could sip wine and play your guitar with your amigos."

    54. Re:This is hilarious by stygianguest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One could consider it his moral duty to teach others. Teaching is severely underrated in research communities. Good teachers probably deliver more scientific advancement to society than anyone else. That said, I wouldn't be surprised if he is a terrible teacher.

    55. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe this person cannot stand living in the society with peace of mind...because teh sociatey is so fuckin stoopid? so you say monks are mentally unstable? who the fuck are you to judge that? or does your psychiatry degree makes you able to judge anyone?

    56. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      bloke and math? where exactly are you from?

    57. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the story? Is Yau the Bill Gates of mathematics, taking ideas and credit wherever he can?

    58. Re:This is hilarious by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      He's weird, he's not insane. People have different lifestyles - like, girls. They wash, iron their clothes, like pink, talk a lot and worry about things that are not theoretically possible. We might call them insane but really we know they are just weird.

    59. Re:This is hilarious by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      I get your point, but I don't think "You're not him" works as a magic-bullet argument. It seems a shame that such a great mind is now completely broken (from the point of view of creating new math). I wonder though if the real problem is his distaste at the mathematical establishment, or the success fear that people get when they make a real breakthrough - your greatest work is behind you, perhaps it's hard to risk producing inferior work.

    60. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, like usual, assholes like you will judge me by my ability and willingness to socialize, instead of by my intelligence, logic, or morality.

      The less you interact with people, the less those qualities have a meaning.

    61. Re:This is hilarious by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

      It always amazes me that people who would smile at you and shake your hand are the same people that will happily threaten you with violence, when they are hidden by the anonymity of a website comment. What's even more amazing is that I've done the same. It's like a real life version of milligrams experiment. Calm down you muppet.

    62. Re:This is hilarious by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      He could buy his mother a nicer place, give some to the charity that seems to have helped him, and have cash left over to do all the math and pick all the mushrooms he wants.

      Not taking the million bucks IS insane, unless there are unreasonable strings attached, Simply not being interested in it is both foolish and selfish in the extreme.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    63. Re:This is hilarious by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are clearly not a psychologist. Insanity is very different from exhibiting symptoms of mental disease. An autistic person (likely Perelman in some range) is not insane. A schizophrenic person (very difficult to diagnose in the presence of autism) is not necessarily insane (unless we live in television world, in which case they are apparently raving).

      Insane means, literally, not sane, and sanity is the ability to make informed and reasonable judgments. Deciding you don't like to be around people, and therefore want to stay in your flat seems pretty informed and logical to me. People (like you) suck, and call people (like him) weird and insane for being different.

    64. Re:This is hilarious by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      PS treatment is unnecessary if the person is happy. The only points of treatment are:
      A) To make us feel better that we 'fixed' the problem (read: wrong on so many levels)
      B) To help the 'sick' person live a happier, more fulfilling life.
      The latter should obviously be judged from the 'sick' person's own perspective, and when they are already happy and fulfilled, this reasoning is invalid.

    65. Re:This is hilarious by mike449 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Doing math is fine, but picking mushrooms in St.Petersburg in March is kinda borderline.

    66. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insane - how come? Because he doesn't watch Pop Idol, pledge his allegiance to the Great God Walmart? Doesn't have God whispering in his ear telling him to invade foreign countires? Etc. Explain by what standard you judge him insane.

    67. Re:This is hilarious by igny · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I would do exactly the opposite. I would take the money and refuse to give away the proof of the Riemann conjecture, which I recently solved.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    68. Re:This is hilarious by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell me: is this becoming mentally unstable and unable to cope interacting with society or not? I mean becoming unstable in one's solitude is one thing; becoming unstable when society intrudes on your solitude is quite another.

      Further, are you differentiating between chosen solitude and enforced solitude, because those would have very different effects.

      Finally, his is social within the confines of his family. Social has many different dimensions. To pick and choose which aspects you want to interact with seems damn near idealized to me.

      It sounds more like you are advocating for social convention hiding behind psychology. Epicurus would like to have a word with you.

    69. Re:This is hilarious by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      Of course, because that's offers from universities wishing to polish up their image by hiring "the man who solved the poincare conjecture!".

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    70. Re:This is hilarious by Cadallin · · Score: 1
      There is also

      C) The person is a threat to others.

      However, Mr. Perelman has shown no signs that I know of that he is a threat to other people. Being annoyed at harassment by the press is not a sign of such. He should be left alone. It is not a crime to be asocial, or to turn down an award you do not want.

    71. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, just remember that genius and madness are only separated by a thin line.

      The poor bloke just wants to do math and pick mushrooms. There's nothing wrong with him just because he doesn't fit into the "nuclear" society mould.

      He is richer than any of us, he understand things that we don't! Money and glory is a religion for the idiots.

    72. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's had offers from the best universities even before solving the Poincare conjecture, but he refused them and went back to Russia.

    73. Re:This is hilarious by glebd · · Score: 1

      (in thick Russian accent) You are disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms.

    74. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and he knows more about a good life then you do.

      No, he knows more about math than I do. For 99.9% of people, being an antisocial nerd who spends his life picking mushrooms isn't a good life at all.

    75. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, Mr. Perelman has shown no signs that I know of ...

      That's the whole crux of the matter. No body really knows about Dr. Perelman's mental health because nobody here as access to any of his psychiatric records (if any exist at all). People are making flippant comments on his mental health based on what the paparazzi are saying about him and his lifestyle. I doubt if most people here have ever even met the man, and yet they feel competent enough to talk about his mental health. This whole kerfuffle smacks of Journalism to me.

    76. Re:This is hilarious by Truth+is+life · · Score: 1

      What? Anyone who wants can give out any award they want at any time they want. If I, well, wanted I could give you a million dollars for having the username "shutdown -p now" right, um, now (and if I had a million dollars, of course). There are all sorts of organizations that give awards for various purposes, it's not like only some of them are "authorized" to do so or that the practice is somehow "weird" and illegitimate.

    77. Re:This is hilarious by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is he doing what he enjoys - Yes (By his own admission)
      Is he happy - Well until the press started bugging him yes ...

      Sounds like he is someone who is happy, employed and has enough money.... ....unlike many people he seems to value the right things

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    78. Re:This is hilarious by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Some people think they will be happy if they are famous - he doesn't
      Some people think they will be happy if they are rich - he doesn't
      Some people think they will be happy if they have a prestigious job - he doesn't

      He was quite content working on a problem, and happy to solve it ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    79. Re:This is hilarious by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I program for fun too.
      But if someone wanted to give me an award and a million dollars for it, I'd take it.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    80. Re:This is hilarious by trurl7 · · Score: 1

      Not "alleged" behavior. Yau's behavior is well documented, to the point of being published. There's no "alleged".

      There's only his reaction to the mathematical community's lack of response to Yau's publication of what amounts to intellectual plagiarism.

    81. Re:This is hilarious by Von+Helmet · · Score: 4, Informative

      While that's what happened in the film, that's not what happened in real life. According to Wikipedia he never had visual hallucinations, and only heard voices from 1964 onwards, 5 years after being diagnosed with schizophrenia.

    82. Re:This is hilarious by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is also entirely possible he's rejecting the award out of spite, to get back at society and mainstream mathematics for perceived wrongs in the past. What proves your superiority more than out-doing them all, then spurning even their congratulations and awards. Passive-aggressiveness at its best. That would still be no crime, but it's much different than simply not caring.

    83. Re:This is hilarious by trurl7 · · Score: 1

      And you do. Enlighten us, oh great one.

      And after that you can go back to playing with your transformers

    84. Re:This is hilarious by JamesP · · Score: 1

      No, you're looking at this at the wrong angle.

      Not wanting to be part of the In-Crowd does NOT make a person insane, or on the verge of insanity.

      You're correct on this one.

      But the real issue is

      An 'insane person' (meaning a person with a certain type of mental illness like schizophrenia) is a shut in and refuses (to even think about) accepting an 1-million dollar prize,

      Andrew Wiles did something extremely dfficult as well... See how he reacted.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    85. Re:This is hilarious by borroff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would think that very early on in his career, he may have realized that he works in a realm where very few people can be taught what he's currently working on. He may feel it's a better use of his time to push out the boundaries of knowledge, and let other folks do the teaching.

      I've met a number of physics Nobel Prize winners, and very few of the theoreticians were good teachers. Feynman was an outlier

    86. Re:This is hilarious by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Kurt Godel did one of the paramount works of logic of the 20th century.

      He also believed that people were trying to poison him and died of starvation as a result. Would you call that a 'logical decision'? (and, no , there was nothing going on)

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    87. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the great "Bob" himself said "You don't understand anything about me. I understand everything about you."

    88. Re:This is hilarious by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      "Mental disorder" is a socially defined entity. Many cases are borderline. Being extremely asocial, or having Aspergers are two examples.

      Then there are those unstable enough to voluntarily seek public office......

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    89. Re:This is hilarious by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Not wanting FREE MONEY is insane. Everyone has expenses and no one can predict the future, so you never know when you might find yourself in a financial tight-spot. Turning down free money (in a case where it actually IS free because you won a prize) is one of the dumbest things you can do, right up there with cheating on Summer Glau.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    90. Re:This is hilarious by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Which is why you don't have any friends... But seriously - why is it self-righteous. If a friend was getting hooked on drugs would you intervene? If he was drinking himself to death would you intervene? If he was suicidal would you intervene? In all these cases you are making judgements that are "self-righteous". But you are a shit friend if you do not do anything.

      Likewise, if someone starts abandoning all his friends (others have pointed out that this may not be the case, but for the sake of the original argument) and goes recluse because something happened to him I would certainly intervene.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    91. Re:This is hilarious by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Not only am I not American, the comment was about his reclusive behaviour rather than not taking the money. But don't let that get in the way of our narrative...

      Also - I have been poor - its not glorious, or enlightening or liberating. It just plain sucks. I dare say the only people who would think that are those who have never experienced the alternative (be it poor or well-off).

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    92. Re:This is hilarious by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      Try running that line past a psychologist, someone who has actually dealt with insanity.

    93. Re:This is hilarious by rgviza · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you left your chair to go outside and pick some Morels, and cooked them with some food, you'd change your tune about picking mushrooms. I promise. There's a reason they cost $115 a pound dried ;) Fresh they are orgasmically good and picking them is the only way to get them that way.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    94. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Nash made 0 mathematical discoveries after the schizophrenia actually took hold. He was famous in Princeton for writing tons of math on blackbloards around campus, none of which was coherent.

      And yeah, don't use a movie as a basis of fact. Nash's reaction after seeing the movie: "It's a good story, but it isn't me".

    95. Re:This is hilarious by Taevin · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true teapartyer. Money is not the most important thing in life. My current job pays barely half of what I could be making if I instead worked somewhere more "corporate." The sad thing is, you probably can't even understand why I would stay instead of roaming around to find the highest paying job.

    96. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And.. maybe he'll get struck by lightning and evaporate if he goes outside.

    97. Re:This is hilarious by mike449 · · Score: 1

      We are talking about St.Petersburg, Russia, not Florida. The average temperature is well below freezing and there is a snow on the ground (at least in the forest).

    98. Re:This is hilarious by Taevin · · Score: 1

      Authority "the power or right to give orders or make decisions"
      Authorization "official permission or approval"

      To say that the organization was "authorized" to hand out money implies that some higher power has granted it the right to do so.

      To say that the organization has the authority to do so (which is what shutdown -p now said) implies that it inherently has the right to do so. I think that was shutdown -p now's point.

      Perelman may well believe that no organization has the right to judge the works of others, which should stand on their worth alone, and arbitrarily decide which deserve renumeration. If indeed that is what he believes, he would have to sacrifice his principles in order to accept the money (which would simply reinforce the idea that this organization has the right to judge). I'm not exactly sure what it says about modern society when not sacrificing your moral principles for cash qualifies you as "insane."

    99. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here's a reason they cost $115 a pound dried ;)

      They make you hallucinate?

    100. Re:This is hilarious by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      He is richer than any of us, he understand things that we don't! Money and glory is a religion for the idiots. Much, much, MUCH agreed. The guy doesn't need nor want the money, he's happy as it is. HAPPY. Let him be.

    101. Re:This is hilarious by Draek · · Score: 1

      Really? why is it "he's a genius, but he's got some mental disorders" instead of "he's a genius, therefore maybe they aren't really mental disorders after all"?

      Just wondering.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    102. Re:This is hilarious by Draek · · Score: 1

      "You can't predict the future" is a lousy excuse for anything. Hey, I should have sex with that drunken, 17-years-old idiot, maybe I'll die tomorrow and if I get her pregnant now my genes will live on! or maybe I'll catch AIDS, but hey! you can't predict the future.

      For those of us whose brains aren't dominated by greed, yeah, there is such thing as "enough money". Sure, if I were offered a million bucks right now I'd take it, but only because I could invest it, live off the profits, leave my job and spend the rest of my life studying mathematics and examining the world's toughest problems. This guy managed to do that *before* being offered the million bucks, so what would he need it for?

