Comprehension fail on your part. In no sense am I "speaking for her". I'm highlighting the lack of any evidence in the argument that says she is a criminal.
If you don't believe in the rule of law then that is your problem. Nobody will justify it to you.
In a criminal case, facts are established by the judicial system. Has a judge found Hillary guilty (to use the OP's words)?
She lied about Bengazi, blah blah
Yes, we get it. She is the lizard queen, she kidnapped the princess in order to start a war with Florin, she secretly forged the one ring to rule them all but fortunately the elves knew her mind and hid the three elven rings. We've heard it all.
The question people should be asking is what is she currently lying about?
No, the question that people should be asking is why are Trumps supporters tearing up the bill of rights?
I can't keep with the various theories - she's a demon, she's a lizard person from the planet zorg, she eats babies, she is personally responsible for the deaths in Syria. Just *insert random theory here* I guess.
More like being whacked with wet lettuce at this point.
It might just be me, but over time it just seems the conspiracy theories about Clinton are just sounding more and more shrill and false. If those guys want to keep at it, then let them, they are only making a rod for their own backs.
So let me get this straight: You are comfortable with tens of thousands of kids, and hundreds of thousands of non-combatant adults being burnt to death in a nuclear conflagration for no reason?
The statement put in bold is snark, and it's painfully obvious snark to an objective viewer.
So Trump couldn't keep his temper?
And you want to convince us that he would make a good candidate for the position of commander in chief? He loses his cool and shoots his mouth off in a debate with Hillary, how is he going to go in a room with the Chinese, or negotiating with Iran? He sounds like a lightweight who can't cut it.
be a piss ant for the elites.
Thanks, but I respectfully decline your kind offer to become a Trump supporter. I weighed the arguments presented by his supporters, and found them lacking.
If you choose the latter, shut the fuck up and stop trying to take others with you!
You aren't listening.
You don't get to tell me when I can speak and when I can't.
You don't get to forbid people from leaving the Trump camp. You CAN, if you want, make some sort of plausible argument as to why centrists should consider voting for him. Or you can choose not too, and continue to lose.
Oh, this coming from the people, who've already convicted Trump of sexual assault?
"From the people"?
The grand-parent implicitly admitted her wrongdoing,
And you've got some proof that Hillary herself is on slashdot, pounding away desperately trying to quieten the trumpentrolls and preserve her record, just in case the 30% support that Trump enjoys is enough to win him the presidency? Scratch that, 28% (I type too slow).
That was patently wrong and warranted a correction
You're right there, because the trumpenshrillskinheads have been squealing for a year about how guilty Hillary was, but at the last gate like magic! we find they have absolutely no proof and can offer no evidence to convince us that Hillary is guilty. No need for the GP to engage in any defence of Hillary, because who is it that accuses her? Not a respected officer of the law. Just a moron and a small bunch of shrill circle jerkers who follow him around.
You don't get tell people what to do or say or whether or not they can vote. So suck it.
I know why you are butthurt. Your boy is going to lose, and a woman is going to be president.
Whose fault is that I wonder? Uh, no I don't, I know already: It's your fault. Your shrill conspiracy theories didn't convince anyone. You should have tried harder I guess: maybe if you'd been more shrill, more people would have believed you. Now, every day for the next 4 years, you can see Hillary on the TV smiling and think about how you put her there.
You didn't read what I said properly.
Firstly, Trump did say ex-judicio that he would put Clinton in jail. He started by saying he would appoint a special prosecutor, but ended by precluding the judgement of the judiciary system by declaring saying he would put her in jail:
DT: "If I win, I'm going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation."
HC: "It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in this country."
DT: "Because you'd be in jail."
Even that is secondary. At this point Trump has to target his message at centrists or democrats who are not, currently, planning to vote for him. Centrists like me. If he continues to play to the people who are already in his cheer squad, then he will lose, and lose badly. The latest prediction I've seen has Clinton with a 95% chance of winning. Yes, 95%. She's already ignoring Trump and looking at the people that will help her with her first term agenda (moderate republicans).
And, I must say, that your tone is not correct here. I'm the audience that you need to convince to give your guy a shot. You and your other braggadacio buddies on slashdot need to dig deep and find some humility, because you are losing this election for Trump by not making a convincing argument as to why non-SWMs should vote for him.
She's got Goldman Sachs and most of corporate America paying her.
Unlike Trump who is fighting man of the people!! and - oh wait.
She's outspending Trump by a ridiculous amount and it's not making a difference.
Want to know why Trumps campaign is broke and Clintons is rolling in the dough? Because Trump is so inept he cannot even hold the Republican base let alone win the swing states that any Republican candidate MUST win to win the electoral college. All this blather about emails is making no difference where it counts, in the states that should be in play, but aren't because Clinton is too far ahead. The Republicans have thrown Trump to the wolves, because he stunk up their house and they couldn't stand it no more. At no point has Trump looked likely to win, and he never looked less likely to win than he does right now. So nobody is giving his campaign any money because why throw money at a loser?
