Slashdot Mirror


Licensing Computer Techs As TV Repairmen

An anonymous reader writes "According to a story in yesterday's New Orleans paper, the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board has sent letters to computer techs demanding fees to license them as radio and TV repairmen. Apparently, as computers drive more home theater applications, the board is trying to classify them as 'playback and recording device equipment,' which the law gives the board power to regulate. It looks more like a money grab, though, since no test is required, just $55 and an affidavit." It seems to me the better question is not whether computers can be defined in many circumstances as playback and recording equipment (hard to get around), but whether this kind of forced classification makes sense in the first place. Disingenuous quote of the day: "We're not trying to swing our arm around a whole bunch of people to get new revenue."

408 comments

  1. End of the letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Y'all send in them checks, ya hear?

    Yours Truly,
    The Fatty McTax.

    1. Re:End of the letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First paying 5 x 699,-$ to SCO, and now this ... WHERE WILL IT ALL END???

      (posted from an ALDI Medion Windows XP homo edition PC)

    2. Re:End of the letter by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Or don't. Here's a thought. If all of the computer techs in Louisiana had the guts to say "we've decided to stop repairing computers rather than pay your extortion fee", the state would implode.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  2. In Home Service? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    How will paranoids get in home service?

    "Awright, it's out there on the grass, yew juss fixit and then back away from it, slow like."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Computer techs hit with fee for license
    But it's coming from radio, TV industry
    Wednesday, August 04, 2004
    By Stewart Yerton
    Business writer

    For the past five years, Jarrod Broussard has run a small computer consulting company, helping business and residential customers deal with a host of problems: from designing Web sites and hosting them, to setting up networks, to troubleshooting software problems and eliminating the viruses that often plague today's computers.

    To Broussard, such work made him a computer technician, plain and simple. But according to a notice sent to Broussard last week from the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board, state regulators have a different view of Broussard and others like him.
    Advertisement

    According to a letter from the regulators, Broussard actually falls under the same regulatory umbrella as a TV repairman.

    As home computers come to the fore as entertainment devices, powering home theaters, audio systems and the like, the Radio and Television Technicians Board is seeking to license computer technicians much the way it has licensed television and radio repair workers since the 1950s.

    To that end, the board last week informed Broussard that he would have to send the board $55 and an affidavit from an employer, customer or computer school attesting that he was a computer consultant. In exchange, Broussard would receive his license.

    Mark Lewis, president of the Louisiana Technology Council, a trade association based in New Orleans, said he finds the situation absurd.

    "They're taking a law passed when computers weren't even around and applying it to computers," Lewis said. "The whole thing is mind-boggling to me -- how they could come up with something like this?"

    According to the letter sent to Broussard, the rationale is straightforward. Louisiana consumer protection laws give the board the power to license people who repair televisions, radios and "playback and recording device equipment" used in the home, the letter said. "Many home computers today, provide for television reception and recording, and all provide audio/visual playback and recording capabilities," the letter continued.

    "Therefore," the letter said, "the Board has elected to license computer technicians."

    The requirement would apply to people "engaged in the repair, maintenance, consultation, or training of computer equipment, including hardware, peripherals, and networks used in the home," the letter said. Commercial computer technicians are not subject to the new requirement, although individuals who provide both commercial and residential services have to comply.

    Computer technicians already in the business would be grandfathered into the system and not required to take a test proving competency to obtain a license, the letter said. Payment of $55 to the board and the affidavit would be sufficient.

    Stanley Brohn, secretary of the Radio and Television Technicians Board, said the intent and scope of the licensing requirement has been misunderstood. The licensing requirement, Brohn said, is designed to protect consumers who have hired computer technicians to install or repair new entertainment systems that employ computers.

    For example, Brohn said, some high definition television monitors are designed to be driven by computers, and in such instances, the work should be done by a certified television and radio technician to ensure that the expensive equipment is not damaged, Brohn said.

    "We're not going after computer technicians," he said. "The only thing we're doing is giving an opportunity for computer technicians to get into the radio and television side of the business."

    Brohn said the letter sent to Broussard and others was misleading in stating that the license requirement would apply to a broad range of computer technicians and consultants, and not simply those wanting to set up home entertainment systems.

    Brohn confirmed that he signed the letter but said

  4. I don't see it as such a bad thing. by mikeophile · · Score: 0

    For $55, you get to say that you are a licensed computer repairperson.

    It would make one stand out amongst competition.

    That seems like a good deal to me.

    1. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by cipher+uk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you are overlooking the fact you won't standout when it reaches a critical mass. as its $55 everyone will get one as without one you will standout badly. this is when it just becomes a money grabbing scheme

    2. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by cmallinson · · Score: 5, Funny
      For $55, you get to say that you are a licensed computer repairperson.
      It would make one stand out amongst competition.
      That seems like a good deal to me.

      In that case, send me $75, and you can be a preferred licenced computer repairperson

    3. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by geek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It would make one stand out amongst competition."

      No it wouldn't because all the competition will also have to have paid $55. It does nothing but gouge people for $55.

    4. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Funny

      Send me $65 and I'll provide a document which let's you say you're better licensed than a Lousiana-licensed TV repairman to work on computers. It'll be about as valid and the money will be about as well spent.

    5. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      You are a fucking short-sighted moron if you think this would help anyone.

      I think that he was joking.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    6. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but regardless of your own opinion, your word carries far less weight than an official Louisiana State document.

    7. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm pretty bloody sure that in my country, my word would count for more than a louisiana state document (which people would just assume was a particularly poor fake id or scam of some sort).

    8. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      An official Louisiana State document? Someone who obviously live outside of LA and has never heard of Huey Long.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    9. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like now, when everyone has a bachelor's degree? But universities are certainly NOT about grabbing money!! (hahaha) It's all about the learning!!! (hahahaha)

    10. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by goatan · · Score: 1

      And for $100 you get the preferred license Plus a titanium toolkit in velour bag and tie pin.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    11. Re:I don't see it as such a bad thing. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "This is when it just becomes a money grabbing scheme..."

      Yup, you got it....I live here in NOLA...first I'd heard about this. But, while this is a REALLY fun place to live, it really is run by a 'bananna republic' type government. These people have no idea about technology...although there are a few that are starting to get in and try, but, then you see sh*t like this happen. I can tell you 1st hand...this is nothing but a money grab. In NOLA, you pay pretty much 9% total sales tax, and I just don't see where it goes. The roads suck here (the city is like one huge speed bump)...the schools are pretty much the lowest in the country..but, great for small arms training.

      Thank goodness the feds are starting to come in down here and try to root out the corruption...but, will take a long time to get it all out after a few hundred years of having it instilled into the culture down here.

      Guess I'd better get out my TV repair study books...and open up my wallet yet again to stuff some politicians pocket or slush fund...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  5. In other news . . . by dgrgich · · Score: 4, Funny

    Louisiana is also attempting to force lawyers to license themselves as garbage collectors. Surprisingly, the Louisiana Bar Association, when asked for comment, indicated that they agreed with the decision.

    1. Re:In other news . . . by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news: "Louisiana state government needs more money, thinks up new way to get it."

      I can visualize the meeting. "Hey, there's lots of people fixin' computers in Looziana and we aint making a dime off'em. Say we charge $55 a pop. I'll get started mailing out the threat letters!"

    2. Re:In other news . . . by new+account+for+mod · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can visualize the meeting. "Hey, there's lots of people fixin' computers in Looziana and we aint making a dime off'em. Say we charge $55 a pop. I'll get started mailing out the threat letters!"

      Darl McBride's first decision at his new job as a consultant for the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board?

    3. Re:In other news . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For good reason.

      Hutz: Mr. Simpson, I was just going through your garbage, and I couldn't help overhearing that you need a babysitter. Of course, being a highly-skilled attorney, my fee is $175 an hour.
      Homer: We pay eight dollars for the night, and you can take two popsicles out of the freezer.
      Hutz: Three.
      Homer: Two.
      Hutz: OK, two. And I get to keep this old bird cage.
      Homer: Done!
      Hutz: [proudly] Still got it.

    4. Re:In other news . . . by afidel · · Score: 1

      Oh how I wish I had mod points tonight, that's damn funny.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:In other news . . . by merdark · · Score: 1

      Except that tv repairmen and computer technicians are much much closer to one another in terms of education than lawers and garbage collectors.

    6. Re:In other news . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah...sense of humor removed at birth?

  6. I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and most TV repairmen can't fix computers.

    It's obviously a way to try to grap money.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I would imagine that TV repairmen were originally regulated because they had to know how to safely work on open TV cabinets containing dangerous high voltages, operate test equipment on those high voltage circuits, and install suitable replacement parts that wouldn't catch on fire.

      I doubt that most computer repair techs have ever opened a monitor (or even a power supply). The entire thing is treated as a disposable unit. Most servicable computer components are relatively idiot-proof, only fit into the appropriate sockets, and operate at no more than 12V.

      If they weren't just going for a money grab, they'd exempt all computer techs who don't open up monitors or power supplies.

    2. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Entropius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is all of them.

      I've been fixing computers for people for a long while, and have never had to open a CRT or power supply. They're just not the sorts of things that break, especially since 90% of repair requests involve cleaning up after Microsoft and are software-only.

    3. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget that an improperly wired CRT will emit X Rays.

      For a TV repairman, it's important to know about this sort of thing.

      If a computer tech doesn't know what he's doing, he will be out of work shortly and he isn't going to cause anyone to get leukemia.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Which is all of them.

      I disagree.

      I've been fixing computers for people for a long while, and have never had to open a CRT or power supply. They're just not the sorts of things that break, especially since 90% of repair requests involve cleaning up after Microsoft and are software-only.

      I don't know about the work you do, but I've had to open a few monitors. Especially when I was doing repair work for Apple. I couldn't tell you how many analog/power boards I replaced in Summer 2000 iMacs. I have a Gateway monitor on my desk right now that was declared junk. I opened it up, fixed it and have been using it for nearly 5 years. Not a bad lifespan for a free piece of hardware.

      I open every dead power supply that I come across to grab the fans. You never know when a 12V fan will come in handy.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:I can't fix most TVs by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would imagine that TV repairmen were originally regulated because they had to know how to safely work on open TV cabinets containing dangerous high voltages, operate test equipment on those high voltage circuits, and install suitable replacement parts that wouldn't catch on fire.

      I worry about this particular money grab for exactly that reason...

      Everyone so far has complained that PC techs have very little in common with TV repairmen, and should not need licensure under the same rules.

      I would point out the flip side to that - Under this wonderful scheme, Lousiana would suddenly have a lot of "licensed" TV repairmen who had no clue how to safely (or successfully, for that matter) repair an actual TV.

      My suggestion for all the geeks annoyed by getting such a letter? Send in your $55, add "TV Repair" to your shingle, and assuming you survive your first electrocution, sue the hell out of the state for making you think you had the skills needed to safely do that job... "Well, they said I could, and in fact, they even said I had to!"

    6. Re:I can't fix most TVs by dmaxwell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple is phasing out CRTs so this won't be true much longer but Apple Certified Technicians are indeed expected to be able to service Apple monitors. The Desktop Certification course contains a high voltage safety portion that has to be passed to get the certification.

      For that matter, LCD panels have inverters in them that can give quite a nasty shock. Apple also expects techs to be able to change out inverters and the lcd itself. Even if you're not working on Apples, it isn't uncommon to have to turn down the flyback voltage and refocus CRTs. I'm certainly not going to throw out a CRT that is slightly out of focus.

      As for power supplies, I've had supplies where the only thing wrong with it was that the fan had bad bearings. Swapping fans out with a more seriously damaged supply is nice quick repair.

    7. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Funny

      would you care to elaborate on what type of "improper" wiring will cause a CRT to emit X-rays

      *scribbles notes furiously*
      *looks for old CRT*

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:I can't fix most TVs by xiando · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As another comment said, get that lisence if you actually do open up CRT monitors and power supplies.

      I do fix other peoples computers from time to time. Home computers. I never opened a CRT monitor. Because I do not know "electronics", I know computers. If the PSU breaks, I get a new PSU. The PC is "repaired", the PSU is broken.

      So I don't get why you would need a paper saying you can do "high volate" (I belive that's why "not just anyone" was supposed to open av TV 50 years ago..). I don't. I do computers. If repairing PSUs is your thing, then do get that lisence. But wait, a PSU doesn't do playback and ANYONE can repair that, apparently, fixing a computer by replaceing a broken PSU, a square box you, as already stressed, DON'T open.. lol

    9. Re:I can't fix most TVs by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      "Let us not forget that an improperly wired CRT will emit X Rays"

      Care to reach under your butt and pull out a cite to this amazing statement?

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    10. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's the "being made before the 1970 introduction of mandatory X-Ray shielding in TVs" issue, which can still affect some b&w TV sets in use in trailer parks and other low-income areas.

    11. Re:I can't fix most TVs by thedillybar · · Score: 1
      >I doubt that most computer repair techs have ever opened a monitor (or even a power supply). The entire thing is treated as a disposable unit.

      And if they did open the power supply with it on, they won't do it again. Touch the wrong thing and it hurts. A lot.

    12. Re:I can't fix most TVs by bstone · · Score: 1

      most TV repairmen can't fix computers

      It seems to me that, if the "TV repair Technicians Board" wants to classify computer repair and installation as "their" field of expertise, they should be required to show that their technicians are competent in the field. Do they test their licensed technicians for competency to install computer driven systems?

      If "the licensing requirement is designed to protect consumers who have hired computer technicians to install or repair new entertainment systems that employ computers." as the licensing board is stating, then where are they "protecting consumers" from TV technicians who install computer systems that drive home entertainment systems?

      I might agree with this licensing if: 1) they could show that the licensing actually meant something other than sending $55 to their bank account, and 2) they could show that the consumer was somehow better off with a "TV technician" installing a computer system, rather than someone who has competency in computer systems. Perhaps, before they start trying to license computer technicians to perform installations, they should try to determine whether or not their current technicians have have the skills and knowledge to handle a computer-driven home entertainment system.

    13. Re:I can't fix most TVs by randyest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not having been anywhere the odious "source" of the grandparent poster's claim (thankfully,) I can only provide a cite to the contrary

      CRT's (Cathode Ray Tubes) direct a beam of electrons at a thin layer of phosphor which coats the screen on your monitor. When the electrons strike the phosphor, shadow mask and other screen components, x-rays are produced. The amount and energy of the x-rays depends on the accelerating voltage. The relatively low voltages in CRT's (compared to commercial x-ray machines) means that relatively low quantities of low energy x-rays are produced and modern monitors are so well shielded, that there is no concern of being irradiated over time. Though it is possible for a damaged monitor to emit x-ray radiation, it is unlikely that harmful amounts will be released, and most x-rays would be directed towards the back or sides of the monitor. Any damage to the front of the CRT severe enough to increase x-ray emission would cause the CRT to implode.

      Ya know, if you're smart enough to ignore this sort of stuff (or vain enough to try to correct them,) /. can be hilarious for the amazing level of confidence maintained by some while posting the most outrageous, usually unsupported, and sometimes unsupportable nonsense ever uttered.

      --
      everything in moderation
    14. Re:I can't fix most TVs by randyest · · Score: 1

      You have a good point, but please be aware that, even if the power is off, unplugged, and it's sitting 50' feet from the nearest outlet, a monitor or TV can still shock you to death. There are very large high-voltage capacitors in there, and if you don't know how to safely discharge them (and still avoid them!) you will get hurt.

      Unplugging isn't enough when it comes to CRTs!

      --
      everything in moderation
    15. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaving it unplugged for a sufficient amount of time is, though.

    16. Re:I can't fix most TVs by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      This doesn't really disprove what he said. He said an improperly repaired monitor could emit X-rays. He didn't say a damaged one would.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    17. Re:I can't fix most TVs by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, let me tell you that a real computer repair shop will have a service depot with people who do work at the electronics level. I work in my companies IT department but sometimes I help the service guys when they are under the gun with a back log. I know only enough electronics to be helpful with basic stuff like testing caps and de-soldering and replacing identical parts based on a sheet of most common failuers until something works. Some of those guys are really smart though and know their stuff. Its incrdible some of the stuff I would have labeled as lost causes that they can have fixed in no-time flat. There service everything from IBM Iserise equipment doing fine detail work on tape drives all the way down to label printers, which most often you just hit with something.

      The point of my comment is this though. The people doing that work for us are EEs, they have credited degrees in Electrical Engineering and many are licensed as EEs. Considering the people who are doing this kinda repair work are already well licensed and covered. It seems insulting to license them again as "repair men"/.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    18. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Macgrrl · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I used to work as an Apple Tech, is was rated to repair monitors (CRTs) and did.

      Power fluctuations could cause the analog baords or the power supply boards on the CRT assembly to fail - usually if a capacitor overloaded. The Performa/PM 5200 model in particular was prone to these problems. In addition to replacing the faulty components, you would then have to 'configure' the display, aligning the image, keystone, etc...

