Slashdot Mirror


$100 Linux Wall-Wart Now Available

nerdyH sends us to LinuxDevices for a description of a tiny Linux device called the Marvell SheevaPlug. "A $100 Linux wall wart could do to servers what netbooks did to notebooks. With the Marvell SheevaPlug, you get a completely open (hardware and software) Linux server resembling a typical wall-wart power adapter, but running Linux on a 1.2GHz CPU, with 512MB of RAM, and 512MB of Flash. I/O includes USB 2.0, gigabit Ethernet, while expansion is provided via an SDIO slot. The power draw is a nightlight-like 5 Watts. Marvell says it plans to give Linux developers everything they need to deliver 'disruptive' services on the device." The article links four products built on the SheevaPlug, none of them shipping quite yet. The development kit is available from Marvell.

464 comments

  1. Did anyone else read this as by nebaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    $100 Linux Wall-Mart now available? That would be cool.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was wondering what in the hell it was. -sigh- End of a long day.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Did anyone else read this as by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

      No way man. I only buy in bulk. I'm not gonna get excited until I can get a $100 Sam's Club.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Did anyone else read this as by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope they sell them at Wal-mart. A Wal-mart Wall-Wart would be cool!

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of OW!! OW!! STOP HITTING ME!!!

    4. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering there shouldn't have been a hyphen I'm not entirely to blame for miss reading it.

    5. Re:Did anyone else read this as by uberjack · · Score: 1

      It says "Wall-Mart", meaning it's just a cheap Korean knockoff superstore. Like a Sorny, or a Magnetbox

    6. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      yeah, it took several tries before I read it as wall-wart.

    7. Re:Did anyone else read this as by cthulu_mt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I imagine hitting you all the time.

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    8. Re:Did anyone else read this as by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nope, it's that Wall-Wart is too close to our conditioned recognition of Wal-Mart. Your brain has too much crap to do to read every letter of every word, and try to puzzle things out...It uses a sort of constant shape/context interpolation. That's why misspelled words don't prevent you from understanding what the word is supposed to be.

      If they'd spelled it correctly (e.g. "wall wart") without the caps and hyphen, it wouldn't have fallen into the same framework, and everyone wouldn't have read it and gone, "Linux Wal-Mart? WTF?"

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    9. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of...

      No joke. If they come out with a Gig of memory, I'll buy 20 or so and set up my own compute farm. I'd really like to get my hand on a sample and a cross-compiler to see what 1.2 GHz ARM means for my application...

      --

      Stephan

    10. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Daetrin · · Score: 0

      I hope they sell them at Wal-mart. A Wal-mart Wall-Wart would be cool!

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of OW!! OW!! STOP HITTING ME!!!


      It works even better if you say it in the right accent. "Imagine a weowulf cluster of wall-mart wall-warts!"

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    11. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      Stop hitting you?

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    12. Re:Did anyone else read this as by nerdman978 · · Score: 1

      I actually did read that as Linux wal-mart, thats the only reason why I read the article

    13. Re:Did anyone else read this as by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      The article says it has SDIO and from the pic in the article it looks like there is an SD card slot on one side. So all you need to do is buy a 1 Gig SD card.

    14. Re:Did anyone else read this as by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      Ack, you probably were referring to having 1 Gig of RAM on board and not extra storage.

    15. Re:Did anyone else read this as by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently Linux devices was running their site on this thing and it melted to the wall.

    16. Re:Did anyone else read this as by moderatorrater · · Score: 0

      It also has to do with the fact that 'W' and 'M' look so similar. I think the lower case and the space would have helped, but probably not enough to clear it up completely.

    17. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read this as $100 Linux Computers at Wal-Mart.

      That would be cool

    18. Re:Did anyone else read this as by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I'll pay them $100 to get rid of Wal-Mart! :D

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    19. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      For me it was more of the previous stories about Wal-Mart selling linux boxes combined with other stories of $100 laptops.

      I noticed the spelling but thought it was just another person with a quirky way of spelling Wal-Mart, e.g. wally world.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    20. Re:Did anyone else read this as by jo42 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a $100 Linux Wall-E.

    21. Re:Did anyone else read this as by amirulbahr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they'd spelled it correctly (e.g. "wall wart") without the caps and hyphen, it wouldn't have fallen into the same framework, and everyone wouldn't have read it and gone, "Linux Wal-Mart? WTF?"

      The insidious kdawson strikes again.

    22. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

      Ack, you probably were referring to having 1 Gig of RAM on board and not extra storage.

      Yep. 512 MB of flash disk is plenty if all you need is a bit of Python, ssh, and a 200 kB executable. But 512 MB RAM is on the low side if you cannot reasonably swap.

      --

      Stephan

    23. Re:Did anyone else read this as by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Nightlight-like Wal-Mart Wall Wart. It practically rolls off the tongue...

    24. Re:Did anyone else read this as by gparent · · Score: 5, Funny

      I imagine a Beowulf cluster of us hitting him.

    25. Re:Did anyone else read this as by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      It really is amazing how effective and powerful the brain's sorta visaul hashing is. Its also amazing how distracting and irritating collisions in that hash are and how long it takes to sort them out.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    26. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll buy 20 or so and set up my own compute farm.

      Er, why? 20 x $100 = $2000. For that you get 20 1.2Ghz ARMv5 cores with a total of 10GB of NUMA memory. You'll also need a 24 port Gigabit switch, so make that $2500.

      For less than $2500 you could just buy a couple of Intel Core i7s and 8GB of memory (unified) memory, and it would blow those 20 ARM CPUs out of the water.

      I know "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!" sounds cool, but unless you have a specific interest in parallel computing and you're on a very tight budget, it's pretty pointless.

    27. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Sun+Chi · · Score: 1

      I read it and went, "kdawson accidentally the $100 Linux Wall-Mart!"

    28. Re:Did anyone else read this as by setagllib · · Score: 1

      You may as well buy a desktop computer valued at 2k. A compute farm built out of 20 ARMs with 512MB RAM each (total 10GB), or a single machine with 16GB RAM and probably just as much raw processing power (quad core * high ghz * high flops per hz). You can bet that saving the overhead of networking is worth it even if the total FLOPS is a bit lower. And you get a GPU for GPGPU work.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    29. Re:Did anyone else read this as by peektwice · · Score: 1

      I read it as wall art. In a way, it is artful.

      --
      Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
    30. Re:Did anyone else read this as by _ivy_ivy_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only hard part would be is figuring out how to efficiently plug in your "beowart" cluster into power strips.

    31. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, as in, you know, MEMORY, not storage.

      Posting AC since some moron will come posting that storage memory is also memory! ..

    32. Re:Did anyone else read this as by aliquis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Atleast you can rest assure DealExtreme sell replacement screens for your Nokla N82!

    33. Re:Did anyone else read this as by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Especially when I'm standing on my head...

    34. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also activated the part of my brain storing info about the $100 linux PC that was being sold at Wal-Mart a few years ago. Then I noticed the word order didn't make sense for that. Then I noticed the extra l. And only then did I realize it was Wart rather than Mart. heh. :) "m" being a lot more common than "w" didn't help either.

    35. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They really do look alike, especially when reading in a hurry. Mhat's wore, editors such as kdamson mould do us all a big favor by paying wore attention to hom they mord their titles. Knom mhat I wean?

    36. Re:Did anyone else read this as by shawb · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    37. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Garganus · · Score: 1

      friends don't let friends shop at the rat shack.</smartassery>
      a much cheaper (per device) alternate cord

    38. Re:Did anyone else read this as by TheDreadedGMan · · Score: 1

      in soviet russia, hitting imagines you.

    39. Re:Did anyone else read this as by sharperguy · · Score: 1

      Lol Didn't even realise it said Wart until I read that message

      --
      "sudo rm -rf your-face"
    40. Re:Did anyone else read this as by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Mhat's wore, eqitors snch as kdamsou monlq qo ns all a pig fa^or by baying wore atteutiou to hom they morq their titles. Kuom mhat I weau?

      If you're going to do it.....do it right.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    41. Re:Did anyone else read this as by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      sorta visaul hashing

      Yes....it is. (:

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    42. Re:Did anyone else read this as by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      No kidding.

      You could also go to eBay and pick up a bunch of 1GHz P3s with half a Gig of memory, probably for $20-30 each, and a lot more powerful.

      Unless for some reason you want your compute farm to use less power than your chandelier, which would be cool in itself. Although you've got to consider your cost per FLOP, unless you're solely going for geek "because I can" cred.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    43. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Splintax · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? Every other Slashdot post has a capitalized title, so why should this one differ? And why is "wall wart" any more correct than "wall-wart"?

    44. Re:Did anyone else read this as by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Bizarrely enough, the first thought in my head was "Wal-Mart only has one ell"

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    45. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a second i did comprehend it as an 100$ linux laptop being sold at wal-mart heh..

    46. Re:Did anyone else read this as by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      Watch out for falling literacy...

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    47. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Lissajous · · Score: 1

      You thought it was odd that there was a spelling mistake in a Slashdot article? You must be new here.

    48. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who tries to mention "beowolf cluster" and "atomic supermen" in the same sentence deserves to be hit.

    49. Re:Did anyone else read this as by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Funny

      Twenty computers the size of wall worts plugged into four power strips?

      Damn, that is cute computing. If it didn't cost $2k to do, it'd be something I'd do right now. Think of the bragging rights: "Yeah, this mid-tower? it's got 20, 1.2GHz cores with 10Gb of RAM."

      Though, personally, I'd probably just nail the power strips on a piece of plywood and display them in the living room...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    50. Re:Did anyone else read this as by noidentity · · Score: 1

      A beowolf cluster? I think you mean an outlet strip full of these!

    51. Re:Did anyone else read this as by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      No...

      The bizarre part is that I read Wall-Wart, and noticed the double l and not the W.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    52. Re:Did anyone else read this as by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      Yes, because they wouldn't want people accidentally clicking on more links now, would they...

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    53. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOOOOSSSH!

    54. Re:Did anyone else read this as by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      I imagine a beowulf cluster of hits landing on him.

    55. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The insidious K-Dawson strikes again."

      Fixed that for you.

    56. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to go... go overboard.

    57. Re:Did anyone else read this as by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      Man, I totally thought you were talking about K-Mart there for a second...

    58. Re:Did anyone else read this as by Peepsalot · · Score: 1

      No, this is what you need.
      Plenty of space for each wart to plug in directly.

    59. Re:Did anyone else read this as by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Instead of Radio Shack, you could help support slashdot with this:

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/travelpower/77e6/

    60. Re:Did anyone else read this as by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Actually a company called "Wall Art" sells cheap prints at Wal-Mart. Now, if someone took a photo of the Wall-Wart and made a print through Wall Art, they could buy Wal-Mart Wall-Wart Wall Art.

      ducks

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    61. Re:Did anyone else read this as by BrunoUsesBBEdit · · Score: 1

      I read it 5 times in my iGoogle box, and then clicked "Show Original" because I could not figure out what this has to do with Wal-Mart. It's crazy how the brain works.

  2. Ethernet by dmomo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it possible to also have the ethernet for this device go over the power lines like so many home networking devices? Then you could literally plug it and and have it running.

    1. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible to also have the ethernet for this device go over the power lines like so many home networking devices? Then you could literally plug it and and have it running.

      Yes.

    2. Re:Ethernet by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. Either it needs BPL or it needs Wi-Fi. Most people don't put an ethernet jack wherever they have a power connection, making this somewhat less than ideal for home automation purposes. I'd also like to see it have a relay to switch on and off a power outlet, but maybe that's just me.

      Either way, it's a cool little piece of hardware. I'm just not quite sure what I could use it for. It's too underpowered for video encoding/decoding, has no power switching capabilities needed for it to control lights, doesn't have the CPU power to replace my web server (a C2D takes several seconds to render an image with dcraw; this would take several minutes), etc. Maybe coupled with some outboard piece of USB gear, it might serve some obscure purpose like controlling a motor to open and close window shades/awnings for solar heating purposes, but it would still have to be enclosed in some sort of box to safely mount it outdoors....

      I'll keep thinking. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Ethernet by Bertie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Torrents!

    4. Re:Ethernet by hattig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The obvious real solution is Power over Ethernet.

      1 PoE capable switch.
      + 8 Wallwart Linux Devices
      = 1 (not quite enterprise level) Server Farm in a shoe-box

    5. Re:Ethernet by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking that when I get out of grad school and get a job and a house, I want to plop a server box in the basement somewhere, and just scatter terminals running VLC or something similar around the house. I would think the Jack PC would be great for this, but the wall-wart in this article would be pretty good. Maybe have a separate gaming computer hooked up to the TV or something like that.

    6. Re:Ethernet by sowth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you kidding? Not enough CPU power? 1.2 GHz is enough for me to do raytracing!

      Anyway, if you are going to do video encoding and translate your camera's pics from raw, it is not as if you need to sit and watch it. Just let the device run and do the work. 5 Watts isn't that much.

      Kids these days.

    7. Re:Ethernet by Danathar · · Score: 1

      You would need two. I hate to break it to you but just plugging into into the powerline all by itself does not make it a networking device....

    8. Re:Ethernet by charlesnw · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm glad it doesn't have built in wifi. I'll simply attach an Atheros USB dongle with SMA connector and high gain antenna. Instant very high powered access point/storage system.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    9. Re:Ethernet by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I'm just not quite sure what I could use it for. It's too underpowered for video encoding/decoding,

      Actually, audio and standard-def video playback and recording and streaming would probably be quite acceptable on a 1.2GHz CPU as long as it wasn't doing anything else. Small flash-based PVR? Small flash-based VOD streaming server for one TV? Internet radio?

      With the built-in gigabit Ethernet and USB, with some good software in place you could probably turn the thing into a 'smart' network adapter that includes a built-in packet filtering firewall. If you could add a NIC or two, it could become a router.

      1.2Ghz is more than fast enough to run some of the older console and arcade games under mame/xmame/etc.

    10. Re:Ethernet by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the era of 802.11N, that is a retarded idea.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many home networking devices? Really? Where are you finding these?

