no dick fingers, it's at the bottom as one poster has already pointed out and i've agreed with, yet some of you still seem unable to comphrend. he can revoke the GPL on all his own further versions, he doesn't make the demand to remove YOUR copies until the last 2 paragraphs.
revoke doesn't have to mean previous versions numbnuts. the only one that looks childish here is you since you continue to go on the attack even after i've admitted my mistake (you know, what adults do)
oh please, your quote doesn't prove jack shit, because it doesn't place a time on when he is removing the GPL from his software.
however, it appears i'm still wrong since one of the posters above points out in his last paragraph at the end of his post he's telling people to remove the software from their computers, which he just can't do as i've already stated.
This guy has every right to stop licensing his software under the GPL (note the whole revoke thing is spin from the GPL crowd). the only thing he can't do is expect to change the license of anyone who has a copy already, from that standpoint he granted them a copy of THAT software under the GPL which is a binding contract. this means you are free to carry on as normal with your GPL copy, he can't try charge you money or demand you take down your own distributions.
If they are telling investors it's $1/gallon, you can be sure it's more like $3 if they ever actually go into production. and why the fuck are they using CORN? it's a terrible source of ethanol
But if all these attacks are from anonymous cowards like you, then they carry no weight and therefore a libel suit has no merit since no damage can be done.
note that if the accusations are actually true and have evidence to back them up then it doesn't matter if they are anonymous or not, and a libel suit won't be successful.
in other words, ananimity protects us from both attack
how many people who run linux do you think are stupid enough to buy vista then uninstall it? why does everyone pretend the white box market doesn't exist?
you people then have to accept linux has the same problem, since far less people use linux then vista. you have all attempted to debunk that same claim from MS for years, to claim otherwise is 2faced.
In this age of climate change hysteria, if you did research that ended up suggested otherwise would you like to have it out there with your name on it? i'd rather have frank and honest EPA employee's and not be able to read their findings then being able to read a bunch of 1/2 truths that they were forced to self censor to protect their jobs and reputations
... no one gives a fuck if you go on strike. in fact i would propose that we help them form said union so that we can force them into a permanent strike so that all blogs dry up and my goggle searches can be useful again.
he doesn't walk around everyday life with spring loaded legs though, when he runs he puts on his racing legs and off he goes. the problem is other people can't afford the super legs and they aren't a human analog at all, so yes i think the legs should be banned and he can compete with normal replacments like everyone else.
If i've purchased a song, i should be able to use it anywhere,on anything and at anytime of my choosing for personal use, and i should be able to exchange my license to use this music with anyone else for a swap or money exactly like any other 2nd hand market.
"Cloning has not been done for hundreds of years, perhaps 30 to 40 years (if that)."
eeeeeeeh! wrong answer. taking cuttings and striking them is no different to cloning, and it's been done by humans for 100's of years.
"my very inexpert understanding of what cloning means"
I think this makes a point all on it's own.
"Good thing the fascist government is stepping in and regulating lead in children's toys."
nice going you even played the "Think of the children card". pity your confusing something known to be toxic with something that's known not to be....
oh and cloning is has nothing to do with genetically modified crops, if anything it's EXACTLY the oppersite since it's purpose is to get the exact same gene's over and over. as usual you people are confused about what your opposed to.
no dick fingers, it's at the bottom as one poster has already pointed out and i've agreed with, yet some of you still seem unable to comphrend. he can revoke the GPL on all his own further versions, he doesn't make the demand to remove YOUR copies until the last 2 paragraphs.
revoke doesn't have to mean previous versions numbnuts. the only one that looks childish here is you since you continue to go on the attack even after i've admitted my mistake (you know, what adults do)
whats your point, that i'm some how the first person in the history of /. to skim TFA and miss something at the end of it?
however, it appears i'm still wrong since one of the posters above points out in his last paragraph at the end of his post he's telling people to remove the software from their computers, which he just can't do as i've already stated.
This guy has every right to stop licensing his software under the GPL (note the whole revoke thing is spin from the GPL crowd). the only thing he can't do is expect to change the license of anyone who has a copy already, from that standpoint he granted them a copy of THAT software under the GPL which is a binding contract. this means you are free to carry on as normal with your GPL copy, he can't try charge you money or demand you take down your own distributions.
If they are telling investors it's $1/gallon, you can be sure it's more like $3 if they ever actually go into production. and why the fuck are they using CORN? it's a terrible source of ethanol
note that if the accusations are actually true and have evidence to back them up then it doesn't matter if they are anonymous or not, and a libel suit won't be successful.
in other words, ananimity protects us from both attack
WTF, so in your world everyone has to be a security expert to be allowed to use the internet, and it's all the victims fault? get a clue.
nonsense. biological controls have largely been a success in modern times. i hope you catch a mozzie born parasite for your troubles.
how many people who run linux do you think are stupid enough to buy vista then uninstall it? why does everyone pretend the white box market doesn't exist?
you people then have to accept linux has the same problem, since far less people use linux then vista. you have all attempted to debunk that same claim from MS for years, to claim otherwise is 2faced.
what's the world come to when you can't trust someone selling phishing software!
.... who gives a fuck if these pecker woods like each other or not?
i seriously have to call bullshit on someone claiming they can measure an ocean to 0.2mm
2. why must it always be the corporations with you people?
In this age of climate change hysteria, if you did research that ended up suggested otherwise would you like to have it out there with your name on it? i'd rather have frank and honest EPA employee's and not be able to read their findings then being able to read a bunch of 1/2 truths that they were forced to self censor to protect their jobs and reputations
... no one gives a fuck if you go on strike. in fact i would propose that we help them form said union so that we can force them into a permanent strike so that all blogs dry up and my goggle searches can be useful again.
I have to agree, that health care as a business is going to end in the next 10 years. it simply will get too expensive and not provide enough benefit.
he doesn't walk around everyday life with spring loaded legs though, when he runs he puts on his racing legs and off he goes. the problem is other people can't afford the super legs and they aren't a human analog at all, so yes i think the legs should be banned and he can compete with normal replacments like everyone else.
making a film and selling it without paying for the soundtrack is compeltely different.
oh and sampling for parody or amature non profit use should be allowed as well.
If i've purchased a song, i should be able to use it anywhere,on anything and at anytime of my choosing for personal use, and i should be able to exchange my license to use this music with anyone else for a swap or money exactly like any other 2nd hand market.
1995 called they want their ramdrives back.
eeeeeeeh! wrong answer. taking cuttings and striking them is no different to cloning, and it's been done by humans for 100's of years.
"my very inexpert understanding of what cloning means"
I think this makes a point all on it's own.
"Good thing the fascist government is stepping in and regulating lead in children's toys."
nice going you even played the "Think of the children card". pity your confusing something known to be toxic with something that's known not to be....
oh and cloning is has nothing to do with genetically modified crops, if anything it's EXACTLY the oppersite since it's purpose is to get the exact same gene's over and over. as usual you people are confused about what your opposed to.
even one life is worth more then all of their music sales ever, and all sales they will ever make.