HRC and DNC baggages had enough anchors in them to sink the fucking Titanic.
Clinton lost election. Full stop. Trump had zero to do with it. Putin had zero to do with it. The DNC made their beds with 'super delegates' long before the general election. When are they going to stop blaming everything from Ze Ruskies to Trump supporters?
The whole election came down to a few swing states, namely Wisconsin and Michigan. States that Clinton didn't even bother to visit until late into the cycle. (And she just sent Kaine to WI). It's not hard to see when you compare the 2012 and 2016 elections, it makes it even easier since Stein and Johnson ran in both elections making them a good control. This was her election to lose and she did.
really the whole campaign just shows how little either sides gives a fuck,
If they democrats really wanted to win they had another candidate. Trump didn't win, Clinton lost. They had Michigan and Wisconsin polls completely wrong in the primary and then all those voters went elsewhere in the Primary (which the polls also had completely wrong).
So you have literally zero evidence. Just your speculation. Based on how wrong you've been about "how" these cars work I'm more confident they're doing fine.
How long have these been running around PA? Other than the one going the wrong way down a road how many of them have just worked as intended the entire time?
As someone with 30 years with matlab and simulink experience, I approve of this post.
If you can figure out the black magic that is TLC programming 'language' you're worth your weight in gold to a company. New dev boards are developed all the time and in my experience there is a huge shortage of people that know how to stitch the C and Simulink together.
RNs have replaced what Doctors do. They have exactly picked up what would have been 'doctor work' 50 or 100 years ago. Just like an H1B can pick up and do what a "IT Doctor" did 20 or 30 year ago.
BUT YOU NEED A 6 YEAR DEGREE TO PROGRAM. THESE ARE USELESS. NO ONE LEARNS TO CODE THAT FAST
WHY AREN'T WE RETRAINING PEOPLE TO DO RELEVANT JOBS?
Notice how you can never win?
Edit 1: It is like yelling because it's parroting how they act.
Edit 2: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris at massa sit amet urna malesuada lacinia. Praesent sit amet iaculis sem. Cras vitae arcu a neque cursus porttitor et nec purus. Fusce viverra eleifend enim eu malesuada. Vestibulum quam orci, porta eu maximus at, bibendum a metus. Vestibulum semper consequat justo feugiat luctus. Duis pretium elit ipsum, eu sollicitudin risus sagittis quis. Nam sodales, ante a semper pretium, sem lectus malesuada orci, quis finibus metus ante sit amet elit. Fusce suscipit, felis quis feugiat bibendum, justo ante scelerisque tortor, vitae gravida velit ante eu arcu. Vestibulum eget magna quam. Suspendisse potenti. Maecenas sed nunc arcu. Nunc eget lorem vel turpis tristique venenatis ut nec metus.
Their skills and knowledge are good enough to teach the job but not enough to actually do it?
Yes. I could train a high school student (or H1B) to do about 80% of my job. I actually wish I could. It means I could spend the rest of my time on the other 20%. Until that 20% becomes 80%, rinse and repeat.
Say your job is getting servers online. Your job is to build a machine, load the OS and deploy it. For whatever reason you refuse to learn docker or (insert other containerization here). If you train someone on what you do and they turn around and do use a tool that means they can do your job in 1/10th of the time are they no longer doing your job?
There is a high demand for Simulink modelers right now. (Search Indeed in any metropolitan area in the US) It should be able to buy you 5-10 years before that's something that's taught at the highschool level. (If I could afford the licenses I could probably teach a 15 year old that loves Minecraft to do it).
- even though he was doing the job for years.
Mechanical drafters had been doing their job for years before CAD came along. I don't doubt that most of them could still draft the exact way they had been for decades at that point, it doesn't mean that they were efficient or productive in the new environment.
If I told you in 1970 that I needed you to spin up 1000 servers how long would it take you to do it? How long would it take in 1990, 2010 and 2016? I don't doubt that the person that knew how to do it in 1970 could still do it in 2016, the question is if that is the best way to continue to do it.