    12. Re:Ethernet by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1

      My home server is a C3 900Mhz with 256MB ram. And it enjoys encoding a DVD as a day's work.

      Kids these days indeed.

    13. Re:Ethernet by Walpurgiss · · Score: 1

      Probably right. Stock Xbox had 733mhz celeron I think and was fine for any SD divx/xvid I threw at it via xbmc. any x264/h264 and it stuttered though.

      Does it have vga/dvi/hdmi/composite/whatever display output though? Or just terminal/ssh/vnc type interface? Summary didn't say :/

    14. Re:Ethernet by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      I think OP was thinking of Power over Ethernet

      --
      What?
    15. Re:Ethernet by sheath · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Either it needs BPL or it needs Wi-Fi. Most people don't put an ethernet jack wherever they have a power connection, making this somewhat less than ideal for home automation purposes.

      If you don't have an ethernet jack where you have power, then how on earth are you powering your wireless hub?

      --

      ---sheath
    16. Re:Ethernet by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      By the look of it, this is more of a polished dev kit than a shelf-ready product. Marvell, typically, sells silicon, not widgets, so that would be standard for them. Also, TFA mentions schematics being available under some sort of free licence, and a bunch of companies already building devices based on this thing.

      I suspect that products derived from this model will tend to have more in the way of peripherals; but as a dev kit that requires no special handling or equipment, and is priced within the range of virtually any student, linux hacker, or general tinkerer, this looks like a fun bit of kit. I know I'm tempted.

    17. Re:Ethernet by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Either way, it's a cool little piece of hardware. I'm just not quite sure what I could use it for.

      I think it's pretty much a ethernet-to-USB bridge. So it's probably pretty useful for any USB device you've wanted to network-enable.

      Personally, I've got a TV I'd love to stream video to from my PC on the other end of the apartment. It's too far for any sort of display cable, but not too far for ethernet.

      Looks like, in theory, you could hook up one of these wall-warts to something like this.

    18. Re:Ethernet by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Then you could literally plug it and and have it running.

      And do what with it? It's kinda cool from a packaging point of view but pretty useless functionally.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    19. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't work for them, but http://www.phidgets.com/ would rock with this thing if it had wifi.

    20. Re:Ethernet by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      If you don't have an ethernet jack where you have power, then how on earth are you powering your wireless hub?

      Every X has a Y. Not every Y has an X. Quite a few power outlets don't need eth jacks nearby because they're not reasonably going to be needed.

    21. Re:Ethernet by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      The keyword in the OP was "home automation." This wouldn't go the same place the wireless hub/router would.

    22. Re:Ethernet by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Yeah this most likely is a reference design, similar to what Nvidia and ATi do. Call their sales rep and you too can licence their technology to manufacture your own brand of Wall-E Wartz or whatever Chinglish sounding brand name you come up with.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    23. Re:Ethernet by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      Most people don't put an ethernet jack wherever they have a power connection,

      Sorry to sound dumb, but... lol wut?

      Call me crazy, but where the hell are you computing from? My computer has an ethernet cable and a power cable. Both are required for proper function and within inches of each other. Maybe you're thinking wireless, in which case...

      Where the hell is your wireless router/switch/AP? Cause mine has ethernet and power, both of which are required. Any chance you could clarify on the lack of power in your house? Haha. =]

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    24. Re:Ethernet by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      I think OP was thinking of Power over Ethernet

      Actually, I think OP was thinking of Powerline Networking. If this were powerline networking enabled, then you could plug it into any of your home wiring and jack in a webcam and not have to run ethernet. If you added on a software controllable plug to the other side of this, so you could plug a light into this and then plug this into the wall, you could control all sorts of devices with home automation. Most homes don't have ethernet jacks next to every plug outlet in the wall, and running them could get annoying.

      As far as needing two, you'd need one of these and at least one bridge capable of enabling your power lines to handle data. Technically two, I think, as you'd need one for each side of your breaker box.

    25. Re:Ethernet by ZeeStorm · · Score: 1

      You could always band several of these together with a networked hdd or "hub" computer to make quite a powerful machine for relatively cheap.

    26. Re:Ethernet by KrimZon · · Score: 1

      He means look at every single wall socket in your house and the vast majority will not have an accompanying ethernet socket, meaning you can't just plug it into the socket you never use at the top of the stairs or something.

    27. Re:Ethernet by Nursie · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I'm just not quite sure what I could use it for. It's too underpowered for video encoding/decoding,"

      It could probably do a bit of that, transcoding and serving anyway.

      This sounds like an absolutely perfect replacement for my Linksys NSLU2. It's only 266MHz and has 32MB of RAM. At the moment I have one doing mail/web server duty and one running torrentflux-b4rt and mediatomb, streaming music and video to my PS3 and to my machine at work.

      That second one is straining to keep up, this little box sounds like it fits the bill perfectly. Similarly powered NAS boxes cost multiple hundreds.

    28. Re:Ethernet by mihalis · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to also have the ethernet for this device go over the power lines like so many home networking devices? Then you could literally plug it and and have it running.

      Yes.

      or... actually no, not really.

      You can connect this device to another ethernet device with a cable. If that other device is a powerline adapter then yes it's sort of doing what you want, however it can't receive ethernet signals over it's own power connectors, which I think is what you're really asking.

    29. Re:Ethernet by gregmac · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Either it needs BPL or it needs Wi-Fi. Most people don't put an ethernet jack wherever they have a power connection, making this somewhat less than ideal for home automation purposes. I'd also like to see it have a relay to switch on and off a power outlet, but maybe that's just me.

      Certainly somewhere in your house you have an ethernet jack near power.. this thing is a server, it doesn't matter WHERE it goes, so long as it is on the same network as anything it needs to connect to. The fact that it is called a "plug computer" and has a form factor that plugs in like a wall-wart is not the draw here - the draw is the low cost, low power consumption, and small footprint.

      For home automation, it would be very cool to integrate this into an insteon interface. Then it can control other insteon/X10 devices over that network, and you can tell it to control that stuff by connecting to it over ethernet.

      --
      Speak before you think
    30. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But typically there is a power outlet wherever there is ethernet.

    31. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA is slashdotted, but why exactly would you need PoE going to something that apparently plugs into a wall socket?

    32. Re:Ethernet by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Add a USB-Ethernet connector, and make a router?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    33. Re:Ethernet by hattig · · Score: 1

      To get rid of the wall socket aspect :)

      One switch on a decent power supply.
      8 (or 24 :D ) Linux Wallwarts (without the wallwart aspect, so, err, a box with an ethernet port, maybe enough room for a 1.8" SATA hard drive (the chipset supports 2 SATA ports))

      A perfect sysadmin learner platform, 8 devices at the eventual end price of $49 would make for a cheap practice platform to learn and apply theory about service distribution, scaling, etc.

    34. Re:Ethernet by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      >Maybe coupled with some outboard piece of USB gear

      AVR-USB: a firmware-only USB interface for atmel microcontrollers. Two resistors and two diodes, one ATTiny microcontroller, two power-ground caps, and you have your hardware interface on a board the size of a postage stamp. This reference board has 8 channels of power switching, that could drive reasonably large relays like, say, 8 Jameco 134949's (at $5 each), that'll each switch 20 amps at 220volts.

      It could drive a three-axis CNC mill. Plug in a webcam and you have a security system. Add a relay board and you have a portable autonomous sentry setup. A usb-to-serial converter combined with fuse and owfs and a half-dozen Dallas Semiconductor one-wire devices and you can put dirt cheap thermometers all over your house. Add some Dallas I/O chips and some motors and you have zone heating for your house.

      I can think of *lots* of interesting things to do with this.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    35. Re:Ethernet by thsths · · Score: 1

      > Are you kidding? Not enough CPU power? 1.2 GHz is enough for me to do raytracing!

      Funny. I think it could serve as a TV hard disk recorder (PVR), because it could just record the bit stream without further processing. Moving 2GB/h should not be a problem even for a system as slow as this one. Reencoding, deinterlacing or commercial detection could be done overnight, or on a different system.

    36. Re:Ethernet by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      But for the price of several of those, you could get a netbook, which is much more powerful.

    37. Re:Ethernet by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Huh? You have that backwards, what's intriguing about this is ethernet over power.

      Aside from the fact that $800 could get you a pretty small core 2 duo powered machine with much more strength and much less management overhead. What's with you people and beowulf clusters? Am i new here?

    38. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the era of 802.11N, that is a retarded idea.

      Given than 802.11n still isn't a standard, maybe not.

    39. Re:Ethernet by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I almost like this idea. The one computing device that's always on in my house is my router. It's got Linux and a great UI that I can control from anywhere in the world (Tomato). If this thing had four more Ethernet sockets and a wireless antenna, we'd be talking! Even better: Throw in a SATA2 socket so I could hook up a hard drive for the Torrents! I know that would up the power usage, but the hard drive would only spin up when in use. Most of the time it wouldn't be. I like the sound of 5W of power usage.

    40. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA is slashdotted, but why exactly would you need PoE going to something that apparently plugs into a wall socket?

      To make it more expensive? Geez, anyone else would have just bought a power strip and plugged them into that. PoE switches are pricey and introduce a single point of failure.

    41. Re:Ethernet by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I think ethernet is cheaper to implement. If this particular unit picks up, I expect Marvell will make a wireless version.

      What would be really funny is if the ethernet chipset isn't Marvell. I think that's where they made their big start.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    42. Re:Ethernet by overlordofmu · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saying this for me!

    43. Re:Ethernet by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      Another option for interfacing: http://www.greta.dhs.org/UBW/

      The UBW shows up as a serial port and you just send commands to it to toggle pins and do other stuff. For example, it has ADC support, so you could connect a thermistor and you can read the temp anywhere. Use the GPIOs and you can control stuff based on sensor readings.

      Still in "hammer swatting a fly" territory though. :)

    44. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you won't be able to store anything because you have used the only USB port for the wifi adapter

    45. Re:Ethernet by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It has a USB port. You can find little USB interface devices that will control remote devices like switching a power outlet.
      There is a ton of stuff you can do with this device with a little effort.
      Wifi could be added to with a USB dongle. Heck you could even make a network to Bluetooth bridge.
      Wifi and POE would be nice options. But you know what? Get the data sheet and learn to solder. You could build one and try and market it.
      Some models even support SATAII.
      They actually look like very nice little devies
      The SOC has not only USB but also SDIO and GPIO as well. You would only be limited by your knowledge and skills.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    46. Re:Ethernet by chill · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm...USB 2.0 for storage and SDIO WiFi for tether-free connectivity.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    47. Re:Ethernet by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > I suspect that products derived from this model will tend to have more in the way of peripherals;

      Which will be a total bitch to develop because you will first have to make a dev board. Did ya look at that SoC? It has all sorts of crap on it! They should have just make a dev board that brings out all of those features and when you are ready to go into production you could just leave out the connectors and glue parts you didn't need. Most apps might not need two ethernets ports but many will. Some won't need multiple USB ports, some probably will. Some might need USB device mode. How about one of the SATA controllers? Some might find the audio/video I/O handy. (STB anyone?)

      The server in a wallwart is a nice idea but just one USB, one ethernet and one SDIO limits the applications. Most deployed apps would still fit in a power plug, doesn't need much space for an extra ethernet (firewall?) or an audio out jack (say a MoH source in the phone closet?).

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    48. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a 1.2 GHz ARM9. That's stupefyingly powerful. We're talking powerful enough to encode 720p MPEG4 AVC almost in real-time. How much faster would you expect for $100?

    49. Re:Ethernet by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Not enough CPU power? 1.2 GHz is enough for me to do raytracing!

      1.2GHz on an ARM9 based processor without floating point? This is coming from Marvell, so I assume they are using a CPU from their own PXA3x0 line. For general webserving, it will be ample, maybe even as a media server if the speed of USB drives doesn't let it down. But I think raytracing will be a bit beyond its capabilities.

    50. Re:Ethernet by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Back in the day, ftp.cdrom.com served ~1TB a day from 1 box, a 200-MHz P6 Pentium Pro.

      (yeah yeah, ftp.cdrom.com had industrial quality I/O, but 1.2GHz is a LOT of computer power for anything but graphics.)

    51. Re:Ethernet by diqmay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      did you considered a USB hub?

    52. Re:Ethernet by _ivy_ivy_ · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Not enough CPU power? 1.2 GHz is enough for me to do raytracing!

      I was raytracing in 1990 on something that the modern cell phone can put to shame. It makes me want to say, "Get off my lawn!"

    53. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Have you actually attempted to do raytracing on an ARM processor? For one thing, there is no hardware floating point on this processor, all floating point has to be done with software code taking 10s of instructions for things like adding two floating point numbers.

      You are falling for the megahertz myth, but in the other direction. An Xscale core like the one this chip uses is basically a classic five-stage pipeline with very few frills (interestingly it does have very rudimentary branch prediction). There is no superscalar type features.

      Multiplys can take up to a few clock cycles, for example, halting everything else.

      WMMXT is also a very simplistic SIMD offering compared to the SSE* you might be used to.

    54. Re:Ethernet by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Let's see, 50 of these things would cost $5K. That's 50 ARM processors (admittedly somewhat underpowered) you could apply to distributed computing tasks.

    55. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you wanted to use it to switch your router on and off over the network?

    56. Re:Ethernet by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Cheap Visual Traffic Detectors at auto Intersections

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    57. Re:Ethernet by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In the era of 802.11N, that is a retarded idea.

      Damn! Those brick walls and I beams just retarded the 802.11N signal!

      Maybe it's not such a stupid idea after all?

    58. Re:Ethernet by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      There are devices which can transmit IP over power lines. They are not that expensive, but do not achieve 100Mbit/s. I do not know how well they work.

      One of those, short ethernet cable, and you've got it.

