Slashdot Mirror


EU Scientists Working On Laser To Rip a Hole In Spacetime

astroengine writes "Those pesky physicists are at it again; they want to build a laser so powerful that it will literally rip spacetime apart. Why? To prove the existence of virtual particles in the quantum vacuum, potentially unravel extra dimensions and possibly find the root of dark matter. The $1.6 billion Extreme Light Infrastructure Ultra-High Field Facility (known as ELI) will be built somewhere in Europe by the end of the decade and physicists are hoping the ten high-powered lasers — delivering 200 petawatts of power at a target for less than a trillionth of a second — will turn up some surprises about the very fabric of the Universe."

575 comments

  1. Mandatory comment. by Dartz-IRL · · Score: 5, Funny

    Commencing Primary Ignition....

    Standby...

    Standby...

    --
    So there I was, scribbling down some notes off the PC screen by hand, when I reached for the keyboard and Ctrl-S'd.
    1. Re:Mandatory comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Land of the Lost...

    2. Re:Mandatory comment. by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      You forgot the...

      Beeeoooouuuuwwwww!

      Sound effect...

    3. Re:Mandatory comment. by paleo2002 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I never thought I'd see a resonance cascade, let alone create one . . .

    4. Re:Mandatory comment. by Surt · · Score: 1

      Who on earth rated this offtopic? Turn in your nerd badge on your way out.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Mandatory comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note to self, buy crowbars.

    6. Re:Mandatory comment. by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

      Europe is too remote to make an effective demonstration - but don't worry; we will deal with your rebel friends soon

    7. Re:Mandatory comment. by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Yes sir, we tore the universe a new space hole, alright. But it's clenching shut fast!

    8. Re:Mandatory comment. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      He did, you just didn't hear it.

    9. Re:Mandatory comment. by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Europe is too remote to make an effective demonstration - but don't worry; we will deal with your rebel friends soon

      Europe is too remote to make an effective demonstration - but don't worry; we will deal with your rebel friends soon ENOUGH..

      FTFY

      Turn in *your* nerd badge.. You gotta be ACCURATE when you quote Starwars...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    10. Re:Mandatory comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WASTE OF ENERGY = MULTI-BILLION OF EUROS OF PROFIT, IT WILL HIDDENLY WASTED for COAL COMPANIES, NUCLEAR FUEL COMPANIES, ELECTRIC POWER COMPANIES, HIDDEN INDUSTRIES, etc. FOR ILLEGAL COMPETITION USING MONEY THAT IS NOT FROM THEIRS.

    11. Re:Mandatory comment. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Note to self, send box of donuts to Barney.

    12. Re:Mandatory comment. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Star Wars" is two words.

      Turn in *your* nerd badge.. You gotta be accurate when you write Star Wars.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Mandatory comment. by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

      No $#|7....

    14. Re:Mandatory comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy smokes geekoid! I thought you stopped posting. That was a good catch. Sorry for ever doubting you.

      ft

  2. Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    Alright folks, listen up: This is not an appropriate time for a shark joke. This is very clearly an opportunity for an Alan Parsens or Preperation H reference.

    Anybody caught making a Frickin' Sharks joke will be permanently labeled a virgin.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by kenj0418 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anybody caught making a Frickin' Sharks joke will be permanently labeled a virgin.

      If that happens, can I have all that child support I've paid refunded?

    2. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Alright folks, listen up: This is not an appropriate time for a shark joke. This is very clearly an opportunity for an Alan Parsens or Preperation H reference.

      So... you're tired of these motherfrickin' lasers on these motherfrickin' sharks?

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    3. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I take it that mutant Sea Bass are still OK?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that the female sharks are looking for something that will last a bit longer than a trillionth of a second?

      --
      If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
    5. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by tepples · · Score: 1

      Only if you're playing one of the Animal Crossing games and you're frustrated at getting the same fish over and over.

    6. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by sjames · · Score: 1

      Looks like time to dust off the Cheech and Chong jokes then.....

    7. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they are bad tempered.

    8. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Umm, this is the time for Real Genius jokes, not shark jokes.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think everyone on /. understands it's the physicists who are trying to 'lighten up".

    10. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Ill-tempered sir, ILL-tempered. Ill-tempered sea bass will eat you enemies, bad-tempered sea bass will jump out of the tank and eat your minions in a flash of pyrrhic defiance

    11. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 0

      Yes, but only if you're not a Christian.

    12. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by syousef · · Score: 1

      Anybody caught making a Frickin' Sharks joke will be permanently labeled a virgin.

      Too late. Take a look at your url bar. This is slashdot.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    13. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just did make a Frickin Shark joke.

    14. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by deek · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, sharks jump bad-tempered sea bass.

      Oh god, my first Soviet Russia joke, and I feel so dirty. So very dirty.

    15. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by No,+I+am+Spratacus! · · Score: 1

      Do NOT look into laser with remaining eye?

      Wait, wait... do NOT aim laser at remaining universe?

    16. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "This is very clearly an opportunity for an Alan Parsens or Preperation H reference."

      The Time Machine was a good album.

      Do you mean Alan Parsons the musician (He used to work with Eric Woolfson)

    17. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Anybody caught making a Frickin' Sharks joke will be permanently labeled a virgin.

      If that happens, can I have all that child support I've paid refunded?

      No, because you can still father a child AND remain a virgin...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    18. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 1

      Well, labeling someone a virgin on Slashdot is about as redundant as..... all those shark jokes....

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    19. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by rednip · · Score: 1

      But, but, I got all of my shit in this universe, what if they break it?

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    20. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by domatic · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it would be great for making hubungous Jiffy Pops.

    21. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't posting to Slashdot enough to get them to do that?

    22. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by PlatyPaul · · Score: 2

      "I think I made the fish too hardcore."

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    23. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Kam+Solusar · · Score: 1

      That should teach you a lesson about the importance of off-site backups.

      --
      The Angels have the Phone Box
    24. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Not generally on the living-in-your-parents'-basement salary (hey, since we're already doing memes...).

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    25. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200 petawatts?! "We're gonna need a bigger frickin' shark!"

    26. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOH!!!

    27. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      I thought that applied only to "mothering" a child

      --
      -- no sig today
    28. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Alan Parsons, and Preparation H, you hemorrhoid!

    29. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Anybody caught making a Frickin' Sharks joke will be permanently labeled a virgin.

      Uh, that's not a very effective threat on Slashdot. It's like telling Somali pirates that we'll bomb their country back to the bronze age if they don't shape up.

    30. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody caught making a Frickin' Sharks joke will be permanently labeled a virgin.

      If that happens, can I have all that child support I've paid refunded?

      You are the Father? Claiming to be virgin? No. But you are very funny.

    31. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I'd tell a good Real Genius joke, but I'm too busy pondering the immortal words of Socrates, when he said:

      "I drank what?"

    32. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the first grad students to test it will load the receiver with a giant popcorn ball and attempt to explode the lab?

    33. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      Anybody caught making a Frickin' Sharks joke will be permanently labeled a virgin.

      Too late. Take a look at TFM. The shark joke was made in the original Discovery.com article

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    34. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be claiming to have had sex. Pics or GTFO.

    35. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by kenj0418 · · Score: 1

      Be careful what you wish for.

    36. Re:Do NOT make a frickin laser beam joke by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      This turkey tastes ... funny. What did you baste it with?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. The article asks "Why?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is not what is given. The answer is:

    1. Pork
    2. Some researchers get media attention
    3. Some researchers might get to play with the laser.

    The whole idea is so lame. Please, give the money to a real condensed matter physicist, or a chemist or a materials scientist please.

    1. Re:The article asks "Why?" by Astronomerguy · · Score: 2

      The answer is not what is given. The answer is:

      1. Pork 2. Some researchers get media attention 3. Some researchers might get to play with the laser.

      The whole idea is so lame. Please, give the money to a real condensed matter physicist, or a chemist or a materials scientist please.

      I'll feed ya, Anonymous Coward! :-) Why is it lame? Potentially (and admittedly it will eat giga-watts of electricity) it could confirm some very fundamental elements of theoretical physics. That, to me, is worth every giga-penny. Advancement of fundamental knowledge is money well-spent. Do you have something against science on the frontiers? Just askin'.

    2. Re:The article asks "Why?" by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Why is it lame?

      Because the shark question has not been considered. I would fucking pay extra taxes to see space-time ripping laser sharks.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:The article asks "Why?" by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      May or may not be Pork, but there will be Cake.

    4. Re:The article asks "Why?" by Artifakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm not the original AC, but I'll give you a two part argument for it's being lame.
      1. The energy density for this device, while pretty spectacular, is still way, way below the range where current competing theories predict exotic results. This has been a problem for projected particle accelerator of the future designs as well, since at least before the Superconducting Supercollider design that was to be built in Texas was canceled by the US Congress. One of the reasons we have gone ahead with new accelerators even though we (as a species) are still tremendously short of achieving the energy levels needs for more direct tests is a few 'work arounds' have been theorized. These are phenomena that are in the range the machine at CERN or others can reach, but that theoretically may be indirectly influenced by Super-symmetry or other theories we can't test more directly. Without some relatively indirect test like this, the Uber-laser still won't be nearly powerful enough to accomplish anything. So, either there's some sort of indirect prediction from one of the String theory variants, or Super-symmetry, or some more exotic theory, and that indirect prediction is down in the energy range that this thing achieves, or they are basically just gambling on something completely unexpected showing up. Since the article doesn't really explain what that indirect, inferential prediction might be, It's seems more likely than not there isn't a specific one. (Of course, it's possible the interviewer didn't get everything into the article.).
      2. The article also states that the energy achieved by this device will be equal to a temperature greater than the center of the sun. That sounds impressive, but we've seen some much more energetic events in astrophysics. Lots of Nova/Supernova variants, neutron star related events, and quasars involve energy densities way beyond both the center of our sun and this laser device. We should at least possibly have seen some evidence for the same kind of effects as this widget is supposed to possibly produce by studying existing astronomical events. While that's not absolutely always a good guideline, I know, in the absence of an indirect prediction based on existing theory, I'd be willing to gamble somewhat if the device aimed to mimic the energy densities of some astrophysical event and could point to theories from there as evidence for this 'hole ripping' or 'cosmic hernia' effect. It's not uncommon for sub-atomic physics to take cues from Astrophysics and Cosmology, and vice-versa, but that too doesn't seem to be happening in this case.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:The article asks "Why?" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. What will they pay for it with?

      Euros?

      Har! It's to larf, really!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    6. Re:The article asks "Why?" by darkshadow88 · · Score: 2

      and admittedly it will eat giga-watts of electricity)

      Well, yes, it's 200 petawatts, but the amount of energy is less than that of an incandescent lightbulb running for an hour. 200 quadrillion watts * 1 trillionth of a second * (1hr/3600s) * (1 kWh/1000 Wh) = .05556 kWh (in other words, the amount of energy used by about 56 watts over the course of an hour).

    7. Re:The article asks "Why?" by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 0

      The matter is lame, because all of Europe is getting rid of nuclear power. So how are they planning on powering it?

    8. Re:The article asks "Why?" by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      So how are they planning on powering it?

      See darkshadow88's comment above. 56W is not a huge power if it's fired once per hour. (Obviously higher average power if it's fired more often.)

      The matter is lame, because all of Europe is getting rid of nuclear power.

      All? For certain values of "all" that include about 1/10th of the countries. That's like saying that North America is "all" Canadians.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If spacetime is ripped apart, where and when will any observations of any phenomena they are studying occur?

    1. Re:Results how? by mrxak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You raise an interesting point. How exactly do we detect the absence of spacetime? Presumably if it's ripped apart, either there will be gaps, or somehow we'll make more of it.

    2. Re:Results how? by dccase · · Score: 2

      Don't panic.
      Eddy's in the spacetime continuum.
      He'll give us The Answer.

    3. Re:Results how? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You raise an interesting point. How exactly do we detect the absence of spacetime? Presumably if it's ripped apart, either there will be gaps, or somehow we'll make more of it.

      Oh come on, we know the answer to this. Hellish beings from another Universe will come charging through the gap causing explosions, terror and Micheal Bay movies.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Results how? by TehNoobTrumpet · · Score: 1

      42. Easy.

    5. Re:Results how? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. Evil twins of local people will come through the tear in space-time, except for one which is actually a good twin (since its double in this universe is evil), and will cause all kinds of pandemonium. When everyone finally figures out how to banish these evil doubles back to their mirror universe, they'll try to send the one evil guy from this universe back with them, but he'll fool everyone so that they send the good one instead.

    6. Re:Results how? by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      explosions, terror and Micheal Bay movies.

      No need to repeat yourself.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    7. Re:Results how? by reverseengineer · · Score: 5, Informative

      It wouldn't be so much tearing a hole in the fabric of space as making a ripple. The laser's electric field would make a wake in the sea of transient vacuum particles that prevents their instantaneous annihilation, and hopefully lets some exotic particles exist for long enough to be detected. Despite the idea that this "quantum foam" of seething virtual particles would be the fabric of space-time, the answers to where and when phenomena would be detected are most likely "in detectors just outside the laser's path" and "femtoseconds after the laser is fired" and not perhaps "in another universe" or "85 million years in the past." This is not a FOX show, after all.

      Actually, far more energetic phenomena-- gamma ray bursts-- have been studied to observe the effects their travels through the fabric of space-time on the way to Earth have had, and the results have been pretty mundane. Even for ridiculously high-energy gamma ray photons, the fabric of the universe behaves as being essentially smooth and respectful of general relativity. Maybe we'll see something a bit wilder given a chance to take a closer look, but to describe "pushing some particles apart so we can see them" as "tear apart the vacuum of space" is a bit of an exaggeration.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    8. Re:Results how? by jd · · Score: 1

      That was Deep Thought. Eddy's answer was infinity minus 1.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:Results how? by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. Evil twins of local people will come through the tear in space-time, except for one which is actually a good twin (since its double in this universe is evil), and will cause all kinds of pandemonium. When everyone finally figures out how to banish these evil doubles back to their mirror universe, they'll try to send the one evil guy from this universe back with them, but he'll fool everyone so that they send the good one instead.

      Nice Southpark reference. (S02E15, "SpookyFish")

    10. Re:Results how? by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. Evil twins of local people will come through the tear in space-time, except for one which is actually a good twin (since its double in this universe is evil), and will cause all kinds of pandemonium. When everyone finally figures out how to banish these evil doubles back to their mirror universe, they'll try to send the one evil guy from this universe back with them, but he'll fool everyone so that they send the good one instead.

      I love your South Park reference. (S02E15, "SpookyFish")

    11. Re:Results how? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Oh no, not Michael Bay movies!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:Results how? by sgrover · · Score: 1

      How? Look for the duct-tape patches over the gaps, of course.

