Damn straight! Minoru Yamasaki and the rest of the crew at Emery Roth and Sons should immediately be sued for failing to secure the twin towers against plane strikes. That's the problem with software security. Even though a lot of software has holes so large you can drive a Mac truck through sideways, plenty of software has been cracked due to obscure attacks that were not thought of before. So before you start blaming the software developers and architects for having a faulty crystal ball, be clear that the impossible happens, especially in software. Gross negligence etc is a different story, but this is simply a piece flim flammery to get someone's blog article published.
Research on Whale snot has fantastic commercial applications. You've heard of "Man Size" tissues, well, what about "Whale Size" tissues, and what do you think they test it on?
It's very interesting to see so many assume that the only way to keep on track to your schedule is to use one of the 3 responses I listed. By no means do I advocate instant gratification, unless of course, you're someone like Rockefella who's desire it was to instill exactly those qualities into his offspring. Case in point was where he not only allowed interruption by, but paid full attention to his 3 year old son whilst talking business with a highly respected and highly paid PhD level consultant.
As I responded to a different post, it is all about expressing to the child that the question is good, but the timing is not. One of two things will happen. Either they will be impatient, and try to find the answer to the question themselves - good result, or, they will wait until the time is appropriate, and then receive their answer, thus learning delayed gratification. - another good result.
No problem. It's all in the wording, and that the childs question is a good thing, rather than a bad thing. I would respond: Hey, that's a very good question, and as soon as I'm done with this, let's explore it together. This still keeps their enthusiasm kindled, and in fact may inspire them to go off on their own and find out.
Have you ever had a girlfriend/boyfriend (don't know who you are or what you're into, so no offence here) that was just a wet blanket?
A: No! I don't want to go swimming, I'm busy! Or;
Hey, that sounds like fun, but let's do it tomorrow because I have something urgent to do right now.
It's all about keeping the enthusiasm, and certainly NOT bending to the childs whims and fancies. Remember, you have the lead as a parent, not the child, unless it is an appropriate situation to teach the child how to lead. Most importantly, you need to get the child used to delayed gratification rather than instant gratification, or they will become exactly the impulsive, narcissistic, borderline sociopath you are talking about, that will be sorely disappointed when they collide with society at large.
These are words that should never be uttered by a parent to a child. Why? Because it promptly snuffs the flame of curiosity. Most parents don't even realise they're doing it. They're just too absorbed in whatever they're doing to notice what they've just said to their curious 3 year old.
"Let's see what happens when we put nitro glycerine into a blender. Timmy, why don't you push that button whilst I get behind this big tungsten shield!"
Yes, just like those at the "cut edge of the field" (sic) in the automotive industry said we'd have flying cars. There are many unseen barriers to a technology, and we all suffer from "the elevator effect" as outlined by Isaac Asimov.
On a long enough timescale, the survival rate for everything drops to 0. But what timescale are you talking about? I honestly would be very, very surprised if an intelligence can be garnered to have an "effective" IQ of 1,000,000. I am assuming that you don't understand the concept of a logarithmic scale, and are trying to say that this being will be 10000 times faster than the average. There's a ton of "if's" in there.
I am truly interested in the advances of which you speak, and the reasoning behind a "human equivalent" neural network. Seriously. Remember the Simpson's quote? "See Homer, that stuff in that robot's head is why yours didn't work!" A human brain is a highly complex machine that should not be simply trivialised. Given long enough, sure, but I would be perfectly happy to make a billion dollar bet with you that it won't happen. Name the date, friend.
I'm not a fanboi to any technology, but HTML5 just doesn't cut the mustard yet when you compare it to flash. And the most important consideration is if you can use the same codebase on every browser.
Those are 2 very large considerations. I work in Flash/Flex as3.0, but believe me, I'd change in a heartbeat if there was something better. Unfortunately to date there isn't. If there is, please post your wisdom here, and not only shall I change my ways, but inform everyone else of what is sorely needed in the world right now: A unified solution that delivers top level functionality. (Note flash no longer is unified thanks to Apple and now Microsoft killing off Adobe's so far good steps forward for their own personal app store gains.)
Yes, but you can perform due diligence. If you're a bank offering secure storage, one would expect a safe that not just anyone can access. This is like putting a giant 6ft steel door on your safe, but having the entry code as 1-2-3-4-5, and known by all staff members - including the janitor.
What's with the incessant gubbermint conspiracy theories? I mean really. There's just so much more to be concerned about right now, rather than jumping at shadows.
And anyway, I can believe incompetence, stupidity, greed and all the rest for being at fault for why society is so broken. But malicious conspiracies? You'd need TALENT to do that.
I have a friend who very seriously orders McDonalds quarter pounders exclusive to consume whilst driving. Why? Because when he drops it, it simply bounces. He picks it up, and continues to chow down on his *ahem* "tasty burger".
But don't forget the marketing! Padlock=SECURE! Unfortunately it will be a while before the PHB's realise that they don't need to pay the Verisign bandits.
Slashdot Mirror
Damn straight! Minoru Yamasaki and the rest of the crew at Emery Roth and Sons should immediately be sued for failing to secure the twin towers against plane strikes. That's the problem with software security. Even though a lot of software has holes so large you can drive a Mac truck through sideways, plenty of software has been cracked due to obscure attacks that were not thought of before. So before you start blaming the software developers and architects for having a faulty crystal ball, be clear that the impossible happens, especially in software. Gross negligence etc is a different story, but this is simply a piece flim flammery to get someone's blog article published.