      Given most newer style digital displays allow you to play with the alignment controls through a control panel on the front of the device, you spend less time with the back off - but it wasn't always that way.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    19. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Let me quote from your cite.

      When the electrons strike the phosphor, shadow mask and other screen components, x-rays are produced. The amount and energy of the x-rays depends on the accelerating voltage.

      If some yahoo who doesn't know what he's doing steps up the accelerating voltage, it WILL increase the x-rays produced.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    20. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Informative

      would you care to elaborate on what type of "improper" wiring will cause a CRT to emit X-rays

      Just because YOU never heard of it, doesn't mean that it's not true.

      Have a look at this.

      When the electrons strike the phosphor, shadow mask and other screen components, x-rays are produced. The amount and energy of the x-rays depends on the accelerating voltage. The relatively low voltages in CRT's (compared to commercial x-ray machines) means that relatively low quantities of low energy x-rays are produced and modern monitors are so well shielded, that there is no concern of being irradiated over time.

      This only applies when things are operating to spec, if some inept repairman steps up the accelerating voltage you will be exposed to X-Rays.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    21. Re:I can't fix most TVs by randyest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please tell me how to "step up" the accelerating voltage in a CRT without installing a new transformer or a bank of capacitors. You speak of this "stepping up" as if one might do it accidentally.

      One wouldn't.

      --
      everything in moderation
    22. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Please tell me how to "step up" the accelerating voltage in a CRT without installing a new transformer or a bank of capacitors.

      You just answered your own question. Either using a higher voltage transformer or connecting a higher voltage output from the existing transformer.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    23. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I did not intend to imply the information was incorrect, was looking for inforamation on how to replicate the condition deliberately in order to turn an old TV into an X-Ray emitter

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    24. Re:I can't fix most TVs by unitron · · Score: 1
      "In color television receivers, x-rays may be emmitted from three possible sources: (1) the high voltage regulator tube; (2) the high voltage rectifier tube; and (3) the picture tube."

      page 419 Television Simplified by Milton S. Kiver and Milton Kaufman, seventh edition, 1973, Delmar Publishers

      It was, of course, a running joke as we wrestled with the content of that book that we'd hate to have to learn it from the unsimplified version.

      It's actually very well written for a textbook.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    25. Re:I can't fix most TVs by tekwiz · · Score: 0

      You'd be amazed at the number of people who think it's as dangerous to touch an opened tv as it is an open pc.

    26. Re:I can't fix most TVs by DrCash · · Score: 2, Funny
      especially since 90% of repair requests involve cleaning up after Microsoft and are software-only.

      Perhaps computer technicians should join the janitors' union, instead of TV repairmen!

      :-)

    27. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. All of the doubting that I encountered in this sub-thread caused me to misread your humor.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    28. Re:I can't fix most TVs by DrCash · · Score: 1
      With all of the existing computer technician certifications (MCSE, database, or whatever) that are offered by the industrial sector, it sounds to me like the government is catching on to this wave a little bit too late. I think half of it is the motivation of governments to try and collect some revenue from the ever-decreasing tax supply. TV repair shops will also benefit from the rights to advertise the license. The general public won't give a rat's ass!

    29. Re:I can't fix most TVs by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hear you on the fans. I've also fixed many a noisy, soon-to-be-dead power supply by just oiling the fan. I use the fans in all sorts of other projects too. Recently I installed a five-inch 12v fan out of a dead Dell Poweredge to increase my room's AC flow. It's about 15 degrees cooler now than it was, and it's been 108 outside.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    30. Re:I can't fix most TVs by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      Screwdriver across the leads.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    31. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      don't worry about it, after posting i saw the other posts calling BS on you and realized what had happened.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    32. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked inside my TV, and there doesn't appear to be any "higher voltage" outputs from the HV transformer. Is that only in sets made in Iceland or something?

      Have you seen many cases where people are wily-nily installing new transformers and increasing those X-Rays? My guess is that it happens all the time to unlicenced guys, and I'll bet you've seen that plenty of times.

    33. Re:I can't fix most TVs by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Mind you that (1) and (2) don't exist in today's TVs or monitors...

    34. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you increase a tv tube's anode past its specification (like 35,000 volts, when it requires 25,000 volts) it will emit xray's.

    35. Re:I can't fix most TVs by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      In Iowa, the DNR issues a "Hazardous Materials" license for businesses that do things like sell batteries and such.

      In their "solicitation" for that, they list batteries and such as requirements for the license - but say that the list of such materials is not limited to what they say.

      This is the same as our governors "bright idea" to start sales taxing service work (parts are taxable, labor (at this time) is not). This would be applied to computer service work, television service work, CPA work, everything but lawyers (the governor was a lawyer).

      This Louisianna deal is just like that - the state has seen something that wasn't being taxed yet and thought it would be a "good" idea to do so.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    36. Re:I can't fix most TVs by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Only if you want to wait six months to a year to fix your monitor after it breaks. I think most people will want it back a little quicker than that.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    37. Re:I can't fix most TVs by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      One 'lead' is the metal chassis of the TV. The other is a very well insulated and difficult to get to plug on the back of the picture tube.
      At least, this is the 25,000+ V capacitor. A screwdriver won't do it, because of the awkwardness of the angles, but it's still easy to blast yourself if you need to remove the picture tube connection - to remove the chassis, for instance.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    38. Re:I can't fix most TVs by ZhuLien · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you think we can apply for a TV repairman licence even though we live in Australia? Sounds like a good deal if you ask me!

    39. Re:I can't fix most TVs by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Mind you that (1) and (2) don't exist in today's TVs or monitors..."

      Not as vacuum tubes, no, but the circuits (and the need for them) still exist, they're just implemented with semiconductors nowadays. You can still get X-rays out of the big bottle, though, if you screw up a repair.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    40. Re:I can't fix most TVs by mingot · · Score: 1

      sue the hell out of the state for making you think you had the skills needed to safely do that job

      Noooo, you just call Morris Bart.

    41. Re:I can't fix most TVs by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Whoops! I should have been more descriptive... I meant the tubes, not the circuits.

    42. Re:I can't fix most TVs by mingot · · Score: 1

      Heh, reminds of when I was 15 years old working at a TV rental store in (oddly enough) New Orleans installing anti-theft devices. Learning to "safely" discharge that cap was the first lesson on day one.

    43. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now who here hasn't turned the yoke in a monitor or replaced one of the settings switches.
      I usually try to replace the $0.60 fuse in a power supply before I replace it.

    44. Re:I can't fix most TVs by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Don't modern CRTs discharge themselves when powered down?

    45. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's why I leave the damn things unplugged for 2+ weeks before opening them up.

      Back in the 80s and 90s discharged displays of all kinds, but after I hit my mid-20s I decided I'd cheated death too many times and decided to go the patient route.

    46. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unplug it while it is still on.

    47. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's BS!

    48. Re:I can't fix most TVs by afidel · · Score: 1

      That's funny because not even IBM field tech's do those sorts of repairs. We had a line of servers with the bad caps that went out to a large customer. Once the line was identified an engineering change was sent out with new replacement motherboards. We simply unseated the CPU and placed it and the peripherals on the new motherboard and sent the old ones back, they were probably remanufactured somewhere with new caps but it sure wasn't done by anyone doing PC work, our time was too valuable for that.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    49. Re:I can't fix most TVs by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even the old ones did. It's all a matter of how LONG it takes to discharge. ;)

      Convincing someone to lick the caps causes them to discharge VERY quickly and most spectacularly.*

      [*] Very bad idea. Do not try this at home. May be harmful or fatal. If you do this and die, the world will be better off. Poster disclaims all liability for your own stupidity.

    50. Re:I can't fix most TVs by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      odd, considering one of THE most common things in a computer to stop working is the PSU fan, and they all require you to open them up and sometimes solder in a new one.

    51. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe. I did that to a 2200uF 400V cap pack (think beer can size). Damn that was loud. And bright. Wasn't looking directly at it fortunately.

    52. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The director of the norwegian state TV channel
      proposed that PCs should pay the annual
      TV-licence (200 USD/yr) som years back.
      The argument was that you could (in theory)
      use a PC connected to the Internett to view
      broadcasted images, and this would then fit
      into the very widely formulated licencing
      mandate given by the norwegian government.

      The proposal failed. One could speculate if
      it would have gained momentum if it had been
      made earlier... (when "a computer" was a less
      known piece of equipment).

      Frank T.

    53. Re:I can't fix most TVs by thogard · · Score: 1

      Tax on service is common every place but in the US. I'm amazed more states haven't thought of that jackpot yet but for now they are waiting for the next state over to blink first.

    54. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      $200/yr PER TV?

      That would cause a revolt here in the US. We've got like 5 tv sets in this house.

      That would be insanity to pay $1000/yr.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    55. Re:I can't fix most TVs by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      've been fixing computers for people for a long while, and have never had to open a CRT or power supply.

      You're telling me you've never opened a PSU to swap the fan when the bearings have died? It's a fairly regular occurance for me.

    56. Re:I can't fix most TVs by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Even if you do open up CRTs and PSUs, why should you need to pay $55 for a certificate which only certifies that you paid $55? If there is a reason to be certified then you need a test to say you can do it rather than just letting anyone hand over some money.

    57. Re:I can't fix most TVs by bonkedproducer · · Score: 1

      No, because it's not worth my time or effort or my clients money. Cheaper for them, quicker for me to swap the PSU out with a good rock solid Antec in 5 minutes and off to the next PC that needs repaired or software cleaned/upgraded.

      I don't want to be an electronics technician, I want to work with computers. It's a cost/benefit thing, I do snatch many a good fan from PSUs that had other problems, but there is time for that later. I don't find soldering particularly enjoyable and only do that sort of thing when it is my only choice. I do, however, enjoy optimizing OSs showing people new and exciting things they didn't realize their PC could do etc. I charge a fair and reasonable price for my labor and parts and users are happy to be back up and running so fast.

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    58. Re:I can't fix most TVs by steve_l · · Score: 1

      Agreed. When monitors break (which is rare, they outlive PCs) you chuck them.

      on the other hand, I think there is a lot to be said for having a license to use regedit. There is nothing that scares anyone providing informal windows support is helping someone who ran regedit to 'clean things up'.

      but the moment you do that, the RIAA will come down against licensed using regedit to turn off autorun of DRM-protected CDs...you could have your license revoked for that.

    59. Re:I can't fix most TVs by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      You can put a tungsten plate in front of the electron-beam, but I don't know about wiring.

    60. Re:I can't fix most TVs by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Having been a computer tech from '77-'91, before making the switch to software, I can tell you that the places I worked cracked just about every monitor we had. Back in those days, it was standard operating procedure to align them on a periodic basis. The comments above seem to indicate that you needed to be really smart, but honestly, you just needed to be safe...discharge the tube when necessary, etc. I witnessed a couple coworkers getting zapped on them over the years, but other than peeing their pants, they were fine.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    61. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      (I belive that's why "not just anyone" was supposed to open av TV 50 years ago..).


      TV's (CRT at least, ignore LCD) still involve very high voltages.

      Usually when something breaks I won't hesitate to break it open and see if I can fix it, but when it comes to CRT's and Microwaves - thats a job for people who know what they are doing.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    62. Re:I can't fix most TVs by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      I've opened up plenty of monitors to fix various things myself, but I wouldn't consider myself a TV repair man.

      My favorite was a monitor that was being thrown away because it wouldn't stay on. It wouldn't stay on because the switch was broken. A sheet metal screw in the front took care of that. It worked for years after that.

      I've replaced many power supply fans. They fail rather regularly in smokers houses. I usually get new ones from Radio Shack, rather than salvaging them from other power supplies.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    63. Re:I can't fix most TVs by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      To be honest, it bugs me more as a consumer than as a service provider. And the Iowa deal really bugs me because the governor (a lawyer) proposed this as a tax on all services except those of lawyers.

      Either Vilsack is stupid or wasn't trying that hard to get it enacted.

      Iowa - the place where a bad idea can take root and grow unfettered.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    64. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few people noticed the affadavit part of the process. The affadavit probably affirms that the person seeking the license has appropriate skills. It probably also affirms that said person is cognizant of applicable laws and will not (for example) rewire a Tivo so that it can broadcast HBO across the Internet.

      I wish there was more information about the affadavit, Google barly registers "Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board" with hits (obituaries?!?!).

    65. Re:I can't fix most TVs by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I find power supply fans to be a bit lower on the list. #1 is hard drives, #2 is CPU fans. #3 is power supply fans. But hey, they're all those damned moving parts. Can't trust those things. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    66. Re:I can't fix most TVs by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      never had to open a CRT

      Then you've probably been the cause of more than just a trifle of unnecessary computer pollution down at the local landfill.

      Monitors routinely get a little out of focus, and not all of them have little access holes to reach the adjustment knob(s). So you open the case and have at it.

      Monitors also just sort of "fade out to black" with a frequency that is not insignificant. Same deal as with the focus, except the knob inside will say "screen." Give it a tweak and a black monitor suddenly comes right back to full life.

      Some monitors will also get a little wonky in the color balance department, and again, will have no ability to adjust this from the outside, but will have a set of knobs inside that can be twiddled to restore proper color.

      And finally, some monitors just go dead as a doornail because a small fuse inside has blown. Swap out the fuse and presto, new monitor.

      None of the above items involve any kind of "rewiring" or replacement of components (unless you want to call a fuse a "component") and can be done by anybody with a screwdriver and enough common sense to keep from electrocuting themselves.

      I'm sitting here in a room containing a whole slew of monitors, amongst which ALL of the above proceedures have been performed to salutory effect.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    67. Re:I can't fix most TVs by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I do not know "electronics", I know computers
      I wouldn't put that on your business cards if I were you.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    68. Re:I can't fix most TVs by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Admittedly, the last time I opened a monitor cover was about 12 months ago to obtain info for driving it with Linux. However, I still open our Dell GX100 power supplies to re-grease the fan, which seems to dry up waaaay too early. The p/s only has 4 screws to open it ... sheesh, as long as you figure out you shouldn't open it with power on, I can't imagine anyone rationally complaining.

      Real computer techs with a range of experience still get into computer guts. Let's not dumb down that ability.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    69. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Sein · · Score: 1

      It's per household, and is applied to finanincing public non-commercial broadcasts. Which is still Norway's single largest media provider across all traditional non-print platforms. Although some of the local right-wing nutjobs think that not-for-profit media enterprises should be outlawed on principle, and are constantly harping on the theme that the licencing fee should be removed, presumably so that the commercial drivel on the also-rans would be the only alternative.

    70. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another comment said, get that lisence if you actually do open up CRT monitors and power supplies.

      Why? Does that license actually make me any better at it? No, they specifically say that they don't intend to make anyone pass a test. As a matter of fact, the only qulaification that I need for working on high-voltage (that includes TV's, monitors, switching power supplies, etc, etc) is the mere fact that I am still breathing after 25 years of doing it!

      Get stuffed, Louisiana!

    71. Re:I can't fix most TVs by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " It probably also affirms that said person is cognizant of applicable laws and will not (for example) rewire a Tivo so that it can broadcast HBO across the Internet..."

      Damn.....there goes my latest and greatest business plan I was working on....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    72. Re:I can't fix most TVs by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      serious...? i find hdd's don't die very often at all for me... and i can't say i've ever had a cpu fan die before the cpu was that old the computer was no longer in use. gfx card fans however... >:|

    73. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Chacham · · Score: 1

      That last comment is hilarious. :)

    74. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Just had to say your comment made me giggle. :)

    75. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and 99% of all computer tech's can not identify most of the semiconductors on the motherboard.

      having an EE degree, hell even a ITT Tech edumacation will get you further in Pc repair than any lame A++ certification. (Note, I have met more incompetent A++ certified people than hobbiests that are bungling about in there....)

      computers should require some EE training.

    76. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I doubt that most computer repair techs have ever opened a monitor (or even a power supply).

      You haven't worked on an E-Mac, have you?

    77. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Even the LCDs involve high voltage, for the fluorescent tube. But it's a minor thingy in comparison with the CRT anode voltage. Ouch.

    78. Re:I can't fix most TVs by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Won't work. There's a diode preventing discharge of this capacitor, and it can't discharge through the vaccuum in the CRT, unless the gun voltage is high enough. Since the gun spits out electrons the entire time the TV is on, it drops the fastest of anything. You'll still have 20,000+ volts on that capacitor.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    79. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Considering most flybacks have only one high-voltage output, you can't pick the wrong one. Also, flybacks differ not only by the output voltage, but also by the pinout at the bottom and the connection and rating of other coils (the transformer usually supplies several voltages, and has several coils at the "primary" side). So it should be rather difficult to put a wrong flyback in, and if you by chance get one with identical size and pins, it's either a rebranded equivalent, or other things won't work.

    80. Re:I can't fix most TVs by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Teach me, swami. I wish to no longer be a polluter.

