"For example, as we know it there are some parameters in the standard model of physics that have to be set just right in order for the universe as it is currently set to exist."
Bad phrase. Source of your error.
As we know it, there are some parameters in the standard model of physics that must have certain values in order of the universe we observe to exist.
Stated that way, you don't need a cause for the "settings".
Your explanation did a lot of dancing around the word objective. It's not a simple word and you have appeared to use it several ways while trying to seem to use it only one. Try explaining yourself without the word and see how it does. I can interpret "objective historical claims" at least three ways, for instance.
And you are investigating data systems that are not your client's, why? That's what PI's do. They investigate the doings of others and show up in court.
Um, your analogy is crap. A PI may not even need to access a computer, depending on the type of work they do. However, a digital forensics expert may very well have to do investigative work in order to provide courtroom testimony. Not to mention, the difference in outlay for the two is quite striking.
For someone in the data business, you're pretty inept at knowing how to start.
Google "Private investigator" license obtaining -- The second link shown is:
fascism, n.
1. (sometimes cap.) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
2. (sometimes cap.) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.
3. (cap.) a fascist movement, esp. the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922-43.
That does not exist here, regardless of how much you wave your little hands and stamp your little feet.
Don't denigrate yourself. You have an innate talent and you practiced with a deliberate intent. You didn't sit and contentedly draw stick figures for 44K hours. I too am an artist, although I sculpt. There are those who will never in their lifetimes, regardless of the hours put in, be able to sculpt well. They simply don't have the innate spatial abilities. That's what talent is, underlying abilities.
You have them, otherwise you'd be drawing extremely fine stick figures.
May your wish come true -- living with every friggin' memory of every friggin' thing you've ever experienced. After a couple of years of that, come back and we'll charge you an arm and a leg to undo it.
Uh, did you quit logic studies in kindergarten? You cannot prevent something that did not happen (terrorist attacks utilizing airliners). That does not mean however, that the fact that there were zero incidents is not in part due to the measures.
Nice straw. Being observed and making note of their behavior for further observation is not a full cavity search or being hassled for hours. Good spin for effect, though.
People don't give people "funny looks" by accident. They do it on purpose, then claim later they're misunderstood. Been in IT long enough to know there's generally a victim mentality coupled with a minor god complex.
Anti-authority and pro-chaos are two distinctly different things. Not attempting to find and stop bad guys is pro-chaos.
"I fundamentally do not agree..."
OK, I'll bite. Explain to me why you might disagree that someone lighting a shoe bomb is not a bad guy doing a bad thing. That's what this is about. To carry on with that note: you may disagree with using "unreliable" methods, but I note you provide not a single suggestion as to a "reliable" one.
And here so many people a few days ago were saying how there was no reason or benefit to Google up someone's blogging or online life during the hiring process.
TFA suggests that it is possible to have dreams which train your subconscious by association.
This is related to another practice technique, fantasizing. The cerebellum is engaged at a low level when you fantasize. Practice - as long as you are fantasizing correctly.
Conversely, when an actual fight situation comes up, you're more likely to do poorly if your conscious mind is engaged. Our brains work without our consciousness--and given training, they do far better without our consciousness.
Uh, no. That's too general. I think what you're trying to say is if you attempt to micromanage with your consciousness, you can screw up, but I guarantee that I can watch in detail what I'm doing when sparring and still not interfere. Add to that, your reflexes don't have a damned thing to do with your overall goal. If you sit there waiting without conscious though on some level, you'll get outflanked or tricked. You'll also not launch any attacks.
This form of training likely has its origins in the lower life forms which perform complex tasks that seem to transcend simple ROM, e.g., wasps.
What the hell does that mean - read only memory? Instinct? Instinct is hardly like memory being read out. You guys gotta stop trying to map biotic behavior into computer jargon. Don't fly.
Someone loading the dice on what I get back from a search. At least with the current crop, I can more or less figure what they're doing. With a dynamic, anything goes approach, I seriously doubt I'll be using it much.
While interestingly, here in fly over land, it doesn't by and large make people fearful. You hear about them when interviewed by reporters who snip out comments from the context, but when you work next to them, no.
The level of hostility at termination in the US is not terrible. Most people get depressed, not hostile.
Sounds like you would like to be able to leave whenever you want, but not get fired for whatever they want. Why the double standard?
Then you didn't read his post. Said explicitly he's pliant and considerate to those who work well. Those nine of ten shit employees you mentioned deserve what, exactly?
While your sentiment sounds good, it is clearly not the case. There are many venues which have in the agreement for hire clauses stating the employee will behave in ways that won't negatively impact the employer. Don't sign and don't take the job, fine. But to say they're doomed is untrue. Most banks, for instance.
Slashdot Mirror
On 9/10, you could have said that about hijackers flying a plane into a building and killing 3000 people. What would be your point?
I never use Word. Each time I've gotten a new system, I've deleted it. I use TextPad for quick and Word Pro for professional.
That said, I just read her article. 'Twas a tale told by an idiot apparently. She can't do what is easy and carps about that which is nothing.
"For example, as we know it there are some parameters in the standard model of physics that have to be set just right in order for the universe as it is currently set to exist."
Bad phrase. Source of your error.
