Slashdot Mirror


Restauranteurs Say Yelp Uses Extortion To Ply Ad Sales

Readers Mike Van Pelt and EricThegreen point out a story in the East Bay Express alleging that online restaurant review site Yelp is doing more than providing a nice interface for foodies to share their impressions of restaurants. Instead, says the article, representatives from the site have called restaurants in the Bay area to solicit advertising, but with an interesting twist: the ad sales reps let restaurant owners know that, if they buy advertising at around $300 a month, Yelp can "do something" about prominently displayed negative reviews of their restaurants. If the claims are true, it sure lowers my opinion of Yelp, which I'd thought of as one of the good guys (and a useful site). I wonder how many other online review sites might be doing something similar.

202 comments

  1. Disappointing by jetsci · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's rather disappointing for a community based effort. My girlfriend and I use a similar site but it skimps on the advertisements: http://ottawafoodies.com/

    --
    Bored at work? Play Game!
    1. Re:Disappointing by jetsci · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a note; *imagine* if Slashdot were to succumb to that.

      CmdTaco calls MS: "For one meallllionn dollas we'll post Pro-MS articles"

      MS Drone: "Deal, cash or licenses?"

      --
      Bored at work? Play Game!
    2. Re:Disappointing by von_rick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't think it was a 'well guarded secret' or anything. Squelching negative reviews of your business and dampening the highly positive reviews of your competitors has been the dominant practice ever since the dawn of two businesses selling similar products.

      From the article it seems like Yelp had gathered a reputation of being impartial and fair. It understandable that people's confidence will diminish.

      --

      Face your daemons!

    3. Re:Disappointing by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, "community based" is something of a farce when there is an owner standing in the background and counting the money. Just because the crowdserfs are doing the work, doesn't make an institution "community based".

    4. Re:Disappointing by French31 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "And for another one, we'll hide the bad reviews dropped by angry /.ers."

      "We'll pass, it would be suspicious if those articles end up with no comments at all."

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. --Ben Franklin
    5. Re:Disappointing by humina · · Score: 5, Informative

      It looks like the CEO has posted his response to the piece. It appears to be quite well documented and researched. Possibly more so than the original article:

      http://officialblog.yelp.com/2009/02/kathleen-richards-east-bay-express.html

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    6. Re:Disappointing by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Community effort. Private gain.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    7. Re:Disappointing by eddiegee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The CEO's response makes mention of "anonymous sources" as being an issue with the article and mentions one interview subject as having posted "fake" reviews. He doesn't mention the other business named in the article that talk about being contacted by Yelp sales and given these terms. There are several mentioned.

      This is coming from someone who has submitted a few Yelp reviews in myself. If this is Yelp's response I would have to say I'm still leery.

    8. Re:Disappointing by LUH+3418 · · Score: 1


      Now just how do you think slashdot survived the dot-com crash!
      </tinfoilhat>

    9. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it be worse than the current situation that refuses to acknowledge paid for ads masquerading as submissions?

    10. Re:Disappointing by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      didn't think it was a 'well guarded secret' or anything. Squelching negative reviews of your business and dampening the highly positive reviews of your competitors has been the dominant practice ever since the dawn of two businesses selling similar products.

      Well, two developments had to take place for this to be a dominant practice. You identified one of them, which was two businesses selling similar products. The other is a general public which is far too eager to believe what they hear, read, or see on TV. You could think of that as the great enabler of most of the rest of our problems, including this one.

      There's this idea that sites like this one or news agencies and others (this is a very general principle) exist to confirm sources and vet stories and information for you. That is, the idea that because they are established, they must therefore be better or higher-quality or more truthful. There is some truth to that, although it's more of a half-truth. Then there's this accompanying idea that therefore, you should not test and confirm information on your own. If you don't like being deceived or used as an unwitting tool in this type of alleged extortion, nothing could be farther from the truth.

      I think the real issue is that most people have no idea how to perform critical thinking or how to cross-reference information or how to judge the authenticity of a source of information. They also don't seem skilled at recognizing propaganda techniques (such as bandwagon appeal, "Big Lie", appeals to emotion, etc.) when they are found in advertising and the media in general. Remedy that one shortcoming and all of these myriad instances and iterations will take care of themselves.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    11. Re:Disappointing by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that is one way to look at it.

      another way to look at it is that the community adds content that is of direct benefit to the community. the private entity (be it individual or corporation) that takes risks (purchasing equipment, signing contracts for hosting, etc.) has the right to make a living and profit. if you don't like it start a wiki and solicit donations for your hosting, that is a lot harder than getting business loans based on ad revenue streams.

    12. Re:Disappointing by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I understand everything correctly, it looks like advertisers get to choose one review as a "sponsored review" and this is shown as the first result. Couldn't this be what the sales people are talking about when they offer to change the order of reviews so that lower reviews are moved down?

      I could easily see "For $300 you can choose one review to appear at the top" becoming "For $300 we will make your bad reviews go away". To me, it sounds like a game of telephone combined 'investigative journalism' and angry restaurant managers.

    13. Re:Disappointing by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      Can you find any of your negative posts that have disappeared?
      Any of your friends?
      None of mine have been removed.
      It would be nice to try to do this with some semblance of logic/sampling.

    14. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using a site a friend made for restaurant reviews.

      Don't have to worry about bad ad tactics there, since he has no overhead and also a real job.

    15. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dude, chill.

      We're talking about restaurant reviews here. Don't jump into full Wikipedia-defense DefCon 5.

      No cross-referencing of information is required, just a quick visit to the cafe, bistro, or bar in question and you'll know whether Yelp is honest or not.

      And by-the-way, they're not. I've read bad reviews that were later pulled, and tried out the restaurant only to discover that the reviews weren't pulled because the food/service got better. I've also written bad reviews that were later pulled. I don't use the site anymore, since (much like the vaunted Wikipedia) it seems the content can't be trusted.

    16. Re:Disappointing by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the CEO's response it seems like some sales droid was being overly pushy and overstating the facts, which is SOP for a salesmen in many fields. The actual practice of allowing a single positive review to be pinned and labeled at the top of the stack is perfectly acceptable IMHO. Personally I discount half of all negative reviews online since people tend to only go online if they have had a really good or bad experience, unless someone says they have repeatedly had bad service or food or almost all of the reviews for an establishment are bad then it's probably at worth at least trying out once.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Disappointing by CraftyJack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...it seems like some sales droid was being overly pushy and overstating the facts, which is SOP for a salesmen...

      Ah, the good old "overzealous staffer" defense. That supposed salesman is acting on behalf of the company. The company is responsible for making sure that nobody gets "overzealous", and is culpable when somebody does.

    18. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "dampening the highly positive reviews of your competitors"
      That might work if the reviews are in say a newspaper. However if the review is on line, I would recommend that it is not a good idea to pour water on your computer.

      -Word Nazi

    19. Re:Disappointing by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      For extra credit you can, with just a touch of spin, use the "overzealous staffer" defense at one end, and the "just following orders" defense at the other, at the same time!

    20. Re:Disappointing by afidel · · Score: 1

      Salesmen don't set policy which is what I am worried about, if a salesmen implied that all negative reviews would be removed and the reality is they got one positive review pinned then it's up to the restaurant to decide if they want to continue to advertise with Yelp. On the other hand if negative reviews were really being pulled at the request of advertiser then that significantly changes the nature of the site and is worse than false advertising in my book.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    21. Re:Disappointing by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean a site that thrives on geeks having too much free time on their hands, and money from showing them ads, survived an event where masses of geeks lost their jobs?

      Shocking, I tell ya. Shocking! ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    22. Re:Disappointing by ojintoad · · Score: 1

      mod parent up. used everywhere.

    23. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      omg I knoe u didnt just dis wikipedia!!!!!

    24. Re:Disappointing by shri · · Score: 1

      Or .... privatize the profits, socialize the content. :)

    25. Re:Disappointing by CraftyJack · · Score: 1

      ...if negative reviews were really being pulled at the request of advertiser...

      That would be really bad, I agree.

      ...if a salesmen implied that all negative reviews would be removed...