      I've had few dead monitors come across my doorstop, but when I do, I want to be prepared...

    81. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that there's rather a cottage industry in the US for states, cities etc. to make money by selling licences to do essentially any kind of job that involves selling your services to the public.

      It's a racket, pure and simple.

      What would actually be useful would be some kind of tradesman's bond scheme, where a trade association would guarantee the work of its members, so if you hired a member of the PC repair association, you'd know that if he blew up your $5000 plasma screen and did a runner, the association would buy you a new one.

      As a consumer, that's a useful thing to have. So is a personal recommendation from someone I know. A $55 bit of paper from some 2 bit bureaucracy claiming that the guy thinks he's competant, or passed some almost certainly irrelevant test once, means nothing.

      Sidenote: and for the record, compulsory union membership is a racket, too. In fact, it's really rather similar.

    82. Re:I can't fix most TVs by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You said the magic words that invalidated your own comment: "field tech's" (sic). A field tech's time is too valuable to do component-level troubleshooting. They swap assemblies and go home, and someone who knows what they're doing figures out what's actually wrong, assuming the part was not designed to be disposable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    83. Re:I can't fix most TVs by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      It may be the environments I've worked in.

      In the computer store, CPU and PS fans would die from dirt clogging them. Usually the bearings ended up shot, so removing the dust just left a pretty much worthless rattly fan. In the servers, the 1u's with fans mounted right on the heatsink don't last very long. A typical service life is 1 to 2 years. The better designs, like the Asus 1u rackmounts with blower fans and ducts, seem to last forever. I haven't had a single failure in those.

      Hard drives are always great victims. I see one or two failures per month. All things considered, that isn't a lot, since we have at least 400 drives in operation, on machines that are up to about 6 years old. The 400 drives is a rough number, it's probably much higher. I see a higher rate of SCSI failures, even in well cooled machines. Obviously, cases with poor cooling lose their drives faster.

      Customers are sometimes less than entertained when they ask me to work on a server that I didn't build or install (contract work). I open up the box, find the dead SCSI drive, and find it has almost no cooling, and tell them, "Your drives died due to lack of cooling because of a poor case design." It's fairly obvious when the drives are too hot to touch after shutting them down and opening the case. :) I like the servers with IDE drives, that last forever and nothing inside gets hot.

      The most IDE failures I ever had at once were when we "retired" 1/2 dozen machines, and shipped the parts back by FedEx (abandoning the old 4u cases at the site). They were all working when the parts were packed, but only a few drives survived shipping, and they were all well packed. Luckly I only wanted them for spare parts.

      A lot of these servers need to be kept functional, even if they're slow. If they satisfy the needs of the client, it's hard to tell them to upgrade, so we fix what's broken and put them back into service. I may mention that the hardware is ancient, but they'll rarely want to buy newer hardware. "I paid $6k for that 5 years ago, why should I upgrade?"

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    84. Re:I can't fix most TVs by DoraLives · · Score: 1

      Check your email. Regards, Swami

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    85. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good to know, Thank You.

    86. Re:I can't fix most TVs by Orick · · Score: 1

      TV repairmen were originally regulated (just like most other occupations) for two main reasons:

      1. Existing repairmen wanted to make it harder for newcomers to compete with them. That's the primary reason for occupational licensing.

      2. The State wanted some extra cash. That's usually a secondary reason to get them to go along with #1 above. May be the main reason for this expansion.

      "Safety" is usually the excuse given to the public when they ask why they can't just arrange for anyone otherwise qualified to fix their stuff. If you stop and consider that the "license" (like most occupational licensing, although you will find some exceptions where they make a really hard and arbitrary test to be judged by those already in the business in order to better limit competition) doesn't actually require any firm proof of safety or skill, it becomes clear that "safety" can't possibly be the primary objective of the license.

      --
      General Houseware

  7. Already required in CA by BrynM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Technically, in California you have to be a licensed appliance and electronics repair person already. It's just not enforced (that wouldn't go over well in San Jose). I wish I had time to find a better link to source, but here's a link.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Already required in CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not a bad idea. Since my sister took a p3 550 dell to a shop and they told her it needed a new mother board and it was going to cost $200 dollars to fix for a new mb, cpu and ram. So she paid the $40 minimum fee to get it back from them and shipped it to me. When I got it all of the drive and power cables were unplugged and the cards and the hard drives weren't screwed down. I plugged it all in and turned it on and it posted. All that had happened was that the XP home upgrade was blue screening. I put the origignal OS back on and the thing ran fine. I wish I could complain to a licensing board about that. I don't know if they were incompetent or dishonest with their diagnosis but returning a machine with all of the cables unplugged and the cards and drive flapping in the breeze is negligent. The transmission guy will at least bolt the pan back on and add the fluid back if I decline the recommended work.

    2. Re:Already required in CA by bstone · · Score: 1

      Yes, perhaps there should be a licensing board for computer technicians so that they have to show at least a minimum level of competency before selling their services to consumers, but how does that affect the fact that the "TV Technicians" don't seem to have to have any competency in computers to install and service computer based systems?

    3. Re:Already required in CA by BrianH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it is enforced, just not uniformly. I run a small consulting firm on the side doing low lost technology assistance for home based businesses (mostly custom software, but I do a bit of HW as well), and I've had my BEAR license for a while. Apparently I stole a contract from someone with a license, they turned me in, and I received a warning letter from the state advising me that I faced fines and prosecution for operating an electronics repair business without the proper permits.

      Today I pay $165 a year to the great state of California for the "right" to fix peoples computers. One advantage though...I get to charge more! When somebody points out that company X is cheaper, I get to say "Are you sure they're a properly licensed facility?" The answer is invariably no, which often lands me the job ;-)

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    4. Re:Already required in CA by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      So it's scam both by you and the state, presuming being a licensed firm means that you had to prove that you could do the work.

      Not accusing anything here - I'd do the same if I had to fork over that $165 - probably would list a small $5 or $10 surcharge on each bill to cover that.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    5. Re:Already required in CA by Jett · · Score: 1

      This is really common from what I can tell. I've had to refer a good number of people to local repair shops and following up with them find that almost always they are charging obscene fees for what amounts to minor work. They charge a shop fee, a labor fee, and a parts fee. Labor fee I can't disagree with, but they mark up the parts and a "shop fee" sounds like BS to me. At a minimum you are going to be paying $100 with no parts.
      When I do freelance work I charge labor only and always show the person where I'm getting parts from and what the cost is, usually I just have them pay for it themselves.
      I'm skeptical about licensing, but if it forces these dishonest businesses to charge more reasonable rates I might be willing to support it.
      What's more likely to happen is it will drive freelancers like me out of the market since we'll have to pay the state for the "right" to work on someones computer. To me it probably wouldn't be worth it to pay the licensing fee since freelance work is something I do rarely and never make much money at.

    6. Re:Already required in CA by bonkedproducer · · Score: 1

      I call BULLSHIT - on shops that pull that sort of thing. I worked for a whitebox vendor that has been named in the top 5 technology providers in AZ for three years straight (with the likes of Intel, Intuit, and Honeywell) by Ranking Arizona Business Magazine and has been in business since 1993.

      We did an assload of repair work on client's PCs most clients were charged in the $35-$40 range for minor work (upgrading a video card, installing a new Hard Drive, putting a burner in, cleaning up a virus) the vast majority that spent more than that we charge $75 to. This was for Windows installs, along with all updates, Anti-virus etc.

      I have seen a lot of little shops that are staffed with guys that "know all about computers so they went into the computer business (primarily to be able to save on personal hardware purchases)" charge stuff like "bench-fee" etc. but I haven't seen many of them survive longer than their first lease.

      Licensing does nothing to prevent this, it only gives the state more $$$ from citzens pockets and ensures that the bar is raised a little bit further to prevent people from "freelancing" because that sort of independence doesn't fit the mold of the 40s-50s and scares the holy shit out of people that grew up hoping to get a good job at the widget factory. These are the people passing the laws.

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    7. Re:Already required in CA by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      What's more likely to happen is it will drive freelancers like me out of the market since we'll have to pay the state for the "right" to work on someones computer. To me it probably wouldn't be worth it to pay the licensing fee since freelance work is something I do rarely and never make much money at.

      You can always work unlicenced. The computers themselves don't care, and if you're just occassionally freelancing, your customers likely know you already or were refered to you - which lowers the probability they will narc you to the Authorities. Just don't leave any written records. After all, is non-conforming to assinine regulations a wrong thing to do?

  8. What about car mechanics? by bravehamster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since the radio is just a component of the car, the car as a whole could be considered a playback device. Are they sending this extortion attempt to car mechanics? No? Funny that...

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:What about car mechanics? by Lotu · · Score: 1

      Shhhhh.
      Don't give them any ideas

    2. Re:What about car mechanics? by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are they sending this extortion attempt to car mechanics? No? Funny that...

      You've got a person who spends all day at a keyboard, versus a person who's adept at wielding a tire iron and can use a pneumatic wrench to remove all your (car's) nuts in five seconds flat. Now...which one would you chose as an extortion target? :-)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    3. Re:What about car mechanics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on the article, you'd only need to license car mechanics who worked on cars that get parked in residential garages.

  9. A+ for TV repair by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It works both ways, A+ for the TV guy and TV license for computer tech.

  10. Oh cool by huber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nothing against tv repair men, it is a very technical skill in many respects, but i didnt pay $28,000 for 4 years of school to be registered as a tv repair man.

    1. Re:Oh cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $28,000 for 4 years? Lucky bastard, I payed that for _1_ year.

    2. Re:Oh cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      i didnt pay $28,000 for 4 years of school to be registered as a tv repair man

      You have a four year degree in repairing computers?

    3. Re:Oh cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Jesus, you paid that much to fix PCs?

      You might as well be able to fix TVs too for that price.

    4. Re:Oh cool by elasticwings · · Score: 1

      Damn you got 4 years for 28K? I paid 26.5K and all I got was a lousy Associates from ITT Tech. BASTARDS!!!

      Oh wait, what kind of degree did you get? I would at least hope you have a Bachelor's. I only went two and got and Associates.

    5. Re:Oh cool by sega · · Score: 1
      Not funny.

      In the current IT environment, a lot of people have decided to settle for less in order to make ends meet.

      It wouldn't surprise me if this guy has a four year compsci degree.

      Oddly enough, doing this kind of work can potentially score the guy significantly more money than what entry level positions (help desk) at many larger organisations.

    6. Re:Oh cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not funny.
      In the current IT environment, a lot of people have decided to settle for less in order to make ends meet.
      It wouldn't surprise me if this guy has a four year compsci degree.


      Yeah, that isn't funny, that is sad.. That must suck to be a PC tech after getting a 4 year degree in comp sci and comp eng.. Granted, where I work, we have to do our own PC repair/maintenance because we are so small, but that is only an occasional thing and is a nice break from the real work. But to do that full time, I'd go insane...

    7. Re:Oh cool by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      An electrician we often use has advised me -- after hearing my tale of outsourcing woe -- to ditch the computer crap and become ... an electrician. A 3rd-yr apprentice makes at least $40K around here, and -- despite the damned lies of salary.com for my area -- that beats computer work. Everybody needs an electrician; few people want to do that kind of work, hence you have little competition; it pays quite well; and computer work is being bid down to manual-labor wages.

      Your instinct in avoiding HelpDesk work is correct. However, Computer Repair is going the same way: it receives no respect; its pay is dropping; it's outsourced upon the drop of a hat; and, it often has a low glass ceiling over it. Computer Repair is yet another entry-level dead-end for being a "company man".

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  11. Looks like a money grab to me by ElForesto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It follows a disturbing pattern of "licensing for no purpose" that has been firmly established as standard operating procedure in this country for decades. We license driving, marriage, fishing, hunting, and now WORKING? What's next? An oxygen license? I hope plenty of IT workers stand up and say "hell no" in a massive act of civil disobedience. For that matter, let the TV and radio guys do it too!

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    1. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      They all have a purpose...

      Driving -- for the safety of the road. Those drivers who prove themselves unsafe are removed.
      Marriage -- the license isn't as much a permission as a document proving it happened on the public record.
      Fishing/hunting -- to count limit the number of people who do so. If requests outnumber the number of animals that are meant to be taken, they won't approve them all and/or stop issuing.

    2. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by parliboy · · Score: 1

      And NOW working? Uh, no, text time you visit your neighborhood licensed teacher, ask her how much it set her back.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    3. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      Hey,where ya at? This is Louisana! Home of Edwin Edwards. Of course it's just a money grab.

      If they really do enforce this, computer techs will just leave the state (I did). Everyone who is left will simply give $10 and a jar of Roue to their cousin and they'll take care of it.

      If your family hasn't lived in Louisana for 300 years (and hasn't been making pay offs and arrangements for that long) then just expect to get hit with huge 'fees' and 'adjustments' if you're trying to make a living in Louisana.

      It's the second most corrupt state in the USA, after Rhode Island. So if you're goin' to Nuu Orlaans, Remy, be sure to bring your 'Buddy bag' (Rhode Island in-joke).

    4. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a way of getting rid of competition. Taxi drivers, hair dressers, teacher's unions, you name it, they'll resort to it if they have the politicians on their payroll. They're the reason that Democrats have a lock on most big cities in the US.

    5. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *After* Rhode Island? Can any place possibly be more corrupt than my home state, LA? Can you give some juicy details?

    6. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Holi · · Score: 1

      Not according to this

      And thats from when Buddy was *in* office. And before you ask, why yes I am from Rhode Island, born and raised.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    7. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      What's next? An oxygen license?

      What... are you trying to tell me that this license I paid $179 for was not even needed?

      Damn! I'm going to have to sue my state! Worthless piece of CRAP.....

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    8. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by randyest · · Score: 1

      My friend just got a job teaching "Integrated Science" to ESL (English as a 2nd Language) students at a high school in Jacksonville, FL.

      I asked.

      $28/month.

      But that's a small price to pay for the protection they provide: no evaluation of your performance, guaranteed raises despite the economy, immunity from firing except in case you commit the most egregious of violations (hit or screw a student, for example.)

      Even if you're teachng Science when you've never had Chemistry and you failed Physics intro. Such as in her case.

      I'd pay $28/month for that. But no one seems to be trying to unionize electgrical engineers that I know of. Funny, eh?

      --
      everything in moderation
    9. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes .. they all have a purpose. The question is whether we, as citizens, agree and accept that purpose. Not that anyone ever asks us if we do: they just require another one and there's a certain inevitability about it, and the associated fees.

      Licensing drivers has absolutely nothing to do with safety. If there were no required "driver's license" and you happened to do something unfortunate on the road, you could still be prohibited from driving. Licensing drivers is a. a revenue source and b. a tracking system, not necessarily in that order. Physical safety has nothing to do with it.

      And a marriage license very much is a matter of permission. In many states, for example, if you have an STD you will not be granted a marriage license. So, yes, it is a license, in the sense of being a privilege that can be revoked at the whim of the State. Yes, you have the "right" (and I use the term loosely) to get married but only if the State says you can.

      Fishing, hunting ... licensing those activities is probably a good idea anyway since people tend to hunt things to extinction if left to themselves.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    10. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Driving -- for the safety of the road. Those drivers who prove themselves unsafe are removed.

      Unsafe drivers are out there in large numbers. You pretty much have to kill someone to get your license revoked these days.

      Licensing does not solve this one bit.

      Marriage -- the license isn't as much a permission as a document proving it happened on the public record.

      Why does marriage need to be licensed? That is what it is called, despite what you think. It is a permission that the State is granting you. More unessecary government interference.

    11. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > We license driving, marriage, fishing, hunting, etc...

      Just because everyone else thinks they need to get one, doesn't mean you need to as well.

      There are numerous people who excercise their right to travel without state permits. (Myself included, I've never been given a ticket for driving without a license. It *is* possible, if you know how.)

      You don't need a marriage license to be married. What do you think a Common-Law Marriage is?!

      You'll want to see Things that are NOT in the Constituion.

      Which means, that ...

      "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." (Bill of Rights - Amendment X)

      Peace
      --
      "Geometry is frozen music"
      - Pythagoras

    12. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      Texas born and bred... outside of the major cities (Dallas, Houston, Austin, and maybe San Antonio) I don't think that know what computers are... :-/

    13. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 0

      "Driving -- for the safety of the road. Those drivers who prove themselves unsafe are removed."

      You OBVIOUSLY have never had to drive in Sun City Arizona.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    14. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Fishing, hunting ... licensing those activities is probably a good idea anyway since people tend to hunt things to extinction if left to themselves.

      I think that in most states (in Iowa at least), fishing and hunting license fees go to the DNR for improving the habitat of the game species and for providing enforcement for catching poachers.

      I Iowa, the act of granting deer licenses to limit the number taken has worked too well. There are too many deer in the state and we're starting to get predators moving in to take care of them.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    15. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, even killing someone won't necessarily get your license revoked. Just look at OJ. I think they still let him drive.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    16. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... or I294 in Illinois during rush hour. A good 30% of those drivers should have their licenses revoked (most of them are in SUVs, which really ought to be renamed AM's (i.e. "Aggressive Menaces".)