    13. Re:Results how? by Scarletdown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm just hoping that the results of this experiment will provide once and for all, a definitive answer to the ages old question of:

      If three astronauts are flying over the Gobi Desert in a canoe, and they crash land, how many pancakes does it take to shingle a doghouse?"

      I've only been able to narrow it down to two possible answers:

      Three, because ice cream has no bones.

      or

      Nine, because watermelons can't use night vision goggles.

      And even then, I am only about 70% sure the answer is one of those. This experiment with the great big lasers could reveal a completely different answer.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    14. Re:Results how? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      I get first dibs on trying to make some time with evil Uhura, when she shows up!

      If shes' evil, why is her name still "Freedom"?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    15. Re:Results how? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      This is a sensationalist article.

    16. Re:Results how? by Bardwick · · Score: 1

      Howard the Duck will land in Clev-Land and start doing hot chicks.

    17. Re:Results how? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      So that you can hate her for her freedom.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    18. Re:Results how? by pburghdoom · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, we know the answer to this. Hellish beings from another Universe will come charging through the gap causing explosions, terror and Micheal Bay movies.

      No, it will be the Dark Overlord of the Universe and only an anthropomorphic duck and a neutron disintegrator laser can save us.

    19. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked evil Jean Grey better

    20. Re:Results how? by Ed_1024 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, we know the answer to this. Hellish beings from another Universe will come charging through the gap causing explosions, terror and Micheal Bay movies.

      That's why the location of the 200PW laser facility is not mentioned... I have it on good authority that it's on Mars.

    21. Re:Results how? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1
      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    22. Re:Results how? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      This is not a FOX show, after all.

      The first tip-off was that it's still on the air.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    23. Re:Results how? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Sure, I got dibs on evil Hoshi and a few Boomer Cylons :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    24. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and Micheal Bay movies

      So you are saying it has already happened???

    25. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just hoping that the results of this experiment will provide once and for all, a definitive answer to the ages old question of:

      If three astronauts are flying over the Gobi Desert in a canoe, and they crash land, how many pancakes does it take to shingle a doghouse?"

      I've only been able to narrow it down to two possible answers:

      Three, because ice cream has no bones.

      or

      Nine, because watermelons can't use night vision goggles.

      And even then, I am only about 70% sure the answer is one of those. This experiment with the great big lasers could reveal a completely different answer.

      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_pancakes_does_it_take_to_shingle_a_dog_house

    26. Re:Results how? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Can't believe there are only two people in the entire thread who thought of this. A seriously underrated film, I watch it least twice a year.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    27. Re:Results how? by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Rodney McKay will appear at the point of the rip.

    28. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably more space, less time..

      That's why these ninth grade nerds who couldn't get laid in college have to be stopped. They are only trying to make everybody pay now. Don't you see? Why doesn't anyone see that?

    29. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we may get a chance to review some theory Ronald Mallett was talking about back in 2007 or so. Would be neat to see how much of that, if any, is verifiable.

    30. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting enough, I am currently seeking grant money to explore and measure the nothing that exists when nothing is there.

    31. Re:Results how? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I thought it would be more Doom episodes...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    32. Re:Results how? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Different strokes for different folks...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    33. Re:Results how? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Simple they just look for space time and not find it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:Results how? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      underrated? no, it's a pile of crap. Not even good campy crap. just boring ol' crap.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    35. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You failed to consider the can of Kidney beans on Michael Jackson's headboard, which makes the answer 42.

    36. Re:Results how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The third answer is "None, because oranges have no doors."

      Of course, the question to that answer is: "If a ship sank in the ocean, how many pizzas could you fit into a doghouse?"

    37. Re:Results how? by bhmcintosh · · Score: 1

      "It wouldn't be so much tearing a hole in the fabric of space as making a ripple."

      Ah, so that earthquake that rocked Louisa County, Virginia a few weeks ago and knocked over some stuff at my mom's house in the DC 'burbs was a ripple from the laser firing, flowing backwards across time? Cool!

      --
      Network geek with a strong affinity for Telecasters
    38. Re:Results how? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      The third answer is "None, because oranges have no doors."

      Of course, the question to that answer is: "If a ship sank in the ocean, how many pizzas could you fit into a doghouse?"

      Actually, the answer to that one is "18, because bananas can't moonwalk."

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  5. The most important question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the event of an alien invasion, can we point it upwards?

    1. Re:The most important question: by MachDelta · · Score: 0

      It won't work unless we can somehow upload a Macintosh virus to their mothership first, to disable their shields.

    2. Re:The most important question: by stms · · Score: 1

      Wrong, the most important question is can we mount the freaking laser onto a sharks head?

    3. Re:The most important question: by Flyerman · · Score: 1

      Virus created on a Macintosh != Macintosh virus

    4. Re:The most important question: by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      Apple does not allow non-macintosh viruses to be created on their products. Additionally, they prohibit macintosh viruses from being created on non=Apple platforms.

      It's in the TOS. Read it.

    5. Re:The most important question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zim? Is that you?

    6. Re:The most important question: by YouDieAtTheEnd · · Score: 1

      Nobody reads that stuff, we all just click 'I Agree' and promptly get scheduled for experimental surgery.

    7. Re:The most important question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If an alien invasion could be stopped by this laser, they'd never make it this close to the Sun! There's a reason we need super-high-res, super-fast, super-cooled detectors to see the events caused by such equipment ;)

    8. Re:The most important question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a few attoseconds, sure.

    9. Re:The most important question: by rossy · · Score: 1

      The laser will be aimed at the HP Pavillion in San-Jose. There are Sharks there.

      --
      Ross Youngblood
  6. The Death Star by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The combined power of 10 separate lasers would be focused down to a very small volume, creating conditions more extreme than in the center of our sun.

    So they'll essentiallly be turning the Earth into the Death Star
    And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?
    Will they be wearing dark suits with funky helmets?

    1. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      No kidding- if we could just stop the US from starting all those World Wars, we could finally get some peace.

    2. Re:The Death Star by khallow · · Score: 1

      Those buggers would prolly turn this project in to one of their toy to be used to destroy the whole mankind, amrkans have that sort of habit you know.

      Oh come on. Obama already apologized for destroying the world last Thursday. Why are you guys still holding a grudge?

    3. Re:The Death Star by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...turning the Earth into the Death Star ...dark suits with funky helmets

      Aaaagh! I just had a Dick Cheney flashback!

    4. Re:The Death Star by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I mean, we already were overrun by stormtroopers a century ago, we will be more careful next time.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:The Death Star by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?

      See the thing is, after having had our continent torn asunder by two world wars, a couple of genocides, decades of Soviet occupation of the eastern block, followed by being dragged into a hornet nest in Iraq following faulty US intelligence, most people over here are so fed up with the whole war thing that we only agreed to help the Libyans deal with Gaddafi after he started using the air-force to bomb innocent protesters.

      However, if you prefer I guess we could put the device in Texas. Then they can use it to guard the double layered, 10 foot tall , lethally electrified, barbed wire fence Herman Cain was talking about. Don't worry though, Rick Perry will have the keys.

    6. Re:The Death Star by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      Don't be ridiculous. If we Americans had a weapon of this power, we'd use it to increase our imperial power and make more money for our giant corporations like Halliburton. Anyone who's against this is just engaging in class warfare. Remember, corporations are people too!

    7. Re:The Death Star by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      "I never thought I'd see a resonance cascade, let alone create one."
        - Dr Rosenberg, head of ELI research, February 2015

    8. Re:The Death Star by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      Oh like you lot wouldn't blow up the world to finally beat the French once and for all. You've only been killing each other for a couple thousand years off and on.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    9. Re:The Death Star by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      F-that. I want a lightsaber. This will be money well-spent.

    10. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this "laser" tears the universe a texas size space-hole, nothing of value will be lost. Where in europe can you remove a texas size chunk and say the same?

    11. Re:The Death Star by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      The french are developing an antimatter bomb?

    12. Re:The Death Star by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure the 2nd amendment had giant space-ripping lasers in mind when it was written.

      and furthermore, the constitution doesn't apply to sharks.

    13. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think as long as they don't have a skull and crossbones or two rune S on their hats, weâ(TM)ll be OK. ;)

    14. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at you, comparing a bunch of really awful shit *that actually happened* to some stuff a politician said. Good form.

    15. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do your best Imperial Officer voice.

      Wooooooooosshhhhh

    16. Re:The Death Star by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Consider how much energy there is trapped in normal atoms just waiting for a trigger to release it, somehow a high short term concentration of photons doesn't seem all that much to worry about. More interesting might be to build up a really, really high concentration of electrons in a super conducting toroid, especially as that build up would produce measurable affects at a distance. A solid electron field.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:The Death Star by AnthonF · · Score: 1

      Im surprised (ok maybe not) that, that post was actually raised up to +4 interesting instead of -1 troll/flamebait.... should speak all about who shouldn't be manning the switch on an imaginary death star weapon.

    18. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the USA would use such a laser to invade Europe.

      You are absolutely right though, we Europeans would not use that laser to attack other countries because we've been exposed to war a lot (and by 'we' I mean our civilians) and we know how awful war is.
      Americans still haven't learned that lesson and it explains their eagerness to solve everything with a Nazi-esque invasion.

      It doesn't really matter anyway since that laser would not make a very powerful weapon (too small of an area of effect) but there's something to be said about experiencing war at home and how it makes you realize you really, really want to avoid war when possible.

    19. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ELI as in Extinction Level Ivan and the suits are either classy German or classy Italian ones. Helmets that are used are re-purposed US military F-35 cockpit helmets which didn't show the light. The music is progressive House from the Nordics and lighting is provided by the Germans. The gas and vodka is Russian and the paprika, honey and girls are Hungarian. Hungary for more?

    20. Re:The Death Star by Nationless · · Score: 1

      Wait, you're worried that Daft Punk will perform the worlds greatest concert with said lasers and funky helmets?

    21. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 80 years of fighting (not to mention the other thousands of years of genocide in Europe's "rich" history) and you figured out was bad in the last decade? And that's supposed to make anyone feel secure?

    22. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd feel worse if it weren't Europeans.

    23. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Gadaffi didnt do any of those things. He was attempting to create a new currency made of real gold coins and have them at real world gold value.

      The western world saw this and realised it would obliterate their fiat currencies so they said they would stop him with force if neccesary. Then they made up crap saying he was opressing his people, yada yada, and that it was grounds to send in nato.

      Then they made a deal with AlQaida saying they can have libiya.

      All the info is on the net... Gadaffi used to be best mates with the western world until his new currency idea upset them.

    24. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      fuck you eurotrash moron

    25. Re:The Death Star by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I hope we get rails this time.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    26. Re:The Death Star by ludomancer · · Score: 1

      Who would you rather have man it? The US? They would just turn it on every other country. For "science", of course.

    27. Re:The Death Star by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?

      I don't care if the Europeans are at the switch, as long as the switch is on the ESA's Mars base.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    28. Re:The Death Star by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      It made me laugh. I figured it was +4 funny until reading the comments responding to it seriously, and was surprised to find it's +4 interesting. I doubt the author meant to seriously poke fun at Europe. They already have the LHC.

    29. Re:The Death Star by tqk · · Score: 1

      If this "laser" tears the universe a texas size space-hole, nothing of value will be lost. Where in europe can you remove a texas size chunk and say the same?

      Well, aside from the innocent non-combattants, London, Paris, and Moscow (for starts).

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    30. Re:The Death Star by tqk · · Score: 1

      The western world saw this and realised it would obliterate their fiat currencies so they said they would stop him with force if neccesary.

      Wow. "Holy Conspiracy theory, Batman!"

      Not sayin' you're wrong. Just, "Wow!"

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    31. Re:The Death Star by sithlord2 · · Score: 1

      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?

      Lemme guess? You think that Americans would be a better choice, no? Because the US of A never abused such advanced technology before...
      What was the only country who ever used the atom bomb in an actual war situation? I rest my case ...

      --
      ...You are over-qualified and under-paid. If we give you a raise, we will break the cosmic balance of the universe.
    32. Re:The Death Star by Post-O-Matron · · Score: 1

      Well it's well known that the Death Star is full of brits...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKfeJ2mw0LU

    33. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?

      Careful, they might be reading /.

    34. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be wearing dark suits with funky helmets?

      Only if you ask nicely....

    35. Re:The Death Star by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      War on terrorists, war on drugs, war on just about anything you can declare war on. These are not world wars?

    36. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self: point laser away from ground

    37. Re:The Death Star by geogob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's point. While America fight a war on terrorists, the rest of the world are doing criminal investigations on organized crime and terrorist groups. While American fight obesity, the rest of the world seeks solutions to a healthier lifestyle to reduce obesity. While American fight a war on drugs, the rest of the world arrest criminals and put them to trial.

      This concept of "fighting wars" on everything is very American (not that wars are not fought somewhere else by other groups, don't get me wrong). This concept is also very hyped by the American medias.

      Of course, you are partly right, once those "wars" go beyond the American borders, the become "world wars", although it would be pretty naive to compare those modern "wars" with what was previously called "world word".

      There have been investigations and actions taken against terrorist groups and organization long before America somehow declared war on terrorism on 09/12 some 10 years ago.

    38. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will they be wearing dark suits with funky helmets?

      No, but you will find their accents most satisfying for the occasion!

    39. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a flamer but this deserves a reply. The OP sounds more likely to be Japanese than 'Euro'. And my opinion (as a 'eurotrash') is that the Japs were far from being defeated; that the atomic bombs *were* necessary in bringing a bloody conflict to a rapid end and saving western lives (remember: it was the Japanese that started it).

    40. Re:The Death Star by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      I hear Iran has some big frickin' lasers, what you gonna do about it?

    41. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The combined power of 10 separate lasers would be focused down to a very small volume, creating conditions more extreme than in the center of our sun.

      So they'll essentiallly be turning the Earth into the Death Star
      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?
      Will they be wearing dark suits with funky helmets?

      You'd rather the USA controlled it then?!

    42. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?

      A damned sight better than letting Americans man it.

      your sincerely,

      Europe

    43. Re:The Death Star by discord5 · · Score: 1

      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?

      The ploy here is that we claim it's all in the name of science, but the truth is we're pretty tired of having our credit rating lowered all the time. Next time Standard&Poors has something to say, we'll have our answer ready for them.

      The electricity bill is going to be a pain though, but we'll worry about that later.

    44. Re:The Death Star by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Greece?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    45. Re:The Death Star by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Ah, I guess those places must be waaaay larger on the inside than on the outside...

    46. Re:The Death Star by YouDieAtTheEnd · · Score: 1

      Because apart from WWI and WWII the United States has never been involved in another war

    47. Re:The Death Star by skapaft · · Score: 1

      Bear arms, not shark fins?

