You may not be 12, but you're not from the south either. That's not the attitude there, or of concealed carry citizens (they've studied the pertinent laws). You're just an AC troll.
No, but you *can* question the utility of a mathematical excursion. Calculating the number of angels that can dance on a pin head is math too but is pretty obviously an exercise in futility.
No he wouldn't, because you're equating a literally once in a war occurrence with common aging results. This makes your question spurious. To add a second reason, he wrote about the societal costs of those healthy people in their last years, so he wasn't arguing for health benefits for tobacco for an individual but instead that its culling effect might simply be cost efficient by coincidence.
Drinking too much coffee has its health issues as well. Should Folger's be on the hook for that? How about we leave the responsibility with the person choosing to use the products they choose.
Neo-jihadist... You don't know what that means, do you? You just think it sounds intimidating, like it makes you an authority of some nature instead of just an AC posting a vagrant comment.
Law enforcement cannot stop a random psychotic individual from getting you, they can only arrest the perp and prove they did it. There's numerous reasons judges would keep their personal information off radar - the criminals they put away.
Slashdot Mirror
A proposition doth not a reality make.
I'd love to see their credentials side by side.
So you think fire is enchantment?
Both of you stated opinion with no cite. My guess is that it varies by locale.
You've worked yourself into such a tizzy that you're arguing against views that haven't been expressed. Is there a point?
"... how about we get over the notion that all bad driving ever is caused by that, ok?" Done - since no one thought that or promoted it.
No, he *doesn't* get out of *their* way and lets them bounce off.
You may not be 12, but you're not from the south either. That's not the attitude there, or of concealed carry citizens (they've studied the pertinent laws). You're just an AC troll.
You are completely misrepresenting the attitude exhibited in his/her post. You're railing against some illusory person.
"... we ..." - Bwahahahahahaha!
Did you order that pomposity by the truckload, or was there a mistake in delivery?
"...then why is my ..." And exactly which of the thousands of ACs are you? Your word about this is meaningless without a reference.
Burning tap water, totally fisked. The methane was in the water before fracking started.
You're honestly equating helping slaves escape with tax-dodging?
A completely bogus concept can be very accurately modeled with math. Reality doesn't care.
What an utterly simplistic and incorrect definition of biology.
Pedantry limits understanding. He was obviously referring to the gene combination that made that individual unique not each specific gene.
No, but you *can* question the utility of a mathematical excursion. Calculating the number of angels that can dance on a pin head is math too but is pretty obviously an exercise in futility.
No he wouldn't, because you're equating a literally once in a war occurrence with common aging results. This makes your question spurious. To add a second reason, he wrote about the societal costs of those healthy people in their last years, so he wasn't arguing for health benefits for tobacco for an individual but instead that its culling effect might simply be cost efficient by coincidence.
Yes, it's known as "influence". It is not, however, known as influence.
Drinking too much coffee has its health issues as well. Should Folger's be on the hook for that? How about we leave the responsibility with the person choosing to use the products they choose.
Neo-jihadist... You don't know what that means, do you? You just think it sounds intimidating, like it makes you an authority of some nature instead of just an AC posting a vagrant comment.
You know this wasn't a troll how? For all anyone knows, you made both posts, so you're sticking it to Gamegate in general is lame.
Said the brave, brave AC.
Law enforcement cannot stop a random psychotic individual from getting you, they can only arrest the perp and prove they did it. There's numerous reasons judges would keep their personal information off radar - the criminals they put away.