Slashdot Mirror


Memory Card Torture Tests

saikatguha266 writes "BBC is reporting that five types of memory cards were dipped into cola, put through a washing machine, dunked in coffee, trampled by a skateboard, run over by a child's toy car, given to a six-year-old boy to destroy, smashed by a sledgehammer and nailed to a tree. It was still possible to retrieve photos from the xD and Smartmedia cards while the others didn't survive just the last two tests. "

236 comments

  1. Miss the old green slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    To avoid damage to your retinas, click here

    1. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Wow thanks!

      Any way to put it back to this theme by default? The other color is.... yuck :|

    2. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by Shai-kun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now what is all this talk of new color schemes about? I still have the plain old dark green and gray scheme.

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
    3. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by Tore+S+B · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Well, as This post suggests, just put the following into your squidgard config file
      rew slashdot {
      s@it.slashdot.org@slashdot.org@
      }
      --
      toresbe
    4. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by iantri · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      If you access links to the headlines through RSS (Opera, AFAIK Mozilla sidebar), all the links point to slashdot.org/storyurl instead of section.slashdot.org/storyurl.

      This results in Slashdot's usual poor, but passable green colour scheme.

    5. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since i've blown my isp's download limit yesterday, browsing in elinks I don't see what you are talking about.
      This also made me use text based browsers again and elinks really is the best, including mouse actions (scrollwheel, clicking links) and tab support.

    6. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by SirDaShadow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there a way to override the colors and styles by using a css and switching to that alternate style on Mozilla Firefox? If so, how do you do it?

    7. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by scruffy · · Score: 1

      I agree that this color scheme is unhealthy and dangerous, especially to young children. Torturing memory card is exactly the opposite, except for the occasional injestion of electronic parts.

    8. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by andreyw · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be true if Slashdot used CSS.

    9. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by mikael · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for the link - I thought my PC needed a new toner cartridge for the monitor.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I found out that if a site doesn't use CSS, the mozilla plugin won't kick in. I remember Opera being able to force a style even when the website didn't have css...is there something like that out there for firefox?

    11. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is, but just remove "it." from the URL. it's much simpler and more effective.

    12. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      actually just replace the "it" in [http://it.slashdot...] with "shit" [http://shit.slashdot...]. That works for me.

    13. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      GOOD GOD! Bless you, man!

    14. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by prog-guru · · Score: 1

      Interesting side effect of wildcard DNS records and name based virtual hosting I guess, cool.

      --

      chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
      /.: nothing appropriate.

    15. Re:Miss the old green slashdot? by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1


      ROTFL ... it actually works! :>

  2. Talk about real life experiments... by Nplugd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    right, coz it happens to me all the time, to nail a memory card on a tree by accident...

    Note that I did had a PS2 memory card go to the washing machine, and it worked like a charm afterwards. Thank God, I was not going to start FF7 all over again :)

    --
    Je n'ai pas d'avenir Je n'ai qu'un destin Celui de n'être qu'un souvenir C'est pour demain
    1. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by b374 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      why didn't they try to expose them to high radiation levels... high / low temperatures... magnetic fields... more real life situations.

    2. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by sparcnut · · Score: 3, Informative
      magnetic fields
      Exactly how is a magnetic field going to damage a memory card (short of some huge magnet that just crushes the package)? They're not disk-based, they're just static RAM.
      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    3. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

      Maximum PC did something like this awhile back to usb thumbdrives.. they all worked fine.. not sure how these other guys would react but it was a good article.. they did some crazy stuff like this but made it realistic too.. i believe they put them in the dryer, and ran over them with a SUV lol...

    4. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 5, Funny

      If your real life involves high radiation levels on a regular basis, you should think about making some changes in your lifestyle.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    5. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by MetalMorph · · Score: 1

      Ran them over with a SUV? That doesn't sound like much.

      Have a drag car burn out on it. If it survives and still works, it's worth buying.

      --
      My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
    6. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magnetic fields screw with microchips too.

    7. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      no idea, perhaps the floating gate of the flash cell is affected (shifting bandgap,ect), and a read will accidently write ?
      ok, you would need a few tesla, but the point is that if you have moving electrons, you cant just say magnetic field cant do anything...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    8. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by octalc0de · · Score: 1

      > Note that I did had a PS2 memory card go to the washing machine, and it worked like a charm afterwards. Thank God, I was not going to start FF7 all over again :)

      Err, what? FF7? PS2 Memory Card? FF7 can only save on a normal Playstation memory card, the memory cards aren't backward-compatible.

    9. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by hansiboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think he meant airport X-Ray scanners and the like...

    10. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by jx100 · · Score: 1

      well, technically, you can transfer PS1 saves to PS2 cards in the browser.

    11. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by jechoe · · Score: 1

      I had my Nokia phone go through the clothes washer - and after basking a day or two in a hot car, it worked just fine!

      --
      Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
    12. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by JT+Snortbuckle+JrIII · · Score: 1

      I did it three times last week, and I once accidentally nailed a tuna sandwich to my forehead. It's a long story...

      --
      I need just enough coffee to tide me over 'til I need more.
    13. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by Nplugd · · Score: 1

      Uh, you're right, I never owned a PS2, that was a PS1. Nice catch.
      The irony being that I never finished FF7 anyway. That game was just too fucking big for me I guess.

      --
      Je n'ai pas d'avenir Je n'ai qu'un destin Celui de n'être qu'un souvenir C'est pour demain
    14. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by gnuman99 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Exactly how is a magnetic field going to damage a memory card (short of some huge magnet that just crushes the package)? They're not disk-based, they're just static RAM.

      When you move though a magnetic field, that induces a voltage which could mess up the memory card. That is, don't bring your camera to a MRI machine (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance describes it better but people freaked out about the word "Nuclear"!)

      It is not the magnetic field that does the damage. It is always the rate of change of the magnetic field that is the problem (its gradient). This is how power plants make the electrons flow from the wall socket :)

    15. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose real life for a space probe would involve high radiation, temperature variations, etc. Nail to a tree, folks? Well, consider pucture with a fast meteorite.

      The one-nail test isn't quite enough though. It could be luck that saves a memory card from a puncture. Potentially destructive tests need to be repeated methodically.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    16. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by afidel · · Score: 1

      here is probably the ULTIMATE real life test. CF in a metal body camera apears to be virtually indistructable.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by Beale · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why yes, I frequently get run over by drag cars on my way to work.

    18. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered who they screwed...

    19. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by sploxx · · Score: 4, Informative
      ACK, and as the parent poster says, it's flash, not RAM. Non volatile flash memory consists of this:
      |electrode 1|
      \-----------/

      [ Insulator ]

      ==Floating ==
      ==== gate ===

      [ Insulator ]

      /-----------\
      |electrode 2|
      It's the floating gate that may hold a charge which is interpreted as a single "1" (or 0, depends how you define it) bit of the flash.
      So... as you can see, with a strong enough electric field, you may surely be able to move the charge across the barriers (e.g. break-through of the insulation or maybe tunneling of the electrons when you skew the potentials alot).

      Now the magnetic thing:
      Because the electrons in the floating gate move (they must do that in every case because of quantum uncertainty, but the greater effect here is the temperature movement!), they have a speed and as you may know, moving electric charges in magnetic fields feel the lorentz force... BUT this force does not change the energy of the particles, i.e. they do not get faster when one applies a magnetic field. So, yes, maybe there're weird changes in the bandgap. I don't know. Try it out, would be a nice experiment.

      Post a link to a graph here that shows the total number bit errors over magnetic field strength :)

      Static RAM mainly consists of two MOS inverter structures wired together on the chip to form a flip-flop. Static RAM needs a small bit of current (because of inevitable leakage currents) to keep it's state.

      At least, that's how I read it some time ago for a seminar in the semiconductor book from the creator of these devices (S.M. Sze).
    20. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Meh. Magnetic fields do not affect SD cards in the slightest. After discovering this, I've used a strong magnet to organise my cards for 2 years now. Just stick 'em to the magnet and you don't lose them. Unless you're thick enough to lose the magnet, in which case you probably shouldn't be let near a computer.