    48. Re:The Death Star by tmosley · · Score: 1

      It's not a world war until somebody destroys a planet.

    49. Re:The Death Star by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      The good ol' USA has already been doing this over in Lawrence Livermore National Lab. 128 lasers pointing to a single little little blob of hydrogen, to fuse it into helium. Actually, I'm pretty sure some of the amazing work they did in their laser amplification is what is going to allow the experiment in the article to go forward. It cost them three billion dollars, but they figured out a way to turn a pulse of electricity that's barely enough to power a light bulb for an hour into over a hundred very very powerful, very angry lasers.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    50. Re:The Death Star by tqk · · Score: 1

      If this "laser" tears the universe a texas size space-hole, nothing of value will be lost. Where in europe can you remove a texas size chunk and say the same?

      Well, aside from the innocent non-combattants, London, Paris, and Moscow (for starts).

      Ah, I guess those places must be waaaay larger on the inside than on the outside...

      I was thinking in terms of population numbers, not physical area. Thanks for playing.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    51. Re:The Death Star by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Photons can push and heat things at a distance, and best of all your victim^H^H^H^H^Htarget can't react to the incoming fire because the instant they can see it is the instant it hits them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    52. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the Europeans? Typical arrogant American. You do know you don't own the world?

    53. Re:The Death Star by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      With the Europeans running it it'll be less of the Death Star and more of the Spaceball.

    54. Re:The Death Star by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Flashback? He's still out there yapping and defending torture and Iraq camping. The nightmare is still going. At least W knows to STFU. It's the only thing W's done right.

    55. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Letting us? You don't let us do anything. Once we have the laser, WE will be the ones doing the letting thank you very much.

    56. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?

      Can you suggest a better option?

    57. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well to be honest, I would trust the europeans more than I would my own country. Lets not forget we are slipping in math and science, we would probally just blow a hole in earth.

    58. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is kind of silly. One person bashes the EU and gets +3 interesting. I counter with an actual argument (somewhat) and a more diplomatic approach and I get a troll rating.

    59. Re:The Death Star by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      You grossly over-exaggerate what the rest of the world is doing.

    60. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer: Europe.

    61. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, would like to pre-emptively welcome our new alien/robot/ai/extra-demensional being/penguin overlords.

    62. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also not "purely civilian targets", the targets were heavy industrial plants/districts (manufacturing things such as planes, ammunition, weapons etc) the demoralizing side-effect of overkill certainly helped turn public opinion towards ending the war.

    63. Re:The Death Star by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      No kidding- if we could just stop the US from starting all those World Wars, we could finally get some peace.

      We're on the wagon now, pray we don't fall off.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    64. Re:The Death Star by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      That's point. While America fight a war on terrorists, the rest of the world are doing criminal investigations on organized crime and terrorist groups. While American fight obesity, the rest of the world seeks solutions to a healthier lifestyle to reduce obesity. While American fight a war on drugs, the rest of the world arrest criminals and put them to trial.

      This concept of "fighting wars" on everything is very American (not that wars are not fought somewhere else by other groups, don't get me wrong). This concept is also very hyped by the American medias.


      And yet... Vietnam was a "police action." Go figure...

    65. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?..."

      Last I looked, we had no way of stopping them.

      And they make better engineered cars....

    66. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama hasn't been reelected yet...

    67. Re:The Death Star by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      It made me laugh. I figured it was +4 funny until reading the comments responding to it seriously, and was surprised to find it's +4 interesting. I doubt the author meant to seriously poke fun at Europe. They already have the LHC.

      And we're not afraid to use it! :P

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    68. Re:The Death Star by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I assume Daft Punk will perform the worlds greatest concert with said lasers and funky helmets

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    69. Re:The Death Star by geekoid · · Score: 1

      When did we ever abuse an atomic bomb?

      Proper use of a technology to lesson one sides casualties is not abuse.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    70. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they'll essentiallly be turning the Earth into the Death Star
      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?
      Will they be wearing dark suits with funky helmets?

      Ve vill of courze haf ze helmetz on. Zey are ze zafety helmetz :)

    71. Re:The Death Star by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought about that too (from Wikipedia):
      Texas: 25,145,561
      London (metro): 13,945,000
      Paris: (metro): 12,089,098
      Moscow: 11,514,330

      Moscow is probably your best bet, since the surrounding area isn't heavily populated, especially to the north.

    72. Re:The Death Star by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Your not thinking very scientifically, photons can only affect the molecules it strikes and it has not affect beyond that. The molecule it strikes, transfers the energy to other molecules either as new photons or direct energy transfer.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    73. Re:The Death Star by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      It is nothing more scary than to make a really grim joke about war and suffering , only to realise there are people who not only think you're serious, but they agree with you.

    74. Re:The Death Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The combined power of 10 separate lasers would be focused down to a very small volume, creating conditions more extreme than in the center of our sun.

      So they'll essentiallly be turning the Earth into the Death Star
      And we feel good about letting Europeans man the switch?
      Will they be wearing dark suits with funky helmets?

      Nazi stormtrooper zombies. That is all.

  7. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Developing a super powerful laser. That can't possibly be perverted for some other purpose, so whether or not it can rip a hole in the "fabric" of "space-time", I'm sure it's totally safe.

    1. Re:Hmm... by sjames · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here you go.

      Thanks for taking me back to the mid 1980s. I'd almost forgotten all the acid I took back then. Good Times!

  8. Extreme "light"... by lvxferre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They need to call it "light" because politicians are stupid enough to ban if they call it "radiation" - although a powerful enough laser won't be visible light, but UV radiation...

    --
    Nerdy news for your nerdy needs? http://www.soylentnews.org Soylent News is people!
    1. Re:Extreme "light"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They call it light because it's common for science to refer to call everything on the electromagnetic spectrum as light. When science talks about light it's not limited to visible light. Or are you too new to all of this to know that light is the accepted term?

    2. Re:Extreme "light"... by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      In my experience with spectroscopy, only the "visible light" spectrum is commonly referred to as "light". Granted, the term originates from a time when we didnt know a whole lot about electromagnetic radiation, so there is some ambiguity.

    3. Re:Extreme "light"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for your "experience" but I've just toured around a few spectroscopy sites and a few NASA sites and they seem to have a different view of the matter.

    4. Re:Extreme "light"... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I believe the ELI is proposed to work at more or less visible wavelengths. It is literally visible light.

    5. Re:Extreme "light"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But UVL is light. It behaves as light* and some animals can see some UV light.

      *you can "play" with it with optical filters, lenses, prisms, LAZORS etc

    6. Re:Extreme "light"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their terminology is correct. The entire electromagnetic spectrum from radio to gamma rays is designated light. Common usage of the word light to indicate the visible light range does not change this.

    7. Re:Extreme "light"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But light doesn't have mass.

    8. Re:Extreme "light"... by Ruie · · Score: 1

      They need to call it "light" because politicians are stupid enough to ban if they call it "radiation" - although a powerful enough laser won't be visible light, but UV radiation...

      No, power of light has nothing to do with its wavelength. In fact, the one common high power laser is the CO2 laser that produces infrared. However, shorter wavelength (like UV) does help to focus the spot tighter providing higher power density.

    9. Re:Extreme "light"... by sorak · · Score: 2

      They need to call it "light" because politicians are stupid enough to ban if they call it "radiation" - although a powerful enough laser won't be visible light, but UV radiation...

      I can see how that conversation would go down:

      Scientist: We're going to rip a hole in the space-time continuum using radiation
      Politician: Wold on!
      Scientist: Wait, did I say radiation? I meant "light". And oil! A mixture of light, oil, and freedom!
      Politician: Now that's what I like to hear!

    10. Re:Extreme "light"... by Spinalcold · · Score: 1

      Photons can carry different energy amounts, e=frequency*plank's constant. So if you can produce just as many photons at a higher frequency you get more energy AND a shorter wavelength. So a UV laser that has the same efficiency should produce more energy. On another point, just cause something is in the UV spectrum doesn't mean it's not a laser. It's the process used to excite the electrons and create a process where all the light produced is of a single wavelength that means it's a laser. So a gamma ray laser would be amazingly powerful!

  9. So this is when... by bmo · · Score: 2

    ... we get invaded by the Strogg?

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:So this is when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I'd suggest bracing yourself for unforeseen consequences.

    2. Re:So this is when... by flyonthewall · · Score: 1

      Actually, the name of the research facility will be:

      "Black Mesa."

      One of the main scientist involved will be a Dr Gordon.

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
    3. Re:So this is when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill the human food!

    4. Re:So this is when... by kav2k · · Score: 1

      Since it's Europe, it'll be Black Mesa East.

  10. Except for the rip a hole in spacetime part... by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another terrible headline, but the article is partly to blame. This isn't about ripping a hole in space time, it's just about putting energy in the vacuum so a bunch of virtual particles become real particles.

    P.S. THE DEVICE WILL GO ONLINE IN 2012 AND END THE WORLD!!! AREN'T I CLEVER? PULL MY FINGER!!

    1. Re:Except for the rip a hole in spacetime part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *pulls your finger*

    2. Re:Except for the rip a hole in spacetime part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Whoosh!*

    3. Re:Except for the rip a hole in spacetime part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must have been some serious cornholing if you pull his finger and all you get is whoosh....

    4. Re:Except for the rip a hole in spacetime part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's going to get delayed until December 21, 2012.

  11. Now witness the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    power of this fully operational battle station! Fire at will commander.

    1. Re:Now witness the... by magarity · · Score: 2

      power of this fully operational battle station! Fire at will commander.

      I've never understood what Will did that everyone always wants to fire at him.

    2. Re:Now witness the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shaved his beard.

  12. Ripped spacetime by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... and my car keys fall through the hole.

    Damn! I hate it when that happens.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Ripped spacetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like a BSP hole, it'll give... interesting visual effects, at least!

    2. Re:Ripped spacetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you live in Cardiff?

    3. Re:Ripped spacetime by geekoid · · Score: 1

      well, that would explain why currently have two identical sets of keys.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. Pull "spacetime" apart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really. It simply creates enough energy so that particle and anti-particle pairs can exist for longer than usual (energy-time principle, lazy to link to wiki, google it yourself) before they annihilate each other; hopefully long enough to make observing them easier.

    How does this constitute "ripping" spacetime...
    More like "those pesky uneducated journalists" are at it again...

  14. OOhh OOhh Mr. Kotter! by retroworks · · Score: 1
    I aspire to make a toaster that cuts a hole in space-time... Can I be on Slashdot, too?? PLEEEEZE Mr. Kotter?

    Hey, beats a shark joke. Let's mine 70s TV for a change.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:OOhh OOhh Mr. Kotter! by dragonsomnolent · · Score: 1

      What you talkin about Willis?

      --
      I got nuthin
    2. Re:OOhh OOhh Mr. Kotter! by retroworks · · Score: 1

      That's sooo 80s.

      --
      Gently reply
    3. Re:OOhh OOhh Mr. Kotter! by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr. Kotter

      Please allow retroworks to be on Slashdot.

      Signed,

      retroworks' Mother

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:OOhh OOhh Mr. Kotter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed captain. It appears as though this joke may be an anomaly caused by the previous space-time toaster joke. Fascinating.

    5. Re:OOhh OOhh Mr. Kotter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity the fool who makes these lame 80s TV references.

    6. Re:OOhh OOhh Mr. Kotter! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      aaay!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. It's all fun and games... by nategri · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... until the universe segfaults.

    1. Re:It's all fun and games... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      It's all fun and games...... until the universe segfaults.

      Don't worry. We can always reinstall. I wonder where I put the distribution media?

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:It's all fun and games... by JoshuaZ · · Score: 2

      The simulation is pretty robust. When one part gets an error it just deletes that section of the simulation and resets it. It uses a lazy evaluation similar to Haskell so it can get away with this without turning off the whole simulation.

    3. Re:It's all fun and games... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      ... until the universe segfaults.

      You mean "coredumps"?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:It's all fun and games... by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      I thought that was why we existed?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:It's all fun and games... by djh2400 · · Score: 2

      It's alright, World Backup Day wasn't too long ago. We can just restore from that.

    6. Re:It's all fun and games... by Nationless · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of fsck'ing.

    7. Re:It's all fun and games... by qpqp · · Score: 1

      In your dimensional pocket!

    8. Re:It's all fun and games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question then becomes: How big is the block that gets erased and reset??

    9. Re:It's all fun and games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll pray for a good Hypervisor.

    10. Re:It's all fun and games... by GCPSoft · · Score: 1

      If that happens, you know we can reboot it... Just call J.J. Abrams!

  16. Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by unity100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Im all for subatomic and quantum physics research - whatever you want to name this field with hip terms.

    But, going about intentionally ripping space/time, getting into dark matter and whatnot, without actually having grasped and totally measured the presence, effects and mechanics of what we already discovered in regard to these, is dangerous. imagine if the research at the turn of the century went a bit too fast, and someone accidentally caused a nuclear fission without taking proper precautions at a lab. dark matter and what surrounds it, may be holding similar energy potential to unleash in certain conditions. i wouldnt want to meet those conditions before we know that we actually know what we are doing.

    1. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by elfprince13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That actually happened several times. Ever heard of Louis Slotin or Harry Daghlian?

    2. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by pz · · Score: 4, Informative

      someone accidentally caused a nuclear fission without taking proper precautions at a lab

      That happened, at least twice. See the WIkipedia entries for Harry Daghlian, Jr and Louis Slotin.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    3. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      several did, and paid with their lives.

      google "demon core"

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      It is quite a scary sounding procedure. If our atmosphere catches fire and every life form from the smallest bacteria to the largest mammal is instantly incinerated then at least we will know who to blame.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by Astronomerguy · · Score: 1

      Oh screw it! You're asking them to read the frikkin' manual or the equivalent thereof! Who does that?!? JUST DO IT! And if traveling at warp speed causes disruptions in the space-time continuum, we'll just reduce speeds and perhaps eliminate warp-speed travel, as long as the Klingons and Romulans do as well.

    6. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      But, going about intentionally ripping space/time, getting into dark matter and whatnot, without actually having grasped and totally measured the presence, effects and mechanics of what we already discovered in regard to these, is dangerous.

      Yep, we're playing with fire. And as we all know, humans were better off without fire.

    7. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, it will be a really, really tinsie wincy little hole in the fabric of space and time.

    8. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by unity100 · · Score: 0

      what if it ends up as a really tinsie wincy little massive energy release that will obliterate a city ?

    9. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's ok, they're staying out of Philadelphia this time.

    10. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i wouldnt want to meet those conditions before we know that we actually know what we are doing.

