social experienments aren't what you could call an exact science. the reason is people aren't a variable they can control exactly no matter how much it might suit their experient.
i want the 15 seconds on my life back i spent reading your nonsense.
you have a twisted, fucked up view of the world if you think effort in exchange for payment makes you someones tool. i suspect you'v never worked a day in your life, nor have you ever had anyone working for you.
Oh so all the people throughout history were just too stupid to realise it was worthless. is that your stunning point?
gold has 2 properties that you have totally failed to comprehend. it doesn't corrode, and it's rare. i don't expect you to actually understand why this is so important, but lets just leave it at modern civilisation wouldn't exist without gold.
the path the environmental lobby is demanding we take is in the trillions of dollars. so i can only assume you are being misleading on purpose when you say "some money". would you care to re word that as "a fuck load of money"?
you also attempt to make the case that spending trillions on cutting CO2 is only going to cost money, when it could in fact result in other environmental problems. what if we destroy millions of HA's of forest to plant bio crops only to find out AGW is fake?
this is the real world with grown up decisions to be made, and they shouldn't be made lightly.
oh and to suggest the human race won't survive global warming.... fuck you watch too many hollywood movies son.
no it's not thousands. where did you come up with this number? it's a handful of research centers at best. feel free to prove me wrong with a list of 1000 names though.
what crack are you smoking. i've never seen any over lap between creationist and AGW skeptics. i demand you show me some evidence of this.
just like you attempted slur of calling skeptics "deniers", all you seem to be capable of is attempts at lumping AGW skeptics in with less desirable groups, as if it makes your narrow view of the world make more sense.
yet another codec implementation trying to push it's way to the top.
the reasons they oppose h.264 are stupid for a start, it has about the most generous licensing i've ever seen. hence the reason it has been so widely adopted.
i call bullshit. you've never even used vista if your claiming it nags you to run word everytime.
fact is linux fanbois have (rightly) bagged windows for a lack of user security for a long time, and when MS implemented it they bagged it like a bunch of fucking hypocrites.
vista was no where near a flop and not at all a bad OS. i've had much much much worse experiences with linux distros.
I think your just having to eat your words about win7, because it's a fucking good OS. it runs faster then vista or winxp, they've dropped the candy land fucked up theme and given it a slick interface.
they lift your print off something, why the fuck would they need anything out of this dinky database? all it's going to tell them is when you clocked into work.
nope wrong. the car has doors and locks, but their are criminals out there that are skilled enough to pick the locks. how far should you raise the complexity of the hack before your off the hook?
Slashdot Mirror
social experienments aren't what you could call an exact science. the reason is people aren't a variable they can control exactly no matter how much it might suit their experient.
so you'd be fine if i barged into your house and took all your shit? if it's not private property then you agree i have the right to take it, right?
you have a twisted, fucked up view of the world if you think effort in exchange for payment makes you someones tool. i suspect you'v never worked a day in your life, nor have you ever had anyone working for you.
yes, because we couldn't possibly benefit from pointing out someone is doing something stupid.
my thats a clever way of saying it's about tenticle sex monsters and flying cocks.
things like second life make me afraid the movie idiocracy will come true...
gg indeed....
typically kdawson posts it, what a tard.
gold has 2 properties that you have totally failed to comprehend. it doesn't corrode, and it's rare. i don't expect you to actually understand why this is so important, but lets just leave it at modern civilisation wouldn't exist without gold.
you also attempt to make the case that spending trillions on cutting CO2 is only going to cost money, when it could in fact result in other environmental problems. what if we destroy millions of HA's of forest to plant bio crops only to find out AGW is fake?
this is the real world with grown up decisions to be made, and they shouldn't be made lightly.
oh and to suggest the human race won't survive global warming.... fuck you watch too many hollywood movies son.
no it's not thousands. where did you come up with this number? it's a handful of research centers at best. feel free to prove me wrong with a list of 1000 names though.
just like you attempted slur of calling skeptics "deniers", all you seem to be capable of is attempts at lumping AGW skeptics in with less desirable groups, as if it makes your narrow view of the world make more sense.
luge by it's very nature is dangerous. these athletes know the risks, they have the option of not competing if they think it's too dangerous.
so let me get this straight, this amazing new generator takes in gas and burns it. it's that called a fucking combustion engine?
they profit from having a good technology at a cheap price. it sounds like the kind of misdirected crap RMS spouts.
umm, so in other words no one is going to give a fuck just like they don't now?!
the reasons they oppose h.264 are stupid for a start, it has about the most generous licensing i've ever seen. hence the reason it has been so widely adopted.
fact is linux fanbois have (rightly) bagged windows for a lack of user security for a long time, and when MS implemented it they bagged it like a bunch of fucking hypocrites.
vista was no where near a flop and not at all a bad OS. i've had much much much worse experiences with linux distros.
I think your just having to eat your words about win7, because it's a fucking good OS. it runs faster then vista or winxp, they've dropped the candy land fucked up theme and given it a slick interface.
big fucking deal.
it's new on slashdrone, because these fuckwits have nothing better to post.
i remeber it for having the ugliest theme ever.
it was as if 1000's of OSS nerds cried out and then were silent.
even then, a decent DBA will prevent even the crappest program from being a problem.
nope wrong. the car has doors and locks, but their are criminals out there that are skilled enough to pick the locks. how far should you raise the complexity of the hack before your off the hook?
I could lock down any system and make 100% hacker proof - i'd unplug their server.
it's a ratio of risk to reward like most things, if you want zero risk there won't be any reward.