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    103. Re:This is hilarious by Vlado · · Score: 1

      Not being fixated on money is not the same as not taking it when it's dangled in front of you...
      Especially if it's legitimately offered for something valuable and extraordinary that you did.

      I mean, I can relate to doing things that I like, rather than doing things that would bring me more money. However if all of a sudden someone would pop by and offer me twice the amount of money for exactly the same job as I'm doing right now, there's virtually no reason that I can think of to turn them down.

    104. Re:This is hilarious by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Um, you forgot to include the rest of the story:

      The American said, "Then you would retire. Move to a small coastal fishing village where you would sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take siesta with your wife, stroll to the village in the evenings where you could sip wine and play your guitar with your amigos."

      The Mexican said, "But senor, I can already do all that right now!"

      The American said, "Maybe I'm not making myself clear. When you have that much money, everyone pretty much wants to do your bidding. You can get special favors from the government. Most importantly, you can go up to the hottest women in the world and bed them that very night. Not just your steadily-depreciating 'Maria'."

      The Mexican paused for a second and said, "So how do these IPOs work, again?"

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    105. Re:This is hilarious by Fedarkyn · · Score: 1
      Your way of thinking can e used by theists to impose "treatment" on atheists since this treatment would "help the 'sick' person live a happier, more fulfilling life." according to their point of view.

      I would like to prefer only to treat ppl that are a threat to himself or others

    106. Re:This is hilarious by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      "Eccentric" is what you call insane people when they are someone (or have done something) important enough that they cannot be labeled "insane".

    107. Re:This is hilarious by Harry+Coin · · Score: 1

      Ignatius J. Reilly, is that you?

      --
      That's pre 7-11 thinking....
    108. Re:This is hilarious by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      He doesn't shower for weeks, doesn't cut his hair or nails. Doesn't talk to any people. Doesn't leave his apartment for days at end (note: this was true even before the journalists started the hunt). All his past colleagues comment on how he was pretty much always entirely asocial.

    109. Re:This is hilarious by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      That said, it's not refusal of money that qualifies Perelman as "insane". It's the lifestyle he's been living.

    110. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and gay people burn in hell too

    111. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking the millions and giving them away wouldn't stir up conversation. If rocking the boat of math community is his goal he's doing jolly well.

    112. Re:This is hilarious by Truth+is+life · · Score: 1

      To say that the organization has the authority to do so (which is what shutdown -p now said) implies that it inherently has the right to do so. I think that was shutdown -p now's point.

      Well, that's kind of what I was saying. Anyone, single or collective, has the right to give money or rewards to anyone they want, for any reason they want. Now, obviously sometimes that might have other problems (eg., someone giving out rewards for killing Jews), but that is not in of itself because that person or group of persons is giving out rewards. Fundamentally, no authority of any sort is necessary to reward people for any reason whatsoever.

      Perelman may well believe that no organization has the right to judge the works of others, which should stand on their worth alone, and arbitrarily decide which deserve renumeration.

      Everyone has the "right" to judge the works of others, at least insofar as the quality and skill of those works is concerned. Otherwise, speaking of the "worth" of someone's works would be nonsense. And they have the right, as I said above, of rewarding anyone they damn well please--and people do, and often for the worth of someone's works. And since mathematicians are people, and vary in ability, it is natural that some people will just be better than others, and that some people will be more motivated by greenbacks than Green's functions, and that the sets of particularly clever and especially money-loving mathematicians will overlap. So when mathematicians recognize one of their own's works as being particularly worthy, or want to attract great mathematicians to difficult problems, money will be one major tool in their kit.

      I don't have any problem with Perelman not accepting the money per se (though that could really do him and his family a lot of good, simply by allowing them a very comfortable safety net), I just have a problem with his stated reasons.

    113. Re:This is hilarious by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      Are you claiming that Perelman is schizophrenic? A schizophrenic person may not have a sound mind if they perceive imaginary people and voices as real, and they may have unsound judgment if they persist in a belief that the hallucinations are real despite evidence to the contrary. I don't see any evidence for that in Perelman's case.

    114. Re:This is hilarious by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      I never once said money was the most important thing in life, if you bothered to read instead of going "capitalist - DIE!! *foam at mouth*", you'd know that. I said that no one knows when you'll have unexpected expenses (you know those "they couldn't help it!" sob stories collectivists like you drag out 1,000 times a day) and as such, it's stupid to turn down free money.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    115. Re:This is hilarious by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      This guy managed to do that *before* being offered the million bucks, so what would he need it for?

      Because the stock market could go to crap (like it did a few years ago) and he could lose most of his money. Or maybe he has a child / grandchild that might have some unexpected expense come up (being falsely sued and having to pay out, car accident that the insurance company won't cover, accidentally burning down the house, who knows) and he'll want money to help them out. Your fallacious "argument" about "you can't predict the future" completely ignored the point I made which is that unforeseen expenses are quite common, and as such there's no such thing as "too much money" set aside for retirement / in case of emergency.

      Also, I find it highly amusing that, since I said that it's stupid to turn down free money because you never know when you might have an unexpected expense (they're called unexpected for a reason), you say I'm greedy. However, you think that you taking a million dollars and living work-free off the interest isn't greedy? To use a quote from Buffy - "Your logic does not resemble our Earth logic".

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    116. Re:This is hilarious by retchdog · · Score: 1

      I do wonder just how much damage this single ridiculous idea has caused, just in the U.S. (where it seems most prominent?), over the years. It is non-zero, I can say for sure.

      Do (continental) Europeans have this kind of nonsense meme kicking around?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    117. Re:This is hilarious by retchdog · · Score: 1

      "Like idiot-savant good."

      Yeah, that'd just be "savant" then.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    118. Re:This is hilarious by retchdog · · Score: 1

      In fact the real Nash wrote once, that a lot of people who would otherwise be totally "crazy" can live just fine, if they are wealthy (or cared for) enough to basically never feel any pressure. It's a comorbidly-social disease.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    119. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone has mental disorders of some sort. He is productive, so he does not have a disorder.

    120. Re:This is hilarious by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      So... he's a college student?

    121. Re:This is hilarious by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I doubt they would give him the prize without him personally collecting it, or doing public appearances, or whatever. The man has said already he is tired of the exposure and prefers leading a quiet life. He actually lived in the US for a time, but he did not enjoy playing the funding game, or the credit game. It is just that the things he treasures the most are different. Heck if you think Perelman is weird try reading about Diogenes of Sinope.

      That said I would take the money.

    122. Re:This is hilarious by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      I do wonder just how much damage this single ridiculous idea has caused, just in the U.S. (where it seems most prominent?), over the years. It is non-zero, I can say for sure.

      Its not a ridiculous idea though. Think about it along the lines of germs and disease.

      We all understand today how diseases work because they have been explained and shown, but before that if you tried to explain it people would think your mad. Something so small it's invisible, can float in the very air around you and has no smell or taste and can quite possibly kill. It multiples on random surfaces or in your body but can't be crushed under your feet. You can freeze it and when it thaws out its fine and keeps on going. A silent, invisible, undetectable life form who's only goal is to make people sick and/or die but won't actually 'eat' the persons body like any other thing on the planet. Without proof, sounds like your insane. With proof, your a genius who advances medical science forward.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    123. Re:This is hilarious by retchdog · · Score: 1

      As you say, it "sounds like" you're insane. There's miles of difference, not a thin line. And we also have just such an example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis

      Clearly the doctors and scientists didn't think he was crazy; they did after all bother to take the time to harshly dismiss his work. (He only went insane later, due to plain old nervous breakdown and/or syphilis.)

      The social function of the odious meme at hand is to 1) keep the marginal kooks (not really crazy, but they think they are) buoyed up by the silly hope that they're really brilliant; 2) provide a just-so story by which normal people can ignore offensive, but nagging, ideas (after all, great ideas are indistinguishable from crazy ones so fuck it and accept the so-called "real world").

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    124. Re:This is hilarious by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Try running that line past a psychologist, someone who has actually dealt with insanity.

      I feel that they would agree. Consider things from history like everyone 'knew' that the world was flat and you were insane to believe it was round. You were insane to think that the sun didn't revolve around the earth, everyone 'knew' that. You were insane to believe in microscopic disease because it was undetectable for so long. Amazing how proof showed who was really insane and who was a genius. Not everyone that is insane is truly an undiscovered genius, but not everyone's insane ideas and beliefs the work of madness either.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    125. Re:This is hilarious by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      As you say, it "sounds like" you're insane. There's miles of difference, not a thin line. And we also have just such an example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis

      Clearly the doctors and scientists didn't think he was crazy; they did after all bother to take the time to harshly dismiss his work. (He only went insane later, due to plain old nervous breakdown and/or syphilis.)

      The social function of the odious meme at hand is to 1) keep the marginal kooks (not really crazy, but they think they are) buoyed up by the silly hope that they're really brilliant; 2) provide a just-so story by which normal people can ignore offensive, but nagging, ideas (after all, great ideas are indistinguishable from crazy ones so fuck it and accept the so-called "real world").

      Thing is, they said he was insane, from the wikipedia article:

      In 1865 János Balassa wrote a document referring Semmelweis to a mental institution. On July 30 Ferdinand von Hebra lured him, under the pretense of visiting one of Hebra's "new Institutes", to a Viennese insane asylum located in Lazarettgasse (Landes-Irren-anstalt in die Lazarettgasse).[5]:293 Semmelweis surmised what was happening and tried to leave. He was severely beaten by several guards, secured in a straitjacket and confined to a darkened cell. Apart from the straitjacket, treatments at the mental institution included dousing with cold water and administering castor oil, a laxative. He died after two weeks, on August 13, 1865, aged 47, from a gangrenous wound, possibly caused by the beating. The autopsy revealed extensive internal injuries, the cause of death pyemia—blood poisoning.[6]:76–78

      He died an insane man who's beliefs were wrong and misplaced, from the article:

      As accounts of the dramatic reduction in mortality rates in Vienna were being circulated throughout Europe, Semmelweis had reason to expect that the chlorine washings would be widely adopted, saving tens of thousands of lives. Early responses to his work also gave clear signs of coming trouble, however. Some physicians had clearly misinterpreted his claims. James Young Simpson, for instance, saw no difference between Semmelweis's groundbreaking findings and the British idea suggested by Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1843 that childbed fever was contagious (i.e. that infected persons could pass the infection to others).[4]:10–12* Indeed, initial responses to Semmelweis's findings were that he had said nothing new.[4]:31*

      In fact, Semmelweis was warning against all decaying organic matter, not just against a specific contagion that originated from victims of childbed fever themselves. This misunderstanding, and others like it, occurred partly because Semmelweis's work was known only through secondhand reports written by his colleagues and students. At this crucial stage, Semmelweis himself had published nothing. These and similar misinterpretations would continue to cloud discussions of his work throughout the century.

      His responses to the medical reviewers who didn't agree with him also help give rise to his 'insanity'::

      After a number of unfavorable foreign reviews of his 1861 book, Semmelweis lashed out against his critics in series of Open Letters.[Note 14] They were addressed to various prominent European obstetricians, including Späth, Scanzoni, Siebold, and to "all obstetricians". They were full of bitterness, desperation, and fury and were "highly polemical and superlatively offensive"[4]:57 at times denouncing his critics as irresponsible murderers[6]:73 or ignoramuses.[4]:41 He also called upon Siebold to arrange a meeting of German obstetricians somewhere in Germany to provide a forum for discussions on puerperal fever where he would stay "until all have been converted to his theory."[13] The attacks undermined his professional credibility.

      It took 20 years a

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    126. Re:This is hilarious by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      No. There is no such thing as being "mad" anymore. Its a classic case of Assburger's syndrome.

      He isn't insane, he just has problems socializing with people and even basic empathy with them. This is the kind of stuff you have to go to therapy for.

      Heck, in the most basic sense, most people with Assburger's don't understand why people don't think like them. Its probity why he left the college as he kept getting "bogged down" by "idiots"

      There is no such thing as "crazy" anymore. You can label anyone. Hell, even "natural death" seems so natural from a medical standpoint.

    127. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an example of that seclusive scientist guy in "the day the earth stood still" with Keanu Reeves where Klatu visits him for a short while at his house and fixes his math problem on the chalk board.

    128. Re:This is hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He sounds like a foolish kid who never grew up and yet was blessed with the mind of a genius. How selfish and inconsiderate of him to abandon his important work because his delicate sensibilities were offended by other people.
       
      At least, that's how I see it.

    129. Re:This is hilarious by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I think if you would go up to him, not as a reporter, but as a friend, bring something nice to drink and eat, just to have a chat about a bit of philosophy, then he’d do it
      Of course for that to work, the reporters have to leave him alone for a bit of time.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  2. I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe leave the guy alone like he wants?

