Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Tesla Pickup Truck Drivers Take Over a Supercharger Station -- Again (electrek.co)

An anonymous reader quotes Electrek: In what is quickly becoming a problem for some Tesla drivers, pickup truck drivers have again taken over a Supercharger station and yelled profanities in what appears to be an act of protest against Tesla. Earlier this month, we reported on a strange situation at Tesla's Hickory Supercharger in North Carolina where three large pickup trucks blocked access to the station and reportedly chanted "F*** Tesla"....

Now it looks like it's becoming a trend since another Reddit user spotted pickup truck drivers taking over another Tesla Supercharger. They reportedly were also yelling profanities to Tesla owners coming to charge at the Supercharger station.

Electrek also cites one Tesla owner's reports of being "coal rolled" -- intentionally targetted with extra black exhaust fumes from specially-modified engines.

719 comments

  1. Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    No better way to convince people they're wrong/dumb than being an asshole to them. These truckers should run for office

    1. Re: Classic by javaman235 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Truckers drive trucks, including Teslaâ(TM)s. These rednecks are in coal/oil, which pumps money in piss poor towns. They have picked a losing fight.

      --
      -The art of programming is the pursuit of absolute simplicity.
    2. Re: Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You died in a coal mine and nobody cared? Aww. That's deplorable.

    3. Re: Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy New Year Haters! Enjoy the ride!

    4. Re: Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a fake-out. The original reddit post used a cropped photo that deliberately didn't show several vacant recharging stations. That reddit post has since been picked up by various news and blog sites, which has been used as further verification from yet more news sites.

    5. Re: Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called click-bait. That's their business. Why would you expect anything else? We have had whole national crisis built on a lot less.

    6. Re: Classic by tempo36 · · Score: 1

      Blocking 3 of 6 stalls and yelling at people is still a dick move and is still harassment. Sometimes, it turns out, there are enough drivers there that they really need all the charging stations. Saying "well they didn't block all of them...FAKE NEWS" makes you look like an idiot.

    7. Re: Classic by Lenny369 · · Score: 0

      Does it not strike you as questionable at least that there are no pics or videos to corroborate this claim? None of the affected Tesla owners had phones? Unless I missed something in the article, this sounds very much like an EV website making up a story, or at the very least exaggerating it. And that would make sense considering it's ALWAYS the leftists who block public access. Facts.

    8. Re: Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truckers drive trucks, including Teslaâ(TM)s. These rednecks are in coal/oil, which pumps money in piss poor towns. They have picked a losing fight.

      dey took our jeeeebbs (picture the southpark redneck episode)

  2. There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... because Tesla is doing a fine job of fucking itself.

    * Late deliveries.

    * Panel gaps that look like the cars were built by a high school shop class after the class had a keg party.

    * Musk, who insists on making public remarks which are likely to cause most of the public to have negative feelings toward Musk.

    * Prices which will very soon look like a bad joke compared to the competition, which is going to come from car companies which have a depth of
        engineering talent that Tesla cannot hope to match.

    * And did I mention that Musk is a raging narcissistic prick ?

    I and many others who are not ever going to block a charging station do not have good feelings about Tesla, for very solid reasons.

    Tesla will go down the toilet with no interference from dumbass rednecks in pickup trucks required.

    Just wait and see.

    1. Re: There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      solid reasons? ok, keep telling yourself that.

      Tell us what the 3 or 5 yr depreciated price on a BMW 7-series, Audi A7, etc. is (peer cars for Model S, at least), Lexus, et al. are compared to their original MSRP?

      I do not worship the false idol of "resale value" (unless I was to buy a one-off Ferarri), but I think that rate of loss says something too...

      So what does all that "fit and finish" buy you? What's the MTBF rate (aka shop times, yes including scheduled maintenance & oil changes...) for those cars compared to Teslas?

      It's like vehemently not using Linux because Linus Torvalds, or indirectly Richard Stallman. It's your perogative, I guess... But there aren't many rational arguments to support those positions, either.

    2. Re: There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus he's dating a witch, which means that all the red neck Christians who love coal and walked with stegosaurus 5000 years ago hate him even more.

    3. Re:There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Prices which will very soon look like a bad joke compared to the competition, which is going to come from car companies which have a depth of engineering talent that Tesla cannot hope to match.

      And who do we have to thank for that, other than Elon Musk?

      Because the last time the established car companies made electric cars, it did not end well.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re: There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the very important fact that Tesla Motors is one of the "dirty dozen" companies with the worst health and safety records for its employees.

    5. Re: There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in California, Tesla had 5 minute deliveries to close out 2018 so buyers could get the max tac credit. In 4Q 2018 Tesla sold more vehicles than in all the months and years before. There is not a damn thing wrong with my wife's Model 3. It's the best car we've ever owned. I rather doubt that old car companies doing things with old mindsets are anything for Elon to fear. Sounds like you are a hater making up justifications to hate. Chill out, dude.

    6. Re:There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

      Well, many of the people driving the car would have loved to buy it from General Motors. But GM preferred to have them scrapped at the end of the leasing period.
      So this one seems to be a case of politically wanted (by GM itself) failure.

      Now we go into round two with much more capable cars by multiple manufacturers. The Chevrolet Bolt and the Hyundai Kona Electric come to mind. And of course, the Tesla Model 3. Not exactly the cheapest cars, but much more serious competition this time than the GM EV.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    7. Re: There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 minute deliveries LUL.

      You fanboys are so fucking stupid. Let me guess, your wife paid 30k for her model 3, and Tesla deliveries it same day, 5 minutes.

      Yea fucking right.

  3. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tesla owners are scared of guns. They would cry if they saw one.

  4. Just have them towed. by tempest69 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Really-- call a tow company in there, block them in, and hook up towing gear, and charge them a stiff fee.

    If it isn't a tow away zone then somebody screwed up.

    1. Re:Just have them towed. by haruchai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really-- call a tow company in there, block them in, and hook up towing gear, and charge them a stiff fee.

      If it isn't a tow away zone then somebody screwed up.

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:Just have them towed. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      Now that would be embarrassing.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Tesla can’t tow shit.

    4. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Really-- call a tow company in there, block them in, and hook up towing gear, and charge them a stiff fee.

      If it isn't a tow away zone then somebody screwed up.

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      Forget a damn pick-up truck, a Tesla Model X P100D can, and has towed an actual Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. That's a 130 tonne aircraft being pulled 300 meters.

      See one of these many, many articles. Or this one.

      For a Model X, a pick up truck isn't going to be a problem.

    5. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything can tow a 787 it’s not impressive.

    6. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They'd lose - 1000+ lb-ft of torque for the Duramax engine.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    7. Re: Just have them towed. by gagegage · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep.

      Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 from Supercharger in âDe-ICE-ingâ(TM) feat
      https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-x-tows-chevy-silverado-1500-pickup-truck-de-ice-ing-supercharger/amp/

    8. Re: Just have them towed. by WhiplashII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This should be stated more clearly: Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 with the Chevy's rear wheels locked!

      Pretty cool!

      Although I don't see the point of ICEing. Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    9. Re:Just have them towed. by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      No, see my other comment. They can tow the truck with the wheels completely locked up.

      It isn't about power, it's about friction on the wheels. If the two vehicles have roughly the same friction coefficient, the Tesla wins because it is heavier. It also has higher starting torque, but that doesn't actually matter because the truck's wheels will be free-spinning while it is dragged forward.

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    10. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Need traction as well as torque.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The Tesla loses. The Duramax trucks weigh more, have more contact patch, and more torque.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "with the Chevy's rear wheels locked" They didn't want the Tesla's huge torque to strip the guts out of the cheapo Chevy differential, right?

    13. Re:Just have them towed. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Need traction as well as torque.

      Teslas are heavy (all those batteries) and many have 4WD.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    14. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chevy is on ice and the shit Tesla can barely budge it. Plus the park brake isn’t set and the Chevy in the neural. It’s a staged video.

    15. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how much of that torque gets to the wheels? Probably HALF of that. Tesla wins.

    16. Re: Just have them towed. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 with the Chevy's rear wheels locked!

      2WD trucks have most of their weight on the undriven (also unlocked) wheels. Teslas have lots of weight and many are 4WD.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    17. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoeAnything can tow a 787 itâ(TM)s not impressive.â

      that right there is the distillation, the very essence of a slashdot comment. bravo, sir.

    18. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Done in 1972 with a Chevy pickup. Except it wasn't a 787-9, it was a 747 that weighs 170 tons. It's really not that impressive; in fact, here's a man pulling a 142 ton 777. I guess the model X comes up short here...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    19. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Here you go, actual dynometer measurements - at the wheel. Electrics can be strong and powerful, but they do not rule the road. There are stronger, higher power ICE engines on the road - the Duramax being one (with 850+ lb-ft at the wheels).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Most big diesel personal trucks are heavier - and usually 4WD (with lots of dually configurations) as well.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    21. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Good point. Guess it depends on how much coal they have in the bed. Of course a good steam motor might be able to out torque a Tesla. The last ones produced had over 1000 ft-lbs at zero rpm. If they had one on each wheel...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    22. Re: Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Trepel Challenger 280 is the recommended tug for the 787; it uses a 180 lb-ft 4 cylinder diesel engine. Probably 80% of cars for sale today have more torque than that. Yep, just about anything can tow a 787.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    23. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      There's really no need for you to link to something unrelated and superfluous like that just to demonstrate that you don't understand reductive gearing. Get a job.

    24. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be awesome.
      Who has a P100D to drag a V8 hemi sideways out of the spot?
      864 ft-lb should do it

    25. Re: Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gear it down, and anything CAN tow a 787. The GP was correct... If a man can pull a 777, then bragging about how a vehicle can tow a lighter plane really isn't all that smart, is it?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    26. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transmissions mulitlt torque faggot.

    27. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 2

      I loved my diesel when i owned one, but one thing it severely lacked was bottom end torque. Had to get that motor spinning over a grand before it hit its power curve.
      Now steam, 1000+lbs of torque at zero rpm, 0-75 in 5-10 secs (wiki quotes 10, another site, 5, but that might have been Hughes's souped up one) doing 900 rpm at 75. 1500 miles to a tank of water. Drawbacks included that 30 seconds warm up, high periodic maintenance and a price close to $20,000 when a Ford cost $400. Quieter then a Telsa too.
      https://www.hemmings.com/magaz...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transmissions multiply torque. The torque at the wheels is greater than the torque at the fly wheel faggot.

    29. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can drag a dreamliner with nipple rings. Have a look at static friction vs rolling friction. Those trucks will have brakes applied.

      Perfect captcha: Straps.

    30. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      The Jay Leno episode with that car was very entertaining! It's a great thing he saves those old cars and lets people learn about them...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    31. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not even allowed to have a passenger due to the 3500kg weight limit of cars. There's a reason pickup trucks are not popular in Europe.

    32. Re: Just have them towed. by mixed_signal · · Score: 1

      If the plane's brakes are off, then it's not that hard... It's _meant_ to roll, and it's light weight.

    33. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      A model X getting towed away - actively fighting - against a smallish H2 (basically a mid-size Checy pickup with an SUV body). The Hummer wins unless it basically turns off its traction control.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    34. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    35. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I’m a faggot retard

      Fixed that for you.

    36. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don’t bother trying to convince Tesla retards with facts and evidence. These morons still thing their cars come with all the hardware for full self driving. They are dumb enough to think the boring company actually dug a tunnel for less money than the previous owner of the exact same machine. They are dumb enough to think space ex actually lowered launch costs without cutting corners and losing money on each flight. They are dumb enough to thing funding was actually secured. They are dumb enough to think that the hero in the Thai cave rescue was actually a pedophile. They are dumb enough to thing a shit Tesla is a luxury car.

    37. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's meant to fly and 130 tons is anything but light weight.

    38. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'd pay to see some jerkoff in a Tesla walk up to Bob's big old Ford 4x4 and try to get a cable on it, before he got his gun out.

      Remember folks, stupid internet arguments carrying over into the real world leads to real world consequences.
      Or, put another way: play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

    39. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weight means nothing faggot. Look up what static friction and dynamic friction mean.

    40. Re: Just have them towed. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2

      Although I don't see the point of ICEing. Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      You've clearly never been to North Carolina.

    41. Re: Just have them towed. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      the tesla is on the same and he's being gentle with pulling it

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    42. Re: Just have them towed. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Cool, but the test is not that clear.

      Conditions are icy in this video, and while you can claim that both the truck and the car are subject to the same conditions, the most important factor in those conditions are the condition and type of tires.

      We have no data on that.

    43. Re: Just have them towed. by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      The parking brake was set (rear wheels only, though)

    44. Re:Just have them towed. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      There were some more recent attempts too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_car.
      I vaguely remember an article about the Saab steam car. IIRC, they had a prototype with decent performance and running quite silent. Fuel consumption was a bit higher than in a conventional ICE though.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    45. Re:Just have them towed. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

      Make it a bet, that's more polite anyway.

      Tesla owner walks up to Bob's big old Ford 4x4 and tells Bob "I bet I can tow your Ford over 50 feet even if you have the brakes applied". Bob might agree, being sure of winning. Now we have a contest where nobody gets shot. We might even get a YouTube video out of it :)

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    46. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you don't understaaaand! Tesla is the new shiny tech, therefore its morally and technically better in every respect.

      Anyone saying otherwise is a backwards luddite who probably voted for Trump. Got sources? They are probably a trumptard too.

    47. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should try that with the truck loaded.

    48. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL I learned. That was really neat, thanks!

    49. Re: Just have them towed. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      Trying to teach us what it is like to be a person who owns a pickup.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    50. Re:Just have them towed. by 605dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your tag line is great. I assume you are trying to say if you want to regulate business and guns, and provide healthcare that you are a Nazi?

      Here let me try.

      The Nazi Party: Militaristic, anti-Immigrant, anti-Gay, anti-Minority, aggressive and resentful of how history has treated our kind. Make Germany Great Again!

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    51. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 0 rpm?

      Peak torque doesn't matter as much as the torque curve.

    52. Re:Just have them towed. by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      This guy actually did a proof of the concept, though with a relative's truck.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    53. Re: Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      And not even allowed to have a passenger due to the 3500kg weight limit of cars.

      What? What are you on about? Every vehicle has its own gross weight allowance.

      There's a reason pickup trucks are not popular in Europe.

      The lads on Top Gear (at the time) stated that you had vans instead of pickups because if you had a pickup, someone would nick stuff out of the bed every time you stopped at a red light. Here in the USA, we seem to have much less of that kind of crime for some reason. It's not that nobody ever steals anything out of a pickup truck, but for the most part you can drive from place to place picking stuff up without worrying about it unless you are foolish enough to put items in the back which are both small and valuable. Of course, if you park your vehicle and leave it long, someone might break a window just to steal some change in your cup holder, but that holds true around most of the world.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    54. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it wasn’t faggot, the Tesla was on clear ground.

    55. Re: Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This should be stated more clearly: Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 with the Chevy's rear wheels locked!
      Pretty cool!

      What's cool about that? If the wheels are locked they'll break loose easily, and once you break them loose they have much less traction.

      Although I don't see the point of ICEing. Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      They are not trying. It comes naturally.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. NC resident here. These people are not TRYING to be stupid. Stupid's in their blood.

    57. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Zero wheel RPM? Sure. It's called power-braking. You step on the brakes, rev the engine to make power, then you slowly let of the brakes. Then your wheels start to rotate - with big torque, in a controlled manner. the RPM that matters in these cases is wheel RPM, not engine RPM - which means you can have that torque you want at the start of movement.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    58. Re:Just have them towed. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      A 747 weighs 170 tons? On which planet?

    59. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where he had to park the truck on ice, didn’t set the park brake and his shit Tesla still could barely move it.

    60. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

      This one. The operating empty weight of a 747-100 is around 172 tons. That was the model pulled in the 1972 commercial.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    61. Re:Just have them towed. by rainer_d · · Score: 2

      AFAIK, the problem is not towing (though that in itself is usually not too good for the gearbox) but braking.

      I saw a video of a VW Touareg (V10) towing such a jet. While the Touareg needed extra sandbags to improve traction, the driver said the techs had told him not to use the brakes, under any circumstances. They certainly weren't designed for such a weight.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    62. Re:Just have them towed. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      This thread is a hilariously silly pissing contest. You can basically make an engine whatever size you want. Both Teslas and pickup trucks are generally towed around (in large numbers) by these, for example:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    63. Re: Just have them towed. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The lads on Top Gear (at the time) stated that you had vans instead of pickups because if you had a pickup, someone would nick stuff out of the bed every time you stopped at a red light.

      the lads in top gear are/were a bunch of idiots.

      We also have plenty of lorries where stuff mysteriously doesn't get nicked all the time.

      We also have rain which makes things wet and having a van keeps it dry.

      Vans are also lower in the back and so rather easier to load large and heavy items and many are sized to hold shipping palettes.

      Also we have pved roads s we don't need 4WD everywhere

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    64. Re:Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I loved my diesel when i owned one, but one thing it severely lacked was bottom end torque. Had to get that motor spinning over a grand before it hit its power curve.

      A grand is great, though. If your standard is steam, sure that seems high, but if it's gasoline then that's incredibly low. Even turbo gassers tend to not come on until at least 1500 or so.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    65. Re:Just have them towed. by azcoyote · · Score: 2

      I think it's funny that the YouTube video of the Austrian man pulling the 777 has this disclaimer: "RT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government." Clearly somebody is worried about propaganda or "fake news," but I find it hard to decipher how this video might secretly be a covert disinformation attack against the West. Perhaps it's supposed to trick the U.S. Air Force into hiring a fleet of Austrians to pull their airplanes into position? Am I missing something?

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    66. Re: Just have them towed. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Do they have enough juice to tow the truck if they came to the station to re-charge? Or they just tow it 100m and leave it in the middle of the road?

      Otherwise: this is the most exhilarating news I have seen in a week :-)

      (heart) Tesla

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    67. Re: Just have them towed. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >Plus the park brake isn’t set

      You daft.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    68. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I loved my diesel when i owned one, but one thing it severely lacked was bottom end torque. Had to get that motor spinning over a grand before it hit its power curve.

      A grand is great, though. If your standard is steam, sure that seems high, but if it's gasoline then that's incredibly low. Even turbo gassers tend to not come on until at least 1500 or so.

      Truck never had a tach so I'm not sure how much over a grand. What I do know is trying to get moving on a steep hill with a load was a clutch killer. Once moving, that little truck just kept going. It was only a 2.5 litre and really needed a granny gear as well as another overdrive one.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    69. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be funny to see the Tesla's get their parts ripped off attempting to do that. Hell I'd bring a lawn chair and a beer to watch that!

    70. Re:Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It was only a 2.5 litre and really needed a granny gear as well as another overdrive one.

      Most engines that size don't really come on until about 3 grand. Makes for nice mileage when just pootling around town, but it's a clutch killer if you don't have a slush box. Torque converters are magical.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    71. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's an example of how it's done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClDpGqj3PGA

    72. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could, but then you would have an angry redneck who just might be packing firearms exacting his own form of retribution. Play stupid games; win stupid prizes...

    73. Re: Just have them towed. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      The parking brake usually only applies the brakes on the rear wheels. The truck's rear wheels are not turning.

      Regardless of the torque of the Tesla, I'm really not at all surprised by this. There isn't much weight above the rear wheels of the truck which means the towing vehicle doesn't need need to apply much force to shift it. Don't forget the model X is all wheel drive and is pretty heavy itself.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    74. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, found the guy whos unsure of his sexuality. It always fun to find the closeted ones. Its okay to like men, dude, you dont have to drive a shitty truck to fight it.

    75. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straw-man argument. The point is that the vehicle in question is more than capable of towing a pick-up truck.

    76. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about something hard, like a man pulling loco https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiwY0pmxjTE
      Landrover can pull a train, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8rQEQAeET8

    77. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to start blocking that AMP bullshit before Google takes complete control of the internet.

    78. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You high? Private citizens are not allowed to fuck with other people's vehicles.

      Call a tow truck asshole.

    79. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really-- call a tow company in there, block them in, and hook up towing gear, and charge them a stiff fee.

      If it isn't a tow away zone then somebody screwed up.

      Put sugar in their gas tank while you wait for the tow, hilarity will ensue when they go to get it from the impound lot.

    80. Re: Just have them towed. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I don't have a van or pick-up truck, but I have a tarp over the crate of my cargo bike and often leave groceries (and occasionally something more expensive) in it, and nobody has ever stolen anything.

      Before I had the tarp, some assholes would occasionally use it as a trash can, though.

    81. Re:Just have them towed. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      While this is certainly a funny idea, I'm not sure it's legal, and it's definitely an effective way to get into a fight and a lot of other trouble.

      Better let some authorities tow them.

    82. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tag line is great. I assume you are trying to say if you want to regulate business and guns, and provide healthcare that you are a Nazi?

      Do yourself a favor and look up Nazi gun control. If the shoe fits ... You don't have to hate Jews to be a Nazi.

    83. Re:Just have them towed. by mjwx · · Score: 0

      Your tag line is great. I assume you are trying to say if you want to regulate business and guns, and provide healthcare that you are a Nazi?

      Here let me try.

      The Nazi Party: Militaristic, anti-Immigrant, anti-Gay, anti-Minority, aggressive and resentful of how history has treated our kind. Make Germany Great Again!

      Your description is the closest to the truth (pretty damn close).

      The tenets of fascism are:
      - Nationalism
      - Totalitarianism
      - Enforcement of political ideology by violence
      - Enforcement of age and gender roles
      - Changing definitions to suit them

      The irony is, Lynwood is actually the fascist for trying to change the meaning of the word "Nazi" to suit his own ideology.

      In reality, the Nazi's opposed social welfare, the closest thing they had to a social program was Action T4, the forced euthanasia of anyone considered a burden to the state (the disabled, infirm, feeble or handicapped).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    84. Re: Just have them towed. by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Cool, but the test is not that clear.

      Conditions are icy in this video, and while you can claim that both the truck and the car are subject to the same conditions, the most important factor in those conditions are the condition and type of tires.

      We have no data on that.

      Here are a few tug-o-war matches between a Model X and a Hummer & a Land Cruiser

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    85. Re:Just have them towed. by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 1

      The water is part of the transmission though, not the fuel source.

      --
      LRN 2 SWM
    86. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The water was usually the limiting consumable on steam engines, especially early ones so rather then going from gas station or rather coaling station to station, it was water source to water source when planning a route.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    87. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yea, when I first drove the diesel after little gas engines, the power curve felt so backwards with tons of bottom end quickly fading away as rpms went up. Unluckily when you've only got a few horses (IIRC, 70 in that motor), you want minimal loses. It was cheap to run though, 40 mpg (imperial)

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    88. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torque is useless if you don't have enough rubber touching the road to make it work for you.