      So far, I've never had a single problem. *Crosses fingers, touches wood, etc.*

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    21. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why yes, I frequently get run over by drag cars on my way to work.

      Yea, I commute in Austin too.

    22. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by Ikester8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once the fossil fuels run out, you'll be singing a different tune!

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    23. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by cev · · Score: 1


      Actually, it's the word "nucular" that freaks people out.

    24. Re:Talk about real life experiments... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      I suppose you've been exposed to high radiation levels and have the secret to the alien mothership stored on your memory stick and need to get it off quickly before you die, eh?

      --
      +++OK ATH
  3. Hmm by sparcnut · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like these memory cards are about ready for use in the real world now that they've passed durability testing. Oh wait...

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
  4. Of course they don't break when you want them to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My only problem with any memory card was with a lexar memory stick for my digital camera, which just happened to stop storing photos 1 day into my first trip to Las Vegas. Reformatting didn't help. I think it knew that I would be forced into buying a card that would have half the storage and twice the price. (I should note that lexar did send me a free replacement, but that obviously didn't help me out on my vacation).

  5. real lifesaver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Most of them did fail to get through two additional tests - being smashed by a sledgehammer and being nailed to a tree."

    The number of times i've accidently nailed my high-tech electronics to a tree... anything that survives that most common of IT mishaps will be a real lifesaver.

  6. Nailing memory cards to a tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember doing that back in 1982.

    Oh, wait, those weren't memory cards. They were assembly language programs, when I should have been nailing higher level languages like BASIC.

  7. What if... by b374 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you realy want to destroy one of those memory cards (compromising pics or whatever on it)... looks like your only chance is a sledgehammer.

    1. Re:What if... by sparcnut · · Score: 1

      Or maybe tape it on top of your nearest set of railroad tracks. No, nevermind, the cards would probably survive that...

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    2. Re:What if... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Or a lighter, or a cutoff extension cord.

      You have yet to explore the many possible ways to destroy an electronic device.

    3. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be amazed what 110V can do.

    4. Re:What if... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Pop it into a microwave oven, set timer for 20 seconds,... and Ding! its all forgotten!

    5. Re:What if... by proudlyindian · · Score: 1

      write some txt or image file over the card till the card gets full

    6. Re:What if... by Shinglor · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, a normal person would just delete the files.

  8. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    At last, indestructible storage for my p0rn!!

    1. Re:Cool! by b374 · · Score: 5, Funny
      At last, indestructible storage for my p0rn!!
      hmm... considering these are used mostly in digital cameras... is that your homebrew porn???
    2. Re:Cool! by mrjb · · Score: 1

      He prefers just looking at it.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    3. Re:Cool! by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

      Yeah but how do you fix the nail hole through all the pictures???

    4. Re:Cool! by hexdcml · · Score: 1

      ... but this is slashdot. Homebrew pr0n = one handed keyboard usage???

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    5. Re:Cool! by Uncle+Jimmy · · Score: 1

      hmm... considering these are used mostly in digital cameras... is that your homebrew porn???

      Yeah. Your wife was more than happy to oblige.

  9. Re:Of course they don't break when you want them t by H8X55 · · Score: 4, Funny

    no no no no. That was just your camera trying to honor the old 'what happens in vegas, stays in vegas' rule.

  10. Are they really representative by lachlan76 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although this only really applies to the nailed-to-a-tree test, where the nail goes through will matter. In DIL ICs, most of the area is taken up by connections to the pins. If these cards have the core close to the edge with the connectors, and a nail is put through the center, it could miss the core entirely. And if the nail went through the bridges, a data recovery person could wire a reader the the connectors inside the package.

    1. Re:Are they really representative by Ianoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To be honest, it sounds like the testers were just getting desperate with the whole nail-to-a-tree thing. They weren't expecting all the cards to survive all the tests, and it would make for a pretty dull magazine article if they just wrote "all the cards are indistructable".

    2. Re:Are they really representative by lachlan76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But who would have though it would survive the 6-year-old????

    3. Re:Are they really representative by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      The 36 year old who couldn't even scratch the surface

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  11. is this a feature or a bug? by jamienk · · Score: 4, Funny

    is this a feature or a bug?

    1. Re:is this a feature or a bug? by akeyes · · Score: 1

      It all depends on how you look at it.

      Feature: For the average user, this would defentally be a feature, they could take their camera to new places without the fear of breaking/damaging the card and losing all of their pictures.

      Bug: However, for those users who store sensitive data that my have to be distroyed by means of physically distorying the media, this would get in the way.

      In conclusion, This would defentally be a feature to the intended audiance.

  12. Re:Oh no by H8X55 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's always the microwave in the employee breakroom. Guaranteed to destroy small electronics placed within - in a matter of seconds.

  13. A pretty pointless experiment.... by drolli · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Besides the fact that "nailing to a tree" is something which is unlikely to happen to my memory cards, probably the outcome depends strongly is the nail goes trough the flash memory or only trough plastic. Furthermore "washing" should be carried out at temperatures from 30-90 degrees, and the results should be interpreted in terms of flipped bits. Hammering is a combination of mechanical stress and vibration, two things which can be separated (and are interestin separate- one tells you if you might put the memory card in your pocket, the other one if you should damp vibrations if you put it onto your bike). Running it over with a toy card after running it over wit h a skateboard (I suppose with sombody on it) will not do additional damage, i guess! And dipping into cola may oxidise the contacts......

    So.... I think the test was not carried out correctly and scientifically......

    1. Re:A pretty pointless experiment.... by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but since when has science ever played a role in consumer reports like this? It's just a fluff article designed to take advantage of a recent trend...

    2. Re:A pretty pointless experiment.... by moonbender · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh well. I mean, on the one hand, you're correct, this wasn't carried out scientifically, but then again, it doesn't have to to be useful. All of the six main tests are representative or real live stress such a card might have to endure.

      I assume the actual article - the BBC's is only an abstract of an article in a UK digital photography magazine - contains more detailed explanations of what the tests entail, for instance at which temperature the cards were washed. The BBC says the cards were "boiled", so that should mean they're washed at 90 - and they survived, which kind of makes any further testing at lower temperatures superfluous. That said, repeated washing might have been interesting as it's somewhat likely the cards would die at some point. However, again, while this might be interesting in a scientific test, it doesn't have a lot of real life value: you are fairly likely to accidently wash one of your flash cards at some point, you're unlikely to do it twice, and increasingly unlikely to do it more often. Unless you're not so smart. ;)

      Hammering is a combination of mechanical stress and vibration...

      I guess it is. But maybe the just presupposed that on the one hand mechanical vibrations don't do anything to a medium that doesn't have any moving parts (probably a reasonable presupposition, but I guess you ought to test it), but more likely and very reasonable is that they thought that the "mechanical stress" part of the "hammering with a slege hammer" action is kind of more significant. I doubt a typical owner of a camera can create much more mechanical stress than with a sledge hammer...

      So in conclusion, while you're right, they could have been more diligent, the test is still quite informative as it is. It's good to know the cards are that rugged.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:A pretty pointless experiment.... by dzarn · · Score: 2

      Furthermore "washing" should be carried out at temperatures from 30-90 degrees

      That could be touh, as the washing machine would be turning a solid block of ice...

    4. Re:A pretty pointless experiment.... by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 0

      Flamebaiting ice?
      Now that's jazzy.

      --
      Sig
    5. Re:A pretty pointless experiment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh.. just keep your mouth shut for another year or so.

    6. Re:A pretty pointless experiment.... by 1337+Twinkie · · Score: 1

      Yup. The only tests that seemed worth doing were the mechanical stress tests. Since IC's are watertight (and washed at the factory), I would expect them to survive the coffe and cola. The cola probably could have corroded some of the contacts, but probably not to the point of destruction. The cards are already so damn thin that it is hard to believe you could put enough weight on them to destroy them (car, skateboard). The sledgehammer has additional force behind it (momentum and all) and can deliver it in a very short amount of time (greater impulse), so it carries far more destructive power than antything else. If the nail went through the IC, it's toast. If it just went through the plastic, the card would be fine.