    1. Re:I have an idea... by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like a plan to me. I'd be pissed off if people kept bugging me as well. Just take the money he doesn't want and give it to a math oriented scholarship fund or something.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:I have an idea... by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Best idea I've heard yet. The right to be left alone is one of the most important ones we have.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:I have an idea... by danlip · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe leave the guy alone like he wants?

      Am I the only one who thinks this guy is getting off on all the attention he is getting by pretending to be a recluse who doesn't want any attention or money. If he had just taken the money the world would have forgotten about him by now.

    4. Re:I have an idea... by topham · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he -is- a recluse.

      From what I read this is all well within his pattern of behaviour.

      Personally I can agree with him. Simply "Fuck off and leave him alone".

      I think it's safe to say that he's not going to sue for the money, they should setup a bursary and help educate a student or two.

    5. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right, he could have accepted the money and had one hell of a bond fire!

    6. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want attention, there are much better ways to do it than by being a recluse. Especially if you know how to prove the Poincare conjecture.

    7. Re:I have an idea... by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Maybe leave the guy alone like he wants?

      Am I the only one who thinks this guy is getting off on all the attention he is getting by pretending to be a recluse who doesn't want any attention or money. If he had just taken the money the world would have forgotten about him by now.

      I doubt if he left the money he would be left alone. To start with there would be a at least small ceremony for him when he received the prize money (something I doubt he wants), there would be many people that would want to interview him at the ceremony (again something I doubt he wants), his picture heavily plastered in lots of places for the achievement (again...), companies that now would want to hire him or at least 'work a deal out' with him because of him intelligence, schools that might want him to give a lecture, ect... Being rude and crabby would be the better option to get people to leave him alone and just be labeled 'that quite reclusive that won't talk to anyone'/

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    8. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe leave the guy alone like he wants?

      Took the words out of my mouth. People, uhm... Journalists and the gossip-hungry are making him into a Freak. It's no wonder he doesn't want to talk to people (or accept awards).

      I hope those journalists who found out his cell phone number and who tried to make contact with him get fired. I'm also hoping the people that run the charity who are asking for money also lose their jobs. People need to be punished for hurting other people and making them into Freaks. Seems unlikely though, because in this world the intellectually stupid and the morally corrupt rarely loose their jobs or become outcasts of society. Quite the opposite. I wish things were reversed.

      If charities want money they should go after people like the former executives of Enron and ask them for money, or people like O.J. Simpson who makes 33K a month as a pension. These people deserve to be harassed.

    9. Re:I have an idea... by miggyb · · Score: 1

      You know, there's a lot of good causes that could use those million dollars. I believe in right to privacy and not being hassled and what not, but I also believe in the common good.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
    10. Re:I have an idea... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Still better to take it. A million would easily pay for building a moat around his house as well as for some sharks and lasers.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    11. Re:I have an idea... by danlip · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's hilarious to have you call me antisemitic since
      1) I am Jewish
      2) You are the only one in this thread to mention religion

    12. Re:I have an idea... by chronosan · · Score: 1

      Give the man an ultimatum to accept. If he doesn't, leave the man alone, declare the problem solved and donate the money anonymously to The Mushroomers' Guild.

    13. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biggest troll failure, evar.

    14. Re:I have an idea... by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How so? This story has been on slashdot on several occasions; I'd say that he's gotten a ton of attention just by refusing the prize money.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    15. Re:I have an idea... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless you are a seriously odd duck, attention that you have to shun in order to continue getting seems like a pretty lame reward.

      Within the field of mathematics, a lifetime of fame is his pretty much no matter what he does. He has the proof, he doesn't have to play act.

      Outside of mathematics, there are a fair few things you could do for $1,000,000, particularly on vacation to somewhere with a lower cost of living index, that could keep you in the tabloids for weeks, or surrounded by enthusiastic companions for longer than that, until the cash runs out.

      I'm betting that he is the real deal. If he got off on attention, he could just accept the cash, be up to his eyes for a month solid in hookers and blow somewhere nice and tropical, and then spend however long he wanted basking in honorary doctorates and crowds of adoring mathematics departments the world over.

    16. Re:I have an idea... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      But then who would be left to prove that the problem was solved? Huh, smart guy?

    17. Re:I have an idea... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Maybe leave the guy alone like he wants?

      If only he had the money to hire a decent bodyguard.

    18. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /Actually, no one gave them any country. Where in the hell are you getting your misinformed history from?

      And you mentioned Valhalla as if your somehow proud of the religion or people sporting it. They have been responsible for just as much bad things in this world as the jews or their Desert God has. In fact, it's been so bad that the vikings are long gone because of their misery and only pretentious asshats that think they have some connection to a historically missing people tend to exaggerate their greatness over others.

      It's mostly like your the pot calling the kettle black except your extinct and they aren't.

    19. Re:I have an idea... by tool462 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the upkeep is where they get you though. Have you seen the prices on shark de-barnacling lately? Talk about a market bubble...

    20. Re:I have an idea... by RMS+Eats+Toejam · · Score: 0, Troll

      You've never had the right to be left alone by whatever amount you would deem necessary, regardless of what government laws you think offer you some kind of pseudo-protection. At some point, this world requires interacting with others. Sometimes we have a choice. Perelman made his when he solved the problem. He should have kept his mouth shut if he was so concerted with privacy.

      --
      Turning to a Linux advocate for thoughts on Microsoft is like asking Hitler how he felt about the Jews.
    21. Re:I have an idea... by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Am I the only one who thinks this guy is getting off on all the attention he is getting by pretending to be a recluse who doesn't want any attention or money."

      No there are a couple of other posters who also don't get it.

      Spinoza..."is considered one of the great rationalists of 17th-century philosophy, laying the groundwork for the 18th century Enlightenment and modern biblical criticism.....Spinoza is considered to be one of Western philosophy's most important philosophers...Spinoza lived quietly as a lens grinder, turning down rewards and honors throughout his life, including prestigious teaching positions"

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:I have an idea... by chronosan · · Score: 1

      I'm no mathemagician, but didn't TFA say he published it in a paper, surely he hasn't retracted that. ---It took the world's leading mathematicians several years to verify that Perelman had definitively solved the problem in a paper published in 2002.---

    23. Re:I have an idea... by Tynin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sounds like a plan to me. I'd be pissed off if people kept bugging me as well. Just take the money he doesn't want and give it to a math oriented scholarship fund or something.

      and yet maybe if you had a clue about where he was coming from you'd know it was the same math community that fucked him over that you suggest giving blindly too.... not that I dont disagree with teaching math on all levels to those that want it., but it is more immersive than that at a higher level (not just a give it to math scholarships and call it a day (yet I can see your point, but his as well). he was at the height of mathadamia (yay for made up words) and what he saw there was nothing short of cut throat... I'm four sheets to the wind, but please look up some of my earlier arguments.... ah fuck it, here is my earlier discussion on him: http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1484928&cid=30508008

      and really, dont take it from me, read the new yorker piece on him (I ref in my link). he is something special. not just some stuck up asshole looking for an albeit good for him negitive bit of PR.

    24. Re:I have an idea... by oljanx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, no. You see, sharks are very large creatures with special needs. You can't just dig up a moat and stick sharks in it. Picture something like Sea World, and then imagine it your front yard. Then figure in the difficulty of training sharks to properly use high-powered laser beams. It's quite a bit more expensive than you might think, not something within the reach of your average millionaire. Trust me, I know.

    25. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /Actually, no one gave them any country.

      True, they waged a guerilla/terrorist war on the British until the Brits just said "fuck this shit" and gave them Palestine (probably hoping the Arabs would just kill those annoying Zionists).

    26. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he had just taken the money the world would have forgotten about him by now.

      I think you underestimate the amount of negative attention you get if the fact you just got a huge wad of money gets publicised with your name.

      There would be hordes of investment specialists, charities, "friends", frauds, scammers, etc. that would try to get a piece.

      Lottery winners often suffer greatly under the pressure of their new-found riches.

    27. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he is Jewish, as most all great Scientists are, and it is obvious you're a racist

      No real Jew would turn away money. Ergo, he is no Jew and you are the racist.

      Surrender to my impeccable logic!

    28. Re:I have an idea... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the number of people trying to break in also goes up when you have $1m. Especially in a country like Russia, where being rich is likely to attract attention from people you probably don't want attention from. Being a broke crazy mathematician, on the other hand, will probably not result in such people paying much attention to you.

    29. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you may well be.

    30. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could prove a bit of a challenge with as he livis in a _flat_ ;)

    31. Re:I have an idea... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That's unworthy of a mathematician, and would make a mess to clean up. If I were him, I would build a non-euclidean space around my habitat to nicely divert all intruders back to the place whence they came. As a bonus, I would have a warm fuzzy feeling for knowing that I have just made all the Cthulhu fans very happy.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    32. Re:I have an idea... by dominious · · Score: 1

      my god, you really thought this through huh?

    33. Re:I have an idea... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      He is now part of the entertainment circus against his will. For general public it does not matter what makes the news, Lady Gaga, Levinsky or Perelman. They are equally interested in juicy personal details (does she has a penis, how many times they did it or what is the level of disgust one can expect from entering "cockroach infested apartment") and equally uninterested in the essence of particular celebrity, be it the question of what makes a particular musical/visual/marketing style popular, why (psychologically) one of the brightest presidents in American history behaved so foolishly or what is real impact of the solved conjecture to our everyday lives.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    34. Re:I have an idea... by siwelwerd · · Score: 1

      he was at the height of mathadamia (yay for made up words) and what he saw there was nothing short of cut throat...

      First, capital letters are your friend. Second, what experience do you have with 'mathademia' to characterize it as cut throat? If we're all out to get each other, then why are so few papers done by single authors these days? Perelman has some legitimate criticisms of a minority of mathematicians, but it hardly follows that those same criticisms apply to the whole of the profession, and hence that one should withdraw oneself from the community.

    35. Re:I have an idea... by trurl7 · · Score: 1

      If we're all...

      So you're in the community? Ok. You have a Fields medal? Clay prize? Critical breakthrough? New field of study? No? In that case, you need to STFU about what he should and should not do. And that papers are coauthored doesn't mean one guy's not doing all the work and the other gets his name on it just because. Tell me that doesn't happen :)

    36. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      )

      There. You forgot a close paran.

    37. Re:I have an idea... by siwelwerd · · Score: 1

      Where did I say what he should or should not do? I agree that people should leave him alone if he wants to be left alone. But running away and retiring because of a few bad experiences in the field strikes me as more of an overreaction than a logical consequence. As to your STFU comment, yes I am a mathematician and in my experience these comments about a 'cutthroat' environment are far from accurate. I'd like to see how many people who have experience in the field share these opinions.

    38. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice idea
      except then it'll just nibble away at people's minds

      why won't he accept the money and just donate it?
      is he really that modest about the work?
      does he feel guilty for some reason?
      is he shying away for some reason?

      when something doesn't fit into people's norms they get suspicious

    39. Re:I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vikings "Extinct"= Norwegians, Danes, and Swedes. Jews Extinct = 0 hook nosed assholes roaming the planet. Are you really going to compare the raids of the vikings as terrible as they are to the raping of the world economy? The genocide of middle eastern non-jews, and a culture of money grubbing? Israel is the main reason we have such tension in the middle east and it should rightly so be nuked from the map and turned into a parking lot for tourists with Israeli bones used as the parking light poles.

    40. Re:I have an idea... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      and yet maybe if you had a clue about where he was coming from you'd know it was the same math community that fucked him over that you suggest giving blindly too[sic]

      Well, he got a million dollars (plus most likely a lot more), and yet he doesn’t do a single thing to change that what he hates so much? Sorry, but when you are so rigid that you harm the very principles that you wanted to protect with that behavior in the first time, then you have definitely gone too far, into mental problem land.
      The land where you stopped thinking why you are doing all this in the first place, but still blindly follow the old imperfect rules based on it, when when they contradict the original intention.

      Like some government drone executing the “rules/laws”, even when that means doing the opposite of what they were created for. It’s something that someone from the TSA would do.

      Of course this all assumes that hating that math community actually is his motivation. Which is not at all clear, until you ask him and he gives you an answer.
      But every time I enter #math, I can completely understand Perelman. I don’t even know if these are humans I’m talking to in there, because their way of thinking is completely insane, and any common sense of what I could mean, is banned in there, it seems. :/
      (I’ll just have to wait for Lockhart’s book. [Nice guy, btw.])

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    41. Re:I have an idea... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, we built large tree fortresses as children. 3 levels, shooting tower, transparent roof, electricity, radio, shooting slots, a moat with wooden spikes it it, and an electric fence with contact alarm. And I can tell you, that a simple moat out of a plastic pond foil, with an electric fence in it, is usually enough to keep anyone but the cops away. ^^ (Beware of anything that could be used as a bridge. Cut down trees around it if possible, or make the fence go up out of the water for 1-2m.)

