Slashdot Mirror


Casinos Warn iPhone Card-Counting App is Illegal

An anonymous reader writes "Gaming commissions in Nevada are informing casinos that a new card counting program has made its way to the Apple iPhone, called Hi Lo. This program can be used in the Stealth Mode. When the program is used in the Stealth Mode the screen of the phone will remain shut off, and as long as the user knows where the keys are located the program can be run effortlessly without detection. Randall Sayre, of the Nevada Gaming Commission says 'Use of this type of program or possession of a device with this type of program on it (with the intent to use it), in a licensed gaming establishment, is a violation of NRS 465.075.'"

462 comments

  1. awww poor casinos by nnnich · · Score: 5, Funny

    they no like a makey no money

    --
    she was the daughter of a wealthy florentine pogen read em and weep was her adjustable slogan
    1. Re:awww poor casinos by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why use the iPhone....?

      Card counting on your own, isn't that hard. Sure, it takes a bit of practice, but, it isn't rocket science.

      I played with it awhile...I just made sure I first memorized basic strategy....the set play for everything based on your cards vs the dealer.

      Once you get that down like 2nd nature...you start going with the +1 -1 for the low and high cards showing up on the table...divide the count by number of decks used to that point..etc.

      Not rocket science, but, it does take some practice.

      Even if you were using this iPhone app...you'd still have to have basic strategy memorized.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:awww poor casinos by mea37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question isn't really whether the casinos need sympathy.

      The question is, realistically what would happen if casinos actually allowed the odds of any game to be tilted in the players' favor?

      Answer: People would flock to that game, the casinos would lose money, and there would be no more casinos. Some people think that would be a good thing; are you surprised that the casino operators are not among them?

      Of course, counting cards in your head is legal. For this reason, casinos will always have to do their own work to detect card-counters and enforce their own rules against them (by throwing them out and banning them from returning). They have a perfectly good way to detect card counters -- they have their own people counting the cards and watching betting patterns. So in my view the law against card-counting devices is not strictly necessary, though perhaps it encourages more people to play nice (as it puts actual legal consequences on those who can't keep track in their heads).

      Of course, I see a lot of games played from a never-ending shoe; good luck counting in that environment.

    3. Re:awww poor casinos by hedwards · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the reason is speed, accuracy and memory. Mechanical devices used for card counting have been banned for quite a while, this is more of a notification that the iPhones have an app to do it.

      When people are doing it in their head, there are strategies in place to cope with that. Usually the dealer will have things that he's allowed to do and in the worst case the pit boss will come over and talk up the player.

      I'm not sure that the iPhone is specifically a problem, but it is within the category of cheating devices when used for card counting.

      But it is also worth while pointing out that Black Jack isn't a game that any sane casino would offer if they weren't able to make card counting difficult. It's just not profitable, mainly they offer it as a sort of favor to the clients.

    4. Re:awww poor casinos by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Even if you were using this iPhone app...you'd still have to have basic strategy memorized.

      While I have the most "basic strategy" memorized, there's variations based on if the dealer hits or stands on soft 17, if black jack pays out 3/2 or 6/5, etc. I practiced using Sega Casino on my Nintendo DS. When I was in Vegas last year, I was happy to find some $5 tables at the Hilton where my convention was, and the dealer told me that you could use the basic strategy cards openly if you wanted to.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    5. Re:awww poor casinos by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When people are doing it in their head, there are strategies in place to cope with that. Usually the dealer will have things that he's allowed to do and in the worst case the pit boss will come over and talk up the player.

      Yeah, they will do all sorts of things to make you distracted. I stayed at the Flamingo, and some of the $15 black jack tables had pole dancers in the middle of the tables! I stayed away until after they were done for the night, and when the free drinks come around I got myself a bottle of water.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    6. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nicky Santoro: A lot of holes in the desert, and a lot of problems are buried in those holes. But you gotta do it right. I mean, you gotta have the hole already dug before you show up with a package in the trunk. Otherwise, you're talking about a half-hour to forty-five minutes worth of digging. And who knows who's gonna come along in that time? Pretty soon, you gotta dig a few more holes. You could be there all fuckin' night.

    7. Re:awww poor casinos by LandDolphin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sounds like you missed out and some of the fun... Pole Dancers and 'free' drinks sound liek a nice way to spend an evening...

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    8. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how much money did you end up winning, Sega Boy?

    9. Re:awww poor casinos by arkham6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, very true. A few years ago when i was in vegas they even sold the basic strat cards in the frigging gift shop, and as long as you held it in your hand and not have it on the table, they don't care.

      In fact, I'm sure they must love people using the cards, since most people don't slavishly follow the basic strategy, and when you don't do that, you break whatever advantage it gives to you.

    10. Re:awww poor casinos by Bryansix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like you missed out and some of the fun... Pole Dancers and 'free' drinks sound liek a nice way to spend an evening...

      And to lose a lot of money.

    11. Re:awww poor casinos by Ed_Pinkley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A strategy guide is OK since playing basic strategy still has an edge for the house. The iPhone app isn't great. It only tracks the raw count. It is still only doing the counts some people do in their head. (Hi/lo, Hi/Lo Opt.) Let it do a perfect betting and playing strategy. *That's the stuff a computer is good at. It is a nice proof of concept but as has been mentioned here, it would be impossible to use in a casino. The warning is just to make sure everyone knows about it.

      Come up with an app. that hooks up to a camera in your eyeglasses, does pattern recognition on the cards and does a perfect computer count and notifies you via vibration or HUD display in your glasses. Then you got something! Of course you still have to be careful. A casino will notice you winning no matter how you do it. Since you are on private property, they can ask you to leave. If you don't leave, you are trespassing.

      --
      "Long time listener, first time caller."
    12. Re:awww poor casinos by mweather · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you have something better than pole dancers to spend it on? I doubt it.

    13. Re:awww poor casinos by johnsonav · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why use the iPhone....?

      Card counting on your own, isn't that hard. Sure, it takes a bit of practice, but, it isn't rocket science.

      No, standard Hi/Lo counting is pretty easy. Most people can even keep a separate Ace count too. All it takes is practice.

      But the power of computer-aided counting is that it can keep track of each card's specific value. Instead of keeping track of only the relative number of high cards played, a computer can keep track of the number of 2's, 3's, 4's, 5's, etc. A computer can process and use every piece of information known about the remaining cards, not just the ratio of high cards to low. It can make the perfect playing and betting decisions every time.

      Someone who is using a computer to count cards, therefore has a greater theoretical edge against the house. Or, he can get the same edge as a traditional counter, without having to vary his bets as much. That's the real power of computer-aided counting: less detectability. (Assuming, of course, he's not fiddling with his iPhone on the table the whole time.)

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    14. Re:awww poor casinos by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      That and they know the strategies in these books backwards and forwards. They know how to counter them, easy. A person using one of these strategies tends to be a dumb ass who won't think of this. They will continue to play using the strategy in the book no matter what and tend to lose more money than someone who is not playing with a strategy.

      Casinos love nothing more than a sucker who thinks they got a winning strategy.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    15. Re:awww poor casinos by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you missed out and some of the fun... Pole Dancers and 'free' drinks sound liek a nice way to spend an evening...

      May as well just go to a nightclub with dancers, buy the drinks, and spend less money overall.

      But then, I don't care for gambling.

    16. Re:awww poor casinos by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well most don't kick you out if you actually Win. Even if you win big.
      But if they suspect you of cheating then they will.
      I would have issues if they kick you out and not give your winnings while you were allowed is one thing. But if you take your winnings then they can say don't come back again is another.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re:awww poor casinos by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      He's probably much better off heading over to Industrial after he's cleaned their chronometers in the Casino...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    18. Re:awww poor casinos by cortesoft · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Umm I am not sure you understand how Blackjack works -- the dealer can't 'counter' basic strategy, since they do not have a choice about which action to take, and you are only playing against the dealer -- the way the other players play has no effect on your odds of winning. The reason casinos don't mind if you use basic strategy is that even using basic strategy, a player will still win less than 50 percent of the time. Basic strategy is something that should ALWAYS be used, and cannot be countered.. you will just still lose money (although not quite as fast) as you would otherwise (unless you count cards as well).

    19. Re:awww poor casinos by shurikt · · Score: 2, Informative

      A casino will notice you winning no matter how you do it. Since you are on private property, they can ask you to leave. If you don't leave, you are trespassing.

      Actually, in Nevada it's a Felony. They don't ask you to leave, they ask you to leave in custody of the nice police officer.

    20. Re:awww poor casinos by moondawg14 · · Score: 1, Funny
      -- the way the other players play has no effect on your odds of winning.

      WRONG. If another player is playing poorly, he is affecting how the cards come out of the deck. For instance, if another player "hits" on a 20, and takes the Jack that would have (should have) accompanied your Ace, he has most definitely played in a way that affect your odds of winning.

      In fact, most blackjack players are expecting you to play the "basic strategy" and will get miffed if you don't.

    21. Re:awww poor casinos by phulegart · · Score: 2, Funny

      hmm.... let's see.
      Hookers? You get more action from them than a tease from a pole dancer.
      Food? Better buy than pole dancer time.
      Umm.. maybe spend more money gambling, and less on bimbos who won't put out?

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    22. Re:awww poor casinos by cjanota · · Score: 1

      Yes the way others play effects the individual hands. But I doubt it has an overall effect on your odds of winning. If a player hits on a 20, they could just as easily burn a low card that you would have gotten and the jack could be next.

      --
      You can fix anything with duct tape and sticks.
    23. Re:awww poor casinos by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...and it's illegal to give weapons to strangers..."

      Where do you live that it is illegal to give guns to strangers? I can't imagine anyone wanting to just give one away, but, if you can sell a gun to a perfect stranger, why can you not just give one to them?

      Do you have some special law in your state that prevents this? I've bought my guns all as private citizen sales...no trace of the transfer. I've bought guns (last one was a nice .44 magnum) from private individuals at gun shows, and they never knew who I was...and all cash transaction.

      So...not sure where you get it is illegal to give a gun to a stranger from...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:awww poor casinos by Rary · · Score: 1

      Well most don't kick you out if you actually Win. Even if you win big. But if they suspect you of cheating then they will.

      Card counting isn't cheating. It's just a smart strategy that can increase your chances of winning.

      The reason they kick you out for doing it simply because it's against the casino's rules. And it's against their rules because, well, it's a smart strategy that can increase your chances of winning.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    25. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 rings... got the bonus stage, but couldn't get the chaos emerald :(

    26. Re:awww poor casinos by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Where do you live that it is illegal to give guns to strangers? I can't imagine anyone wanting to just give one away, but, if you can sell a gun to a perfect stranger, why can you not just give one to them?

      You can give guns away. I've both received and given them as birthday gifts. What isn't legal is straw purchasing, i.e: I buy a gun on your behalf from a dealer so you don't have to go through the standard background checks.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:awww poor casinos by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Usually the dealer will have things that he's allowed to do

      You mean cheat. Why is is that the dealer and the operators hiding behind the machines are allowed to flip switches or insert/take-away cards? Probably because the casino owners are bribing the lawmakers.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    28. Re:awww poor casinos by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      You'd spent less at the casino. That is, unless you get all craxy with your betting and blow through stacks of cash like a fool. Which, well is what most probably do.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    29. Re:awww poor casinos by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Funny

      He could buy a iPhone, the counting app, and then count effectively even when distracted!

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    30. Re:awww poor casinos by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bah... You lose what you can afford too.. Figure you'd be spending the money doing something else for entertainment. Many forget that's what gambling is, entertainment.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    31. Re:awww poor casinos by LabRat007 · · Score: 1

      As I recall the basic Casino credo is something like this....

      Fool me once, shame on you.
      Fool me twice, shame on me.
      Fool me three time and I break your f-ing legs.

      Save a knee; leave the iPhone in your hotel room.

      --
      "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    32. Re:awww poor casinos by rachit · · Score: 5, Informative

      WRONG. If another player is playing poorly, he is affecting how the cards come out of the deck. For instance, if another player "hits" on a 20, and takes the Jack that would have (should have) accompanied your Ace, he has most definitely played in a way that affect your odds of winning.

      In fact, most blackjack players are expecting you to play the "basic strategy" and will get miffed if you don't.

      Before saying in all caps that someone is wrong, you should know what you are talking about. It works out to be the same. In your example, he could have easily have hit another card which allowed you to get your Jack on your turn.

      Looking at it another way, the chances of the Jack being at the top of the deck vs. the card underneath it is exactly the same.

      I get really annoyed at people who blame others at the table for their losses, saying they shouldn't have hit yadayada. It even happens when you follow basic strategy, they complain when you hit on 16. They only remember the situations where that causes them to lose the hand when they shouldn't have vs. when it made them win the hand.

    33. Re:awww poor casinos by Zwicky · · Score: 4, Funny

      some of the $15 black jack tables had pole dancers in the middle of the tables!...free drinks

      In fact, forget the... wait, which one of these can I do without?

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    34. Re:awww poor casinos by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that if you're card counting in your head, you can make a mistake. You could not account for any of the variations and distractions they provide. In this sense you're playing "the game", and if you win money they won't mess with you until you're too good. Hence the truly excellent won't attempt to bankrupt the house...they'll just net positive. Having a small time winner telling stories can only help you as a casino owner. If what he was doing was easy, you'd have to stop running the game.

      If you use a machine, you're not really playing the game at all, you're just the arms. It's not a game anymore, there's no skill...it's just a matter of being obedient. I think they're well within their rights to boot you out, or if they can no longer prevent cheating, stop running the game.

      In theory gambling is supposed to be fun, not a profitable career. Casino's are often their own worst enemies in creating the atmosphere where you believe you can make a good living by playing the odds. Unless you're ill, you will quickly see it's a losing proposition without working the system.

    35. Re:awww poor casinos by Justtaint · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://renzey.casinocitytimes.com/articles/8863.html
      Not the greatest source, but it explains how this is a myth. Yes, a poor player can affect your odds on one hand, but it works both ways. Most blackjack players get miffed, not because you are affecting their hand, but because you are being an idiot.

    36. Re:awww poor casinos by DaScribbler · · Score: 1

      errrm... In that scenario wouldn't you already be sitting on 21 and therefore not need the jack? Besides which, the flaw in that line of logic is that the next card coming is the one You need. The moment you start assuming that, you've already lost because you're not playing the odds anymore.

    37. Re:awww poor casinos by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It ain't cheatin' if they disclose it beforehand.

    38. Re:awww poor casinos by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree but you lose more money when you are drunk and distracted.

    39. Re:awww poor casinos by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Card counting on your own, isn't that hard

      Can I have a ride in your Gulfstream?

      rj

    40. Re:awww poor casinos by deathlyslow · · Score: 0

      When I used to go to the casinos in Cripple Creek I would take a set amount of money and Play nickel slots. I went to watch people not to win money. But just standing there watching people has a tendency to get you arrested or kicked out, besides it's just creepy.

      --
      Don't blame me for redundant posts. I can't type very fast. Hence the user ID.
    41. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missing the point. The money you lose when you're distracted could buy a month of pole dances at a club.

    42. Re:awww poor casinos by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And you 'lose money'(aka spend money) to get drunk and distracted at other places.. AS long as you don't lose more then you can afford you're all good.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    43. Re:awww poor casinos by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Umm, threating the law is simply a way for them to grin at you.

      If you are caught counting cards, I dont think they'll be calling the cops. You might have a couple of broken legs or have the crap beat out of you after they strip your winnings and everything else they can find.

      Dont forget, these are not clean cut honest businesses. no matter what they tell you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    44. Re:awww poor casinos by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you can't play a profitable game of blackjack while also watching the pole dancer in the middle of the table, you need more practice.

    45. Re:awww poor casinos by mike2R · · Score: 1

      WRONG. If another player is playing poorly, he is affecting how the cards come out of the deck. For instance, if another player "hits" on a 20, and takes the Jack that would have (should have) accompanied your Ace, he has most definitely played in a way that affect your odds of winning.

      That doesn't make sense to me (although admittedly most statistical things don't unless they are explained in words of one syllable). Surely it's just as likely that the other guy takes the 6 you would have got and gives you the Jack that was underneath it?

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    46. Re:awww poor casinos by johnsonav · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean cheat.

      No, cheating conducted by the house, not an individual employee cheating to enrich himself, but actual cheating by the casino at a card game is very rare. I've worked in a casino (riverboat in Iowa) and gambled at almost every casino in the Midwest, and have only seen or heard of real casino cheating once. That was at a tribal casino in South Dakota. They were caught removing cards from a blackjack deck.

      To prevent this, and assure the gamblers that the cards are all there, most casinos have implemented a strict procedure for introducing new cards in play. First, the factory sealed decks are brought to the table by pit personnel. They are opened by the pit, but the cards are removed from the box by the dealer. The cards are then spread out on the table, face down, to check for imperfections on the backs. Then they are flipped face up and counted. All cards must be accounted for before the deck is put into play. The same process is repeated for all decks coming into play. When it is time to change those cards for a new deck, the same procedure is followed in reverse. The cards are inspected to assure they are all still present, re-boxed, and set aside for possible further inspection. This is all done in front of the gamblers, who could easily spot missing or duplicate cards. They take this very seriously.

      It's rare because they already have a statistical edge against the player; they don't need to cheat. They also need to make sure that the gambling public doesn't associate their establishment with cheating, and stop patronizing them. Then they wouldn't make any money. A casino jealously guards its reputation.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    47. Re:awww poor casinos by cortesoft · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thank you for explaining to this poor guy how basic odds work, I am not sure I could have responded with the same tact.. I also get quite annoyed at this basic misunderstanding of how probability works. An unknown card is an unknown card - by definition of a randomly shuffled deck, each unknown card has an equal chance of being at every position in the deck. In fact the only argument that you could logically make is that a poor player sitting next to you (someone who hits on cards they should stay on) will actually HELP you, because you will see more cards per hand and can therefore COUNT more cards per hand and increase the likelihood that you will encounter favorable deck conditions before you run out of cards. (although at the same time, you might want the loose player to stop taking so many cards once the deck does shift in your favor).

    48. Re:awww poor casinos by mike2R · · Score: 1

      Please don't use such offensive and outdated phrases. It is insulting to people from Wales and of Welsh ancestry.

      Really? Sweet. Sheep-shagger was getting kind of old.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    49. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they love selling the strategy cards. If you play perfect strategy, the odds are in their favor still. Only this way, you feel like you've got a shot and are thus more likely to give away more money.

    50. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't want to lose money, a casino probably isn't the best way to spend your time.

    51. Re:awww poor casinos by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The question is, realistically what would happen if casinos actually allowed the odds of any game to be tilted in the players' favor?

      IIRC, the odds in blackjack, played optimally, under the rules that were used in casions used to be very slightly in the player's favor, but casinos still on average made money off of it because (1) the average player did not play optimally, and (2) gamblers ruin -- even playing optimally hand-to-hand, players would often enough play until they hit a streak where they lost their available stake and quit because of how far behind they were.

    52. Re:awww poor casinos by M1rth · · Score: 0, Troll

      Have seen it happen, actually - we were on a vacation in Vegas and a friend of mine won 10 straight hands in a row at blackjack. He wasn't "card counting", he's not that smart - he was just lucky enough to be dealt 19+ every hand (he got three facecard+ace combos, the "upside" of the multi-deck shoe), and the dealer was getting to 17 and staying.

      The pit bosses came down to the table with two bouncers, took his chips, dragged him to the office, "asked him questions" for an hour while the rest of us were wondering what to do and if we should call the cops. Then they pushed him out, marched him over, made him cash out his chips, and forced him to accept a "banned from blackjack" stamp on his hand before they'd let him go back to his room. Took a whole week and five good scrubbings with shop soap (the orange pumice stuff) for that mark to go away, his boss looked at him REALLY funny the first day back after vacation before hearing the story.

      --
      If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
    53. Re:awww poor casinos by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know the rules going in.

      The casinos promise not to cheat you.

      You promise not to cheat the casinos.

      The Gaming Commission is the referee.

      You don't like it? Stay the fuck home.

    54. Re:awww poor casinos by acohen1 · · Score: 0

      Casinos in Atlantic City and Las Vegas at least have state regulators there all the time. Certainly this wouldn't make it impossible to cheat, but theres someone watching closely. I don't know how this works for tribal casinos.

