I've done all that for over five decades using just my mind and a note pad. I have no desire to invest in something that costs way more than pocket change, requires futzing around to set up and is far more prone to malfunction than a note pad and pen. Aside from being attractive to the techies who simply want to reach for that Star Trek living I see no benefit. It's more of an embellishment than an enhancement for the bulk or humanity.
Those aren't art, so I question your knowledge to make a statement. But, as people can only determine if they are inclined towards one area or another, art needs to be in education if only to dabble and move on. Education isn't about pumping out automatons or likenesses of what one group of people thinks should be the norm and you have deluded yourself if you think art won't be integral to the 21st century.
The author admits that he's been using the quote wrong all this time but that he, like some, will continue to use it wrongly because he simply doesn't want to change his mind based on his emotional attachment to the word anecdote. I found that ironic.
Nope. If incapacitated, yes. Not at all the same thing. If you insist it is, then you have to agree that the man who was also drunk during that encounter was raped as well.
I don't, however, recall PayPal printing their own money as do the various bit coins. Other than a new concept having difficulty being implemented at first, there's not much of a comparison. PayPal was a go-between, the bit coins are attempting to mint money.
Nice big double handful of straw you threw about there. You presume everyone here is and acts like what you want to rail against, then rail. If you stopped exaggerating you'd have nothing to whinge about.
Straw. No one believes that. Fabricated rationale to excuse the desire to censure other people's information because you yourself cannot control your children adequately.
Your appeal to a middle-aged English writer and art critic from the turn of last century is noted. Only the literal pedant thinks fairy tale dragons are about actual large beasts. They are metaphors for evil, and indeed instruct that evil exists and must be opposed, which children do not already know. So in essence, writing literally or not, he agrees with me as to the efficacy of fables.
Watched quite a few because I find them amusing. The documentation is very cherry-picked. As for reasoned, that only works if you accept their rather agenda driven premises.
Slashdot Mirror
No, no there wasn't. That's a little pipe dream you had that you think is real.
CO2 and temperature fluctuations.
Not at all what that guy said.
I've done all that for over five decades using just my mind and a note pad. I have no desire to invest in something that costs way more than pocket change, requires futzing around to set up and is far more prone to malfunction than a note pad and pen. Aside from being attractive to the techies who simply want to reach for that Star Trek living I see no benefit. It's more of an embellishment than an enhancement for the bulk or humanity.
This announcement brought to you by the H1 Visa Promotional Board.
Those aren't art, so I question your knowledge to make a statement. But, as people can only determine if they are inclined towards one area or another, art needs to be in education if only to dabble and move on. Education isn't about pumping out automatons or likenesses of what one group of people thinks should be the norm and you have deluded yourself if you think art won't be integral to the 21st century.
You kind of left out the conditional there, Sparky. Changed the meaning quite a bit. Was that accidental?
You know, I just did that search and the very first link was "The plural of anecdote is data, after all".
The author admits that he's been using the quote wrong all this time but that he, like some, will continue to use it wrongly because he simply doesn't want to change his mind based on his emotional attachment to the word anecdote. I found that ironic.
Nope. If incapacitated, yes. Not at all the same thing. If you insist it is, then you have to agree that the man who was also drunk during that encounter was raped as well.
I disagree, it's not above photocopying, Those machines produce tangible results.
I don't, however, recall PayPal printing their own money as do the various bit coins. Other than a new concept having difficulty being implemented at first, there's not much of a comparison. PayPal was a go-between, the bit coins are attempting to mint money.
Nice big double handful of straw you threw about there. You presume everyone here is and acts like what you want to rail against, then rail. If you stopped exaggerating you'd have nothing to whinge about.
Not at all. The idea is to not tear down the other person's self-erected soapbox.
Straw. No one believes that. Fabricated rationale to excuse the desire to censure other people's information because you yourself cannot control your children adequately.
Your appeal to a middle-aged English writer and art critic from the turn of last century is noted. Only the literal pedant thinks fairy tale dragons are about actual large beasts. They are metaphors for evil, and indeed instruct that evil exists and must be opposed, which children do not already know. So in essence, writing literally or not, he agrees with me as to the efficacy of fables.
"That being said, Fox didn't..." You then drop into spouting partisan word count as if it were fact.
Rather easy if you've read them fairy tales as they grew up.
Only a fool would believe that remotely possible. Funny thing about dictatorships, once in place, democracy of any form is the first thing to go.
Not a single thing.
Mother is neither an arbitrary nor a meaningless role.
Middle of farming Missouri here and it's mostly family owned as well.
Is this a nerd version of an SJW? You're not ____ , therefore you don't understand ____ and must not speak or question?
Nawh. You're a troll. Bet you're the same guy who says "Music should be free! Artists should do tours to make their money."
Perhaps you would be so kind as to provide some links to evidence of said "revealed preferences" instead of just typing out talking point PR?
Love it. Two AC's assigning themselves authority. Each contradicting the other. Neither providing a jot of sourcing. Probably both the same guy.
Watched quite a few because I find them amusing. The documentation is very cherry-picked. As for reasoned, that only works if you accept their rather agenda driven premises.