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    17. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I personally got no beef with people paying fees to support their leisure activities on public land. Not quite the same thing as saying I have to pay $xx/year for the right to drive my car (or fix someone's computer.)

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    18. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by iamchaos · · Score: 1

      What's next? An oxygen license?

      No, a thinking license. If you think you have to pay them. Wait, nevermind. They wouldn't make any money.

    19. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you say that licensing drivers has absolutely nothing to do with safety? I would say that most people who do not pass a driver's test will not drive a vehicle unlicensed. So a substantial amount of bad drivers will be kept off the road.

    20. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fishing, hunting ... licensing those activities is probably a good idea anyway since people tend to hunt things to extinction if left to themselves."

      That doesn't have anything to do with why there are hunting and fishing licenses. The laws limiting the number of deer killed or fish caught takes care of the overhunting/overfishing. Before there were no such laws so greedy people would kill/catch more than they need. The licenses exist for the purposes of collecting money to support wildlife preserves and other programs. They also attempt to estimate the number of game taken based on the number of licenses sold. This is a very rough estimate though since in some situations you don't even need a license, like if you are hunting on your own property (at least in my state).

    21. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Me either - just saying that the hunting and fishing licenses don't seem like a money grab because the money is (supposed) to be going back into that activity.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    22. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marriage -- the license isn't as much a permission as a document proving it happened on the public record.

      If you didn't need government permission to get married today, we wouldn't have a pack of bigots trying to get the Constitution amended to keep that permission restricted.

    23. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      youve never gotten a ticket or youve never paid a ticket?

    24. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right.

    25. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      "Travel" is not a synonym for "operate a motor vehicle on public roads." No rights are absolute.

    26. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > youve never gotten a ticket

      nope. :)

      With freedom, comes responsibility - that means paying MORE attention to the other drivers and your surroundings.

    27. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What's next? An oxygen license?


      Actually, you already need an oxygen license. Oxygen is actually a drug and to administer it to someone else, you need to have EMT or dotor/nurse training. Of course, there's nothing stopping you going to Linde gas and buying 50L of compressed O2 yourself, but if you give it to someone else and they die, you can be held responsable.

      DAN (Divers Alert Network) offer a course on how to provide oxygen for scuba diving injures involving DCS. At the end of it you recieve a 'license' that says you know how to provide o2. Thing is, part of the course is the memorisation of a phrase along the lines of: "It has been demonstrated that oxygen could improve your condition. I am not offering this oxygen to you, but the regulator is working and I am leaving it here next to you".


      I know, I know, you probably meant air (21% o2, 79% n2) when you said o2 above..

    28. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by coyotecult · · Score: 1

      "Marriage -- the license isn't as much a permission as a document proving it happened on the public record." Then why can't a gay couple get a license in nearly all places if it's so much about permission? I can understand the other two, but not about the marriage.

    29. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by thogard · · Score: 1

      No this is step on for a plan they can't quite do yet. Step 2 is to send everyone thats registered a letter saying "if your working on a computer and you see illegal things, you must report them to 1-800-... failure to report illegal activity will result in the termination of your license"

      When the director of the FBI used to drance around in dresses and dreamed about a HQ with a moat, these sorts of things where common and I expect the last time most of the tv repair people got a general letter was about turning in commies if they found hints of red at someones home.

      As far as license to work, many jobs require it from things like being a doctor to real estate to teaching to running low voltage wires in a building. Theres been rules on the books for a very long time requiring certification and a license.

    30. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      Marriage -- the license isn't as much a permission as a document proving it happened on the public record.

      In the UK you very much have to get permission before getting married. It's the local council you gives you permission, which is then valid for (IIRC) 14 days after to up to one year after.

      They give you a particularly rigorous test too to check that you know each other, and it's not just for immigration reasons.

      Sucks, I know ...

      Rich.

    31. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extra Credit Question:
      What is "public" land, and under what ultimate authority is it administered?

    32. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      I personally got no beef with people paying fees to support their leisure activities on public land. Not quite the same thing as saying I have to pay $xx/year for the right to drive my car

      You can drive your car on your own land as much as you like, without a license.

    33. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      And for that "privilege" what do you pay in taxes - specifically taxes on fuel?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    34. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Mordaximus · · Score: 1
      Driving -- for the safety of the road. Those drivers who prove themselves unsafe are removed.

      I agree this is the intended purpose, unforunately, it really only demonstrates permission, not aptitude and ability. It aught to be treated as a professional license, and owners of said license be held professionaly accountable for their actions. Unfortunately people believe driving is a right, not a privlidge, as the average driver demonstrates.

      At most, driver's temporarily lose their license to drive, even if they are grossly neglegent even to the point of taking lives. The only people I know of that aren't licensed either a) don't want one or b) have a medical condition which prohibits driving (like blindness.) How about checking mental fitness!

      Marriage -- the license isn't as much a permission as a document proving it happened on the public record.

      Silly thing is, here in Ontario Canada, you pay different rates depending on which municipality you register for the license in! We save 50% by applying in a township about 30 minutes outside of the suburbs where we live. (OK my wife did, all I had to do was show up on time sober in a tux!) The rate was around 4 times as high where we actually got married.

      Fishing/hunting -- to count limit the number of people who do so. If requests outnumber the number of animals that are meant to be taken, they won't approve them all and/or stop issuing.

      Maybe fishing but I'm guessing you are from the US though... Here in Ontario you have to attend courses to demonstrate competency with a firearm before you are issued a license.

    35. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that your post is in direct contradiction to your current .sig

      .

      --
      uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
    36. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Uh ... I think we pretty much said the same thing.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    37. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that anyone ever asks you? So you're telling me that you, as a citizen can't vote? You, as a citizen, can't run for public office?

    38. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What really bothers me is:
      "the board is trying to classify them as 'playback and recording device equipment,' "

      If I become a 'playback and recording device repair main', I'll really have to worry about INDUCE and the RIAA/MPAA/etc... Thats freakin scarry!

    39. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      so you've never tested this theory of yours that its ok to drive around with out a license?

    40. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      They all have a purpose...

      Be accurate. "Some of them may have a purpose" could be better formulation.

    41. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Driving -- for the safety of the road. Those drivers who prove themselves unsafe are removed.

      Guess you haven't been to Nevada lately. :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    42. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by ElForesto · · Score: 1

      You're preaching to the choir, my man. :D

      --
      There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    43. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well over here the process also reduces the odds of people having more than their approved number of spouses.

      Apparently the plural of spouse isn't spice ;).

      --
    44. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      No need to run for office to stop it. Just send a check to the Institute for Justice. They have fought for years (sometimes successfully) to throw out ridiculous licensing requirements for various types of businesses -- hairbraiders, jitney drivers, florists (the florists are also in Louisiana), etc. They're sort of a libertarian do-gooder group. They also do some anti-eminent domain work as well as some school choice work. A neat bunch of folks:

      http://www.ij.org

      GF.

    45. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by ElForesto · · Score: 1

      Looks like an excellent organization. Thanks for the linkage! :D

      --
      There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    46. Re:Looks like a money grab to me by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > so you've never tested this theory of yours that its ok to drive around with out a license?

      Not sure why you're jumping to that conclusion.

      It's not a theory -- I've been doing it for 5+ years. (I've been stopped twice for speeding, but no ticket due to a) lack of Jurisdiction, and b) lack of Contract.) Obviously just because you have the freedom to do something, doesn't imply that you should do it.

      I didn't believe it either, but others have been doing it for 20+ years. If you believe something is impossible, but see others doing it, it becomes much easier to figure out how to do it.

      Peace

      --
      The fallacy of government is that it assumes everyone needs to be told how to live,
      but the fact remains it is unconstitutional to homogenize community by its own standards (due to seperation of Church & "State")
      When it passes more laws until it makes everyone a criminal it has made the mistake of placing the intent on the "Letter of the Law" over the "Spirit of the Law" but this is nothing new...
      "The more corrupt the republic, the more numerous the laws" -- Tacitus, A.D. 55

  12. I dunno... by Srass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd think there'd be a big difference between someone licensed to repair computers, and someone who repaired computers who was licensed to repair television sets.

    1. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think both groups of people are aware that it's a bad idea to use a screwdriver to short a capacitor the size of your fist.

      That's the main point of TV repair licensing.

    2. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about using a screwdriver to short the flyback transformer circuit in a display? Nothing like thousands of volts travelling through a ground circuit less than an inch from your nearest body part.

      I've done that way, way too many times. Gave up doing it about a decade ago. Now I'm surprised I'm still alive.

    3. Re:I dunno... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      In a computer store I used to work at, we had a guy who was an ex-navy electronics repair tech. He would rip apart monitors and fix the boards, to get them going again. I was in his area a lot, so he was careful to point out which parts were rather hazardous. Ya, the flyback was the one thing he said "never touch this."

      He was really interesting. He'd occasionally blow up parts. I'm guessing they must have been ready to go, right? He once filled the store with the stink from a failed capacitor. They were fun to watch. Sometimes they'd shoot sparks, sometimes they'd just smoke.

      BTW, if Scott is reading this, HI!. :)

      But, to stay on topic, I agree with some of the other posts, this is wrong. If they want to license it, they should make a seperate license, not try to group PC techs in with TV/Radio repair techs. Not only is it wrong, but it's insulting to the real TV/Radio techs. Most of us computer guys wouldn't have a clue how to repair a TV or radio. Personally, I'll fix almost anything in a computer, but I wouldn't dare touch the guts of a TV.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voltage doesn't travel through anything. Voltage is a potential across two points. It's a good thing you gave up this screwdriver stuff a decade ago, you don't know anything about electricity!

  13. Whats next? by DBA_01123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whats next automechanics having to get licenses as ferriers to change tires?

    1. Re:Whats next? by Six+Nines · · Score: 2, Informative

      that's "farrier" -- it means "one who shoes horses" -- not that spelling is considered a skill, or anything...

    2. Re:Whats next? by B747SP · · Score: 3, Funny
      not that spelling is considered a skill, or anything.

      What's next, a license to spell?

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    3. Re:Whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather they charged people an annual fee for the right not bother to spell correctly. Of course, I want jail time for failure to use capital letters. There was a comment the other day where a Slashnerd bragged about hunting and pecking 80 WPM. He didn't use one single capital letter.

    4. Re:Whats next? by DBA_01123 · · Score: 1

      In my defence I did google for the spelling I used. Enough on topic hits to make me think it was the proper spelling.

    5. Re:Whats next? by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
      Whats next automechanics having to get licenses as ferriers to change tires?

      Whoa there, boy -- now that's a horse of a different color! Let's stick with the original subject area here - you don't want to go changing horses in midstream, after all. ;-)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    6. Re:Whats next? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      http://dictionary.reference.com/

      Gives you both the spelling, and the meaning.
      Or, you could use Google, and type "define: " in. That'll look up definitions, too.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    7. Re:Whats next? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Sorry...that should be "define: ".

      Doesn't work when you html format your post, then use what looks like an html tag in your comment.....duuh.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    8. Re:Whats next? by legojenn · · Score: 1
      not that spelling is considered a skill, or anything.

      What's next, a license to spell?

      Don't you mean licence?

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    9. Re:Whats next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...most people refer to it as a High School Diploma or GED.

  14. Best Idea ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computer techs SHOULD be licensed. I would EASILY pay double if I knew that they were licensed and presumably accredited.

    1. Re:Best Idea ever by chizu · · Score: 1

      Ok, but if computer techs should be licensed, license them as computer techs not television repair men.

    2. Re:Best Idea ever by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what A+, CNE, etc are for. Pay money, pass a test that actually represents your level of expertise in the field, and get a time-limited certification showing competance. What we have here though is just an obvious money grab.

      Though that being said, I seriously doubt any more than 2% of the customers that come into our shop think to look for (or ask about) our technicians' certifications. Though I seriously wonder if any of the remaining 98% would know the difference between a "I paid $200 and passed a test any computer user could pass" cert and a "this took me three attempts at $150 each and six weeks of study to pass" cert.

      I'd also be willing to bet 50% of the techs working at computer service shops have zero certifications. The only reason I have certs is because we can't order service parts from the manufacturers without them.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:Best Idea ever by base_chakra · · Score: 1

      That's what A+, CNE, etc are for. Pay money, pass a test that actually represents your level of expertise in the field, and get a time-limited certification showing competance. What we have here though is just an obvious money grab.

      Not quite (for the case in point). However, for quite some time now CompTIA has offered the HTI+ Certification program, which seems to be the most relevant IT cert currently available. Whether HTI+ ("Home Technology Integrator") is a good fit for the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board's rather vague requirements is difficult to say.

      I worked for an audiovisual services company for about three years. Although a certificate from a sound engineering school carries some clout at such companies, they tend to rely heavily on their internal training programs, which are seriously lacking.

      I think consumers would be well-served by a third-party A/V certification program that acknowledges IT skills. As A/V technology continues to merge with computer technology, basic accreditation will become even more of a necessity (hence HTI+). For example, the corporate training program at my former company didn't involve any real IT instruction whatsoever, and I was the only staff member with any IT skills--which were called upon frequently.

  15. Don't license by pholower · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In the end, Brohn acknowledged, the licensing system as it is now envisioned will not fulfill its stated purpose of ensuring consumers that a licensed worker will have the skills that Brohn said are needed to set up the new computer-based media systems. By requiring little more than a fee and a letter from a boss or client, Brohn admitted, the board is doing little to control the quality of licensees.

    "That is the problem with a grandfather clause," he said. "There is nothing that we can do about that."

    Sure there is, don't license computer technicians!

    --
    -- johntracy.com, because everybody else is wrong.
  16. Louisiana = Alabama by Zaranne · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is same sort of stupid stuff that Alabama pulls. They charge a licensing fee to sell calculators in the state. This is from a law made in the 1800's when cash registers were introduced. I think politicians thought "if it takes money, we should get some of it." They threw "them thar' cal-u-lating machines" in since they can be used to calculate money.

    --
    So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    1. Re:Louisiana = Alabama by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What do you expect from a state that bans dildos?

    2. Re:Louisiana = Alabama by randyest · · Score: 1

      No no -- they allow dildos. Just look at the state legislature. It's only the distribution of "any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs" that they have a problem with.

      :)

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Louisiana = Alabama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as bad as Texas. We have the same rule, but it also can't look like human genital organs either. Nothing quite like the bible belt (outside of certain Arab areas).

  17. Arm-swingin! by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > "We're not trying to swing our arm around a whole bunch of people to get new revenue."

    "We are, however, quite diligently working on swinging our arm around $55!"

    1. Re:Arm-swingin! by maximilln · · Score: 1

      > "We're not trying to swing our arm around a whole bunch of people to get new revenue."

      When I read that, I had a recollection of a particular pair of managers that I had while working for a big pharmaceutical company in Chicago: "We're not just trying to bust your chops. We're really trying to help you."

      Uh-huh... suuuuuuuuuuuuure.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  18. isn't that against the law? by Vandil+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According the the RIAA, MPAA, the NFL, and several other entertainment groups, playing broadcasted or distributed entertainment on a computer is against the law....

    ...So how can a local government body issue people a license to repair lawbreaking equipment?

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:isn't that against the law? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Informative
      So how can a local government body issue people a license to repair lawbreaking equipment?

      Same way they can demand you pay a tax on all the marijuana you (not you personally) sell. You can actually buy marijuana tax stamps, which you are required to place on all bags of the stuff.

      Weird. "Put these stamps on all the bags of the stuff we'll send you to jail for if we catch you."

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:isn't that against the law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny they should consider that against the law in such vague terms. I guess that makes DVD players illegal too, since they do electronic computation to decode the image. And while we're at it, I suppose DVD's are illegal too because they aid in the playback of distributed entertainment through the computer.

      Looks like the MPAA needs to sue itself ;-)

    3. Re:isn't that against the law? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The IRS can require you to report all income, including from your drug deals, stolen property you fence, and income from illegal gambling...

      and penalize you for failure to do so..

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    4. Re:isn't that against the law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tru dat. That's how they finally got Capone, isn't it?

    5. Re:isn't that against the law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't have tax stamps it is now a RICO violation and the FBI can have it's merry way with you. That is the point of tax stamps.

  19. Maybe they aren't crooked scum by RealAlaskan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From the fine article:
    Brohn [ Stanley Brohn, secretary of the Radio and Television Technicians Board...] said the letter sent to Broussard and others was misleading in stating that the license requirement would apply to a broad range of computer technicians and consultants, and not simply those wanting to set up home entertainment systems.
    So, just maybe, they are simply trying (clumsily, but legitimately) to enforce an existing law as it was intended to be used. If they tell computer techs who aren't trying to specialize in home theater systems that they aren't subject to the tax, we'll know that the government there is honest. Or is that an oxymoron?