    89. Re:Just have them towed. by MidSpeck · · Score: 1

      It's just letting people know where the TV station gets their funding so people can make more informed decisions. Do people really think that _everything_ Russia does is an attack or attempt as disseminating propaganda?

    90. Re:Just have them towed. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Hilarious!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    91. Re: Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We also have rain which makes things wet and having a van keeps it dry.

      We have everything here in the states.

      Vans are also lower in the back and so rather easier to load large and heavy items and many are sized to hold shipping palettes.

      Only if they're FWD, which sucks.

      Also we have pved roads s we don't need 4WD everywhere

      We don't need 4WD everywhere, either. Lots of those trucks and even so-called SUVs are 2WD, and lots of the 4WDs will never actually be driven off road.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    92. Re: Just have them towed. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Again, the two first videos are on snow/ice. You can't even see the tires in the first one, and the third one specifically indicates at the start that is on "Wet tarmac"

      Viewing them did bring up an equally important factor that I left out. Just as standard ABS help to brake in these conditions, Tesla obviously handle detection of loss of static friction and compensates during acceleration as well.

      I don't want to take anything away from Tesla - this is a good thing, but it is not in line with the original assertion, and I have yet to see one of these 'tug-o-war' on dry tar.

    93. Re:Just have them towed. by boskone · · Score: 1

      depends on the diesel. my 8,400lb truck can do 0-60 in 5.x seconds and has over 1,100 lb-ft of torque. also, with compound turbos, it spools beaucoup fast

    94. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yes, with a big enough engine, just the inertia will help when you pop the clutch. I'd guess modern fuel pumps help a lot too as they can vary their timing better then the old mechanical ones. You've still got limits on the power band though and definitely need a transmission.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    95. Re: Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. People seem to think Teslas are special in this regard. It's like they failed physics, but did really well in marketing classes. Which is fine, I guess, but not on Slashdot. :-(

  5. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funny thing is those pickups are WAY more cool and interesting than yet another lame P.O.S. electric car. I love the fact that these guys fucked with the libtards this way and I plan to do the same with my custom boosted Raptor.

  6. Re:Good for them. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We will replace you. And all your coal rolling desperation does is tell us you know it too.

  7. cameras and sensors.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some 'no unauthorized parking. violators will be towed' signage with crazy high towing and 'storage' fees (high as legally allowed) posted and some cameras.

    anytime someone that isn't a tesla owner parks there, alert someone at tesla to verify via video.. then call tow trucks (plus police if vehicles are not unattended).

    split the proceeds with the tow companies. the cops get all that sweet civil forfeiture.. drugs or guns likely, money even, plus pad their monthly tallies for citations written.. illegal vehicle modifications, owi/dwi (even when parked it's usually illegal), no insurance, improper display of plates, parole/probation violations or whatever else these hicks can get nailed for.. trucks like that parked in a tesla lot is fish in a barrel.

    1. Re:cameras and sensors.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "civil forfeiture"

      No. Just no.

      This is something that seemed like a good idea at the time, until it turned into "cops can get anything they want from anyone at all - even YOU"

    2. Re: cameras and sensors.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes everyone knows that. gp here is saying the full brunt of this abusive practice should be targeted at people they don't like.

    3. Re:cameras and sensors.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civil forfeiture is only a problem in locations where it gets abused. In case of the USA, it's abused constantly alongside the disregard for their own constitution (practically a contest to see how many amendments they can violate at once.)

      It's easy to make it fair, the only problem is the lazy lawmakers taking too long to argue about how to fix it.

  8. So, just call the police. by bob4u2c · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take our your cell phone, take pictures of the trucks (and license plates if you can). Then call the police and report that trucks are blocking a public entrance. When the cops finally show up, show them the pictures and file a report.

    How hard is that?

    Or I guess you could just pull out your guns and have a showdown. Seriously are people this stupid?

    1. Re:So, just call the police. by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously are people this stupid?

      If you don't know, you don't want to.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't met the wackjob Libertarian "I woulda's" on this site, eh? Lol, see above. "I own several guns and am Rambo, take my word. I even see a trucker it's lights out, baby. Shoot everyone you meet, take no chances."

    3. Re:So, just call the police. by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

      Except it's typically not a public entrance; the charging stations are on private property and the trucks aren't blocking any sort of a driveway. From the reports that I've seen, the gas station attendant tells the truck owners to leave, and they do. The truck owners are still assholes, but reporting them to the police probably won't accomplish anything unless they refuse to leave the property.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:So, just call the police. by magarity · · Score: 1

      Carry an extension cord. Park longwise behind the pickups blocking them in. Plug in with the extension cord.

    5. Re:So, just call the police. by rekoil · · Score: 2

      Great idea, except that the current that gets pulled from a Supercharger would melt a standard extension cord to slag in seconds.

    6. Re:So, just call the police. by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is america we are talking about. Those rednecks are probably the cops themselves.

      --
      -
    7. Re:So, just call the police. by tempest69 · · Score: 1

      Then get something with a bit of girth to it.

    8. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great point, except where did the OP specify a "standard" extension cord? You're the slag here.

    9. Re:So, just call the police. by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      "We didn't see them block the entrance. If it happens again, give us a call."

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get something with a bit of girth to it.

      That's what she said.

      (Captcha: tingling)

    11. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what she said.

    12. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rednecks are more afraid of cops than they are women or black people.

    13. Re:So, just call the police. by imidan · · Score: 2

      Yeah, until goddamn the hillbillies beat the shit out of you and destroy your phone. Putting yourself into physical confrontation with that kind of person, and threatening them with the police, is a great way to find out just how stupid they are.

      Getting into a gunfight with them is likely to result in either your death or felony charges.

    14. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are failing to appreciate how much juice is delivered to the car.

    15. Re:So, just call the police. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. It's a dick move, but not a crime.
      The best response is to tweet a pic of the trucks and hope the owners get forever doxxed out of any job that pays above minumum wage.

      That'll learn 'em!

    16. Re:So, just call the police. by Geeky+Don · · Score: 1

      Superchargers deliver 250 amps at 400 volts. Where would you suggest getting an extension cord that could handle that?

    17. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We didn't see them block the entrance. If it happens again, give us a call."

      The did it again, but you don't need to come. I shot them all, and burned their stuppid vehicles. Problem solved for good. Bye.

      If you aren't that violent, you don't need to actually do any more than make the call. The cops will arrive in numbers after you report the shooting.

    18. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you handle things like an adult, you don't get to brag about how oppressed you are on the internet.
      Assuming that any of this had actually happened, of course.

    19. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww.... Someone still butthurt over that speeding ticket?

    20. Re:So, just call the police. by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Call the police and request them to be towed. If I parked my car at a gas pump to block them from filling up, you can be sure the response would be the same.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    21. Re:So, just call the police. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's a dick move, but not a crime.

      Who told you that? It is criminal trespassing, since they're there with willfully malicious intent. The threats are also crimes. If they're in the roadway and not on the property, then it may be reckless driving, which is also a crime.

      Deliberately blocking access to a place of business absolutely can be regarded as a crime, even without the threats.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get something with a bit of girth to it.

      That's what she said.

    23. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In which case either the attendant is completely oblivious, allowing this to go on for some time before telling them to leave, or they are NOT leaving when asked and instead hanging around. If they were leaving directly when asked then this wouldn't be a thing.

      Also, why the shitfuck are they not filing no tresspass orders on all of these?

    24. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea. Take someone who is already vicious, stupid, and make sure he never can get a good job again, no matter what he does. That will end really well.

    25. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying just knuckle-under, and let them do whatever they want? Got it. Remind me never to end up in a foxhole next to you.

    26. Re:So, just call the police. by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

      They're typically parked in a charging station, not a roadway, and they're not (from the reports that I've read) making any outward threats to anyone. They're only trespassing if they refuse to leave after being asked to do so by the property owner. Are they assholes? Yes, but being an asshole in and of itself is not a crime.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    27. Re: So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your idea better. Reward them with copious attaboy's.

    28. Re:So, just call the police. by laird · · Score: 1

      The SuperCharger can hit 250 amps of power. No "extension cord" can survive that. Though perhaps you could plug into a 110 socket somewhere...

    29. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing you do is, as the owner who has an electric vehicle charging station and probably makes a few bucks charging vehicles, is post a sign stating non-electric vehicles will be towed at owners expense, list the phone number of the two place, and state trucks are double-charge. The tow truck shows up 15 minutes later, tows the truck, and the truck driver gets to spend the impound fee plus tow charge to get their vehicle back, easily $500+ in the city, and to boot the business owner may get a cut of the payment to sweeten the deal.

      That is a simple, legal, and very effective fix, at the cost of a sign for the charging port owner.

      Now if that doesn't work or isn't possible, and reporitng the SOB to the police won't yield results, then you remove the truck from the equation. You can send a warning by popping the tires, or keying the vehicle, or loosening the lug bolts so the tire falls off within 10 feet and trashes the axle. I personally prefer the idea of getting under the truck and cutting break lines or transmission fluid lines, that's a REAL Expensive repair. Another option is to use a hammer and long metal stick to pop the radiator resivour.

    30. Re:So, just call the police. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure making them lose their job is going to make them more rational or less angry.

      Best response would be to get them some therapy to figure out what's wrong with these people.

    31. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at the trucks in the images... those aren't hillbillies. They're suburbanites. The trucks are too clean.

    32. Re:So, just call the police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a crime in 9 states + DC.
      Write your legislature to tell them it should be a crime in your state too.

  9. Gee what a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Redneck trump supporters being total dickheads. Not surprised by this at all.

  10. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wow 2 Russian bots! ;)

  11. Pic should have had license plate numbers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tag numbers are publicly posted info. If similar happens to you, get clear license plate pics. Then splatter them over the internet so others may be warned of these criminals.

  12. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    so i guess itâ(TM)s okay for tesla drivers to block entrances to gas stations and yell obscenities at all the drivers? makes sense.

  13. Call the Cops!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ban them! Ban them all noowww! Outlaw black smoke, pickups, any interference with anything Tesla anywhere on Earth and DO IT YESTERDAY OMGWTF!!1

  14. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy your time in prison, mr criminal. Maybe chanting 'fuck *anything*' will be a turn on to your cell mate.

  15. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You will never own a Tesla, you have never even been in the same room as a gun, and you would never confront anyone over the age of ten years. These facts are immediately obvious to every single person who reads your post.

  16. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They’re wrong.

    FTFY

  17. Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Coal-fired Republican nazi trash is upset at urban vehicles, news at 11, wah"

    1. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Straight to nazi, huh? It's no wonder we can't have a discourse anymore...civil or otherwise. Yes, I'm saying you're part of the problem

    2. Re: Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Will you eat out my ass?

    3. Re:Headline : by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      Good Lord go back to /g/ and leave /. in peace.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    4. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retro go waaaaaahhhh!

    5. Re: Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was already licking his lips before you even posted.

    6. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? /. is now loaded with trash and Russian/Chinese trolls. Bizx is a joke and will do nothing about this.

    7. Re: Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you say they're coal supporters? AFAIK, they haven't even said why. They could just be pissed at the 1% for having sedans that are both much faster and more powerful than their truck, and they can't afford anything better. In which case they'd be liberals.

      Besides, in states like that, Tesla customers are all coal customers.

    8. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look, found the commie faggot trash!

    9. Re: Headline : by cyber-vandal · · Score: 0

      Why do so many "progressives" on here use homophobic slurs?

    10. Re:Headline : by mukinrestak · · Score: 0

      The republicans are the science deniers? Quick, what is a Y chromosome and what effects does it have on a human which possesses one vs a human that doesn't?

      Be careful not to deny any science about upper body strength, spacial reasoning abilities, pain resistance, cancer rates by type, or reproductive functions and strategies.

    11. Re: Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torn between the truthful "they're not progressives, just trolls" and the funny "wishful thinking"

    12. Re:Headline : by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Go chuunibyou somewhere else.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    13. Re:Headline : by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      Quick, what is a Y chromosome and what effects does it have on a human which possesses one vs a human that doesn't?

      By itself? A Y chromosome has almost no effect on the development of a human fetus. The SRY1 gene which normally resides on it is responsible for penis growth - which occurs even if the SRY1 gene has transposed to the X chromosome. If your trying to argue there are only 2 sexes, you're ignoring that there are at least 6^12 major combinations of sexual genes which result in not 2 sexes, but a multidimensional spectrum with 2 clusters we call 'male' and 'female'.

      A person can have a penis, testicles, and a womb (one father of 3 found that out going in to have his "tumor" biopsied). You also see drug interactions that are often associated with 'male' occurring in 'female' patients. "Male" and "female" are convenient categories, but the reality is NOT as binary as many people think.

    14. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look, found the commie faggot trash!

      you are the commie faggot trash

      quit hacking my account

    15. Re: Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm pick up trucks are expensive. They are not cheap. Usually starting at about 20% more than a car.

      They also have more torque than cars because they pull stuff.

      who am I kidding, you have no idea wtf you are talking about. I fed the troll. Sorry.

    16. Re: Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I see you're poor. My bad. Well, that's what happens when you decide to get high and play world of warcraft instead of going to college.

      That aside, the base MSRP of an F-150, generally considered one of the better pick-ups, is about 28k. I don't know about you, but I could drop cash on three of those and still have plenty left over. And unless you turn it into a hotrod (in which case, the sky is the limit) you're not going to spend more than 70k, and even then, that would be one very expensive pick-up. The absolute barebones minimum you can spend on a new Tesla model 3 is 43k, which climbs to 70k for a model S, going upwards of 130k at the top end.

      Moreover, the actual trucks they were parking there are affordable on a 30k/year income. I get it, in your case, 30k means you'd have to allow 3,000 men to put their dicks in your butt, which is probably very painful and laborious, but most people with your background find it easier to dig ditches instead.

    17. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straight to nazi, huh? It's no wonder we can't have a discourse anymore...civil or otherwise. Yes, I'm saying you're part of the problem

      Civil discourse ended more than 20 years ago with the republican't decided to impeach Clinton for lying about a blow-job. Obummer kept trying to have civil discourse with Bitch McConnell; but Bitch wasn't having any of it. Bitch just wanted more blatantly partisan hearings as part of the republican't character assassination of HRC they started back in the 90s.

      You motherfuckers absolutely do not wan't civil discourse, you just want to fucking whine about it. And the dems have finally figured that shit out so they're electing who are finally willing to to give payback.

    18. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straight to nazi, huh?

      I'm sorry, did you just complain that a liberal was not being sufficiently political correct?

    19. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "negro slim" is in no position to demand that /. be made a safe space.

    20. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans have spent the past 15 years calling me a communist for believing the minimum wage is good policy.
      Republicans have spent the past 20 years threatening to blow my face off if I so much as winked at one of their daughters (my classmates).
      Republicans have spent the past 25 years calling me a Satanist for playing Dungeons and Dragons.

      In all that time, they have also been screaming to high heaven about the horrible tyranny of political correctness.

      This is the world you wanted, and by God you get to live in it.

  18. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those that publicly claim to be a gun owner are seldom capable of effectively using a firearm. Beware of the person with a single firearm ... and keeps it a secret.

  19. Hehe by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First they ignore Tesla
    Then they laugh at Tesla
    Then they fight Tesla <--
    Then Tesla wins

    1. Re:Hehe by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please point to where oil and coal companies aren't getting subsidized but getting by entirely on their own merit.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in us fossil fuels gets 3.2billion subsidies.. green energy 8billion... so go figure...

    3. Re:Hehe by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Well, their sales figures are solidly beating BMW's in the US right now...

    4. Re:Hehe by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, Teslas are selling as fast as they can build them.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By subsidizing the electric car they're also subsidizing cleaner air for all.

    6. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This saying is so dumb because every contentious relationship is somewhere on the scale.

      First they ignore Nazis
      Then they laugh at Nazis
      Then they fight Nazis
      Then Nazis win

      Get ready for Nazis to win I guess aptly German Mr. Henseler.

    7. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost every car company in the entire world, since the beginning of time, has received government support at some point.

    8. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet these industries pay some of the highest taxes to the federal government. With taxes in the 45% rate. Higher than most other industries. Think about it a little under half your profit is paid in taxes.

    9. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All car makers get the EV tax credit. Tesla's has already dropped to half, and will be gone entirely before the end of the year. What will be your trolling argument then?

    10. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the oil "subsidies" that people talk about are in fact tax deductions. Which Tesla wouldn't be able to take advantage of anyways, because they don't even make any money.

    11. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Business expenses are not subsidies

    12. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not quite true, apparently, although they are getting close. However, worldwide, Tesla's stales are only a few percent of BMW's. And unlike Tesla, BMW consistently manages to make a profit from those sales.

    13. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they ignore Tesla
      Then they laugh at Tesla
      Then they fight Tesla <--
      Then Tesla goes bankrupt.

      FTFY.

    14. Re:Hehe by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Except that the paraphrased quote was not a Gandhi quote, contrary to popular belief.

      But I do agree that Tesla is overvalued, and also, that the public subsidy of that company should end. Also, their valuations are ridiculous, when they have constantly been in the red, in sharp contrast to, say, Ford. Also, the truckers are right about one thing. There are about 10 million truckers in the US. One day, all those jobs may well get automated, and we may just use self driving trucks. But to force that now, and driving 10 million people out of work, w/ the domino effects on their families, is something that the truckers are completely justified in protesting. I doubt that it's so much the electric charging vs the gasoline or hybrids, as opposed to the complete automation of their jobs. Musk is the one who deserves to be replaced by a droid.

    15. Re:Hehe by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I'm European, to me that's par for the course.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    16. Re:Hehe by mcvos · · Score: 1

      You mean they pay some of the highest bribes. There's a lot of oil money in politics.

    17. Re:Hehe by mcvos · · Score: 1

      And they're primarily valuated on how fast they're able to ramp up their production to meet that demand.

      That's an unbelievably comfortable place to be in for any company.

    18. Re:Hehe by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      According to a report from what appears to be a very anti-fossil-fuel organization*, the US spends $20 billion per year on fossil fuel subsidies. Sounds like a lot right? But it turns out the US collects $35 billion in fuel taxes.

      Now there's probably some non-monetary benefits that's not being counted, but if the government is making $15 billion a year from it, I don't think it's a subsidy overall.

      * Their mission is apparently "exposing the true costs of fossil fuels and facilitating the coming transition towards clean energy"

    19. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, more on how fast they claim to be able to ramp up their production, which is not quite the same thing. There is also the implicit assumption that Tesla will still have the long-range EV market entirely to itself at a time when there will be plenty of competition from companies with much more experience in building cars in large numbers.

    20. Re:Hehe by Calydor · · Score: 1

      If the industry would crash and burn without the money they get from the government (to the tune of 20 billion dollars) then I'd call that a subsidy. It doesn't matter that the government ultimately makes a profit from it.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    21. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please point to where oil and coal companies aren't getting subsidized but getting by entirely on their own merit.

      Don't be ridiculous. The oil and coal companies paid good money for the lobbyists, politicians and laws they bought.

    22. Re:Hehe by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they would crash and burn?

  20. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful. Don't annoy the rich people.

  21. They'll do it as long as they get attention... by ClarkMills · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect that it's a ploy to dissuade buying electric by presenting a "Electric car owners will be bullied" sentiment. I have no doubt it's orchestrated as I am sure the drivers or the utes have better things to do really.

    The inevitable EV revolution is being attacked on many fronts.

    1. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those pickup owners are just worried because Teslas are so much faster than their silly pickups. And they don't worry about increasing gas prices either!

    2. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      The inevitable EV revolution is being attacked on many fronts.

      There is no great conspiracy against EVs. It's a combination of:

      Range anxiety.
      They're too damn expensive to build, compared to ICE vehicles.
      Electricity isn't cheap (especially so, if you buy it from a charging station) enough to make a quick ROI.
      In most of the USA, electricity generation isn't particularly "green".
      Used EVs don't become really affordable (compared to an ICE vehicle of the same vintage) until the batteries have become sufficiently degraded.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    3. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inevitable EV revolution is being attacked on many fronts.

      There is no great conspiracy against EVs. It's a combination of:

      Range anxiety.
      They're too damn expensive to build, compared to ICE vehicles.
      Electricity isn't cheap (especially so, if you buy it from a charging station) enough to make a quick ROI.
      In most of the USA, electricity generation isn't particularly "green".
      Used EVs don't become really affordable (compared to an ICE vehicle of the same vintage) until the batteries have become sufficiently degraded.

      Bullshit on all counts. Plenty of gas cars cost more than a base model 3. "Range anxiety" is a non issue for the vast majority, here is a video from Engineering Explained talking about his experience using a Nissan Leaf as his daily driver for some 3 months, he's a gear head who normally drives his custom supercharged Honda S2000 sleeper rice rod.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qo4byxhI6kY

      Since you can charge at home, charging at home over night is by far and away cheaper than gas and not subject to the same massive price fluctuations. Even coal power is less damaging than the cost of extraction, shipping, refinement and burning gasoline and can be swapped out to ANY source of power, which is increasingly wind generation and home solar arrays.

      Bullshit on the use vehicles part as well, there are tons of very low cost, low mileage EVs on the used market starting as low as $3k, below is every used all-electric car on the market in the US sorted by price, change the ZIP and the range you are willing to travel to test drive.

      https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/Certified+Cars/Beverly+Hills+CA-90210?zip=90210&marketExtension=true&startYear=1981&endYear=2019&listingTypes=CERTIFIED%2CUSED&engineCodes=EL&searchRadius=0&sortBy=derivedpriceASC&numRecords=100&firstRecord=0

      Especially in the 2nd car daily driver style of sub 100 mile range, which is more than the average daily use going to and from work and the grocery store for 95% of the US population. Given that there are early gen Prius'(first shipped in 1997) with over 250k miles on cars well over a decade old and the batteries still haven't given up the ghost it is yet another bullshit claim.

      https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2011/02/the-200-000-mile-question-how-does-the-toyota-prius-hold-up/index.htm

      https://www.torquenews.com/1083/can-toyota-prius-battery-last-250000-miles

      So, you can stop with the FUD and bullshit about electric cars and go beat off to the sounds of coal rolling F-350's that never get used for anything more demanding then a trip to Walmart to get some more Mountain Dew and a can of dip.

    4. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Plenty of gas cars cost more than a base model 3.

      Which is a strawman argument. Just because you can spend as much on an ICE vehicle as an EV, it doesn't change the fact that new EVs start at approximately double the cost of the cheapest ICE car. The cheapest new ICE car is the 2019 Nissan Versa S Sedan at a MSRP of $13,255.

      "Range anxiety" is a non issue for the vast majority

      Knowing you can just stop almost anywhere and quickly fill up is like having insurance. It's comforting to know it's there, even if most of the time you don't need it.