$65K workers to replace $80K locals and to drive wages down
You mean how an 'unpaid' mule replaced a farm hard earning a wage? Throughout the course of history everything has been pushed down, simplified and cheapened. The way to stay ahead of that is to adapt.
Your average RN these days can do as much, if not more, than a doctor could do 100 years ago. Your average Physicians Assistant does what a doctor would do 20-30 years ago. My wife's a doctor, she doesn't complain that the RNs and PAs are "taking her job". Or that it's pushing down the wages of doctors. The doctors have moved on to doing something else. Doctors no longer take blood pressure even though at one time that was a cutting edge diagnostic. They don't put in IVs. They don't do a lot of what is medical grunt work. It has allowed them to specialize and as a result medicine has improved. However the doctor that refused to do continuing education has found themselves irrelevant in 2016.
Once upon a time people were paid a living wage drafting, then CAD took off and we eliminated those positions because they weren't relevant jobs anymore. However if you asked the drafters I'm sure they would insist they were highly skilled. As a rule of thumb every 20 years you should be able to replace someone making $100k with someone making $50k, it doesn't mean that "no one makes" good money any more. It means that that the $100k job has moved on to a different skillset. You've never been able to learn something when you were 20 and continued doing that, exactly as you learned it, until retirement. Look at office photos from the 1940s, 1960s, 1980s and 2000s. You should notice a big progression in the skills required to operate in each of those office environments. If someone graduated college in 1940 and refused to pickup anything new in 40 years they would be absolutely irrelevant by 1980.
Seeing how slashdotters whine about anything new I completely understand why some of them are being replaced by H1Bs. Left up to some people we'd still be using punch cards because "That's the way it's done". The 'old people' I know that are still gainfully employed are ones that have continued to reinvent themselves every 10-15 years and stay ahead of what is coming. They're the ones that worked on the tools that replaced other people.
A college education is not a guarantee you can't be replaced, it just gives you a head start. My local highschool's VocTech IT program looks a lot like what a BS IT program looked like 20 years ago. We've created tools and simplified it to the point that we can teach a bulk of it to highschool students. That's the position H1Bs are filling.
So yes, we are all cogs. The trick is you need to make sure you're a cog that is hard to find an expensive to replace because the rest of the world is coming after your position.
requires a test permit for self-driving prototype vehicles,
It is like the human test permit? Where you can flat out fail but they go "eh, we're backed up. Don't do that thing you failed for again". Can you goad it into violating the rules of the road because "They won't work for this intersection" like my BMV employee had me do?
Like I said elsewhere, the Amish are left alone to their own ways around here. I occasionally see a Model T on the road as well. You are more than welcome to leave autos behind.
But the new ones are going to move forward, just like with every other technological evolution in the last 2000 years.
You will be more than free to be left alone. The Amish out here have rejected cell phones, electricity and cars. They go about their business and we go about ours.
There is plenty of land in the 'flyover' states where you can build yourself a unibomber style hut and live completely off grid.
Slashdot Mirror
They made a reasonable decision: Bernie looked unelectable.
http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
You have now invented Google Voice.
HRC and DNC baggages had enough anchors in them to sink the fucking Titanic.
Clinton lost election. Full stop. Trump had zero to do with it. Putin had zero to do with it. The DNC made their beds with 'super delegates' long before the general election. When are they going to stop blaming everything from Ze Ruskies to Trump supporters?
The whole election came down to a few swing states, namely Wisconsin and Michigan. States that Clinton didn't even bother to visit until late into the cycle. (And she just sent Kaine to WI). It's not hard to see when you compare the 2012 and 2016 elections, it makes it even easier since Stein and Johnson ran in both elections making them a good control. This was her election to lose and she did.
Wisconsin:
2012:
2016:
Michigan
2012:
2016:
Good. It's time for something else.
It's not that hard to set custom date ranges on Google:
Obama Sharia Law - 06/12 to 12/12.