    Of course, the idea of licensing TV repairmen is neither more nor less insane than the idea of calling computer repairmen TV repairmen. All it accomplishes is to restrict the supply and drive up the prices, hurting the very public it was ``supposed to protect''.

    1. Re:Maybe they aren't crooked scum by ectospasm · · Score: 1

      ...we'll know that the government there is honest. Or is that an oxymoron?

      If you knew anything about Louisiana politics you'd know that it was an oxymoron, to say the least. Practically every Louisiana government has been corrupt in one way or another. Hell, the police department in New Orleans (for instance) had a corruption rate of over 90% a few years ago.

      I'm still trying to figure out why my brother has chosen to live there...

      --


      We are the music makers. We are the dreamers of the dreams.
    2. Re:Maybe they aren't crooked scum by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Assuming my knowledge is still current, the N.O. police force is being directly run by Federal overseers due to all the past corruption.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    3. Re:Maybe they aren't crooked scum by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I'm still trying to figure out why my brother has chosen to live there..."

      Well, I live here, and yes, you do have to put up with a LOT of crap. High crime, lots of poverty..etc. However, the lifestyle here is great. I've met some fantastic people here, the southern LA culture is a wonderful thing...not like a different state, but, almost a different country entirely!!

      Not to mention the best food in the world, drive through daquiri shops, to-go cups at all the bars to take your drink out with you....and the fact that on a whim, I've had over 125 lbs of oysters in my bathtub on a Sat. night. Just got a craving, went and bought a sack of them for about $32....and got home to realize I didn't have my BIG ice chest with me...so, dumped them in the tub...and we had an oyster party that night with a bunch of friends and beer....

      Where else in the world do you hear things like that...?

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  20. VOTE LIBERTARIAN, Louisiana by WarMonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    VOTE LIBERTARIAN, Louisiana

    --
    -- I could tell right away that she was impressed with my HUGE Slashdot Karma.
    1. Re:VOTE LIBERTARIAN, Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Libertarians, you want a great example of all your noble ideas? Africa. Head over to Nigeria, where free market rules without any pesky government intervention. It's your utopia!

    2. Re:VOTE LIBERTARIAN, Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And exactly which clue do you have about Libertarians? Or anything else, for that matter...

    3. Re:VOTE LIBERTARIAN, Louisiana by bluGill · · Score: 0

      You seem to have mistaken anarchism for libertarianism.

      Read both links carefully, and note that while what the author means is different from anarchy.

    4. Re:VOTE LIBERTARIAN, Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't afford the poll tax

    5. Re:VOTE LIBERTARIAN, Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Same thing, Libertarianism=Dog-Eat-Dog/Survival-Of-The-Fittest
      Dog-Eat-Dog/Survival-Of-The-Fittest=Anarchism

      Anarchy (New Latin anarchia) is a term that has a number of different but related usages. Specific meanings [1] (http://www.yourdictionary.com/ahd/a/a0282000.html ) include 1) absence of any form of political authority; 2) Political disorder and confusion; and 3) absence of any cohesive principle, such as a common standard or purpose.

      Sounds like a shititarian to me.

  21. sign me up! by to_kallon · · Score: 3, Funny

    i think it's a great idea, given proper expansion. for instance, i'd be willing to pay $100 if i could call myself a doctor and get paid like one. or for $75 you could call yourself a pilot and get to fly around. of course, becoming a lawyer would be free, just as encouragement.

    --


    The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
    -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:sign me up! by rewt66 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Problem is, paying $75 to call yourself a pilot may let you fly around, but it doesn't mean you can land...

    2. Re:sign me up! by scoser · · Score: 1
      Oh, you'll end up landing sometime...

      The question is, how many pieces will you be in when they bring the body bag?

    3. Re:sign me up! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Problem is, paying $75 to call yourself a pilot may let you fly around, but it doesn't mean you can land...

      This post has been forwarded to the Department of Homeland Security.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  22. From my spam box by Axe · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    You still don't have a degree? Let us help
    Earn your degree, while you take NO tests or classes
    Increase your earning power, we offer Bachelors, Masters, even PhD's!
    Call us anytime of day. We assure your Confidentiality 100%
    Call to get started: (1) 801 469 9957

    ------------------
    - Looks like even better offer then the 2 year CS, is not it? :D

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    1. Re:From my spam box by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      No, this one is much better:
      www.universityofnigeria.com
      You can get your degree and 34 Million Dollars...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  23. IAAL by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Troll

    A license is legal permission for you to do something because you have passed a standard test to prove you are competent (eg pilot, driver, doctor etc) this isnt a license. He should sue them saying that its not a license and demand they change the name to "membership" then pay it out of the winnings.

    I am a lawyer because some guy on AIM said i was good with that sort of stuff.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:IAAL by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Funny
      So what test does Americans have to pass to get a Marriage license?

      So American girls can go around and say: I'm a licensed bride? Would a hooker be an 'unlicensed bride?'

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:IAAL by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Thankfully he's been moderated as troll (deservedly--there's not '-1, Total BS' moderation), but I would like to point out that a license is permission.

      A license is a grant of permission to do something you presumably couldn't do without the license. This is distinguished in law from a contract, where there is a mutual exchange of promises.

      I am not a lawyer, but I did watch several televised law classes covering such things over my college's cable network (though I did not take that particular class).

    3. Re:IAAL by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Well firstly you need two people, and if Bush is going to have his spoilt brat way they will have to be man and woman, not woman and woman or man and man. If theres an issue of one of them being from outside the country then theres all that crap about making sure they arnt just trying to get citizenship. The TV repair license is _just_ a membership of a club that lets anyone in if they have 50 bucks, and serves no purpose what-so-ever (marrage has plenty of legal and financial implications).

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    4. Re:IAAL by kfg · · Score: 1

      So what test does Americans have to pass to get a Marriage license?

      Blood.

      KFG

    5. Re:IAAL by Darby · · Score: 1

      So what test does Americans have to pass to get a Marriage license?

      Blood.


      Nope.

      You need ID. That's it.
      YMMV depending on the jurisdiction, but as an American, you can go anywhere in America to get your license and get married.

      When I got married (in Vegas) we flew in, went to the courthouse got a license (took about 5-10 minutes), went to the hotel got ready ( I had time to spare (obviously) so my friends took me to a strip club) then I left from there to the Chapel, where we got hitched.

      No test of any sort blood or otherwise.
      She is even a UK citizen.

    6. Re:IAAL by kfg · · Score: 1

      YMMV depending on the jurisdiction. . .

      Of which there are more than 50 in America alone. The Vegas wedding/honeymoon combo is very popular for the very reasons you state, it has the laxest requirements.

      . . .but as an American, you can go anywhere in America to get your license and get married.

      This is incorrect. As an American you can go nearly anywhere in the world to get your license and get married.

      KFG

  24. Stop complaining! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Go run for office and fix it already!

    Anyway, I *like* that there is a driving license. I wish it were *more* difficult.

    Marriage... that one is less useful now than it might have been 100 years ago. And with common law marriages, quite useless, though lots of states don't recognize common law marriage.

    Fishing and hunting I'll agree too as I don't think we should have unlicensed folk with guns shooting at things. At the least, it limits them.

    Essentially licensing is a force to limit, and in certain things I think that's good.

    1. Re:Stop complaining! by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Go run for office and fix it already!

      Where are trolls like you when Bush, et al. want to play our heart strings and force us to believe that we need to spend billions of dollars to help those poor oppressed people halfway across the world?

      Don't like the Taliban? Quit whining and do something about it yourself.
      Don't like Saddam Hussein? Quit whining and do something about it yourself.
      Don't like Milosovic? Quit whining and do something about it yourself.

      Certainly, in those regions, running for office takes a different set of skills. It's possible, though.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  25. $55 is nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I gouge customers for much more than that on a daily basis.

  26. And so dies a whole genre of pr0n movies by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    The tv repair man producing his tools and getting it from the lady of the house and 2 of her most intimate friends was a fantasy but a geek connecting his laptop to the tv and getting the same treatment is just so not going to happen.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:And so dies a whole genre of pr0n movies by base3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if the geek brought a pizza with the patch cables . . .

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  27. All Governments are inherently evil by Bodhammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who is John Galt?

    There is no nonsense so errant that it cannot be made the creed of the vast majority by adequate governmental action.
    Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)

    For every action there is an equal and opposite government program.
    Bob Wells

    Government is too big and too important to be left to the politicians.
    Chester Bowles (1901 - 1986)

    After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood.
    Fred Thompson, Speech before the Commonwealth Club of California

    You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature.
    George W. Bush, Speech on May 17, 2002
    Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.

    H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
    I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.
    H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)

    The government consists of a gang of men exactly like you and me. They have, taking one with another, no special talent for the business of government; they have only a talent for getting and holding office.
    H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)

    Whenever you have an efficient government you have a dictatorship.
    Harry S Truman (1884 - 1972), Lecture at Columbia University, 28 Apr. 1959

    You will find that the State is the kind of organization which, though it does big things badly, does small things badly, too.
    John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )

    The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop.
    P. J. O'Rourke (1947 - )

    Sure there are dishonest men in local government. But there are dishonest men in national government too.
    Richard M. Nixon (1913 - 1994)

    So they [the Government] go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all-powerful to be impotent.
    Sir Winston Churchill (1874 - 1965), Hansard, November 12, 1936

    Disbelief in magic can force a poor soul into believing in government and business.
    Tom Robbins (1936 - )

    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    Voltaire (1694 - 1778)

    I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.
    Will Rogers (1879 - 1935), Saturday Review, Aug. 25, 1962

    There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you.
    Will Rogers (1879 - 1935)

    The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments.
    William H. Borah

    --
    "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    1. Re:All Governments are inherently evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I'm confused now. It's been so long since I've read Atlas shrugged that I don't really remember much beyond the general gist. But Randian's don't like government? It seems like half the articles I see from the ayn rand foundation has the author kowtowing to the Republican party line. I know that 'officially' republicans are against big government, but anyone taking more than a few minutes to observe their actual actions should know how they really feel about it. How are objectivists reconciling this with their beliefs?

    2. Re:All Governments are inherently evil by Bodhammer · · Score: 1
      Of course your confused, your thinking that there is a difference between conservatives and liberals, a difference between democrats and republicans, a difference between socialism, marxism, democracy, and communism...



      Read the John Galt speech again, yes it is long but it is enlightening!



      ------------
      The Who
      Won't Get Fooled Again

      "Meet the new boss
      Same as the old boss"

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    3. Re:All Governments are inherently evil by wobblie · · Score: 1

      government isn't evil, it's an inescapable part of politics.

      the state is evil.

    4. Re:All Governments are inherently evil by alita69 · · Score: 1
      Don't listen to the Ayn Rand Foundation. The Objectivist Center is a much better source. The ARF has gone a bit off the deep end on a couple subjects.

      In any case, no, they don't spout the Republican party line (at least, not if they're really Objectivist; haven't paid attention to ARF for a while, so I can't say for sure). They do sound quite Republican on economic matters, yes. Basically, keep government out of it unless someone's doing something like committing fraud or theft. They disagree strongly with the Repubs on social matters, though. Objectivists think things like flag-burning bans and gay-marriage bans are silly. And certainly don't agree with the whole Christian State nonesense. Or the agressive "hit them before they hit us" War on Terror nonesense. Or the drug war. Or... well, you get the picture.

  28. Good grief by Flower · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Just pass the cost to your customers and make a tidy profit at it over time. If someone complains explain the whole stupid situation for them and they can vote the idiots out of office.

    Like this isn't what will happen anyway.

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  29. Recording+Playback by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    During either the DeCSS suit, the DMCA hearings, or a RIAA/MPAA suit (I can't remember which), the court specifically ruled that computers were not playback and recording devices and thus did not fall into the realm of protected devices for fair use copying.

    Either computers are not such devices as the court ruling indicated, and thus this money grab is illegal, or computers are such devices and thus protected by fair use copying exemptions to the chagrin of the RIAA/MPAA.

  30. Don't pooh pooh it by OYAHHH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those of you,

    Who are staring down the double barreled outsourcing monster you might want to consider a talent for fixing TVs as a godsend.

    I mean, who in their right mind is gonna ship a 60 inch plasma TV to india for repair? Gotta be done locally, get the drift....

    Plus, from everything I've ever seen those TV repair guys make some pretty good dough while getting to play with all kinds of electronic gadgetry.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
    1. Re:Don't pooh pooh it by randyest · · Score: 1

      Maybe an interesting point (unique in this thread, at least) but:

      I mean, who in their right mind is gonna ship a 60 inch plasma TV to india for repair? Gotta be done locally, get the drift....

      A CRT you can maybe repair. There are serviceable parts inside. A Plasma or LCD? Not likely possible, and even less likely cost effective (except in rare cases where invertors are in LCDs and designed to be replaced, such as with Apple. No plasma examples I can think of though.)

      Just FYI before you start counting on all that income from your plasma repair shop :)

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Don't pooh pooh it by sega · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone in IT who faces the prospect of having his/her job offshored/outsourced, see becoming a TV repair guy as a 'godsend'?

      For starters, not all jobs are going to be outsourced/offshored.

      Secondly, if my job was on the line of being offshored or outsourced, I'd probably want to start my own business and work as an IT professional services consultant, or IT technical services.

      In other words I wouldn't want to repair tv's if my skill is with IT.

      Finally, I see no correlation between tv repair and IT professional/technical services such as website development, installation and configuration of networks, database administration, possibly some business systems analysis.

  31. Not a first for Louisiana by DrLudicrous · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Apparently, Louisiana is well-known for this kind of crap. In order to be a florist in Louisiana, you have to be licensed. Achieving this requires taking a $150 exam before a committee. Of course, the committee is composed of other local florists, to whom you represent competition. For a quick blurb on this, and the effort to eradicate (which has already failed), check out:

    http://www.2theadvocate.com/stories/071504/opi_edi 2001.shtml

    1. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of a case in AZ were a NativeAmerican was working as a indian hair braider. Thelocal cosmotology got ahold of this and forced her to take classes, learn all about everyting but indian hair braiding, so that she could be licensed tobraid hair.

    2. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who are quick to support requried certifications for engineers (who already have 4+ years of education) and bringing on new certification requriements for programmers are sure quick to bash this. Interesting.

    3. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Those who are quick to support requried certifications for engineers (who already have 4+ years of education) and bringing on new certification requriements for programmers are sure quick to bash this. Interesting."

      There's an enormous difference between a privately offered *certification* and a legally mandated *license*. One is the free market's way of identifying competent engineers; the other is the state making work and jobs (without the state's permission) illegal.

      Is that "interesting" too? I should think it was obvious.

    4. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Well, lessee. As a former computer repair tech, I don't really have a problem with requiring some sort of certification. However, I would insist that the certification require more than making sure the check cleared.

      I'm also a PhD student in EE, with master's and bachelor's degrees under my belt already. I've been a TA, mentored several teams of undergrads through engineering projects, and helped supervise some undergrads and grads at our research site. Believe me, AC, we ABSOLUTELY need certification of engineers. I've seen some people get BSEE's who couldn't solder a connection to save their mom's life, can't read the resistor color code, don't know the difference between shielding and insulation, and haven't the faintest idea what the gain equation for an inverting op-amp might look like.

      The two situations aren't similar at all.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    5. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no "interesting" here, fella. Requiring a fee to "certify" computer techs as TV techs (which they aren't) is nothing like requiring EE's to be certified based on an actual examination of their EE knowledge. Go crawl your little troll ass back under your rock, and be quiet while the grownups are talking.

    6. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by mackinaugh · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not that we're know for corruption down here or anything, but Roger Villere is also the chairman of the Louisiana Republican Party.

      There were those who thought there might have been a connection between the florist licensing thing and him, but I dunno. There was also the home inspector license thing initiated a year or two ago, and now this shit. They're always whining that they need more money.. There was the "temporary" business tax-thing that got "renewed" because they need more money. And the Stelly tax joke.

      How about instead of trying to suck us dry, we try to get all these fuckers to keep their hands out of the pot ?
      It's no wonder nobody wants to do business in our state.

    7. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, most of what you described falls into the realm of an electrician.

      An auto mechanic can probably overhaul an engine better than my Masters ME friends, but I'd hate to see him try to design a restraint assembly.

    8. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by zaf · · Score: 1

      Not that we're know for corruption down here or anything, but Roger Villere is also the chairman of the Louisiana Republican Party. There were those who thought there might have been a connection between the florist licensing thing and him, but I dunno. I work for the agency that does the certifications for florists. Our commissioner is no friend of the Republican party, so I seriously doubt there's any connection there.