    55. Re:awww poor casinos by torkus · · Score: 1

      Actually most casinos will give you all kinds of comps if you win big. Either to get you to stay longer, come back soon to the casino that took such good care of you, of feel rich so you play higher stakes tables. All because every hand/spin/bet after that big win puts money back into the casino's pocket.

      Winning by itself, through luck, is part of their operating costs and also doubles as advertizing. It proves the dream of hitting it big can actually happen to you.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    56. Re:awww poor casinos by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Can't say I've ever heard of that, unless you consider counting cards to be part of optimal play. Maybe you know more about the history than I do. I do know that every variation in use today is in the casino's favor unless you can count cards. Some variations are more favorable to the casino than others, and some gamblers will boycott any but the most player-friendly games, but the house always keeps the edge.

      Now, don't get me wrong -- like I said you may know older history than I do, and I do intend to go get better informed... but I have to say at face value the idea that casinos would have a game where the player had the edge and count on non-optimal play sounds doubtful to me. The problem is, optimal blackjack (excluding card-counting) isn't "hard" -- it just requires that you memorize a table. Not everyone does it today, but then again today it's not the difference between an expensive hobby and a cash cow. If playing optimal blackjack in a disciplined manner (i.e. not just playing until you hit a losing streak) were profitable, I find it very hard to believe that few enough people would train themselves to do it as to allow their gains to be offset by those who don't.

    57. Re:awww poor casinos by spacefiddle · · Score: 3, Funny

      At which?

    58. Re:awww poor casinos by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yup, but there is this little stumbling block:

      NRS 465.088 Penalties for violation of NRS 465.070 to 465.085, inclusive.

      1. A person who violates any provision of NRS 465.070 to 465.085, inclusive, is guilty of a category B felony and shall be punished:

      (a) For the first offense, by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 6 years, or by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by both fine and imprisonment.

      (b) For a second or subsequent violation of any of these provisions, by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 6 years, and may be further punished by a fine of not more than $10,000. The court shall not suspend a sentence of imprisonment imposed pursuant to this paragraph, or grant probation to the person convicted.

      REF: http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-465.html

      I live about 90 minutes from Las Vegas and I can tell you the state of Nevada is serious as a heart attack about cheating. There are repeat offenders serving LIFE without parole for creating and distributing cheating devices and schemes.

      Counting cards in your head is not illegal, but if you do master the art of counting cards without being detected, you can be refused entry at the whim of the casino, just because you are too good at the game... They can walk up and ask you to leave and never return and you must do so. They can also put you face, vital statistics, and biometrics (for facial recognition) in a database shared with other casinos.

      Enjoy your stay

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    59. Re:awww poor casinos by torkus · · Score: 1

      Yes but in the case you linked, the machine was (per the story) labeled with an advisory that the maximum payout is $2,500.00 and the casino is not responsible for errors or malfunctions, etc. la la la "we can't hear you!"

      Now, I disagree that they should be able to write off responsibility like that for errors. Especially since there's no way for you to know if there's an error in the casino's favor (without running real-time debugging which they will never let you do). But ... if you sit down in front of a sign that says "the most you can ever win in one hand is 2500" then how can you reasonably expect to win 1.6M? I'll skip the lame car analogy though :)

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    60. Re:awww poor casinos by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Many forget that's what gambling is, entertainment."

      Maybe it is because there's no fun on gambling. There's fun on wining.

    61. Re:awww poor casinos by mea37 · · Score: 1

      "Card counting isn't cheating [...]
      The reason they kick you out for doing it simply because it's against the casino's rules
      "

      And who, if not the casino, do you think defines the game? If you violate the rules of the person who defines the game, you are cheating. If you don't like the rules, play someone else's game. If nobody offers the game you want to play... tough.

      Counting cards isn't illegal, but doing it in a casino that doesn't allow it is cheating. (And no casino I've ever heard of allows it.)

      "And it's against their rules because, well, it's a smart strategy that can increase your chances of winning"

      Except other things that increase your odds of winnnig -- like playing the basic strategy -- are not against their rules. In fact, most dealers will tell you what the book says to do on any given hadn if you ask.

      The problem with counting isn't that it increases your odds of winning; it's that (if done correctly) it makes it so that on average the player is expected to win. Nobody is going to offer a game called "come in and I will give you money".

    62. Re:awww poor casinos by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      You mean the casinos you visited were only CAUGHT cheating one time. The other 100,000+ times they were cheating, but not caught I don't believe for a second those machines and wheels are not wired for independent control.

      And of course if you do start winning, then they immediately assume you are a cheat and kick you out. Even if you were doing nothing wrong.

      It's all a setup to extract dollars from wallets.

      It's no better than legalized theft.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    63. Re:awww poor casinos by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      When was this? I was there a few years back and they didn't have that.

      In addition, at the Flamingo, you have to walk through the casino to get to the buffet and other restaurants. I'm not sure they'd do that out in the open.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    64. Re:awww poor casinos by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Certainly there is fun.. The anticipation to see if you are going to win or not. The shared experience with those around you. The conversations and socialization with the others you are playing with (Dealer included) are all "fun" and entertainment.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    65. Re:awww poor casinos by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      Yes they do get pissed, and I just laugh at them on my way to the cash window. Card counting is a suplement to basic strat, and needs to be used in concert. You can't get anywhere if you lose all your money by the time you have the deck locked down. You have to play conservatively until you hit that "moment." Then, and only then, can you start to play with what you know from counting, which sometimes violates the "standard."

      I don't play much, but I'm about just above even from the times I have. Way above if you count comps & entertainment value. Some days your up, winning crazy, compd meals, and more, some days your 8 hands down in 20 min. and out of gambling cash. It's just how the cards roll.

      NEVER EVER play when your in a bad mood, or "need" money.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    66. Re:awww poor casinos by localman · · Score: 1

      Casinos don't need to cheat. The games are designed so that over time they always come out well ahead. It's just simple probability. And that is all out in the open, so no cheating is required.

      There are only two reasons to gamble: you enjoy the game and you can afford to lose some money, or you're an idiot.

      Cheers, from Las Vegas :)

    67. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll agree with the parent somewhat, having worked for a number of casinos. Usually it's the employees that are the problem instead of organized cheating by the casino.

      Although, I have seen one video slot machine bug that was insanely abused by what had to be an organized crew of employees and "owners" that stretched up to the director (or whatever) of slot services in a casino in the sw mn area.

      What the official reports show as the losses and what the fairly honest surveillance crew guesstimated as the actual losses differed by at least half a mil for under a dozen quarter machines in a eighteen hour period though.

      The machines were quickly taken down once the security staff noticed it and basically forced the casino and others to do the same.

      The security staff wasn't blamed officially, but were unofficially though rumors of 'stealing from the casino', and were all released without cause after being on unpaid leave for as long as long as it took for them to 'quit'. One lasted for almost two months, but got sick of not being able to work and/or being otherwise employable.

      Casinos just invite corruption through their nature, and require extra scrutiny. It has to be knowledgeable scrutiny though.

    68. Re:awww poor casinos by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Card counting in Vegas is pointless. The Vegas casinos wised up to the idea several decades ago, and they now use a rotation of several decks of cards in various permutations, at least the big ones on the strip do.

      If you want to be certain of coming out ahead in Vegas blackjack, there's only one strategy: don't bet your fucking money. The casinos do such great business precisely because the odds are stacked in their favor, and counting cards isn't going to swing the odds to your side.

    69. Re:awww poor casinos by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "The question is, realistically what would happen if casinos actually allowed the odds of any game to be tilted in the players' favor?
      Answer: People would flock to that game, the casinos would lose money, and there would be no more casinos. Some people think that would be a good thing; are you surprised that the casino operators are not among them?"

      Stupid answer.
      Right answer: casinos just wouldn't offer that game but only those that get the casino an edge no matter with, roulette, or coin machines for example.

    70. Re:awww poor casinos by petershank · · Score: 1

      Players who get miffed when others don't follow Basic Strategy are just trying to feel superior. (Hmm, just like people who post on Slashdot, including you and me?)

      It really is all a wash. If you're on first base (first player to be dealt to) and the count is negative (the composition of the remaining cards is unfavorable to all the players) then if everybody after you hits a 20, you should be happy because by taking cards they are bringing the deck back towards neutral or favorable after you've played but before your next bet, which is precisely what you want. In that situation their (provably) incorrect play is improving the odds for you. But of course over time their incorrect play is just as likely to hurt your odds, so you might as well give your blood pressure a break, because it will probably improve your counting.
      All of this is true even if you play perfect Basic Strategy but you don't bother to count.

    71. Re:awww poor casinos by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Card counting on your own, isn't that hard.

      If they could declare -that- illegal (or have a reliable way of spotting it), they would.

      Someone should make it illegal for games of chance to favor the house... this is gambling, after all, no?

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    72. Re:awww poor casinos by Knara · · Score: 1

      I would imagine there really isn't a very reliable way to check for such a thing that's not done on a large scale (onesie-twosie purchases probably end up under the radar)?

    73. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus if a player is on a winning streak, the casino can stop it by offering comps or just kicking them out.

      Give a couple a free dinner and show and they'll happily lose the next night or the next trip.

    74. Re:awww poor casinos by Knara · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Yes.

    75. Re:awww poor casinos by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      For an hour? There's such a thing as a false imprisonment tort. Look into it in your jurisdiction. Plaintiffs have won for less.

    76. Re:awww poor casinos by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like someone really sucks at gambling, to me.

      For the record, aside from one time, I've never left a casino with less money than when I arrived. Sure, maybe it wasn't a jackpot, but I still came away with a profit AND had a good time.

      Maybe your tinfoil hat gets in the way of your gambling ability, or your ability to enjoy frivolous things.

    77. Re:awww poor casinos by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The tables?

      I'm sure the dancers will still manage as long as you provide them a suitable pole...

      --
    78. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the loser sitting next to you is counting cards as well, he can take as many hits as possible to change the odds of you getting the card that you need. You thought you were +14 and suddenly your +10.

      Granted, 3, 4, or 5 cards out of a 6 card shoe aren't gonna shift the odds that much, but you CAN be affected by other players.

    79. Re:awww poor casinos by Ardeaem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WRONG. If another player is playing poorly, he is affecting how the cards come out of the deck. For instance, if another player "hits" on a 20, and takes the Jack that would have (should have) accompanied your Ace, he has most definitely played in a way that affect your odds of winning.

      Actually, this helps you on average, since you have slightly more information about the composition of the remaining cards in the deck if your neighbor hits.

    80. Re:awww poor casinos by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      When was this? I was there a few years back and they didn't have that.

      It was this summer. Apparently, the Flamingo had a promo going for a cabaret show called "X", and that was the theme of the cheaper casino tables, and yeah, it was right in the southwest corner of the casino facing out into the street opposite Bill's Gambling Hall. In case anybody is wondering, I played for a couple of hours and walked away up almost $200.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    81. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (onesie-twosie purchases probably end up under the radar)?

      Until the person you straw purchased it for does something bad with it and gets caught........

    82. Re:awww poor casinos by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a crappy and stupid casino then. Any hints on which one? :)

      It should be pretty obvious to everyone else at the table that he was dealt good hands.

      So if you come down with two bouncers and drag him off, that just ruins the mood for the recreational gamblers - those who are there to spend money, dream about winning and have a good time.

      You want those "losers" to hang around at your casino and not the one next door.

      --
    83. Re:awww poor casinos by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

      This is utterly untrue. Blackjack is far and away the most profitable game in any casino. Why? Because most people either don't know, or don't religiously play, basic strategy.

      Casinos don't offer any unprofitable or nearly-unprofitable games. That being said, basic strategy brings the edge down to well within the range of entertainment cost for the $5-10 player, and card counting can bring it down further or even reverse it if done well, but I pity the person who thinks he/she can do it well but actually cannot.

    84. Re:awww poor casinos by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      But, then, again, fun != entertainment.

    85. Re:awww poor casinos by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

      Did these people get a jury trial? I've heard that the jury pool HATES casinos and will rarely if ever return a guilty verdict, but I don't have any hard evidence.

    86. Re:awww poor casinos by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it's not too hard to throw out the few people who bother to learn to count cards well themselves. Those people might even be a benefit (for a while) because a winner tends to get other people playing.

      It's a real pain to detect and throw out every idiot who can download an iPhone app.

    87. Re:awww poor casinos by uniquename72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A casino will notice you winning no matter how you do it. Since you are on private property, they can ask you to leave. If you don't leave, you are trespassing.

      Have you ever even entered a casino? They LOVE when you win. The more you win, the more comps they shower you with. Having a winner at a table entices all the suckers around them to play and lose. It's the best advertising there is!

      Card counting has become almost impossible (despite the liars here who claim to do it -- as though wealthy card cheats spend their free time on /.) because it requires wild (and obvious) swings in betting.

      Add to that 10+ deck shuffles (every dozen or so hands) and a ban on entering a game mid-shuffle, and it's a loser strategy overall, more likely to entice the retarded geek than a real hustler.

    88. Re:awww poor casinos by uniquename72 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah, yes -- the "my friend had this happen" story. As a Las Vegas resident, I've heard about 20 permutations of the same story. Funny how it's always someone's "friend" or "cousin" or "this guy I know".

      Also funny how no one who works in a casino has ever heard of such a hand stamp.

      Also funny how the casinos use this super-secret ink that takes a whole week to wash off. And don't forget the needless details (common in every urban legend) such as "the orange pumice stuff".

      When your friend got to his car, was there a hook hanging from the door handle?

    89. Re:awww poor casinos by Autonom · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. You're supposed to let them take your money. If people really made money at the casinos then they wouldn't exist. Consider this: Night on the town drinking - $75; Dinner and a movie - $45; Rock concert - $50; Night out gambling with free beer free strippers and a chance to win + or - $100 (unless you're the impulsive type); If you're really willing to sacrifice the unique atmosphere of a casino for a realistic shot at winning money, you might as well sign up for publishers clearing house and invest in lotto tickets because with your luck, you're destined to win.

    90. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, Casinos itself are illegal. No need to go any further about this.

    91. Re:awww poor casinos by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I think it is mainly to keep up the myth that you can beat the house, which is what encourages most people to go there.

    92. Re:awww poor casinos by jeko · · Score: 1

      "Card counting on your own, isn't that hard. Sure, it takes a bit of practice, but, it isn't rocket science."

      And the second they suspect you're doing it, you'll be escorted off the property. Casinos ain't there to play fair, son...

      --
      He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    93. Re:awww poor casinos by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      There is one cheat that is more-or-less undetectable, and that is for the house to maintain its own count as the game is played. This should be pretty easy since there are multiple cameras on every table. When the deck is overly favorable to the player they can simply force a reshuffle/change of decks.

      I'm not saying that this is happening, but even I could write the software to maintain such a count given a fixed camera. Remember, the count doesnt need to be perfect (players only use hi/low after all) .. all you have to do is be sure that of the cards that you do count, you are correct. You can skip a given card if you arent sure what it is.

      Such software can also be used to detect certain kinds of cheating by the dealer, such as intentionally paying hands the dealer has beaten.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    94. Re:awww poor casinos by johnsonav · · Score: 5, Informative

      The other 100,000+ times they were cheating, but not caught I don't believe for a second those machines and wheels are not wired for independent control.

      Believe what you want. It doesn't change the fact that you are wrong. I understand how people can think that slots are rigged, the internals of the machine are hidden and complex. But a game like blackjack takes place in full view of the gambler. In roulette, a "fixed" wheel would be spotted relatively quickly by the gamblers. Have you ever seen "system" players at roulette recording the result of every spin? They would see and exploit any irregularity or pattern. If you think craps is being played with loaded dice, bet on the Don't Pass line.

      They don't have to cheat. They have the odds on their side. All cheating would do is raise the risk to the casino. It would only take one mistake by any one of the dozens of employees involved in the scam to unravel the entire scheme.

      And of course if you do start winning, then they immediately assume you are a cheat and kick you out. Even if you were doing nothing wrong.

      That is simply untrue. Casinos want some winners. They want people to win tens of thousands of dollars; because, at the same time, there are more gamblers watching the winner, betting more, and losing. A winning gambler is a casino's best advertising.

      Each employee you come into contact with at a casino wants you to win, from the cocktail waitress, to the dealer, to the guy working in the cage. Winners tip. Winners tip well. I've payed out massive amounts of money to winners, and did it with a smile on my face every time.

      I have never once seen anyone thrown out of a casino for winning. I have never been thrown out of a casino for winning, and I have had some large wins (I'm not a great gambler, but if you play a lot, you'll win sometimes). Most people thrown out of casinos are drunk and belligerent.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    95. Re:awww poor casinos by johnsonav · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is one cheat that is more-or-less undetectable, and that is for the house to maintain its own count as the game is played. This should be pretty easy since there are multiple cameras on every table. When the deck is overly favorable to the player they can simply force a reshuffle/change of decks.

      This is a feasible way for the casino to assure they always have the edge. But, unless there is some reason to think there is a counter at the table, they lose more money from pausing the play. Casino blackjack's profitability is all about the number of hands played per hour. Start reshuffling every time the count gets high, and you'll reduce the hands per hour, which means less profit per hour. And, you'll start pissing off the gamblers.

      It's not that what you're proposing won't work. It's just that it wouldn't be profitable for the casino.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    96. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, that is what makes straw purchases such a bitch to legislate against :( which is unfortunate, as it makes the lives of us law abiding gun owners much harder.

    97. Re:awww poor casinos by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Nah, they're not allowed to cheat. What they are allowed to do, however, is even more devious. For example, Frank Sinatra was big Vegas star, and famous for liking Baccarat. He was also on a casino's payroll. Whenever there was someone winning big on the Baccarat tables, they'd just call Frank, give him a stack of chips, and let the big roller hobnob with the star (all with free drinks). Problem solved.

    98. Re:awww poor casinos by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

      They don't have to cheat. They have the odds on their side.

      Most valuable comment in this thread! That's really all anybody really needs to know, yet people prefer to believe in dealers cheating, rigged machines, whatever.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    99. Re:awww poor casinos by bladesjester · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're forgetting one very important place in a casino where it is possible to consistently win if you're good - the poker tables.

      There you aren't playing against the house. You're playing against other players, and the house doesn't care how much you win because they get a cut of every hand. For a casino, poker is essentially free money with no real risk. For a player, it's a game with much better odds than ones you play against the house if you know what you're doing.

      Just be sure to go during the day when the resident sharks are asleep (they only tend to come out at night). There's still plenty of action, and a much better chance of leaving with more money than you walked in with.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    100. Re:awww poor casinos by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Actually, he misused the phrase, which is supposed to be "welch on it". I don't know the origin, but you can see the occurrences here:

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=welsh+on+it
      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=welch+on+it

      Most hits for the first one are talking about signs in Wales that "have Welsh on it".

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    101. Re:awww poor casinos by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      And then once I was so good that I was banned from every casino I would practice card tricks as well and ask for a job as a dealer.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    102. Re:awww poor casinos by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I see where you are comming from, but it isnt accurate.

      If the count is such that basic strategy is -EV for the house, then by definition they are losing money on those hands. It is true that *in general* they want more hands played, but they do not want more hands played when the odds are against them.

      How to recover a player who is annoyed at a suprise change of setup:

      "Here are some coupons for the buffet... complements of the house"

      (Note that they would give out those coupons anyways, rather than have a player go to another casino to eat)

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    103. Re:awww poor casinos by johnsonav · · Score: 1

      If the count is such that basic strategy is -EV for the house, then by definition they are losing money on those hands. It is true that *in general* they want more hands played, but they do not want more hands played when the odds are against them.

      While that is true if all players at the table are playing basic strategy, I wonder how many deviations from BS it would take for the house to have a +EV, no matter the count. Does the guy at the table, who never splits his eights, reduce his EV enough to drag the EV for the whole table down? Does "average play", not basic strategy, ever have a +EV, even with a good count?

      I guess even if the EV never became positive for the players, it could get less negative. So, it would benefit the house to reshuffle in a high count.

      But, I have never seen this type of thing happen at any of the casinos I have gone to. Granted I haven't played much in the major markets (LV, AC). I just wonder if the casinos have thought of this, researched it, and decided that it wasn't profitable enough to offset the fewer hands per hour and player dissatisfaction.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    104. Re:awww poor casinos by MrMarket · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Nothing is more annoying than grandma over on first base b!tching at me because I refuse to split aces against a 10. It's not my fault you're losing your social security check.

    105. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before saying in all caps that someone is wrong, you should know what you are talking about. It works out to be the same. In your example, he could have easily have hit another card which allowed you to get your Jack on your turn.

