Slashdot Mirror


White House: Use Metric If You Want, We Don't Care

Earlier this year we discussed a petition on the White House's 'We The People' site asking the administration to adopt the metric system as the standard system of measurement in the U.S. Today, the administration issued a disappointing response. Simply put: they're not going to do anything about it. They frame their response as a matter of preserving a citizen's choice to adopt whatever measurement system he wants. Quoting Patrick D. Gallagher of the National Institute of Standards and Technology: "... contrary to what many people may think, the U.S. uses the metric system now to define all basic units used in commerce and trade. At the same time, if the metric system and U.S. customary system are languages of measurement, then the United States is truly a bilingual nation. ... Ultimately, the use of metric in this country is a choice and we would encourage Americans to continue to make the best choice for themselves and for the purpose at hand and to continue to learn how to move seamlessly between both systems. In our voluntary system, it is the consumers who have the power to make this choice. So if you like, "speak" metric at home by setting your digital scales to kilograms and your thermometers to Celsius. Cook in metric with liters and grams and set your GPS to kilometers. ... So choose to live your life in metric if you want, and thank you for signing on."

1,145 comments

  1. Start here by GeoSanDiego · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A good place to start would be on all of the federal highway signs.

    1. Re:Start here by countach44 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, there are limited places in the US that do this: Metric Road Signs in the US I think this is something that could be voted on at the municipality/state level and could eventually work its way nationally.

    2. Re:Start here by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "55 MPH" seems fine to me. I don't have a problem with adding KPH readings to the signs, but if they want to claim that they are truly "bilingual" with measurements, then having both MPH and KPH would make the most sense...

    3. Re:Start here by waddgodd · · Score: 4, Informative

      They did that once, ISTR the mileage (kilometerage?) sign on I-15 between Blackfoot and Pocatello, Idaho being in both Miles and Kilometers in about '75-'77ish (I was a bit young at the time), but since it was during the Carter administration, of course it HAD to be undone because fuck Democrats. I can't remember exactly when I-15 signs were changed over to strictly miles, but I think it was the late eighties. So until we get over this two-party backbiting festival in DC, it does us no good to even try to do good things.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
    4. Re:Start here by mark-t · · Score: 5, Informative

      When Canada was switching to metric, dual signage was common. The km/h value was shown first, and the mph was shown in a smaller (but still quite readable) font below it. Usage of "km/h" or "mph" was explicit, to ensure there was no ambiguity.

      This transition period lasted for quite some time, and after a while, the signs were ultimately replaced with speed limits listing strictly in km/h (and often the "km/h" was no longer present as well).

    5. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The metric system is not just a set of units; it's also a notation system. You should write "km/h".

    6. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Are you for real?

    7. Re:Start here by Microsift · · Score: 2

      And don't forget bank thermometers

      --
      My other sig is extremely clever...
    8. Re:Start here by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Take your awkward, unnatural metric system back to europe where it belongs

      I agree this is nothing the USA can afford to do right now. After all, you need that money to fight the drug war and build more aircraft carriers.

      However, while the metric system is many things, 'awkward and unnatural' isn't one of them. You look up 'awkward' in the dictionary and there's the Imperial system. 5280 feet in a mile? 16 ounces in a pound? Water freezes at 32 degrees?

      What the hell? It's like if my toddler invented a system of weights and measures.

    9. Re:Start here by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not a waste of money if the Feds simply say that any new signs paid for with Federal highway funds must have SI units as their primary measure. They should also require auto manufacturers to mark speedometers with km/h (although most already do).

      The SI has officially been""the preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce" since 1975, so it's well past time to make that mean something.

      No sympathy for innumerates who find it difficult, because it is in fact much simpler.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re:Start here by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Agreed, our roadways are in desparate need of repairs (ask the folks no longer to drive the I-5 bridge that just collapsed about that) and the last thing we need to do is waste limited highway maintenance funds on re-signing our entire road system. Further, miles works just fine there is no advantage to a switch. In science and engineering sure go ahead and switch but I don't think those calling for converting our hwy system really understand exactly how many signs would need to be replaced. More than just a couple.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    11. Re:Start here by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Informative

      "55 MPH" seems fine to me. I don't have a problem with adding KPH readings to the signs, but if they want to claim that they are truly "bilingual" with measurements, then having both MPH and KPH would make the most sense...

      They did that in Florida. People kept stealing the signs.

      Then they raised the speed limit and dropped the metric numbers.

    12. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good would it do to write 65 kilofeet on them?

    13. Re:Start here by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"It's not a waste of money if the Feds simply say that any new signs paid for with Federal highway funds must have SI units as their primary measure"

      I don't even think they need to be marked PRIMARILY in metric units, but why not at least include them secondarily?

      The costs of adding a few additional digits and letters to new signs has to be negligible in the overall cost.

    14. Re:Start here by Hentes · · Score: 2

      Actually, it should be in km/s, as h isn't SI.

    15. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting the highway signs would create employment. If it's perfectly fine to throw vast amounts of federal money at sub-contractors making all manner of unneeded military crap in almost every state, changing the signs would be small change by comparison and generate lots of jobs for years.

    16. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, most of the places that do post metric road signs are places located at or near the Canadian border.

    17. Re:Start here by Miamicanes · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Every time a state starts printing metric speed limits, it inevitably ends up rounding the limit DOWN.

      I remember one failed experiment where FDOT (Florida) tried to be cute and put up signs declaring "44kph" to be the metric equivalent of 30mph (it's only 27mph). The signs were SO hated, most of them got vandalized beyond recognition within a month, and pretty much ALL of them had the "44" spray painted, X'ed (with black markers), or shot out (with BBs, paintball pellets, or real honest-to-god bullets) by the time FDOT took them down and replaced them with 30mph signs. FDOT later admitted that it was a mistake.

      If you want the public to accept metric speed limits, roll them out with a big public campaign that emphasizes that the limits are being RAISED everywhere by up to 5mph. Instantly, metric speed limits will become popular and cool among drivers. Declare 115kph (71.45mph) to be the equivalent of 70mph, and drivers will like them. Round it up to 120kph (74.56mph), and drivers will LOVE them. Try pulling another FDOT stunt by putting up signs saying "70mph/111kph", and they'll get vandalized beyond recognition within days.

    18. Re:Start here by cdecoro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That would be the last place to start, as it would cost a fortune to replace all of the highway signs. Not only that, but also all of the mile markers, for which most states have every 1/10 of a mile. Moreover, contrary to what some people have implied, the numbers are generally not painted on, they're fabricated from other materials and overlaid. And for what? So we can convert the length of our commute into a multiple of our height, or something else of the sort? Yes, it's absolutely absurd that there are 12 inches in a foot, 3 feet in a yard, and I-don't-even-know-how-many yards in a mile (and yes, I've heard of Google/Wikipedia; but I just don't care). The truth is, I never need to convert inches into miles. You measure human-scale things in feet and inches, travelling distances in miles.

      On the other hand, you know where we should start: volumetric measurements. I have frequently had a recipe that takes some number of teaspoons of a liquid, while having measuring cups measured in (naturally) cups, and nutritional information in ounces. Oh, and keep in mind that most tea spoons are significantly larger than a teaspoon. And then there's tablespoons, pints, quarts, gallons, barrels, and who knows what else. This is a lot harder to keep straight, and unlike miles to inches, sometimes you actually need to convert between these.

      Add into the mix the problem that pints differ from place to place (either 16 or 20 oz), and "ounce" is both a volumetric measure and a weight measure. Obviously, if you have something that's clearly a solid or a liquid, it's clear which is which. But what about, say, frozen yogurt. When the self-serve froyo place sells by the ounce, and posts calories by the ounce, it would only be reasonable to think that these are the same ounces. It would also be wrong.

      Moreover, in the case of volumetric measures, not only do you have a real problem, but an easier solution: most of the containers that hold liquids are disposable anyways, and constantly manufactured (i.e. food). All that would need to be done is to make containers that are metric-sized, and printed with metric labels, rather than Imperial. In fact, we're closer to that already. By law, all wine and distilled alcohol must be sold in one of several metric sizes (for distilled, it is 375 mL, 750 mL, 1L, 1.75 L, if I recall correctly). Soda is frequently sold in 2 L bottles.

      Do that, let people see that metric actually saves time and hassle, and then go about changing other measurements. Weight would probably be the easiest to transition next, followed by lengths for things other than highway signs. (No one will care that they can't easily convert meters into miles, just as they don't care that they can't convert feet into miles). But please don't try to start with highway signs. Or bother with highway signs at all, for that matter. They are the death of metricfication in the US, and insistence on them is only counterproductive to the rest of your goals.

    19. Re:Start here by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

      meters per second or nothing! :P

    20. Re:Start here by stanlyb · · Score: 0

      Try to convert 100km/h to mph while the cop is just behind you, and the driving instructor next you, and you have to make the decision in a few seconds, meaning calculation from one system to another, and taking care of the passing by cars, and the good looking chicken crossing the street, and the singing birds, and...and....

    21. Re:Start here by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      it should be in km/s

      I can see the speed limit signs now: 1.94E-3 km/s.

    22. Re:Start here by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      Or you could start with our less advantaged citizens.

    23. Re:Start here by will_frag_for_food · · Score: 1

      some acceptance of derived units might be wise, or do you want speedometers and signs calibrated to m/s? (- not personally opposed to this btw)

    24. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya' know, they have a system where they put two rows of numbers on a dial to tell how fast the vehicle is going. One of the rows can be MPH and the other km/h.

    25. Re:Start here by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Yes, road signs on turnpikes should be in both miles and kilometers, and speedometers should provide both mph and kph. The reason being safety: having to mentally convert between the systems is an unnecessary distraction for a driver who is attempting to keep a ton or more of lethal machine under control at high speed.

      Where immediate safety is not a concern, let the vendor choose between the two systems. Most people these days can pull out their cell phone or pocket calculator and do any conversion they require. The few who cannot do this probably need other help in managing day to day activities so they can just ask someone how many kilograms are in a quart of blueberries.

      --
      Will
    26. Re:Start here by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Try to convert 100km/h to mph while the cop is just behind you, and the driving instructor next you, and you have to make the decision in a few seconds, meaning calculation from one system to another, and taking care of the passing by cars, and the good looking chicken crossing the street, and the singing birds, and...and....

      Every car I've owned in the past 10 years has had both km/h and mph markings on the speedometer - though they've all been german and/or Japanese cars.

      Do some cars only show mph?

      Anyone that runs 10K races will be able to do the conversion quite easily, 10 km=6.2 mi so 100km/hr = 62mph

    27. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Behold, Florida.

    28. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      km/s yields unreasonably low numbers for anything not spaceborne or supersonic. m/s, on the other hand, would be roughly on the same scale. km/h per mph ~= 1.6, m/s per km/s ~= 0.28, m/s per mph ~= 0.45.

      Of course, switching to m/s instead of km/h would leave the US with yet another weird unit nobody else uses in normal life - though at least this one would be used in science.

    29. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There was a movement around that time to convert all highway signs to metric. Someone figured the only way to make the switch was to force people. That's probably true, but, at least at the time, it was a bit like mandating that all highway signs be in Cyrillic. The vast majority of people on the road had absolutely no clue how far 100km was or how fast 100km/h was.

      There was a huge backlash from the public. The change back to the way things had always been had nothing to do with the party in power and everything to do with what the people wanted. As I recall, there were negative opinions about the attempt to switch to metric voiced by several prominent liberal commentators at the time.

    30. Re:Start here by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Easy, 60mph. That's one of the more psychologically prominent ones (another being 100mph == 160km/h). Also, your car's speedometer likely lists both scales, so all you have to do is look at the inner scale instead of the bigger, outer one.
      I do recognize you were being funny.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    31. Re:Start here by Kohath · · Score: 2

      Too bad President McCain kept us from repairing them by vetoing that stimulus package.

    32. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      km aren't SI either - meters are

    33. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there many different speed limits in US? Over here we have only 50km/h inside cities, 70 and 90 on the larger roads and 110 on the highways. Which means that you only have to remember the corresponding mph for these four and thus there is no need to convert on the fly.

    34. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weight is the worst. Pounds are so much more useful than kilos or (especially) stones. Nobody wants to diet for months to lose 1 unit.

    35. Re:Start here by GoogleShill · · Score: 1

      Just a big waste of taxpayer money for something purely cosmetic. It would a frivolous waste of money we dont have to fix something thats not broken. I already pay too many taxes as it is. We need to stop spending on frivolous crap like this. It would confuse the hell out of everyone and there are no real reasons or benefits, just nonsense excuses. I actually find the english system to be perfectly fine and useable on road signs. No need to fix something thats not broken. Take your awkward, unnatural metric system back to europe where it belongs. i like the mile and foot just fine and I actually prefer this on our signs.

      Now who can argue with that? I think we're all indebted to Eravnrekaree for clearly stating what needed to be said.

    36. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention that the imperial system is also from europe :)

    37. Re:Start here by hawguy · · Score: 2

      Just a big waste of taxpayer money for something purely cosmetic. It would a frivolous waste of money we dont have to fix something thats not broken. I already pay too many taxes as it is. We need to stop spending on frivolous crap like this. It would confuse the hell out of everyone and there are no real reasons or benefits, just nonsense excuses. I actually find the english system to be perfectly fine and useable on road signs. No need to fix something thats not broken. Take your awkward, unnatural metric system back to europe where it belongs. i like the mile and foot just fine and I actually prefer this on our signs.

      Why is the metric system not natural? It makes for nice even numbers on road signs, instead of the common 35mph and 55mph, you have 50km/hr and 100km/hr.

      I grew up in the USA and can switch seamlessly among metric and american units of length and volume, but I still need to mentally convert units of weight (well, ok, mass, I don't regularly use Newtons) and temperature in my head. My wife didn't move to the USA until she was in her late 20's, so she needs to convert measurements to the metric system to understand it. She learned English in school, but they didn't teach american units.

      She still rolls her eyes when I try to explain how the american system is better for dividing into smaller parts -- if you have a recipe that calls for 16 ounces of butter, and you want to cut it by 1/4, then it's easy to use 4 ounces. Then she said "What if you want to cut it by 1/5", and I didn't have a good answer for that.

    38. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only really a big deal for foreigners. I've used the metric system as an engineer almost exclusively and I'm American.

    39. Re:Start here by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

      Sell gas in liters

    40. Re: Start here by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Are there many different speed limits in US?

      Yeah. 25, 30, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 70 are all extremely common in my experience. 15 and 20 are common for fairly special cases (e.g. school zones or shopping mall access roads), you occasionally see 40 or 50, and other parts of the country have interstate speed limits that are 75 or even 85.

    41. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better place to start would be with NASA. (science and all that)

      http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17350-nasa-criticised-for-sticking-to-imperial-units.html

    42. Re:Start here by glassware · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Part of the problem is that our imperial metrics are rounded to "convenient multiples of 5" in some cases, and "significant fractions of one" in other cases.

      When you see 1 1/4 cups, or 55 mph, or 3 1/2 miles to the exit - there's a good chance that the measurement is inexact or unnecessary. Nobody actually paced out exactly 18,480 feet and placed the "3.5 mile" sign at exactly that spot. They placed the sign and filled in the best available number in the most convenient unit.

      We get in trouble when somebody gets assigned the job of adding "km" to all the road signs. The person looks at the text on the sign, plugs it into google, and changes the "3.5 miles" sign to "5.6327 km". That's not helpful! It's no surprise people get upset by that.

      If you actually re-measured the road, or simply rounded to a reasonable level, you could replace "3.5 miles" with "5.5 km" and be fine.

    43. Re:Start here by Tuidjy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kilometer means 1000 meters. Milli-, nano-, kilo-, terra- are ways to conveniently denote powers of ten. It's a system of prefixes, and yes, it is defined in the metric system.

      Si is a system of units. Abbreviation from SystÃme international des unités (I may be missing an 'e' or an accent, somewhere)

      The two are systems, both are quite French, but their origins are about a century apart, if I am not mistaken.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    44. Re:Start here by EvanED · · Score: 5, Funny

      Abbreviation from SystÃfme international des unitÃf©s (I may be missing an 'e' or an accent, somewhere)

      Don't worry, so is Slashcode.

    45. Re:Start here by msauve · · Score: 5, Interesting

      " It's like if my toddler invented a system of weights and measures." Unlike today, where many units are defined by fundamental physical properties which can be duplicated (to a high accuracy) anywhere, Imperial measurements came from the need to be able to specify units which would be suitably accurate across geographies.

      So, we ended up with a foot being, well, the length of a foot. A mile ("mille passus") being 1000 paces, etc. The needs were to measure small units (foot), or large distances (mile), so the conversion wasn't often needed (who builds a mile long building, or steps toe-to-heal across Europe?)

      Then you get a pound being equivalent to so many grains of wheat (or a different number of grains of barley), etc.

      It made sense at the time, and worked well enough.

      BTW, 16 oz in a lb is from binary powers, easily divisible. The history of temperature units is interesting and convoluted, but 32 for freezing is based on binary divisions (64 units) between that and human body temperature (96). 0 was ice+salt. So again, it was an attempt at units which could be duplicated independently.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    46. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you want si, you want m/s

    47. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How can you say that 1KM == 1000M == 1000000CM == 1000000000 MM is awkward? I didn't even have to think about the conversion to write that.

      Lets try this in Imperial...
      1 Mile.... Umm hold on, let me look that up... == 5280 Feet which.. um... hold on.... == 1760 yards...
      I mean... What the fuck??? An that's just measurements in distance.. Lets tackle Mass.

      1KG == 1000g == 1000000 cg == 1000000000mg.. Easy-peasy..
      Ok.. lets try this with Pounds.. Whats north of a pound? I think it's a ton. Let's look it up.....

    48. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many American cars have both too (since the same models are often sold in Canada and Mexico). Just that the km/h markings are inset inside the MPH markings and usually in a smaller and harder to read font. (That's how mine is.) A few cars that show one speed indication can switch to km/h via the driver information system or some trick involving the trip odometer button, but most people wouldn't know that feature exists unless they actually bother to read their car's manual.

      So it's easy to be lazy and no need to do the conversion if you can see it right there on the dash.

    49. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. I know.. I got the conversion off by a factor of 10, but I'm drunk. So i have an excuse. Either way, the point, still stands.

    50. Re:Start here by istartedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      5280 feet in a mile

      Care to foot the bill (no pun intended) for all the land records that would have to change? Aside from the problem of changing, that 5280 feet is very convenient. How?

      A square mile is a "section", which is 640 acres. Now 640 acres ought to be enough for anybody (heheh). You could be the "section boss"--a familiar phrase from the Old West. Take that section and cut it into 16 equal squares. You get 16 40-acre plots. You could have "40 acres and a mule" if you bought one--another familiar phrase with deep meaning to African-Americans. The 40 acres are conveniently divided again into 10 acres plots, then in half for a five acre lot. Five acre lots were common mini-estate sizes where I grew up for this reason.

      OK fine, by all means define the foot in terms of metric; but remove it from all records and from the culture? No. Just. No.

      Aside from that, the Metric system is no less arbitrary than our customary units. The only reason 10 matters is because we have 10 digits on our hands. An alien race might not. If you want something truly universal, consider Planck units. Otherwise, all the metric arguments just boil down to "my arbitrary system is better than yours".

      If anything, a system where things are commonly divided into two is more "ready for the digital age" than one that uses base-10 everywhere.

      All that aside, I've gotten used to some metric units over the years. Liters are nice enough; but Celcius? Fuggedaboutit. Each decade of the Fahrenheit scale has a readily associated "feel" that Celcius can't match. They're both arbitrary systems, so it's really just one person's preferance vs. another.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    51. Re:Start here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I can see the speed limit signs now: 1.94E-3 km/s.

      We'll do that once we adopt the Spastic System. Sign the petition now.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    52. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the use of the metric system is a political and historical accident/event, as is the decimal system itself. Far better would have been a base 16 counting system.

      In the early days different bases were used for different purposes. Decimal was used for counting slaves and livestock, then Babylonian bankers had it made law that all counting use that system, the Egyptians later adopted it, then it was made into law in France in the late 1700s after the french revolution, spread via treaties, and here we are today.

      So decimal system is one more tool of the banker/Illuminati elite.

    53. Re:Start here by Hentes · · Score: 1

      No, I just pointed out that not even here in Europe do we use full metric.

    54. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some things are goofy, but base 12 (feet/inches) is clearly and obviously better than base 10. Base 12 numbers divide easily by 3 and 4; 10 is useless. Need to split a yard in thirds? One foot each. A foot? Four inches. A meter? 3.3333333 arrrrrrghhhhh. No. Base 10 is wrong.

    55. Re: Start here by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      I much prefer Fahrenheit to metric for temperature measurement. It might be less convenient for chemistry, since that is the nomenclature but for everyday use fahrenheit is more precise. There are one hundred units from zero degrees Celsius to 100 (freezing to boiling water). From 32 to 212 degrees Fahrenheit there are 180 units.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    56. Re:Start here by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Some cars with digital dashboards will allow you to select either km/h or mph, but will not show both. To switch, you have to reprogram the selections.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    57. Re:Start here by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Actually, it should be in km/s, as h isn't SI.

      The numbers would be too big. How about km/ks

      As in kilometers per kilosecond or km/ms kilometers per myriasecond.

      Speaking of which... how come we haven't stopped using normal seconds and switched to decimal seconds yet?

    58. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems the US they have been introducing things for a while to "warm" people up to the idea.

      Ever go to a US grocery store and see the 2L PET bottles of "soda"?

    59. Re:Start here by mysidia · · Score: 1

      We'll do that once we adopt the Spastic System. Sign the petition now.

      As long as you write 1.94E-3 km/s plus or minus a standard deviation [Sigma], in regards to the distribution of speeds people actually travel down the road away from the mean, or plus or minus 10x the expected measurement error.

    60. Re:Start here by camperdave · · Score: 1

      mile? foot? yard? inch? fathom? rod? league? Geez! How many units of length do you guys have anyway?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    61. Re:Start here by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      I've got an '01 Ford. MPH only, I'm pretty sure. A few years older than that, but not absurdly old to be on the road.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    62. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Base 10:
      10/2 =5
      5/2 = 2.5
      2.5/2=1.25
      This clearly sucks

      Base 12:
      12/2=6
      6/2=3
      3/2=1.5
      1.5/2=.75
      Better, but not as good as it could be

      Base 16:
      16/2=8
      8/2=4
      4/2=2
      2/2=1
      1/2=.5
      Best

    63. Re:Start here by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except nobody's feet are exactly 1 foot. Nor is anyone's 1000 paces exactly 1 mile. If those were truly universal measurements, you'd have some point. As they're not, you don't. And in the long term we'd save money by being on the same system as literally every other country in the world by removing the possibility of tooling mistakes, idiocies like NASA Orbiter problem, and additional cost to companies trying to sell in the US of having to have both measurements in their workflows and computer systems.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    64. Re:Start here by Jmc23 · · Score: 0

      Is it really that hard to divide by 8 and multiply by 5? Wait, this is the US we're talking about right?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    65. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no shit, it is *Florida*. The shittiest place on earth.

      Next you'll say that governments don't work because Somolia's didn't last.

    66. Re:Start here by Hentes · · Score: 1

      km/ks is the same as m/s

    67. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it makes a lot of sense. 5280 is a really great number because it divides evenly by so many (48) other numbers:
      2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 16, 20, 22, 24, 30, 33, 44, ... 120, 160, 176, 220, 240, 264, 330, 440, 480, 880, 1056, 1320, 1760, 2640, to name a few.

      And besides, what self-respecting geek would object to hexadecimal in the kitchen where we have a nice round 10 ounces per pound!

    68. Re:Start here by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Why would you bother to convert anything? Just look at the damn speedometer, it's right in front of you. Maybe you should fail your driving test if you don't know how to read the speedometer correctly... which is labeled with both units of measurements. It's not much different than the majority of thermometers in U.S. stores are dual-labeled with degrees in both Fahrenheit and Celsius.

    69. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be more readable in simple m/s
      And the new standard graffiti on the signs would be to add a ^2

    70. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think the imperial system is awkward then you've never taken calculus.

    71. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an awesome response. There is no more a need to enforce a metric standard than there is a need to have everyone speak the same language. This is the Google\Computer age where translation is only a click away. Sure a meter makes more sense than a mile but what about the age old pint of ale. Do we really need to force everyone to drink some boring nicely rounded metric equivalent?

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/3794278/Pint-of-beer-and-the-metric-mile-safe-after-Europe-backs-down.html

    72. Re:Start here by c0lo · · Score: 1

      If you want something truly universal, consider Planck units.

      (excerpts from "The Art Of Being Irrelevant")
      Plank units are universal inasmuch as the assumption that the spacetime is homogeneous and isotropic.
      Granted, if those assumptions are not true, meters or miles would be equally useless.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    73. Re:Start here by msauve · · Score: 1

      Whoosh, to the extreme.

      At the time the units developed, the concept of interchangeable parts was foreign. Assembly lines were non-existent. Making a road 8 feet wide so a chariot could fit didn't require any more precision than the average foot. Knowing that it was 25,000 paces (25 miles) to the next town was good enough to suit the need.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    74. Re:Start here by camperdave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You want further broken-ness? You cannot just measure the volume of a liquid in US customary units. Nor can you just plop a chunk of stuff on a scale to see how much it weighs. Why? Because different substances use different units. Wine uses different volume units than beer, which is in turn different than the units you would use for water. An ounce of gold is heavier than an ounce of steel, but a pound of gold is lighter than a pound of steel, because the pounds and ounces that you use to measure gold are different than the pounds and ounces you use to measure steel.

      Oh, and if you were to dig out your ruler and measure out two survey markers that are supposed to be ten miles apart, you'd find them to be 633601+1/4 inches apart, instead of the 633600 inches you'd expect, because again, the imperial system is broken. Survey miles are different than real miles.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    75. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear rest of the world, this is REALLY works over here. I hope you are listening to this guy. He nailed it.

    76. Re:Start here by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why in the world would you do that?

      * Maps are usually still in miles
      * Everything around those highways is measured in miles (or acres...)
      * Road exits, sections, etc. are measured in miles (and can be predicted by such), usually in a grid system
      * It would add yet another distraction to the roadways, particularly in busy areas where there are lots of signs as it is.
      * You gain nothing.

      In terms of relevancy, we might as well be using cubits or furlongs...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    77. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kph, what's that, "kilo per hour"? Makes no sense.

    78. Re:Start here by rHBa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Moreover, in the case of volumetric measures, not only do you have a real problem, but an easier solution: most of the containers that hold liquids are disposable anyways, and constantly manufactured (i.e. food). All that would need to be done is to make containers that are metric-sized, and printed with metric labels, rather than Imperial.

      FWIW, this became a legal requirement in the UK 20+(?) years ago when we joined the EU and we have just about assimilated metric measures of volume and weight when it comes to consumables.

      Also noteworthy, the building industry also works in metric these days, although there are many builders who still think in ft/in a lot of the materials are sold in metric sizes, i.e the width of a standard sheet of plaster board (sheet rock) dictates how you space your studs.

      However, street signs are still in MPH and most people still measure their body weight in Stones and their height in Feet and Inches.

      It takes a while but the ability to trade with neighbouring countries makes it worth it...

    79. Re:Start here by rHBa · · Score: 1

      What temperature does water boil at in Fahrenheit?

    80. Re:Start here by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I drive an '06 Ford that has a dual-labeled dial.

      But since Metric is supposed to be 'base ten' shouldn't we wait until they come to their senses and re-scale time into metric. 'Hours/Minutes/Seconds' don't seem very 'Metric' at all. There need to be Ten Hours in a day 100 Seconds in a minute, etc.

      Somebody should get right on that.

    81. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canada did it.
      Mexico did it.
      England did it.

      If these countries are able to convert to metric, then the US can.

      Transitions suck, but eventually people will understand that going 100 km/h will be a couple miles under a 65 mph speed limit.

    82. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weight is a problematic thing to convert, in part because we tend to conflate weight and mass. Scales generally give lbs/kg or ounces/g, but these are different quantities - weight/mass in both cases. I've never seen a bathroom scale that gives newtons for weight (the proper unit).

    83. Re:Start here by CAIMLAS · · Score: 0

      Don't get me wrong: SI units are certainly preferable and superior in many cases, but in many others, it's completely asinine.

      I am NOT going to have 0.000236588 cubic meters of coffee or sugar; I'm going to have a cup. (I may even have a quarter liter of coffee over that, but that isn't SI).
      I'm going to go walk for a block or so, not 80 meters.
      I AM going to do precise measurements for wood furniture with mm and cm, not inches.
      I am NOT going to use those same mm and cm (or dm or m) measurements when I decide to re-frame the living room wall in house. (I wouldn't re-wire half my server room for DC current, either.)

      There are many different measurement systems, many of which make sense in some situations; in others, they do not. Roadways in the US is one location where SI is absolutely retarded. (Proposing km instead of miles is, at this point, about as retarded as making the argument against miles or feet as a unit of measurement with "but not everyone's foot is the same size!" Oh, really.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    84. Re:Start here by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      And nobody's meter stick (except one specific metal rod in a glass case somewhere) is exactly one meter. You had a point?

    85. Re:Start here by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which... how come we haven't stopped using normal seconds and switched to decimal seconds yet?

      Get the world off of daylight saving's time, or convince everyone to use GMT. Kill the leap second. Decimalization is pointless if all human–computer time conversions continue to require politically-driven lookup tables.

    86. Re:Start here by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      We need to keep all the shovels ready for Obama's Shovel Ready Healthcare System, ya know.

    87. Re:Start here by Myopic · · Score: 2

      It depends on how strict you are being: "Most of mankind has used the day and its non-decimal subdivisions as a basis of time ... The catalogued units are minute, hour, day...".

      So, GGP made a point, GP tried to get pedantic, you upped his pedantry, and now I've upped yours. We are approaching the asymptotic limit of pedantry.

    88. Re:Start here by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I really don't think measurements are a political party thing. There's no major religious argument in favor of it (keword: major) akin to say evolution vs creationism, and there's no party line that we have to use X system. It's just that average joe's prefer things a certain way.

      Ever since I was in the Army, I've always written my dates as 12-FEB-09, and sometimes when I do so, somebody gives me shit because I don't use the same date format that "everybody else" uses, and it is never a conservative or liberal thing. I could see maybe if I wrote 12/02/09, which would easily be interpreted as either december 9th or february 12th, but I like that date format for the same reason that the Army uses it as standard: There is no ambiguity. No matter what day of the month it is, the date/month is obvious, but people still complain to me about it anyways.

      Likewise, I could see why they'd complain even more about measurements. It's hard to mentally picture units that you aren't used to thinking in without doing a manual conversion.

      And FFS I'm sick of this constant political divisiveness just for the sake of political divisiveness. Stop pointing fingers at the "other side" just because something doesn't go your way. If you stop to look for a second, you'll often find that members of the "other side" agree with you on more things than you realize.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    89. Re:Start here by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

      but if they want to claim that they are truly "bilingual" with measurements, then having both MPH and KPH would make the most sense...

      They did that in Florida. People kept stealing the signs.

      You might be a redneck if, your unit conversion chart is made of empty food boxes and stolen street signs...

    90. Re:Start here by stanlyb · · Score: 0

      Yep, and usually one of the scales is the smaller one, and you are usually very good at distruinshing between the big scale, and the little one, and usually there are missing number, and again instead of just see you speed, you have to actually stop for a second and decode the scales..........bbbbbbrrrrrrrrrrrrooooooom. Here goes your ticket, if you are lucky.

    91. Re:Start here by CAIMLAS · · Score: 5, Informative

      When you see 1 1/4 cups, or 55 mph, or 3 1/2 miles to the exit - there's a good chance that the measurement is inexact or unnecessary. Nobody actually paced out exactly 18,480 feet and placed the "3.5 mile" sign at exactly that spot. They placed the sign and filled in the best available number in the most convenient unit.

      As someone who's done roadway surveying... yeah, um, that's a horribly ignorant statement. Maybe you live in CA or something, where that approach seems acceptable, but throughout most of the US, there is consistency in things like: distance between a stop sign and an intersection, roadway mile markers (some places it's a quarter mile, some places it's a mile, etc.). Believe it or not, a roadway where the speed limit is 55mph WILL be surveyed its full distance to within an inch of accuracy for elevation, the roadway bedding, incline, and curve - there's a lot of math that goes into it, and it's all thoroughly planned out.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    92. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2^5

    93. Re:Start here by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      I speak from experience, yes i have both scales, and yes i am used to metric system, and yes, i do know in my bones the equivalent in the little scales, but, BUT, once i switched to another car, with just a little bit different scales and font size and position, and.........as you see, i am still alive :)

    94. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting some areas is easy (bottle sizes, net weights for food aside from the conflating of mass/weight on these labels, new toys). On the other hand are things like hardware - even as young as the US is, we have plenty of 100 year old buildings and plenty of new buildings that will still be here in another 100 years for which any renovation work pretty much has to be done in imperial to work - you don't want to be continually re-sizing drywall that isn't 4 x 8 for instance. Similarly, it would be nice to have a truly universal standard for power supply, but the massive cost in transitioning, even if it is only a one time cost, is too prohibitive.

    95. Re:Start here by Myopic · · Score: 0

      The critique of the metric system isn't the unit ratios but rather the units. Imperial units are more useful as base units.

    96. Re:Start here by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Which scale? The big one? or the little one? Do you know that you have to literally stop and read the little one, as the big one is distracting you? No? Yep, i knew it, you were being genious.

    97. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? It's like if my toddler invented a system of weights and measures.

      It's like you're ignorant and don't know the history of systems of weights and measures.

    98. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in the US, we have:

      5 mph -- some private parking areas.
      10 mph -- other private areas.
      20 mph -- school zones.
      25 mph -- some neighborhood streets.
      30 mph -- other neighborhood streets
      35 mph -- most city streets
      40 mph -- boulevards/avenues.
      45 mph -- larger streets.
      50 mph -- some highways.
      55 mph -- other limited access highways.
      60 mph -- some interstates in town.
      65 mph -- most interstates around a town.
      70 mph -- rural roads.
      75 mph -- rural highways.
      80 mph -- Texas 130
      85 mph -- Texas 130 between Seguin and San Antonio

      Enforcement is random. In California, they use cameras that will go off at 1mph over (assuming they are kept in any calibration, which is unlikely.) Rural roads, they will pull over at 1mph over since it might mean a marijuana bust and a free seized vehicle. Most cities don't care, so there is a 10% margin unless there is a push for revenue, then that 10% can turn into any factor.

      There are also plenty of speed traps. Marking a transition from 65 to 35 can be made optional, and some places will place school zones on 65mph roads which go to 20 mph. Don't see the sign, the city gets the cash for reckless child endangerment, felony charges.

    99. Re:Start here by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Nobody's kilogram is exactly 1 kilogram, either. But your bathroom scale, which shows your weight in Kg, and it "works well enough", just like msuave said about the units at that time. They were exact enough.

    100. Re:Start here by smellotron · · Score: 1

      And then there's tablespoons, pints, quarts, gallons, barrels, and who knows what else.

      For (non-pastry!) recipes, I've found it simple enough to just remember that everything is "four"-ish. Four teaspoons in a tablespoon. Four tablespoons in a quarter of a cup. Four cups in a quart. Four quarts in a gallon. Pint is the odd one out, but it's the size of a large glass. For my beer.

      I don't ever find myself having to measure/convert barrels. I guess I just don't cook for a big enough family.

      I don't mean to pooh-pooh metric by this. Just offering my own experience on managing Imperial conversions in the kitchen.

    101. Re:Start here by Guru80 · · Score: 1

      Every car I have ever owned since the 90's have had both measurements listed there on the speedometer, allowing you attention to spend more time on that hot piece of poultry crossing the road.

    102. Re:Start here by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Actualy, I believe pedantry actually has a diagonal asymptote and can thus increase without bound.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    103. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, send them to jail if they dont count the way we like. The world is insanse.

    104. Re:Start here by Myopic · · Score: 1

      "my arbitrary system is better than yours"

      Yes. That is the claim.

    105. Re:Start here by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Like 273.15 is a better number than 32.

    106. Re:Start here by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Try to convert 100km/h to mph while the cop is just behind you, and the driving instructor next you, and you have to make the decision in a few seconds, meaning calculation from one system to another, and taking care of the passing by cars, and the good looking chicken crossing the street, and the singing birds, and...and....

      "OK Google. Convert 100km/h to mph."

      In a connected world, anyway.

    107. Re:Start here by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Why worry about it at all? If you grew up here in the States and still get confused about our system, then you have some serious cognitive issues.

      If you are a visitor, then learn to adapt. You aren't posting any non-metric signs for our benefit so don't complain that we are any less obliging.

      If you were born elsewhere and are having problems learning our system... well that's a similar situation as the visitor isn't it.

    108. Re:Start here by otuz · · Score: 1

      km/ms would be kilometers per millisecond.

    109. Re:Start here by otuz · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd suggest just base36-formatting the epoch (unix) time. It's about mnbzcn when I'm writing this.

    110. Re:Start here by kpoole55 · · Score: 1

      Most Canadian cars have such dual reading speedometers. There's not a full gauge for the miles per hour but a set of dots and the miles number for each tens of miles. It's quite easy to manage with these when travelling in the States and reading the speed limits signs in mph.

    111. Re:Start here by JubilantShank · · Score: 1

      I drive a '98 F-150, and it has dual labels on the speed-o-meter (I like saying it this way).

    112. Re:Start here by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      A good place to start would be on all of the federal highway signs.

      Been there, done that. 1970s.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    113. Re:Start here by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      My reaction to your wife complaining about not integrating easily into "American" life. She chose to come here so suck it up. I haven't heard of any other countries accommodating my desire to not have to learn their system when I travel. Would they be anymore likely to accommodate me if I moved there?

      Why is it that "the world" seems to complain about Americans always expecting things to be American everywhere else but they fail to see themselves complaining that in America everything isn't like the rest of the world?

      As for dividing into five parts instead of four? Why? Just use four and serve slightly larger portions.

    114. Re: Start here by JubilantShank · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is kinda how I feel. I don't really think either system is superior for day-to-day use. I mean, sure Metric is easier to convert and has easier references, but really, how often do you actually need to convert units in day-to-day life?

    115. Re:Start here by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      What elevation?

    116. Re:Start here by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Which states put a marker every tenth of a mile? Admittedly, I haven't driving in every state but the only ones putting signs more frequently than every mile that I've noticed are Missouri, Arkansas and Illinois. Missouri and Arkansas had them every two-tenths on some interstates but not all. Illinois has them every half-mile on the toll roads but not elsewhere that I've noticed.

    117. Re:Start here by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      This. I think most folks have the wrong idea about how a society actually changes. The people themselves don't change. Once someone is about in their mid-20s or 30s, their habits and preferences become ingrained and are highly unlikely to ever change for the rest of their lives. You're not going to be able to convince them to use metric, so don't even bother trying. Instead, you take advantage of the fact that people grow old and die, and are constantly replaced by younger people.

      You introduce a new system in a way that it doesn't upset the older generation while giving the younger generation a chance to get used to it. Then you wait for the older generation to die off. Then you abandon the old system. So introduce signage in both metric and English. Wait a generation or two until the bulk of the population is used to both systems. Then you phase out the English system.

    118. Re:Start here by yellowstone · · Score: 1

      A better place to start would be to explain why I should put up with a switch to a bunch of mostly unfamiliar measures of distance, volume, and temperature?

      Because honestly, the "big problem" for imperial measures (lots of weird measures with odd conversions) really has never been a problem for me. It doesn't matter what a rod or a hogshead is (or a bushel, or a dram, or how many teaspoons in a gallon, or inches in a mile) because I pretty much never need to know (and if I do need to know, I can just google it).

      --
      150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    119. Re:Start here by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      some acceptance of derived units might be wise, or do you want speedometers and signs calibrated to m/s? (- not personally opposed to this btw)

      That seems reasonable to me. Then people would be more aware of how far they go when they "just took their eyes off the road for a second." For example, at 55 mph, you would go almost 81 feet in one second, or about 24 and a half meters. That is quite a long ways to go without looking.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    120. Re:Start here by mark-t · · Score: 1
      "kilometerage"

      Klickage

    121. Re:Start here by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Oh great. Now you've started the never-ending flame war about engineering notation vs scientific notation.

    122. Re:Start here by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 0

      Which scale? The big one? or the little one?

      The one up your ass. If you're trying to be funny, you're failing miserably.

    123. Re:Start here by JubilantShank · · Score: 1

      This, this completely.

      Everytime I hear people talking about going to metric they start talking about the road signs. I mean, really, when was the last time you ever had to convert "exit in 3 miles" into feet? What do you gain by having the speed limits in kp/h? In my opinion, nothing. Sure, it simplifies conversion between units, but I have *never* needed to find out exactly how many feet until the next exit.

      Right now, I think in feet, Fahrenheit, gallons, and pounds. Yes, metric would be very advantageous in the kitchen. It would be advantageous when mailing things. It would be advantageous for sizing out my house. But, road signs? There is no advantage.

      You are absolutely right when you say that they're the death of metrication in the US. No one in their right minds wants to spend billions in tax dollars to go out and change road signs. Sure, maybe someday we can start putting in new road signs with speeds in both metric & Imperial. Until then, we just need to let it go.

    124. Re: Start here by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As parent said, lots of different speed limits. Also in rural areas there are road signs like

      "Last gas for 75 miles"

      "Next rest area 43 miles"

      "Road work begins in 33 miles. Trucks and cars with trailers must use alternate route 10 miles ahead. No gas stations on alternate route for 76 miles"

      These are particularly meaningful in parts of Eastern Oregon, Idaho, Montana, etc, where there is nothing between gas stations and rest areas but sage brush, a few jack rabbits, and even fewer coyotes.

      I heard tell of a billboard in the Mojave Desert that has an arrow pointing at the dirt under it and reads "Last shade for 150 miles." But that might be just crazy California talk.

      --
      Will
    125. Re: Start here by Anonymatt · · Score: 1

      It's only mathematically simpler.

      Metric is obviously just another of the liberal's scams to make us more like Europe!

    126. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 0

      daylight savings is a waste, but having everyone use GMT is just retarded -- it doesn't solve any problems.

      Oh, it makes people who frequently must schedule meetings with people in other countries work slightly less. That is, they don't have to remember what time zone they are calling. That's so tough, though!

      For everyone else? It'd have no benefit whatsoever.

      Time is just made-up numbers on a made-up scale. Use GMT if you want. The rest of the world won't, because I like lunch at noon and dinner in the afternoon, not lunch at 7am and dinner at noon. Yes, that really is pretty silly -- but so is changing those made-up numbers on the made-up scale for everyone else when it's entirely possible to either take 3 seconds to do the math you need or to just use GMT of your own free will.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    127. Re:Start here by Githaron · · Score: 1

      Seeing how most areas have only a handful of unique speed limits. You will not have to bother calculating anything after about the first week. You will simply remember your previous calculations. That is assuming you don't have a dual speedometer.

    128. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be stupid since pretty much all cars in the us have speedometers in miles

    129. Re:Start here by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      It's not the conversions that are problematic. The problem is that there are still too many of us who have a much easier time envisioning an imperial measurement as opposed to a metric measurement. As useful as the Metric system is, I still find it easier to picture a mile than a kilometer. I know how it feels to lift a 10 pound item, but 10 kg doesn't mean much to me. To me, 100 degrees would describe a typical mid summer day in Eastern Washington or Eastern Oregon, for those of us who are immersed in the Fahrenheit temperature, and 98.6 degrees sounds perfectly normal. But it's mind blowing to think that those temperatures are considered too fucking hot for Humanity under the Celsius scale.

      The one aspect that I did fairly easily adjust to is volume though, mostly because a liter is not too far off from a quart.

      I propose we all switch to the Unwashed Masses system of measurements, with units such as the buttload, assload, shitload, crapload, fuckload, slew, fuckton, smidgen, jiffy, shebang, etc.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    130. Re:Start here by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "However, while the metric system is many things, 'awkward and unnatural' isn't one of them. You look up 'awkward' in the dictionary and there's the Imperial system. 5280 feet in a mile? 16 ounces in a pound? Water freezes at 32 degrees?"

      But then the metric people blew it with 101300 pascals to make atmospheric pressure at sea level. Fortunately, most of the time people use bars instead.

      Pascal, either a computer language or a unit of measure that was logical, consistent, but just didn't work out when it met the real world.

       

    131. Re:Start here by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Just multiply by 6 and drop a digit, thus 100 km/h times 6 yields ~ 60 MPH, 40 km/h ~ 24 MPH, 50km/h ~ 30 MPH, 60km/h ~ 36, 70km/h ~ 42, 80km/h ~ 48, 90km/h ~ 54; as you'll notice common metric speeds and non-metric speeds are almost the same, I've never gotten pulled over either in Canada or Germany for driving a smiggen over the speed limit due to conversion.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    132. Re:Start here by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Name one industrial nation the size of the US that's done it.

      Yeah, I didn't think so.

      The US has the 3rd largest population in the world and is the 3rd largest by land mass as well. The only nations comparable would be China and India, and they got to start largely from scratch as far as new infrastructure goes. I've been to China and their units of measure are a mess, you're never quite sure if you're going to be dealing in metric, imperial measure or the traditional units of measure that predate both.

      But, what's more, there's basically nothing to be gained. Seriously, you don't go out side and think that it feels like it's 19 C, or 85 F, you compare it to whatever feels comfortable to you personally. When you're driving, a quarter mile isn't any less convenient to think about than 500m is, and the total time of the trip is just as easily calculated in one system as in the other.

    133. Re:Start here by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The last car I saw that wasn't marked in both systems was the car my brother bought in Canada that only had metric marks on it. All the ones I've ever seen in the US were marked for both systems. Granted, the metric makers were a bit cramped, but it was there and functional.

    134. Re:Start here by mark-t · · Score: 4, Informative

      They didn't wait a generation.... the conversion started in Canada, in earnest, in about 1971, and was completed over the course of about 10 years.

      Oddly enough, about 5 years after the decade-long process of Canada's conversion to Metric was completed, our then-prime minister ended up abolishing the regulations that really enabled the conversion to happen in the first place. Switching back, since it was not actually legislated any more, was simply too inconvenient, and Canada remained on the metric system ever since.

    135. Re:Start here by smellotron · · Score: 1

      having everyone use GMT is just retarded -- it doesn't solve any problems.

      Upon re-read, I was not clear enough in my original post. My point is that eliminating rule-based "adjustments" to local time representation is more valuable than decimalization, not necessarily that they are worth doing. DST and leap seconds are imposed by organizations, and cannot be pre-encoded into algorithms. Time zones are also similarly "artificial", but the rule for the majority of them is simple. IIRC a few timezones are not hourly, which is weird. But at least if DST is out of the picture, the remaining timezone ruleset would be more consistent than the life of most software.

      You can have your lunch at noon, and I'll weigh myself in pounds... but there's really *no* intrinsic value in replacing HH:MM:SS with something base-10. 60 and 12 are way more convenient for fractions.

    136. Re:Start here by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Why is the metric system not natural? It makes for nice even numbers on road signs, instead of the common 35mph and 55mph, you have 50km/hr and 100km/hr.

      Considering that 35/55 mph aren't especially close to 50/100 km/hr (35 mph ~ 56 km/h, 55 mph ~ 88 km/h), this piece of "logic" is as specious as any I've seen in this duscussion.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    137. Re:Start here by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you're operating in a system. The US has a ton of infrastructure and current use of imperial measures and our standard date. Converting to something else would be a Herculean tasks. Seriously, right now all construction is done using imperial measure materials, so you'd have this awkward period where you're trying to mix and match metric with imperial measure. Roads are constructed using imperial measures in the US. The metric measurements on the speed dial in a car are usually on the inside, which means that they aren't quite as accurate as the imperial measures are.

      And when you consider how little there is to be gained by switching, I'd be surprised if we're using metric in my lifetime. The things where it makes sense to use metric, are already metric, I wouldn't expect much else to change as there just isn't any good reason to cause that much trouble.

    138. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Height is easier in feet an inches than meters and centimeters.

      No... really, it is. When asked how tall I am, I can say, "i'm six two". Just that, 3 words.
      With metric, I'd have to either say "i'm one point eight eight", or maybe drop the final eight and round up or down, and maybe drop the point.. but if I did all that, and said "i'm one eight", that's a pretty inaccurate statement about my height, as 1.8m isn't 6'2, it's actually shy of 5'11, and people would think I'm odd if I undersold my height to that degree (as it is, i'm closer to 6'3 and my everyday footwear is a pair of engineer boots -- once you add in the thick sole and the heel, i stand closer to 6'4 or 6'5).

      Oh, and temperature's nicer in farenheit, at least for weather outside. Roughly every 10 degrees of farenheit is a different sort of clothing you'll want to wear -- but in celcius, that's only a 6 degree difference (whatever, it's actually 6.25). That one is a bit of a stretch even compared to the height thing, but it actually is a wonderful scale to use for just seeing what the weather is going to be like tomorrow.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    139. Re: Start here by hedwards · · Score: 2

      That's been my experience, I spent a year using the metric system in China, and I came to realize fairly quickly that there was no particular advantage for every day life. Rather than buying my meat by the pound, I would buy it by the half kilo. Sure, it's not quite the same amount, but it's fairly close.

      Temperatures took the longest to get intuitively as I had to live through the various weather patterns before I could feel it. But, even then there wasn't really any advantage to it as I was still comparing it to what I consider a comfortable temperature.

      Driving, well, you don't generally think about the distances in terms of feet, or meters,you usually think of it in terms of miles and kilometers, and use the odometer heavily, so there wasn't much change there either.

      For all the slamming of the US by foreigners over the issue, you'd think that the imperial system was incredibly hard to use. Which it's not, it just requires somewhat more work to learn in the first place. But, even then, not really as you're not using the numbers in most cases, you're comparing with your experience. I don't usually care if it's exactly right, I want to know if it's about what I want.

    140. Re:Start here by Indigo · · Score: 1

      I prefer the metric assload, because it's a bit bigger than a "regular" assload.