      Another scenario that I can see happening is this: Guy has card in shirt pocket. Guy bends over to put some papers in shredder. Card falls into shredder.

      Man, that would be nasty ;)

  14. Smartmedia cards not indestructable by usurper_ii · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While it is neat they held up to the test, I have had several just quit working and they had little to no abuse at all. One was for my wife's camera and one for my mp3 player...and neither one that went bad was probably much more than a year old.

    Usurper_ii

    1. Re:Smartmedia cards not indestructable by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      The ultimate test does seem to be actually using them - many cards seem to randomly corrupt in my Palm Tungsten, for example.

    2. Re:Smartmedia cards not indestructable by fishbot · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Tunsten has something of a reptutation for destroying memory cards. Check out this list of problems encountered using different cards in different machines.

      Note that in the Tungsten T3 only 1 out of 7 tested cards actually survived the ordeal! Of course, this particular test isn't scientific, but it is based on real user feedback really using them for real things, so it's probably worth a read.

    3. Re:Smartmedia cards not indestructable by fishbot · · Score: 2, Informative

      And just too late, I found a more specific article:

      http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_story.asp?ID=60 86

    4. Re:Smartmedia cards not indestructable by SirCrashALot · · Score: 1

      Aye, I'ce seen many many smart media cards fail, I would never use them. My CF cards have been through the wash many a time without fail.

    5. Re:Smartmedia cards not indestructable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash memory wears out on writes, so if you write too many times in your card it will die soon...

      The number of writes depends on the maker, it goes from 100.000 to 2.000.000 writes on the same block.

      Some implement an internal mechanism of wear leveling.

  15. And in other news... by rossdee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They don't survive being submerged in molten steel either.

    Whats the point of all this destructive testing? Do you really need your media to be THAT tough? (with the obvious exception of military applications but they can afford to pay for that.)

    1. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, steel melts around 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit.

      Memory cards melt around 9,980 degrees Fahrenheit.

      Wait--what? Memory cards aren't made of neutronium?

      Oh, sorry, nevermind.

    2. Re:And in other news... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whats the point of all this destructive testing?

      It's simple my good fellow.
      They call it "soft news". The article writes itself, all you need to do is apply some stupid practices to every day items.
      Human interest programs do this all the time, testing washing detergents on household floors or pets to see what will happen. It's a handy way for second rate journalists to churn something out and meet a quota. It's also handy marketing fodder.

      It's not News for Nerds, or even Stuff that Matters, it's just something pointless, but nice and simple to digest.

    3. Re:And in other news... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well cola and coffee testing IS usefull. Shit Happens.
      Some goes to washing: Yes, you should check your pockets, but you could miss a card.

      nailing is idotic, and i dont unterstand what kind of stress a RC car should provide..

      But i would be REALLY interested in a torture test like 100 read write cycles, 48h at 70degrees in a climate chamber, repeat for a year to test how good longterm reliance really is...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:And in other news... by Aim+Here · · Score: 1

      "Whats the point of all this destructive testing? Do you really need your media to be THAT tough? (with the obvious exception of military applications but they can afford to pay for that.)"

      I'd have thought the military would want their media to be more destructible, not less.

      Picture the scene, you're shot down behind enemy lines with the entire plans for Operation Atomic Puppydog on your person and the bad guys are about to catch and interrogate you. You don't want your ultra-secret military data to withstand sledgehammer blows and being nailed to the tree - and if swallowing it isn't going to destroy it by the time the enemy's crack Special Forces proctology team gets to it, then you're going to be in trouble...

    5. Re:And in other news... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      If you know the thing works after some brutality you can be more confident nothing will happen ordinarily. When floppy disks were so delicate I worried about touching them, getting dirt on them, etc. it really made me worry about everything in the computer.

      Technology has come a long way since but think of the possibilities. Some people want to take pictures under water. Some people might take a long field trip and not be able to make a backup for weeks. It would be nice for laptops to be generally far more tolerant. People should feel more free to take their equipment with them.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    6. Re:And in other news... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Whats the point of all this destructive testing? Do you really need your media to be THAT tough? (with the obvious exception of military applications but they can afford to pay for that.)

      Because these are the things that happen when have a family. It's Saturday, the kids are outside playing, and they see something really funny, like a baby squirrel trying to raid a birdfeeder. You run upstairs, grab your camera and try and take some pictures to keep the kids happy. You take a couple of photographs or make a MPEG movie, then allow them to take the memory-card out to download onto the PC. You get the card back and put it back in your pocket. Forgetfully, you put the trousers in the washing basket, and fail to remove the card (It gets a full spin wash). Or you briefly put the camera down on a coffee table, leave the room to get your laptop. In the meantime, your 3-year old decides that its time for Builder Bob to search for building materials for the new multi-colored office block that going up in his bedroom. Or you leave a spare card in the carrying bag for the camera, on the picnic table in the sundeck, and there's a Summer thunderstorm. The bag is soaked, but at least the card still works (You don't have to spend another $50 on a new card).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:And in other news... by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Whats the point of all this destructive testing? Do you really need your media to be THAT tough?

      It wasn't quite a memory card, but I put my usbflash drive through the wash the other day by accident (damn thing's so light I didn't notice it in my shirt pocket). It was pretty wet inside afterwards, but after careful drying over the central heating vents, it works as good as new :)

      So it's quite useful to have tough media! Although I don't intend to make a habit of regularly laundering my flash memory ...

    8. Re:And in other news... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Okay, nail it to the tree and put a round from the 1911 through it.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  16. Bad news or good news for printing services? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article: The results of the test are bad news for photography processing services... Around eight out of 10 digital pictures are thought to never make it into printed form at all.

    My parents have about 50 baby photo's of me. I have about 2000 digital baby photo's of my daughter. However, if I am lucky 25 of those are really worthy of printing. If 2 out of 10 digital pictures really make it to actual print, I consider that a great deal. I would say that translates to booming business for the printing services.

    1. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by jchawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have to agree with the poster. I am on my third digital camera and have shoot 10's of thousands of photos. Maybe 1 in 10 is worth printing out. Digital photography gives you the power to shot things over and over again until you get the shot to look exactly like you want.

      You don't have to "Get lucky" anymore to get a good shot! This is truly nice. Plus there's tons of places that are doing digital processing and they'll even mail you the photos. I just used ofoto.com and was impressed with the quality / turn around time, I had my pictures in 3 days. I'm thinking of giving Walmart a try next because their prices are slightly cheaper and they do have an in store pickup option which saves you $$$ on shipping.

    2. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      3 days for printed pictures?

      Even old style film rolls are processed in 20-60mins as standard. Heck, even my printer can do better!

      The asda (walmart) near us has a decent enough processing lab (digital and roll, paper output and cd copy from a variety of card formats) and gets them ready by the time we've finished shopping. :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but printing digital pictures is about 10 times as expensive as getting regular prints...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by Professor+S.+Brown · · Score: 0

      1 in 10? Now I dont know wether I have high standards or I'm just an shitty photographer. I always have postview on, and when I take a photo maybe 1 in 4 photo's make it past postview and onto the memory card. Eventually I copy all the photos onto my computer, and delete at least 2/3s of those. Then I fix em up in Photoshop, and delete another 1/3. Of those that are left, and I consider worth keeping, just maybe 1 in 10 are worth printing! Thats about 1 in 200 photos!

      --
      Shitram Brown, PhD
      Professor of Mathematics
    5. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by hgcrpd · · Score: 1

      Walmart and Sam's club both give great prices, though the latter is a bit cheaper for those of you with membership. It's like 19 cents for a single print or something, which really isn't all that bad. Their quality is good, and they can have it done in an hour in some cases. I'd definately go with these guys over some sort of online company: the prints are done quickly, and if you don't like some photos, you can return them for a small refund.