    59. Re:Ethernet by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      What it could not do is play back the content through a software decoder. It doesn't have the storage to be a good Myth back end, and doesn't have the display hardware to be a good front end, though with an external USB display adapter, you could sort of make it work if the CPU could decode the video quickly enough. I'm not sure it could, though, once you add in the extra overhead of pushing the video stream over USB to a framebuffer.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    60. Re:Ethernet by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      but a netbook doesn't hang on the wall without a lot of help.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    61. Re:Ethernet by Splintax · · Score: 1

      Summary indicates that the device has 512MB of onboard flash memory.

    62. Re:Ethernet by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      One of those could work.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    63. Re:Ethernet by sowth · · Score: 1

      I used to do raytracing on a 100MHz 486. I also seem to have a vague memory of raytracing being done without floating point. ...actually I remember seeing a program in ST Resource (I think that was the name) which raytraced on the Atari ST (history). I think I would only get a black screen because I didn't understand how to use it properly (probably didn't have any lighting). That computer used a 68000 processor. It didn't have floating point at all and it was only 8 MHz, and I'm sure the number of instructions per clock was worse than this wall wart's processor.

    64. Re:Ethernet by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I've usually pulled away from wires going everywhere and just went with 802.11g for everything. Makes it simpler, and works fine unless you're needing that high bandwidth between machines for local network use.

      My first thought on this was tagging this into the wall somewhere and using it as a print server/mail server/web server, and MAYBE an mrtg server to monitor the network. (all 2 machines...)
      I'm debating on dropping in a 16gb SD card like was said by others, if I get one of these. That'd let the memory be put to use the right way :)

      Pretty sweet idea.. a nice little toy. expensive for a toy, but very unique.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    65. Re:Ethernet by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

      Imagine a server room full of these things...

    66. Re:Ethernet by hughk · · Score: 1

      Our house is constructed on 4 levels. The connections come through in the basement which has a wired LAN. The floors are constructed using reinforced concrete. The DSL modem sits in the cellar utilities room. It is a Fritz/AVM Fon unit with builtin WiFi but the WiFi only gets from the cellar to the ground floor but, so straight repeater tech won't work. We use Linksys Powerline technology (LAN over Power tech with AES encryption) to get the signal to the top floor where we have a second wireless router. The advertised bandwidth is about 200 Mb/s but you will usually get a bit less, say about half of that).

      In a domestic environment, with everything on the same phase, it works much better than wireless, partly because far fewer people use it, so less interference.

      A server using the same standard (HomePlug A/V would be neat.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    67. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That costs $800 and isn't really great to begin with? , then costs more in power by using 5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5 = 40 watts?

      Also that takes up all the damn free outlets in the power strip...

      No thanks, I'm waiting for when they've got some means to power these via DC and not AC.

      On a side note, lightning jumping from the power outlet to your Wired-LAN isn't something I hope to ever experience, this device sounds pretty risky on an engineering point of view, what if there are spurious spikes or interference coming down the power line, do they jump onto the Wired-LAN?

    68. Re:Ethernet by seanellis · · Score: 1

      I had a fully wireless home setup. Pain in the backside, it was. Unexplained outages, unreliability, supposedly compatible devices having different chipsets in them, the works. I invested in a few powerline ethernet doohickeys and all my problems went away, without having to explain to the wife why I was gouging channels in the plasterwork for network cables.

      I had a problem, it solved my problem. How retarded I am.

    69. Re:Ethernet by hattig · · Score: 1

      Um, power over ethernet is when you route the power over the ethernet cable alongside the data. No power strip required.

      My one mistake was that this probably doesn't work for GigE because I think that uses all 8 wires for data, whereas with slower ones there were 4 wires free for 12V, 5V and ground (I don't know the exact PoE configuration). DC, as you're asking.

      However it would work worldwide as there is no PSU required, as the power is coming from the switch.

    70. Re:Ethernet by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      But I think raytracing will be a bit beyond its capabilities.

      If an Apple LaserWriter, which used a 12-MHz 68000, can do raytracing, this gadget (which is clocked two orders of magnitude faster, just for starters) should be more than up to the task.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    71. Re:Ethernet by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Do you set of EMPs in your living room? I have cat-5E wired into every room in my house, but I unplugged the switch last months when I realised that the only light on it was the one connected to the Internet, and none of the other cables had been used for ages. All of my computers are wireless, and when other people bring laptops over they can connect easily.

      If you're getting unexplained outages and unreliability from 802.11g, you're doing something badly wrong.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    72. Re:Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can add the storage to make it a decent back-end. What you want from a back-end is something running all the time so it is ready to record/serve content when you want it, which is why this will make a good back-end since it is low-power so won't cost a lot to keep it running. The front-end can be separate.

    73. Re:Ethernet by seanellis · · Score: 1

      Indeed, probably true. Bu the point it that I couldn't find it. I spent several whole days trying to figure it out, in dribs and drabs. In the end, I decided on a solution and it worked, and I haven't worried about it since. That's a positive, successful result as far as I'm concerned.

      I just objected a bit to the word "retard" in the original post - different people will find different solutions acceptable. Just because I've chosen a different one for my circumstances may mean that I have a different setup/requirement, rather than being wilfully perverse.

    74. Re:Ethernet by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      Most people don't put an ethernet jack wherever they have a power connection

      And depending on your definition of "close" putting an ethernet outlet close to a power outlet will likely mean breaching wiring laws.

  3. How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This would be cool for a pocket-sized router, firewall, packet sniffer, etc.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I was thinking of an 8-port Belkin powerstrip full of these.

    2. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Other ideas:

      Plane-carryable voip system
      Tiny network sniffer
      SSL based VPN gateway
      Remote roomba controller
      Mud-in-a-box

      This reminds me a bit of apple's airport extreme. Tiny, versitile, Multi-function wall wart. Apple's, of course is quite limited in what it can do. Does anyone know if airport extreme is hacked to run custom software yet?

    3. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of an 8-port Belkin powerstrip full of these.

      in a beowulf cluster.....

    4. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know.. how much does a USB to ethernet adapter cost again?

    5. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, when I imagine a beowulf cluster of those I imagine a cluster of melted plastic. Dunno why...

    6. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by sootman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed. There are countless uses for something like this. 2009 will be the year of Linux in the outlet! ;-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    7. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by priegog · · Score: 1

      With a cheap-ass usb-ethernet adapter (or several) you'd get something pretty useful.

    8. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by priegog · · Score: 1

      Most of these can be achieved with a modded (to add a battery pack, sd card reader and whatnot) La Fonera.

    9. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 2, Insightful
      print server, dhcp server, squid server, local dns server...

      Everything you need to make the home network a usable network, rather than a collection of machines accessing the internet.

      Multiple ethernet ports would be nice, but as long as the cable modem can use USB, not as big a problem as it could be.

      "Eventually, prices are expected to drop to around $49" Wow. That is cheap enough to buy just to play around with.

    10. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not a webserver, as demostrated after it turned into a pile of smolten plastic after getting slashdotted.

    11. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by Unoti · · Score: 1

      Use as a squid server would be somewhat limited, though, since it'd be a pretty small squid cache. But maybe it'd be great for just caching a couple of pages.

    12. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I think you mean AirPort Express. The AirPort Extreme is the bigger, more traditional router with an integrated Ethernet hub.

      -Peter

    13. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      This would be cool for a pocket-sized router, firewall, packet sniffer, etc.

      You mean like some kind of a pocket protector, for you network? That can store pen-test tools and even a simple calculator? Hmm... sounds interesting.

    14. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by dfsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or the Year Of Linux Under The Desktop.

    15. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by collinstocks · · Score: 1

      That would be cool, but, unfortunately, they made it just like all the other wall warts and "dongly things" (Douglas Noel Adams reference) in that it tends to cover the other outlets. You could always buy a special extension cord for it, but who wants that? This would work, but it seems a little over the top to me as a solution for such a problem.

    16. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I was thinking a nice disruptive application would be to build micro TOR servers that you can plug in on the unsecured ports of a small business internet connection. Create a "community duty" to share some of your bandwidth without the typical security risks.

      Or, another fun application would be to plug it in a timer that goes on at a set time every day or hour allowing you to have a cheap "backup firewall" to wake-on-lan machines on a network.

      Hell, throw in an external (or integrated) battery, a wireless 3g modem, and the thing could be a great little remote status system (sensaphone type thing).

      Could be fun...

    17. Re:How much for a multi-ethernet-port version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firewall was my first thought too. Only one ethernet port though...

  4. Power line networking by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the linked page: "This device connects to the network using GbE"

    Does it strike anybody else as strange that this device wouldn't have power line networking built in?

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    1. Re:Power line networking by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does it strike anybody else as strange that this device wouldn't have power line networking built in?

      Yes and no. It would make sense for it to be capable of powerline networking, but you'll still need to ran a patch cable from the main network (be it router, cable modem/dsl box, whatever) to either this device (if it were powerline network capable) or another powerline network plugin device.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Power line networking by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you'd only need one or two devices to service a potentially huge cloud of these things if they had power line networking built in. That's where the real power of this device gets interesting.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:Power line networking by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      True. But what kind of bandwidth is available with powerline networking?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    4. Re:Power line networking by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Screw that, I want wireless. Put some WiFi on that thing and I'll buy five with fries on the side.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    5. Re:Power line networking by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Up to 200Mbps

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    6. Re:Power line networking by lupine · · Score: 1

      It sucks, speeds on par with 802.11b, worse speeds as you add devices.

      Plus power line networking adapter would likely add 4 watts of additional power requirements.

    7. Re:Power line networking by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 0

      200 Mbps? Meh. I'll take the GigE. OTOH, a 6-port powerline network hub is pretty cheap.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    8. Re:Power line networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is actually 8.05 GB in 56 minutes if you are lucky enough to be on the same phase. Or 24 mbits.

      http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/18/2053237

      Could be slower, or not work at all between phases. In that case I suppose you'd need to hook up one to each phase and run crossover cable between those ones. Easy enough in older kitchens, since both phases are available at the same kitchen counter outlet, but not very intuitive. And a bit expensive.

    9. Re:Power line networking by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      UP TO, which means "you will never even get remotely close to that". It's more like 100 mbps full-duplex, and the marketing department calls it "200".

      I have a pair of these Netgear adapters, for my ReplayTV box, and they blow. Bandwidth sucks, latency sucks, everything sucks. And this is in a brand new house, with perfect wiring. My super-crappy Westell wireless G router is much faster.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    10. Re:Power line networking by Perf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The design is open - re-engineer the board.

    11. Re:Power line networking by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Powerline ethernet isnt very popular, its buggy, and its also expensive. It would double the price of this thing and make it get 10x hotter. What it needs is wifi.

    12. Re:Power line networking by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Its a prototype, when (if) these are sold commercially the first value-add someone would probably do is an integrated usb attached powerline ethernet module or 2wire hookup for coax/phone. Then, value-add an outlet on the other side of it, a relay, and a voltage/current sensor and you have the making of a real neat home hobby kit. Include some sensors and some custom programming and sell it for $100 and you could probably do a pretty nice business in fridge/freezer monitoring for small businesses (among other uses).

    13. Re:Power line networking by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      As somebody else pointed out: You can just plug in a USB stick WiFi adapter.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    14. Re:Power line networking by Ghubi · · Score: 1

      so get a USB wifi dongle

    15. Re:Power line networking by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you. If it doesn't have wifi I don't see the point. And having a couple of relays would be really nice too.

    16. Re:Power line networking by pheede · · Score: 2, Informative

      YMMV.. I have a pair of Panasonic powerline network adapters. I get about 45 mbps sustained (indeed these adapters are also "up to 200 mbps"), but the latency is quite decent at less than 5 ms extra latency compared to an ordinary wire.

      I'm very happy with this solution since my apartment is bombarded with competing WiFi networks from the neighbors as well as the super-crappy old microwaves my apartment complex uses that completely kill anything at 2.4 GHz.

    17. Re:Power line networking by hughk · · Score: 1

      As noted elsewhere, we had WiFi problems due to the house construction and ended up bridging a second WiFi router using Linksys Powerline tech (also Homeplug A/V). I would say that 100 Mbits/sec full-duplex is probably about right, but only if I link directly to the second router.

      Otherwise I'm quite happy with it.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    18. Re:Power line networking by hughk · · Score: 1

      Powerline ethernet isnt very popular,...

      Maybe that is what is good at the moment. Adjacent households on the same phase will interfere/use bandwidth.

      ...its buggy,...

      I would disagree. I have second gen firmware on my Linksys devices and they are running fine. Maybe aircons nuke the power but we don't have any with the only significant power consumer in the household being the cooker.

      ...and its also expensive.

      The Linksys units come in pairs at slightly more than $120. Others may be cheaper

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  5. Sounds like a great industrial espionage device! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All you need to do is wrangle yourself an "interview" with a company, plug one of these unobtrusive babies into a wall outlet, attach a short patch cord to the nearest RJ45 data jack and you're off to the highest (competitor) bidder!

  6. A NAS? by tburke261 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like a nice box to use as a NAS, just hook up a fast USB 2.0 drive and you're set. With a 1.2ghz CPU and all that RAM it should fly. Meh, my 2TB professional Raid 5 NAS only has a 400mhz CPU and IIRC 32mb of RAM.

    1. Re:A NAS? by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly..this has the potential to be a NMP as well.Add a USB encoder/Decoder and run MythTV.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    2. Re:A NAS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the sample devices based on this in TFA are indeed geared towards NAS applications. Unfortunately, all of them only offer the USB option, despite the silicon itself supporting two SATA ports.

  7. Add USB + WIFI or Powerline and... by jhfry · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...you could deploy these things as camera servers anywhere you had power. Locker rooms, hotel rooms, etc!... awesome!

    Actually I do think these things have a place, though I am not sure exactly how I would use one, except maybe as described above.

    --
    Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    1. Re:Add USB + WIFI or Powerline and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Madwifi and a usb based atheros adapter?

      Could make yourself a cheap and far more powerful draft-n router.

    2. Re:Add USB + WIFI or Powerline and... by yabos · · Score: 1

      Sweet, now we can see naked women!!

  8. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... because wall warts with a tail plugged into the nearest network port wouldn't attract any kind of attention.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  9. Hard Drive Slot? by crf00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps one more slot to insert an 2.5" hard drive would make that a perfect home server.