      But if you accidentally kill a neighbor’s child, that’s your problem. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  3. This guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is a total badass, he sets the standard for life.

    1. Re:This guy... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      He lives with his mum in a small flat.

      90% of /. would also be "a total badass" but for their parents dwellings having more than one floor.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  4. I'm amazed he has a mobile by LittleBigScript · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe try his facebook.

    They don't make recluses like they used to.

    1. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the reporter just assumed that it was a mobile since he was picking mushrooms. It might have been his home phone.

    2. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by BoppreH · · Score: 2, Funny

      His beard does look like it has it's own flora.

    3. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the reporter just assumed that it was a mobile since he was picking mushrooms. It might have been his home phone.

      in Britain, maybe Europe, they call cordless phones (landline ones) mobiles

    4. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and fauna....

    5. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm English, live in Britain, and I've never heard anyone call a cordless phone a mobile. But this guy is Russian so what's your point again?

    6. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      I think I can guess where he was picking the mushrooms...

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    7. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time someone brags about not having a cellphone, you know what to say: "Grigori -fucking- Perelman has one, you Luddite."

    8. Re:I'm amazed he has a mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe try his facebook.

      They don't make recluses like they used to.

      In Facebook, no one knows you are an introvert.

  5. 'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by Kitkoan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I know how he figured it out at least. He went out, picked magic mushrooms, ate them and let the universe tell him the answer. No wonder he doesn't want the prize, it should be given to the great mushroom spirits.

    --
    Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    1. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Redundant

      ... "picking mushrooms?"

      Those must be some powerful 'shrooms!

    2. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, the mushrooms pick you?

    3. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by FooBarWidget · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rumor has it that anyone who eats those mushrooms will become twice as tall and have the power to break bricks.

    4. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms.

      You'd think that a man of his intellect would know the difference between "your" and "you're"

      Wait a second... How did he make that mistake during a telephone call?!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    5. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is a funny quote in the context of most people from the Americas, understand that in Russia, specifically St Petersburg there are millions of people who eat mushrooms, not the magic kind, the good stuff, eatable. He picks mushrooms in St. Peterburg's parks, they are huge parks, also there are forests right outside the city.

      People really eat mushrooms and berries that they pick, it is a tradition and a free source of food. I highly HIGHLY doubt that he does almost anything that changes his perception of reality at all. His perception is very acutely tuned, apparently he has very very strong moral compass, to the point of obsessiveness.

    6. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by skornenicholas · · Score: 1

      No comrade, in Soviet Russia you pick a thousand mushrooms and give it to the Homeland, in return you receive one mushroom.

    7. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by Alvare · · Score: 1

      I'd bet he meant the psilocybe cubensis he keeps under his bed.

      And, by the way, I can't see why a very acutely tuned perception and a very strong moral compass would prevent someone from picking gold caps.

      --
      4 - A robot may not masturbate, except where such action would conflict with the Second Law.
    8. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      You don't understand? Good.

    9. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I was going to post the same thing. He doesn't pick mushrooms because he's crazy, he picks mushrooms because he's Russian.

    10. Re:'Your disturbing me. I'm picking mushrooms' by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      In an around Germany it’s also not an unusual thing to do. There are guide books, and in the right time of the year you just have to walk trough the forest, and find the eatable ones. And man, there are great ones, that you will never find in your supermarket.

      The only problem is, that nowadays they are full of environmental toxins, which they naturally concentrate. And because of Chernobyl’s radioactive rain back then, we were told not to eat them, since they were highly radioactive. (Which should still be the case. Dunno. People eat them again.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  6. Just leave him alone.. by gyepi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He probably wants nothing more than being left alone. It's ironic that he doesn't seem to grasp that his eccentric behavior makes that even more difficult to achieve.

    --
    Attitudes make the difference between Space and Time: we want to MAX our temporal, and MIN our spatial extension.
    1. Re:Just leave him alone.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but I'm willing to bet he actually wants nothing more than people begging him to accept the prize, and then rejecting them. I'll bet it gives him a small rush every time it happens.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Just leave him alone.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah he gets a rush moom. Failing which he goes for the mush rooms.

    3. Re:Just leave him alone.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. It's HIS fault for telling people he'd like to be left alone. Not the fault of the people who don't respect that. Is this some kind of [noun] 2.0 explanation?

    4. Re:Just leave him alone.. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I am sure that's your wet dream, and as per usual, you are projecting your own desires onto others.

    5. Re:Just leave him alone.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey Chris Crocker is that you?

    6. Re:Just leave him alone.. by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Something tells me having a million bucks laying around would make it awfully easy to avoid people.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    7. Re:Just leave him alone.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      No, no, it's actually not. Do you project on other people a lot?

      --
      Qxe4
    8. Re:Just leave him alone.. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Oh, wow, what a comeback. Ladies and gentlemen, he got me!

  7. This guy... by logback · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is a badass and sets the standard got life.

  8. Ah... an Oscar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This latest snub follows his refusal in 2006 to collect the maths equivalent of an Oscar, the Fields Medal.

    Its sad that the Fields medal is being compared to the Oscars - don't get me wrong, the Oscars are high honors in their fields - but comparing the lifetime of dedication scientists and mathematicians put into their work to the winner of 'Best miniskirt on hot actress in a running scene' doesn't seem right.

    1. Re:Ah... an Oscar by lorg · · Score: 1

      I think that was the first time I ever seen it refered to as the math equivalent of an Oscar. Feels very odd to compare the two since they are clearly very VERY far from eachother. Usually the Fields Medal if compared is compared to being the Nobel prize in math, cause for some odd reason there isn't one.

      Anyhow, I get the feeling it's just not a matter of collecting the money. If it was just about that then why don't just deposit it in his bank account (I assume he has or had one since he got a salary previously for his university work and I doubt they paid in cash) and be done with the whole mess? Or they could just send him a cashiers check cause last I checked there was a postal system in Russia to. Concidering they apparently know where he lives they could come to him to. But for some reason it seems important that he comes to them and collects. So I think they want something else, or more. There are probably strings attached like giving speeches or lectures and possibly other things. Something that he clearly doesn't want for some reason, I think he stated that he already presented his solution and if someone was interested in it they could just download it and read it.

    2. Re:Ah... an Oscar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best miniskirt on hot actress in a running scene

      Damn, they should make that a category.

  9. An ordinary man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...can never understand/quantify what a genius wants.

    1. Re:An ordinary man... by mjwx · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...can never understand/quantify what a genius wants.

      When I use that excuse to justify my interest in Thai prostitutes they call me insane. When I use that excuse on slashdot they call me a troll.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:An ordinary man... by __aagbwg300 · · Score: 1

      "+4 Informative"? Really? What the Hell is wrong with you people?

      "+4 Funny", sure.
      "+4 Deadpan", ok, I'd go with it.
      "+4 Is-This-Guy-My-Brother-In-Law?", absolutely.

      It isn't informative guys. Look for the joke.

  10. Tools by presingular · · Score: 1

    Seriously man, take the million. Why is it that some feel if a tool is used to accomplish something ( in this case a computer to generate the proof ), then it wasn't "truly" accomplished? Math itself can almost be considered a "tool", albeit a mental one. I mean, what? Does this guy never use a pencil or chalk or pocket calculator, or own a digital watch!?...actually, when I think about the kind of person that turns down a million dollars, especially for simply being considered really smart, maybe he doesn't...

    1. Re:Tools by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. I mean I used my car to totally kick ass in last years Boston Marathon. I finished it in like 15 minutes. The officcial were real d-bags though and refused to declare me the winner.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    2. Re:Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Seriously man, take the million."

      I suspect that in Russia, as in other places, large amounts of cash, even if given away, attracts the attention of all sorts of unwelcome characters. The government with taxes; receiving the reward leads to paperwork which if not everything is in order can lead to huge repercussions, like jail time. Criminals who will only hear you received a lump sum, not that you gave it away. Reporters who are only bothering you now but will instead be critical of how you spent the money or attack your decison making (why that charity?). Charities for not being on the receiving end of your generosity. Pesky social people wanting to get a piece, such as women or men (depending on how you spin, and maybe the 'or' should be an 'and') showing up, despite you being in a happy relationship already, maybe even disrupting that.

      Right now he's an interesting story. If he accepts the million, he's an interesting story and rich, and the additional story of what he does with the million becomes a reality.

      Hell, when the economy went to shit here in the US, just look at the nasty backlash online, even here on /.; people were attacking ALL upper class simply because they were rich, not because they had done wrong. It was guilt by association.

      Maybe this recluse has his reasons and understands the world far better than you know.

    3. Re:Tools by blahplusplus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      He doesn't have to accept the million he can say "award it to so and so" and be done with it. The man is smart but he is no genius ethically, there is so much suffering in the world. Anyone with a brain would find some way to circulate that money to where it is needed in the world. It's not going to save the world but reducing the suffering in the world IMHO should be among the top goals of any intellectual worth his or her salt.

    4. Re:Tools by Samah · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...or own a digital watch!?

      I dunno, I still think they're a "pretty neat idea".

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    5. Re:Tools by presingular · · Score: 1

      Well, if we are drawing racing analogies, in this case I would use the space race as mine. I recall no rules or limits on tools for that one - as I don't know of any for solving age-old mathematical quandaries. Having snarked that, I do like your analogy - you clearly illustrate the mode of thought. Still, I can't help but think of any time a tool is created which makes something possible, or at the very least easier, there is no end of individuals ready to declare that tool something bad (or at least that which comes from it) - or to be ashamed of using it.

      Like digital music, "it's not as warm as analog" - these same complaints were/are heard for digital photography/film.

      I don't like that mode of thinking.

    6. Re:Tools by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      suspect that in Russia, as in other places, large amounts of cash, even if given away, attracts the attention of all sorts of unwelcome characters. The government with taxes; receiving the reward leads to paperwork which if not everything is in order can lead to huge repercussions, like jail time.

      Not for this guy. If he were to come out of the basement, he could easily become a national hero overnight. The government officials would absolutely love to spin this story - a Russian genius showing the world how things are done! And they could make a stab at China, too, for good measure, and that's always popular.

    7. Re:Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never give money to charities and I do not find ethically correct or superior to give the money to "who suffers".

    8. Re:Tools by lightspeedius · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some would say simply being rich when many are much poorer in itself is wrong.

    9. Re:Tools by dfarcanjo · · Score: 1

      So your point is that maybe he's just afraid of being rich, for a reason? But it's too late! The money is already his, and half of the stuff you described is already happening.

      He needs to accept that there's a world full of people out there, and guess what, he's in it. And however sad that may be, saying "leave me alone" is sometimes not enough. People sometimes get to you anyway. Of course, publishing a life-changing mathematical proof doesn't help.

      Now that he's already in the spotlight, and especially if he wants to be left alone, he needs to take a stand regarding the prize. Either he takes it, or he calls Millennium and get them to withdraw/donate/whatever, or he refuses and tells the media why... something. The money is already in his porch, and he needs to deal with it. Doing nothing is only making it worse.

    10. Re:Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind that there are:

      * Greedy bastards that take the money and only pretend to do good with it.
      * Incompetent people who waste it on bureucracy and otherwise messed-up projects.
      * People with agenda who end up doing more bad than good.
      * Normal human beings that actually may get something worthwhile done, just not as much as those who would have that million otherwise.

    11. Re:Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      "...people were attacking ALL upper class simply because they were rich, not because they had done wrong."

      You're either poor but overly optimistic about your prospects, poor but subservient, or rich.

      People don't get rich by being kind to others, and there is no type of person they like more than a person who smiles and stands aside while they take their plunder.

      Trickle down economics is the theory that if we allow the biggest landowners to have even more land, somehow, the rest of us will also be able to have more land too. Unbelievable to some, yet I am sure you have no problem believing it at all.

    12. Re:Tools by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      And just how do you manage to maintain an average speed of 168 km/h (104 mph) in the middle of Boston

    13. Re:Tools by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      And just how do you manage to maintain an average speed of 168 km/h (104 mph) in the middle of Boston

      Considering his was probably the only vehicle along the route I don't think traffic was a problem.

    14. Re:Tools by The+Flymaster · · Score: 1

      The Boston Marathon is only briefly in Boston, and then on a fairly straight, 4 lane road.

    15. Re:Tools by kill-1 · · Score: 1

      It's still a bit faster than the average speed of Formula One in Monaco.

    16. Re:Tools by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

      That same logic keeps battered women staying with their husbands/boyfriends because they feel that they can't and shouldn't do any better.
      It seems far worse a moral sin to have people suggest he give anything to charity. Telling other people how to live their lives is the biggest wrong one can do.
      He is in a no-win situation, but if he didn't want the attention/fame he could have published his proof anonymously -- but he may have had a different goal by not doing that, or perhaps he didn't even consider that as an option.

      If the problem is as important as Clay Mathematics Institute purports it to be, by merely giving the proof to them has he not committed an act of charity to mankind?

