This is absolutely not true!
Languagepacks for every version remain valid for bug-fix releases that follow that version. Mozilla 1.7.2 can safely be run using the languagepack for 1.7.
I think you are just parroting what you heard from within the community of translators at Mozilla. We have recognized what you state in your last sentence. The Mozilla Foundation will release translations with every version very very shortly.
Good article in itself, but definitly flawed since it's not half of the story.
You've got to look to birthground of comics, Europe, for the most interesting part of the story.
Comics have been mainstream in Europe, especially in Belgium, France and The Netherlands, since long.
Check out Lambiekhistory of Dutch comics and the The Comiclopedia.
Stopping the cause of an infection is good.
Making a cleaner that undoes the virus is good.
However, achieving this by "Gaining control" and using an "Antivirus Virus"?
Who is the better of the other in this:
* the cracker that had the creativeness to develop a pitfall
or
* the cracker that fell into that pitfall and had the creativeness to develop a crack for that pitfall to undo itself?
Slashdot Mirror
This is absolutely not true! Languagepacks for every version remain valid for bug-fix releases that follow that version. Mozilla 1.7.2 can safely be run using the languagepack for 1.7. I think you are just parroting what you heard from within the community of translators at Mozilla. We have recognized what you state in your last sentence. The Mozilla Foundation will release translations with every version very very shortly.
Good article in itself, but definitly flawed since it's not half of the story. You've got to look to birthground of comics, Europe, for the most interesting part of the story. Comics have been mainstream in Europe, especially in Belgium, France and The Netherlands, since long. Check out Lambiekhistory of Dutch comics and the The Comiclopedia.
this gives a whole new meaning to buffer-overflow ...
As in: A) pigsty clean B) litttered C) neat D) dustfree
I am afraid by 2010 slashdotting will vanish ...
Perhaps "Not/." would be a good name for the protocol?
Stopping the cause of an infection is good. Making a cleaner that undoes the virus is good. However, achieving this by "Gaining control" and using an "Antivirus Virus"? Who is the better of the other in this: * the cracker that had the creativeness to develop a pitfall or * the cracker that fell into that pitfall and had the creativeness to develop a crack for that pitfall to undo itself?
I'd say they'd be better off employing some folks that CAN drive a vehicle ... but then again there maybe none to be found ...
Simply Throw Out Window ...