    9. Re:Not a first for Louisiana by rco3 · · Score: 1

      I will gladly agree that an EE doesn't necessarily need to know how to solder (despite being required to take Senior Design), nor do they have to know the resistor color code (ahem! Senior Design); however, knowing the difference between shielding and insulation is, in fact, crucial, especially in anything involving signal propagation; so is being able to design a simple inverting op-amp configuration. If you don't know the basics, you can't use the high-level stuff. Perhaps you can be a DSP engineer or something similar; that's no longer EE, that's CS IMHO.

      However, your point is well taken. I believe in engineering as applied science, and that may put me in a minority. However, let's not skip over my main point either - people may have had 4+ years of education, but these days that does NOT mean (sadly) that they actually learned what they were supposed to have learned. Hence, certification is necessary.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  32. [clears throat] by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    According to a story in yesterday's New Orleans paper

    It has a name, you know: the Times-Picayune. A little respect, please.

    Anyway, it sounds just like our corrupt idiot-officials.

  33. Nice dodge. by pla · · Score: 1

    Brohn confirmed that he signed the letter but said he didn't write it.
    "That wasn't my choice of words," he said.


    Dear Mr. Brohn...

    Take a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut.


    Oh, don't like that? Sorry, not my words, I just added my name to 'em for this post. You'll have to take the issue up with Kurt Vonnegut.

  34. Louisiana: State of REDNECK BOSS HOGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you expect from a state government (laugh) that also sells out as the nations landfill.

    1. Re:Louisiana: State of REDNECK BOSS HOGS by wobblie · · Score: 1

      Louisiana is not redneck. There are no rednecks here. However, they have sold us out as the nations landfill.

    2. Re:Louisiana: State of REDNECK BOSS HOGS by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Are your sure? I thought we shipped of all our Mardi Gras garbage to MS??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  35. yea right! by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    "We're not going after computer technicians," he said. "The only thing we're doing is giving an opportunity for computer technicians to get into the radio and television side of the business."

    Who wants to miss such a great opportunity?

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  36. Just as long by xmorg · · Score: 1

    Just as long as tv and radio repair(wo)men are not classified as pc repair we should be ok.

    Its kinda like the govmernment sponsored monopoly the AMA, and the state bar have on law and medicine.

    1. Re:Just as long by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Just as long as tv and radio repair(wo)men are not classified as pc repair we should be ok."

      I'd sooner trust my computer to the average TV service tech than my TV to the average computer tech.

      Fortunately I know enough about both to have a good chance of being able to recover from either.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  37. Anybody else see this coming? by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

    I saw this kind of change happening about a year ago. When I ran the idea past my other IT oriented buddies, they laughed at me.

    How insane it was that computer technical services would be in the same bag as TV repairmen.
    Not meaning any disrespect to TV repairmen, obviously.

  38. MISSING OPTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mother.

  39. This is great.!!!!!!!!! by YankeeInExile · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have always heard rumors of Marijuana Tax Stamps and the like, so I did a little googling. Here's a random sample from Kansas:

    Drug dealers, as defined above, are required by law to purchase tax stamps from the Department of Revenue's Business Tax Bureau (K.S.A. 79-5204). In order to protect against any possible violation of the self-incrimination constitutional protection, a dealer is not required to give his/her name or address when purchasing stamps and the Business Tax Bureau is prohibited from sharing any information relating to the purchase of drug tax stamps with law enforcement or anyone else
    There is other text http://www.ksrevenue.org/faqs-abcdrugtax.htm for your amusement.
    --
    How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    1. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know if you discovered the purpose of these laws. It's to make marijauna a civil crime. That way they can steal, um "seize", your home, car, money, whatever, without ever proving you guilty.

    2. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad I live in Texas then.

      http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3661

    3. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is no longer legal to be prosecuted if your drugs are confiscated and you do not have tax stamps.
      http://www.ndsn.org/nov96/drugtax.html

    4. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by gandy909 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, these days, won't a simple "...we think they may be, or are contributing to, terrorism..." be enough to trump that law and grab what info they have, as well as the video cam tapes of them buying the stamps...?

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
    5. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose if this is to nail a drug dealer on tax evasion charges which used to be a hell of a lot more severe than the pot charge. It also allows for the persons home, car, yacht, and inflatable doll to be confiscated. Everyone knows that when you mess with the Tax Man, ye have no rights. Seriously.

      Hell, around these here parts, ten years ago, if you sold a bag of oregano to some one and claimed it was pot, the fraud charge was much more serious than if you had actually sold them pot. Ain't it great folks?

    6. Re:This is great.!!!!!!!!! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's so the prosecutors can add an additional charge when they arrest the drug dealer, that's all. Remember, Al Capone was not put away for killing people or shooting up businesses. He was put away, in Alcatraz, for tax evasion...

  40. Oh yea, Louisiana... by javaxman · · Score: 1

    That's the same state that decided to pick between a KKK member and a known crook for governor in 1991. It's a nice place to visit... I guess it's to their credit that the crook won by an extremely narrow margin??

    1. Re:Oh yea, Louisiana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At least the crook in Louisiana actually won, as opposed to the crook in the White House.

      ~~~

  41. What's a "repair"? by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What specific actions constitute a "repair"?

    Backing up a hard drive?
    Swapping one hard drive for another?
    Swapping one hard drive for another because the first had failed?
    Re-installing Windows?
    Replacing Windows with Linux?
    Modifying the Windows registry?
    Unplugging one mouse and plugging in another?
    Brushing dirt from the lens of a (optical) mouse?
    Moving files around?

    There are so many ways that a computer can "break" that don't require getting out your soldering iron... I'd think it'd be difficult to differentiate between someone who "repairs" computers and someone who "supports" computers.

    1. Re:What's a "repair"? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think a lot of repairmen simply replace faulty components rather than try to mend them. I am thinking of a bad compressor on a fridge that's simply replaced. Belts on a dryer that are old and replaced. Auto mechanics replacing entire exhaust systems. I see the point you were trying to make, however the old image of repairmen actually fixing something has gone out of fashion. Most of them just find the broken part and replace it. So in that sense, if the hard drive is broken, replace it. Windows is broken, run the idiot proof Norton tools and hope they fix it. Replacing Windows with Linux? I haven't heard of that one, but who knows.

      On a side and off-topic note, I can't wait in 50 years when most people will have grown up with computers and the basics of them will be familiar. I'm not saying old people are dumb, it's just hard for them sometimes to understand what a desktop is.

    2. Re:What's a "repair"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Replacing Windows with Linux? I haven't heard of that one, but who knows.

      You're lucky. It's one of the stupid tired old Slashdot jokes that never stops.

    3. Re:What's a "repair"? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I've heard the "in soviet russia," "beowulf," "clippy," "bsod," and I'm sure a bunch others that are equally lame. I'd say I should read slashdot more often to pick these up, but I think 5 hours a day combined over the 18 I'm awake for is long enough. I'll b

    4. Re:What's a "repair"? by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Replacing Windows with Linux? I haven't heard of that one, but who knows.

      There are those who consider that any PC with Windows installed is "broken" in any number of ways and can only be fixed by means of drastic measures. The point, of course, is that in order to require "repair men" to obtain a license, you'd have to come up with some sort of definition of what constitutes a "repair," or of the conditions under which a computer is "broken."

      I'm not saying old people are dumb, it's just hard for them sometimes to understand what a desktop is.

      Okay, I'll bite: what's a desktop?

      Answer: the desktop is an illusion, and a vague metaphor. Back in the early days of Macintosh, the metaphor a bit more concrete than it is now. In addition to the Trash and document icons that looked like sheets of paper, we had desk accessories similar to those you might find on a real desk (scrap book, puzzle, clock, note pad, etc.) and applications that tried hard to support the "desktop" metaphor. Most importantly, Apple shipped an introductory program which explained the metaphor and taught people to do things like point, click, drag, and use menus. These days, GUI's are a lot more complicated, and there's an awful lot that doesn't fit into the desktop metaphor at all. Many, if not most, applications are designed with complete disregard for the metaphor. In short, the "desktop" notion has pretty well outlived its usefulness. It's no surprise that new users (young or old) have a hard time figuring out what a "desktop" is, because today's interfaces give you darn little clue.

      I can't wait in 50 years when most people will have grown up with computers and the basics of them will be familiar.

      Fifty years from now, we'll have about as much clue about the tech du jour as our grandparents have now. Stuff most people would consider "basics" will almost certainly change. The "desktop" business will surely have given up the ghost by then, and people will have a hard time undestanding why you'd want to have a "central" processing unit. New tech based on multistate circuitry could make binary computing seem quaint. Global warming and astronomically expensive energy may give people some badly needed perspective and actually reduce our reliance on electronics. Who knows?

      So the first time you hear yourself tell your grandchildren "Back when I was your age, we used machines called 'computers' to do that...", just remember: you heard it here first.

  42. People still call for TV repairmen? by ejaw5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps I've been lucky (knock on wood) but TVs seem to last a long time with little maintenance. I figure when a TV finally does bite the dust, its served its lifetime well and about time to buy a new one anyway. People aren't calling repairmen to fix knob-controlled tv's embededded into wood frames are they? (wish they had kept the form design around though)

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:People still call for TV repairmen? by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1

      You've hit the nail on the head. TV repairmen (at least in my neck of the woods) are really struggling. TV sets cost so little these days, and parts for them are so high, that repairing them isn't really feasible anymore. Most TV sets are cheaply made, and cheaply priced. 19 inch TVs with built-in DVD players sell for less than $200.

      That may be changing soon though. There are a lot of pricey very high-end TV sets that might need skilled technitions to repair. Plasma screens come to mind as they are both expensive, and not very servicable. You simply wouldn't want to replace them. However, I don't see how this will at all be related to computer repair.

      Let's leave that alone for a moment, and assume that plasma screen TV set repair will be like computer repair, with user servicable parts mostly made to fit in predetermined slots. The only tools needed are a flat and a phillips head screwdriver. Why would you tehn be required to be licensed? The hardware work is basically monkey replaces the parts stuff. We're not soldering onto motherboards and testing things with multi-meters after all.

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    2. Re:People still call for TV repairmen? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I recently had to have a tv repaired. 35" tv. Cost about $900. Repair cost was $200. One of the circuit boards with the IR receiver died. I probably could have replaced it myself, but if I guessed incorrectly about which part was bad, I would have been out the $85 part. Do that a couple of times, and you've paid for the repair. Oh, that price included pickup and delivery. Too bad it didn't include plugging the inputs in correctly.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:People still call for TV repairmen? by westlake · · Score: 1
      People aren't calling repairmen to fix knob-controlled tv's embededded into wood frames are they?

      No. But "home theater" is beginning to affect things like interior design, furniture and lighting. People are spending serious money on very ambitious and complex systems.

  43. i'm from louisiana... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and i can honestly say that LA has the most crooked government in the US. this doesn't suprise
    me at all. louisiana government is all about how much money they can fuck the people out of and put
    in thier greedy pockets.

    thats why i moved from that miserable excuse of a state.

  44. Hmm... by remigo · · Score: 1

    > "Disingenuous quote of the day: 'We're not trying to swing our
    > arm around a whole bunch of people to get new revenue.'"

    Well, I mean, maybe it wasn't a disingenuous comment.
    Maybe they have other uses for the $55 fee.
    After all, Doom 3 is $54.99....

  45. TV reapir dudes by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    just my anecdotal, but I've been to two differnt TV repair shops in the past two years,once for a monitor repair (not worth it cost wise but possible) and once for a vcr part (unobtanium) both places had stacks of computers and monitors in them, and the guys there did all manner of repairs, in fact, more repairs on computers (real repairs, not just component swapping) than the average whitebox shop I have been in. I found both the guys to be quite hip and knowledgeable computer users and techs. They got into the biz because they loved gadgets and had the attitude and aptitude for it, so it's a simple transition to working on boxes. One came from a dotmilgov tech background, the other from a hobbyist to a civvie tech school background.

    FWIW

  46. The power to regulate is the power to destroy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...although regulations never hurt the fat cat lawyers and bureaucrats who benefit from them.

  47. Re:You've hit on something... by blargh3 · · Score: 1

    In the spirit of spite, perhaps all these ripped-off computer techs should go out and incompetently "fix" televions all over the state. Then they could point to Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board for licensing them and thereby making them think they were qualified to fix televisions...

  48. The big easy by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    "What a great meal! Could you bring us the check?"
    "What! The Check? Remy, you done know your money's no good here!"
    "By the way, did I introduce Miss Ann Osboure of the Federal District Attorney's Office? And, could you bring THE check?, please"
    "oh, the Check! Why sure Remy, comin' right up"

    "Ahh, don't go gettin' your pretty head all upset there, 'cher. It's just the way we do things down here in the Big Easy."

    Dennis Quaid and Ellen Barkin in
    The Big Easy 1986

    1. Re:The big easy by Simonetta · · Score: 1


      Laisse les bon tons roulez!

      Ico Ico, jack kee mo fee nai nay!

      Every year, at carnival time,
      we make a new suit!
      Red Yellow Green Purple and Blue,
      we make a new suit!

      "There's two of them. One is a quiet, dark-haired gentleman named Louis. He will leave you alone if you show the sign of the cross. Not because it affects him, but because he respects it. The other one, the blond one, talks like a gangster and is truly evil. Avoid this one."

      STELLA!

      Well, I went on down to the Audobon Zoo, and they all asked for you. The monkeys asks, the tigers asked, and the elephants asked me too.

      Brother John is gone!

      It youse da cost a quoita to go down na Quartoir onna streetcah, but'n nawh it costa dahllar.

      Who put their Lucky Dog in my Hurricane glass?

      I no'ed her, she done from the I'ish Channel down ov' by the kaanaar of Tchoppatoolas 'n Caa-ly-o-pee.

    2. Re:The big easy by Simonetta · · Score: 1


      No,

      They all AX'ed for you.

    3. Re:The big easy by mingot · · Score: 1

      No "Confederacy of Dunces" quote? You rilly ourtah be ashamed ayosef.

  49. We should welcome this by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

    We Computer Professionals should welcome and encourage / expand this trend. As our profession becomes more key to health and safety, our society will want to be sure Computer Pros know what they are doing. Further, Government licensing can be a POWERFUL way to fight offshoring. That programmer in Bangalore is unlikely to be licensed to program in Louisiana!

    1. Re:We should welcome this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not comparing apples to apples. How many computer technicians are going to fly to LA to hook a computer to a HDTV set? Add in the health and safety issue and you are completely out to lunch.

  50. This is Louisiana after all by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 1

    Its what they do best. After all, Nopoleanic laws etc.. Its just a huge money grab to get more money for a dying industry. Seriously? How many TV Repair Techs are there right now? Not many. My uncle was a TV Repair guy and he retired a long time ago. He fixed TV's when they REALLY needed fixing, IE replacing a tube that was dead or dull. Once semiconductors came into the market, his repair business died.

    In our day, its a throw it away and buy another $5000 HDTV set and hang it on the wall. Long gone are the tubes that went out. I bet if someone investigate the financing on the Radio and TV board in Louisiana it will show that the inflow of money has long ago trickled down to almost nothing.

    This is OBVIOUS. Its a money grab. The entire state is almost dead from unemployment and everyone like myself moving out.

    --
    Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
    1. Re:This is Louisiana after all by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > The entire state is almost dead from unemployment
      > and everyone like myself moving out.

      You should go into the Shrimpin' bidness. Maybe you could talk Lt. Dan into being your first mate!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  51. Similar Law in Minnesota by teslakid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Recectly, the state of Minnesota decided that only Certified Electricians can legally install low voltage electrical cable, which includes network and alarm system wiring. Here's http://www.mwpersons.com/articles/3-12-01-licensin g.htmlone man's story with a link to the relevant code. Gotta make sure those network cables don't electrocute anybody.

    1. Re:Similar Law in Minnesota by unitron · · Score: 1

      Of course the problem there is that a lot of licensed electricians, although quite knowledgeable and proficient with 60 Hz power wiring, don't know the stuff, besides the safety part, which you need to know about low voltage wiring, or at least about the particular type of wiring with which you're working. (Here's a hint: If it involves high frequencies or a wide frequency band, there's stuff they might not have covered in electrician's school.)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  52. Actually... by ElForesto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm already running for office (3rd time), and I'm the county chair of a political party (not the Republicrats). And now to address your points...

    Driver's licenses do not do anything to ensure safe driving. Not wanting to get into an accident ensures safe driving. Not wanting to get cited or hauled to jail ensures safe driving. How does paying a couple of dollars every few years (with no testing) ensure that I drive safer? It doesn't. I would personally feel safer if the truly unsafe drivers (speeding to excess, reckless driving, DUI, etc.) were thrown in jail for extended periods. Maybe it would discourage the bad behaviours.

    Marriage licenses were originally meant to prevent inter-racial marriages. I prefer the system of common law marriage as a license is a permit to do something that would otherwise be illegal. When did normal marriage become illegal? I support keeping them around for people that want to quickly bypass waiting periods and such.

    Fishing and hunting licenses don't make a dime's worth of difference in population control. It just ends up amounting to another case of "papers, please". Why the heck do most states require an SSN for one of those? It's just another control for the sake of control.