    I don't need fast processor, but I need large hard disk space to share media files between my computers.

    1. Re:Hard Drive Slot? by nijk · · Score: 1

      Well there is a usb slot..

    2. Re:Hard Drive Slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usb sucks though. esata or firewire would be more suitable.

    3. Re:Hard Drive Slot? by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      It sucks 'til you realize you're sending files over Ethernet.

    4. Re:Hard Drive Slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then sucks again once you realize NFS over GbE easily hits 70MB/s while USB2 gets maybe 30MB/s on a good day.

    5. Re:Hard Drive Slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it sucks even more when portmap freezes the host requiring a hard reboot.

  10. Got plenty of ideas by RenHoek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It looks pretty awesome.

    Maybe I can use one with an USB cam to implement some cheap security cameras.

    I can put a daemon on there to only start emailing images on movement. :)

    1. Re:Got plenty of ideas by tulcod · · Score: 1

      I kind of have the same feeling I had when I first heard about Eee: wow, finally, someone pulled it off!

      Now, the question is when this will *really* be sold (they say march, but I guess it'll be june). And then everyone will suddenly have one.

    2. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can buy an IP camera. Axis and some other IP cameras actually run Linux but it won't be on an x86 in 1GHz range.

    3. Re:Got plenty of ideas by priegog · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the new La Fonera 2.0. It is intended exactly for that kind of thing. And it costs less. www.fon.com

    4. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the second time today I've read "an U..." in a Slashdot comment.

      "Words beginning with the letter U which start with a Y consonant sound like âoeuniversityâ and âoeutensilâ also take an âoeaâ: âoea universityâ and âoea utensil.â But when an initial U has a vowel sound, the word is preceded by âoeanâ: itâ(TM)s âoean umpire,â âoean umbrella,â and âoean understanding.â "

    5. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unicode fail

    6. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      a unicode fail

    7. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or spend less for something that already does all of that. It runs Linux too. Seriously, I have a few of these around the house along with some of the more expensive pan/tilt versions. They work great. Built-in webserver means I can run a custom perl script on my home server to grab images at any frequency and do whatever I the hell want with them (time-lapse movies, anyone?).

    8. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could use one of these

    9. Re:Got plenty of ideas by compro01 · · Score: 1

      This isn't x86 either. It's ARM based.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    10. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could use one of these

    11. Re:Got plenty of ideas by mevets · · Score: 1

      You could plug a usb powered light in. That would be cool.

    12. Re:Got plenty of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess Zoneminder should run fine on this one...
      Fits the purpose perfectly...

  11. I'll tell you why... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bseacue, evoneyre kwons taht you olny need to hvae the fisrt and lsat leettr rghit to be readlbae. I secsupt you see Wal-Mrat in prnit mroe oeftn tahn Wlal-Wrat.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:I'll tell you why... by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Funny

      I didn't understand a thing you said.

      Copreehenshon is impotent too.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:I'll tell you why... by easyTree · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's always heartening when someone can't sling an insult correctly due to their own ignorance...

      It's You're a stupid nigger... (the apostrophe indicates dropped letters.

      For what it's worth I usually see this type of comment from someone who's trying to suppress homosexual urges involving dark-brown penises....

    3. Re:I'll tell you why... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Of course, that only works if you're literate to begin with.

    4. Re:I'll tell you why... by againjj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is good response to this meme: http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/ The most interesting analysis is after "Update 2". Also click on Graham's thesis summary.

    5. Re:I'll tell you why... by JackCroww · · Score: 1
      --
      "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
    6. Re:I'll tell you why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet... still more readable than the dribble written in Youtube comments.

    7. Re:I'll tell you why... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Funny

      I said it before and I'll say it again:
      Profanity is the last resort of desperately inarticulate motherfuckers.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:I'll tell you why... by cheftw · · Score: 1

      Who's impotent?

      --
      Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
    9. Re:I'll tell you why... by oodaloop · · Score: 1, Funny

      And I just ran out of fucking mod points. Goddammit.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    10. Re:I'll tell you why... by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Then you are illiterate or English is your second language.

      Else read it faster

    11. Re:I'll tell you why... by Mystra_x64 · · Score: 1

      Even as a second (or third that depends) language I can understand it.

      --
      Quick way to get 30% Funny 70% Troll: defend Opera browser on /.
    12. Re:I'll tell you why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth I usually see this type of comment from someone who's trying to suppress homosexual urges involving dark-brown penises....

      Spend a lot of time with gay black men do you?

    13. Re:I'll tell you why... by cmdrcoffee · · Score: 1

      LOL KITTEH
      haz no problemz
      copreehendon dis artycal

    14. Re:I'll tell you why... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Except that wasn't easy to read at all, you messed it up way too much. Sure it was readable but ..

  12. Re:Wall-Mart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll start shopping at Wall-Mart if they start selling stores for $100.

  13. Beowulf Cluster by Hordeking · · Score: 1

    Can anyone imagine a beowulf cluster of these? I could take over the world! Or at least a small chunk of Nantucket, RI.

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    1. Re:Beowulf Cluster by Miseph · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Or at least a small chunk of Nantucket, RI"

      That would be no small feat, seeing as Nantucket isn't in Rhode Island.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    2. Re:Beowulf Cluster by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? Y'see, I once knew a girl from Nantucket...

      .

      (Bonus points for completing this comment...)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Beowulf Cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There once was a hermit named Dave...

    4. Re:Beowulf Cluster by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Not the most cost effective hpc system.

      I just priced out a 1U rack mount system with 2xquad core 2.4GHz processors and 8GB of RAM which is equivalent in processing capabilities to about 16 of these guys for the same price (~$1600). Except it also has 320GB of disk space, PCIe slot, and dual gigabit network connection, and only needs one power cable.

      I can even get a similar system in non-rack mount (just a tower server), for ~$1500 which includes a DVD drive.

    5. Re:Beowulf Cluster by Gospodin · · Score: 4, Funny

      It will be. It. Will. Be.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    6. Re:Beowulf Cluster by nschubach · · Score: 1

      ...who killed a squirrel with a bucket.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    7. Re:Beowulf Cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...,Rhode Island

    8. Re:Beowulf Cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about that? Y'see, I once knew a girl from Nantucket...

      .

      (Bonus points for completing this comment...)

      ... who's dick was so long she could suck it...

      I don't think this is heading in the right direction.

    9. Re:Beowulf Cluster by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I just priced out a 1U rack mount system with 2xquad core 2.4GHz processors and 8GB of RAM which is equivalent in processing capabilities to about 16 of these guys for the same price (~$1600). Except it also has 320GB of disk space, PCIe slot, and dual gigabit network connection, and only needs one power cable.

      And, I'd suspect, probably draws more than 80W (16 times the power draw of the 5W "wall wart").

    10. Re:Beowulf Cluster by LaminatorX · · Score: 1

      Imagine a power strip cluster of these.

    11. Re:Beowulf Cluster by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I forgot to add that it probably drew more than 80W. So, you would end up saving more in long term electric costs since it would be 5-10x cheaper to operate and cool, while being about the same amount to purchase.

    12. Re:Beowulf Cluster by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      She squished its head...

  14. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by davidwr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, he's got a point. If you can infiltrate the janitorial staff and can plug a two-ethernet-port version of this in between an important computer and a switch, you can sniff/analyze/record all unencrypted traffic until you run out of RAM.

    Just be sure to remove it the next day before anyone notices.

    Then again, an audio-recording device that recorded keystrokes or a keystroke-interceptor on the USB or PS2 ports is probably smaller.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  15. Re:Wall-Mart? by genner · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do I keep reading that as Wall-Mart?

    Because they got to you.

  16. trouble with cart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone else having trouble ordering one? It allows me to set up an account, but then it thinks my shopping cart is empty.

    1. Re:trouble with cart? by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've run into this with a number of shopping carts, including some big name sites. I usually have to switch to a different browser - a lot of carts don't work with Safari or Chrome, and some don't even work with FireFox.

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    2. Re:trouble with cart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a strategy from earlier in the decade: "We can do without 5% of our web sales... after all, we make sooo much money on the other 95%!"

      These days, it's "What? We lost a sale? Shit, that means another vendor goes unpaid - which vendor can we do without this month?".

    3. Re:trouble with cart? by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Funny

      How is it even possible to screw something so simple like a shopping cart? Do they add items through rpc over carrier pigeons or what?

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    4. Re:trouble with cart? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Usually (in my statistically-signficant survey of one internet user, me :) an empty cart is due to blocked cookies.

      It uses a session to maintain your cart's contents so you need to enable cookies.

    5. Re:trouble with cart? by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      I suspect that these sites all use some third-party shopping cart solution that is badly designed and not tested across the browser universe. And I wish I could mod you funny or insightful or something for your sig...

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    6. Re:trouble with cart? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Yep, their ordering system is COMPLETELY bustit.

    7. Re:trouble with cart? by fnj · · Score: 1

      That's not the problem in this particular case.

  17. What's it good for? by ahoehn · · Score: 0

    Sounds like an awesome little appliance, but what can you do with it? You know, besides a beowulf cluster.

    I'm sure my fellow Slashdotters will have some suggestions. Let's hear 'em.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    1. Re:What's it good for? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative
      Do you have no imagination? Put a thumb drive on it and use it for most anything you'd use a linux server for, but with no moving parts, negligible power usage, and less than negligible space.
      • Web/ftp/etc server
      • streaming media
      • download torrents in the background
      • tor node
      • proxy server
      • MUD server
      • fill it with kiddie porn and plug it into your boss's house
      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:What's it good for? by turing_m · · Score: 1

      Since this is basically an NSLU2 with roughly an order of magnitude faster CPU, RAM and ethernet, the capabilities should be a superset of the NSLU2. Here is a pretty comprehensive list of what the NSLU2 has been used for:

      http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Info/WhatPeopleAreReallyUsingTheirSlugsFor

      The more interesting question for me is, since the NSLU2 was ~$100 and used ~5W of power, what would this allow me to do that the NSLU2 wouldn't? The first things that come to mind are streaming HD content, a more load tolerant webserver, and running a less stripped down version of Linux. Am I missing any other major applications?

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    3. Re:What's it good for? by crazybilly · · Score: 1
      Mod parent. I've currently got this exact setup in my basement, using an old, noisy, power-inefficient, 800MHz tower.

      And it's WAY too noisy to hide in my boss' house.

      But $50-100, might be worth getting rid of all that power inefficency and bulk. In my boss' house.

    4. Re:What's it good for? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I have an nslu2 with debian. (I also have a qnap TS-409 raid box since 32Megs of ram wasn't enough to do all the interesting stuff I wanted to do). I wouldn't try to ssl tunnel to an X server running on the slug, but the wall-wart could handle it.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  18. Corporate Espionage by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Plug it somewhere unobtrusive and plug it in to an out-of-the-way network jack in a corporation somewhere. Run your favorite network traffic sniffer and have it quietly sniff user IDs and passwords out and update them on a web page regularly. It's the perfect form factor and could go unnoticed for years!

    Oh yeah, that would probably be totally illegal...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Corporate Espionage by Yewbert · · Score: 1

      It'd be even more unobtrusive if it had some more power outlets on its back - y'know, to look like a pass-through device, like some nightlights. It certainly doesn't need a whole outlet's capacity for itself, and if you had another device or two plugged into IT, who'd ever look twice at the wart itself?

    2. Re:Corporate Espionage by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Heck, put a photocell on the front and a bulb on top, and it could BE a nightlight. The "photocell" could actually be a webcam.

    3. Re:Corporate Espionage by Molochi · · Score: 1

      LOL. Stick it in a power strip. Mine has Ethernet jacks on on it already.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    4. Re:Corporate Espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome! I can take photos of my baseboard!

  19. Re:Wall-Mart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's funny; I see Wall-fnordWart.

  20. LOL. For a few secs, my mind saw the power draw by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "The power draw is a nightlight-like 5 Watts."

    as six GIGAwatts...

    That could be approaching a home-based (no relation to HomeBase, and, yeh, I was also seeing "Wal-Mart") personal teleportation device...

    But, we're gettin' there.... Say, what would you trust:

    A Linux-based matter-conversion teleportation device, or a windows-based one? I would wager the windows one might reduce me to Sonak's condition in ST:TMP. But, what would the Linux-based XR do?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:LOL. For a few secs, my mind saw the power draw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the more important question is to ask who wants to be the one to try out human teleportation on version 0.6.0.1

      Although, I guess you could set automated bug reports in there, so you don't have to rely on the testers still being alive afterwards to file a bug report.

    2. Re:LOL. For a few secs, my mind saw the power draw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck are you on?

    3. Re:LOL. For a few secs, my mind saw the power draw by Ashtead · · Score: 1

      Teleportation device with bug reports? Lets hope, for all that is good and well, that the bugs are just software and not, for example, flies, making it into the teleportation system.

      Too much unpleasant prior art for that.

      As for the device featured, I definitely want some!

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  21. I must've missed the memo by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    $100 Linux wall wart could do to servers what netbooks did to notebooks.

    And what, exactly, is it that "netbooks did to notebooks"? I don't see many netbooks out in the wild, while notebooks are pretty much everywhere at our university (and really, I'd expect any trend to show up at school faster than in the world at large).

    I bet you thought tablets were going to take over the world too, right?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I must've missed the memo by callinyouin · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just because I live in Michigan, but I've been seeing an awful lot of netbooks lately, especially at the college I attend.

    2. Re:I must've missed the memo by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The small cheap notebook segment transformed the low end of the market and also made the smaller systems less expensive than the mainstream rather than more expensive. The mainstream of the market it didn't touch at all, really. The "UMPC" market was outrageously expensive compared to most notebooks, but the Eee-alikes aren't much bigger and are much cheaper.

      These little servers are smaller, cheaper, and sacrifice some power and storage at the very bottom end of the market. You can buy bigger systems just as cheap. You can buy other systems nearly as small. You can't really buy anything else as small and as cheap in the same unit unless you go down to the power of a Gumstix.