    6. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by aslate · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about an online service which you send your photos by email or something, they print and post back to you. Therefore the 3 days is just postage. If you're not in a rush for your photos or you don't have somewhere that does digital photos near you, it's a good compromise.

    7. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by MacFury · · Score: 1
      I'm thinking of giving Walmart a try next because their prices are slightly cheaper

      And you get the warm fuzzy feeling of supporting a terrible company with shady business practices.

    8. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by mgscheue · · Score: 1

      Except that if you have to keep shooting until you get something decent you're still depending on "getting lucky"; it's just that you'll have more lucky shots in 10,000 pictures than you'll have in 1000.

    9. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by Huogo · · Score: 1

      It comes out about the same actually. Around here, a 36 exp roll of film costs $6.99 to devolop, or ~ $.19/print. The film then costs about $3.5. So total, we have (6.99+3.5)/36, or $.29/print. At our Walgreen's, its... guess what... $.29/print for digital. Exact same cost, except you only have the pictures you want printed. AND, At Walgreen's, if you have over 50 pictures printed, they drop the price to $.20/print. Walmart is $.24/print regardless of how many you have printed.

      Seems cheaper to me, especially if you wait until you have 50 pictures to print and them get the discount.

    10. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm thinking of giving Walmart a try next because their prices are slightly cheaper and they do have an in store pickup option which saves you $$$ on shipping

      Make sure you do it on a Tuesday when our Walmart boycott is not in effect.

    11. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Your right of course,

      its easy to take local services for granted when living near a large city.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    12. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I do ALL my shopping there!

    13. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Mhmmm, strange... Around here, a 36 exp. costs around 2 USD to develop, plus .12 USD for prints, while digital prints are about 1.5 USD...

      Seems that kodak/fuji/etc minilabs are being exported cheaply here to the third world...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    14. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by a1englishman · · Score: 1

      Outside of drug stores with 1 hour developer machines, I have never seen a price of $2 to develop a 36 exposure roll. Drug stores are netorious for having bad chemicals, and machines full of lint. You want a good print, you send the film to Kodak or Fuji's lab, and pay the piper.

    15. Re:Bad news or good news for printing services? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Here in Mexico City, I get good prints from $2 USD developing and $0.15 each print.

      Cheap looking pictures I can get at the subway station for about $1.5 USD plus $0.10 each print.

      Of course, in the third world, you win some, you lose some... I can't find a decent digital camera for less than $200.00 usd, go figure.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  17. Yes by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most ICs are surprisingly resilient. I remember hearing about somebody testing an atari cartridge to see what it would take to break one. He was trying to see if the arguement for the legality of ROM dumping as a way to backup your games in case they become corrupt really had any merit. IIRC he through it a couple stories onto the sidewalk, rolled over one with his car, hit it with a sledgehammer, dumped soda in it, etc. The case cracked earlier on, but I think the cartridge didn't actually stop working until the actually IC broke after a couple hits with the sledgehammer, although it did continue to work after the circuit board was broken.

    1. Re:Yes by LaForce · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine had a living room fire, and I still has some of her Nintendo cartridges that survived. The cases are slightly melted and discolored, but the ones that still physically fit in the Nintendo work great(not the same machine my friend owned. AFAIK that one isn't around anymore)

      I don't know how close the fire actually got to his Nintendo, but if it was hot enough to melt the plastic I'd think the guts of those things have to be pretty good. Try doing that with a PS2 game and see what happens. :)

    2. Re:Yes by LaForce · · Score: 1

      Blah should be "her nintendo". Why is it whenever I use the term "my friend" these days I always default to a male pronoun? Maybe I'm just lonely.

    3. Re:Yes by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I think the cartridge didn't actually stop working until the actually IC broke after a couple hits with the sledgehammer, although it did continue to work after the circuit board was broken.

      If that's the case, Atari games are far more durable than newer cartridges. I've had TWO Genesis cartridges killed by a simple 1/2-story fall (onto hard flooring, not carpet, unfortunately).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  18. Paper Shredder by leon.gandalf · · Score: 3, Funny

    That will kill it....

    1. Re:Paper Shredder by H8X55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or kill your paper shredder. i have a pretty cheap one.

  19. Smartmedia still fragile by jridley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Regardless of these tests, the fact still remains that the vast majority of friends that have had memory cards fail have been using SmartMedia. Practically every person I know with SmartMedia cameras have at least one card that isn't working.
    I've been using CompactFlash for a long time, and have yet to have a failure. I have everything from 16M cards (used to carry files around) to 1GB cards (hundreds of photos, filled only on vacation). I don't know any of my friends with CF that have ever had a card fail, though a few of them have had filesystem corruption (I blame that mostly on the devices, not the card).

    1. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by thogard · · Score: 1

      I have a few smart media cards from a few years ago when the rio was new and when I was recently trying import the pictures again, I found 5 of the smart memory cards could not be read. That was out of about 15 or so. Most of the cards are 32mb but all the ones that are bad are 32mb cards.

    2. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it these were flash cards, not Microdrives?

    3. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      They cannot be read because the early Rio's used a proprietary disk format. I had one of the early Rio players too and the format it used was incompatible with my camera that uses a FAT file system.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    4. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      Yeah I had a similar problem I have smart media cards and I bought this cheap MP3 player that also used smart media unfortunately it seemed to reformat my card and now the card can't be reformatted in my camera. Now that the mp3 player broke that cheap thing has destroyed my 128 Meg card :(

    5. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing I do with any card I buy is to dd it in linux and run it through tar -cj and it spits out a tiny file that I can always restore to later. I've had to use it twice, a real saver!

    6. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by janinl · · Score: 1

      I had an similar problem.
      It has been solved by reseting the CIS (card information structure) thanks to a Zio smartmedia reader.
      http://www.digit-life.com/articles/smcres tore/
      http://www.geocities.com/roberthaus/pan/

    7. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

      At least memory cards are getting cheap these days. I saw a Fry's ad in the paper this morning for a 256MB compact flash card for $15 ($35 - $20 mail-in rebate). A couple days ago they were advertising a 1 GB card for $100. A few years ago when I bought a 128 MB card it was nearly $100.

    8. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      why didnt they MELT them?
      or grind them into powder?

      just as probable.

      what would be more intresting would be failure rates for different manufacturers cards in totally normal long term usage. ic's are quite resilent to normal (physical)abuse but can just 'break on their own'.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by lanner · · Score: 1

      I must agree with this post. I have an Olympus C-3000 that uses SmartMedia, and have seen a number of friend's cameras and how they operate. I have seen and experienced more problems with SmartMedia than any other. Ironically the problem it's with the media but with the devices that write to the media.

      The reason for this is that "SmartMedia" is actually "ReallyDumbMedia", in that it doesn't have any embedded controller intelligence. This resulted in a bunch of problems with early SmartMedia devices which were programmed badly and could not have their firmware updated. If the devices writing to the card fail to behave and all conform to the exact format standards, the card becomes corrupt and all data is lost. For applications where you might take you card from your camera, to your computer, and then your PDA, this spells real trouble.

      The only advantage to all of this is that SmartMedia is cheaper to manufacture due to it's dumbness.

      These problems are why Olympus and Fuji have dumped SmartMedia and came out with the XD card -- to fix some of the problems that SmartMedia had. I have not had any experience with XD yet though.

      SmartMedia is physically pretty tough, completely protected to submersion in liquid, and it's very very thin (credit card thin). It's good for write few/read many applications, but not for writing in different devices that don't have good operating systems.

    10. Re:Smartmedia still fragile by thogard · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of the rio issues... My name is in snow blind's rio software :-)

      These cards are having problems were some images just aren't right anymore or the entire card can't be read because of fat file system blocks are bad.

      Another problem is most of the usb adapters won't read a card in block mode unless its got a partition table so I can't just dd an image out and then fix up what is broken.