      This is also really bad. Was Yelp management really unaware of this behavior? Were they turning a blind eye to it?

      The Yelp CEO seems to acknowledge that manipulating review order for money would be bad and wrong. What bothers me is that he doesn't also state that it would be bad and wrong for his sales force to imply that they could do that.

    26. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, the context dampeners have gone offline. I recommended that you stop posting before you make an ass of yourself.

    27. Re:Disappointing by FredFredrickson · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. I have customers who misquote me all the time when I'm giving them a pitch of sorts. If they don't like the way things turned out, they always lie about what I said.

      Of course, where I work, our phone system is recorded (and disclosed as such). I usually apologize for the misunderstanding and offer to have the customer come to my office and review the phone logs with me if they truely believe that I've changed a price or my story. They usually back down at that point.

      The problem is, people get angry, and often times it's their own ignorance that sets them up... "What? I never approved $200! That's ridiculous!"

      They'll spend a fair amount of time griping to friends and family about how we agreed on a different price, and that those guys are up to no good. It's easy to twist the facts when you're defensive. Especially when they think it's a my-word-against-his ordeal.

      But the recording always says differently.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    28. Re:Disappointing by SoopahCell · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is my problem with the story. The CEO sets policy. Nowhere in his blog response is a statement about what would happen to a salesperson if they were found to be selling review removal, or moving ads. The entry should have stated how they check for this (like the way Starbucks uses Secret Shoppers to pose as customers) and that salespeople violating it will be fired.

      Instead the response read as, "We're doing nothing wrong, because if we did, we'd be violating what we say we do"... yes that's what you're accused of... that you run a business doesn't imply you do so honorably.

      And he spends time impeaching the sources, which is sometimes the proper response but often how liars get away with a lie - reframe the conversation to be about those who speak up's honesty, and you'll kick up some dirt but most importantly shift the conversation to be about them, not you.

      It sounds to me like this CEO is out of his league. There's probably some salespeople out of line and nothing being done to account for it.

    29. Re:Disappointing by causality · · Score: 1

      We're talking about restaurant reviews here. Don't jump into full Wikipedia-defense DefCon 5.

      So asking people to see for themselves that such a site cares about its advertisers a hell of a lot more than it cares about its users (much like network TV) is unreasonable? That's what you call "DefCon 5"? You sound like you've never seen real effort before if you think that's something special and I hope that isn't really true. Or was it that I suggested some methods that can deal with the bad information that results? Is that what bothers you so?

      Personally, I don't care to be deceived by anyone for any reason. I don't care to be majorly deceived and I don't care to be mildly deceived. I especially dislike the idea of someone earning a profit by feeding me bad information. The tactics of deception are quite similar whether it's a major national political campaign or a dinky little restaurant review site. There are things that can be done to render those tactics ineffective and I named some of them. Relax. The techniques I mentioned aren't really "work" at all, they come quite easily with even a small amount of practice.

      No cross-referencing of information is required, just a quick visit to the cafe, bistro, or bar in question and you'll know whether Yelp is honest or not.

      To really put that to the test, I would need to spend money at the establishment in question. I can't say I want to do that if I have any reason to believe that they are manipulating reviews, with Yelp's alleged assistance or otherwise. I'd prefer to see businesses lose customers when they engage in this sort of behavior. So, I'll keep cross-referencing and I'll keep refusing to believe anything I see, hear, or read without first checking it out, thank you. If you really think this is about restaurant reviews just because that was the example, then you have missed my point entirely.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    30. Re:Disappointing by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      The company is responsible for making sure that nobody gets "overzealous", and is culpable when somebody does.

      I second that! Additionally, the impact that sites like Yelp and TripAdvisor can have on the bottom-lines of restaurants cannot be underestimated.

      I dare anyone to challenge my assertion any manipulation of reviews by user-review-driven sites is FRAUD and FALSE ADVERTISING. These sites need to firmly establish corporate policies that all content must be clearly marked as either unencumbered publicly-submitted reviews or as paid placement/advertising/etc.

      It's not unheard of for a travel/leisure reviewer to be biased (book: "Do Travel Writers Go To Hell?"). That said, those of us who are avid travelers and foodies KNOW this--and take steps to gather data from sources that are more reputable. The fact that Yelp, TripAdvisor and other sites may not be clear about how they police and protect this content is disappointing.

    31. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The company is responsible for making sure that nobody gets "overzealous", and is culpable when somebody does.

      Possibly, but I think there is a real possibility of it being an isolated instance vs standard practice.
      You wouldn't make sweeping general accusations based on a single piece of anecdotal "evidence" would you?

      Yes, why, I AM new here, why do you ask?

    32. Re:Disappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defcon 5 means "condition normal"

  2. Protection? by MarkvW · · Score: 1, Funny

    So the restaurants would be buying protection from negative reviews? Interesting . . .
    Paying protection money . . .
    Wow.

    1. Re:Protection? by grandpa-geek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does Yelp also make sure that the restaurant's plate glass doesn't get broken by rocks thrown through it and that the head chef's knees don't get broken in an "accident" with a thug?

      Or is that a possible future service offering consistent with their current portfolio of services?

      Hmmm.

    2. Re:Protection? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I'll make him an offer he can't refuse....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Protection? by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 1

      What have I done to deserve this negative press? You come to my website on the day of my daughter's wedding, and you ask me to commit review-fraud...but you don't come with a handful of cash. You don't even think to call me Publisher.

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    4. Re:Protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to offer to drive your Porsche up his fat ass? Germany'd!

    5. Re:Protection? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Are you going to offer to drive your Porsche up his fat ass? Germany'd!"

      Nope...I lost my '86 911 Turbo in Katrina...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Protection? by MooUK · · Score: 1

      What was it doing in her?

  3. risky? by belmolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Yelp removes negative reviews for a fee, it seems to me that they have given up their common carrier status and have made themselves liable for errors in the reviews they leave up. Restaurants that receive negative reviews could sue Yelp for libel if they can demonstrate errors in the reviews.

    1. Re:risky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I don't post whatever comes to mind, do I give up my common carrier status? Yes, you too can misapply "common carrier"; visit your Slashdot today!

    2. Re:risky? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Your analogy to not posting whatever comes to mind is incorrect. The issue is whether Yelp is acting merely as a forum for others, in which case it is not liable for what they post, or whether it is selecting material to post, in which case it is a publisher and is liable.

      As for "common carrier", the term is commonly extended from its original use with respect to telephone companies and the like to ISPs and other hosts that do not control content.

    3. Re:risky? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Common carrier is a legal term with a specific technical meaning. Any "extension" of the term is a misapplication of the term. It misleads people as to the actual legal specifics of a case, and should not be done.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:risky? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but the extension is in common use. I didn't invent it.

    5. Re:risky? by belmolis · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want the technical legal terminology, the question is whether Yelp is a "conduit", "distributor", or "primary publisher". Primary publishers are strictly liable, conduits are not liable at all, and distributors are liable under certain circumstances. The risk to Yelp is that by removing negative reviews they control content and become a primary publisher. It seems very likely, though, that few Slashdot readers know these terms but that most understand what a "common carrier" is in telecommunications and in the extended sense.

    6. Re:risky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you did post your uninformed and factually inaccurate opinion.

    7. Re:risky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If everyone jumped off a bridge into the clear murky waters of a Ted Stevens car metaphor couldn't we care less about prior art? Or should we sue for felony punitive damages? I object, your highness!

    8. Re:risky? by winkydink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yelp is not nor have they ever been a Common Carrier.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    9. Re:risky? by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you were actually thinking about Section 230 protections, not common carrier.

    10. Re:risky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, again, if they know what a "common carrier" is then they may know that the term embodies more than just restrictions on liability..such as access and charge restrictions..which do not apply to conduits.

      As a professor of linguistics, you should know that misusing legal terms of art with very definite meanings and legal ramifications is a bad idea - even if you it is in "common use" (according to?) and you "didn't invent it".

    11. Re:risky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Shampoo invent it?

    12. Re:risky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yelp is and has always been a bunch of fucking tools. Useless site, written by a complete collection of twats.