    141. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty terrible idea - mixed signs? That should be something done *QUICKLY*.

      You don't want a road sign to say "55 MPH", and then 2 miles down the road the speed limit drops to 35 MPH which is.. shit. 55 km/h.

      Well, people should be more aware, I'd agree, but I think you can see that a gradual change like you suggest is simply *asking* for accidents to happen.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    142. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for democracy.....

    143. Re:Start here by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A square mile is a "section", which is 640 acres. Now 640 acres...

      Canada managed to cope just fine. I used to live in a rural area where the road network was pretty much a grid, divided into square miles. Converting things to metric didn't bring about the end of the world. People still talk about acreage since the historic size of the plots were even acres - I lived on a 5 acre plot which as you noted were quite common, and since the intersections are a mile apart we'll still use miles when giving directions. And there is no reason to eradicate that.

      But the speed limit is 90km/h, farmers know how much property they have in hectares, and the measurements for all the properties in meters is available for legal property descriptions.

      OK fine, by all means define the foot in terms of metric; but remove it from all records and from the culture? No. Just. No.

      I don't think we need to actively eradicate it. But if we stop using it officially, it will gradually fade into the background. I doubt anyone in rural manitoba is ever going to completely stop using miles given the physical layout of the rural road network. But that's fine.

      Aside from that, the Metric system is no less arbitrary than our customary units. The only reason 10 matters is because we have 10 digits on our hands. An alien race might not.

      That is the opposite of arbitrary. Yes, we surely use base 10 due to the number of digits on our hands, but metric was designed to fit into base 10. That was not an arbitrary decision. We are not an alien race. Base 10 is natural for us; not arbitrary.

      Otherwise, all the metric arguments just boil down to "my arbitrary system is better than yours".

      The precise length of a meter is arbitrary; and we both use the same somewhat arbitrary unit of time (seconds) but pretty much everything else derives from that in a natural and logical way. Volume, mass, energy, speed, temperature, force. English units are not linked the same way. There is no defined relationship betwen a gallon and a foot the way there is between a meter and a liter. Or between a pound and a foot the way there is between a kilogram and a meter. A 4 liter jug of milk has a mass of 4 kilograms (for all practical purposes). To equate the arbitrariness of metric and imperial is just delusional.

      but Celcius? Fuggedaboutit. Each decade of the Fahrenheit scale has a readily associated "feel" that Celcius can't match.

      I've got no issues whatsoever with celsius. Instead of 10 degree feels, its more increments of 5. Its what you grow up with.

      They're both arbitrary systems, so it's really just one person's preferance vs. another.

      Metric is far less internally arbitrary, and pretty much all the rest of world uses it. Personal preference in my opinion seems to come down to what you grew up with; so raising the next generation in metric will take care of that. There's no real reason for -you- to change though.

    144. Re:Start here by cupantae · · Score: 1

      For the record, in Ireland, 30mph went to 50kph (up), 50mph went to 80kph (roughly same), 60mph went to 100kph (up), and 70mph went up to 120kph. Despite this, people found plenty to complain about. 40mph was taken out, and many of those roads went down to 50kph. People were mostly better off with the new system, but still kicked up a fuss and tried to stop it. If you tried that in America, I'm guessing people would consider it some kind of violation of their right to freedom.

      As cdecoro says below, though, this is just about the last thing that should change. We've used both systems for decades. Nowadays, we measure roads in km but people in feet. Milk is in litres but beer is in pints. Sugar is in kgs, butter in pounds, people in stones. Out of interest, how would Americans react to a dual system on packaging, like 1lb / 454g?

      --
      --
    145. Re:Start here by vux984 · · Score: 1

      standard atmospheric pressure

    146. Re:Start here by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Clever but wrong. Water doesn't boil at 32F. It melts.

    147. Re:Start here by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      There aren't more than 5 common speed limits anyway, it's not that hard to memorize the equivalents, so there's no need for math or gratuitous mocking of people who don't do things identically to Europe.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    148. Re:Start here by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      At what pressure?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    149. Re:Start here by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you write 1.94E-3 km/s plus or minus a standard deviation [Sigma], in regards to the distribution of speeds people actually travel down the road away from the mean, or plus or minus 10x the expected measurement error.

      OK, you're officially in charge of the standards committee for the spastic system.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    150. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Tell her to stop cutting your portions by 20% and go with 1/4 like any reasonable person!

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    151. Re:Start here by deimtee · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much what Oz did when we converted. The open road limit was 60 mph, and went to 100 km/h (~ 62 mph). Same with the in-town limit of 35 mph which went to 60 km/h (~37 mph).
      Made it much more acceptable to most drivers.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    152. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, not even metric nations use metric for weight. I don't remember the last person-scale I saw that measured in Newtons.

    153. Re:Start here by msauve · · Score: 1

      Name a Federal highway with a speed limit of 35 MPH.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    154. Re:Start here by lee1026 · · Score: 1

      On the surface planet Earth, these things tends to be more or unless interchangeable.

    155. Re:Start here by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The next time I get pulled over and the cop asks "Do you know the speed limit here?", I'll reply "Certainly, boy. Yonder sign says it's 30 kilomiles per kilohour."

    156. Re:Start here by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly acceptable to use the world 'mileage' in English-speaking metric countries to refer generically to 'distance' - the units that distance is measured in don't matter. Though here in Australia they tend to just call them distance signs.

    157. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All out of mod points. I would mod you up for insightful and informative. Bravo.

      Imperial made sense for a lower tech time. And metric came along with a bit more scientific basis.

    158. Re:Start here by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Time is just made-up numbers on a made-up scale. Use GMT if you want. The rest of the world won't, because I like lunch at noon and dinner in the afternoon, not lunch at 7am and dinner at noon.

      So if you like to eat lunch at noon, I take it you eat it at 1 PM when DST is in effect?

    159. Re:Start here by westlake · · Score: 2

      So, we ended up with a foot being, well, the length of a foot,
      It made sense at the time, and worked well enough.

      The history of temperature units is interesting and convoluted, but 32 for freezing is based on binary divisions (64 units) between that and human body temperature (96).

      Fahrenheit is quite useful when you are thinking in terms of human comfort and safety.

      Summer weight clothing will be appropriate and comfortable at 75, autumn weight at 50, winter weight at 25.

    160. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been said before, it will be said again. the Mars Orbiter problem was not do to a lack of understanding of how to convert units, it was a documentation issue where the units at the interface between two groups were not understood.

      It's perfectly naive to think that you will ever avoid any "unit" conversions--ultimately, in any real work, you will always have some conversion to do (even if only a calibration on a sensor, or a data storage question---but it could be something more fundamental, astronomers with their love of cgsor maybe the desire to work in cannonical units or to non-dimensionalize your equations). The issue is understanding that conversion needs to be done.

    161. Re: Start here by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not that the US system is hard to use, it's that you're the last outliers (among major developed countries at least) not to switch. It's for the sake of consistency rather than anything else. No more having to program two separate measurement systems into every bit of software. No more wondering WTF 'letter' size paper is anymore when your printer demands it for some reason (i.e. someone in the US has emailed you a document that wants to print on that size paper). Etc.

      It'd be no different if everyone ELSE used the US system, and the US were the only people using metric - it would make sense to change. It's not about which system is better, it's about being consistent.

      If there were several major countries not using metric yet, then I don't think there'd be the same 'annoyance' with the Americans. But you guys are literally the ... last ... ones. Cmon! :)

    162. Re:Start here by VGPowerlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I recall, it was required nation-wide during the late 70s. Then Reagan happened.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    163. Re:Start here by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      I wonder why they chose such a random, 'un-neat' number as 44, regardless of whether it's a round-down or round-up? 45 would have achieved the same effect (=28 mph, so still a slight 'round down')...

    164. Re:Start here by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      It'll look so cheap on the signs, too :)

    165. Re:Start here by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      I like the Japanese system: 2009-02-12 or sometimes 09-02-12. It has the additional advantage of being easily sortable.

    166. Re:Start here by neonKow · · Score: 1

      In the US, I believe most packaging does in fact have both measurements (oz, then g). If you try to buy a liter (litres don't exist here) of beer, though you're out of luck. Soda comes in 2-liter bottles for some reason even though all other liquids are generally measured in pints, quarts, and gallons. And we definitely don't use stones for weight; people lose or put on pounds. Even thought almost everything has both Imperial and Metric markings, we use almost exclusively Imperial in everyday conversation.

      Also, if you go climbing around here, your routes are measured in feet, but your ropes in meters. So try to remember that your 60-meter rope can't get you back down anything much higher than 100 feet.

    167. Re:Start here by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Australia, Canada, NZ and many other countries that have vast areas of land divided up into neat blocks based on miles and acres seemed to manage just fine.

      Also your comment regarding temperature and 'feel' is simply rooted in what you're used to, and would be no different if using Celsius. As a 'native' Celsius user, I feel the same way about C. To me, each interval of 5 C has a similar associated 'feel', centered neatly around 20 C (room temperature, typically what you'd have a thermostat set to). So I think of the 15-20 range much like you'd think of "60s", and 20-25 like you'd think about "70s" etc. (Obviously neither maps neatly to the other, but the principal is the same).

    168. Re:Start here by neonKow · · Score: 1

      This just highlights the weakness in our counting system. We need to start a petition to switch from decimal to hexidecimal!

    169. Re:Start here by Cimexus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here in metric-using Australia, I'm 178 cm, spoken "one seventy-eight". Barely any longer to say than the approximate equivalent "five eleven". Noone says "one point blah blah metres" - height is in centimetres (specifically to avoid using decimal points and/or mixing units).

      Also, as a Celsius-user, I think of each 5-degree increment as a "different sort of clothing" marker (or at least a "different type of weather feel"). Centered on 20 C (comfortable room temperature), which is no more difficult than thinking about departure from comfortable room temperature in F (i.e. ~70 F).

    170. Re:Start here by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      It's because the traditional aerospace contractors of red-state areas (Ares was corporate welfare for them) stick to it.

      This is why the Mars Climate Orbiter crashed. JPL/NASA scientists use metric of course. The first of the recent successful return-to-Mars systems was Pathfinder, all done by JPL. Worked great. Next one, Congress forced use of outside MIC contractors for some part. They used imperial units, and had a fresh-college hire working on the guidance computations. They passed information back and forth on plain files.

    171. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually since Canada uses metric and essentially the US and Canadian cars are the same both are shown on speedometers. It has been that way since at
      least 2000 (i don't recall my earlier vehicles). This was a 2000 pickup and a 2011 Cruze. The cruze has a units setting but I have not tried it to see what happens if you select metric besides speed measurements.

    172. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are only three countries in the world that don't use the metric system: Liberia, Myanmar and U.S. Since the first two are not "industrial nations", I think you'll be stuck with imperial forever. Or maybe one day you will realize that ALL OTHER industrial nations already converted years ago, and then maybe you will try to catch up.

    173. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Congress outlawed the use of federal funding for metric road signs (with exceptions for border areas). The signs that are out there are either funded locally or stragglers from the 1970/80s.

    174. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't replace every sign at once. You replace the old signs when their time comes (they really don't last that long) with metric/imperial signs. Do that for a decade or two, then start with the metric-only signs.

    175. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be using yyyy-mm-dd. No ambiguity there!

    176. Re:Start here by SydShamino · · Score: 2

      The metric system is seen as foreign governments exerting pressure on the US to conform. There is a party that claims to resist a global world government, and thus tries to resist such pressures. If that party furthermore starts to point out that SI is French, the factions of that party that also dislike the French will resist the metric system even more.

      Ever since I was in the Army, I've always written my dates as 12-FEB-09, and sometimes when I do so, somebody gives me shit because I don't use the same date format that "everybody else" uses, and it is never a conservative or liberal thing. I could see maybe if I wrote 12/02/09, which would easily be interpreted as either december 9th or february 12th, but I like that date format for the same reason that the Army uses it as standard: There is no ambiguity.

      See ISO 8601.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    177. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your understanding is somewhat misinformed. We purchase our meat at the store in Kilogram but it is advertise in lbs because the cost per lbs sound better. Most people in construction still work in feet (like 2 X 4 X 8). Pipe are still in inch. etc...

      Obviously, if USA was to convert to Metric, we will probably finish the metric adoption. It does not means that we will adopt the same method however. For example, the glucose reading in hospital in US and Canada are in metric... but the reading is different.

    178. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different standards for paper sizes might be annoying, but it has nothing to do with "metric conversion".

      (And it is impossible to change due to massive legacy requirements. Buy an iPad.)

    179. Re:Start here by smellotron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your post made me question what tied "noon" to 12:00 in the first place... The Internet says that noon originally meant 15:00, as the ninth hour of daylight (noon ~ nine). Contrast that with "high noon" which refers to the sun being directly overhead.

    180. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point msuave made:

      "It made sense at the time, and worked well enough."

    181. Re: Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      fahrenheit's great for day-to-day, tomorrow's weather sort of things, because every 10 degrees is basically a different sort of clothing to be worn. 30s is cold as poop (and anything lower is just even colder poop), 40s is cold, 50s is chilly, 60s is nice to brisk, 70s is nice to warm, 80s warm to hot, 90s or up don't wear anything that can't be sweated on.. from jacket and gloves, to jacket, to flannel shirt, to long sleeve shirt, to tshirt, to shorts, and finally 90 and up i just sit around the house naked with a fan under my desk so i have no point of reference.

      seriously it's the greatest thing in the world, dont hate.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    182. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      um.. actually, the mile markers on the interstate here and most states i've been to in the past decade are marked every tenth of a mile, and that's surveyed distance. they're pretty accurate -- more accurate than the number of significant figures on the sign would lead you to believe. but then, all the world can't be a scientific paper (good or bad thing, YOU DECIDE!)

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    183. Re:Start here by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Out of interest, how would Americans react to a dual system on packaging, like 1lb / 454g?

      Virtually all food packaging in the US lists both imperial and metric units.

      For the most part though, nobody cares about the metric ones. An exception seems to be bottles of soda. Large bottles are typically sold in the 2 liter size (when I was a kid 3 liters were also common but you don't see them as much anymore).

      That's pretty close to a half-gallon so if they'd wanted a similar sized container marked in imperial units they could have done so, but for whatever reason big soda bottles come as a 2 liter (and people know it as that). Individual sizes USUALLY come in bottles measured in ounces (12oz cans, 20oz plastic bottles, or 8oz glass bottles), though I have seen some "half liter" bottles sold lately.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    184. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Not all highways are freeways - many traverse city streets (e.g. US 101 in San Francisco)
      2) Freeways still have advisory signing for "35 MPH" curves etc.
      3) Sign standards are the same regardless of whether a road is "federal" or not.
      4) Please STFU about topics you are completely ignorant about.

    185. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best place to start: Infomercials.

      - Show someone using a calculator before taking a trip to determinie how many miles they need to go and then show them driving past an off ramp and throwing up their hands in disgust.
      - Show someone using measuring cups and flailing about trying to figure out how to get 9/7 of a cup of flour for their recipie. Flour dumping everywhere, etc.
      - Show a kid coming home from school with an F on a paper and then have his parents snapping his old wooden non-metric ruler in half.
      - Show some guy kicking a angular and poorly built doghouse, cut to him angrily throwing a yardstick in the trash along with a VCR or something.
      - Show a captain of a sinking ship stomping on an astrolobe.

      Then "solve" all those problems with the "ingenious" new system just invented by (insert some loud slimy schmuck)...

      Old people everywhere convert to metric in about 6 weeks. Everybody gets new metric measuring cups for xmas too.

    186. Re:Start here by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      However, while the metric system is many things, 'awkward and unnatural' isn't one of them. You look up 'awkward' in the dictionary and there's the Imperial system. 5280 feet in a mile? 16 ounces in a pound? Water freezes at 32 degrees?

      The units you actually need to convert between tend to be related by either powers of 2 or multiples of 12, which are extremely convenient when working with fractions. The SI system is designed instead to be convenient when working with decimal numbers.

      In science and engineering, decimals are more common and SI is more useful. But then, SI is more useful in science and engineering anyway because the scientific units in SI are sane, as opposed to the Imperial scientific units -- where they exist. Don't complain about 5280 feet in a mile. Nobody really converts feet to miles. But units like horsepower are just a headache. Fortunately, scientists have it easy -- they just use SI. (Engineers are boned. Sorry.) And being familiar with Imperial units doesn't hurt them -- scientists work mostly in weird units that you don't develop familiarity with anyway.

      Now, in construction and manufacturing, it's common to use fractions, and they use Imperial. This is where the real cost of any kind of "switch" to metric comes in -- there's a whole set of manufacturing standards that are specified in Imperial units. You can't just convert them to "metric equivalents" with any reasonable degree of accuracy. And transitioning to metric manufacturing is pointless, expensive, and downright stupid.

      Water freezes at 32 degrees?

      It doesn't really matter what number water freezes at. It's arbitrary. Most users of Imperial units remember that 32 is freezing. If they're clever, they also remember that 37 is roughly the air temperature where there could be ice on the ground. But the freezing and boiling points of water rarely are useful in real life. Do you know the freezing and boiling points of other substances in Celcius?

      Really, the stupid temperature systems are the ones that don't have 0 as absolute zero.

    187. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before the conversion of Odometer to "KM", it is a little challenging.
      I have a Canadian truck in US... displaying everything in KM. This is somewhat a nightmare in conversion every time I need to know how many mile I have done.
      Many truck and cars can now swith their display in MPH and KMH.... but not mine

    188. Re:Start here by mysidia · · Score: 1

      km/ks is the same as m/s

      Err.... how about km/ms or seconds per kilometer :)

    189. Re:Start here by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 2

      " The people themselves don't change. Once someone is about in their mid-20s or 30s, their habits and preferences become ingrained and are highly unlikely to ever change for the rest of their lives."

      Maybe its because I am getting older, or not old enough, but [citation needed] on that one. I regularly change my mind. I also regularly have insights. I hope people don't lose that with age, and I certianly know many 60y+ old people who have to adapt and do.

      You realized we are talking about reading different numbers off of street signs right? I would feel bad if I ever got to a point where I was incapable of reading signs, and probably shouldn't be driving at that point. I guess the km/h text on the speedo isn't bigger on american cars? canadian cars all have both scales, with the km/h being the most prominent or a different colour, going back to at least 80s cars. Wouldn't most new cars have electronic speedometers which would probably change at the touch of a button? is this really that difficult for people that should in theory, have the ability to drive?

      --
      -
    190. Re:Start here by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      It'd be wonderful if we not only switched to the metric system, but adopted the worldwide signage at the same time. New signs would be standards based, and legacy signs would go the way of the dodo. Also - the metric signs could be the limit rounded up - 55mph would be 90kmh, 60 - 100, and so on. Buy in should be easy.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    191. Re:Start here by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      US 1 and US 15, for starters. Along parts of them.

    192. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Celcius is equally (if not more) useful when thinking in terms of human comfort and safety.

      A basic guideline is that single digit temperatures are cold, 10's are cool, 20's are nice and 30's are hot.

    193. Re:Start here by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Beer and water generally use fluid ounces. (In fact, water could use floz or ml depending on how you get it -- beer uses oz and wine uses ml, so it'll be one of those.)

      Did you know if you're measuring things for yourself, you can choose to use whatever units you want? And you can even convert between units!

    194. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      When we need to start measuring the weight or mass of objects subject to gravity that isn't Earth's gravity, your argument will be relevant.

      Until then, it's a meaningless distinction if you're just weighing something. We conflate them because we're all subject to the same gravitational force (the difference in gravitational force between death valley and mount everest is really negligible).

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    195. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? 20ÂC, 10ÂC, 0ÂC would do as well for such approximation. But then 0ÂC is also the freezing point of water which is important e.g. for car drivers, because this could mean icy roads. Having 0 for this is easy to remember and makes lots of sense.

    196. Re:Start here by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      When they post nutritional information in ounces, they mean weight. I hope you can appreciate that there's no such thing as "fixing" the fact that you can't easily convert volumetric to weight measurements.

      Here's a helpful tip for volumetric measurements.
      1 cup = 8 oz
      1 oz = 2 T
      1 T = 3 t
      There. Now do math.

      Better yet, stop buying cookbooks that list measurements in volume. It's not an accurate way to measure. Hell, if you can't remember the conversions, if they list it in volume, it's so low-accuracy you should just take a stab at it. 2 tsp salt? That's "some". 1 Tbsp sugar? Slightly more that "some". 1/4 tsp cayeene? "A little bit".

    197. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I much prefer Fahrenheit to metric for temperature measurement. It might be less convenient for chemistry, since that is the nomenclature but for everyday use fahrenheit is more precise. There are one hundred units from zero degrees Celsius to 100 (freezing to boiling water). From 32 to 212 degrees Fahrenheit there are 180 units.

      Oh, bullshit. Both my thermometer and the forecast report in 0,1 degrees acuracy. So there are 1000 units, even more precise than your 180...

    198. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol you must be kidding :P

    199. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An even better place to start is with GPS, driverless cars and get rid of all of the signs.

    200. Re:Start here by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      When Canada was switching to metric, dual signage was common. The km/h value was shown first, and the mph was shown in a smaller (but still quite readable) font below it. Usage of "km/h" or "mph" was explicit, to ensure there was no ambiguity.

      This transition period lasted for quite some time, and after a while, the signs were ultimately replaced with speed limits listing strictly in km/h (and often the "km/h" was no longer present as well).

      Canada, where I am originally from, is interesting. Metric is official measurement system but there are still a number of things that use the British Imperial System. For example, building materials still uses feet and inches, most recipes and cooking is in Fahrenheit, etc.

    201. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually say that I'm "I'm One, eightyfour" see 3 words.

      If you are 6'2 why don't you round of to "I'm one nine" then? Here in Sweden no one would belive you because it would mean 100cm +9 cm.

    202. Re: Start here by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Temperatures took the longest to get intuitively as I had to live through the various weather patterns before I could feel it. But, even then there wasn't really any advantage to it as I was still comparing it to what I consider a comfortable temperature.

      Temperatures are easy.

      -18degC: typical freezer.
      0degC: freezing! Literally.
      4degC: typical fridge.
      10degC: bit parky out, definitely put a jumper on.
      20degC: room temperature.
      30degC: really quite warm.
      37degC: human body temperature.
      40degC: really bloody hot innit.
      100degC: boiling (literally!)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    203. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that about 97% of slashdot readers know the metric system just fine and we were all taught it in school, despite what you Europeans think about our schools, they do work. We just choose to go our own way and don't ask the government to fix everything for us. We're perfectly content to convert on our calculators and google when the need arises. I can actually convert readily between the common units in my head and be within about 5% for rough day to day usage. So take your superior attitude somewhere else where someone wants to hear it.

    204. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You FAR underestimate the amount with which Republicans cling to the "old is good, new is bad" mentality.

    205. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a scientist can't convert from imperial to metric unit he doesn't need to be computing things flying around in orbit anyway, and the mistake in some form was inevitable anyway.

    206. Re:Start here by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, here (west coast of BC) there is a movement to make daylight savings time permanent. Really it depends on where in a timezone you live whether standard or daylight time makes more sense.
      Of course for basement dwellers who only interface with the outside world through computers it doesn't matter.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    207. Re:Start here by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Except nobody's feet are exactly 1 foot. Nor is anyone's 1000 paces exactly 1 mile. If those were truly universal measurements, you'd have some point. As they're not, you don't.

      The units were more convenient back in the day before the advent of widespread calibrated measuring tools and interchangeable parts (about the 19th-20th century). In those days, for purposes of construction and manufacturing, it didn't matter if your measurements were universally consistent. As long as they were locally consistent you were ok. If the castle walls were supposed to be quarter mile square, a surveyor could pace out 250 steps along one wall. As long as the same surveyor paced out the 3 other walls, you were good. (That's just an example. In reality there are other things you'd have to do to make sure the corners were right angles which obviate the need to actually pace out wall lengths multiple times.)

      idiocies like NASA Orbiter problem

      The Mars Climate Orbiter wasn't really lost because of a botched imperial to metric conversion. It was lost because (1) someone didn't write down the units on a number. And (2) the person(s) who received the number didn't make a phone call asking what the units were, and instead assumed what they were. The exact same failure can happen even if all your numbers are metric. There's just a higher chance that error (2) will accidentally cancel out error (1) if both numbers are using the same unit system.

      That's what was drilled into me while studying as an engineer - who cares if the numbers are imperial or metric? You're usually going to be doing a lot of complex math with the numbers, so an extra multiplication for a unit conversion is trivial. Knowing what the units for a number are, however, is crucial. If we ever turned in a homework problem or answered a test question with a number but no units, it was automatically marked wrong (dimensionless numbers excepted).

    208. Re:Start here by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      It'll look so cheap on the signs, too :)

      Yeah, but a gas price rise of 1 cent/L is a MUCH larger increase than 1 cent/gal. For example, most cars have tanks that are about 20 US gal. This is equal to about 75.7 L. So you are paying about 55 cents more for each 1 cent rise in gas prices per fill-up when you use metric.

      The gas companies screw us enough as it is. Metric just makes it easier for them to hide it.

    209. Re:Start here by mishehu · · Score: 2

      Every car that my family owned since around 1983 had both mph and kph on the dial. This counts even GM cars back in the early 80's before my folks switched to Japanese automakers.

      I really wish we could just put a fork in it and be done with the migration to metric. Do we buy soda by... the 4 oz, 12oz, 16oz, 20oz, 1/2 liter, liter, 2 liter, 3 liter? Medicines are measured as... hmm... ml, teaspoons, various gram-oriented measures, etc. It's fscking schizophrenic...

    210. Re:Start here by dryeo · · Score: 2

      Here (Canada) when we converted there were lots of commercials with facts like 20=30,30=50,40=60 and 60=100 (or perhaps it was vice a versa, long time ago) and it became automatic 60mph is the same as 100km/h, no thinking needed.
      They also mailed out little stickers that you could put on your speedometer so that you could look and see, Since then most vehicles have both, usually large font is km/h and small print is mph.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    211. Re:Start here by mishehu · · Score: 1

      Actually, IIRC, Fahrenheit is based upon typical saline water of concentrations similar to the ocean... Thus salt water freezing at 0 deg F instead of like fresh water at 32 deg F. Celcius is based upon fresh water, and accounts for the boiling temperature as well. According to the Wikipedia article, 0 F is the freezing point of "brine" but I'm not sure what is defined as brine in this case.

    212. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nobody's meter stick (except one specific metal rod in a glass case somewhere) is exactly one meter. You had a point?

      Uh, what?

      That's just a historical relic now (the rod was based on the distance from the Equator to the North Pole divided by 10 million, the definition before that was how far a pendulum with enough string to swing from end to end in 1 second would travel). The modern definition of a meter is the distance travelled by a beam of light in a vacuum after 1/299,792,458 seconds.

      Sooo... Your point was what exactly? [By the way, the Wikipedia page on US Customary units says they are derived from Old English units, such as the infallible "barleycorn" (length of a corn of barley). Can't beat that for robustness, huh?]

    213. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ever since I was in the Army, I've always written my dates as 12-FEB-09, and sometimes when I do so, somebody gives me shit because I don't use the same date format that "everybody else" uses, and it is never a conservative or liberal thing. I could see maybe if I wrote 12/02/09, which would easily be interpreted as either december 9th or february 12th, but I like that date format for the same reason that the Army uses it as standard: There is no ambiguity

      So is that 12th Feb 2009, or 9th Feb 2012?

    214. Re:Start here by GNious · · Score: 1

      Didn't they just say you can do as you want, and simply read the sign as being in metric meter-per-second?

    215. Re:Start here by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Canada, a larger nation then America, did it though we're mostly bi-lingual (a 2x4 is still a 2x4 as inches are better for carpentry). Population doesn't matter, just size. Suddenly when you got on the hi-way, the sign said something over 8000 km to the end.
      Of course you Americans never even changed over to imperial where a gallon of water masses 10 lbs and a fluid oz is an oz, though you did change over to the Canadian inch back in the '50's without problems (excepting the surveyors who still have a weird sized foot).

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    216. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor is anyone's 1000 paces exactly 1 mile.

      Incorrect. In the old days, armies used to train dedicated personnel whose sole job was to walk with a certain pace length. They would march with the army and count their steps, allowing the leaders to determine distance in miles (thousands of their paces). One could say that it wasn't exact to the highest degree of accuracy, but any measurement includes some measurement error.

    217. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has a point, a base-10 number is more natural to devide into smaller parts. If you would want 1/5 out of 160ml you divide by 10 and multiply by 2, its quite natural to use since its based on our numeral system. I never really understood why everything has such a strange relationship in imperial.

    218. Re: Start here by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Every one (but one) of those numbers I automatically converted to close enough metric equivalents. 75=120, 43=60, 33=50, 10=16, 76=120 though the 150 miles to shade I had to think about, 150=250. Not accurate but close enough. You're really stupid if you plan on sucking fumes when you get to that last gas station.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    219. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be a federal highway?

      Road heading north out of the town I live in is 55mph, and, about 7 miles down the road, it drops to 35mph.
      This wasn't just an example I made up to fit the situation, it's a real thing. That one runs N/S.
      The roads that run between the towns here E/W also jump between 55mph and 35mph when you get to a town. Heading east out of town, actually, after ~3 miles it jumps to 55mph, and then ~5 miles after that back down to 35.

      Oh, and when I lived in the South, most of the roads down there that weren't interstates did the same thing too. 55mph in the country, 35mph as it passed through a town.

      Where the fuck do YOU drive that you've never come across something like that? Do you even HAVE a car?

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    220. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well actually there is ambiguity: You could interpret it as 2012-FEB-09 or 12-FEB-2009. But of course are passed that ambiguity zone now ;-)
      There is an ISO-standard ISO 8601, but Sweden seems to be one of the few countries that actually uses it for everyday purposes...

    221. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans are more conservative, i.e., they prefer to conserve the present state - leave it as it is. It happens to be MPH, so that what they would prefer to stick to.
      Democrats are more scientifically minded, and the metric system is much more prevalent in science. For good reason, it is more elegant for arbitrary measurements, while some measurements in the English system may be more intuitive, at least judging by the name (like "foot").

      Because of this I would expect the parties to be associated with a certain preference, but not because of religion. Republicans are just mostly Christians in the States because that's what they happened to grow up with and they are conservative. In Arabic countries, the conservatives will probably care more about Islam, because that's what they happened to grow up with (convincing, isn't it. Such a fine line of arguments).

    222. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Well then, we are agreed.

      this site being this site I've come across wahoos trying to argue for GMT-only time and assumed that's what was going on again (and really, the argument is only ever "waah, i have to have video meetings with people in asia and it's hard to keep things straight!" which is... actually very fucking depressing that anyone that fucking ignorant and stupid is in such a position that anyone in another country ever has to give a shit what that person has to say..).

      Daylight savings kills more people every year than sharks. Er, I didn't look that one up, but I'm pretty sure it's true -- sharks are actually very safe, and there is actually a surge in heart attacks, strokes, and car accidents after sprint DST -- people lose that hour of sleep, aren't used to adjusting their sleep schedule, and it throws them off for the whole week. I don't think it saves any electricity these days either, which was the only reason for it -- factories and offices are all lit inside by electricity through the day regardless, so I really fail to see why we have to keep moving our clocks around.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    223. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      every two-tenths

      We call that a "fifth".

    224. Re:Start here by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Does America use any imperial measurements? Distance is now based on the Canadian inch of 2.54 cm (changed in the '50's, though a very small change), fluid is pre-imperial which is why you have little gallons and a weird number of fld.oz in a gallon. (Imperial gallon of water weighs 10 lbs and has 160 fld oz) I guess a pound is the same in American and Imperial, but not a ton or even a hundred weight.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    225. Re:Start here by staalmannen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right now, there are only 3 countries in the world that are non-metric: US, Burma and Liberia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Metrication_by_year_map.svg). Some have made a partial conversion, Brittain officially changed to the metric system partially but their street signs are still in miles. I think a conversion in the modern society needs to take its time due to all the legacy material (maps, cars etc). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication_in_the_United_Kingdom And seriously, the Britts got lots of other standards compliance issues which probably hurts its consumers by more expensive custom-made products for that market, like cars made for left traffic and their own type of electrical plugs compared to the rest of EU.

    226. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      That's.. actually kinda neat. I had no idea, and had never actually wondered about it.

      Now I can't stop wondering why somewhere between the 12th and 14th centuries the meaning shifted. What changed in society that changed noon? That's just so... *weird*.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    227. Re:Start here by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd be giving myself an extra centimeter or two if I did that, and I'd feel bad for it. I'm tall enough as it is, and saying 6'2 is really me just dropping a fractional inch anyway (so.. actually about an extra centimeter or two...), but saying I'm 6'3 feels dishonest and 6'2 and 3/4 feels like I'm a 5 year old hehe

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    228. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious advantage with mm/dd/yy is that it is a fair mix of big endian and little endian, so everyone can be happy with it.

    229. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't think measurements are a political party thing.

      Preservation of tradition has long been a conservative value and has driven resistance to international units of measurement or currency in a number of nations. (Though ironically enough, labor unions were one of the major opponents of metrification in the 70s & 80s before they became mostly irrelevant as a political force).

    230. Re:Start here by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Canada, a larger nation then America,

      Canada's 2011 population was 34.5 million people. The USA: 314 million. Canada is larger than the US?

      We're talking about getting PEOPLE to use a system, not how much vast empty space there is to measure in square meters instead of square feet. "America" (The US) is nine times the size of Canada in population.

      Population doesn't matter, just size.

      Nonsense.

    231. Re:Start here by Sun · · Score: 1

      I don't think GP was trying to say the Imperial system makes sense today. I think he was saying it made sense at the time it was invented. Back then, the level of accuracy required was much lower (if only because higher levels of accuracy were unobtainable).

      He was not saying the US should stick with Imperial. He was saying it had a certain sense behind it that was good for the time in which it was invented.

      Shachar

    232. Re:Start here by Sun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Almost a decade ago, I was in a trip to the USA. I was very surprised to see Liter used for car engine sizes (here they usually use cubic centimeters, which are exactly 1/1000, so not a real problem).

      I remember strolling through a supermarket, and looking at the soda bottles, which were bigger than the 1.5L bottles common here. I picked one up to see what size it was. I guess most readers know the answer - it was 2 liters. I remember wondering how come Americans are willing to use a metric unit.

      So I asked a vendor. His answer was "This isn't a metric unit. It's liter".
      So I asked him how much was a liter, and his answer was something along the lines of "33.8 ounces" (without blinking of stopping to think about it).

      Which, of course, got me my answer. The reason Americans are using a metric unit is because they don't know it's metric.

      The problem with your proposal is that, if implemented that way, means just adding another unit to the mix, without exposing people to the main advantage that the metric system has to offer. That does not bode well for a "migration path".

      You should add to that the fact that volume realization is hard. I'll give a couple of examples. First, bear in mind that the two units people are, more or less, familiar with are a milliliter (1 cubic centimeter = 1/1000 of a liter) and a liter.

      The first was when a company I worked for ordered a certain amount of boxes for their product. We were trying to figure out whether we have where to store them. I made the calculation, based on box size, and figured the entire bunch would require a little less than 2 cubic meters (around 1.8). We sort of made a hand gesture estimate and figured it was not that much. Boy, were we wrong. We ended up using up every spare cabinet and space in the office. Lesson learned: a cubic meter is a lot.

      The happened just yesterday. I was telling my wife we will have to remove some soil from our garden to make space for extra flooring. She said "we'll be giving that to friends, right?". I told her it was about 500 liters of soil. I then made a quick mental calculation. We'll need about 12 squared meter of flooring, and the base is about half a meter deep. 6000 liters. Assuming soil is half as dense than water (it was while driving, so I couldn't look it up), you get 3 tons of soil. My instinct was off by a factor of 10, and her instinct was off by a factor of 1000.

      This doesn't mean this is useless. Can you make this same calculation, off the top of your head, using imperial units? Metric does simplify things quite considerably. It's just that, specifically for volumes, that is a hard problem to solve.

      Shachar

    233. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately, in America, those without digital dashboards have the k/ph text in a much smaller font and on a much smaller scale making precision nearly impossible or, at best, difficult. Mandating the reverse would be a good idea but the number of old cars on the road means that's still a problem. It isn't an insurmountable problem but a problem nonetheless. I still, of course, support a complete switch to metric and (oddly enough, I am usually very opposed to any additional legislation with few exceptions, this being one of them) wouldn't mind it being federally mandated.

      A part of me thinks it should be mandated just so I can hear the various sides howl like banshees at each other. Did I mention that I'm easily amused? My countrymen are straight up retarded for the most part and, unfortunately, that is bipartisan.

      Anyhow, I think the simplest means of advocating the metric unit of measurement is this:

      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a meter?
      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a yard?

      Simpler means fewer chances to have errors. As an American I can say, with complete certainty, that we need simplicity here.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    234. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny. Also, don't forget drugs. Drugs have been teaching our kids the metric scale for quite some time.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    235. Re:Start here by GerryHattrick · · Score: 2

      The older half of Britain is still non-metric. Supermarket near here sells milk printed '13% free' - 1 litre bottles sold for the price of 2 pints; wrong calculation! And we all know our cars' MPG, but can only buy in price-per-litre. Makes you wonder who won WWII.

    236. Re:Start here by dryeo · · Score: 1

      So it should be easier. Neighbours can actually see each other and observe that the neighbour is using metric so the" keeping up with the Jones" syndrome kicks in. You just have to make metric cool.
      Somewhat hard considering it was invented by the French and Americans have hated the French since they kicked the shit out of Washington, then saved your revolution.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    237. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who's in the metric system, all this shows me is that you have memorized arbitrary numbers and equate it to the system being useful.
      If you want useful, how about below 0 water freezes and above 100 it boils? Much more sensible in my mind than 32 and 212.

      In metric,

      0=freezing
      10=chilly
      20=comfortable
      30=tropical

      For what it's worth, In both systems, -40 means "spit goes clink".

    238. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Hmm...

      By their definition a conservative wants things to stay the same and a liberal wants change.

      Which, as an aside, has always made me wonder what a liberal becomes once they've finally achieved their goals.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    239. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True story: The UK have switched to metric a while back. If you go to German supermarket chains such as Lidl and Aldi, you'll get 250 grams (1/4 kilogram) of coffee in a pack, just like anywhere on the main continent. If you go to a mainstream UK supermarket, it comes in packages of 227 grams. Obviously, this "Look mom, we do metric now!", although accurate, completely misses the point.

    240. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      When you see the sign that says 3.5 miles to the next exit you can bet that it is 3.5 miles to the next exit or VERY close to it. If you think that it is off and have "measured it in your car" then it is likely your car, you, or someone has moved the sign from its original spot.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    241. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's relative. I'd say 25 C to switch to summer clothing, 15 for autumn/spring, winter for anything colder like today, a very bad spring here this year.

    242. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      2+2=4

      2 cups = pint
      2 pints = quart
      4 quarts = gallon

      That's the easy one I have memorized.

      Also they screen print highway signage on demand, there are usually a few (up to a half dozen or so) DOT employees doing it in one of their offices or warehouses. They're not layered on as the poster implied above. It's a thick paint so it may look like that up close but they're not stickers. The paint is that way because it is thick paint containing glass or another reflective substance. (I've been inside a few of the different paint shops in different states oddly enough, we'll just say that it was a business interest and leave it at that. I suppose there may be a state or two that does it differently though.) An exception would be the triangle highway signs that are temporary, those are often just changed with stickers or they'll use a template and paint on a new number as needed, those change more frequently and aren't meant to be permanent. As highways and roads are long drawn out processes with lots of planning and lots of time it only takes a few employees to make all of the signs and they have plenty of time to make them. There is also a How Its Made episode showing the process, well, it could be the other show that's just like it but I've forgotten its name.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    243. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, you know where we should start: volumetric measurements. I have frequently had a recipe that takes some number of teaspoons of a liquid, while having measuring cups measured in (naturally) cups, and nutritional information in ounces. Oh, and keep in mind that most tea spoons are significantly larger than a teaspoon. And then there's tablespoons, pints, quarts, gallons, barrels, and who knows what else. This is a lot harder to keep straight, and unlike miles to inches, sometimes you actually need to convert between these.

      teaspoons and tablespoons (level, rounded or heaped) are common volume measures used for cooking even in countries that are using the metric system. If I tell you "add 5ml of oil" you are probably left wondering how you are going to measure 5ml (using your 250ml or 500ml measuring cup) , if I tell you "add one teaspoon of oil" you know what to do.

      I've only seen cups used in recipes which use them excluisvely for measurement (for anything larger than a tablespoon) - in those cases the size of your cups doesn't matter as they are only used to signify the relative ratio of ingredients you need to use.

    244. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Err, have you thought about this?

      What is the speed in kp/h when the speed limit is 55mph? Are you going to include the decimal points and, if so, how far out? If not then which speed is the correct speed? The two speeds aren't the same unless you include decimal points and strange numbers like 92.89 kp/h which is going to be less confusing how?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    245. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't say anything awkward like that. Based on my lifelong experience (even if in another language ) you'd say one and eighty eight.

    246. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, 12-FEB-09 is ambiguous - is it the 9th of february 2012, or the 12th of february 2009?

      It's funny how many different date standards there are...

      I generally stick with the ISO standard, 2013-05-25 09:29:35 +02, mainly because it's the only truly international standard. But even that one isn't entierly unambiguous.

      But 12/12/12 is especially ambiguous, since people in different countries all use it - and mean different things.

      12/11/10 in the older swedish notation means 2012-11-10
      12/11/10 in norwegian notation means 2010-11-12
      12/11/10 in american notation means 2010-12-11

    247. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever since I was in the Army, I've always written my dates as 12-FEB-09, and sometimes when I do so, somebody gives me shit because I don't use the same date format that "everybody else" uses, and it is never a conservative or liberal thing. I could see maybe if I wrote 12/02/09, which would easily be interpreted as either december 9th or february 12th, but I like that date format for the same reason that the Army uses it as standard: There is no ambiguity.

      Actually, it's still ambiguous. Is that the 12th of February 2009 or the 9th of February 2012?

    248. Re:Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It should be m/s as that is the SI unit for velocity.

    249. Re:Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Thats about 4mph... You won't see many of those.

    250. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. My grandma also learned a completely new currency at 75. Old folks take a bit longer to get used to it, but they just as well get used to it. I say she took about a year or two. It took me about 1-3 months until it was intuitive enough.

      Daily usage and reference points help a *lot*. You got to find a few key items and their values (XKCD got you covered, but C is completely unrelated to metric), and most importantly stop converting and start thinking in the new unit. As long as you continue converting, you'll be stuck. Get out of it as fast as you can, using the reference points.

    251. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong thinking. You remove the sign at 3.5 miles and put a sign at 5 km. No need to convert aanything.

    252. Re:Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The numbers wouldn't be big at all. They would be too small. 0.0244km/s is 55mph

    253. Re:Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      yeah... you just divide/multiply by 1.6

      100kph = 62mph
      100mph = 160kph

      You don't even need to do any math. There's not that many different speed limits. Just remember 55mph = 88kph. Don't mix up the kph and mph though, cause if you go 88mph you risk time travelling.

      Don't recall the last time I saw a car with mph on the speedo though.

    254. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add into the mix the problem that pints differ from place to place (either 16 or 20 oz), and "ounce" is both a volumetric measure and a weight measure.

      Both? More like quadruply. After all, there are liquid ounces, Avoirdupois ounces, apothecary's weight ounces and Troy ounces. The old joke "what's heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of gold" has an inbelievable answer since feathers are measured out in Avoirdupois (?) and gold in Troy (?).

    255. Re:Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Canada (it's 2nd by land mass)
      India has 3x the population of USA, China has 4x.

    256. Re:Start here by Meeni · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Highway mileage are the last thing that matter. You never need to convert them to anything else anyway.

      What only matters is units that need to be converted to one another and are tedious or borderline insane in "imperial". having base 16 for small measures and 3 for longer is nonsensical. square feets being multiple of 144 is very impractical. Volume units that are a jungle of non-convertible measures is problematic.

      But definitely, highway miles, who cares? Same goes for temperature. This is a single unit, it is confusing for foreigners for a while, but you get used to it. Unlike volumes and weight metric units, the Celsius system is not vastly superior, simply because Fahrenheit system is not broken, it is unusually consistent for an imperial measurement.

      I think time could benefit from rationalization, but I doubt it is doable because of political/sociological resistance.
      Beside, there is rarely need to do other type of conversions than hours:minutes to seconds, months to years and weeks to years/month. It would be more practical to have a unit in wich a year is a kilomonth, a month a kiloweek etc, but that would be a disruptive change, for little practical improvement.

    257. Re:Start here by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I also vote that we start using liters at the pump instead of gallons.

      For consumers, it will make it look like the price of gas has decreased, plus for gas stations it means they won't have to upgrade their signage when the price reaches $10+ per gallon. It's a win-win all around. I'm just surprised that politicians haven't realized the wisdom of this proposal yet.

    258. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? It's like if my toddler invented a system of weights and measures.

      Oh, but there are perfectly computer scientific underpinnings to some. In the ale gallon system, we have

      1 tun = 2 butts
      1 butt = 2 hogsheads
      1 hogshead = 1.5 barrels (ok ok)
      1 barrel = 2 kilderkins
      1 kilderkin = 2 firkins
      1 firkin = 8 gallons

    259. Re:Start here by loufoque · · Score: 1

      In a lot of countries, noon is actually at 2 PM.

      Unrelated, but a lot of culture have dinner in the evening, not in the afternoon.

    260. Re:Start here by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Many cars only show kmh

    261. Re: Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      12 inches in a foot, 3 feet in a yard, 1760 yards in a mile... 16oz in a pound, 2000 pounds in a ton... where is the logic?

      I prefer metres and grams.

      and Fahrenheit.. the scale based on salt water and the temperature of a sick Dutch man.

    262. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody actually paced out exactly 18,480 feet and placed the "3.5 mile" sign at exactly that spot. They placed the sign and filled in the best available number in the most convenient unit.

      Then you don't know Germany! If the thing says "5 km" you can bet your ass that it is exactly 5000 m, to the centimeter!
      And if it weren't, some old geezer would issue a complaint within a month! ;)

      We Germans like our construction and products to be exact. We also love rules and regulations, and blindly following them like cattle even when it makes absolutely no sense. (Like as a pedestrian waiting at a cross-walk's red light even when there is no car as far as the eye can see on a perfectly straight road.)

    263. Re:Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      wait... is that teaspoon 1/3 or 1/4 of a tablespoon? is it 4 or 5ml?

    264. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put away childish things, dearie. Don't care so much about things that really don't matter, and get back to things that do matter, like the fun childish things you put away when you were trying to seem grown-up.

    265. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we are interested in measuring the mass of people, not their weight. For any medical purpose a 150 kg / 170 cm guy would be labelled "overweight" even on the moon, with the exception that it would be easier to lift him from a bed. But measuring weight is easier and for a long time not even scientists knew about the difference. The notion of mass became commonplace later on in human history and for almost everbody it is just a rare synonim of weight. Given where we spend our lives and the definition of kg and N we can easily live with that. We pay attention to that when doing Physics homeworks from school on when doing some kind of jobs.

    266. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      People will still be oblivious. It is all ready obvious to you. This just makes it more oblivious. People are all ready oblivious. This just makes it more oblivious. For most people lets make it simple. The speedometer can ready A,B,C,D,etc. A = 15 MPH, B = 25 MPH, C = 30 MPH. Than all the driver has to do is match the letters! They wouldn't know any more or less than they all ready do.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    267. Re:Start here by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Err.... how about km/ms or seconds per kilometer :)

      A car and/or a speed limit where you can go a few kilometres per millisecond? Shut up and take my money. ;-)

    268. Re:Start here by ZankerH · · Score: 0

      "Metres", colonial scum.

    269. Re:Start here by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      Every car I've seen with a digital speedometer also has an analog one on the side that displays both MPH and KPH.

    270. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1
      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    271. Re: Start here by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the imperial system is also from europe :)

      I'd also like to point out that the US is not even that advanced.

      The Imperial system was first defined in Britain in 1824 (weights and measures act of 1824), well after the US's independence. The US is still on pre-imperial measurements called US customary units.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    272. Re:Start here by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      The base 10 reason matters because our number system is base 10.
      If we had a base 12 number system then it would be best to use a base 12 measurement system..

    273. Re:Start here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The UK changed to decimal currency over about three or four years, but most countries that adopted the EU switching in about one year. Okinawa switch between driving on the left to driving on the right and then back to the left again, both times in a single say of course.

      Decimalization was a huge change. We had 240p in a Pound, and weird coins like the half crown which was worth two shillings and six pence, or 1/8th of a Pound. People coped with it just fine.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    274. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese? That's the ISO standard that was supposed to be adopted everywhere but only a handful of countries did.

    275. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1
      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    276. Re:Start here by dkf · · Score: 1

      Ever since I was in the Army, I've always written my dates as 12-FEB-09

      Where I have a choice, I write dates using a format that produces "12-Feb-2009" as nobody (not even computers) misunderstands that. Failing that, ISO 8601 because it sorts properly without teaching that particular bit of software about time.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    277. Re:Start here by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reagan said it was a waste of money, so the government spent a lot of money to take the signs down again.

    278. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said to just use the alphabet: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3783519&cid=43820077

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    279. Re:Start here by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      All you have to do is make the speed limit either 55mph or 100km/h (driver's choice...)

      Pretty soon you'll have most of America swearing they were driving at 100km/h.

      --
      No sig today...
    280. Re:Start here by dkf · · Score: 1

      FWIW, this became a legal requirement in the UK 20+(?) years ago when we joined the EU and we have just about assimilated metric measures of volume and weight when it comes to consumables.

      With the exception of alcohol sold in bars (which has its own set of regulations) and a few other goods, the quantity has to be marked in metric at reasonable accuracy, but can be sold in any amount and additionally marked with other measures too. Most things are now sold in metric quantities, but nothing in the regulations forces that.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    281. Re:Start here by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      It should be m/s as that is the SI unit for velocity.