  20. Microwave? by jomas1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's odd that with all the things they did to these cards, they did not put them through a microwave. It's not like that would have been hard to do and should happen more often to cards than being nailed to a tree.

    1. Re:Microwave? by Kippesoep · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's scary. How many times have you accidentally put something in a microwave? Not that many people accidentally nail stuff to a tree very often... That said, it would've made a fun experiment.

    2. Re:Microwave? by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Oh nno! It's the guy from the urban legend about the poodle!

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    3. Re:Microwave? by MadBurner · · Score: 1

      Microwaving cd's is lots of fun. give it a try. of course dont use something with data on it. and dont give it more then about 3 seconds or you'll smell it for months.

    4. Re:Microwave? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      How many times have you accidentally put something in a microwave?

      A spoon... Only once in my entire life.

      Not that many people accidentally nail stuff to a tree very often...

      If you get that specific, of course not. However, if you generalize it more, it's quite possible.

      How many people have put a nail through something on accident? Quite a few I'd say, especially when it's something as small as a SD card, that could either be unnoticed setting on a porch rail, kitchen table, etc. Odds may be against the nail problem, but it's more likely than you accidentally putting it in a microwave.

      When was the last time you were taking off your shoes, and accidentally put them in the microwave instead of your coffee mug? Not too often I'd bet. Memory cards and digital cameras aren't like silverwear. They're not too likely to even be near your microwave, let alone be mistaken for something you wanted to put in the microwave.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Microwave? by Matrix9180 · · Score: 1

      you meant to put your shoes in your coffee mug? ;)

      --
      120chars for a sig is teh suck
  21. Washing your memory card by dustbunny26 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    CF cards usually stand a trip through the washer. Just let it dry (no, don't use the dryer.) If you use a liquid fabric softner, it might not work. The advice I got from a Canon rep was to wash it again, but don't add softner.

    DB26

    --
    The dustbunnies are under your bed.....
    1. Re:Washing your memory card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "softener".

    2. Re:Washing your memory card by dustbunny26 · · Score: 1

      Yep, you are correct. Not enough coffe yet....

      --
      The dustbunnies are under your bed.....
    3. Re:Washing your memory card by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The advice I got from a Canon rep was to wash it again, but don't add softner.

      Normally, to avoid liability, companies only allow their customer service reps to read from a script rather than to suggest last-ditch things that might work.

      Canon gets an A+ for customer service here.

    4. Re:Washing your memory card by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Canon gets an A+ for customer service here.

      A-. I'd suggest rinsing or moderate soaking in a couple of changes of lukewarm distilled water. Putting it through the washing machine introduces all kinds of new opportunities for mechanical damage, and you might get trouble from mineral deposits if your local water is particularly hard.

      Still, good for the Canon rep for taking a shot at it, and having the confidence to recommend doing that to their product.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  22. Re:Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the indestructible company car the company microwave will never be harmed. Dont do this at home script kiddies.

  23. Can't wait... by b374 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... for something from these guys to handle these.

  24. Use Fuji digital cameras by ylikone · · Score: 1

    The earlier versions of their FinePix line used Smartmedia and now the newer ones use xD cards, so they must know what they're doing. Fuji makes awesome cameras for not too much $$$ also!

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Use Fuji digital cameras by ilikejam · · Score: 2, Funny

      This message brought to you by Fuji Inc.

      --
      C-x C-s C-x k
    2. Re:Use Fuji digital cameras by base_chakra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The earlier versions of their FinePix line used Smartmedia and now the newer ones use xD cards, so they must know what they're doing. Fuji makes awesome cameras for not too much $$$ also!

      xD-Picture Card was developed by Fujifilm and Olympus, and for years there's been evidence of SmartMedia phasing out of the market.

      After reading a lot of reviews, I bought a FinePix A105 at a low price. While shopping around, however, I counted the xD format as a strike against the FinePix because xD is expensive and isn't widely supported--not even by most multi-card readers. It's good to know that xD performs well, but it still makes me feel somewhat like a Betamax user. Ergonomically, I think Memory Stick (PRO) is what appeals to people most, both for its design and the way in which it's installed/removed; but both xD and Memory Stick demonstrate a conflict of interests: the card size that human hands like best is greater than the card size optimal for installation in digital cameras.

      Worsening the ergonomics issue, some cameras place the xD slot inconveniently behind a door on the bottom of the camera; so if the camera is mounted on a tripod or other stand, you have to detach it before you can access the xD door.

    3. Re:Use Fuji digital cameras by adzoox · · Score: 1

      Actually the XD is smartmedia.

      From what I've read the XD card is nothing but encapsulated smartmedia. The majority of a smartmedia card is unused/dead space/plastic

      You can get an adapter to use with media readers for the compact flash slot (what I use) or you can even get one for the smartmedia slot - kinda cool but flimsy, its a smartmedia card with a pocket for the XD.

      I love my Fuji 40i - I wish I could havea greater capacity though - uses Smartmedia. I've been thinking trying to hack an XD card into a smartmedia to see if it works or either dremeling a slot where my media fits so I can use the smartmedia to XD adapter.

      The only thing I'm worried about is - will the camera support media beyond 128MB

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    4. Re:Use Fuji digital cameras by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Ok, that certainly explains the FujiFilm xD/Smartmedia PC-Card adapter that I use to transfer pictures from my camera.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  25. Obligatory coca cola myth debunking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  26. all lies: not indestructable... by Scythr0x0rs · · Score: 5, Funny

    To destroy your flash card:

    Install a small httpd server on flash card and get it \.ed.
    For an extra five (5) points, install Java (Sun) at the same time.

  27. Astonishing? by condensate · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well it goes without saying that there is quite a ssmall probability for a card to get nailed somewhere. And do you really wonder why SM and xD did survive sledgehammering? Come on, they are by far the flattest out there (apart from SD /MMD ). Sledgehammers cannot strike them as hard as CF cards for example.

    Still, those two cards are a bit out of style, since SM is REALLY old, and xDs are only used by digital cameras made by Fuji and Olympus, so I dont think they will find a great audience.

    --
    Black holes were created when god tried to divide by zero
    1. Re:Astonishing? by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Well it goes without saying that there is quite a ssmall probability for a card to get nailed somewhere.

      Better odds than slashdot users. ;)

    2. Re:Astonishing? by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      Well it goes without saying that there is quite a ssmall probability for a card to get nailed somewhere.

      Sounds like most /. readers...

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  28. CEO testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No matter what I used to give one of our CEO's, no matter how hard I'd tested it first, he found new and unusual ways to kill it.
    That's the test I want to see: Can it survive a week at home with a mining company CEO?

    The same kind of CEO who's password was always "password"....

    1. Re:CEO testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same kind of CEO who's password was always "password"....

      BTW, where do you work?

    2. Re:CEO testing? by a1englishman · · Score: 1

      The same kind of CEO who's password was always "password"....


      Well, it does ask for your password.

  29. Re:Oh no by Technician · · Score: 1

    There's always the microwave in the employee breakroom. Guaranteed to destroy small electronics placed within

    I stuck in a spare magnitron I had laying around and it still works fine. ;-)

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  30. Thats a relief! by Tridus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its good to know that if Hillbillies steal my memory card and nail it to a tree to worship as a god, I will still be able to get back my precious pictures of last years Christmas party!

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Thats a relief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its good to know that if Hillbillies steal my memory card and nail it to a tree to worship as a god, I will still be able to get back my precious pictures of last years Christmas party!

      I'm sorry, they didn't actually conduct the "worshipped as a god" test, so there's really no telling. You'd just better hope you can intervene before they get that far.

  31. This reminds me... by MancDiceman · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... of a letter I read in a now long-defunct weekly computer magazine in the UK called New Computer Express. Printed on cheap paper, it attempted to cover all available platforms in one 80-page weekly magazine. This included everything from ZX Spectrums to the then quite new 486 PCs. Macs, Amigas, Ataris, Amstrad CPCs, you name it, they all had their corner in there. Great magazine. Only problem was, their letters page looked like the flamewar from hell...