    3. Re:I must've missed the memo by Shatrat · · Score: 1
      Netbooks have been much more successful than tablets.
      I believe that a significant part of the failure of Vista to gain widespread acceptance is due to the fact that it isn't offered on netbooks.

      This wall wart won't kill servers any more than netbooks will kill Laptops, but they both offer a radically new approach in price and size. I think that's what tfsummary is trying to say.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:I must've missed the memo by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It costs about $100 for a 500GB network hard drive, or $100 for one of these things + about another $70 for a 500GB USB drive to go with it. That's not quite the disruptive technology than a EEE was when it came out.

    5. Re:I must've missed the memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, netbook sales are cannibalizing low end notebook sales. Leastways that's what "they" say. I don't see a lot of them either. I'd rather buy a $400 4-5 year old 12" Fujitsu Lifebook with its decent lcd, 1.2GHz ULV Pentium-M and a new battery.

  22. Yes, but ... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... will it run Linux?

  23. How often do you look under your desk? by Rix · · Score: 1

    Network ports are often right beside power outlets.

    Sure, it'd eventually be discovered but it'd likely be there a while.

  24. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by canuck08 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Then again, an audio-recording device that recorded keystrokes or...

    indeed, and you get the audio by shining one of those nifty 'laser-mics' on the 20th floor executive office window from across town.

  25. Goatse would love this.. by strangeattraction · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is just the right size and would be disruptive.

  26. Re:(not quite enterprise level) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFL

  27. Heresy by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It might be heresy, but I'm seriously considering using this instead of my Linux box at home... IF it can run rtorrent and hellanzb and handle the load of streaming to my Windows PC in the living room.

    Software and CPU power are the only problems I foresee. (And CPU power is probably enough.)

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Heresy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is immediately what came to mind for me as well. I just want to hook this up to an external HD and use it to run bittorrent / stream movies over intranet.

      First person to sell pre-configurations of these wall-warts running bittorrent / bonjour (or something similar for easy configuration & interaction with osx or windows) will have my business.

    2. Re:Heresy by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      Storage might be a problem with only 512MB flash. Wonder if that's expandable.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:Heresy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When torrenting, you may have issues with the 512 MB of flash. (from TFS)

    4. Re:Heresy by onezan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recently just dumped my linux server from my house. not from lack of love, but from lack of space. i replaced it with the DNS-323 from Linksys. it's a NAS box (2 drives) that is easily hacked to run linux. the tiny box now serves as my web server, ftp server, upnp video/music server, torrents, the whole enchilada. all in a box the size of 2 hard drives. i have the whole thing tucked in a back cupboard. much easier and quieter than a full system.

    5. Re:Heresy by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Does the USB port count? That seems to be the only storage expansion on this model(though the SoC it is based on includes, among other peripheral support, a 1x PCIe lane, which would make it trivial for a redesigned board to hang just about any lowish-end RAID controller off of it, not something I'd want to bodge onto an existing design; but the first OEM to put one in a NAS will probably do exactly that.)

    6. Re:Heresy by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Oops, there is also an SDIO port. SD cards up to 32 gigs or so are pretty cheap. Still not Serious Storage; but handy.

    7. Re:Heresy by harry666t · · Score: 1

      It has an usb 2.0 port :)

    8. Re:Heresy by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I thought I saw a slot on the thingy. An SD slot oughta do the trick. Where do I get one, again?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    9. Re:Heresy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You an always plug in a USB drive.

    10. Re:Heresy by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      As they noted, it has a USB port. I was planning on plugging my 1TB hard drive into it. :)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  28. Power over Ethernet by argent · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm more interested in a version that supports PoE.

    1. Re:Power over Ethernet by Perf · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm more interested in a version that supports PoE.

      That would be cool! Then you could add an inverter and power the outlet strip. ;-)

    2. Re:Power over Ethernet by argent · · Score: 5, Funny

      You, sir, are the reason they put warning labels on toothpicks. :)

    3. Re:Power over Ethernet by Perf · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the compliment. ;-)

    4. Re:Power over Ethernet by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's not this fast, but PC Engines will sell you a Geode-based device that can do that (or run on, IIRC, 8-20VDC.) Some of their computers just run on 12V, so look around to see which is which.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Power over Ethernet by argent · · Score: 1

      Ack, that's a hard website to find product on.

    6. Re:Power over Ethernet by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes it is. There's a sales link on the right hand side (IIRC) which will take you to prices and stock. The point is that for about $200 you can build a dual-lan, dual-minipci, CF-storage server with fully supported (incl. master mode) Linux box for about $210 shipped... or for around $130 you can get a board that will do PoE. Not THAT much slower, not that much more money, significantly more I/O.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... because wall warts with a tail plugged into the nearest network port wouldn't attract any kind of attention.

    Was that intended to be sarcastic?

    How much time do YOU spend analyzing at the rat's nest of cabling located under your desk, where the Linksys wireless router and the three daisy-chained power strips live? Less than an hour per year, if you're anything like me.

    I would dare say that an espionage device that disguised itself as a wall wart would be more likely to be discovered based on network analysis ("hold up, what's this device with the unfamiliar MAC off of network port 73?") than based on a visual inspection of the site.

  30. Slashdot $100 law... by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else noticed that summaries matching regex /\$100/ are more often slashdotted?

    1. Re:Slashdot $100 law... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, because I participate. A whole lot of slashdot's readers are in the income bracket that has $100 as a toy price cut off. Over $100 and something may actually have to be sacrificed. At or under $100, the budget can absorb. Eight years ago I wanted to get away from my dependency on a single computer in the house. I got tired of being totally cut off and having to drag an old system out of the closet when my desktop suffered some sort of failure. So I bought three used PIIs. For $100 each. Two of the three have suffered hard drive failures in the intervening years, but aside from that, they've kept right on working. One of them is the NAT/firewall machine for the whole house.

      Looks like I finally have a candidate for a replacement. With gigabit ethernet. And its CPU is 200 MHz faster. Gotta love progress.

      Yesterday I bought two used APC 1000XL UPSs. For $100 each. The one I had already could hold up my desktop with a 21" CRT for 27 minutes. One of those 5 watt warts should be able to run on battery for, what, a month? GOTTA love progress.

    2. Re:Slashdot $100 law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are apparently a liar or an idiot. Mostly likely both. You didn't get a complete, working P2 system for $100 8 years ago... maybe 6, most likely 4. Also, there were no 1ghz Pentium 2's. The i686 chips without SSE maxed out at 450mhz. That would be a Pentium 2 in case you didn't know. Finally, plugging a 5 watt device into a 40 watt battery doesn't make a whole lot of sense. By 40 watts I'm referring to the power the battery eats by just being plugged in.

    3. Re:Slashdot $100 law... by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      If your cable service is up for.. a month and your power isn't... that sorta sucks huh?

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    4. Re:Slashdot $100 law... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Woops. You're right, I was thinking of the Pentium III systems I have, which are 1.0GHz. The PIIs are two 266MHz and one 300MHz. The price and the timeframe, however, are completely correct. They were off-lease Dell GX1s, purchased November 27th, 2001. Bite me, coward.

    5. Re:Slashdot $100 law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The clock rate is misleading here, it uses and ARM processor, I doubt it could compete with a Pentium 2.

    6. Re:Slashdot $100 law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1Ghz PIIs?

    7. Re:Slashdot $100 law... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Just from my use of ARM, I'd say this will be comparable to about a 750 mhz x86. (minus the floating point computations)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  31. Power over Ethernet by Zantetsuken · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The question is though, does it support power over ethernet?

  32. Slashdotted so a mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  33. Other coverage not yet /.ed by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    See also SlashGear's writeup or Legit Reviews coverage at least until the /. effect allows Linux Devices some breathing room.

  34. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can sniff/analyze/record all unencrypted traffic until you run out of RAM.

    And if you can get away with opening an encrypted network connection to some drop box, you don't have to worry about RAM.

    Just be sure to remove it the next day before anyone notices.

    I suspect that in most places it could be there for months -- maybe years -- before anyone noticed. Make sure the drop isn't traceable to you and just collect the take as long as it goes unnoticed.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  35. Netbook by barncha · · Score: 1

    What IS a netbook?

    1. Re:Netbook by vlm · · Score: 1

      What IS a netbook?

      A laptop, usually small lightweight and long battery life, marketed as a gmail/youtube/linkedin/slashdot/4chan/AIM access device, rather than marketed as a windoze device.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Netbook by Molochi · · Score: 1

      It's an ultraportable notebook from 2005, except the ultraportable from 2005 had a better LCD.

      The idea of the netbook was to take a bunch of very low cost parts that were unsuitable for running MS Windows Vista and build a cheap, notebook out of them running something less demanding/bloated. Low LCD resolution, 3cell battery by default, and limited storage because better quality reserved for ultra portable 12" notebooks with ULV Core processors.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  36. Re:Wall-Mart? by easyTree · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's just weird.

    It clearly reads "fnord-fnord-wall-fnord-mart-fnord."

  37. X.10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd also be nice if this had a built in X.10 controller for signaling over the power lines.

  38. $100 Linux Wall-Wart Now Available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it could be used as a NAS drive with mirroring?

  39. disruptive? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nice, but I don't think this is as big a deal as all that. More along the lines of price pressure than anything else. I may buy one, because it is so cheap. Even if I don't, I'm glad everyone else will have to lower their prices now. I've always felt they put on too big a price premium for the small size, considering the generally low performance of the class as a whole.

    There are many similar devices already out there. There's the much beloved Linksys WRT54GL. I have a Soekris. Not the most friendly plug and play device ever. I find it easier to update the CF drive by removing it and mounting it on a desktop system and editing files that way, rather than connecting via a serial port terminal. Gumstix is another. Lots of super micro mini ATX form bricks (mini-itx) out there too. Expensive though.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:disruptive? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2, Informative

      Beagleboard is another. Same chip as the latest generation of Gumstix, circuit board double the size but with many more on-board connectors, for the same price as the Gumstix.

    2. Re:disruptive? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something, or are there no ethernet connectors on that board?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:disruptive? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're not missing anything. There aren't any, any more than there are on the Gumstix. Fortunately USB 2.0 can do 480 megabits per second and USB to Ethernet adapters are both cheap and very small.

      Since the Beagleboard is open hardware, chances are fairly good that somebody will design a variant with 2 on-board gigabit ethernet ports, at some point. I thought the lack of ethernet was an unfortunate choice too.

    4. Re:disruptive? by lixee · · Score: 1

      This is a big deal. This machine has open software and hardware with a big company behind. That's enough to get me really excited.

      Marvell has committed to do everything it can to ensure the best Linux support for SheevaPlug going forward. Raja Mukhopadhyay, product marketing manager, commented, "Whatever the community needs to facilitate development, we will provide the critical resources needed to facilitate that."

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    5. Re:disruptive? by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      When you say "disruptive", it makes me wonder why Marvell named their processor "Sheeva".

      "I am become Shiva, destroyer of worlds."

      "I am become Sheeva, destroyer of conventional paradigms."

    6. Re:disruptive? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      This, in itself, is not disruptive - though it could easily help pave the way to a major disruption.

      Think for a moment about what you just posted on. You don't seem to be paying attention!

      I'm uncertain of the specs on the Linksys, but I don't doubt it's on rough par (or less) with the Gumstix boards in terms of power and capabilities. Soekris boards use ~20+ year old hardware specs, mostly! And the mini-itx shit? That's little different than the Atom: commodity x86 hardware.

      The "disruption" being spoken of is that we're looking at a $100 "dev" model, being sold in the US, with an ARM processor running over 1GHz, connectivity, and 512Mb of RAM. They see these devices dropping down to $40 or so once they become mass-produced. This equipment uses a miniscule amount of power.

      So, to pull one from trade rags: what does this mean? In essence, it's advertising for ARM-based hardware. It's out there, and it's capable. Not only that, but the numbers alone demonstrate that it's at least as capable now as Intel's processors in the same market: especially with Linux.

      How would you like a "netbook" that has no moving parts whatsoever, with an ARM processor which runs cool enough to neither be warm or need a heatsink, and yet can run for a couple days without a battery recharge? That's where we're headed.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    7. Re:disruptive? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Same chip as the latest generation of Gumstix

      No it isn't. The Gumstix uses a cheaper version of the chip. Same ARM core (but that's just a licensed ARM Cortex A8, the same as in Freescale's i.MX515 and a few other systems) and the same DSP, but no GPU.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:disruptive? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Then I guess if you buy a Gumstix, you'd better be really really sure that it's the only one that will physically fit in your application. The Beagleboard is otherwise a much better deal.

  40. MythTV seems like an obvious choice by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    If the USB analog-digital converter works with this device one could build a DVR out of this thing. When my Panasonic DVR's DVD writer broke down, I went hunting for a DVR that does not involve monthly payments to TiVO. To my shock I find no such device exists and the box I bought in Nov 2006 for 410$ was selling at 1800$ in E-Bay!

    Hope some creates really disruptive product to displace TiVO.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:MythTV seems like an obvious choice by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Tivos *do not (necessarily) involve monthly payments to Tivo*. You can buy lifetime subscriptions (tied to the device, not you). (Amortize it among a long enough time, and it's a very good deal indeed IMHO.)

      Plus, there are non-Tivo DVRs.. hard drive/DVD recorders.. which sounds like what your Panasonic one already is.

    2. Re:MythTV seems like an obvious choice by Abreu · · Score: 1

      You can buy lifetime subscriptions (tied to the device, not you). (Amortize it among a long enough time, and it's a very good deal indeed IMHO.)

      Just a clarification: This is not available in all countries...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  41. Beowulf clusters, you say? by macraig · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hey, I already have a beowulf cluster of wall-warts! No, wait, make that two clusters. I don't even need to run the furnace this winter!

  42. dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    marvell and linuxdevices both /.'d

  43. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by icydog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would dare say that an espionage device that disguised itself as a wall wart would be more likely to be discovered based on network analysis ("hold up, what's this device with the unfamiliar MAC off of network port 73?") than based on a visual inspection of the site.

