Actually, 64 bit processors have been available for years already: Alpha, Spark, MIPS...
and to answer your question, GCC handles them OK.
Intel is not the leading processor developer - they are the leading CONSUMER grade processor manufacturer. There are other bottom feaders below them too, eg. VIA.
Well, yes. Microsoft distributes Alexa free with Internet Explorer. They have to ensure that existing spyware will continue to work.
Mediaplex will sue MS for interfering with their business if all the cameras and microphones that they turned on with their Flash advertisements will suddenly quit on them.
That member of parliament actually was decades ahead of Babbage. Error correction codes come to mind.
Also, Babage's later engines had special mechanisms to detect accumulations of rounding errors, so he was eventually clueing in to the imprecision of his machines.
Well, if you use the same data everywhere, then you have not accomplished much. You have simply established a new identity that can be traced back to you. It may need a few nanoseconds of NSA processing time, or an hour of work by a PI, but doesn't buy you any privacy really, apart from maybe reducing spam a little bit. Think about it.
are more of a problem than covert channels. Every cell phone is a covert channel out of a business. Since DNS can't be used to deliver advertisements, I don't see a business threat here. It may be a concern to a military installation though.
Circuit boards are washed during manufacture in something closely resembling a dishwasher, using orange oil. Puting them through a home dish washer is nothing special.
I use portsentry for protection against scans. The result is that all my ISP scanners are now in hosts.deny and consequenlty I can run any server I want and they will never know and can't complain about it...
Expect, autoexpect, Tcl/TK and Perl. With that combination you can even test GUIs, mouse and touch screen applications, but yes, it is a pain in the derrier...
Expect is a Tcl thing, that is also a module in Perl.
Autoexpect is a script generator of sorts for Expect.
Using that combination, you can create a test harness that can also test things that were not designed to be tested, such as GUIs, Browsers, SSH and Password sessions.
However, it is not easy and yes it works on Windoze too...
Slashdot Mirror
The Knights of NIH...
and to answer your question, GCC handles them OK.
Intel is not the leading processor developer - they are the leading CONSUMER grade processor manufacturer. There are other bottom feaders below them too, eg. VIA.
MS distributes Alexa with IE - that is malware and since you download it off the MS web site, they obviously do condone, support and maintain malware.
Mediaplex will sue MS for interfering with their business if all the cameras and microphones that they turned on with their Flash advertisements will suddenly quit on them.
Uhhh, so what you are saying is that the MS QA Dept has virus infected PCs which they use to test their software on?
Get with it and try a newish version of Mandrake or Suse Linux.
So American girls can go around and say: I'm a licensed bride? Would a hooker be an 'unlicensed bride?'
No, this one is much better:
www.universityofnigeria.com
You can get your degree and 34 Million Dollars...
Also, Babage's later engines had special mechanisms to detect accumulations of rounding errors, so he was eventually clueing in to the imprecision of his machines.
is more likely...
Well now, nothing prevents the poor from getting a good education and becoming rich beyond measure: http://www.universityofnigeria.com
Yah and the two damn supersonic planes did nothing to frighten the poor little tortoise?
Therefore Linux is God and consequently Linux == Unix.
That would make perfect sense to 60% of Americans...
Well, if you use the same data everywhere, then you have not accomplished much. You have simply established a new identity that can be traced back to you. It may need a few nanoseconds of NSA processing time, or an hour of work by a PI, but doesn't buy you any privacy really, apart from maybe reducing spam a little bit. Think about it.
are more of a problem than covert channels. Every cell phone is a covert channel out of a business. Since DNS can't be used to deliver advertisements, I don't see a business threat here. It may be a concern to a military installation though.
Circuit boards are washed during manufacture in something closely resembling a dishwasher, using orange oil. Puting them through a home dish washer is nothing special.
I may be missing something, but port knocking sequences is just a silly waste of time as far as I can see - kinda amateurish actually.
Install portsentry. Wait until corporate Nazi scanned your machine and got added to hosts.deny. Enjoy the freedom.
I use portsentry for protection against scans. The result is that all my ISP scanners are now in hosts.deny and consequenlty I can run any server I want and they will never know and can't complain about it...
So, sit on your driveway, project against the garage door, sell 'I am an official friend of Joe SoapOpera' badges, pocorn and drinks... Hah!
This must be in Canada eh? Anywhere else the equipment will get stolen in the blink of an eye eh?
Expect, autoexpect, Tcl/TK and Perl. With that combination you can even test GUIs, mouse and touch screen applications, but yes, it is a pain in the derrier...
Expect is a Tcl thing, that is also a module in Perl.
Autoexpect is a script generator of sorts for Expect.
Using that combination, you can create a test harness that can also test things that were not designed to be tested, such as GUIs, Browsers, SSH and Password sessions.
However, it is not easy and yes it works on Windoze too...
I had to go and manually edit prefs.js adding some lines as suggested in other posts and even then the status bar still gets overloaded.
Do you have any idea why?
OK, I am running FF 9.1, but is this fixed in 9.2?
Try this, it mostly works:t ion", true);
b ar", true);
m izable", true);
z able", true);
l lbars", true);
u s", true);
./.mozilla/firefox/default.flc/prefs.js
user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.loca
user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.menu
user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.mini
user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.resi
user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.scro
user_pref("dom.disable_window_open_feature.stat
It is only the last line that seems to be buggy, since the status bar still gets overloaded.