actually you are wrong/. if you read apple suit they are claiming "tortious"(sp) interference. basically that nick coerced an apple person to break their nda.
do i think that happened?
No.
Do you or i know all the facts?
No.
Does apple have a case?
Possibly, so we should not be so quick to say "oh evil corp is trying to smother someone's free speech"
Let me ask you a question:
If an apple person is leaking this stuff for free (to nicks site) is it within the realm of possibility that this person could be bribed by Creative or dell or someone else about new ipod or mac info MONTHS before launch allowing Creative or Dell to change their plans and costing apple untold tens of millions?
I made the foolish assumption that since I wasn't a developer, and I had a copy that it would be ok if I shared it with 5 or 6 fellow mac fanatics.
As to the question, did I do exactly what Apple is accusing me of doing? I did share the file. So in that regard yes. But there was no malicious intent.
well if you have any ideas of how to break the laws of battery physics and do so in a cost effective manner then go right ahead and send them you plans...
According to appleinsider sources, the form factor of the phone you may have seen in images is only a test mule based on a diff moto phone.
http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=816 snip: Update: According to sources, the phone shown above and elsewhere on the internet is not the rumored Apple-Motorola cell phone, but rather a development phone used for demonstrating the embedded version of iTunes that will be included with the Apple-Moto phon
"commitment" may mean, EA etc.. just tests that it runs on it and if does then it "supports" it.
Its embedded XP, if phantom made it too different they knew they could not get people to support it so it probably works with just about any app out of the box save for hd / save issues.
Because the thieving little 'tards think that donating 10 bucks will remove their guilt of stealing thousands of dollars of movies, music and software...
Slashdot Mirror
if i had 100 mod points i would give you them all :)
if by "crush" you mean it would have run anti-spy-ad-thing-a-jig daily as opposed to the mini. then yes. it would "crush" the mini.
Guess what item I will be adding to my "Amazon Wish List"
??????
read my post above.
actually you are wrong/. if you read apple suit they are claiming "tortious"(sp) interference. basically that nick coerced an apple person to break their nda.
do i think that happened?
No.
Do you or i know all the facts?
No.
Does apple have a case?
Possibly, so we should not be so quick to say "oh evil corp is trying to smother someone's free speech"
Let me ask you a question:
If an apple person is leaking this stuff for free (to nicks site) is it within the realm of possibility that this person could be bribed by Creative or dell or someone else about new ipod or mac info MONTHS before launch allowing Creative or Dell to change their plans and costing apple untold tens of millions?
"alleged"
from the link:
I made the foolish assumption that since I wasn't a developer, and I had a copy that it would be ok if I shared it with 5 or 6 fellow mac fanatics.
As to the question, did I do exactly what Apple is accusing me of doing? I did share the file. So in that regard yes. But there was no malicious intent.
STFU.
well if you have any ideas of how to break the laws of battery physics and do so in a cost effective manner then go right ahead and send them you plans...
According to appleinsider sources, the form factor of the phone you may have seen in images is only a test mule based on a diff moto phone.
http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=816
snip:
Update: According to sources, the phone shown above and elsewhere on the internet is not the rumored Apple-Motorola cell phone, but rather a development phone used for demonstrating the embedded version of iTunes that will be included with the Apple-Moto phon
quite possibly the most asinine statement of this short year...
"commitment" may mean, EA etc.. just tests that it runs on it and if does then it "supports" it. Its embedded XP, if phantom made it too different they knew they could not get people to support it so it probably works with just about any app out of the box save for hd / save issues.
i'm not saying sue google. unless they wave it in your face and refuse to do the right thing and take down the links.
>The donations show that people are willing to pay money, but the quality of films (and music?) is not worth paying for.
Don't think they are worth paying for?
Fine.
DONT FREAKIN INFRINGE THEIR COPYRIGHTS by illegal downloading it.
what a joke.
i can't afford a ferrari.
where's my lockpick?
and don't give me any of that, "its not technically stealing" bull hockey.
No this is like suing google because it knowingly and has not stopped providing links to social security and credit card numbers of you and me.
Because the thieving little 'tards think that donating 10 bucks will remove their guilt of stealing thousands of dollars of movies, music and software...
You need to look at your calendar....
Justification of theft reason #22489922
Semantic Word Play.
yes. a lack of viruses and spyware and ease of use.
I see your point. these will never catch on.
end sarcasm.
yes. the feds should never involve themselves with "civil" crimes until ALL murders have been stopped and ALL of the terrorists are behinds bars...
thank you for your input..
read the first post.
when you have taken his advice please report back.
until then....
>So, what is it you are talking about specifically? He's just trolling.. any guy that thinks OSX is just "pretty widgets" is a dimwit.
You will be able to watch this on one of you CSPAN channels tonight.
(in the US)
I watched the last couple of Mars mission Events and it was GREAT! (ok i'm a space geek)
CSPAN, its not just for politics anymore!
based on multiple emails, web postings and a day at Qt developer camp.
Happy?
-5 Troll
its supposed to be 20% faster overall. Ignore the trolls.
Y
E
S
I
D
O
N
T
K
N
O
W
W
H
Y