      They know what they are doing and the headline and summary are sensionalist bullshit with the intention to cause strong reactions like yours.
      If you can't handle the way headlines are written then please stop reading them or at least stop comment on them.

    11. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by Hentes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Noone is ripping anything. It's just a sensationalist article. Energy concentrations far bigger than this happen in the Universe.

    12. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Nah, I bet it would at least take the better part of a minute.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    13. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      It would not be the first time that government/scientists have gone ahead with these types of projects/experiments without proper safeguards, all in the name of science/economy. The first one to discover the dark matter, or the first one to claim this technology to produce better weapons for their country, wins...no?

      I hate to say it, but we have been so brainwashed by all these scifi movies of the exact same thing, that now we see this and totally do not react, who is to say that by doing this they are not going to send us all into oblivion and rip this planet apart by creating that rift.....yet because we think back to the countless movies we have seen about this hero that comes along and saves the day, we feel better and think...."it will all work out in the end...."

      NO,NO,NO! If we all stepped up and as one MASSIVE body of people.....told our governments to stop playing god , and maybe focus more on creating a more stable economy....else we would all revolt.....they would realize maybe....that.....the scifi movies need to be laced with even more subliminal content to be more effective???

    14. Re:Ok. That's one research field going too fast. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      waaah waahhh wah.

      Shut up.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. but but but virtual particles... by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

    don't actually exist. virtual particles are just mathematical simplicities. They are only a *model* of how physics works. Even in the name- they are "virtual" because they are just mathematical abstractions. nothing more.

    1. Re:but but but virtual particles... by harryjohnston · · Score: 2

      *All* particles are mathematical abstractions.

    2. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Tyrannosaur · · Score: 1

      this is also true

    3. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of physics is actually mathematical models. It can tell you the outcomes of different scenarios, but it never pretends to give you any information about the physical reality of it all, and that's where it gets too deep and melts your head

    4. Re:but but but virtual particles... by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Informative

      don't actually exist. virtual particles are just mathematical simplicities. They are only a *model* of how physics works. Even in the name- they are "virtual" because they are just mathematical abstractions. nothing more.

      The electric field started out as a model of how charges interact, then he noticed that waves in the electromagnetic field would produce energy transfer at a speed that was the same as that of light.

      Einstein's theory of relativity was just a model of how gravity works, a gravitational field was just a mathematical tool for predicting the motions of objects, and black holes were mathematical curiosities that probably did not exist in reality. Today we have observed binary star systems gradually changing their orbits as they lose energy due to gravity waves. Frame dragging of space itself surrounding the earth has been empirically measured in satellites, and several black holes have been found by astronomers.

      Quantum mechanical wave functions were models for how elementary particles work, and the Dirac equation predicted negative energy solutions, suggesting each particle had a double of opposite charge. A few years latter the positron was discovered.

      Circulation in fluid dynamics is a mathematical quantity used in predicting the flow of fluids. As it happens it cannot simply disappear without viscosity, leading to the concept of vortex tubes, the most famous example of which is a tornado.

      Perhaps the greatest prejudice to new ideas is however found in mathematics. Whenever new numbers have been discovered, how have we named them? Negative, irrational , imaginary ... As it happens complex numbers are inherent to the laws of quantum mechanics. You would have a very hard time trying to explain why matter sticks together without them.

    5. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Even in the name- they are "virtual" because they are just mathematical abstractions. nothing more.

      Except the effects of virtual particles are observable. Hawking radiation, and small black holes boiling away both should exist if virtual particles are real. The casimir effect, (The pushing together of parallel plates in a vacuum) is due to virtual particles. The casmir effect has actually been measured. I don't think Hawking radiation has been yet.

      I do agree with you that a theory should be falsifiable, and not merely just a mathematical abstraction. But virtual particles aren't that.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:but but but virtual particles... by tragedy · · Score: 1

      It was my understanding that Hawking Radiation had actually been confirmed and that it was caused by virtual particle pairs being created and one of them passing the event horizon and the other escaping.

    7. Re:but but but virtual particles... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1
      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    8. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. Forces are caused by virtual particles. Also, making a virtual particle "real" has already been done in colliders.

    9. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Hentes · · Score: 1

      I don't think it can ever be confirmed as it basically states that only black holes that are too small to exist radiate.

    10. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're getting modded up more if I get points anytime soon. Nicely put.

    11. Re:but but but virtual particles... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      All black holes radiate. The power density decreases with size. This means that even galactic ones must have non-zero blackbody temperatures which, at least in principle, could be measured.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:but but but virtual particles... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, no they are not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:but but but virtual particles... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      math is not science.

      Science is the study of nature, mathematics is the study of math. And math was created by intelligent beings(us) as a way to deal with abstract concepts.

      I know this has become unpopular, but it is true. People who 'like' math want to give it additional authority so they call it a science; which is sad because it doesn't need it. Math is a tool. One of the greatest greatest tools man has ever come up with. The only real tool to understand nature.

      A math sin't as pure as Randall makes it out to be their. For examples: if you have two apples, and you added to more apples you would have 4 apples (2+2). However, that doesn't mean you have twice as much apple. The second set of apples may hav been larger then the first set. SO while math was good enough to get a practical use, it wasn't entirely accurate.

      Of course, that is a gross example, but one that applies in most mathematics.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      Fascinating. As Dijkstra said, when learning new concepts, we try to relate the new concept to concepts we already know. Models we already know. Mathematics allows us, to a degree, to break out of that trap, as it can describe almost completely novel phenomena in a manner/model we can understand.

    15. Re:but but but virtual particles... by harryjohnston · · Score: 1

      ... because?

    16. Re:but but but virtual particles... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      As I understand it the best current information shows that they do exist, as demonstrated through the Casimir Effect. In more general terms they seem inevitable, both due to the general idea that 'nature abhors a vacuum' and the heisenberg uncertainty principle (if empty space was really empty, then you'd know its energetic properties exactly (zero)).

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  18. Very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now just point it to the Debt Problem. You might prove that keynesian spending in lasers ir the way to growth. Wait. Are you talking about physics? You insensitive worker!

  19. I'll be pissed if they create a black hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll be like the Greek fiscal crisis, times 10.

    1. Re:I'll be pissed if they create a black hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. The 10x would be the recently started Chinese real estate bubble (and a big reason why China does not want to bail out greece).

  20. Creating matter by abelb · · Score: 0

    Would matter not be created at the flash point due to the amount of energy they're concentrating? http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/09/970918045841.htm

    1. Re:Creating matter by harryjohnston · · Score: 1

      I'd have thought so. But the home page of the actual facility says "A European facility opening new avenues to reveal the secrets of matter on ultra-short timescales" so I'm guessing the Discovery article isn't very accurate.

  21. Research Moneys! by inhuman_4 · · Score: 1

    As a Canadian, I wish our government would partner with the US to fund super awesome science mega-projects like this. Seriously guys, would it be so hard to scrap one aircraft carrier in exchange for something useful?

    1. Re:Research Moneys! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't your government instead partner with the Europeans, instead of pointlessly hoping for the Americans to do something useful instead of only things that increase corporate profits? Heck, you'd make a lot more progress partnering with the Chinese than with the US.

    2. Re:Research Moneys! by inhuman_4 · · Score: 1

      Because Europe is far away which means we won't get many jobs (shipping costs) out of joint ventures with Europe, no jobs means no votes means no money. If that sounds retarded, it's because it is. With the US we can usually get some kind of make work project to keep the politicians happy.

    3. Re:Research Moneys! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Shipping costs aren't that much, depending on what you're shipping and how much. If you divide up the project and make the Canadians responsible for some significant-sized part, that can be shipped when complete.

      Think about it: we North Americans buy stuff from the Europeans all the time: ships, marine diesel engines, large industrial equipment, cars, etc. The fact that they're in Europe doesn't make that much of a difference. China's far away too, but that doesn't keep us from buying stuff from them, even in small quantities; I've had PC boards made in China and the cost to Fedex them here is pretty small.

      And if you do software work, the shipping cost becomes irrelevant.

      The place where the distance becomes a problem is if you're working hand-in-hand with teams in other locations, and have to fly people and equipment back and forth a lot, or have people stay up late or get up early to talk on the phone with each other. That's why having multiple teams working on the same problem is usually a bad idea; instead, you need to divide up the problem into more independent parts that the different geographically-dispersed teams can work on on their own until it's time for final integration.

    4. Re:Research Moneys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian, I wish our government would partner with the US to fund super awesome science mega-projects like this. Seriously guys, would it be so hard to scrap one aircraft carrier in exchange for something useful?

      Well it would be for Canada; we have no aircraft carriers.

    5. Re:Research Moneys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give us 30 years until the self-oriented baby boomer generation dies off, then we'll happily turn a couple of CV-class ships into world-class research institutions. Until then, those paranoid freaks have too many votes.

      50/50 if we have any money left after they vote themselves social security for eternity, though.

    6. Re:Research Moneys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian, I wish our government would partner with the US to fund super awesome science mega-projects like this. Seriously guys, would it be so hard to scrap one aircraft carrier in exchange for something useful?

      The US is about 3 things nowadays:
      - short term profits
      - starting wars
      - exporting MPAA and RIAA mafia like laws around the world.

      Partnering with the US for science projects is just retarded since you can't do long term basic research with short term profits as the goal. You shouldn't partner with the US; if your politicians had still some brains they would partner with the EU.

    7. Re:Research Moneys! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I wish our government would partner with the US to fund super awesome science mega-projects like this. Seriously guys, would it be so hard to scrap one aircraft carrier in exchange for something useful?

      Well it would be for Canada; we have no aircraft carriers.

      Okay, how about each Canadian give up one Molson's per day? That'd add up pretty fast...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:Research Moneys! by hoppo · · Score: 1

      How is a research project like this useful, exactly? Big budget science projects like this seem to me to epitomize wasteful and improper spending by government. Billions of dollars will be pumped into this project, which may or may not produce interesting results, and will be of abstract value at best to society.

    9. Re:Research Moneys! by Verity_Crux · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I wish our government would partner with the US to fund super awesome science mega-projects

      Well, as an American I wish that the rest of the planet could understand this stuff should be done by private companies and organizations. If you want to do some awesome science, start the company yourself ask for donations to be received out of good will. Don't wine about the government's lack of initiative -- that's the last thing any government needs. Personally, I don't want is some government official pocketing my tax money in the name of science. I can do it better myself. It's not in the proper role of government as it has nothing to do with maintaining liberty and justice for all.

    10. Re:Research Moneys! by inhuman_4 · · Score: 1

      Well, as an American I wish that the rest of the planet could understand this stuff should be done by private companies and organizations.

      You mean like atomic energy, space flight, internet, vaccinations, anything to do with the military? Sorry I'm as pro free market as they come, but there are somethings the free market is just not good at. Basic research is one of those things.

      A lot of basic research has no obvious return on investment, in fact much it has no return on investment. Then there are the things that are just too expensive for a private company to fund. Then there is the issue of being able to profit from a discovery, you can't patent the laws of physics.

      The free market is like an optimization algorithm, it is really effective at efficiently using capital. But sometimes efficiency is not the goal.

  22. eotw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its Half Life all over again

    1. Re:eotw by cosm · · Score: 1

      The resonance cascade!!!!! OH NOES Gordon Freeman save us!

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:eotw by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      I personally think this commenct was very funny. Too bad nobody's modded it up!

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
  23. Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that the EU is above starting these "unofficial skirmishes" for resources, I'd bet you think that CCTV cameras are a needed measure.

    1. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The CCTV thing is purely a British phenomenon, not European. Britain isn't really part of Europe. It acts like it when it suits it, and it acts separate when that suits it. They weren't even invited to the recent talks about the crisis with the Euro, Greece, etc. Britain's really a lot more like the USA than continental Europe.

    2. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They weren't even invited to the recent talks about the crisis with the Euro, Greece, etc.

      Could that be because, you know, they don't use the Euro?

    3. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Yes, but they took it as a major snub. After all, the crisis threatens the existence of the entire European Union, and Britain is (population-wise and economy-wise) one of the larger members of the EU. So it makes sense they'd want to at least be present during any big meetings, even if they haven't yet changed to the shared currency.

    4. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You're wrong: Britain actually slavishly and pedantically implements every European directive to its fullest and most exact extent. The population resents this: the French tends to ignore EU directives as they please, the Germans love it, the Italians and Irish are too chaotic to implement them. It's only the British who fully implement them and then resent it.

      British civil servants love the EU because it allows them to implement all sorts of rules in a jobsworthy manner then blame it on the EU when anyone complains.

    5. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Not only that, Britain's banks are heavily exposed to Irish debt, so what happens in the eurozone hugely affects Britain.

    6. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, lots of U.S. banks are heavily exposed too. You don't really expect the Euros to invite Obama to their conference, do you?

    7. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they took it as a major snub. After all, the crisis threatens the existence of the entire European Union, and Britain is (population-wise and economy-wise) one of the larger members of the EU. So it makes sense they'd want to at least be present during any big meetings, even if they haven't yet changed to the shared currency.

      The Crisis threatens the €, not the EU.

    8. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Jerom · · Score: 1

      If you're not a member, you're not invited to the talks even if your affected. In or out UK - make up your minds.

    9. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So why don't the British people elect some leaders who do what they want for a change? I didn't think they had the whole broken two-party system problem that we Americans have.

    10. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how that's relevant. First, are we talking about central (government-run) banks, or private banks? If the latter, then it's totally irrelevant; what private companies choose to do is irrelevant to government policy (a private company that makes poor decisions with some international business doesn't mean its government can get drawn into international politics over the issue; the private company should just fold and its investors lose their money). If the former, then what the heck are they doing getting entangled in a foreign country's finances?

    11. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The Euro and the EU are inextricably tied to each other. While I guess it's completely possible for them to dump the Euro currency, give up on the monetary union, and go back to just having a customs union, that would be a huge backwards step from what they've been doing all this time and a huge change in the direction of the EU. Imagine the USA deciding to stay a single "union" with a Federal government, but abolishing the Federal Reserve, the US Mint, and every state establishing its own currency. While it's a little different for Europe since they were like that not very long ago, it's still a giant change that affects every member of the union.

    12. Re:Selfish, unneeded violence? In MY EU? by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Someone been watching Yes, Minister recently?

  24. Did I miss something? by definate · · Score: 1

    Did I miss something, but why is Europe getting all the cool new science toys? :-(

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Did I miss something? by cosm · · Score: 1

      Because...well..my sig.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did I miss something, but why is Europe getting all the cool new science toys? :-(

      Because we are not warmongers so we have money for serious things, like doing basic research.
      As for the US : reform your military industrial complex, close down the 700 or so bases you have around the world, downsize your military etc... Raise taxes, put and end to the tax subsidies to the ultra rich, tax the hell out of corporations and voila' my dear friend. Money flowing into the government that can be put to good use.