    You're wrong on what a license is. See above: a license is a permit to do something that would otherwise be illegal. I'm very suspicious of any attempt to make something illegal and replace its legality with a licensing system.

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    1. Re:Actually... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Driver's licenses do not do anything to ensure safe driving.

      You're wrong. (So is this weirdo).

      How does paying a couple of dollars every few years (with no testing) ensure that I drive safer?

      You're incorrectly focusing on license-renewal, which is actually less important than the initial issuance, which is what really improves safety. Or do you think that I'd really be fine to allow 14-year olds to get in cars and do 65 on the highway without at least first convincing a backseat cop that he's fundamentally competent?

    2. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should seriouly reconsider running for public office. Your superficial, black & white view of the issues you mentioned demonstrates a severe lack of the depth necessary to successfully represent other people.

      Republicrats? What are you, twelve?

    3. Re:Actually... by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      "You're wrong. (So is this weirdo)"

      That sounds reasonable, but you provide no evidence whatsoever beyond your say-so.

      Can you back up your claims? Logic or links?

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about his entire fucking second paragraph? Are you totally blind or just stupid?

    5. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the county chair of a political party (not the Republicrats)

      Ohh ohh, let me guess? Libertarian, right?

      Well thank God for that, at least you'll never actually have any chance of doing any harm!

    6. Re:Actually... by ElForesto · · Score: 1

      So the possession of a printed piece of plastic makes me a safer driver automagically? And you think I'm crazy?

      It's not a license that increases safety. It's driver training that increases safety. Anyone that wants to drive wants to drive in a way that ensures a)they don't get in an accident, b) they don't get pulled over, and c) that it doesn't encourage the real crazies to pull them out of their cars and beat them.

      Your analogy to 14-year-olds is not appropriate anyway. I think it *should* be illegal to drive when you're under 18, and I think that a license for anyone under 18 that wants to drive is appropriate. This is because minors can't be held legally liable in the same way that an adult can. I believe that any adult should have the fundamental right to travel, and operation of a motor vehicle should be part of that.

      --
      There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    7. Re:Actually... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      So the possession of a printed piece of plastic makes me a safer driver automagically?

      No, obviously. The fact that you drove around with a traffic cop in your backseat for 30 minutes and he didn't get angry at you makes you safer.

      Virtually everybody wants to drive. Almost everyone assumes they know how. But many 18-year-olds imagine themselves immortal, and don't exercise as much caution as they should. Requiring a practical test before public driving is the real benefit of licensing.

      . I think it *should* be illegal to drive when you're under 18,

      You feel that the 18th birthday magically imparts skills and responsibilities that were totally absent the previous day?

      A firm cutoff date like that is both wrong and unfair. Some 30 year olds can't drive safely, while some 16 yearolds can. Out of fairness for them, and for our own safety, we must have a cop look at each individually before allowing him to drive.

    8. Re:Actually... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      That sounds reasonable, but you provide no evidence whatsoever beyond your say-so.

      Do you know how enormously more likely a person is to get in a harmful accident during his first 4 years of driving?

      Can you imagine how much worse it would be if they were allowed to start driving as soon as they can buy/borrow a car, without even demonstrating a minimal level of ability? Without even having proven that they can vaguely remember 50% of the traffic laws?

    9. Re:Actually... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Licensing US drivers certainly does nothing to prevent accidents, because the driving test is so pathetically easy anyone can pass it - ditto for the written test. If you can't read the driver's handbook once over and pass the written, at least in California, then you should be sent back to grammar school. Elderly drivers DO have to retest here now, my grandfather is just about to have to do it, so finally we're getting some value.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Actually... by ElForesto · · Score: 1

      On the flip-side of that, does a license make one think higher of their driving skill regardless of their actual skill? Who knows. It would seem that the prevailing thought it that those who a licensed somehow inherently have a greater driving skill than those who are not. I haven't seen any data to back up either side.

      I stated the reason that I think it should be illegal to drive for anyone under 18 is for legal liability reasons. The only reason a minor should be licensed to drive is to extend the same liabilities that an adult has to them, or explicitly to their parents. Please read the full comment before replying.

      I don't believe that prior restraint is very appropriate, and driver's licenses are just the most prevalent example of it in action. If someone can't drive safely, they should get ticketed, taken to jail, etc. I think that the licensing system would be moot if there were real penalties for unsafe driving and causing property damage/injury/loss of life.

      I don't think we're going to end up seeing eye-to-eye on this at all. You have an opinion without facts to back it up, I have an opinion without facts to back it up. Let's just agree to disagree.

      --
      There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    11. Re:Actually... by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      "The fact that you drove around with a traffic cop in your backseat for 30 minutes and he didn't get angry at you makes you safer."

      No. This constitutes weak proof of minimal competence. (you can drop the weak and minimal here if it makes you feel better, even strong proof of competence doesn't change this.) It does not make you safer. At all. The practice and training needed to pass such a test is what makes the driver safer.

      "A firm cutoff date like that is both wrong and unfair."

      I totally agree with that statement. Are you arguing for a repeal of minimum driving ages?

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    12. Re:Actually... by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      "Do you know how enormously more likely a person is to get in a harmful accident during his first 4 years of driving?"

      Yes. This proves that practice and/or expierience makes safer drivers. Is there any proof that the licence grants any such ability? Or assures such ability?

      "Can you imagine how much worse it would be if they were allowed to start driving as soon as they can buy/borrow a car, ...[?]"

      Yes, actually. If I remember correctly, a person is more likely to get into an accident in the first few years around drinking age than before. (here driving age starts at 16, drinking age is 21) Assuming that the parents are somewhat responsible, I imagine that there would be little loss in safety. Since that assumption is not always true, actual results would be a little bit worse, but not disaster by any means.

      This starts to get into a philosophical question. Which do you value more, liberty or safety? I would rather be at liberty to drive my car without the restrictions of licensing, registration and safety inspections, than to have safer roads - even if I am wrong, and such regulations actually do signifigantly increase safety.

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    13. Re:Actually... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The practice and training needed to pass such a test is what makes the driver safer.

      Yes... so can't you follow the logic?
      Requiring licenses means that young drivers need some training to pass the test, which makes them safer. Therefore licenses makes them safer.

      Licenses are important for other reasons, too. They give the state a mechanism to take a dangerous driver off the roads, without slamming him in prison. If a man gets drunk and totals two of his cars, but survives because of airbags and crumple zones, won't you feel safer when he's forced to the backseat?

      Licensing re-exams also protect us from hazardous elderly drivers. Extreme age reduces perception, reflexes, and concentration- but also makes people unwilling to detect or unable to admint their own deterioration. Licensing re-tests helps get non-longer-capable drivers off the roads; hopefully before they kill 9 people.

      (Re-testing every 5 years is probably a mistake, and a test frequency more based on your actual age could be both less intrusive for the middle-aged and more likely to catch deteriorating elders)

      Are you arguing for a repeal of minimum driving ages?

      There is not (in the USA) a firm minimum driving age, like you advocated. The right to drive is granted partially: first at 14, then 16, then 18, then 21. (It isn't uniform across all states- in particular, only a few rural areas let you begin road-driving at 14). The partial-priviledge system is more fair than the firm cutoff you want.

    14. Re:Actually... by tehdaemon · · Score: 1
      Gaaa.. missed your reply, Better late than never?

      "Yes... so can't you follow the logic?"

      Yes, but it is flawed. Rocks from the top of a mountain do not make legs stronger, hiking to the top to get them does. Buying (or using an aircraft to get) those rocks defeats the purpose. The licence test only catches incompetence, not recklessness, or most bad judgment (late for work and speeding, drinking etc.) Training for a test will only make people with bad coordination and related problems safer. If they could get a little practice first anyway. Young adults typically do not have these problems and so testing them does little. Do you see why I made the distinction between the licence and the process of getting them? The process can (but not will!) help make drivers safer. The licence won't.

      Now, if the driving tests were more rigorous like they have in Europe, maby I would be a little less harsh, but the training here in the US is almost worthless.

      "They give the state a mechanism to take a dangerous driver off the roads, without slamming him in prison.

      And making guns illegal will keep criminals from using them to commit crimes. Sorry, but I do not buy that. Same for the elderly, except they will usually realize 'they said I can't drive safely, so maby I shouldn't'

      You misunderstood me about minimum driving ages. I was not advocating firm minimum driving ages. (nor am I convinced they should be repealed) Just asking where you stood.

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
  53. Good old Louisiana politics... by artemis67 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And yet somehow, it's still a mystery as to why the Louisiana economy has been in the toilet for 20 years...

    1. Re:Good old Louisiana politics... by archivis · · Score: 1

      Hey the economy isn't in the toilet.

      It got flushed a while ago...

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
  54. Are they going to stop with computer repairmen by Ja�ana · · Score: 1

    Or is this just a step in a direction? My job is repairing ground radios for the Marine Corps. With the training I have in the electronics field, if I can get my hands on a scematic, I can fix damn near anything. Does that mean that, should I move to Louisianna and set up a radio repair business, or get licensed similarly, that I need to pay 55 more dollars just because I am capable of fixing TVs? This may seem a little off topic, but that's almost the impression I'm getting from this story, that they're just looking for more income, and will jack pretty much anyone they can to get it.

    --

    -- Napalm sticks to kids.

    1. Re:Are they going to stop with computer repairmen by unitron · · Score: 1
      "...if I can get my hands on a scematic, I can fix damn near anything."


      Schematics are nice (wish I could get them for some of the BX mobos I've got lying around here), but you're still screwed if you can't get the parts.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  55. Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's force those computer literate people out of New Orleans so they can use their skills in areas that don't screw you over for a tax grab. Well Heck, a computer and a TV both have screens, they must be the same....

  56. Oh boy... by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1
    "For example, Brohn said, some high definition television monitors are designed to be driven by computers, and in such instances, the work should be done by a certified television and radio technician to ensure that the expensive equipment is not damaged, Brohn said."
    Oh please! If you're opening up the monitor in order to repair it then its clear that the licensing requirement applies, but if you're fixing computer equipment or attaching some cables to a monitor then you shouldn't need a license from the Radio and Television Technicians Board.

    It's like the buggy whip manufacturers bitching about the sale of horseless carriages. Just get over it and don't expect the world to protect you from obsolescence.
    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  57. Mississippi most corrupt? by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Only if your judging by the number of convictions. And Mississippi wins because they have every young idealist in the country watching them, trying to make their reputation.

    I grew up in Rhode Island, by Sand Pond in Warwick. If I had been ten years younger and a few IQ points dumber, I would have been burned to death in the The Station just like everyone else.
    The owner had complaits about the noise, so instead of getting a professional acoustic consultation, he goes to his brother who gets him a great deal on sound foam. The brother forgot to mention that he couldn't sell it because it was highly flammable, so it goes in the club. Then one night, the dumbest band on earth comes to town and they shoot off firebombs right into the super flammable sound foam.

    Typical Rhode Island.

    The only reason why Mississippi is 'ahead' of Rhode Island in the corruption statistics is because no one can convict anyone of corruption in Rhode Island. It took the Feds twenty years to build a case against Buddy Cianci. It would have taken twenty minutes anywhere else.

    1. Re:Mississippi most corrupt? by Holi · · Score: 1

      Pleasure to meet you Simonetta,

      Well your argument is almost sound I would not have used The Station fire to make your point. While it shows state wide corruption, it is not for the reason you mentioned. You should have mentioned the rubber stamped fire inspection. Or better yet the whole buy your way onto the police force scandal. Hell even Plunderdome.

      What you described was not state level corruption just someone cutting costs in a very illegal manner.

      And if that were so typical in RI why was that the only time it has ever happened in the state.

      And I still wouldn't say RI *is* the most corrupt, I would say *was* though. But a lot has happened in the past 10 years or so.

      and on a final note, I don't think Buddy was a bad mayor, corrupt yes but not bad. He did a lot for a dying downtown district, too bad he never got a chance to finish that project.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  58. A Sign of the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we move toward integration of computing devices, it seems likely that this type of thing will continue. After all, cellular phones are becoming hubs for more and more uses of technology, VoIP is the target of regulation, (see /. story http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/08/04/2212251.shtml ?tid=158&tid=95&tid=103), as are other forms of Internet-based communication. The lines are blurring and computing devices are becoming ripe for federal bureacracies to harvest for revenue. But perhaps these new paper certifications will look good on resumes too?

  59. sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    becoming a lawyer would be free, just as encouragement.

    No! becoming a lawyer would cost a bundle, just as Discouragement!!

    Kinda like...
    Why does it cost so much for a pound of lawyer's BRAINS??

    Ans: because it takes sooo many to get a pound...

    or

    Whts the difference between a dead lawyer in the middle of the road and a dead skunk in the middle of the road??

    Ans: there are skid marks by the skunk...

  60. Licenses? Do we get a union too? by Gldm · · Score: 1

    Maybe then we can lobby against outsourcing and set some regulated wages so I'm not struggling to make more than they do at Home Depot or UPS.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  61. oughta be unconstitutional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From : http://www.ksrevenue.org/faqs-abcdrugtax.htm

    "The drug dealer has 15 days from the date of assessment to request a hearing before the Director of Taxation to determine the validity of the assessment pursuant to K.S.A. 79-5205. The assessment is statutorily presumed to be valid and correctly determined. The burden is on the taxpayer to prove otherwise."

    Guilty until proven innocent. How unamerican.

    1. Re:oughta be unconstitutional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Guilty until proven innocent. How unamerican.

      No, how New American.

      We detain people without legal access for suspicion of terrorism, being associated with terrorists and even being the same nationality as suspected terrorists a la Perl Harbor.

      We're a cowardly and hypocritical nation, but no longer honorable, if you judge us by our actions instead of our words.

  62. This is great by Deanasc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the low LOW price of 55 bucks I can pad my resume with "Radio and TV Repairman".

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  63. I started out as a TV repairman by aristus · · Score: 1

    Just when i think I'm out, they drag me back in.....

    --
    Sometimes seventeen/Syllables aren't enough to/Express a complete
  64. Nigeria's market is more anarchy than libertarian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck-tard

  65. California Already Does This by datastalker · · Score: 1

    All computer repair facilities in the State of California have to register with, and follow the strict rules of, the Bureau of Electronics and Applicane Repair (B.E.A.R.). A repair store can't operate without that - they have to be licensed in order to even stay open.

  66. I looked, but couldn't find it by tkrotchko · · Score: 3, Funny

    " Let us not forget that an improperly wired CRT will emit X Rays."

    According to this link:
    http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/TVRad.html

    There's never been a case where this has happened. Is this because its not possible to do, or because all TV repairmen are licensed and all exercise extreme caution when wiring CRTs?

    Incidentally, do you know anyone who has ever rewired a CRT? When is a re-wiring advisable? Is it an annual thing, or just when the wires get old?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:I looked, but couldn't find it by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, do you know anyone who has ever rewired a CRT?

      I have. I'm using that monitor right now.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:I looked, but couldn't find it by ScouseMouse · · Score: 1

      I suspect its probably because if it is fixed so badly to emit a significant amount of X rays (IE, the components are stressed far over their normal tolerances), they would probably not survive long enough to give you a decent dose of X rays.

      I suspect anyone who deals with 10,000 volts on a regular basis exercises extreme caution. There is sort of a darwin thing encouriging it.

      Saying that, i have heard a number of stories about people being thrown across the room by HT from TV's, but never actually killed by it.

      I am informed that this is probably due to the fact that these circuits cant supply enough current to be lethal, but the voltage causes your muscles to contract violently, throwing you across the room.

    3. Re:I looked, but couldn't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you rewire it to pass the time? Or just because the wiring got old and cranky?

    4. Re:I looked, but couldn't find it by gunmenrock · · Score: 2, Informative

      The flyback on your average monitor puts out about 14KV. Most chassis' will dissipate that pretty quickly when the monitor is powered down, but caution is still advisable. Getting bit by the flyback won't kill you (unless you have a pacemaker or something), but it will knock you on your ass... As far as rewiring a CRT (meaning the pix tube itself), no, you shouldn't ever have to do it. Why would you? The only wire that even "goes" to the CRT is the anode coming off the flyback. You shouldn't ever, ever cut that, let alone splice it and wrap it in a little electrical tape. Everything else is right on the chassis or neckboard. There are a couple of wires that run to the CRT socket on the neckboard, but those shouldn't ever need to be cut either... in the event of swapping out a neckboard (no, don't do that either) or a CRT socket (maybe), those wires should be desoldered right at the socket. I work with monitors, CRTs, etc., frequently (I fix arcade games). There's a lot of misinformation here. Misinformation can be dangerous... like the people who say "to discharge a CRT, ground it to your wall socket!" Wrong wrong wrong. That won't do anything. You need to discharge to a RELATIVE ground; I.E. - the chassis' ground. A CRT is basically a bigass glass capacitor. OK. Rant over. Need coffee. I'll read this later to see if it's even coherent.