    Forgive me if I'm wrong, but it doesn't sound like you are a network admin (disclaimer: IANANA). Do you know the "familiar" MACs on your network(s)? And what does it mean for a device to be on a network port 73? Unless you mean a physical port on a router or switch somewhere, that doesn't make sense.

    Not that I disagree with your point, which is that the device would not likely be discovered visually, given it was placed well to begin with.

  44. Mirror here by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  45. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

    oldspewey writes:
    "... because wall warts with a tail..."

    Wall warts? Pear pimples for hairy fishnuts?

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  46. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    If you've got physical access to the guts of the network, you can do all kinds of nefarious/black-hat-like things. Admittedly gadgets like this might make it easier.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  47. Re:Wall-Mart? by Perf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'll start shopping at Wall-Mart if they start selling stores for $100.

    Yeah, but right after you buy one, they'll try to get you to upgrade to a Super Store.
    To get it, you'll have to agree to make all future purchases there and sign over the deed to your neighborhood.
    (They have a viral end-user license.)

  48. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Maybe he's using UDP port 73 as a custom connection.

  49. Marvell's Linux support isn't spectacular by VorlonFog · · Score: 1, Redundant

    If they are judged by the OpenWRT's project efforts with the Linksys WRT-350N, Netgear WNR854T, and D-Link DIR-615 are any indication. Two Marvell associates are providing support in their personal time to develop a fully functional open-source driver for Marvell's gigabit switch chip.

  50. HEY! by SnarfQuest · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone know what happened to the server? It just quit responding, and when I went to check it, all I found was a cell-phone charger.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:HEY! by ericdano · · Score: 4, Funny

      They were running the webserver on it so........it popped out of the wall.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  51. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by 0racle · · Score: 1

    You are definitely overestimating the attentiveness of the average person.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  52. Obligatory... by geekmux · · Score: 1

    This would be cool for a pocket-sized router, firewall, packet sniffer, etc.

    Is that a QFE firewall in your pocket, or are you just happy...

    Sorry, I just couldn't...resist.

    I do agree with you though, especially while traveling. Gives a whole new meaning to plug and play...

  53. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Network management tools have had this built in for years. Cisco calls it port security. But it's a bit of a pain in the ass, so not many people use it.

  54. Voltage and phase reading by Skapare · · Score: 1

    If it includes a way to read the power voltage waveform at high resolution (at 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz with 16-bit would be great), I have an idea for it. And no, it's not communications over wireless (that would be great for other applications, too).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Voltage and phase reading by vlm · · Score: 1

      If it includes a way to read the power voltage waveform at high resolution (at 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz with 16-bit would be great), I have an idea for it. And no, it's not communications over wireless (that would be great for other applications, too).

      I'm guessing, maybe the worlds most complicated software implemented X-10 remote control interface, complete with DSP filtering?

      Might be fun to monitor/hack that new "inspiron" home automation hardware.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  55. Actually not a bad idea by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not torrents per se, but a dinky 100 computer sitting somewhere. Doing something...naughty.

    If you get caught you're out 100 bucks. So what? Cheaper than an RIAA settlement letter, for instance.

    Not that I'd ever advocate such behavior. Oh heavens no.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Actually not a bad idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you can really make use of GigE on a system that slow, but having USB2 is fantastic what with the low low prices of large (say, 16GB) flash sticks these days (~$30). It would definitely be an ideal torrentmachine to stash at work. It also seems like you could build a whole business around providing people with their very own server. I know I'd pay $10/mo to have one of these with a 16GB stick on a decent connection someplace.

      The problem is that its specs are just a hair too lame for that purpose. With 512MB of flash you've got about enough room for Debian Lenny, Samba, build-essential, openssh-server, ntp, dvdbackup, libdvdcss2, and vim. I think that's about all I installed, and with an autoclean I'm around 480MB. I have 1GB flash in my cute litle server (DT Research DT168) and it has quad USB2, which makes it a lot more useful as a filesharing device. It probably has much less processing power than this Marvell device, but has a lot more I/O. No GigE, but I don't think either machine really needs it. Both need PoE, neither have it.

      If it just had 1GB flash or 2xUSB2 it would be more useful as a product in and of itself. I wonder if they aren't really making anything on it, and intentionally limited the functionality to make it less appealing to geeks. I further wonder if there's any more USB2 ports in there someplace. I know you could just add a hub, but that has its own problems - not least that if you want to deliver much current through it, it's got to have its own power supply and that eliminates a lot of the charm of this device. Ultimately it seems most useful as a secret, nefarious device :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Actually not a bad idea by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      Don't promote torrenting as being something "sneaky". They can't stop everyone from sharing information, nor will they ever be able to, so the more who do it and do it visibly, the better. :)

      (Besides, any and all content can be shared, who's to say you didn't have permission.)

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    3. Re:Actually not a bad idea by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh no, I wasn't saying torrenting is sneaky. It isn't.

      I was suggesting other nefarious uses. Like an open proxy that doesn't keep logs. Or a server for eMule. Or an icecast server with a public uploads folder - the modern day equivalent of pirate radio, just with audience participation. Or some other such thing.

      Not that I'd ever advocate such behavior. Oh heavens no.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    4. Re:Actually not a bad idea by itzdandy · · Score: 1

      you could certainly install a 4GB+ USB key and mount any filesystem that was not critical for the OS to be up. If you wanted to get creative you could install the system and then dump it all to cramfs. Then mount the cramfs and use unionfs on top of that. I would suspect that many of your files would be static after the initial setup and only configuration files in /etc would change. cramfs provides a read-only compressed filesystem and unionfs lays a read-write layer on top of that so the system thinks that it has real read-write access to the filesystem.

    5. Re:Actually not a bad idea by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Your OS and your data have to share the space on your storage device (more a logistics issue than one of space) or you have to have a hub, unless what you are doing will fit in 512MB. They claim that 512MB is enough for commodity operating systems rather than tiny adaptations of Linux distributions or a custom-only solution, but they are wrong unless you are talking about Debian or Slackware and you're not planning to even install the full default CLI install! At least for Debian, THAT is more than 512MB. I have a just-barely-less-than 512MB install of Debian Lenny on my 1GB-flash DT168 with samba, build-essential, ntp, and opensshd. Oh yeah, and dvdbackup, xfsprogs, vim, and libdvdcss2. That's about 488MB after autoclean. If they put 1GB flash in there it still wouldn't be enough to install an Ubuntu command-line server. There is simply not enough flash in the device. I maintain that they intended this as a crippled teaser platform to limit sales and drive potential nerd buyers to buy the devices derived from it, to keep their customers happy. That's not you, that's the people buying the parts from them...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Actually not a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdotters everywhere will now start finding unnoticed outlets within a wifi network just in time for the next gen of the device with .11n/g support ... suddenly thousands of devices are purchased anonymously and distributed with some unknown script just sitting, waiting for the moment to strike!

      the only question that remains is where, when, and for what nefarious purpose!

  56. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with your main point. And even among people who spot it, how many are going to think twice about it?

    As to your second point, couldn't you avoid detection by configuring it as a transparent bridge between points on the network?

    How would you detect it with network analysis, if (say) it were configured to clone the MAC address, remain silent except for forwarding, matched the speed of the existing network, and caused no significant latency?

  57. Not cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You used to be able to get Linux at Wal-Mart for far less than $100.

  58. Low Watt Webserver for Wordpress? by ericdano · · Score: 1

    But will this run Wordpress? I don't think so. And a USB drive hanging off it would draw a ton of power, and you wouldn't get things like SMART monitoring.

    I'd like to get something to replace my antique Dual Pentium II 450 FreeBSD 4 server.....something around $100 that draws less power, but could do RAID mirroring and could run MYSQL, PHP5 and Apache 2

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Low Watt Webserver for Wordpress? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to get something to replace my antique Dual Pentium II 450 FreeBSD 4 server.....something around $100 that draws less power, but could do RAID mirroring and could run MYSQL, PHP5 and Apache 2

      Something like...this then?

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813153045

  59. slashdotted so... by whitefox · · Score: 1

    I'll believe it when I see it and since I don't see it I don't believe it.

  60. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by turing_m · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... because wall warts with a tail plugged into the nearest network port wouldn't attract any kind of attention.

    It really depends on Murphy's law. If you were planting the device, you would be caught red handed and receive fines and a jail term.

    If the device was planted by someone you were interviewing in your office, it would escape detection for 5 years. Your company's trade secrets (in a convenient folder labeled "top_secret_company_docs") would be stolen by a larger competitor and used to drive your company out of business. Additionally, you would be fired 5 years later as a port audit discovered the device in your office.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  61. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    I once worked in a large office where they scanned their network for such rogue devices. >1 MAC address reported on a single switch port in the closet? Sure sign of someone hiding a little hub under their desk and plugging in their own laptop. They discovered dozens of these setups (in the IT dept, of course) the first time they swept up. Of course, it helps that it was a new building, and they actually knew which switch port corresponded to which cubicle.

    As for *extra* ethernet jacks, how many offices have some kind of cabinet in a conference room, in which resides both power outlets and an ethernet jack? I'd bet a lot!

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  62. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Do you know the "familiar" MACs on your network(s)?

    I don't. My DHCP server does, as it has a whitelist. And elsewhere there is a whitelist to real-world identity table.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  63. Re:Wall-Mart? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

    Have you got any stores without quite so much fnord in it?

  64. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by up2ng · · Score: 1

    Nope, Port 73 on a switch assigned to mac 01:23:45:67:89:10:11
    if its an unrecognized mac the goto port 73 and walk to the jack and see whats connected (you do have a cabling map right)
    Marvell (sic) at the wally-wart as you say WTF ?

    too punny

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  65. Nice by vincentabry · · Score: 1

    That would be great if real

  66. More links and lower price.. by littlefoo · · Score: 1

    Obligatory EE Times link with a slightly different emphasis..
    http://eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=214502566
    which has a link to another implementation (for remote USB access) available for pre-order at $ 79
    http://pogoplug.com/

  67. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    A network admin would probably have said "drop 73" (or just had a flunky do it, while pretending to be real busy doing Something Important because going out and getting your hands dirty sucks) but that is actually quite plausible.

    Just to keep things organized, if nothing else(particulary important when you have POE and non-POE switch ports, or ports on different VLANs), any decent size network setup will have labels or diagrams or a giant huge visio file or something documenting which drops connect to which spots on the patch panel, connect to which ports on the switch. Further, reporting MACs is a standard function for big expensive switches, and obtaining client MACs in an automated fashion is pretty basic client management.

    Not everybody does it; because it is a pain and isn't really justified in many environments; but sniffing out unauthorized MACs on a wired network is totally doable. Any real hardass admin would just be using 802.1x, and your covert ethernet device wouldn't even get in the door.

  68. just hook up a fast USB 2.0 drive and you're set by djdavetrouble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love how easy everything sounds when you precede it with "just".
    You and I both know there is no such thing as a fast USB 2.0 drive, DESPITE THE SPECS.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  69. Does CowboyNeal Say by idontgno · · Score: 1

    No wireless. Less space than an SSD. Lame.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  70. contain your enthusiasm by Eil · · Score: 2, Informative

    LinuxDevices constantly showcases new and fascinating Linux-based hardware like this. Everything from phones to tablets to embedded systems. The problem is that few of these ever seem to make it to market and the ones that do are usually only available to companies who can buy them by the thousands. The remainder that are within the reach of the average hobbyist don't stack up price-wise to more pedestrian solutions that can do the job for cheaper (e.g., a netbook, WRT54GL, or NSLU2).

  71. Re:just hook up a fast USB 2.0 drive and you're se by tburke261 · · Score: 1

    Will it be as fast as a dedicated NAS, with 4 SATA drives, and a "real" RAID controller? No, but it will be much better many other products out there today. But for other applications, this box should be pretty good. Many people will be limited by 100meg network infrastructure more than USB 2.0 bandwidth. I'm no Kernel Hacker, but I'll pick up one to play around with.

  72. Wall-Wart + DisplayLink + BlueTooth by whyde · · Score: 1

    I could almost picture one of these Wall-Warts hooked up via USB2 to a DisplayLink adapter and a TV/Monitor, using a nice BlueTooth keyboard (Apple Wireless Keyboard) for a sweet little noiseless media center front-end.

    Too bad the CPU is not quite capable of HD content decoding, and DisplayLink does not have Linux support yet.

    That's just me dreaming and wishing...

  73. Waterproof / Weatherproof? by GunJah · · Score: 1

    There's a lot I could do with one of these if it was weatherproof and maybe run off 12V...

  74. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Janitorial staff don't go in the server rooms here. They use Roombas.

  75. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by tburke261 · · Score: 1

    I actually have something in my network management suite that pops up in big, red letters "Intruder Detected". Hired (and armed) goons are automatically sent to the physical location of the network port.

  76. Wal-Wart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny how the author knew so many would mis-read that (I know I did at first) and hence he even had to name himself "not-to-be-confused-with-wal-mart". A linux powered Wal-Mart would certainly be great though :p

  77. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny

    the device would not likely be discovered visually, given it was placed well to begin with.

    But if you're going to go to the trouble of carefully hiding an electronic device somewhere in an office, would you really choose this wall wart or something else?

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  78. Re: lower price.. by littlefoo · · Score: 1

    damn..i'll just quietly mod myself down for not seeing the Pogoplug link in the linuxdevices article

  79. Is it UL listed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently had a look at the inside of cheap line-powered Chinese speakers. My advice is don't buy stuff if it is not UL listed. Ever.

    1. Re:Is it UL listed? by k1e0x · · Score: 1

      Good point, how likely is this thing to catch fire, what kind of environment can it operate in?

      I'm fairly sure it's not going to to detonate when you plug it in.. but questions remain like.. can I operate this in a special type of environment like.. say... under the chair in the visitor room in.. you know.. a large government bureau of some kind?