Let me share something of how the rest of us see things differently to what you do as a loyal Trump lapdog and shill. In the recent debate Trump promised to put Clinton in jail if he won the election. He said that, and his supporters cheered because they thought it made him look like a straight talker and a tough man, an alpha dog, the strong man. Like Duterte and his jokes about missing opportunities to gang rape a woman and boasting about the number of people he has killed, or Recep Tayyip Erdogan: although old Tayyip is too smart to publically say he is going to jail his political opponents , he prefers to do that sort of thing in private. Which is why he gets to be president, and Trump never will.
This implication did not escape the notice of many, those of us from functioning democracies, and not lost either on those Americans who long for healthy democracy, who long for a better place where you can say what you want without being threatened by punishment. Trump has just demonstrated, emphatically, that he will never be the leader who will take them to that better place.
There just aren't enough Americans who are charmed by his tough man Duterte-lite act to win the election. And he has left it too late to pivot toward the moderates, without whom he cannot win.
He's not Hillary Clinton, and for nearly half of American voters that's all he needs.
Where "nearly half" means "not anywhere near enough voters to win the presidency"
Of course it is legal to be an oligarch, because oligarchs make the rules.
The irony is, that Trumps supporters think he is like them, that he hears them and sympathises with their concerns. He doesn't, he doesn't pretend to, and he even boasts about it. He is mocking them, and they hear that as him mocking someone else.
It would not be legal for Trumps supporters to do what he did, of course, but they don't seem to be able to put those 2 ends together, and recognise that Trump speaks to them, and thinks of them, as serfs and morons to be played.
That's why he won't stand down and let a Republican who might win take the ticket. He enjoys cheating the gullible too much.
Slashdot Mirror
If you don't believe in the rule of law then that is your problem. Nobody will justify it to you.
The truth is, she's a lying sack of shit criminal.
Are you a judge? What's your role in the criminal justice system?
Facts are used to make claims against Hillary.
In a criminal case, facts are established by the judicial system. Has a judge found Hillary guilty (to use the OP's words)?
She lied about Bengazi, blah blah
Yes, we get it. She is the lizard queen, she kidnapped the princess in order to start a war with Florin, she secretly forged the one ring to rule them all but fortunately the elves knew her mind and hid the three elven rings. We've heard it all.
The question people should be asking is what is she currently lying about?
No, the question that people should be asking is why are Trumps supporters tearing up the bill of rights?
I'm not an American - no need to be embarrassed for my sake.
And you are a judge, or comprise a jury of one?
What is your official title in the judicial system?
I can't keep with the various theories - she's a demon, she's a lizard person from the planet zorg, she eats babies, she is personally responsible for the deaths in Syria. Just *insert random theory here* I guess.
Enough already. We get it, Democrats, you really want to go to war with Russia for some reason.
So the investigation should not continue in case it embarrasses Putin and you are afraid of that?
Guess it's in that box with the evidence for Hillary's supposed criminal activity that for some reason nobody can find.
More like being whacked with wet lettuce at this point.
It might just be me, but over time it just seems the conspiracy theories about Clinton are just sounding more and more shrill and false. If those guys want to keep at it, then let them, they are only making a rod for their own backs.
Whatever Hillary is in relation to Trump, in absolute terms she's still a bought and paid for member of the establishment.
And so is Trump.
If by "winning" you mean values of "winning" which actually ignore the voting intent of more than half of your constituents so that you completely miss the fact that you are losing then sure.
insults don't improve the validity of your argument
I'm not making an argument, I'm just here waiting for proof of earlier assertions. Do try and keep up.
So let me get this straight: You are comfortable with tens of thousands of kids, and hundreds of thousands of non-combatant adults being burnt to death in a nuclear conflagration for no reason?
He just didn't recommend prosecution.
Which would suggest that a finding of guilt is out of the question.
The statement put in bold is snark, and it's painfully obvious snark to an objective viewer.
So Trump couldn't keep his temper?
And you want to convince us that he would make a good candidate for the position of commander in chief? He loses his cool and shoots his mouth off in a debate with Hillary, how is he going to go in a room with the Chinese, or negotiating with Iran? He sounds like a lightweight who can't cut it.
be a piss ant for the elites.
Thanks, but I respectfully decline your kind offer to become a Trump supporter. I weighed the arguments presented by his supporters, and found them lacking.
If you choose the latter, shut the fuck up and stop trying to take others with you!
You aren't listening.
You don't get to tell me when I can speak and when I can't.