    3. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have any Republicans.

    4. Re:Did I miss something? by Iceykitsune · · Score: 1

      Because being smart isn't "cool".

      --
      GENERATION 24: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    5. Re:Did I miss something? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Because science is Anti-American, remember?

    6. Re:Did I miss something? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Because they're smart enough to invest in science, rather than pouring most of their tax revenue into resource wars to benefit a few corporations.

    7. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because europe is a bunch of countries with a lot more people than the US, it's not surprising we have some of the cool new toys. Don't worry, you've (if you're american) still got NIF, and Sandia Z-machine, and SLAC, they're pretty amazing.

    8. Re:Did I miss something? by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Cause America keeps starting all the cool new Middle East wars and have no play money left over?

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    9. Re:Did I miss something? by Hartree · · Score: 1

      "They don't have any Republicans."

      Tell that to Ireland.

    10. Re:Did I miss something? by morcego · · Score: 1

      Because they are not spending most of their money on wars and war-related stuff. War on terror, war on druids, war on illegal immigrants, war on porn, war on whatever, air conditioning etc.

      The economic crisis on EU is at least as bad as in the US, so that can't be it.
       

      --
      morcego
    11. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feel bad. America is getting all the cool new creationism theme parks, so it all evens out in the end.

    12. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if something goes wrong...

    13. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes both ways, USoA is anti-science. There is no market for this kind of science and china is going to steal all the sciences anyway.

    14. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have as many lawyers to feed.

    15. Re:Did I miss something? by timbo234 · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure of this but I think it's because of the funding process. You have various European organisations or projects (eg. ESA, ESO (astronomy), ITER (test fusion reactor) etc.) which effectively exist as international organisations, some even have diplomatic immunity. Then countries that choose to, and they don't have to be members of the EU, sign up to these organisations in the form of committing to paying 'membership dues' for X Euros for Y number of years.

      These organisations then know how much assured funding they'll receive over the next 5 or 10 years and use that to plan big, long term projects. This is better than the piecemeal approach you often get when it's a single government funding projects individually, and cancelling them if they go over budget instead of just pushing them out over a longer time period like the European organisations do.

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
    16. Re:Did I miss something? by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      Republicans by name but certainly not republicans in the American sense.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    17. Re:Did I miss something? by tombeard · · Score: 1

      We would never wage war on air conditioning. AC is gods gift so fat republicans can stand to live in Texas.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    18. Re:Did I miss something? by anomalous3 · · Score: 1

      Those Druids...always sacrificing our children.

  25. But where do we get the power? by Zaldarr · · Score: 1

    I'm not a physicist and this might be a stupid question, but how do we generate 100,000 times the Earth's power generation to work the darn thing even for the smallest moment? Is there something I'm missing?

    --
    I write professional videogame reviews! http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/
    1. Re:But where do we get the power? by harryjohnston · · Score: 1

      You store it up. No doubt there are all sorts of subtleties, but basically all you need is a frickin huge capacitor.

    2. Re:But where do we get the power? by mdenham · · Score: 2

      200 petawatts is easy enough to produce - it's 200 joules over one femtosecond. (Chances are the pulse is somewhat longer than one femtosecond, but there are two ways to produce large power numbers - large amounts of energy, or very short timeframes.)

    3. Re:But where do we get the power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about time and space. Imagine you have a 2 watt battery. When you put it in your torch it will continually provide an average of 2 watts for some time. Perhaps 4 hours. Half the time it lasts you have 2 hours at 4 watts, half it again, 1 hour at 8 watts, 30 minutes 16 watts, 15 minutes 32 watts, etc. The overall amount of energy might not be that great, but focus it all at one particle for for a tiny amount of time and that's one intense spark of specially concentrated energy.

    4. Re:But where do we get the power? by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the idea is that you relatively slowly charge up some kind of energy bank, eg ultracapacitors or something, using relatively low power. And then you discharge the bank very very fast - so you get 200 petawatts output, for a trillionth of a second, and then the energy banks are drained and need to be recharged.

      It's possible that the energy capacitance is actually an inherent part of the laser physics rather than being stored electrically. I'm not really sure what the details are.

      But, 200 PW for one trillionth of a second is actually only 200 kJ total energy if I've done the math correctly - ie about 9% of the dietary energy content of a Big Mac. This would not actually take very long for the world's total electrical generation capacity to deliver. :)

    5. Re:But where do we get the power? by Zaldarr · · Score: 1

      Thank you all very much. I've always wondered about that, and the solution is obvious now. Thanks for putting up with me.

      --
      I write professional videogame reviews! http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/
    6. Re:But where do we get the power? by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of playing with numbers. Lets say that the worlds production of drinkable water is 1 litre an hour. If normally, the world only uses 9/10ths of that litre, there is 100mL left over that can be saved. Now, if over the course of ten hours, that 100 mL is put aside into a tank for an experiment. The experiment then squirts a high pressure jet of water that uses the entire litre that has been saved up in a mere second. The experiment can be said to have expended 3,600 times the Earth's water production because normally it would take an hour to amass that volume, not the second that it took to expend.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    7. Re:But where do we get the power? by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      200 petawatts over less than a trillionth of a second isn't that much energy; well, its a lot but not what you seem to think it is. If I did my conversion correctly, it's 0.055556 petawatts? (200 pWh / 3600 / 10^-12 I think)

      --
      -SaNo
    8. Re:But where do we get the power? by dido · · Score: 1

      Your conversion is not quite right, 200 PW is 2e17 W. Over a trillionth of a second, that's 200,000 joules. This really isn't a lot of energy. It is about the energy released by the combustion of only four grams/5mL of gasoline (200,000 joules), or approximately one-fourth the food energy of a typical candy bar (about 1 million joules). A kilowatt-hour is 3.6 million joules, so the energy used is 0.056 kilowatt-hours of energy. My household consumes more than a hundred times that amount in a typical day.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    9. Re:But where do we get the power? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Well, the article says it's for less than a trillionth of a second, so, based on your 100,000 times, that's one 10 millionth of the world's power generation over one second. Over a minute and 40 seconds it's one billionth of the worlds power generation. It's just a matter of finding a way to store it up temporarily and release it in one precisely timed laser burst. Of course, that "just a matter of" encompasses a pretty huge technological challenge. I assume that's why the $1.6 billiion is needed.

    10. Re:But where do we get the power? by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      I knew it didn't seem quite right; thanks for the fix.

      --
      -SaNo
  26. 2nd time lucky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The mini black hole at CERN designed to swallow everything didn't work - on to plan B!

  27. Ex-squeeze me? by chortick · · Score: 1

    Pardon the commercial intrusion, but are we discussing a $1.6B innovation by the same "Europe" currently facing an existential crisis that is threatening to destroy the very economic fabric of the world? Either I am confused, or the media are confused... because they are portraying the current fiscal situation as one step removed from "widespread cannibalism", and here we are talking about physics.

    1. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only 1.6B, and Europe is far from being broke. A few pseudo-countries are, but there are also those with a real industry that will just keep rolling, financial fluctuations or not.

    2. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.6B is a fair bit less than 1% of the EU's spending power.

    3. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon the commercial intrusion, but are we discussing a $1.6B innovation by the same "Europe" currently facing an existential crisis that is threatening to destroy the very economic fabric of the world?

      Either I am confused, or the media are confused... because they are portraying the current fiscal situation as one step removed from "widespread cannibalism", and here we are talking about physics.

      You are confused. Think of it this way, California is bankrupt, does that compromise the US ? No.
      Same thing for Europe. Yes Greece is in a dire condition, but the EU is not just Greece, just as the US is not just California.

    4. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent! Finally... some current-events common sense. Admittedly, $1.6 B is less, for each, than the major European powers are exposed to Greek debt, ... but that's the whole point! they won't pay off that debt, so they won't pay off this $1.6B debt... where does it end? oh right... "widespread cannibalism".
      Peak Everything, kids. Go buy some beans... you're gonna need 'em.

    5. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      To be fair it is not Europe that is broke, It is Greece with a few other wobbly economies, then we have the rest of europe which is generally ok but awefully pissed at the moment they they are being affected by the braindead decision to let the basketcase that is greece join a decade ago despite them being in incredibly bad shape even back then.

    6. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      It's mostly Greece, Ireland and Spain to some extent. The rest of us are doing OK. Don't buy in to the media scaremongering too much.

      --
      Error: No error occurred
    7. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by Jorl17 · · Score: 1

      I am Portuguese. I live in Portugal and I always have. I am one of the many here who openly target the government and the corruption that has hit our country (which, it seems, is even less than the one that reaches some other big-shot countries). However, we are not a pseudo-country, even though we are going broke. Some of the greatest minds of the world come from here -- and some don't. We were important in many historical aspects -- did you know, for instance, that the first solar panel was created here? Literature prize winners? Bright mind scientists travelling around the world to spread their discoveries in many areas. We are known for being a caring and sentimental people, but also very lazy. However, some of our "lazyness" becomes "desenrascanço", which basically means "working with what we've got". A couple of months ago some countries in Europe published announcements specifically for the Portuguese because of this particular characteristic. We've seen some of the best poets in the world born in this land and, more importantly, love this land (Pessoa, Camões and many many others). In recent years, we've triumphed at sports more often than we used to, and we've also started having some good success in founding IT companies. Our universities are ranked in the top 10 of Europe -- probably above many of those "real-countries". Our problem is, like I said, corruption, but that doesn't mean we're a pseudo-country. You wish you'd had the good part of our story.
      Now the bad part, I'm not so sure of.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    8. Re:Ex-squeeze me? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Weeeelll... the fact that the exchange rate is not much higher than it could be for Northern Europe is actually keeping the economy afloat in that region. They're basically using Greece as a currency anchor. If they didn't have Greece, people would be pointing at them and say "Oooh you're artificially lowering the value of your currency" and they'd also need to pay a lot of money to intervene in the currency markets (which is risky and costly). If China was smart (and it it was politically viable), they'd split off Tibet, then form a new union with it and let Tibet raise massive debts to give everyone their own palace. A bit pricey, but as you can see, it's very effective as long as the increased exports outgrow the cost of the upkeep :)

      The Swiss are even smarter about it though: they link their currency to the euro through interventions, keeping it low and benefiting from the weakness of the euro (because if they didn't, they wouldn't be able to export *anything* except Rolexes), without having to pay for the Greece, Italian and Spanish deficits.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  28. If we are in a False vacuum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this laser could trigger vacuum decay....

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

    I am sure the other intelligent species in the galaxy would be annoyed....

    1. Re:If we are in a False vacuum... by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      The universe tunneling to a lower energy state would destroy all existing structure in the universe instantly. They wouldn't be annoyed at all, they would simply cease to exist like everything else we know.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:If we are in a False vacuum... by jameskojiro · · Score: 2

      And it would propagate across the universe at the speed of light so they would get little warning of it except when the wave hits them then [carrier lost]......

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    3. Re:If we are in a False vacuum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm you both bring up an interesting question.

      Would everything in the universe be destroyed at the same instant, as the first reply
      suggested, or would the destruction propagate at the speed of light so that even if
      we went *poof* it would take billions of years to reach the farthest galaxies?

  29. You're gonna need a bigger boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-D

    (Let's see who gets the reference...)

  30. BBBBBBUT people are starving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sums up what killed nasa.

  31. Truth stranger than fiction. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    will turn up some surprises about the very fabric of the Universe

    I'm guessing...plaid and flannel.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Truth stranger than fiction. by OwMyBrain · · Score: 1

      That's Ludicrous!

    2. Re:Truth stranger than fiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, it's corduroy. Which explains entirely why it always seems like the universe hates me.

    3. Re:Truth stranger than fiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely plaid. Plaid is cool.
      Amy!!! To the TARDIS!!!

    4. Re:Truth stranger than fiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will turn up some surprises about the very fabric of the Universe

      I'm guessing...plaid and flannel.

      Such findings may give us a better understanding of Spaceball One's Ludicrous Speed Engine.

  32. Don't hold your breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask LLNL. They've been working on their laser ignition fusion device for 10 years+ and still haven't reached their 500terrawatt goal.
    yes, I know the purpose isn't the same but I'm talking about capabilities here.

    Just like everything else in dreamland science, there's about 25 years you need to tack on to any time estimate

    1. Re:Don't hold your breath by jijitus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this project sounds as if NASA announced a mission to Alpha Centauri, while we haven't even made it to Mars.
      First achieve controlled nuclear fusion, THEN use that cheap, clean power for crazy experiments.

  33. Fuhck yeah! by chicago_scott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    $1.6 billion is a bargain to have space and time ripped up. The money won't be missed anyway.

    1. Re:Fuhck yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I for one would rather spend it on awesome shit like this than bailing out fucking bankers.

      In fact, I for one hope to have a government that ONLY SPENDS ITS MONEY ON SHIT LIKE THIS. Fuck the military, healthcare, social benefits, give me a state that wants to build shit from sci-fi and has no intention of watering it down just to make our lives "easier" (if they even do).

      Imagine the possibilities.Genetically engineered dogs and cats, food that comes when called, fusion reactor experiments littering the countryside, multiple (increasing in scale) versions of CERN enveloping the country...

      I want my national news paper to read like slashdot.

    2. Re:Fuhck yeah! by sam0737 · · Score: 1

      It took so much more to rip the economy apart, so $1.6b to rip the spacetime is a really good deal

    3. Re:Fuhck yeah! by Nationless · · Score: 1

      Well, not until yesterday.

    4. Re:Fuhck yeah! by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      If the space and time of Greece are ripped up, it is obviously a good investment in the EU economy...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Fuhck yeah! by vagabond_gr · · Score: 1

      Shoving billions down a spacetime hole: priceless

    6. Re:Fuhck yeah! by sorak · · Score: 1

      $1.6 billion is a bargain to have space and time ripped up. The money won't be missed anyway.

      "Blowing shit up" always has bipartisan support!

  34. Laugh-a while you can, monkey-boy. by Hartree · · Score: 1

    "Hellish beings from another Universe will come charging through the gap "

    And they'll all be named John.

    1. Re:Laugh-a while you can, monkey-boy. by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Why is there a watermelon there?

    2. Re:Laugh-a while you can, monkey-boy. by Pope · · Score: 1

      It's technical. I'll explain later.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  35. Fact or fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When then Klingons and the Romulans did a similar experiment in a fictional show, they did it on a remote planet and that was still not far enough away for the safety of the respective populations.

  36. Come to Us, Great Cthulhu by afabbro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's rip up space and see what's underneath. What could go wrong?