      Well, that is actually somewhat usable as X km/h = 3.6 X m/s. For instance: 100 km/h = 62.14 mph = 27.78 m/s

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    282. Re:Start here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      There isn't any real need to replace your mile markers. Just add some KM markers or forget about them completely. Going metric does not mean obliterating all trace of Imperial measures.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    283. Re:Start here by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I am NOT going to have 0.000236588 cubic meters of coffee or sugar; I'm going to have a cup. (I may even have a quarter liter of coffee over that, but that isn't SI).

      Why would you use cubic metres for your sugar measurement, rather than litres (the SI volume measure) or grams (the weight measure, which is what all my cookbooks use for any large quantity of dry mass)?

      Why do you think a quarter of a litre isn't SI? You can express metric measures as fractions (1/4 litres) if you want; you can apply any mathematical operations to metric measures you like, just like any other numbers. I would happily walk into a shop and order half a litre or quarter of a kilo of something; they know that I mean 0.5 or 0.25 of one.

      You're just looking for things to complain about. Whether converting to metric is worth the US's time and money is one valid question. But there's no question about whether metric is a useful system for day to day life- just ask one of the billions of people in the world who use it just fine.

    284. Re:Start here by dkf · · Score: 1

      Nobody's kilogram is exactly 1 kilogram, either.

      Except for the international standard kilogram (held in Paris), and then I'm not sure about that.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    285. Re:Start here by zwarte+piet · · Score: 2

      The speed limit is the same everywhere: 299,792,458 metres per second.

    286. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the international format should be (yy)yymmdd - no ambiguity, descending to the right, sorts properly etc etc

    287. Re:Start here by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Coffeemugs tend to hold 200ml

    288. Re:Start here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Celsius is quite useful when you are thinking in terms of human comfort and safety too.

      Summer weight clothing will be appropriate and comfortable at 25, autumn weight at 18, and winter weight at 10.

      When I hear "it's 100 degrees outside" on American TV shows I have a vague sense that it is hot due to context, but no idea what it really means. Utility seems to depend mostly on what you are used to.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    289. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fahrenheit is quite useful when you are thinking in terms of human comfort and safety."

      That has to be one of the absolutely dumbest arguments I've ever heard. Strictly speaking it's not even an argument, so it's just bloody stupidity in written form!

    290. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I write yyyy mm dd. It sorts correctly on computers. I get flack from work when I try and write reports this way, yet I got it implemented for a shared drive for reports and folders. One location still has this though: "1 - Jan", "2 - Feb" etc.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    291. Re:Start here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How lazy are you? "I'm one eighty two". Wow, after all that exertion I need a nap.

      Temperature is easier in Celsius. Zero or close to it means you need to watch out for ice. 10 is cold, 20 is nice and 30 is hot. Of course it depends entirely where you live because some places get a lot more wind chill than others.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    292. Re:Start here by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      The Speedometer problem really isnt 120 100 80 60 50 are the common ones in km which are close enough to 75 60 50 40 and 30 mph. It doesnt take much to get used to it. My Car is primarily in mph and I still think in mph and I often will use the Speedometer as a conversion tool so if a road sign says 100 km i'll call it 60 miles.

      half a kg is about a pound 8 foot is 240 cm 15mm about half an inch 25gram about an ounce close enough not to worry about it. A euro is a bit less than sterling which perhaps makes me a little frugal when it comes to shopping, if a price seems fair it probably is a bargain.
             

    293. Re:Start here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Metric is all base 10, and you can convert to any other base in a single step. A lot of Imperial fans say they like how you can divide 12 inches exactly by several factors, but in metric you can of course just use 120mm or 16mm or whatever random multiple you like to base your design on.

      With Imperial each unit uses a different base. Feet are base 12, yards are base 3, miles are base 5,280 (or base 1,760 in yards). To do any conversion between units you have to do a base conversion.

      Human beings naturally use base 10. Our languages are all based on base 10 naming for numbers.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    294. Re:Start here by Sique · · Score: 2
      Russia and France?

      After all, the metric system is a french idea, first codified 1790 at the French Academy of Science.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    295. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metric is obviously just another of the liberal's scams to make us more like Europe!

      <troll>
      It's worse than that.. it will actually make your penis drop off!!1!

      Not to mention the other infernal gay commie atheist standards such as DIN A4 paper, ISO 8601 sortable time format, etc.

      The rest of the world *acts* as if they use those for their own benefit, but obviously they just want to trick Americans to switch, and then they'll secretly switch to God's own American standards behind our backs!
      </troll>

    296. Re:Start here by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Fahrenheit is quite useful when you are thinking in terms of human comfort and safety.

      Summer weight clothing will be appropriate and comfortable at 75, autumn weight at 50, winter weight at 25.

      F was designed to be 0 was COLD and 100 was HOT to humans.

    297. Re:Start here by Sique · · Score: 2

      C is not completely unrelated to metric in that 1 K means the same temperature difference than 1 Celsius.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    298. Re:Start here by smash · · Score: 1

      Or rather, m/s, which would give you somewhat less insane values. 100km/h = ~28m/s.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    299. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I would guess 9th Feb 2012, so that it sorted the year correctly on my computer. Of course the months would all be out of order, but that is better than having it sort by the day first.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    300. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amusingly, when you cross the border in Plattsburgh, NY over to Québec they place signs that say 100km/h != 60mph

    301. Re:Start here by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      Ireland switched to Metric for road signs a few years back. Their speed limit signs say things like 50km/h with no mph on them. At the border with Northern Ireland, which still uses mph, there are signs facing into Ireland saying "Speed limits in mph", and into Northern Ireland saying "Speed limits in km/h"

    302. Re:Start here by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Canada managed to cope just fine..... There's no real reason for -you- to change though.

      Canada managed to cope just fine, because they didn't have a choice. And yes -I- have to change, when all the sizes change around me.
      While I agree that metric is cool, everyone loves it cause it is easy to convert... But honestly, as a lay person when was the last time you needed to convert from kilometers to liters?

    303. Re:Start here by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      It's not a waste of money if the Feds simply say that any new signs paid for with Federal highway funds must have SI units as their primary measure.

      Ahhh perfect. So the first sign says "55" and "2 miles to exit 32" a mile later it says "1500 meters to exit 32" and "85" Uhmmm ok...

    304. Re:Start here by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It's about 62mph, and I didn't need to check on Google.

    305. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird, 178 is pronounced "one hundred and seventy eight" here in metric-using Australia. When shortening it, it's "one seven eight".

    306. Re:Start here by smash · · Score: 1

      The rest of the world is bigger than the US, and we managed it.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    307. Re:Start here by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Every time a state starts printing metric speed limits, it inevitably ends up rounding the limit DOWN.

      I-19 is signed in metric... EXCEPT for the speed limit sign.

    308. Re:Start here by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Even though m/h is the de-facto standard in metric countries, m/s would be the proper metric unit.

    309. Re:Start here by Smauler · · Score: 1

      No... really, it is. When asked how tall I am, I can say, "i'm six two". Just that, 3 words.

      Heh... with metric my height is 2. Incidently, it makes my BMI easy to work out, especially when I used to weigh 100kg.... 100/2^2.

    310. Re:Start here by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Assuming soil is half as dense than water (it was while driving, so I couldn't look it up), you get 3 tons of soil.

      Why would you assume that? Here's a hint - if it sinks, it is denser than water, and if it floats, it's lighter than water.

      I'd personally guess that soil's about twice a dense as water, which actually gives you 12 tonnes.

    311. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be gained by doing this?

    312. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK is metric but we don't have metric in cars on on road signs.

    313. Re:Start here by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I have a better idea, how about NO. I mean the speedometers already have both do we REALLY want to spend all that money to throw away millions of signs (and even more in storage, i can tell you nearly every place has huge numbers of these signs for replacement purposes that could frankly last 30 years without printing any more) just so some guys who prefer metric can get their smug on? Are YOU willing to take a 40% hike in local and state taxes to pay for it? I bet the answer to that is no.

      And can we stop with these God damned petitions anyway? I mean how damned stupid does the American public have to be to keep buying this lame ass PR stunt? has the administration EVER, even once, changed their position because the people petitioned? I mean for the love of God we even had a "please stop ignoring us" petition (which has to be ironic as hell, having a petition to say stop ignoring our petitions) and every time a petition has said something the bought off administration didn't like (such as the one stating we'd like to stop seeing kids thrown in jail and their lives ruined over pot busts) all we get is a smug little "We hear you but really don't care because you are a peasant and don't "understand" the issue". Yes we DO understand asshole, we understand that you are kissing the ring of various lobbys and would happily sell out the people for 30 pieces of silver just like the last guy whom you said was so bad...but then kept all his policies because wadda ya know? the lobbyist check cleared.

      So can we PLEASE stop with the fucking petitions and talk about the stupid ass petitions, pretty please? you might as well be standing in your little free speech zone with your little home made sign for all the good its gonna do, its nothing but a stupid PR stunt to fool the morons into thinking somebody there gives a rat's ass what you think when they don't.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    314. Re:Start here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Supermarket near here sells milk printed '13% free' - 1 litre bottles sold for the price of 2 pints; wrong calculation!

      Reminds me of that pub that had miserable hour - one for the price of two.

      Have you tried contacting Trading Standards? If you want to be a real bastard, set Anne Robinson on them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    315. Re:Start here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You actually pointed out that you think "SI" and "metric" are synonyms.

      They aren't.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    316. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can't always be true. There are signs on bridges that can say, for example, "3.5 miles to exit 5", but I doubt that the bridge was placed at that exact distance from the exit (or vice-versa).

    317. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also be a redneck if you place commas at random.

    318. Re:Start here by dskoll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fahrenheit is quite useful when you are thinking in terms of human comfort and safety.

      Really? Maybe it's because I grew up with only the metric system, but I have absolutely no feeling for fahrenheit. I know that 20 Celsius is a nice summer day, 15 is cool, and -30 is about as cold as it gets where I live. I wouldn't have a clue what "80" or "60" or "20" means in Fahrenheit.

      It's all a matter of what you're used to. The US is one of the most conservative and reactionary societies on earth, so I expect it'll still be using Imperial units 50 years from now and probably still retain the penny when you need ten thousand of them to buy a loaf of bread.

    319. Re:Start here by xaxa · · Score: 1

      "kilometerage"

      Klickage

      Distance.

    320. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 2

      I don't think I have an answer, but this is interesting to the discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limits_in_the_United_States

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    321. Re:Start here by loneDreamer · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that Winter, Autumn and Summer temperatures are, if anything, even LESS UNIVERSAL, they depend a lot on where you live. And if you are remembering completely arbitrary numbers, 10, 20 and 30 C does the trick just as well. Or whatever hits your fancy, since those are extremely arbitrary divisions anyway...

    322. Re:Start here by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I reckon if the UK converted properly, which is more down to the Daily Mail than the government (it's attitude rather than legislation) there'd be a lot less dual measurements in both countries -- most packaged products seem to be labelled for both countries.

      The measurement varies by brand, anyway. Most butter is sold in 250g blocks (no one cares), but crap sausages are 454g (the way God intended, etc). Supermarket milk is in pints (people get religious about this), but the fancy stuff and the stuff sold at the corner shop is in litres.

    323. Re:Start here by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough I have a '91 Toyota that has both on the gauge, but I'm swapping in the gauge cluster (among many other things) from a sportier variant of the same car that was sold only in Japan, and the gauge on that one only has MPH :-\

      And it goes up to 180 when 150 would be plenty enough...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    324. Re:Start here by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Do you have the 1000L chemical containers in the US? The big white plastic cube in a grid? http://www.blowmouldingmachine.cc/products_info/-Chemical-plastic-barrels-1000L-218722.html They're pretty common here, but probably not seen in public that often.

      They're a little over 1m^3, due to the tubes giving it strength, but I think they're near enough for the visualisation. It's how I imagine 1m^3 (or a tonne of water) anyway.

    325. Re:Start here by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 2

      Si is a system of units. Abbreviation from SystÃfme international des unitÃf©s

      Thankfully, Slashcode does allow HTML entities. HTMLTidy has an option for this (I have it bookmarked Notepad++) :D

      è is &#232; and é is &#233;

      Système international d'unités

    326. Re:Start here by Sun · · Score: 1

      When you put soil in water, it changes. In particular, one component is removed from the mix: air.

      I have no idea how much air is in the soil. I was working under restrictive assumptions (i.e. - ones that make the weight smaller), just to give a feel for the result.

      Shachar

    327. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has driven about 120,000 miles in the last 7 years (most with GPS and all with aggression :)) traveling all the way from Portland to Miami (and all points in between) while living on the road, I can assure you that almost all signs (of the short range 2 mi or less variety) are within a few feet of accurate. Regularly, I will see a X miles to exit sign and start watching my odometer at 10ths of a mile so I can figure out my merge, and the exit is exactly where I expected. I've been very impressed by this fact.

      Now, in Birmingham on I-65 heading north to the I-20/59 interchange, there is a "3/4 mile to exit for I-20" type of sign that is only about 1/3 of a mile before I-65 SPLITS for the exit. The exit itself (separating East from West) is probably accurately measured, but it's pointless. I got caught out a couple of times being aggressive before I made it a point to make the split and hate on that sign every time I would pass it.

      The other way to compare signage is with a GPS telling you distance to the exit. I've found signs to be spot on that way also. There are maybe only 2 or 3 other times I can think of that the signed seemed a little short in the distance it would describe.

      So if there is a sign that is false, it's not going to be common and will stick out like a sore thumb. Perhaps it won't have to-the-inch accuracy, but if it's more than 10 feet off, I'd be surprised.

    328. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, we ended up with a foot being, well, the length of a foot. A mile ("mille passus") being 1000 paces, etc.

      If your pace is 1.6 meters long, you must be popular with the ladies.

    329. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should write 2012-02FEB-09 and then no one can give him any shit.

    330. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made the calculation, based on box size, and figured the entire bunch would require a little less than 2 cubic meters (around 1.8). We sort of made a hand gesture estimate and figured it was not that much. Boy, were we wrong. We ended up using up every spare cabinet and space in the office. Lesson learned: a cubic meter is a lot.

      No, it isn't. Something must have been awful wrong with your calculation. A cubic meter is 1 x 1 x 1 meter. That is not a lot. 1.8 cubic meters would be 1.41 (square root of 2) x 1.41 x 1.41 meters. Still not a lot.

    331. Re:Start here by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You may be right about the difficulty in converting between units of volumetric measurement, but what is one quarter of 236 ml? One quarter of a cup is 1/4 cup. Everything I have seen suggests that English Units are better for cooking and baking than metric units. I am not going to go into it in depth, but the above is based on an argument made by a European as to why English Units were better for cooking and baking than metric units. His point was that English Units were more readily scaled to increase or decrease a recipe. He, also, argued that they lent themselves more to being "eyeballed" because they were based on "human scale" (I wish I remembered where I came across the article because he made a very good case). He even made a case for them in construction that I, someone who grew up using English Units but perfectly comfortable with Metric Units, would never have thought of, but found rather convincing. Up until I read that article, written by someone who grew up in and lived in a country which uses Metric Units, I believed that eventually Metric Units would displace English Units because they are easier to do math with. However, now I do not know.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    332. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I find it funny when people use the argument it is easy to cut, and forget to mention on in some cases.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    333. Re: Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I think this is the biggest agreeable argument. To be consistent. I think someone pointed out though, so will not want it just for this reason.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    334. Re:Start here by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Actually, you make a good point. If we really want a good measurement system, we would get rid of the metric system and replace it with a base 12 system. Of course, we should probably at the same time replace our numbering system with one in base 12 as well. Base 12 is the ideal numbering system because in base 12, 10 is divisible by the first two prime numbers. This makes math a lot easier.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    335. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I honestly think that the weights are market on different on packaging to make it hard to compare prices. Than they get you the unit price so you can compare, oh wait this name brand compares pounds, the store brand in ounces. Android unit compare for the win. Oh an alcohol is in liters. But than we call it a 5th, and half gallon? but it is really 755 ML I think? But we have pints, oh and yes the one "shoters".

      But again, I think most of this is on purpose to confuse the consumer so they just buy something without realizing a comparison. And to this in, as it appears corporations run America, it won't change.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    336. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The signs were SO hated, most of them got vandalized beyond recognition within a month, and pretty much ALL of them had the "44" spray painted, X'ed (with black markers), or shot out.

      This is Florida we are talking about here. Shooting everything or anyone is a state sport. Signs are are just low hanging fruit.

    337. Re:Start here by stenvar · · Score: 1

      As you point out, a lot of volumes are already metric. For the purpose of cooking, people just use 1 quart = 1l, 1 gallon = 4l, 1 cup = 250ml.

      I suspect cooks are more used to metric than most other people and understand its benefits, but they also realize that it's not such a big deal. I don't mind using both systems.

    338. Re:Start here by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      That is funny. Funny thing, I looked at your post, looked at your post. Than suddenly got it. It has been a long night for me, I hate graveyard, but /. makes it better.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    339. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, no. Calculus fail. 1.8 cubic meters are about 1.2 x 1.2 x 1.2 meters. Really not a lot. The desk i'm right now sitting at is 1.6 meters (ca. 63 inch) width, and 0.8 meters (ca. 31.5 inch) depth, which makes 1.28 square meters. So if my desk would have a height of about 1.4 meters (ca. 55 inch), the space under it would be about 1.8 cubic meters. My desk actually is about 0.7 meters high. So 1.8 cubic meters is not taking more space than a desk with another one stacked on top. That is really not much. I could stuff dozens of cubic meters of stuff into my flat and still be able to wander around without problems. My book shelf in the living room is actually about 2.8 meters width and 0.3 meters depth and 2.2 meters high. This also equals to about 1.8 cubic meters. And the book shelf does not fill up my living room (about 20 square meters) significantly.

      So your story still makes no sense or your initial calculation was so awfully bad that you should be really ashamed of yourself.

    340. Re:Start here by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Other counties, like Canada, did it for years without major issues. No, don't include decimal points, it doesn't need to be THAT exact, just round. Half a kilometer is only 0.31 miles.

      55 MPH
      89 KPH

    341. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This can get so confusing that I now use ' YMD=2013-05-25 ' in system file date stamps. No confusion anywhere, anytime.

    342. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would much prefer meter per second sign (eg: 28m/s). Per second is much more on the human scale, it is easy to figure what distance you have travelled in a blink of a eye and therefore should help peoples drive safer.

      Posting as AC because of the flood of morons calling 'whoosh'. I am just replying to a good joke so my post can be read. Thank you.

    343. Re: Start here by kenh · · Score: 1

      Because once one administration starts something, the next administration is obliged to continue it...

      It WAS a waste to spend federal dollars to add Km/hr speed limits to ALL signs, and the effort/expense of replacing a few speed limit signs was a big cost savings over finishing the conversion of all signs to include metric speed limits.

      --
      Ken
    344. Re: Start here by kenh · · Score: 1

      Anyhow, I think the simplest means of advocating the metric unit of measurement is this:

      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a meter?
      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a yard?

      Seriously? What the heck do you do for a living that requires you to figure out the percentage of a yard/meter?

      I've walked this planet for nearly half a century, and I have never, not even in a word problem in math class, been asked to make such a calculation.

      --
      Ken
    345. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water freezes at exactly 273.15 degrees.

    346. Re:Start here by forand · · Score: 1

      I generally agree with you but Celsius is just as arbitrary as Fahrenheit. Why is water at a specific pressure and humidity a reasonable thing to define a temperature scale on? If there is a "natural" temperature system it would be defined by absolute zero and the Cosmic Microwave Background temp. There is no ambiguity and you can measure it anywhere (but it does change with time but very very long times with respect to humans).

      Fahrenheit has some benefits:
      * 0-100 is about what temps people live in
      * the difference between steps is about the level people can tell the difference


      What are the benefits of Celsius? That if I measure the pressure and humidity I can tell when water is going to boil or freeze? That I can cram most of the temps that people deal with regularly between 10-40?

    347. Re:Start here by Anonymuous+Coward · · Score: 1

      15mm about half an inch

      You're way off, sooner or later you'll get into trouble with that.

      Better try something like: 25mm ~ 1'', 10cm ~~ 4'', 1.5m ~~ 5'.

    348. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever since I was in the Army, I've always written my dates as 12-FEB-09

      There is no ambiguity.

      Is that 2012 or 2009?

      There aren't many reasons (I can't think of any) not to write out the full year. It's only two more numbers, and it eliminates all ambiguity.

    349. Re:Start here by arth1 · · Score: 2

      The church spreading to the North.
      The rule that the noon prayer should be at the ninth hour from sunrise prevented the prayer from being held in the Northern countries whenever the day was too short to have nine hours.
      It was moved to the sixth hour, then later, to meridian, and then the Catholic church finally abandoned the sun-based time keeping and set it at 12 PM.

      Orthodox Jews and Muslims still have some logical problems with what to do as they approach the polar circles. Especially the letter abiding Jews whose faith dictates that the rules should be upheld even when they don't make sense, because that's how you prove faith, and you cannot substitute the intent of the law for the letter of the law. They have devices that disconnect the fridge light before the sabbath so you don't violate the sabbath laws by turning on the light, but they can't do much about when the sun rises and sets.

    350. Re:Start here by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Do you know that you have to literally stop and read the little one, as the big one is distracting you?

      The current speedometer design prefers only one unit (mph in US). Suppose metric road signs were adopted by some states but not others. In this case, the car manufacturers have to redesign the speedometer such that you can switch between mph and kph by flipping a switch on the dash and restarting the car. In kph mode, "km/h" is displayed under the speedometer needle. Similarly, "mph" is displayed in mph mode. Note that there's no big and small scale: only one scale that shows kph or mph.

      Since mph range is 0-140 and kph range in 0-230, the dials have to be more circular than the current semi-circle design to accommodate both units in the same scale. Only when all cars have such unit switching capability can the road signs be switched to metric.

    351. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't see that this is solely because your base unit inch is simply to much? 3/4 of a inch is nearly 2 cm. If you would be in a metric world, you would consider dropping 3/4 of a cm or adding 1/4 of a cm. A cm is a very small difference, so it would make sense to round up and represent yourself 1/4 of a centimeter higher. The equivalent for you would be adding 1/10 of a inch. Would you still feel dishonest when adding such a small difference?

    352. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For god's sake man, kph is NOT part of the metric system.

    353. Re:Start here by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      55 is shitty speed limits. 75mph is my minimum "speed limit". sammy hagar can kma!

    354. Re:Start here by smellotron · · Score: 1

      0.0244km/s is 55mph

      This is why I don't understand everyone's obsession with using km/s. 0.0244 km/s is just 24.4 m/s. It's still SI units, it rounds quite nicely to 25 m/s, and it actually puts the numerator on a scale that makes sense on a local (foot traffic) scale.

    355. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For everyone else? It'd have no benefit whatsoever.

      I disagree. Every significant software project has had a tussle over logging, recording and displaying dates and times over timezones and DST. We like UTC in the DB and everywhere except the display, but then someone screws it up. And then you have an alarm that has to be recorded by a user and stored in local time, and then the server has to figure out how long it will be from now to then, and it's bugs bugs bugs...

      If everyone adopted UTC and we got used to a local interpretation of the numbers, surely it would make no difference? Why does 12:00 sound like lunchtime and 7:00 not? - and given that you said "noon", which would be midday wherever you are, it's sounding like you've already made the move. I usually judge lunchtime by a certain "few hours after breakfast", "gap between meetings" sort of feeling. I'm figuring that if it became normal to get up at 03:00 and go to bed at 19:00, I'd be used to it by about week 2.

      And actually, I suspect that a fixed adherance to "lunchtime is 12:00" mentality is really a raging desire to be British (at least in their wintertime). "We like to do things the way the British do, because it's the best way and the right way". Damn those revolutionaries! :-)

    356. Re:Start here by jbssm · · Score: 1

      as a lay person when was the last time you needed to convert from kilometers to liters?

      About this morning when I went to the grocery store and asked for 25 meters of bananas and 12 seconds of potatoes. The lady at the counter asked me if I wanted 7 Km/h of milk to go with it, but I politely told her that my girlfriend just bough 11 pascal of it so we still have enough for the next 5 newtons.

    357. Re:Start here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also noteworthy, the building industry also works in metric these days, although there are many builders who still think in ft/in a lot of the materials are sold in metric sizes, i.e the width of a standard sheet of plaster board (sheet rock) dictates how you space your studs.

      But here in the USA, a piece of sheet rock which comes from china is 4x8 feet, and not measured in meters :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    358. Re:Start here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The happened just yesterday. I was telling my wife we will have to remove some soil from our garden to make space for extra flooring. [...] Assuming soil is half as dense than water (it was while driving, so I couldn't look it up), you get 3 tons of soil.

      You don't actually know what soil weighs per unit of volume until you weigh it, because it can be compacted to varying densities, can be composed of varying constituents, and contains a variable quantity of water. This is why we like to buy soil by volume and not by weight. The weight doesn't come into play until you're trying to figure out how much they're going to charge you, and you find out how much water you're paying for, or until it comes time to load it onto a truck, and you find out how many trips you're going to have to make.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    359. Re:Start here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, you have this almost exactly ass backwards.

      Sugar is measured in grams, you'll have 1 or 2g

      You can certainly take a walk measured in meters. Who goes for a walk for a block? Most walks worthy of the name will be measured in kilometers. Maybe fractional ones if you're superannuated.

      Wood furniture? Very commonly done in fractional inches. Imperial units are convenient when you're doing things with your hands.

      Meanwhile, in some countries building materials are metric...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    360. Re:Start here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You realized we are talking about reading different numbers off of street signs right? I would feel bad if I ever got to a point where I was incapable of reading signs, and probably shouldn't be driving at that point

      Modern consumer society is predicated upon people feeling bad about themselves. That won't change your behavior. You'll still drive, if the average oldster is any indication.

      I guess the km/h text on the speedo isn't bigger on american cars?

      Damned near illegible on some cars, though you can generally read the numbers. The numbers are smaller and in a less-contrasting color, though.

      Wouldn't most new cars have electronic speedometers which would probably change at the touch of a button?

      I don't know what percentage of new cars have digital speedometers. That would be an interesting factoid. Maybe you could do some research instead of speculating.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    361. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Celsius IS metric. It's just not a SI unit. Only difference between C and K : different 0 point.

    362. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    363. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that 1 cup of butter is 227 g, and butter in metric countries comes in 250 g blocks. if you don't cut that extra quarter inch off the end, the cookies come out all wrong. You could convert, but unless you sell your butter in 225 g and 450 g blocks, pre-wrapped in 112 g sticks, people who make cookies and cakes are going to be very unhappy. In the UK they just weigh their ingredients, but the US uses volumetric measurements and butter is obnoxious to dig out of measuring cups.

    364. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory: http://www.theonion.com/articles/metric-system-thriving-in-nations-inner-cities,458/

      "While the typical teen has only a vague notion of what a kilogram is, teens in the Cabrini Green housing projects in Chicago and the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles were thoroughly familiar with this unit of metric measurement," said Ira Danielson, the researcher who spearheaded the study. "They were able to identify a kilogram of weight by merely tossing it back and forth in their hands."

    365. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in a vacuum.

    366. Re:Start here by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Quick guide to farenheit:
      212: water boiling
      150: this ends the cooking section of farenheit (lowest number on the oven) ...
      110+: too fucking hot, this begins the section of Fahrenheit relevant to most people's daily environment
      98.6: you (if the temperature of 'you' is > 100 consider seeing a doctor)
      32: water freezes
      0: too fucking cold

      Having the typical range of human-livable temperature span 100 positive degrees makes it easy to 'visualize'. Also compared to Celsius, Fahrenheit is more precise. I can tell whether the house is 69, 70, 71 or 72 degrees. I can tell when the office has gone from its normal 73 degrees to 74 after someone puts an ice pack on a thermostat. I don't usually see Celsius measured in decimals but I'd imagine a lot of those temperatures would blur into the same number.

      For most of the other stuff (ie: paper sizes, containers, weight) I agree metric is better, but I wouldn't want to give up the precision of Fahrenheit and its natural relation to human-liveable environments for the sake of conformity.

    367. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no shit, it is *Florida*. The shittiest place on earth.

      You've obviously never been to central Pennsylvania!

    368. Re:Start here by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      Get the world off of daylight saving's time, or convince everyone to use GMT. Kill the leap second. Decimalization is pointless if all human–computer time conversions continue to require politically-driven lookup tables.

      if we do standardize on GMT, then as an american I insist that the standard be changed so that 12:00 is the middle of the day in america.

    369. Re:Start here by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      don't be a dimwit. if you're traveling at 60 miles per hour, how long will it take you to travel to your destination 30 miles away? now, what if you're going 110 FPS? what then? what do you do, asshole?

    370. Re:Start here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Every car I've seen with a digital speedometer also has an analog one on the side that displays both MPH and KPH.

      No car I've ever seen has had both a digital speedometer and an analog one. I'm going to want to see a picture of some of these incredibly idiotic dashboards that you've been seeing. (I've found one example of such using google image search...) And I've owned at least two of them, I drive one regularly, and I have the gauge cluster for another (not my pic but I have an S13 HUD dash I hope to use for a simulator in the future) sitting here, absolutely none of them are like that. Most of them don't even have a tachometer; most people who want a digital dash don't care how many Rs they're turning, they have an automatic anyway. Of course, the very top-end cars now have all-digital dashes, so that trend will probably finally change the way I thought it would in the 1980s, when manufacturers were experimenting with bar-graph tachometers and the like.

      As an aside, what I would like is an analog speedometer with two needles, I supposed it could be emulated but there is no screen which can emulate the resolution of the physical world, period the end, so I prefer a real needle in my gauge. I would like one needle (in a darker color, naturally) to show the speed I'm trying to achieve with my foot, and the other needle to show my calculated speed.

      In any case, I have never seen a car with two speedometers. They clearly exist but they are by far in the minority.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    371. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I can't tell if you are meaning 2012-02-09 or 2009-02-12.

      It may seem obvious to you coming from a place where that system was commonly used. However, The only things clear in your statement were month and the 2 numbers, which were both 2 digits, which could be either the day or the year as both are =12. Had the year been specified as a 4 digit number, instead of taking the Y2K shortcut, it would not have been ambiguous. (For at least a sufficiently long period, then it would be 5 digit, so it wouldn't be ambiguous at that point either.)

      I do agree about the stupidity of the reactionary political parties.

    372. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cheapest thing to do is to put up all new signs with Km/hr, but that was stopped too.

    373. Re: Start here by hedwards · · Score: 1

      And you regularly go around with a thermometer? I know the metric system, I have a degree in the natural sciences. That does not however mean that I think in metric units. I think in imperial measures because that actually relates to my life experience.

      So, no, temperatures aren't easy as the actual number has only a loose connection to ones experience in the real world.

    374. Re:Start here by Sun · · Score: 1

      Neither. I suspect you just fell for the same blunder I originally did.

      My bookshelf is 85cm wide, 170cm hi and 33cm deep. That makes it about half a cubic meter in volume. This, however, does not amount to the amount to the volume of books it can contain. Not all depth is used, and the books are not tall enough to fill the gaps between the shelves. All in all, let's assume half of the bookshelf's volume is lost (and I'm being generous to your side of the argument). Let's round the bookshelf's volume up to half a cubic meter (again, making your case easier to make).

      So a bookshelf can host around 0.25 cubic meters of books. To make the analogy, we need to suddenly dump 7 new bookshelves worth of books on your apartment, and tell you "yeah, find a place for them".

      As for your desk analogy - that just proves my point - people have a hard time of understanding volume. A desk is measured by its surface area. It has plenty of usable volume beneath and above it. If that were a block, you'd speak differently.

      At the moment, there are five uninstalled air condition units sitting at the side of my living room. They take about 3 cubic meters. Yes, I can still use the apartment (but it's a really really big one), but they sure as hell stick out.

      Oh, and this is algebra, not calculus.

      Shachar

    375. Re: Start here by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Logic has nothing to do with it. 10,000,000 meters from the equator to the North Pole isn't what I would personally consider to be logical. And 1kg is for all practical purposes outside of science is arbitrary as well.

      What you're ignoring is the fact that people don't generally think of both yards and miles at the same time. If I'm talking about miles, then it's unlikely that the precision is good enough to warrant much more than tenths of miles. Just like in the metric system where you're unlikely to be talking about both kilometers and meters as that's likely within the margin for error on any measurements you're doing.

    376. Re: Start here by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Why should we change? Unlike most of the world, we had a system of measure that worked prior to the metric system being invented. We also have trillions of dollars in legacy infrastructure and hardware that's all in imperial measure. And we're a large enough market to justify people making more in our measures.

      The assumption that we need to change is one that really requires justification. We have a system of measures that's been enforced for a very long time. It works a lot better than what the pro-metric people are willing to acknowledge and it's going to literally cost us trillions of dollars to do the transition.

    377. Re:Start here by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Interstates that run within NYC (particularly river crossings).

      Also, any highway that has a variable speed limit due to weather conditions.

      Finally,during road construction work if there is no clearance between the construction area and the open lane.

      Also (admittedly this is more pedantry) the US Numbered Highways are sometimes called "Federal Highways" even though they do not receive Federal funding - these typically follow the speed limits of local roads.

    378. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to try again? 100 kph is closer to 60 mph.

      Personally in engineering everything is already usually done strictly with SI units and converted as/when necessary. I'm perfectly happy working with them professionally, but at home I greatly prefer imperial units for air temperature speed limits etc.

    379. Re: Start here by sootman · · Score: 1

      > No more wondering WTF 'letter' size paper is anymore

      "PC LOAD A4? The fuck does that mean?"

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    380. Re: Start here by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the computations are simple, but not every driver is always going to have a bright kid in the back seat to do those calculations for him.

      A driver's prime directive is keeping his vehicle in that ever changing sweet spot between making a dent in the landscape on the right, and bumping an approaching vehicle at a closing speed of 120+ mph (190+ kmh) on the left. Adding any unnecessary distractions, no matter how simple, is uncalled for. Perhaps it takes no more than 0.2 seconds to ballpark the math, but at a closing speed of 120 mph, that could be 4 feet (about 1.2 meters) of lateral travel. More than enough to smack that oncoming turnip truck in its big old front bumper.

      The really stupid person is the one who insists on playing silly mental games in potentially lethal situations rather than devoting his attention to risk identification and avoidance. Road signs that state both mi. and km. are a good idea.

      Gee, I hope I managed to express that in terms that our younger slashdotters will easily comprehend

      --
      Will
    381. Re:Start here by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I have seen some "half liter" bottles sold lately.

      Six packs of half liters are pretty common in grocery stores around here (I live in the Washington DC area), and you'll generally see 1 liter sodas at gas stations. Just yesterday, I saw 1.5 liter bottles for the first time, at a Target (they also had 2 liters, which is what I bought).

    382. Re:Start here by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Four teaspoons in a tablespoon.

      All my cookbooks say that there's three teaspoons in a tablespoon.

    383. Re:Start here by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      but what is one quarter of 236 ml?

      59 ml. One quarter of 240 ml is 60 ml, one quarter of four less than 240 ml is one less than 60 ml.

    384. Re:Start here by dkf · · Score: 1

      That would be the last place to start, as it would cost a fortune to replace all of the highway signs. Not only that, but also all of the mile markers, for which most states have every 1/10 of a mile.

      Putting a mile marker every 0.1 miles seems like a waste of money to me. Every half mile would be enough, and would quite a bit less. No, if you were going to start changing, the first thing to do would make the informative signs giving distances to major destinations (large cities, international borders) along interstates also give the distance in km, while not saying anything about changing the more local signs giving distance to the next exit and other basic info like that.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    385. Re:Start here by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound like a problem, as much as a natural place to start.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    386. Re:Start here by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      So now is the best time to invent immortality in the USA so in say oh 100 years we can convert everything back?

    387. Re:Start here by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you don't go out side and think that it feels like it's 19 C, or 85 F

      Well, yes, I do. I go outside and shiver, and say "Feels like it's 50" and go back in and get a jacket. I go outside and sweat and say, "Feels like it's 90". I don't do it in Celsius because I don't have any feeling for those numbers; I have to convert into Fahrenheit to understand how hot or cold it is.

    388. Re: Start here by iinlane · · Score: 1

      A sprinter runs 100m in 10s. How does the average speed of the sprinter compare to a car speed?

      There are 3600s in an hour, the sprinter runs at 36kp/h.

      Before the metric system there were many, many versions of mile and other measurement units. In northen europe we had russian mile, british mile, swedish mile, danish mile, finnish mile, grman mile, nautical mile with distance ranging from 1.5 to 11km. Without metric system the trade with the rest of the world would be really difficult.

    389. Re:Start here by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Except it is written 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, etc. so we called that two-tenths when I went through mechanical design. Had it been written 1 1/5, 1 2/5, etc. then I would have written fifths.

    390. Re: Start here by iinlane · · Score: 1

      A sprinter runs 100m in 10s. How does the average speed of the sprinter compare to a car speed?

      There are 3600s in an hour, the sprinter runs at 36kp/h.

      Before the metric system there were many, many versions of mile and other measurement units. In northen europe we had russian mile, british mile, swedish mile, danish mile, finnish mile, german mile, nautical mile with distance ranging from 1.5 to 11km. Without metric system the trade with the rest of the world would be really difficult.

    391. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16.2% of a yard is 0.162 yards ... Am I missing something?

    392. Re:Start here by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if you have a recipe that calls for 160 grams of butter and you want to cut it by 1/4, then it's easy to use 40 grams. I don't understand the difference either. :)

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    393. Re:Start here by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Ok, how about 1/8th or 1/16th? English Units are designed to be divided by fractions. Metric units are designed to be divided by 10ths, but rarely does one adjust a recipe up or down by 10ths, generally one thinks of adjusting it by some fraction (1/4.1/3, 1/2, etc).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    394. Re:Start here by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      I had a 2010 Pontiac G6 with only MPH ticks on the speedometer. It was a pain in the ass in Canada...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    395. Re:Start here by pipatron · · Score: 1

      This is something that a lot of newspapers do, and it's so extremely silly every time you see it.

      "He walked three thousand miles (4828 km)"

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    396. Re:Start here by pipatron · · Score: 1

      So do your weight loss in grams. Lose thousands of grams in a month!

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    397. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't wait a generation.... the conversion started in Canada, in earnest, in about 1971, and was completed over the course of about 10 years.

      Oddly enough, about 5 years after the decade-long process of Canada's conversion to Metric was completed, our then-prime minister ended up abolishing the regulations that really enabled the conversion to happen in the first place. Switching back, since it was not actually legislated any more, was simply too inconvenient, and Canada remained on the metric system ever since.

      who freaking cares what canada did?

    398. Re:Start here by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      So you're saying we should teach this in schools at an early age, like me when the US was "converting' to metric, and we were taught very little about Imperial measurements? I'm 46 and all that did was cause me confusion as everyone was using the old style, that I was barely taught.

    399. Re:Start here by dcpking · · Score: 1

      ""55 MPH" seems fine to me" Please don't encourage the bureaucrats! Living in the USA with a 55 mph limit was excruciating. I moved here from Germany, and had difficulty not falling asleep from boredom on long drives. A journey I would expect to take maybe 2.5 hours took almost 5. Arrrrgh!

    400. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to try again? 100 kph is closer to 60 mph.

      Ahhhh... That's the point. Obviously went over your head. People will choose the higher limit, if that limit is in kph... oh, why am I spelling this out for you? It should be fucking obvious.

    401. Re:Start here by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Poor wording on my part. I was talking about the type of digital dashboard where the speedometer is an electronically "painted" analog style display. Switching from km/h to mph changes the numbers around the dial.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    402. Re:Start here by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, soils typically have a specific gravity of like 2.5... So that's your scale factor. But you see why civil engineers typically use english units. They units are based on tangible quantities, not some scientific ease of math basis. When we need easy math, we use kilopounds and decimal feet. The fact that metric units are based on a scientific standard is irrelevant. As long as there is a standard and it's consistently used, there isn't a problem. As far as people complaining about units like 12, 8, and 4 instead of 10 is ridiculous. Plenty of times you end up working with fractions instead of decimals, and that's why english systems use the even units so they can be split into fractions. Math might be easier for decimal, but most of the people doing construction work AREN'T GOOD AT MATH, but they understand half, third, quarter, etc. That's why construction typically uses english units.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    403. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reagan said it was a waste of money, so the government spent a lot of money to take the signs down again.

      Wasteful government spending is so offensive, such a travesty, that no expense should be spared to undo it. If it costs twice as much to eliminate the output of overspending, well, by damn, that's the cost to cutting costs. But don't expect my taxes to pay for it.

      (Too blatant?)

    404. Re:Start here by mark-t · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not misinformed. Mulroney abolished the Metric Commission in Canada in spring of 1985. Stores might advertise in lbs because it sounds cheaper, but they are only allowed to do this at all because the laws that enabled the metric system to be adopted in the first place were repealed when the metric commission was abolished. Had those laws not been abolished, stores would not have had a choice in the matter, and would have had to use metric for all advertising.

    405. Re:Start here by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      It makes perfect sense... 100 is fucking hot, 0 is fucking cold. 50 is comfortable in a sweatshirt, 60 in a long sleeved shirt, 70 in a t-shirt, and 80 in a swim suit. Basically the Fahrenheit system is based on normalized temperatures that exist on earth, not some physical property of a common chemical.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    406. Re:Start here by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Why is the metric system not natural? It makes for nice even numbers on road signs, instead of the common 35mph and 55mph, you have 50km/hr and 100km/hr.

      Considering that 35/55 mph aren't especially close to 50/100 km/hr (35 mph ~ 56 km/h, 55 mph ~ 88 km/h), this piece of "logic" is as specious as any I've seen in this duscussion.

      You have a different definition of "close" than me - to me, 13% seems awfully close when dealing with something as imprecise as a speed limit. People certainly drive more than 10% +/- away from the speed limit. If speed limits were somehow scientifically or statistically proven to be accurate to within 10%, then every stretch of road would have a new speed limit every time there's a curve or cross street, and speed limits would often be more exact numbers like 33mph, 37mph, etc.

    407. Re:Start here by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 1

      As you were, No it wasn't. he didn't.

      --
      I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    408. Re:Start here by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Who uses maps?

    409. Re:Start here by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're joking or not. 10 (base 12) == 12 (base 10). 12 (base 10) is divisible by 2 and 3 regardless of what base you use to represent it. FWIW if I were going to change our numeric base, 16 seems like a better choice for the aforementioned digital aspects. Plus there's already widespread use of hex in the computer industry, just as there was widespread use of metric in science before it started spreading to the general public. On sale now! For the low, low, price of just $1FF.FF. LOL, pennies would be worth even less... BTW... I am joking. I have no desire to convert everyday numbers to hex.

      Cycling back to the article, the White House response is spot on. If the person behind the counter at In-n-out can take my order in English, and then take the next order in fluent Spanish (I've seen this happen) then there's no reason why we can't have a mix of measures.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    410. Re:Start here by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 1

      Why are Federal highway signs a good place to start? Because sign makers will make twice as much?

      People are always screaming about getting the government out of their bedrooms and personal lives . They then turn around and tell the government, "we can't do a damned thing without Uncle Sam helping us out." If you need/want to use metric in your business, then do it. Probably the first thing this administration has said that I actually agree with. Stay tuned for the scandal.

      --
      I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    411. Re:Start here by hawguy · · Score: 1

      My reaction to your wife complaining about not integrating easily into "American" life. She chose to come here so suck it up. I haven't heard of any other countries accommodating my desire to not have to learn their system when I travel. Would they be anymore likely to accommodate me if I moved there?

      What are you talking about? I should forbid her from complaining about it being hard to remember all of the units and the relationships between them?

      She's not asking the supermarket to sell milk in liters instead of quarts, but she might ask me how many cups are in a pint (which I can never remember so I have to look it up), or when she sees something in a catalog, she might ask me how big 16" is. I guess I fail as a husband by answering her question instead of telling her to suck it up and look it up herself if it's so damn important to her.

      Why is it that "the world" seems to complain about Americans always expecting things to be American everywhere else but they fail to see themselves complaining that in America everything isn't like the rest of the world?

      Why is it that America claims to be all about freedom of speech, but if someone from outside of the country dares to complain about some aspect of American society/culture, then that person is told to suck it up and to stop trying to change things because America is just fine the way it is and never needs to change because we're "different" and we like it that way?

      As for dividing into five parts instead of four? Why? Just use four and serve slightly larger portions.

      That was her point - instead of dividing by four, why not just divide by 5? So the metric system isn't really any worse for dividing portions.

    412. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only to stupid people such as yourself. The acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the search isn't a constant.

    413. Re:Start here by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 1

      Great, now were going to have people pulling out their calculators to determine how fast they are going.

      --
      I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    414. Re: Start here by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Where is there an 85? Sweet.

    415. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hockey Rink: 200x85 feet
      All markings on the ice are measured in feet.
      Hockey Goal: 6x4 feet

    416. Re:Start here by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      within an inch of accuracy

      Not good enough. We want it within a millimeter!

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    417. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Fahrenheit is more fine grained than that.

      60 need wing breaker long pants
      65 wind breaker shorts
      70 shorts no jacket.

      Hell when cycling

      70 just standard shorts and jersey
      60 arm warmers
      50 leg warmers, vest, full finger gloves
      40 leggings, base layer, heavy gloves, heavy socks, Balaclava
      30 gortex layers, booties

    418. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mars orbiter wasn't a problem with units. It was a problem with unlabeled units.

    419. Re: Start here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What scenario in everyday life requires you to distinguish temperatures with higher precision than 1 degree Celsius?

      About the only one I can think of is measuring body temperature, but degree Fahrenheit is not small enough for accurate measurements there, either.

    420. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be a rhetorical question... look at how the comment to which you replied was modded.

    421. Re:Start here by thoth · · Score: 1

      The precise length of a meter is arbitrary

      Actually, the length of the meter was chosen to be 1/10 millionth of the length from the equator to the north pole on the Prime Meridian. In other words, it is 10,000 km. That distance was then described in wavelengths of cesium or whatever, since that's easier to measure in a lab.

    422. Re:Start here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Individual sizes USUALLY come in bottles measured in ounces (12oz cans, 20oz plastic bottles, or 8oz glass bottles), though I have seen some "half liter" bottles sold lately.

      Red Bull also bucks the trend by selling 8.4 oz cans (250 ml). But then they also sell 12 oz and 16 oz cans. Go figure...

    423. Re:Start here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I am NOT going to have 0.000236588 cubic meters of coffee or sugar; I'm going to have a cup.

      Sugar is normally measured by weight, not by volume (at least where we use metric). But if you insist on volume, then you can use cubic centimeters (also known as milliliters). One cup would be 230 ml. And in practice you'd probably just go with 250 ml, or 1/4 liter, and call it done.

      I'm going to go walk for a block or so, not 80 meters.

      This depends on where you walk. In a city, certainly, no-one measures walking distances in precise units. Out in the boonies, it is not uncommon to tell someone to "walk 300 m down that forest path, then you'll see a tree on the left" etc.

      I am NOT going to use those same mm and cm (or dm or m) measurements when I decide to re-frame the living room wall in house.

      If your wall is already defined in Imperial measurements, then it would be a waste of time. But there's nothing making cm/dm/m less convenient than in/ft, generally speaking.

      For the most part, neither system is really "making more sense" in any situation; it's all about what you're used to. Metric is generally more convenient whenever you have to deal with unit conversions, or when your scale changes a long (and you can then use prefixes).

    424. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like it would work about as well as the response I used in high school.

      "Son, do you know how fast you were going?"

      "No, sir! This speedometer only goes up to 85."

    425. Re:Start here by metrometro · · Score: 1

      2012-02-12 is the ISO, because it works OK in all regions, save a few Buddhist calendar countries.

    426. Re: Start here by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A sprinter runs 100m in 10s. How does the average speed of the sprinter compare to a car speed?

      Okay, you made a word problem, but you're lacking a real life use case. When would it be useful to compare a human sprinting to a car? When are you ever going to say, "okay I can either sprint to the end of the block in 10s, or I can drive, how long will it take to drive?"

    427. Re:Start here by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Your speedometers will have to show both miles/hr and km/hr for at least 5 years, as people get used to the changeover. Suddenly, gasoline will be in litres with roughly 3.8 litres to a USA gallon. But there will be immense savings in construction, in international trade, because the rest of the world is using metric measure, and you will be able to USA products worldwide. Aircraft parts are all metric, as are probably trains, subway cars, etc. Tools for manufacturing purchased abroad or sent abroad will be metric.

      It would be a standardized measure. TV weather reports could for a few years, post both measures. And produce that is in pounds would be sold in 1/3 kilos (about the same weight as a pound)

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    428. Re:Start here by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      A better place to start would be to explain why I should put up with a switch to a bunch of mostly unfamiliar measures of distance, volume, and temperature?

      Youre doing it for your children. Its too late for you. You have been convinced that a less convenient system is better and simpler for everyone... simply because you were forced to learn it and it is all you know. But it is much easier for children to learn metric systems of measure over Imperial. I know this because I was in the last class in Canada to be taught both. It was clear to me and all my classmates which was better (as in... easier to learn and use).

      You are doing it for your country. Why force your repair shops to have twice the tools and parts in order to service domestic and international products? Why force your children to learn metric anyways if they want to work internationally. Why make your building and product blueprints twice in order to sell internationally? Imperial units force your country into a weaker positioning for international sales. And it forces other countries to support your unique system of measure.

      Why? ...so you can "feel" more comfortable with your limited understand of it?

      Because honestly, the "big problem" for imperial measures (lots of weird measures with odd conversions) really has never been a problem for me. It doesn't matter what a rod or a hogshead is (or a bushel, or a dram, or how many teaspoons in a gallon, or inches in a mile) because I pretty much never need to know (and if I do need to know, I can just google it).

      Its not like this is going to change your life. In your lifetime, you will always have the option to see Imperial units. You simply set your thermostat or scales to show Imperial and when your in your car, there is a perminanent conversion chart in front of you on your spedometer. Continue to use feet and inches for your height... everyone in your lifetime will know exactly what you mean.