      Given that there are early gen Prius

      The Prius is a hybrid, and can still limp along on its ICE if the battery is depleted. The average age of a car in the USA is 11.6 years. Most lithium batteries will be shot to shit at that point.

      So, you can stop with the FUD and bullshit about electric cars

      I'd love nothing more than to see the technology become truly affordable and match ICE vehicles for longevity. We're not even close to that point, yet.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    5. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of gas cars cost more than a base model 3.

      Which is a strawman argument. Just because you can spend as much on an ICE vehicle as an EV, it doesn't change the fact that new EVs start at approximately double the cost of the cheapest ICE car. The cheapest new ICE car is the 2019 Nissan Versa S Sedan at a MSRP of $13,255.

      "Range anxiety" is a non issue for the vast majority

      Knowing you can just stop almost anywhere and quickly fill up is like having insurance. It's comforting to know it's there, even if most of the time you don't need it.

      Given that there are early gen Prius

      The Prius is a hybrid, and can still limp along on its ICE if the battery is depleted. The average age of a car in the USA is 11.6 years. Most lithium batteries will be shot to shit at that point.

      So, you can stop with the FUD and bullshit about electric cars

      I'd love nothing more than to see the technology become truly affordable and match ICE vehicles for longevity. We're not even close to that point, yet.

      Nope, guess again redneck, the average new car price in the US last was $36,978

      https://b2b.kbb.com/news/average-new-car-prices-up-2-percent-year-over-year-incentives-helping-offset-affordability-concerns-according-to-kelley-blue-book/

      A base Model 3 comes in at $35,950, so again, boo, fucking hoo for your FUD campaign.

      Electric car can plug into a standard 110v 20a outlet that can be found anywhere, a guy up the street charges his S this way in his driveway every night and wakes up to a full charge, other charging methods are on offer only if you need to charge more quickly. Far cheaper as well, at $0.11 it costs about as much as 2-3 gallons of gas to charge a Tesla from completely flat.

      The Prius was used as an example because the battery packs are showing that they are outlasting the idiot naysayers like yourself by leaps and bounds.

      So, once again, fuck right off with your dumb shit and go do some more meth with Skeeter, Steve-Dave and Ricky-Bobby.

      I'll stick with actual evidence and expert opinion instead of redneck bullshit.

    6. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Nope, guess again redneck

      I was born well north of the Mason–Dixon line, but thanks for playing the "irrelevant personal attack" card.

      the average new car price in the US last was $36,978

      The average is skewed by wealth inequality in the US. The average middle class American can't afford a new car priced at the median average.

      Far cheaper as well, at $0.11 it costs about as much as 2-3 gallons of gas to charge a Tesla from completely flat.

      According to the EPA sticker on the Model 3, the estimated savings is $4,500 over 5 years. If the objective is purely to save money, a cheaper car still wins hands down.

      The Prius was used as an example because the battery packs are showing that they are outlasting the idiot naysayers like yourself by leaps and bounds.

      Being utilized in a hybrid, the Prius batteries aren't subject to the same usage patterns as an EV. We already do know what happens to EV batteries when they're run hard with improper cooling - older Nissan Leafs have extremely poor resale value due to suffering extreme battery degradation. It is also reasonable to assume that since the lithium battery technology used in current generation EVs is similar to battery technology used in portable electronics, that expecting them to last well over a decade (again, the average vehicle age in the USA) might be a bit too optimistic.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    7. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, guess again redneck

      I was born well north of the Mason–Dixon line, but thanks for playing the "irrelevant personal attack" card.

      the average new car price in the US last was $36,978

      The average is skewed by wealth inequality in the US. The average middle class American can't afford a new car priced at the median average.

      Far cheaper as well, at $0.11 it costs about as much as 2-3 gallons of gas to charge a Tesla from completely flat.

      According to the EPA sticker on the Model 3, the estimated savings is $4,500 over 5 years. If the objective is purely to save money, a cheaper car still wins hands down.

      The Prius was used as an example because the battery packs are showing that they are outlasting the idiot naysayers like yourself by leaps and bounds.

      Being utilized in a hybrid, the Prius batteries aren't subject to the same usage patterns as an EV. We already do know what happens to EV batteries when they're run hard with improper cooling - older Nissan Leafs have extremely poor resale value due to suffering extreme battery degradation. It is also reasonable to assume that since the lithium battery technology used in current generation EVs is similar to battery technology used in portable electronics, that expecting them to last well over a decade (again, the average vehicle age in the USA) might be a bit too optimistic.

      Redneck doesn't mean southern dipshit.

      Wealth inequality is the weakest argument possible you could make for the average price of a car, since the poor buy used cars.

      A cheaper car is still going to be the EV as per the link to Auto Trader dumbass, You can drop $5000 on an used all electric today that still has a few years left on it's warranty and charge it at home saving far more in transportation costs.

      Except that they are using vented NiMH or LiFePO4 cells and not sealed Li-Ion pouch cells, which are the ones that are known for bulging and exploding, hence why you don't see hybrid and electric cars going up like Ford Pintos in crashes.

      You still haven't made a single valid or evidence based claim you stupid mother fucker. And no, I don't have to be nice to a willful idiot.

    8. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Wealth inequality is the weakest argument possible you could make for the average price of a car, since the poor buy used cars.

      And how many EVs do you see at Buy-Here-Pay-Here dealers?

      You can drop $5000 on an used all electric today that still has a few years left on it's warranty and charge it at home saving far more in transportation costs.

      This is the cheapest used EV I found near me. $5.5k and 40% battery life remaining. What planet are you living on?

      You still haven't made a single valid or evidence based claim

      Buy an EV if it makes you happy, but it's likely not going to save you any money over simply buying a cheaper, fuel-efficient ICE car. The numbers don't lie.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    9. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wealth inequality is the weakest argument possible you could make for the average price of a car, since the poor buy used cars.

      And how many EVs do you see at Buy-Here-Pay-Here dealers?

      You can drop $5000 on an used all electric today that still has a few years left on it's warranty and charge it at home saving far more in transportation costs.

      This is the cheapest used EV I found near me. $5.5k and 40% battery life remaining. What planet are you living on?

      You still haven't made a single valid or evidence based claim

      Buy an EV if it makes you happy, but it's likely not going to save you any money over simply buying a cheaper, fuel-efficient ICE car. The numbers don't lie.

      Plenty, as per the Auto Trader link, since almost all of them are posted by car lots.

      Funny that it seems you chose to post the only one being sold by a private seller that didn't so much as a VIN number, in Florida...

      Also, fun to see you hick ass dumbasses are still pulling the same, previously disproven data about the batteries, still vastly overstating the cost of batteries and their failure rates, your hick ass thought they where using LI-Ion batteries.

    10. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come talk to me when a Tesla can tow my 12,000 lb fifth-wheel travel trailer 500 miles in one day, Doing 70 up and down the mountains of Colorado.

      Then you just might interest me, but not until then.

    11. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come talk to me when a Tesla can tow my 12,000 lb fifth-wheel travel trailer 500 miles in one day, Doing 70 up and down the mountains of Colorado.

      Then you just might interest me, but not until then.

      Trying to reach the bottom of the cliff I see.

  22. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given how many charging stations are paid with public tax money - I'm quite all right with tax payers blocking chargers and preventing their tax money from being wasted on some asshole's car.

    Don't forget that Teslas are partially paid for with our tax money, and those chargers are also subsidized with our tax money, for a service almost no one can use.

    Tesla owners deserve everything they get.

  23. I really don’t get it by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What exactly do the truck drivers think they’re accomplishing? And what do they think they’re protesting?

    I realize these guys are likely not the brightest bulbs in the box... but seriously, they must have at least a vaguely-defined reason they are choosing to do this.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They think that acting like a dick is contributing to national political discourse.

    2. Re:I really don’t get it by mysidia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time; even when they're not actually hauling anything are self-centered arrogant SOBs who compare p***s links with each other; couldn't care less about being green, and often either don't think the rules apply to them -- or challenge the rules frequently through open defiance, Such as parking as to straddle two parking spaces, ignoring the lines, double parking locking people in, pulling in parallel to perpendicular parking, or pulling in perpendicular to parallel parking, etc.

      Many Supercharger stations are in sectioned off area of a larger parking lot ---
      the pickup drivers' ego is probably irked that someone else is special, other than them. Tesla drivers get dedicated Tesla-only "parking" areas in a crowded space, and that alone drives them batshit insane.

    3. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Tesla drivers don't care about Americans, this is a way to make them take notice.

    4. Re:I really don’t get it by sit1963nz · · Score: 0

      The HAVE to drive pickups because they are carrying a whole pile of stupid with them.

    5. Re: I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just carry a few #6 screws with you. I see an asshole do that diagonal parking bullshit, I palm a spike and slip it into the tire treads as I walk past. Most people don't learn the first time, but most learn after the second. Costs me two seconds and five cents, costs them a tire, an afternoon and a tow.

      Sure it isn't eco friendly, but that isn't the point. I'm not trying to save the world. I'm just punishing assholes.

    6. Re:I really don’t get it by Solandri · · Score: 0

      I think what they're doing is stupid. But rather than the "idiot redneck" rationale proposed by most EV advocates, I suspect their rational is more along the lines of, "These arrogant EV advocates vote themselves government rebates, free passes into HOV lanes when driving alone, and get privileged parking spots at certain businesses. They deserve to be taken down a notch."

      This is the problem with using incentives to encourage wider adoption of something than normal market forces would generate. What you perceive as an incentive for something that makes sense, someone else can perceive as unfair punishment for their different lifestyle choices. You have to be careful that your incentives never cross into the realm of privilege, because that becomes the start of a caste division.

    7. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time; even when they're not actually hauling anything are self-centered arrogant SOBs...

      Whereas you seem like a complete spewing asshole yourself.

    8. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha. "like a rock" -sissyphus

    9. Re: I really don’t get it by usr1987 · · Score: 1

      And Tesla owners are not. Used to be BMW. Now is Tesla.

    10. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They deserve to be taken down a notch." Is the actual pseudo-victimstance problem conservatives (women, there are no males anymore) have with anyone else getting something they don't, under any circumstances regardless of wealth.

    11. Re:I really don’t get it by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      They are protesting the size of their brains. They feel short changed, unfairly discriminated against, victims of tiny brain syndrome, being born a dumb loser, being human genetics bitch, fucked in the head, from conception to death, unfairly victimised by everyone in society smarter than them.

      Is it fair and reasonable for those born genetically, well, stupid, to be so victimised by society, at the very bottom of the pay scale, doesn't not matter, colour, creed or religion, born to a shitty minimum wage with no escape, well, unless they have a smarter parent (only needs one to be smart, to support the others) to sponsor well the dummy in a smarter world.

      It's not fair, they might well be annoying arseholes well deserving of being losers but being born that way doesn't mean they should be victimised for it, sure kept at arms distance but those well behaved enough deserve a living wage and to not be ruthlessly exploited. When they are, they play up and become a problem for the normies, stop being prejudiced against them in their chance at a reasonable life.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time; even when they're not actually hauling anything are self-centered arrogant SOBs who compare p***s links with each other; couldn't care less about being green, and often either don't think the rules apply to them

      I own and drive a 3/4 pickup truck, whether I'm hauling anything or not. It's my only vehicle, and by limiting myself to only one vehicle, I'm being a whole lot more green than the twits who keep a stable of them.

    13. Re:I really don’t get it by sjames · · Score: 2

      Not so sure. These are the same people who spend hundreds adding a switch to detune their engine so it will blow clouds of soot. They tend to use it to blow soot at economy cars as well as electric and hybrid.

    14. Re: I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not Judge Dredd, you're a smug psychopath. Hopefully someone will spot you and take you apart.

    15. Re: I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing completely unrelated memes again, dumbass lol.

    16. Re:I really don’t get it by Locutus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most likely it is because they keep hearing EV's are the future, that gasoline and diesel fuel is wrong and you know, the whole 'global warming is fake' thing. Probably listen to guys like Rush and Alex who'll say anything so they've probably heard there'd be people coming to take their truck away from them like the Gun Police they constantly talk about coming to collect their guns. So all of This gets focused on those who are proving EVs are viable.

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    17. Re: I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, carry some "compensating for my tiny dick" bumper stickers, and apply those.

    18. Re:I really don’t get it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Treating them as bizarre space aliens instead of fellow Americans who should have their needs cared for just like everyone else is the problem. You're dividing us into US and THEM. Vladimir Putin would be proud. He has to pay people to incite rhetoric like this; you're doing it for free.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    19. Re:I really don’t get it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      That is such a Republican view it hurts.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re:I really don’t get it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time; even when they're not actually hauling anything

      Most people I know only own one car. If it's a pickup truck, that's what they drive.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    21. Re: I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're willing to actually investigate POTUS, I'll bet that Putin IS funding these jerks, after a fashion. Sitting around in a pickup doesn't come free. And the goal? This story, so that a billion sock puppets can turn up and spout nonsense.

    22. Re:I really don’t get it by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's just part of the political divide that completely dominates US culture. Electric cars mean concern for the environment, which means the owners can be assumed to be hippy liberal types who hate freedom and deserve to be covered in good American soot.

    23. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a vice principal who gives the bullied kid detention for fighting, telling him he has to figure out how to get along with the bully.

    24. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're doing it because it is fucking hilarious to watch you guys get all pissy. It's too damn easy, jeez. Electric cars can be cool, but the people that drive them now are not. Talk about dim bulbs.

    25. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you periodically need a truck (or believe you do) and you can't afford both a truck and an energy-efficient alternative, you might opt for the truck as your single vehicle.

      Just sayin'.

    26. Re:I really don’t get it by tfried · · Score: 2

      They're protesting the (anticipated) change in social norms.

      For a long time, in America, you could count on any "green" idea to be laughed at by a solid majority, either for being totally unrealistic, or for being obviously un-American. Thus no sane American would ever be expected to adjust their personal lifestyle towards anything green.

      Now, there is increasing evidence that some green ideas are not so unrealistic at all. (I hesitate a bit to call Tesla "green", but clearly they are riding that wave, and have a green reputation). Those pickup drivers are rightfully afraid that, in a decade or two, their own true American neighbors, too, will expected them to switch to EV vehicles, and possibly even to pick up other green ideas, as well. And they don't want to.

      Of course, class issues do play a role, too, as Teslas are also relatively costly, but I think at the heart of the issue that is a plain and simple fear, that their personal lifestyle is going to have to change, eventually. (The list of fears is long, here, I'll just throw in "vegetarianism" to illustrate the scope of the threat.)

      Bicyclists are even worse "traitors", for obvious reasons, but since those are still so few, and so "obviously" laughable, they are not a real threat, yet.

    27. Re:I really don’t get it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      More to the point, what are they smoking, and what meds are they on?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:I really don’t get it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1, Insightful

      by limiting myself to only one vehicle, I'm being a whole lot more green than the twits who keep a stable of them.

      Is this a demonstration of the intellectual capacity of a pickup truck owner? It's how much and what you drive, not how many you own that affects the environment. I'm pretty sure your pickup puts out more smog than a sedan, other things being equal.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    29. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with big, manly pickup trucks used to pick up all the chicks (hence the name). Now chicks are more into eco friendly than big and manly.

      They ought to rename some really sophisticated high-end Tesla model "Tesla Pickup". That would really drive ye olde redneck insane.

    30. Re:I really don’t get it by pz · · Score: 1

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time ...

      I drive my pickup all the time because it is the only car I own. I suspect that is true for the majority of pickup owners, because it is true for the majority of vehicle owners.

      ... even when they're not actually hauling anything

      I also suspect that people driving their cars are similarly not using their vehicles to their fullest capacity and potential the vast majority of the time. Most of the time cars are carrying one or two passengers, a far cry from their full capacity of four or five.

      But why let a few bits of common sense get in the way of a good screed?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    31. Re:I really don’t get it by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      They get treated as what they are based on their behaviour: arseholes.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    32. Re:I really don’t get it by gtall · · Score: 1

      It's fairly simple, the truck drivers hear and see the push for enviro-friendly technologies. Electric vehicles are one of these. They figure that the environmentalists will eventually come for their trucks. So they are doing their bit to dissuade people from buying electric vehicles. Hence the car and truck companies will think twice about the push into electric vehicles, and Goddess-forbid, electric trucks.

      If you are a guy and worried about people thinking you have a small dick, then you buy a big gas-guzzling truck that makes a lot of He-Boy noise. Other enfeebled males now look at you as though you have a big dick and feel they too must have one of these noise-generating male empowerment machines.

    33. Re: I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to put it succinctly: not everyone who drives a truck is a redneck asshole, but every redneck asshole drives a truck.

    34. Re:I really don’t get it by geekmux · · Score: 1

      What exactly do the truck drivers think they’re accomplishing? And what do they think they’re protesting?

      I realize these guys are likely not the brightest bulbs in the box... but seriously, they must have at least a vaguely-defined reason they are choosing to do this.

      "For the fuck of it."

      "Hold my beer."

      That's probably some of the more popular reasons they have, but I'm sure I could reference any You Might Be a Redneck guide for a few hundred more.

      Even the dullest bulbs in the box, make fun of these kinds of idiots.

    35. Re:I really don’t get it by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Oh fucking please. You're just spouting enclave paranoias. As another commenter said, people usually own one vehicle. If it's a pickup, that's what they drive. A million pickups plus sold each year; the numbers say you're hysterical.

    36. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I drive my pickup all the time because it is the only car I own. I suspect that is true for the majority of pickup owners, because it is true for the majority of vehicle owners.

      Owners of more-expensive vehicles tend to have multiple vehicles, and pickup truck prices have been trending upwards as they have added content. Couldn't rapidly find any stats, though, so I don't have actual numbers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:I really don’t get it by buddyglass · · Score: 2

      What exactly do the truck drivers think they’re accomplishing? And what do they think they’re protesting?

      Just guessing here. Accomplishing: irritating Tesla owners, making it less convenient to own a Tesla. Protesting: subsidies to Tesla, people who don't like fossil fuels, environmentalism in general.

    38. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the GP's point. They chose a pickup truck to drive around all the time even though they rarely to never haul anything. So, they burn substantially more fuel for their ego. Note, I've seen plenty of women do it too so it's not just a p***s thing. It's also not some rural/farming bullshit as around here even country roads are well paved and even though farming is concentrated here vs cities, a very marginal number of people actually engage in farming, construction, or anything else that begins to explain the need for hauling on even a semi-regular basis. The only remotely good excuse is winter time, bad drivers hoping weight will compensate, and a little bit the notion of a more powerful engine to get you out of your dirt/gravel driveway (instead of spending the money on paving said driveway).

      Oh, and finally, here there's lots of people who have two vehicles. I'm not saying all, but it's clear that husband/wife, boyfriend/girlfriend/, or whatever/whatever have their own vehicle, and one of them chose a pickup truck. Maybe they rationalize it that if they need it, they'll have it. But, it's a really poor excuse to burn a ton of fuel. After all, if the truck is so necessary in the winter because the other vehicle is likely stuck and you're still wasting burning fuel on a car you don't really need during the rest of the year. The obvious answer is to pick a car with more ground clearance and/or move into town even though it means give up a good amount of land you don't really use/need for a much smaller plot; in exchange, you'll get pretty rapid street snow removal (as long you choose the right street).

    39. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most likely it is because they keep hearing EV's are the future, [...] so they've probably heard there'd be people coming to take their truck away from them like the Gun Police they constantly talk about coming to collect their guns.

      No, it's because they've heard those things, and they are stupid enough and have little enough historical perspective to believe them. We don't ban vehicles in the USA, we ban sale of vehicles, and let them age out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the impact of vehicle production, owning more vehicles than one can drive tends to have a larger footprint.

    41. Re:I really don’t get it by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Teslas are also relatively costly...

      Have you looked at the price of pickups lately?

      https://www.ford.com/trucks/f1...

      Cheapest F-150 starts at about $30k, and that's bare-bones. The most expensive one starts at $67k before you add in options.

      If Tesla actually ever comes out with their $35k Model E variant, they then overlap pretty much the entire F-150 price-range, save for the $28k-$34k sliver.

      And in case a delicate little F-150 isn't for you, if you want to go with the Super Duty Fords, top of the line there starts off at $86,500 before you add options. There's a reason Ford is dropping a lot of its automotive lines in favor of just pumping out F-Series. They're cheap to make, and they successfully sell them at ridiculous prices.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    42. Re:I really don’t get it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Thanks Ivan, but we really don't need your input here. We're talking about our own people here, and fuckshits like you trying to sow discord are exactly who we don't want. Fuck off back to St. Petersburg, troll.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    43. Re:I really don’t get it by apoc.famine · · Score: 0

      In addition to what's already been said, there's a subculture within rednecks of pulling the trucks around somewhere for some chew, smokes, and beers and shooting the shit. Generally talking about hunting and fishing, sports, trucks, and politics while hating on various groups of people. Depending on the location, it might be done at the local fishing hole, someone's garage, or a parking lot somewhere.

      If they were going to be leaning on trucks somewhere, might as well do it where they can piss off a couple of liberal environmentalist rich suburban assholes in the process. If none of them show up, so be it. If one or two do, more entertainment.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    44. Re:I really don’t get it by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      And, Tesla is coming to take my truck away ha-haaa
      Tesla coming to take my truck away ho ho hee hee ha haaa
      To the funny farm
      Where life is beautiful all the time
      And I'll be happy to see those nice young men
      In their clean white coats
      And Teska is coming to take my truck away ha haaa

    45. Re:I really don’t get it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      You don't need to haul things that often to make it worthwhile. Pickups aren't usually that fuel inefficient, maybe 20 mpg instead of 30. Given the high costs of renting (including extra gas), if you have to haul a time or two a month, it's worth buying.

      Also, cute slight of hand at the end, but you just showed a pair of people having a pair of cars. Which doesn't help as each person needs to drive somewhere different.

      And while I certainly don't want to live in a rural area, telling people that they cannot is likely one of the causes of them being pissed.

      I really don't get the pick-up hate. But then again, I don't get the Tesla hate (except that my tax dollars are subsidizing your car).

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    46. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're dividing us into US and THEM. Vladimir Putin would be proud. .

      jesus fuck, you loser, you split yourself off from society with your stupid choices, and you are really poor at blame shifting

    47. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Producing vehicles has a pretty significant environmental cost itself.

    48. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel the same thing. Although there appears to be in this country right now a sentiment that you're either with us or against us. So anyone that's different is automatically a threat. I noticed this when I was talking about my interest in self driving cars saying I will get one as soon as they are available. People actually get really upset by this. That they didn't want me taking away their right to drive their own car? Where did they get that idea, I said I don't care if you drive your own car or not, I just don't want to have to drive myself. Oddly people actually viewed this as a threat.