      These things would be good to have in the manual and product description.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    2. Re:Is it UL listed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. but questions remain like.. can I operate this in a special type of environment like.. say... under the chair in the visitor room in.. you know.. a large government bureau of some kind? ...

      Yes, but my first thought was: Am I going to have line voltage on the end of the Cat6 cable plugged in to that thing if something goes a little wrong inside?

    3. Re:Is it UL listed? by k1e0x · · Score: 1

      .. but questions remain like.. can I operate this in a special type of environment like.. say... under the chair in the visitor room in.. you know.. a large government bureau of some kind? ...

      Yes, but my first thought was: Am I going to have line voltage on the end of the Cat6 cable plugged in to that thing if something goes a little wrong inside?

      Hmm, on fault become ether killer.. ya know.. perhaps you may want that if it was discovered under that chair. ;)

      It's not a cheep design.. it's a feature. lol

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  80. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    A guy I worked with use to be like that. He's like "My guild is going on a raid, can you go check on this for me.."

    Yeah.. really..

    Anyhow, yeah it switch port security in Cisco, and you can allow a port a various amount of mac's before it will stop responding to new ones. I know one company in Redmond does this and it's a HUGE pain.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  81. Only a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the article:

    the unobtrusive device approaches the computing power found in the servers of only a decade ago.

  82. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Imagix · · Score: 1

    Yep.. The three byte MAC address prefix may be an otherwise unused vendor in the network, plus there may be MAC-based ACLs on the switch ports. (Although a 73+ port switch is kinda big... I guess they could be two stacked 48-port switches...)

  83. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I once went to a university that did this.

    The 'macchanger' program came in useful. ifconfig eth0 on the lab PC, run macchanger on the laptop, swap the cables over :-).
    You can do it in Windows too, but it's a little more involved.

  84. Screw Marvell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will give you information, only if you sign and NDA, join our "ExtraNet" and suck one of our sales guy's dick. If we are feeling good after that, we might let you see a datasheet. Good luck buying anything from us though, unless you sign an agreement to buy 500,000 units a year.

    EAT SHIT MARVELL. Who taught you guys how to do business anyway?

    1. Re:Screw Marvell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what the hell is wrong "with me":

      Please note that access to all Marvell product documentation requires that you be under a current Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). If you do not have a Marvell NDA on file, please contact your local Sales Representative.

      Also note that Marvell Technical Representatives will be unable to respond to your technical questions unless you have an approved NDA on file.

  85. versus NSLU2 by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's interesting to compare this to the Linksys NSLU2, which I'm using as a home music server.

    ............Marvell NSLU2
    price ($).....100 67 (amazon.com)
    memory (MB)...512 32
    flash (MB)....512 8
    ethernet......yes yes
    usb.......... yes yes, 2 ports

    So I guess with the Marvell box you get somewhat higher specs, but I'm not sure you really need the higher specs. For most applications, you're going to attach a keychain usb drive to these things, and then the internal flash becomes irrelevant. 32 MB of memory may not sound like much these days, but it's actually plenty for a file server, music server, home automation system, etc. The main advantage I could see to the Marvell is that it sounds a little more open. Linksys ships the NSLU2 in a configuration where it's not really a general-purpose linux box, and you have to go through some hassles to get a real linux on it where you can install packages, etc. Linksys does, however, officially bless the use of third-party linix distros on the NSLU2.

    1. Re:versus NSLU2 by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      But how much power does it use? 5 watts is unparalleled as far as I'm concerned. I think I just might move my email and files over to one of these hooked up to a usb drive.

      Then I'll be free of storing my things on Google, and using almost no power to do it.

    2. Re:versus NSLU2 by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      But how much power does it use? 5 watts is unparalleled as far as I'm concerned.

      The figure I have written down in my notes for the NSLU2 is 10 watts. For both machines, the actual power it draws is probably going to depend a lot on what state it's in: whether the cpu is doing anything, whether it's doing I/O, etc.

    3. Re:versus NSLU2 by david.given · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I used to run my home server on an NSLU2 with 500GB of USB disk, before the power supply packed in. This was my main world-facing machine, and did routing, firewalling, HTTP serving for my website, NFS/SMB internally, SMTP and IMAP, backups, etc.

      32MB is not quite enough for this. Picking the right software helps a lot --- spamassassin no, spamprobe yes; apache no, thttpd yes. The biggest load was processing spam; adding a greylister wot I wrote myself helped enormously, as most spam now got rejected before transfer and before the enormously expensive Bayesian filtering stage. But even so, logging into it and working remotely was deeply frustrating as every time it processed an SMTP message the session would freeze; and unison/rsync/rsnapshot (my favourite file transfer and backup system) basically didn't work, as it would just sit and swap continuously until you nuked the process.

      So this little box, which runs at 4.5 times the speed anyway and has scads of RAM, looks ideal to me. Right now my server is a PC of about the same spec, and it's a huge, loud, power-hungry monster. The whole stack, which includes an ADSL router, a WRT54GL, and two hard drives, is currently sucking down 90W!

      So one of these gadgets, with a home-made SSD (4x16GB USB sticks and RAID. Half the price of a real SSD. Slower, but a low-end server won't care) and an external drive that only spins up on demand, would be cheap, small, and low power and silent...

      Incidentally, by the looks of it the Sheeva SOC this thing uses does not have an FPU. Common on ARMs, but a bit of a shame, as the new ARM VFP FPU system kicks arse.

    4. Re:versus NSLU2 by rubies · · Score: 1

      I run an NSLU2 as well, it's not quite fast enough for a DVB TV usb dongle unfortunately, whereas this thing might be.

      Add MythTV to the Wizd / rtorrent software I usually run and I'd be golden. I want one, with a couple of TB hanging off it it'd be sweet.

    5. Re:versus NSLU2 by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      and unison/rsync/rsnapshot (my favourite file transfer and backup system) basically didn't work, as it would just sit and swap continuously until you nuked the proces

      I use unison on my nslu2, and it works fine for me.

    6. Re:versus NSLU2 by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      The hassle factor is far less than you hint at, and 32MB starves the box for RAM. Combine the 32MB of RAM with a dinky 266MHz chip and you get mediocre->crappy Ethernet performance over anything other than FTP. I own one running Debian - great little box, but puny.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  86. Re:Wall-Mart? by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

    Strange. It clearly reads Wall-Mart. The previous headline on the other hand reads "Supreme Court of India Comes Down On fnordBloggersfnord"

    --
    I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  87. If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing had an OS-controlled AC passthrough, so you could plug random electrical devices in and switch them on or off via ethernet.

  88. Imagine a Beowulf Powerstrip Cluster! by whitefox · · Score: 1

    I don't have enough outlets in one room to house a cluster of these so I'd have to use a powerstrip which should be safe considering each wart consumes 5W each. But I'd probably have to have another strip as well for the USB drives I'd be attaching to each wart. :)

    1. Re:Imagine a Beowulf Powerstrip Cluster! by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      That would be bad ass for a torrent based backup restore idea I had. Thanks whitefox.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    2. Re:Imagine a Beowulf Powerstrip Cluster! by Archeopteryx · · Score: 1

      No, you only need one set up as a NAS with the drive on it.

      --
      Dog is my co-pilot.
  89. Re:Replace my NSLU2 by colinnwn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd use it for a NAS, print server, itunes server. I could envision hooking it up to a HDHomeRun and using it as my MythTV backend. Lots of uses for this kind of thing.

    I don't have a use for a webserver. But in your case why can't you prerender your images in the scales you need, and just have this device serve whichever image needed? You could save some considerable $ in power.

    I have electricity within 3 feet of all my ethernet jacks. But the thought of using it as basically a network enabled X11 outlet switch if it only could switch power, or with external USB gear, seems like using a hammer to swat a fly.

  90. NAS NAS NAS NAS by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    The 4 example products are all some form of NAS, or making your NAS function better by providing protocol translations.

    You could run a nice little webserver off of this, it looks like linuxdevices.com might be trying this right now.

    1. Re:NAS NAS NAS NAS by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      A low power NAS that wouldn't kill your bill to keep on all the time like another computer would.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    2. Re:NAS NAS NAS NAS by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Yep, with the right software, this thing could be a cost effective alternative to the TS-109 that I use... I chose the 109 over a retired Pentium box because of total power draw considerations.

  91. It only seems to be available for US sockets by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    I'd like to buy one if they had one for use in the UK. I know I could get an adapter but I don't really fancy paying more and making it stick out even further.

    1. Re:It only seems to be available for US sockets by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      Huh? That's ridiculous, everyone knows everything comes from The Good Old US of A and that because of that everything follows US compliance.

      Seriously, though, it wouldn't be that much of a stretch to install a converter and a US 110/15 polarized grounded receptacle. I mean, it's a little ridiculous for one device, but certainly doable.

      I kind of wish the US would adopt something like the EU plug, it's so much safer and it's practically impossible to be in contact with the 'blade' while plugging it in or removing it. It's a little on the bulky side, but it sure stays in a lot better and you don't have to worry about it halfway hanging out.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    2. Re:It only seems to be available for US sockets by don.g · · Score: 1

      At least if you're in NZ/AU you can, er, convert the plug with a pair of pliers. Which is what I'll do when mine arrives :-)

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  92. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by 680x0 · · Score: 1

    If he's running ArpWatch he'll get an email each time an "unfamiliar" (i.e. new) MAC address is seen.

  93. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    Or plug an HSDPA modem stick into it and you can dial into the other side of their firewall.

  94. HDMI out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is one of these itty-bitty things going to have hdmi out and be able to run vlc in full hi-def resolution? I want a match for the $99 Roku netflix box that will run whatever programs I want.

  95. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Four or so years ago there was a packet sniffer that fit INSIDE a CAT5 cable drop and relayed it's data wirelessly. One-time access to a years of intel.

  96. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by d474 · · Score: 1

    Then again, an audio-recording device that recorded keystrokes or...

    "click click click click click click click-click-click click..."

    We're gonna need to build a GUI interface in Visual Basic to demodulate those keystrokes.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  97. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's not all that uncommon in smaller networks to whitelist MACs to an ethernet port or a subnet. It's an easy way to discourage the salesweasles from trying to access the network with an unauthorized notebook. Won't stop MAC spoofing, of course, and something like this little device could work inline with a PC, spoofing it's MAC address, and be accessible via a separate 802.11 link to a hostile network. But, you would need to do more than that to remain undetected on a reasonably secured, wired network.

  98. Dawson's Creek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave it to kdawson to fucking spell Wal*Mart wrong.

  99. solarnetwork.net by FriedmannSolution5 · · Score: 1

    an open source solar generation and home consumption logging project: http://www.solarnetwork.net/architecture.php this device might be helpful!

  100. Not a Power over Ethernet source... by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think people are missing the point of this.

    If you set this up as a power-over-ethernet device, you could have it powered from a PoE capable switch with only one wire going into it, no need to plug it into the wall.

  101. Something already available by sqrammi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not just use something that's already available, like a RouterStation or Microtik RB433? The RouterStation's cheaper than Marvell's wart, too.

  102. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I do-- and I get emails whenever an unknown MAC shows up.

  103. underground network by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    This is getting close the ideal kit for what I want to try to do. I want to plug in a bunch of these things everywhere with wifi in them as a background network. Extend the internet into areas that can't be filtered easily. Go around backbones (may be a bit slower but unstoppable) and other blockages that could be put up in our way. in most metro areas we could easily get a few thousand of these things plugged in behind a fridge or other inconspicuous places. Might be cool. Could be free (well sort of, people would need to share I guess) wifi city wide at the very least.

  104. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the target office has a networked telephone system connected between the computer and the network, you might be able to monitor that at the same time. Many desks sit undisturbed for years, and even if someone sees the device they might not remove it.

    Label it "LAN Surge Protector" or similar.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  105. I concur (about the xbox...) by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    Just unplugged my xbox (was my "home theater" since well, the xbox and xbmp, then xbmc)

    Got it replaced with (ahem) vlc-server on the linux file server and the ADSL2+ set-top box from my ISP (named "Free") as a (dumb) player. Video codecs just evolved too much for the xbox, and I cannot find a cheap, modded 1.4GHz xbox anywhere (if it ever existed)

    (N.B. yeah, I know, totally unconnected to the wall-wart, but where else can I brag of having a vlc-server serving video at a high rate to a DSL set-top box and have people actually understanding the thrill ?)

    No display, but with a USB2 port and a IOGear USB 2.0 External Video Card (if there are linux drivers for it), you could stream video from your server (with vlc) almost anywhere you have ethernet+ power.

    A poe version for the wall-wart ? (5W is within parameters, only poe is not a consumer grade solution yet) - or bpl to anywhere in your house could make a nifty package...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  106. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suspect that in most places it could be there for months -- maybe years -- before anyone noticed. Make sure the drop isn't traceable to you and just collect the take as long as it goes unnoticed.

    You forgot some steps...

    1. Place device
    2. Collect the take 'as long as it goes unnoticed'
    3. ???
    4. Do not pass 'go'.
    5. Do not collect $200.

  107. Re:just hook up a fast USB 2.0 drive and you're se by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I am doing exactly this with an AMD Geode LX 800-based DT Research DT168. I paid $139 for it with a Keytronic USB keyboard and a Microsoft USB mouse with the glowy red thing at the head end. I still feel like I got robbed; for about the same power consumption I get half the processor power or less. I guess I have to come up with a use for the crypto engine now. But anyway, how fast does it have to be? I have a 1 TB WD MyBook hooked up via USB2 to my cute little 500MHz AMD chip. The server draws less power than the disk. It's more than fast enough to (for example) stream a DVD to the Xbox and let me work with files via my Windows XP system at the same time. I wouldn't try to edit video on it or anything.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  108. The point? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Sure might be cool for techies and they might sell a few, but selling it at *walmart*??

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  109. Is this good? by Mathness · · Score: 1

    you get a completely open (hardware and software) Linux server

    You get what you pay for, I would rather spend a bit more for the secured Linux server. :p

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  110. cool device by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    This is close to the way I'm expecting the cell processor to become popular. I'd prefer two nics instead of usb but with a usb nic you could put together a cheap linux firewall with it.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  111. Re:underground network by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    interesting idea but I wonder how many loops you would end up creating. ie. blocking traffic instead of "freeing" it.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  112. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by meringuoid · · Score: 1

    Then again, an audio-recording device that recorded keystrokes or...

