"Both" sides use their cherry-picked facts to justify government action to back them not realizing every government action is actually a loss for both sides.
And you use your cherry-picked facts to justify your ideology despite that it is trivially easy to point to a positive action by a government.
Take a good look guys. This guy just committed a basic mistake in method. He made a leap unsupported by the facts. The presence and quantity of trees may be correlated with healthier people, but that in no way means there's a connection.
Maybe you should try checking for a claim of causation before trotting out the lame correlation != causation cliche. The title of this fine summary is: "Death of Trees Correlated With Human Cardiovascular & Respiratory Disease"
If you said "billions and billions of random events occurred to create anti-entropic self-organizing entities" people would say "well, Occam's Razor says no." And yet here we are.
Unless you have a simpler explanation, Occams Razor says Yes.
Methane is less stable than CO2. Its lifetime in normal atmoshperic sunlight is about two decades. CO2 stays for thousands of years.
True to a point, the global warming potential of methane for 100 years is 25 and for 500 years is 7.6. So even after 500 years the methane is still 7.6 times as bad.
If the ocean warms too much, the hydrates will just bubble out and poof, LOTS more methane in the atmosphere that didn't provide us anything useful...
Additionally, methane is 25 times more potent as a grennhouse gas. So converting that to energy and CO2 gives you energy and a net reduction in the greenhouse effect.
Some of the most widely respected invertebrate zoologists I know are also creationists.
From Wikipedia: Zoology/zoÊSËÉ'lÉ(TM)dÊ'i/, occasionally spelled zoÃlogy, is the branch of biology that relates to the animal kingdom, including the structure, embryology, evolution, classification, habits, and distribution of all animals, both living and extinct.
In addition, they will also have access to your: personality profile, criminal records, court records, land records, birth certificate, marriage certificate, political contributions, address, phone number, date of birth, and embarrassing photos of you drunk in college.
Slashdot is full of such reactionaries! It is obvious that political contributions, so long as you meet the minimum donation, will remain anonymous.
That's point. While America fight a war on terrorists, the rest of the world are doing criminal investigations on organized crime and terrorist groups. While American fight obesity, the rest of the world seeks solutions to a healthier lifestyle to reduce obesity. While American fight a war on drugs, the rest of the world arrest criminals and put them to trial.
This concept of "fighting wars" on everything is very American (not that wars are not fought somewhere else by other groups, don't get me wrong). This concept is also very hyped by the American medias.
And yet... Vietnam was a "police action." Go figure...
Bush's budget issued in 2001 warned that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were overleveraged, and said that they needed tighter controls, oversight, and a host of reforms...
I would love to see a source for that.
I do personally recall Bush campaigning in 2004 based on the increase in home ownership. Here are some direct quotes: link (think what you will of the linked source, it was the first I found in google with actual quotes)
Slashdot Mirror
The link in this article references the UW Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences in what appears to be a peer reviewed paper.
Your link references some dude's op-ed.
I know which source I would tend to believe more...
"Both" sides use their cherry-picked facts to justify government action to back them not realizing every government action is actually a loss for both sides.
And you use your cherry-picked facts to justify your ideology despite that it is trivially easy to point to a positive action by a government.
That sentence quoting SCOTUS says nothing about "non-profit."
Non-profit is literally in bold in that sentence!
Or you're a tea party supporter trying to start a nonprofit.
Or a political advocacy group illegally trying to file as a non-profit.
Take a good look guys. This guy just committed a basic mistake in method. He made a leap unsupported by the facts. The presence and quantity of trees may be correlated with healthier people, but that in no way means there's a connection.
Maybe you should try checking for a claim of causation before trotting out the lame correlation != causation cliche. The title of this fine summary is: "Death of Trees Correlated With Human Cardiovascular & Respiratory Disease"
Any time an argument starts with "You $ETHNICORCULTURALGROUP" anything written subsequently loses all merit immediately.
You blind people can't see very well.
QED.
In your first sentence you say the new code is easy to implement. Then you say that is a bad thing because the US tax code is difficult to implement.
If you said "billions and billions of random events occurred to create anti-entropic self-organizing entities" people would say "well, Occam's Razor says no." And yet here we are.
Unless you have a simpler explanation, Occams Razor says Yes.
Do we really need the administration wasting time on this?
Shouldn't taking someone's domain "by force" just be domain name hijacking?
Fuck that. I shouldn't have to pay the medical expenses for smokers, alcoholics or drug users.
If you have insurance you pay the medical expenses for smokers, alcoholics or drug users.
So true. Only an economist could say with a straigth face that asymptotically approaching zero equals infinity.
It worked for CFCs...
Methane is less stable than CO2. Its lifetime in normal atmoshperic sunlight is about two decades. CO2 stays for thousands of years.
True to a point, the global warming potential of methane for 100 years is 25 and for 500 years is 7.6. So even after 500 years the methane is still 7.6 times as bad.
If the ocean warms too much, the hydrates will just bubble out and poof, LOTS more methane in the atmosphere that didn't provide us anything useful...
Additionally, methane is 25 times more potent as a grennhouse gas. So converting that to energy and CO2 gives you energy and a net reduction in the greenhouse effect.
Or maybe it is one-sided because they found ours but we can't find theirs?
Some of the most widely respected invertebrate zoologists I know are also creationists.
/zoÊSËÉ'lÉ(TM)dÊ'i/, occasionally spelled zoÃlogy, is the branch of biology that relates to the animal kingdom, including the structure, embryology, evolution, classification, habits, and distribution of all animals, both living and extinct.
From Wikipedia:
Zoology
Hmm.....
From the EPA:
Myth: Volcanoes and the Oceans are Causing Ozone Depletion
In addition, they will also have access to your: personality profile, criminal records, court records, land records, birth certificate, marriage certificate, political contributions, address, phone number, date of birth, and embarrassing photos of you drunk in college.
Slashdot is full of such reactionaries! It is obvious that political contributions, so long as you meet the minimum donation, will remain anonymous.
In other words: estimates of temperature in medieval/Roman times based on tree ring data may well be too low.
And as we all know...nothing bad ever happened to the Romans.
1. Is harming someone a crime?
2. Is credibly threatening a person with harm a crime?
3. Is credibly threatening several people with harm a crime?
Which is worse, doing one or doing all three? Which should be punished more severely, committing one or three crimes?
So you advocate teaching something outside of the scientifically "significant modern consensus" in elementary school science classes then?
Whoever uses "whomever" as a subject needs some serious English lessons.
Him didn't pay attention whilst in English class.
FTFY
That's point. While America fight a war on terrorists, the rest of the world are doing criminal investigations on organized crime and terrorist groups. While American fight obesity, the rest of the world seeks solutions to a healthier lifestyle to reduce obesity. While American fight a war on drugs, the rest of the world arrest criminals and put them to trial.
This concept of "fighting wars" on everything is very American (not that wars are not fought somewhere else by other groups, don't get me wrong). This concept is also very hyped by the American medias.
And yet... Vietnam was a "police action." Go figure...
Bush's budget issued in 2001 warned that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were overleveraged, and said that they needed tighter controls, oversight, and a host of reforms...
I would love to see a source for that.
I do personally recall Bush campaigning in 2004 based on the increase in home ownership. Here are some direct quotes: link
(think what you will of the linked source, it was the first I found in google with actual quotes)