      I would suspect that a) these people are bullies, and Tesla owner's are their latest victims and b) they, rightly in my opinion, suspect their way of life and way of seeing things is going away, change is hard for people you aren't always in the majority or the "winning team." Sometimes you need to learn to adjust to changing world. The more technological the world gets the more people will need to adapt, these folks probably know this will not be a pleasant adjustment.

    49. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pickups generally cost more than cars, so you're not only paying extra for a vehicle but also pay 50% more on gas (presuming your 20 mpg vs 30 mpg). Further, hauling once or twice a month on average is a pretty incredibly high number, actually. I'd imagine the real number is closer to 0.5/month or less. It's also not a slight of hand to point out that in rural areas, one is actually more likely to have multiple vehicles precisely because multiple people have sufficiently different (30+ miles) places to go.

      So, the argument would be that I should see most people with multiple vehicles should have multiple pickup trucks. Yet, the pattern is more car+truck. If the truck is used for hauling substantially, that makes sense. The reality is, though, the for-winter arguments I listed (as well as having a higher view making people feel "safer", which I failed to include) would then translate into requiring two trucks, not a mix of car and truck. So, clearly that argument or the actual need for two vehicles is questionable if you're relying upon one truck for a substantial part (3+ months) of the year.

      Just to be clear, I have lived in a rural area almost my whole life. There are definitely more rural areas with much worse road systems, and there I can imagine being some justification for a truck over a car. It just doesn't universally apply because "rural". I wouldn't say my feelings are "hate", btw. It's just general confusion and the way people identify with their truck (just as those who identify with their car) make them seem irrational at times when other people make a different decision. There's nothing "rugged" about wasting money on a bigger, gas guzzling vehicle when you're not hauling much if at all; if all you want is higher clearance, then seek a car that accomplishes that without all the pitfalls. Further, hopping on the electric vehicle bandwagon isn't necessarily the right move--used vehicles are glutted here and fully utilizing those vs building new vehicles is probably not only less costly but more environmentally friendly.

      Obviously, it comes down to each individual and whether they're making their decision for rational reasons. For what a vehicle costs, even used, it's amazing how most often people choose based on preference or want and not need. If that is true, then nearly all vehicles are ubiquitously good enough for most purposes, and it really does return to the point: people are not mostly buying pickup trucks because of a need. (Yes, I know this is circular logic, but I'm basing this on my own personal observation. I'm not trying to conjecture valid reasons without considering how in reality false they are.)

    50. Re:I really don’t get it by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      That all you right-wingers can do? Projection? You're less than pathetic.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    51. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, what do have you against Rush? I happen to love their music.

    52. Re:I really don’t get it by johnw · · Score: 1

      Pickups aren't usually that fuel inefficient, maybe 20 mpg instead of 30.

      Ouch! I know American gallons are smaller than real ones but that really is terrible fuel consumption. You can drive a decent sized car and get 50 mpg without difficulty.

    53. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's rich. Some people are going out of their way to be confrontational and you call the critic divisive. Though, I don't think these truck drivers were being assholes just for the sake of it. They're probably afraid that the climate change movement is trying to take away their guns i mean trucks.

    54. Re:I really don’t get it by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Just curious, but are you really saying that people who intentionally block others from using a service because of some bizarre prejudice are not assholes?

      Your comment is far more Ivanish than the GP. The vast majority of blue collar workers wouldn't do this. Your attempt to equate a bunch of assholes with generic blue collar workers, and then complain that people who criticize the assholes are "dividing the country", is a dick move, and exactly the kind of thing the trolls promote.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    55. Re:I really don’t get it by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Well, I had a quick look at ford.com. And their cheapest truck, the Ranger... which you used to be able to buy for $15K-$20K depending on options... now *starts* at $25K, bare-bones, and can push $50K equipped. So, right off, if you choose more wisely you're already in Civic Si and BRZ territory, and really close to an MX-5. Go up on the options list, and you could easily be in a 370Z instead. Fully-loaded, and you could be in a Type-R, a decent 2, 3, or 4-Series, or even a RWD Model 3.

      And their more-popular F-series just gets worse from there. I was able to use Ford's configurator tool to spec an F-series, fully-equipped, at $94,965. That is not a joke. And that would put you into a nicely-specced M-Series, a midrange Model S, or a low-end 911. Hell, you're just *barely* short of GT-R money at those prices.

      So... this whole blue-collar "working class hero" in opposition to those rich and arrogant "liberal technocrat elites" business? I'm not buying it for a second.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    56. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would compare them to Ned Ludd, except that guy actually had a valid point to make (about worker's being badly treated in the early industrial revolution), whereas these guys remind me of a token crazy with his shoes on the wrong feet ranting at ducks in the park.

    57. Re:I really don’t get it by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 1

      FWIW, we own both a Chevy volt and an F150. Since I work from home, my wife typically drives the volt and I drive the F150 mostly as a backup vehicle or as you said, if we need to haul something (mulch, tree branches, multiple kids, etc). Just wanted to let you know not all truck owners are raging assholes.

    58. Re:I really don’t get it by exomondo · · Score: 1

      That's the GP's point. They chose a pickup truck to drive around all the time even though they rarely to never haul anything.

      95% of the time they probably don't but every other weekend I do take out the trailer, camper or jetski and/or throw a couple of trail bikes in the tub. I'm certainly not opposed to Tesla and if they can make a reasonably priced vehicle that can do that then I'm all for it (in theory it could be immensely powerful too). I don't know whether they have a solar option or battery booster so you don't have to worry about range when offroading (somebody in the convoy always has, or can get, extra fuel if somebody else runs out) but that would also be important.

      Let's not pretend these few douchebags in the picture are representative of all people who own pickups or that everybody who owns a pickup is irrationally opposed to EVs, the only issue is that there isn't yet an EV that satisfies that market segment. I'm not sure what they're protesting about but certainly depending on your use case there are a lot of reasons to buy an EV and a lot of reasons not to buy one, that doesn't mean the person who does or doesn't buy one is irrational.

    59. Re:I really don’t get it by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Pickups aren't usually that fuel inefficient, maybe 20 mpg instead of 30

      More like 20 mpg City, 23 mpg Highway Instead of: 30 mpg City, 40 mpg Highway.

      Driving only 2/3 the miles is kind of a big deal; it means you need 1.5x as much fuel which also means 1.5x as much
      fuel cost, for city driving, and 2x as much fuel and 2x as much cost for highway driving.

      For an average driver, that's $1600 a year in gas, instead of $800.

      And there's a simple solution for occasional hauling --- fit your car with a towing hitch, and get a small trailer.
      As I was saying.... Pickup Trucks don't make any economic sense at all to purchase, unless its a work truck, and you
      have a special professional justification or good reason to be hauling a lot of stuff with every or nearly every ride.
      Otherwise, it makes
      more sense to own both car and pickup --- one or both vehicles purchased used, and use pickup only when necessary.

      The environmental impact for manufacturing such vehicle is ~5 Tons of CO2; approximately the same as 1 year's worth of driving.

    60. Re:I really don’t get it by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Well, I had a quick look at ford.com. And their cheapest truck, the Ranger... which you used to be able to buy for $15K-$20K depending on options... now *starts* at $25K, bare-bones, and can push $50K equipped. So, right off, if you choose more wisely you're already in Civic Si and BRZ territory, and really close to an MX-5.

      And if you choose more wisely than that you can have a BMW S1000RR and a lot of change, it will be much faster and much more fuel efficient than an MX-5 too. Of course it also has other problems that the MX-5 has like not being able to carry my trail bike, transport my kids or dogs or tow the camper and it certainly can't get very far offroad.

      Everybody is aware that for the price of one thing you can buy many different things. I have a pickup because it suits my needs, if there was an EV that did the same then that'd be great but there isn't (yet).

      So... this whole blue-collar "working class hero" in opposition to those rich and arrogant "liberal technocrat elites" business? I'm not buying it for a second.

      It might serve you well not to paint everybody with the same brush, is every pickup owner - much less every pickup owner who specced up a $94k truck - protesting against Telsa or EVs? No of course not. You've got maybe a couple dozen of the tens of millions of pickup truck owners protesting something here.

    61. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time; even when they're not actually hauling anything are self-centered arrogant SOBs who compare p***s links with each other; couldn't care less about being green, and often either don't think the rules apply to them -- or challenge the rules frequently through open defiance, Such as parking as to straddle two parking spaces, ignoring the lines, double parking locking people in, pulling in parallel to perpendicular parking, or pulling in perpendicular to parallel parking, etc.

      Would you agree that many of the people that own and drive EVs are self-righteous, technocratic elites that pay lip service to the concept of ecological prosperity for their own smug self-satisfaction? Probably not. So just because you've got so much of your personality and self-worth tied up in what car you drive don't project that out upon everybody else.

    62. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely it is because they keep hearing EV's are the future, [...] so they've probably heard there'd be people coming to take their truck away from them like the Gun Police they constantly talk about coming to collect their guns.

      No, it's because they've heard those things, and they are stupid enough and have little enough historical perspective to believe them. We don't ban vehicles in the USA, we ban sale of vehicles, and let them age out.

      In 1996 the government banned the sale of leaded fuel. If you're looking at it purely historically they certainly could just ban the sale of gasoline.

    63. Re:I really don’t get it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Hardly. Vehicles depreciate mainly by miles, not time. You will own the vehicles longer, or someone will.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    64. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, you're pretty much the exception to the rule. As another poster mentions, most cars can fit a towing hitch and as long as you're wise to choose a car with all wheel drive (and there's lots of them) for off-roading, a car still might make more economic sense; it's definitely up to you to determine that*. None of what I was talking about was suggesting that EV was some sort of solution. I was merely trying to point out how perplexed I am that so many people are willing to spend substantially more money to buy a vehicle that uses substantially more fuel without being able to spell out a clear reason. I mean, even if it's not a need, it's understandable to me if it's a preference, you know it costs you substantially more fuel, and you're willing and able to pay for it. I just don't seem to actually witness people engaging that actual thought process nor really considering how their few bucks above minimum wage job really doesn't give them a lot of luxury money, so their truck is burning through most of it.

      I definitely wasn't trying to paint these anti-Tesla fools in the same broad brush as the people I'm thinking about. Clearly a person who chose a truck by preference should rational understand a person choosing an EV by preference. So, I honestly don't know who the anti-Tesla jokers are nor why they're acting out.

      * Obviously, your situation might not be well suited for the most efficient ICE econo-car probably more than anything because of a failure in design to deal with the stress of towing. Those sorts of cars are hardly the only ones available. Similarly if the need is clearance, there's plenty of cars that should be more than sufficient. Presumably you considered all that before choosing a truck. For a lot of people though, I don't think that's what's happening; I tend to believe that people buy into the advertising and want a "tough" truck without really putting a lot more thought into it. Maybe it's different in the area where you live.

    65. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the point that they intentionally divide themselves from the rest of polite society due to their own narcissistic demands? It is certain that everybody has their own personal needs and troubles, but there are certain narcissistic individuals who have no concern for a harmonious society, those whose greatest consideration is their own narcissistic self. I don't know what kind of world you live in where these kind of narcissistic people have the will to cohabitate in harmony with society.

    66. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >what do they think they’re protesting

      rich tech people.

      tesla's are a powerful symbol of all that's wrong with silicon valley.

    67. Re:I really don’t get it by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It's fairly simple, the truck drivers hear and see the push for enviro-friendly technologies. Electric vehicles are one of these. They figure that the environmentalists will eventually come for their trucks.

      And they probably will. And rightly so, if you see some of the dirty smoke these trucks spew. They're not exactly clean machines.

      If they want to keep their trucks, they should encourage cleaner trucks.

    68. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We don't ban vehicles in the USA, we ban sale of vehicles, and let them age out.

      In 1996 the government banned the sale of leaded fuel. If you're looking at it purely historically they certainly could just ban the sale of gasoline.

      My first car was a 1960 Dodge Dart with a 318 ci big block, and a 650 cfm carter carb. It had 12:1 compression and also required leaded fuel, so I had to run both octane booster and lead substitute. Removing leaded fuel from the road did not remove my car from the road; it only forced me to purchase a fuel additive. Your comparison is not only un-apt, it is inept.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    69. Re:I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been coal-rolled at least a dozen times, possibly two dozen... I've had a hybrid and/or EV since 2002.

      The people coal-rolling me are highly propagandized, and the left's demonization of them, while understandable, works to reinforce their estrangement from other Americans.

      It doesn't matter if they are assholes. We're all assholes. (If you are certain you're not, that kind of proves conclusively that you are, really.) The point is they are the people we need to work with, so engaging them as humans on a human level (instead of as cops, on a cop level) is necessary if we are to move forwards as a nation.

      I talk to 'em, I don't call the cops on them. I listen to them. And I offer them sincere sympathy, and if I can manage it, help them find solutions to the problems in their lives, like you would for a friend or neighbor. It works.

    70. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Vehicles depreciate mainly by miles, not time.

      Idling, miles, and years each take their toll in their own special ways, and to varying degrees depending on design, equipment, and storage conditions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And here, ladies and gentlemen, we have the perfect slashdot comment. It's garbage like this that drags this site ever closer to being another Twitter.

  25. Re:Speak a language they can understand by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a Tesla and own several guns. If this was happening to me, I would construe it as a threat upon my being and I wouldn't hesitate to put the assailant(s) to death.

    This is why a mental health assessment should be required for both gun ownership and a drivers license. You should have neither.

  26. Re:Speak a language they can understand by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Funny

    your airsoft gun will just make them angry, basement dweller. besides, you'll get a sunburn.

  27. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs anger management counseling and its not just the truck drivers.

  28. LOLZ - mostly not happening by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We have quite a few of those recharging station at the malls and railroad stations around here, 16 within 2 miles of me..... never seen them blocked by anything or anyone, ever.

    1. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who asked? Who cares what you see in your daily life? Nobody. Nobody asked, nobody cares. This isn't about you. Learn that.

    2. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Informative

      no one asked for article implying incidents at a whopping total of 3 stations out of 16,000+ were indicative of anything either.

      I live near one of the largest cities in the United States (also one of the "top ten EV friendly cities"), nothing like that has ever been reported here.

      In short, what this article is trying to make a news item out of, mostly is not happening anywhere, to anyone.

    3. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, thread over. This dipshit hasn't seen this happen, so obviously it doesn't happen. We can all go home now.

    4. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who asked? Who cares what you see in your daily life? Nobody. Nobody asked, nobody cares. This isn't about you. Learn that.

      Your opinion of it isn't any more news than it is.

    5. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. Of course an internet forum is a valid place for giving anecdotal evidence.

      Nobody wants to hear any more of your bullshit. Learn that.

    6. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's trying to use his own local (*bullshit*) anecdote, singular, to prove a negative, that this IS NOT HAPPENING and nobody sees it happening, regardless of other people or the article. He has no idea, neither do you, morons.

      FUCK YOU BOTH, MORONS.

    7. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      In short, what this article is trying to make a news item out of, mostly is not happening anywhere, to anyone.

      As is every article. If it was a commonplace, everyday occurrence, it wouldn't be news.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      Yes, if you personally have not experienced it, it can not possibly happen.

    9. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Tugrik · · Score: 2

      I've not seen any group efforts to block superchargers but this week I did see a single incident. I pulled into a supercharger station in Sandy, OR and plugged in to get a top off. I was the only Tesla there using them at the time. At the end of the row, however, was a huge diesel van; one of those 'earthroamer' types that was jacked up on high suspension with big tires, parked sideways across three of the spots.

      A few minutes later the driver got back to his vehicle. He saw me sitting in my model 3, flipped me off, got in his van and took off with a good bit of tire squealing. No other communication; just a flip of the bird and he was gone.

      Then I see this /. story and have to wonder how often this kinda thing happens. It was mostly just puzzling. :)

    10. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you live in a blue state.

    11. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Geeky+Don · · Score: 1

      The chargers you are referring to aren't Tesla superchargers. Those don't get scattered around like the lower power chargers you frequently see and the appearance is quite distinctive.

    12. Re: LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the picture linked. Those are Massachusetts plates, bluest state in the nation. It can happen anywhere.

    13. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      This happened in Oregon? The place where cyclists catcall pedestrians?

    14. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      So you agree, the article is bullshit spin.

    15. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who cares what you see in your daily life?"

      Exactly. How would anyone rely on their own experience when they can live in click-bait universe. Lets discuss the sex lives of Elves and Orcs.

    16. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      Would be BIG NEWS if this were happening coast to coast at dozens of stations. But Instead, it's making mountain out of molehill.

    17. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if you personally have not experienced it, it can not possibly happen.

      But if half a dozen pickup truck drivers do it at one location then it must be a newsworthy epidemic and all pickup drivers are intolerant ranting rednecks that don't care about the environment.

  29. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm. Sure. And as owners of status only trucks show no smugness, all will be just fine.

  30. Re: Just a response to smugness by hey! · · Score: 1

    Are you really that fragile.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  31. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I donâ(TM)t think u think the post means what u think it means.

  32. Nice... by skam240 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nice, have these idiots vehicles legally towed and let them enjoy their ridiculous impound fees that most communities have. Maybe they'll direct their far right rage towards the bullshit government attitude towards the privatization of impound lots. Your car was towed on a Friday? Good luck low income person being able to afford getting your car out of impound on Monday.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Towing them would be illegal since they aren’t breaking any laws.

    2. Re:Nice... by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      That depends very much on where the charging station is - many are on private property, and if asked to leave they must.

      So yes, a representative of the property owner would need to ask them to leave before towing them.
      Of course, if a sign was put up warning them that non-tesla vehicles will immediately be towed at owners expense, then no such warning would be required.

    3. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the property owner can be perfectly fine with it. In which case the Tesla faggots can go fuck themselves.

    4. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The property owner is the one who solicits, installs, manages the supercharger, presumably profits from it. You are missing chromosomes and/or critical neural pathways. Fuck off to some plausible semblance of sentience.

    5. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you referring to the same property owner who agreed to have the stations installed, given they may be installed on private property?

    6. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can still have the legal right to tell any Tesla faggot to go fuck themselves. In fact they have the legal right post a sign that says all EVs parked at these chargers will be towed at the owners expensive then have every Tesla faggot towed that parks and tries to charge there.

    7. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if a sign was put up warning them that non-tesla vehicles will immediately be towed at owners expense, then no such warning would be required.

      Somewhat surprised that these signs are not already in place.

      Seems like whoever setup the charging station failed to sufficiently account for how stupid/misinformed/misguided people can be. Understandable I suppose. I'm very much a cynic and I still get surprised quite frequently by some public stupidity. Ah well. We live & learn.

  33. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Precisely. Tesla's are expensive solar jewelry taking advantage of tax subsidies. In most places they are largely fueled by inefficient coal, oil and natural gas, creating more carbon emissions than the typical diesel truck.

  34. Prius drivers in good company by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Prius drivers in good company by jeti · · Score: 1

      As are bicyclists.

  35. Re:Speak a language they can understand by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tesla owners are scared of guns. They would cry if they saw one.

    They seem pretty fond of flamethrowers though.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  36. No Video? by Kunedog · · Score: 0

    So this has happened twice, and during those times worse behavior occurs on demand (i.e. they cuss people out when they approach the chargers) and yet there's no cellphone video of the perps?

    1. Re:No Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you are personally made aware of, Cletus? No, they didn't care to inform you. You have no idea if footage exists or not, just that you don't have it at your fat butterfingertips. Get over it. It proves nothing either way. Collective Derp.

  37. I'm just spitballing here by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but they're probably angry at technocrat elites. If they're blue collar types odds are good they listen to right wing media which is often on the warpath against silicon valley and the like. Plus if they're blue collar then odds are good they're not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession and never really recovered.

    Still, I could be totally wrong. Like the author if TFA I'd love to just ask them why.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not blue collar, and even I think saying Fuck You to the technocratic elitists is a great fucking idea.

    2. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound blue collar. Coors drinking, goatee wearing, F350 Super Duty driving, piece of shit.

    3. Re: I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I also believe those horrible uncultured working people should disappear. The sooner the better.

    4. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > [...] if they're blue collar then odds are good they're not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession [...]

      Actually they're getting hammered since about mid '70ies. As we all are getting -- at least those south of 100-200K/year (threshold rising).

      Whether demonstrating against EVs changes that is another question, though...

    5. Re:I'm just spitballing here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of them just seem to enjoy upsetting "liberals", in the broadest possible sense.

      They feel that "liberals" had to good under Obama, with a lot of changes in their favour like marriage equality and other rights, and a general recognition by society that some behaviour was no longer acceptable. Now they feel things are swinging back the other way and are emboldened to to this kind of stuff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kinda follow left and right sites. Briebart has targeted (arguably) asshat "masters of the universe" cook/zuck/musk. I get the hate for apple and FB (profiting from spying on people) , but the hate for musk eludes me. Just hatin on techno elites? Why is getting off of oil addiction a bad thing? More coal being burned By EVs, less demand for gas, prices go down.

      Full disclosure, owner of 3/4 ton 4x4 longbed, AND a prius. I Wanna get a model 3. I'd volunteer to drive up there with my pickup and see if I can understand the motivation, were there a charging station nearby.

    7. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of them just seem to enjoy upsetting "liberals", in the broadest possible sense.

      Drink! AmiMojo makes broad generalizations about a group in a way that would totally "upset liberals" if said the other way around!

      Imagine if conservative said something like "a lot of them (blacks, Mexicans, gays, feminists, liberals, etc) seem to enjoy [usual talking points conservatives make about those groups]"

    8. Re:I'm just spitballing here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Drink!

      What? (drinkypoo is long for 'drink', my first Unix login chosen back in 1991. 'drink' was taken by someone who never posted, go figure.

      AmiMojo makes broad generalizations about a group in a way that would totally "upset liberals" if said the other way around!

      What broad generalizations? It's a well-demonstrated and self-avowed tendency of many conservatives that they like to troll liberals.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they're probably angry at technocrat elites. If they're blue collar types odds are good they listen to right wing media which is often on the warpath against silicon valley and the like. Plus if they're blue collar then odds are good they're not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession and never really recovered.

      With the irony that the Democrats used to be the champion of the blue-collar workers (and still try to claim to be) yet only seem to give a damn about Wall Street and the Left Coast these days.

      Not that the Republicans are treating them much better but they are doing a better job of getting their attention.

    10. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are correct and they are not doing so well economically, seems to me perhaps one would drive a vehicle that does a little better than a pickup in terms of miles per dollar.

    11. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Powercntrl · · Score: 0

      A lot of them just seem to enjoy upsetting "liberals", in the broadest possible sense.

      Your typical "liberal" probably drives around in a Craigslist beater that burns almost as much oil as it does gas. I'd venture a guess most Tesla owners in areas where there are a lot of "good ol' boys" are just as conservative as the idiots blocking their charging station. You don't get to be that successful by asking Uncle Sam to take more of your hard-earned money.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    12. Re:I'm just spitballing here by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      You might try checking out the pricing of pickup trucks.