3-Star General: Muslim Brotherhood Has Infiltrated All Levels of US Govt To Install Sharia Law
Just one fun one I found from 2008: UPDATE: 4/1/09. Obama appointed a radical muslim extremist, Harold KOH, to head the U.S. State Dept Legal Team. KOH advocates SHARIA ISLAMIC LAW to be allowed in USA courts. SHARIA LAW would over-ride USA LAW and allows women to be beaten and killed by their husbands, thieves to have their hands cut-off and Muslims to kill Infidels (i.e., American Christians and Jews) without fear of prosecution.
There was once a time when English was for the lowest common denominator.
The higher denominators used French or Latin.
really the whole campaign just shows how little either sides gives a fuck,
If they democrats really wanted to win they had another candidate. Trump didn't win, Clinton lost. They had Michigan and Wisconsin polls completely wrong in the primary and then all those voters went elsewhere in the Primary (which the polls also had completely wrong).
I am quite certain
I can find as many people that were 'quite certain' Obama was going to start sharia law, take all their guns, declare himself president for life, ...
I can only assume
So you have literally zero evidence. Just your speculation. Based on how wrong you've been about "how" these cars work I'm more confident they're doing fine.
If you only need to save text, Self hosted Etherpad behind NGINX for authentication.
Especially for solutions in search of problems.
Like those horseless carriages. No one has a problem with horses. Those things just fuddle the road. Waste of time if you ask me.
http://classroom.synonym.com/i...
It's as easy as it is on other android devices.
How long have these been running around PA? Other than the one going the wrong way down a road how many of them have just worked as intended the entire time?
As someone with 30 years with matlab and simulink experience, I approve of this post.
If you can figure out the black magic that is TLC programming 'language' you're worth your weight in gold to a company. New dev boards are developed all the time and in my experience there is a huge shortage of people that know how to stitch the C and Simulink together.
its illegal for RNs to replace Doctors.
RNs have replaced what Doctors do. They have exactly picked up what would have been 'doctor work' 50 or 100 years ago. Just like an H1B can pick up and do what a "IT Doctor" did 20 or 30 year ago.
making sure her ass isn't replaced by web MD
I would have given you Watson, but WebMD? No.
can also take over
And if that occurs 'never' then is the car self driving or not?
If you ride a bike with training wheels are you not riding a bike? What if the training wheels never touch the ground?
Self driving cars are coming, they're already here.
You can continue to shout that water isn't wet but it doesn't mean these cars aren't coming.
BUT YOU NEED A 6 YEAR DEGREE TO PROGRAM. THESE ARE USELESS. NO ONE LEARNS TO CODE THAT FAST
WHY AREN'T WE RETRAINING PEOPLE TO DO RELEVANT JOBS?
Notice how you can never win?
Edit 1: It is like yelling because it's parroting how they act.
Edit 2: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris at massa sit amet urna malesuada lacinia. Praesent sit amet iaculis sem. Cras vitae arcu a neque cursus porttitor et nec purus. Fusce viverra eleifend enim eu malesuada. Vestibulum quam orci, porta eu maximus at, bibendum a metus. Vestibulum semper consequat justo feugiat luctus. Duis pretium elit ipsum, eu sollicitudin risus sagittis quis. Nam sodales, ante a semper pretium, sem lectus malesuada orci, quis finibus metus ante sit amet elit. Fusce suscipit, felis quis feugiat bibendum, justo ante scelerisque tortor, vitae gravida velit ante eu arcu. Vestibulum eget magna quam. Suspendisse potenti. Maecenas sed nunc arcu. Nunc eget lorem vel turpis tristique venenatis ut nec metus.
Their skills and knowledge are good enough to teach the job but not enough to actually do it?
Yes. I could train a high school student (or H1B) to do about 80% of my job. I actually wish I could. It means I could spend the rest of my time on the other 20%. Until that 20% becomes 80%, rinse and repeat.
Say your job is getting servers online. Your job is to build a machine, load the OS and deploy it. For whatever reason you refuse to learn docker or (insert other containerization here). If you train someone on what you do and they turn around and do use a tool that means they can do your job in 1/10th of the time are they no longer doing your job?
What parts would those be?
Anywhere but SV.
