Also, get an AT to PS2 adaptor - I came across a rig that was the right price, but uses an AT keyboard... arrgh! My Model M is even PS2 (I think you can get an AT cable for it, but I'd rather get an adaptor)!
Intel desktop and server processors. Have you looked at the Pentium M lately? By the way, I didn't think the Athlons ran exactly cool (cooler than any Intel desktop CPU nowadays, though).
I hate to say it, but these guys are just as bad as the RIAA that they're screwing. It really does support organized crime... This is why I don't pirate my music OR buy RIAA music.
Umm... have you checked out Slashdot Japan lately? Ask Slashdot has a US-centric slant, just like all of slashdot.org. The two ISPs I'm considering are available nationwide.
However, the two ISPs I'm considering are at least available in all areas that offer cable in the US (Earthlink and RoadRunner). The other ISPs are WCOILExpress, inter.net (these are only in the TW Columbus service area, as far as I know), and AOL for Broadband (NO WAY IN HELL...)
90W versus 75W. Also, the Prescotts will break the 100W barrier. AMD is cooler. (Unless you use a Pentium M @ 20-30W, and performance per MHz is better than an AXP or A64, but you'll have to wait for Intel to respond to my petition (and for me to actually get it sent out), or PowerLeap to release their Socket 479 to 478 adaptor)
So, why don't they just e-mail the site saying that in 12 hours, the story will be posted, and please respond to provide permission to mirror the site, or you're/.ed.
Hmm, I'm going to get modded into oblivion for this, but then why is the more relevant task of selecting a cable ISP, which is more likely to get helpful replies on Ask Slashdot, not put on?
I said better design on the 486. I hadn't thought that it had more instructions, however. Also, Cyrix had shipped 486 CPUs that were pin-compatible with the 386DX, and TI and IBM shipped CPUs that were pin-compatible with the 386SX (that performed almost as well as their 32-bit bussed Intel counterparts in the case of the IBM - just think of an IBM designed full 32-bit 486!).
I knew THAT. Let me rephrase it: The 486SX is a version of the 486DX without a math coprocessor. The 486DX was an enhanced version of the 386DX with a better design, on-chip cache, and higher MHz.
Basically, wasn't the 486SX a version of the 386DX with on-chip cache, and better layout internally? BTW, IBM made a 486 that worked on a 386SX bus, and it went almost as fast as a 486 running on it's native bus.
The RISC architechture dates back to the NexGen 5x86 (a fourth-generation (486) code, sixth-generation architecture CPU). AMD developed the K5, another RISC-based x86, that was 5th-gen code, 6th-gen arch, and then they bought out NexGen and used their in-development NexGen 6x86 (5.5code/6arch) to make the AMD K6 line. The Pentium Pro was the first fully sixth generation (6th code/6th arch) processor. All P6 (PPro, P2, P3, PM, some Celerons, some Xeons) or NetBurst (P4, some Celerons, some Xeons) cored Intel CPUs are RISC internally. All K series (K5, K6, Athlon/Duron, Opteron) AMDs are RISC cored.
Actually, you didn't look very hard. It's got SEVERAL Goatse images in it. BTW, I've found it hits Opera pretty hard (unless JavaScript is off, or popups are completely disabled), but from looking at the code, IE is the worst.
GnuCash and TurboTax Online? BTW, how much RAM does that have? My Celery 466 with 256MB RAM was a decent web server and a decent workstation (but not both - if score-1ot seemed slow then, it was because of that and the 512/128 ADSL) when it was up and running, and 2000 Pro ran like a charm. By the way, Opera would be a lot faster than IE (even if it used the same rendering engine, the UI is better, but it uses a MUCH faster rendering engine - the funny thing is, the effects are most noticable on dial-up)
Hmm, a Slashdot Jihad member, now a supporter of the GNAA, and he's got nero-online.org/lastmeasure as his site? Sounds like we've got a troll on our hands (and a new entry in my foe list!)
Then why do they have more and more ads, and more and more pay-for services? As far as I know, Google's only pay-for services are their ads (which are text, not banner, popup, or browser-takeover, all of which I've seen on Yahoo), and their answers service. In the case of the answers service, it all goes to the researcher (as far as I know).
Trusted computing gives control of YOUR computer to the company that made the software or hardware. It means that the company can trust the computer. You can't trust a TC computer.
Whoa there! Mini-ATX? That's bigger than Micro-ATX! Not to mention, as there are no Mini-ATX cases (as in not ATX), and very few boards, it's kinda pointless. Now, Mini-ITX, that's different.
Also, get an AT to PS2 adaptor - I came across a rig that was the right price, but uses an AT keyboard... arrgh! My Model M is even PS2 (I think you can get an AT cable for it, but I'd rather get an adaptor)!
Intel desktop and server processors. Have you looked at the Pentium M lately? By the way, I didn't think the Athlons ran exactly cool (cooler than any Intel desktop CPU nowadays, though).
I hate to say it, but these guys are just as bad as the RIAA that they're screwing. It really does support organized crime... This is why I don't pirate my music OR buy RIAA music.
Umm... I think they mean people selling illegal copies of RIAA-member CDs on street corners, not indie artists.
Umm... have you checked out Slashdot Japan lately? Ask Slashdot has a US-centric slant, just like all of slashdot.org. The two ISPs I'm considering are available nationwide.
Only on the laptop, as they can't scale the Pentium 4 QUITE far enough down.
However, the two ISPs I'm considering are at least available in all areas that offer cable in the US (Earthlink and RoadRunner). The other ISPs are WCOILExpress, inter.net (these are only in the TW Columbus service area, as far as I know), and AOL for Broadband (NO WAY IN HELL...)
90W versus 75W. Also, the Prescotts will break the 100W barrier. AMD is cooler. (Unless you use a Pentium M @ 20-30W, and performance per MHz is better than an AXP or A64, but you'll have to wait for Intel to respond to my petition (and for me to actually get it sent out), or PowerLeap to release their Socket 479 to 478 adaptor)
So, why don't they just e-mail the site saying that in 12 hours, the story will be posted, and please respond to provide permission to mirror the site, or you're /.ed.
Hmm, I'm going to get modded into oblivion for this, but then why is the more relevant task of selecting a cable ISP, which is more likely to get helpful replies on Ask Slashdot, not put on?
*clicks No Karma Bonus checkbox*
I said better design on the 486. I hadn't thought that it had more instructions, however. Also, Cyrix had shipped 486 CPUs that were pin-compatible with the 386DX, and TI and IBM shipped CPUs that were pin-compatible with the 386SX (that performed almost as well as their 32-bit bussed Intel counterparts in the case of the IBM - just think of an IBM designed full 32-bit 486!).
I knew THAT. Let me rephrase it: The 486SX is a version of the 486DX without a math coprocessor. The 486DX was an enhanced version of the 386DX with a better design, on-chip cache, and higher MHz.
Basically, wasn't the 486SX a version of the 386DX with on-chip cache, and better layout internally? BTW, IBM made a 486 that worked on a 386 SX bus, and it went almost as fast as a 486 running on it's native bus.
The RISC architechture dates back to the NexGen 5x86 (a fourth-generation (486) code, sixth-generation architecture CPU). AMD developed the K5, another RISC-based x86, that was 5th-gen code, 6th-gen arch, and then they bought out NexGen and used their in-development NexGen 6x86 (5.5code/6arch) to make the AMD K6 line. The Pentium Pro was the first fully sixth generation (6th code/6th arch) processor. All P6 (PPro, P2, P3, PM, some Celerons, some Xeons) or NetBurst (P4, some Celerons, some Xeons) cored Intel CPUs are RISC internally. All K series (K5, K6, Athlon/Duron, Opteron) AMDs are RISC cored.
Actually, you didn't look very hard. It's got SEVERAL Goatse images in it. BTW, I've found it hits Opera pretty hard (unless JavaScript is off, or popups are completely disabled), but from looking at the code, IE is the worst.
Some of us have cheaper TVs. For that matter, I got my TV just before Sun Electronics started going out of business, and it only has a coax input!
GnuCash and TurboTax Online? BTW, how much RAM does that have? My Celery 466 with 256MB RAM was a decent web server and a decent workstation (but not both - if score-1ot seemed slow then, it was because of that and the 512/128 ADSL) when it was up and running, and 2000 Pro ran like a charm. By the way, Opera would be a lot faster than IE (even if it used the same rendering engine, the UI is better, but it uses a MUCH faster rendering engine - the funny thing is, the effects are most noticable on dial-up)
Hmm, a Slashdot Jihad member, now a supporter of the GNAA, and he's got nero-online.org/lastmeasure as his site? Sounds like we've got a troll on our hands (and a new entry in my foe list!)
I'm losing trust fast, considering I can't YET get my Windows partition to boot.
BTW, I'd put less trust in a TC OS that has source code available (even with an NDA - those can be broken), than a closed source non-TC OS.
Then why do they have more and more ads, and more and more pay-for services? As far as I know, Google's only pay-for services are their ads (which are text, not banner, popup, or browser-takeover, all of which I've seen on Yahoo), and their answers service. In the case of the answers service, it all goes to the researcher (as far as I know).
Trusted computing gives control of YOUR computer to the company that made the software or hardware. It means that the company can trust the computer. You can't trust a TC computer.
Whoa there! Mini-ATX? That's bigger than Micro-ATX! Not to mention, as there are no Mini-ATX cases (as in not ATX), and very few boards, it's kinda pointless. Now, Mini-ITX, that's different.
When it backfires because they supposedly price-fixed RDRAM chips...
Who do I recommend for SDR/DDR SDRAM NOW?
You should see my dad drive when my mom is reading some paperwork... his eyes are on the road 10% of the time...
Approximately 50%, because IQ isn't perfect, and the stupid people all migrated here to the US.