    One guy wrote in saying he had got fed of up how his friend was always boasting about his Amiga 500 and how it was vastly superior to any other machine on the planet, especially this individual's ZX81 Spectrum. So convinced was he, he proposed a test. He offered the letter-writer his Amiga 500 for free if he could come up with one test, any test of his choice, where the ZX81 outperformed the Amiga.

    The Speccy-owner, sat down, had a think, realised what to do and called his friend over with his Amiga for the test to begin. The friend arrived, and was summoned to the back garden. The Speccy-owner took his ZX81 frisbee-style and flung it across the garden, landing it perfectly in a compost heap.

    The Amiga owner stared at him, spun around with his Amiga, tried throwing it, fell over under the weight, the machine smashing into several pieces. The speccy owner picked up, cleaned off and plugged in his ZX81, and was playing Manic Miner in minutes. The Amiga owner was told to take his trash and go home, which he did, crying...

    When it comes to destruction tests, you have to ask "what's the point?". My media cards are normally well protected inside cameras or PCs and are unlikely to be dipped in cola or nailed to trees. However, it's always interesting to see how things work outside of the environment for which they were designed, just like that ZX81 and Amiga 500.

    1. Re:This reminds me... by marol · · Score: 0

      He fell over under the weight of his A500? Shouldn't be too hard even for a 11 year nerd to throw one of these over the yard.

    2. Re:This reminds me... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Funny

      >My media cards are normally well protected inside cameras or PCs and are unlikely to be dipped in cola or nailed to trees.

      Even if you don't have children sometimes your visitors will have them.

      A friend of mine kept work and backups on 5.25" floppies with red and green sleeves. One day she found all her work and backups cut into festive shapes and hanging from the Christmas tree.

      Don't assume you know what to expect.

    3. Re:This reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that particular Amiga vs Spectrum test is the paucity of information with regards to how to judge which machine "outperformed" the other. Was the test to see how far it could be thrown? How loud a noise it makes when it lands? Or, how many pieces it is reduced to? Consider the following observations.

      a) It didn't go as far and heaviness is obviously an important property of any computer.

      b) Presumably, it made more noise than the flimsy Spectrum made when it landed on the compost heap. This is to be expected though because of the superior sound chip in the Amiga.

      c) Finally, the Amiga completely broke while the Spectrum remained intact! We can conclude from this observation that the Spectrum is far sturdier and therefore more suitable for use as a doorstop.

      It is clear therefore, that the Amiga is the superiour computer.

      (Yes, I am one of those die-hard Amiga users.)

    4. Re:This reminds me... by MatanZ · · Score: 1

      Manic Miner on a ZX81?

    5. Re:This reminds me... by troon · · Score: 1

      Note: ZX81 != Spectrum.

      The ZX81 had 1K user RAM as standard, with a 16KB expansion pack. Black & white display only, with a flat keyboard. Available from 1981, superseding the similar white ZX80.

      The original Spectrum was available from 1982 with either 16KB or 48KB of user RAM, with an expansion pack for the former. Colour display (no more than 2 colours per character space) and dead fish keys.

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  32. Missed a couple of tests... by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ..from the real world.

    shuffle your feet thru carpet with nylon footwear and pick up a memory card (in Minnesota in February).

    Have my cat determine the memory card is alive and subsequently attack the memory card

    Have a dog carry the memory card in it's mouth for a couple of hours; then bury the memory card in the back yard.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  33. How to destroy a Compact Flash card by alien-alien · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Much more real-world than even the dog chewing on your memory card.

    Just insert the card the wrong way up into your card reader. Our Compact Flash card reader is not well keyed and allows this.

    Instant card death on powerup :-(

  34. Offer by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    Anyone who wants me to destroy their valuable electronics, please contact me. I would be glad to send you lots of pictures, like this guy did! You know where to find me...

  35. I want a blow by blow! by sosuke · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want a blow by blow with video and what cards performed after what tests! I wanna see the pain in the media cards face when it gets nailed to the tree, and bashed with a sledgehammer!

    1. Re:I want a blow by blow! by scottking · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe mel gibson can direct it.

      --
      scott king
  36. Um...the brands? by rfunches · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Notice there aren't any brands mentioned (don't know about the magazine article it came from though). I'd bet anything that they bought the pricey stuff. Try those tests with PNY CrapMedia cards and see how long they last.

  37. Honey quick! Nail this memory card to the tree! by khrtt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These guys have just such imagination. How about some real-life tests, like static electricity, X-ray machine, being left on the dashboard on a sunny day, being brought in on a cold winter day..

    And if you are going to drop it in water, use salty water. After all, there are those things called "sea" and "ocean" and people get their cameras splashed when they play near them. Probably no less often then they spill soda on them.

    Oh, and when you precious memory card falls out of your pocket while you are crossing the street, there are going to be tons of toy cars running over it.

  38. It's a Non-test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry, but: yawn.

    Real tests would've included rewriting until the flash would die and counting the rewrites.

    I think they didn't have enough real material to fill their papers (much of a recent syndrome).

    1. Re:It's a Non-test by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      I don't really understand. If you take enough pictures to burn out the bulb don't you just put in a new bulb and keep going??

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  39. Real life experiments indeed by Teun · · Score: 1

    I'd say the high temp test was in the boiling and washing machine tests.
    Contrary to high radiation and strong magnetic fields these are Real Life situations.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Real life experiments indeed by b374 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Contrary to high radiation and strong magnetic fields these are Real Life situations.
      Right... specially the nailing on a tree stuff is real life situation.

      And there are x-ray scanners for the radiation stuff... speakers for the magnetic fields... etc
    2. Re:Real life experiments indeed by gnuman99 · · Score: 2, Informative
      And there are x-ray scanners for the radiation stuff... speakers for the magnetic fields... etc

      X-ray scanners are quite weak and will do nothing. You get more problems with the background radiation which can be more ionizing to RAM. Things like muons (heavy electrons) can flip a gate or two if lucky. X-ray will do nothing. At least at the levels that people survive.

      As to magnetic fields, well, check out the MRI machines. Those have a huge magnetic field and there is the ramp (magnetic field getting changed type of ramp) in the scan area of a quite large amount.

    3. Re:Real life experiments indeed by modge · · Score: 1

      those of us who regularly used big f*** off speakers as seats (no they weren't plug in hence vibrating u sick minded fool) will know that magnetic fields are a real life danger to e.g. all the mag strips on stuff in your wallet.

      --
      I am a sig
  40. Squidgard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh, right, my squidgard config file...

    You know, I really don't think I'm going to bother setting up a proxy server just so I can correct the egregious aesthetic miscalculations of Taco and company.

    Is there a CSS answer?

    1. Re:Squidgard? by Tore+S+B · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, I and the poster I was shamelessly stealing from, assumed that you already have a proxy server (The network I'm on, a Skolelinux system (I'm a translator/tester) uses a proxy on the gateway)
      Other uses for the HTTP proxy is apt-get caches and so on.

      I completely agree that there is no point in setting up a proxy for this purpose.

      --
      toresbe
    2. Re:Squidgard? by Beale · · Score: 1

      Just use your hosts file to redirect it.slashdot.org to slashdot.org.

    3. Re:Squidgard? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      This is a web-browser-level issue. Everything is the same server, it just checks the URL your browser asks for for things like "it" and "ask" and then colors things appropriately. Nothing hosts can fix. Something that regular expressions in a javascript style sheet can.

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:Squidgard? by Beale · · Score: 1

      Um... From here, it looks like all the specific upper hosts (like linux.slashdot.org or it.slashdot.org) go to one IP, while all the requests to just "slashdot.org" go to another. So, redirect one to the other, and they'll all be the default colour scheme.

  41. 2000G's by Teun · · Score: 1

    Talking about dropping, with a SD card I recently bought was a little folder claiming it would withstand a acceleration/decelleration of up to 2000G!
    That's probably the sledgehammer test.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:2000G's by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Excuse my ignorance, but what exactly is 2000G?