EXACTLY what SPECIFIC skills are missing.
There is a high demand for Simulink modelers right now. (Search Indeed in any metropolitan area in the US) It should be able to buy you 5-10 years before that's something that's taught at the highschool level. (If I could afford the licenses I could probably teach a 15 year old that loves Minecraft to do it).
- even though he was doing the job for years.
Mechanical drafters had been doing their job for years before CAD came along. I don't doubt that most of them could still draft the exact way they had been for decades at that point, it doesn't mean that they were efficient or productive in the new environment.
If I told you in 1970 that I needed you to spin up 1000 servers how long would it take you to do it? How long would it take in 1990, 2010 and 2016? I don't doubt that the person that knew how to do it in 1970 could still do it in 2016, the question is if that is the best way to continue to do it.
$65K workers to replace $80K locals and to drive wages down
You mean how an 'unpaid' mule replaced a farm hard earning a wage? Throughout the course of history everything has been pushed down, simplified and cheapened. The way to stay ahead of that is to adapt.
Your average RN these days can do as much, if not more, than a doctor could do 100 years ago. Your average Physicians Assistant does what a doctor would do 20-30 years ago. My wife's a doctor, she doesn't complain that the RNs and PAs are "taking her job". Or that it's pushing down the wages of doctors. The doctors have moved on to doing something else. Doctors no longer take blood pressure even though at one time that was a cutting edge diagnostic. They don't put in IVs. They don't do a lot of what is medical grunt work. It has allowed them to specialize and as a result medicine has improved. However the doctor that refused to do continuing education has found themselves irrelevant in 2016.
Once upon a time people were paid a living wage drafting, then CAD took off and we eliminated those positions because they weren't relevant jobs anymore. However if you asked the drafters I'm sure they would insist they were highly skilled. As a rule of thumb every 20 years you should be able to replace someone making $100k with someone making $50k, it doesn't mean that "no one makes" good money any more. It means that that the $100k job has moved on to a different skillset. You've never been able to learn something when you were 20 and continued doing that, exactly as you learned it, until retirement. Look at office photos from the 1940s, 1960s, 1980s and 2000s. You should notice a big progression in the skills required to operate in each of those office environments. If someone graduated college in 1940 and refused to pickup anything new in 40 years they would be absolutely irrelevant by 1980.
Seeing how slashdotters whine about anything new I completely understand why some of them are being replaced by H1Bs. Left up to some people we'd still be using punch cards because "That's the way it's done". The 'old people' I know that are still gainfully employed are ones that have continued to reinvent themselves every 10-15 years and stay ahead of what is coming. They're the ones that worked on the tools that replaced other people.
A college education is not a guarantee you can't be replaced, it just gives you a head start. My local highschool's VocTech IT program looks a lot like what a BS IT program looked like 20 years ago. We've created tools and simplified it to the point that we can teach a bulk of it to highschool students. That's the position H1Bs are filling.
So yes, we are all cogs. The trick is you need to make sure you're a cog that is hard to find an expensive to replace because the rest of the world is coming after your position.
Ever think that maybe you don't have relevant skills anymore? No one complained when we filled the fields with migrant workers.
Plenty of jobs around these parts if you have the skillsets.
Nah, it's easier to whine "They Took Our Jeorbs"
requires a test permit for self-driving prototype vehicles,
It is like the human test permit? Where you can flat out fail but they go "eh, we're backed up. Don't do that thing you failed for again". Can you goad it into violating the rules of the road because "They won't work for this intersection" like my BMV employee had me do?
> be forced into a vehicle
Like I said elsewhere, the Amish are left alone to their own ways around here. I occasionally see a Model T on the road as well. You are more than welcome to leave autos behind.
But the new ones are going to move forward, just like with every other technological evolution in the last 2000 years.
How dare you bring technical discussion to fearmongering.
You will be more than free to be left alone. The Amish out here have rejected cell phones, electricity and cars. They go about their business and we go about ours.
There is plenty of land in the 'flyover' states where you can build yourself a unibomber style hut and live completely off grid.
No one is forcing you to buy these cars.