      Stopping thinking this is all about you and start considering what is good for your people and your country for the future.

      You do realize that metric uses decimal and that your money is decimal? Would you prefer to have kept traditional systems for money like: the pound was made up of 240 pence, with 12 pence in a shilling and 20 shillings in a pound [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_Day]. Because that is the sort of rediculousness you are defending.

    429. Re: Start here by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Texas, and at some point soon, Nevada. Also apparently there's 80 in at least Utah.

    430. Re:Start here by evultrole · · Score: 1

      increase your graphics settings?

    431. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's unlikely we use decimal because we have 10 fingers. Why? Because base-10 number systems are no more common than any other numbering system across cultures.

    432. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is that 12th Feb 2009, or 9th Feb 2012?

      Maybe it's 12th Feb 1909 the centennial of Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin's birth, or 9th Feb 1912 when Japan began shipping 6,040 cherry blossom seedlings to America? Both of those dates are also Fridays.

    433. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard speeds one sees on signs in metric countries are 30, 50, 60, 80, 100 and 120 kph, which for all intents and purposes are equivalent to 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 mph. In either system, one ends up rounding to a sensible multiple of ten. If you don't round your numbers but insist on an exact 1:1 conversion, you're not using the metric system but a "look mom, we're metric!" adaption of the metric system. Converting from one unit to another isn't the same as switching.

    434. Re:Start here by smellotron · · Score: 1

      All my cookbooks say that there's three teaspoons in a tablespoon.

      Yep, just checked the google for converting 1tsp and 1tbsp each to mL. Well... shit.

    435. Re:Start here by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      55 MPH
      88.5139 KPH

    436. Re:Start here by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      Easy 8 is 4 by 2 and 16 is 4 by 4.

      So to get 1/8 just take the value and half it 3 times and to get 1/16 half it 4 times.

      Its not hard.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    437. Re: Start here by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not I can feel within a 2 degree Fahrenheit (perhaps 1.5) temperature difference given a constant humidity according to my air conditioner thermostat.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    438. Re:Start here by Gen_Music · · Score: 1

      Because it's impossible. I was mentored by someone on the project and getting us into decimalized time without destroying day/night cycles is impossible without some very complex today = 1231543425242.12412456413241342 second style problems.

    439. Re: Start here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I can believe that. But 2 degree Fahrenheit is 1.1 degree Celsius, so what you're basically saying is that degree Celsius is pretty close to a unit of temperature that you can distinguish :)

    440. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to use YYYYMMDD_HHMM (sometimes with seconds, "SS") when copying files/directories to create a backup of my work. Then I know that the work I was doing on 5/13/2013 at 7:12 pm is in directory with the added time stamp in the name of 20130513_1912. This sorts nicely when sorting directories by name.

      As long as we are on the subject, what the heck is the meaning behind Star Trek stardates?

    441. Re: Start here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I knew I should have specified in inches. LOL Nice.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    442. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I have less faith in my fellow Americans, I'm not sure they could handle 89.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    443. Re:Start here by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      A good place to start would be on all of the federal highway signs.

      To what end? So foreign visitors are less confused when driving on or roads? Or to drive up small town ticket revenue until people become acclimated to kph? Both are great ideas... /rolls eyees

      Converting the official measurement system simply for the sake of converting, to be like everyone else, is not a valid case for conversion, especially in the country with the world's largest economy. There has never been a piece of framing lumber, iron, or plumbing pipe sold in the US labeled with metric dimensions. The total cost in actual dollars, education, retraining, wasted material, etc, to convert these industries alone would likely equal the GDP of all but the top 20 coutries in the world. The amount of lumber wasted, thus more trees cut down, during this conversion period would surely put Greenpeace squarely against such a thing. Note: construction workers and plumbers are your high school classmates who got Ds in basic math. The first house constructed after such a conversion to SI will have to be rebuilt at least 3 times before it's done right, if then. Would you want to buy this house? Would you want to buy any house built during this transition phase? How about occupy the 100th floor of a high rise built during this transition? Commute over a bridge build during this transition? Recall the Minneapolis collapse? And those engineering mistakes were made using the well known and understood English system.

      The US industries currently using SI do so because it makes sense and increases the bottom line: aerospace, automobiles, electronics, etc. These industries have significant exchange of engineering documents/data/people with overseas partners and contractors who only use SI. The building materials industry in the US has no such relationships so there is no advantage to doing this, only needless cost. There are other industries who would have zeo advantage here.

      This is why the White House has taken the position it has. One of the great things about America is choice. Keep an eye on what happens with Obamacare, the single largest forced conversion of an industry in US history. Then think about those problems in relation to such a mandated conversion to SI.

    444. Re:Start here by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      This. I think most folks have the wrong idea about how a society actually changes. The people themselves don't change. Once someone is about in their mid-20s or 30s, their habits and preferences become ingrained and are highly unlikely to ever change for the rest of their lives. You're not going to be able to convince them to use metric, so don't even bother trying. Instead, you take advantage of the fact that people grow old and die, and are constantly replaced by younger people.

      You introduce a new system in a way that it doesn't upset the older generation while giving the younger generation a chance to get used to it. Then you wait for the older generation to die off. Then you abandon the old system. So introduce signage in both metric and English. Wait a generation or two until the bulk of the population is used to both systems. Then you phase out the English system.

      Election cycles are 2/4/ 6 years. Not...gonna...work.

    445. Re:Start here by arth1 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like it would work about as well as the response I used in high school.

      "Son, do you know how fast you were going?"

      "No, sir! This speedometer only goes up to 85."

      "Ok, Mr. Heisenberg, do you know how fast you were going?"
      "No, but I can tell you where I was."

    446. Re: Start here by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps 1.5 though (my air conditioner thermostat is digital). But as an aesthetic consideration wouldn't you like to know to within a degree with the greatest precession. :)

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    447. Re: Start here by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Only in a vacuum.

      Wrong.

      It's actually a problem that c is known as "the speed of light in vacuum". It leads to wrong assumptions like yours. It's the absolute speed limit for anything. While light moves slower in non-vacuum, gravity, for example, isn't limited this way, and moves at c no matter (no pun intended) whether there's vacuum or not.
      I prefer to think of c as the causality speed limit.

    448. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      A guy commented just above that his '01 Ford (which isn't exactly new, but not exactly ancient either; lots of people drive 10-15 year old cars these days) has a speedometer with only MPH markings on it.

    449. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Canada remained on the metric system ever since.

      I can verify that it's true. On a recent visit to "our hoser's native land" (as their anthem dubs it), I asked a fellow "How's it hanging?", to which he replied "aboot 15.24 centimeters" instead of the expected "about 6 inches." Needless to say, I felt very far from home at that point.

    450. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ever since I was in the Army, I've always written my dates as 12-FEB-09

      My wife was in the Air Force, and she always writes dates as 12FEB2009 (no hyphens, 4-digit year). I adopted the convention because it does make a lot of sense. If you write date-first, you're going to have lots of Americans who interpret it wrong. If you write month-first, you'll have all the non-Americans interpreting it wrong. You can also do year-first (year/month/date), but you'll definitely have to write all 4 digits of the year or someone will get confused thinking you're talking about the 13th, instead of 2013; but that is one way to avoid the problem without having to use 3-letter month abbreviations. Of course, some people probably don't like the 12FEB2009 notation because it uses English month names/abbrevations.

    451. Re: Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Temperatures took the longest to get intuitively as I had to live through the various weather patterns before I could feel it. But, even then there wasn't really any advantage to it as I was still comparing it to what I consider a comfortable temperature.

      Personally, I think there's a small disadvantage to using Celsius rather than Fahrenheit: you get a smaller range of usable whole numbers. The temperatures we humans are likely to experience walking around on this planet range from about -50F to 135F; in America, it's probably more like -40 to 120F. And in temperate cllimates (most of the US, but not all), you're not likely to see many days that fall outside of the 0F-100F range. If you convert those to Celcius, they'll be about -45C to 57C, -40C to 49C, and -18C to 38C. 1 degree Fahrenheit is just enough of a difference I think for people to notice the difference, and when I'm setting my thermostat at home, it's enough for me to want that level of granularity. I wouldn't be happy with a thermostat that only let me choose between 68, 70, 72, 74, etc. Wtih Celcius, you get less granularity unless you resort to fractions or decimal places.

      And for what? What does it gain you? Nothing that I can see. If I'm doing scientific calculations, I'm going to be using Kelvins anyway, not Celcius, and converting between any of the systems is trivial if I have a calculator.

    452. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I remember being told a story (I don't know if it's true, as I was much too young at the time to remember) that back in the 70s, they tried to switch to selling gasoline in the US in Liters instead of gallons. However, instead of converting honestly, many gas station owners jacked up the price, thinking people wouldn't notice. Of course, they did, and metricification became reviled. Again, I don't know if there's any truth to this story.

    453. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, a roadway where the speed limit is 55mph WILL be surveyed its full distance to within an inch of accuracy for elevation, the roadway bedding, incline, and curve - there's a lot of math that goes into it, and it's all thoroughly planned out.

      Really? You make it seem like highway departments actually do things competently and in the interest of safety and accuracy. I find that hard to believe, since there are also guidelines and laws that yellow lights must be a certain duration (3.0s in most places I believe), yet many municipalities have been intentionally reducing these durations at intersections that have for-profit red-light cameras at them. Since this country and the governments at all levels are so thoroughly corrupt these days, I have a hard time believing that roadways are actually surveyed that accurately and bedding and all that done correctly, rather than contractors cutting corners to save money and then paying off inspectors to look the other way.

    454. Re: Start here by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Millikelvins FTW!

    455. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      All our product packages these days do have both systems marked on them ("1lb/454g") here in the US. I'm pretty sure it's required by law.

      How do Americans react? They don't care. Most of them look at the Imperial version and ignore the metric one.

    456. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There is no defined relationship betwen a gallon and a foot the way there is between a meter and a liter.

      Pro-metric arguments seem to frequently come to this: unit conversion. The problem is, who cares? Why should I care that it isn't easy to convert between a gallon and a foot? When was the last time you actually did that anyway? Yes, it's really handy in science class to convert between meters and liters (e.g., 1 cubic cm = 1 mL), and in engineering practice this may be useful too (which is why much engineering work is done in SI units these days). But why should Joe Sixpack give a rat's ass about this? He's not a scientist or engineer, and never, ever does unit conversion.

      The people who care about these things are already using metric units for their work. Everyone else doesn't care about these things; they just want to use units that are customary and convenient, and no one has demonstrated how metric units are any more convenient for everyday use than Imperial ones.

    457. Re:Start here by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      That goes both ways. I've lost count of the number of times that liberals talk about how things are far worse today in all sorts of areas.

      For example, they frequently state that the poor are poorer than ever. It's a big load of shit though. Here's a list of things that used to be something only the rich owned, which now even the poorest of the poor own:

      - Automobiles
      - DVD players
      - more than one TV
      - A personal computer
      - A mobile phone

      Food is cheaper than ever and more easily available. I pay less for a 50mbit internet connection than I paid for a dialup internet account plus dedicated phone line in the late 90's. However try finding a slashdot article without a comment somewhere that says today we live in a feudal society.

      Other things I can think of are that liberals often state how there is too much war today, even though less than 100 years ago it was still very common for economic expansion to come via means of conquest, which is almost unheard of today.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    458. Re:Start here by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      That really doesn't make any sense at all, and it doesn't seem that you are basing this off of anything at all other than your own biases that the GP has. Conservatives are called that just for the mere fact that it is a label they refer to themselves as. In other countries, conservative means the same thing that liberal means in the US. Exact same thing.

      Liberals, in the US sense, want to ban ownership of firearms and restrict free speech rights in the form of banning paid campaign speech, as well as many other issues that remove freedoms. So how does the term "liberal" apply to them, exactly? From my perspective, the only thing they are pro freedom on is gay rights, other than that they believe the state should be given greater control of our lives. There's nothing "liberal" about that. In fact, in a sense that would be "conservative", because the old ways before modern democracy spread across the west, this is how governments behaved.

      If US conservatives wanted to stick with the old ways just for the sake of doing so, then I think they would have been opposed to lowering taxes in the 80's.

      And finally, the last nail in the coffin of your argument is this: The white house response, written by a liberal, says they won't actively change the present state from being as it already is.

      Other than for being labels that people simply want to apply to themselves, the distinction between liberal and conservative is rather meaningless.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    459. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, this became a legal requirement in the UK 20+(?) years ago when we joined the EU and we have just about assimilated metric measures of volume and weight when it comes to consumables.

      With the notable exception of beer. There are limits.

    460. Re:Start here by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      My old '97 Chevy had both gauges on its speedometer. Maybe that just says something about Ford more than anything...

    461. Re: Start here by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Leaving the signs alone would have been cheaper still. And there were MANY such signs, not just a few. Replace the signs when they need replacing, not before. Then replace them with decent metric signs so that the rest of the world can stop laughing at us for being ignorant savages.

    462. Re:Start here by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      That goes both ways. The French by and large deeply resent the fact that the internet originated in the US, and many of their politicians fought tooth and nail to keep minitel alive. Chirac even spent millions of euros of taxpayer money to try to create a French version of Google (it was called Quaero, and it failed miserably.)

      Numerous governments around the world have laws in place that require content distribution sources must provide a minimum quota of domestically created content. Ones I can think of right off of the top of my head include Canada, France, Australia, and England. The idea behind these laws is that they want to restrict American cultural influence on their populace. It doesn't matter what the end users demand or what sells best. There really is no logical reason to want to do this other than some politicians simply don't like America just for the sake of not liking America. Common arguments I've heard from people in these countries is that this particular person hates American content, which is why these rules need to be there. Even though market research shows that pretty much everybody else doesn't feel the same way.

      No matter how you look at it, it is pure xenophobia. In the US, laws like this simply don't exist. For example, there are a ton of broadcasters in the US that only broadcast content produced in Mexico. In fact in Arizona, more than half of the local TV stations do this. If you want more American content, you have to subscribe to cable.

      The above also applies to politics in general. People in Canada for example are known to support policy changes just because of the fact that they are contrary to what is done in the US. In Europe it happens too, though I haven't done any research to analyze to what extent.

      However as far as the metric system goes, I don't think that is seen as foreign pressure. One thing you can notice, is that in Europe, all of the countries that are doing well have fiscal policies that the party you mention want. In Germany, Iceland, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden for example, there are no defined wage floors.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    463. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point regarding Fahrenheit being a good scale for human reference actually seems valid.

      Really, I think of it as a scale from zero to one hundred (which, of course, isn't anywhere near accurate but does cover most of the annual temperature range, at least where I live).

      Zero degrees is cold as shit.
      One hundred degrees is hot as balls.

      Intuit that which lies between.

    464. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't wait a generation.... the conversion started in Canada, in earnest, in about 1971, and was completed over the course of about 10 years.

      well, to be fair, a generation is considered to be a span of 10 years.

    465. Re: Start here by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like as good a reason as any to abandon the metric system- the increase in complexity will create jobs in a world where labor is in surplus.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    466. Re:Start here by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Unlikely unless you have the luxury of not adjusting your sleep schedule due to DST. Keep getting up an hour early and you're likely to be hungry an hour earlier as well.

    467. Re: Start here by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      1kg is the weight of 1 litre of water.
      All those formulas work out correctly as well, like E=mc2. Wouldn;t work so well if mass wasn't measured in kg and c wasn't the speed of light in metres per second.
      All the SI units are all related - that's logical. If you tried that with imperial units, you'd have a bunch of arbitrary constants in all the various formulas.

    468. Re:Start here by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the length of the meter was chosen to be 1/10 millionth of the length from the equator to the north pole on the Prime Meridian.

      And you have to admit that is a pretty arbitrary choice.

    469. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK power sockets are designed for safety.

    470. Re:Start here by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, who cares?

      You've already laid out that metric makes sense in science and engineering. So we are keeping that.

      And if you just use metric units in day to day life they are as easy to use as English units. The rest of the world does it.

      What is the point of hanging onto English units as well?

      But why should Joe Sixpack give a rat's ass about this? He's not a scientist or engineer, and never, ever does unit conversion.

      Precisely. Joe Sixpack doesn't care. So why do we need to preserve the english system for him. He DOESNT care. Raise his kids on metric, and a generation or so from now, the new Joe Sixpacks will use metric without breaking a sweat.

    471. Re: Start here by eyedentities · · Score: 1

      In metric countries they still speak of mile per gallon, and there a lot of soft conversion. One inch pipe is the same size, but they call it 25 mm.

    472. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy the signs from South Africa. Hardly anyone follows them anyway

    473. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, really it's what YOU are used to.

      Like the other responder, I'm located in Australia and the use of metric is second nature. I have no trouble using metric units to observe and convey my surroundings, and neither do any of the people around me. I'm perfectly comfortable being 178cm tall,and living in a place where the temperature is currently 11 degrees Celsius outside. Converting them to 5'11" or 52 degrees F means nothing to me.

    474. Re:Start here by Sun · · Score: 1

      But you see why civil engineers typically use english units. They units are based on tangible quantities, not some scientific ease of math basis. When we need easy math, we use kilopounds and decimal feet.

      Actually, I don't see that at all. In fact, this sentence, to me, seemed completely unrelated to anything else discussed here. I suspect you just grew up with these units, got used to them, and therefor, now, think they are somehow better.

      Shachar

    475. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia went (40 years or so ago) from 60 mph to 110 km/h for most of the country roads, and from 30 mph to 60 km/h for most of the built up area roads.
      That's a speed increase of 9 mph for country and somewhat less for towns.
      Recently many town roads have been reduced to a mere 50 km/h, which is still faster than 30 mph.
      So yes, Miamicanes makes a good point.
      As for converting miles to kilometres, the government supplied stickers showing the conversions from 0-110 km/h so people could stick them on their dashboards, but since you only really needed to know how fast in mph was 60, 80, and 100 km/h it was easily memorised. And all cars for the last 30 or more years have speedos showing only kilometres per hour.
      The biggest change has been from fuel efficiency measurement, from miles per gallon (where higher is better) to litres per 100 kilometres (where lower is better).
      And on a recent 4000km cross country trip in my 2000 Olympic Edition Holden Astra I averaged 5.84L/100km, pretty good!

    476. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Highway signs don't last forever, you update them when you replace them, at no extra cost.
      I admit to being surprised that apparently you have mileage markets every 160 metres, though, can you explain why this is so?

    477. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20C is a nice summers day?
      Umm, it's Autumn here and it's 24C! 20C is a nice (and common) WINTER day!
      Summer is 40C and more...
      And if hits 0C, it's front page news!
      Welcome to Perth, Western Australia, mate! :)

      Hmm, the preview removed all my degree symbols, how ... curious.

    478. Re: Start here by yenic · · Score: 1
      I'm a US citizen, and I would recommend you simply do not program in the English system. Leave it out. I use metric in my day to day life, as I did what the White House suggested years ago- simply stopped using it.

      I'm not sure if we'll ever get some regulations pass to move to metric, but I certainly gave up on being a good American a long time ago.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
    479. Re:Start here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A lot of older people use metric. My mum is in her 70s and uses Celsius and metres. Anyone in the building trade, any engineers, any cooks or chefs, anybody that has to deal with measurements as part of their work is metric or unemployed.

      Anyone up to the age of about 35 was only taught metric at school, and everyone before that was taught both systems at some point. There are a few vocal idiots who claim otherwise but the reality is we could switch tomorrow easily if the political will was there.

      Makes you wonder who won WWII.

      Ah, I see you are one of those idiots.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    480. Re:Start here by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      A lot of older people are perfectly capable of using metric. Centigrade (we call it) seems much more logical, but kitchen units measured in millimetres are plain silly. The aliens of Brussels force motor advertisers to quote 'litres per 100 km' - most Brits have no intuition for what that means. The reason there is no 'political will' is that there would be a political backlash here. Seems the White House have judged their 'freedom fries' about right.

    481. Re:Start here by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

      (And I don't think I could have give more clues...)

      --
      No sig today...
    482. Re:Start here by bsidneysmith · · Score: 1

      As a mathematician and educator I was an early advocate of the metric system, and shared your complaint about cups and quarts, pints, teaspoons, etc. Then, in middle age, I started cooking and building things, and I discovered something remarkable. The old US version of the older Imperial system of measurements embodies some remarkable wisdom. The volumetric measures are actually binary; two tablespoons in an ounce, 8 ounces in a cup, double that for a pint, again for a quart, and twice more for a gallon. The length measures allow for easy divisibility (12 is an abundant number, unlike 10) making it possible to easily design and build almost anything on a human scale without resorting to decimal approximations. I now think very differently: the old system isn't old-fashioned and dumb, it is old-fashioned and full of subtle sophistication. I think people are right to resist having it taken away from them. An educated populace should have no trouble learning it and the SI system, and using whichever is most appropriate for the task at hand.

    483. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What is the point of hanging onto English units as well?

      Because the transition costs are enormous, and the taxpayers don't want to pay for it.

      Precisely. Joe Sixpack doesn't care. So why do we need to preserve the english system for him. He DOESNT care.

      He DOES care. He doesn't want to change, plus, he's a taxpayer and will bitch to his Representatives if this change is pushed on him. The change has zero benefit for him, so why should he be forced into it or be forced to pay for it, just because it's easier for scientists, many of whom also don't care because they don't have trouble converting when necessary as you seem to?

    484. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't usually see Celsius measured in decimals

      Here in Italy Celsius are pretty much always measured with one decimal point.

    485. Re:Start here by mattr · · Score: 1

      Personally I find it curious the army would encourage a y2k error, plus if you read it backwards you can confuse day and year.
      I use 2013-0527 which is like the Japanese way with only one hyphen, especially on filenames, folders, in todo lists and memo, etc.
      This has proven the easiest and least ambiguous format for me and I've naturally sustained it for years now.
      Compare that to people who use something like 130527-xxx for all filenames which is nervewracking. Just type two more digits and a hyphen to make it human readable, and be done with it already! (my two cents).
      Drawbacks:
      Not a default in LibreOffice. Not sure about excel.
      Mac OS X doesn't pick it up as am iCal date automatically (how would one add a format?)
      No standard way to include day of week. So in a mini calendar (a text schedule of the coming week) I may write MON May 27, etc.

    486. Re: Start here by volmtech · · Score: 1

      I just turned 61 and when I am doing some wood work I find using the metric side of my tape measure is easier. Instead of trying to write down or remember feet-inches-sixteeths it's just centimeters- millimeters. Plus a millimeter is 50% more precise than a 16th of an inch. I feel so ashamed.

    487. Re:Start here by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

      That bridge collapsed because an overheight truck took out the structural supports. It was structurally sound before that..

    488. Re:Start here by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

      We use metric where it is convenient and don't use it where it isn't. Why should this come as any great surprise? Nobody is against using metric where its convenient. What people are against is being forced to use one arbitrary system over another.

      Why is base 10 so great? Why do you count to 10 on your fingers like a 4 year old? I was taught when I was young by my parents how to count to 12 using the joints on my fingers and using my thumb to count

      You use Metric because you, or your ancestors, had a gun put to your head and were thrown in jail if you didn't use it. I'd love to see English enforced in Metric countries with the same vigor and see how well that goes over with people.

      Use whatever system works for the situation and leave everyone else alone.

    489. Re:Start here by Sun · · Score: 1

      Assuming your reply was serious, I'll just point out that the question is not what system to use. By all means, do use whatever is most convenient to you. In fact, that is precisely what the article is ridiculing your government for saying. The question is what system should we teach children who have not been indoctrinated to any of the systems.

      And, also, do you happen to have any references to the gun claim, or was this some obscure car analogy I didn't get?

      Shachar

    490. Re:Start here by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a meter?

      16.2 centimeters

      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a yard?

      16.2 centiyards

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    491. Re: Start here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      One inch pipe is the same size, but they call it 25 mm.

      You need a converter.

      At least that's what my brother, a plumber, told me while fitting one without a converter. "Thought it was a bit tight", he said, when I pointed it out.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    492. Re:Start here by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Isn't a generation at least 20 years?

    493. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And seven digit phone numbers, even that means ten overlaid calling areas.

    494. Re:Start here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      but kitchen units measured in millimetres are plain silly.

      Why? Engineers prefer mm. Car dimensions are routinely measured in them, and cars are roughly the same order of magnitude. Now for ships or countries, indeed that would be silly.

      The aliens of Brussels force motor advertisers to quote 'litres per 100 km' - most Brits have no intuition for what that means.

      Now there I agree. It just seems more intuitive to put the thing you get out in the numerator and the thing you put in as the denominator. Benefit over cost or output over input, if you like.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    495. Re:Start here by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      The little orange posts on the side of motorways are not mile markers, but rather kilometer markers - they're placed 1/10th of a km apart. Every size of a new roadway is metric, even the road signs, just that they've got imperial markings on.

    496. Re:Start here by nobodie · · Score: 1

      wHOOSH! 100 kph=62.5mph, if you had the choice you would obviously choose to go stupidly faster. Frankly, I wish they would set a 100kph maximum standard speed for all highways at all times. Cruise control rules!!

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    497. Re:Start here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a yard?

      48.6% of a foot.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    498. Re:Start here by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Temperature's the same whether it's Fahrenheit or Celsius - my parents still use Fahrenheit and I use Celsius - we confuse the hell out of each other every time we talk about the weather, when my mum says "it's 80 out" it makes absolutely no sense to me, and when I say "it's 15 out" it's the same for her. There's no benefit or disadvantages of either measurement system - I prefer Celsius because I'm used to it and my parents prefer Fahrenheit because they're used to it. If I grew up with Fahrenheit, I'd prefer it over Celsius.

    499. Re:Start here by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Speedometers in the UK has been legally required to show both MPH and km/h since the 70s in preparation for our metrication, but it has stuck.

    500. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a millimeter is 50% less precise than a 33nd of an inch.

      FTFY

    501. Re:Start here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't most new cars have electronic speedometers which would probably change at the touch of a button?

      I don't know what percentage of new cars have digital speedometers.

      Since when were "electronic" and "digital" synonyms?

      Maybe you could do some research instead of speculating.

      Maybe you could learn to read?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    502. Re:Start here by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Because the transition costs are enormous, and the taxpayers don't want to pay for it.

      Why are they enormous?

      That's a myth predicated on the assumption that we're going to switch overnight. The transition can take place over multiple generations. Nothing that is out there needs to change tomorrow. Only new things going forward should be dual marked.

      News & weather starts dual reporting units. New laws and regulations are published in metric with English conversions parenthesized.

      New road signs marked with both. Old road signs can stay as they are until they need replacing. If it takes 2-3 generations, so what.

      Once >80% of signs are converted over, switch cars speedometers to metric by default. It won't be this generation, or next, maybe not even the one after that. There's no hurry.

      Set a time line of 30 years to convert all manufacturing to metric tooling. When new production lines are rolled out they'll roll out in metric. Nobody has to retool anything today. They can retool in metric when they retool the line organically.

      He DOES care. He doesn't want to change,

      Right. He cares about not changing, he doesn't care what system he uses. But he doesn't have to change. For this generation, nothing changes except things are gradually dual marked and dual reported. This generations Joe Sixpack doesn't have to change.

      3 generations from now, everyone is comfortable with both, metric is official and in front, and English is starting to fade the background. All the Joe Sixpacks of today are long dead, and even their kids are winding out their retirement years.

      4-5 generations from now, the switch is complete. People still know what the old measurements are, and they know how to convert them when making grandma's traditional thanksgiving stuffing or working on an antique car.

      just because it's easier for scientists, many of whom also don't care because they don't have trouble converting when necessary as you seem to?

      Its a barrier to scientific literacy when non-scientists aren't familiar with the units scientists use.

      Plus pretty much the rest of the world is metric. Eliminating english units isn't just for scientists, it eliminates a needless conversion when bringing anything in or out of the country. Its a pain in the ass to have metric and English tools. To have everything from rulers to wrenches in two formats. Foreign companies manufacturing goods for the US have to comply with US regulations in English units. And Americans exporting to pretty much anywhere have to comply foreign regulations written in metric.

      Its not "just scientists" that are affected. There are plenty of real benefits to being on metric... and the cost and resistance to "change" are easily dealt with by doing it very gradually.

    503. Re:Start here by dwillden · · Score: 1

      If a truck bumps a bridge support and justs drive away, that indicates the structure was NOT structurally sound. Structurally sound indicates it should be able to tolerate a minor accident that doesn't event stop the vehicle involved from continuing on.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    504. Re:Start here by asc99c · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm also only used to mpg, but I'm trying to get into using l/100km.

      The problem is no one has any intuition for comparing MPG values. If you do 10000 miles a year, and switch from a car that does 40mpg to one that does 60mpg, how much will you save? The calculation isn't one you can do in your head easily.

      But a switch from 7.1 l/100km to 4.7 l/100km? I can work out pretty quickly it will save around 400 litres / £550 a year.

    505. Re:Start here by asc99c · · Score: 1

      You were just getting your units mixed up when aiming that joke. Head height is about 2 yards, not 2 metres.

    506. Re:Start here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      News & weather starts dual reporting units.

      Why would they do that? Only old people watch the news and weather on TV these days, and they certainly don't want to hear temperatures in Celsius (and the newscasters don't want to waste precious seconds on unnecessary information). The government has no right to force newscasters to use any particular units either.

      Set a time line of 30 years to convert all manufacturing to metric tooling

      Most manufacturing these days probably already uses metric.

      When new production lines are rolled out they'll roll out in metric.

      They already are, for the most part. You obviously don't work in American manufacturing. Even American cars are all designed in metric units and require metric tools to work on these days.

      Its a barrier to scientific literacy when non-scientists aren't familiar with the units scientists use.

      People whose jobs involve sitting in offices and talking all day, or other non-productive tasks, don't need scientific literacy. The people who do, already are familiar with the units scientists use. Go to a hospital and ask a nurse what units she dispenses medications and fluids in; hint: it's not fluid ounces. Go talk to a mechanic and ask him what tools he uses for working on cars; he only keeps the SAE tools for the older American cars.

      Eliminating english units isn't just for scientists, it eliminates a needless conversion when bringing anything in or out of the country.

      No, it doesn't. Go to the grocery store and look at any bottle or jar or container of anything there. It's already marked in dual units.

      Its a pain in the ass to have metric and English tools.

      You only have to do that if you're working on older American cars. Everyone's already moved to metric for cars.

      Foreign companies manufacturing goods for the US have to comply with US regulations in English units

      Citation needed. Manufacturing and design is all metric now as I said before.

      Again, you people don't seem to understand: scientists and engineers are all already using metric (except for the defense contractors, at least in the mid-90s when I worked at one; they're a little weird, and the US Military probably likes it that other countries can't easily copy or service our equipment). And people working in technical industries are already using metric too. It's only the Joe Sixpacks who don't want to use it, and for most applications, it doesn't matter because there's zero downside to using Imperial/US units for everyday things. Suzy Homemaker does not do unit conversions when she's baking a cake or setting her thermostat. For everything where it matters, we've already converted to metric. And even many of the scientists and engineers and other people prefer US/Imperial units for certain things, like temperature. Fahrenheit is a better scale for humans than Celsius and it makes no sense to change.

    507. Re:Start here by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      In Canada we went metric 20 years ago. The analog speedometers show metric as an outer circle for the needle/hand that shows speed. The inner circumference shows miles.

      In the newer vehicles, this is user programmable, as the guages are electronic displays

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    508. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was taught metric during elementary school. The teachers insisted that we would be switching to the metric system any time now and we needed to be ready. Thirty years later I am still waiting. This was useful during my time in the military and was useful during my science curriculum in college. Still remember the conversions. So in short waiting for it to happen doesnt do any good. You have to bite the bullet and make it happen or it wont.

    509. Re:Start here by jrumney · · Score: 1

      deg C has the same status in metric as litres. The official SA units are Kelvins and cubic metres, but deg C and litres are simple derivations of those.

    510. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good place to start would be on all of the federal highway signs.

      Yes, the government has to take the initial step.

    511. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like Florida. They should have rounded up to 50kph like all the countries that went metric ages ago.

    512. Re:Start here by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      They have a digital display in the center of the dashboard that has controls to show different things such as a speedometer, odometer, tire pressure etc, then on the right sides they have an analog speedometer, gas gauge, etc. So you can always see the speed even if you are doing other things, but you still have the luxury of a digital display for your speed.
      My 2009 Pontiac G8 GT has this, and I have seen it in other cars as well.

    513. Re:Start here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      LOL I shoulda known better. Alright, what's that in inches? No calculator either.

      Wise asses. ;) That's why I love you guys.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    514. Re:Start here by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the calculation is more often needed: "I want to go to something X km away, how much gas do I need?" is more real-world relevant than "I've got Y gallons of gas, how far can I possibly travel?"

    515. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      44km/h? That's retarded, in Europe (and I guess every other place with ISO units) you get either 40km/h or 50 km/h.

    516. Re:Start here by MarysDuby · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are limited places in the US that do this: Metric Road Signs in the US I think this is something that could be voted on at the municipality/state level and could eventually work its way nationally.

      Fuck metrics!!

      --
      MarysDuby Mathews,Va.
    517. Re:Start here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't most new cars have electronic speedometers which would probably change at the touch of a button?

      I don't know what percentage of new cars have digital speedometers.

      Since when were "electronic" and "digital" synonyms?

      When you were talking about electronic speedometers which could be changed at the touch of a button. You can't do that with the original electronic speedometers, which basically feature an op-amp and an air core. They could have added the functionality, but no one did. (Show me a picture of a classic analog electronic speedo which can be switched between mph and km/h, please, or shut the fuck up.)

      Maybe you could learn to read?

      Maybe you could learn not to be a stupid cunt. You don't even know what you're talking about, so just stop. You know fuck-all about cars, don't try to make car analogies, you'll just get them badly wrong as you have done here. Only digital speedos (or emulated analog ones, which are a new thing) can be switched between standards. That's why they're dual-printed. If you want to convert between english and metric speedos (if there's no dual printing) you have to swap the speedometer.

      In short, you are suggesting I learn to read because I was able to follow the conversation the direction you took it, because I know something about cars that you don't. Then you went all fucking stupid. Learn to read? How about you learn to think, and just avoid telling people about things you don't understand, like cars?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    518. Re: Start here by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      It's ridiculous to claim one system is inherently more intuitive than the other. People's intuition is forged by experiences, and even then they can be massively off.

      Eyeballing stuff only takes you so far. When you do real calculations (even simple ones) that the advantage of the metric system is immediately apparent: You don't have convert for different scales and dimensions. Instead of four common units for length, their square's for area, another unrelated unit for area, at least as many for volume, and a curious distinction between dry volume and liquid volume, you just have the meter from which all other "units" are easily derived.

    519. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of what you've said, if not all. :-)

      (finally someone agreeing here in /.)

      But wait, I have to disagree, otherwise it is not a regular /. comment.

      It's interesting to call Metric less arbitrary, because it is more arbitrary in a sense. You've told we count in base 10 because we have 10 fingers in our hands. There is also a "base 12" counting system, which makes use of our phalanges to count. Search for "counting with phalanges", you'll see some nice pictures of how to count up to 24 using your hands. That's why (probably) we have the word "dozen" in english and "dúzia" in portuguese (i'm from brazil), and i'm quite sure that happens in many more languages.

      But my point is: metric is arbitrary in the sense that someone invented it. It doesn't have a real good reason to exist, except (of course) because it's easy to count and calculate and relate measurements that all share the same idea. But even here in brazil, in the countryside, people still talk in acres ("hectares", pt_BR), and I have almost no idea of how big this is.

    520. Re:Start here by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Most people in the UK will give you half inches as well, so it's "six-foot-three-and-a-half", as opposed to "one-ninety-two".
      Arguing for mixed fractions because one example is shorter is silly.

    521. Re:Start here by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Neighbours can actually see each other and observe that the neighbour is using metric

      The fact that you keep such close track of your neighbors is scary. Stalking doesn't even begin to describe it.

      For the rest of us, what you say is utter nonsense. We don't know what units of measure our neighbors are using because we simply don't care. Oh, you filled your car up at a station that uses liters. How nice. You buy your undies in sizes based on cm and not inches. How nice. You bought a liter of soda instead of the 20 oz bottle. How nice.

      The fact is, changing the US with nine times as many people will be more than nine times as hard as changing Canada. Not just because of the people, but the history. US: overthrew British overlords more than 200 years ago. Canada: God Save the Queen, eh?

    522. Re:Start here by vux984 · · Score: 1

      So your first argument is that it would be an enormous expense, your second argument doesn't back your first argument up at all.

      Instead you've backpeddled and said pretty much everything is in metric anyway:

      For everything where it matters, we've already converted to metric.

      But then your last ditch hold out is this:

      it doesn't matter because there's zero downside to using Imperial/US units for everyday things.

      No there is zero upside. The downside is having to perpetuate two measuring systems. A measuring system that 90% of the world has stopped using.

      There is no good reason to keep US units. Teach our kids to use metric, and let the US units die out. There is no reason to keep them them going, generation after generation.

      Fahrenheit is a better scale for humans than Celsius and it makes no sense to change.

      ONLY american's beleive that. Nobody raised in celsius finds it the least bit awkward to know what to wear or what to expect when they go outside.

    523. Re: Start here by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Huh? Other large countries that switched also had pre-existing systems that worked (in many cases, the very same system you still use) and huge amounts of legacy infrastructure. It's not like the change was made in the distant past - just a few decades ago for many countries. My father (who isn't particularly old) grew up with the 'old' system and went through the change when he was in his late teens/early 20s. This was in Australia which has a similar physical size and Federal/State system of government to the US. A smaller population (i.e. less infrastructure) admittedly, though that means you also have a proportionally smaller tax base to fund the change and proportionally smaller teams of people available to perform the necessary work - so I'm not sure that invalidates the comparison.

      And yes there's a cost involved (though not as much as you think - the switch occurs in stages and the cost is amortized across several years). You don't have to throw away old infrastructure (except obvious things such as road signs - and they aren't that expensive in the scheme of things), you just gradually introduce stuff built to the new standard and let the old stuff expire through attrition. A lot of measuring equipment these days is already switchable to metric anyway (scales in grocery stores, newer gas pumps etc.), or could be modified through a software patch.

      Noone is claiming that the switch is easy or cheap or without inevitable teething issues. But it'll need to happen at some point, unless you truly believe 100, 200 years from now the US will still be using US traditional units in an otherwise completely metric world. I think the appeal and efficient of having a single global standard for measurement will inevitably force the change at some point - industry and manufacturing would love it as it allows simplification of product lines and easier trade between the US and other countries. I suspect though that it won't happen until the US is no longer the #1 consumer market in the world and/or no longer the largest economy. That's only a few decades away at most though...

    524. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Metric system only benefits people who have ten digits on the hands... What good is it to us?

    525. Re:Start here by ranulf · · Score: 1

      ... but kitchen units measured in millimetres are plain silly.

      All kitchen units in the UK have been measured in mm for as long as I've owned a house and been interested in such things (so at least 9 years). A standard unit is 600mm deep and usually 600mm or 450mm wide.

    526. Re:Start here by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with a millimetre per se, it's when sizes get too big for wetware to visualise that humans clock out. What's wrong with 60x45cm? Would 0.6x0.45m work almost as well? (I'd prefer 2footx1foot6, but then we did learn 12-times tables at school). Don't get me started on powers of eV !

    527. Re:Start here by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      What? You have to stop and check? You should see an optician. I've taken my car to Europe and had no problem reading either dial, after an hour you are checking the small one automatically.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    528. Re:Start here by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      There has never been a piece of framing lumber, iron, or plumbing pipe sold in the US labeled with metric dimensions. The total cost in actual dollars, education, retraining, wasted material, etc, to convert these industries alone would likely equal the GDP of all but the top 20 coutries in the world.

      Two things:
      -No one in suggesting throwing out all of the existing material. Just start labeling it in both. Eventually, label it only in metric.
      -We're not doing this for us, we're doing it for our kids. Yes, there will be expense during the transition, which normally takes 10 years. Those that were taught Imperial units will use them until they die. But once most of those people die (and die they will, eventually), everyone else will stop wasting money converting stuff into American units. Something made in the US could be used world-wide with no re-labeling or re-measurement.

      Learn the difference between a one-time cost and something that saves money forever.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    529. Re:Start here by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      No one in suggesting throwing out all of the existing material

      The "wasted material" will be due to measurement mistakes.

      Just start labeling it in both. Eventually, label it only in metric.

      You are clearly clueless. Before you can speak intelligently about a subject you must educate yourself on that subject. For you to actually understand the magnitude of such a conversion you must first spend a week as an apprentice at an architectural firm in the US, then spend a week with a construction crew as they build a new house. Then you will spend a week working at a lumber yard. After all of that, then you can come back and comment intelligently in this thread.

      We're not doing this for us, we're doing it for our kids. Yes, there will be expense during the transition, which normally takes 10 years. Those that were taught Imperial units will use them until they die. But once most of those people die (and die they will, eventually), everyone else will stop wasting money converting stuff into American units. Something made in the US could be used world-wide with no re-labeling or re-measurement.

      You mean in the same vein that every product I buy in the US that's made in China has a instructions in 6 languages? No cost there...

      Learn the difference between a one-time cost and something that saves money forever.

      It never ceases to amaze me how liberals think they have the answers to all of the world's ills which are always caused by those pesky Americans, and the Amercicans should have to pay to fix other people's problems. Such a conversion would not benefit any future generations of US citizens. So you just want us to convert to SI to makes things easier for everyone else. Do you work at the UN by chance?

    530. Re:Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.162 meters,
      0.162 yards
      What was your point?

      Now using your answer above, answer these questions:
      Using just your head, what is one third of a meter?
      Using just your head, what is one third of a yard?

    531. Re:Start here by Tran · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I see the problem of no exact fit current lumber for my house built in the early 60s.
      The guy who built the house originally used true dimension lumber, so a 2x4 in the house was truly a 2x4.
      Without custom ordering I could not get the standard thickness plywood used for the floors (which I did not do - was easy enough to bevel the new plywood where it abutted the old). Made for some interesting rebuilding and renovating issues - but was doable.
      So I am sure - even in the future, one could always custom order old dimension if so inclined. Or find innovative solutions to make things work out.
      Not sure if all contractors are innovative, but from what I read and the stories I hear, good contractors and good carpenters certainly are an innovative group of people.

    532. Re: Start here by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      . . . .until, of course, the Aliens arrive, and they laugh with derision at our quaint base-10 incremented system, in comparision with the binary-incremented system used throughout the galaxy, with the base unit a cubic drikh of plegh. . . .

      Or, for the humor-impaired: it actually doesn't matter WHAT the standardized set of measurements **is**: the **standardization** is what makes all the difference. . . .

    533. Re:Start here by GodGell · · Score: 1

      That's how we write dates in Hungary/Central Europe too (not sure if our neighbors do as well), I always thought it's the most logical way of writing it - most significant part first. After all, you don't say "it's 35 seconds, 6 minutes and 5pm" when referring to the time-of-day do you? :)

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    534. Re:Start here by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      Maybe you live in CA or something, where that approach seems acceptable, but throughout most of the US, there is consistency in things like...

      Caltrans for the win!

      No, but seriously... we like being different. I haven't run into a single native San Diegan who uses, acknowledges, or even mentions exit numbers... Conformity blasted onto us by (recalled!) former Governor Davis and CT head Jeff Morales when the populace doesn't want it is the kind of thing that metrification would remind us of. No thanks.

      (And yes, in this era of massive budget deficits and spend-crazy Democrats, a metrification program at the Federal level would be just as much a waste as it was in the '70s. Republicans and fiscal conservatives in the heartland would have a field day.)

    535. Re:Start here by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      12-FEB-09 is unambiguously the 12 of February 2009, yes. But I still prefer the ISO standard where it would be 20090212.

    536. Re:Start here by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      So, we ended up with a foot being, well, the length of a foot,
      It made sense at the time, and worked well enough.

      The history of temperature units is interesting and convoluted, but 32 for freezing is based on binary divisions (64 units) between that and human body temperature (96).

      Fahrenheit is quite useful when you are thinking in terms of human comfort and safety.

      Summer weight clothing will be appropriate and comfortable at 75, autumn weight at 50, winter weight at 25.

      bullshit. bullshit. bullshit. bullshit. some 0-100 comfort scale ? how about this: water freezes at 0. rain turns to snow at 0. the closer you get to 100 the more uncomfortable it gets but 100 is the right temperature for a sauna. in fahrenheit the freezing point is a pretty random number. the whole fahrenheit is as if someone made a template for a measuring device and accidentally had what about human body temperature at 100 and then justified everything else around that. anything more stupid than that when it comes to measuring is the XX proof alcohol system.

      you know why USA really uses imperial units? all of europe dumped their old instrumentation to fledgling USA when europe switched over to metric..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    537. Re: Start here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have fun failing engineering projects and paying more for stuff! and installing all those 220v outlets!

    538. Re:Start here by smithmc · · Score: 1

      As I recall, it was required nation-wide during the late 70s. Then Reagan happened.

      The use of the metric system has never been required by the Federal government. The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 designates the metric system as the "preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce", but it did not make this mandatory, at least not for private citizens or businesses.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    539. Re:Start here by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Doesn't most of the US now have highway speed limits of 65 mi/hr or higher?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    540. Re:Start here by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a meter? Using just your head, what is 16.2% of a yard?

      Yeah, 'cause that problem comes up every 5 minutes for most people.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    541. Re:Start here by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The Soviets were Russians before they became Soviets.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    542. Re: Start here by smithmc · · Score: 1

      At one point back in the '90s, the highway speed limit in Montana was "reasonable and prudent".

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  2. The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can you fight this idea, if it's all about multiculturalism in a bilingual country without receiving a negative label?

    1. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only a left wing extremist, America hating, Kenyan, terroristic, neo-communist, piece of scum like Obama would be pushing this hard for a multicultural approach to a system of measurement. I demand that my representatives in the House and Senate do everything they can to stop the President in this latest push to destroy what few remaining decent things remain in this once great nation. We should immediately adopt the metric system as a means to protest this naked grab for power by a mean spirited and hateful administration bent on the destruction of democracy and the last remnants of a Christian faith that sustain us. (We should also outlaw counting by base 12... just because.)

    2. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same way you fight all other outdated cultural norms.

    3. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect a profit motive. Department funding for measurement programs are gladly accepted; yet the let it go, live and let live attitude lets them off the hook when it comes to tasks involving implementation and enforcement.

    4. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, given that this administration is about campaigning, not governance, it's clear that metric proponents need to recast themselves as a victim group, and start delivering some votes.
      Strong possibilities include:
      • Tying traditional measurements to Tradition, which is evil in the face of Holy Progress
      • Pointing out that 'feet', 'yards', and 'miles' are associated with patriarchal oppression structures.
      • And don't neglect the race card. Those units were implemented by white males, and are thus tinged with the scourge of slavery.

      I'm having the vague feeling that I can't tell if I'm trolling here, or drafting notes for a Progressive strategy session.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, you're not trolling at all. You carry the 'white man's burden' with total aplomb and grace.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I see your problem you think the president of the USA is actually a useful position. The president of the USA is actually the least powerful, least effective job in the USA.

      The president doesn't make laws congress does, the president doesn't decide which laws are fair or balanced the judicial system does. The president doesn't even decide details of policy only vague generalities.

      The president( i don't care which ones you like they all fall into this) can't make decisions. he can only choose between choices others make for him. he has three basic tools Force(military or civilian), Legal(lawyers), or Diplomatic(Negotations, etc) However he can't use force for anything but quick attacks or else congress must intervene. He can use legal but lawyers aren't useful for much. Diplomatic only works when the other party actually is willing to change.(that's why you can't negotiate with palenstine/isreal or the tea party, neither side can look at things from anyone else's view)

      There is a reason why Presidents go into office looking healthy and come out Physically healthy but looking like they went through a meet grinder. Because they get all the blame, very little of the credit, and can actually change very little.

      The president controls the price of oil about as much I do. The president controls the budget of the country about as much I do.

      If your curious look up what the president is actually allowed to do in most cases all he can do is advise someone else to look into the problem and report back. Take the IRS scandal. I would be willing to bet the president knew about it a while ago. however he couldn't actually change the policies or punish people because congress ultimately controls those positions.

      This true of every president they can at best suggest. whether or not they get listened to is another story.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anarchduke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Outlaw base 12? Give me A good reasons!

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    8. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your base-12 are belong to us.

    9. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I don't carry jack, boss. But I do note attempts at guilt dispersal as a means of separating friend from foe.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    10. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      No, look: BHO was the most oversold thing since XML. You cannot have the media equating him with some epiphany FOR YEARS and then fail to own it.
      There are high school volleyball captains with more leadership chops than BHO, whom I like to call #OccupyResoluteDesk over on Twitter.
      However, I will allow some amusement in watching the apologists oscillate between praising his Super Genius and attempting to explain that, well, he's really the Queen of England. Thanks!

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    11. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      That's pretty narrow-minded.

      The President has the biggest soap box in the country. Among the largest in the world, with the exact rankings a debate for not-me.

      He might not be able to dictate change, or do very much.. but he knows a lot of things are going on.

      All he's gotta do is talk. That's all. Something fishy going on, he can't directly do anything about it? Tell us about it. The knowledge that something is known to the public would force a change.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    12. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by mishehu · · Score: 1

      The POTUS has some power in that:

      -The VPOTUS sits in the Senate and has some powers there.
      -The POTUS has some ability to affect HOW legislation is enforced.
      -The POTUS can propose legislation to the legislature, IIRC

    13. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by kbolino · · Score: 1

      While you are correct that, in practice, the President is largely a powerless figurehead, the President actually does possess a number of useful powers. The problem is that most Presidents nowadays do not use them. The President has the veto power to reign in legislative excesses. The President has the power to commute and pardon prisoners to reign in judicial excesses. And the President has the ability to appoint the officers of government and terminate the employees of executive agencies. Although the extent of the President's independent warmaking powers is open to considerable debate, the President is indisputably the commander-in-chief and so has the power to set military priorities in peacetime and strategies in wartime. Of course, taking a bold position and exercising any of these powers judiciously would open the President up to personal responsibility, which means he couldn't shift blame to other people as much.