      Say, how do I turn that into some more meaningful figure, like the distance it can fall into a stone floor? Or is there somewhere a site that details the common values for comparison purposes, like the tables that give examples for sound levels?

    2. Re:2000G's by imroy · · Score: 1

      Lets see... 2000g = 19.6Km/s/s acceleration. So imagine car travelling at 19.6Km/s (43843.951 miles per hour) and braking to a stop within one second. But considering that these CF cards only weigh probably < 50 grams, the actual forces and energies involved would not be nearly so great.

  42. The Passion of the Memory Card by Mad+Man · · Score: 2, Funny
    was Talk about real life experiments
    right, coz it happens to me all the time, to nail a memory card on a tree by accident...
    What if you're holding the memory card in your hand while somebody is driving a nail through it? It could happen.
  43. The goggles... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... they do nothing!

  44. nailing XD to a tree by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I use XD cards in my camera. Nailing them to a tree might be a good idea LOL. They are so d**n small, you might lose them. I have to keep them in the little plastic case they came in, because in the bottom of my camera bag, is sorta like a womans purse! It's a bottomless black hole!

  45. friends have had plenty of CF go bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And I do mean bad, not just corrupted. I've seen more bad CF than anything else. Part of this is because CF is so popular. But another part is because CF lends itself well physically and as a market thing to making crap cards from crap parts.

    There is a big market for low priced CF and a market for good quality CF. Compare this to a less thriving market like MemoryStick. All MemorySticks are essentially the same. The Sony and the Lexar ones are made in the same factory. And since MemoryStick is so small, you can't go buying up lousy old surplus flash chips and try to make a card from them.

    I'm not trying to complain about CF either, if you buy decent CF it works great. On the other hand, I can't stand SmartMedia. It is and always was a poor standard. xD replaces it and is a better standard, I just don't think we need another memory format.

    1. Re:friends have had plenty of CF go bad by jridley · · Score: 1

      Hmm, weird. I *do* treat my cards pretty well, as with all my equipment.

      I've always bought the cheapest $/megabyte card I could get that was around $100 when it was time for a new card. Over the years I've gotten the following cards for around $100:

      64M, 128M, 256M, 512M, and now 1024M (most expensive at $120). The 1024 has only had 4 week's service, but so far, so good.

      I also once owned a 1GB microdrive, but I sold it fast when CF prices started plummeting; I never trusted it.

      I'm at somewhere around 15,000 photos in 6 different digital cameras over the last 4 years or so. Never lost a photo except out of stupidity (rm * in wrong dir, etc).

  46. Re:Of course they don't break when you want them t by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Informative
    I have had a terrible experience with Lexar as well when it comes to digital media. I class I was taking provided everyone with a Lexas Jumpdrive (USB flash memory drive) and it turns out that almost half of them just stopped working after a few weeks. Data could not be written/read off of them, and they would not format either.

    It may have been the USB controller that was damaged. The way that these drives were designed was that the connector was attached directly to the circuit board, without anything else holding it in place. Or, perhaps it may have been the flash memory that was faulty, like in your circumstance.

  47. Alternatively... by antizeus · · Score: 1, Insightful
    You could always switch to light mode. It will "reduce the complexity of Slashdot's HTML for AvantGo, Lynx, or slow connections", but I use it with graphical browsers over a fast connection.

    I think it looks a lot better than default mode. I'm the sort of person who cares more about content than (hideous) presentation.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
  48. Tree by akeyes · · Score: 2, Funny

    I nail my memory cards to trees all of the time.

    1. Re:Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah go ahead.. ridicule it now.. but suppose you're Jesus and you're looking to reviews like these to inform you about the best kind of memory card to carry with you on your second coming??

  49. ... okay. by jesdynf · · Score: 4, Funny

    So most memory cards are just as powerful, if not more so, than Jesus. Hmm.

    --
    Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    1. Re:... okay. by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Guys, how the heck is that a troll? Mod up funny!

    2. Re:... okay. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Modding up +Funny will not help, it's just an invitation to have more karma removed when it gets modded down again. Someone appreciating the comment should mod it underrated or another +category other than Funny.

  50. Nailing it to trees by t_allardyce · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is this some kind of Christian thing?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Nailing it to trees by arodland · · Score: 1

      I had come up with a great new design for a memory card. This time it was right, it would work, and no one would have to get nailed to anything. Sadly, however, before I could get to a phone to tell anyone about it the Earth was unexpectedly demolished to make way for a new hyperspace bypass, and so the idea was lost forever.

  51. Torture? Joking? by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just use such a card as Knoppix home directory, work on it intensively for a month or two. You'll exceed write cycle limit of the flash memory and it will die without a squeak. That's how I busted my Nokia 5510 flash memory. First sectors are corrupted and unwritable.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  52. Tougher, realistic tests? by ChumpusRex2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nice to know these cards are so tough. I've been struggling to think of some conceivable situations which might actually cause accidental damage. 1) Trip to beach (Lots of salt and sandy bits) 2) Immersion under pressure (dropped in swimming pool) 3) Magnetic fields (accidentally taken for an MRI scan) 4) Ionizing radiation (Multiple airport X-rays) 5) Extremes of temperature (left in car in winter)

    1. Re:Tougher, realistic tests? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      1) Trip to beach (Lots of salt and sandy bits)

      Sand shouldn't do anything, as there are no moving bits.

      There is no reason not to fully seal CF cards, but the salt *could* corrode the contacts unless they are completely gold-plated.

      2) Immersion under pressure (dropped in swimming pool)

      There's no reason to have gas in the CF card, and hence the card should not be compressable.

      3) Magnetic fields (accidentally taken for an MRI scan)

      Unless you have a CompactFlash fetish and regularly store CF cards in your rectum, you won't be accidentally taking these into an MRI scan. MRI people are careful about this (and generally require you to switch into a hospital gown to avoid exactly this. I have a friend that got an MRI that did a good deal of metal ship work, and has metal filings embedded in his skin -- when the MRI magnets kick on, the tiny filings ripped out through his skin, leaving little droplets of blood. The MRI people won't be letting you accidentally leave anything sizeable and metal on your person.

  53. Not Surprising by longbot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is not at all surprising, considering that these are solid-state cards, with no moving parts. If they had tried to do any of this to something like a CF MicroDrive, then it wouldn't have lasted even through the first test before it stopped working.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
  54. Nailed to a tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knew that Jesus would come back as a memory card?

  55. Cell phones give off microwave radiation by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Cell phones give off a small amount of Microwave radiation. And putting any consumer based product with ICs in a microwave will fry the gates. So, I would imagine over time putting memory cards in the same pocket with a cell phone might cause damage to the memory.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Cell phones give off microwave radiation by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      That's like saying fire gives off heat, and my body gives off heat. Fire damages all IC based products, so over time the heat from my body might cause damage to the memory.

      --
      AccountKiller
  56. Real-world Testing by monkeymanatwork · · Score: 1

    I have a 128MB Trek ThumbDrive purchased in December of 2002. Since then, it has been dropped in hot coffee twice, been through the washing machine three times, and left at a business site 500 miles from home and returned via FedEx. The plastic cap is shot on it; this was a bad design to start with. The keyring was attached to the point of greatest strain, the top of the pocket clip. The keyring and pocket clip therefore broke off together, making it impossible to carry except in one's pocket. Two tiny plastic doodads keep the cap snugly on the device, until after about 6 months one of the plastic tangs broke off. Breakoff of the other is imminent. But the company where I work has several of these, and no one has ever lost data on any of them, except the clown who "accidentally" reformatted his in MacOS 9. I think I saw these recently remarketed under the Maxtor brand name.

  57. What's so special about memory cards? by Simon+Spero · · Score: 1

    iPods are just as survivable...

    http://www.ibiblio.org/ses/washandgo.html

  58. The *ULTIMATE* test for your memory card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moving it from your camera to your memory card reader. In my case it scrambled the data on the card.