  4. Just like everyone else by mc1138 · · Score: 1

    People manipulate online review and rating systems all the time, whats interesting is that this is on such a local level that it brings the corruption much closer to home. That being said, it does not seem that this is a very uncommon occurrence.

  5. Slashdot Submissions by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe you don't like to look at ads. Maybe you wants them to go away. Let's say you become a member. I would not be at all surprised if you found yourself +1 Insightful in the very near future. Think about it. Let me know.

    1. Re:Slashdot Submissions by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe you wants them to go away, Precious?

    2. Re:Slashdot Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DO NOT WANT!!1

    3. Re:Slashdot Submissions by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      It was supposed to be more of a New York thing...let me try again:

      Maybe you don't like to look at ads so much. Maybe you wants them to disappear like. Let's say that you become a member. Pay a simple, one-time fee and dat's dat. I for one would not be surprised a'tall if you found yourself +1 Insightful in the very near future. Tink aboudit. Lemme know.

    4. Re:Slashdot Submissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, Slashdot has ads?

  6. Another useful site succumbs to greed? by PapaBoojum · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend who manages a restaurant in Watertown MA asked me what Yelp was... She was contacted by someone claiming to be from Yelp with the same pitch.

    I knew of Yelp, and used to trust the reviews. But I had already lost respect for them when they obviously sold my e-mail addy, despite claims of confidentiality and my opting out of their mailings.

    1. Re:Another useful site succumbs to greed? by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yelp succumbed to greed a long time ago, when they implemented Facebook's Beacon.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:Another useful site succumbs to greed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was lovely when they did that. I review with a fake name and different email account for yelp because I don't want or need my reviews under my name. It was just great that facebook did that. Simply marvelous. It goes well with the physically threatening email I got from a coffee shop that threw a hissy fit that I thought the coffee sucked.

    3. Re:Another useful site succumbs to greed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This reminds me. I need to start cold-calling restaurants, claiming to be yelp.

  7. Reviews in Santa Barbara by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thankfully my town has a really great local source for impartial reviews of every restaurant in town so we don't have to deal with yelp or citysearch or whatever:

    http://www.santabarbara.com/Dining/

  8. That's not extortion by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What they're allegedly doing is scummy, but not extortion. Or rather, it's only extortion if Yelp itself is generating the negative reviews. Accepting cash to remove legitimate negative reviews is just slimy.

    1. Re:That's not extortion by sdaug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or rather, it's only extortion if Yelp itself is generating the negative reviews.

      If you RTFA, you'll see that Yelp employees do write reviews, including negative reviews.

    2. Re:That's not extortion by mea37 · · Score: 1

      That probably depends on jurisdiction, but in general I'd say extortion is a broader term than you think and this could be construed as extortion.

      The elements of extortion are typically a threat, intent to take money to which one isn't entitled, and sometimes the actual acquisition of the property as a result of the threat. The question is, does the threat to leave negative reviews visible count?

      You appear to be asserting that the threat has to be affirmative in nature -- i.e. "give me what I want, or I will do something to you". But that's not necessarily the case. Threatening to withhold testimony can be extortion; so at least some of the time, the threat can be one of omission -- "give me what I want or I will not do something that would prevent harm to you".

      That the threatened action be illegal, or that the harm be unjust by any particular standard, are not typically elements of the crime.

    3. Re:That's not extortion by codegen · · Score: 1

      In the article there is some suggestion that some of the negative reviews were written by Yelp staffers

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    4. Re:That's not extortion by Quothz · · Score: 1

      What they're allegedly doing is scummy, but not extortion. Or rather, it's only extortion if Yelp itself is generating the negative reviews. Accepting cash to remove legitimate negative reviews is just slimy.

      From the fucking article:

      Indeed, Yelp does pay some employees to write reviews of businesses that are solicited for advertising. And in at least one documented instance, a business owner who refused to advertise subsequently received a negative review from a Yelp employee.

    5. Re:That's not extortion by sideshow · · Score: 1

      Or rather, it's only extortion if Yelp itself is generating the negative reviews.

      From TFA, emphasis mine:

      Indeed, Yelp does pay some employees to write reviews of businesses that are solicited for advertising. And in at least one documented instance, a business owner who refused to advertise subsequently received a negative review from a Yelp employee.

      --

      Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  9. Awww. Yelp is all growed up. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their advertising side dominates their editorial side, just like the respectable old media guys. Web 2.0 made good, I think I'm tearing up...

    1. Re:Awww. Yelp is all growed up. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Tearing up what? Newspapers? ;)

  10. Related News by Fuseboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news, Yelp has announced that it has reached a $300 cross-advertising relationship with Slashdot to "do something" about a prominently displayed news item.

    1. Re:Related News by Zarquil · · Score: 1

      So has Slashdot has been seeding dupes for years to cash in on this $300 advertising phenomenon?

      Diabolical! When do the bad dupes get moved down?

  11. Finally by internerdj · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all now know what the ... step is: Extortion.

  12. Not so much Yelp as a Growl by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

    Shake down marketing, in desperate times men do desperate things.

  13. If you don't by an ad, we shoot this puppy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then thinly slice it and place it in a broth that perfectly balances sweet, sour, salt and heat.

    Four stars.

  14. Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by leroybrown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I lost confidence in Yelp after I posted a negative review of an Italian bistro in Haddonfield, NJ (which I won't name to avoid giving them any free publicity) and it was removed after about a week. Over time other reviewers for the restaurant made references to their previous negative reviews being removed as well. My girlfriend and I had dinner at this place for Valentine's day last year and the experience was miserable. The food was bland and overpriced, and the kitchen manager was making very rude sexual comments about his dating life and experience with women. I wrote to the owner first explaining the problem and he responded with suggestions that I'm a prude, obviously don't know good food, would not be happy anywhere, and suggested that if I'd like to come back sometime (I live in PA), he'd be willing to settle this outside. So since I wasn't getting anywhere with that route, I posted both my and his emails into a yelp review. Gone a week later. I've watched the review section since then and have noticed several negative reviews go up and are then removed shortly after. Currently there are only two reviews up, with 3 and 5 stars. My only idea at this point is that the owner of the place (whose email address looks suspiciously like the word "douche") badgered Yelp into removing them.

    Anyone else have this experience?

    --
    Founder, Americans Allied Against Alliteration
    1. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      the kitchen manager was making very rude sexual comments

      Is-a no fair!
      Avete dato al mio ristorante una revisione difettosa per formulare le osservazioni sessuali inadeguate.
      Ma ho dato alla vostra mamma cinque stelle per il sesso caldo della scimmia!

    2. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by leroybrown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Okay, babelfish translated this as:

      You have given to my restaurant a defective review in order to formulate inadequate the sexual observations. But I have given to your mother five stars for the warm sex of the monkey!

      "Warm sex of the monkey" was about how the food tasted...

      --
      Founder, Americans Allied Against Alliteration
    3. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else have this experience?

      With Yelp? Or with Duo?

    4. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Keep posting them. Eventually that restaurant will run out of money in their "Yelp fund"

    5. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote to the owner first explaining the problem and he responded with suggestions that I'm a prude, obviously don't know good food, would not be happy anywhere,

      Any chance the owner is correct? Honestly, if I have an unsatisfying meal at a restaurant, I move on with life the moment I walk out the door and just don't go back. Every single person I have met who would take it further than that has been a prissy little wanker with delusions of importance. You *wrote* to the manager? Who even does that? Who cares? The place will live or die on its own merits. That fact that it's not even local to you only make it sillier.

    6. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suggested that if I'd like to come back sometime (I live in PA), he'd be willing to settle this outside.

      Doesn't he know that you keep a razor in your shoe?

      Seriously, though, I doubt that they'll get a rash of new business from the comment you posted, and Slashdot would *never* stoop to deleting your comment, so you might as well post the name of the place -- starts with a D? Might as well post the address and phone number too.

    7. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Since I've not tasted the "Warm sex of the monkey", can you please elaborate and tell me what it tastes like?

      -walks away hoping it's not chicken!

    8. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Warm sex of the monkey" was about how the food tasted...

      Avete giocato molto bene, signore. Molto bene.

    9. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Wit his girlfriend...

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    10. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anyone else have this experience?

      Of spending Valentine's day with a female? No, sorry...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    11. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, same exact experience, with a dentist.

      Funny thing is, only two of us reviewed this dentist--negatively--and it kept getting removed.

      I killed my Yelp account after this, and quit using the site.

    12. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by WarmSexOfTheMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mom's a great cook. Oh wait...

    13. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the obvious way around this (and many other sites that also remove -ve reviews) is to give a 3/5 or 4/5 review, the 1st line should be something +ve, then the rest is what you had before.

      People who read reviews usually search for problem keywords to see if the place has issues, and will find your review. The 3/5 will keep it under the radar

    14. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by segedunum · · Score: 1

      You'd probably be best off getting yourself a blog and writing fairly regular reviews of stuff you find good and stuff you find bad. When people do a search on something with Google they will almost inevitably end up finding your review. I just don't trust these review sites. I've seen a number of reviews that have been negative on many of them that have been removed and it kind of negates the point of writing a review in the first place.

    15. Re:Yelp bends over to restauranteurs already by bingbong · · Score: 1

      Anyone else have this experience?

      Of spending Valentine's day with a female? No, sorry...

      Well, I did.

      But her avatar kept asking for my credit card number.

      --
      "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
  15. Extortion? Not Yet. by moore.dustin · · Score: 1

    First things first, what Yelp is doing is not the most respectable thing, but should not surprise a single person that understands business. Next, what they are doing is not extortion, at least not yet. When they call companies and tell them that a competitor bought a sponsorship to promote themselves and if they don't up the ante along with them, then they 'wont be able to do anything about those negative reviews,' then you have a case for extortion. It could come in many flavors, but you should get the idea.

    It is also important to remember that bad ethics is not evidence enough alone to throw around the extortion word. In this case, you merely disagree with how Yelp handles sales, sponsorship and their relation to the reviews on their site.

    1. Re:Extortion? Not Yet. by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...should not surprise a single person that understands business

      And people wonder why the economy's in the toilet.

    2. Re:Extortion? Not Yet. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      If they are posting false negative reviews and then offering to take them down for a fee they are engaging in extortion. The false negative reviews may also constitute libel.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Extortion? Not Yet. by WNight · · Score: 1

      extort - obtain by coercion or intimidation;
      "They extorted money from the executive by threatening to reveal his past to the company boss"
      "They squeezed money from the owner of the business by threatening him"

      Seems to be common usage.

      Yelp is essentially lying to customers. ('reviews' implies all reviews, not just selected ones.)

      I can't imagine the life of anyone here would be enriched by listening to a lawyer yammer on about the technicality in the legal definition of extortion merely makes this jackassery instead of criminal. It's still antisocial and the people involved need to be ostracized.

    4. Re:Extortion? Not Yet. by ericrost · · Score: 1

      More aptly, just like with Microsoft, the Television Studios, etc. You're not the customer, you're the product. The advertisers and, in this case, restauranteurs are the customers.

      Sucks, but its more and more true.

    5. Re:Extortion? Not Yet. by WNight · · Score: 1

      A TV studio is just giving stuff away, so they don't have much of an obligation.

      It seems worse with Yelp because a review site has to know that any value the reviews have is in being honest. By offering a review site and not saying 'A worthless review site' you are implicitly offering an uncensored one.

    6. Re:Extortion? Not Yet. by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Or you can simply realize that those that pay the bills hold the leash.

  16. Sounds pretty damning by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1
    The article sounds pretty damning-- if they move bad reviews down based on whether you advertise on the site (or even, apparently, actually write bad reviews if you don't advertise), that's extortion.

    I'm wondering if they can be sued for that. If they really write bad reviews for restaurants that don't advertise, I would think that this would count as libel, even if you can't sue for extortion.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Sounds pretty damning by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I'm wondering if they can be sued for that. If they really write bad reviews for
      > restaurants that don't advertise, I would think that this would count as libel,
      > even if you can't sue for extortion.

      I think that they could be sued for both libel and extortion, if anyone wants to bother.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  17. Restauranteurs by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

    Does Jack White have another side project?

    Hahaha!! Oh man, I crack myself up....

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  18. Bucket of salt by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    after RTFA I am not so sure what's going on is clearcut, so take this story with some salt.

    Clearly the sales reps are 'shaking down' some restaurants, but I think it's more likely that they are trying to inflate their own numbers and don't have the power they pretend or are wording it in such a way that it seems they can do more than they can.

    What you get is just the ability to choose one review to be 'front and center'. Otherwise all reviews are placed by an algorithm. So a sales rep says 'we could help with that negative review' but what they mean is 'because you get to place one featured positive one at the top'

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Bucket of salt by garcia · · Score: 1

      Lots of media groups are doing shit like this. Take for instance Minneapolis/St Paul's CityPages and what they're doing with their restaurant reviews.

    2. Re:Bucket of salt by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      In other words...

      "Nice restaurant youse gots there. Be a shame if you had lots of negative reviews, now, wouldn't it, Vinny?"
      "Yeah, Guido, it sure would!"
      "Well, we's got an offer for youse that youse can't refuse...."

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    3. Re:Bucket of salt by Jay+L · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it's more likely that they are trying to inflate their own numbers and don't have the power they pretend or are wording it in such a way that it seems they can do more than they can.

      I was thinking the same thing... If Yelp's search results change frequently, and if reviews are regularly removed (for any reason at all), couldn't this be a combination of two classic scams, plus confirmation bias?

      1. The Perfect Prediction scam: You send postcards to 10,000 people, predicting the winner of tomorrow night's game. On half the postcards, you write the home team's name; on the other half, the visiting team's name. You keep track of who got which postcard. The day before the next game, you send 5,000 postcards - to only the people who got the "accurate" postcard. Repeat a few times, and you'll have a few hundred people who think you have the inside scoop on fixed games, and who will pay you for the next "prediction".

      2. The White Van Speakers scam: "Psst! Hey, wanna buy some speakers? I, uh, these were left over after we did a high-end home theatre job. Yeah, and the boss said throw them out, but I figured someone could use them, you know? I'll let 'em go for only $500." When you get them home, you discover they do work, but they're horrible. Who are you going to complain to? You bought what you thought were stolen speakers out of the back of a van.

      It seems to me that even if Yelp isn't *actually* gaming their reviews, there might be a sales team that's discovered it's in their best interest to *claim* they are. The recipe:

      1. Wait till the next "Google dance" on Yelp.
      2. Check out the newly-sorted review page for your potential client.
      3. If they now have good reviews at the top, claim you did it, just to show what you can do.
      4. If they have bad reviews, claim you can fix them.
      4a. And if they turned you down last month, hint vaguely that this is the result.

      Naturally, when the next Yelp dance occurs, that client will have a newly randomized set of results - and they may not be better than the current ones. But who are they going to complain to? "Hey, I paid to have negative reviews removed, and they're still up there."

    4. Re:Bucket of salt by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The Perfect Prediction scam

      Never heard of this before, but it's so simple and yet so clever. One of those ideas that's obvious *after* it's been pointed out to you!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  19. New job opportunities for the MAFIAA bunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, who else thought it was this yelp

  20. 6 Pages!?! by DrWho520 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is this article 6 pages long? I cannot help but snicker reading the first paragraph. I get the image of a restaurant owner cringing every time the phone rings, dreading the voice of Henchman Number 24 on the other end.

    "Would you like to purchase advertising on our site? We can rearrange the order of your ratings. The Monarch Mobile will be right over with the paperwork."

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    1. Re:6 Pages!?! by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      Come on, don't act like you don't know that they are cramming every ad that they
      can on, repeatedly !!!!

      It is a virtual advertising gang bang.

      --
      music lover since 1969
  21. Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by kabocox · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in Texarkana AR. I eat mostly in Texarkana, TX. The Bowie County has this nice report http://www.txkusa.org/health/Food-Report.pdf
    It lists: Establishment, Address, Date of Inspection, Type of Inspection, and Score. My wife and I check it every time we consider trying something new. We first look 'em up. If they don't have an A; we don't eat there.

    I just wish Miller County had the same thing. Heck, it would be nice if there was an easy federal health website that it was trivial to search for this info. Heck, it would be nice to have those GPS units be able to poll for that info when you are "out of town." Just so you are sure to pick a clean place to eat.

    1. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      All the information is "free" but it's not put together anywhere. So you're depending on your local news organ to get the information, and publish it. Most papers put it in the actual paper.

      I agree though, it should end up online either through local government or a local watchdog news organization.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      an easy federal health website

      Because we all know that if the government is involved, bribes and money and bias don't have any affect anymore. :)

    3. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do this in San Francisco too. It's a bit of an open secret among restaurant workers here that you can bribe the inspection officer to get a better "grade" on your inspection.

    4. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      In California restaurants are legally required to post those ratings on the storefront. Most seem to do so inconspicuously though.

    5. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if there was an easy federal health website that it was trivial to search for [restaurant inspection scores]

      Quite true! Part of the problem is that the way places do this is not really standardized at all, from what I can tell, and often are in PDFs, and thus harder to extract text from.

      I think a good idea would be to write to your people-that-provide-inspection-score-info and ask if they could also include an XML or other file for the information. Point out that the PDFs are likely automatically generated from a database, and that you would be happy to write code to pull the data from the same database in order to publish a text file in parallel with the PDF. Crap ... I need to take that advice and do it myself: finding inspection scores in California was a royal pain.

    6. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      What's even better is that in L.A. county they have to post a notice in a "conspicuous place" that has the rating. When they first implemented it, I was amazed at what motivation the little placard with an "A" on it (as opposed to a "B" or "C") provided--several seedy joints were surprisingly cleaner.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    7. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Hmm... nicer places have more money to bribe the inspector with, and so get better grades. It actually works, in a roundabout way.

    8. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we all know that if the government is involved, bribes and money and bias don't have any affect anymore. :)

      Drag the corrupt individual off to court and throw them in the slammer. That's a level of accountability you will never see in Yelp.

    9. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by Henry+Pate · · Score: 1

      I've worked in a number of restaurants, from fast food to fine dining and I can tell you that health department scores are not always an accurate representation of how clean the restaurant is. A lot of areas (in the States at least) only get one or two surprise inspections a year, if you fail a surprise inspection you get a scheduled inspection soon after.

      Often the managers of restaurants will know around when they'll be inspected and double or triple the number of staff during just that time frame. Some restaurants take pride in their craft and properly care for their kitchen and equipment.

      A lot of restaurants are repeat offenders and fail surprise inspections over and over again, then clean up for the scheduled one. It saves them money and most people don't look up the scores before they go to the restaurant. One great deterrent is to require posting the scores from the last four inspections prominently at the entrance.

      --
      Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
    10. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by houghi · · Score: 1

      I just ask friends if they have eaten somewhere or just go and look at it myself. I look up restaurants for type of food and price range. The rest I will see when I get there. If the food is realy, realy, realy bad (only had that happen twice in many, many years) I have a good laugh over it.

      There is one type of restaurant I would never enter. Empty ones. When on the road, I try to look for places with a lot of truckers in front. Otherwise will look at places where a lot of locals go to. An almost full place is a good way of knowing that the food will be good.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Food Establishment Inspections not reviews... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a very good way to tell. Some of my favorite restaurants are empty at times. Some are rarely full.

      You know what kinds of restaurants are always full? Applebee's, McDonalds, the Cheesecake Refinery, places like that. Following the herd often backfires in my opinion.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  22. That's too bad by dave562 · · Score: 1

    I use Yelp regularly and have found some good restaurants through Yelp that I would have never visited on my own. It seems like they can't simply leave good enough alone.

  23. True by paimin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Absolutely true. I personally know a restaurant owner in San Francisco that complains about these suggestive calls.

    Yelp = crap.

    --
    Facebook is the new AOL
    1. Re:True by inviolet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Absolutely true. I personally know a restaurant owner in San Francisco that complains about these suggestive calls.

      Apparently the Better Business Bureau operates the same way, but with more obfuscation.

      Membership in the BBB allows your company to 'respond' to customer complaints, which means that your company no longer has a nasty "complaints unresponded" number. You don't actually have to do anything about the complaints; you just have to respond, which requires member$hip.

      MBAs are wrecking our society.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    2. Re:True by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely true. I personally know a restaurant owner in San Francisco that complains about these suggestive calls.

      Apparently the Better Business Bureau operates the same way, but with more obfuscation.

      Membership in the BBB allows your company to 'respond' to customer complaints, which means that your company no longer has a nasty "complaints unresponded" number. You don't actually have to do anything about the complaints; you just have to respond, which requires member$hip.

      MBAs are wrecking our society.

      I've used the BBB to resolve complaints with companies; in all cases the companies actually responded, worked out a solution I found acceptable. At that point the complaint was listed as resolved. BBB gives an option to list it as unresolved if you don't like the response; I've never used that so I can't comment on that process' effectiveness. Oh wait, this is /. ...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  24. Yelp CEO responds by MrEricSir · · Score: 1, Redundant
    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  25. This has nothing to do with liability... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    and everything to do with sleazy ad sales tactics.

    A LOT of sites still in "start up" mode (it still is in start up mode, despite what anyone may think) rely on these types of tactics.

  26. I'm curious, why write the letter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My response to a crappy meal and poor service is to just not go there again.

    Why write the letter? Was it the leacherous nature of the manager what did it? It seems a letter just adds to the waste of your time beyond just a crappy meal.

    Perhaps a letter to the local editor of whatever rags your town has might be a better use of your time.

    1. Re:I'm curious, why write the letter? by gknoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When your experience at a store, restaurant, or other service is bad enough to cause you to explicitly avoid them, telling the owner lets them know that there's a problem. They might have been unaware that their employees were rude, or that service was poor, or that the food is uncompelling or overpriced. This allows them to know WHY they're losing customers, rather than wondering why they continue to do poorly. This could conceivably lead to the restaurant's service/food/attitude improving, thereby improving the experience of all future customers (and potentially yourself, if you ever go back).

      Sure, sometimes the owner is a jerk, and already endorses the establishment's bad behavior. You're then just informing him that you are no longer part of his customer demographic; the chance of restaurant improvement is much much smaller in this case, and I can understand the "why bother?" perspective in this case.

      If you're EVER unhappy about an experience anywhere, it's often fruitful (or at least cathartic ;)) to tell the owner that you had a poor experience. Even if it's something like, "We love your restaurant, but service was especially poor this past Friday night." Being polite is bound to be morefruitful than telling them off, as in almost all communications, of course.

    2. Re:I'm curious, why write the letter? by afidel · · Score: 1

      I write correspondence like that because as a former business owner I was always glad when my customers gave me honest feedback. I know that at least one local restaurant had a major overhaul in front end staff after multiple reports of poor service got back to the owner.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  27. Company Policy or rogue Salesman by olddotter · · Score: 1

    Of course all companies in this situation would claim its the actions of a rouge sale's person. But I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt.

    1. Re:Company Policy or rogue Salesman by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      claim its the actions of a rouge sale's person.

      So if you buy the advertising you can also get makeup at a discount?

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  28. Pssst! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hey, Yelp. For the right incentive this whole Slashdot thread can go away.

  29. I live a town over from Haddonfield by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please name names.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:I live a town over from Haddonfield by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Only one of the two results matches the GP's ratings description.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  30. Yes and no by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, yes and no.

    1. That some businesses would want to slander (or libel) the competition, yeah, that probably goes all the way back to the dawn of time. Which is why most countries have various numbers of laws to contain the phenomenon.

    2. There's still something distasteful about being the guy who tries to cash in on that with a "if you don't pay 300 a month, we'll show bad reviews of you at the top." That's no longer even about competition, it's a plain old protection racket. It's not just a betrayal of the public's trust, it's really trying to blackmail someone with a threat to their public image and reputation.

    We're in an age where someone's reputation is probably the most important asset of their business. I wouldn't be surprised if some restaurants would lose less money if you threw a molotov through their windows, than if you convince half the town to not even give them a try. Doubly so since you can insure agains the former, but there's no insurance I know of against just not getting customers. So basically I see no fundamental moral difference between, basically:

    - "Nice restaurant you have there. It would be a shame if anything happened to it. It's a rough neighbourhood, you know? Lots of evil people out there. Some vandals could tear the place down one night. But we're nice people. If you pay us 300$ a month for our efforts, we could keep an eye out that it doesn't happen."

    - "Nice reputation your restaurant has. It would be a shame if anything happened to it. It's a tough world, you know? Lots of evil people out there. Some bastards could plaster the reviews page with really nasty stuff. But we're nice people. If you pay us 300$ a month for our efforts, we could keep an eye out that it doesn't happen."

    Both essentially threaten you with a bigger loss unless you pay the protection fee.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Yes and no by Abreu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad they got greedy and managed to get accused of extortion... If it was me, I would have settled for giving a discount on the banner ads to those restaurants who gave me free lunches

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Yes and no by The+name+is+Dave.+Ja · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yelp.com just neglected to pay _their_ protection money. This "exposé" (essentially a negative review) is just to show them what can happen.

    3. Re:Yes and no by tjonnyc999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1. That some businesses would want to slander (or libel) the competition, yeah, that probably goes all the way back to the dawn of time.

      Astroturfing and astro-slander goes on all the time, on almost every review site. After all, if a business is going to invest the time/effort into promoting themselves (via fake reviews), why not slander the competition while you're at it? Makes sense from the time-management point of view.

      Which is why most countries have various numbers of laws to contain the phenomenon.

      And we're all keenly aware of just how well those laws work. Everything on teh interwebz should be taken with a grain^H^H^H^H^H large industrial-sized shaker of salt.

      We're in an age where someone's reputation is probably the most important asset of their business.

      Completely agree with you here. This goes double for new businesses especially, that do not have an established brand name or an expensive marketing campaign to bring new customers. And triple for online-only-based businesses. Of course, the more valuable reputation / credo becomes, the more incentive there is for competitors to trash it. Unfortunately, unless and until the "general public" learns to distinguish astroturfed reviews from real ones, this will keep happening, and there's precious little anyone (legislators, review sites, or businesses themselves) can do about it. And considering the general mental skillset of the general public (i.e. "sheeple"), this isn't very likely to happen anytime soon.
      All that being said, I'd like to point out (after positioning tongue firmly in cheek) that Yelp (and a few other sites I won't mention here) aren't threatening businesses with adding bad reviews, they're offering incentives to remove the existing bad reviews. Which, according to their terms, they're well within their rights to do. Ever notice the "we reserve the right to remove any review if it does not meet editorial qualifications" or "if we suspect fraudulent activity" or similar verbiage? It's there for a reason. So technically, it's not extortion. *takes tongue out of cheek*.

    4. Re:Yes and no by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      1. Well, I didn't say that those laws are perfect, nor that they _solve_ the problem. I'm just saying they try to _contain_ it.

      2. Well, when the friendly neighbour, the mafia thug drops by, he isn't actually threatening you with wrecking your shop. He's just, you know, offering an incentive to pay him so he prevents any threats to your shop :P

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    5. Re:Yes and no by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Normally I would be on the side of Yelp because of free-speech. However when cash is involved suddenly it's not so free.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    6. Re:Yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The restaurant management rule of thumb is that it takes one-tenth the cost to keep a (dissatisfied) customer versus the cost in gaining a new one.

      Since reviews on Yelp will have essentially zero effect on existing customers, the cost is aimed at new ones.

  31. Restaurants in my city by theredshoes · · Score: 1

    There are pretty fair reviews on the very expensive restaurants in my city on Yelp, especially the Big Burrito owned restaurants. Maybe there is something to this because in Podunk, PA Big Burrito owns/runs the nicest places in this city. A lot of the independently owned gems aren't even on there, which is a shame. There are a lot of kind of hole in the walls places which are very clean and arty in our city that have great Indian, Filipino and Thai food. I would pick those places over Soba any day.

  32. Hello, and Welcome to the World of Print by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    The same behavior has been going on in print magazines and newspapers probably since the they started. Ever notice how whatever band or establishment is reviewed in a magazine also ends up advertising? What they print and what is advertised is often very related. That's how they stay in business. The cover cost of magazines rarely pays for anything besides distribution costs and its the ad revenue that actually lets print happen. Thus, ad dollars often dictate was is or isn't in print. Sometimes the print media is extorting money out of others, and sometimes they're selling out and accepting the money offered to them for services. If they're really lucky, they're being offered money by people they really like and they don't actually have to edit stories. Even newspapers run into this because what news and stories they cover can offend their advertisers so it must be edited. It's the sad truth of print.

    The web is just another form of print. Many websites get their money from advertising and so you see the exact same behavior that exists in dead tree media. Difference in media doesn't mean there's going to be any difference in how the operations are run as businesses. An establishment like Yelp might have their reputation matter somewhat, but only the clicks and the dollars will determine if it is enough.

  33. Re:Extortion? No, more like Payola . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This better fits the description: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola

    And, considering that it is/was practiced by our pals in the Big Music Industry . . . doesn't make it any more palatable.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  34. Yelp has issues... by Fulminata · · Score: 1

    even without this article, Yelp sucks from the perspective of a business owner. The root of the problem is that there is no way for a business to respond to misleading reviews. Businesses are barred from reviewing themselves, which makes sense, but there's no other way to post a comment other than in the form of a review!

    As a result, there's no way to respond to information that is simply wrong. For example, if a reviewer says that a retail store doesn't carry 'brand X' when in fact the store carries the complete line, there's nothing the store owner can do to correct the misinformation, short of setting up a shill account and posting a new review.

  35. What happens... by MyrddinBach · · Score: 1

    when they meet the REAL mafia..

    Call up some local italian joint in Chicago and do this offer. Pretty soon yelp will pay THEM to make sure their kneecaps stay whole.

    1. Re:What happens... by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      They already refused two offers - first, for only $500, they could have stopped the article, and second, for only $1000 they could have kept it of /.
      Now, for only $2500 ..

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    2. Re:What happens... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      It's all pretty much the same business.

      If you don't pay Yelp, they'll rearrange reviews.
      If you don't pay the maffia, they'll rearrange faces.

      Both are simply in the rearrangement sector.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  36. Down with Yelp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't stand Yelp. Many times the reviews don't match the reality of the restaurant. And what the CEO says about not being true 'coz there are some bad reviews, the question is how many bad are taken out and if only the less bad reviews are left... And probably the restaurant he posted in his blog as an example was one which didn't pay the bribe fee! DOWN with YELP!

  37. "Common Carrier Status" by fm6 · · Score: 1

    ROTFL. I'd be very curious to know what you think a "common carrier" is. God save us from amateur lawyers!

  38. Title of article by lloydy · · Score: 1

    The word is restaurateur, not restauranteur.
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/restaurateur

  39. If you live in Buffalo by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

    If you live in Buffalo, NY, check out Bill Rapaport's Buffalo Restaurant Guide. It's put together by a CS professor at the University at Buffalo. Although the web design is right out of 1995, but it's extremely fair, useful, and informative site, and a model for other grass-roots restaurant review services to emulate.

    1. Re:If you live in Buffalo by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Thanks; while I live in California currently, I grew up about a mile from the UB north campus and next time I go back I will know where to eat - besides for free at my parents' house of course :)

  40. Scummy business practices indeed by BenVis · · Score: 1

    I read a blog post about this case pointing out that East Bay Express also happens to run a restaurant rating service. Conflicts of interest don't always lead to problems, but the conflict should be kept in mind when evaluating the article's claims.

    A link to the post.

    --
    "Preceded by itself yields falsehood" preceded by itself yields falsehood.
  41. Jamie Zawinsky's DNA Lounge Affected by Beltway+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Jamie Zawinsky talked about the dirt under the shiny Yelp logo recently: http://jwz.livejournal.com/1002269.html

  42. Yelpâ(TM)s servings could use a dash of cando by Bryan-10021 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The LA Times had this "scoop" a week ago. This is old news!

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus11-2009feb11,0,6849007.column

  43. bad publicity is better than no publicity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yelp is now known to all of us, and Im sure more of us will probably use this service to find restaurants when we visit other citys. Such a sham.

  44. Duo Italian Bistro by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Am I right or am I right? I'm right.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Duo Italian Bistro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ay! You-a big-a winner!

  45. Evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evidence please? Could it be a competitor that is making these claims?

  46. I don't think that word means what you think... by sampson7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The basic elements of common carrier status are:

    (1) A business operating under a license issued by the government;

    (2) The business offers to provide non-discriminatory service to the public; and

    (3) The service provided is considered a "public convenience and necessity".

    According to Wikipedia (my Black's is at home):

    "A common carrier must further demonstrate to the regulator that it is "fit, willing and able" to provide those services for which it is granted authority. Common carriers typically transport persons or goods according to defined and published routes, time schedules and rate tables upon the approval of regulators."

    Common carrier is also often used in the telecom sector to describe a similar service, whereby the cell phone company (for example) offers you access to the publicly owned radio spectrum according to a rate schedule.

    In short -- nothing about Yelp relates in any way to common carrier status.

    Please don't use technical terms you don't understand in posts without doing some research first. I don't go around flining technical jargon about compiling techniques, why do people insist on trying to use (or should I say misuse) tecnical legal terms???

  47. Yelp Yelp by HandleMyBidness · · Score: 1

    Yelp Yelp (as in search for yelp), then sort by rating you'll see shit going waay back.

    My gf works in the restaurant industry. When I showed this to her she told me that because Yelp just valued themselves at like 10million the news media are getting interested.

  48. East Bay Express has conflict of interest here by bikerider7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yelp directly competes with East Bay Express for restaurant reviews, and their "Best of" awards, so no surprise that the Express would run a Hit piece against Yelp. Moreover, the Express has also had controversies of its own in how it does reader "rankings" of local restaurants. And for those of us trying to improve local public transit, the author of this EB-Express article is very well known for her slanted and inaccurate hit pieces against AC Transit (the local bus service).

    1. Re:East Bay Express has conflict of interest here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, the author doesn't need to run hit pieces against AC Transit for us locals to know to avoid it. Our bad experiences are enough. While I've seen the East Bay Express run shabby hit-pieces before, I don't know that AC Transit isn't an undeserving target.

  49. He who lives by the sword ... by LrdDimwit · · Score: 1

    If it really is as blatant as this, then this is a trivial problem to correct. Put one of those prerecorded messages on your phone saying "To ensure quality, conversations may be monitored or recorded". Next time a Yelp employee tries to shake you down, record them. Post it on your store's website and make a YouTube clip of the audio. When Yelp attempts to force the message to be removed ... Behold, the Power of Streisand.

    1. Re:He who lives by the sword ... by hypnos · · Score: 1

      funny how no one has produced any sort of evidence like that, isn't it?

  50. Easy Reviews by simonbas · · Score: 1

    1-Create Restaurant rating site 2-Make it collaborative and make people review it so you don't have to hire staff 3-Extort restaurateurs 4-.... 5-Profit!!!! (for a while) 6-Getting your site discredited. 7-FAIL

  51. Reviews are worthless by bpkiwi · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, no review by anyone that you do not personally know is worth anything.

    Professional reviewers 'do it for the money' and can therefore be either bought, or just recognised and given preferential treatment.

    Reviews by members of the public can be faked. Anyone can sign up and claim anything.

    Some people just love to complain, and will do so in every forum at every chance. Negative reviews will always dominate. (This very article is a negative review, in a way). Satisfied customers have no reason to leave a review.

  52. its true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i own a bakery and yelp weirdos told us we could have some negative reviews "dealt with" if we advertised with them

  53. Reviews are important, but. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    I know a couple of restaurant owners. Reviews are only half of the story. Positive word of mouth is really vital; restaurants are by their very nature dependent on the bricks & mortal business style. They can't even do mail order, so a bad reputation leading to the loss of repeat business can destroy them.

    This one place in my town was making an easy million per year, most of that from repeat customers eating there a couple times a month, some as often as two and three times a week. Then the owner cashed out and the new owner let things slide. You can make a LOT of money on a successful restaurant, or you can lose a lot of money on a restaurant very fast. It only takes a couple of bad experiences for a patron to stop coming around. If 100 regulars take away their $20 to $50 per week, then that's a catastrophic loss just on it's own. But that means 100 people are no longer saying, "I know this great place. . !" and are instead saying, "My favorite place is under a new dick-head owner and it totally sucks! Don't go!", then the damage can be almost impossible to recover from. The restaurant in question went from being a fifteen-year gold mine success story to closing its doors within just 18 months.

    In the restaurant biz, word of mouth really matters, so the place you're talking about is probably already suffering.

    -FL

    1. Re:Reviews are important, but. . . by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      No kidding. My favorite place for lunch went through that exact same process. For three years I ate lunch there two-three times a week. I must have taken at least ten people there, and a few stuck with it. It was a Persian grill/kabob place, and it used to be packed at lunch time. I started taking my lunch break later in the day so I did not have to wait.

      So, there comes an asshole, buys the place from the family that runs it, and during the last week they were still running the place chats up the customers while they are eating, telling them how he's going to make great changes... Even after I told him that I had been going there for years, and after he had seen me there for the third time, he still insisted telling me how he was going to be changing things, and how I would not recognize the place.

      So the old Persian lady left, the good stuff slowly disappeared from the menu... and one day, the name of the place was changed to 'Between the bun' (sic) Well, within three weeks, the place was empty at lunch. I know, because I still walked past it every day. In two months, he closed it. There have been other restaurants in there, but no one held for more than an year, and right now it is vacant. A corner building on a nice little plaza with a fountain... a place that used to overflow even at lunch time, even on weekends.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
  54. They BOTH have conflict of interest. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    While this practice may not legally be extortion (or may be, that remains to be seen), accepting advertising dollars from companies that are being reviewed is, itself, a conflict of interest. That is a system that cannot help but to be dishonest!

  55. Yelp removed my negative review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wrote a negative review on Yelp for Linn's in Cambria, CA last year. That review is now gone.

    Wonder why...

  56. appcrave iPhone reviews do the same thing by kraln · · Score: 1

    I sent a promo code to appcrave for them to review an iPhone app I wrote -- they replied back essentially saying "No guarantee, unless you give us $50. We don't publish bad reviews if you give us money. Advertising starts at $400, and you get a free good review" Yick. Bad taste in my mouth.

  57. See also, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://jwz.livejournal.com/1002269.html

    Hey, you with the finger on the down-moderation button! No, JWZ isn't just some schmuck with a livejournal account! In fact, he is probably the one person who it makes the most sense to link to in this discussion*.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Zawinski

    *(and not just because he will hate it)

  58. At Any Price? by JCNavarro · · Score: 1

    They have a lot of preasure to break even, they need to make money...but at any price? they are risking their reputation. Here is a free alternative to Yelp for local businesses: www.rateitall.com/promote

  59. Restaurateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no such word as "restauranteur" - no letter "n" in it x

  60. Yalp removes good reviews to! by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    Like most small business owners when you add your business to a website like Yalp you check in once in a while to see how things are going. I went from 8 positive reviews down to 2, no reason. All legit reviews from existing happy customers.

    So ya Yalp is very shady but this is common knowledge now. In fact I was warned against putting my company on Yalp by others because of how shady they are.

  61. anecdotal support by doctor+handshake · · Score: 1

    I've heard anecdotal evidence of this behavior in NYC as well. A good friend explained his experience with a Yelp salesperson as a thinly-veiled shakedown. He didn't take the bait and is staunchly anti-Yelp at this point. Personally I rely on Yelp when I travel for business but I use it like any intelligent person should use a review site - with deep skepticism and concerted effort given to spot instances of manipulation and fanaticism. Kinda like I use Slashdot!

  62. Take this Yelp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read the article. What a shame. I immediately deleted the Yelp App from my iphone and gave them a 1 start rating on my way out. Thanks but no thanks.

  63. CDA Section 230 by tony1343 · · Score: 1
  64. Had a negative post removed by end15 · · Score: 1

    I had a terrible experience with a restaurant. I posted my story on Yelp and it disappeared. I contacted Yelp several times to find the reason they had taken my post down. Yelp claims they will contact you before they take your post down and if not you can contact them. Still I never heard back from them. I posted it again and it immediately disappeared. I don't use Yelp anymore and find their black box approach disingenuous.

    --
    All glory to the Hypnotoad!
  65. Bye bye Yelp! by m509272 · · Score: 1

    There's enough supporting comments to convince me this crap is going on. Bye bye....

  66. This is true. by colsandurz45 · · Score: 1

    I posted a negative review on yelp and not it's not there unless I sign in. Here is the link: http://www.yelp.com/biz/driscolls-package-store-inc-andover

  67. This happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a user called Gus had his comment removed about the owners of the Mid City Nursery in American Canyon, California supporting prop 8. He wrote to me that it had been removed shortly after I posted a similar comment. Today, I got a notice that my own comment was removed.

    In my post, I expressed that I would not be shopping there anymore because their owners open supported for prop 8, that the owners hurt many of its patrons' families, and that it tarnished my ability to appreciate the products I had purchased there. I even went as far as to say I did not blame the employees and that their products as a whole were not bad but that I did not want to have the money I spent there used against my family. I am not sure how this would not be appropriate for a consumer review. Wouldn't conservatives want to know if a local business that they were spending money on was supporting abortion, gay rights, or stem cell research. I would like to point it that they owners sent a letter to the gay community in the area using their company name and stating that they supported prop 8. It was not about their ideology, it was about the fact my money was going to be used to support causes that were causing harm to my family.

    After reading about this and looking at the reviews of this establishment, I notice they are all positive to very positive. Now they are not a terrible nursery but they do have problems. I have seen mislabeled varieties, invasive weeds in their plants, and their water themed area is decayed and smells. It is not god awful, but I doubt everyone who goes there would find it awesome.

    This is the link to the comment page where my comments were removed.
    http://www.yelp.com/biz/mid-city-nursery-american-canyon

    Here is the letter they sent me about it. I would like to point out I was on the site the day they said it had been flagged, there where no flags that I saw. There were none for Gus either.

    Hi Robert,

    I'm writing to let you know that we decided to remove your reviews of Mid City Nursey after it was flagged by the Yelp community. It is undoubtedly a controversial issue for a business or one of its employees to take a stand on Proposition 8. While we encourage you to exercise your free speech rights with respect to this issue, consumer reviews are not the place to do it.

    As our review guidelines (http://www.yelp.com/faq#great_review) state: "Reviews aren't the place for rants about a business's employment practices, political ideologies, or other matters that don't address the core of the normal customer experience." We trust you recognize that our decision impacts both sides of this debate equally, and that our policy has been in place long before this issue emerged.

    Regards,
    Pam
    Yelp User Support
    San Francisco, California

  68. Sounds good, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found that most of the really good restaurants are filthy as all heck in the back. In fact when it comes to Chinese restaurants I won't eat there if the dining room is clean.

  69. Take inspections with a grain of salt. by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1

    My wife and I check it every time we consider trying something new. We first look 'em up. If they don't have an A; we don't eat there.

    You're probably keeping yourself away from some perfectly fine restaurants that make great, safe food.

    I have a number of friends who have worked in restaurants. Their stories are pretty uniform: 1. you probably don't want to know what's really happening in the kitchen, and 2. they don't care. A friend who loves telling horror stories about working at a particular major pizza chain still loves eating at that chain Another friend who told me about taking steps to actively thwart a health inspector maintains that the restaurant in question makes the best steaks in the city and continued to eat their after quitting for a better job. A restaurant can get dinged a few points and end up with a non-perfect rating for relatively minor slip ups. It's a kitchen, not a surgical theater. Put another way: unless you're obsessive about it, your own kitchen and food preparation would occasionally fail to get an A rating. The same goes for your friends whose food you've been eating. (Again, I'm generalizing. Perhaps Texarcana has particularly lenient standards.)

    Do keep an eye on the reports! If a restaurant gets a particularly low rating (which is vary from area to area), yeah, they're probably a hole. But if a restaurant is near the top, occasionally bobbling, I wouldn't worry about it. And, not knowing much about the "critical violations" in your area, yeah, I'd be worried about those, even if the restaurant ended up getting an A.

    1. Re:Take inspections with a grain of salt. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Put another way: unless you're obsessive about it, your own kitchen and food preparation would occasionally fail to get an A rating.

      I bet most peoples' kitchens would frequently fail to get an A. I know mine would, at any rate, and as far as I know I haven't contracted anything deadly in there.

      As you say, it's cooking, not surgery.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  70. Something similar happened to me at Amazon by Manzanita · · Score: 1

    I have received a number of spam messages from some author I had never heard of before, sending me to her Amazon listing. After the third round of spamming I decided to make a note of it on the page for the book, creating a review titled "Please don't buy books from this spammer." I used my real name and account, gave an accurate description of what had happened and a fairly objective review of what I could glean about the book. I also observed that the other reviews appeared to be shills, so I gave a little review of their reviews as well. None of what I said was mean or vindictive, just matter of fact.

    It has been a week since I wrote that review and I thought to check for it today. There is no trace of it. I was not notified in any way that it was unacceptable or that it had been removed. If you are curious, you can check out the books here , but please do not buy from this spammer! I think you will see immediately how poorly the book is written and what obvious shills the reviewers are. It is almost funny, if it weren't for the spamming.

    Of course any comments you leave about that book, or feedback you send to Amazon about their pulling reviews is up to you.

    -Dan

    1. Re:Something similar happened to me at Amazon by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      That is a standard practice on Amazon though, pulling reviews that aren't actually reviews of the book but reviews of the author or the circumstances around it. Not to say that Amazon doesn't delve into the shady area as well.

  71. No 'n' in the middle by sailorlula · · Score: 1

    There is no 'n' in 'Restaurateurs.'

  72. There is no "n" in "restaurateur"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  73. Uninstalling... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I honestly haven't used yelp a lot (Didn't have many reviews for the area I was in at the time) but I'm uninstalling the iPhone app.

    I remember back before the appstore turned on there was a nice little review app available via Installer but i don't recall the name...anyone remember it?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  74. This call may be recorded for quality purposes by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    Recorded audio conversation or it didn't happen.

    Are my expectations for 21st century journalism just too high?

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  75. Yelp Shakedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a small restaurateur in Portland OR that hosted a YELP party that rented out a portion of our restaurant. When it came time to pay the bill, the woman didn't want to pay the full bill because the entire guest list didn't show as she expected. We had made the food for the amount of guest she invited and so there was a ton of wasted food and a soured relationship with YELP. This is not an honest company.

  76. Extortion by Ripoff Report? by rwzeitgeist · · Score: 1

    One of the very credible TV stations in Dallas recently published a story and some followup stories alleging that the Ripoff Report attempted to extort a payment from a small company in return for removing or deemphasizing a negative report.
    Story: http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/localnews/investigates/stories/wfaa090115_mo_ripoffreport.8a6931c.html

  77. Zawinski has been there by DrProton · · Score: 1

    Uhhm, Jamie Zawinski blogged about this on Feb 11, slashdot. In case anyone was interested. He runs a club in SF; he received a shakedown from Yelp!

    Perhaps most bad reviews come from picky eaters?

    Online reviews simply are not trustworthy. No review is, really. You can't tell me what I like, and vice versa. We can probably agree that rats should not be running around the restaurant. We cannot agree on the proper seasoning levels and the drinks. Who knows what happened to your dish before it came out of the kitchen? If you dine out, you regularly place blind trust in the servers and the cooks. Why then compound this by trusting some guy with a yelp! account, who could be a shill?

    --
    "Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens." - Schiller