Research on Whale snot has fantastic commercial applications. You've heard of "Man Size" tissues, well, what about "Whale Size" tissues, and what do you think they test it on?
Mine says don't forget your towel.
Here's hoping that the crazy zealot religious types follow their own advice and stay abstinent then. But I guess that's too much to hope for.
It's very interesting to see so many assume that the only way to keep on track to your schedule is to use one of the 3 responses I listed. By no means do I advocate instant gratification, unless of course, you're someone like Rockefella who's desire it was to instill exactly those qualities into his offspring. Case in point was where he not only allowed interruption by, but paid full attention to his 3 year old son whilst talking business with a highly respected and highly paid PhD level consultant.
As I responded to a different post, it is all about expressing to the child that the question is good, but the timing is not. One of two things will happen. Either they will be impatient, and try to find the answer to the question themselves - good result, or, they will wait until the time is appropriate, and then receive their answer, thus learning delayed gratification. - another good result.
No problem. It's all in the wording, and that the childs question is a good thing, rather than a bad thing. I would respond: Hey, that's a very good question, and as soon as I'm done with this, let's explore it together. This still keeps their enthusiasm kindled, and in fact may inspire them to go off on their own and find out.
Have you ever had a girlfriend/boyfriend (don't know who you are or what you're into, so no offence here) that was just a wet blanket?
A: No! I don't want to go swimming, I'm busy! Or;
Hey, that sounds like fun, but let's do it tomorrow because I have something urgent to do right now.
It's all about keeping the enthusiasm, and certainly NOT bending to the childs whims and fancies. Remember, you have the lead as a parent, not the child, unless it is an appropriate situation to teach the child how to lead. Most importantly, you need to get the child used to delayed gratification rather than instant gratification, or they will become exactly the impulsive, narcissistic, borderline sociopath you are talking about, that will be sorely disappointed when they collide with society at large.
Why is that cookie GLOWING?!?
Shut up. Not now. I'm busy.
These are words that should never be uttered by a parent to a child. Why? Because it promptly snuffs the flame of curiosity. Most parents don't even realise they're doing it. They're just too absorbed in whatever they're doing to notice what they've just said to their curious 3 year old.
"Let's see what happens when we put nitro glycerine into a blender. Timmy, why don't you push that button whilst I get behind this big tungsten shield!"
Whirrrr... bang!....
"We're gonna need another timmy!"
Sorry, Karl isn't home right now. He's currently dirt farming in Elbonia.
if(voteForRIAA) vote++;
else dev>null;
Yes, just like those at the "cut edge of the field" (sic) in the automotive industry said we'd have flying cars. There are many unseen barriers to a technology, and we all suffer from "the elevator effect" as outlined by Isaac Asimov.
On a long enough timescale, the survival rate for everything drops to 0. But what timescale are you talking about? I honestly would be very, very surprised if an intelligence can be garnered to have an "effective" IQ of 1,000,000. I am assuming that you don't understand the concept of a logarithmic scale, and are trying to say that this being will be 10000 times faster than the average. There's a ton of "if's" in there.
I am truly interested in the advances of which you speak, and the reasoning behind a "human equivalent" neural network. Seriously. Remember the Simpson's quote? "See Homer, that stuff in that robot's head is why yours didn't work!" A human brain is a highly complex machine that should not be simply trivialised. Given long enough, sure, but I would be perfectly happy to make a billion dollar bet with you that it won't happen. Name the date, friend.
Apple?
Being honest and open amonst religious types IS the problem.
As opposed to the UK, where there's a whole panel of overpaid consultants for every bereaucrat. You know, to make sure they're not wasting money.
I have a very serious question. Exactly when?
I'm not a fanboi to any technology, but HTML5 just doesn't cut the mustard yet when you compare it to flash. And the most important consideration is if you can use the same codebase on every browser.
Those are 2 very large considerations. I work in Flash/Flex as3.0, but believe me, I'd change in a heartbeat if there was something better. Unfortunately to date there isn't. If there is, please post your wisdom here, and not only shall I change my ways, but inform everyone else of what is sorely needed in the world right now: A unified solution that delivers top level functionality. (Note flash no longer is unified thanks to Apple and now Microsoft killing off Adobe's so far good steps forward for their own personal app store gains.)
Yes, but you can perform due diligence. If you're a bank offering secure storage, one would expect a safe that not just anyone can access. This is like putting a giant 6ft steel door on your safe, but having the entry code as 1-2-3-4-5, and known by all staff members - including the janitor.
Well, at least superman will have a place to get changed again.
The idea of a space elevator was conceived a long time ago, but you would be patenting HOW you do it. Schematics, or it didn't happen and all that.
What's with the incessant gubbermint conspiracy theories? I mean really. There's just so much more to be concerned about right now, rather than jumping at shadows.
And anyway, I can believe incompetence, stupidity, greed and all the rest for being at fault for why society is so broken. But malicious conspiracies? You'd need TALENT to do that.
Wouldn't be the first time!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brajeshwar/214854623/
I have a friend who very seriously orders McDonalds quarter pounders exclusive to consume whilst driving. Why? Because when he drops it, it simply bounces. He picks it up, and continues to chow down on his *ahem* "tasty burger".
But don't forget the marketing! Padlock=SECURE! Unfortunately it will be a while before the PHB's realise that they don't need to pay the Verisign bandits.
It's not that big a stretch of the imagination.