Yes. People tend to 'debate' these things as if they occur in isolation. We see more cancer because we've (mostly) wiped polio, tuberculosis, whooping cough, measles, flu (again mostly), pneumonia and many other killers. What we have left is basically what we haven't conquered - cancer.
Cancer existed in 1 out of 100 humans a century ago.
Yeah, no. "Readup. "Anti-cancer drugs made their entrance in the 1940s."(from second) Very nice step-by-step timeline of all the milestones in the second.
We simply detect much more of it earlier and are more successful in the treatment now.
What YouTube channels you addicted yourself to to arrive at those views is disturbing. Re your current rating: you're either trolling or very seriously deluded.
How can a dating site reasonably protect people from misuse?
Perhaps by honoring the court ordered restraining order against Grindr that required the company to disable the impersonating profiles? Not doing so is what ya call being "reasonably negligent".
Summary pointed to no such thing. This case is about Grindr ignoring the law. From NBC.
The alleged harassment continued for months, even after Herrick obtained a temporary restraining order against Grindr that required the company to disable the impersonating profiles.
Emphasis mine. Had Grindr simply flagged and disabled the harassing profiles, this case wouldn't exist.
Spout your open source screed somewhere it applies.
I wouldn't get all that high and mighty about who is the most polluting. Of the ten top polluted cities, CA has 8 and the other two are Phoenix and New York City.
The only river I've ever seen on fire was in the upper east coast, not the middle or south.
Oh fucking please. You're just spouting enclave paranoias. As another commenter said, people usually own one vehicle. If it's a pickup, that's what they drive. A million pickups plus sold each year; the numbers say you're hysterical.
Neither of those links support your assertion that at night plants consume all (or even most) of the O2 they produce during the day ("more or less balances with what they release in the day").
Slashdot Mirror
Like posting on /., right? Yeesh.
Not in the way normal, everyday people understand that phrase. Only pedants tread that far. The rest is further pedantry.
They're goddamn programs.
I was unaware that the bulk of polisci and women's studies students were older people.
I was there. No it wasn't.
Duranty. Cronkite.
Yes. People tend to 'debate' these things as if they occur in isolation. We see more cancer because we've (mostly) wiped polio, tuberculosis, whooping cough, measles, flu (again mostly), pneumonia and many other killers. What we have left is basically what we haven't conquered - cancer.
Yeah, no. "Read up. "Anti-cancer drugs made their entrance in the 1940s."(from second) Very nice step-by-step timeline of all the milestones in the second.
We simply detect much more of it earlier and are more successful in the treatment now.
China's population problem is due to their birth policies. It supports neither side of this debate.
Just as there are hidden subsidies for soy and corn. Don't pretend either side is lacking.
That may be what you tell yours, but I'll cook up a real meat burger for mine.
What you described them doing *is* part of controlling the narrative.
What YouTube channels you addicted yourself to to arrive at those views is disturbing. Re your current rating: you're either trolling or very seriously deluded.
Your mistake is that it wouldn't be a waste.
Dear Mr Pedant: fake is in common use as a synonym for fraudulent and has been for many decades.
Perhaps by honoring the court ordered restraining order against Grindr that required the company to disable the impersonating profiles? Not doing so is what ya call being "reasonably negligent".
Emphasis mine. Had Grindr simply flagged and disabled the harassing profiles, this case wouldn't exist.
Spout your open source screed somewhere it applies.
LOLOL You're a posing liar. Great preening though.
I wouldn't get all that high and mighty about who is the most polluting. Of the ten top polluted cities, CA has 8 and the other two are Phoenix and New York City.
The only river I've ever seen on fire was in the upper east coast, not the middle or south.
Your second sentence has it backwards. The "completely different view of gov't" was around before Fox, et al.
Dude, you're harshing the narrative.
Self-assumed victim preening.
So you agree, the article is bullshit spin.
Oh fucking please. You're just spouting enclave paranoias. As another commenter said, people usually own one vehicle. If it's a pickup, that's what they drive. A million pickups plus sold each year; the numbers say you're hysterical.
Neither of those links support your assertion that at night plants consume all (or even most) of the O2 they produce during the day ("more or less balances with what they release in the day").
Yeow. Back to school with you, sir. If what you say were true, animals would deplete the O2 and we'd all be dead.