      I had a quick look over at ford.com today. And unless you're settling for the most bare-bones Ranger (Which is already ridonklously overpriced at $25K.); you're spending quite a pretty penny. With the F-series, which the googles tell me is the best-selling pickup of the lot of them; a middle-of-the-pack setup will put you well into the pricing of a nicely equipped BMW 2, 3, or 4-series, mid-range Infinitis or Lexuses (Lexuii???), or a very nice 370Z. And a fully-equipped F-series? Try $95K. At that point, you're spending as much on your pickup truck as one would on a Model S 100D w/ autopilot, a nicely-equipped M-series, or even a low-end 911.

      Oh, and that $25K Ranger? That is, as I said, only the most basic bare-bones model you can get. Equipped, the Ranger averages $35K and can hit $45K fully-loaded.

      So I'm not, for a second, buying into the "not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession and never really recovered" line. People who aren't doing so hot economically aren't dropping $35K-$60K, and higher, on trucks so they can sit around (not working) at Superchargers to harass and threaten Tesla owners. Hell, I AM doing pretty well financially right now; and I'm still driving my $17.5K Mazda3, and the only way I see myself upgrading to *anything* else in the near-term is if the redesign includes a new Speed3 or if Subaru brings back the hatchback WRX.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    13. Re:I'm just spitballing here by mcvos · · Score: 2

      if they're blue collar then odds are good they're not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession and never really recovered.

      It's a wild guess, but they might even be voting for the party that keeps hammering blue collar types.

    14. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

      Wasn't talking to you. I said drink as in take a drink. You know like a drinking game.

      What broad generalizations? It's a well-demonstrated and self-avowed tendency of many conservatives that they like to troll liberals.

      That one. It's a broad generalization that many conservatives like to troll liberals. Almost every word in there is vague and poorly defined, leaving the listen to decide what each of those words mean (how many is "many"? Who counts as a conservative? Liberal? What counts as trolling?)

      It's a vapid and devoid of meaning as "many liberals are SJWs"

      It's a generalization that doesn't say anything

    15. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Around here there's a distinct social class of people who buy enormous white pickup trucks and generally flout every traffic law they can ignore that won't result in getting pulled over - crusing slow in the passing lane, blocking intersections, pulling out in front of traffic and forcing it to drop below the speed limit to avoid a collision, double parking, you name it. It really is an interesting phenomenon that I assume might have some genetic component. Or maybe there's some organization actively promoting this behavior.

  38. Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people can block freeways in protest, what can't ordinary citizens deny the public access to?

  39. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then I have good news for you: He has neither.

  40. I can imagine the arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla: Why are you blocking the entrance?
    Redneck: Go home, fag!
    Tesla: OK, I'm gay. But why?
    Redneck: Fuck you!
    Tesla: You still haven't answered my question
    Redneck: Go home, fag!
    Tesla: What is the problem exactly?
    Redneck: You're ruining America!
    Tesla: How's that?
    Redneck: Go home, fag! ...

    1. Re:I can imagine the arguments by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Tesla: Why are you blocking the entrance?
      Redneck: Go home, fag!
      Tesla: OK, I'm gay. But why?
      Redneck: Fuck you!
      Tesla: (drops his pants)

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:I can imagine the arguments by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Redneck: Not gay if you're pitching.

    3. Re:I can imagine the arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla: Why are you blocking the entrance?
      Redneck: Go home, fag!
      Tesla: OK, I'm gay. But why?
      Redneck: Fuck you!
      Tesla: (drops his pants)

      Redneck: Mongo straight!

      Salt of the earth. Common clay of the west. You know, ...

  41. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "they're harder to start"

    I assume this is aimed at diesel trucks, and tells me one of two things:

    1. You've never owned a diesel truck

    2. If you have, it was a PowerStroke.

    REAL diesel trucks are not hard to start.

  42. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, just ask them if there is some gay or black couple down the road and they will load up and haul ass there to start giving them hell too.

    I live in North Carolina and, unfortunately, we have a certain level of rednecks out here where the only thing that melts quicker than their IQ is their snowflake when stuff they are too afraid to deal with comes around.

  43. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope someone slashes all of your tires. Maybe then you'll get the point.

  44. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you!!!! I have a gun!!!! I will kick your ass and then shoot you!!!! Animeeeeee!!!!!!!

  45. Re: Speak a language they can understand by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    I know a guy with two firearm. His name is Johnny Storm.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  46. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty much what you would expect from a state that was basically one of the major players in slavery.

  47. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you really suggesting murder is the best response to protests? You're good with Charlottesville, then?

  48. It's all good just remember it when they want jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When NC comes to SF or NYC begging for investments and tech job creation to help get their hill billy economy off the ground, just remind them that no educated skilled worker wants to live in a place where people behave like that.

  49. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like it, here's what you can do:

    Step 1- get some used forklift batteries (lots of the blue collar type folks protestin' probably have access to these)
    Step 2- build a battery pack with a charger/adapt an off the shelf one with a step up/down transformer and plug adapter for the standardized electric charging stations
    Step 3- put the pack in the bed of your pickup and drive to a charging station
    Step 4- charge your pack, go have a Bud Light and a smoke
    Step 5- unplug the pack and return home to your trailer, plug it in -- FREE POWER

    So not only a great protest, but now you can watch Fox News powered by free libtard charging stations!!!

  50. 1970s, Japanese imports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC, people dropped rocks from overpasses on early Japanese imports that were on the roads of North America.

    And their kids drive Toyotas, Hondas, and now those upstarts from Korea, Hyundais.

    Blather, rinse, repeat.

  51. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Tesla and own several guns. If this was happening to me, I would construe it as a threat upon my being and I wouldn't hesitate to put the assailant(s) to death.

    1. no you wouldn't

    2. if you were actually dumb enough to try this as a defense...you'd be imprisoned for murder. Blocking a gas pump is not a threat.

  52. Extreme dumbassery on both sides. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Big truck drivers must not have much to do. I wonder how long they waited for somebody to actually wanna use those chargers? Must have been a sale on Copenhagen and Budwieser.

    In TFA, Tesla driver reports “took them 10 minutes or so and one of them did that ‘I’m going to hit you’ maneuver after circling the parking lot.”

    WTF is a ‘I’m going to hit you’ maneuver?

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:Extreme dumbassery on both sides. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Self-assumed victim preening.

    2. Re:Extreme dumbassery on both sides. by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      That is when you drive aggressively right at you as to actually drive right into your car but then swivel away at the last second.

  53. Re:Bullshit by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    WHILE watching Fox 'News'

  54. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, no you wouldn't. Or you are lying. No responsible gun owner would brandish their weapon because someone said mean words. It is literally the opposite of "responsible".

  55. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have a clue how taxes work.

  56. Re: It's all good just remember it when they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, they have to ask for them you know. Jobs donâ(TM)t collect on the sidewalk duh

  57. Re:Speak a language they can understand by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    oh boy, John Wick lives, and threatens geeks on slashdot. I'm shaking in my boots, er slippers, right now.

  58. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I fairly clearly said diesel FIRES are harder to start. "Die in a diesel fire, they're harder to start." Jesus man, reading isn't a beartrap, stick a toe in and learn how it works. As if I needed to deign to insult diesel mechanics, lol.

    The poor filthy SOB's have bigger problems than what I think about their choice of fuels. Besides, if you don't make your own bio-d, you're missing the entire point of that platform.

  59. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Er high heels. We know you.

  60. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that next.

  61. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's talking about the fuel, not the engine, you dense fuck.

  62. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not even his, the cheeky slag.

  63. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Taxes are how evil liberal Muslim gay atheists steal the pretty women from us real Muricans. Fucking bastards with their "good higene" and elitist "literacy".

    Trumps gonna build that wall with clean coal and make murica great like back in the fifties!

  64. Its an allegal protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call in the cops, tear gas the lot of em.

  65. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    So if he doesn't agree with your politics, he's unfit? got it.

  66. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shooting someone because they inconvenienced you is pretty much always considered illegal. There is no threat to life, so no reason to shoot. Yes, someone who wants to do what the GP stated he did is either mentally unstable or clearly acting with criminal intent.

  67. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome! I can hear Sean Hannity lying to me over liberal-subsidized electricity already! Is there nothing the ghost of Reagan can't do? I knew being a freeloading Libertarian retard would pay off someday!

  68. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He worked hard enough to take them off your dad...

  69. Yes, he does know how taxes work. by thesupraman · · Score: 2

    Actually I think you dont have a clue how taxes work.

    What the grantparent said is true. Both teslas and charging stations are subsidized by taxes.
    As of course are a lot of other things, however it does not make it untrue.

    1. Re:Yes, he does know how taxes work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All gasoline in the US is HEAVILY subsidized, but saying charging stations are subsidized and that's "why you don't like them" because you don't have an EV is just ignorant head-in-ass selfish zero-math Republicanism to the T.

    2. Re:Yes, he does know how taxes work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All gasoline in the US is HEAVILY taxed

      There, fixed that for you. The government makes more off of a gallon of gas than the refinery, the oil company or the gas station does.

    3. Re:Yes, he does know how taxes work. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to include about 75% of the Department of Defense's budget in your subsidy calculation.

    4. Re:Yes, he does know how taxes work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While GP was indeed wrong, the fuel taxes in the US are lower than almost anywhere else in the developed world.

  70. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our tax dollars also subsidize gas stations and traditional vehicles. Oil and gas companies get tens of billions of dollars in subsidies every year, and have for quite some time. The government loaned the auto industry tens of billions of our tax dollars during the last recession, and it wasn't the first time. Are you really that picky about how our tax dollars are spent?

    Would you feel better if Tesla had a century of experience prior to accepting public money? Maybe they need to also make billions of dollars per year on top of the corporate welfare they receive. Would that make them 'Mercian enough for Main Street, Peckerwood?

  71. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you (and a small but obnoxious number of truck owners) think Tesla owners are liberals?

    I badly want a Tesla, and I'm possibly the most conservative person I know.

    Screw the planet, I want the technology. And the low-end torque.

  72. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't work: they implement a protocol where the charger talks to the car before throwing closed a relay.

    The power delivery is just a dumb dump of high voltage power straight to the car, but you need to validate with the charger before it will turn on. Pretty sure the car has to talk to the power station while charging too, for "safety."

    Even if you did reverse engineer this protocol, you still have to authenticate with the station using some phone app or something. So, no, they've already figured out how to prevent tax payers from using the power they're paying for to charge some rich assholes car.

  73. Re:Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reap what they SOW, you fuckwit. SOW. Sewing, really? #Ayn Rand facepalm

  74. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, we mod up the cretin that threatens death and mod down the progressive mocking such antiquated values?

  75. Sooner or later by jd · · Score: 2

    Someone is going to die.

    Whether it's a pregnant woman being driven to hospital in a Tesla dying of complications, a kid getting hit by something thrown, raised tempers turning ugly, someone failing to stop in time for the parked cars...

    And the truckers will deny it has anything to do with them. Legally, they'd probably be right. Blood on innocent hands.

    The Tesla drivers will deny any blame, too, if it's a case of raised tempers. Stand your ground is a legal defence.

    It wouldn't matter if they had to stack the bodies in a double 40' trailer. Nobody's guilty here, your honor.

    Who the hell gives a shit what you think of such and such a political ideology that nobody here can define anyway. Who the hell cares what you think of Tesla or truckers?

    Is the absolute certainty of accidental death of someone who has nothimg to do with either side a desired outcome? This isn't whatiffery, this is guaranteed if these incidents keep happening.

    At what point is it more important to find and apply a fix than to whine about the bug?

    My guess is never. The days when getting things done mattered are long over.

    Now get off my lawn!

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Sooner or later by kenh · · Score: 1

      How will blocking a charging station lead to death?

      You'd have to, for example, only own a tesla, not own a home charging station, only have access to the one (now blocked) charging station, and have a medical emergency when you have an inadequate charge to get you to the hospital... AND you live in an area not served by an ambulance service.

      Yeah, that's a certainty.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Sooner or later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Yeah, that's a certainty.

      If you think the scenario you outlined above amounts to theater of the absurd, remember what year it is and who is president of the United States, and how many people said exactly what I quoted above about the guy in 2015. Shit happens.

    3. Re:Sooner or later by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      How will blocking a charging station lead to death?

      "Irate Tesla owner inserts Supercharger cord into pickup truck's gas tank, details at 11"

      (yes, I know, it wouldn't work in practice due to safety interlocks, etc)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Sooner or later by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If you have to stop by a charging station on your way to the ER, then you're going to have to ask Cletus to take the patient the rest of the way in his pickup.

    5. Re:Sooner or later by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're harshing the narrative.

    6. Re:Sooner or later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf if you got emergency situation when your tesla wasn't charged much and there is quite a bit of distance to drive??? you are just a moron.

  76. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They aren't protesting anything. They are just being jackasses. I think the pickups should be crushed into little cubes. It would not particularly upset me if the owners were inside during the operation.

  77. Re: Speak a language they can understand by usr1987 · · Score: 1

    Interesting. But you don't fit the Tesla owner model. So get rid of one

  78. Hillbillies at their worst by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Hillbillies and yahoos know no better. This just reveals that they have seen the writing in the wall, and that they are shitting in their pants.

    1. Re:Hillbillies at their worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This just reveals that they have seen the writing in the wall

      Trump has built the wall?

      Lets build a wall around America to keep the Americans in. Make Trump pay!
      Based on the posts here, it sounds like we need it urgently!

  79. Re: Good for them. by usr1987 · · Score: 0

    Its ironic but the religious the ones that did accept facts. Now its the liberal religion.

  80. Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by kenh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In what is quickly becoming a problem for some Tesla drivers

    It's happened TWICE - that's the same number of times Hillary lost her bid for President...

    Let's not over-react.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's happened TWICE - that's the same number of times Hillary lost her bid for President..." Or roughly 1/8000th the number of times Trump has been caught lying in his short stint as our first traitor POTUS, say.

    2. Re:Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by tomhath · · Score: 1

      that's the same number of times Hillary lost her bid for President...

      Which tesla drivers still haven't gotten over, two years after the fact.

    3. Re:Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla owners are 55% republican from the last survey.

    4. Re:Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

      To be fair, when Hillary lost the second time, it was a disaster for the nation. So there's that.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's happened TWICE

      Not sure where you get the number from, but if you do go to the Tesla subreddit, a lot of people have been posting this particular problem for the past half-year.

      It will only get worse as more Model 3s start going around. Tesla needs to start managing their superchargers soon or they'll have a hard time fixing the problem later.

  81. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost every dictator has used "mental health" to suppress dissent.

  82. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean those subsidies that kept our country from being dependent on importing crap from other nations? That's what tax money should be spent on.

    Besides, most of the power used to charge Teslas comes from these gas and oil companies that you decry.

    Not to mention gasoline is heavily taxed to pay for road upkeep, and Tesla owners complete sidestep that, so I am yet again literally paying money for services they get for free. And as battery packs are a waste of weight, Teslas cause more damage to the roads than other vehicles, meaning yet again everyone else is subsidizing the Tesla owners.

    EVs and Teslas can all go to hell. They use up even more CO2 than regular vehicles, all so the driver can feel smug about how they're not emitting any CO2 where they are, ignoring all the CO2 required to let them do that.

  83. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Its ironic but the religious the ones that did accept facts" - Learn how to form a coherent thought and get back to us. You're not repeating Hannity verbatim and original thoughts only confuse and anger you.

  84. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maryland has lots of coal and it is solidly Democrat. I guess they fuck their sisters and watch Fox News there, too?

  85. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla pays for the power, idiot.

  86. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we would have to go up to become twitter. /. has become filled with trash and russian/chinese trolls.

  87. Anti-Tesla Pickup Drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do they actually think the Tesla owners are going to say, “Gosh fellas, you’re right. I’m going to sell my Tesla today and buy a Ford pickup.”?

  88. Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side ? by Btrot69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a suburbanite and I've been driving a hybrid Camry since 2007 and I like it.
    But I don't think that insulting these truck owners (or vice versa) is going to help anybody.

    I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans, who feel that their work depends on trucks, cars, vehicle repair, oil, oil equipment, coal, scrap yards, etc, etc.

    That is especially the case today, when Tesla has been publicizing the success of their SELF-DRIVING electric SEMI-trucks. Tesla says that in a convoy, they are more energy efficient than trains. They even have a standing order for HUNDREDS of these new trucks from Walmart, rural America's love/hate store/employer.

    For years, the only way that a rural American could escape and see the world was to either drive a truck or work on the railroad.
    Its a fundamental part of American culture, and it doesn't escape these people that Tesla's development poses a tangible threat to that way of life.

    There are political and economic solutions that could provide jobs AND save the environment, but its not going to happen by spewing all this filth.

  89. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oversized glorified expensive blow torch. There I fixed it.

  90. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Hortense+Yaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tesla owners have laser pistols.

  91. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    Urbanites don't generally drive Teslas, or cars at all if they can help it. You're looking at rich suburbanites. But sure, make it a city vs country thing, despite the rather obvious fact the cities continue to have their transportation needs ignored while expensive, highly subsidized, highways to nowhere continue to serve the non-urban parts of America.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  92. Re:Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If EV and hybrid drivers would back off on the smug factor, the problem would go away.

    Funny, my office parking lot has three Tesla vehicles in it, but the frequent comments along the line of, "If only you had a real vehicle..." comes from the three lifted truck owners.

    Quite a sensitive bunch too, they get upset when other people's vehicles do things they think only their trucks can do. Here is an example from a coffee machine conversation just the other week:
    Corolla owner: "Hey Bob, you should check out this awesome hiking trail I found"
    Truck owner, who is not Bob: "Bob's has a car and you could never make it up that logging road without a real vehicle."
    Corolla owner: "I've been up there several times with my corolla just fine."
    Truck owner: "People like you are why we pay so much taxes, because every time you get stuck on one of those logging roads you have to be bailed out"
    Corolla owner: "... you get a private tow truck to bail you out, not a tax funded service. You should know since you had to be towed out when you got tangled up in that fence a couple months ago."

  93. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    "I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans" = You living in a ridiculously limited paradigm, making excuses for being unable to adapt to reality and/or progress, essentially.

    If rural America can't figure out what to do outside of a coal mine, I guess we need a war for them to die in. #Solved.

  94. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're blocking the Tesla superchargers that are powered by fossil fuels. Having solar panels on their house makes no difference to where the power for the charging stations comes from

  95. It's not hard by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    When you can't find an obvious reason, look for who stands to gain. Traditional auto companies have been fighting a delaying battle against Tesla for years. Tesla is way ahead of them in an area they know they will eventually have to compete in. Plus Tesla is one of the most short-sold companies in history. Doesn't take much to spark a temporary fluctuation in stock prices.

    I would be astonished if there weren't some of these motives behind this. Likely a combination - a lot of those who have short positions on Tesla are funded by traditional auto.

    This is the same kind of FUD Microsoft tried against Linux with SCO. No different.

  96. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not directly, no.

  97. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from being dependent on importing crap from other nations

    Given the auto sales numbers.. i think you mean the "foreign cars everyone wants to buy" instead of the domestic garbage.

    Look below, as far as cars go, the domestic market is just toast... which is why they are all exiting to go build trucks.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story...

    1st place: Honda Civic
    2nd place: Toyota Camry
    3rd place: Toyota Corolla sedan
    4th place: Honda Accord
    5th place: Nissan Altima
    6th place: Nissan Sentra
    7th place: Ford Fusion
    8th place: Chevrolet Cruze
    9th place: Hyundai Elantra
    10th place: Chevrolet Malibu

  98. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Btrot69 · · Score: 1

    No, I think there are plenty of other jobs that rural America can easily adapt to. Obvious ones are solar, wind farming, growing biofuels,

    I requires political leaders who can win people over to a new view of the future.

    I think trolling "Anonymous Cowards" like you, who stick everyone into a "category", and flippantly pose war as the solution don't help very much.

    But we will learn to ignore you.

  99. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's Not A Flamethrower...

  100. Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by neiras · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think that insulting these truck owners (or vice versa) is going to help anybody.

    Fuck these fragile snowflakes who are so afraid of change that they'll go park their trucks in front of another guy's filling station. That's small ball. You don't see Tesla owners blockading filling stations.

    They don't get to be assholes and expect that anyone will listen to them. The American Yahoo is something to be derided and mocked. I've met them - if you aren't like them, you're their plaything or their enemy. They'll screw you mercilessly if they have an angle, and they'll laugh to their buddies about it later.

    For years, the only way that a rural American could escape and see the world was to either drive a truck or work on the railroad. Its a fundamental part of American culture, and it doesn't escape these people that Tesla's development poses a tangible threat to that way of life.

    Railways will continue to exist. Trucks will continue to exist. The rednecks will still be able to hoot and holler and do doughnuts in walmart parking lots at midnight. Soon they'll be able to stagger out of their shitty bars and have their trucks drive them home without the usual DUI along the way. You don't need to be doing the driving to see the country.

    I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans, who feel that their work depends on trucks, cars, vehicle repair, oil, oil equipment, coal, scrap yards, etc, etc.

    The fact is, moving goods around and monkey-wrenching are not going to be fallback jobs for Joe Schmoe anymore. They only ever paid reasonably well because they're shit jobs that no one with half a brain wants. Those jobs will go away, because it's cheaper and more pleasant to deal with a self-driving vehicle than it is to deal with Joe Schmoe. Time for Joe to do something with his life.

    1. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Congratulations for providing the least empathetic, ugly bigoted view of your fellow Americans on this thread. You, not them, are the problem. Maybe if you considered them people instead of The Other, we wouldn't be having this problem.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, those pickup truck drivers are the REAL victims here! They should be allowed to molest Tesla drivers in peace! How dare someone harshly criticize them -- on the Internet, no less! -- simply for exercising their right to be assholes? It's a horrible injustice, I say!

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that insulting these truck owners (or vice versa) is going to help anybody.

      Fuck these fragile snowflakes who are so afraid of change that they'll go park their trucks in front of another guy's filling station. That's small ball. You don't see Tesla owners blockading filling stations.

      They don't get to be assholes and expect that anyone will listen to them. The American Yahoo is something to be derided and mocked. I've met them - if you aren't like them, you're their plaything or their enemy. They'll screw you mercilessly if they have an angle, and they'll laugh to their buddies about it later.

      For years, the only way that a rural American could escape and see the world was to either drive a truck or work on the railroad. Its a fundamental part of American culture, and it doesn't escape these people that Tesla's development poses a tangible threat to that way of life.

      Railways will continue to exist. Trucks will continue to exist. The rednecks will still be able to hoot and holler and do doughnuts in walmart parking lots at midnight. Soon they'll be able to stagger out of their shitty bars and have their trucks drive them home without the usual DUI along the way. You don't need to be doing the driving to see the country.