You don't get to forbid people from leaving the Trump camp. You CAN, if you want, make some sort of plausible argument as to why centrists should consider voting for him. Or you can choose not too, and continue to lose.
Oh, this coming from the people, who've already convicted Trump of sexual assault?
"From the people"?
The grand-parent implicitly admitted her wrongdoing,
And you've got some proof that Hillary herself is on slashdot, pounding away desperately trying to quieten the trumpentrolls and preserve her record, just in case the 30% support that Trump enjoys is enough to win him the presidency? Scratch that, 28% (I type too slow).
That was patently wrong and warranted a correction
You're right there, because the trumpenshrillskinheads have been squealing for a year about how guilty Hillary was, but at the last gate like magic! we find they have absolutely no proof and can offer no evidence to convince us that Hillary is guilty. No need for the GP to engage in any defence of Hillary, because who is it that accuses her? Not a respected officer of the law. Just a moron and a small bunch of shrill circle jerkers who follow him around.
You don't get tell people what to do or say or whether or not they can vote. So suck it.
I know why you are butthurt. Your boy is going to lose, and a woman is going to be president.
Whose fault is that I wonder? Uh, no I don't, I know already: It's your fault. Your shrill conspiracy theories didn't convince anyone. You should have tried harder I guess: maybe if you'd been more shrill, more people would have believed you. Now, every day for the next 4 years, you can see Hillary on the TV smiling and think about how you put her there.
It does not absolve her of the crime.
Since she hasn't been convicted of a crime, she needs to be absolved of exactly squat. Learn how due process works.
DT: "If I win, I'm going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation."
HC: "It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in this country."
DT: "Because you'd be in jail."
Even that is secondary. At this point Trump has to target his message at centrists or democrats who are not, currently, planning to vote for him. Centrists like me. If he continues to play to the people who are already in his cheer squad, then he will lose, and lose badly. The latest prediction I've seen has Clinton with a 95% chance of winning. Yes, 95%. She's already ignoring Trump and looking at the people that will help her with her first term agenda (moderate republicans).
And, I must say, that your tone is not correct here. I'm the audience that you need to convince to give your guy a shot. You and your other braggadacio buddies on slashdot need to dig deep and find some humility, because you are losing this election for Trump by not making a convincing argument as to why non-SWMs should vote for him.
At least, they were voting Republican up till now.
She's got Goldman Sachs and most of corporate America paying her.
Unlike Trump who is fighting man of the people!! and - oh wait.
She's outspending Trump by a ridiculous amount and it's not making a difference.
Want to know why Trumps campaign is broke and Clintons is rolling in the dough? Because Trump is so inept he cannot even hold the Republican base let alone win the swing states that any Republican candidate MUST win to win the electoral college. All this blather about emails is making no difference where it counts, in the states that should be in play, but aren't because Clinton is too far ahead. The Republicans have thrown Trump to the wolves, because he stunk up their house and they couldn't stand it no more. At no point has Trump looked likely to win, and he never looked less likely to win than he does right now. So nobody is giving his campaign any money because why throw money at a loser?
Let me share something of how the rest of us see things differently to what you do as a loyal Trump lapdog and shill. In the recent debate Trump promised to put Clinton in jail if he won the election. He said that, and his supporters cheered because they thought it made him look like a straight talker and a tough man, an alpha dog, the strong man. Like Duterte and his jokes about missing opportunities to gang rape a woman and boasting about the number of people he has killed, or Recep Tayyip Erdogan: although old Tayyip is too smart to publically say he is going to jail his political opponents , he prefers to do that sort of thing in private. Which is why he gets to be president, and Trump never will.
This implication did not escape the notice of many, those of us from functioning democracies, and not lost either on those Americans who long for healthy democracy, who long for a better place where you can say what you want without being threatened by punishment. Trump has just demonstrated, emphatically, that he will never be the leader who will take them to that better place.
There just aren't enough Americans who are charmed by his tough man Duterte-lite act to win the election. And he has left it too late to pivot toward the moderates, without whom he cannot win.
He's not Hillary Clinton, and for nearly half of American voters that's all he needs.
Where "nearly half" means "not anywhere near enough voters to win the presidency"
Might be other places he's contemplating as well. Too late for condemnation from from congress once those devices go critical.
Thanks for that confirmation.
It's the same thing, with a different jacket.
The irony is, that Trumps supporters think he is like them, that he hears them and sympathises with their concerns. He doesn't, he doesn't pretend to, and he even boasts about it. He is mocking them, and they hear that as him mocking someone else.
It would not be legal for Trumps supporters to do what he did, of course, but they don't seem to be able to put those 2 ends together, and recognise that Trump speaks to them, and thinks of them, as serfs and morons to be played.
That's why he won't stand down and let a Republican who might win take the ticket. He enjoys cheating the gullible too much.