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Come to Us, Great Cthulhu by not_surt · · Score: 2

      Dude, if you want to see Cthulhu all you need is a deep sea submersible. Yog-Sothoth on the other hand...

    2. Re:Come to Us, Great Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's rip up space and see what's underneath. What could go wrong?

      So humans really did cause the "Big Bang?"

    3. Re:Come to Us, Great Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There could be a big, hairy set of universe sized balls, under.

    4. Re:Come to Us, Great Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot ripping open time as well... oh dear... i already said that... saying it again...

    5. Re:Come to Us, Great Cthulhu by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our head-eating, insanity bringing, eldritch icthilid overlords. Ia! Cthulhu Fhtagn!

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  37. Haven't these people ever watch The Mist? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Or read From a Buick 8? Or The Langoliers?

    I really don't want to rip a hole in space-time.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  38. The good news is it should answer questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bad news is they plan to test it 12/22/12.

  39. This is why I love science. by jeesis · · Score: 1

    Destroying reality just to prove a point.

  40. Oblig. Futurama by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Professor Farnsworth: We tore the universe a new space-hole, alright. But it's clenching shut fast!

  41. Posted from the what-could-possibly-go-wrong? dept by wanzeo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the most appropriate department title I have seen.

  42. Warning Label by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not look at laser with remaining spacetime.

  43. Re:nothing nada nix nyet there. Empty. Comprende? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
  44. Re:nothing nada nix nyet there. Empty. Comprende? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

    Henrik Casimir called, he wants a word with you.

    (And, before anybody replies, yes, I know, he's calling from the Great Beyond.)

  45. Hmmm not enough power by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

    Lets see a petawatt is 1 x 10^15.. Our star (sol) has a surface power of +/- 4 x 10^25 and it hasn't rent space time asunder yet that I know of, but hell I could be wrong. 200 PW is only a little more then the power of the sun that hits the earth. The sun runs at its power level continuously and they think they can do that in a couple of fempto seconds? I think not.

    --
    Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    1. Re:Hmmm not enough power by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      This laser is focused into a space considerably smaller than the surface of the sun.

    2. Re:Hmmm not enough power by Hentes · · Score: 2

      Of course there are many events in the Universe far more powerful than this, and good old spacetime survived them all. The article states some heavy bullshit.

    3. Re:Hmmm not enough power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is one hell of a lot of power...
      are you sure they can produce as much as hits the entire earth atmosphere for a few fempto seconds, which is really short but the cost of all those capacitors to charge up is insane.
      i think jesus said it best when he said 'Fuck you god damned mother fuckers!'

    4. Re:Hmmm not enough power by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      Are you saying size matters?

      Sorry I couldn't help myself.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
  46. NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I absolutely forbid them or anyone else from doing this. Strictly NO.

  47. The 8th Dimension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    142 comments and not a Buckaroo Banzai joke to be found. And you call yourselves nerds :(

    1. Re:The 8th Dimension by dzerkel · · Score: 1

      Ahem....

      Just stay away from the 8th dimension or it will be Orson Wells, all over again.

      Better now?

      --
      "What's the point of going abroad, if you're just another tourist..."
    2. Re:The 8th Dimension by Maritz · · Score: 1

      There was one, I didn't get the reference though.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  48. Crashed our currency, you CIA bastards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, we'll rip a hole in spacetime. That'll show you.

  49. use clairvoyance, occult chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 year old occult chemistry has the answer.. just do yoga and concentrate really hard on shrinking your field of view to the size of atoms and look for the dark matter.

  50. Half life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read this and thought of the beginning of half life...

  51. Re:Extreme sun tanning! by kawabago · · Score: 1

    How many femto seconds to get a perfect tan?

  52. No signs of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After thousands of years of searching the universe for intelligent life scientists eventually realized that the evidence had been right in front of their eyes since the invention of the telescope. Once an intelligent species discovered quantum physics it was only a matter of time before their experiments triggered a super nova, thus wiping themselves out before ever achieving faster than light travel.

  53. Extremely incorrect title and article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This does not rip a hole in spacetime, or anything like that. It's all about pair production, which is mundane and happens all the time, but is very hard to observe directly without large amounts of energy. (There are indirect ways of seeing it, though. For example, astrophysical TeV photon sources such as some blazars cannot be observed at TeV wavelengths beyond a certain distance from us because the energy gets used up by pair production.)

    FWIW, I work in astrophysics.

    1. Re:Extremely incorrect title and article by emtilt · · Score: 1

      Grr, accidentally posted that while logged out.

  54. Vacuum metastability event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since we exist in a false vacuum, the rip in space-time will cause a vacuum metastability event since it's not contained within a singularity (where the flow of time equals zero).

    There. Can I now apply for a research grant?

  55. Couldn't find a better solution hah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    delivering 200 petawatts of power at a target for less than a trillionth of a second

    I suppose it's cheaper than kicking Greece out of the euro zone.

  56. The Subtle Knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind me of Subtle knife

  57. Death Star by alex-tokar · · Score: 1

    I guess the Death Star patent has expired, then?

  58. This is really pretty ordinary... by dentin · · Score: 1

    As another poster said, this is about virtual pair production, which we see all the time. But there's an interesting side effect of pair production which I figured I'd toss out there: it makes vacuum an imperfect insulator. If you apply enough voltage across a chunk of vacuum, current -will- start to flow. In other words, vacuum has a breakdown voltage as a result of virtual pair production.

    This breakdown point is at roughly the voltage required to separate virtual particle pairs that come into existence. Suppose a pair of the two lightest species, an electron and a positron, pops into existence for a moment. Before they can mutually annihilate, a huge external electric field pulls them apart and pays the energy debt to create them. The resulting electron flow to the positive terminal and the positron flow to the negative terminal are an electrical current, reducing the potential difference of the field.

    This same effect of separating virtual particles via a huge electric field is what the experiment is proposing to measure. Normal matter breaks down long before the required field strength is met, so the only way to create an electric field that strong is via photons, which in a laser pulse all constructively combine to give small regions of space huge electric and magnetic fields.

    Just FYI.

    --
    Alter Aeon Multiclass MUD - http://www.alteraeon.com
  59. Zero point energy by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Oh good. Perhaps these experiments will put to rest arguments that zero point energy is the Next Big Thing(tm).

    Proponents of it (at least the ones I've met) won't shut up about it.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Zero point energy by kesuki · · Score: 1

      well, at least they aren't claiming everything can run on radium, which was big in Edgar rice boroughs day.

  60. suggestion by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I think maybe they should do this on a different planet...you know, for safety and all that. Didn't they learn anything from Star Trek? You don't just go build an Omega particle right next to a bunch of important stuff. You don't rip time and space apart on your home planet either! Seriously, "let's see what happens when we rip a hole in space and time" is NOT a valid safety policy.

  61. Universe to Earth by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Universe to Earth: That will leave a mark.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  62. Queue Gordan Freeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully we can get Half Life III as a survival manual before this happens.

  63. fabric of the universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what happens if this fabric of the universe ... unravels ... ? ?

    1. Re:fabric of the universe by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      It opens up and scientific grant money comes out! Like a big pinata!

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  64. Future mfh by mfh · · Score: 1

    Hi I'm from the future (that's how I have such a low UID).

    Just letting you guys know that ripping a hole in space-time is a really bad idea.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Future mfh by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      Do the UID's rollover or is the server overthrown in violent rebellion?

  65. Farm tools and Non-GMO for starving countries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under $50 million of well-placed farm equipment and starter seeds would win the "war" on hunger, just like how a hundred well-placed hookers of AIDS would obsolete US Military, but not on Planet Hearth.

    Starvation has always been a weapon, and the over-vaccination of a population would vanquish the disease from the wild so that in a couple generations immunity would be lost so the military can refine their hoarded stock of virus into a more effect Germ Warfare agent since it's proprieters need more effective weapons to blame as an Act of God.

    1. Re:Farm tools and Non-GMO for starving countries. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Go do your homework, GMO is THE weapon against hunger and if it wasn't for GMO many countries would still be starving.

    2. Re:Farm tools and Non-GMO for starving countries. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      He's done his homework. Alex Jones told him everything he needs to know.

      [/sarcasm]

    3. Re:Farm tools and Non-GMO for starving countries. by Teun · · Score: 1
      It seems you know little of agriculture and the longer term challenge of feeding the world.

      Patenting food isn't the solution.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  66. Attention everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do not look at the results with the remaining eye !

  67. Re:Extreme sun tanning! by Nationless · · Score: 1

    If you count the part where you have to rip a hole in spacetime?

    -5.

  68. They are not ripping spacetime apart. by mathfeel · · Score: 1

    They are trying to electrically polarize vacuum. And physical vacuum can be seen as a dielectric.
    Distortion and ripping open of space-time are ultimately a gravity thing and gravity is sensationally weak unless you are near some stellar object.

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  69. Shame on you all! by Jager+Dave · · Score: 1

    Not one comment regarding the "Oscillation Overthruster"? That was basically a laser that blasted it's way into the 8th dimension, taking our hero Buckaroo Bonzai along for the ride :)

    1. Re:Shame on you all! by prgrmr · · Score: 1

      As soon as I read the headline, I immediately had to suppress the urge to start whistling.

  70. Have they ever seen any sci-fi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What ever in the realm of sci-fi or even euro-sci-fi could ever make them think this is a good idea? This sounds like the beginning of the plot of some stargate episode that ends up with Daniel Jackson getting killed in the rift and having to get picked up by the doctor and go back in time in the Tardis to tell the world something they should have already guessed if they were paying attention the previous 5 seasons, this is a bad idea.

  71. Sounds like the plot for Doom by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    Except on Earth, instead of Phobos.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  72. Fuck you by symbolset · · Score: 1

    As I'm reading this there are are 226 comments on this article. NOT ONE addresses the issues presented, examines the math, argues on the merits. It's all about whim and whimsy, and talking points. Kids, I am dissapoint.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Fuck you by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      You seem surprised. I stop reading the comments on science-related articles here from time to time for that very reason; very very few people here actually have the knowledge required to comment sensibly on this sort of stuff. That's fine, everyone knows almost nothing about almost everything. However it would be nice if they didn't make so many asinine comments.

    2. Re:Fuck you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only like the funny comments. You are not funny.

  73. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a couple of quick calculations i've just performed, this will not work.

    E!=mc2

  74. 200 petawatts?! by Rennt · · Score: 1

    Christ... I'd love to see some discussion on how they are going to store that much energy. To my mind it seems more like science fiction then the actual hole-in-spacetime part of the experiment.

    1. Re:200 petawatts?! by spectrokid · · Score: 1

      Let's see. 200 petawatt is order of magnitude 1 E17 Watt. If we assume trillion is short scale (an american trillion), then that is 1 E-12 seconds. Combined gives 1E5 joules per shot. So 100000 Watt for 1 second, or 27 Watt for one hour. About the energy your DVD player needs for one episode of BSG. Just delivered in the time your DVD player needs to read one single bit.

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    2. Re:200 petawatts?! by Rennt · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, but I'm more interested in energy storage. The articles talk about developing the energy delivery (lasers), but that seems like a walk in the park compared to the seemingly insurmountable problem of how to store 100,000x the output of the world's electrical grid.

    3. Re:200 petawatts?! by heitikender · · Score: 1

      They really don't have to. Watt is joule/second i.e. power is energy/time. Because the time is so short (10 -9 of second), Power is so big (2*10 15 Watts). So, storage needed is power * time = 2*10 6 Joule, which is about the amount half-depleted car battery has. I don't know how much it is in Library of Congress units, though.

    4. Re:200 petawatts?! by Arlet · · Score: 1

      about the amount half-depleted car battery has

      Except that a car battery couldn't deliver the instantaneous current required for this project.

      So, the question about storage is still a valid and interesting one.

    5. Re:200 petawatts?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superconducting magnets, how do they work?

    6. Re:200 petawatts?! by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Meta-stable excited atomic state in the activated laser matrix (or operative medium, or whatever its name is)

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  75. Hey, I saw this story tomorrow! by kawabago · · Score: 1

    nuf sed

  76. somewhere in Europe?! by von_poruba · · Score: 1

    it's czech republic and i live there, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:somewhere in Europe?! by Hentes · · Score: 1

      It's acually a series of experiments in 4 European countries.

  77. Is this what Sheldon meant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when he said "...tear the mask off nature and stare at the face of God.."?

  78. News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headlines today:

    Entire toba-toba planet was vaporized by an un-identified blast of energy. No survivors reported. The mani-popa system has called this an attack on the alliance by the laser-crazy and sworn retribution. This could plunge the entire galaxy into a descrtructive war.

  79. Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerds by Required+Snark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The level of comment on the article is puerile (look it up, most of you don't know what it means).

    First the shear amount of dumb laser jokes is astounding. It seems very few people bothered to read any of the other posts or bothered to consider that maybe someone else on Shashdot had ever seen Austin Powers. Or Star Trek. Or your favorite SF series here. Real herd behavior in action.

    Next, the number of people whining about 200 PETAWATTS!!!!!! was really sad. Are the posters hear actually that ignorant about the concept of instantaneous power values and pulsed power systems? I am surprised by this level of technical ignorance.

    Also, does anyone seriously think that a project of this size would be approved without an air tight argument that the experiment will operate in a domain where there are likely to be measurable results? Is it even vaguely possible that physicists picked "200 petawatts of power at a target for less than a trillionth of a second " by guessing? They have a well reasoned case to do the experiment, and part of this is a way to measure the results. But many of the post deride the practicality of the experiment, and even make specific statements that it won't work and that key measurement components are nonexistent. All based around a badly written publicity piece and their extensive personal knowledge of ultra high powered lasers and the mathematics of virtual particle production in the ground state of the space-time vacuum.

    The worst and most puzzling part is the shear amount of hostility shown towards science. Assuming that it pork spending, saying it useless, that it can't show anything interesting, that the resources would be better spent somewhere else. All without a shred of logic or reference to any external source. This is the kind of anti-intellectual crap I expect from Fox News, not Slashdot readers. All I see here is a few true nerds surrounded by a bunch of fakes who either express their ignorance directly or try and hide it by making a ridiculous hostile comments.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  80. Re:Happy November from the Golden Girls! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this Laser will open a rift where this 'cosmonaut' moron disappears into.
    He also deserves the preposition at the end of the sentence.

  81. Another World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect what they will find is that they just wasted billions of monies on a laser that doesn't achieve anything...

  82. Value for money? by NonFerrousBueller · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm getting old, but wouldn't we be better off spending $1.6B educating, feeding, and homing people? I feel the same way about manned space flight. I'm not saying it has nothing more to offer us, but as a benefit to mankind, the cost/benefit ratio doesn't look good.