    17. Re:Tools by bjk002 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you can say "wrong", but certainly "inappropriate" would work...

      Whatever that last word comes to be, the truth of the sentiment within that statement is so elegant, it belongs carved into a monument somewhere.

      --
      Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
    18. Re:Tools by euxneks · · Score: 1

      I suspect that in Russia, as in other places, large amounts of cash, even if given away, attracts the attention of all sorts of unwelcome characters. The government with taxes; receiving the reward leads to paperwork which if not everything is in order can lead to huge repercussions, like jail time. Criminals who will only hear you received a lump sum, not that you gave it away.

      I bet Russia is just a nice a place to live in as the USA. Your opinion seems skewed either by the media or scaremongers left over from the cold war era.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  11. A politician agrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One of Russia's most senior politicians, Federation Council Chairman Sergei Mironov, has appealed for Dr Perelman to be left in peace to make up his own mind. He suggested that it was "not very decent to look into other people's pockets and count other people's money", Russia's Interfax news agency reports.

    Me thinks someone needs to look at the politician's bank account and count how much he has ;)

  12. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From reading the brief summary, it seems that the guy is fully satisfied with a quiet, still life.
    Not seeking attention and being at peace with yourself is something far too underestimated in todays egocentric world.

    OTOH, the money could help a few less fortunate souls.

  13. Not for this reason by Beetle+B. · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He's rejecting it on principled grounds. Regardless of what you think about those principles, he simply can't do this just for short term charity.

    When he rejected the Field's medal, he simply said to the effect of, "If I take the money, I'd be obligated to correct the wrongs I see, otherwise I'd be a hypocrite. I don't want to be the one making that crusade, so I have to reject the money." (Remember the scene in Thank You For Not Smoking?) It's a simple, logical response. He may be a recluse and all, but there's nothing strange about his refusal to take the money.

    --
    Beetle B.
    1. Re:Not for this reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true. If you accept the role of hero, you also accept the responsibilities of a hero. People who don't realise or fulfil this usually end up as media shipwrecks.

    2. Re:Not for this reason by houghi · · Score: 1

      Perhps there is logic in him refusing the money. But a huge majority of humanity will take the money. As he won't, that is not normal behaviour. Un-normal behaviour is called strange. Look at number 4 at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/strange

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Not for this reason by xappax · · Score: 1

      That's not a logical response. If having money obligates one to use it to "correct wrongs", then he is pretty clearly already saddled with that obligation. Just because he doesn't legally have the money in his name doesn't mean he doesn't have access to it, and therefore the power to use it to "correct wrongs" if he so chooses. It's like if Bill Gates turned down a starving kid because he didn't have any money in pocket. If he really cared, he would go get the money he has access to and share it. When you have the possibility of accessing tons of money with little effort, the excuse "I don't have anything to spare" is no excuse at all.

      On the other hand he could just say "I really don't care about charity or the well-being of others, I'd prefer if everyone just left me alone." Which would at least be honest. After all, his work for the field of mathematics is more charity than could reasonably be expected out of anyone.

    4. Re:Not for this reason by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      It's strange without context. With context, it's not strange. This is not unusual behavior for principled people being asked to act against their principles.

      --
      Beetle B.
    5. Re:Not for this reason by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      He's not rejecting the money per se. He's rejecting the award - not getting the money goes along with it.

      I think you'd agree it would be silly for him to refuse the award and say, "I want the money".

      What would obligate him to act is not the money, but the award. So he's rejecting the award.

      Besides, I fail to see the logic. As an ordinary person, he's not obligated to correct the wrongs he sees in the mathematical community. Merely offering him an award doesn't obligate him. If he accepts, it does. Just like my offering you a position as head of the UN doesn't obligate you to enter global politics if you choose to refuse. You can't obligate someone merely by offering. The other party has to voluntarily accept.

      --
      Beetle B.
  14. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who win prestigious awards often become "revisionists" a few years down the road.

  15. Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you prove that? Your $1M is waiting ...

  16. self defeating by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Refusing a $1 million prize will, I suspect, generate more, of the attention he doesn't want.

    The journalists camped outside his home and calling his cell phone don't give a crap about some obscure piece of mathematics - they care about the weirdo who is turning down a fortune.

    1. Re:self defeating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'd been offered this years ago.

    2. Re:self defeating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it hasn't really. He turned down the prize in 2006 - have we heard a lot about him since then? Well... no. This is just coming back around because some well meaning (possibly) charity suddenly piped up and said hey, if you really don't want that we could use it. So, yes, he has been getting a little attention in the last few days, but I expect it will blow over fast and I really doubt that it will amount to anything like the attention that accepting would have done. Of course, his not accepting was also not just about wanting to be left alone either.

    3. Re:self defeating by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      So they announced a prize just over a week ago, and he managed to turn it down 4 years ago.

      No wonder he doesn't care about stupid prizes, he's playing with his time machine which I'm sure is much more fun.

      Or are you confusing the Fields medal with this prize? Obviously to the non-mathematics media (i.e. all of them) accepting or not accepting the Fields medal are both just about equally boring and not worth caring about. Refusing a million dollars is much more interesting from a news perspective than accepting it.

    4. Re:self defeating by wmac · · Score: 1

      These paparazzies have taken him as those attention monger actors.

      Just leave him alone. He wants to have a simple calm life and as he stated he has what he wants. He lives with his mother and that's enough for him.

    5. Re:self defeating by Olli_Niemitalo · · Score: 1

      Well, if he is protesting against commercialization of and competition in research, then the attention works towards his goal.

  17. Mother and Sister? by Prien715 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If he's jobless and living with his family, the least the foundation could do is contact his family and ask if they'd like the money for rent, food, etc. They're essentially paying for his work and even if he doesn't want the prize, they could give it to his family quietly so he can continue to do his work without someone having to worry about rent.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:Mother and Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He made enough money working in the U.S. years ago to live on (given his minimal needs) for life.

    2. Re:Mother and Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From what I can recall, his mother and sister are similarly minded as he himself is.

      Thus, they too would refuse the money.

      Is integrity such a rare thing these days, that everybody freaks the fuck out when they see it, call the person exhibiting it "Strange", and "Weird"?

      Because that is what seems to be happening from my vantage point.

      Seriously, just stop harassing the man. The doesn't want any prizes, additional prestige, or some fucking trophy for his wall. He solved the conjecture, his name will be in math books for the rest of eternity, and that is prize enough for him. Just leave him the fuck alone already.

    3. Re:Mother and Sister? by Nialin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is integrity such a rare thing these days, that everybody freaks the fuck out when they see it, call the person exhibiting it "Strange", and "Weird

      Of course! Things are only "strange" or "weird" because they are outside the norm. If integrity were the norm, the situation would be quite different. Wouldn't you agree?

    4. Re:Mother and Sister? by wmac · · Score: 1

      He has been a professor in very top US universities in past. Being jobless does not always mean being a poor beggar.

    5. Re:Mother and Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between integrity and irresponsibility

    6. Re:Mother and Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is integrity such a rare thing these days, that everybody freaks the fuck out when they see it, call the person exhibiting it "Strange", and "Weird"?

      ... apparently so.

    7. Re:Mother and Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I can recall, his mother and sister are similarly minded as he himself is.

      Thus, they too would refuse the money.
       
      You are unfamiliar with females, I see. They're probably cat-fighting over who will get it.

    8. Re:Mother and Sister? by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      It makes people feel uncomfortable about the fact that they are not really living their own life. thats what freaks people out about people that dont accept large sums of money. If you are happy with your life you dont need money to make it better.

    9. Re:Mother and Sister? by lxs · · Score: 1

      Well said. This reminds me of the reactions when the K-foundation burned a million pounds of their own money.

      Somehow there is this assumption that money is holy and all must bow to it's power. Well it isn't and what he chooses to do or not to do with it is his own fucking business.

    10. Re:Mother and Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "outside the norm" is the definition of strange. You've gone and argued yourself in a darn circle.

    11. Re:Mother and Sister? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      He is not jobless, he tutors students, I am sure he figured out it was going to be enough. He probably knows how much money he needs to live and also he can add.

    12. Re:Mother and Sister? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Not to sound pedantic, but his family did not win the prize. It is a prize and not a charity. Jean-Paul Sartre rejected the 1964 Nobel Prize for Literature. People have asked Obama to reject the Nobel Peace Prize. Sinclair Lewis rejected the Pullitzer prize. Many people have rejected prizes for a variation of reasons. He does not accept it. Get over it and move on with your life.

      Can you image that you are Jean-Paul Sartre's family and because he refused the Nobel Prize. "Hey, he doesn't want the Nobel Prize, Do you want it?". And how sily would that look later in history: Nobel Prize winners: Jean-Paul Sartre's Mom.
      It would look like a sketch from Mothy Python

      Nobel Person : Hello.
      Perlmans Mom : 'Allo. Whoo is eet?
      NP: I am President of the Prize comity and these are other comity member. Whose apartment is this?
      PM: This is the apartment of my son, Grigory Perelman.
      NP: Please go and tell your son that we have been charged by The Comity with a sacred quest, and if he will accept our prize, he will receive a lot of money as well as a prize.
      PM: Well, I'll ask him, but I don't think he'll be very keen. He's already got one, you see?
      NP: What?
      Second NP: He says they've already got one!
      They are stunned.
      NP: Are you sure he's got one?
      PM: Oh yes. It's very nice

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:Mother and Sister? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      This is why there is a huge story every time a cabbie returns a large sum of money to the passenger. Nowdays you are expected by default to be a greedy, thieving bastard only following laws when there is a clear threat of punishment. Perelman has a very strong moral compass, he burned the bridges with the mathematical community, now how can he take money and titles from them now?

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  18. Quit bothering the guy by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Quit bothering the guy already.

    He's sensible enough to know that if he accepts, people will want him to give speeches, attend talks, and will generally waste his time. Feynman once pointed out that winning a Nobel Prize meant that he heard from many people he really didn't want to talk to. Feynman sometimes gave talks under a pseudonym, so that only the people really interested in the subject matter would show up.

    1. Re:Quit bothering the guy by slew · · Score: 1

      Have to hand it this guy, though.

      Feynman succumbed to the peer pressure and accepted the prize. Perelman hasn't caved in to peer pressure yet and this is his second one...

    2. Re:Quit bothering the guy by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      This all comes down to the general public putting to much emphasis on external things and putting to much stock in names, titles and associations. In an attempt to give themselves an identity they think it enables them to live though someone else's success, instead of living though their own achievements and accomplishments. Most people live desperate lives and this is what they do to make themselves feel better about the fact they are doing nothing to really live life. This story is a good lesson to remember to live your own life and not live through someone else.

  19. Everyone's friends when you've got the greenbacks by ghostunit · · Score: 1

    especially charities

  20. Oh yeah, go ahead... by BoppreH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Disturb him some more and he might never submit another of his solutions to the world.

    1. Re:Oh yeah, go ahead... by Albinoman · · Score: 1

      No, he probably understands the importance of discovery or else he wouldn't have revealed this one. We don't want him to release them post-mortem.

  21. what mushrooms? by slonik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and another who managed to call him on his mobile, 'You are disturbing me. I am picking mushrooms.'

    Just check the weather in St.Petersburg, Russia. It is still too cold there for any mushrooms to grow. So much for journalist's integrity.

    1. Re:what mushrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The weather in his warm basement filled with lights is perfect for picking "mushrooms".

    2. Re:what mushrooms? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      They can grow mushrooms indoors now that we have that wonderful invention 'heating'.

    3. Re:what mushrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mushrooms grow very well in a basement.

    4. Re:what mushrooms? by svunt · · Score: 1

      Since there's mobile coverage where the mushroom picking is going down, maybe it's indoor rather than in a forest?

    5. Re:what mushrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or on his feet

    6. Re:what mushrooms? by zombie_monkey · · Score: 1

      Just check the weather in St.Petersburg, Russia. It is still too cold there for any mushrooms to grow. So much for journalist's integrity.

      Dude, journalists have been harrassing him for years. It's weird that you hadn't heard of the media siege on him, but at least RTFA.

    7. Re:what mushrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I don't know why people have to take every thing in a story as being contemporaneous.

      It is entirely possible the mushroom quote hails from fall of 2006 when he turned down the Fields Medal or anytime after that when it mushrooms were in season.

    8. Re:what mushrooms? by migloo · · Score: 1

      and another who managed to call him on his mobile

      Frankly, I seriously doubt he owns a cell phone.

    9. Re:what mushrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have temperature controlled environments now, they are called houses! Do I get a million for solving this puzzle?

    10. Re:what mushrooms? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      He maybe picking the kind of mushrooms that infect tree trunks, quite a few people do mit here in Russia.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    11. Re:what mushrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it couldn't have been that he wasn't telling the truth when he said that. The journalist must have made it up.

    12. Re:what mushrooms? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      'You are disturbing me. I am picking mushrooms.'

      "Oh, I'm sorry, I can see now that you were disturbed long before I called..."

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  22. Oblig. Good Will Hunting quote by dfarcanjo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will: Oh, come on! What? Why is it always this? I mean, I fuckin' owe it to myself to do this or that. What if I don't want to?
    Chuckie: No. No, no no no. Fuck you, you don't owe it to yourself man, you owe it to me. Cuz tomorrow I'm gonna wake up and I'll be 50, and I'll still be doin' this shit. And that's all right. That's fine. I mean, you're sittin' on a winnin' lottery ticket. And you're too much of a pussy to cash it in, and that's bullshit. 'Cause I'd do fuckin' anything to have what you got. So would any of these fuckin' guys. It'd be an insult to us if you're still here in 20 years. Hangin' around here is a fuckin' waste of your time.

    <b> mine.

    1. Re:Oblig. Good Will Hunting quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol hell yea

    2. Re:Oblig. Good Will Hunting quote by ghostunit · · Score: 1

      But that was said to him by a (real) friend, that's the whole point.
      This man has no friends, and all everyone wants from him is his work.
      It is true that he would most likely be way better off if he used that work to make himself rich, but that's up to him and it's insulting to propose that he owes it to complete strangers such as us.

    3. Re:Oblig. Good Will Hunting quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Be yourself." --Just about everyone. If Will wants to work construction, then let him work construction. If this guy doesn't want to accept the prize, don't give it to him. You people never seem to see your contradictions.

    4. Re:Oblig. Good Will Hunting quote by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Doesn't apply. The lottery ticket Chuckie is talking about isn't cash. It's the ability to get himself out of the boring ass jobs he's stuck in, and that his friends would love to get out of but don't have the ability to leave.

      This guy is in the opposite situation. He used to do what he loved - math. And then the math community fucked him over, repeatedly. And now the same community is asking him to come back. Pretty please. They'll even pay him quite a lot of money. Pretty please with sugar on top.

      Might as well ask Fritzl's if she'd like to make a shit load of money by moving back into that dungeon for a reality tv show.

  23. Mo' money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mo' problems.

  24. An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Perelman is not so much a weirdo, but an aesthetic artist of sorts--he's been hurt by the fact that humans have tried to monetize something he considers to be beautiful...as if you could place a price on Shakespeare or a price-tag on Emily Dickinsons' poems.

    1. Re:An artform. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful

    2. Re:An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you basing this analysis of his behavior on? Or is it just a wild guess?

      It sounds like you just want to romanticize his behavior.

    3. Re:An artform. by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Do you think Shakespeare wrote only for the art?

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    4. Re:An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as if you could place a price on Shakespeare or a price-tag on Emily Dickinsons' poems.

      yeah, about $10 at the Barnes and Nobles down the street.

    5. Re:An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's partly a sum of my opinion and analysis from this article http://plonk.in/Perelman

    6. Re:An artform. by fyoder · · Score: 5, Funny

      as if you could place a price on Shakespeare or a price-tag on Emily Dickinsons' poems.

      Shakespeare : $26.40

      Emily Dickinson : $14.95

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    7. Re:An artform. by signingis · · Score: 2, Informative

      ascetic

      --

      I prefer a void in conversation to a vacuous one.
    8. Re:An artform. by Nukedoom · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare probably didn't only write for art and yes, you can buy poems at your local bookstore for a couple bucks. I'm just suggesting that when you offer a prize for a proof; when you package up literature for a couple bucks, you lose a part of that creativity of the medium. I think, I don't know, I guess you would call it a suffocating experience. It's not an entirely bad thing, but you know, it's something to think about.

    9. Re:An artform. by Stephen+Tennant · · Score: 0

      He might also be a schizophrenic. Isn't the incidence of schizophrenia higher among mathematicians?

      --
      I spend most of my time in bed, darling.
    10. Re:An artform. by jjohnson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Shakespeare certainly didn't write for art. If he were alive today he'd be Jerry Bruckheimer or Michael Bay. Throughout his life he made a reasonable living producing plays that had large audiences from all levels of society. He wasn't writing for posterity, he was writing to sell tickets, and his plays reflect that: Kings and Queens, forbidden love and betrayal, lots of opportunities for swordfights to be staged, and comedy that still holds up today if performed well.

      The only reason he seems like a God among writers is that, because he was popular, his plays survived. He wrote very little that was original in concept; he was constantly borrowing from other, earlier playwrights and from popular stories of the day. The (now) archaic English gives it a patina of high art, but that's our faulty perspective, not his intent.

      If that depresses you, it's only because in 500 years, there will be revival companies performing Top Gun and Die Hard rather than Driving Miss Daisy.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    11. Re:An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. What really pisses him off is that all the cultural imperialists keep misspelling the name of his home city and calling it his home town.

      He lives in Saint Peterburg. There is no "s" in the middle. Look at it in Cyrillic where an anglo S looks like C. Only one there is at the start of the Saint part.

    12. Re:An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason he seems like a God among writers is that, because he was popular, his plays survived.

      I'd suggest it's the other way around: his plays survived because they were great. Have actually you seen (or read) any? They genuinely are brilliant, you know, it's not all some big hoax!

      That said, much of of your post is on target, and in fact contains important lessons. Great art doesn't revolve around 100% originality. And just because something is popular doesn't mean it's bad.

    13. Re:An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alan Rickman did both Shakespeare and Die Hard.

    14. Re:An artform. by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Since the other AC didn't bother to explain Shakespeare's greatness, I'll try. Keep in mind, this isn't my field.

      Shakespeare's underlying stories are good. Pacing is good. Themes are well-addressed. Plots have twists and the plays are populated with dialogue that help build rich, full characters.

      So far, we're at the Bruckheimer level you mentioned. But next, we've got subtlety and reveal. Watch a movie apiece from each decade and notice how the film industry (and their audiences) progress through learning how to reveal story. Playwrights are similarly hampered. Now, go back and compare Shakespeare's abilities here. They're not 21st-century good, but they're much better than one would expect for being CENTURIES old. He shared details with audience sometimes, kept them for dramatic twists in others, and used everything from soliloquy to asides to engage audiences and unfold the story as he wanted.

      Finally, the plays use metric and mnemonic techniques common for plays in an illiterate era: actors needed to be able to store all that prolix, lyrical prose by the pageful in their heads. They needed to know lines to a dozen roles in as many plays. This was done by structures and rhythms that helped establish the words as strongly as the ideas -- they sounded so cool because the patter guided actors to the same words, rather than paraphrasing. Some of what feels stilted about his writing isn't because we talk differently now, but because plays talked differently expressly because that distinctive rhyme and structure was a tool to really help actors memorize this dialogue.

      Similarly, in an era before amplified audio, redundancy was needed in the dialogue so that listeners heard enough to track the story even if they missed hearing words occasionally. All that's in there, too, without detracting much from the story's pace.

      The best contemporary children's writers and moviemakers are famous for plussing stuff onto their cartoons until the story engages the parents as well as the kids. Shakespeare was a bit less constrained about offending children and their protective parents, but he balanced humor in a way that titilated the elite and the masses, merchants and working stiffs, etc. He even was successful at touching on contemporary hot-button issues, kindling controversy when mentioning scandals without himself becoming a political pariah.

      So, yeah... genius. It looks easy, but putting all that together ain't. And there will be revivals of some of contemporary lit/plays/videos, but a lot doesn't age well, much like Sir Edward Bulwer-Lytton's goopy novels.

    15. Re:An artform. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Bruckheimer and Bay aren't writers, so it's doubtful whether Shakespeare could match their talent. And since Shakespeare's audience was smaller, satisfying highly educated patrons and potential patrons would have been at least as important to him as mass popularity.

    16. Re:An artform. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that depresses you, it's only because in 500 years, there will be revival companies performing Top Gun and Die Hard rather than Driving Miss Daisy.

      Doubt it. They will still be in copyright.

      Hows that for depressing?

    17. Re:An artform. by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare certainly didn't write for art. If he were alive today he'd be Jerry Bruckheimer or Michael Bay.

      I shudder to think that Jerry Bruckheimer or Michael Bay will be considered the Shakespeares of our time in 500 years.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  25. Mr. Perelman by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    If you are out there, you sir, are my hero.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Mr. Perelman by BlueWaterBaboonFarm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why's that? I have a lot of respect for the math he did, but I really don't see him as heroic.

    2. Re:Mr. Perelman by wmac · · Score: 1

      Because he is courageous enough to reject $1m. Are you?

      Only heroes think they have what they want. We normal people always think we are incapable because we did not have what we needed.

    3. Re:Mr. Perelman by Cryacin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jumping off a cliff does not take courage, it takes cowardice.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:Mr. Perelman by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because he is courageous enough to reject $1m. Are you?

      No, but I'm so heroic I've managed to reject the temptation to sleep with Natalie Portman. That's WAY more heroic!

    5. Re:Mr. Perelman by quantumpineal · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is the funniest thing Ive seen for a while

      --
      ~don't feel threatened by my pineal~
    6. Re:Mr. Perelman by cjyetman · · Score: 1

      bullsh*t.... the man is a recluse and doesn't like all the attention he's getting from it. he's not a hero or courageous, he just can't deal with the attention, so he's refusing it out of self preservation. which is not a criticism... I can relate... but it's not some sort of self sacrifice for the benefit of humanity. gimme a break.

    7. Re:Mr. Perelman by wmac · · Score: 1

      Didn't your family teach you to be polite?

    8. Re:Mr. Perelman by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      That was probably a wise choice. I hear she's a bit of a skank

      Link NSFW on so many levels.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    9. Re:Mr. Perelman by danlip · · Score: 1

      Jumping off a cliff does not take courage, it takes cowardice.

      I wouldn't call that cowardice. It takes stupidity or insanity. In Perelman's case it is clearly not stupidity.
      (not that you can really compare jumping off a cliff to rejecting $1m, the latter does not kill you -
      but it does cause you to get lots of attention, which is exactly what he claims he does not want)

    10. Re:Mr. Perelman by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Jumping off a cliff does not take courage, it takes cowardice."

      That depends entirely why one is jumping off the cliff.

      In the case of the million bucks, the genius in question might be self-aware enough to know it would interfere with the way he prefers to live. His gift for maths is tremendous, but (obviously) he is otherwise nuts.

      His preferred coping mechanism developed over years. Best to let him alone.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  26. Leave him alone by horza · · Score: 1

    He seems a nice but geeky guy. He loves maths, but doesn't want some prize he never applied for. Good for him. Of course there are plenty that would love to leech off him, 'charity' or not, which is all the more reason not to set himself up as a target by accepting. It will be interesting to see what Grigory comes up with next.

    Phillip.

  27. 1 million probably isn't worth his effort. by Narcocide · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's my theory. He's a genius, a madman and a recluse, as well as everything else people say about him plus one other note: a mushroom farmer. 1$ million probably isn't even worth his time to open the door. "I have all I want" pretty much sums it up. Take your paltry 1$ million and donate it to an appropriate charity. If you really want a minute of his precious time you'll probably have to raise the figure by a couple orders of magnitude.

  28. Just donate it to charity already by origin29 · · Score: 1

    Very simple.. after x amount of time, the award defaults to a charity. Perelman (or any other winner) doesn't want to pick it? The Millennium Prize board picks it. Done. Now live him alone.

  29. Can I have it? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I'll do good things with it. Honestly. :-)

  30. leave the man alone, or else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you will be haunted

  31. Not Married by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    He must not be married. If I turned down a mil, my wife would kill me, dig me back up, kill me again, film it all, and sell the film rights to recoup it.

    1. Re:Not Married by carolfromoz · · Score: 1

      I did hear he lives with his mother and sister though - you wonder what they have to say about it.

    2. Re:Not Married by euxneks · · Score: 1

      He must not be married. If I turned down a mil, my wife would kill me, dig me back up, kill me again, film it all, and sell the film rights to recoup it.

      Nice wife.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  32. Put a stop to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so he wants to be left alone and people won't leave him alone because of the money.
    He should accept the prize, pay the associated taxes, take the remaining money to a different city, buy one or two small but valuable things, and destroy them in public. All gone, problem over.

  33. Nigerian Prince Antimatter at work somewhere by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    i just know it

  34. Incorrect by maroberts · · Score: 1

    He turned down the Fields Medal award/cash in 2006, the cash award for the Fields Medal is quite small ($15000 or so)

    The Millenium Prize is somewhat different ($1,000,000 for each one of 7 difficult maths problems solved) and his award for solving one of the problems has been granted this year (2010).

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  35. Re:Everyone's friends when you've got the greenbac by jamesh · · Score: 1

    That's the thing that would really bug me about suddenly coming in to a heap of money I didn't really earn (i'm not saying this guy didn't earn the million, but that appears to be his opinion). You'd find out more about the people around you than you probably ever wanted to know.

    And i'm sure there are exceptions, but giving people lots of money that they don't really feel that they've earned probably isn't going to make them happy in the long run.

  36. The guy is smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what happens to people in Russia that suddenly come into money... many disappear.

    1. Re:The guy is smart by Stephen+Tennant · · Score: 0

      You know what happens to people in Russia that suddenly come into money... many disappear.

      Yeah, to the Bahamas! Russia: brrrr!

      --
      I spend most of my time in bed, darling.
  37. as far as criminals go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't he in MORE danger by not accepting the money? Once he has it and gives it away, he can not get it back, so criminals have nothing to extort from him. But as long as he has the ability to collect and doesn't, he's a prime target: "listen, stupid, collect the cash and give it to us, or we'll hurt you and your family".

  38. White Elephant by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Based on what people are saying wrt to receiving a large sum in Russia, the origin of the phrase "white elephant" comes to mind.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  39. Neal Caffrey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should take this guy's money on the next season of WhiteCollar.

    But seriously, how hard can it be for some impostor to assume his identity (if only for a little while) and claim the money -- either the white hat move of laundering it and setting up a charity, or the more normal take-it-and-run move? With him being so reclusive, I can only imagine there's not a whole lot of recent photos...

  40. Re:He could be a genius AND an asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He owes you nothing.

  41. He is the Lady Gaga of Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This guy is a game changer and is ridiculing the entire field.

  42. nope by tempest69 · · Score: 1

    He solved the Poincare conjecture, go ask Andrew Wiles if he is forgotten for some work he managed a over a decade ago.

    1. Re:nope by danlip · · Score: 1

      Andrew who?

  43. this guy is a great example! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    He illustrates PERFECTLY the difference between intelligence and wisdom. He's only got one. *shrug*

  44. He's on Step 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Solve ridiculously hard math problem
    Step 2: Reject 1m reward
    Step 3: ????
    Step 4: Profit!

    1. Re:He's on Step 2 by kirill.s · · Score: 1

      Step 3: Have your peace and quit, make your way into history books.

      The PROFIT he has cashed in can stand the test of time better than mere money.

  45. Genius at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If integrity were the norm, the situation would be quite different. Wouldn't you agree?

    You are disturbing me. I am picking mushrooms.

  46. Bow down too him fellow nerds, geeks and aspers! by burni2 · · Score: 1

    He is the jesus of geekyness, he is the saviour of nerdism - strip down nerd !

    Well he was picking mushrooms, mh.. these have to be "special" mushrooms.

  47. Schizophrenia? by lightspeedius · · Score: 1

    IANAP (I am not a psychiatrist), but he sounds like someone who is managing schizophrenia.

    Or he might just prefer his own company and not be concerned about appearance.

  48. Playing devil's advocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that Perelman has attracted far more attention by refusing the Fields Medal and Millennium Prize than if he had quietly accepted them, and that he certainly should have know that would be the case, perhaps he is not the humble saint that everyone here is making him out to be. Commence downvoting.

  49. That's a Great Idea! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy to form the charity foundation for leaving Perelman the fuck alone if he wants to give me the million bucks. Then he could refer anyone bugging him to my foundation whenever they bug him. Actually, he's welcome to do that anyway. For a million bucks, I'd be willing to poke intruders in the eye and spew random obscenities at them, though!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  50. This is probably his second gift to mankind... by Chaffar · · Score: 1

    I noticed that the 1st reaction of most people was "wtf man just take the cash it's too much money to turn away" "think of all the good you can do" etc... but for many people this was also followed by the far more important 2nd reaction "OK - this can make sense if you think of it THIS way".
    I think the real reason he rejected it might be far more simple than we make it to be, but the questioning of his motives by thousands of people is probably what is really interesting here.
    If 1% of the people who hear of this story lose interest in amassing vast piles of cash, I think he has done a far greater thing than just solving what was fundamentally a complex puzzle with possibly no solution, he has given mankind back a piece of his dignity.

  51. it's more about us, less about him by blueworm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This bit is more about our personal dissatisfaction with our lives, as the readers, having to do things we don't like for money. It's more about a dissatisfaction with the economic system and less about this mathematician, or ex-mathematician. This dissatisfaction leads us to react to any declination of money with shock. The real key to freedom is living with very little and very humbly such that we "work" less and live more enjoyably, where "work" is here defined as any activity done more for money and less for personal enjoyment.

    Even Richard M. Stallman himself has suggested this:

    "I live like a student, basically. And I like that, because it means that money is not telling me what to do."
    -- Richard M. Stallman
    http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fsfs/rms-essays.pdf
    Pg. 164

    1. Re:it's more about us, less about him by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      This post needs to be modded up. Very well said.

    2. Re:it's more about us, less about him by DMiax · · Score: 1

      And yet Stallman gladly takes money from strangers that admire him and would gladly take a million, if only to put it in FSF pockets *because he is of simple needs but he values his work*. What Perelman does is not really on the same scale.

    3. Re:it's more about us, less about him by tiks · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much the smartest remark i have seen in this whole discussion. I can understand why do we have to push our framework of life onto everybody else that seems to 'not conform'. Its almost as if we need everybody to buy into our way of thinking to convince ourselves that we are all fine.

      This reminds me of a quote from my favorite philosopher J Krishnamurti:
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."

      --
      We are always correct.. even when we realize we were wrong.
    4. Re:it's more about us, less about him by consonant · · Score: 1

      When I was living like a student, it was more like the LACK of money telling me what NOT to do.

    5. Re:it's more about us, less about him by blueworm · · Score: 1

      Adopting a humble lifestyle does money must be rejected, it simply means its use should tend be avoided in want of expensive or unnecessary things. While I cannot expect us to eliminate our worldly possessions, we can take steps to minimize the amount of physical things we own such that we cannot be easily controlled with threats against them (direct or otherwise). If you are unsatisfied with your job and have a few vehicles and a large house to maintain, expenses for these things makes saving money difficult, and in turn make exiting that job difficult, which makes it more likely for you to accept frustrating management decisions at work for fear of not being able to afford the upkeep for your investments in physical products. Variations of this scenario may be adapted to fit the idea expressed here, however the general argument remains the same.

    6. Re:it's more about us, less about him by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      "I live like a student, basically. And I like that, because it means that money is not telling me what to do." -- Richard M. Stallman Missing the fact that lack of money is constraining what you can do - sounds like RMS idea is to be a tenured grad student

    7. Re:it's more about us, less about him by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Stallman has a cause to fund. He is a modern-day crusader. Perelman has said he doesn't want to be a crusader.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  52. I have taken care of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no further need to discuss this. I have accepted the prize on Perelman's behalf. I am confident that some day Perelman himself will complete his mushroom picking and return my call. In the mean time, I will put the money to good use. And please don't reach out to me, I'm currently busy choosing the paint color for my Porsche.

  53. Have they tried reverse psychology? by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah, never mind, you're probably not smart enough to take the money.

  54. Euphemism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to lock myself in the bathroom when I wanted to "pick my mushroom", but my sister was a lot more presistent than this reporter...

  55. For the sake of all mankind by oljanx · · Score: 1

    Let this man pick his mushrooms in peace. He may be our best bet at finding the question to the answer, which we all know is 42. Or maybe he'll come up with a proof for the Riemann Hypothesis whilst wandering about his mothers yard. Seriously, it's in everyone's best interest to back the hell off.

  56. Cause and effect by wye43 · · Score: 1

    I think that freeing up brain power from mundane tasks like money, socializing and gossip provides some serious spare capacity that can be used to accomplish things that may seen amazing for "normal" people.
    While I never accomplished anything as great as solving Poincaré conjecture, I completely sympathize with Perelman's attitude!

  57. For communist party by patrikas · · Score: 1

    It's for communist's party. It was written that they asked him to accept the price and donate everything to the party as they saw 'true communist's' spirit in him or something.. Remember that everything's being taken under control in R..

  58. Happens when ordinary people comment on a prodigy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of people could solve the problem that he did? I guess not any.
    Well that mean we simply can't think at the same level as he does, so its futile to interpret his decisions.
    Leave him alone. A man of his intellect would know what is best for him, better than any of ordinary mortals.

  59. Obligatory by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the prize gets you.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  60. how about a new price? by managementboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What the comity could do is take the million and invest it at say 3%. Create a new price called the Perelman price and give the interests away to the winner every 5 years.

    1. Re:how about a new price? by kgo · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing he would raise hell if they did that. Does Russia have the 'right to publicity' in their laws? It's not like I can just setup the "Obama Prize" and start giving awards to late-term abortion doctors without getting into trouble.

      --
      Can you construct some sort of rudimentary lathe?
  61. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    aspergers?

  62. money = responsibility = too much trouble by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Perelman is an artist. What he did, he did not do for fame or riches.

    Understand that he did not publish his proof in a 'scientific' paper, he simply placed it on-line for others to see, like a beautiful photograph or a painting or a piece of music for others to enjoy. He did not do full calculations in it, it was about 60 pages, the full calculations were done separately later by others, it took an additional 280 pages. From this, understand, the man has created art and once he had the actual proof, he needed no calculations to finish all the trivialities.

    Math is not about trivialities of computation of the known, it is an art form of deducing, finding new approaches, new patterns of ideas. Ideas are more important than the concrete implementations because implementations take energy away from enjoying the ideas, the old and the new.

    Math is free, it is also Free. Millions are not needed to enjoy it. Millions, however, create distractions in various forms. Of-course Perelman could use the money, his life is extremely ascetic, but he could take the money if it did not entail a number of problems with it.

    At least one problem cannot be overcome: taking this cash from an institution that is associated with the 'mathematicians', who do not view math as an art form, but as means to make money. This means degradation of the principles, of the reasons to do the real Math Art in the first place. What is the purpose of the Poincare conjecture? Nobody cares. Maybe sometime in the future there will be a use for it, but as it is, for Poincare, for Perelman, for the artists in the field, this is just a beautiful pattern.

    The utilitarians among us will look for the uses, the Mathematicians do not care about the uses, they like the form that they have invented, like the string of patterns that it took to make the form, they like the shape, the dynamics, the boundaries, the infinities. These things are pretty in ways that can only be understood when you look at it by yourself and see how it is done and that it could be done this other way or maybe it could not be done in any other possible way and how things combine and disconnect and intersect and loop around.

    Perelman is an actual Mathematician Artist, but that is why he does not see himself as a genius, as many call him, because they don't even understand the first thing about what he is looking at, so because it is so complicated and unknown and totally outside of their world and the reasons for it are not clear at all, they think it takes a genius to do this. He thinks it was a neat problem that he found a beautiful pattern to as a solution, he thinks genius is something else completely.

    He is being insulted by everybody at this point, I think that's his view.

  63. you are a scared little one, aren't you? by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does Perelman not taking the money scare you?

    Does he offend you?

    Does he entice a violent reaction in you?

    Do you hate it, when someone sticks out of the crowd not out of a desire to be more 'cool looking' but simply because he does not need the crowd?

    Take the money and give it to charity, you self-important Shit

    - why don't you go and find him and beat him into submission to your own standards, that will hopefully satisfy your primordial craving to make sure nobody is different and whoever is different they are destroyed, so that the coherency of the group is in balance yet again?

    1. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Single best Slashdot post in several weeks. Bravo, sir.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by g253 · · Score: 1

      Hey, freedom goes both ways. He's free to say it's all bullshit and he doesn't want anything but for people to fuck off and leave him alone, I'm free to voice my opinion that it's selfish and stupid.

    3. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      Hey, freedom goes both ways. He's free to say it's all bullshit and he doesn't want anything but for people to fuck off and leave him alone, I'm free to voice my opinion that it's selfish and stupid.

      Yes, and I'M free to voice MY opinion that YOUR opinion of him is also selfish and stupid. See how that freedom goes both ways?

      I'm flabbergasted when people trot the line "I'm free to say whatever I want" as if that somehow gives credence to their stupid comments. I'm free to say that 2+2=5, but that doesn't mean I'm correct, or that you're somehow infringing on my 'freedom' by publicly disagreeing with me.

      There should be something similar to Godwin's Law for people who resort to using the "I'm free to say whatever I want" argument.

    4. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by trurl7 · · Score: 1

      And we are free to consider you the asshole that you are.

      Love "teh freedom" :)

    5. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't about non-conformity. This is simply an issue of ethics. He is being offered $1 million. He doesn't have to DO anything for it. If he doesn't want it, he could give it directly to starving children. Should children die because he can't be bothered to take free money?

    6. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha ha, you know what, talk to the people who are awarding him the money.

      He does not have to do anything, he is not going to do it.

      You want 'the starving children' to benefit, go right ahead, talk to those guys who are prepared to give away that million.

    7. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Sure, you are free to do whatever, except here is the difference:

      Your whatever means NOTHING.

      You did not prove Poincare conjecture, you did not win a million dollars, you also probably did not donate anything much to the children, you love so much.