      Looking at it another way, the chances of the Jack being at the top of the deck vs. the card underneath it is exactly the same.

      False. There's less cards in the deck if the player next to you hits.

      Say there's 30 cards left in the deck and the player next to you hits, now your turn comes around and there are 29 cards. 1:30 odds if he stays vs 1:29.0333 if he hits (the .0333 is the added probability that he takes your card).

    106. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh... I'm 100% sure that cheating and collusion between dealers and players happens all the time.

      True story: middle of the night, random casino in Vegas, I saw someone being advised BY THE DEALER to double-down when he had a 20 and the dealer was showing a king. He got an Ace on the draw, winning the hand (for a couple hundred dollars).

      One dealer, One player. The dealer had a 20, by the way.

      If that's not cheating, I have no idea what it could be.

    107. Re:awww poor casinos by johnsonav · · Score: 1

      If that's not cheating, I have no idea what it could be.

      You're right, that is cheating. But what it is not, is a systematic and coordinated effort by the casino to cheat the gambler. It's not a rigged roulette wheel, loaded dice, or a shorted blackjack deck.

      I can almost guarantee that if the pit personnel had seen what happened, the dealer would have been fired or arrested. Even if the dealer had been cheating in the house's favor, he would have been fired. A casino is simply too profitable, when operated without cheating, to risk losing its gaming license by cheating the gambler.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    108. Re:awww poor casinos by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      retarded geek

      You said it, buddy.

      The only point you hit was your first. One winner just encourages the crowd of losers.

      But card counting is very possible, and without much practice. How do I know? I did it.

      I am not a wealthy card cheat--I am not wealthy and not a cheat. (I don't consider using my brain cheating.)

      As for wild and obvious swings in betting--sure, if you're trying to pay for Harvard Law over the course of a semester. But if you're just looking a couple hundred for a nice dinner, you could for example, play $15 a hand and bump up to $25 when you "have a good feeling."

      You won't be flying home first class, but you won't be attracting any goons either. What you will get is an afternoon of fun, and after tipping the dealers and land stewardesses, enough for a nice dinner.

      I don't know where you get the ban on entering mid-shuffle. (And in any case, a larger shoe is an advantage to the player. It makes higher counts more probable.) Whatever. Just because you couldn't do it, does not mean it can't be done.

    109. Re:awww poor casinos by mysidia · · Score: 1

      And the second they suspect you're doing it, you'll be escorted off the property. Casinos ain't there to play fair, son...

      No, the second they suspect you're doing it successfully.

      I'm sure they'll happily take money from folks trying to card count who do it poorly.

    110. Re:awww poor casinos by SleepingWaterBear · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be fair, it is possible for one player's decisions to affect another's returns. If a player tended to hit more often with a good count, then he'd make periods of positive count shorter for the other players, which would hurt their expected return. Of course, that wouldn't be bad play; in fact, in some marginal cases it makes sense to hit on a high count when basic strategy says to fold, so it could be unusually good play.

      That said, unless a player is specifically changing his betting strategy based on count, you're completely right that his effect on other players' expected returns should average out to nothing.

    111. Re:awww poor casinos by Paiev · · Score: 1

      Single deck with favorable rules (S17, DAS, Surrender) can give a small player edge with perfect strategy, I believe. However, once basic strategy came around casinos changed their games to remove the player edge (more decks, H17 and no DAS, etc).

    112. Re:awww poor casinos by hardburn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That'll only bring attention to the casino. Even if they have good lawyers, spending money fighting a lawsuit isn't as lucritive as spending money on more slot machines. It's much easier to send over a busty waitress with a free drink (distracting you enough to loose the count). Or do nothing. It's likely the big winner is attracting a lot of losers, and the casino will win out in the end.

      So I trust that they are, to a point, a clean cut business, because it's in their best interest to be so.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    113. Re:awww poor casinos by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you missed out some of the irony & sarcasm

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    114. Re:awww poor casinos by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      You think casinos can be successfully sued?? In NEVADA??? LOL!

    115. Re:awww poor casinos by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      There are three reasons people gamble at casinos:

      1. To lose money.

      2. To make money.

      3. To have fun.

      If you're going to lose money, just keep enjoying those drinks and pole dancers until you're broke.

      If you're going to have fun, do the same, but stop before you're broke, when you reach the amount you preset as your intent to spend.

      If you're going to make money, concentrate on becoming the best at the game you're playing, and leave for the day/night as soon as you're up 10%. Since you're almost always up 10% at some point, you've found a nice job, paying 3,650% of your investment each year. You can't do better :).

    116. Re:awww poor casinos by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      When your friend got to his car, was there a hook hanging from the door handle?

      Yes, and the tip of the hook was actually an AIDS-infected needle. It didn't matter though, when he drove the car he flicked his brights at someone who didn't have their headlights on; turned out it was a gang initiation so the guy in the car shot him.

    117. Re:awww poor casinos by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Actually, in Nevada it's a Felony. They don't ask you to leave, they ask you to leave in custody of the nice police officer.

      and this is an improvement from the old days (you left in the hands of a couple "gentlemen" and had a nice "hike in the desert")

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    118. Re:awww poor casinos by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > actual cheating by the casino at a card game is very rare.

      They don't need to cheat. The rules are designed to ensure that they make a trainload of money.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    119. Re:awww poor casinos by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Actually, in Nevada it's a Felony. They don't ask you to leave,
      > they ask you to leave in custody of the nice police officer.

      That's only if they have reason to believe you're cheating. If you're just *winning* too much, they'll just ask you to leave. Which is what they do to people who have unnaturally good memories and apply them to card-counting.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    120. Re:awww poor casinos by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > One winner just encourages the crowd of losers.

      Up to a point, but there's such a thing as winning *too* much. Carefully-practiced precise card-counting (not just high-low, but actually knowing which cards have been played and which haven't), which you need an unnaturally good memory in the first place to be able to do well, is the usual way. And yeah, if you get greedy and win too much, they WILL ask you to leave.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    121. Re:awww poor casinos by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > For this reason, casinos will always have to do their own work to detect card-counters and
      > enforce their own rules against them (by throwing them out and banning them from returning).

      It's not that tough. You don't have to know the details of what's going on in side their head (e.g., "He's keeping five separate counts, for aces, faces, 7-9, 4-6, and 2-3). All you have to know is, "He's winning more than three grand an hour, consistently." It doesn't matter why.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    122. Re:awww poor casinos by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I do know that every variation in use today is in the casino's favor unless you can count cards.

      I believe Poker is equally in the casino's favor whether you count cards or not, because you're betting strictly against the other players. The casino just takes a percentage cut off the top, irrespective of which players win or lose.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    123. Re:awww poor casinos by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      Do you have something better than pole dancers to spend it on? I doubt it.

      Yeah. An iPhone.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    124. Re:awww poor casinos by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      the problem (as I understand it) casinos can have everything you mention going on their cameras. They don't care about winning, they care about perfect strategy. IE perfect strategy can be detected by Image recognition, and separated from lucky wins. So then you would need some randomness injected in the mix, but not enough to hurt profit too much..

    125. Re:awww poor casinos by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      I've never been much into gambling, but I have enjoyed some blackjack now and again just for fun. Sadly, it's the people like the parent that seem to take 'luck' far more seriously then actual reality that keep me from playing. I'm just out to have fun, not for a stressful time worrying about the other players getting pissed at me because i made a mistake when I was just trying to enjoy myself.

      I guess it's my gain for keeping my money at the end of the night.

    126. Re:awww poor casinos by NovaHorizon · · Score: 2

      ..

      I was gambling this one time down in the luxor, and was winning on the roulette table (go red!). I'd been there an hour or so, and started with a couple of dollars. I kept putting half of my winnings on my bets, and keeping the other half for safety. Somewhere around $800,000 in winnings, I had a couple of bouncers, and a short chubby guy with a top hat come over to me, and ask me to follow them. They only let me grab a handful of chips before dragging me away from the table too!

      Well, after 7 minutes of dragging, and 3 minutes of walking (your heels start to hurt after a while of being drug around..) they finally threw me in this small room with a chair, and a hanging lamp (ugly lamp too.. had like a green cover or something, and the darn thing just kept rocking back of fourth!) They tried my wrists and ankles to the chair and walked out.

      I sat there for a little while, until finally some punk in a nice suit came in, holding a pair of branch trimmers. We talked for a few minutes, he accused me of cheating a few times, and then tried to cut off my right hand with the trimmers!
      He tried for a good 10-15 minutes, until finally deciding that the trimmers he grabbed were just too small to fit around my wrist.

      So they just threw me out of the casino, and told me to never come back. I went to the police, but they didn't believe me, and threatened to throw me in an asylum. Talk about a bad week.

    127. Re:awww poor casinos by WNight · · Score: 1

      Suck at gambling? It's random, idiot.

      You're delusional. Almost everyone I know who gambles says they're up, and almost every time, just like you.

      I'd really love to see people like you studied. Are you totally lying, or is there some weird justification like having only lost money you already won on something and thus not counting found money, or WHAT!?

      I guess you simply have to be delusional to bother gambling.

    128. Re:awww poor casinos by JNSL · · Score: 1

      Luckily, since most people gambling in Nevada are not Nevada residents, you can sue on your tort claim in federal court.

    129. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. A person who violates any provision of NRS 465.070 to 465.085, inclusive, is guilty of a category B felony and shall be punished:

      (a) For the first offense, by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 6 years, or by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by both fine and imprisonment.

      Jesus H. Christ -- isn't the US of A a wonderful place to live -- the very paradigm of a free country -- where people with enough money can make it a felony to beat their child-fucking business plan!!!

    130. Re:awww poor casinos by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IOW if you want to cheat at gambling better gamble with something less serious like the economy.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    131. Re:awww poor casinos by Seahawk · · Score: 1

      Come play some Fixed Limit in the poker room - in there you will absolutely adore the people that don't get basic statistics. Just remember to be nice to them when you take their money - and order lots of White russians in the process! :)

    132. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG. If another player is playing poorly, he is affecting how the cards come out of the deck. For instance, if another player "hits" on a 20, and takes the Jack that would have (should have) accompanied your Ace, he has most definitely played in a way that affect your odds of winning.

      In fact, most blackjack players are expecting you to play the "basic strategy" and will get miffed if you don't.

      Before saying in all caps that someone is wrong, you should know what you are talking about. It works out to be the same. In your example, he could have easily have hit another card which allowed you to get your Jack on your turn.

      Looking at it another way, the chances of the Jack being at the top of the deck vs. the card underneath it is exactly the same.

      I get really annoyed at people who blame others at the table for their losses, saying they shouldn't have hit yadayada. It even happens when you follow basic strategy, they complain when you hit on 16. They only remember the situations where that causes them to lose the hand when they shouldn't have vs. when it made them win the hand.

      Right, but the other player's choice of hit or stay affects the number of cards in the deck that you have seen, and therefore affects a perfect player's model of the deck state for the next game. So the number of other players and their strategies affect how the quantity of information received between decisions made by the player.

    133. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how it is in the USA but i've definately seen a slot machine with a setting for the percentage pay out. In fact my dads still got it somewhere. It was taken out as it developed a fault and was paying out too much. I think it was supposed to be set at 83-87% pay out and it was paying out at > 100% when it became faulty.

    134. Re:awww poor casinos by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Is there a link to learn how to become REALLY good at it, I have a casino near my house!

    135. Re:awww poor casinos by ElAurian · · Score: 1

      Brain implants are going to cause a ton of fun for the lawmakers of Nevada, it seems.

      "What do you mean, cheating? I did all the realtime 3-D roulette-wheel physics modelling in my head, officer!"

    136. Re:awww poor casinos by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "While that is true if all players at the table are playing basic strategy, I wonder how many deviations from BS it would take for the house to have a +EV, no matter the count. Does the guy at the table, who never splits his eights, reduce his EV enough to drag the EV for the whole table down? Does "average play", not basic strategy, ever have a +EV, even with a good count?"

      It doesn't matter what the other players do...it is only YOU against the dealer. It matters not what they play, the only thing that concerns you about them is what cards they play (regardless of if it is BS or not), so that you can keep a count of what the deck is. I see people get ticked at other players...but, it really matters not what they play, they do not affect your statistical advantage/disadvantage against the dealer.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    137. Re:awww poor casinos by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      IOW if you want to cheat at gambling better gamble with something less serious like the economy.

      Obama took your advice already.

    138. Re:awww poor casinos by johnsonav · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what the other players do...it is only YOU against the dealer. It matters not what they play, the only thing that concerns you about them is what cards they play (regardless of if it is BS or not), so that you can keep a count of what the deck is.

      No, I'm not saying that other players' actions effect my EV; only that other players' actions effect the average EV of all the players at the table.

      If the count is such that the EV for any BS player at the table is positive, but some of the players at the table are deviating from BS, it could well be the case that the casino still maintains a positive EV for the table as a whole.

      My point was that the casino may still have a positive EV, even if the count were very high, because the "average" player is deviating from BS. If I'm playing BS and you're playing very badly, and the count is very high, the amount I win may be less than the amount you lose. So, for the casino, it is still profitable to continue play.

      --
      ... and that's when the C.H.U.D.'s came at me.
    139. Re:awww poor casinos by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is incorrect to believe that every gambling game is entirely random. There are some *variables* that are random with most games, but it is not true that every gambling game (there are some) is wholly random. That's why card counting is a "problem" for the house, for example.

      You seem very passionate about this particular topic. You should get that looked at.

    140. Re:awww poor casinos by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Some of the casinos (not all) will give you free daquiris, which you can order virgin... free shakes! Much more festive than a bottle of water, and it might make people *think* you're drinking.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    141. Re:awww poor casinos by tprime · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding me.... Either you are full of it or you do not have the full story from your friend. Up until a couple years back we visited Vegas a couple of times a year and hit the Michigan casinos a couple times as well. On numerous occasions I won an unusually high number of hands in a row at Blackjack (a few over 9 in a row) and was never visited by security or even looked at in a suspicious manner. In many cases those wins were followed by an unusually high number of losing hands which I just attributed to the probability gods reminding me that you can't beat the numbers at the end of the day.

      You need to remember that the casinos NEED someone to occasionally win more than it appears like they should; it gives everyone else at the table a reason to keep betting and losing. The bottom line is the casinos are FAIR when it comes to winning and losing until you get up into the really big winnings. Then they start to question things. But for the little guy, like me, that may sometimes take them for a few hundred to a few thousand by winning honestly they call it marketing

      --
      http://www.tomandemily.com
    142. Re:awww poor casinos by Almahtar · · Score: 1

      ... an iPhone!

    143. Re:awww poor casinos by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      And you 'lose money'(aka spend money) to get drunk and distracted at other places.. AS long as you don't lose more then you can afford you're all good.

      True.

    144. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this happened to my step brother, destroying any chance of him getting a job as a lounge pianist for a casino anywhere in the country.

      If you win too much, they will ban you. These days casino video monitors put a big red mark above your face if you are on the banned list. Welcome to the future.

    145. Re:awww poor casinos by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

      If you go into a casino thinking you'll do anything BUT lose money, you're a fool. A trip to the casino is no different than a night out with an expensive dinner and a movie - it's an entertainment expense, nothing more. Occasionally you'll get lucky and come out with more money than you started with, but you have to go in looking at it as an entertainment expense.

    146. Re:awww poor casinos by kalirion · · Score: 1

      In roulette, a "fixed" wheel would be spotted relatively quickly by the gamblers.

      I heard that some casinos teach the operators how to increase the odds of the ball stopping on 0/00.

    147. Re:awww poor casinos by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Casinos are run to MAKE money, not give it away.

      They make the money through cheating.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    148. Re:awww poor casinos by WNight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, card counting CAN be an edge, in the right circumstances, with perfect play, and a count that varies enough, if the casino doesn't kick you out when you start betting in time with their own count.

      Besides, it's not like that slow small gain would explain all the stupid stories I hear. Every second gambler is apparently totally out of touch with reality.

      And seriously, wouldn't you like to have some real answers about the addiction potential of gambling? Wouldn't it be interesting to see examples of the lies gamblers tell themselves to keep gambling? How can so many people be so delusional about something so easily tested?

    149. Re:awww poor casinos by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      People are too believing of what they see on TV and in Movies. What comes to mind here is the Movie "21". No... Larry Fischburne is NOT going to come and take you into the back and beat the snot out of you because you are counting cards. In America, I THINK this would be grounds for a lawsuit..

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    150. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's why you toss a game or two. No casino is gonna eject you for spending a couple hours and coming away with a couple hundred bucks. They made 100x that in the same time span from selling drinks and collecting nickle slot revenue.

      And while, indeed, there are many people who are quite deluded about gambling, there's also folks (the vast majority, I would "wager"... HA!) who just like the experience, the glitzy environment, and the "illusion" of living the high life for a weekend by going to a casino.

      You sound to me more like the folks who claim that you're an alcoholic if you have 8 drinks a month (that's 2 a weekend).

    151. Re:awww poor casinos by Knara · · Score: 1

      No, they make money by offering games that statistically favor the House. That's very different, since "cheating" implies they break the rules. Everyone knows the House has an advantage if you play. Fortunately, there's games that are not totally random which you can "beat the house" at eventually.

      Overall, taking the entire population of gamblers, the House beats them the overwhelming majority of the time, this is true. However, people do indeed win at gambling. It's very profitable for the House, and fun in moderation for the rest of us.

    152. Re:awww poor casinos by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Counting cards in your head is not illegal, but if you do master the art of counting cards without being detected, you can be refused entry at the whim of the casino, just because you are too good at the game... They can walk up and ask you to leave and never return and you must do so. They can also put you face, vital statistics, and biometrics (for facial recognition) in a database shared with other casinos.

      They should do this with baseball players. Don't test for drugs, just ban the ones that are too good at the game. And then share their biometrics with the NFL, NHL, and NBA.

      The mafia has way too much power in nevada.

    153. Re:awww poor casinos by blueskies · · Score: 1

      tell that to your wife...(oh wait, i'm on slashdot)

    154. Re:awww poor casinos by iconic999 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, in Nevada, casinos have the right to eject anyone from casino at any time for any reason whatsoever (or for no reason). If they suspect you're a counter, you're outta there! If the player returns to the casino after being told "never to return", then they are committing a misdemeanor trespass at very least. Using any device in the process of counting in Nevada is a FELONY. Don't try it! They WILL prosecute you without mercy.

    155. Re:awww poor casinos by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They should just pay a guy to walk around saying :
      one zero hot cold one one one zero one plus minus minus minus.

      really screw up people trying to count.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    156. Re:awww poor casinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would love to watch you count a auto schuffle box

    157. Re:awww poor casinos by WNight · · Score: 1

      You're an alcoholic if you can't go a weekend without your drinks, regardless of how many you need.

      No, I don't understand how throwing your money away to a neon machine (or blackjack, or anything short of Poker or other skill-based game) could be considered fun. But my problem isn't with the people who budget some amount of money and go expecting to lose it.

      My problem with gamblers is with those who are sure they are up, even when they have to be totally deluded to do so.

      I'm aware there are some people who play only Blackjack and count nearly perfectly, and make money. But the majority of the people who think they are that good aren't.

      One guy who was insisting he was up, a ridiculous amount in total, was telling me how he hates people who don't play with perfect basic strategy because they fuck up his game - get cards that were meant to be his and so on... Well, he's obviously delusional about statistics/etc. And of course he had no answer for why he didn't quit his job and just gamble if he really was that good. But he was sure it was skill based, and HE had the skill.

    158. Re:awww poor casinos by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      Not my aunt, I don't know what it is, but she always wins when she goes to the casino. She goes pretty regularly and I've never seen her go without winning at least $200 just on slots. It's crazy.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    159. Re:awww poor casinos by M1rth · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      First:

      - Bullshit, it was plain sharpie ink (you can tell by the smell). Shit takes forever to get out of your skin. There is nothing "super secret" about it. And they were using it for plenty of stamp varieties.

      Second, this is not a "my friend had this happen" story. I was FUCKING THERE, you shithead.

      Tell me, what's your job in the casino?