    1. Re:Value for money? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Until we conduct the research we have no idea where it could lead us. My favourite example is the laser, which was sat in research labs for years after its invention as no one had any idea what to use it for. Now most homes in the developed world contain at least one; I have three myself (in regular use that is, I have more lying around unused). Likewise superconductivity - once a novelty, now used in medical imaging (and so helping to save lives).

      Sure this is pretty esoteric, but who knows where the path might lead until we've followed it?

    2. Re:Value for money? by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      If we took that attitude we would have nothing. I don't think you realise just how much of our world is the result of blue sky projects like these. The space program is great example, aluminium, microwaves, etc 1.6 billion would barely dent the problems of homing and educating people, that a massive cultural and political issue more than something you can solve with a couple of billion.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    3. Re:Value for money? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ...blue sky projects like these.

      This is no "blue sky" project. No holes are being ripped in anything. The article is mostly hype and bullshit.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Value for money? by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      sure the article is ridiculous, but the science is sound, creating particles from the quantum foam is a worthy experiment and doesn't really affect my point.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
  83. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by anerki · · Score: 1

    surrounded by a bunch of fakes who either express their ignorance directly or try and hide it by making a ridiculous hostile comments

    Brilliant ending to that ridiculously hostile post.

    --
    Life is great! (as told by Lady Susan)
  84. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An almost excellently angry rebuttal to most of the ignorance displayed in the comments.
    One problem: the definitions of sheer and shear (look it up, irony?).
    You will then have sheared away your sheer ignorance of these homonyms.

  85. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally agree. It doesn't help that slashdot has one of the worst over engineered comment systems I have ever seen.

  86. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the posters here actually that ignorant

  87. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He's right though. I go through phases of not reading the comments on science-related articles here for that very reason - the general level of commentary is awful. Sure, not everyone has the knowledge and/or experience required to comment meaningfully, but it would be nice if they would refrain from doing so.

  88. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sheer*

  89. Aperture by Meneth · · Score: 1

    We're not banging rocks together over here. We know how to make a quantum space hole.

  90. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, tastiest bit I've read on slashdot lately.... Very on point...

    btw spelling/grammar is vital in making an intelligent argument..... hear=here?

    Finally, you might want to look into mixing decaf with your beans man...... most people, even slashdot readers, have little to no concept of "instantaneous power values and pulsed power systems", be serious...

    pack up a phatty and change the channel lol

  91. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you, look up shear vs sheer

  92. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are the posters hear actually that ignorant about the concept of instantaneous power values and pulsed power systems?"

    I am a physics teacher, so I bet I'm not "that ignorant". Also, I know the difference between "hear "and "here ". Scotty, beam this moron out of HERE.

  93. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you've only worked this out... now?

  94. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheer amount of hostility

  95. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "200 Petawatts" is nothing compared to the gigawatts required to power a time traveling Delorean!

    I take it you are new to Slashdot. I tried in the past to point out when micro-hole experiments were claimed to potentially end the world that a black hole can't eat much if the initial mass is low. I got a zero mod for those comments. No one here cares about the physics, most on this site learned physics watching Star Trek. There's zero risk but hey there's always the "what if" scenarios. We're talking a brief pin hole in the Universe that would go unnoticed if they didn't have millions of dollars worth of instruments pointed at it. You might as well say since lightning produces anti matter the world will end during the next thunderstorm. Earth shattering events go unnoticed every single day and that's the real truth.

  96. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you expect on slashdot nowadays?

  97. Petawatt lasers by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    They go "PW PW PW!"

  98. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by jovius · · Score: 1

    The concentrated puerility of multitude of slashdotters enabled you to produce a virtual article. Maybe you should actually be grateful :)

  99. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you go making it all complicated again.... :(

  100. What? My userid is NOT the number of women lusting by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    What? My userid is NOT the number of women lusting after me? So it is the number of times I will have sex sometime in the future at least right? Right?? RIGHT?!?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  101. Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wow, Steins;Gate all over again...
    We don't need a second season, because it's already airing... in real life...

  102. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's remarkably annoying that you can't spell "sheer".

  103. Earth is moving through space-time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth is rotating around its axis and orbiting the sun. The moon, as well as other things, add a little wobble to the Earth's movements. We are moving through space-time. If they are focusing the lasers and reading data from a very small point in space-time, will they be able to get accurate results when we are moving so quickly? If they are studying a very tiny point in space-time, even if the observations last a fraction of a second, the earth could have still moved beyond the area in which they are measuring results.

    Note: I do not know jack about physics... this is just an idea.

  104. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent is so funny read in a Sheldon Cooper voice :p

  105. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the shear amount of dumb laser jokes is astounding. It seems very few people bothered to read any of the other posts or bothered to consider that maybe someone else on Shashdot had ever seen Austin Powers. Or Star Trek. Or your favorite SF series here. Real herd behavior in action.

    If you think this is bad, take a stroll over to the quantum mechanics stories and see how many uncertainty principle jokes you can find.

  106. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 archaeologists talking:

    - "wow, this data fragment found is over 1 billion years old"

    - "I know, it was discovered on a 3rd planet in a solar system in the spiral galaxy called (translated): "dumb fucks". The planet has a moon that is the same size - we don't think this is a natural occurrence. Our scientists think that the planet used to be much bigger and some cataclysmic event happened that ripped it apart."

    - "Hmmmm, the data fragment is binary, let's run it through the translator....."

    - "Something about "Slashdot..... the ELI going online, blackhole, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions" and then there's nothing more..

    - " hmmm strange. Oh well, throw it in the garbage and let's get to some fun stuff...."
     

  107. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you'd be happier with a site that had a smaller audience. Perhaps an audience of one.

  108. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the posters hear actually that ignorant about the concept of instantaneous power values and pulsed power systems? I am surprised by this level of technical ignorance.

    Are you ignorant in elementary spelling and grammar?

  109. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    While I was looking up puerile, I noticed that you used shear instead of sheer (twice) and hear instead of here. The fine is 1.37 Internets. Also, I finally found puerile in yo momma.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  110. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing I don't like about most science advancements is that, regardless of what that is, someone find a militar use for that.

    Wont be surprised if when the space-time is conquered, the main use will be to attack and dominate others. No one will find an use in favor of the humanity in general.

    Like, instead of putting us all to work for the robots (like it is today), why not put robots to work for us?

    Sad.

  111. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by discord5 · · Score: 1

    First the shear amount of dumb laser jokes is astounding.

    Someone replaced the sugar for your coffee with salt this morning, right? I hate it when that happens.

    maybe someone else on Shashdot had ever seen Austin Powers. Or Star Trek.

    Really? You don't say. I thought I was the only one who knew about Star Trek. I'll need to find a new thing... Maybe I'll go watch that Star Wars thing I read about. That death star thing should prove to be quite the hilarious joke.

    I am surprised by this level of technical ignorance

    Are you new here?

    badly written publicity piece

    By all means, write a better article. I BEG of you, write a better article. I couldn't agree more with you that lousy science articles need to go. But how many scientists are willing to write an article that a layman can understand? There's no time, writing articles doesn't bring back any funding, the public doesn't care, and your peers care even less since they read the paper. Thus you get pseudo-science articles. Hi Reality, nice to meet you. FYI, most people here won't even read the article, and it's been that way for a long time.

    shear amount of hostility shown towards science

    Have you been sleeping for the past 20 years or so? Science needs to be deliver immediate results to be cool these days. The only people who care about the nature of the universe these days are theologists and to a lesser extent theoretical physicists. Sad, but true.

    This is the kind of anti-intellectual crap I expect from Fox News, not Slashdot readers

    Slashdot was never the meeting grounds of the intellectuals its readers so gladly say it is. It's always been what it is : a news aggregator with geeks and their terrible terrible jokes. Sure, you've got a few people that are (studying) in this field, and they'll post a meaningful comment every now and then, but most of it is bored geeks with laser jokes. Anything you might think it was in the past is overly optimistic nostalgia.

    true nerds surrounded by a bunch of fakes

    OMG! Fake nerds. Quick, someone grab the Monty Python tapes. We'll weed 'm out by seeing who falls asleep after we watch quest for the holy grail umpteen times!

    Leave now before you post yourself into a heart attack. That's the best advice I'm going to give you. Go read the paper, do something interesting, and spend the time you'd spend here arguing doing something that you feel is productive. You'll probably end up feeling much better that way.

  112. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Puerile is currently in the top 20% of lookups on Merriam-Webster.com.

    - so 1/5th of all Merriam-Webster.com lookups came from this single comment.

    Congrats.

  113. About time by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    This Universe is getting old and tired. This site is getting old and tired. Let's do this. Let's tear the Universe a new one.

    By the way, can the same tearing be achieve with a nuke I wonder?

  114. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, am a FOX News viewer - ;-)

    And I agree with your observations relating to the quality of posts here on Slashdot - seems to be the general direction of such things on the big /. sadly enough.

  115. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just as puzzled about the numerous pop-media references (yours included). Simply scanning the default unfiltered comments (50 of 346 right now) reveals two instances of Fox network, one of Dick Cheney, and one general reference to politicians. What do they have anything to do with this laser?

  116. At last .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A solution to the global economic crisis - the aliens will fix it.

  117. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the refreshing slap in the face. Although your post places a lot of trust in government's process of approval.

  118. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know they make products that dillute in water to help with constipation.

  119. QUANTUM BOGOSORT by JambisJubilee · · Score: 1

    This could be used as an efficient implementation of the quantum bogosort

  120. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pew-pew! PEW-PEW!!! ZAP!!!

  121. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to go Sgt. Buzzkill.

  122. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir are a big poo poo head.

  123. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you use it, the word is properly spelled "sheer" and not "shear".

  124. Caveman & clocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These scientists and the ones at the large hadron collider remind me of caveman.

    Hand them a bunch of coo coo clocks and they will bang them together to see the insides and try and figure out how it all works.

    So all they do is bang a bunch of particles together in the hopes of figuring out the secrets of the universe.

  125. ELI - hmmm by Torodung · · Score: 1

    ELY (n.)
    The first, tiniest inkling you get that something, somewhere, has gone terribly wrong.

    From "The Meaning of Liff" by Douglas Adams and John Lloyd.

  126. Yeah, but by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Does it run Jiffy Pop?

  127. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome to the internet

  128. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the shear amount of dumb laser jokes is astounding.

    . Are the posters hear actually that ignorant about the concept of instantaneous power values and pulsed power systems? I am surprised by this level of technical ignorance.

    I think you mean "sheer" and "here", rather than "shear" and "hear".

    Pedantry deserves the same scrutiny it proposes.

  129. My stuffed monkey could have written that by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    As much as I like Discovery, that was horribly written article. Hernias and Austin Power jokes? C'mon!

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  130. Shear versus Sheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shear... I do not think it means what you think it means.

  131. Greece...great location for laser by magbottle · · Score: 0

    1) help their economy
    2) if any holes in space-time are to be ripped, well......
    3) no plebiscite

  132. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you at least check your spelling/grammar while you're bawling us all out? You used the word sheer incorrectly twice. Butt-head. Neener neener.

  133. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read Slashdot for the comments, not for the science :)

  134. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by bigpaperbag · · Score: 1

    I love that you use puerile to show your fancy vocabulary and then fail basic grammar throughout the rest of your post.

  135. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    "Also, does anyone seriously think that a project of this size would be approved without an air tight argument that the experiment will operate in a domain where there are likely to be measurable results?"
    Yes I do. I think they have a reasonable argument that the experiment will operate in a domain where their are likely to be results. That is why it is called and experiment. It might fail to get results but that too is a result.

    This got me wondering though. At what point in science does a race become advanced enough that they should move some experiments off planet just for sake of safety? This test is not at the level yet but as the energy levels go up and up one has to wonder when having a base on the moon or in the Astroid belt becomes a good idea. See Castle Bravo as an example of what can happen when physics goes wrong.

    Like I said NOT THIS TEST but at some point I wonder if it will be wise to build some of this stuff off planet.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  136. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your high-horse position would have been more respectable with fewer spelling and grammatical errors.

  137. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is European project, you know. What did you expect ? Be glad it is not done in China, then the comments would be much worse.

  138. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About time someone said it.

  139. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you're going to bitch about people making jokes? Maybe you should step away from the computer and go do something else before you have a fucking heart attack. Unless, for you, being a total asshole is worth dying over.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  140. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. As long as its built in my district, it ain't pork.

  141. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real slashdot is dead. Give up. BTW, I love that you posted this under an account named "Required Snark". Cheers.

  142. Wheel of Time readers by Fulseman · · Score: 1

    know this is how they bored a hole into the Dark Ones prison.

  143. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by deblau · · Score: 1

    You must be new here.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  144. on the subject of pseudo-nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My nerd-dom is limited to computers, a biowolf cluster of them. how many petawatts is that?

  145. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the posters hear actually that ignorant about the concept of instantaneous power values and pulsed power systems? I am surprised by this level of technical ignorance.

    Gotta' love a condescending rant with an error like that!

    I think you're getting worked up over nothing here...the posters you reference are largely just fooling around. If you don't care for the posts modded "Funny" you can remove them altogether just fyi.

  146. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.21 GIGAWATTS! Great scott!

  147. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > ...talking a brief pin hole...

    No we aren't. There are no holes involved. That's just typical reportorial hype.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  148. Galactic CNN Update: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "In today's news, planet Earth is gearing up for their third attempt at the prestigious but controversial Galactic Darwin Award by opening a space-time rift with excess lasers. Their second attempt, the Large Hadron Collider still has some glitches to be worked out. Since their first attempt, what they called the "cold war" ended, Earth has been eagerly seeking new and creative methods of winning the coveted award."

  149. Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this talk about lasers, death stars, sharks...

    And no one wondered if this will open up an Untempered Schism?

  150. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amen

  151. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are the posters hear actually that ignorant..." -> "Are the posters here..." Fixed that for you.

  152. Please don't bother the Red Lectoids on Planet 10 by TVDinner · · Score: 1

    Please don't attach it to an van with an oscillation overthruster. We've been there, done that.... Signed John Bigboote

  153. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like the sort of fellow who has a high powered laser and an axe to grind. I beg your mercy and forgiveness on behalf of the slashdot crowd.

  154. God... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "They did what?!... Ha ha ha ho ho ho... silly humans!"

  155. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm so with you on this. I've only been been posting for a while but the cliques on here is unbelievable. If you make mention of thing close to Anti-Apple or Anti-Google (and you had better not mention anything pro-Microsoft), or if you happen to be pro making money off of your ideas you get modded to "bad karma". and your done with being heard since you will forever be scored as 0 and filtered out. I'm now just an Anonymous Coward poster (still at zero but at least nothing more can happen to me) now and really beginning to wonder if this place is for me. I like the news brought up here because it is news that I find fascinating and would love to talk about with giving my own thoughts and ideas and not being eaten by wolves who only want to joke and harrass the people who seriously question or want to learn. Hey /. why don't you have two sections one for the jokes and one for the thinkers and filter it that way so some real discussions can take place about the topic at hand?