      I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans, who feel that their work depends on trucks, cars, vehicle repair, oil, oil equipment, coal, scrap yards, etc, etc.

      The fact is, moving goods around and monkey-wrenching are not going to be fallback jobs for Joe Schmoe anymore. They only ever paid reasonably well because they're shit jobs that no one with half a brain wants. Those jobs will go away, because it's cheaper and more pleasant to deal with a self-driving vehicle than it is to deal with Joe Schmoe. Time for Joe to do something with his life.

      There are three assholes that drive pickups in South Carolina, or wherever the fuck this was. Not news. Do you know how many cars get keyed in a DAY, or how many penises are drawn on dirty back windows? Good lord, there are bigger problems in the world.

    4. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Someone needs to start shoving mirrors into these peoples' faces and say "This is you. You're an asshole."

    5. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The fact is, moving goods around and monkey-wrenching are not going to be fallback jobs for Joe Schmoe anymore. They only ever paid reasonably well because they're shit jobs that no one with half a brain wants. Those jobs will go away, because it's cheaper and more pleasant to deal with a self-driving vehicle than it is to deal with Joe Schmoe. Time for Joe to do something with his life."

      Are you saying this because you despise the working class or because you're a capitalist bootlicker that loves scabs?

      Either way, sounding mighty fascist there, Adolf.

    6. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you also shed a tear every day for buggy manufacturers and horse whip makers? Their livelihood ripped right out from underneath them! Progress is so cruel!

      The fact is EVs would have been a thing a long time ago were it not for the intervention of the ruling monopolies of the time. Gas engines are a cancer that we've been forced to tolerate for too long.

    7. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You go! Comfort the comfortable, afflict the afflicted! Speak truth to the powerless!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "The rednecks will still be able to hoot and holler and do doughnuts in walmart parking lots at midnight."

      Ah, no. True independent four wheel drive and traction control is too easy to do with electrics. Sadly, soon not even the driving-a-front-wheel-drive-in-reverse doughnut truck will be viable.

    9. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by neiras · · Score: 1

      Congratulations for providing the least empathetic, ugly bigoted view of your fellow Americans on this thread. You, not them, are the problem.

      Wait... You want me to give the yokels consideration and empathy in a thread about yokels being inconsiderate assholes? Ha!

      No one but rednecks actually likes rednecks or thinks their way of life is worth preserving. They're tolerated because they are a source of cheap labor and easily-controlled, useful-idiot Republican taxpayers too stupid to realize they're being played. They also provide a market for expensive consumer credit and consume huge volumes of trash Chinese goods at insane markups. Smart people mine them for big money.

      They will be forced to adapt to new things, because they don't come up with anything new. They'll get over their egos and delusions of grandeur because they won't have a choice. And if they get the guns out and start acting like Afghani warlords, they'll get run over. No one will tolerate that shit.

    10. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sound completely reasonable. not surprised people probably try to beat your ass every time you open your smug mouth. seriously, you sound like the type of incel that hates women too. good luck in life buddy.

    11. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by neiras · · Score: 1

      you sound completely reasonable. not surprised people probably try to beat your ass every time you open your smug mouth. seriously, you sound like the type of incel that hates women too. good luck in life buddy.

      Nobody tries to "beat my ass" when I open my mouth, because I don't associate with lowlifes like yourself, Mr. Anonymous Coward.

      I understand that it might be a bit of an eye-opener for you to discover that the broskis with their brewskis aren't actually considered kings among men by the rest of civil society. Happy to educate you.

      While we're at it, here are some relevant tips on the correct use of capital letters when writing in the English language.

      Hope that helps!

  101. Typical Trump-trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like attacking a minority for no real reason.

  102. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I doubt it, at least until the uber-Troll-in-Chief goes off to prison and we stop ALLOWING the Republican faggots to gaslight the rest of America with their anti-science, anti-education, anti-law, anti-professional regime.

    So you're half right, you just don't know how to point out the elephant in the room like it requires to be acknowledged and dealt with.

  103. Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Amiably agree to just split, no civil war necessary. The middle and the South get their "news" from Fox, Breitbart, and AM pundits; and thus have a completely different view of gov't and reality.

    Why keep clashing with them over pollution, healthcare, science, etc.? Just fucking split. Let them have their own reality to themselves.

    1. Re:Time to split the USA by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      So the "middle and South" do what they will to bring down environmental regulations to the point where they can manufacture and pollute as they like. What does the other half do about the environmental fallout created by their laissez faire approach?

    2. Re:Time to split the USA by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Nice try Ivan, but we see your bullshit a mile off. Your boss Putin would love to see that happen. We're all Americans, truck drivers or not. We have sympathy with our own people, especially when they get screwed over by events beyond their control.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Time to split the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and while we're at it, the clown president could sell California back to Mexico, and use the funds to builld his wall. He would get rid of alot of illegals and democrats in the process and finally fulfill his campaign promise.

    4. Re:Time to split the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, because left leaning outlets and ideology are so objective and unbiased.. you both deserve to be left on an island to squabble it out while what's left of the sane country repairs the damaged you both have caused..

    5. Re:Time to split the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahaha...ahh funny. You don't even believe what you wrote yourself do you? It's just wishful thinking. America is screwed.
      Divide and conquer. It's been used by the US government for more than a century to advance American interests. Now the chickens have finally come home to roost. The left and right hate each other more and more every day and with the echo chambers throughout the Internet filled with ideologues whipping each other up into a frenzy over every stupid issue it's just going to get worse and worse.
      Just looks at Slashdot these days. With even the most innocuous article, how long does it usually take for comments to descend into pro-Trump/anti-Trump bullshit, with both sides being so sure of their moral and intellectual superiority? It truly is glorious to behold.

    6. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What does the other half do about the environmental fallout created by their laissez faire approach?

      Sanction them.

    7. Re:Time to split the USA by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Your second sentence has it backwards. The "completely different view of gov't" was around before Fox, et al.

    8. Re:Time to split the USA by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't get all that high and mighty about who is the most polluting. Of the ten top polluted cities, CA has 8 and the other two are Phoenix and New York City.

      The only river I've ever seen on fire was in the upper east coast, not the middle or south.

    9. Re:Time to split the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Amiably agree to just split, no civil war necessary. The middle and the South get their "news" from Fox, Breitbart, and AM pundits

      This is how it looks if you ignore reality. But in fact, much of the south has become extremely progressive. Their votes are being miscounted or just made irrelevant (through gerrymandering) to keep the conservatives in charge, but several of those states (notably including Texas) would probably be blue today if not for gerrymandering. We need to pull through this thing together. Giving up on the union is what Putin wants. Don't be his useful idiot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re: Time to split the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. And then the beefier, tougher half comes about and kicks your delicate environmental-friendly ass all over the places and bashes your head in with a beer bottle. Brawns shits on brains any time.

    11. Re: Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We'll have more drones.

    12. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We need to pull through this thing together.

      We'll that's a great ideal, but if it continues to fail, we need to consider splitting.

    13. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      He would get rid of alot of illegals and democrats in the process

      The Wall won't stop illegals. Business has enjoyed their cheap labor and has legally bribed GOP to keep it coming. GOP has only given the issue lip service and punted when they have had a chance to change the flow.

    14. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, "Kick extremists on both sides out" may work if actually performed, but how would you pull that off? Splitting by geographical boundaries is usually much easier than splitting population by personality or beliefs.

    15. Re:Time to split the USA by Dusanyu · · Score: 1

      funny part is nobody know if this would happen in the Middle of the country yet, I live in Wisconsin and we don't have these Tesla charging things yet. or Tesla dealers but i have yet to see anyone "Roaling Coal" at Pedestrians, Cyclists or Prius drivers. to be honest people in the rural Midwest wold be to polite for this.

    16. Re:Time to split the USA by Dusanyu · · Score: 1

      And than they stop selling you food, you are aware that the area of the country you want to separate from is where all the Farms Food Production facilities are?

    17. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Why would they automatically want a trade war?

    18. Re:Time to split the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And than they stop selling you food, you are aware that the area of the country you want to separate from is where all the Farms Food Production facilities are?

      The food is produced in California. We produce far more than we need, and much of the acreage in the midwest is dedicated to export or fuel feedstock crops.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  104. Re: Good for them. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    You got me. The Russians have been on this account for more than 10 years, slowly building up an excellent karma record, all in pursuit of a fiendish conspiracy that ends with snarking at an Anonymous Coward. ;P

  105. RTFA by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and look at the pictures they took of the trucks doing it. Those aren't hillbilly trucks. In the first picture they were late models, MSRPs starting at $27k. The second picture it was 2 SUVs and 1 pickup with a pricey looking lift kit. Second pick somebody had the hood popped and was working on something, so it mighta just been somebody who had a breakdown, first picture looked legit though and it's probably just middle class blue collar guys pissed off at the elites they keep hearing about on Fox News or one of Sinclair media's Fox News wannabes.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neither picture is 'legit' (use of the space by the trucks). they are parked in spaces reserved for drivers of tesla vehicles to use privately funded charging stations, for which tesla has lease on the private property for or has contracted with the land owner for the exclusive use of the space.

      not having trump bumper stickers, confederate flags, or gun racks in the window doesn't mean they aren't inbred morons. just the fact they have nothing better to do than real life trolling of tesla owners says more than enough.

  106. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    pretty much all of those "foreign cars" are made in america dumbass

  107. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gas? Would you like to rethink your post?

  108. Tesla is the 1st American car company I'm proud of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla is the first American car company that I can be proud of. I never felt pride toward GM nor Ford nor Chrysler, but I feel proud of Tesla.

    These coal-rolling assholes should perhaps stop dedicating themselves to pollution and contempt, and think of Tesla as the vanguard of American automotive ingenuity.

  109. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would depress Tesla stock as it would increase the supply of used Teslas on the market (the Tesla owners who get a life without possibility of parole will have to sell their Teslas as they will have nowhere to store them) and cut back on new car sales (when the last Tesla owner goes to prison for life, there's no fan boys to buy a new Tesla).

  110. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think rural whites are bad, wait until you see what happens when the pet immigrants and n-ggers you're going to "replace" us with become the majority and go off your plantation. They'll be spilling blood in the streets. You'll wish it was just good-'ol-boy Joe 6-pack in his pickup truck you had to deal with.

  111. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't drop the soap (unless you live in a state with the death penalty -- I think most death row inmates don't take showers with other inmates).

  112. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, this is definitely worth murder.

  113. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These North Carolina pickup drivers really took the time and effort to block Tesla drivers from charging their cars?
    Don't these pickup truck drivers have anything better to do, like impregnating their sisters/daughters/mothers? I mean, it is the South, after all.

  114. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well how are we supposed to be aware of them if they keep it secret?

  115. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're generous in what you count as a subsidy, you get maybe $10B. In the meantime, people pay $40B in federal gas taxes and another $70B in State gas taxes at the pump every year. That's not a government subsidy, that's $100B in extra taxes on gas other products don't have to deal with.

  116. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see any reason to be so personal or vengeful on the attacks. Tesla runs on electricity, which can be made with many things, including coal. That is not the choice Tesla owners get to make. Tesla owners get to make the choice of not having to decide what form of energy to use, and at over 100 MPGe, they are using a lot less of whatever it is.

    If you get in a Tesla, and put your foot on the accelerator, you have to like what happens next, it is pretty awesome. And if you are somehow tied to ICE engines financially, you have to worry about what happens next. There are few and declining reasons to cling to a gasoline car for the vast majority of the population.

    Now if it's Tesla in particular they loathe, take the trucks out of the EV charge slots, which is inevitably going to result in a lot of fines and impound fees, and fund an EV car company that makes a cheaper car. I do not think Tesla's place in the automotive universe is certain. They make the best product, but they're up against an industry that knows how to make "just good enough" into a weapon, and they're still at a price point which isn't attainable to the masses.

  117. Re:Bullshit by SirSlud · · Score: 1

    being subsidized should be familiar to lots of people outside of major urban areas

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  118. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capitalism is the reason people have to live in fear of losing a job. Socialism would prevent this.

  119. That's why airports use nipple rings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to drag jumbo jets around to taxi....

    The morons complaining at teslas are trash and since they are an existential threat and the USA has in many states laws allowing you to protect yourself from aggression with lethal force, they should be removed for the general public safety.

    If this causes the police some worry, just take some boot polish to the rednecks' faces and blacken them up, the police won't give a shit then.

  120. What facts and evidence, flattards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "facts" are bullshit and irrelevant. It's a fact that the year is longer than 360 days, but such facts, despite scaring you shitless, is rather irrelevant.

  121. Republican snowflakes taught us all they know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And now that the rednecsk are being treated as they treat others,suddenly it's mean.... right....

  122. Those taxes are PAYMENT FOR THE OIL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moron. What do you think sets the price of oil? The government would do it if they demanded a payment in flat currency for the oil, since that would be the base price for sale of that oil. So the government is not doing that, they charge a tax to pay for the resource that the companies took from the public. That way the market finds the "market price" without government intervention.

    Fucking clueless libertard moron.

  123. Faith by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    Seems like conservatives don't actually have faith in the free market. If they really believed electric will fail, why intervene?

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    1. Re:Faith by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Seems like conservatives don't actually have faith in the free market. If they really believed electric will fail, why intervene?

      You don't even understand the argument. They believe the free market WOULD do those things, but that it's being interfered with by EV subsidies. Then you tell them about fossil fuel subsidies (both literal and indirect) and they change the subject because they willfully refuse to permit any new information to enter their head and shake things up. Learning makes them uncomfortable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Faith by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      But you just argued my point. If they did believe in free market, they would argue against fossil fuel subsidies. But they support them because they know free markets don't actually work.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    3. Re:Faith by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      But you just argued my point. If they did believe in free market, they would argue against fossil fuel subsidies.

      I think the intent of their comment was to point out that most people don't actually believe there are subsidies supporting the fossil fuel industry.

    4. Re:Faith by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's true. I think they pretend not to believe, but they excuse themselves internally. They're allowed to have subsidies because they naturally deserve it, but everyone else must play by the rules.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  124. Yeah maybe they keep hearing by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    How we have been killing the planet and how it triggers more and more disasters that will kill us all off
    https://ourworldindata.org/wp-...

  125. If it was me by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    If I needed to use the pumps and it was blocked, I would park in front of the truck so it cannot move. can't help it if the batteries died.

  126. Except that is a load of bollocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the entrances to Malls therefore ALSO possible to block? No. Because "it's muh prifate properly!!!" is a load of irrelevant bollocks.

  127. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Given how many charging stations are paid with public tax money - I'm quite all right with tax payers blocking chargers and preventing their tax money from being wasted on some asshole's car.

    Given how many roads are paid with public tax money - I'm quite all right with tax payers blocking roads and preventing their tax money from being wasted on some asshole's truck...

    Given how many schools are paid with public tax money - I'm quite all right with tax payers blocking entrances and preventing their tax money from being wasted on some asshole's kids...

    Given how many hospitals are paid with public tax money - I'm quite all right with tax payers blocking the emergency entrance and preventing their tax money from being wasted on some asshole's heart attack...

    > Don't forget that Teslas are partially paid for with our tax money, and those chargers are also subsidized with our tax money, for a service almost no one can use.

    Subsidies are also given to companies that extract dino bones and convert them to fuel. Anyone who demands Tesla should receive no subsidies should also demand that the oil companies likewise receive no subsidies.

  128. Re:Speak a language they can understand by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Good luck in court with that one you macho douche

  129. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny thing is those same people putting their own personal progress against that of the human race. Funny how the same group of people are among the bible belt's 'finest'. These people need to unfuck themselves and go find a job that actually works in the 21st century.

  130. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So hard right now..

  131. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They think dumb ol' fire is better than harnessed LIGHTNING that electric cars use.

    Electric has Speed, Power, Focus; combustion based cars are for little old ladies for whom 0-60 time doesn't matter, because they never reach it.

  132. give me steam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Block the pickup with a steam tractor.

  133. Re:Speak a language they can understand by spongman · · Score: 1, Troll

    drunk rednecks vs. faggots. pistols at dawn!

  134. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And every dictator breathes air, so according to your logic you should stop that

  135. Re:Bullshit by spongman · · Score: 1

    maryland only has one coal-fired power station.

  136. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about using your Tesla Flamethrower?

  137. Re:Speak a language they can understand by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, Tesla owners have phased plasma rifles in the 40 watt range. At least the ones in the early-experience program do.

  138. Fairly straightforward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla announced self-driving electric semis a while ago. Many of them are on the hook for debt on their trucks. Many truckers get into the business because they don't perceive many other options for jobs they're qualified for. So when a company announces they plan on replacing you, your truck, and their primary source of income

    I dunno. Maybe you take it personally? Productive? Maybe not. But when you don't feel you have other options, one of the points of public protest is to bring media attention to the issue. They don't have polished PR staff on retainer, so there you go. They are getting media attention. Maybe a reporter will have a slow news day and run what's going on in their minds. Maybe they'll have a good point, maybe not. That's how this works.

  139. What are their reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a few occurrences so obviously it is some sort of local grudge. The list of possible ways the Tesla owners could have ticked someone off is too long spend time on. Just call the cops or the media and cause a scene, then we'll know what dickhead action the Tesla drivers did to tick them off and it will get some national publicity.

  140. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    > think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to
    > the jobs

    BFD. To use the buzzword... cloud computing posed a "very real threat" to traditional "rack 'em & stack 'em"-style IT & operations jobs. In fact, it basically killed them; unless you want to be a datacenter tech for Amazon or Google. But who cares? We all just learned our ways around AWS, GCP, and Terraform. Problem solved. Hell... I call it an improvement. I'd not realized, before updating my own skill set, how much Id grown to view mucking about with hardware to be the least-fulfilling and most-annoying part of the job.

    It's not, after all, like Teslas never break down or malfunction. The skillset needed when the do is simply different; that's all. It's not like mechanics, and the like, can afford not to keep their skills up already. Working on a modern Mercedes turbo-diesel is a far different deal from keeping a '95 Civic on the road. Moving up to a Tesla is just the next step up or right on the skills tree.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  141. I think they are building a wall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably wanted to do it near the border, but don't get good enough gas mileage to get that far.

  142. Re:Speak a language they can understand by basecastula+ · · Score: 2

    Hit TV show right there.

  143. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subsidies are also given to companies that extract dino bones and convert them to fuel. Anyone who demands Tesla should receive no subsidies should also demand that the oil companies likewise receive no subsidies.

    Fortunately most of the subsidies are expiring and a lot of the charging stations are being converted to pay stations because as it turns out no one likes subsidizing cars that are worse for the environment than regular gasoline powered cars just to sooth some rich asshole's ego.

  144. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, just ignore the inconvenient truth that the definition of "mental health" is inherently political; and that diagnosis of "mental illness" has been used to suppress political dissent by many different tyrannical regimes.

  145. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truck driver: "Shuddup idjit."
    Corolla owner: (chokes on his own teeth)

  146. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jackass, meet jackass.

  147. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a racist, classist Corporate Progressive asshole. You live in some human sewer suburb, and have never actually spoken to a "redneck" in your whole life.

  148. When was the last time you did donuts somewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hint for you: Unless you strip your license plates and wear a baklava first, expect that a security camera somewhere nearby will identify you, and your car, and either they will set up a sting, or just send you a ticket in the mail, like they already do with red light tickets.

    The era of doing anything unnoticed in public in America is rapidly coming to a close. The security apparatus has too much of a hardware for pervasive surveillance, and the common pleb too little understanding of just how much longer it will take to roll it out everywhere of (economic) importance eventually including areas of economic importance to citation writing, at which point everything you do, saw, or enjoy will be taxed mercilessly with no way out except emigration or suicide. And they may take emigration away from you if you're not careful.

  149. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Barsteward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    unfortunately there are far too many irresponsible gun owners out there with shit for brains

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  150. Re:Bullshit by Barsteward · · Score: 2

    they are "smug" because they have an EV? that chip on your shoulder must be getting heavy.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  151. Re:Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    are you mentally old enough to drive?

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  152. Re: Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 2

    "f it's their tax money being wasted on some asshole Tesla driver." how does that compare to all the tax money being used to prop up a dying industry from the 2 centuries ago?

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  153. Re: Speak a language they can understand by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Certainly strong enough to cause some serious paint damage on those pickup trucks. That's not a suggestion, by the way, wink wink...

  154. Re:Speak a language they can understand by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Yep, it's one of the referral benefits. You need about a hundred referrals if I'm not mistaken.

  155. Re: Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    Step 6: work out how to simulate an EV for the data connection handshake with charger

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  156. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially not a Tesla flamethrower

  157. Troglodytes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, Luddites (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite)

  158. Re:Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    the mistake you are making is that you are expecting these few childish truckers to be logical or thoughtful, its hard for them when they are so racked with jealousy of someone having a more than them.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  159. Re:Bullshit by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    The tax subsidies are actually hurting Tesla right now. They are being phased out (cut in half from january onwards, and going down further later on) while remaining in full effect for many others.

    (GM's will be cut in half next quarter, too)

  160. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not about liberal vs conservative. It's about class. These are a bunch of working class boys protesting against rich, effete pricks.

  161. Re: Speak a language they can understand by vux984 · · Score: 1

    "the definition of "mental health" is inherently political"

    I guess we can just make stuff up, and declare it is a fact.

    "diagnosis of "mental illness" has been used to suppress political dissent by many different tyrannical regimes."

    Some people are dangerous, unstable, and crazy regardless of who is in charge.

  162. Stupid Trump-voters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you expect?

  163. An interesting question: by drolli · · Score: 1

    Is there anything in the terms when buying a Tesla which allows Tesla to run a license-plate scanner in every Tesla car looking for these people (which may owe them compensation for using the charger station without being a customer)? - I am not suggesting they should do it, but could they?

  164. Scratch the pick-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If word gets out that trucks parked there are frequently getting scratched or otherwise damaged, this trend will stop quickly.

  165. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds just like High School. Nerds getting harassed by bullies.
    Tesla really needs to make a pick up truck with twice the torque of a Cummins Diesel and make it larger than any big three truck. That will really confuse them.

  166. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let him take the test, or assessment, or whatever, before he takes your opinion.

  167. Re: Speak a language they can understand by mukinrestak · · Score: 1

    Much like Islam, redneck is not a race. He's a bigot, and probably a classist, but we've seen no evidence of racism.

  168. Land of the free by k2r · · Score: 2

    home of the stupid bullies.

    Trump as a President fits perfectly.

    1. Re:Land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sugar in the gas tank is a quick fix for their bullshit, Have them towed as well to add even more to the cost of getting their POS truck back.

  169. Re:Bullshit by mukinrestak · · Score: 2

    One of the lesser known functions of the highway system is for national defense. It's not just about civilian shit.