    14. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      It is true that the president doesn't have nearly as much power as people think, but he does have significant amounts of power. The two most significant are the military and international diplomacy. The president has nearly universal latitude in both of those areas to do whatever he likes. What power Congress has to oppose him in these areas has essentially been forfeited slowly over the last century or so. The President couldn't start a war with the UK or anything crazy like that, but for the most part he can authorize any lower scale use of force, even large-scale military intervention like in Libya. Congress *could* block it theoretically, but in practice the President always gets what he wants, and if there's a realistic chance of that happening he can always just send in the CIA or black ops.

      And there are lots of other powers the President *usually* has, although many of them have been thwarted by the Republicans under the current administration. Federal appointments, for example. Normally a very underrated and subtle use of influence, and the Republicans have used Congress to block a huge portion of Obama's appointments. But in a properly functioning government (ie one not hell-bent on opposing the executive branch) that is a huge power.

      Another underrated one is the decision *not* to pursue federal prosecution, as evidence by Obama not pursuing anyone responsible for the financial crisis, or any war crimes or perjury under the previous administration, and Bush/Clinton basically giving anybody casually associated with their adminstrations a free pass to skirt federal law.

    15. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why the hell do the Presidents promise so much then?

    16. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....and then came George II with his executive orders among all kinds of other shenanigans to make an end run around a lot of those limitations. If you'd really take a look there's a lot of things that really are unconstitutional, illegal and immoral going on, but since nobody cares to, or are able to put a stop to it, in some respects it's not that different from an absolute monarchy. In fact, the US is increasingly starting to look like Russia; Ruled by a "nomenclatura", backed by the secret police.

      Just as long as you don't do something the general populous can relate to and identify themselves as "immoral". Start an illegal war or two, imprison people who you have no idea whether they genuinely were hostile when you grabbed them or not, without trial, for years - no problem. Get a blowjob from an intern, OMG IMPEACH!

      Captcah, "terrors". How appropriate.

    17. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're delusional at best, dangerously misinformed at worst. Which is it?

    18. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of the Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan wars was to secure the US Dollar as the currency in which energy is transferred.

    19. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I don't carry jack, boss.

      But you do... You're just not aware of it. Only you know if it's by choice or not.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    20. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Help me here: I'm not supposed to believe in God, but I'm supposed to buy-off on whatever psycho-piffle people want to sell me? Thanks!

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    21. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You're right.. Creationism trumps biology

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re:The Spin was Awesome! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Having studied both, the point is to avoid taking either too literally.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  3. So for once they gave a sane answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So basically: use what works best instead of us forcing a one-size fits all approach on you. If Obama followed that philosophy more often he might find being President to be a little easier.

    1. Re:So for once they gave a sane answer by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      Slavery worked great, too, and then you had an attempt of secession and a huge war about it.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    2. Re:So for once they gave a sane answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, no. Slavery didn't really work great at all.

    3. Re:So for once they gave a sane answer by Crosshair84 · · Score: 1

      Rather fitting. Those who supported slavery said slavery was in the best interest of blacks. Seems like those pushing Metric are using the same argument. Those against want people to be free to choose whatever they want.

      Everywhere metric makes sense the switch has already happened voluntarily.

    4. Re:So for once they gave a sane answer by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Metric system is in the best interest of blacks?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  4. Not my choice by watermark · · Score: 1

    You can't put XBMC to Celsius unless you tell it you don't live in the US.

    1. Re:Not my choice by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Revenge for all the US-made products (including some software) that won't switch to metric, or d/m/y, or metric paper sizes etc, even if you tell it you don't live in the US :)

  5. What were you expecting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you expect that the White House administration was going to somehow force businesses and residents of the US to start using metric? I don't really get what the point of this petition was. Was it just to point out to everyone that it's dumb that we don't natively use metric in our households and businesses? I think most people are already starting to believe that, as indicated by the presence of the petition itself.

    1. Re:What were you expecting? by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you expect that the White House administration was going to somehow force businesses and residents of the US to start using metric?

      Why not? With three exceptions, EVERY country in the world did it at some point.

    2. Re:What were you expecting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argumentum ad populum.

    3. Re:What were you expecting? by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Why? To justify the expense, it is incumbent upon those wanting the change to convince the rest of us that it is necessary*, that it will prevent some kind of harm or something.

      * Being like the rest of the world is not a necessity; it is a desire.

    4. Re:What were you expecting? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We're funny that way in the U.S.

      You're entitled to be proud of whatever you wish to be proud of about your National culture.

      USians don't always take well to government edicts, tho.

    5. Re:What were you expecting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is the most important country in the world right now. They (most of you guys) have little incentive to switch to what all the rest of the world uses and I feel fine with that. You'd be fool to invest resources in something that gains you little. American scientists and some kind of engineers use metric units because they gain a lot from them. General population don't.

      Anyway, eventually all the leader countries have been replaced by other leader countries. China might be the next one. When that happens to the USA (don't worry, it won't happen tomorrow) there will be a chance for a switch but it will take a long time because the USA is a country with the size of a continent and the inertia is much bigger than what any other country experienced during its switch.

      And don't think that a switch means measuring everything you have with the new units. You'll keep using old units for old things. New stuff will be built on new units and in a few centuries you'll almost only use them. Look at the slow switch the UK is experiencing with a mix of traditional and metric units, a switch than IMHO would never happened if they still were the most powerful country in the world.

      Btw, I've always been puzzled by the reason the USA is metric regarding the volume of car engines, which looks like a centerpiece of the American way :-)

  6. The metric system is the tool of the devil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The metric system is the tool of the devil! My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it.
    ----
    The Simpsons, Abraham Simpson

    1. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by jrmcferren · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mod Parent +5 funny! Anyway as of the last time I was in my auto I was getting 532,224 rods per hogshead which is low compared to 544320. Of course I've been driving where the speed limit ranges from 27,200 furlongs per fortnight to 107,520 furlongs per fortnight. However when the school zone lights are flashing it is a piddly ass 40320 furlongs per fortnight even in a 107,520 furlongs per fortnight zone.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    2. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      having a hard time with your units, how many piss pots per parsec is that?

    3. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A parsec is a unit of distance, not of time.

      I know, I know, woosh, star wars, and all that.

    4. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      actually I was enquiring about the fuel economy he first mentioned

    5. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      The metric system is the tool of the devil! My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it.

      Uh, are we talking imperial hogsheads or metric hogsheads? Myself, I prefer the precambrian hogshead, for sentimental reasons.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    6. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by Curate · · Score: 1

      African or European hogsheads?

    7. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      having a hard time with your units, how many piss pots per parsec is that?

      Good question, but the only pisspot I know within a parsec is the one that's still using Imperial.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      So? Maybe he wanted to know how many roadside toilets he was passing every mile.

    9. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by David_W · · Score: 1

      But the important thing to remember is he had an onion on his belt, which was the style at the time...

    10. Re:The metric system is the tool of the devil! by StueyNZ · · Score: 1

      and its speedo is calibrated in MegaFurlongs per KiloFortnight?

  7. But your ass is going to jail if you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more than one kilogram of weed.

    1. Re:But your ass is going to jail if you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know how much fucking weed that is!? Nobody, but nobody, has ever carried around anywhere near a kilogram of weed to share with their buds.

    2. Re:But your ass is going to jail if you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody, but nobody, has ever carried around anywhere near a kilogram of weed to share with their buds.

      You must have pretty boring and selfish friends.

    3. Re:But your ass is going to jail if you have by Stephen+Chadfield · · Score: 2

      Bob Marley

    4. Re:But your ass is going to jail if you have by reve_etrange · · Score: 1

      You are not from California.

      --
      .: Semper Absurda :.
    5. Re:But your ass is going to jail if you have by Zan+Lynx · · Score: 1

      In the states where it is legal (sorta) now, I predict this will happen, like beer kegs.

      "Gimme a kilo man. It's for the party."

    6. Re:But your ass is going to jail if you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know how much fucking weed that is!? Nobody, but nobody, has ever carried around anywhere near a kilogram of weed to share with their buds.

      if you smoked 20 grams a week you would be out of weed in a year, it would be plausible to have it for personal consumption. if it were legal, some people would pick it up at that amount. not many since it's expensive, but it wouldn't be if it was legal...

  8. WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The petition site isn't a method for legislative fiat. If you want the metric system adopted talk to your Congress person. The president can't force adoption of the metric system. Jesus, people, the president can't even enter bills into Congress and you want him to just pass the fucking law personally? You have representatives for that.

    1. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Only problem is that somewhere along the way we elected Toydarians to Congress and our boards-of-directors. Tell one of them to do a true switch to metric, and they'll give you a nice and resounding LOL before mumbling "stupid job-killing regulations" and other such incantations.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And our representatives gave us a petition site and told us to go there.

    3. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient;"

      Sure, it's not executive fiat, but saying he can't enter bills into Congress? Not quite true. Can't get them passed by Congress, but not what you said.

    4. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      "You have representatives for that."

      where? that set of useless fucks hightailed it out of town with a middle finger the second they stopped needing to beg for votes. calling or writing to them just gets your message instantly tossed in the can, and I bet half of them dont even remember what part they "represent"

    5. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, quite true. Only members of Congress may enter bills into a congressional session. The president could write a bill then get a member of Congress to introduce it, but that isn't entering a bill into Congress is it?

      http://www.whitehouse.gov/our-government/legislative-branch

      "The first step in the legislative process is the introduction of a bill to Congress. Anyone can write it, but only members of Congress can introduce legislation."

      ALEC writes a lot of Republican sponsored bills, but ALEX is not the one that enters it into Congress for consideration.

    6. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Jesus, people, the president can't even enter bills into Congress and you want him to just pass the fucking law personally?

      Apparently, you haven't been paying attention. The executive branch does just that all the time, not over measuring systems and what not, nope, just things like declaring folks enemy of the state -- like, Julian Assange, or other equally heinous acts. Protip: Only congress in supposed to be able to do that too.

    7. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Yes, quite true.

      Not so much. Nothing stops the President from submitting legislation to Congress. By law, he's even required to do so once a year. Heard of the Federal Budget?

    8. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      No, actually, they didn't. You and many other individuals misunderstand the purpose of that site.

    9. Re: WTF is the administration supposed to do? by nbritton · · Score: 1

      The Pres Is Executive Officer for the Federal government, he can mandate through Executive Orders. Yes only Federal employees and contractors would be required to follow them, but since businesses that bid on goverment contacts are required to abid as well, you've just encompassed most of American business.

    10. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient

      And clearly the metric system is one such measure :)

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    11. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a God given right to use any system of measurement your prefer, but buying healthcare is mandatory!?

    12. Re:WTF is the administration supposed to do? by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yes, quite true.

      Not so much. Nothing stops the President from submitting legislation to Congress. By law, he's even required to do so once a year. Heard of the Federal Budget?

      Well, from the very beginning of the article you linked to...

      "The Budget of the United States Government often begins as the President's proposal to the U.S. Congress which recommends funding levels for the next fiscal year, beginning October 1. However, Congress is the body required by law to pass a budget annually and to submit the budget passed by both houses to the President for signature".

      It's a proposal. "Submitting legislation" has the nuance of the submitters being the legal representatives to do so.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  9. Missing the Point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wasn't one of the most famous NASA blunders caused because two parties couldn't agree on a single standard?

    1. Re:Missing the Point? by Antipater · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Not really, no. If you actually read what happened, the "metric mixup" was a contributing factor but not the critical factor, especially since the people knew it was off course and decided not to correct course. From the very article you linked:

      The discrepancy between calculated and measured position, resulting in the discrepancy between desired and actual orbit insertion altitude, had been noticed earlier by at least two navigators, whose concerns were dismissed. A meeting of trajectory software engineers, trajectory software operators (navigators), propulsion engineers, and managers, was convened to consider the possibility of executing Trajectory Correction Maneuver-5, which was in the schedule. Attendees of the meeting recall an agreement to conduct TCM-5, but it was ultimately not done.

      But "We mixed up feet and meters! Whoopsie!" while embarrassing, is not quite so embarrassing as "We canceled the scheduled maneuver that would have saved the ship, even though we knew something was very wrong." Plus, it was an easy headline for the media. There were a legion of problems with the Mars Climate Orbiter that had nothing to do with unit systems. NASA was just in full-on derp mode at that time. Likewise, the Mars Polar Lander, which did not have a similar unit-conversion error, also crashed a few months later.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
  10. Makes perfect sense to me by bokmann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The country doesn't have a national language, despite the fact that the majority speak English... so why do we think the Federal government could just mandate metric? Hell, even if they tried, a bunch of angry southern congressman would probably cry 'states rights'. Thanks Obama.

    The cooking channel, the car dealers, gas stations and everyone reading this response could start speaking metric tomorrow if they wanted too... about the only thing that would seem awkward on the green highway mile markers and speed limit signs... and we already largely ignore those...

    If you think you care so much about metric, why can't you tell me how many liters per 100 km your car takes? Its *your* car... no one is stopping you.

    1. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Chuckstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. Why is this response considered so "disappointing"?

    2. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The country doesn't have a national language, despite the fact that the majority speak English... so why do we think the Federal government could just mandate metric? Hell, even if they tried, a bunch of angry southern congressman would probably cry 'states rights'. Thanks Obama.

      The cooking channel, the car dealers, gas stations and everyone reading this response could start speaking metric tomorrow if they wanted too... about the only thing that would seem awkward on the green highway mile markers and speed limit signs... and we already largely ignore those...

      If you think you care so much about metric, why can't you tell me how many liters per 100 km your car takes? Its *your* car... no one is stopping you.

      a full tank gives me 600ish km, so, 1 lt per 10km

    3. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, about 20 MPG, so...

      1) Invert. 1/20 Gal/mi = 0.05Gal/mi
      2) Convert volume. 1/20 Gal = 1/5L = 0.2L
      3) Convert distance. 1mi = 1.67km
      4) Combine. 0.2L/1.67km
      5) Reduce. 0.12L/1km
      6) Multiply(*100). 12L/100km.

      Not hard. Tedious, but not hard. This is all stuff you should be able to do easily, even with a dropout education (age 16 here, which means mid-10th grade).

    4. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      9-10L/100km for gasoline and 13-14L/100km for LPG (which in my country is about half the price of gasoline).

    5. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think you care so much about metric, why can't you tell me how many liters per 100 km your car takes? Its *your* car... no one is stopping you.

      My car is electric. 0L/km of gasoline. I have no idea how many liters of windshield wiper fluid per km.

    6. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It's not just roads. That would be easy enough with dual numbers (though I would do it on a replacement as-needed basis rather than a mandate all at once. Gubbmint loves to freakin' spend other peoples' money.)

      But a cup of flour is a cup of flower, not 125 grams or 3.1 deciliters.

      Aaaah I don't know where I was going with this. Where's pie?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I don't really see the problem. I know a liter is about a quart and a kilogram is a little over two pounds. 100KPH is about 62MPH and all that but I still convert it in my head every time I see something in metric because I think in standard. It's using tools that drives me crazy though. I can look at a nut or bolt and if it's SAE I can instantly grab the right wrench or socket but with metric, although I've had metric wrenches for 3 decades now I still can't do it. Growing up with something makes it instinctive. Even so I'm okay with a change to the metric system but I really don't think it's that big an issue and apparently neither does the Obama administration. Now I'm worried.

    8. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      They didn't like the response. They wanted a progressive answer and got a conservative one. I'm a little shocked myself.

    9. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 0

      "If you think you care so much about metric, why can't you tell me how many liters per 100 km your car takes? Its *your* car... no one is stopping you."

      Because L/100Km is the stupised metric ever invented by man!

      Which is easier:
          - take the size of your tank in L, multiply by "Km/L" rating of the car, and get how far you can drive on a tank of gas.
              (or, for you Yanks, take the size of your tank in gal, multiple by "miles/gal" rating of the car, and get how far you can drive on a tank of gas), or
          - take the size of your tank in L, divide by "L" portion of the "L/100Km" rating, multiply by 100, and eventually figure out how many units of 100 Km you can drive on a tank of gas, although you'll most likely just wing it after banging your head against the steering wheel

      I really don't care how many litre it takes to drive 100 Km -- I want to know how far I can drive on a full tank of gas!

    10. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      8L/100km

    11. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, OMG, OMG!!! I can hear your car sippin' away !!

    12. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metric makes sense, but why not km/liter, far more analogous to mpg. What point is there in inverting the ratio, and multiplying by 100?

      After living in Europe I was very pro-metric for many years, I was very pro-metric. But then things like that...how many liters per 100km? come on. And really, Fahrenheit is more precise than Celsius (1 degree C ~= 2 degrees F), with more "octaves" to divide out a sense of whether ("it's in the 60s today, in the 50's tomorrow, and in the 70s the day after") is, to me at least, far more descriptive of the weather than, say, it will be around 10s today, the 10s again tomorrow, and the 20s the day after (where the "20s" could be anything from a chilly high sixties to a sweltering mid-eighties Fahrenheit).

      Now I just don't care. It would be nice to use km, liter and grams, but I don't want to adopt boneheaded measures like Liters/100km or Celsius, so quite frankly, I can live with miles and gallons if it keeps that nonsense at bay.

    13. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how did you make sure you drove 600km with exactly one full tank....

    14. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by timmyf2371 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why bother to convert though? The natural way to "speak a language" such as metric is to use it as your first language; not convert between the two.

      Most car manufacturers publish fuel consumption figures in metric and imperial, so the natural way would be to know what your litres per 100 would be, and what this actually means in reality.

      We have a weird situation here in the UK. All fuel is sold by the litre - but no one knows what litres per 100km means or how the cost of a litre of gas will affect them. We all refer to MPG and we know that a gallon is about 4.5x the cost of a litre (yes, our gallons have more litres than yours).

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    15. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Bob9113 · · Score: 2

      Here's the math that explains why you are wrong. When it comes to compatibility issues, like standards, it is easy for a laissez-faire system to get stuck on a local maxima. It is one of the primary reasons that a well regulated market can be a closer approximation of the theoretical ideal free market than can laissez-faire. This sort of problem is exactly why people institute governments.

    16. Re: Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12.1L/100 km.

      Not so good but it's a 15 year old V6.

      http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=12.1+litres+per+100+km+in+mpg&x=11&y=3

      My father used mpg so I am comfortable with both. I think that's the argument they've made in the response - use both and you get comfortable with both and it doesn't matter so much. I live in Australia where cars are advertised in L/100km so I understand what is good and not good mileage using both systems, but only because I've been exposed to both.

      But - I can't intuitively convert between them. I know 40 deg Celsius is bloody hot and I believe "110 in the shade" (Fahrenheit) is bloody hot but have no clue how close those measurements are to one another. And "hot" is subjective, my relatives from Tasmania think 26C is a heatwave, I live in Brisbane where 32C is an average summer day.

      I don't see how you can "use what you want" for anything where there isn't widespread use of both - thinking in kph isn't easy (and maybe dangerous?) when speed signs are in mph.

      There are some imperial measurements that are useful so they're still used here - inches, for small measurements - feet, but less so - and the dozen isn't going anywhere. They're intuitive as they align with things in nature - an inch is easier to picture than "two and a half centimetres". The common use would only be in qualitative descriptions though, never written down, and for small units not large ones - up to half a metre. I'd prefer to see a metric unit for 5 centimetre lots.

    17. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by etash · · Score: 1

      redneck detected.

      mpg isn't clear about efficiency. l/100km is. if a car has double the efficiency then the L/Km gets doubled. not the same is valid for mpg. because when going from 10mpg to 20mpg is not the same as from 20mpg to 30mpg

    18. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > so why do we think the Federal government could just mandate metric...

      The Federal government already mandates non-metric.

      Or are you suggested that road sign units should be a state decision?

    19. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a formality though, considering that 100% of the governmental functions in the U.S. are carried out in English.

      That makes it the official language. They should've declared this a long time ago to elminate this stupid technicality, since while it is technically true that the U.S. doesn't have a national language, the fact is, English is the majority by a massive margin and it has been that way since colonial times.

    20. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Strider- · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where L/100km makes an infinite amount of sense is when comparing the fuel efficiency of different vehicles. What is better, upgrading a 35mpg car to 42mpg, or upgrading a 15mpg SUV to one that gets 20mpg? If we look at this in L/100km, it becomes pretty damned easy. The 35mpg car gets 6.72L/100km. Upgrading it to a car that gets 42mpg will mean you're now burning 5.6L/100km, saving approximately 1.1L for every 100km you travel. Conversely, the 15mpg SUV gets 15.68L/100km, while its 20mpg replacement burns 11.76L/100km, a savings of 3.92L for every 100km. So even in the first case, despite increasing your mileage by 7mpg, you're only saving 1.1L, while in the second case you're only increasing your milage by 5mpg, but saving 3.92L.

      The fundamental reality here is that for most people, the only time they ever look at the fuel efficiency figures is when they're shopping for a new vehicle. Specifying the fuel usage in L/100km (or hell, Gallons/100mi) provides a much more accurate and useful comparison. The easy solution to your problem is to just publish a number for range. I know that my Jetta gets 725km per tank in city driving, and ~1000 or so in highway driving.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    21. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      a full tank gives me 600ish km, so, 1 lt per 10km

      I just wonder how did you make sure you drove 600km with exactly one full tank....

      You seem to be unfamiliar with the meaning of "ish".

    22. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      if a car has double the efficiency then the L/Km gets doubled. not the same is valid for mpg

      If a car has double the efficiency, then the l/Km gets *halved*. Maybe we'd better just stick with mpg.

    23. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by EvanED · · Score: 1

      We have a weird situation here in the UK. All fuel is sold by the litre - but no one knows what litres per 100km means or how the cost of a litre of gas will affect them. We all refer to MPG and we know that a gallon is about 4.5x the cost of a litre (yes, our gallons have more litres than yours).

      So I tend to be pretty ambivalent about metric vs imperial. I would vaguely prefer if everything switched to metric, but I also don't think that it would make much of a difference at all in day-to-day life. Cooking is about the one time I care about the imperial system. (How many tsp are in a tbsp again?)

      But I would posit that one reason that L/100km may not have taken off is because that's a stupid way to measure fuel efficiency.

      The times I'd care about my fuel efficiency are (1) when I'm choosing whether to buy a new car and what to get and (2) when I'm on the road and want to know whether I have enough fuel to get me to some future waypoint of interest (e.g. "can I get past the Mobil stations on the Indiana turnpike that are run by a bunch of greedy opportunist bastards and across the border to Ohio where prices drop substantially, or should I fill up now?"). Volume-per-distance is the better way to measure efficiency for the first purpose, as if one car's L/100km measure is twice another's then it'll make me pay twice as much for gas.

      But for the second purpose you really want distance-per-volume, so you can look at your gas gauge, estimate how many gallons are left, then multiply. Easy peasy. With volume-per-distance it becomes much more awkward. And #2 happens way more than #1. How often do you buy a new car?

    24. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a tiny majority asked for something and the president said no, oh wait that's the way it is supposed to work. These are petitions not referenda.

    25. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      about 9.5

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    26. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      L/100Km is a unit where we have length cubed over length, leaving length squared, or area, in the end. Gallons/mile works the same, so MPG is the inverse of an area. So, what real world object or property is being described by this area in metric, or its inverse in imperial? Complaining that either system is flawed because of these particular combinations of units is pretty strange, when it will probably take a 20 year veteran automotive engineer to explain just what esoteric area related property of internal combustion engines actually can be calculated starting from either formula.
                  To put it another way, why are we debating how hard or simple it is to apply a formula when we studiously have to avoid reducing that formula to simplest terms just so we can get at least a little use out of it? Isn't this in effect saying, "Ha-Ha, my system doesn't mess up quite as much when it trys to create an esoteric compound measurement that doesn't actually mean what most common users will think it means, as your system does?" It's kind of like debating swallows carrying coconuts, and thnking just because you backed the Adfrican, your whole argument now actually makes perfect sense.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    27. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by EvanED · · Score: 1

      redneck detected. mpg isn't clear about efficiency

      But who cares? How often do you really compare about the efficiency? About the only time I would was if I was contemplating buying a new car and trying to figure out if it would be worth it. And how often do you do that, vs when driving around figuring out how far you can go on the current tank? Because for me it's a ratio of about 1 time to 100...

    28. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, L/100km is very useful for figuring what you need to arrive at a given destination. Driving somewhere that's 250 km away in a car that uses 10 L/100 km? You'll need 25 L of fuel for that. With gas in the US at roughly $1/L, you'll know it costs $25 to drive there. You release about 2.5 kg of CO2 per L, so the trip dumps about 60 some kg of CO2 in the gas powered car.

      You can do the same analysis in mpg, of course, but the figuring takes a bit more in the head. Which doesn't make for good decision making and encourages "just winging it".

    29. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by etash · · Score: 1

      indeed, halved, that's what happens when you don't proofread. Point is, with mpg one may think that the difference in efficiency will be way bigger than it actually is.

      from 12.5mpg to 25mpg it will save you 4 gallons on a 100miles trip. from 25mpg to 50mpg it will save you 2 gallons. yet, most people will think that the difference of going from a 25mpg car to a 50mpg is way better than going from 12.mpg to 25mpg.

    30. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Palinchron · · Score: 1

      So, what real world object or property is being described by this area in metric, or its inverse in imperial?

      That's simple, actually. If you laid the gas you burned while driving a certain distance as a thin tube over that distance, this area would be the area of the cross section of this tube.

      --
      The lesson here is that a sufficiently large corporation is indistinguishable from government. --ultranova
    31. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by EvanED · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, L/100km is very useful for figuring what you need to arrive at a given destination. Driving somewhere that's 250 km away in a car that uses 10 L/100 km? You'll need 25 L of fuel for that. With gas in the US at roughly $1/L, you'll know it costs $25 to drive there. You release about 2.5 kg of CO2 per L, so the trip dumps about 60 some kg of CO2 in the gas powered car.

      But what decision are you going to make based on that figure? Are you really going to choose whether to take a trip based on the gas cost? (I suppose you might want to figure drive cost vs air or something like that.)

      Whereas "I estimate I have 3 gallons left in my tank, can I make it 90 miles" is something I compute many times each longish car trip.

    32. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by AvderTheTerrible · · Score: 1

      Except the feds do have that power. One of the clauses enumerating the powers of Congress has explicitly states that "The Congress shall have power to ... fix the Standard of Weights and Measures". So if Congress wants to say "lets get of this nonsense imperial crap no one can remember" they can do that at any times, and the states have literally no standing to say otherwise.

    33. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      I agree that we should have L/100km (or gallons/100 miles) as well as km/L or MPG. However...

      Where L/100km makes an infinite amount of sense is when comparing the fuel efficiency of different vehicles. What is better, upgrading a 35mpg car to 42mpg, or upgrading a 15mpg SUV to one that gets 20mpg?

      No -- in this case, you're not "comparing the fuel efficiency of different vehicles." You're comparing the net gain by two different upgrades to two different vehicles.

      In other words, there are at least FOUR vehicles involved in this comparison. I always hear this exact example trotted out whenever someone starts arguing for L/100km or gal/100mi, but I honestly wonder how common this particular problem is.

      Let's look at the things that have to be true for this scenario to actually be relevant to a car shopper, with at least two vehicles (most shoppers don't even have two or more vehicles to consider upgrading to begin with):

      • The shopper must have two vehicles, both of which he/she is somewhat unsatisfied with enough to consider changing at the same time.
      • The old vehicles must have been used similar amounts and driven similar distances, and the shopper must plan to do the same with the new ones.
      • The upgrade is optional for both vehicles (i.e., neither one is dying soon), or else the shopper wouldn't have a choice about which to upgrade.
      • The shopper must be on a budget enough to restrict them to only one upgrade at once.
      • The shopper's budget must also be flexible enough to allow an upgrade on either of the two vehicles, even though upgrade costs might vary significantly depending on the type/size/quality of both vehicles.
      • The shopper plans to upgrade both vehicles to newer vehicles in a similar class (or at least which have similar fuel efficiency); otherwise, it's probably not really an actual "upgrade" comparison and differences could be reasonably apparent even with km/L or MPG.
      • etc.

      I just don't think these particular comparison scenarios are that likely. Even the idea that a shopper has two vehicles ready to upgrade, neither of which SHOULD be upgraded (because of age, condition, etc.), and both vehicles are driven the same distances all the time is just such a rare occurrence that I can't imagine such a comparison is actually useful that often.

      When they do occur, most of them could be solved simply by knowing approximately that lower MPG or km/L vehicles are really inefficient and it usually makes sense to make any small improvement to a regularly used one can before worrying too much about more efficent vehicles.

      The fundamental reality here is that for most people, the only time they ever look at the fuel efficiency figures is when they're shopping for a new vehicle.

      Frankly, I don't think think anyone but diehard environmentalists or some sort of mechanics interested in optimization give a damn about actual "fuel efficiency" in the abstract.

      Most people care about the practical impact on their driving. Measuring in L/100km or Gal/100mi is useful for people whose driving distances are relatively constant, like commuters who drive every day. They can clearly see by what percentage their fuel bill would go up or down for constant distance. Measuring in km/L or MPG is more useful for people whose gas budget is relatively constant and want to know how much farther they might be able to drive (whether to take a new job that would require a longer commute or because they plan to use the vehicle irregularly for trips or random drives).

      Many people live on limited budgets, and for them, MPG or km/L will actually tell them how much farther their car can travel with their same fuel budget. That's useful information too.

      Again, I personally think BOTH measurements should be displayed, if for no other reason than that L/100km and gal/100mi show how truly bad the wors

    34. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      ...If you think you care so much about metric, why can't you tell me how many liters per 100 km your car takes? Its *your* car... no one is stopping you.

      Just under 8L/100km (7.7 - 7.8 depending on the road) on a country road. See? Easily done.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    35. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      What is better, upgrading a 35mpg car to 42mpg, or upgrading a 15mpg SUV to one that gets 20mpg?

      Why do you care? Either you have a 35mpg vehicle or you have a 15mpg vehicle.

      It seems to me that the main reason to want to use something like L/100km is so that you can boast to your friends about how much greater your car upgrade was compared to their car upgrade. Get yourself some self-esteem and you wont suggest that the rest of the world has to conform to your chosen system so that you can belittle them.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    36. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by c0lo · · Score: 1

      If you think you care so much about metric, why can't you tell me how many liters per 100 km your car takes? Its *your* car... no one is stopping you.

      Who says I can't? It's quite easy where I live: the pump dispenses liters of petrol and my car's odometer is in km. Lately, it has been about 7.2 L/100 km - a sign the car is quite old now (about 3 years ago, it was closer to 6.9 l/100km for the same trip).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    37. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      They got an opportunity to engage in a research project: exploring the meaning of the terms 'progressive' and 'conservative.' That's a surprising perk coming from Obama's White House.

    38. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Proofreading is for typos. Not blatant blunders.

      But it's fun watching someone who just exclaimed 'redneck detected' squirm a little.

      Did you know that some intellectuals have shown that black culture is redneck in origin?

    39. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Myopic · · Score: 1

      ha ha @ 'tiny majority'

    40. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Except the voters then have the power to say 'lets get rid of these idiot politicians nattering about the metric system' and they're voted out of office. I guess they have pretty good pensions lined up for themselves if that were to happen, but being a politician is all about the seductiveness of flexing all that power. A govt. pension and a crummy lobbying job just doesn't appeal to those guys much.

    41. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      L/100km shines for efficiency comparisons, but MPG shines for range - If you know your tank size (16 gallon in my case) and how full your tank is, you can figure out how far you can expect to drive before stopping - can I make it to the next state where the gas is cheaper? Can I make it to my destination or do I have to make a pit stop somewhere? Sure, some cars have a 'range' indicator, but most don't and it is nice to be able to easily figure this out.

      From a consumer purchasing standpoint, what matters is ordering rather than relative gain - if I'm replacing my car, I am examining my options for new/new to me cars. For families with multiple cars, generally which ever car is in more urgent need of replacement (worst condition, least suitable to current needs) is the one that gets replaced, relative fuel economy doesn't come into it. As to fuel economy reducing total fuel usage, behavioral changes reduce the naive savings expectations and so the efficiency is still not helpful.

    42. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try asking for an end to war. Or an end to drone strike assassinations. Or an end for foreign aid to countries that embrace racial/religious discrimination. Or an end to the war on American minorities and youth and freedom that goes by the name of "the drug war." Or an end to the PATRIOT act. Or an end to Guantanamo. Or an end to

      Oh, yeah. Obama is Bush Three-Point-O. That's why the Republicans hate him so much—it's not because he's black or popular or anything personal like that; it's because he steals their thunder and occupies their positions, leaving them ideologically homeless. It's more than just trying to be conciliatory or accommodating to his opposition—he actively tries to preempt the red-team party line to leave them scrambling for a new position to hold against him, which just ends up pushing the aggregate position of both parties further to the right.

    43. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      So, if 12.5 to 25 is a much larger savings than 25 to 50, why are we busting our humps to get from 35 to 40?

      I'm not doubting your math, just wondering why we argue so much about so little.

    44. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "progressive" answer like MY response?

      Me: "Fuck you and your metric system demands. Shut the Hell up, and use metric when you like. Stop trying to fuck everything up just because you don't like it."

    45. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easy solution to your problem is to just publish a number for range. I know that my Jetta gets 725km per tank in city driving, and ~1000 or so in highway driving.

      then the easy solution to boost that number would simply to put a bigger gas tank in the car... "hey i can do 2000 miles with my car!" "hum.. it cost you 500$ to fill it! you're not saving fuel!"

    46. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The country doesn't have a national language, despite the fact that the majority speak English... so why do we think the Federal government could just mandate metric?

      Because The constitution explicitly grants this power to congress:
      Article 1 Section 8
        The Congress shall have Power ...
      To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

    47. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      L/100km is about comparing the efficiency of different vehicles on a linear scale. It's not about estimating how far you can get on a tank.

    48. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I don't know man. I think you're reading too much into all this.

    49. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      That's not progressive. It's aggressive.

    50. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12.3 L/100KM on mostly highway.
      15.2 L/100KM on mostly city.
      25.2L/100KM when pulling a 8000 trailer on mostly highway.

    51. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      L/100km is, in fact, the most stupid way to measure fuel efficiency possible.

      I really kinda suspect it's used for that very reason honestly.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    52. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      idjit detected.

      one's a 100% increase and the other is a 50% increase.

      any fucking idiot knows that. anyone who doesn't simply didn't bother to give a half moment's thought to their answer.

      your example is pretty shitty, too. you're talking about someone who's looking to buy a new car, but not just buy A new car -- this is someone who has TWO cars, and is buying a new one and doesn't care which old one they get rid of.

      The.. fuck? Talk about some fucking first world problems! That's not even a problem the majority of the first world ever fucking faces! Most people replace cars when they're *worn out*, not simply because they want something shiny -- further, the sort of person who is looking to just get something new but doesn't know which of their two cars they want to replace is probably NOT going to be simply getting a new car on the basis of fucking *fuel savings*.

      If you've got two cars with wildly different fuel efficiency, likely one is small and one is large. So you're replacing the small with another small and the large with another large, because gosh you need *BOTH*, but somehow they're both equally old and in need of replacing?

      Really. Really dude? nobody gives two shits about that one guy who has faced that problem that one time.

      That is, by the way, the ONLY argument EVER offered in favor of L/100km -- the one you gave. It's such a convoluted and unrealistic situation, and it's the best argument for it. miles/gal lets you know how far you can get pumping in a gallon of gas, right off the bat -- that's useful information. y'know, since my fuel gauge measures the fullness of my tank, and I know the capacity of it, and can just multiply where the gauge is by the full volume it holds to figure out how much gas i've got left and then multiply that by how many miles per gallon i get, BAM! Range left in my vehicle before I need to fuel it. Simple!

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    53. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      And really, Fahrenheit is more precise than Celsius (1 degree C ~= 2 degrees F), with more "octaves" to divide out a sense of whether ("it's in the 60s today, in the 50's tomorrow, and in the 70s the day after") is, to me at least, far more descriptive of the weather than, say, it will be around 10s today, the 10s again tomorrow, and the 20s the day after (where the "20s" could be anything from a chilly high sixties to a sweltering mid-eighties Fahrenheit).

      The thing is, in metric countries, I've never heard anyone say the temperature is "in the twenties". We generally say, "low twenties" for 21-23; "mid twenties" for 24-26 and "high twenties" for 27-29. You'll note that this is somewhat MORE granular than dividing the Fahrenheit scale in to groupings of 10. There's of course nothing stopping you dividing Fahrenheit further of course, and many people do (including yourself in your post with "high sixties" and "mid eighties"), but the point is that both systems are granular enough for normal usage since in neither system does anyone really care about a difference of one unit.

      Generally, it's a matter of what you're used to as to what feels more comfortable or "fitting to reality". I grew up with metric and so the imperial system feels unnatural to me. Most people who grew up with imperial say that metric feels unnatural to them. So, which one is more "natural feeling" is therefore an invalid argument from either side and the sensible argument has to come from practicality. Generally, metric is more mathematically practical - this is hopefully immediately obvious even to the people who don't want to use it.

      Metric makes sense, but why not km/liter, far more analogous to mpg. What point is there in inverting the ratio, and multiplying by 100?

      I do understand the argument that others have put forth for MPG over L/100km (km/L is used in some countries from what I've heard but it's pretty rare). The idea being that you can more easily say, "I've got approx x number of gallons left in the tank, which means I can go y distance". However this is actually less of a problem with L/100Km than most people who are used to MPG think. When I'm driving, I can look at my fuel gauge and think, "Hmm, I've got approx x litres left, which gets me y kilometres... this is [more|less] than the amount I need to get to my destination.". It clearly is another way of looking at it since it's reversed, but the calculation is no less simple.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    54. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      It's metric. It's built to make the 'multiply by 100' really simple.

    55. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by dskoll · · Score: 1

      L/100km measures fuel consumption. The lower the consumption, the better. Also, you don't end up dividing by zero for electric cars and bikes. 0 L/100km is easier to handle than infinity MPG.

      And the reason you choose "L" and "100km" is to make the numbers relatively close to 1 for typical fuel consumption of modern cars.

    56. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by loneDreamer · · Score: 1

      Funny situation truly, we use Kilometers-Per-Litre easily enough. But you know, humans are not particularly characterized for being consistent or rational.

    57. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by vandamme · · Score: 1

      My car is already 100% metric, except for the speedometer.

    58. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      But for the second purpose you really want distance-per-volume, so you can look at your gas gauge, estimate how many gallons are left, then multiply. Easy peasy. With volume-per-distance it becomes much more awkward.

      How so? With L/100km, you simply divide instead of multiplying.

    59. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think you care so much about metric, why can't you tell me how many liters per 100 km your car takes? Its *your* car... no one is stopping you.

      I can. I get 13.84L/100KM city, and 11.76L/100KM city.

    60. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't giving people the choice be progressive?

    61. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by AvderTheTerrible · · Score: 1

      You really think that the American Public, who can't be bothered to vote people out of office who violate all kinds of other rights, intrude upon private affairs, and gave wholesale approval to an illegal spying program perpetrated against every citizen of this country, will somehow mobilize and vote people out of office for supporting the implementation of the metric system? What?

    62. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a country trip, about 6L/100km. In the city, about 8L/100km.
      On a recent cross country (4000km) trip, I averaged 5.84L/100km, in a 12 year old car (4 door 5 seat hatchback, with power everything, a Holden Astra).

      (That's about 44mpg)

    63. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by etash · · Score: 1

      you don't need to know that. the car already tells you when it's low in fuel. it's right in the front of the driver's eyes.

    64. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK, we use MPG but even then, I know my car gets 4L/100km or 70MPGimp

    65. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Age of car shouldn't affect fuel consumption too much - my 9 year old car with 150,000 miles/240,000km on the clock gets 3.8L/100km which it has been doing for the past few years. I find air temperature affects it a lot more - it's sometimes 3.5 when it's very warm, or 4.2 when it's cold.

    66. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      It tells you when it's low, but it doesn't tell you how far you can go on that amount of fuel. It's very easy to do a calculation in your head based on MPG to figure out, and next to impossible to do based on L/100Km.

    67. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you afraid that the word "petrol" would confuse the poor Americans?

    68. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Which is easier to do in your head? At least for me, multiplying is much more likely to be easy to both estimate and arrive at an actual answer.

      (Remember, unit conversions are never hard; this whole story is about frequent but small annoyances.)

    69. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I think once it gets into habit, you don't really do any calculations - you just look at the gauge and translate it directly into distance. E.g. for my car, I just know that a full tank gets me ~600 miles on the highway (and I use miles because everything is in miles here in US, it's not worth the bother converting back & forth), and go from there; but I'd have to do math to translate that back to actual MPG.

    70. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I think once it gets into habit, you don't really do any calculations - you just look at the gauge and translate it directly into distance. E.g. for my car, I just know that a full tank gets me ~600 miles on the highway (and I use miles because everything is in miles here in US, it's not worth the bother converting back & forth), and go from there; but I'd have to do math to translate that back to actual MPG.

      it's a stupid argument in the first place. new cars tell you how long you can drive before it's empty..not that people are that worried about not finding a gas station.

      but what you want to actually know is how much going somewhere costs and litres per 100km tells you that quite well.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  11. Zero is Still Zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    'Zero' is still 'zero' whether measured in metric or standard. Why does that matter? Because that's exactly how much I care about how the White House feels about this.

    We have so many more important things to concern ourselves with than what unit of measure we're using. The most important unit of measure, lives, doesn't seem to measure up to what the government thinks the most important unit of measure is: dollars.

    1. Re:Zero is Still Zero by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      'Zero' is still 'zero' whether measured in metric or standard.

      Well, no!

      Not if you are talking about temperature measured in degrees C vs. F vs. K!

      Agreed with the rest of your comment though...

      Paul B.

    2. Re:Zero is Still Zero by mtippett · · Score: 1

      Thankfully it isn't like temperature.

      0 (C) != 0 (F). But fortunately -40 (F) = -40 (C). Or you can just double and add 30, or maybe you prefer to divide by 9 and multiply by 5...

      Hell, let's just go duodecimal... Software engineers will be comfortable with the A and B value, and young kids learning to write will be happy with the reversed 2 and 3.

      Got to love measures. I seriously hope we *do not* come across aliens any time soon and get tempted with a true universal (well maybe galactic, well probably just an Orion Arm (our part of the galaxy) specific set of measures. Let's hope that physics is consistent at that level too....

  12. Makes sense by knotprawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not yielding an inch, are they? Imagine the impact it would have on Subway.

    1. Re:Makes sense by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      not really, you can look up articles to see the normal variation of subway's bun. could be the "303 mm sandwich" or something

    2. Re:Makes sense by gmb61 · · Score: 1

      Not yielding an inch, are they? Imagine the impact it would have on Subway.

      I agree, asking for a 30.48 centimeter sandwich instead of a footlong just wouldn't work.

    3. Re:Makes sense by knotprawn · · Score: 1

      Worthy idea. Just did that. Turned this up. Friday night, and I'm on a thread about standards. Makes me want to pound myself and tear things limb from limb.

    4. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, at least in Europe, they are called Sub 15 and Sub 30. It works for us! ;-)

    5. Re:Makes sense by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Just tell Congressmen that their dicks will seem longer in metric. They'll pass a law for going metric.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here in Germany they sell them as 30 cm and 15 cm sandwiches.

    7. Re:Makes sense by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      In Australia, which has used metric since the 70's, Subway market their products as the Subway 6-Inch(r) and Subway Footlong(r) Sub. They recently came to grief because the Subway Footlong(r) was routinely less than a foot long. Subway initially tried to weasel out of false advertising claims by insisting that neither trademark was descriptive of the product it was applied to: clearly counter to any common-sense interpretation of their advertising.

      Few Australians are likely to ask for a Footlong "sandwich", in metric or imperial measure, because that use of the word "sandwich" is an Americanism too far.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    8. Re:Makes sense by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      there is a similar problem with some male pornstars' nicknames

    9. Re:Makes sense by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Insightful

      that use of the word "sandwich" is an Americanism too far.

      Ah yes, the Earl of Sandwich was truly one of the great Americans, wasn't he?

    10. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone has already pointed out that sandwich is British (as am I), so what do you call a sandwich? I lived in Scarborough Beach, Perth for six months and I completely failed to notice that Aussies have a different word for sandwich.

    11. Re:Makes sense by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      This isn't a 'thread about standards.'

      It's a standard Slashdot Metric System Troll. They always turn out like this.

    12. Re:Makes sense by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Weiner isn't in congress anymore. He is trying to nudge his way back into public view, though.

    13. Re:Makes sense by Wallslide · · Score: 1

      A regular sized Subway sandwich in Japan is called a 'footlong', despite most units being metric there (and when they aren't metric, they most certainly aren't imperial-based in the British or American sense. Room-size is often measured in 'tatami mats'. Oddly enough, there are different standards for those depending on whether you're from Tokyo or Kyoto.).

    14. Re:Makes sense by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. Americans call things 'sandwiches', that would not be called 'sandwiches' in the rest of the world (or by the Earl of Sandwich for that matter). This includes things like the things Subway sells. It also includes burgers (I've seen American fast food restaurants refer to things like the Big Mac as a 'sandwich', or asking whether you wanted the 'sandwich only', or a drink with that).

    15. Re:Makes sense by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      How is a hamburger not a sandwich? That's like saying a butty isn't a sandwich.

    16. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be 30cm. Which is incidentally more than the 11 inch you're getting nowadays anyway.

    17. Re:Makes sense by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Not yielding an inch, are they? Imagine the impact it would have on Subway.

      Over here in Metric land they still refer to it as a Footlong(TM) despite multiple photos measuring a subway sub and the total length amounting to less than 11 inches.

      Reference here

      BTW, distances are measured in centimetres, metres and kilometres, exaggerations can be measured in inches and miles.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:Makes sense by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Someone has already pointed out that sandwich is British (as am I), so what do you call a sandwich? I lived in Scarborough Beach, Perth for six months and I completely failed to notice that Aussies have a different word for sandwich.

      I'm not Aussie, but I lived there for 6 years. In my experience, the Australian word "sandwich" is more strictly defined as two pieces of sliced bread with something in between. Rolls, buns, baguette bread, etc. that have been sliced open and something placed in between get called a sandwich everywhere else in the English speaking world that I know of, but not Australia.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    19. Re:Makes sense by rasherbuyer · · Score: 1

      http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/hamsandwich-atrb.jpg

    20. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Subway's 6-inch subs are actually 5.75 inches long, a de-emphasis on the importance of Imperial measurements could work in their favor.

    21. Re:Makes sense by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      A foot is considered 30 centimeters here, but Subway sells 30 centimeters or 15 centimeter sandwiches. I found it odd to sell sandwich by lenght though, and they always look oddly at me when I order a meter.

    22. Re:Makes sense by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      "BLT Royale with Cheese"?

    23. Re:Makes sense by foxed · · Score: 1

      Not yielding an inch, are they? Imagine the impact it would have on Subway.

      I agree, asking for a 30.48 centimeter sandwich instead of a footlong just wouldn't work.

      When Subway offer you a footlong, that is one foot to within, what, plus or minus half an inch? Converting to 30.48 centimetres implies a precision of .1 millimetres, which is ridiculous. Just a thirty would be fine, and about the same precision.

    24. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheers. Here in the UK, if I was ordering a sandwich I'd be specific and only say sandwich if I meant two pieces of sliced bread. In every other context I use sandwich for everything.

    25. Re:Makes sense by captjc · · Score: 1

      From the Merriam-Webster Dictionary

      Sandwich - sandÂwich noun \Ësan(d)-ËOEwich, Ësam-; dialect ËsaÅ-\

      1
      a : two or more slices of bread or a split roll having a filling in between
      b : one slice of bread covered with food
      2
      : something resembling a sandwich; especially : composite structural material consisting of layers often of high-strength facings bonded to a low strength central core

      How does what Subway and McDonalds sell not fit the definition of Sandwich?

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    26. Re:Makes sense by GumphMaster · · Score: 2

      You have also missed the point

      The origin of words is often important, as are regional variations. I am assuming you realise that the Merriam-Webster is the quintessential American English dictionary. A quintessentially English English dictionary does not have the "or a split roll" addition to the definition (see also this one). My Macquarie English Dictionary (Australian English) dictionary reads: "1. two slices of bread (or toast) , plain or buttered, with a layer of meat, fish, cheese, or the like between. 2. something formed by similar combination." The term "Sub", traded so heavily by Subway is a contraction of Submarine sandwich which is claimed to be American in origin (along with quite a few US regional variations). While what Subway sell is a "sandwich" in arrangement that is not the term that much of the English speaking world would use outside of a Subway outlet: that is the point.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    27. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent not actually insightful. GP actually referring to the fact that 'sandwich' means 2 slices of bread, not a friggin' baguette.

    28. Re:Makes sense by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      The definition you are using is from Merriam-Webster, an American English dictionary. So of course what Subway and McDonalds sell fits that definition.

      The key difference is the "or a split roll..." part. Here (Australia, but also in the UK, NZ, other English-speaking countries), the word 'sandwich' means something between two pieces of (normal, flat, sliced) bread. Something with fillings in bun, or a roll, etc. is not called a sandwich. It's called a (ham)burger, or a roll, or something else that's more descriptive of the particular type of bread used (e.g. focaccia).

      Or to put it another way, Americans use the word 'sandwich' as a generic term encompassing a whole class of food items that feature fillings between some kind of bread, whereas in other places, 'sandwich' is a specific term referring to a subset of what Americans would call a sandwich. (Incidentally, I can't think of any equivalent 'generic' term in UK/AU/NZ English equivalent to the US usage of 'sandwich').

    29. Re:Makes sense by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Seriously, in non-US English, it's not. A hamburger and a sandwich are two different things (insert non-overlapping Venn diagram here). That's like saying "how is a cat not a dog". They are both pets (or in this case, food items with fillings between pieces of bread), but they aren't the same thing.