      So whatever, sit in your basement and type away, see if people pay attention to you, you, you.

    8. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Perelman not taking the money scare you?

      Does he offend you?

      Does he entice a violent reaction in you?

      Do you hate it, when someone sticks out of the crowd not out of a desire to be more 'cool looking' but simply because he does not need the crowd?

      Take the money and give it to charity, you self-important Shit

      - why don't you go and find him and beat him into submission to your own standards, that will hopefully satisfy your primordial craving to make sure nobody is different and whoever is different they are destroyed, so that the coherency of the group is in balance yet again?

      special unorthodox snowflake spotted.

    9. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Does Perelman not taking the money scare you?

      No. I find it rather childish and odd.

      Does he offend you?

      No. But why is he so stand-offish? Why not try to change what you don't like from a position of authority? Perelmen could do it if he wanted to, but it's like he's given up. That's what bothers me.

      Does he entice a violent reaction in you?

      No. Apparently in some other people it does though.

      Do you hate it, when someone sticks out of the crowd not out of a desire to be more 'cool looking' but simply because he does not need the crowd?

      I doubt it's because he "does not need the crowd". I think perhaps there is something more underlying his entire attitude. You've given him attributes that he may not have. Obviously, it's cool to think of the genius recluse who "doesn't need the crowd", but if we can learn from him, why is he not teaching us? We are a social animal after all - when one does well, all of us do well. Unfortunately, there's a problem with a lot of North Americans where they think "doing well" is "looking good and being rich". What Perelman's doing may seem noble, but why not give that knowledge to science? I think he's being selfish.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    10. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. I find it rather childish and odd.

      - person has everything he needs, he is happy. Is that childish and odd? I wonder, I envy his childish oddity then.

      No. But why is he so stand-offish? Why not try to change what you don't like from a position of authority? Perelmen could do it if he wanted to, but it's like he's given up. That's what bothers me.

      - and what a waste of time that would be for him. Instead of taking off and going to pick up some mushrooms and prepare a dish, instead of working out details of some math problem you want him to become a social activist? He is happy doing what he is doing. He is happy living the life he is living. He lived in the USA for a year, he was mostly eating rye brad and fermented milk (kefir) and he was wearing the same pants and a jacket. Then he went back to Russia, because he did not fit in.

      I doubt it's because he "does not need the crowd". I think perhaps there is something more underlying his entire attitude.

      - he specifically said he did not want to be awarded by a group of people who award those, that are not worthy, people who take other people accomplishments and pass them for their own. He specifically said he does not want to deal with the mathematics crowd because it is a corrupt crowd, though he said some people in it are not, but they are complacent.

      He does not want to waste his time on people, vast majority of who are the real selfish people.

      You call him SELFISH? He solved Poincare, he did not even need to show the solution to anybody, but he did anyway. He taught people an entire multitude of lessons:

      1. Poincare.
      2. New approach to the solution, his solution used an observation from a physical event this time in math, not the other way around.
      3. How to have principles.

    11. Re:you are a scared little one, aren't you? by g253 · · Score: 1

      Hey, relax. I wasn't trying to be agressive, I'm just saying it's ok for people to disapprove of Perelman's behaviour a to voice that disapproval. What's so wrong with that?

  64. One metre? by celibate+for+life · · Score: 1

    1m means one metre. 1M should be used to refer to 1 million (mega). Slashdot, get your units straight.

  65. Maybe he's not mad. Perhaps you're stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I read about his life and habits and achievements, then I read your post again.

    I'd say my suggestion is the more likely explanation for your comment.

  66. Yes, you are by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    And it says an awful lot about your own personality that this is what you think.

    We judge people by our own nature.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  67. I think you misunderstand him by jonaskoelker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He solved the conjecture, his name will be in math books for the rest of eternity, and that is prize enough for him.

    I think you're either misunderstanding him, or replacing his wants by your own.

    I think it's more like this: he solved the conjecture, and that is prize enough for him.

    1. Re:I think you misunderstand him by madpansy · · Score: 1

      I think it's more like this: he solved the conjecture, and that is prize enough for him.

      A purity that cannot be achieved by normal men. If that is true, shouldn't he have submitted his solution anonymously?

    2. Re:I think you misunderstand him by xappax · · Score: 1

      I dunno, if just solving it was prize enough for him, why would he have told anyone? Obviously there was a desire there to have people take notice of his accomplishment.

    3. Re:I think you misunderstand him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He solved the conjecture, his name will be in math books for the rest of eternity, and that is prize enough for him.

      I think you're either misunderstanding him, or replacing his wants by your own.

      I think it's more like this: he solved the conjecture, and that is prize enough for him.

      I think you're either misunderstanding him, or replacing his wants by your own. It is really this: he solved the conjecture.

    4. Re:I think you misunderstand him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more like this: he solved the conjecture, and that is prize enough for him.

      A purity that cannot be achieved by normal men. If that is true, shouldn't he have submitted his solution anonymously?

      And risk someone else later taking credit for it instead? Even if he doesn't really want notoriety for himself, that still doesn't mean he'd be OK with someone fraudulently appropriating his discovery. On the basis of pure ethics such a scenario would make him complicit one of the biggest academic lies in history!

  68. May be OK for him, but how about his mom and sis? by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It may be a good life for him, and that's all he thinks he needs. But that may not be so true for the people who are providing for his needs.

    No, I don't think he is providing for his needs (he doesn't look capable of doing it) - I think his mother and/or sister are/is.

    So if it were up to me, I'd actually use the money to provide a monthly stipend to his mother and sister (for as long as Perelman continues to be supported by them).

    Since he doesn't want the money, I think it's fair to give it to the ones who supported him, since without them he might not have survived to solve the problem.

    IMO giving a monthly amount is better than a lump sum. Since it is more likely that Perelman would benefit in the long term.

    I think it's also a good idea to give the mom and sister a one time sum of money as a gift - on top of that monthly amount.

    --
  69. Jeez by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

    Too many people here are romanticizing and glorifying this guy based on pure conjecture. I suppose it's especially easy to glorify a man you'll never have the chance to learn about, since he'll never, ever get in front of a camera to talk about himself.

  70. Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He's clearly not a product of this corrupt society. Leave him alone FFS!

  71. Re:He could be a genius AND an asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think while not exactly politically correct, the parent's got an interesting point of view. This guy's probably gotten much more publicity by not accepting the medal and the money.

    And a $1m goes a long way. I too would have given at least a part of it to charity. Then again, all I have to do is solve some little maths puzzle and I can do whatever I want with the money. Except maybe declining to accept it...

  72. Actually... by toby · · Score: 1

    St Petersburg's Summer/Autumn are warm enough to incubate more than a few mushrooms. It's not exactly Siberia.

    --
    you had me at #!
  73. Maybe he's just smarter than you by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    And understands the reality of the situation we all live in. Whereas you may have all sorts of bizarre misapprehensions and assumptions about your reality.

     

    --
    Deleted
  74. In my best emo voice: by redalien · · Score: 1

    Leave Perelmen alone!

  75. Mr. Perelman by Redpill82 · · Score: 1

    He is not available to accept this $1m, so I accept it on his behalf.

  76. Hold out by bushwahd · · Score: 1

    I think he should hold out until they raise the offer to $5 million. THEN, turn it down. Bwa-ha-ha. That will get the trolls in a lather.

  77. $1m or $1M ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    $1m (1*10^-3) wouldn't be much of a prize and I'm not sure how you would collect it since it is only a tenth of a cent. The lowest denomination piece of US currency (the penny) is worth ten times that amount.

    $1M (1*10^6) would be a nice prize though.

  78. My suggestion for the prize-givers... by rclandrum · · Score: 1

    Would be to deposit the money in a trust and have the trustee silently monitor this guys life. If he ever gets sick or ever experiences misfortune (we all get old), he would then be authorized to step in and anonymously help him with whatever was needed. That way, he gains the benefit of the money he won while maintaining the purity of the lifestyle he desires.

  79. Re:He could be a genius AND an asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Accepting the money would be giving legitimacy to those offering it, encouraging the commercialization of mathematics he as I understand it hates.
    And if that makes him an "antisocial douchebag" you'll have to invent a new word for those offering the prize, after all they aren't donating that money and much more money either.

  80. ZOMG!!!eR@ You figured it out. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Yes, exactly, that is exactly how it happened.

    Perelman receives a call on his 'mobile' phone, answers it and when he is asked in English (he does, speak the language, he taught in the US for a little while) and when asked the question he dictates the answer letter by letter: YOUR disturbing me.....

  81. Re:He could be a genius AND an asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact we owe him more then he owes us. He chooses to be paid in solitude.

  82. MOD PARENT UP!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mathematical semantics troll for the win!

  83. A little background... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little background to why he's been refusing the prize:

    Annals of Mathematics
    Manifold Destiny
    A legendary problem and the battle over who solved it.
    by Sylvia Nasar and David Gruber
    http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/08/28/060828fa_fact2

    Chinese Mathematicians Prove Poincare Conjecture
    http://science.slashdot.org/story/06/06/05/0440258/Chinese-Mathematicians-Prove-Poincare-Conjecture?art_pos=3

  84. I am just sayin' by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    A million bucks will buy you a lot of mushrooms...

  85. ITS A TRAP! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Don't let them fool you Grigory Perelman! Admiral Akbar knows best!

  86. wth? Get off his lawn!!!! by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I know it's hard for some of the world to understand, but there are those of us in it that don't want fame, don't want to be in the public eye, don't care about money.

    Dude did the challenge probably because it was a challenge. He didn't do it for fame, or money, he did it because he enjoyed doing it. He submitted what he did so it would help others. (I have no idea what the significant of what he did, i'm just guessing here).

    So now he wants to be left alone, pick his mushrooms, take his lsd, smoke his weed, or whatever the fuck he enjoys doing.

    oh ya, Get off his lawn!

    --
    Be seeing you...
  87. I am picking mushrooms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sigh... Another genius lost to Farmville

  88. Re:May be OK for him, but how about his mom and si by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you are such an intensely considerate person to show this passionate concern for the possibility of Perelman's caretakers being burdened.

  89. Re:May be OK for him, but how about his mom and si by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not really a considerate person. It just seemed like an obvious solution to me.

    It just like trying to give a champion horse 1 million dollars for being a top racehorse (or stud). What's the point? The horse is going to say: "Nay! You are disturbing me, I'm busy eating grass". Trying to convince the horse to accept it just irritates the horse and makes you look stupid.

    1) They want to give Perelman the money.
    2) Perelman being Perelman insists he doesn't need or want the money, or want to have anything to do with the whole thing.
    3) Perelman is likely dependent on his mother/sister on many things (whether he realizes/admits it or not).

    So one way to give Perelman the money is via the people who are taking care of him.

    Of course if Perelman finds out he might take it rather badly, so it is best do it very discreetly. If that is not possible for whatever reason (e.g. can't hide the transaction enough), then don't give the prize at all.

    After all, the whole point of _genuine_ giving is to benefit the receiver.

  90. Maybe setting an example for Russian students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Yau and company are setting an unethical example for Chinese students to follow, Dr. Perelman might be setting an example for Russian students who love their math and science to not go after money or fame. Math geniuses are often deeply thoughtful and sometimes very principled.

    If just one other Russian student or mathematician solves another Millenium Prize-like Math problem, it will do wonders for the intellectual pride of a society going towards unbridled "free market" capitalism. Socialism and concern for everyone might still be alive in the hearts of many Russian citizens on account of the hardships they personally face in their lives.

  91. Maybe he's just busy. by ffflala · · Score: 1

    Maybe he's busy working on more math that people can sort through when he's finished, and doesn't wish to suffer any interruptions.

  92. He...is...odd by NotOddManOut · · Score: 1

    He is odd, to say the least. Nothing wrong with being odd, but that is what he is, and from what I can tell, he doesn't care. If you are offended by the notion that others see him as odd/weird/strange, then the problem is yours and yours alone, because he doesn't seem to care. Perhaps you should do some navel gazing, because he has...and he has found mushrooms! (Sorry, couldn't resist)

  93. Umm, so what you're saying is... by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    ...that a million dollars isn't exactly a lot of money these days, eh?

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  94. To share the result with the world by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    I dunno, if just solving it was prize enough for him, why would he have told anyone?

    To share this newly discovered knowledge with the rest of humanity---for the good of others.

  95. he understands the transaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the money isn't free - he understands if he takes it, he's part of the perceived problem then he must work to fix the problem (else he wouldn't be him) - the work to fix the problem isn't worth 1mil to him

    what i think he would REALLY like is for the money to be used for a foundation to try to correct this perceived problem - problem is not many people can understand the issue enough to go about trying to correct it

    I applaud his decision and integrity - recall Newton had the same problem when dealing with people and it bittered him and probably LIMITED his creative thinking ability - what is the cost of that ??????

  96. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story is recycled old news. There is no mushrooms at this time of year in Russia, especially near St. Petersburg.