    Also, those non-urban areas have people that pay their taxes just like the urban areas.

    Also, again, those highways to nowhere are what connect your urban areas together so you can move between them, and connect farms to your grocery stores so you have food to eat.

  170. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redneck is a racist remark, dipshit. Black people don't turn red when working in the sun.

  171. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol as usual libtards always revert back to insults when there arguments fail. Sure sign of losers!

  172. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what you are saying is that all of history can be viewed through the lens of class struggle?

  173. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My custom Raptor would cost upwards of $150k if you kitted it out from scratch today. In this case I am the rich guy and the teslatards are the lowers eho couldnt afford an actually cool ride.

  174. I don't think it's our Slashdot Tesla haters by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    They don't strike me as being a trucking demographic, but more of a mom's basement demographic.

    The pickup protesters in the story probably see a row of EV charger parking spaces as being "stolen" from them. It's the same people who resent seeing handicapped spaces. The boutique mall next to me now has a row of ten Tesla spaces, off to one side so there is less conflict with the ICE population.

  175. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The right-wing in the USA operates under a lot of myths that they tell themselves about the other side. One thing they believe is that if it ever "came down to it" their side would obviously win in any kind of civil war that they like to fantasize about.

    It's because they operate under the belief that they must be an entirely homogenous group so the other side must be as well. Since they perceive the "typical" left-winger as some kind of weak willed pansy they assume they must all be like that.

    Which as an aside, a right-wing myth is in play with the gov't shutdown as well, which is the right-wing pushes the narrative that almost all gov't employees are democrats that are leaching off their tax dollars when the reality is the gov't employees are split much in the same proportions as the rest of the country, about 30% republican, about 30% democrat, and the rest independents.

    You also see it in rhetoric about who receives gov't social welfare benefits. They love to present the myth of them all being inner city and minority when the reality is that there are more rural whites receiving social welfare benefits than city minorities.

    But back to my original point, one myth they love is that republicans surely have all the guns and make up all the military and law enforcement when the reality is that an estimated 45% of guns are in the hands of democrats and that while it's true republicans have a majority in military and law enforcement, it's only a little more than half.

    In spite of what the NRA likes to push there are loads of gun owners and enthusiasts who see no issue with some common sense regulation around guns, and that's not just democrat gun owners but republicans as well.

  176. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Tesla owners have laser pistols.

    No, they have Musk flamethrowers. Just the thing to use on vehicles containing gas tanks.

  177. Fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the glitter bomb guy, fake as fuck. And all of you people fall for it over and over again. It's no wonder what passes for reality TV.

  178. 200% Increase In The Last 6 Months Alone!!1111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much more quickly do you need it to be?

    This is a global disaster in the making!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  179. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next civil war wont be north vs south. It will be on twitter.

  180. Shipping. Isn't. Profitable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truck drivers and shipping operators are a dying industry that does nothing but create losses for shareholders and should honestly be replaced with robots

    Seriously, check the stock of any shipping company. Nearly all of them have lost 90+% of their value decades ago, never recovered, and continue just forever sliding downwards.

    One of the largest US freight companies YRCW's stock used to be ~$250,000/share. It's now $3.58/share

  181. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    LOLOL You're a posing liar. Great preening though.

  182. The Argument for Eugenics by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

    I realize that this is a touchy subject, but can we please agree that anyone who deliberately tunes their truck so that it will produce more pollution so that they can show off for other intelligence-challenged individuals should lose their reproductive rights? And preferably, their reproductive organs? As a diesel owner, they make me look bad. As a human, they make us all look bad. Plus, I like breathing, and they're spewing HCs which interfere with that.

    Coal-rollers are the lowest form of vehicle owner.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  183. brownshirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't get why they are writing "Juden" storefronts. What do they think that is going to accomplish?

  184. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been coal rolled just for walking on the sidewalk. Fuck anyone who feels the need to do this.

  185. all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man, if only they could write, they could have just written a sign that says "tesla, when are we gonna get electrical trucks!?" and all this misjudgment could have been avoided ...

  186. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a gun owner and concealed carry permit holder in Pennsylvania, you are completely wrong. Anything other than an immediate life-or-death situation is not a justification for brandishing weapons or threatening death. If I had a Tesla and someone was yelling at me while blocking the charging station, I'd leave the area and call the police regardless of if I was carrying or not.

  187. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ever eat any food? Where'd it come from dumb fuck? Your entire urban existence is subsidized.

  188. Re:Speak a language they can understand by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Stop talking, thank you e-tough who we all know is not. We know you.

    We know you too, Anonymous Coward. Run along now, and play with the other cowards.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  189. Re: Speak a language they can understand by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Beware of the person with a single firearm ... and keeps it a secret.

    Maybe. If it's a big secret, how much range time is he getting?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  190. Most stations go to waste here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the Midwest, and one major supermarket has like a dozen Tesla charging stations. I have yet to see one EV use one, but I have seen plenty of people call them out as a waste on money and space. Most people who really need trucks to do work and haul stuff won't ever buy a Tesla pickup. Not because they don't embrace all electric. But I have not seen any argument that a Tesla pickup really can do what the others can.

  191. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You also see it in rhetoric about who receives gov't social welfare benefits. They love to present the myth of them all being inner city and minority when the reality is that there are more rural whites receiving social welfare benefits than city minorities."

    I have seen this tripe before, so, once again: Not as a percentage by race. Just because there are substantially more white people, the net number will be larger, but not the percentage.

    Blacks 41.6%
    Whites 13.2%
    https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-97.html

  192. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, he's right. Mental illnesses do actually exist, but deciding where to draw boundaries on them depends on the society in which they occur, and is related to the consensus over what's considered acceptable - which is a means to control who is listened to politically. Medicalization of dissent was a real thing under the USSR, because hey, what human being doesn't have the "simple empathy for other humans" to want Communism, right?

    Anyhow, Leftists still talk like that, anti-guns tend to make laws that criminalize self-defense, anti-guns demand more gun laws even when the laws they demand already exist, etc.

    So he's not wrong to be concerned about it.

  193. Re: Speak a language they can understand by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    "diagnosis of "mental illness" has been used to suppress political dissent by many different tyrannical regimes."

    Some people are dangerous, unstable, and crazy regardless of who is in charge.

    You're both right. And sometimes, someone dangerous, unstable, and crazy is in charge...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  194. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when you are unfriendly to regime, they decide you have new job, working in rock-breaking camp! Truly, glories of socialism are magnificent, comrade.

  195. All I can say is this: by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    if the bros driving those trucks were real men they would have backed into the spaces. What sort of truck driving sissy parks a truck nose in?
    They should all be driving Priuses.

  196. Paid by Mush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably paid by El Mush to get some media attraction.

  197. Finally by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    Instead of traitorous slime like Soros paying "protestors" and "instigators" there's some red-blooded Americans like Ford doing it.

  198. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And buffoons who block Telsa charging stations with pickup trucks only understand machoeize.

    Calling the cops translates to "I'm scared and can't stand up for myself" in "machoeize". These buffoons see the law as macho, but those who call on the law do so because they are not macho.

    The buffoons are challenging the Teslas to prove that a Telsa is macho. That Tesla owners are macho. That owning a Tesla is macho. Everything must be established as either macho, the "domain of men", or not macho.

    Star Trek Discovery expressed it thusly, send them a "Vulcan Hello".

  199. Good for the goose, good for the gander by tomhath · · Score: 2

    "...if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” - Maxine Waters

    "at a gasoline station"...hmmm? Maybe it isn't a good idea to incite that kind of activity.

  200. Nuke it from orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knuckle-dragging redneck blocks Tesla charging stall with his giant metallic penis extension.

    Tesla owner makes call to MuskCorp customer services.

    A few minutes later, a tungsten rod drops from orbit, straight through the engine block of the offending pickup. The sad wrecked remains of the pickup are then towed to the impound.

    Do not fuck with the customers of a guy who has his own space program.

  201. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First intelligent/funny comment , congrats!

  202. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The spilling needs to hurry the fuck up. The less of you dumbass whiteys the better. You're dragging us ALL down, idiots.

  203. Re: Speak a language they can understand by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    It won't confuse anyone. An electric truck would have to be that big in order to have enough battery to do a full day's work for a regular truck.

  204. Re:Bullshit by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't bother. I know his type. They think milk comes out of a milk carton, cereal comes out of a cereal box, and that it's possible to live in 70 degree comfort year round at 45 degrees north with solar panels and AA batteries.

  205. Elon Musk can tackle this by conoviator · · Score: 1

    Musk is nothing if not clever and audacious. I'm sure he's designing a whiz-bang death-ray module for the Tesla that will handle these yahoos quite well. Of course, the unintended consequences may get out of hand.

  206. "Rolling Coal" Shit-Bags be Damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone "Rolling Coal" should be drug from their vehicle and have the face smashed in with a claw hammer until the pea-sized piece of shit in their skull they call a brain is smooshed over a 100 square foot area.

    Brought to you by:

    Gerald E. Butler
    2807 Summit Road
    Copley, Ohio 44321

    Come tell me I'm wrong bitches!

  207. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you suggesting that the quintessential Macho Tesla owner should just walk up to the dipshit's window and say GTFO? If not, please elaborate on how one should reply in kind to a diesel coal-blowing asshat.

  208. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nearly all solar panel installations that don't have a battery are directly feeding the grid that everyone is pulling from. Do your research next time.

  209. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rolling coal at people is an assault

  210. Everyone wins! by Socguy · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why these folks are upset. Tesla's are made in America... so... jobs... and If EV's ever gain significant market share, the price of gas will plummet. They can fuel their trucks at rock bottom prices!

  211. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And didn't need a fucking bale out.

  212. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I donâ(TM)t think that word means what you think it means.

  213. Re:Just have them towed. - Already been done by mspohr · · Score: 1
    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  214. Re:Speak a language they can understand by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    They aren't protesting anything. They are just being jackasses. I think the pickups should be crushed into little cubes. It would not particularly upset me if the owners were inside during the operation.

    Ah, the good old "pressing arrangement"...

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  215. Re:Just have them towed. - Tesla wins here by mspohr · · Score: 1
    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  216. Relevant Laws by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to the states that have laws covering this:

    https://pluginsites.org/plug-i...

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  217. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    Oh modded down, sorry, did I upset some jackass "I hate cities, I'm not sure why, but Daddy said urban places suck and are full of criminals" moderator?

    Because fuck you if that's the case. You shitheads are literally why we can't have nice things in this country. You're why our taxes are through the roof yet we get virtually nothing in services. You're why everyone has to spend a third of their income on a little metal prison on wheels that we have to spend an hour or two a day in playing the fucking game of "Try not to get killed while keeping this thing between two white lines". Fuck you.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  218. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    One of the lesser known functions of the highway system is for national defense. It's not just about civilian shit.

    This is true in every single country in the world. So what?

    Also, those non-urban areas have people that pay their taxes just like the urban areas.

    On what planet does this justify running down cities and preventing them from having their transportation needs met? You even admit yourself that urban people pay taxes - yet you seriously argue that only non-urban transportation should get adequate funding? REALLY?

    Also, again, those highways to nowhere are what connect your urban areas together so you can move between them, and connect farms to your grocery stores so you have food to eat.

    Who argued there should be no rural roads?

    Your entire rant at me is because I dared mention that we overspend on rural roads while we don't meet the needs of cities. You're pretending that this means I argued that all rural roads should be closed. Are you fucking kidding me? Are you seriously that fucking stupid?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  219. Fighting the future for no damned good reason by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    This is utter stupidity. What are they thinking? Are they thinking that pickup trucks are going to become obsolete or somesuch nonsense? LOL, no, pickup trucks will remain a staple of transportation because of their utility. Let's see how upset these pickup truck owners are when Tesla or some company that comes later starts rolling out full-size plug-in electric pickup trucks that have more horsepower than even the largest V8 ICE pickup truck has right now? That they can then have a high-capacity charging post installed at their house and not ever have to go to a gas station again? If they really want the roaring of a big internal-combustion engine to feel manly they can install a sound system to simulate it, I guess, but really, what's the problem? Nobody is going to take their trucks away from them. They can still have rifle racks in the back window and a Confederate flag flying from it all they want, huge offroad tires and jacked up all they want.

  220. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    You deduced all that because I observed that we overspend on rural roads and that cities don't get their transportation needs met, huh?

    I've lived in two countries, in both rural and non-rural areas. Policies that run down cities and force people to live outside of them are fucking stupid. People who demonize those who live in urban areas, such as the original poster, are part of the problem. You're part of the problem. YOU ARE WHY THE COST OF LIVING IS SKY HIGH IN THE UNITED STATES. Go fuck yourself.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  221. See what happens when cousins marry? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    I'm disappointed to see some support expressed here for these drooling morons. This is the right wing base in all its hideous glory. These pickup drivers deserve nothing but our disgust and contempt, and maybe a week in jail with nothing to read but math and science text books.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  222. Re: Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    Wonder why the cost of food in Britain is about half the cost of the same food in the United States, despite the fact that the EU's "subsidies" to rural areas are nowhere near as extreme.

    Oh, I know, it's because American subsidies are fucking stupid and are largely used to fund the lifestyles of white flighters, not to reduce the cost of food. People who live in cities don't generally benefit from the subsidies, in fact, between being taxed more than they would otherwise be, and their lack of services, those subsidies harm them.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  223. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans, who feel that their work depends on trucks, cars, vehicle repair, oil, oil equipment, coal, scrap yards, etc, etc.

    That's just junk.

    Cars have little to do with coal,

    That is especially the case today, when Tesla has been publicizing the success of their SELF-DRIVING electric SEMI-trucks.

    So? So has Ford. And a bunch of truck companies. Self driving vehicles are coming this is essentially inevitable and has nothing to do with vehicles being electric. All the major manufacturers are exploring the tech. So why target tesla?

    They even have a standing order for HUNDREDS of these new trucks from Walmart, rural America's love/hate store/employer.

    so why the anger at Tesla not Walmart?

    Tesla says that in a convoy, they are more energy efficient than trains.

    Smells like BS from Tesla to me.

    Its a fundamental part of American culture, and it doesn't escape these people that Tesla's development poses a tangible threat to that way of life.

    Rubbish. The inexorable march of technology, combined wit hcapitalism is the threat here and it's coming for good or ill. It's happening with or without Tesla, and I doubt tesla is affecting the overall timescale.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  224. No information on reactions of owners by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    No information how the situation was resolved.

    Call the police, tow the trucks?

    As for somebody yelling on your on the road: this is pretty much what road is for: for rage.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  225. Re:Speak a language they can understand by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    I'm flattered you have such fantasies about me, twink.

  226. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even in California, coal is producing the electricity those Tesla chargers are using. I doubt there are nearly as many Tesla owners living off-grid as there are truck owners. You buy a Tesla for appearances and to make a personal statement about yourself, not to help the planet. Folks that want to help the planet find better ways to do it than owning an expensive sports car.

  227. Classy fzxors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Louisiana Redneck IT dude, and I think this "Rolling Coal" bullshit is just stupid, childish, counter-productive to even their own arguments, and just plain fukkin DUMB.

    Us real Southernn men are sorry for all the low-class scumbags out there making us look bad...

  228. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put out several inflatable women dolls by the entrance to the charging station. The rednecks will get distracted and stop blocking access to the station.

  229. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is mostly irrelevant since we don't yet produce enough solar power for it to make any difference. The fact is driving a Tesla adds to the demand for electricity and that extra demand almost always means more carbon being spewed into the atmosphere than the average truck does.

  230. Diesel pumps are fair game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time for Tesla drivers to park in front of Diesel pumps. Sucks since it'll affect me, but tit-for-tat bitches!

    1. Re:Diesel pumps are fair game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, they do it all the time. I've seen it more than once on hauling trips where a Tesla driver pulls in and parks in front of one of the usually few pumps at a gas station that has diesel.

      There I am pulling a trailer full of donated food for our local soup kitchen and some Tesla asshat ensures our local homeless and indigent population misses out on a meal by delaying the delivery of their food.

  231. Not in California, that's to be sure. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    Because it's illegal under California Motor Vehicle Code 22511 and 22511.1.

  232. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh - no. Most expensive highways serve urban areas. They go THROUGH rural areas, in much the same way they serve suburbs while going THROUGH inner city neighborhoods.

  233. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, it means less, as 100% of ices are less efficient than the current mix of electric production.

  234. Because it's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many comments, and only one with the right answer.

  235. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. And a well deserved mocking it is, too.

  236. Coal Miners Blocking Teslas Counter-Productive by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1

    Teslas need electricity which, in coal country, is generated by coal fired power plants. Gas cars, on the other hand, run on out-of-state oil. In other words, more Teslas mean more coal jobs.

    This is, on the other hand, a mildly counter-intuitive argument for why people in coal country who care about the environment should not currently buy Teslas.

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    1. Re:Coal Miners Blocking Teslas Counter-Productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't go that deep. These pickup truck owners are conservatives illegally acting out at what they perceive to be liberal Tesla owners. It's as simple as that. Don't hope conservative pickup truck owners put any amount of thought, consistency or reason into what they do. Their psychology has one pedal to push, politics. Call law enforcement and have their vehicles towed. They learn quicker that way.

  237. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all of you libtards and deploribltards are going to learn to walk if you want a habitable world no cars planes boats .

  238. Rethuglicans loved using it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now theyre being the butt of those slurs, suddenly no longer so free speechy for it, are ya, moron?

    1. Re: Rethuglicans loved using it. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      Sorry to disappoint but I'm not a Republican, or a Democrat for that matter. Quite frankly I wish all you extremists, left and right, would take your hate and prejudice and fuck off.

  239. why they protest Tesla by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Had Tesla been a company just focused on making a better car, it would have been one thing. Sure, pack in all the tech you want - built in navigation, connection to CarPlay/Android Auto, rearview cameras, steering controls, et al. (OTOH, Tesla is the only car that commercial towing companies refuse to handle, since impossible to access the engine should the battery die. That's the moronic concept about basing all operations on batteries, rather than allowing for mechanically accessing, say, the hood.) But Tesla coming out w/ self driving cars - a solution looking for a problem, since most people enjoy driving their cars - is one more of those 'disruptive forces' that just threatens the livelihood of truckers - one of the biggest employers in the country, while having little to give for it.

    Yeah, over time, it's fine to assume that ultimately, self driving cars and trucks and planes and ships will be the norm, and that 50-100 years from now, no one will drive. However, to try and force that change now, which is what Musk, as well as companies like Uber and Lyft would love to do, only has major negative societal implications in terms of accelerating the hollowing out of the US, w/o having anything else to show for it.

    1. Re:why they protest Tesla by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I would submit that there's a huge difference between enjoying a... spirited, shall we say... drive down Skyline's curves & hills on your leisure time; versus a daily trudge down 101 for work. The former, yes, I enjoy it greatly. The latter? If my commute included, in any capacity, the misery that is a peninsula commute on 101; I'd be pinching every penny to get myself into an autopilot-equipped Tesla.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    2. Re:why they protest Tesla by mcvos · · Score: 1

      But Tesla coming out w/ self driving cars - a solution looking for a problem, since most people enjoy driving their cars

      I would love to have a self-driving car. The main downside to traveling by car compared to train or other public transit, is that I can't read while driving.

  240. Are woo twiggered, snowflake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a tesla charging station. Why would the owner of it want tesla owners to piss off you retarded redneck kidfucker??

    1. Re:Are woo twiggered, snowflake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To put Tesla faggots in their place.

  241. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill yourself, cuck.

  242. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually, there aren't substantially more larger white people. That's becoming less and less true each day. Non Hispanic whites account for 61%. So not substantially more people as you suggest.

    Also where did you find that 13% number for whites. I didn't see that on the citation you listed. Only that 41% of the black population in any given month.

  243. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REI is in for sure then.

  244. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm the Wikipedia article says you are wrong.

  245. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WhT?

  246. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you elaborate on why they are the reason housing cost so much? I'm not seeing the correlation.

  247. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OP is a conservative.

    Your mind === blown.

    Kabooom.

  248. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When whose argument fails?

  249. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their trucks likely cost just as much, if not more, than most Tesla's.

    Your angle on the story is wrong, you are looking at it from a Tesla fanboy point of view. Go back and check the reddit thread, it's fake. They cropped the images to hide all the pumps that were open. This is manufactured outrage. There were 3 people taking up 2-3 pumps. Big fucking deal.

    Why are you so scared of the past?

  250. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you agree that more social welfare money is spent on rural whites? Because that is what he is saying, and it's true. Any cuts to social benefits hurt more rural white people than city minorities.

  251. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that guy - he's a weirdo who pretends he's hanging out with his sister even though she's nowhere to be seen.

  252. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EXACTLY! if they are made in the USA, didnt need a bailout, and dont suck ass.. why does GM/Chrysler and Ford SUCK?

    Why do you need to get to number 7 before any of the "big three" even show up on the list?

  253. That's what a fag would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were caught i front of "friends" who he pretends to be straight in front of. See Ted Haggard. The most desperate for pork whistle are those most vocally against "teh gayz".

  254. Remember this when advocating policy. by couchslug · · Score: 0

    Coal supporters are perfectly represented by these white trash. The sooner they lose their jobs the better. They wish to kill us indirectly by pollution so they deserve the same level of hate in return.

    Remember them when Trump is gone and the GOP weakened.
    Remember they despise logic, reason and anyone not white.
    Remember they serve the Koch brothers.
    Remember they oppose net neutrality.
    Remember they approve of police brutality.
    Remember they drink beer while supporting cannabis prohibition.
    Remember they approve of lynching.
    Remember everything they want done to you if you aren't Christian Taliban.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  255. Yeah, but the hicks need strength to do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they're frankly a load of pussies. Ol bonespurs himself is an honorary hillbilly. Show the hillbilly a black skin and they're too busy crapping their pants that your empty hand is holding a nuke detonator or some shit.

  256. Video: Linux and license revocation, in American. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video: Linux and license revocation, in American.

    We have noticed that many of you have rejected
    the very idea of waddling through long written
    soliloquies on the subject.

    So, the information in a format that is more
    accessible to you has been prepared.

    Video: openload.co/f/mT_AH3xmIUM/TruthAboutLinuxandGPLv2__.mp4
    Audio: ufile.io/sdhpl

    Enjoy.

  257. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stereotype much?

    You might want to associate with others outside your personal echo chamber, I know several Tesla owners and they all have concealed carry permits.

  258. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt it, at least until the uber-Troll-in-Chief goes off to prison and we stop ALLOWING the Republican faggots to gaslight the rest of America with their anti-science, anti-education, anti-law, anti-professional regime.

    So you're half right, you just don't know how to point out the elephant in the room like it requires to be acknowledged and dealt with.