      Or to put it a different way, Americans use 'sandwich' as an all-encompassing term that includes burgers and many other food items, including what non-US English speakers call 'sandwiches', whereas for the rest of us, sandwich is a specific term that doesn't 'include' any other subset of food items.

    30. Re:Makes sense by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I'll get a 3 decimetre sub with a 30 centilitre beverage please!

    31. Re:Makes sense by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      How is a hamburger not a sandwich? That's like saying a butty isn't a sandwich.

      it has crust at top and at bottom? making it a bun, not a sandwich made from pieces of bread?

      subs are 15 and 30cm here.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  13. both are bastardized. by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    Every time I see someone write decimal feet and fractional meters I must conclude that point is mostly lost.

    1. Re:both are bastardized. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly, decimal is kind of a cruddy system. It was a bad call in the first place to use base 10. Yeah, it's good for counting on your fingers, but it's only cleanly divisible by 1, 2, 5 and 10. Base 12 would have been a much better choice, it's cleanly divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12.

      I say we ditch metric, imperial and the decimal system as well.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:both are bastardized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All good bases are powers of 2 you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:both are bastardized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use radix=12 for inches=>feet

    4. Re:both are bastardized. by stud9920 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      well, if it had been base twelve, it would have been divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 10

    5. Re:both are bastardized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You poor thing. You want so desperately to be seen as the gadfly of Slashdot, yet you're just so inept at actually acting like one.

    6. Re:both are bastardized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And binary would be better still. It is divisible by all numbers in the system, and of course also has the simplicity of having only one number. And by one number I do mean 1.

    7. Re:both are bastardized. by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      "Ditch the decimal" is the funniest argument ever.

      Try to tell that to accountants: "sure, you do no longer buy 123 units $234 each, you buy A3 units, each costing ..."

    8. Re:both are bastardized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you meant to say "base 60" - if not, you fail math forever.

    9. Re:both are bastardized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could use base twelve but please then we should also have separate symbols for those digits. because using base 12 and then writing them in decimal is insanity.

    10. Re:both are bastardized. by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      We should have used base 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 so numbers like this aren't so long

    11. Re:both are bastardized. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Most of us can cope with fractions, so dividing 10 by 4 isn't a problem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:both are bastardized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please use base 8 or 16 (or any other power of 2), then we can calculate each digit op pi independently AND we get rid of the kilobyte/kibibyte discussion. Who ever needs to divide by 3 or by 5 anyway?

    13. Re:both are bastardized. by JigJag · · Score: 1

      I've said it before, but it bears repeating. You boast the 6 sub-division of base 12 (namely 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12) as being better because it's more than in base 10.
      You are mistaken however as in base 10, there are 10 sub-divisions. (.0, .1, .2, .3, .4, .5, .6, .7, .8, .9) and each of those also have 10 sub-divisions, and each of those also have ... you get the idea.

      JigJag

      --
      "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    14. Re:both are bastardized. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I've said it before, but it bears repeating. You boast the 6 sub-division of base 12 (namely 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12) as being better because it's more than in base 10.
      You are mistaken however as in base 10, there are 10 sub-divisions. (.0, .1, .2, .3, .4, .5, .6, .7, .8, .9) and each of those also have 10 sub-divisions, and each of those also have ... you get the idea.

      JigJag

      Take 1 cake. Divide it evenly amongst 3 people. Represent the amount of cake each person gets in decimal. Sorry, you can't. It's impossible.

      Get the idea?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    15. Re:both are bastardized. by JigJag · · Score: 1

      your example is no more and no less applicable to imperial units. In each case, you get a third. How do you write a third of a cake? Maybe you take the perimeter or the area and divide by three. Suppose the perimeter is 11 inches. What's that divided by 3? 3.66666(...) inches. Since the inch is subdivided by powers of 2, you won't get a clean fraction.

      So your example only highlights the inability to write down irrational numbers in either systems.

      JigJag

      --
      "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    16. Re:both are bastardized. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      your example is no more and no less applicable to imperial units. In each case, you get a third. How do you write a third of a cake? Maybe you take the perimeter or the area and divide by three. Suppose the perimeter is 11 inches. What's that divided by 3? 3.66666(...) inches. Since the inch is subdivided by powers of 2, you won't get a clean fraction.

      So your example only highlights the inability to write down irrational numbers in either systems.

      JigJag

      Irrelevant. This is a VERY common use case. THIS use case, and other COMMON use cases, do not need to be so hard. Different choices would make them easier. That is all.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  14. We used to have those. by Molochi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be we decided that provinciality was a smaller sacrifice than the cost of the paint.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    1. Re:We used to have those. by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      ...or was it?

    2. Re:We used to have those. by Molochi · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was the right choice.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    3. Re:We used to have those. by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      I didn't say you said that.

  15. Really Already Metric by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Omnibus Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 amended the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 and stated the metric system was "the Preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce". Also said the federal government has a responsibility to assist industry and especially small business, as it voluntarily converts to the metric system .

    Metric system is of course taught in U.S. schools, even since the early 70s (yes, I was there)

    1. Re:Really Already Metric by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      stated the metric system was "the Preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce".

      Which has absolutely no practical meaning as far as I can determine, unless you can cite some actual concrete consequences of this declaration.

      Also said the federal government has a responsibility to assist industry and especially small business, as it voluntarily converts to the metric system

      Which, once again, means what? Are there grants? Is the US offering any kind of money to anybody to help fund their conversion to metric?

    2. Re:Really Already Metric by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you're saying this to a guy who had to buy metric sockets for the stabilizer bar and links of his Dodge Caravan

    3. Re:Really Already Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Omnibus Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 amended the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 and stated the metric system was "the Preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce". Also said the federal government has a responsibility to assist industry and especially small business, as it voluntarily converts to the metric system .

      Metric system is of course taught in U.S. schools, even since the early 70s (yes, I was there)

      In '77, at my school, all references to non-Metric measurements were removed and we were defacto Metric.

      Then some parent complained about the "Commie Counting System"...

      In '78, at my school all references to Metric measurements were removed and.....

  16. By trying to make everyone happy, no one is happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One advantage of a common system is uniform communication. While I'm sure we'd all love to "speak metric at home," it wouldn't help us explain what we need when we go to the grocery store for 2 kilos of flour.

  17. Cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no, I'm in Canada and love metric, but you don't use it for cooking.. use cups and tablespoons and shit.

    1. Re:Cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit? I don't think I want to eat at your place...

    2. Re:Cooking by lisaparratt · · Score: 2

      You mean the metric cup of 250ml, the metric tbsp of 15ml, and the metric tsp of 5ml?

    3. Re:Cooking by Darktan · · Score: 1

      ... and shit

      There's your problem.

  18. It's the american way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's almost like choosing between roman numerals and the decimal system. There's a slight learning curve, but the metric system is far superior for math and doesn't really have any drawbacks. Forcing people to make the smart long term choice is not the American way, though, so the US will be stuck in with two systems for a very long time.

  19. did one right by charlesr44403 · · Score: 1

    It is rare for me to agree with the present administration but they got this one exactly right. In the UK merchants were punished for still using old weights and measures. I would really hate to see that here. Not our way.

    1. Re:did one right by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      It is rare for me to agree with the present administration but they got this one exactly right. In the UK merchants were punished for still using old weights and measures. I would really hate to see that here. Not our way.

      Well, technically, when the old system of weights and measures ewnt out, you HAD to convert. Because otherwise it meant you were possibly ripping off people using an uncalibrated scale.

      If you look at your gas pump or grocery pricing scale, you'll find a calibration sticker on them that tells you when the unit was last measured and approved for trade use.

      It's why your bathroom scale says "not for trade use" on it - it's not calibrated and what it shows is not guaranteed.

      And using an uncalibrated scale for trade is considered fraud - I'm sure you'll be pissed if the pump said you pumped in 10 gallons of gas, and in reality, it only pumped in 9, thus cheating you that gallon (and $3-4, depending on where you are). Or if you bought a pound of meat that really was 15oz instead.

      In the UK, all they had to do was simply declare the imperial scales and uncalibrated (and only use metric calibration tools), at which point yes, the shop really was committing fraud.

      Hell, we see it today - where a 4 litre bottle of milk gets shrunk to 3.79 litres (which conveniently, is a gallon).

  20. Re:first by Beerdood · · Score: 4, Funny

    first

    That must be a imperial first, not a metric first.

    --
    Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
  21. In the mean time. JIS screws and screwdrivers by aoeu · · Score: 1

    are unknown in the US.

    --
    All your database are belong to U.S.
    1. Re:In the mean time. JIS screws and screwdrivers by Strider- · · Score: 1

      I prefer God's one true screw: The Robertson.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  22. Good by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 0

    Do we really need the administration wasting time on this?

    1. Re:Good by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      I suppose that if you tie your hands behind, you could still walk, and why stop here, maybe we should tie you right leg, but wait, i am pretty sure that if you blind your left eye you would be still a fully functional regular american.

    2. Re:Good by Kohath · · Score: 1

      You don't understand. Metric is The Right Answer. And knowing The Right Answer makes us better than other people who don't know The Right Answer. We're important. We matter.

      In your answer, we don't matter. How can we be important if knowing The Right Answer isn't important? Therefore, the US must officially adopt the metric system.

    3. Re:Good by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Using Imperial measurements for anything in 2013 is analogous to people who research their reports with a twenty year old Encyclopedia Britannica. It's not righteousness, it's common fracking sense.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    4. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia we converted to metric in the 70's. If you asked Anyone younger than 50 about how far away something is in miles or what a pound is they would have no idea. It's complete bullshit that metric is harder, it's actually easier. Speed limits - in most places more than 100km/h will get you a ticket. 0 degrees - there's a frost outside. There is no conversion to do if that's what everyone uses and the US is the only holdout because the general population seems to be too stupid to cope with any type of change.

    5. Re:Good by Kohath · · Score: 1

      The Right Answer is very frequently Common Sense. And Common Sense is what makes us better than those senseless morons who don't have any Common Sense. All of us who matter and are important have Common Sense -- or course we do. If you agree with us, you have Common Sense, and you are therefore not one of those senseless morons who disagree.

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when units organically change. Boom.

    7. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/

      Because losing a 125 million dollar orbiter isn't reason enough? English measurements have no good reason to exist...it's not cultural and to interface with other non-metric systems is a real pain. We had a CNC type machine that used both english and metric bolts and nuts inside the machine. What a nightmare to service that POS.

    8. Re:Good by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You've been "slowly adopting" the metric system for over a century. The rest of the world wants to know, "What's the friggen hold-up?" We're sick of running two production lines, one in metric for home use, and one in American units for export Stateside.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Good by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Me, I think it would be an excellent thing for the Obama Administration to spend the rest of it's term working on.

      But I'm just weird that way.

    10. Re:Good by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      But don't you find it interesting that the GP commenter appears to endorse Fracking as a good thing? It's good to find open-minded people in places you don't expect them.

    11. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is the most important windmill you have at which to tilt, you're living a blessed life. Really, who gives a shit. And I, like the GP, say this as a scientist who uses the metric system every day at work. It's all just numbers, it's not that hard.

    12. Re:Good by Kohath · · Score: 1

      The rest of the world wants to know, "What's the friggen hold-up?"

      We're a free country. Forcing a measurement system on everyone based on a central government edict isn't the way we have traditionally done things. That is changing though. Soon, no one will remember when the US was a free country.

    13. Re:Good by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      and given time we can slowly move to using metric all of the time if we want. The most effective change happens so slowly that you can't pinpoint when exactly it happened. Since there's no urgency here, it will be fine if it takes another generation or so to fully transition.

      You don't understand. It takes a generation after the point when using the wrong system will get you fined, laughed at, or punched in the face. Otherwise the old system, no matter how idiotic, continues to perpetuate itself indefinitely.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    14. Re:Good by JubilantShank · · Score: 1

      If you have to create two separate production lines in order to have two separate labels on a product then you're doing something wrong. Do you also have one production line for French, one for English, and one for Spanish? Hell, you don't even need to use different labels - just say "x Liters (x Gallons)" or vice versa, just like pretty much every fucking company does anyway.

      Yeah, Imperial is kinda clunky sometimes. So is the French number system. It makes sense up until 70, then 70 is (literally translated as) 60 + 10, and 80 is 4 * 20. In French, 99 is "quatre-vingt dix-neuf". That is literally translated as "4 80's plus 10 and 9". That's incredibly clunky and it doesn't even involve any type of unit conversion. (I took French this semester, and the number system really annoyed me. Nice language otherwise.)

      Basically, quit whining. Why the hell should anyone else care what system is most commonly used in the US? There are no regulations that require you to use the Imperial system. Sell whatever you want in whatever units you want, no one is stopping you.

    15. Re:Good by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      This exactly. And shit, people forget we dont only use the metric system in science. AU and Light Years are definitely not metric yet used in science.

    16. Re:Good by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Slapping a different label on something is easy if you're dealing with foodstuffs, paint, and the like. It's quite a different story when you're dealing in mechanical parts and hardware.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    17. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was an xkcd reference.

    18. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're really saying is that anyone who really needs to work with measurements, uses metric. If I were the benevolent dictator of the USA, I would start by banning all bolts and nuts that were not metric. Why the fuck do we need two sets of tools, just so the americans can continue being apathetic?

    19. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most effective change happens so slowly that you can't pinpoint when exactly it happened.

      Seeing as the US has been trying since 1866, I think this approach is flawed.

    20. Re:Good by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Then don't. Just make everything in metric and sell however many units of your goods that U.S. residents want to buy when they are purely metric. I am assuming that the reason companies don't do that is because they make more from selling products made in U.S. Customary Units. Why should U.S. residents be forced to change to help corporations make more profit? Companies are free to produce everything in metric units if they wish.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    21. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. Everything at work is in Metric and the world doesn't fall apart when I walk out the door at 5.

      The guys designing the craft for the Apollo program weren't using Metric. I heard a rumor they actually made it off the launch pad. Did I miss anything?

    22. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most effective change happens so slowly that you can't pinpoint when exactly it happened

      I have to disagree there. In my experience, you either actively push for a change, or it ends up never happening.

    23. Re:Good by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      More than you know. I use pounds, inches and other Imperial measurements all of the time. I use them to fix old things- which one day will be gone. Holding on to an antiquated measurements is senseless, though. There seem to be economic benefits to metric standardization likely far beyond propping up the odd parts manufacturer.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    24. Re:Good by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Hipster logic. Fails to acknowledge that popular things can also be popular because they practical.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    25. Re:Good by Kohath · · Score: 1

      But "Common Sense" is not a quality. It is simply a way to say that people who disagree with you aren't sensible.

    26. Re:Good by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Since there's no urgency here, it will be fine if it takes another generation or so to fully transition.

      There are substantial costs involved in having to manage with two incompatible measurement systems. Never mind needing to convert between each one, how about every mechanic in the US needing to have two sets of tools for ever size, metric and SAE, doubling the cost. That's a huge, huge cost across the economy.

      Since the rest of the industrialized world uses metric, the sooner the US completely switches over, the sooner we'll start seeing big savings from not having to be "multi-lingual".

      And let's not mention the costs of spacecraft crashing into the faces of other planets.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    27. Re:Good by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Thankfully we don't have a dictator in the US.

      Really, this whole thing is a non-issue. Why is everyone so fanatically opposed to other people making different decisions and having other opinions? Americans are obnoxious in many ways, but the rest of the world seems to be occupied by straight up authoritarians.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    28. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they really meant it, they'd start having all federally-funded signs and information in both Metric and old-fashioned units. But they don't.

  23. That's completely chickenshit. by gatesstillborg · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the main thing to start with is driving mileage. They aren't doing much with metric if that (ie public facing) is still English, and only internal govt stuff is metric.

  24. Another worthless waste of time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They complain that the government spends too much money on dumb things. Then they want the government to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars so that the road signs are all in km instead of miles...

    1. Re:Another worthless waste of time ... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Yes, for a change that's spending money in something worth it.

    2. Re:Another worthless waste of time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, they don't need to change the signs over night. But I expect you're too much of a fucking retard to think of that. Second, this would be about adopting a global initiative of a truly intuitive measurement standard. Third, I guess we would be better off putting more money into food stamps so that ghetto rats and trailer trash can keep getting fat off HoHos? I love how things that serve the public and have actual productive ends are attacked but this fucking nation can't get its head out of its ass about keeping welfare fucks alive on my dime.

  25. Free to chose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government is letting people make their own decisions? So it ain't so!
    BTW, the English system works very nicely for cooking, making it easy to halve or double recipes (e.g., 4 tablespoons in a 1/4 cup). Metric is not good for that at all, although it's marginally easier for determining ratios of ingredients.

    1. Re:Free to chose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty damned easy to divide 500 milliliters by two... Is three digits too much math for your little brain?

  26. Re:Let's apply that to other government programs. by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Hospitals aren't going to turn away critically ill people. And more importantly, the insurance companies need to make sure they get their dough.

  27. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So you always want to buy 2 sets of wrenches?

  28. The great thing about standards... by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 1

    ...is there're so many to choose from.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
  29. High five by scottbomb · · Score: 0

    I almost never agree with anything the Obama admin. does but when I do, I'm happy to give kudos.

    1. Re:High five by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

      That's a high 6 3/8ths, Imperial.

  30. Zero isn't Zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zero Celsius is 32F. But other than that I agree with you. Temperature should be measured in Kelvin anyways.

  31. Not disappointing by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 0

    The White House respecting the First Amendment is not disappointing. Unexpected, maybe.

    --
    +0 Meh
  32. Re:Sure beats jail time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I convert stuff to imperial all the time, so far I've not been imprisoned for it. We still drink pints, buy eggs by the dozen and talk about fuel efficiency in miles per gallon. Older people routinely convert Celsius to Fahrenheit, measuring jugs come with both fl oz and ml markings... no prison time.

  33. no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by mrvan · · Score: 5, Informative

    I agree that no laws should be passed that force e.g. a supermarket to use specific weights or measures. If people are annoyed by the choice of a supermarket they can bring their business elsewhere.

    However, the "free choice" argument does not work for monopoly players, especially the government itself. The last time I was in the US, miles were used in the interstate system to indicate both distances/exit numbers and maximum speeds. You can't choose to pick the other road that goes the same place but uses metric, because there is no real competition in the road network.

    I don't know whether other official communication of the state(s) uses metric or not, I could imagine many laws and forms that refer to land area, volumes of water, weight (e.g. of cars) that could use either non-metric or metric. They can't hide behind a "free choice" argument there, and a real "bimetric" system requires the government to provide information, like speed limits, in both systems, just like a blingual government publishes laws etc. in two languages.

    1. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still choose to read speed limits as if they said kilometers. You'll only be going slower, which on most roads should still get you at the minimum required speed, if there is any.

    2. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, supermarkets are already regulated by the same government as to what weights and measures that are used. It's not to say that a supermarket couldn't add additional information but it would be hypocritical of the government to act like private businesses aren't beholden to a standard today.

    3. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you MUST have laws forcing supermarkets to use specific weights or measures. Otherwise, Shady-Joe's meat market could just shave down their scales and sell you 14 oz of beef instead of a full pound. This is the entire reason we have standardized weights and measures in the first place.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great and all, except some things were measured in imperial and converting them would cause them to make little sense - think surveying, exit numbers (listed in miles from the western/southern border fore most highways, though some like I-81 in NY don't correlate to mileage). When our exits are conveniently in ~ mile increments, it makes sense to maintain miles/mph as the units for that system. If a farm was surveyed in imperial, it makes little sense to switch from acres to hectares, etc.

    5. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US we invented something called GPS (global positioning system). You can buy these little receiver computer displays that you mount in your car. Many cars now come with them built in as standard. Many cell phones also have this capability.

      Through the use of some fifth grade math they are able to display distances in km/m or in miles/feet. This makes almost all street sign superfluous. I've had a GPS in my car for six years now and it's been that long since I even bothered looking at a street sign other than to verify a freeway exit number. I don't even look at distance numbers anymore, just the time (the GPS devices have the ability to tell you when you'll arrive at your destination). And they are pretty accurate. Even after driving all day, mine has told me when I'll get to my destination within a few minutes if I don't make any stops.

      I suggest you check one out, You can get pretty good ones for under $100USD. Also with self driving cars (another US invention), street signs will become even more useless. Personally I would like to see them all go away and reduce the clutter in my view. As an engineer and work almost mainly in metric and have no problem with either. If you really want to change something, get rid of the whole 60s in a minute, 24 hours in a day brain damage. 360 degrees in a circle? WTC is up with that?

    6. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by istartedi · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, every car sold in the US has a dual readout speedometer. When I got a car with digital display I found that this was accomplished with a toggle-button. This leads to a trick that gets old quickly. "Hey this car has a button that makes it go 120 in an instant" /me toggles to kph. Hardee-har-har.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Exit numbers, if they need to be tied to instance alonga highway, could be relcualted in km and rounded to the nearest integer. In Canada, multiple exits that would correspond with the same integer have different letter suffixes after them, such as exit 53-a and 53-b, for instance

    8. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by dkf · · Score: 1

      No, you MUST have laws forcing supermarkets to use specific weights or measures. Otherwise, Shady-Joe's meat market could just shave down their scales and sell you 14 oz of beef instead of a full pound. This is the entire reason we have standardized weights and measures in the first place.

      Actually, you have laws that specify the clear meaning of weights and measures, and require that stores properly mark on quantities and so on. The problem isn't that you're getting 14 oz of beef; the problem is that you asked for 16 oz and the store is claiming that that's what you should pay for.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    9. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . If people are annoyed by the choice of a supermarket they can bring their business elsewhere.

      And when all the choices do the same?

      AC

    10. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by dskoll · · Score: 1

      I agree that no laws should be passed that force e.g. a supermarket to use specific weights or measures.

      Why not? Supermarkets are already heavily regulated wrt the accuracy of their measuring tools. I think legislation requiring metric units would be fine; you could leave it up to each supermarket whether or not they wanted to augment that with approximate imperial measurements.

    11. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the manufacturers do this enough already...

      59 oz half gallon orange juice.. that when first came out was literally the same exact size as the 64 oz containers.. same fucking size (some still are)..
      48-54 oz half gallon ice cream...
      10-14.4 oz (weight) packages that customarily were a full 16 oz (1 lb) for generations.. outside dimensions often the same, just less product inside.
      now 1.25L and 1.5L soda (in addition to the 1L 2L and 3L containers).. 1.25 or 1.5 "new" sizes have an old price, the 2L price higher.

      i'm waiting for out for the 10 egg dozen, or them to fuck around with the 1 gallon milk jug, or take away that 2L bottle or the 12 oz beer can/bottle -- then, and only then, will consumers stand up against this horrid practice of shrinking packages as a form of increasing prices.

    12. Re:no free choice for gov't info like speed limits by foxed · · Score: 1

      ... the "free choice" argument does not work for monopoly players, especially the government itself.

      Yes, we can't choose our own individual time zone or or own personal daylight saving time. They can only be done as a community. Similarly, units of measure have major implications for society as a whole and the government should standardise them.

  34. The White House has the right idea. by Sydin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe before we rush to adopt the Metric system, we should stop to consider the consequences of blithely giving this measurement system such a central position in our lives.

    1. Re:The White House has the right idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like our monetary system. Which is simple. And metric.

    2. Re:The White House has the right idea. by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Maybe before we rush to adopt the Metric system, we should stop to consider the consequences of blithely giving this measurement system such a central position in our lives.

      Someone has just read xkcd.

    3. Re:The White House has the right idea. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Well done sir.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  35. The right answer by RevWaldo · · Score: 0

    We measure distance in miles, but fiber optic cable diameter in millimeters. We weigh deli products in pounds, but medicine in milligrams. We buy gasoline by the gallon, but soda comes in liter-size bottles. We parcel property in acres, but remote sensing satellites map the Earth in square meters.

    While many countries mandate the use of the metric system by law, the U.S. Congress has repeatedly passed laws that encourage voluntary adoption of the metric system. We use a mixture of metric and customary units depending on the context. We also have a long tradition of voluntary standards and our bilingual system of measurement is part of that tradition.

    I may be prejudiced by my upbringing, but I always broke it down to metric being the most scientific measurement system, while imperial is the most human, very much in the Spock vs Kirk kind of way.

    Fahrenheit? 0 = friggin' cold, 100 = friggin' hot.
    How long is a foot? Approximately the size of your foot.
    You walked a kilometer? Big whoop. You walked a mile? That's a workout.
    A gallon of milk will last you the week, a gallon of gas will get you home.
    Putting up a wall? We're gonna need some 2x4s and 4x8s
    Even the concept of converting grandma's recipe for chocolate cake to metric give me hives.

    Now fixing my car? Measuring out the baby's medicine? Sending a probe to Mars? Hells yes, use metric, are you kidding? But for day to day stuff, mine's a pint.

    .

    1. Re:The right answer by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      You ran a 10K? You're pretty fit.

      You drank a whole 2 liter bottle of Coke? You fat bastard.

      It's below zero - We might get snow.

      It's 200K to Seattle? We'll, we're averaging 100 kph so we'll be there in a couple of hours.

    2. Re:The right answer by EvanED · · Score: 1

      It's 200K to Seattle? We'll, we're averaging 100 kph so we'll be there in a couple of hours.

      Actually I think driving is one place where miles actually has a tiny advantage.

      Suppose you're going 60 mph. That's a mile each minute, which is really easy to work with. Destination 13 miles away? That's 13 minutes. But if you're going 100 km/h and your destination is 20 km away, now you have to do more actual math: divide 100 [km/h] by 20 [km] to get 5 [1/h], then divide 60 [min/hr] by 5 [1/h] to get 12 [min].

      It's not hard, but really nothing in this unit conversion stuff is.

      Even at 70 or 75 mph, the 1 mile/minute rule can be adjusted a bit. 13 miles away? Well, that's a bit less than 13 minutes. You do still have to do some calculations to get a more accurate answer, but a rough estimate can be arrived at nearly immediately. And even 60 mph is reasonably common -- many non-interstate highways have a 55mph speed limit, as do most interstates in urban areas. Also even on the interstates, if are going 70 mph but stop for an average of 5 minutes each hour, you get a lot closer to 1 mi/min. (That comes out to 64.1 mph on average.)

      OK, I am giving a bit of a strawman. 75mph is 120km/h, which is very nicely 2 km/min, so there you'd just divide the destination distance by 2. At 70mph, you'd divide by 2 then add in a fudge factor, just like I subtract a fudge factor.)

      This is made possible of course by the coincidence that 60 mph happens to be in the ballpark of highway speeds and there are 60 minutes in an hour, not because of any actual unit conversions or anything.

      (Actually know I wonder what you'd get if you took the average speed limit of the entire interstate system weighted by traffic amount.)

    3. Re:The right answer by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I may be prejudiced by my upbringing,

      Probably everyone is.

      Anyway, as someone who lives in a country with only metric system, I think that the imperial system is weird.
      Different units with the same name (IIRC there are at least 3 kinds of "ounces", 2 kinds of "miles" etc).
      Difficult to switch scales, that's why you end up writing things with lots of zeros like "altitude: 20000ft" instead of converting to the next higher unit (20kft or however many miles it is).
      No reason why the wood cannot be "50x100".
      If it's below 0C outside, prepare for some ice/snow and most likely scraping your car window.
      A meter is approximately the length between the tips of your left hand fingers and your right shoulder.
      Gallon is approximately 5L, it weighs (for stuff that's about the same density as water) about 5kg.

      Now fixing my car? Measuring out the baby's medicine? Sending a probe to Mars? Hells yes, use metric, are you kidding? But for day to day stuff, mine's a pint.

      So, you have to use two different measuring systems, while I can use one since it is more suited for day to day stuff than imperial is for scientific/etc stuff.

    4. Re:The right answer by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Fahrenheit? 0 = friggin' cold, 100 = friggin' hot.

      How is that any easier than: 0 = water freezes, 100 = water boils?

      How long is a foot? Approximately the size of your foot.

      How long is a meter? Approximately the size of two steps. Big whoop.

    5. Re:The right answer by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      If they were really serious about converting to metric they wouldn't be using heretical non-base-10 units like minutes and hours. The speed limit would be 25 meters per second (~55 MPH), and a 20 kilometer trip would take 8 kiloseconds.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    6. Re:The right answer by PRMan · · Score: 1

      As someone who grew up with Imperial, I also think it's weird. Dry ounces and wet ounces. Dumb. Land miles is different than nautical miles. Stupid.

      But I like writing 20,000 feet instead of switching to something else. Do you spend kiloEuros?

      Wood could be 50x100. It would be even better if it actually WERE 50x100 instead of 48x96.

      Fahrenheit is way better for weather. You'll never convince me there. 0 is painfully cold and 100 is painfully hot.

      Inches are better than centimeters for measuring normal stuff. Millimeters and centimeters are too small for most things and meters are too large. Kilometers vs miles really doesn't matter much, except for the US standard speed of 60 mph making time calculations easier. So in distance, I actually prefer Imperial units.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    7. Re:The right answer by CoderBob · · Score: 1

      Fahrenheit? 0 = friggin' cold, 100 = friggin' hot.

      How is that any easier than: 0 = water freezes, 100 = water boils?

      It's not so much that it's easier, but it provides a greater degree of differentiation for the normal temperatures of day to day life. Most people aren't really concerned with where water boils on the scale, but rather what the temperature is outside. A better comparison between 0 and 100 degrees F is -17.8 to 37.8 - which becomes more cumbersome. Where I am in the US (Michigan) we see both ends of that extreme every year. There's something easier about the gradual change in temperature over that 100 degree interval compared to the 55.6 degree one- no decimals, and it's a smooth transition from one temp to the next.

    8. Re:The right answer by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      But I like writing 20,000 feet instead of switching to something else. Do you spend kiloEuros?

      In an informal writing (chat, email to a friend), yes. I hate writing lots of zeros, so I will usually write things like "That thing costs 5kEUR". When I am talking I will say "5 thousand Euros", but writing "5kEUR" is shorter/faster than "5 thousand EUR". I also try not to use "." or "," as thousands separators as they are confusing as hell (my country uses dot as thousands separator and comma as decimal separator - exactly reverse of what the US uses) if I really need to write a thousands separator (not in a formal document of course) I will use a space (20 000 feet) or ' (20'000 feet) - now it's not ambiguous.

      Fahrenheit is way better for weather. You'll never convince me there. 0 is painfully cold and 100 is painfully hot.

      But if it's below 32 you'll need o go earlier to scrape the ice from your car. Other than that, you could be right, I just am so used to Celsius that for me it's OK that -10C outside is really cold without a jacket, +24C (inside) is time for a fan, +28C is time for AC.

      For distance, my country uses metric and the car fuel consumption is specified in L/100km, so I can calculate how long will it take me to go there and how much I will pay for the fuel.
      Milimeters are good for small things (like wire thickness), centimeters are good for bigger things (like human height, though you could use 193cm or 1.93m - whichever looks better). The good thing about the metri system is that converting to bigger/smaller units is not a PITA.

    9. Re:The right answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A meter is approximately the length between the tips of your right hand fingers and your left shoulder.

      FTFY!

      Note: Measurements should not be done while preforming the macarena.

    10. Re:The right answer by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      For the purpose of "too cold" and "too hot", -15 and +40 (or -20 and +35 for me) numbers work just fine.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    11. Re:The right answer by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      Fahrenheit? 0 = friggin' cold, 100 = friggin' hot.

      What temperature water freezes (quite important, e.g., for road conditions, plants, etc)? Was it 34? :)

      How long is a foot? Approximately the size of your foot.

      Who's foot?

      Putting up a wall? We're gonna need some 2x4s and 4x8s

      Which are really 1.5x3.5 and 3.5x7.5.... You can't even get that one right!

    12. Re:The right answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the concept of converting grandma's recipe for chocolate cake to metric give me hives.

      Either Grandma specified awkward weights like 4 and five sixteenths of an ounce, in which case the value in grams will be no more unwieldy (122g) or the exact amount isn't critical and she actually just wrote 4 and a quarter ounces. Just use 120 grams and it'll be perfectly fine.

      The hard part will be measuring out 1.026 metric eggs, since they are a different size to the old imperial ones...

  36. Good by chihowa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that this is a perfectly adequate solution.

    I'm a scientist and use metric for everything at work, but I can drive in miles and get groceries by the pound, too. It's really not that hard to effectively use both systems, and given time we can slowly move to using metric all of the time if we want. The most effective change happens so slowly that you can't pinpoint when exactly it happened. Since there's no urgency here, it will be fine if it takes another generation or so to fully transition.

    Look at the progress we've made since the seventies. Today, anyone in science, engineering, medicine, the military, and many other fields are already proficient with both systems. There's no rush, so why not let it happen organically?

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  37. Wow they really are pro-Choice! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    They've left it up to us and are uninterested in obeying the fascists that want to use government violence to force you to obey their will.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:Wow they really are pro-Choice! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      We keep using Imperial just because we like pissing off the French...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Wow they really are pro-Choice! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The French tried to renumber the calendar right after the French Revolution, right at the same time they prescribed the Metric System (SI) be adopted. I have some 'year one' and 'year two' French centime coins in my coin collection. Just the usual sort of flaky stuff you expect from the French. Unfortunately the metric system didn't blow over the way most of the rest of their 'revolution' did.

  38. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I actually think the English system is better for daily use, the measurement units seem more natural to me than the metric ones.

    O_o

    Natural for what? The only advantage the English system has is that lots of lazy-brained people are accustomed to it.

  39. Re:Sure beats jail time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The UK mandates that things being sold have to provide metric units - they can provide other units as well if they wish. This actually makes a lot of sense, as it protects customers from misleading labelling. I could create my own units that at a glance will look similar and use those instead, giving customers less product for their money.

  40. Wait, so what they're saying.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... is that it's okay for Americans to go up to signs that are in imperial, rip them down, and replace them with ones that are in metric?

    I mean, if it's really supposed to be entirely voluntary.... isn't that what that means?

    Of course, conversely, they could rip down any metric signage that they see and replace them with imperial too...

    I'm seeing a rather glaring problem with this notion of "voluntary" as it applies to what kinds of units the country uses.

    1. Re:Wait, so what they're saying.... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      There are very few signs put up by the federal government. So, the notion of voluntary means that you can use whatever unit of measure you want in any signs that you put up and I can use whatever unit of measure I want in any signs that I put up. And in both cases, we are free to lobby the various government bodies that put up signs to use our preferred unit of measure.
      Of course, as someone else pointed out there is very little that is within the authority of the President to change what units of measure are used on signs (that is mostly based on laws passed by Congress or state legislators).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  41. Put subject here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are unknown in the US? The first part of your sentence got cut off for some reason.

  42. Real Americans eschew metric. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real Americans grew up using base 3, base 12, and base 60. Pushing decimal points is for sissies.

  43. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why is everyone so bent on this metric system?

    I'm from a country that changed to metric decades before I even started school. I now live in the US, honestly I dont have a problem with the imperial system, I learned all the useful conversions with-in a few months, now I just know what the commonly used imperial units represent with out having to do conversions. If anything the units of measurement are easier to deal with. Gee 55 litreeees of fuel or 14.5 gallons.. 14.5 gallons sounds more practical to me.

    If you want to use the metric system exclusively, go and live in a country that enforces it.

    1. Re:Why by Dominare · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone so bent on this metric system?

      Oh, I don't know, maybe because its intuitive, infinitely scalable in either direction, doesn't require a gigantic list of esoteric nouns to be memorized... hell, it even maps directly to the number of fingers you have!

    2. Re:Why by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Only if you're an average human. Guinea pigs have three toes in front, four in back. One of our cats is polydactyl. I'm not even sure how many toes she has on each foot, but there she has a bunch of extra toes.

      The metric system is actually rather badly scaled, if you want to talk about scalability. Sure, in a laboratory it scales well, but for purposed of human craftsmanship, you can't get much better than the 12 inch foot. 12 is easily divisible into 1/3 and 1/4 units. And the 3:4 scale is fairly useful in human scale. Also, the foot is roughly scaled on the length of the human foot. Stuff people can relate to. Not a metal bar in a glass case somewhere in Paris with lines scribed on it.

  44. Metric is awkward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm British. Metric system feels unnatural to me. I see the world in feet and inches, and fractions of inches. Kilometres seem useless when miles do the job fine. I bake with pounds and ounces (ok, usually I bake by volume - I haven't got the patience for anything else), and weigh myself in stone. If I was doing science, I would use the metric system, but for daily life - why bother? If you have a system that works fine, use it.

    1. Re:Metric is awkward by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      so, you do have 12 fingers? Then go on, it is perfectly natural for you to count to 12.

    2. Re:Metric is awkward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I long ago grew out of counting on my fingers.

      It was a tossoff between saying that or saying that I have ten fingers and two feet.

    3. Re:Metric is awkward by PRMan · · Score: 1

      You underestimate the number of Americans in Arkansas, Kentucky and Alabama with 12 fingers and 12 toes...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  45. Speak metric at home by Meeni · · Score: 1

    I was born and raised in metric land. I am now doing everything in "imperial" measurements, because using foreign units to do daily tasks is just about as productive as speaking cantonese to order food at your local burger drive-in. It doesn't work without excruciating efforts.

    Go to a shop, buy food produces, everything is labeled in oz and other random nonsensical units. Still, converting everything doesn't make it easier. Cooking is their example, so lets try it! You'd thought that using your imported cookbook, you'd be able to cook all in metric. Not so quickly. First cookware are not in metric, but I also had imported metric measuring bowls, haha ! Then I discovered that the amount of fat in butter, milk, etc is not the same as in Europe (it is standardized, but standardized differently). So all recipe made with an european cookbook fail miserably, the cake falls, it looks dry, or wet, but never quite right. Good luck then finding a US cookbook using metric measurements. Then, what is the point exactly of using an imperial cookbook, convert all units to metric, use metric tool and result in failure because you made conversion errors ?

    1. Re:Speak metric at home by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Easy, don't use imperial cookbooks, try use the republican cookbooks only :)

    2. Re:Speak metric at home by Meeni · · Score: 1

      And remember I am saying all that, meanwhile I am all infuriated by the fact that incoherent and inconsistent units make it super hard to do the most simple things, like comparing the price per volume/weight of produces you buy at the local grocery store. One is labeled in oz, the other in pounds, the third one in fluid oz (brilliant, having too different things with the same name). Anyway, I am buying groceries, not participating in counting-bees contest, so computint divisions by 12 and multiplications 16^3 was not in my program for the day. This is were mandating consistent units for selling volumes of goods and comparable price/g or price/L would make sense. Conversion and comparison is simpler for consumer. Instead, the unit jungle makes price impossible to compare.

    3. Re:Speak metric at home by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I was born and raised in metric land. I am now doing everything in "imperial" measurements

      Imperial or US Customary? The two systems are not identical, though they share many units (and slightly more names of units than actual units.)

    4. Re:Speak metric at home by Strider- · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Easy, don't use imperial cookbooks, try use the republican cookbooks only :)

      Little known fact: Many recipes are not directly transferrable between even Canada and the US, even if the proportions are kept correct. This is due to ingredient differences rather than measurement units (In fact, most Canadian cookbooks offer their recipes in both Metric and US). The biggest difference is flour. Canadian flour has a significantly higher gluten content than US "All Purpose" flour, and that can make a huge difference in bread, pastry, and other similar things.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    5. Re:Speak metric at home by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I use cookbooks for guidelines. I cook by touch, taste and consistency. I don't measure the flour going into the bread, I put flour into the wet ingredients till it hits the correct consistency. Yes you either need to use recipes or learn with an experienced cook before you can do so but give up your cook book and learn the basis and governing principles of the chemistry which governs the recipe and you will be far better off. Cooking is nothing more than very complicated chemistry.

      The one caveat to what I just said is pastries, you need specific weights and measures to make them turn out right and even people that have years of experience making them have to carefully measure the ingredients cause small variations can completely change the end product.

    6. Re:Speak metric at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you are shopping but every grocery store I shop at displays unit pricing, eliminating this issue.

    7. Re:Speak metric at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Germany (most likely it's a EU wide customer rights law, but I'm not sure) grocery stores are required to put on signs with the price of goods in €/1 kg or €/100 g (€/1 l or €/100 ml for goods measured by volume), irrespective of the packaging size.

      Companies complained about losing their freedom, but I personally think they should put their energy in competing about product quality, not in competing about who can fool his customers in the best way possible.

    8. Re:Speak metric at home by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A good cook doesn't really work in absolute units of flour in the first place. You make a batch of dough by weighing it out, but then you must sift in more flour of an arbitrary amount as you're kneading the dough. And as it rises and is punched down yet more flour is added. Industrial baking can be done by strict weight, but, then, I started out talking about good cooks.

    9. Re:Speak metric at home by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      'Quick breads' are fairly strict chemical formulations because the leavening agent is a chemical. Yeast bread is a complex living process. There are way too many factors to really control anything by strict measure once you set that yeast loose in the dough.

    10. Re:Speak metric at home by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      You can't actually convert between volume and weight in a general fashion. Products with oz and fl-oz would just be products with mL and g and equally uncovertable. (Unless, you foolishly "remember" that 1 mL = 1 g.)

      Oz and lb are different by a factor of 16. Should be able to multiple by 2 in your head 4 times, really.

    11. Re:Speak metric at home by Meeni · · Score: 1

      In most of Europe, size of containers is standardized. That is, it is illegal to package things by 486g, meanwhile everybody else sells 500g in order to get a sticker advantage. Similarly, it is mandatory by law that stickers give price per unit or price per volume or price per weight in a consistent unit per product type, all produces of a particular type have to be labeled in price/Kg, and it is not legal to label them in price/L. It is especially irritating when, in the US, a similar item is sold per pound from one brand, per floz on the second brand, and per "unit" on the third one (typical for toilet paper rolls, often labeled per sheet, or per linear feets or per weight, all brand choose a different one, and sometimes even within a single brand this is not consistent). Makes any comparison practically impossible.

    12. Re:Speak metric at home by Meeni · · Score: 1

      Try making Macarons with your gut feeling, and tell me how it goes :)

      Patisserie requires precision. You cannot just pour, stir and adapt. Doing this is a recipe for poor looking pastries, at best. At the extreme they do not even take and you have nothing but a sugary goop.

      This is why recipe are actually different depending on what is customary for raw ingredients (amount of fat in butter/milk, amount of gluten in flour, yolk in eggs, dominant variant of yeast, etc).

      Now, if you are making pizza, this is a different story.

  46. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also find the English miles unit size to be more natural, it may be because the English system developed out of practical use in daily applications

    Like the Tudor money system?

  47. Km? by stanlyb · · Score: 1

    That's why every time someone wanna to check the "mileage" of my car, i have to explicitly tell him that it is KM, not MILE, and then again, and then again, and god help me if i forget to do it, you could not imagine the paperwork that i have to go after that, because the stupid b**** could not read english, which says KM, not MILE.
    brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

  48. This misses the real problem by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1
    Sorry guys, but metric is a sub issue. The real issue is the number of people who go through the school system who can't really use either english or metric systems very well. They're really functionally illeterate in making simple measurements, adding them, and so on. Solve that, then worry about which system is in use.

    When I was in graduate school, we made our experimental apparatus in metric units on tools, like a milling machine, calibrated in english units. I'm nearly finished building an aircraft that uses metric units, except for hardware, which is in english units. I think you need to be able to use either, and switch back and forth wihtout difficulty. If you can't, you don't really understand either measurement system all that well. But that gets back to the lack of measurement ability that emerges from our schools.

    I can see no reason for spending tax dollars to change exisiting things, like road signs, from english to metric. Replace them as they wear out, if this really needs to be done. But then, I can't see any good reason to spend tax dollars on bilingual signs, regardless of the language. And no, English is not the only language I try to speak.

  49. Re:Sure beats jail time... by moderators_are_w*nke · · Score: 3, Informative

    The EU single market mandates that you must be able to buy and sell in metric, which is logical since you can't really have a common market without common units. You can also use whatever other units you like and as such many places use imperial units in preference to metric units, reverting to them only when necessary.

    Road signs are still mph, horse races are still miles and furlongs and beer is sold by the pint so I think we're happily confused on matters of units this side of the pond.

    --
    "XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, use more." - Anonymous Coward
  50. White House: Use Metric If You Want, We Don't Care by Molochi · · Score: 1

    I'm completely OK with this, personally. However, I was taught metric in US elementary school and don't GAF about your kids. Sorry 'bout that.

    I don't have kids, but if I did I'd make sure they knew metric by the time they learned a conversational language and basic algebra. So, by age 12.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  51. Re:English system is fine by EvanED · · Score: 1

    I did see an awesome comment here on /. on an earlier story on the topic. It was something like:

    "Fahrenheit is a wonderfully human temperature scale: 0 degrees is too damn cold, and 100 degrees is too damn hot."

    I actually pretty much agree with this; Fahrenheit much more nicely covers the range of temperatures that a lot of places experience than does Celsius. The much-vaunted pegging of the Celcius scale at the melting and boiling points of water doesn't really matter one iota in day-to-day life; when I want to make pasta, I don't put a thermometer in the pot of water and say "yup, it's at 100 degC now, must be boiling; I just wait until it's bubbly."

  52. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you to the extent of 5/32 - 85/544 inches. That old folksy fraction-and-non-base-10 system makes everything easier, except for that nerdy science stuff. It's all cosmetic, because manipulating numbers in metric isn't any easier... right?

  53. Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Gothmolly · · Score: 2

    The point of a system of measurement is to relate dimensions which are not directly perceivable to those which are. Thus, while you can't "see" a mile, you know that it's 5280 feet, the "foot" being related to some portion of the body (or some particular person's body). Likewise the inch, the yard, the fathom, etc. Using metric, while perhaps more "scientifically" determined, replaces one non-human, non-perceivable value with another. Instead of an imperceptible distance being some large multiple of an average person's foot size, it becomes some multiple of wavelengths of light, another imperceptible value.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by markdavis · · Score: 2

      This doesn't fly for me. There is no human equivalent of an inch or mile or gallon or acre anymore than a kilometer or centimeter or liter or gram. The foot is about the only human thing about the imperial system, and that is not enough to matter all that much.

      I was taught both systems in school and use both. Interestingly, I prefer cm/mm over inches and feet over meters; have no preference with gallons/qts vs. liters; prefer ml over fluid ounces, prefer grams over ounces but pounds over kg. How is THAT for confused. This is the result of the mess we have right now :)

    2. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid about 80% of the world's population would disagree.

      As a personal observation, I moved to the states 10 years ago from Europe, and while some metrics were easy to get used to (Fahrenheit, miles), others are still flummoxing (3/16" drill bits come to mind).

    3. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I prefer cm/mm over inches and feet over meters; have no preference with gallons/qts vs. liters; prefer ml over fluid ounces, prefer grams over ounces but pounds over kg. How is THAT for confused.

      Heh, I'm similar except with a different list: inches over cm and feet over meters; liters over gallons/qts/fl oz; indifferent about pounds vs kg; prefer Fahrenheit over Celsius.

    4. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      Officially, the United States and some other countries have defined non-metric units in terms of metric units for over 50 years.

      Unofficially: The metric system has some units that you can directly perceive and understand: a meter is a little bigger than a yard, a liter is a little bigger than a quart, a kilogram is a little bigger than two pounds. ("Related to some portion of the body" is, AFAIK, specific to feet.) I'd argue that the big mental block is that you can "see" and are accustomed to multiple base points for the same type of unit (e.g. inch, foot, yard). Also, you can sort of "see" miles as its own base point, roughly equivalent to "minutes driving at highway speed" (at least in the absence of congested traffic).

    5. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I agree with this exactly. And I grew up with Imperial / US Customary units.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    6. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love all the arguing over arbitrary units of measure. Whether the distance between my house and place of work is "1.2 miles" or "1.93 kilometers" makes no difference. None whatsoever. It's still the same amount of time to walk.

      Same goes for cooking. Ah, I love cooking. Whether something calls for ounces by volume, ounces by weight, grams, teaspoons, tablespoons, cups, etc. Doesn't matter. It's a trivial problem. And calling it a problem is stretch.

      Speaking of time, where's all the hate over 24 hour days, 60 minutes per hours, and 60 seconds per minute? Where are the hoards of people demands metric time?!?

    7. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, that makes no difference in real life. When you hear that the distance to X is a mile, do you actually relate that to a body part or any other real-life object? I don't speak english natively so I really don't know what kind of perceivable object a fathom or an inch is supposed to represent, but according to Wikipedia, even inch is simply derived from latin word "one twelfth part" and I doubt a yard makes people think about "straight branches".

      I live in a metric country (i.e. outside of america). Just like americans do we learn instinctively all common measures, some completely instinctively, some associate with extremely common everyday object (so it's 5 l? that's exactly like 5 juiceboxes), and here's the difference with the US system: the remaining ones that we can't relate to instincitvely, we can *calculate* almost instictively by just shifting commas or adding zeros. 3 dm? No worries, 30 cm or 0,3m, both units I know instictively. Same goes if the numbers given is too large or small to comprehend instictively, just move comma or cut digits until it's in a relatable unit: 415361 cm? Just cut last two digits and we get 4153 m. Cut three more digits and you get 4,1 km.

    8. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd argue that the big mental block is that you can "see" and are accustomed to multiple base points for the same type of unit (e.g. inch, foot, yard). Also, you can sort of "see" miles as its own base point, roughly equivalent to "minutes driving at highway speed" (at least in the absence of congested traffic)."

      Of course, when you are used to the metric system, you do exactly this with all of the most common metric "equivalients" as well. We "see" cm, m and km instictively or using some association, just like you americans "see" inches, yards and miles. It's not like we metric folks go around converting everything to meters everytime we need to get a feel for how much 7 mm or 7 km is (although it is significantly easier to do conversions like that in metric :P)

      The etymology of "inch" is literally 1/12 (right?), but that doesn't mean you go around converting inches to feet every time, right?