      --
      If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
    160. Re:awww poor casinos by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      One guy who was insisting he was up, a ridiculous amount in total, was telling me how he hates people who don't play with perfect basic strategy because they fuck up his game - get cards that were meant to be his and so on...Well, he's obviously delusional about statistics/etc

      No, you're delusional about how Blackjack works. A common blackjack noobie mistake is to split 10's, which invariably (and correctly) pisses off experienced players. Tens are the most common card in a blackjack shoe. Arguably, the focus of basic strategy assumes that a 'ten' will be your next card. A shoe loaded with tens keeps the deck 'hot' for the player, increasing his chances against the house. Now, the dweeb who splits his tens does two bad things. First, he breaks up a hand that, most likely will win or push (a total of 20). His new cards will either make his hand worse (2-9: pretty likely), improve it (Ace: not likely), or tie it (10: pretty likely). But if he draws another 10, he will split the hand again.

      This leads into the second cardinal sin of splitting 10's: he often depletes the deck of one of its most powerful cards. This makes the odds of winning smaller for all the players at the table . A deck stripped of its tens favors the dealer. Not only does the noob player increase his chances of losing, he increases the chances of losing for everyone else but the house.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    161. Re:awww poor casinos by WNight · · Score: 1

      Not only does the noob player increase his chances of losing, he increases the chances of losing for everyone else but the house.

      Only if you keep playing when the count is unfavorable. (Yes, I know it's hard to come and go or vary your bets widely, but this is part of why card counting doesn't pay well in "real life".)

      And yes, that player can get tens, tens which would have gone elsewhere. Like all other cards would go elsewhere if anything had been different.

      But it's roughly the equivalent of that ten going to you and depriving the player after you of it. You taking that ten "legitimately" reduces his chances just as much as the newb taking it because of incorrect strategy.

      But the newb might get the card that would have made you bust, and you seeing another card helps your count, so it's not like you can focus only on the negative aspects.

      If newb mistakes bother you so much switch to playing poker. It takes more skill, isn't a waste as people play it outside of casinos for fun unlike most "gambling", and it turns the fleecing of newbs into part of the game. Make them pay to learn basic strategy by being better than them and exploiting their mistakes.

    162. Re:awww poor casinos by mweather · · Score: 1

      A hooker? Have you priced those for the whole night? Pole dancers are definitely the way to go.

    163. Re:awww poor casinos by mweather · · Score: 1

      Harrison Bergeron?

  2. I just don't see how it would work. by SuperBry · · Score: 1

    How would some one inexperienced be able to operate the card counting app without drawing some massive amount of attention to them selves be with the the screen on or off.

    1. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by qoncept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better yet, with the screen off, how do you, uh, see what the count is??

      --
      Whale
    2. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to see a count, you just need to know whether or not to bet a hand. I suspect it can vibrate to alert you.

    3. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by fifedrum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      iPhone has an accelerometer, I use a step counting app all the time, imagine the step counting app keeping track, an up kick with your foot is +1, a down kick is -1 and when the app senses the time is right to bet, it vibrates

      and fuck the casinos, they can all burn

    4. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? What, are you an interface designer on Firefox or something? If I were to write a program like this, my first thought would be how to make it usable discretely. That would mean operable from your pocket, which in turn would mean:

      -You keep the iPhone in your pocket such that it's on the front/outer side of your thigh. (Yes, I used the definite article with iPhone. Blow me, Dave Schroeder.)
      -You punch in the info via virtual buttons on the touchscreen.
      -The iPhone has vibrate, right? And different levels of it? Then give different levels of vibrate for whether you should hit or stand.

      Oh, and by the way -- make it so I don't have to move my entire right hand out of position to choose an entry on Autocomplete ... kind of defeats the purpose otherwise. Thanks.

      P.S. No, I don't know if this is how it's actually done, I just don't see how it's so mystifying that it would be possible.

      P.S.S. I recently downloaded Vimperator for Firefox and modded it so I can do all browsing from the keyboard with my left hand. Exceptions: Flash, typing posts, and ... yep, Autocomplete.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    5. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by BaShildy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need an iPhone for what you described, people have been cheating using a step counter for years and even the best got caught from time to time. Pitbosses will have zero difficulty picking up a bunch of amateurs trying this. The only thing this does is reduce the barrier to entry for people without hardware experience.

    6. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by torkus · · Score: 1

      You realize this kind of thing is watched for, particularly at higher stakes tables and especially if you're winning big. It's watched for by people with lots of training and years of experience doing it 40+ hours a week.

      Do some people get away with it? Sure. Do most people get caught? You bet. If you're that smart you can design a camera and HUD into a pair of glasses with an undetectable wireless connection to a computer to play the perfect game...well you could make plenty more money doing high-end R&D i bet.

      Also - I'm reasonably certain that if you're caught using a cheating device you not only face lovely felony charges in NV but also void all winnings (but odd, do you void losses? doubtful).

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    7. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      You keep the iPhone in your pocket

      and

      You punch in the info via virtual buttons on the touchscreen.

      Two words: Capacitive screen.

    8. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by CaptSaltyJack · · Score: 1

      Right, imagine this: as the dealer deals out the cards, the pit bosses see your leg jiggling up and down rapidly as each card comes out. That doesn't look suspicious at all. ;)

    9. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      and fuck the casinos, they can all burn

      This is a common problem with many people.. listen, if gambling is not fun to the point you demonstrate by your comment.. find something else to do with your money.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    10. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      how about a subtle tap on the pocket?

      1 for up
      2 for down

    11. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      oh come on now, that comment doesn't reflect my attitude towards gambling, it reflects my attitude towards casinos, my attitude towards people that market, protect and support casinos. and my attitude towards politicians who are owned by the casinos.

      And it's not my problem. It's the problem of millions of people who know the negative impact casinos have on our culture.

      Personally, I can gamble, walk to the table burn some cash, no biggie and walk away after the free drink. I can gamble with friends around a table just fine.

      There are people who can't and those are the people the casinos target. Casinos are run by people who don't give a flying fuck about the customer and are glad to chew up and spit the customer out, people who purposely design "games of chance" where there's 0% chance of them losing, and then when a system is developed that gives the customer any change in odds, they exploit it by running to government and buying a law against it!!

      Why can't I run a casino from my house?

      Why are only "Indians" allowed to own casinos in many states?

      Imagine that! If I don't like casinos in my town, I have no recourse. Hell, I can barely get an appointment for 2 minutes with my representatives. Casinos? Hours and hours and hours.

      It takes a groundswell of the populace in huge numbers to stop a project like that, but only three guys with cigars to start one.

      Corrupt politicians. Corrupt Casinos.

      That's why they can all burn.

    12. Re:I just don't see how it would work. by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Table games have odds built into the game, all of them favor the casino some only slightly..

      Slot machines are regulated, and must return back a minimum percentage (75 percent for Nevada I believe) by LAW.. however, this does not mean that if you put in $100 you will get back $75 .. it may be that the next guy, or the one after him and so on, will eventually get that $75... again, this is by LAW... If you think on this, what that means is that for every $100 of coins run through, they will get to keep $25 of it... Now the guy that goes to Vegas and drops $500 and goes home broke.. he did not give the casino $500, he gave them $125, and someone else (or many elses) got the other $375.. You might not believe it, but that is the way it is.. at least for slot machines... When you see those signs of 95 percent payback.. the casino MUST also payback the percentage advertised.. again by LAW.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  3. Re:This app is for those of us... by kcbanner · · Score: 3, Funny

    No kidding. I mean I've watched 21 and that episode of Hustle...those casino folks don't joke around!

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  4. From TFA by spydabyte · · Score: 1
    It says:

    Randall Sayre, of the Nevada Gaming Commission says "Use of this type of program or possession of a device with this type of program on it (with the intent to use it), in a licensed gaming establishment, is a violation of NRS 465.075."

    So is it illegal to have it? Or just have the intent to use it? Five years for possession of illegal apps!

    1. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From our almighty master Google:

      NRS 465.075

      Use of device for calculating probabilities. It is unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, any device to assist:

                  1. In projecting the outcome of the game;
                  2. In keeping track of the cards played;
                  3. In analyzing the probability of the occurrence of an event relating to the game; or
                  4. In analyzing the strategy for playing or betting to be used in the game, except as permitted by the Commission.

    2. Re:From TFA by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      "No sir. I did not intend to use it. I accidentally turned it on while fumbling around in my pocket..." What you say to the judge when you get caught with the app on your phone.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    3. Re:From TFA by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So is it illegal to have it? Or just have the intent to use it?

      Both. According to the gaming laws in Nevada:

      NRS 465.075 Use of device for calculating probabilities. It is unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, any device to assist:
      1. In projecting the outcome of the game;
      2. In keeping track of the cards played;
      3. In analyzing the probability of the occurrence of an event relating to the game; or
      4. In analyzing the strategy for playing or betting to be used in the game,
      Ê except as permitted by the Commission.
      (Added to NRS by 1985, 970)

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:From TFA by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Both. According to the gaming laws in Nevada:

      According to what you C&P'd, you can't read. It's legal to use it for your own game at your house, so it's legal to own. It's not legal to own it with the intent to use it to actually make money, and it's not legal to use it, either.

      It is NOT illegal to own the software. It IS illegal to own the software if you intend to use it to defraud a casino.

      The relevant standard in the US courts is "substantial non-infringing use".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:From TFA by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Replying a second time because I forgot to include the link. Here is the full text of the regulation in question.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    6. Re:From TFA by gnick · · Score: 1

      But what kind of self-destructive Las Vegas judge would actually accept that argument and then step forward and set a precedent against the casinos. On one side, you've got some random shmuck who has obviously broken the law but has a semi-plausible excuse that, although although almost certainly false, could reasonably present some doubt as to his guilt. On the other side, you have the financial gods of the region who have in their possession the map that shows you where they've hidden your wife and kids and, as a bonus, have the law on their side. Which way would you rule?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    7. Re:From TFA by LargeWu · · Score: 1

      It's not illegal to own. That said, I don't think I would walk into a casino with this loaded on my iPhone. If casinos suspect you of cheating, or even counting, they will use any pretext to hassle you or even prosecute you as aggressively as possible. Just being in possession of this on a casino floor is a bad idea.

    8. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For five hours?" What the judge says to you during sentencing.

    9. Re:From TFA by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      According to what you C&P'd, you can't read. It's legal to use it for your own game at your house, so it's legal to own. It's not legal to own it with the intent to use it to actually make money, and it's not legal to use it, either.

      Well, if you want to get picky, according to the C&P'd text, you can't read either. ;) It's legal to own it with intent to use it to actually make money, it's just not legal to do so "at a licensed gaming establishment". It's perfectly legal to own it, intend to use it, and even actually use it to make money anywhere else.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    10. Re:From TFA by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      More importantly, the Casinos rarely take the matter to court. They can quite happily bar you from their casino, and make sure you're barred from all the rest of them as well.

    11. Re:From TFA by nsayer · · Score: 1

      The relevant standard in the US courts is "substantial non-infringing use".

      How about using it outside the state of Nevada? There are places you can take your phone that are not regulated by the Nevada gaming commission and where blackjack is played (whether there are similar rules in those places is irrelevant). Ergo, there is a substantial use for this app that does not violate Nevada state law.

    12. Re:From TFA by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      I have a fundamental problem with the phrase "defraud a casino". Isn't that like saying "rob a thief"?

    13. Re:From TFA by furby076 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a fundamental problem with the phrase "defraud a casino". Isn't that like saying "rob a thief"?

      No, not really or at all. You go to the casino, willingly, and put money down on a game of chance to win. The casino, by law, states the odds of you winning. You have a willing decision to make. Play or not play. A thief robs you, you have no chance to win, and you have no willing choice to make.

      Casino's are a legitimate business model. If you don't like the odds then don't play the game.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    14. Re:From TFA by 2short · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the old "Judges aren't allowed to call bullshit" defense. Good luck with that.

    15. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. It is only illegal to bring it to a licensed gaming establishment (casino) with the intent to use or using it in a casino. Reading the OP helps :)

    16. Re:From TFA by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      True, they are willing victims. I guess the issue comes from the fact that odds are *so* in favor of the house, and then if $DIETY forbid someone actually wins, they get stiffed and banned.

    17. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Delete it from your phone, duh.

    18. Re:From TFA by torkus · · Score: 1

      That's funny, the last part essentially makes the gambling commission an independant law-making body that I assume does not follow the same checks and balances as our actual government which are mandated by the constitution.

      Make a good project for a law student perhaps.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    19. Re:From TFA by torkus · · Score: 1

      How about at these "indepentant nations" al la indian casinos?

      If they can't be sued in US courts (except for specific, limited things) how come they can sue you in US courts? They would have to sue you based on US law which does not apply in their 'independant nation' or sue you based on indian law in an indian court which can't do much to you if you walk off the reservation. The irony!

      Yes, i know there's more complexity to the interaction of US/native indian laws but it's incredibly stupid overall. ESPECIALLY with something so regulated as gambling.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    20. Re:From TFA by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this argument is moot. I was reading it strictly as stated by law. While there are prima facie indicators of intent (for instance, reloading the gun and shooting the victim with the full clip would probably indicate intent to kill) there are quite a few situations which would render the intent part inconclusive. Maybe the app got bumped on by accident? See? No intent proven. (of course, if you were "accidentally" diddling with your phone in your pocket for 5 hours while winning, that might be prima facia evidence.

      That said, most of those won't end up in court. Most likely, you'll have your winnings confiscated, your phone smashed, and shown the door.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    21. Re:From TFA by torkus · · Score: 1

      You walk in, you know the odds, you place your bet, you win/lose based on established rules.

      Where's the part about theft? If you don't like the odds, don't play.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    22. Re:From TFA by 2short · · Score: 1

      Strictly as a matter of law, Judges have sufficient discretion to decide that what someone is telling them is plainly ridiculous, and to discount it on that basis.

      I'm saying, having a blackjack-specific app running on your iPhone while sitting at an blackjack table is going to be taken as a prima-facie indicator of intent. Accidentally happening to bump your iPhone into running a card-counting app while sitting at a blackjack table is not a possibility that's going to get you a reasonable doubt. It's arguably a stupid enough suggestion to get you cited for contempt.

    23. Re:From TFA by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      If you win big, they usually give you tremendous amounts of free stuff to entice you to stay and give all that money back.

    24. Re:From TFA by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The law that makes it illegal is not the DMCA.

      Substantial non-infringing use pertains to copyright and is not relevant here.

    25. Re:From TFA by JNSL · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the regulatory state.

    26. Re:From TFA by WNight · · Score: 1

      Sure, if they think you win randomly. If there's a suspicion that you're a capable card counter they'll throw you out.

      If casinos don't want counters they should have to offer only games that don't give a positive payout for counting.

      But, yeah, I'm in the burn them crowd. (Can anyone spare a pitchfork?) Sure, it's legal, but it's also incredibly destructive to the people (most?) who get hooked. Technically the owners are only feeding on the willing, but still... what kind of person needs to profit on the destruction of another?

      For every casino owner we feed to the sharks we could adopt a refuge and take a chance on finding a person whose best feature was more than "stayed within the law while ruining the lives of countless others."

      So if all someone is doing is stealing from a casino, why on earth should we care? Except to laugh. Like when spammers get attacked by pit bulls.

    27. Re:From TFA by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Depends on the came. You can legitimately get to 49.5% in a casino.
      well, you can get 100%, but you would loose money. For example I could bet on every number on the roulette wheel and 'win', but I wouldn't make money.

      I know, maybe I could make money with volume~

      I do know a crafty cheat for roulette..well, it's more of a social engineering thing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. Hi Lo? by Samschnooks · · Score: 4, Funny

    They couldn't call it "Rainman"?

    1. Re:Hi Lo? by jornak · · Score: 0, Funny

      They d-d-definitely, d-definitely could definitely have called it that.

    2. Re:Hi Lo? by D-Cypell · · Score: 2, Funny

      iManexcellentdriver

    3. Re:Hi Lo? by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      If they'd have called it Rain Man, they're highly likely to incur the wrath of the MPAA for infringing the copyright of MGM/UA. Whilst the casino might only beat you up a little, the MPAA will take away your house (unless you have a credit line to the local whorehouse or a senator in your pocket).

      Now I'm not sure whether I'm joking or not...

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    4. Re:Hi Lo? by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Movie and an application are not the same thing. The MPAA can say all they want but if someone wants to put out a application, sprinkler, what ever they can. As long as it is not a movie or TV show, the MPAA has no case.

    5. Re:Hi Lo? by nsayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      If they'd have called it Rain Man, they're highly likely to incur the wrath of the MPAA for infringing the trademark of MGM/UA.

      There. Fixed that for you.

    6. Re:Hi Lo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that's the same reason they didn't call it "KMart sucks"

  6. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    No I'm not counting cards, I'm masturbating.

  7. I just use that Fiest song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one, two, three, four, tell me 'bout the Kings some more.
    one, two, three, four, five, six, nine, and ten, I see that the dealer seems to have called some men
    money can't buy you back the love that you had then, but it can get you out of jail on bail.

  8. How to use in stealth mode? by shogun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the screen is off its all well and good to input card appearances with it hidden in your pocket, but how do you get its current odds output? Vibration or something like that?

    1. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moot point. If you play with your hands in your pocket you will get busted.

    2. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cigarret Lady: Is that a good odd output? Or are you just happy to see me?

    3. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Moot point. If you play with your hands in your pocket you will get busted.

      Good advice for any occasion, not just gambling!

    4. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      If I'm in Vegas and I see a guy playing blackjack... one hand constantly in his pocket (possibly vibrating), I'm gonna be creeped out and will find another table.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    5. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone above mentioned blackjack tables with pole dancers, just head to one of those tables, they won't wonder why you're playing pocketed then.

    6. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Newtonian Casino by Thomas A. Bass details such a scheme from the late seventies or early eighties for Roulette.

    7. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      The iphone battery explodes when it's time to be all in.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:How to use in stealth mode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the screen is off its all well and good to input card appearances with it hidden in your pocket, but how do you get its current odds output? Vibration or something like that?

      First two guesses:
      1. Audio: the iPhone and iPod Touch have audio output. This assumes that you use ear plugs as it would be pretty stupid to have the audio piped from the internal speaker to anyone within hearing distance.
      2. Vibrate: the iPhone has this feature, while the iPod Touch does not.

      Lastly, I don't see such an app available in the App Store.

  9. Re:slashdot sensationalism by ericrost · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wrong:

    NRS 465.075 Use of device for calculating probabilities. It is unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, any device to assist:

                1. In projecting the outcome of the game;

                2. In keeping track of the cards played;

                3. In analyzing the probability of the occurrence of an event relating to the game; or

                4. In analyzing the strategy for playing or betting to be used in the game,

    Ê except as permitted by the Commission.

                (Added to NRS by 1985, 970)

    The Nevada laws are friendly to the casinos, as they make Nevada a LOT of money.

  10. Would this have widespread use? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was recently in Las Vegas and it seems to me that an application like this would only find use in the smaller casinos. The bigger ones use card shuffling machines that I think continuously reshuffle the deck. After a hand the dealer puts the cards back into the machine which reshuffles the decks (I think they hold several decks). Anybody else know if this is how the machine works? Some of the smaller casinos offer 1 deck Black Jack with no machine used for better player odds. The smaller casinos need to draw more players in and have to offer better odds. These would help here.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Would this have widespread use? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "The bigger ones use card shuffling machines that I think continuously reshuffle the deck."

      Well, if you want to play blackjack...you avoid these tables like the plague!!

      I've not been out there in a couple years or so...but, are you saying ALL the major casinos use the continuous shufflers only? I know they tried those at the Harrah's down here in NOLA, and they did not go over well. Most blackjack players..can't / don't count cards...but, using that machine took away the illusion they had that they could win.

      I thought the continuous shufflers pretty much went away due to players bad responses to them...?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Would this have widespread use? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      I've never been to Vegas so I have no idea what they are using. However, I remember seeing something about a machine that doesn't shuffle the deck but pushes out exactly one card at random from a stack which is in effect the same thing. Perhaps that is what Vegas uses now.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    3. Re:Would this have widespread use? by gnick · · Score: 1

      The bigger ones use card shuffling machines that I think continuously reshuffle the deck.

      No. They will use several decks and do indeed have shufflers. But they do not reshuffle until the decks are exhausted. Continuous shuffling in pretty much any card game would be ludicrously bad form.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:Would this have widespread use? by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      Most casinos have 1 or 2 deck games but those usually come with high minimums and are in the "high roller" rooms off to the side. The minimums are usually in the $50-$100 range.

    5. Re:Would this have widespread use? by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was recently in Las Vegas and it seems to me that an application like this would only find use in the smaller casinos. The bigger ones use card shuffling machines that I think continuously reshuffle the deck. After a hand the dealer puts the cards back into the machine which reshuffles the decks (I think they hold several decks). Anybody else know if this is how the machine works? Some of the smaller casinos offer 1 deck Black Jack with no machine used for better player odds. The smaller casinos need to draw more players in and have to offer better odds. These would help here.

      There are several shufflers around - one is a "continuous shuffler" - basically a circular rake (or one on a belt) that can take cards that moves back and forth randomly. Dealer inserts cards at the top, and they get inserted into the rake one by one, and pulls cards from the bottom, whatever happens to be there. Another kind simply takes cards and shuffles them periodically.

      But the usual trick is to simply shuffle after every round - the tables only have one deck in play (and a pre-shuffled deck standing ready to keep play fast). When the round ends, that old deck is tossed into the shuffler, and the new deck dealt. This completely screws up counting. Smaller casinos simply use less decks - turns out more decks in the shoe make card counting more successful.

      Also, while card counting itself isn't illegal, using an aid is (mechanical, electronic, etc). But it's easy to spot card counters (the people monitoring the eyes in the sky can count cards too). Heck, I'm surprised they haven't equipped the tables with RFID readers and use cards with RFID in them so a computer at the table can maintain the count and watch the bets and point out potential card counters.

      And Blackjack is one of the worst games for a casino - the odds are very low. They only carry it because it's popular. Someone doing basic strategy already has cut down the house advantage to less than half a percent - a very poor return. Card counting tips that into the player's favor.

      Finally - do casinos allow cellphones to be used at tables? At best, this warning is just a heads up to people who'll use the application that aids to card counting is illegal, but I suppose if one was trying to learn, they could use it at home or in small groups.

      The problem of communicating the count has remained though - but since card counting is a probability play anyways, communicating the rough hotness and coldness of the deck is sufficient.

      In short, the iPhone app is nothing new - many people have done this in the past, often with more elaborate contraptions suitable for the lower level of technology in the day...

    6. Re:Would this have widespread use? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Continuous shufflers aren't as reliable about screwing things up as one might imagine. The basic problem is that you aren't guaranteed to hit those dead spots in the decks where most of the cards suck.

      This is actually fairly important because it means that with the constraints on the dealer, it means that there's a relatively consistent number of 10 point cards left in the deck. And with the dealer being required to take a hit at any total less than 16 and depending upon the casino will uniformly take a hit or not on 17s.

      And as such it changes the dynamics of what you take a hit on, knowing that the dealer has a card between 2 and 6 is more consistent than it is on a table where the decks aren't being shuffled as often.

      Which is a long way of saying that while it does limit the traditional card counting, it does open up other conditions in a way which opens up other options.

    7. Re:Would this have widespread use? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Try venturing off the Strip. Lots of $5 single & double-deck games.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    8. Re:Would this have widespread use? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Finally - do casinos allow cellphones to be used at tables?

      Typically no. When someone gets a call on their phone, the dealer will ask them to step away from the table after a while, usually after one hand of play. Maybe it was only at the Mirage but I can see how all casinos would have the same procedures. First they don't want to give the players any advantage. Second it is annoying to other players.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    9. Re:Would this have widespread use? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Or they are at the low end casino's that have to have them to get business.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    10. Re:Would this have widespread use? by feepness · · Score: 1
      The bigger ones use card shuffling machines that I think continuously reshuffle the deck.

      Please avoid these as much as you would the most draconian DRM you can ever imagine.

      Not only are they impossible to count (if designed properly) but they actually lower the odds for the player because of this.

    11. Re:Would this have widespread use? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Dealers don't like them either. Takes all the finesse out of the job.
      Makes it a live-action video blackjack.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:Would this have widespread use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While most casinos would not allow cellphone use, the difference is that using the cellphone would entitle the casino to ban you and dump you on the street, whereas card counting entitles the casino and law enforcement to bring you to court.

      Many people would have no problem with a maximum risk of being banned from a casino. Most people would have a problem with a risk of a criminal record and lawsuits.

      The casinos want you to know they won't just be booting you to the street anymore. They'll be pressing charges.

    13. Re:Would this have widespread use? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Are there any out there that don't use card shufflers at all? For me part of the fun is watching a expert shuffle cards. Its part of the show.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    14. Re:Would this have widespread use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      And Blackjack is one of the worst games for a casino - the odds are very low. They only carry it because it's popular.

      The odds for Blackjack are very low if the player uses the basic strategy. That's an important distinction since most people don't bother to take the time to memorize basic strategy and don't want to feel foolish by either asking the dealer on hands they don't know or using one of the cards you can get in the gift shop. The vast majority of blackjack players make stupid mistakes and increase the house edge substantially. Even card counting can get players into more trouble than it's worth. If a counter makes more than 1 or 2 mistakes an hour and modify their play according to what they believe is the count, they can end up with lower odds than simply playing basic strategy. Before they inform a player that they're no longer welcome to play blackjack, the casinos will make sure that the card counter is actually skilled enough to have an edge over the house.

      Blackjack has, as evidenced by your post, gotten the reputation for being the best odds you can get in Vegas, at least for the table games when you discount the "don't come" bet at the craps table. And that's true from a purely mathematical perspective. But it gets a lot more profitable for them when the player makes mistakes. And since most people in Vegas are there to have fun rather than make money, most people make mistakes. And even people that don't make mistakes are still profitable for the casinos. Card counting changes all that, but only if you're allowed to alter you play accordingly. But those kinds of changes in play make it easy to spot people counting, so it's pretty difficult to be able to play a prolonged amount of play time where you've got an advantage over the house, which is something you'd need to make money when your advantage is only 1-2%.

      In general, card counting gets overrated as a way to beat the house. What people forget about the MIT team is that they gave back most of their profits when they had a rough patch. The book and movie rights likely made them far more money than their actual card counting did. And that was before the Casinos got clued in to the team concept and essentially closed that loophole. Basically, card counting is more trouble than it's worth. It's not as glamorous as the movies or books make it out to be and you still have swings where you lose despite having the odds in your favor (the same holds true for the casinos...the odds are in their favor yet many players win in the short-term.) But if you take the time to learn basic strategy, make sure you can stick to it when you're drunk and learn how to work the waitresses to double up on the free drinks (tip well and order another drink each time she brings you your drink), Blackjack can be one of the cheapest ways in Vegas to get drunk.

      If you want to make money, however, head to the sports book and bet against the LA teams. Vegas gets so much traffic from LA that the lines on games with LA teams get skewed in favor of the opponent.

    15. Re:Would this have widespread use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, I'm surprised they haven't equipped the tables with RFID readers and use cards with RFID in them so a computer at the table can maintain the count and watch the bets and point out potential card counters.

      Then it would be easier for people to read those RFID sigs, and know what the top card of the deck is going to be. Sounds fun to me, until you get busted!

    16. Re:Would this have widespread use? by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      I use the same setup for poker. Nothing beats five aces!!!

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    17. Re:Would this have widespread use? by feepness · · Score: 1

      Lots don't use card shufflers at all. Even the casinos that do use card shufflers have tables without them. The card shufflers are usually not more than 25% of the tables.

    18. Re:Would this have widespread use? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Since the shuffling machine is a machine it is a perfect shuffle, or because they do not want a perfect shuffle it is deliberately imperfect i.e. it effectively unsorts the cards in a predictable manor and this too can be factored in to a card counting system .... it just makes it nigh on impossible for a human to count cards ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    19. Re:Would this have widespread use? by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      > I'm surprised they haven't equipped the tables with RFID readers and use cards with RFID in them

      Yeah, they're starting to do that - well for now RFID is officially used to prevent fake chips, but I've heard they're using it to spot typical counting betting patterns (minimum bets with a few high bets per hour).

      http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-141181.html

    20. Re:Would this have widespread use? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      Very informative post, but a couple points...

      But the usual trick is to simply shuffle after every round - the tables only have one deck in play (and a pre-shuffled deck standing ready to keep play fast). When the round ends, that old deck is tossed into the shuffler, and the new deck dealt. This completely screws up counting. Smaller casinos simply use less decks - turns out more decks in the shoe make card counting more successful.

      Actually, the more decks, the worse it is for counting. In multi-deck shoes, you have to adjust for the "true count". You do +1 and -1 like before, but divide by the number of decks remaining. This tends to even out the bell curve of extremes-- there's fewer "really high" counts. If a shoe hasn't gone hot by the end of the second deck, it probably won't get hot at all. It's best to head to the bathroom at that point.

      Ironically, the continuous shuffle machines actaully lower the house edge a tiny bit. BUT they also deal far more hands per hour, and tend to attract for more unskilled players, so the dollars per hour earned by the casino is MUCH higher.

      Heck, I'm surprised they haven't equipped the tables with RFID readers and use cards with RFID in them so a computer at the table can maintain the count and watch the bets and point out potential card counters.

      Schemes like this get proposed, tested and scrapped quite a bit. They tend to be technically infeasible, illegal, or more often than not, unprofitable. RFID in high-denomination chips, however, is (from last I read) widespread. But that's mainly to combat theft and cheating, rather than counting. A team with a Faraday chip-bag that switched stacks between them every couple shoes could defeat that system easily.

      And Blackjack is one of the worst games for a casino - the odds are very low. They only carry it because it's popular. Someone doing basic strategy already has cut down the house advantage to less than half a percent - a very poor return. Card counting tips that into the player's favor.

      While I'm sure the casinos would love to gut every table and insert endless rows of slots, BJ isn't as bad for them as it seems. First, a very small minority of players even know basic strategy well enough to earn that 0.05% house edge. Counters get a 2% edge true-- but bad/wannabe counters give it right back. And someone playing but gut/instinct/system/drunk can be playing under a 8%-20% house edge. That's worse that any slot machine, idiot-wheel or Keno player!

      Finally - do casinos allow cellphones to be used at tables?

      I think it depends region to region. In Canada, there's zero electronic devices allowed. No cellphones at the tables. No mp3 players at the poker tables. I believe you're allowed mp3 players at most poker tables in Vegas. It'll be interesting to see what happens once wearable computers (and heck, implanted computers) become the norm. Though last I checked, "perfect strategy" gives the player an edge of about 3%.

      Note: There's lots of stuff about to back up the post. I'm just too lazy to find it all again. I do suggest www.wizardofodds.com and blackjackinfo.com as excellent resources, though.

    21. Re:Would this have widespread use? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      In CA, at the Chumash Casino, when the guy next to me got a call, the dealer immediately asked him to step away from the table.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    22. Re:Would this have widespread use? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      Any means of randomizing the the deck makes a counting system useless. Even such a simple measure as a single riffle-shuffle that mixes the top and bottom halves redistributes any collection in the top half throughout the entire deck.

    23. Re:Would this have widespread use? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      {sigh} Mod -1: Wrong... wait, that doesn't exist. Okay, I'll reply instead:

      Continuous shufflers aren't as reliable about screwing things up as one might imagine. The basic problem is that you aren't guaranteed to hit those dead spots in the decks where most of the cards suck.

      And you aren't guaranteed to not hit those "dead spots" either. The machine randomizes the shoe either after each hand, or about every 1/2 deck.

      This is actually fairly important because it means that with the constraints on the dealer, it means that there's a relatively consistent number of 10 point cards left in the deck.

      A consistent number-- that are randomly distributed in an unknown pattern, and thus unsuitable for basing any play or bet decisions on. All those 10s might be clumped at the back of the deck, or they might be clumped at the front. You don't know, and cannot know. And since all played cards keep getting shuffled back into the deck, there's no way of knowing the ratio of high to low cards remaining. It always resets back to 1:1 after each shuffle. This would be the exact same as if you played against an 8 deck shoe where the cut card (the point where the muck gets reshuffled back into the deck) is placed 1/2 deck into the shoe (rather than the 6-7 decks it normally is).

      And as such it changes the dynamics of what you take a hit on, knowing that the dealer has a card between 2 and 6 is more consistent than it is on a table where the decks aren't being shuffled as often.

      No. No it doesn't. You still play basic strategy. The ONLY time you would change your hit/stand pattern *might* be hit a 9 vs dealer 2 if the count rose to +8 on the one hand that gets dealt before the shuffle (+8 / 8 decks remaining = true count +1 = hit instead of stand). You will never get enough information about the composition of the remaining deck before the shuffle occurs to change basic strategy.

      Which is a long way of saying that while it does limit the traditional card counting, it does open up other conditions in a way which opens up other options.

      Let me correct: it is a WRONG way of saying blah blah blah. The only +EV move to make against a continuous shuffle machine is to not play against it. Demand a hand or shoe game with good rules. If the casino won't provide it, let them know you're taking your business elsewhere.

      ADDENDUM: A +EV move for ME is for YOU to play against the CSM. Because players like you fill the casino's vaults via their blackjack tables, giving players like me places to play.

    24. Re:Would this have widespread use? by eyeota · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heck, I'm surprised they haven't equipped the tables with RFID readers and use cards with RFID in them so a computer at the table can maintain the count and watch the bets and point out potential card counters.

      Some Casinos Do. L'Auberge du Lac in Lake Charles does. I was there 2 years ago playing BlackJack so when I asked to be rated for my level of play, she went to the computer attached to the table and pulled up my stats. She was able to tell my average bit, how many hands I played an hour, etc. That being said, I know that computer must also signal card counting betting patterns. [Note to anyone that plays there: The 'button' the dealer hits before dealing out the cards tells the computer a round has started to collect the wager -> player position for the round.

    25. Re:Would this have widespread use? by mmandt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do know that when the big card shufflers first came out, they had a bit of a flaw. They could shuffle the cards so much that the cards essentially might become un-shuffled. Then some math guy to figure out the optimal number of random shuffles per X decks to ensure maximum randomness of each card dealt. Naturally, they then fixed the deck shufflers. I remember learning the story in a college math class. It had something to do with chaos theory. Pretty cool stuff. Card counters can't beat it because it shuffles between every hand.

    26. Re:Would this have widespread use? by furby076 · · Score: 1

      And Blackjack is one of the worst games for a casino - the odds are very low.

      Just be careful of the picture painted. Odds and casino hold can be very different. The odds are based on if people play exactly by the book. Most people do not so this modifies the casino hold.

      So the casino hold (how much money the casino makes off every $100) comes to 1.22% blackjack. As a reference point the casino hold on your average slot machine is 8.5%.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    27. Re:Would this have widespread use? by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 1

      My first thought upon reading this article is that Vegas wants to get lots of people to think they can count cards and come on down to empty their pockets. Even (maybe especially?) in relatively desperate times.

      Most won't dare use the IPhone in a Casino anyways, though they might kid themselves long enough to book a trip and hit the floor.

      Some might decide to do it themselves once they figure out the mechanics of card counting. The casinos love people like this.

      It's basically a big commercial for Vegas, Blackjack, and deluding yourself that you can maybe win too. Just like everything else these days, it seems.

    28. Re:Would this have widespread use? by qwertysledge · · Score: 1

      All the casinos, Vegas and elsewhere, that I've been to don't let you place your cell phone on the card table. And if you are constantly putting our hand in your pants pocket to touch something they might ask you to leave.

      --
      "There is a fine line between fishing and just standing on the shore like an idiot." -- Steven Wright
  11. Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by nweaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Card counting really doesn't work that well in Vegas casinos unless you go with a distributed ring: its pretty obvious when an individual is card counting, if you miscount slightly the casino ends up winning big, and the casions can really mess you up, from shuffling more to "backrooming" you and intimidating the F-outta you.

    But if they start suspecting this (which is easy, its just like detecting any other card counter, and then looking more fully at where you keep your hands), then they can not just backroom you, but through the legal process, make you WISH they'd just have settled for the old days when they'd have shoved your iPhone where the sun don't shine.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by areusche · · Score: 1

      Please, they just take you into a back room and scare you. The worst they can do is bar you from the casino. It's nothing like 21 where you have Lawrence Fishbourne beating the heck out of you. If you make a real hubbub you get into this mystical book published by Griffin Investigations that lists you as a card counter that security staff will pick you up and kick you right back out.

    2. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "Card counting really doesn't work that well in Vegas casinos unless you go with a distributed ring: its pretty obvious when an individual is card counting, if you miscount slightly the casino ends up winning big, and the casions can really mess you up, from shuffling more to "backrooming" you and intimidating the F-outta you."

      They're not gonna backroom you like they did in the old days....they don't need to. They can just simply refuse your play, and if a problem, ban you from that casino, where if you do reenter, you are legally trespassing and they let the law deal with you.

      There are ways to count, even as a single person with no team. There are plays that you 'can' make, which are usually very stupid, but, at times can be made and not really lessen your edge you get by counting properly. I was reading one awhile back that where in a strategy, you actually did at times split 10's....a generally stupid move, but, if done at certain times, sparingly, it would not mess with your edge badly, yet it would definitely throw off the casino watching you as a 'serious' counter. I'm sorry I don't have the book around to cite the source, but, it is out there.

      Team play is definitely the best way to go, but, most casinos know that MOST people who think they can count cards...will mess up. So, unless you are making huge swings in bets with VERY high denominations of checks...you're likely not going to be harassed. They only really start looking at you if you start taking serious money from them.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Oidhche · · Score: 1

      Oh, so now you're not allowed to win, are you?

    4. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by amoeba1911 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nope, that's the whole idea of a casino... suckering people into thinking they stand a chance.

    5. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by hamburgler007 · · Score: 0

      They don't backroom you anymore, that would be one of the dumbest things a casino would do today. They ban you, and distribute your photo to every other casino, and you are effectively banned from every casino.

    6. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Oidhche · · Score: 1

      In that case, why bother playing at all? Just give them your money and be on your way. Actually, both sides would greatly benefit from that. Casinos would save a lot of money if instead of a great expensive building and a lot of staff they only needed a small room and a clerk to collect the money. Players on the other hand would save a lot of time. I guess they could spend it earning more money to lose.

    7. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so now you're not allowed to win, are you?

      Actually, no, and that's kind of the point.

      The odds are all in the favor of the casinos. This is done on purpose. There are laws that preserve that advantage. If the odds were not in the favor of the casinos they would not be able to make money and they would close.

      Sure, a given individual might win once in a while... And if you quit while you're ahead you can actually make some money... But over the long run the casinos will win, that's how they make their money.

    8. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      >Oh, so now you're not allowed to win, are you?

            Uh, why do you think these large companies are falling all over themselves to build ever larger casinos with even more spectacular attractions? To play *fair* with you? Where do you suppose they get the money to build all these casinos?

              The entire system is designed to extract money from idiots who either don't know any better, or think somehow that they can beat the odds. Suckers, in other words.

                Brett

    9. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Card counting really doesn't work that well in Vegas casinos unless you go with a distributed ring: its pretty obvious when an individual is card counting, if you miscount slightly the casino ends up winning big, and the casions can really mess you up, from shuffling more to "backrooming" you and intimidating the F-outta you.

      Take note that this is illegal. This is what pissed me off about the movie "21". None of the people who were beat the fuck up in the backroom pressed charges against the attackers. Counting cards is NOT illegal. Assault and Battery IS illegal and will get you brought up on Criminal and Civil charges quick like.

    10. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Because contrary to any logic that I apply to the subject, I actually enjoy wasting time playing penny slots and getting free drinks. Plus I generally get my money back as the retention rates are pretty high. The other game with such high retention rates is... You guessed it: Blackjack.

    11. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by hairykrishna · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that it's relatively easy to keep track of a players winnings over time, being a consistent winner at blackjack will get you ID'd as a counter very quickly.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    12. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Well, that's actually good advice.

      My tip to people going gambling - take along X amount of money, and when it's done, it's done. Plan on spending it like you would on any other form of entertainment. And, of course, as Bryansix said, free drinks are not a bad thing.

    13. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUD, I have worked in casino's in Vegas as security, and can guarantee you that "Backrooming" you does not happen at all. In the case of a device, you can go to jail, but you will long be politely 86'd (trespassed) from a casino before this happens. You can count cards if you don't use a device. 100 percent legal, however the casino reserves the right to refuse you service for any reason.

      By the way, in the holding room where you will be taken by security if you actually break the law, you are on camera and microphone at all times. very easy to have your lawyer get a copy if you feel mistreated.

    14. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Penny slots + free drinks = cheap evening out.

    15. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      It's Blackjack for me. When I play I don't expect to win. Hell, I expect to lose but that is not why I love to play. There is just something about sitting around with a bunch of random strangers and playing cards. Even if I am losing. And some times when I do win it's even better.

      The real strategy to winning at blackjack against the casino is knowing when to quit.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    16. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by midnightkiller · · Score: 0

      So what you're suggesting is, casinos are really a way to collect taxes from people voluntarily? Not a bad invention, actually!

    17. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Oh, so now you're not allowed to win, are you?

      No, not even if you're not doing anything even close to cheating, only having a good run of luck. A friend was recently banned from a casino because he won "too much" at roulette. He was purely gambling, and had never even set foot in a casino or gaming establishment before, and wasn't real sure how to even play. He only played straight bets of the table-minimum.

      Nonetheless, after he won about $2500 he was taken by security to the back and told he was "suspected of cheating" and after being searched and nothing found, was brow-beaten verbally in an attempt to intimidate him by a couple large security-types for about a half-hour.

      They couldn't even tell him *how* they thought he was cheating, other than he won more than they thought he "should". They even attempted to tell him that he needed to give back his winnings to avoid being arrested and going to jail. When he balked at this and told them to go ahead and call in the cops, they finally relented and let him cash-out and then escorted him out.

      Needless to say, he decided that going to a casino won't ever again be on his list of recreation activities.

      For me, this just proved what I'd always thought about casinos; the only winning move is not to play.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    18. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Why indeed?

      This is why you want to play poker, not house games (like blackjack). In poker, the house has no interest in the outcome of the hand - they get paid for hosting the game by raking the pot. The competition is between you and the other players at the table. Meaning that good players, on average, take money away from bad players.

      Nevada casinos hate poker, because they make a lot less money at it (you basically never get comped anything if all you play is poker). And to be successful at poker, you need to be a better than average player. And, of course, poker is like driving in that 80% of people believe they are above average at it. Which is why the 20% (or less) of truly profitable players can keep playing it.

    19. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Puffy+Director+Pants · · Score: 1

      Of course you're allowed to win. They're just not going to make it easy for you. But you can go into any casino, and every slot machine in there is required to be able to give whatever it's payout is supposed to be. If you play blackjack, they provide a non-marked deck, with all the standard cards in it.

      You may not have good odds to win, but yes, you can win. The games are not rigged, and if you suspect they are, you can report the Casino.

    20. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Splitting 10's is statistically a pretty smart move. The problem is that it pisses off the other people at the table.

      You're very likely to get more 10's if you split 10's, which doubles your payback when you very likely win with 2 hands of 20. Of course, when you lose, you lose double. Same applies for a double down, which should be done if you have hard 9 to 11, and on soft or 8 if you're "feeling lucky" (a.k.a. "don't care").

      Basic rule of thumb: assume every card you can't see is worth 10. It's more likely than not.

    21. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you miscount slightly the casino ends up winning big"

      totally false. slight miscounting does not alter the odds. you need a systemic bias in your counting for it to affect the odds.

    22. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Rary · · Score: 1

      Oh, so now you're not allowed to win, are you?

      Nope, that's the whole idea of a casino... suckering people into thinking they stand a chance.

      Actually, to that end it's essential that people do win.

      Basically, casinos need winners, particularly really big winners. They're what gives all the losers the illusion that they, too, could be a winner someday, and that's what keeps people in the casino.

      You see, for every person who gets extremely lucky and walks away $10,000 richer, there's 1000 people who don't get lucky, and walk away $100 poorer. Do the math -- the casino still wins.

      However, if no one is ever seen to get lucky, then the losers will begin to flock to another casino where they think they have a better chance.

      So the casinos don't mind big winners, in fact they need them. However, it has to happen in a controlled way. That's why they don't like people who upset their ability to control the odds -- like card counters.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    23. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was reading one awhile back that where in a strategy, you actually did at times split 10's....a generally stupid move, but, if done at certain times, sparingly, it would not mess with your edge badly, yet it would definitely throw off the casino watching you as a 'serious' counter. I'm sorry I don't have the book around to cite the source, but, it is out there.

      You are probably thinking about Blackjack for Blood by Bryce Carlson. It's a really good read and a good introduction to a level II counting system.
      The rest of this post isn't directed toward you cayenne8, but seemed like a good of a place as any to put it.
      At the end of the day, card counting wasn't very profitable for the level of effort it takes. While playing, a good card counter needs to do the following things:

      • Keep track of the count (possibly maintaining a separate count of aces)
      • Play perfectly based on the current count
      • Keep track of his or her bets
      • Look like he or she isn't counting cards

      The last item is actually the hardest on the list. Vary your bet spread more than 4 to 1? You're a possible counter. Make an advanced play (split 9s against a dealer 9 with a high plus card deck)? You're a possible counter. Look focused? You're a possible counter. Have an average bet of over $100/hand? You're a possible counter. The list goes on.
      Now assume you've mastered the above and can count perfectly. Lets look at the money involved. To ensure that you have a 99.5% chance of not being wiped out, you are going to need a stake of approximately 120 times your average bet (details are hazy, but that's about right). Let's say you are going for an average bet of $50/hand. You will need a $6000 stake. Using the number of $50/hand, let's see how much you can expect to win per hour. Let's take a really high number for hands per hour, 100. In my experience, you would have to be playing three or four hands at a time to achieve this, but lets go with it. Bryce says that the best counters in the world have a 1.6% advantage over the house. Using the numbers so far we have $50/hand * 100 hands/hour * 1.6% advantage which leads to a whopping $80/hour take for perfect play that still carries a 0.5% risk of losing your entire $6000 stake.
      On top of the risk/reward issues outlined above, card counting made blackjack boring for me. Instead of being fun, it was a job, and a job that required a lot of outside work as well. Keeping your skills up to date with a level II system takes daily practice. If you are going to try to push the limits on bet spreads or average bets, you have to manage where you play and how long you play for with excruciating detail. It just wasn't worth it. Now I play roulette when I want to gamble. There's nothing you can do from preventing the house from taking its cut. Just throw some chips down and hope you end up a winner.

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

    24. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Oh, so now you're not allowed to win, are you?

      Hell, you're not allowed to break even. Somebody's got to pay that electric bill.

      --
      -
    25. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      How sweet, it's seen movies.

      No, a casino will not backroom you. Backroom = massive profit for the player and his lawyer.

      Easily detected = only kinda sorta. If you're playing the same table during the same shift, every day, without cover, sure they'll spot you. For green ($25) and black ($100) chippers, moving from house to house and limiting your time will make you damn near a ninja. Most dealers don't even know how to play the game they're dealing, and most pit bosses just want to be sure the trays balance at the end of the shift. If you do get caught, you'll get "backed off". The pit boss will tap your shoulder, and tell you you're welcome to play any other game. Worse case, they'll "tresspass" you. They'll pull you aside, cash you out, then read you the tresspass act. The message is: get out and don't come back. If you do, you're tresspassing, and they'll call the cops to take you off their private property. Then you're kinda boned.

      Casinos in Vegas, and in fact most of North America and Europe, make far too much money running an honest ship to risk thugging it out with someone who might be earning a couple thousand from counting. I wouldn't try it in the Caribbean, Asia or most other places. The rules are different there, and you're probably a foreigner. Not a good combination.

    26. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by swaq · · Score: 1

      There have been card counters that have been beat up in the backroom.

      I've seen the Griffin book many years ago, my dad was in it.
      http://www.kevinblackwood.com/

    27. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cards in a single suit with a value of 10 - TJQK. Cards without a value of 10 - A23456789.

      I think you need a new definition of "more likely".

    28. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      On top of the risk/reward issues outlined above, card counting made blackjack boring for me. Instead of being fun, it was a job, and a job that required a lot of outside work as well.

      Read the book Busting Vegas by the same guy who wrote the book that the movie 21 was based on. He describes more advanced techniques that aren't card-counting per se but use some of the same skills. They also drastically tilt the odds against the house if done right. Basically it involves following a single card rather than estimating the general tilt of the deck toward "hot" or "cold." (Actually there are three techniques described, but they are all related to this principle). It not only sounds like better odds than card counting, but a hell of a lot more fun, too. And also pretty dangerous, if any of these stories are to be believed. Top that off with the fact that casinos are all alert to these techniques (I think the guy sells videos showing how to do them too), and it's probably not worth investigating for more than informational purposes, but it seems a quantum leap from card counting.

    29. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that you aren't allowed to win as that you can do nothing statistically speaking to keep the casino's from making money in the long run. If you are gambling for the purpose of 'beating the house' in some long run sense you are doing it wrong.

      --
      snig
    30. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      His card counting was now the big deal. It's how the changes in betting were masked.

      counting is easy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone has been beat up in the last 25-40 years. It really doesn't get you anything anymore, and you ahve a high risk.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    32. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Read the book - it's not just masking the changes in the betting (in fact, their behavior was welcoming scrutiny rather than trying to be inconspicuous) but it's a paradigm shift from counting. Rather than just figuring out whether the deck is hot or cold you are using your counting techniques to determine where a particular card will land. Think about it - if you know the dealer's going to get a 10 on the next deal and he's showing 12-15, you know the dealer's going to bust. And if you've got a group of five people at the table who all know the dealer's going to bust, you're going to win big -- a certainty rather than a 51% probability.

    33. Re:Not only that, but detectable and stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a liar and a very bad one at that. $2500 in roulette wins will not result in anything other than a complimentary room at the establishment and probably a free meal and congratulations from the crew.

  12. Only in Nevada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello Foxwoods!!!! "The wonder of it all..."(commercial theme jingle)

    1. Re:Only in Nevada by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Having lived in CT for quite a while, I can only say, "Hello Foxwoods security!" when you get caught :). They're not very friendly people, although they are definitely "professional..."

  13. Making Money in Casinos is Illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other than poker, there is no way to consistently play a game that will make you money and not break gambling laws. The only reason poker slides is because you're being charged to gamble against other players and you're not winning the house's money. It's like horse betting at the Kentucky Derby in that way.

    1. Re:Making Money in Casinos is Illegal by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Which is why I'm partial to poker.

    2. Re:Making Money in Casinos is Illegal by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Except in a casino. Then, the casino profits substantially from your bets, without risking any of it's own capital.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  14. Re:slashdot sensationalism by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Counting cards is NOT illegal

    Using a device to assist you in counting cards IS. Geico pointing out that drunk driving is illegal, but that doesn't mean that Geico is MAKING drunk driving illegal.

    Further more, whoever submitted the post used a clever trick known as synonyms. Citing a violation of one of the many Nevada Revised Statues is the same as, gasp, warning that the app's usage IS ILLEGAL. Granted the headline could've included, "use of" instead of just the app name would be far more clear. But oh well.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  15. Really??? by jskline · · Score: 1

    And all those silly little electro-magnetic devices under the craps and roulette tables are legal???

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  16. Re:slashdot sensationalism by qoncept · · Score: 1

    How can you make that mistake when the guy you're talking about references the actual law?

    --
    Whale
  17. The conclusion seems to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't go to casinos and support their stupid business!

    1. Re:The conclusion seems to be by nsayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Or go and play poker, which is a different proposition altogether since you're playing against the other players at the table rather than the house.

    2. Re:The conclusion seems to be by Icegryphon · · Score: 0

      or you can play pai gow poker.
      of course since it is 50/50% on a win the casino will take 5% commission.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pai_gow_poker
      Then again I have seen those dealers make serious insane hands.
      If the table ain't hot, walk the hell away! Don't go dropping another bill on it.

  18. The new mob ... same as the old mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    same old setup, make sure the house always wins

    it's a crime that greed still keeps the cut so deep

    1. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by Skye16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's a crime that people are so fucking stupid that they keep going and playing. It's one thing if gambling of the sort offered in Las Vegas were offered in every town on the planet, but people schedule entire vacations just to go out to Vegas and piss their money away. If it were offered everywhere, I'd agree it was messed up. But you have to physically go there, for pretty much the express purpose of gambling, to get ripped off. It boggles the mind.

    2. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty fucking stupid that people keep willfully snort cocaine even though it is messing up their lives. Why do they keep doing it?

      Today's magic word: adultery

    3. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Depending on how good you are you can hit do well though. The odds are adjusted so that the house always wins overall, but most people will subscribe to that dream that they're going to be the exception.

      Example: there's a buddy of mine that plays cards in our local games a lot. He's very, very unpredictable, such that it's almost impossible to tell exactly what he's holding. Although he's not mentioned it, I'm pretty sure he counts cards too. Every time he ever plays locally he always walks away "to the good" (with more money than he started). Recently, he and several other friends went on a Caribbean cruise where they had gambling on the ship in international waters. He came back with almost $30,000 more than he left with, all from gambling winnings. Now, MOST people won't do this, but those few examples keep hopes up enough that people want to try.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      People schedule entire vacations just to go out to (insert random vacation city here) and piss their money away. Silly people...

      SOME people have a problem, but some people just enjoy it and are willing to spend the money. There's nothing stupid about spending your money on an activity you enjoy. You spend the money and you get the enjoyment you want for it. The same simple formula that drives any "silly" expense of money where you don't get anything material back in return. Movies and WoW fall into the same camp. It's not silly in any of these cases if you have the money to spend (and it is silly in all cases if you don't).

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    5. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Looking at your credit card receipts, I could probably show you 100 examples of you pissing away money on nonessential items in less than 5 minutes.

      To each their own I guess...

    6. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Let me know when you find me pissing away 2k at a clip.

    7. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nothing boggling about it.

      Some people enjoy spending there money, getting drinks and talking. Along with seeing a show. Reading the handouts for a professional in room show.
      It's fun. Drop a grand there, or drop a grand at Disney land, or on a cruise. At least with gambling you MIGHT get your money back.

      I have been known to ahve a blast in vegas. Partying, getting into a little mischief. Like muttering numbers while the guy next to me is trying to card count. Or playing a poker hand in such away the professionals come over the table at you....ah, good times.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:The new mob ... same as the old mob by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      Eh. If gambling isn't fun for you then don't do it. In fact if you don't like gambling Vegas is just about the ideal destination for you: all of that food, all of those shows, all of the hotel rooms, all of everything subsidized by people gambling.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  19. Waiting by mark72005 · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the toothpick counting program.

  20. Oh hey by kjzk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    iPhones still suck.

  21. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

    These types of things used to be obvious markers for trolls.

    Sadly, Slashdot's anti-trolling efforts have both made the site less user friendly and resulted in a user base that falls for even the most thinly veiled efforts. Back in the inchfan days the parent wouldn't have even merited a link.

    --
    "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  22. its pretty easy to see you using it by peter303 · · Score: 1

    You are either visibly typing on a phone, or have it running in voice mode with ear buds with a hand in your pocket. I supposed you could get blue tooth earphones and hide them under a hat or wig.

    1. Re:its pretty easy to see you using it by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Larger casinos check for radio transmissions.

  23. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Oidhche · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean it's unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, a brain?

    Ah, well, no surprise there.

  24. Idiotic article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making money on card counting is based on betting the minimum amount when the count is bad and betting the maximum (or someone else betting it for you) when the count is good. It is looks extremely suspicious if someone varies their betting amounts like that. Dealers can also count and they are taught to recognize when the count is good. I see absolutely no use for an application like this.

    What would you do as a dealer if someone always tapped something into their phone between BJ hands and varied their betting amounts?

    1. Re:Idiotic article by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      What would you do as a dealer if someone always tapped something into their phone between BJ hands and varied their betting amounts?

      Besides take their money? Nothing.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:Idiotic article by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Counting is perfectly legal. In fact, you can even announce to the dealer that the odds are tilted to in your favor and you are going to bet more. What's illegal is using a machine or any other contraption/help to come to that conclusion, however cheat sheets are perfectly legal. Hell, in most casinos a decent dealer will actually advise you on what to do on a per hand basis if they see you are a knuckle head. Of course, the flip side is that at anytime they can "ask" you to leave, or close the table down. So flaunting your card counting abilities isn't very wise unless you like to do a lot of walking between casinos.

      Using some very simple rules you can easily slowly bleed the entire night away at blackjack and walk away with most of your money. More often then not the simple advice of 'assume the hidden card is a 10 and play to beat it' works fairly well. You won't lose your shirt, but you won't walk away with a heck of a lot either

  25. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

    Precisely. Thinking upsets the house odds :P.

    --
    There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  26. foot input, blue-tooth ear voice output by peter303 · · Score: 1

    For most card counting, you need one gesture for positive count, another for negative count. Toe tapping is an obvious gesture, but you could trained more hidden muscles.

    You could have the accumulating count trigger voice results at a significant threshhold and deliver these by blue tooth earplug.

    1. Re:foot input, blue-tooth ear voice output by fucket · · Score: 2, Funny

      Time to break out the Kegelcizer?

    2. Re:foot input, blue-tooth ear voice output by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have the accumulating count trigger voice results at a significant threshhold and deliver these by blue tooth earplug.

      Well that will be subtle and hard to spot.

      Seriously though, if you just look at everything from a strictly statistical perspective, it's pretty easy to spot a counter. If they're consistently winning, they're counting. No amount of subterfuge can get around the simple statistics of the game.

    3. Re:foot input, blue-tooth ear voice output by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Even if you were to somehow wire a (hypothetical non existant device) into your optic nerves that could do image recognition on every card and feed it to a hyopthetical non existant device connected to your brain and tell your brain directly what move to make, the simple fact that you are winning far more than the laws of probability should suggest will give your game away.

  27. computer shadowing detects card counting by peter303 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Any establishment may expell a player at will and doesnt need to have the physical counting computer. Of course, they'd like to keep the clumsy counters around, because they make money for the casinos.

    Wikipeadia mentions computer programs that track cards (by camera recognition) and bets (RFIDs in chips). The computer computes several of the popular counting schemes and compares that against actual play. Positive correlation with actual betting is suspicion of counting and grounds for expulsion.

    1. Re:computer shadowing detects card counting by Oidhche · · Score: 1

      Sounds like only allowing alcoholics to enter your bar.

    2. Re:computer shadowing detects card counting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like only allowing alcoholics to enter your bar.

      More like only allowing paying customers to enter your bar.

      Folks don't seem to understand that the casinos are around to make money. If they didn't make money, they wouldn't be able to stay open. Nobody is going to start up a casino just to give away cash for the fun of it.

      The odds of all these games are in the casino's favor - that's how they make money. It is no different than playing the lottery.

      The mechanical games... Things like slot machines and whatnot... Have their odds hardcoded into the game. They will only pay out a certain percentage of the time. The rest of the time they're just sucking up money for the casino.

      Games that can possibly involve skill have rules in-place to preserve the casino's advantage. If you break those rules and increase your odds of wining you are, in effect, depriving that casino of income.

      Casinos are built on a lie. Or, at the very least, an illusion. People are under the impression that they can actually win.

      It is certainly true that people do win... It is possible to walk in the door, play a single slot machine, and hit the jackpot. But for every person who actually wins the jackpot there are thousands of people spending thousands of dollars and getting absolutely nothing for it. They are paying loads of cash for the possibility that they might be the one who gets the jackpot. And, realistically, they may as well be flushing that money down the drain.

      This is how casinos work. The project images of opulence and decadence and make you think that you might be able to win... That if you get a single lucky hand you could be living in the lap of luxury... And people will pay hundreds of dollars, over and over again, for that possibility.

    3. Re:computer shadowing detects card counting by TravisO · · Score: 1

      Of course, they'd like to keep the clumsy counters around, because they make money for the casinos.

      Even poor counting is better than no counting at all, at least your odds are still in the ballpark, vs just playing totally blind, which is what 99% of players are doing anyways.

    4. Re:computer shadowing detects card counting by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Given a large enough set of "popular counting schemes" implemented in the observational system, that scheme approaches the situation where winning is grounds for Probable Cause.

    5. Re:computer shadowing detects card counting by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Not really. Poor counting is profitable for the casinos. If you think the deck is more positive than it is, you'll be betting larger on hands where you may not hold a statistical advantage. The converse is also true, where you may be betting the table minimum when the deck is favorable. If you can't count accurately, you're better off playing to the basic strategy as perfectly as possible, and remembering to leave when you're ahead. (ahead can be be when you're losing money, just s long as you don't spend more than your one-session limit)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    6. Re:computer shadowing detects card counting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Positive correlation with actual betting is suspicion of counting and grounds for expulsion.

      the real problem is that, as I understand it, they don't *need* grounds for expulsion. they just do it.

    7. Re:computer shadowing detects card counting by geekoid · · Score: 1

      they don't need grounds for expulsion.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Illegal to actually use it in the casino by hellfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's illegal to actually use it within the casinos. You can take your cell phone, even an iphone, into the casino. However, they have cameras with tape everywhere. If they catch you looking at your phone repeatedly, they will probably have probably cause to search your person. They can then try to get into your phone look to see if you have the app, and if you do they'll probably charge you right there. I wouldn't be surprised if they are working on a pin cracking software package so they don't have to get your permission. This of course has it's own legal issues, but casinos will err on the side of profits, and they don't care if the court case can't go thru, at least you are out of their casino. Let the courts worry about little things like civil rights. Winning a court case that your rights have been violated is hard against a casino whether or not you did cheat.

    Casinos have the right to eject you and ban you from a casino for any reason. I've never experienced this because I don't gamble, but I wouldn't be surprised if they ask you to remove bluetooth headsets before sitting down at a table. If you refuse, bye bye, they don't have to "serve" you, like any private establishment.

    However, just for the record, casinos don't beat you up for committing a crime or counting cards (unlike how the movie 21 portrayed it, that was a complete lie), no they don't make you sleep with the fishes any more, and you can only be charged with a crime if that crime is clearly stated in law. Counting in your head is not illegal. Counting using some kind of electronic device, or communicating with someone outside of the table using an electronic device to help you gamble are both illegal.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Illegal to actually use it in the casino by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      re:"Casinos have the right to eject you and ban you from a casino for any reason."

      NEVADA casinos. Not in New Jersey. Rather famous court case about it actually - but they don't mention that in movies about counters in Vegas. Makes it seem rebellious. It's about as rebellious as crossing the street at the corner crosswalk in Atlantic city. You cannot be barred for using your head counting cards period.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Card_counting#Legal_status_of_card_counting

  29. Do you want to cheat at cards? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's an app for that!

  30. Re:slashdot sensationalism by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose pen and paper are legal, are they?

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  31. Make casinos illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Problem solved. I shed no tears for anyone involved in the casino / hedge fund mafia getting their just deserts.

  32. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Nihixul · · Score: 1

    Presumably, the compassionate Commission "permits" this one device.

  33. Also illegal, but only at New York New York by sjonke · · Score: 1

    iPhone Sheep-Counting App

    --
    --- What?
  34. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Oidhche · · Score: 1

    God forbid, no! Of course not! What kind of a criminal mind would think of using pen and paper in a casino?!

  35. You Watch Too Much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was busted for card counting just 10 days ago in Vegas. The pit boss politely leaned over and said, "Sir, we are going to have to ask you to stop playing blackjack."

    I said, "ok", cashed in my chips and that was that. I got to keep the $200 I won and didn't even get escorted off the premises.

    1. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      That has been my experience too. I've never been busted at card counting but I've been at some tables where someone has. They just politely but firmly ask you to leave. They even let you keep the money because it isn't worth the scene you might make otherwise. $200 bucks, that is nothing to them but your bitch'n about being robbed might turn some people away who would be spending more money.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Rary · · Score: 1

      I got to keep the $200 I won and didn't even get escorted off the premises.

      Now try that with $200,000 of winnings instead of $200. Might be a slightly different story.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    3. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by blair1q · · Score: 1

      No, it wouldn't.

      They asked, he complied.

      The problems start when you refuse to comply.

      The request becomes a demand; then an escort; then a physical removal; and then a temporary incarceration and questioning while they wait for the po-po to come haul your security-assaulting (and well-mangled in response) ass off to the joint.

      How far you progress through this sequence depends on the point at which you start to comply.

    4. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by localman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be a poorly managed casino that didn't ask you to leave long before your card-counting winnings were $200,000.

      Cheers.

    5. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Rary · · Score: 1

      No, it wouldn't.

      They asked, he complied.

      The problems start when you refuse to comply.

      It has nothing to do with your willingness to comply. A player caught counting cards at a high-stakes table, who has made a large sum of money, will generally be banned for life from playing Blackjack at that casino, or any others owned by the same company.

      Just ask Andy Bloch or any of the other MIT players.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    6. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Rary · · Score: 1

      It would be a poorly managed casino that didn't ask you to leave long before your card-counting winnings were $200,000.

      Cheers.

      At a $5 table, this is true. At a $5000 table, not so much.

      Admittedly, $200,000 is a bit high (I was simply adding zeros to his number to make the point), but Andy Bloch has claimed to have made as much as $100,000 in a single card counting session at the Blackjack table.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    7. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you still get to walk away with all your money, and they aren't stupid enough to try and take you out back like it's still the 70's.

    8. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a Vegas casino decided you were counting cards and cut you off after winning $200? You sure that's why they asked you to leave?

    9. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? they really make a fuss for 200$?

    10. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were escorted off for winning 200 dollars? In a casino where people win and lose five figures without pit bosses blinking an eye?

      How the hell did you find people to mod you up for that steaming pile of bullshit?

    11. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by geekoid · · Score: 1

      200 bucks! holy cow it's amazing they didn't take you in back and beat you up! wow 200 bucks, that's some amount of cash...in 1952~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The MIT players had no control for 'luck'.

      anywho, it needs to be a very large ammount of money, and repeatable.

      However, the asino would rather ply you with drinks and a free room.
      In the 80's I did Casino security. You wouldn't not believe the shit some people try to pull. They use 40 year old card marking trick, and there not even good at it.
      Sometimes I would just walk up behind some and say "that's enough of that." Then they leave. Of course that was just penny ante bets about 50 buck or under.

      The single most important thing I learned while in the Casino industry is this:
      "Don't sleep with the pit bosses girl friend."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They let you keep the money, because it's legally yours.

    14. Re:You Watch Too Much TV by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      The single most important thing I learned while in the Casino industry is this: "Don't sleep with the pit bosses girl friend." Tell Cindy I say 'Hi'

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  36. Re:slashdot sensationalism by rograndom · · Score: 1

    Pen and paper are illegal if you're using them to count or try to gain an advantage. So are the casino's own chips, drinks, ice cubes, scraps of paper, etc if you're using them in that way. The law is intentionally vague with it's wording, mainly so it doesn't have to re-written everytime a new technology is developed. Any "instrument" is illegal. Please note that you brain is not an instrument, but the casino can still ban you from their property for any reason.

  37. Re:This app is for those of us... by tburke261 · · Score: 1

    Nice to see another hustle fan around

  38. Blacklist by necro81 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even if it weren't illegal, casinos really, really don't like card counters. Even those who do it entirely in their heads, if they are found out or simply start winning too consistently, can be asked to leave or escorted out of the casino. It's not a matter of legality or fairness; casinos regard it simply as cheating (anything that tips the odds they've established in their favor is cheating to them), barely above outright theft, and take action accordingly.

    In extreme cases, they can add you to a blacklist that other casinos subscribe to. Enforcement of the blacklist starts getting into really impressive, and scary, Big-Brother stuff that governments could only dream of - automatic face recognition and tracking, cross-checking faces against the black list, logging time spent at such-and-such location (i.e., table), who happens to be around the person at the same time (to sniff out collaborative counting groups). Casinos can do it because they have lots of money and incentive to do so, plus they are working this stuff in a smaller environment that they design and control to the hilt.

    1. Re:Blacklist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend was recently banned from all MGM Mirage casinos. It was a pretty simple/impressive/scary ordeal. The manager of the casino said something into his walkie talkie, and then told my friend "Look at that camera" and pointed to one of the many cameras around. That was it.

      No charges, but he is not welcome in any MGM Mirage casinos, any more.

    2. Re:Blacklist by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hah, no, casinos love card counters. They even sell how-to books in the gift shop.

      They don't want everyone to be a successful card counter of course, but they're perfectly happy to let you think you've got the chops to do it successfully. And to do that, they have to let a few successful ones slip through the cracks for a while.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  39. Illegal to possess by daveywest · · Score: 1

    Possession of a cheating device in a casino is a misdemeanor. Like others have said, using said device may be a death sentence.

  40. Re:This app is for those of us... by kcbanner · · Score: 1

    Not many appreciate that show's true awesomeness.

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  41. Plagiarism by monoqlith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Last paragraph:

    'The idea behind counting cards in blackjack is that a deck of cards with a high proportion of high cards (ten-valued cards and aces) to low cards is good for the player, while the reverse (a deck with a high proportion of low cards to high cards) is good for the dealer.[...]

    Wikipedia article on Card Counting:

    'The idea behind counting cards in blackjack is that a deck of cards with a high proportion of high cards (ten-valued cards and aces) to low cards is good for the player, while the reverse (a deck with a high proportion of low cards to high cards) is good for the dealer.'

    C'mon TechFragments. If you copy a Wikipedia article, which you shouldn't be doing anyway, you need to give a link back to the article you copied from and give proper attribution to its authors.

    1. Re:Plagiarism by Joe+Random · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, they'll have an article that just copies the dictionary definition of "Money Laundering".

    2. Re:Plagiarism by SirGarlon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who's to say TechFragments plagiarized Wikipedia, and not the other way around?

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:Plagiarism by RockMFR · · Score: 1

      I guess it's plausible that some people on Wikipedia saw the TechFragments article, went back in time more than 5 months ago, and changed the Wikipedia article. We all know how much liberals love time travel.

      But seriously, this is really unfortunate for TechFragments. They had a single link on Wikipedia before I made this post, and afterwards, they'll have none.

    4. Re:Plagiarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The history page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Card_counting&diff=271381893&oldid=270798108

      coupled with the article's publication date: Author: Wesley Roberts Category: Software 7 hours ago

    5. Re:Plagiarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's to say TechFragments plagiarized Wikipedia, and not the other way around?

      Me. Because I checked the history and found that the wikipedia article has contained that sentence for at least the last year.

    6. Re:Plagiarism by allgoodnamesaretaken · · Score: 0

      TechFragments is a comment counter.

    7. Re:Plagiarism by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      How do you know that: 1) that Wikipedia didn't rip off the author? The article isn't necessarily brand-new, it could have been around for a while. I know that I re-use useful content. Or that: 2) the author of the article and the author of the Wikipedia aren't the same?

      For me, the last straw was seeing articles that I had written myself ripped off into another person's publication, and then the Wiki page for the topic was edited with a citation to my material. Yeah, I should just remove the content from Wikipedia - yeah, right. The guardian of the page instantly reverts any removals.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Plagiarism by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

      I've just edited the Wikipedia page so that the part TechFragments quoted is cited to the TechFragments article--problem solved!

    9. Re:Plagiarism by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      1) Article history, as others here have pointed out, shows that this article has contained that paragraph since, at the very least, 5 months ago, while the TechFragments article was published yesterday.

      2) Just like I wouldn't cite my own work on Wikipedia in a research paper without noting that I was the author - well, I wouldn't use any work from Wikipedia in a term paper. But if I did, I would be sure to note whoever the authors were, if it was me or someone else, to prevent any confusion. You don't just take a sentence from another publication without giving proper attribution.

  42. How does this help? by feepness · · Score: 1

    If the screen is black you don't see the running count?

    Counting the cards is easy enough without the phone and becomes second nature. I can't look at a table without getting a sum nowadays.

    The hard part is memorizing all the tables, and the phone can't help with that.

    1. Re:How does this help? by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

      That is the same question I have. If the screen is off, how do you determine the count? I think it would be pretty damn obvious when you pull your iPhone out.

    2. Re:How does this help? by Zwicky · · Score: 1
      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  43. App not very useful in real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. ANY device used to count cards or cheat in any way is illegal. If you can do it in your head, you are ok. If doing it in you head card counting is perfectly legal (though they will probably toss you if they think you are doing it, or if you even just win too much)

    2. ANYONE who has been to vegas knows they don't let you dick around on your phone while playing. You can't even talk for any length of time (sometimes not at all). So reports/reviews of making 50 grand etc with this app is total BS.

    Only time I can see this being helpful is in online gambling, and maybe only if they tell you the number of decks used etc.

  44. Re:slashdot sensationalism by anethema · · Score: 1

    And do if caught counting! Even just in your head :D

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  45. Illegal my ass by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    May not be permitted on the grounds, but that does NOT make it illegal.

    Casinos do not make the laws and those that think they do should have their license revoked.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Illegal my ass by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Casinos do not make the laws

      You really must be new here.

  46. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Albio · · Score: 1

    Counting cards is not illegal, but if they think you're counting cards in your head they'll ask you to leave anyhow.

  47. Odd by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I looked at the pole dancers and boozed up, loosing maybe $20.

    Obviously you are smarter then I am.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Odd by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say ... if you're playing for money, then clearly the pole dancers are a detriment ... but for entertainment, it certainly SOUNDS interesting. ;)

    2. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "loosing," "then."

      Yes, I think I am.

    3. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it appears he can spell better than you can.

  48. Re:slashdot sensationalism by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    You mean it's unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, a brain?

    Ah, well, no surprise there.

    Exactly. Blackjack is the only game where the odds aren't already heavily stacked in favor of the house and then they make it illegal to use your skills? Yeah, learning how to play the game smart is cheating. That's like deducting points from Jeff Gordon for speeding. Well, I guess if the track itself was sponsoring drivers in the race and they stood to get a large wad of cash if their guys won, there would be some rule against speeding.

    Anyone who plays in a rigged game is asking to be taken for everything they have. I think part of our economic crisis is people are realizing the only difference between the stock market and Vegas is there's no showgirls on the trading floor. But wait a sec, the cable news money honeys... no Carrot Top. That's the difference, no Carrot Top.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  49. Re:slashdot sensationalism by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

    Card counting is not illegal, but as in any private establishment they can ask you to leave, at any time, with no reason given, and they can ban you, again with no reason given.... the only thing they cannot legally do is not give you your winnings.. unless they call the police and charge you with defrauding the casino ..

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  50. Re:slashdot sensationalism by LordKronos · · Score: 1

    I don't know whether a pen and paper would be considered illegal or not, but it would be irrelevant. You may be allowed to card count at a casino, but they aren't required to let you continue card counting. They've developed strategies to try an identify card counters, and once they suspect you of card counting, they'll simply ask you to leave. If you are sitting there with a pen and paper, you are only making it that much easier for them to identify you.

  51. Illegal inside a casino by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

    You are correct that the app itself isn't "illegal" in a general sense, but it is a crime to possess it inside of a casino in the state of Nevada:

    It is unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, any device to assist: (2) In keeping track of the cards played

    CRIMES AND LIABILITIES CONCERNING GAMING

    1. Re:Illegal inside a casino by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I have photographic memory and can do calculus in my head. Does that mean i cant bring my brain in?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Illegal inside a casino by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes. It is a crime punishable by, perhaps, banishment, maybe a savage beating, or even your agonizing death at the hands of a large Italian gentleman from Chicago. You are not allowed to think, you are not allowed to use your brain to work the odds. Somehow, winning is not permitted.

      The fact that they can get away with this says all that needs to be said about the USA's love of the Mafia. We really think they are the schiznit.

      Don't feed the mob. Stay out of Vegas and Reno.

    3. Re:Illegal inside a casino by DoktorSeven · · Score: 1

      You can, but they'll throw you out.

      Because gambling is for stupid people, you know. Any advantage smart people can use in their little games isn't tolerated.

      All the more reason to avoid gambling garbage in the first place.

      --
      This is a sig. Deal with it.
    4. Re:Illegal inside a casino by the+phantom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stay out of Vegas and Reno.

      But... but... I live in Reno!

  52. Cut decks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I was in a casino I saw the tiny decks and ran to the table. I'd had no problems counting on an 8 deck shoe in the past so I was excited at the faster turnaround.

    When I watch the table for a minute, I realize they cut the deck in half, discard half, and play with the other half. EVERY FACE CARD could be in the other half... there is no way to know. DOH!

    It was alright though. I just sat at the bar and played $5 video poker to get a free drink, and cashed out as soon as I was up or even. Yay for free beer!

  53. Re:slashdot sensationalism by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

    Exactly. There's a difference between illegal and getting kicked out of a casino. Casinos don't like losing money. If they spot a card counter they basically just say, "If you leave in the next 5 minutes we won't have Bubba and Tiny throw you out for trespassing. Oh, and never come back."

    This differs from legitimate winning because those types of winners are more likely to give those winnings right back to the casino. They're also more likely to excite those around them. Those losses for the casino are acceptable.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  54. Fine for Nevada, but... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ...thanks to the native Americans, there are card rooms and casinos popping up everywhere. And not all of them are as smart or well equipped as the Vegas mob is. Smart card counters can just steer clear of the big operations and still make plenty of money elsewhere.

    The problem will be explaining why you are fiddling with your iPhone when there's no cellular coverage out in Dogpatch, Kentucky.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Fine for Nevada, but... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Put it on vibrate, and use codes that someone not playing but watching sends you.

      It's all pointless, becasue the only way to use card counting is to change yor bet. A pattern a viewer will have confidence in will emerge pretty quick.
      If you are playing for large sums, they can ply you with drink. IF you don't partake, they can just ask you to leave. No, they don't need a reason to ask you to leave. They have the right to refuse service.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. Re:slashdot sensationalism by WebCowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also, counting cards is not illegal in any shape or form.

    Counting cards WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF DEVICES is legal. If you can do it in your head, signal to collaborating people what the conditions are, etc. you cannot be charged, but if you are discovered counting cards you can be escorted off the property, as is the right of the private establishment.

    However, if you use ANY sort of device, be it mechanical or electronic--even so much as a pad of post-it notes and a pen, you are now not only going to be escorted off the property, you are actually breaking the law and are likely to be arrested.

    sooo...you are actually quite wrong when you say counting cards IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM is legal, because it clearly is not--only UNASSISTED counting of cards is legal.

    Incidentally, the rule also applies to any gambling activity on the casino, not just card games. Some video slot machines have been known to have a poor pseudo-random algorithm and there have been a couple of cases I know of where mathematically inclined people have noticed this and profited from it. In one case, the casino could not press charges because the person in question actually sat and watched the machine himself for many hours. In another case, a concealed photographic device was used to do the observing and that person was charged and convicted.

  56. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't suppose pen and paper are legal, are they?

    Not if you are using them to count cards.

  57. Re:slashdot sensationalism by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

    yup, gambling is effectively a tax on stupidity.

    Maybe I just say that cause I find gambling to be no fun. Seriously, is blackjack not the most boring game ever or what? Now poker, I can see. But blackjack?

    --
    blah blah blah
  58. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which part of "except as permitted by the Commission" is too difficult for you to understand?

  59. CSMs are to save time. by rnelsonee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the 'high roller'/VIP rooms you still see traditional shoes more often. The bigger players like them, both because it's more traditional, and because they at least operate under the illusion they have a better chance of winning.

    Now, lowly players like me still would prefer a shoe, but the casinos know that CSMs make more money - *not* by preventing card counting (which isn't happening at the low tables anyway) but by simply cutting out the time it takes the dealer to shuffle. More hands per hour = more money.

  60. The whole idea of poker is statistics. by anonieuweling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is counting cards illegal in poker or whatever playing environment? The whole idea of poker is statistics. And there's even a rule/law against that? Land of the free?

  61. Re:slashdot sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean it's unlawful for any person at a licensed gaming establishment to use, or possess with the intent to use, a brain?

    Ah, well, no surprise there.

    That went to SCOTUS, and as long as you only use your brain without any help the casinos can't do anything legally besides kicking you out.

  62. Just watch the stupid MIT black jack show already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just watch the stupid MIT black jack show already. It is entertaining and enlightening. Master card counters work in groups where you've got someone counting the cards but not winning and when the count goes really in your favor you signal for the closer to come to the table, clean up and go.

  63. Check your brains at the door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the NRS 465.075 regulation prohibit me from bringing my brain into a casino?

    GC

  64. Re:Making Money in Casinos is Illegal - untrue by HEbGb · · Score: 1

    That's not true at all. Card counting is perfectly legal, as long as you aren't using a "device".

  65. If I had mod points I'd mod this up by M1rth · · Score: 0, Troll

    Really, wow - Casinos do cheat. The info on what they do (like stacking 10 decks to the 'shoe', rigging up the odds on the slot machines and dice games, etc) is available all over the net.

    Gotta wonder, how many casino employees did it take logging in to find the mod points to call an honest and insightful post "flamebait"?

    --
    If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
  66. Why is this a law? by professorguy · · Score: 1
    Just repeal the law and let anyone count with anything that doesn't slow down play. Heck, you could have a display above the dealer showing all cards played so far.

    .

    You'd instantly see that the casinos all protect themselves by dealing only 3 decks into a 10 deck shoe, then going to the next shoe. That eliminates pretty much all the advantage you could glean from card counting.

    Why does every problem require a fucking lawyer? Some just need a mathematician.

  67. Yeah, but you lose money at Disney. by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's the thing. If you are going to a casino to get money, you are kinda missing the point. The whole essence of the casino is sin, getting the drinks and the hookers and the whole nine yards of decadence and then a good steak, cigar, and a game of cards. That's a man's way to do things.

    I mean, you could go to Disney and blow a few hundred bucks on Dumbo balloons... or you could go to Vegas, and gamble, get hammered and get laid. Hmmm, if you are going to blow money, why not blow it something cool. Believe me, once you get married, the gambling, cards, drinking are all going to go away.

    The only thing that sucks about so many casinos and bars is that you can't smoke at them. What a stupid thing. A bunch of people whining about second hand smoke and then they all drive home drunk. It's just stupid. Quit being such a pussy about cancer, and smoke up.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Yeah, but you lose money at Disney. by Knara · · Score: 1

      Mod.

      Parent.

      Up.

    2. Re:Yeah, but you lose money at Disney. by Resident+Emil · · Score: 1

      Believe me, once you get married, the gambling, cards, drinking are all going to go away.

      This kind of statements never cease to amaze me. Why in the world did you enter a marriage where things you like are taken away from you?

    3. Re:Yeah, but you lose money at Disney. by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      That's a man's way to do things.

      For a given value of 'man'.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    4. Re:Yeah, but you lose money at Disney. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "This kind of statements never cease to amaze me. Why in the world did you enter a marriage where things you like are taken away from you?"

      Dude, from what I've heard from just about EVERY married man I've talked to...both friends and strangers, it is TRUE. They have to give up a multitude of things, sexual fun often included. I think if most men knew what they were truly getting themselves into, they'd not tied the knot.

      I thank God I was lucky enough (upon reflection) to basically dodge marriage twice and remain single. I get to 'upgrade' to a newer model chick periodically so nothing gets stale, and I don't risk losing half my shit every time I do so....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Yeah, but you lose money at Disney. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Quit being such a pussy about cancer, and smoke up.

      Wow, just wow. No thanks, I'd rather not.

  68. Go to a college casino night! by fustar · · Score: 1

    I remember as an undergrad we would hold our yearly casino night at our dorm. The math and physics professors would sit down and clear us out. Good thing max bets were $2. If I knew about card counting then...

  69. Obvious gestures by phorm · · Score: 1

    And obvious gestures are usually the easiest ones to get caught using.

  70. Re:slashdot sensationalism by blair1q · · Score: 1

    The Nevada laws are friendly to you, as they permit gambling and guarantee an open set of rules.

    Because the games are profitable (which is due to the human nature of believing you can beat a game that is openly stacked against you), the casinos can afford to make the gaming place a very enjoyable place to be (the fact that this helps feed your belief that you can beat the game is no coincidence, but no detriment, either).

    There is no law anywhere that forces you to gamble in a casino in Nevada. You are free to stay home and save your money.

    The rest of us will go have fun and pay a fair amount for the privilege.

  71. Re:slashdot sensationalism by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Yup. They have the right to refuse service to anyone, and to do it completely arbitrarily.

  72. Wow, I got a "troll" mark. by M1rth · · Score: 1

    Go ahead Casino rejects... the truth will be told. You can't downmod insightful, truthful posts forever.

    --
    If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
  73. That's nice, but... by slapout · · Score: 1

    Is the iPhone a good driver?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  74. Re:slashdot sensationalism by swaq · · Score: 1

    "legitimate winning"? Are you implying that card counting in your head is not a legitimate way to win? Perhaps you meant "winning by luck"?

  75. Re:slashdot sensationalism by mmandt · · Score: 1

    yup, gambling is effectively a tax on stupidity.

    You mean, the lottery is a tax on stupidity.

    Gambling is part of life. You can't walk out your door without gambling that a satellite won't fall out of the sky and strike you on the head.

    Seriously though, I like sports betting. My favorite bet to make is when two teams are fairly even matches, but the odds are very lopsided. Like the Super Bowl, the Cardinals were going to give the Steelers a good game. But the Steelers were a heavy favorite, cause... they are playing the Cardinals. It was easy money with the 6.5 point spread.

    Point being, if someone bets you 3 to 1 that a coin will land on heads and you know your odds are 2 to 1. Then you take the bet. Its still gambling, but it is far from stupid. In sports gambling and all variety of casino games, the astute gambler can make it pay.

    The one big exception to this is the lotto. (Though, at one point I believed the lotto was beatable. Then I found out that they switch out the balls regularly). Regardless, I find it especially puzzling that this is the only legal form of gambling in most states. Both the lotto and slots have a guaranteed percent on house odds. However, the lotto stands alone in that there is no way you can game it to your advantage. I have often said that the lotto is a tax on people who don't know math.

  76. Re:slashdot sensationalism by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I was thinking from the casino's position. You are right, "winning by luck" is a better way of putting it. Basically the casinos want people that play for fun and entertainment while discouraging people that are trying to make money at it. And since they can refuse service to anyone they want...

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
  77. Duh..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Obviously, card-counting with a device, mechanical, electronic, or even a pencil and paper, is flagrantly illegal. Everybody knows this.

    However, card-counting in your head is not.

    *BUT* they can kick you out if they suspect you are counting cards in your head, or will use any number of methods to screw up your mental counting, such as distraction (hecklers, waitresses with great tits, etc. They use the same methods for dice controllers too.).

    Keep in mind, if someone says "This table is too hot for you", then leave. Immediately.

    Card Counters caught cheating with a device are handed over to the police (if they are lucky), your mugshot is taken by casino personnel, and you are placed into a Black Book database, and effectively banned from every casino with access to the database.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  78. $200? by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    you probably exerted more effort and time than a shift at a fast food restaurant, and wound up with less money, and didn't have mob run casinos red flagging you every time you go in a door. that's WHY you didn't have a visit to a room with no cameras with some intimidating fellas: its just $200

    now if you were making $2,000 ok, its worth your effort. $20,000 even better. but then the casinos wouldn't just ask you to leave

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:$200? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      People go and play at casinos and LOSE $200, so there must be some entertainment value there. If you can play and win a little, or break even, they why not?

      Personally, I don't understand why you'd play anyway, but then, I have the opposite of an addictive personality. I got bored after about six coins in the nickel slots. Worse, I kept winning so I kept having more nickels to get rid of.

  79. Hey, it's no biggie ... by gordguide · · Score: 1

    Getting caught cheating Vegas Casinos? No biggie.

    So, you lose your phone. Or is it the use of your right hand. I can never get those two straight.

  80. Want to cheat the cheats? by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    There's an app for that.

  81. Re:slashdot sensationalism by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Using a device to assist with card counting IS illegal, as well as trying to calculate odds on other table games.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  82. 1983 - Computer beats Casino Roulette by Cliff+Stoll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the early 1980's, a group of Santa Cruz physics grad students built a set of computers into their cowboy boots. These timed the spinning of roulette wheels and applied Newtonian physics.

    Thomas Bass wrote this up in the 1985 book, The Eudaemonic Pie, and caused the Nevada Gaming Commission to ban the use of these devices.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eudaemonic_Pie

  83. Nevada is owned by the casinos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure that this should even be considered "cheating" because all you're doing is using perfect strategy. To me, it's fundamentally different from, say, having aces up your sleeve.

    Anyhow, the fact that there are laws like this with penalties that severe reminds me of how the RIAA operates. Of course, I'm having trouble seeing the difference between the MAFIAA and the mafia, so that's hardly surprising.

    But there's no way that cheating in a casino is any worse than ordinary theft and I don't see why it gets especially harsh punishment except as a favor to casinos.

    1. Re:Nevada is owned by the casinos... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Nevada has NO personal income tax, the money collected as tax from casino profits is a very large portion of the state budget... So they frown on people peeing in their revenue stream. It's considered cheating because a device is being used to track the probability of a favorable hand being dealt to the player, if you do it in your head it is OK.

      People have built many devices to keep count and it's always considered a felony to use them in the state of Nevada. In fact, many devices are a felony to even OWN... Here come the iPhone police, oh joy.

      BTW, the current thing going on is teams where team players keep a count at a few (or many) tables and the "High Roller" sits in at a hot table at the opportune moment based on signals sent from each tables team member. The casinos are now reworking the software to correlate groups of players to try and discourage this behavior, but it is a lot harder when you have enough people to rotate them in and out of small teams and work various casinos.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:Nevada is owned by the casinos... by ztransform · · Score: 1

      BTW, the current thing going on is teams where team players keep a count at a few (or many) tables and the "High Roller" sits in at a hot table at the opportune moment based on signals sent from each tables team member. The casinos are now reworking the software to correlate groups of players to try and discourage this behavior, but it is a lot harder when you have enough people to rotate them in and out of small teams and work various casinos.

      A simple solution is for the casinos themselves to count their own cards. When the odds become favourable they then shuffle the deck.

    3. Re:Nevada is owned by the casinos... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that is not uncommon. In at least one casino I frequented, one requirement for dealing used to be the ability to count the deck down accurately in under one minute, I don't know if that still holds true. The casinos adjust their behavior if the amount of play drops off, so they don't always cold deck a game for fear of losing players. They are now looking at continuous shufflers that reintroduce all the cards into play after each hand, but that has the same danger of losing players.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  84. -1 Offtopic by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    Ah, yes, Albert Einstein, the great statesman. Truly the one to turn to for theories of diplomacy, and not such paltry matters as physics.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:-1 Offtopic by Rary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

      Ah, yes, Albert Einstein, the great statesman. Truly the one to turn to for theories of diplomacy, and not such paltry matters as physics.

      Yes, because a man with such a brilliant mind for theoretical physics can't possibly have any insights into anything else.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    2. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

      Ah, yes, Albert Einstein, the great statesman. Truly the one to turn to for theories of diplomacy, and not such paltry matters as physics.

      Yes, because a man with such a brilliant mind for theoretical physics can't possibly have any insights into anything else.

      Question: How does one prevent war? Assume you are running (via democracy or dictatorship or a republic-like appointment) a country, what is your strategy to prevent war?

      I assume you are kind to your neighbors and trading partners (read: make alliances, i.e., prepare for war).

      I assume you don't needlessly piss off other countries (read: avoid adding to the number of potential enemies, i.e., prepare for war).

      I assume you allow your citizenry to be informed and armed (read: defend freedom, i.e., prepare for war).

      I assume you keep foreign miscreants out of the country and maintain some level of monitoring of your borders for taxation and standard import restrictions (read: border security, i.e., prepare for war).

      Here is my question for you, young Einstein, how does one simultaneiously prevent war and NOT prepare for it? I will bookmark this post and checkback if you have any insights. Thanks.

    3. Re:-1 Offtopic by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      Sure, he could.

      The thing is, in any field besides theoretical physics, he has no more credibility than you or I.

      I wouldn't ask him to run a 7-11 or set the timing chain on my truck, either. I'm sure he'd be capable of learning how to do either, but he hasn't, and it's best to ask elsewhere.

      I'm also sure he has opinions on running a 7-11 or setting a timing chain, but opinions aren't worth much. Demonstrated competence is worth something, and he never demonstrated competence in timing chain maintenance, convenience store operations, or statecraft.

      Having an opinion you agree with isn't demonstrating competence, it's just having an opinion you agree with..

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:-1 Offtopic by Rary · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'm really not interested in getting into an in-depth discussion of eight words that someone else wrote that I happen to like and stuck in my sig on a whim. Go ahead and re-read your own post and contemplate what you've argued. You've simply redefined every single act as "preparing for war", whether or not that act actually has anything whatsoever to do with preparing for war.

      Why don't you track down the context in which Mr. Einstein's eight words were originally found and perhaps you'll find the answer you're looking for.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    5. Re:-1 Offtopic by Rary · · Score: 1

      The thing is, in any field besides theoretical physics, he has no more credibility than you or I.

      Actually, given his much broader and more extensive life experience and his actual work with world leaders, I would consider him to be more informed and credible than myself.

      If you've read any of his non-physics work, and don't find it to be filled with any insight and wisdom, well, that's fine by me. You're not required to agree with everyone on everything.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    6. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is all the same, I'll wait until you make an assertion you're willing to defend.

  85. Re:slashdot sensationalism by stine2469 · · Score: 1

    hell, just email the application to the pit boss, or perhaps the GM ...since you only have to posses it to be convicted, any attachment downloaded to an iPhone or blackberry would make them guilty...

    hell, if you could write a program that ran in motorola hand-held radios, you could clear the casinos of ALL of their employees

    nah, i'll just stay home and play solitaire.

  86. This is non-news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Card counting is legal, the casino's don't like it but it is.

    However, using any kind of computing device, either electronic of mechanical, is illegal. Period.
     

  87. Re:slashdot sensationalism by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Observation: The human brain is a device that has all of these capabilities and more.

    The mental card counter playing with an optimal strategy uses the human brain to: (1) project the outcome, (2) keep track [count] of cards played, (3) provide insight into probability of occurence of certain card values being dealt, and (4) providing the user with analysis of the game for best strategy as of how to proceed.

    So under this law, you would have to remove your brain before sitting down at the blackjack table, the same at any card-game where the human brain can provide such advantage.

  88. Re:slashdot sensationalism by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Just waiting for someone with a mental impairment to get the law overturned under the Americans with Disabilities act, since certain conceivable assistive technologies (i.e. memory aids) could also be used to gain an advantage in games like blackjack.

  89. Blackjack for fun and profit by UnixUnix · · Score: 1

    I have been counting cards in Blackjack for years and grinding out a modest return -- it pays for the trip to Vegas and concommitant fun. No, I don't use iPhone or other devices. The danger of detection exists -- the casinos videotape everything and can rerun the session and assess your play. The solution is to lose yourself in the crowd: play for an hour at most before you move on, and avoid greed.

    And so it was, for years... until the 6- and 8- deck shoes became ubiquitous and utterly diluted the counter's advantage. Thanks for the memories :)

    1. Re:Blackjack for fun and profit by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "play for an hour at most before you move on, and avoid greed. "

      dude, that negates any possible real gain from counting. Any advantage you believe you have is in your head.

      And no, multicard decks do NOT dilute the counter advantage. It's still the same... unless the casino you go to adds a uno deck or something.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  90. Why illegal? by RolfRomeo · · Score: 1

    The underlying goal of any game is to win. The rules of casino-games are set up to make winning in the long run nearly impossible. I can never understand why counting is illegal. You are simply navigating within the rules of the game, to increase your chance of winning. Now I realize this is about not using an appliance to gain an edge, but I get the feeling manual counting is almost equally frowned upon. You are allowed to sit there and give your money away, but try to win and you're in the gray? I smell corruption from all the way across the atlantic.

    1. Re:Why illegal? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      It actually wasn't illegal until 1985.
      Previously they ahd the right to refuse you service.

      Making it illegal probably came about becasue people who came to power in the industry don't actually understand the practicality of the industry. See RIAA.

      You can count in your head, the law specifically talks about devices.
      The casino does have the right to refuse service...however there not likely to care on any small wager.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. All of the odds are belong to us by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 1

    We are the house. We control the odds. You may not do anything that shifts the odds to your favor. Just hand the money over without making a fuss. Thank you for playing.

  92. iPhone App isn't even in the Top 100! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The interesting thing is that iPhone application is not even in the Top 100 paid apps on iTunes. Instead another App with simular name, "Card Counter", has risen into the Top 25 probably because they are taking the legal approach and offering a video game that trains you to count without a device. As somebody pointed out you still have to learn basic strategy so it makes since to also learn how to count instead of using an illegal device and ending up in jail!

  93. True enough by jeko · · Score: 1

    ...but I was using the verb "counting" in the same sense as "flying." If you're not doing it successfully, you're not "flying" any more, you're "falling". :-)

    But yes, you're absolutely correct. Reminds me of a quote I heard from a casino boss, something along the lines of "Some people come with their paycheck. We send free food to those people. Some people come with real money. Those people we comp rooms for. Some people come with real money and a SYSTEM. We send limos and women for those guys..."

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  94. A Blackjack Card Counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is inaccurate.

    The App is actually called "A Blackjack Card Counter" created by Webtopia http://www.webtopia.com.au/apps/bjcardcounter.php and is available in the iTunes store.

    http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=294151538&mt=8

  95. Felony to own...? by LionMage · · Score: 1

    People have built many devices to keep count and it's always considered a felony to use them in the state of Nevada. In fact, many devices are a felony to even OWN... Here come the iPhone police, oh joy.

    Naturally, this piques my curiosity (and gives me the urge to go out and purchase or build such a device just so I can own something that is illegal in another state). But after reading the statute in question, I am not really clear on what specific items are a felony to own. The only section that stands out in that regard is NRS 465.080, which outlines materials prohibited because they can be used to make counterfeit coins, chips, tokens, etc.

    Lead and lead alloys are on that list, so technically you could get arrested if you're found with a lead fishing weight in your pocket. (Yeah, I know, lead is being replaced by tungsten and other metals for sinkers.) If two or more items from the prohibited list are on your person (say, a torch and a pair of tongs), that permits a "rebuttable inference" that you intended to use them for cheating... and not, say, lighting charcoal for your hookah. I'm assuming a "rebuttable inference" means that you're allowed to provide a rebuttal to the claim you're using the items for cheating, presumably by telling the authorities what you were really using them for.

    So anyway, I'd really like to know what devices are actually a felony to own.

    The rest of the statute is just as scary sounding. Casino employees are permitted to detain and question anyone suspected of cheating. In what other state of the Union would a non-cop or other non-state, non-federal employee be permitted to do such a thing? They don't even have to worry about civil or criminal liability for conducting such questioning or for detaining someone against their will. Any "evidence" seized does not have to be returned if the case goes to trial, and can be disposed of even if it isn't produced in court. Devices seized which don't result in charges, but which are considered prohibited devices, are still retained by the Gaming Board and destroyed by them.

    So, probably not a good idea to take your iPhone into any casino just to be safe, because even if you're deemed innocent, you might not get your property back.

    1. Re:Felony to own...? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Lead and lead alloys are on that list, so technically you could get arrested if you're found with a lead fishing weight in your pocket. (Yeah, I know, lead is being replaced by tungsten and other metals for sinkers.)

      As used in this subsection, "paraphernalia for manufacturing slugs" means the equipment, products and materials that are intended for use or designed for use in manufacturing, producing, fabricating, preparing, testing, analyzing, packaging, storing or concealing a counterfeit facsimile of the chips, tokens, debit instruments or other wagering instruments... So if you have an old fishing weight, NBD, but if you have a box of them along with tools to cast them into slugs that work in slot machines, bad news.

      If two or more items from the prohibited list are on your person (say, a torch and a pair of tongs), that permits a "rebuttable inference" that you intended to use them for cheating... and not, say, lighting charcoal for your hookah.

      If you are smoking charcoal you will not last long enough for them to arrest you, the monoxide will do you in... you meant hibachi perhaps?

      So anyway, I'd really like to know what devices are actually a felony to own.

      They leave that open because to produce a list of items would instantly create the "My client's cheating device is not on your list" defense. Any device intended to be used for cheating covers future advances in gaming and cheating technology. And they don't normally go after someone without already having them on video cheating... they can still be SUED for abusing people that are found not guilty.

      Another thing no one mentioned was that once someone is busted for using their iPhone to cheat, what legal ground are the programmers on?

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  96. AH, how times change by geekoid · · Score: 1

    When I work in the industry, the boars sent out a memo reminding Casinos that card counting device where NOT illegal; however the casino did have the right to refuse service to anyone.

    Now it's a law. So now I can't even open a casino the explicit allowed them.

    "These timed the spinning of roulette wheels and applied Newtonian physics."
    to what gain? I mean they must ahve found a person who doesn't know how to throw a ball for that to work.or devised a way to calculate spin for each throw. I'd like to see this in action.
    Naturally the way this should ahve been countered is with all bets stand as soon as the wheel starts spinning.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  97. Re:slashdot sensationalism by ericrost · · Score: 1

    Right, so I'll let the suckers go to the casinos, and I'll spend my money in a way that brings me enjoyment. Which doesn't include paying the light and air conditioning bills for a bunch of mobsters in the desert. :)

  98. Webtopia's "A Blackjack Card Counter" sales are up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is about my app!

    The media interest means sales are up! http://www.cairns.com.au/article/2009/02/21/29805_local-news.html

    For more about it see
    http://www.webtopia.com.au/apps/bjcardcounter.php

    or the iTunes Store
    http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=294151538&mt=8