    The absolute dip shitery in this MONUMENTAL.

  259. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably meaning âoegenerally a secretâ. Range goers rarely talk about firearms outside certain circles and most outsiders (ie, rest of the world) would never have an idea of the level of expertise involved. Firearms owners tend to prefer to keep it that way.

  260. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 1

    I'm a suburbanite and I've been driving a hybrid Camry since 2007 and I like it.
    But I don't think that insulting these truck owners (or vice versa) is going to help anybody.

    Screw that. I'm a suburbanite and I drive an F150. These guys are the same jackasses that terrorized all of the other kids in high school. Our society would be better off if we passed laws that made engaging in this kind of behavior punishable by permanently removing them from the gene pool.

  261. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Tesla owners don't pay their fair share. They are freeloading on the roads using electricity which doesn't pay a road tax.

  262. Premium Parking Spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want Tesla stations blocked, then don't make premium parks Tesla stations. Put them at the far end of the car park and no-one will care, but when they're in prime positions, some people will object to others being able to buy privileges like a closer park. If you think that buying electric entitles you to privileges like this for your environmental sacrifice, you're part of the problem. Not everyone can afford, or is willing to go into debt for a Tesla.

  263. Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are blocking a parking place. If they wanted to be nasty they could:

    Drop a case of screws in the charging spot.
    Use a nail gun and drive a nail through a charging cable.
    Take bolt cutters to charging cable.
    Leave dead animals in charging spot.
    Leave bear bait in a charging spot.
    Pull the meter on the charging station and throw it in the river.

    I'd say these people who do the real hard work in America are showing real restraint against mamby pampy Millennials and global warming alarmists. It wouldn't be hard to attack Tesla infrastructure because it has to be safe and not kill people who play with it. I bet vice grips to the end of the charging plug would do serious damage.

    So take the roll coaling and the ICEing of your spots and wear them with a badge of honor, or alpha males will take it up a level.

  264. I'd happily block these fuckers in with my truck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Referring to the people doing the ICING. I'll ICE the ICErs.

    My trucks got like 160k miles on it anyway. I could care less if it gets dented (again).

  265. Re: Speak a language they can understand by vux984 · · Score: 1

    "Nah, he's right. Mental illnesses do actually exist, but deciding where to draw boundaries on them depends on the society in which they occur, and is related to the consensus over what's considered acceptable - which is a means to control who is listened to politically."

    The fool claimed it was justifiable to murder people who blocked an entrance to telsa charger, because he felt that amounted to a threat to his life.

    I don't think where we settle in a nuanced discussion on where to draw the line between bona fide mental illness and the politicization of mental illness is the issue.

  266. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "there are more rural whites receiving social welfare benefits than city minorities"

    the net number [of rural whites] will be larger

    Which is the very claim OP made, so why go on about "percentage by race?!" How is that relevant? It might be if the argument were about widespread racial discrimination in employment, but it isn't from the point of view of government expenditure, which was OP's point. So what actually is the point are you trying to make, what's your motivation here?

  267. Why is this news? by adfraggs · · Score: 1

    A small number of asshats behaving like asshats shouldn't be news. We're making far too big a deal out of this and giving the asshats far too much publicity. I'd put this up there with a situation like a handful of errant teenagers loitering around a gas station making it an unpleasant situation for motorists to gas up. People are, and will continue to be, douche bags. Someone will inevitably not like what you're doing with your life, how you spend your money, what your political affiliations are. Most folks will keep quiet and grumble to themselves, others will feel like they have to do something about it and thus express their douchebaggery in a more direct and confronting way. These idiots will eventually be bored with what they're doing and get on with their lives.

  268. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The battery in a 100D can deliver 300kW.
    Where can I get a 300kW laser to mount on my Tesla?
    Maybe they should become standard equipment.

  269. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redneck isn't racist... neither is hillbilly. I am from the south and everyone uses them all the time. Many proudly say they are Rednecks because it also connotes a reckless abandonment for person safety in seeking an achievement.

  270. Re: Speak a language they can understand by orlanz · · Score: 1

    I thought Mr Musk gave them flamethrowers?

  271. Farmers ruin your therory by Dusanyu · · Score: 2

    I will admit my Father drives a Pickup but, he is a farmer he has his truck for Farm things, Like most farmers he will drive and repair his truck until it needs to be replaced. As such he also can't afford to own a car as well so my parents drive the farm truck into town to get food, banking ext. This may also surprise you but most farmers are very environmentally aware (after all one bad season or storm can make them loose the farm. so they combine trips. It is a forgone conclusion that your average farmer is not parking at a fast charger or "Rolling Coal" they are too busy for that sort of thing. Parking in these lanes is childish, but so is looking down at people who drive a truck out of pure necessity.

    1. Re:Farmers ruin your therory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your father who is a farmer is obviously using his truck for practical reasons. The criticism is not for people with legitimate workloads such as farmers and construction workers. The criticism is for people who can barely justify the need for size and power of a truck, people who don't have business moving big workloads. They buy the truck simply because they like the big size of it.

    2. Re:Farmers ruin your therory by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I will admit my Father drives a Pickup but, he is a farmer he has his truck for Farm things,

      A Farmer's farm pickup truck is definitely a vehicle used primarily for professional/work reasons,
      e.g. Actually hauling large heavy loads around in a farm, and picking up and dropping off the materials and products related to business conducted by the owner of the vehicle.

      And not used nearly as much for driving when not for the purpose of hauling stuff.

      Which is specifically not the type of pick-up truck owner I'm referring to.

      Look at the pickups in the photo at the charger... these are really shiny with no visible wear, they do not even look like vehicles that have seen much use, let alone hauling for a work purpose.

      You can likely go to a used car lot and purchase 2 to 3 used pick-ups and 1 regular car, all suited for 10 to 15 years or more of additional operation for business use, for the price the owner paid to get one of the new shiny trucks in the photo.

  272. Symbols of Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guns and oversized 4X4s that spew plumes of black smoke are common possessions of people who want to express their dissatisfaction with their lives and their inability to live effectively. They seem to consider it to be effective to impose undesirable consequences on other people. Being in the way is a default action.

  273. A Tesla could easily drag one of those pick ups o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A chain and grappling hook could come in awfully handy to a Tesla driver

  274. Hickory by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    We visited Hickory a couple years back when we were searching for decent size towns with lakefront homes to retire to. Hickory used to be the furniture capital of the U.S., and pretty much all of that industry is now overseas, so the town has a lot of good stuff from back when it was still doing well. But, it has a lot of skilled workers w/o decent jobs. The first restaurant we had dinner at, we discussed this with our elderly waitress who told us that if we moved there and were cleaning our own house, or mowing our own lawn, we were doing it wrong because the labor is cheaply available.

    So, just my speculation here, but I think what you're seeing is people protesting against what they see as wealthy people with things they can't really afford.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:Hickory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, just my speculation here, but I think what you're seeing is people protesting against what they see as wealthy people with things they can't really afford.

      Look again, they spent as much or more on their gas guzzilng super-duty sized trucks(Ford F-350, GMC 3500 etc.) trucks and both legal modifications to it's suspension and tires as well as illegal modifications to the exhaust to release thick black clouds of soot and smog at a massive hit to fuel economy. These trucks are also too clean to be used offroad or for any real work, a truck used for actual work looks it, the most these trucks see is a trip to the Walmart and the Dollar General.

      These assholes have money, they're just assholes.

  275. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither of you morons know what socialism is.

  276. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck em' if they can't adapt and find new work and yet still refuse to support UBI. Their jobs are about as useful as whale oil harvesting is today and yet they refuse to take a way out of their shit situation. Some people refuse to be helped, their opinions no longer matter at that point.

  277. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jackasses who fail to realize that sugar in the gas tank then having them towed will be the gift that keeps on giving.

  278. Re:Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If EV and hybrid drivers would back off on the smug factor, the problem would go away. ...but given what I generally see from that crowd, the smugness will only grow and they will reap what they sew.

    Awww, poor fragile little snowflake. What a pathetically sad and sorry existence you lead.

  279. Big Babies can't contribute only throw a tantrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, oil is a fungible commodity that funds people that kill US troops.

    Oil is treason.

  280. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you priced pickup trucks like the ones from the picture lately? They're not exactly cheap vehicles and are largely bought by people who have no need for them just to be used as a status symbol. This is just hypocritical. Also, even when the power is generated by coal, the power is generated in a large, central power station, so the generation is a lot more efficient than the small, portable engine in a truck. Power transmission and conversion losses are pretty negligible these days, and also the EV uses power a lot more efficiently than the truck engine. Oh, yeah, the truck is dragging around at least 50% more weight than the EV (usually just to go commute to work and go to the supermarket and so forth). Oh, also, if we're going back in the supply chain, you can't just count the diesel burned in the truck engine, you also have to count all of the emissions from making the diesel from crude oil in the first place. So, no, the EV does not have more carbon emissions than the diesel truck. Not by a long shot, really.

  281. Re:Speak a language they can understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    you can be easily killed in moments with simple chinese takeout chopsticks, 1 set, in at least 30 ways off the top of my head.

    Go on then. I'm going to go out on a limb and assume these 30 'ways' are all actually variations on stabbing. So what, through the ear, nose, eyes, maybe throat. I don't think a chopstick will go through a rib cage, well maybe if you do it right but probably not consistently. So come on then 20+ more 'ways'? Don't forget the within moments part.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  282. Re:Speak a language they can understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    I see you've played knifey spooney before.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  283. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Ridiculous. Power plants are a lot more efficient than individual truck engines (it's a simple matter of scale). Power transmission is highly efficient. EVs are much more efficient with power than ICEs. You're also comparing trucks to smaller vehicles that need less power in the first place. Also, large power plants burning, for example, coal require a lot less refining of their fuel to start with, so there are a lot more emissions to generate the fuel for the truck than there are to generate the fuel for the power plant. Also, the power grid doesn't have the additional emissions from a bunch of tanker trucks driving many tons of fuel around to gas stations. With all the factors taken together, your assertion is simply ridiculous.

  284. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just spend your money on a penis enlargement instead?

  285. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh, This crap again. Just, no! Centralizing power production means that power is generated in highly efficient central power station rather than in millions of individual, inefficient engines. Power losses through the grid are pretty negligible. The distribution networks for fuel for ICE trucks produces lots of emissions. EVs are also a lot more efficient than ICE trucks, so they're not using anywhere near as much power per unit of mass to move. Also, you're comparing EV sedans to trucks, which are more massive, so the ICE trucks use even more power. The fuel for the power station also doesn't require as much refinement (and hence, emissions) as the fuel for the power plant, even if it uses coal.

    Also, people buying trucks are almost always buying them for appearances and to make a personal statement about themselves. Almost none of the trucks I ever see are being used to get work done. They're usually just commuter vehicles.

  286. Re: Just a response to smugness by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Given how many charging stations are paid with public tax money - I'm quite all right with tax payers blocking chargers and preventing their tax money from being wasted on some asshole's car.

    Don't forget that Teslas are partially paid for with our tax money, and those chargers are also subsidized with our tax money, for a service almost no one can use.

    Tesla owners deserve everything they get.

    Didn't some car manufacturers get a massive taxpayer bailout not too long ago?

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  287. It's in their culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taunting and shitting on people is part of their culture, as is making enemies. They don't need a reason other than that you're "not them". If you've ever interacted with this type, you know exactly what I mean. Part of their culture is to categorize people into "us vs. them", so that they demonstrate their loyalty to "us" by shitting on "them".

    Simply put, they're a bit farther behind on the evolutionary timeline. Like the lesser animals, physical force and disrespect to others is the way to get ahead.

  288. Re: Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    Wonder why the cost of food in Britain is about half the cost of the same food in the United States, despite the fact that the EU's "subsidies" to non-urban areas are nowhere near as extreme.

    Oh, I know, it's because American subsidies are fucking stupid and are largely used to fund the lifestyles of white flighters, not to reduce the cost of food. People who live in cities don't generally benefit from the subsidies, in fact, between being taxed more than they would otherwise be, and their lack of services, those subsidies harm them.

    Where does your food come from? Not the fucking subsidized suburbs, you dumb fuck.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  289. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did I really just read someone claim CITIES SHOULD BE DEPRIVED OF INFRASTRUCTURE BECAUSE THEY PAY TAXES JUST LIKE PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF CITIES?

    And did someone really mod that shit up?

    You anti-city people are nutcases. Complete and utter nutcases. You're so wedded to your "pro-country" tribalism that you actually believe people should be punished for not living in it. Guess what? The major reason why we have a deficit right now is that traditionally cities have subsidized the suburbs and rural areas, BUT YOU'VE MADE CITIES SO SHITTY TO LIVE IN BY SUCKING THEM DRY that hardly anyone lives in cities in the US now.

    So, more debt, higher cost of living, people forced to live shittier lives, and all because of your tribal "Must take sides, cityfolk suck, unlike suburban people" jackassary.

    You are a horrible person. I hope you die soon.

  290. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    You deduced all that because I observed that we overspend on rural roads and that cities don't get their transportation needs met, huh?

    Want to explain the logic? Oh, you can't? Because you're projecting so far you've disappeared up your asshole? It's kinda weird, I've never seen a city advocate complain about people who live outside of cities, but I'm always coming across suburban idiots, like you, who think they're "rural", despite the fact they've never been within one mile of a cow they weren't passing at 70mph.

    I've lived in two countries, in both rural and non-rural areas. Policies that run down cities and force people to live outside of them are fucking stupid. People who demonize those who live in urban areas, such as the original poster, are part of the problem. You're part of the problem. YOU ARE WHY THE COST OF LIVING IS SKY HIGH IN THE UNITED STATES. Go fuck yourself you stupid scumbag.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  291. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ITT: idiot hillbillies that think redneck means something conservative originally. Look it up, you dipshits.

  292. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the pickups should be crushed into little cubes.

    Now your cube is illegally parked, you have thirty minutes to move your cube.

  293. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But theyâ(TM)re not driving trucks, so theyâ(TM)re causing basically no road wear and tear.

  294. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Part of the bizarreness here is listening to people talk "rural" and pretend it's farms and stuff, when actually "rural" in the US means "Non-urban". You're saying you're a suburbanite? Congrats, you probably live in a similar neighborhood to the pick up drivers under discussion. You really think they live on farms?

    Your plumber, your house painter, your AC guy, they're not living on farms, they're living in places like the one you live in. And that goes for the jackasses hogging charger stations too. Yes, those people doing it are jackasses. They don't have economic anxiety, they're doing it to own the libs (which is ironic, I'll get to why in a moment) not to strike a blow for fair wages and more jobs.

    The reason these particular jackasses think of themselves as "rural" and (by-and-large conservative, suburban) Tesla owners as "city" (which is ridiculous) is because of the bizarre identity politics being perpetuated by the culture warriors. They think their "lifestyles" are under threat from "liberals", because that's what Fox News tells them, and they think liberals drive Teslas.

    Which we don't. 60% of Tesla owners are conservative, which is what you'd expect because they're expensive and their chief salesperson lives in a different world from that of most liberals, constantly belittling walkable communities and advocates for that, and treating poverty and poor working conditions as if they don't exist.

    The number of rural Americans is tiny. Most are suburban. A minority is urban. Most suburbs exist because of "White Flight" during the 1950s, 60s, and 70s, which has colored the politics of those areas. Most wouldn't want to admit in a million years that their parents moved to an artificial, poorly thought out, shit hole, because they were frightened of black people, so they cling on to this myth that they live in a "natural", "rural", part of the world that's somehow better than urban living despite being completely unnatural and unusual by historical human standards. And culture warriors like to take advantage of this. And because a handful of every group are assholes, the assholes take it too far, and try to run homeless cyclists off the road (I've seen this), or, less evilly but still obnoxiously, prevent people they think are "bad" by the standards of the culture warriors from being able to do what they want.

    The only funny part of this is that they're more likely to end up blocking the Tucker Carlsons of this world than the Keith Olbermanns, so in some ways it's a tremendous self own. And means you're right in an ironic way, because I think most of the problems in the US right now can be traced to people who promote culture wars and who harness racism and other prejudices to pit people against one another, and that fits the Carlsons of this world.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  295. As a Diesel Truck Owner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in South Carolina... and I sometimes drive a 3/4 ton Diesel 4x4 Pickup, because it is a necessary tool to manage my small 10 acre farm.

    Let me be the first to say that so-called "Brodozers," those obnoxiously outfitted toys of over-privileged Clemson students and unproductive hillbillies, are a huge problem.

    Farming is not a full-time occupation for me (I'm an engineer full time), but I think I speak for most people who own diesel pickups for the right reasons when I say, "these people are idiots, every last one of them." We should be embracing technology like electric vehicles for applications where they make sense. For urban areas, electric cars are a fantastic solution to a local problem. Out here in the country, they have comparatively less usefulness.

    There is no questioning the leaping advances Tesla has made to the use of batteries in vehicles. No questioning whatsoever. There is also no questioning that EVs are a great solution to urban air pollution. One day even my farm truck might be replaced by an EV, which would not necessarily be a bad thing as long as it has the capability. Plus, the sooner I can stop worrying about cleaning DPFs and pouring fuel out of my exhaust for active regeneration cycles and constalty-failing EGR coolers, and other problems with modern diesel emissions, the better. (These idiots break federal law and remove their emissions controls, because they don't care about our environment at all, and don't worry about the true cost of responsible diesel vehicle ownership).

  296. Turn the other cheek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why don't they just go to another fueling station in town? With Range Anxiety being a myth, I'm sure there's tons of chargers in all parts of the middle of nowhere.

  297. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>I've never seen a city advocate complain about people who live outside of cities

    Yeah, that's bullshit, alright. Cityfags constantly mock, belittle, and bitch about "rural and suburban sister-fucking retarded backwards racist redneck hicks." Screeching like an autistic idiot when someone points this out is beyond pathetic and hypocritical.

    >>YOU ARE WHY THE COST OF LIVING IS SKY HIGH IN THE UNITED STATES

    No, you choose to live in a city, which will always be more expensive due to the basic functions of supply and demand. Take your head out of your ass and get off your high horse.

  298. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a leftist that even to left of Bennie Sanders and I own a number of firearms. Not all gun nuts are right wingers. There's plenty of us on the left that are gun owners too.

  299. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which as an aside, a right-wing myth is in play with the gov't shutdown as well, which is the right-wing pushes the narrative that almost all gov't employees are democrats that are leaching off their tax dollars when the reality is the gov't employees are split much in the same proportions as the rest of the country, about 30% republican, about 30% democrat, and the rest independents.

    In light of the recent shutdown & statements by our stable genius propagating the above mentioned myth, I'm wondering whether many life long republican government employees impacted by the shutdown have decided that perhaps they have been drinking Kool-Aid all this time.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that they should all convert to being Democrats. That's entirely up to them. But I am wondering whether they'll acknowledge that their ring-wing pundits & politicians are just full of it.

  300. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's bullshit, alright. Cityfags constantly mock, belittle, and bitch about "rural and suburban sister-fucking retarded backwards racist redneck hicks." Screeching like an autistic idiot when someone points this out is beyond pathetic and hypocritical.

    This is bullshit. _I_ have lived in cities and never said anything of the sort. And most of the people who I have heard call people "racist redneck hicks" actually live... in the suburbs. And they're not saying every non-urban person is a racist redneck hick because that'd mean they're calling themselves that, you stupid twat.

    No, you choose to live in a city, which will always be more expensive due to the basic functions of supply and demand. Take your head out of your ass and get off your high horse.

    No, I don't. I want to live in a city, but YOU STUPID FUCKS have made living in a city in the US completely impossible. The cities have been intentionally run down, with suburban planning rules enforced in the centers, and their transportation systems and infrastructure underfunded.

    Moreover, you're not addressing the point. The cost of living is sky high in the US, and it's because fuckers like you insist that the suburbs need massive subsidies. The result is that taxes are high throughout the US, massive resources are spent providing infrastructure to the suburbs, and most people end up finding the suburbs are the only place they can live thanks to subsidies that make it cheaper than than the cities, and because with infrastructure broken in most cities, they're completely clogged with traffic.

    This is completely fucked up, and pretending that it's A-OK because you once heard someone who you think lives in a city, but probably doesn't, call someone else a racist hick shows how out of touch and part of the problem you are.

    You are the problem. You are why the cost of living is so high. Fuck you.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  301. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    (Jesus Christ the mods are fucked up today)

    You deduced all that because I observed that we overspend on rural roads and that cities don't get their transportation needs met, huh?

    Want to explain the logic? Oh, you can't? Because you're projecting so far you've disappeared up your asshole? It's kinda weird, I've never seen a city advocate complain about people who live outside of cities, but I'm always coming across suburban idiots, like you, who think they're "rural", despite the fact they've never been within one mile of a cow they weren't passing at 70mph.

    I've lived in two countries, in both rural and non-rural areas. Policies that run down cities and force people to live outside of them are fucking stupid. People who demonize those who live in urban areas, such as the original poster, are part of the problem. You're part of the problem. YOU ARE WHY THE COST OF LIVING IS SKY HIGH IN THE UNITED STATES. Go fuck yourself you stupid scumbag.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  302. What a bunch of losers by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what a bunch of losers.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  303. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Yes it would. We could all pretend to work, and our masters pretended to pay us.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  304. I'm a pickup driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want an electric pickup because I want an American made truck that doesn't run on foreign oil.

    Extra points if it comes with a gun rack. Even more points if it is easily cusomizable.

    What else is more American?

  305. Re:Good for them. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "I don't see any reason to be so personal or vengeful on the attacks."

    You appear not to understand White Trash. (I'm white and have no problem with that frequently accurate term.) They are primitive vicious human garbage on a good day. The term isn't an accident.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  306. Making The Trump Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putting a good suit on a Deplorable gives you... a stylish Deplorable.

    It really makes no difference how expensive the vehicles were, what the license plate holders said, or what stickers were (or were not) found decorating the vehicle.

    A-holes drive Bentleys too. So what?

  307. Re:Speak a language they can understand by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    The only way to reduce crime and restore human honor is stop fearing death.

    Stop treating your life as your highest comodity. You will lose. 100% of you

    What matters is _how_ you lived. Never give up a single penny for the fear of your life, the life of your mother or your child. Never give up to a terrorist that tells you "plata o plomo".

    Eat the plomo, die with honor. Let him take the plata at the price of your life. That will mean that much more law enforcement will go after him and overall there will be much fewer apes trying to rob you.

    There are people around the world that live like that.

    You do not have to live like sheep.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  308. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is very clear who is the assole here. The assole truck driver is not paying his fair share for all the carbon he is putting into the air which the tesla owner will land up paying for. So i guess we are even.

  309. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep that magic thinking going buddy.

  310. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that a question. Or a statement? Punctuation, is a; thing? It! Changes ... meanings: