Absolutely. IT should address technology issues. Shutting off PC's at night is a social issue. It's implementation is tecnhical - the underlying problem/requirement is not.
Doubly so for IT Ops. If the business tells IT it wants PC's powered off when not in use, then it will happen. So far, for the most part, that businesses haven't asked. It's disingenuous to lay this problem at the feet of the IT department.
IIRC, it's standard practice to frisk somebody after you arrest them. I would guess that this is when they discovered the phone crammed between her butt cheeks.
His point was that long before you ever get your day in court for "reasonable doubt", you will be arrested, jailed, your friends & family will be questioned about you, your stuff searched, etc... all with a much lower burden than "reasonable doubt".
So while you may ultimately prevail with "reasonable doubt", the police/prosecutors can your make you life a living hell until you get your day in court.
There should be something in there about what Google can and cannot do wrt unsubstantiated rumors and pure speculation. It think it's after the Indemnification clause.
If the lawyers felt she had a valid claim, they would have taken the case on contingency. She woul dput up nothing up front, but the lawyers would claim 33-50% or the settlement as their fee. Worst case, that's a milion dollars to the screwee.
So I agree. This is a BS Slashdot story. Also, 10% of the company? 10%? A CEO coming into a Series A funded company in Silicon Valley will usually net 5-10% http://venturehacks.com/articles/option-pool-shuffle Some random individual contributor pulling 10%? I don't think so, unless you are a founder.
Trust or not, you will have to reregister it eventually. When you do, you'll be presented with an unpleasant surprise. fines, administrative fees, and probably a bunch of jacked up late fees. You want to fight it? Go right ahead. Just don't expect to get your new registration until it's all cleared up.
Slashdot Mirror
Absolutely. IT should address technology issues. Shutting off PC's at night is a social issue. It's implementation is tecnhical - the underlying problem/requirement is not.
Doubly so for IT Ops. If the business tells IT it wants PC's powered off when not in use, then it will happen. So far, for the most part, that businesses haven't asked. It's disingenuous to lay this problem at the feet of the IT department.
Boston College != Boston University
That said the BC police have powers granted to them by the commonwealth. http://www.bc.edu/offices/bcpd/about.html
On second thought, I'd be in for a long stint.
Never mind.
They need time to figure out how to profit from the deployment.
http://www.networkmirror.com/MuDp_g5XY_ZJoCQZ/linuxdevices.com/news/NS9634061300.html
Hey - what color is the sky on this planet where news networks are accountable to their readers?
Further balkanization of gTLD's does nothing for the end user. It will be a great stream of new revenue for registrars though.
ICANN has become nothing more than a pawn of domain registrars. Read the meeting minutes and see for yourself.
Yelp is not nor have they ever been a Common Carrier.
IIRC, it's standard practice to frisk somebody after you arrest them. I would guess that this is when they discovered the phone crammed between her butt cheeks.
Try venturing off the Strip. Lots of $5 single & double-deck games.
The internet's dirty little secret. It's amazing it works at all.
His point was that long before you ever get your day in court for "reasonable doubt", you will be arrested, jailed, your friends & family will be questioned about you, your stuff searched, etc... all with a much lower burden than "reasonable doubt".
So while you may ultimately prevail with "reasonable doubt", the police/prosecutors can your make you life a living hell until you get your day in court.
There should be something in there about what Google can and cannot do wrt unsubstantiated rumors and pure speculation. It think it's after the Indemnification clause.
If the lawyers felt she had a valid claim, they would have taken the case on contingency. She woul dput up nothing up front, but the lawyers would claim 33-50% or the settlement as their fee. Worst case, that's a milion dollars to the screwee.
So I agree. This is a BS Slashdot story. Also, 10% of the company? 10%? A CEO coming into a Series A funded company in Silicon Valley will usually net 5-10% http://venturehacks.com/articles/option-pool-shuffle Some random individual contributor pulling 10%? I don't think so, unless you are a founder.
I don't know about Windows, but CentOS 5 has pushed 14 security fixes to me since Jan 1, including ones for openssl, BIND & Kerberos.
He is a PG&E customer in Northern California. That's how he spends $400 a month on electricity.
PG&E = Pricks Grabbing Everything
pray tell, do you mean Claris?
It's free, but you get what you pay for.
This must be the sign. Any day now The Announcement will come: "Perl Six is Ready!".
And there will be much rejoicing!
Seriously, I can't wait!
Right after majordomo 2.
Get caught driving with your paper plate and it's no longer simply a moving violation. It's an arrest.
Trust or not, you will have to reregister it eventually. When you do, you'll be presented with an unpleasant surprise. fines, administrative fees, and probably a bunch of jacked up late fees. You want to fight it? Go right ahead. Just don't expect to get your new registration until it's all cleared up.
Not on my bill in Silicon Valley, California.
another browser
Google continues to struggle to find something beyond search that a) they excel at and b) they make money from.
You misspelled semen.