    9. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by camperdave · · Score: 2

      The Romans used to march around a lot, and they would measure things as they went. A mile is a thousand paces (ie left footfall to left footfall) and is derived from the Latin word for one thousand.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least most of the world uses mostly the same units to measure time. And there is a fair bit of outcry about at least harmonizing daylight saving times. One step at a time :)

      There have been attempts to establish metric time. France I think attempted 10 day weeks some centruries ago (although the number of days off/week wasn't increased so that wasn't particularly popular). Then there's "Swatch Internet Time" back in 1998 :)

      The thing about the US customary system is that it's just so... unneccessary. Most everyone that has used both seem to agree that metric system is easier to use and less prone to error. Students in scientific education have to learn two different sets of measurements and then there's of course the occational satellite crash due to confusion between metric and US customary. Sure, converting america to metric would be a a costly and annoying decade, but it is just that - one decade of trouble, to make live easier for every american until, well, the day americans don't have to measure anything anymore. The sooner it's done, the earlier lives will be better. A few generations after that, americans will look back with embarrasment how they were the last ones to refuse to abandon an obviously inferior system.

    11. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously inferior? Hardly! The units are merely different. The only embarrassment here is your narrow-mindedness.

    12. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      the "foot" being related to some portion of the body

      In the region I was born -near San Lazzaro di Savena- we have a somewhat loosely defined unit named "p'zulon". It is widely accepted that the origin is Etruscan and it translates into italian as "pezzolone" which literally translates into English as "big-ish thing". It is widely believed that it too is related to "some portion of the body".

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    13. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen many 1-meter stuff, walked many 1-kilometre distances, hold many 1-litre recipients in my hands, lifted many 1-kg weights, etc. and I can perfectly picture them in my head. And most likely I can do so better than you do, because you're equalling your units of measurement with parts of your body which are guaranteed to not be equal to them.

      Hint: People from places other than Burma, Liberia and the USA have no problem buying groceries in the IS.

      PS: if you can mentally picture 5280 feet in your head, and translate that to a meaningful distance, you my new hero.

    14. Re:Relating the conceivable to the perceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm...an inch was the distance between the knuckle and first joint of the thumb of the king at the time. So, there is a human equivalent for that.

      I'm somewhat like you. I think kilometers are to short (and therefore things seem farther away) and degrees Celsius represent too large of a gradient as well as just not sounding right. Whenever I see temperature in Celsius it always seems cold to me. With Fahrenheit, each degree represents a smaller increment and the numbers sound like what it feels. 30 is cold. 90 is hot. I prefer pounds over kilograms also.

      I think almost all international trade is done in metric so what's the problem?

      Really, all systems and units of measurement are arbitrary no matter what they are based on whether they be "scientific" based or "humanistic" based or any other base.

      And, besides, how are we to tell who are the FSB agents if we switched to metric? Dividing by 10 is easy...not so by 12. lol

  54. In favor of decision to stick to regular standards by JasonHall6450 · · Score: 1

    I approve and actually cringe a little each day when I think about the dangers we as a nation, and the dangers congress are facing each and everyday. With inflation and cost of healthcare as well as employment opportunities. Funny thing, it isn't everyday the industrial average falls less than 2.0 points. -Jason

  55. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also find the English miles unit size to be more natural, it may be because the English system developed out of practical use in daily applications

    I like the English Miles for entertainment: Horrible Histories - The English Mile

  56. Lets compromise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll adopt the metric system if the world adopts the English language.

    Seems fair to me.

  57. We are metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the signatories never realized that the inch is DEFINED in terms of the millimeter.

    Our national standards are metric. What else is Obama supposed to do? If he was powerful enough to force the country to use metric in their daily lives, he should use that power to get everybody jobs.

    Actually, if any individual was that powerful, I would be terrified....but that is a different rant.

  58. Re:first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does it feel to be wasting your life?

    You tell me, you're the one replying.

  59. Re:Sure beats jail time... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

    Isn't that how the use of the metric system was enforced in Great Britain?

    No. There was a grocer who cried oppression in my home town, but that was just a publicity stunt.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  60. 2x4 by DragonWriter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Putting up a wall? We're gonna need some 2x4s and 4x8s

    Which, incidentally, don't seem use American Customary units of length for those dimensions, but whacky industry units where 1" (board measure other than length) is approximately equal to 7/8" (US customary).

    1. Re:2x4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still wondering what a 4x8 is...

    2. Re:2x4 by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Cut lumber. But the lumber is measured pre-cut, so you only get 7/8" per inch. A 2x4 is 2 inches by 4 inches by some length. A 4x8 is 4 inches by 8 inches by some length. Those are the most common lumber used.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:2x4 by CoderBob · · Score: 1

      The difference in size is due to the fact that the measurement is from a rough-cut board. The "lost" size is from the process that goes from rough-cut to the nice, smooth, minimum-of-splinters-during-handling chunk of lumber.

    4. Re:2x4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was 2x4 when it is sawed before it is dried

    5. Re:2x4 by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The 4 x 8 bit refers to 4 foot by 8 foot sheets of plywood or OSB, actually.

      I've never heard of a 4" x 8" board.

    6. Re:2x4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia says:

      Lumber's nominal dimensions are given in terms of green (not dried), rough (unfinished) dimensions. The finished size is smaller, as a result of drying (which shrinks the wood), and planing to smooth the wood. However, the difference between "nominal" and "finished" lumber size can vary. So various standards have specified the difference between nominal size, and finished size, of lumber.

    7. Re:2x4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've never heard of a 4" x 8" board.

      It's like an eXtreme 2x6.

    8. Re:2x4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7/8? More like 3/4! Seriously, it's that far off in some cases - a 2x4 actually measures 1.5x3.5!

    9. Re:2x4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4x8xY boards are used for at least multistory decks/stairways around here.

  61. Re:Sure beats jail time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even worse, you guys still use stones as a measurement of weight!

  62. US and the Metric System by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The US is converting gradually to the metric system, and NIST towards that for decades. The definitions of official US units in metric terms was one of those steps.

    A lot of things sold in the US are sold in metric containers, for example 2L soft drink containers, many food packages and so on.

    The US has also been signatory to every metric measurement treaty.

    The petition is really rather silly. Changing the measurement system of a nation is a long and slow process. Even the French had to put it aside for a while (Napolean discontinued the process for a while).

    The real shame is the US didn't start this process sooner. Thomas Jefferson actually advocated a decimal system of measures well before the French adopted the metric system but Congress (setting an alarming precedent) failed to act on the proposal. Later Jefferson was successful in getting the US to use a decimal currency, which was the first of it's type in the world.

    Is it in contemplation with the House of Representatives to arrange our measures and weights [the same as the coinage] in a decimal ratio? The facility which this would introduce into the vulgar arithmetic would, unquestionably, be soon and sensibly felt by the whole mass of the people, who would thereby be enabled to compute for themselves whatever they should have occasion to buy, to sell, or to measure, which the present complicated and difficult ratios place beyond their computation for the most part

    --Thomas Jefferson

    1. Re:US and the Metric System by ve3oat · · Score: 1

      Is there any other major country in the world that does not already use the metric (SI) system officially for everything they do? Think of it - all of your major trading partners have to convert their measurements to what is in effect the "american" system before they sell them to you. Maybe they could sell those products to you more cheaply if they didn't have to change all the labels etc before shipping them to the USA.

    2. Re:US and the Metric System by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Wait!! Are you telling me we used to have politicians that cared about the welfare of the average person?!?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:US and the Metric System by simonbp · · Score: 2

      For many products, they have to change them anyways. For example, I just had a English beer (Fuller's ESB), and the entire back label is clearly different from the UK version, with the US-specific health warning, US state bottle deposits, and US importer's address. The fact that it also has the volume in fluid ounces is trivial compared to everything else they have to add.

      The more productive thing to change machining standards. When a US engineering company receives an order from outside the US, they have to change everything to US units, do the engineering work in the US units that all the tool are calibrated to, and then convert back to metric to send the spec/blueprints/etc back to the customer. It's an unnecessary expense, and not really justified given how much the US industrial base has shrunk.

    4. Re:US and the Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of things sold in the US are sold in metric containers, for example 2L soft drink containers, many food packages and so on.

      One and two liter soda bottles were introduced during the metric conversion days of the late 1970s. They're pretty much the exception to the rule, almost nothing else in the grocery store comes in a natural metric size (unless it's imported).

    5. Re:US and the Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that some exchanges in the US still use fractional USD as prices for products, for example: 5 3/16 USD?

    6. Re:US and the Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice information! Since the dollar was apparently the first decimal currency, I wonder why it took hundred of years for the US stock market to convert to decimal (I think the change was made early in this century)

    7. Re:US and the Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a single nation in the world that uses SI measurements. Any road sign printed in km/h isn't SI because h isn't a SI unit.

    8. Re:US and the Metric System by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

      I work in importing and all quantities for imported goods must be reported to U.S. customs in metric units, so the U.S. is already using the metric system as it's official system of measurement. It works out well for the most part, except for Canadian goods. Canadians, being our neighbors, "know" that we don't use the metric system, so they try to make everything "easier" by reporting everything in english units. Seriously annoying. And then there is textile fabric, which is customarily sold by the yard even in countries that have been using the metric system forever.

      One area that definitely needs to change though is beer. U.S. bars seem to think that "pint" refers to all glasses of a certain shape. Most "pints" sold in U.S. bars are 14 oz, in clear violation of the law. Marking glasses in ml would be a welcome improvement.

    9. Re:US and the Metric System by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      It's a shame nobody moved to adopt Knuth's proposed system of binary dollars.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    10. Re:US and the Metric System by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      And when I say binary, obviously I mean hexadecimal....

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    11. Re:US and the Metric System by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The US industrial base hasn't shrunk. The fact is that it is still about the same percentage of world output as it always has been.

      What has shrunk is the number of people employed in the manufacturing sector, which is due to improved automation and efficiency. People look at this and draw the conclusion that the output has shrunk, which is not so.

    12. Re:US and the Metric System by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Thomas Jefferson was suis generis.

    13. Re:US and the Metric System by j-beda · · Score: 1

      http://www.zmescience.com/other/map-of-countries-officially-not-using-the-metric-system/
      http://www.ibtimes.com/america-liberia-myanmar-anti-metric-system-holdouts-1109357

      There are three countries that are not officially metric: Liberia, Myanmar (formerly Burma), and the USA. Liberia seems to be moving towards full metrification faster than the US, but what would we expect from such a forward thinking nation?

  63. Let's see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.5 gallons per hour works out to 4 milli-furkins per micro-fortnight.

  64. Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing to see how many people are all "yeah, the metric system isn't a big deal."
     
    If it were a Republican saying we're using the English system and we're going to learn to like it we'd hear cries of how metric is the only reasonable choice in the matter and that using any other system is short sighted.
     
    Fucking goose stepping bitches.

  65. US not ready for globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am european mechanical engineer who worked and lived on 3 continents. The metric system is way superior than the imperial system in many ways but the most important is that it is used everywhere and it is a consistent system*. A lot of companies here in the US have switched to metric (at least for this reason), but soon when asian industrial power will swamp the US market with metric product and parts (in the same way that IKEA did) a lot people in this forum will be lost and realize that a dual system is completly stupid.

    * if your not convince ask yourself why in a imperial system electrical power unit is Watt and but heat power it is in Btu/h....

    1. Re:US not ready for globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We won't be "lost". We'll be just fine. It's really easy to adapt, which we all do when travelling. The reality is, that the metric system is not the standard in the US, and therefore is not "used everywhere" and is not "a consistent system". If I walk out my door right now, every street sign is in miles, not kilometers. This is not my fault, but I don't really give a shit, honestly. I would be happy for the US to finally go metric, but it's not up to me, is it? My very limited political advocacy capacity will go to more pressing things, like keeping crazed Christian fundamentalist whackos from taking over my country even more. If all you europeans want to move here and change us over to the metric system, please do!! We could use a decent socialized medical system too, while you're at it. Until then, I'll just tolerate what the rich powerful people in charge here have stuck us with, which is that stupid British system. Let's standardize what side of the road we drive on! That is way more annoying.

    2. Re:US not ready for globalization by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The metric system is way superior than the imperial system in many ways but the most important is that it is used everywhere and it is a consistent system

      If those are you two 'most important reasons', frankly, you can skip the rest because these aren't in any way compelling or persuasive.

  66. Already is, but not official (and forced) by mtippett · · Score: 2

    Kind of like official language of the USA. There isn't one. Just like customary units, there are customary languages.

    Metrification is already happening. Executive order http://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_x/otm_x_1.html. The Federal government has a preference, but it is only that.

    The CIA World factbook has a snarky "At this time, only three countries - Burma, Liberia, and the US - have not adopted the International System of Units (SI, or metric system) as their official system of weights and measures. Although use of the metric system has been sanctioned by law in the US since 1866, it has been slow in displacing the American adaptation of the British Imperial System known as the US Customary System. The US is the only industrialized nation that does not mainly use the metric system in its commercial and standards activities, but there is increasing acceptance in science, medicine, government, and many sectors of industry."

    Don't worry though, moving 300 million takes a hell of a long time - measured in generations. If you go to the store you will see lots of metric rounded numbers (drinks in 500 mls). Dates on the immigration forms have moved to ISO DD-MM-YYYY. Give it another 50 years, globalisation will take care of it.

    1. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Oh, the dates, the mess they create, and for which reason i always use LETTERS for months, just to make sure we are on the same date/time format...

    2. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by mtippett · · Score: 1

      Me too. If the dates require numbers, I double check. If not, I *always* put the 3 letter (ISO) month name.

    3. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except ISO dates are YYYY-MM-DD :) (ISO dates always ends with the least significant digit).

    4. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dates on the immigration forms have moved to ISO DD-MM-YYYY.

      What ISO standard is that? ISO 8601 says YYYY-MM-DD.

    5. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean the American ISO or this?

    6. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dates on the immigration forms have moved to ISO DD-MM-YYYY.

      That's not the ISO date format, which is YYYY-MM-DD or other most to least significant formats.

      Example source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601

    7. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by richlv · · Score: 1

      Dates on the immigration forms have moved to ISO DD-MM-YYYY.

      iso is yyyy-mm-dd ;)

      --
      Rich
    8. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dates on the immigration forms have moved to ISO DD-MM-YYYY

      Actually, ISO date notation is YYYY-MM-DD.

    9. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For ISO, isn't it YYYY-MM-DD ?

    10. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Me too. If the dates require numbers, I double check. If not, I *always* put the 3 letter (ISO) month name.

      I grew up with dd/MM/yyyy; however after starting work in an international company and dealing with US colleagues writing MM/dd/yyyy and Japanese colleagues writing yyyy-MM-dd, I eventually switched to the Japanese style for almost everything I do in daily life - it's a scaled order (like the one I grew up with; just the other way around) but also has the additional advantage of sorting correctly in a text sort as well. If I speak a date without the year, I tend to stick to what I grew up with though "11th of August" instead of "August 11th". I generally never write a date without the year though so both 11/08 and 08/11 look "wrong" to my brain.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    11. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISO dates are YYYY-MM-DD. THat way the most significant digits are first, and can be sorted as a text string...

    12. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dates on the immigration forms have moved to ISO DD-MM-YYYY. Give it another 50 years, globalisation will take care of it.

      ISO date format is YYYY-MM-DD.

    13. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess moving 1+ billion people takes even longer, and yet India already completed their metrication which they started only in the 50's. We need not only more time, but more determination.

    14. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISO-8601 is YYYY-MM-DD

    15. Re:Already is, but not official (and forced) by JigJag · · Score: 1

      thanks for posting this interesting comment. A shame though they don't use YYYY-MM-DD for dates like they recommend in Canada.

      JigJag

      --
      "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
  67. Canadian Mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First up, let me say, "I AM... CANADIAN!!!"
    Metric/Imperial wise though, I'm a mess.

    My speed/(long) distance is measured in kilometres.
    Short distances are still inches/feet/yards. (xbox size, height of a person, size of my property, etc...)
    Construction... definitely feet/inches (16 on centre, 2x4's, etc... Not 406.4mm, 60.54cm or 50.8x101.6mm's)
    Weight? Depends... people: pounds, trucks: pounds, gold: ounces, big weight (ie: 100+ tons: metric)
    Fuel economy: MPG (45 MPG just sounds better than 5.23L/100km)
    Temperature: completely fluent! This is Canada. -40C is -40F. Summer is a myth (this year at least)

    Yeah I'm the son of a "transition generation" and my measurement use is confused.
    Things I'm certain of though:
    It's neighbour, not neighbor
    colour, not color
    centre, not center,
    fibre, not fibre
    a mickey, not a fifth
    Poutine, not poo-teen
    Etc,.. etc.. etc...

    Anyhow... I am... Canadian
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRI-A3vakVg
    Or for the French Canadians (ouin, J'en suis un):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TncdhLGjFTE

  68. Whatever we want? Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "So choose to live your life in metric if you want, and thank you for signing on."

    Great. So you won't mind if I paint over the local road signs with "100" instead of "60"? :-)

  69. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how much of Obama's dick is up your ass? If this was Bush saying the same thing you'd be flipping your fucking lid.

  70. Re: no free choice for gov't info like speed limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the problems of trying to convert to metric is the entire postal address layout system is based on it in all grid based cities.
    One block = 1 furlong = 100 address numbers
    One mile = 8 blocks = 800 address numbers

    Changing that would break a system that has been in place since mail was delivered via horseback. Yes, the horse and buggy is long gone, but the subdivisions created while they were used are.

  71. until yall make up your mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'll be chugging my 2 liter bottle of soda

  72. Re:Sure beats jail time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that how the use of the metric system was enforced in Great Britain? Good to know there are so many people that want to use the force of government to get their way on such piddling matters.

    You know who's put in jail for measurement? People who give shortweight on measurements. That's called fraud.

  73. Re:English system is fine by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most companies already label their products with both systems which is just fine.

    Sure. I don't have a problem with seeing both units. But why not mandate metric be on there? The benefits are clear. What is the harm?

    As for roadsigns, the cost would be far too great, and it wouldnt be worth it for what is basically a cosmetic change, and I think would actually make things worse,

    It doesn't have to happen overnight. Start with the major highways, and do both units. Gradually filter it down to the other stuff, and in two generations its done. 4 generations down we can remove the mph if we want, or not.

    I do not think metric is a better system in daily use.

    The goal isn't to utterly eradicate the English system.

    I also find the English miles unit size to be more natural, it may be because the English system developed out of practical use in daily applications

    As a Canadian, I don't see this at all. The km vs the mile makes no 'natural' difference whatsoever.

    I see pounds, feet, and inches being more natural, but not miles.

    We are all very used the English system

    You get used to whatever you live with. We order deli meat in 100gram increments, we buy milk by the liter, and a good size jar of peanut butter is a kilgram. We know -4 is just below freezing, and that 35 is hot. Its not difficult.

    I still think of my own weight in pounds because all the media (TV, magazines, etc) all refer to weight still in pounds. But I know a few nurses etc and they have no trouble thinking in kilograms.

    Recipes go either way; because a lot of them are old or from american sources english units are still common. My wife is pretty comfortable in cups or mL.

    The only english units that I really think are more natural are feet and inches. But my brother in law works with CAD drawings all day and metal forming, and he can eyeball something in mm or m just fine; and finds it easier than inches or feet.

    So my 'intuition' that its more natural is suspect. Its what I grew up with, and its what I'm more used to, but my pre-teen kids have barely been exposed to english units at all, and they live just fine.

    If you live with it, you get used to it.

    Is it worth converting a population over to metric? No, definitely not. They are used to it, and it works fine for them.

    But is it worth gradually shifting a population to metric so that future generations are using metric natively, yes, I think so.

  74. L/Km and MPG are BOTH stupid. And redundant. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    (Distance in one unit) cubed over (distance in a completely different unit)? Come on, do the simple unit analysis and just give fuel efficiency in square meters.

    1. Re:L/Km and MPG are BOTH stupid. And redundant. by NekoYasha · · Score: 1

      Oblig. Xkcd: It would be about 0.1 square millimeters. http://what-if.xkcd.com/11/

    2. Re:L/Km and MPG are BOTH stupid. And redundant. by fazig · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Now I will start to write electrical resistance no longer as Ohm or even V/A but as (kg*m^2)/((A*s^1.5)^2).

    3. Re:L/Km and MPG are BOTH stupid. And redundant. by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That's nonsense. It's J*s/C^2.

    4. Re:L/Km and MPG are BOTH stupid. And redundant. by fazig · · Score: 1

      Since those aren't SI base units it could only add to the confusion, we need to keep it simple.

    5. Re:L/Km and MPG are BOTH stupid. And redundant. by makapuf · · Score: 1

      Olbligatory xkcd : http://what-if.xkcd.com/11/

  75. Economic Stimulus by SmokeRing · · Score: 0

    Think of the economic stimulus which would result from a forced changeover. Every machinist in the country would be able to retire rich on the income from drilling out every hole in every piece of equipment which is tapped with the evil fractional inch threading and tapping it for the ever-so-pleasant and convenient integer millimeter metric Heli-Coil inserts. Metric screw and bolt makes rejoice!

    --
    BBQ promotes Global Warming
  76. Re:English system is fine by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

    No, zero Celsius is "too damn cold", zero Fahrenheit is HOLY SHIT HOW CAN A HUMAN BEING LIVE HERE.

  77. It is a broken system by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would a frivolous waste of money we dont have to fix something thats not broken.

    Ah but it is broken. For a start there is no agreed upon standard for several of the units e.g. fluid ounce for which the Imperial unit is not the same as the US unit which is then further compounded by the fact that there are 20 fluid ounces in a UK pint and only 16 in a US pint. As such it is a completely broken unit system you not only have to memorize an insane number of relationships between units you even have to remember whose imperial-based unit scheme you are using.

    However, what makes it s truly broken unit system is that it uses the unit pound for both mass and weight. Yes there have been "hacks" of the system to bring them inline with physical reality so you have the "avoirdupois pound" meaning a mass and the "pound" meaning force. However this means that the units are not clear: when you say "pound" do you mean force or mass? If you need to tweak your unit system to make it consistent with physics that's not really a good sign is it?

    If that's still not enough to convince you that there is a problem then consider that there are only three countries in the world still using the old imperial-based system: Liberia, Burma and the USA. There are not many things that practically the entire planet agree upon but apparent metric units is one of them and it is not without good reason!

    1. Re:It is a broken system by hawguy · · Score: 2

      It would a frivolous waste of money we dont have to fix something thats not broken.

      However, what makes it s truly broken unit system is that it uses the unit pound for both mass and weight. Yes there have been "hacks" of the system to bring them inline with physical reality so you have the "avoirdupois pound" meaning a mass and the "pound" meaning force. However this means that the units are not clear: when you say "pound" do you mean force or mass? If you need to tweak your unit system to make it consistent with physics that's not really a good sign is it?

      Scientists already use the Metric system, and few people who live on earth and are not scientists need to make a distinction between weight and mass.

    2. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's some work done under pressurized conditions these days where the difference is relevant (the traditional example is anything nautical at all, but some manufacturing processes are like that).

      They, of course, also use metric. Most manufacturing does internally too anyway, even if they create results that are most succinctly expressed as integer numbers of imperial units. Leads to the argument of why have two when you could have one? The parallel to bilingualism is apt. Languages that otherwise don't have a homeland are preserved for cultural reasons, not for functional ones, and strictly speaking they're an inconvenience.

    3. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look we put a man on the moon with pounds, feet, and seconds. It's not that hard.

    4. Re:It is a broken system by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I say the following as someone who really loves the metric system.

      Ah but it is broken. For a start there is no agreed upon standard for several of the units e.g. fluid ounce for which the Imperial unit is not the same as the US unit which is then further compounded by the fact that there are 20 fluid ounces in a UK pint and only 16 in a US pint.

      This only matters when one has to do conversion between these units. For most people in their everyday lives, this is completely IRRELEVANT. Unless you're an international traveler or are importing some substance measured by volume, why the heck would you care how they measure in the UK?

      However this means that the units are not clear: when you say "pound" do you mean force or mass?

      99.9% of Americans have absolutely no use for this distinction in their daily lives.

      And I say this as someone who took a lot of engineering courses where we were required to understand and make use of imperial units, if nothing else other than to make use of old books and tables -- complaining about minor differences like ounces in a pint or the difference between lb-force and lb-mass is nothing compared to doing fluid dynamics, mechanics courses, and chemistry courses using imperial units (atm-cu.ft./lb.-mol-degreeR anyone?).

      There are STRONG arguments why science and engineering people -- who deal with unit conversions everyday -- benefit from metric, and almost all of them do use metric already. However, 99% of Americans don't need to do these things in everyday life, so why should they care? To them, the system is NOT broken.

      If that's still not enough to convince you that there is a problem then consider that there are only three countries in the world still using the old imperial-based system: Liberia, Burma and the USA.

      I think that's a great argument, and the best one you've given for the everyday person who might consider traveling internationally. For Americans who don't, though, it's not actually a "broken" system for them. I wish they would switch -- but for most people in most situations, it is a solution in search of a problem.

    5. Re:It is a broken system by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Your entire thing seems to be that you can't easily convert between units. Speaking as an American who has lived in metric countries for the last decade, that's bullshit. Nobody ever needs to know how much a liter of water weighs. Nobody ever converts dekameters to hectometers. You just stick with one unit, the one that's suitable for whatever you're measuring.

      "When you say "pound" do you mean force or mass?"
      Fucking hell, when is the last time anyone needed to actually use this? "In the lab the other day" yeah right we're not talking about edge cases.

      Moreover, if you're a drinking man like me, the metric system is a ripoff. A bottle is 12 fluid ounces and that's all there is to it. 355ml. With the metric system, at best you get 350ml, and it's really easy to slide down to 325ml, 275ml, and so on.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:It is a broken system by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Be realistic. You're arguing with a guy who has his middle initial in his Slashdot username, and it appears it might be his real middle initial....

    7. Re:It is a broken system by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1

      It would a frivolous waste of money we dont have to fix something thats not broken.

      However, what makes it s truly broken unit system is that it uses the unit pound for both mass and weight. Yes there have been "hacks" of the system to bring them inline with physical reality so you have the "avoirdupois pound" meaning a mass and the "pound" meaning force. However this means that the units are not clear: when you say "pound" do you mean force or mass? If you need to tweak your unit system to make it consistent with physics that's not really a good sign is it?

      Scientists already use the Metric system, and few people who live on earth and are not scientists need to make a distinction between weight and mass.

      How is this different from the folks who use kilogram-force? I just read a post on a motorcycle forum about an unfortunate individual who didn't know the difference between kgf*m and N*m on his torque wrench and managed to break three bolts in his cylinder head by applying 9.8 times more torque than necessary. Why anyone would label something in kgf*m (and why he continued torquing after breaking #1) is beyond me.

      The imperial mass unit is slugs. The unit of force is pounds. Yes, you can use lbm, but it's no more revolting than kgf.

      That said, I strongly support converting to metric.

      --
      What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
    8. Re:It is a broken system by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Well, since I live in the US and I say pound, I mean the one that is registering on the scale at the grocery store or the floor of my bathroom.

      When I say ounce, I mean the ones that are on my measuring cup or possibly the ones that are also on the grocer's scale.

      Pints are two cups = half a quart. I don't drink but I have been to a few bars in the States and I don't think the sell beer by the pint over here so that is another distinction not to worry about.

      When I've traveled outside the States, I go with whatever units they are using.

    9. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of things about America make a lot more sense if you regard it as a third-world country that just happens to have had a stroke of luck.

    10. Re:It is a broken system by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only scientists care about the differences. And they are free to work in metric if they want. I can't measure 'one fluid ounce', I can only get close. And for most people, close is good enough. Only engineers need to worry about things less than 1/8th of an inch when building stuff. And working in fractions is pretty easy when you do it all the time. I worked at a factory that made corrugated containers (cardboard boxes to the ignorant), and everything was in fractions. I got really good at manipulating fractions down to the 16ths of an inch and adding/subtracting. Just because something is difficult for one person doesn't mean it's not difficult to learn, it could mean that they just haven't learned it. Like having to learn all of the centi, milli, micro, kilo, deci, etc. prefixes. Unless you use them often enough, they are difficult to remember. I have no problems remember inches/foot/yard/mile, ounces/pound/ton, secs/hour/day/week/year, months/quarter/year. None of those are decimal. And never had to convert inches to miles, so who cares. When I need to, I can calculate it long hand. And I've never been very good at remembering all of the metric prefixes. Never had to, don't really need to. But I'm sure if I worked somewhere that I was exposed to them, I could.

      Imperial is very easy for cooking, most of the items are multiples of 2 (i.e. 2 cups in a pint, 2 pints in a quart, 2 quarts in a half gallon, 2 half gallons in a gallon). Even the factions are multiples of two, often 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, and 1/16. The odd man out is fluid ounces, but many recipes use fractions of a cup, not ounces. Ounces usually means weight, unless it specifically says 'fluid ounces'. But then again, a cup of water is different from a cup of sugar, dry cups are different sizes from 'wet' cups and most people who cook know the difference. It's only confusing to people who don't cook very often, or who weren't taught it. Just as the metric system is only confusing to people who don't use it or weren't taught it.

      Just because someone isn't smart enough or willing to learn a measurement system doesn't make it a bad system. They both have advantages and I agree 100% with letting individuals decide which one they want to use. Teach both in school, and if one system offers a true advantage it will become more prevalent while the other fades away to it's niches.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    11. Re:It is a broken system by JubilantShank · · Score: 1

      But, even with international travel it's not difficult. I go to Europe, I rent a car. The car's speedo is in kph, so are the speed limits, and so are the road signs. So, that's not difficult at all. I don't care if I'm actually going 62 mph, the sign says the limit is 100 kph and the needle on my speedo is pointing at 100. Problem solved.

      It would be far more advantageous to switch if we were a small country surrounded by other small countries which all used metric, like in Europe. But we aren't. Canada uses metric (I believe, but I have heard that they dual-label their signs (or used to)), but every car I've ever driven has dual labels on the speedo and relatively few Americans regularly drive their cars between the US and Canada. I'm not sure what system Mexico uses, but it's a similar situation. Those are the only two countries which actually share a land border with the US. Sure, you could conceivably take your car down through Central America, but if you do that you should really make an effort to know the local languages and customs of the countries you're in, and the metric system would be a part of that.

      For international trade, yes, it's very useful. But, companies that participate in international trade need to convert units anyway.

      Just because everyone else is doing it is no reason to switch if there's no real benefit to doing so.

      Like you said, it *isn't* a broken system.

    12. Re:It is a broken system by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      I. wow that's kinda dumb. Firstly I've never even heard of kilogram-force.. but, wow. How useless to have it and N*m together. If it was foot-pounds, yes, I have wrenches with foot-pound and newton-meter scales, and that's reasonable.. but two different scales both using metric units? that's silly. that's just silly.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    13. Re:It is a broken system by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      From all of us "everyday persons", thank you for speaking the truth about this ridiculous argument.

      I'm sure the US will convert fully to metric in a couple centuries, but for us today, miles and pounds make the most sense.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    14. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no mention of slugs?? You talk about mass claiming the avoirdupois pound is for mass. Where have you been educated?

      Imperial measures of mass are in slugs you cretin.

    15. Re:It is a broken system by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      An inconvenience to whom? The people they're inconvenient to already use metric and the others aren't inconvenienced or they would already be using it and don't want to endure the inconvenience of converting.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    16. Re:It is a broken system by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

      'Avoirdupois' has nothing to do with mass, or at least nothing to do with mass in the customary system, much as the UK pint has nothing to do with anything expect British pubs.

      You are thinking of that bastard unit the pound-mass, defined as the mass that produces one pound force at normal Earth gravity. The true mass unit for the US customary system is the slug which weighs in at 32.2 pounds at normal Earth gravity. Just as a kilogram weighs 9.81 Newtons in Earth gravity. No tweaking required.

      And don't forget the metric system's own bastard unit: the kilogram-force. Which, I might add, is far more commonly used than pound-mass, unless all of the metric world's cheap bathroom scales are really sophisticated mass-balances in disguise. And whereas pound-mass is always specifically stated, kilogram-force seems only weakly attached to the force.

    17. Re:It is a broken system by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      For a start there is no agreed upon standard for several of the units e.g. fluid ounce for which the Imperial unit is not the same as the US unit...

      Hopefully you can see that there are, in fact, two agreed-upon standards. The US Imperial system and UK Imperial system are not the same. That shouldn't be too confusing, since according to you, the UK doesn't use the Imperial system any more. So clearly fluid ounces is always in US Imperial units.

    18. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists already use the Metric system

      But it takes a US scientist to mess up between imperial and metric units and blow up spacecraft.

    19. Re:It is a broken system by KGIII · · Score: 1

      How is it different? They're an idiot to start with. Anyone who wasn't an idiot would have stopped after breaking a SINGLE bolt, not kept going to break three of them. The unit of measurement isn't going to matter much in that case.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    20. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your pound argument is a little off, isn't it? While the actual mass of a kilogram of foodstuffs (as measured by a scale at the grocery store) may be very close to one kilogram, in all likelihood what was actually measured was the force the food exerted on the spring in the scale.

      Centigrade is stupid for non-scientific measurements, Fahrenheit is, on the other hand totally awesome. "It's 45 degrees out" will never indicate to me that today might be a good day to go swimming.

    21. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah but it is broken. For a start there is no agreed upon standard for several of the units e.g. fluid ounce for which the Imperial unit is not the same as the US unit which is then further compounded by the fact that there are 20 fluid ounces in a UK pint and only 16 in a US pint. As such it is a completely broken unit system you not only have to memorize an insane number of relationships between units you even have to remember whose imperial-based unit scheme you are using.

      In the U.S. for weight alone you have Troy pound, Apothecary's weight pound, and Avoirdupois pound. No need to look at the UK for inconsistency.

    22. Re:It is a broken system by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      I want to point out I cook. I'm not a 5 star chef, but People seem to like what I make. I use any and all types of measuring for any and all types of things. Of course, I never REALLY measure, most my recipes say add cumin. I don't say ow much. I just figure based oh how much volume I have over the entire recipe. My 2cp.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    23. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I present thee all here the Internet equivalent of the provincial villager.

      This only matters when one has to do conversion between these units. For most people in their everyday lives, this is completely IRRELEVANT. Unless you're an international traveler or are importing some substance measured by volume, why the heck would you care how they measure in the UK?

      This exact argument could have been, and probably was, made back when pounds, feet and what not were different in size even between regions or cities in the same country. I also take it that you have never for instance been given a recipe by a friend who lives in another country. Presumably this is because you have no friends.

      99.9% of Americans[...]

      Yepp. And that's what they will continue to be. Inbred ignorants from a backwater village/country nobody cares about anymore.

      You see, the problem is that things are not going to stay the same. We get increasingly interconnected with other people as time goes on. Being unable to deal with international standards like units for weight, volume and distance is going to be crippling in the long run, because it will make you difficult to deal with. Why would I bother with someone whom I have to spoon feed every little thing in their own archaic and ambiguous measurements - ffs you guys can't even write the bloody date in a way that is not confusing - when I can go anywhere else in the world and immediately understood?

    24. Re:It is a broken system by beanyk · · Score: 1

      However, what makes it s truly broken unit system is that it uses the unit pound for both mass and weight. Yes there have been "hacks" of the system to bring them inline with physical reality so you have the "avoirdupois pound" meaning a mass and the "pound" meaning force. However this means that the units are not clear: when you say "pound" do you mean force or mass?

      U.S. Physics textbooks sometimes (always?) use the slug as the standard imperial unit of mass. A force of one pound will accelerate one slug by 1 foot/sec^2. I'd never heard of this slug thingy before moving to the U.S., and I grew up in Ireland, which has the same half-assed approach to metric and imperial as the U.K.

    25. Re:It is a broken system by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Yet you also failed to put a probe in Mars orbit due to problems with units. Good thing it was that way around!

    26. Re:It is a broken system by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      That was when I was a young, naive internet user and did not realize that Slashdot wanted a nickname and not a real name. I would love to be able to change the damn thing but Slashdot does not offer anyway to change a username :-(

    27. Re:It is a broken system by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1
      You can measure mass using its weight if you know the gravitational field strength. There is nothing wrong with that: it is a perfectly valid way to measure the mass. If we ever get off this planet, you can measure the mass of something on earth using its weight and sell it as "x kg" on e.g. the moon. Of course the weight will be different due to the different gravitational field but the mass is invariant (even under relativity!).

      Centigrade is stupid for non-scientific measurements, Fahrenheit is, on the other hand totally awesome.

      So you are arguing that having two systems for measuring temperature is better than one simply because you are familiar with one for weather and not the other? Really? It's not that hard to familiarize yourself with celsius and then everyone can use one scale for everything. That being said both scales are completely arbitrary and there is really nothing to choose between them - you could easily imagine reworking kelvin to use fahrenheit spacing instead of celsius. However there is a strong argument to be said for having one, and only one scale and it is clear that far fewer people would have to change (only Liberia, Burma, USA) if fahrenheit were dumped.

    28. Re:It is a broken system by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      So clearly fluid ounces is always in US Imperial units.

      You forget Burma. Also many items are still labelled in old units as well as metric which is particularly confusing for Canadians using the old units because US items use US units while Canadian items use Imperial units. Fortunately I use the metric units so I don't care but for those using the old units you need to know where the thing was made to know what "1 gallon" actually means.

    29. Re:It is a broken system by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      There's no clear distinction between everyday life and non-everyday life. In the days of GPS and prepared food most people probably don't even use any kind of measures most days anyway.
      But I'm guessing that anybody who uses actually fluid ounces would be bothered by the inconsistency. For instance I find it quite annoying that I have to take into account where a cooking recipe was published and make appropriate corrections for the stuff in my kitchen.

    30. Re:It is a broken system by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      You just took an entire paragraph to explain what in the metric kitchen is very simple: liters and grams. It is simpler and less ambiguous. If that doesn't make it superior I don't know what does.
      Now, of course you can just say that it doesn't really matter an awful lot. But saying that it's just as good because people get used to it isn't a good comparison.

    31. Re:It is a broken system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: few non-scientists feel the need to quantify forces, including weights. Anyone who knows that you weigh less on the moon has already distinguished between weight and mass, whether they realize it or not.

  78. Whine all you want by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...as much as the intelligentsia want to whine about it, the bulk of the US uses imperial systems in their daily lives.

    There is NO compelling need to mandate a switch. None. The bulk of the people in the US who need metric, or need to convert units, or deal with the rest of the world can use either one without an issue (and already do).

    For you true utilitarians out there, then, who firmly believe that we should switch to metric because it would simplify massive world systems immeasurably if everyone was simply on the same standard...I'll switch to officially metric the moment you all switch officially to English. Because the benefits of monolingualism are PRECISELY the same (or greater) as the stridently-cried reasons for Metrification.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Whine all you want by PRMan · · Score: 1

      iExactamundo! iMucho gusto!

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Whine all you want by Shados · · Score: 1

      If there was only one first world country that wasn't using English across the board, the pressure for them to abandon their legacy language would be extreme.

    3. Re:Whine all you want by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      No, we have to all switch to Esperanto.

      And code only in Ada, of course.

    4. Re:Whine all you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metric is easier to use than the US system, that's simply a fact. Metric would improve the life of the bulk of the american people in their daily lives. The switch is hard, but in the long run, metric would indeed improve every day life for everyone.

      Almost every country in the entire world have had a historical set of measurements and replaced it with metric. AND NO ONE REGREATS IT, not even anyone in "the bulk" of any population. And we do find it quite laughable how US of A is so fucking starsprangled awesome that you are keeping your arcaic system against all common sense because America Fuck Yeah(tm).

      Global standardization is NOT the only benefit of the metric system, Except the ease-of-use, you are also ignoring all cultural aspects of extinguishing a language - it has quite a few more problems than extinguishing a couple of arcaic units does. so your claim that "the benefits of monolingualism are PRECISELY the same (or greater)" is just plain wrong.

    5. Re:Whine all you want by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      So I switched from Dutch to English. Now make the Frenchies around me do the same. hmmm...

  79. The scheduled maneuver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would had made the problem worst. The maneuver was calling for an adjustment of course .... which was going to be TOTALLY WRONG because of the mix-up in units. A mix-up that wasn't discovered until AFTER the catastrophic failure.

    1. Re:The scheduled maneuver by Antipater · · Score: 1

      The mix-up was on the maneuvering thrusters used to correct lateral position. It did not affect the force exerted by the main engine during a course correction burn.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
  80. Yeah, but what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my clock. It's a pain when I watch the international news to always have to
    get my iPhone conversion app to figure out what time it is in, say, London or Moscow.

    Why the U.S. is lagging behind in the world's metric clock standard is a broken Obama
    campaign promise. It's downright embarrassing. But, you say, can't you buy one? Ha!
    Obama has this so tightly wound up that if you go into a reputable clock store and ask
    politely to view their metric clocks (that you know) they have in the back-room, the police
    will probably be called. Go ahead, try it. Uh Huh. See what I mean. Conspiracy. //

    Listen, it's simple why the U.S. hasn't gone on to the metric system. Remember that
    British probe set to Mars that burnt up/crash landed? Yupper.

    But seriously, all jokes aside, it's because of military hardware (which is odd since bores
    are metric - krazy) like subs, carriers, etc. The cost of converting things to "metric" is
    too much, and there really is no direct replacement (in terms of metric) for, say, a 2"-8 bolt.
    You'd essentially have to start completely from scratch to build a ship. But it's more than that;
    all of the tooling your vendors use are now scrap, and they'd have to re-tool everything, and
    so on.

    As far as I can tell, it'll never happen in the US.

    CAPTCHA = 'armament' - very funny, /.

  81. reference for those that missed it by tokiko · · Score: 2
  82. Re:English system is fine by EvanED · · Score: 1

    No, zero Celsius is "too damn cold", zero Fahrenheit is HOLY SHIT HOW CAN A HUMAN BEING LIVE HERE.

    I'm biased because of my location (Wisconsin), but part of the reason that I like that quote is because it matches my own temperature opinions so closely. By my scale, down to about 10F it's really easy to dress appropriately and be reasonably comfortable, and single digits Fahrenheit is where I really start wishing it was warmer. On the other end of the spectrum, I can deal reasonably well up to mid-80s, and 90 is where I really start wishing it was cooler. And ~60 is about perfect. :-)

    Really though, places that regularly see 100 F, I have the same reaction to your reaction to 0 F. I really don't understand how someone would voluntarily live in Texas or Arizona or whatever. (And if you say "it's a dry heat" I hope to god someone mods you down as literally flamebait. :-))

  83. Even drug dealers by freedom_surfer · · Score: 1

    and drug users are capable of using the metric system and converting between ounces/pounds and grams.

  84. liters of water at sea level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you know something is 3 miles away that is usually good enough for most people. Most folks are not going to convert into liters of water at sea level. The argument is academic.

    I am a mechanical engineer and I think in the American system but often use metric. In all cad systems all you have to do is enter "in" or "mm" and it will convert on the fly. Heck, I have come to see all the dimensions as ratios to the other dimensions instead of US or metric.
    Has anyone seen the specs for standard computer hardware? It is not uncommon to see metric and american on the same spec. I am not talking about a metric along with ameican dimensions, I am talking some dimensions in american and some in metric!

  85. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you wonder why Americans don't care to switch to metric, ask yourself whether you'd like to switch to a decimal time notation. Then little pause in your mind, right before you came to a decision and generated a rationalization for one or the other... that's why American's haven't changed yet. That little pause is "WTF? Why would I want do that?"

  86. No need for units by mypalmike · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given that relativity is well established, those signs should be unitless. Instead of 55 mph, just have them say 0.000000082.

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    1. Re:No need for units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but then you would have to state the reference frame...

  87. Re:English system is fine by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

    Natural for what? The only advantage the English system has is that lots of lazy-brained people are accustomed to it.

    When dividing by even numbers, english units are a lot easier to deal with: 1 inch, 1/2 inch, 1/4inch, 1/8inch, 1/16inch, 1/32inch, 1/64inch etc.
    Metric units are generally not marked off in fractions like that, so you quickly end up with unruly decimals: 1cm, .5cm, .25cm, .125cm .0625cm, .03125cm, .015625cm

    And in response to the people who are currently reading this and thinking "But you could just say 1/16cm!": When is the last time you've seen a metric measuring device marked off in fractions? English measuring devices take to fractions like that naturally. The only reason you don't like it is because you're accustomed to base10.

    Metric does make a ton of sense for anything scientific (1ml of water = 1cc of water = 1g of water is massivly convinient), but the decision for the average person (let alone someone doing carpentry where things are frequently cut by 2's and 4s) to use metric units over english units isn't the massive no-brainer that all of you guys keep making it out to be

  88. Go Mars Mission! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a scientist and use metric for everything at work, but I can drive in miles and get groceries by the pound, too. It's really not that hard to effectively use both systems, and given time we can slowly move to using metric all of the time if we want.

    Apparently not ALL scientists can keep their metric straight.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter

    the spacecraft was lost as the spacecraft went into orbital insertion, due to ground based computer software which produced output in non-SI units of pound-seconds (lbf×s) instead of the metric units of newton-seconds (N×s) specified in the contract between NASA and Lockheed

  89. Dumb Americans :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are ridiculous. Lovable, but really, fucking, dumb.

  90. I dunno. by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

    Extracting 0.453592 kilograms of flesh just doesn't have the same ring to it.

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    1. Re:I dunno. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extracting 0.453592 kilograms of flesh just doesn't have the same ring to it.

      Then you would love living in China, where they have defined a "pound" to be exactly 500 grams.

  91. Re:Sure beats jail time... by Cow+Jones · · Score: 1

    Road signs are still mph, horse races are still miles and furlongs and beer is sold by the pint so I think we're happily confused on matters of units this side of the pond.

    Only in the UK, as far as I'm aware. The rest of Europe has far fewer imperial relics in everyday life (maybe because they were never part of the British Empire in the first place). But even on the continent you'll buy your Subways by the inch, and you could buy "5-1/4 Zoll" and "3-1/2 Zoll" floppy disks. Our yard sticks tend to be a bit longer and marked in both inches and cm. Almost every (physical) thermometer I've seen has Celsius and Fahrenheit scales. The pound as a weight unit is still informally used in parts of Germany, but it's getting rarer now.

    I feel for the people in the US who understand how much more practical the metric system is, but I also know how hard it can be to convince a majority in a democratic country to do the right thing. Maybe you need a dictator? Europe can help with that, too.

    --

    Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
  92. Esteemed company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA and Liberia are the only remaining countries without metric as an official standard.

  93. Re:Sure beats jail time... by reve_etrange · · Score: 2

    For example, every rice cooker. All those "6 cup" rice cookers on Amazon have their own "cup" which is about 2/3 of a regular, 8 fl. oz. cup.

    --
    .: Semper Absurda :.
  94. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wonder why Americans don't care to switch to metric, ask yourself whether you'd like to switch to a decimal time notation. Then little pause in your mind, right before you came to a decision and generated a rationalization for one or the other... that's why American's haven't changed yet. That little pause is "WTF? Why would I want do that?"

    If you have to deal with all the stupid conversion from second to minutes to hours to days to months to years, then you would ask "WTF? Why aren't the world in decimal time already?!"

    Quick, you have a transaction that uses 3 CPU-seconds, you have to do 5 million such transactions per day, how many CPU do you need? Have fun calculating 24x60x60 in your head. Now, instead, there are 5M per month, have more fun multiplying by 30, er... no, 31, er... no! 28 so your system won't fall over in Feb. But then you are calculating storage requirements, remember to multiply by 31 this time so your storage can hold in Jan/Mar/May/etc. Do you get a WTF yet?

    Oh, BTW, how many days are there between 4th August and 3rd November (3 months), and how about 4th June to 3rd Sept (another 3 months)? Notice that the answers are different? How many days are there in 1st/2nd/3rd/4th quarters of a year? Notice the day counts are different, but businesses still report financials on quarterly basis, thus creating seasonal fluctuations even when there is none in the underlying business? WTF?

    Every science and engineering related discipline uses metric already, even in case where some discipline used a more convenient non-metric system, it is usually trivial to convert back to metric, and people in that discipline would know to convert back when talking to a wider audience. So knowing metric makes it easy for everyone to understand each others' measurements.

    Metric is the English language in science and engineering, if would be the choice of measurement if your population needs to work with any modern science or technology on a daily basis. So Americans would.... er... um... Yeah, maybe that's why Americans never moved to metric yet, like the other two in the world.

  95. costly and difficult to convert machine tools by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a machine shop in my garage, which includes a large mill and a lathe. Both have lead screws set to work in thousands of an inch, so one revolution of a handle is a certain subset of inches (.05) with individual tick marks at .001. It is essentially baked into the hardware, and you have to replace the feed wheel dials and lead screws to change it, among other things.

    I purchase metal stock that comes in US units as well (1/2" bar stock for example) which corresponds to stock needed for drawings that give all their dimensions in inches. There is a cascading chain of things, all of which need to change.

    You will not see me switching my shop to metric in my lifetime most likely.

    Converting a large industrial economy over to metric has a lot of hidden costs that make it very difficult to do, because all valves, pipes, fittings, metal stock, screws etc. offerings have to be changed, and imperial parts need to be offered for many decades to come to service older equipment.

    The idea itself is a good one as ultimately metric is a more scientifically advanced and clear set of standards than imperial. It's nice to work in a consistently matched base-10 for all scales.

    In the case of smaller economies, it is easier to support the change due to much smaller scale and very small industrial base. New Zealand as a country switched over to metric in a single day, after much preparation.

    Although the US auto industry has largely gone over to metric, I do not think that the rest of the US is currently in a position to swallow that pill easily. I believe that no matter how much ideologically it makes sense, that it is still political dynamite.

    It would be nice if everyone taking up this topic had machine shop and fabrication experience so they would understand just how much it impacts the pipeline from raw stock to finished product. Politicians tend to think in abstracts and statistics and do not always consider all of the consequences. Most of the rest of the population is so far removed from it that they A. don't understand the entirety of the impact and B. as others have said would not benefit significantly from the change.