  59. Sample size too small by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Really, they should have requested evaluation cards and tested ten of each. Doing things like testing nailing to a tree depends a lot on where the nail is going through.

  60. Six year old? by RDW · · Score: 4, Funny

    Giving the card to a six year old kid to trash is all very well, but what about a _really_ destructive force like a four year old? There's a good reason why the nearly indestructible Pelican protective cases are guaranteed against everything except shark bite, bear attack and children under five.

  61. One more test for the books by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    Place two cards under the rear wheels of a front wheel drive car. Set the parking brake. Drive.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  62. "Bad" CF or Bad OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I had a 8 MB flash card (free "rebate" type deal from Kodak), that appeared to fail.

    I could not do anything with it in the camera or my Windows box. Couldn't even format it.

    When the PC with the CF reader in it finally got a real OS put on it, I gave it another shot and was able to resurrect it.

    Although with my current camera, 8 MB only holds 1 or 2 images. I use it mostly as a "reserve tank". If I put that card in I have to go from the "it's digital, shoot everything" mode to "save your last bullet" mode.

  63. Re:Missed a couple of tests... by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

    My cat doesnt need a memory card to start attacking. I swear she sees "ghost mice".

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  64. Real world example by CrackedButter · · Score: 2, Informative

    My dad dropped his camera in the lake while fishing. The camera was fubar, the XD memory cards still worked and I retreived the photos off them. I use them even today in my own digital camera, he hasn't got one now!

  65. Nail Tree Thing . . . by Dausha · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm not worried about the nail-to-a-tree test, but I am worried about the staple-through test. I've only rarely seen a tree in an office, but I've seen many lUsers who are given to some strange behaviors. I've seen them staple through a 5.25" to attach it to a document. What would come of a staple-to-docuemnt for these media? Why didn't they test that?!

    Now I'm going worry so much that I'll have problems sleeping, followed by curling up into the fetal position in a dark corner, rocking myself back and forth whispering "Rosbud," until they give me my Thorazine.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  66. Depends by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Interesting
    on where exactly you put that nail...

    Circuit boards are washed during manufacture in something closely resembling a dishwasher, using orange oil. Puting them through a home dish washer is nothing special.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  67. Pedantic Point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Zx81 and spectrum were two different machines. I'd bet a zx81 would survive more abuse than a speccy as it's smaller and lighter.

    Also, until last year there was no manic miner for the Zx81.

  68. Not a good idea by elegie · · Score: 1

    Virtually all electronics contain metal. Placing metal objects in a microwave oven can pose a fire hazard and can damage the oven. Google Answers has a discussion on the presence of metal racks in some microwave ovens.

  69. aren't memory cards supposed to be INSIDE computers?

    When's the last time you dunked your whole computer in coffee?

    (For some of you, probably recently.)

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:Uhhhh by 1337+Twinkie · · Score: 2, Informative

      These are the cards that you use in your camera, non-volatile flash memory cards, not RAM. Your standard RAM card would certainly not survive jack. But then, RAM is normally confined to the inside of your case, which is generally too large to stick in coffee.

    2. Re:Uhhhh by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Ah, I didn't even notice the memory card reference in the last sentence of the heading, I was too amazed at the nonsensical torture tests.

      The way I see it, people should handle electronic stuff gently. Morons won't. So how tough do you have to make it? More importantly, why is this never done?

      I'm still amazed that every "archival" media ever invented seems to be easy to make useless. First it was tape - it unspools, it twists, it rubs, it slips - all from normal use. Then it was eight-inch floppies - bend 'em, they're worthless. Finally somebody got the bright idea of putting them in a plastic case - only took them a decade or two to figure that one out.

      Then they came out with - ta-dah! - CD's - put a fingerprint or a scratch on them, they're worthless.

      When are these morons going to come up with storage media that is in fact HARD to make worthless?

      Obviously, never - because then they couldn't sell you gazillions of them.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    3. Re:Uhhhh by 1337+Twinkie · · Score: 1

      Obviously now. Those media cards are pretty had to make worthless. It's kind of hard to put a fingerprint on an IC and you can't bend such a tiny thing (and even if you do, they have been shown to work even with a busted circut board). Flash media won't unspool, slip, or mechanically degrade through normal use. They will electrically degrade, after about 100000 write cycles, but that would take months of constant usage as a swap partition for petes sake.

      Oh, it's also pretty hard to make stone tablets worthless, and those were invented thousands of years ago ;)

    4. Re:Uhhhh by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but media cards have what capacity compared to tape and disk? I was referring to archival media. Media cards really don't qualify except for very small amounts of data.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  70. RTFA, moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are talking about flash memory cards that are used in things like cameras and USB thumdrives, illiterate dipshit

  71. Tech Passion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bruised and beaten, nailed to a tree, this memory card died and rose again to free your soul.... what was the article about again?

  72. compact flash aquatics by iew · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had a compact flash survive the washing machine and drier (permanent press cycle)! The Yellowstone photos came out okay in the end, and that flash card still works. The labels got a little rubbed off though.

  73. Smartmedia availability? by ksheff · · Score: 1

    I've had a friend that's lost a bunch of pictures on CF cards. I have a few SmartMedia cards and I've never had any problems with them.

    The only real "problems" that I've had with Smartmedia cards has been availability of them. Most stores that I go to have a ton of CF, MemoryStick, or SD cards. If they happen to carry Smartmedia, they are usually sold out. Did this format ever go beyond 128M and what is the reason for its demise?

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    1. Re:Smartmedia availability? by jridley · · Score: 1

      Without knowing your friend I can't say what the problem is. IMHO most people losing stuff are following bad practices or are using buggy devices that are corrupting the cards. Keep on top of firmware updates for your camera.

      AFAIK SmartMedia never went past 128M. The standard had built in limitations and had to be continually revised to allow for more space. As a result you couldn't just take any SM card and put it into any SM device and expect it to work.

      Basically SM was designed to be as absolutely cheap as possible, by having no intelligence on it at all. This leads to big problems with compatibility (standards have to be followed TO THE LETTER by every single device and card maker or there's trouble), and it meant the standard would never settle down.

      More modern standards (and the old, venerable Compact Flash standard) put a controller on the card. This allows a standard interface (usually just one or two companies will build interface chips and sell them to card makers; those chips are very good at implementing the interface), and gives the card manufacturers a huge amount of flexibility in how their cards work internally. This is why Lexar was able to make faster cards than others; they figured out ways to write to the chips inside faster than other companies were, and could hide it all behind the standard CF interface layer, so it worked transparently with no modification to the device.

      Manufacturers abandoned SmartMedia because there are now much better standards out there, and chip cost is so low that putting some smarts on the card is pretty much free. Look for SD/MMC devices for your next batch of toys; this standard has the advantage of Compact Flash's standards and no real standards limitations, but is also a very nice size. I have a 512M card in my Palm and it's working great!

    2. Re:Smartmedia availability? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      In this case, the "bad practices" has more to due with nightclub security being jerks, confiscating, and 'conveniently' dropping cameras before giving them back.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  74. I ate a 256MB usb drive by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

    and after I pooped it out it worked fine!

    --
    word.
    1. Re:I ate a 256MB usb drive by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      Where's the "+1, Weird" moderation?

  75. MOD PARENT UP by jamonterrell · · Score: 1

    What I wouldn't do for some mod points. That's just funny. You'd think he was kidding, but no, it works.

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  76. windows user exposed! by babybird · · Score: 1

    back-slashdotted? omg!! a windows user!!

    --
    Keith D.
  77. More Tests by PMuse · · Score: 2, Funny
    Let's have some more practical tests:

    hand card over to TSA (Transportation Safety Administration) and ask them to "be careful -- it's fragile"

    pass card over retail store checkout counter magnetic pad

    microwave card for 10 secs

    feed card to puppy (slather with peanut butter if necessary)

    bury card in dust

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)