    "click click click click click click click-click-click click..."

    I'm pretty sure it's actually been done; I'd have to pore through Crypto-Gram back issues to find the reference though. The key here is that there are characteristic delays between clicks that depend on the distance between keys, there are subtle differences in pitch, things like that. The spacebar sounds very different, and so does Backspace. Gather a large enough record of clicks from the same typist and it just becomes a matter of statistics, and you can often extract quite a bit of the text.

    Of course if you have such a cunningly placed listening device you're probably better off just monitoring conversations between the typist and his co-workers, but I think this one was done as a Cool Hack rather than as a practical feat of espionage.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  113. So, when can we expect... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

    ...an ARM port of IPCop?

  114. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming the vast majority of its little bulk is the step down & rectifying stuff, does that mean there could be a smaller (or more powerful in the same sixze) machine running off 12V DC. A dashboard computer that fits in the ashtray would be cool!

  115. Re:Wall-Mart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, we've got fnord fnord wal-mart and fnord. That's not got much fnord in it."

    "But I don't like fnord!"

  116. But is it really available? by bartwol · · Score: 1

    According to this page it seems that essentials like the "Linux support package" are not yet available ("Coming Soon"). So would that be like REAL SOON NOW?

    <bart

  117. it needs 4x USB by jipn4 · · Score: 1

    This would be a much better device with 4x USB and/or WiFi. Then, it could be used as a camera server and for similar purposes. If you have to add another powered external box for that, the small form factor quickly loses its appeal.

  118. webcam by jipn4 · · Score: 1

    How much time do YOU spend analyzing at the rat's nest of cabling located under your desk

    I have a webcam there with motion detection! You can never be too secure!

  119. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting as AC because I'm probably not supposed to talk about it, but at the government facility I won't name where I used to work as a network admin, a government agency that got to test our security had a Linux box disguised as a UPS. They got access to a server closet in some outlying building with poor security, after getting in with visitor credentials, and then left and did all of their probing over a tunnel (connected outbound over some allowed port) using that device.

    So yeah, that sort of thing most definitely does get used, and it works.

  120. Re:Ethernet(over power) by thefekete · · Score: 1

    You were close, but not quite there... The really awesome feature that's missing is EoP. That way you just get a power strip, or hell just put one in every room of your house and you have an instant networked "decade-old" server farm. Anyways, you could then have the servers communicate through the powerlines and use the gigabit port to access the server network. Or something, I don't know.

    --
    The cool things is to have windows that bounce up and down like a good tits.
  121. In this form factor it HAS to be data over powerli by Mike+Zilva · · Score: 1

    otherwise the disavantage of this form factor are a biger problem: -If you want to use more than one, each has to have it's own power supply -no easy car (12v) power adaption -diferent models for 110/230v countries (with diferent plugs types)

  122. I don't concur (about the xbox comparison) by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

    There's more to it than "1.2GHz". We don't know much about the Shiva architecture. According to the article it's "ARM9-like" because it's based on Feroceon and XScale. How many ARM9 encoders or transcoders have you heard of?
    Also consider that although the Xbox can decode most everything, it's a closed system, which I'm sure added a little to the performance of XBMC code. I doubt a similar 733MHz Celeron desktop would be as capable even if it had more than 64MB of RAM.

    Aside from serving video, the system may not be able to saturate its gigabit ethernet either. I read that spec as Marvell saying the CPU and SoC can push more than 100mbits, so they used gbit ethernet. Maybe its throughput is limited to, say, 20MBytes/s.

    This is a sweet little toy, especially for its price, but it's not going to compare to most x86 mini-computers.

    1. Re:I don't concur (about the xbox comparison) by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Most ARM SoCs do well at video decoding by cheating; they have a separate DSP on the same die that can handle the CODECs while the ARM code just does the I/O. From the block diagrams, it doesn't appear that the chip in this system has a DSP so it would probably be slow. Don't forget either that it's based on the XScale, which was notorious for getting a much lower IPC than any other ARM core in the same segment. I wouldn't be surprised if a 1GHz i.MX515 outperformed it by a large margin at pretty much any workload. I would only be a little surprised if a 600MHz OMAP3530 was faster.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:I don't concur (about the xbox comparison) by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

      having put the decoding tasks to the linux server, the xbox would actually be able to do the task now. It would not ne used to decode anymore, it just has to grab the decoded video flux and put it on the screen. streaming it only.

      => same for the wall-wart. It doesn't have to have a decoding dsp, it just has to be able to grab the stream and put it on video-out.

      "Surely 1.2GHz would be enough for anybody" 8)

      --
      It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  123. It's missing something important... by j741 · · Score: 1

    This is almost exactly what I need for a little project I have in mind, except that it also needs to have a VGA video output port.

    --
    - James
    1. Re:It's missing something important... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That was exactly my thought as well. I wonder if they will offer another version, or if a derived product might have a VGA/DvI out? This IS the developers version, apparently: it also only has 1 ethernet and 1 USB. Given that the arch supports Intel's WMMX2, lack of video seems kind of silly.

      Realistically - to be a good geekable, or even viable consumer product, it needs to have at least two network interfaces of some sort. And preferably at least 2x USB ports, though I know I would personally make use of 3+ if they were available (printer, flash, camera). And where's the SD slot?

      Then again, it's quite possible that they don't want to make their product (and company) into a "cult personality" in the open source community, and they're just looking at getting free advertising. Or maybe they hadn't thought of doing these things yet, or didn't foresee the geeking limitations to the device. Who knows? It's a dev kit, as of now; I suppose we'll see more later, yes?

      (Side note: gumstix is likely pissing themselves, on account of this dev kit costing less than their entry level board alone, and contains a lot more than what the gumstix does by quite a bit!)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  124. Insidious thought by UnRDJ · · Score: 1

    Hide one of these behind a desk somewhere in a computer lab, sneak a cable to the switch or through one of the workstations, and have it connect via rootkit to a remote server somewhere. Then connect to the server and do whatever naughty things you desire. If you were clever you could even disguise it as an AC adapter.

  125. Wired ethernet is simply better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wired Ethernet is still the preferred mechanism for connecting computing devices. If you're lucky enough to have your house wired with Ethernet you'd understand that it's faster than even 802.11n (which isn't even a standard yet).

  126. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by TrevorB · · Score: 1

    You'll have to put it where Chandra won't find it without a deliberate search.

  127. MOD PARENT UP! by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    Crap! I had mod points, literally, less than 5 minutes ago.

    Then I see this comment, which of all comments ever posted on /., probably ranks in the top 5 for hilarity, and I notice my mod points are gone.

    Somebody do the deed for me, please!

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  128. Re:Wall-Mart? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

    Why do I keep reading that as Wall-Mart?

    Because they got to you.

    Just be glad you can't see the fnord between "Wall" and "Wart."

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  129. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forgive me if I'm wrong, but it doesn't sound like you are a network admin (disclaimer: IANANA). Do you know the "familiar" MACs on your network(s)? And what does it mean for a device to be on a network port 73? Unless you mean a physical port on a router or switch somewhere, that doesn't make sense.

    Not that I disagree with your point, which is that the device would not likely be discovered visually, given it was placed well to begin with.

    The physical port 73 on the network, (i.e. port 12 on switch 3).
    If they buy their hardware bulk, they're most likely to have the same brand NIC's with similar MAC's, after looking over a network and at a glance seeing at the bottom of a routing table there's a out of place MAC isn'tsuch a stretch.
    Barring that, they may be alerted automatically to new MAC's springing up on the network.

  130. Not too useful by drwho · · Score: 1

    WHat would be better is a simple wall wart, would be something with a 3.5" SATA drive interface and two slots or so for everyday memory. Something you can use generic parts in. Yeah, I think that would be useful also if it could have a USB 2.0 interface for a printserver. Hell, I'd pay for than $100.

  131. Gigantic missed opportunity by Trixter · · Score: 1

    I can't believe a server designed to simply plug into the wall doesn't support powerline ethernet. Or wifi for that matter!

  132. sooo close by jabjoe · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it would be possible to: Attach a usb hub. Attach a usb audio device to hub. Attach a usb tv out device to hub. Attach a usb harddisc to device. Install Apache. It can then be the low-power, always-on, web-site hosting, media Linux machine I've always wanted. :-)

  133. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Uh, what?

    An unfamiliar MAC would be one which isn't in your reporting/asset records, and is of a host type/name/etc. that is unrecognized or not set by you. And "port 73" could very well be any of the things you mention - switch, router, room, etc. numbers apply.

    As for placing such a device... I suspect the best place to put a device like that is actually in the server room, or near the switches. Just plug it right into the switch and find an extra UPS port to plug it into. The messiest cables are always in the server room, because users will bitch and moan about cables being visible - and they will notice a change, if only for a reason to bitch. Even an attentive admin is going to likely overlook such an environmental intrusion, simply on the basis of having too much shit to do - it'll come up when equipment needs replacement, and that's it.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  134. Zoneminder -- one of the free camera monitor SWs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your daemon has arrived. The current not-so-workingness with V4L2 is a bit annoying but you can always use the V4L2 to V4L1 compatibility wrapper program to ameliorate the incompatibility situation with varying levels of annoyance/pain depending on your linux distribution.
    http://www.zoneminder.com/

  135. Re:Wall-Mart? by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the fnords.

  136. Re:just hook up a fast USB 2.0 drive and you're se by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    How 'bout eSATA? How long until powered eSATA jacks are standard?

  137. Always happens... by mydocuments · · Score: 2, Funny

    First thing you know, someone will hack this thing and install vista on it.

  138. Re:just hook up a fast USB 2.0 drive and you're se by Briareos · · Score: 1

    I'm no Kernel Hacker, but I'll pick up one to play around with.

    Careful there! Some of those Kernel Hackers really dislike being played around with...

    np: Lali Puna - Alienation (Faking The Books)

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  139. returns? by AmherstburgVision · · Score: 1

    Walmart customers buying $100 computers... I think they'll have a nightmare with returns, no?

    --
    http://www.AmherstburgVisionCentre.com
    1. Re:returns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wall wart, not wal mart.

  140. Re:In this form factor it HAS to be data over powe by hattig · · Score: 1

    You mean Power over Ethernet, as I wrote! No power supply required, works worldwide because PoE is a standard, one cable for data and power, etc.

  141. Welcome to my "wall of power"... by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    I think I could mount several thousand wall receptacles on a reasonable-sized wall. (Better yet, POE...)

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  142. Add SDIO WiFi, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So add a $40 SDIO WiFi card, and you have a $140 device that only needs to detect a usable WiFi connection in order to provide some net service. Network print server for USB printer?

  143. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by bpgslashdotaccount · · Score: 1

    Annoy-a-trons blend, you know.

  144. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by Pinchiukas · · Score: 1

    Did this one attract attention: http://www.elektronika.lt/_sys/storage/2004/11/29/etherkiller.jpg ? If not, neither will the wall wart :).

  145. eSATA by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    Whoops a llama's ass!!

    Seriously... Fire what?

    USB what point what ?

    eSATA . Tell your llama to touch its toes.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  146. Re:Wall-Mart? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Now all three of you have agreed that it says 'wall-mart' can we stop this thread please?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  147. Re:Wall-Mart? by easyTree · · Score: 1

    fnord-lol-fnord

  148. Re:Sounds like a great industrial espionage device by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    Depends on your environment. When I worked for a university department, I had a chronic problem with grad students hooking up all sorts of things to the ethernet ports. And with cheap ethernet devices this is a security concern.

    We finally got switches that could be told, "This port belongs to this MAC" and outlets that weren't in use were not connected between the patch panel and the switch.

    All this meant was that the grads had to learn how to clone the MAC address of the device they were replacing. Then nmap would tell me that the Linux box had turned into a Windows box.

    Nowadays I expect that they would put in their own $40 wireless AP. Once a dozen of them did this, no one would be able to do anything on the air.matchedmatchedmatchedmatchedmatchedmatchedmatchedmatched

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  149. Dedicated Squid / Dan's Guardian Box? by tillerman35 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see something cheap and simple like this that I can plug one side of into the internet and the otherside into the "outbound" port of my home network. The goal would be to provide easy "net nanny" functionality that couldn't be defeated by a savy 14-year old. Since I would have physical control of the network (it's in the locked utility closet), I could have reasonable assurance that he's not visiting questionable sites (like that wretched hive of scum and villainy that is Slashdot).

  150. Re:Replace my NSLU2 by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    I think you mean X10. It's quite capable of being an X11 outlet.

  151. Re:underground network by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    Small technical problem. Completely solvable in software. This is now an engineering exercise, the concept is out there.

  152. Re:Did anyone else of read this as by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1
    For my application (proof search in first-order logic), I need nearly exclusively integer performance, not flops. I also have extremely well-behaved parallelism - each processor gets an individual work package (typically a few kB of input), and chews on it for minutes, producing a summary of less than one kB. So I don't need a high-performance network, either. NUMA is not an issue, as every task works locally. On the other hand, multicore processors have given me very unreliable results, as the application is very memory access intensive, and contention between two processes on the same CPU is non-deterministic. For Core-2 processors, running two jobs at the same time throws off my measurements of cpu time by 20-30 percent.

    On the other hand, Marvel expects to get the wall wart down to US$49,- and it only uses 5 watts. I'm interested in integer MIPS/watt and integer MIPS/$, and I think the wart is attractive there.

    And there is the geek factor, of course!

    --

    Stephan

  153. iSCSI? by zigfreed · · Score: 1

    1) iscsid
    2) upgrade wall wart to USB2/eSATA combo port
    3) ????
    4) PROFIT

  154. Re:You've got be beat. by zigfreed · · Score: 1

    The one I had already could hold up my desktop with a 21" CRT for 27 minutes.

    My UPS only lasts 3 minutes, and that's with a 21W flat panel!