    -PH

    1. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      That's why you need a transition plan. Officially Canada went metric over 30 years ago, but you can still buy tools with Imperial measures and almost all our materials are sold in feet and inches because we share the worlds longest unprotected border with the Neathertals to the south who refuse to evolve.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by Gimric · · Score: 2

      I'd argue that small, industrialised economies had a higher cost per capita to change over to metric because some fixed costs are distributed over a smaller population. Australia changed over between 1970 and 1988, and the world didn't end and there weren't riots on the streets. I really think this is one way in which the USA is broken - nobody can agree on changing things so nothing gets changed, even when it would be better in the long term. That is not a good thing and contributes to a slow decline in competitiveness.

      We still use imperial units when precision is not important, and where it is customary. We still talk about a person's height in feet, and talk about "mileage" even though we actually measure distances in kilometres.

    3. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. I currently work in a mid-sized American machine shop (about 30 employees) which owns a few dozen CNC Lathes/Mills, as well as a veriaty of other equipment and they all are based in thousandths of an inch. Combined, this adds up to several millions of dollars worth of machinery, not including all of the tooling and QA equipment we use (a couple hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of micrometers and gauges (a single thread gauge could cost around $500) and various other inspection instruments). On top of that, all of our customers provide us schematics which are dimensioned in (thousandths of) inches. Natually, the parts we manufacture are just single components of larger systems, which are also designed and dimensioned in inches. I'm all for metrification, but it is important to realize that, as far as industry goes, there are high costs for conversion. Every industry is different, but as far as manufacturing goes, it seems that using decimal measurements of inches works well enough.

    4. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked as a CNC machinist for about 5 years and at our factory half the machine were in inches and have metric. It wasn't really a problem - you just had to learn to convert microns to thousandths etc. After just a month or so at the shop you hardly needed to think about it - converting if necessary was simply part of the job.

    5. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      because we share the worlds longest unprotected border with the Neathertals to the south who refuse to evolve.

      What the hell, man. Didn't Huckabee congratulating you on your National Igloo count for something?

    6. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are parts that are visually indistinguishable, and yet incompatible because they differ in size by more than the allowed variation. In the aviation sector their are strict rules to separate metric workshops from thou-inch workshops, to avoid the possibility that the wrong parts or tools could inadvertently be used.

    7. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own two and operate them. One here and one in Thailand. Both have metric as the standard.

      And you should know this if you do any real engineering and mechanical work. It is easier to work in metric. Any real manufacturing company or engineering company with any type of world presence works in inches. All the automotive parts we do are do eand have been done for more than 20 years in metric.

      Maybe you in your little garage machine shop only work on old equipment in inches. I have all CNC milling (5axis) (3axis) lathes, toppers, grinders etc are all metric. Even the Haas'es come with metric. Only those who do not go very far are still working in inches.

      So um... maybe that is what you see from your garage. From my two factories located here and the other side of the world....we do like most of the manufacturing world....and we do it in metric.

      Good luck with your archaic system. Real world manufacturing does not have time to waste on an old outdated system.

    8. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      That's why you need a transition plan. Officially Canada went metric over 30 years ago, but you can still buy tools with Imperial measures and almost all our materials are sold in feet and inches because we share the worlds longest unprotected border with the Neathertals to the south who refuse to evolve.

      Thats because many products in Canada have been constructed in America. It has nothing to do with a desire for Canadians to purchase twice as many tools in order to keep Imperial measurements. We also have screw bolts and washers in both metric and imperial in all hardware stores. But its not like we enjoy having so many incompatible components. This is a cost, not a benefit. I dont know, but I would guess that all hardware stores in America have both imperial and metric tools and components. Otherwise, how do you repair any products made outside of the US?

    9. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah Canada, that wonderfully large 51-57th state.

    10. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Ah Canada, that wonderfully large 51-57th state.

      You realize that if you take that point of view you have to accept Justin Beiber and Celine Dion as Americans?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    11. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I have a machine shop in my garage, which includes a large mill and a lathe. Both have lead screws set to work in thousands of an inch, so one revolution of a handle is a certain subset of inches (.05) with individual tick marks at .001. It is essentially baked into the hardware, and you have to replace the feed wheel dials and lead screws to change it, among other things.

      As a fellow machinist, I put a DRO on my lathe and a CNC controller on my mill. Now I hit a button and everything displays in metric. It's very nice, especially when I can have the mill machine ellipses while I'm busy using the lathe.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    12. Re:costly and difficult to convert machine tools by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      It's not about changing existing parts and machines, just the way they're measured. Or, more accurately, how the data is published. For most intents and purposes your shop is already metric. The inch is defined in mm, and pound force has an exact decimal representation in Newtons. Even in metric countries the inch-sized stuff is ubiquitous, just that it happens to be a 12.7mm pipe or whatever.
      Of course there is a problem with screw threads, but that's more of a problem of not adopting the ISO standard than the measurement system that's used.

  96. 'MURICA!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at all the pathetic citizens begging government for permission to use a different ruler.

    How's closing down Gitmo working out for you? Or keeping the Executive Branch accountable for drone assassinations? Or ending the war on some drugs?

    I'm sure another petition on the White House website will keep the rulers in check.

  97. Everything in the metric system relates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not enough people know just how well the metric system is tied together, even with the posts on this article... but with a little common knowledge about the system and it becomes amazing.

    How does it relate?... not only does everything use the same base 10 for counting, but it ACTUALLY all relates to itself.

    1cm x 1cm x 1cm is a milliliter

    1 liter of pure water is a cube of 10cm x 10cm x 10cm... and, how about this, this amount of water weighs 1 kilogram.

    1 metric tonne is 1m x 1m x 1m... how 'bout that shit huh? nothing in the US system is this well related.

    So, not only is it superior because all the counting is the same, with this you can start to have pretty accurate guesses at sizes and volumes. If you want to know the rough weight of how much water will weigh in your fancy new fish tank so you can test a base for it?... just a few measurements of the tank and this basic knowledge above, will get you more than close enough. It's easier to remember, easier to calculate, easier to get everything to relate. Heck, people can now have a rough stab at the weight or volume of their swimming pool they want to set up on a deck... to do the same with the US system takes a lot more totally inconsistent and forgettable details.

    The US measurement system isn't just inferior, it's totally retarded. The system itself is retarded, but people staying with the harder system to work with is nothing short of astounding.

    The metric system is actually thought out. Take a general test of people familiar with the metric system versus the US system and see how well each can convert their weights and measures without a reference.

  98. What's all the whining about, just get it done. by H0p313ss · · Score: 5, Informative

    I lived in Canada before, during and after the transition.

    Over 30 years later we're all wondering why you're all still whining like little bitches. We'd tell you but you might decide to invade our socialist paradise.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    1. Re:What's all the whining about, just get it done. by peawormsworth · · Score: 2

      I was in the last class to be taught both metric and imperial measurements. We were the last students in Canada to ever be tested on knowing how many centimeters are in a foot and how a meter compares to a yard. I will confirm that learning metric was far easier then learning imperial. Especially when you need to resize units or multiply various units like calculating units of energy. It is an unfair burden on the children to force them to learn an outdated system of measure just to support the fears and misconceptions of the adults.

  99. Re:Sure beats jail time... by smellotron · · Score: 1

    Add coffee makers and pots to the list. A coffee "cup" is 6oz.

  100. Re:English system is fine by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I am all in favor of a non-linear time scale.

    Some hours (i.e. lunch hour) should be longer. Some hours should be shorter. Oh, and it shouldn't be up to Management.

  101. Free to choose by PPH · · Score: 2

    I'd like a car with a metric speedometer/odometer. The only version of the model I want equipped this way is the Euro spec one. The White House says I can have it. NHTSA, the EPA and my state's DOL can go f*ck themselves.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Free to choose by dkf · · Score: 1

      I'd like a car with a metric speedometer/odometer. The only version of the model I want equipped this way is the Euro spec one. The White House says I can have it. NHTSA, the EPA and my state's DOL can go f*ck themselves.

      Mechanical speedometers in Britain are typically dual-marked with both mph and km/h. Mechanical odometers tend to not be, but they're not needed by drivers nearly so frequently. Digital displays tend to be switchable (because that's trivial to do in software).

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  102. 1/10th? I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely they should've put the markers at every 1/8th of a mile, one furlong.
    Then they could stay there and they could just say they're every 200 metres.
    The metricising of miles only makes it harder to convince people to switch.

  103. Not White House responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The WH response was correct. It has nothing at all to do with them. Amerikins need to read their konstitoooshun and stop bothering the WH with nonsense.

  104. We the Consumers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Learn how to move seamlessly between both systems" (?) if it is possible to "move seamlessly between both systems" then it would be called - one system. ... Evenmore, he non-chalantly calls The People - consumers. Whatta guy! Or maybe It is me? With this obsolete idea that people are people.... Still...

  105. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is, the only reason you would need to divide an inch by 64 anyway, is because you don't have a smaller unit than an inch to use instead. That's the reason metric measuring devices don't measure 1/64 of a cm - it's generally not needed. If we need to have something in that tiny scale, we'll use a suitable size in mm or m. (By the way, 0.015625 cm = 0.15625 mm = 156.25 m so it's not THAT unruly. Also, that is extremely tiny.). Unless I for some reason REALLY need to have exactly 1/8 of a cm, I'll just take 1 or 2 mm instead.

    Can we now do the same exersice and divide a yard or inch into 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000? That will yield in pretty much equally unruly decimals and/or problems with measuing devices, but worse, because you can't easily convert from different scales by just shifting the comma. And if you count how often these two cases (1/2^n vs 1/10^n) occur in real life - excluding those that only occurs because there happens to be measuring devices that can measure them - I think 1/100 (%...) and 1/1000 is a quite a lot more common than 1/32 and 1/64.

  106. i don't even know most customary units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a 90's kid i was almost taught exclusively in metric. I can think in nearly every unit. Only standout issues being my height and weight.

    I got through school with minimal customary unit knowledge. I still have to go look things up when i need to convert them.

  107. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is mandated if it's a food or drug. Do you have something that is not labeled in metric?

  108. Re:Sure beats jail time... by jhol13 · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen a thermometer with fahrenheit scales for at least 20 years. Pound I have seen never. Some rulers do have inches, but not all. I do not know about Subways, I never go there.
    But I live in Scandinavia and we have always been more metric.

  109. Re:English system is fine by jhol13 · · Score: 1

    The melting point matters to people who live in regions of the Earth where temperatures goes below 0C.
    I leave it as on excercise to the reader why +1C is hugely different compared to -1C when going out. I am not claiming either is "better" weather, they are just very different. No matter whether there is snow on the gound or not.

  110. What the metri-nazis seem to forget by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

    What the metri-nazis seem to forget is that the English or Imperial system was in use for hundreds of years simply because it was convenient for the day-to-day measurements people needed to make. Most people never need to do unit conversions. They want their cup of coffee, their pound of sugar, their so many yards of cloth. They measure their waist and inseam in inches, They don't want 250ml of coffee, they want a cup of soffee. They don't want a half kilo of coffee beans; they want a pound of coffee.

    You can bastardize the metric system by adding a "metric cup" (250ml) or a "metric pound" (half a kilo) but woe be to them that use a metric cup in a recipe that calls for a cup (English) of some ingredient. They aren't the same.

    That being said, I need a pint of ale to get the metric taste out of my mouth.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:What the metri-nazis seem to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a metric country and I have never came accross something like a "metric cup". The recipe will just say 250ml. That is the point. There is no need for arbitrary unit names in the metric system. The standard unit just server fine. You want to use a measuring cup with a scale anyway for cooking.

      By the way, a standard cup of coffee is 200 ml anyway (and a big one 300).

    2. Re:What the metri-nazis seem to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the metri-nazis seem to forget is that the English or Imperial system was in use for hundreds of years simply because it was convenient for the day-to-day measurements people needed to make. Most people never need to do unit conversions. They want their cup of coffee, their pound of sugar, their so many yards of cloth. They measure their waist and inseam in inches, They don't want 250ml of coffee, they want a cup of soffee. They don't want a half kilo of coffee beans; they want a pound of coffee.

      You can bastardize the metric system by adding a "metric cup" (250ml) or a "metric pound" (half a kilo) but woe be to them that use a metric cup in a recipe that calls for a cup (English) of some ingredient. They aren't the same.

      But they're damn close enough. You see many recipes calling for 0.9 (or even 7/8) of a cup, or 1.1 cups (or even 1 1/8)? No, because 10% doesn't matter, for almost all cooking. So the 250ml that is 5% off from being a cup DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER.

    3. Re:What the metri-nazis seem to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That being said, I need a pint of ale to get the metric taste out of my mouth.

      Don't forget the buggy whip on the way out when you go to the pub, your horse may be stubborn today. Prosit!

    4. Re:What the metri-nazis seem to forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fucking moron you are. Your examples are just idiotic. Who there orders 15 cupic inches of coffee? It's a cup of coffee everywhere, idiot.

      A pint is a pint even if the official value is half liters (500ml) or what ever.

      So what exactly is sooooo more day-to-day in a pound of coffee versus half kilo? Nothing.

      Why don't you fill that pint with rat poison, since you are so afraid of change (to better).

    5. Re:What the metri-nazis seem to forget by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What the metri-nazis seem to forget is that the English or Imperial system was in use for hundreds of years simply because it was convenient for the day-to-day measurements people needed to make.

      This argument is trivially disproved by observing that other countries had their own systems which used different units (but with similarly non-standard ratios). For example, for all the people who claim that inch is somehow "most natural", you might want to ponder why Russians have used vershok (1 3/4 in) for centuries.

      The sole reason why Imperial stuck for so long is not because it's convenient, but because that's what you learn to use from very early childhood. There's no practical pragmatic difference between 250 ml and a cup, or half a kilo and a pound - either one is convenient enough.

      But the barrier of entry to metric for you personally is great, and likely more expensive than any personal benefits you may derive from it. Long-term (on the scale of generations) and society-wide it's a different proposition, but it is never really considered.

  111. Re:English system is fine by vux984 · · Score: 1

    It is mandated if it's a food or drug. Do you have something that is not labeled in metric?

    Yes. Everything.

    http://www.samsclub.com/sams/shop/product/templates/samsShop_productTypeIndex.jsp?altQuery=&searchTerm=&rootDimension=1430221+4294952644&brand=&searchCategoryId=430221

    Yes, its on the physical package, but its not in the advertising, on the flyers, the website, the coupons...

    Putting it on the package is the first step, but its not enough to make it actually useful.

  112. "We Don't Care" = FUCK OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The White House Succulent Underlings seem to be near an End to this "Petition Madness" and for good reason.

    Why not have a length standard defined on the length of the President's penis ! or the width of his asshole !

    Should we ever, meaning never, have a real bitch like HillBIlly for a President then we have a volume standard
    based on HillBilly's tits !

    Ha ha.

  113. Re:English system is fine by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    Quick, you have a transaction that uses 3 CPU-seconds, you have to do 5 million such transactions per day, how many CPU do you need? Have fun calculating 24x60x60 in your head. Now, instead, there are 5M per month, have more fun multiplying by 30, er... no, 31, er... no! 28 so your system won't fall over in Feb. But then you are calculating storage requirements, remember to multiply by 31 this time so your storage can hold in Jan/Mar/May/etc. Do you get a WTF yet?

    This is why this is such a contentious issue -- people *this bad* at math have an opinion about units. You should not be frightened by simple problems!

    Oh, BTW, how many days are there between 4th August and 3rd November (3 months), and how about 4th June to 3rd Sept (another 3 months)? Notice that the answers are different? How many days are there in 1st/2nd/3rd/4th quarters of a year? Notice the day counts are different, but businesses still report financials on quarterly basis, thus creating seasonal fluctuations even when there is none in the underlying business? WTF?

    A business quarter is 13 weeks so that the number of days is the same in each quarter.

    Incidentally, you can't have a metric calendar because the year isn't easily divisible. Hell, you can't have an integral calendar. (Hence leap objects.) Welcome to the level of calendar complexity that the Romans figured out. (You could have a calendar with 13 4-week months. We don't.)

  114. Re:Sure beats jail time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But even on the continent you'll buy your Subways by the inch

    Untrue. It's 15 and 30 cm at least in Netherlands and Germany.

  115. big government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need big government in my measurement system. It's worked just fine for several hundred years, and arguably is useless with the advent of calculators. It doesn't have any real advantage now for quick conversions between scales. Leave it be, long live the Imperial Units, far superior to those socialist European metric units!

  116. Given inflation, this is the optimal time by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

    WIth food inflation, the producers have been downsizing for quite some time in attempt to mask inflation. For example, coffee, chocolate and ice cream used to be sold by the pound. No longer - now it is something like 12 oz. Same with many cereals.

    My modest proposal: switch all food to metric. The consumer confusion will mask the gigantic rip-off. But, we'll finally be on metric!

  117. *whoosh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correction: I fail base 12 forever. Le derp.

    And base 60 would actually be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, and 60.

  118. English? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    You must mean Empirical? If you would mean English, you wouldn't have the same weights as you have now in the USA. Imagine the confusion you could prevent by teaching every American decimal counting and simple calculations. On the other hand, the 12 fingered citizens would disapprove....

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Imperial".

      I wish the damn Yanks would stop calling Imperial weights and measures "English".

      England uses metric, with a very few exceptions (road signs measure distances in miles and yards*, and speedometers read in mph) and has done for several decades.

      * though a yard is pretty much a metre anyway

    2. Re:English? by smash · · Score: 5, Informative

      The second worst thing about non-metric systems is that the measure for a pound, a gallon, a foot, etc is not actually standardized between countries. Calling the US measurements "english" is a bit wrong, as an imperial gallon and a US gallon are two different amounts.

      The worst thing obviously being insane conversions between different units of distance, volume, weight, etc.

      We count/do maths in base 10. We have 10 digits. Our measurement system should reflect that. The rest of the world, and the scientific community get it.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:English? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      they're not called english units they're called US customary units.

    4. Re: English? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the US, but everybody else (at least in Canada) calls what Americans use "Imperial"

    5. Re:English? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      The worst thing obviously being insane conversions between different units of distance, volume, weight, etc.

      seriously how often do you convert inches to miles? or even inches to feet for that matter?

      something short you might say is 39 inches...it doesn't matter that it reduces to 3 feet 3 inches, just keep it in inches since you are working in inches.

      same thing for miles...you aren't going to say it is 6 miles and 2640 feet to the next town. you are just going to say it is 6.5 miles so you are already using decimal. when you are talking miles you typically don't care about individual feet or inches.

      so really what is the advantage of metric then? people always seem to site the conversion between units, but really there is no reason to continually swap between units unless you are masochistic.

    6. Re: English? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      well then canadians would be wrong. in canada they (you) use the imperial gallon, while in US we use the us customary gallon. difference is like 5%. so, try again precision boy.

    7. Re:English? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      We count/do maths in base 10. We have 10 digits. Our measurement system should reflect that. The rest of the world, and the scientific community get it.

      10 is a tough number for working with - factors are 2 and 5, which aren't terribly useful for real world work (well, 2 is). We have twelve knuckle segments on our fingers, and it has factors of 2, 3 & 4 (also 6, but less useful). The Egyptians and the Babylonians got it, but then the Arabs forgot about eleven and twelve (not oneteen, twoteen, eh?) and folks pushing for a metric system went with a base-10 metric system, and people used to working in common fractional amounts for mental math balked.

      Dozenal metric is the system that will make the world happy some day.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:English? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the Babylonians used base 60, not 12, and the Egyptians may have also.

      Also I really doubt the Arabs "forgot" 11 and 12.. they got their number system from the Hindus pretty much verbatim. Not the Babylonians or Egyptians.

    9. Re:English? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      The early metric folks tried to redefine calendars and clocks too. It didn't work. Doesn't work for angles either. In my opinion, Celsius has absolutely no benefits over Fahrenheit.

      All you really like about the metric system is the SI prefixes. Nothing is stopping someone from measuring in kilofeet or millipounds.

    10. Re:English? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      base 10 is not magical thing that should be applied to everything just because we use 10 numbers. that's silly and does not logically follow.
      there are many engineering and computational situations where the non-metric units have an inherent advantage.
      also: with the ubiquitiness (whatever) of calculation tools, the process of converting should never take more than a few seconds, nor be scary to anyone, even those who cant do maths.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    11. Re:English? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      a yard is pretty much a metre anyway

      An 8% error isn't negligible. Rugby changed the 25 yard line to 22 metres, though the 5 and 10 were deemed close enough.

      Does the CFL use metric?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:English? by smash · · Score: 1

      seriously how often do you convert inches to miles? or even inches to feet for that matter?

      Never, because I live in a metric country. However, if i do need to convert units in metric, it is a simple case of moving the decimal point.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    13. Re: English? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      In Canada, we don't use any gallon. While we still use many Imperial units in day to day life (often in specific contexts, like inches being used for paper measurements, but centimetres being used for other things), the gallon is not one of them.

    14. Re:English? by snadrus · · Score: 1

      I never got the 10 digits thing. You can't show that number in a single base-10 digit. The digits argument advocates for a base-11 number system.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    15. Re: English? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      regardless of what you "use", in US we don't have the imperial gallon we have the US customary gallon

    16. Re:English? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      hows the moving the decimal working for you with the conversion of seconds, minutes, hours?

    17. Re:English? by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      so really what is the advantage of metric then?

      Mainly that the rest of the Earth uses it, and we live on Earth.
      Perhaps you never have to work with people in other countries now. My guess is that if you continue to work, you will have to deal with this sooner or later.

      Other reasons:
      Waste of money to make products in US units and metric units.
      Cooking with grams & ml is MUCH easier than cups, quarts, tablespoons, teaspoons, etc. as you can scale quite easily.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    18. Re: English? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      in canada they (you) use the imperial gallon, while in US we use the us customary gallon. difference is like 5%.

      No idea what gallon, if any, they use in Canada. But an imperial pint is 20 fluid ounces whereas a US one is only 16. Given that the fluid ounce is more or less the same and both systems have 8 pints to the gallon, that would imply a difference of more like 20%.

      so, try again precision boy.

      You might want to taste your own medicine.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re: English? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      in canada they (you) use the imperial gallon, while in US we use the us customary gallon. difference is like 5%.

      No idea what gallon, if any, they use in Canada. But an imperial pint is 20 fluid ounces whereas a US one is only 16. Given that the fluid ounce is more or less the same and both systems have 8 pints to the gallon, that would imply a difference of more like 20%.

      so, try again precision boy.

      You might want to taste your own medicine.

      **hangs head in shame**. I will turn in my TI-81 and cancel my internet service. :(

  119. slight amendment to the powers of the president by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    Your post is true and I agree with it, with the amendment that there are times in which the president does have power, but it's unpredictable and contextual. Sometimes he has administrative power given to him by a previous Congress, and a current Congress would be too deadlocked to change his decision, or that it isn't worth the political capital used. In other situations, he may make compromises with Congress tit for tat which allows him discretion and power.

    Some powers are available at some times in some situations.

  120. Bilingual? by Evtim · · Score: 1

    Some businesses might be, but the people are not. In the US I had to constantly convert for the Americans, they'd ask for it. I, the European was the bilingual in fact...

  121. Just leave it alone. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    The last time the feds tried to push us to metric it was a political shitstorm. Leave it alone. We have bigger problems at the moment without worrying about this stuff.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  122. More Sharia Law NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL!

  123. I don't know about roadway surveys by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    But when I was a surveyor's assistant we usually tried to close surveys to less than an inch. We were really, really, precise about locations. Maybe that was just a weird firm, but I suspect not, I think that's SOP. Given that we placed markers that precise, it is hard to imagine that the physical structures, items, etc got placed more than a couple inches off.

    I can't imagine roadways would be much different.

    So ya, as you say, these things are known pretty precisely. Turns out that even pre-GPS you could get really good measurements, if you did it right.

    Also having done that, it makes me think all the metric stuff is a little silly. It really isn't that hard to go back and forth. Most contracts were in US units, however some government contracts were in metric. So what did we do? Switched the digital theodolite and computer to metric and worked with that.

    Really metric only shines when you talk science or engineering, when you are doing more advanced things like inter-unit conversion. There the standardization is so damn useful, hence why science, including in the US, is done and taught in metric (or at least it was when I went to school).

    For every day use though? It doesn't really matter. All that matters is you have a feel for the units, and you can have that for both no problem. I really can't see what the compelling reason to convert to metric for everyday use is. Even in countries that have converted, you find plenty of unit mixture. In Canada you will see things at grocers sold in pounds, gallons, etc. It is amusing that in the same grocer you can see meats side by side, some priced by pound, some by 100 grams.

    Then all over you find some units that defy either system. Like ever buy a home AC? They are sized in "tons" however if you've had a look at the unit you realize that it is far lighter than the figure. So what the hell does that mean? It means how many tons of ice per day you'd need to equal the cooling capacity. Seriously. It started way back in the day when it was a new concept, and that was a comparable method of measure.

    I really think people make a bigger deal of this than is warranted. I certainly don't think there should be any resistance to using the metric system, it is great, but in terms of forcing a conversion, I fail to see what that gains you.

    1. Re:I don't know about roadway surveys by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Even in countries that have converted, you find plenty of unit mixture. In Canada you will see things at grocers sold in pounds, gallons, etc. It is amusing that in the same grocer you can see meats side by side, some priced by pound, some by 100 grams.

      You won't find that in countries that have fully converted.

      Like ever buy a home AC? They are sized in "tons"

      ...in the US. In Australia they are measure in kW (I'm not sure if that's the power consumption or the cooling rate, I don't live in Australia, and have never needed to buy an air conditioning unit). http://www.harveynorman.com.au/appliances/heating-cooling/air-conditioning . It's the same in other metric countries.

    2. Re:I don't know about roadway surveys by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      In the UK, we've "converted" but you still see old measurements everywhere, such as milk having to be sold in litres, but they're sized in pints - for example I can buy 1.136 litres, or 2 pints of milk. See this as an example.

    3. Re:I don't know about roadway surveys by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I live in the UK. It was easier to find an air conditioner website from Australia.

      What you refer to is "soft metrication", where the amount is unchanged, just the label. There aren't that many cases remaining -- but those that do remain are common products. Milk, jam, sausages, sometimes cream, but often only the old or biggest brands. Look at Cravendale milk, or any other luxury brand, or the milk sold at your local corner shop. It's a multiple of 0.5L (probably to make it look cheaper; the proposed laws to avoid this situation were not introduced.)

  124. Google Glass for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use augmented reality to translate every unit you come across to something that you can relate to ;)

  125. Base 10 is gimp by bartoku · · Score: 1

    10 is only divisible by 2 and 5. Everything should be like time, divided into 60. 60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30. That is why feet and inches are superior to meters and centimeters. Dividing a foot by 2, 3, 4, and 6 inches is much better than 2 and 5.

    1. Re:Base 10 is gimp by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      And if units were only used in division, you might have a great point there. Without using a calculator, how many feet are in 123 miles, vs how many meters are in 123 kilometers. Then, how many inches in those miles, vs how many centimeters in that many kilometers.

  126. Re:Sure beats jail time... by richlv · · Score: 1

    i don't think many people actually have an idea how much a pint is. it's... a beer in uk :)
    it's a bit bigger than oh-five, so not much to complain about that. some pubs "on the continent" also do "british pint" drinks, but again - everybody just knows "it's a bit more than standard beer".

    and, as a supporter of the metric system, i'm totally fine with pint staying as a curiosity historical unit, only applicable to that single thing ;)

    --
    Rich
  127. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natural for people who do math without sliding a decimal point.

    That's your damned answer.

    Or do you have trouble reading a clock? Yeah... based off of the babylonian numeric system.

    Have trouble with other units? Guess what -- they tend to be powers of 2, capping out at about 60.

    Which conveniently subdivides into factors 2,2, 3, 5.

    And will express other common fractions fairly reliably 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/5, 4/5... .

    Yes, you can find an infinity of decimal values it can't express.

    (And that you can is totally irrelevant). It's a good enough system for people who understand that measurement can often be safely approximated, and that the easiest way to do this is to keep eyballing 'halfway' as far as you're comfortable. Of course, it's sometimes acceptable to slice into thirds or fifths...

    The mile, as has already been pointed out was about a thousand paces. That my pace is different from your pace is totally fucking irrelevant. That it is /no longer/ a thousand paces because of a longer average gait is far more relevant.

    Measurement needs to be precise for physics and zoning (and machining and ...). For humans it needs to be in useful intuitive units.

    These two purposes need not overlap.

    Don't talk to me about a thousand roughly arm length meters for a kilometer -- nobody's going to fucking understand it in that context because you *WALK* a kilometer as a human, not roll your damned arm over it.

    If you want SI, go ahead and use it for astronomical units, measurements, machining, whatever.

    With something like the pound you'd have a useful argument -- the origin dating back to the weight of a specific quantity of minted silver pennies, something that is just... no longer in common human experience.

    The foot, the inch, the hogshead...

    They aren't less applicable just because you like to work in multiples of ten. They aren't arbitrary because of variance.

    They're intuition.

    Something all the SI in the world can't fix with anything other than temperature. And even that needs to assume STP.

    SI crowd needs to learn -- you can't replace intuition with mere science. It's not valuable or helpful. That you recognize it is arbitrary doesn't help the people who think through analogy. It doesn't add value.

    You need different things in a measurement than others. So use a different thing already.

  128. Re:English system is fine by EvanED · · Score: 1

    The melting point matters to people who live in regions of the Earth where temperatures goes below 0C.
    I leave it as on excercise to the reader why +1C is hugely different compared to -1C when going out.

    As someone who is very familiar with such weather, I don't think I agree. For instance, take perhaps the most important reason that freezing/not freezing makes a difference, at least IMO: you're driving, and want to know how much you have to worry about ice. If it was the case that, for instance, at +1C you knew you wouldn't have to deal with ice on the roads or something like that vs -1C you do, I would. But it's already so fuzzy already: hyper-local air temperatures, amount of sun, ground temperatures, etc. already mean that 0C doesn't actually tell you a ton. You have to be worried about ice potentially even several degrees warmer than freezing, and you may not have to deal with it (even if there's water) several degrees below. It makes the nice round number 0C way less useful.

  129. Re:English system is fine by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

    The problem is, the only reason you would need to divide an inch by 64 anyway, is because you don't have a smaller unit than an inch to use instead.

    Nope. Thousandths of an inch are frequently used in the machining world to measure tolerances. And while you don't usually ever divide anything by 64, it's very common to divide something by 2, then by 2 again, and then cut those things up into fourths, etc. Especially when working from a common stock material (e.g. a 2x4) and trying to maximize the usage for something in which the exact dimensions don't matter a lot as long as they're all equal.

    By the way, 0.015625 cm = 0.15625 mm = 156.25 m so it's not THAT unruly.

    It's still unruly no matter where the decimal point is. Unless you're honestly claiming that you can mentally divide 15625/2 faster than you can divide 64/2

    Can we now do the same exersice and divide a yard or inch into 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000? That will yield in pretty much equally unruly decimals and/or problems with measuing devices, but worse, because you can't easily convert from different scales by just shifting the comma.

    And this is what my point was. Both systems have different strengths. As far as everyday sort of uses for the common person, english makes a ton of sense due to relateable units and ease of dividing by even numbers. It rapidly loses its appeal when attempting to scale things or do scientific calculations, which is where metric really shines.

  130. Re:English system is fine by slew · · Score: 1

    France tried decimal time after the French revolution (each day had 10 hours, 100 minutes/hour, 100 seconds/minute)...

    They also tried a wacky calendar: 12-month year, 30 days/month each consisting of 10-day "weeks".

    Perhaps the whole thing failed because their scheme only suggested 1/10 days of rest instead of 1/7 (because 2/10 was too much historically). Given the current French employment situation, perhaps 3/10 days off is better than 2/7?

  131. Article 1 Section 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Congress shall have Power...To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.

    So the White House's response should've been "Not our realm, go petition your congressperson."

  132. Imperial or Republican? by Kirth · · Score: 1

    Funny that the republicans don't advocate the usage of the republican (=metric) system.

    And of course, the current government seems to be rather fond of imperialism, so I'm not astonished that they don't push for the republican system..

    --
    "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  133. Great! by Narcogen · · Score: 1

    Because that's what having a standard means, right? When everyone just chooses their own?

  134. m/s by Mirar · · Score: 1

    m/s would be a slightly more convenient unit at the speeds a car normally travel. It would even work at well at 5 m/s-intervals: 10,15,20,25,30,35 m/s for 36,54,72,90,108,126 km/h or 22,33,45,56,67,78 mph.

    1. Re:m/s by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Because if I'm driving from Manchester to Birmingham I just totally know the distance in metres and want to work out the journey time in seconds because that's so easy to add to what's on my watch.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re: m/s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      107 826.048 metres.

      You don't know that? What are you? A commie spy in my Blighty? A German? Say "squirrel"....

  135. Re:Sure beats jail time... by dkf · · Score: 1

    Road signs are still mph, horse races are still miles and furlongs and beer is sold by the pint so I think we're happily confused on matters of units this side of the pond.

    Almost all bottled beer is sold in 500ml quantities, with 330ml and 250ml also occurring, if fairly rarely. A few premium beers are in pint bottles, but I'm guessing that they'll convert eventually (when their bottle supplier decides to call it a day). Canned beer is virtually all in 330ml quantities. Only beer sold for immediate consumption in bars is in pint-denominated quantities (mostly because we've got very strict laws on that which would have to be altered) and since our pint is actually now defined in terms of metric units anyway, that's not a big problem.

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  136. Can you blame them for this response? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Imagine the republican attack ads if this White House decided to switch over:

    "Obama wants to force your kids to use metric...just like those socialists in [ominous musical stab] LIBERAL ENGLAND."

  137. DIN A4 is meaningful by fritsd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Different standards for paper sizes might be annoying, but it has nothing to do with "metric conversion".

    That's incorrect: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html (read it; it's very informative!)

    1 A0 sheet of paper has an area of 1 m^2, so if it is "normal" paper of 80 g / m^2 then the A0 sheet weighs 80g and the 8 A3 sheets you can cut from that without any paper loss weigh 10 g each, and each of the 16 "standard" A4 sheets you can cut from it again, without any paper loss weighs 5 g.
    It's so perfect that probably aliens use the same ratio 1 : sqrt(2) on their paper :-)

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    1. Re:DIN A4 is meaningful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's a nifty system, but it really has nothing to do with labeling things in metric sizes.

      "80 g / m^2" is an arbitrary value that makes it work; in the the end A4 is still a "unnatural" metric size (210mm x 297mm).

      You guys are conflating mostly unrelated bitching. The fact that the US paper industry developed entirely separately from the Euro industry is an accident of history. Even if the US had adopted the metric system, we probably still wouldn't be using ISO paper sizes.

    2. Re:DIN A4 is meaningful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As explained in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sKah3pJnHI#t=1m33s

  138. Read too many Dan Brown books? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I guess the French and Italians get up at a different time, because their words for noon don't resemble their words for nine. Same for the Dutch and Germans too.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  139. Would the economy improve if USA went Metric?? by aphelion_rock · · Score: 1

    I simply refuse to purchase any goods from the USA, not because I believe I will be purchasing an inferior product , quite the opposite. It is because I know they will use imperial threads / spanner sizes on their bolts and I *hate* the hassles this creates..
    I am sure the rest of the world who are mostly on metric think the same. Imagine what could happen to the manufacturing industry if they began to use metric measurements?

  140. HIghway Signage is the Least Important Place by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 1

    What is the purpose of highway signage? 1) Establishing speed limits and 2) Allowing you to estimate how long your trip will take. Purpose 1 is easily fulfilled if speedometers use the same units as road signage and purpose 2 is easily fulfilled if road distances are measured in the same units as velocities. Therefore there is virtually nothing to be gained in converting highway signage to metric.

    On the other hand volume measures are utterly confusing in imperial units. How about changing those instead? The only question remaining would probably be whether to give car efficiencies in miles per gallon, miles per liter, liters per kilometer or some other hybrid, as this is the main point of contact between the different systems of measurement.

  141. A joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously this gets over 700 responses? What is wrong with the system the way it is? I was a machinist working from German blueprints, you either use the standard system or you metric it is not like industry forces you to have one choice, and then use a calculator to fill in the blanks. Just about any weighing system or measurement system is standard and metric.

    Unreal!! Out of all the thing people could bitch and moan over this is somehow the only thing people are up in arms over....

  142. As a civil engineer... by eonduckem · · Score: 1

    It would be a pain to make the switch right now. Imagine all the mistakes and problems that would be made during the transition of miscalculating literally billions of physical and digital hand-drawn or scanned in documents.This would in turn delay production and significantly increase costs of doing business. The only practical way I see a transition to metric actually happening is when the majority of our documents and drawings are completely digital using open file formats designed to be able to switch to metric at a future date. The bottom line is people need to be comfortable with the meter. Solution: Put meters next to feet on height strips at gas stations.

  143. High conversion cost for home appliances by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I think the biggest issue with adopting the metric system in the USA is the HUGE cost of conversion of home appliances to metric to measure volume in millimeters, weight in grams, and temperature in degrees Celsius. And changing food packaging specifically to be metric oriented. We're talking costs that could eventually run in the hundreds of billions of US dollars to complete if done over a ten-year period.

  144. metrication is nobody's business by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    I said this in a post like a year ago, but now apparently obama agrees with me. go metric if you want, but don't try to force your world view on others.

    1. Re: metrication is nobody's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It IS the world view. Literally.

    2. Re:metrication is nobody's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gods, you are a creationist, aren't you?

    3. Re: metrication is nobody's business by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thinks the administrations responseÂis perfectly reasonable? Let the local gov decide based on its constituent's views. Mandatin g it for private industry would be a disaster.

    4. Re: metrication is nobody's business by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mandating for industry would be an economic boon, since we'd be on the same standardized system as the entire world, and outer space. Keeping an isolationist perspective is damaging.

    5. Re: metrication is nobody's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is circular logic.
      If it's so great why aren't people using it.
      As a metric person, I don't care, I can use the imperial system good enough - it doesn't bother me at all.
      The idea to put km/h signs is useless. They should use the money to fix potholes.

    6. Re: metrication is nobody's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? On the 'same system as the entire world'? Ever been to the UK? Where speed limits are in miles per hour? Beer is sold in Pints and gasoline in Liters?

    7. Re: metrication is nobody's business by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      How exactly would that benefit us economically? Do you know how many G-Code recipes or die-designs I've gotten from chinese companies (yes sending work TO the US) that had microns on them? Something like 3 out of ~140. A lot of countries selectively use the imperial system in circumstances where it makes sense. There aren't that many, but they are out there.
      Thousandths of an inch are so embedded into fabrication (excluding semiconductor fabrication I'd imagine) that it would be impossible to use anything else.

      Why would you actually WANT government to go out of it's way to take away choices from private businesses? Would I be allowed to use inches internally? Would I have to convert every single dimension on a print before putting the dimensions into my CNC? After the company who prototyped it did it in thousandths and converted it into microns just for the print? Then I get to convert 100s (or 1000s) of dimensions back into thousandths (what is what was originally pulled from the recipe.)

      Are you familiar with a little thing called "hardware limitation?" In addition most control packages in use in fabrication do NOT give you a choice. Things that are somewhat important like light curtains from keeping people from getting their arms cut off. Also die protection, and the like. The reason behind this is simple: most small shops use circa 1970 hardware. A high quality wintriss clutch control from 20 years ago (which is highly reliable, and works great) might cost $12,000. A modern one might cost $30,000.
      The only drawback is lack of configuration.....

      I agree that it would be great if everyone switched over to metric. Little by little that IS happening. However, to mandate that would simply FURTHER erode America's manufacturing industry. It wouldn't be the only industry hurt. I'm sure cooks wouldn't be particularly happy about that. I guess it depends on how far you carry it. Frankly there just isn't enough reason to justify taking that choice (no matter how minor) away from private businesses.

      Why do you want to grow government control? I'll never understand that particular agenda.

    8. Re: metrication is nobody's business by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You think it is not government control that set up the imperial standard in the first place?

    9. Re: metrication is nobody's business by smithmc · · Score: 1

      You think it is not government control that set up the imperial standard in the first place?

      Indeed. Why else would it be called "Imperial"?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  145. mnbzcn already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like only yesterday it was cso93veo.

    How the world has changed since then!

    1. Re:mnbzcn already? by otuz · · Score: 1

      Back from the future, eh? cso93veo in legacy datetime is 33747-01-13 14:40:00 UTC assuming no new leap stuff was invented since mnd8qv.

  146. use metric like the rest of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait, the US still uses inches, feet, pounds, acres, square miles? wtf? get with the rest of the world! no one else uses 12 inches to a foot

    don't get me started with Fahrenheit.

  147. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think you get to make the argument that Imperial units are for lazy brained people if the whole reason you're pushing metric is because it's easier and simpler.

  148. ISO != DD-MM-YYYY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISO8601 is YYYY-MM-DD.... and it is the only thing I use.

  149. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Nope. Thousandths of an inch are frequently used in the machining world to measure tolerances"

    Are you saying that you measure things in 1/1024 and 1/2048 of an inch? How is that better to work with than 1 um and 0.5 um? (In my previous post the "mu" character designating micro = 1*10^-6 seems to have been lost)
    Or are you saying that you measure things in 1/1000 and 2/1000 or 0.001 and 0.002 inch? In that case... same question again, how is that better to work with than 1 um and 2 um?

    "relateable units"

    They are only relatable because you're used to them. Live with metric and a cm is just as relatable as an inch.

  150. Changing ... how by dcpking · · Score: 1

    doing it slowly might be good ... otoh, Sweden moved from driving on the left to driving on the right overnight! People just drove cautiously for awhile, knowing full-well that lots of others were even more uncertain than they themselves!

  151. Actually the MARKET has said... by servant · · Score: 1

    If you want us in the USA to convert, teach our kids metric. Metric system is the 'official standard' of the USA for some time now. Gulf Petroleum converted all their gas pumps to Liters many years ago, and it drove customers away. Gulf as a independent petroleum company retail presence doesn't exist now. Even in woodworking 6MM is not really 1/4 inch, but it is used. 3MM is not 1/8 inch, a 100x150 board 3 meters long is not a 2x4 12' long but the conversion is used. Even 2x4's are really 1.5x3.5 inches anyway. My Nissan car made in the USA displays Metric OR Imperial units, but not both. If we want to get folks to convert, display Metric units more prominently and in smaller type the Imperial. Folks in the USA will like most, go with the easiest thing. But if we have our auto's converted, we do need all traffic signs and maps display BOTH also. Will the USA convert totally to metric? Yep. When it makes ECONOMIC -AND- POLITICAL sense. As crazy as BO is, that is one sacred cow even he isn't willing to tip... yet. And my Gas Sucking Nissan gets between 13 and 27 mpg. Now how many K/L is that? :)

    --
    ... "When you pry the source from my cold dead hands."
  152. Metric has sunk Subway in the UK... by astroengine · · Score: 1

    ...the "£3.30 0.3 Meterlong" sub never took off.

  153. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you say "it's a dry heat" I hope to god someone mods you down as literally flamebait. :-)

    I live in Houston, so I'll say "it's a wet heat".

  154. Slash-Dotties Are Pro-Metric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has the 21st century brought us techies so dependent on calculators they don't remember the fundamentals of octal and hex, or that those are non-decimal-metric base eight and base sixteen systems? Metric's base ten is as unnatural to a computer as it is to a U.S. carpenter. Bases two, four, eight, sixteen, thirty-two and sixty-four (halves, quarters, eighths, sixteenths,thirty-seconds and sixty-fourths) are natural bases. Base ten is for people who have to use their fingers.

    1. Re:Slash-Dotties Are Pro-Metric? by lpq · · Score: 1

      Comparing regular vs. irregular?

      We are talking a *regular* base that vary their prefix with
      10**3, vs. something that has no prefixes or constant multipliers.

      I.e. we are talking about what is easier for humans to understand.

      You are talking about computer-understood bases.

      Um... different topic?

  155. Re:English system is fine by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    100 C being the boiling point doesn't really matter much, but having the freezing point at 0 is very convenient, at least in climates where you actually do get snow and ice in winter.

  156. Use ISO-8601 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ISO-8601 Standard is "yyyy-mm-dd" and computer geeks use it. I sorts!

  157. To add to this .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Brits went to Celsius, they had a poster with a girl in various costumes next to 10-degree steps, something like Parka = -10, heavy coat = 0, .. bikini =30, .. HazMat suit = 50. and they had a poem which I cannot remember. But it was very simple.

  158. 55 MPH -- KPH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hardest part will be getting Sammy Haggar back in the studio to re-record.

  159. Metric (put both) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gosgog:
    Post both, no worse than English and Spanish, on other stuff (40% of the legal population are from Spanish Speaking places...& knowing two languages is better than one anyway). Now you assholes who think 55mph is good, not on a FREEWAY DUMBASS...all you do is end up causing accidents. Go buy a bicycle and stay in your neigborhood!

  160. Re:English system is fine by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

    In case if Fahrenheit it's true.

    10s and 20s - damn cold
    30s - freezing
    40s - cold
    50s - chilly
    60s - cool
    70s - room temp, t-shirt time
    80s - warm
    90s - hot
    100s - very hot

    Take Celsius is 26C warm or hot about about 31C? How about 17C is it too cold or only chilly?

    And I'm saying as somebody who lived most of my life in a country with a metric system. Somehow I got used to Fahrenheit and I find it easier to follow for day to day things. I prefer metric for all the other stuff though.

    --
    "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  161. Re:English system is fine by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    Agreed.

    Moreover, the 180 degrees between freezing and boiling were selected to match a human's ability to differentiate temperature by touch --- if one can make two items 0.5 degrees Celsius apart, while they're the same temperature reading (disregarding the decimal), one will seem warmer than the other --- but things need to be a full degree different in Farenheit for the difference to be perceptible.

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  162. Re:English system is fine by jhol13 · · Score: 1

    I bicycle during winter. -1 is very different from +1, not only because it means how I need to dress (raining v.s. snowing). Supercooled rain happens maybe once a winter, so it is not important.
    Besides, if the road is on snow and temperature is below zero you know it won't be very slippery, just "normal". But if the temperature is above, you know it is melting & icing and will be slippery. If there is no snow, then +1 means there can be some places with black ice, but overall it won't be that bad. If temperature is below zero moisture will freeze to the road and it can be very slippery. Zero does not tell me everything, but it does tell me a ton.

  163. Re:English system is fine by jhol13 · · Score: 1

    I should add that zero tells me more than any other temperature. It tells more than few next most important ones added together.

  164. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using the CIA World Factbook, less then 400 million people don't use the metric system, out of a population of over 7,000 million.

    "Lots of people"?

    No, not by any definition of "lots" that I've ever read.

  165. Global World by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Unless you're an international traveler or are importing some substance measured by volume, why the heck would you care how they measure in the UK?

    We live in a world of global trade and information exchange. If you look up fuel consumption figures online UK cars will appear far more fuel efficient that US cars because the gallon in "mpg" is significantly larger. Nobody lives in isolation from the rest of the planet anymore even if you never leave the US you are likely to use non-US products and look at non-US webpages for information.

    There are STRONG arguments why science and engineering people...benefit from metric... However, 99% of Americans don't need to do these things in everyday life, so why should they care?

    Any American should care. How much time is wasted in the US converting between metric and imperial units? How much do conversion mistakes cost both tax payers and companies (who will pass those costs on to the consumer)? Having two different unit systems costs time and money and can lead to some very expensive mistakes - remember that multi-million dollar NASA probe?

    Switching to metric will certainly be a pain and irritating for those used to the imperial system. However if you start teaching your kids the metric system and start using both when selling things it will make the switchover relatively painless. It will also save money and remove a trade obstacle between the US and the rest of the world - which is not something you want to have given the rapidly eroding dominance of US trade.

  166. Kitchen Units in ML by cmcguinness · · Score: 1

    Sure, ml is silly, until your wife asks you how many teaspoons in a quarter cup (as she's trying to upsize a recipe). Then ml are wonderful, and I thank god the measuring devices are marked in ml too. (teaspoon = 5ml, quarter cup = 60 ml).

  167. Not very convincing by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    'Avoirdupois' has nothing to do with mass...

    Au contraire it has everything to do with mass because it is defined as a mass.

    You are thinking of that bastard unit the pound-mass

    Indeed I am: the avoirdupois pound IS the pound-mass. If you as (I assume) an avid imperialist are confused by your own units don't expect to be able to convince anyone that your unit system is a good idea!

    And don't forget the metric system's own bastard unit: the kilogram-force. Which, I might add, is far more commonly used than pound-mass, unless all of the metric world's cheap bathroom scales are really sophisticated mass-balances in disguise.

    A mass-balance measures mass via its weight just like a bathroom scale. If you know the gravitational field strength then there is no problem whatsoever in measuring a mass using its weight. Indeed you need an inertial balance to measure mass without gravity. As such the "kilogram-force" is almost never used unlike pounds which are used both for mass and force e.g. pressure has units of pounds per square foot/inch/furlong/... but I have never seen kg/m^2 used for pressure you use newtons per square metre (N/m^2).

  168. ISO 8601 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're doing it wrong.

    The only unambiguous date format is YYYY-MM-DD: it's wholly artificial (divorced from language or culture) and it also has the bonus of sorting properly when alphabetized.

  169. Interesting reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/inches.html

  170. Re:English system is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if the system the Americans use is more complex and they can handle it, and the metric system is easier....Who is the lazy-brain?

  171. Re:Sure beats jail time... by richard.cs · · Score: 1

    when their bottle supplier decides to call it a day

    Unlikely to change for that reason. Cheap beers might come in standard bottles but premium beers tend to have custom bottles anyway with brand names and logos in the glass. As long as they see a benefit in branded bottles they can have them made any size they like at no change in the cost.

    Canned beer is virtually all in 330ml quantities

    I assume you're Australian then? In the UK canned beer is 440 ml or 500 ml. Only soft drinks tend to come in 330 ml cans. 250 ml bottles are very rare here but 330 ml is common for many imported beers.