As we know it, there are some parameters in the standard model of physics that must have certain values in order of the universe we observe to exist.
Stated that way, you don't need a cause for the "settings".
Up until the point that the body of knowledge refuted them, yes.
Your explanation did a lot of dancing around the word objective. It's not a simple word and you have appeared to use it several ways while trying to seem to use it only one. Try explaining yourself without the word and see how it does. I can interpret "objective historical claims" at least three ways, for instance.
And you are investigating data systems that are not your client's, why? That's what PI's do. They investigate the doings of others and show up in court.
Um, your analogy is crap. A PI may not even need to access a computer, depending on the type of work they do. However, a digital forensics expert may very well have to do investigative work in order to provide courtroom testimony. Not to mention, the difference in outlay for the two is quite striking.
For someone in the data business, you're pretty inept at knowing how to start.
Google "Private investigator" license obtaining -- The second link shown is:
http://www.oregonpi.com/licensing.htm
It's a reasonable place to start. There you will learn it's a state by state thing.
Uh, no.
fascism, n.
1. (sometimes cap.) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
2. (sometimes cap.) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.
3. (cap.) a fascist movement, esp. the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922-43.
That does not exist here, regardless of how much you wave your little hands and stamp your little feet.
Don't denigrate yourself. You have an innate talent and you practiced with a deliberate intent. You didn't sit and contentedly draw stick figures for 44K hours. I too am an artist, although I sculpt. There are those who will never in their lifetimes, regardless of the hours put in, be able to sculpt well. They simply don't have the innate spatial abilities. That's what talent is, underlying abilities.
You have them, otherwise you'd be drawing extremely fine stick figures.
"After taking a year of karate, ..."
That, chum, is the basic definition of sophomore.
May your wish come true -- living with every friggin' memory of every friggin' thing you've ever experienced. After a couple of years of that, come back and we'll charge you an arm and a leg to undo it.
You might read up on England during Charles Dickens time, or New York during the early 1800's, or....
Uh, did you quit logic studies in kindergarten? You cannot prevent something that did not happen (terrorist attacks utilizing airliners). That does not mean however, that the fact that there were zero incidents is not in part due to the measures.
Nice straw. Being observed and making note of their behavior for further observation is not a full cavity search or being hassled for hours. Good spin for effect, though.
People don't give people "funny looks" by accident. They do it on purpose, then claim later they're misunderstood. Been in IT long enough to know there's generally a victim mentality coupled with a minor god complex.
Anti-authority and pro-chaos are two distinctly different things. Not attempting to find and stop bad guys is pro-chaos.
"I fundamentally do not agree..."
OK, I'll bite. Explain to me why you might disagree that someone lighting a shoe bomb is not a bad guy doing a bad thing. That's what this is about. To carry on with that note: you may disagree with using "unreliable" methods, but I note you provide not a single suggestion as to a "reliable" one.
And here so many people a few days ago were saying how there was no reason or benefit to Google up someone's blogging or online life during the hiring process.
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and a dream is just entertainment.
TFA suggests that it is possible to have dreams which train your subconscious by association.
This is related to another practice technique, fantasizing. The cerebellum is engaged at a low level when you fantasize. Practice - as long as you are fantasizing correctly.
Conversely, when an actual fight situation comes up, you're more likely to do poorly if your conscious mind is engaged.
Our brains work without our consciousness--and given training, they do far better without our consciousness.
Uh, no. That's too general. I think what you're trying to say is if you attempt to micromanage with your consciousness, you can screw up, but I guarantee that I can watch in detail what I'm doing when sparring and still not interfere. Add to that, your reflexes don't have a damned thing to do with your overall goal. If you sit there waiting without conscious though on some level, you'll get outflanked or tricked. You'll also not launch any attacks.
This form of training likely has its origins in the lower life forms which perform complex tasks that seem to transcend simple ROM, e.g., wasps.
What the hell does that mean - read only memory? Instinct? Instinct is hardly like memory being read out. You guys gotta stop trying to map biotic behavior into computer jargon. Don't fly.
Someone loading the dice on what I get back from a search. At least with the current crop, I can more or less figure what they're doing. With a dynamic, anything goes approach, I seriously doubt I'll be using it much.
Same time the Democrats did.
Well, unless it was an operating system problem and not bad data or bad programming, what's the point in mentioning that other than childish bashing?
While interestingly, here in fly over land, it doesn't by and large make people fearful. You hear about them when interviewed by reporters who snip out comments from the context, but when you work next to them, no.
The level of hostility at termination in the US is not terrible. Most people get depressed, not hostile.
Sounds like you would like to be able to leave whenever you want, but not get fired for whatever they want. Why the double standard?
Then you didn't read his post. Said explicitly he's pliant and considerate to those who work well. Those nine of ten shit employees you mentioned deserve what, exactly?
While your sentiment sounds good, it is clearly not the case. There are many venues which have in the agreement for hire clauses stating the employee will behave in ways that won't negatively impact the employer. Don't sign and don't take the job, fine. But to say they're doomed is untrue. Most banks, for instance.
To be analogous, your example explosion must occur in a void and originate from a point.
Now. Pull up a screen play on the internet, read it and get back to us if it's entertaining or shallow writing.