  156. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, will we be able to see the face of God[1] ??

    [1] Pick favorite god here: http://www.godchecker.com/

  157. Hi.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Universe, we're gonna rip you a new one!

  158. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "shear amount of hostility"
    Yes ignorance is a terrible thing. Take pity on the sheep though.

  159. The crazy thing by jd.schmidt · · Score: 1

    I swear this is the same exact experiment every nerdy Junior Highschooler thinks we should perform. Including myself.

  160. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it's true. This man has no dick.

  161. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lighten up, Francis... I read through most the comments and people are trying to be funny.

    Also, I wouldn't go around insulting people's intelligence with all the basic English errors in your post.

  162. NOOOoooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't rip up Space.

    I wanted to go there.

  163. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the kind of anti-intellectual crap I expect from Fox News, not Slashdot readers. All I see here is a few true nerds surrounded by a bunch of fakes who either express their ignorance directly or try and hide it by making a ridiculous hostile comments.

    Well said. On here we see so much criticism of something which a LOT OF SMART PEOPLE think is worthwhile.
      People in this thread have either been cracking jokes or making ridiculous ill-educated complaints. Humans are building an enormous powerful laser to do cool science. Why can't we just go 'awesome!' for once?

  164. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by lymond01 · · Score: 1

    You're pointing out that comments on an internet news article don't appear informed? From your tone one might assume the highly improbable: that you've only recently discovered or at least bothered to read comments on the internet. People speaking opinion as fact is common. More common in the anonymous world of the internet.

    Either that or your entire post is an elaborate ruse to make people believe you're new to the internet. This I find to be more believable.

  165. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad can beat up your dad... I think...

  166. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're obviously in a bad mood. Go suck a dick, I'm sure it'll make you feel better. Besides, you sound like you've had plenty of practice.

  167. Lasers Outlawed in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder they outlawed powerful lasers on eBay.

  168. They're anti-science because of people like you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Albeit perhaps not all of them are anti-science because of people like you, religion has its role to play, but mean-spirited narrow-minded jackasses like yourself have done more in modern times to harm the advancement of science than the most ardent theist.

    Good God man, you remind me of one Chemistry professor I once had. She wanted me to accept that "you're not a scientist if you don't use a pen" as fact. Let's forget that ink is no barrier to forging results. For one thing, the option to make shit up has always existed and is all too easy in those early practice labs for undergraduates. Let's forget that I had hand spasms that she was well aware of and that pencil was a reasonable accommodation that would afford the neatness she demanded in the limited time I had. No, it was her way or the highway.

    She was not the only one. I have found many instructors and practitioners of varying disciplines to be indescribably narrow-minded and even stupid in the most literal sense. Most frustrating is the assumption by these individuals that any concern I may share with them is because I am failing to understand their point of view or methodology, or that I simply don't stand a chance to. That I or those with such concerns must not be operating on, or be capable of, their level of thinking. I don't claim to know all, or much of anything to be quite honest, but I am well aware of how people like these are viewed. They're pests.

    While the majority of scientists I've come across have been nothing but the most wonderful people when it has come to expanding the understanding of just about anyone, a significant number have not been. Too many scientists are viewed not as the people with any practical chance at advancing humankind, or saving us from our stupidity, but as assholes to be avoided. This isn't to say they don't make fair contributions to their fields. Take Rosalind Franklin, she wasn't know for her kindness. /rant off

    Here's my point, you could have written a response that really was insightful. This wasn't. You could have told us how things will work, what the argument really is, directly answered the questions posed by other posters, etc. You could have told us about your own personal knowledge of ultra high powered lasers and the mathematics of virtual particle production in the ground state of the space-time vacuum. You could have made the whole thing digestible for the layman or at least given links to others who have. Instead you attacked and in a matter most vile.

    You seemed incensed that people even dared to question the expense. Yes, science needs to be well funded and yes, it isn't always clear what the benefit is, but questioning the expense isn't out of line; and if data is available that would illuminate what benefits may be there, however remote those benefits may be, people have a right to know. You attacked science fiction. I'm sorry, but most of us didn't have our physicist grandfathers to inspire us to explore science, Spock did it for a lot of us. You attacked humor, as if Slashdot should be nothing but the facts ma'am.

    In your final paragraph you practically compared us to the devil and then you want to talk about hostility and wonder why people are anti-science? Let me be clear explain things or shut your yap, please. My thanks in advance.

  169. A Natural Progression of Scientific Inquiry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and also the reason we have not yet detected other Life in the Universe.

  170. Obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The level of comment on the article is puerile (look it up, most of you don't know what it means).

    First the shear amount of dumb laser jokes is astounding. It seems very few people bothered to read any of the other posts or bothered to consider that maybe someone else on Shashdot had ever seen Austin Powers. Or Star Trek. Or your favorite SF series here. Real herd behavior in action.

    You must be new here.

    Ya, I know, herd behavior and all that. I. just. could. not. resist, you feel my pain.

  171. The Red Lectroids are coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, next thing you know they'll be testing out the overthruster at the salt flats.

  172. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the shear amount of dumb laser jokes is astounding. It seems very few people bothered to read any of the other posts or bothered to consider that maybe someone else on Shashdot had ever seen Austin Powers. Or Star Trek. Or your favorite SF series here. Real herd behavior in action.

    Get a life. Maybe you'll understand why people have fun one day.

  173. "Synthetic Hawking Radiation" is a better headline by Fubari · · Score: 1
    No space-time ripping here. "Synthetic Hawking Radiation" would be a better headline - they're using lasers instead of a black hole, hence "synthetic".
    They're trying to make temporary Hawking Radiation, e.g. use lasers to push apart spontaneous particle+antiparticle pairs long enough to detect some of those particles before they recombine and vanish.
    So really, "Temporary Hawking Radiation" would be more accurate headline than "Synthetic", but not as catchy. :-)
    From the fine article:

    It is hoped that the ELI lasers will also be able to pull these particles apart -- not to make them "real" (Ã la Hawking radiation) but to keep them around long enough so we can detect their existence.

  174. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you must be new here

  175. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Lairdykinsmcgee · · Score: 1

    Sounds like someone shot 10 high powered lasers -- delivering 200 petawatts of power for less than a trillionth of a second, and ripping open space time -- into your fruit loops.

  176. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Tiny bit 'o hubris spotted in there, mate. No matter.

    W

  177. Ob. Mythbusters ref. by He+Who+Waits · · Score: 1

    This strikes me as being "Mythbusters science" -- basically just blow sh!t up and see what happens. Maybe we SHOULDN'T try this at home.

  178. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The level of comment on the article is puerile (look it up, most of you don't know what it means).

    First the shear amount of dumb laser jokes is astounding. It seems very few people bothered to read any of the other posts or bothered to consider that maybe someone else on Shashdot had ever seen Austin Powers. Or Star Trek. Or .

    You must be new here .. WELCOME !!

  179. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooo...are you saying that you don't *want* 200 petawatt lasers on the heads of sharks?

  180. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow angry. 1 Lasers, starwars = fun, so think about that (i know blasters where kinda like weird railgun lasers but still). Second, they are delving into new territory, that is not well understood. I'm sorry if not every "true nerd/geek etc." has a strong understanding of high powered laser, or even a basic understanding of particle physics, I forgot that no programmers, car designers, or artists are nerds. While I appreciate your contribution a level head would have better conveyed your argument, as opposed to making you feel so vastly superior to your fellow man and upsetting everyone around you.

    Your response is the childish one, no matter your use of language or understanding of the topic, because all you have evoked in this conversation is emotion when you are intending for facts.

    Also lasers + Sharks = Fun

  181. These numbers are a little high... by Mech610 · · Score: 1

    No, no, I'm sure they're within acceptable limits...

    --
    Data's painting is making me dizzy...
  182. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sheer

  183. Re:What? My userid is NOT the number of women lust by geekoid · · Score: 1

    With that Sig? no, no you will not.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  184. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are the posters hear actually that ignorant"
    here....(look it up, since you don't know what it means).
    If your going to be a dick at least use SPELLCHECK

  185. ROFL by fireylord · · Score: 1

    Anonymous coward is just lol! No really, hilarious!

  186. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is anti-science so get off your high horse, you asshat. But really, does it make sense to shit in one's backyard? Scientists make all of these damn experiments up in their heads, go beg for public money to make them happen, and don't truly have idea one about what will happen or how it will affect the Earth. It ain't like we got a backup plan if they really do cause something terrible to happen. Just because they haven't screwed the pooch for all of us yet, doesn't mean they should continue to get a free pass. Why don't you take your advanced degree and go do something beneficial for humanity, like flip burgers or cook fries (we all like fries) and then the limit of your harm equation will be burning your stupid ass on hot oil or maybe burning down Joe's burgers instead of melting the planet or placing a long distance call to the inhibitors.

  187. But what of the children? by sneakyimp · · Score: 1

    200 Pedo-watts sounds very dangerous for the children.

  188. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by tfiedler · · Score: 1

    No one is anti-science so get off your high horse. But really, does it make sense to shit in one's backyard? You science types make all of these experiments up in your heads, go beg for public money to make them happen, and don't truly have idea one about what will happen or how it will affect the Earth. It ain't like we got a backup plan if they really do cause something terrible to happen. Just because they haven't screwed the pooch for all of us yet, doesn't mean they should continue to get a free pass. Why don't you take your advanced degree and go do something beneficial for humanity, like flip burgers or cook fries (we all like fries) and then the limit of your harm equation will be burning your stupid ass on hot oil or maybe burning down Joe's burgers instead of melting the planet or placing a long distance call in the inhibitors. Hey here's an idea, even if giant lasers are cool and all, but fix something instead of waste money.... say spend some effort on finding and developing a nice, clean energy supply that doesn't pollute and can be had cheaply and easily, thereby freeing us from the clutches of the petroleum/coal overlords.

    --
    Democrats and Republicans are like AIDS and Cancer, I want neither!
  189. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The worst and most puzzling part is the shear amount of hostility shown towards science. Assuming that it pork spending, saying it useless, that it can't show anything interesting, that the resources would be better spent somewhere else. All without a shred of logic or reference to any external source."

    Preference is subjective, and as such, cannot be defined by objective evaluation of the external world. So, statements regarding value to a person cannot be investigated further. You may be able to watch for behavior or other statements which contradict it, but otherwise you can only assume they are voicing their valuation truthfully. That eliminates any refutation of two of the three claims, and leaves only one statement left, which does make a claim about the external, measurable, objective world: pork spending.

    Now, the vernacular is a shifting thing, but unless there is reason to object, lets agree that 'pork spending' is close to the wikipedia definition:

    Pork barrel is a derogatory term referring to appropriation of government spending for localized projects secured solely or primarily to bring money to a representative's district. The usage originated in American English.

    I'd argue that it makes sense if we ruled out the specifics of American bureaucracy and generalize the term a bit. Instead of localization being a function of geography, we could make it a proximity to friends and other connected benefactors of politicians. So specifically, this would qualify as pork spending if it were money appropriated out of general funds the government takes from citizens for the sake of financing the Extreme Light Infrastructure Ultra-High Field Facility in order to first and foremost secure an income to the bureaucratic leadership and connections. Before I go any further, I'd like to point out two things. First, statements about intentions are very tricky. We cannot say for sure what motivations direct a politicians actions for certain in specific cases like this where it could be one interest or another. Unless we found a voicemail of a bureaucrat joking with a buddy about how he is getting his friends cousin a cushy desk job at some new agency or something, we really can't say. Only praxeological and psychological investigations might help us then. That brings me to my second point, which is in absence of any means towards certainty, what should ones default assumption be. Can we say that it is more likely than not that those involved in securing money for this project have a strong interest in financing their own wallets and their associates? I'd say absolutely. However, it is always a good idea to remember that this is just an assumption.

  190. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm....
    "...the shear [sic] amount of hostility..."
    "This is the kind of anti-intellectual crap I expect from Fox News,..."
    Do tell us about hostility.

  191. Something Wonderful is going to happen... by rossy · · Score: 1

    Oh my god...
    It's full of...
    Stray socks and dryer lint!

    --
    Ross Youngblood
  192. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...'shear amount'...??
    btw, we love lasers.

  193. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are you saying that you cant think of 10 ways to more usefully and better spend all of that money?

    Are you also saying that "They have a well reasoned case to do the experiment, and part of this is a way to measure the results" "without a shred of logic or reference to any external source"

    Why are you so "surprised by this level of technical ignorance"? is every nerd a physicist that they should be experts "about the concept of instantaneous power values and pulsed power systems?"

    If you dismount your pot-smoking horse, you might not be so grumpy : ) and maybe a little thoughtfulness and understanding will seep into your character.

  194. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Sumtingwong · · Score: 1

    This is a great commentary on the state of /. today.

    Most disturbing is the comments that are modded up that have absolutely no basis in reality.

    --
    Word!
  195. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better hope no one attacks you with a pair of sheers for those grammar errors.

  196. a serious question about space-time by jackoneill314 · · Score: 1

    "Allow me to pose a hypothesis. Say, hypothetically, I ... slayed a prostitute during an 8-Ball fueled weekend of debauchery. I know, it sounds silly but bear with me. Would this hole in space-time be a good place for such a hypothetical and now very lifeless body?"

  197. FSCK by tingentleman · · Score: 1

    ... until the universe segfaults.

    Finally the "s" can be replaced for a "u"

  198. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey there elitist asshole. how about coming down from your ivory tower and take some time away from being a douche and researching what it means to poke fun at something?

  199. what the deuce?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't we have to find dark matter first before we get all uppity about its origins???

  200. Gamma World Begins by z917183 · · Score: 1

    Didn't the creators of "Gamma World" predict this one? "The 2010 edition introduces a significantly different backstory that attributes the destruction of civilization to the activation of the Large Hadron Collider, which caused multiple realities to exchange features in an event known as "The Big Mistake". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_World) " Close enough.

  201. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay, logic in a sea of ignorance. Many thanks

  202. This is gonna be GREAT!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm buying every laser pointer I can get my hands on and trying this at home!

  203. Re:Slashdot: Anti-science for ignorant pseudo-nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word you're searching for is "sheer".

  204. Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooooh. God is gonna be soooo pissed off when he finds out we've accidently burnt one of his paintings.

  205. Big Bang Bomb ? by natoochtoniket · · Score: 1

    Apparently, nuclear weapons are not powerful enough. They want a bigger bang. This won't end until we build the big-bang bomb.

    Of course, they will have to test it.