    5. Re:I looked, but couldn't find it by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The image was flickering.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:I looked, but couldn't find it by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I had to replace a bad VGA input board in a monitor once when the geometry went bad and as long as you have had the most cursorary course in electronics you should be fine. IF you paid attention to the week of safety rules to observe when working around electricity.

  67. Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If some yahoo who doesn't know what he's doing steps up the accelerating voltage, it WILL increase the x-rays produced."

    That would be amazing. Someone who doesn't know what they're doing would be unlucky enough to step up the accelerating voltage.

    How would one go about that? I've looked inside a lot of TV's, and I've never seen a voltage adjustment for the acclerating voltage. How high would this voltage have to be?

    According to a couple people, they think its impossible to repair a TV set so it would emit any appreciable X-Rays, but you seem like a guy who knows what he's doing, so I'll bet you've seen this plenty of times from unlicensed TV Repairmen, right?

  68. Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I want you. Does that make me a bad person?

    1. Re:Whoa by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I'll have to ask my husband... :)

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  69. Let 'em know, some contact info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's some relevant contact info. Let 'em know what you think, is Brohn lying and it's a money grab, or are computers really televisions and vcrs?

    Governor Kathleen Blanco, Office of the Governor Attn: Constituent Services
    P.O. Box 94004
    Baton Rouge, LA. 70804-9004
    Telephone 225-342-0991 or 225-342-7015
    Fax: 225-342-7099
    contact@gov.state.la.us

    Radio and Television Technicians Board, Louisiana State
    C/O Jesse Pugh
    6554 Florida Boulevard Suite 109,
    Baton Rouge, LA 70806
    225-231-4710

    Brohn, Stanley J.
    10265 Darryl Drive,
    Baton Rouge, LA 70815
    225-272-0648

  70. (___)*(___) -- the board stamp lincense here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with their lips.....

    They need to check the person out that thought this tripe up, and find out how long they been on crack...

  71. No, they are scum by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative
    If there was any sort of testing involved, I'd buy it. I understanding licensing when there is a test. The point is to try and ensure some minimal level of competence. True, a written test does not necessitate real world skills, but at least it weeds out the total bozos.

    Like take car audio. Many (most even) manufacturers won't warentee their equipment unless it's "professionally installed". The reason is because there exists the good likelyhood of fuckup if some dumb teenager just wires it up themselves (it's much easier to fuck up car audio than home audio). So just what is a professional? Well it's someone that is a Mobile Electronics Certified Professional, MECP. It's a simple written test akin to the A+ for computers. It's not proof you are a master with electronics, but at least it means you should know which wire is positive and how to ground a system.

    So, if it was something along these lines, that you had to be A+ certified, or have some computer certification, I could see the point, though not necessiarly support it. In that case the point would be to ensure minimal competence, that someone could know you were state licensed, meaning you'd apssed a standard test and so weren't just a complete liar that knows nothing of computers.

    That is not the case. All you do is send them $55. Oh give me a break, that probes nothing other than that you have (had) $55. It's like those diploma mills on the Internet. Sure it says PhD, but since all you did was give them money for it, it holds no actual meaning or value.

  72. Weak attempt to regulate PC consulting profession by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 1
    I live in Louisiana and have been a computer geek, tech, and coder for 23 years. Sadly, these shennanigans are not new here, nor I suspect elsewhere. The Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board is clearly trying to set themselves up to regulate the PC consulting profession without the legal footing necessary to do so.

    They're attempting to extend the definition of a TV (and they could also argue a radio) to include PCs. They lack the legal footing to redefine what constitutes a television, that is a matter for the legislature and the courts.

    Simply because a device can be equipped (via hardware and software) to record and display a television signal does not a television make. A PC can be similarly equipped (via hardware and/or software), to listen to radio broadcasts, but this does not make it a radio.

    I'm not going to pay the damned $55 fee or file the affidavit; I'm a computer guy, not a TV repairman. Any attempt to force it on me will be considered extortion and will be met with appropriate legal action. I'll have to take this up with my attorney and see what he thinks of a class action...

  73. Simplify by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    Without some form of certification test, or acceptance of one like A+, It is just a meaningless piece of paper. That makes it a money grab plain and simple.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  74. semi-OT: best Louisiana politics quote evar by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    "Leander, the federal government's got the atom bomb. What you got?" -- Earl Long, to Leander Perez, the boss of Plaquemines Parish, and outspoken segregationalist, in 1959.

    While other states have histories of political corruption, none are as interesting as Louisiana's.

  75. Whistling Dixie by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The well known political wisdom in Louisiana is "People down here don't expect corruption. We demand it". The New Orleans "permit" office, for example, is known by everyone as the hole into which every conceivable (and some inconceivable elsewhere) business must pour money every so often, unless its owned by one of the good ol' boy network that started out owning slave plantations. It's one of the many reasons that Louisiana has no "Silicon Valley": its a Carbon Swamp, the cancerous "Chemical Alley" too hot for even neighboring Texas.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  76. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This works out well with the government's idea of training cable guys and exterminators terrorist spotting training. Might as well give anyone with $55 a badge and a gun too.

  77. Didn't know Thief 4 was out so soon... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    But is this really a surprise? This is the same mentality that thought up the Coffee Tax for Seattle. There is always somebody looking to put there unwelcome hands into you wallet while doing nothing to earn the money they're taking ; from the government on down.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  78. it is what you think it is by humankind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Being in New Orleans, I got wind of this about a week ago and was amused - there's a grass roots effort to oppose this bone-headed idea. Unfortunately, this is a prime example of how chaotic and irrational the government down here is. Everything you've heard is basically true.

    We spawn politicians that have the dubious distinction of removing park benches as a means to stop homeless people, school board members that spend more money on lawsuits than they do schools, a monopoly daily newspaper that all throughout 1999 referred to the year 2000 as "the millennium" with a small blurb that said, "some purists believe the millennium begins in 2001", neo-nazi state representatives, indicted governors, etc. The former governor repealed the mandatory helmet law for motorcyclists... I could go on and on... This is one messed up area... This latest fiasco is more of the same.

    1. Re:it is what you think it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the mandatory helmet law is a debate-able issue.

      Under the right circumstances, the weight of the a helmet will snap your neck. Which is more often than you'd think.

      Lot of parapalegic ex-bikers out there.

    2. Re:it is what you think it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, okay. Quadrapalegic.

      And the number who died instantly because the spinal column was severed too high is obviously a debate-able figure too... but it's a large percentage...

    3. Re:it is what you think it is by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      I fail to understand how repealing a mandatory helmet law (or seat belt law) for adults is dubious.
      It's my heath, my life and my head at risk, why should the government be able to dictate the risks I can take with my own life that don't affect anyone but myself.

      The licensing of computer techs as TV/Radio repair people is just insane though.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    4. Re:it is what you think it is by mabu · · Score: 1

      I fail to understand how repealing a mandatory helmet law (or seat belt law) for adults is dubious.

      In Louisiana, it's called Darwinism.

      They're obviously far ahead of everyone else in the nation. Why we're dissing them I don't know. I'm all for the no-helmet, no seatbelt law. Maybe it'll make the world less occupied by idiots.

    5. Re:it is what you think it is by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Arizona also has no mandatory helmet law. Never has, likely never will.
      Not wearing a seat belt is a primary cause for a police stop, but there's no vehicle safety inspection to assure the seat belt works.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    6. Re:it is what you think it is by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Two reasons for a seat belt law: First, if you are strapped down you are more likely to maintain control of the vehicle in, shall we say, stressful situations. Second, the reason shared with the helmet law is that if you kill yourself, or worse, make a vegetable of yourself, it tends to cost the taxpayers a lot of money.

      In a less litigious and less generous society we might not need helmet and seatbelt laws. We don't live in that kind of world, so the laws are both obvious and necessary.

      Also, it's kind of a drag to see dead people smeared across the pavement. I'd like to be spared that and it's worth it to me to be required to wear my seatbelt, something only idiots eschew anyway.

      You, too, are a fool if you think that your violent death on the highway won't affect anyone else. If nothing else the coroner has to waste some time on you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:it is what you think it is by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      If the government maintains seat belt and helmet laws for safety, it isn't working, the death toll on the roads keeps rising. The best the laws have done is to slow the rate of increase. Several studies I've read show conclusively that as vehicle safety systems improve, so does the reckless behavior of the driver.
      Did you know that Volvo "the boxy but safe car" had one of the highest collision rates?
      If safety is TRUELY the reason for the laws, then there should be a law that regulates the maximum rate of acceleration and top speed of all vehicles on the road. ... maintain control of the vehicle in, shall we say, stressful situations.
      How does a seat belt help moderate my mental state or allow better physical control under mental duress? Seat belts are there for two reasons: to control the rate of deceleration of the human body such that the deceleration occurs over a longer period instead of more abruptly against the vehicle's internal surfaces; and to prevent ejection from the vehicle. ... tends to cost the taxpayers a lot of money.
      How so? If an autopsy is required, that's the government's fault not the dead person's. Autopsy should only be indicated in cases where the cause of death is truly unknown. The fact is that seat belts cost more money than dead people. Seat belts cause more people to survive more serious collisions, this means more people need medical attention, and more involved medical procedures.
      In a serious collision if you die, you're dead, all that remains is to remove the body and dispose of it in a grave or via cremation. If you are a mangled wreck, you need all manner of medical attention and potentially thousands of dollars a day.

      If you want to get rid of the law suits and massive rewards, lower the number of people that survive car collisions. Dead people don't sue.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    8. Re:it is what you think it is by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Did you know that Volvo "the boxy but safe car" had one of the highest collision rates?

      Doesn't surprise me. The people who seem to drive the worst are volvo and mercedes drivers - some of the safest cars around.

      How does a seat belt help moderate my mental state or allow better physical control under mental duress?

      I was using "stressful" as a euphemism for "sliding all over the road". Thanks for your deliberate obtuseness.

      If you want to get rid of the law suits and massive rewards, lower the number of people that survive car collisions. Dead people don't sue.

      No, but those they leave behind, and those they injure in the process of crashing into shit often DO sue.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  79. I, for one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new, green, yellow and purple, plastic bead necklace slinging overlords.

    (If you've been to Mardi Gras, you know what I mean).

  80. Radio Communications Equipment by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    TV repair men need to be licenced since they are modifing radio communications equipment, not because the systems deal with audio/video.

    IANAL but if you presented that case to any judge he'd probably see the logic in it and rule in your favor.

  81. Disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only allow union projectionists to work on my home theater PC.

  82. Cell phones? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't any old Joe with a cell phone that has a built in camera also qualify under the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board's insane opinion?

  83. ARe you nuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pay the fee and join the clubl.

  84. They need their licenses too by SirKron · · Score: 1

    They had better have their sanitation engineer licenses before they clean up all the defication they occur from slashdot and the press about this.

  85. Not just Radio and TV Repariman.. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    but LICENSED Radio and TV Repairman.

  86. You're obviously not from Louisiana... by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Louisiana is a different place than the rest of the country. First off, the state uses Napoleanic Code (which is derived from Roman Law) while the rest of the nation is using English Common Law. Every governmental position in the state is elected, NONE are appointed.

    Secondly, the state has continously put political machines into office. Fmr. Gov. Edwin Edwards (3-term governor) is currently serving a prison sentence in Dallas because of a variety of charges, basically stemming from taking bribes from casinos. Then back in the day, we had Huey Long, followed by his brother Earl Long. Huey even had a box where he kept all the kickbacks from state businesses and employees.

    Hell, to become a notary public in Louisiana, you've got to get approval from the Governor!

    The state has some of the most corrupt, crooked, and just plain old screwed up politics in the nation. Every profession you can think of has to be licensed - and especially now, because the state is running low on cash (thank you Kathleen Blanco), taxes are extremely high.

    Most businesses just stay out of Louisiana since the cost of doing business there, unless you know somebody, is extreme. Its good-ole-boy politics at its finest.

    1. Re:You're obviously not from Louisiana... by ScottBob · · Score: 1

      Louisiana is a different place than the rest of the country. First off, the state uses Napoleanic Code (which is derived from Roman Law) while the rest of the nation is using English Common Law. Every governmental position in the state is elected, NONE are appointed.

      And you're guilty until proven innocent. And common law marriages are not recognized in Louisiana, either. People in legal professions from other states who come to Louisiana for whatever reason say the legal system is a whole different ball game over here.

      And Louisiana is the only state in the union that taxes soft drinks. Ever see a little "LTP" on your bottle or can? That stands for "Louisiana Tax Paid". Any soft drink company that does business in Louisiana has to display on the label or top somewhere that the tax has been paid.

      During the mid 90's, I worked for a computer shop for a while, and we took all our broken monitors to a local TV repair shop, because even back then anyone who made a living repairing televisions, computer monitors, or anything else with a CRT had to have a license. A license is also required for satellite system installers. This doesn't mean you have to have a license to put up your own DirecTV dish, but you do have to have one if you do it for a living. But a license is no longer required for repairing CB radios.

  87. Previous Daily Show Coverage by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    This is the same state that got previous Daily Show coverage for some row regarding licensing of nail technicians or hair dressers or some such. Of COURSE it's a money grab. Most licensing is. Government licensing without testing is how they make you pay the equivalent of union dues without offering the protection of a union.

    I was a licensed TV and antenna tech in Indiana. We had to take a test or have something better already (like FCC class A license). Louisiana requires no testing. All they're doing is making sure they get a cut from the boneheads that'll be fixing Louisiana's computers, but don't know a transformer from a butt plug.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  88. Regulating shysters? by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the problems I've seen in the consumer end of the computer industry is that practically anyone can call themselves a "computer technician" and fix the things. I've seen people ripped off horribly. Case in point, my wife has a friend who was told "Once there's a virus on your hard disk, it's there forever - for $200 we'll provide a new one, install all your software on it, and safely dispose of the old one". No, that's not the rip-off because I fixed the thing for her instead - the initial purchase of the system and all its pirate software was in this instance, but I've got a dozen similar tales dating back fifteen years. Registration doesn't indicate competence, but it does mean that they've needed to provide a fee and adequate identification to the state before setting out their shingle. It makes it that much more likely that in the event of a problem you can track them down. It makes it a little less likely for the more overt shonks to set up shop for a month or two then move. It's annoying for the legitimate businesses, but might under some circumstances help keep the less desirable out. Of course, then we have the ongoing problem of who is deemed "undesirable", and with computers being able to be viewed as playback or encryption devices we have a whole other can of worms.

  89. Over-Licensing In Louisiana by wwi · · Score: 1

    This state is particularly famous for
    over-licensing (rather like Hawaii). The most
    recent court case involved people failing
    the "florist test" year after year. Without
    the license, they could not sell flowers.

    See:

    http://www.ij.org/publications/liberty/2004/13_1 _0 4_a.asp

  90. One minute this... One minute that... by leprechaun92 · · Score: 1

    Oh jesus... one minute the riaa is trying to stop us from using these machines as such, then this louie group wants to define this as exactly what the riaa is trying to stop

    who wins...

  91. Marriage Licenses... by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    ...if the licenses would show real capabilities to nurse and maintain a relationship (akin to a driving licence for driving a car), divorce rates would arguably be much lower.

    1. Re:Marriage Licenses... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      ...if the licenses would show real capabilities to nurse and maintain a relationship (akin to a driving licence for driving a car), divorce rates would arguably be much lower.

      Interesting that this should come up in a discussion about Louisiana. Isn't that the state that also has the option of getting a "covenant marriage"?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  92. Lousiana by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    The home of corruption since Huey Long.

    Fucking morons.

    PC techs don't do TV repair - a TV is a "field replaceable unit". Fuck 'em.

    If they pass the law, let every PC repair person in the state - corporate and freelance - go on strike for a month.

    The state would collapse in a week.

    See what I mean when I say the state is nothing but an extortion/protection racket?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  93. Skill level by hashwolf · · Score: 1

    As one who knows how to repair both types of devices I find repairing TV's the most difficult of both jobs. Repairing at component level takes some skill and experience, as opposed to just swapping boards.

    Classifing a computer as a TV sets a dangerous precedent since a computer can subsitute nearly any electronic device that has only solid state parts. A computer can function as an oscilloscope, VCR, Radio (both RX & TX) etc etc with adequate peripherals... the level of skill required to repair these (the actual devices, not the peripherals) is simply beyond the skill of a typical computer technician.

    Of course with adequate training that might be another story...

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
  94. Work Stoppage by NightMgr · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, if you work for the state or local government and do computer support, go into work tomorrow and announce you've applied for the license, but haven't received it yet. Sorry, Senator/Judge/Mayor/Officical who decided you need a license, but I can't reset your password because I don't have a license. You'll just have to wait a few weeks until I receive it.

  95. 5 years lifespan for hardware good??? by fantomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I opened it up, fixed it and have been using it for nearly 5 years. Not a bad lifespan for a free piece of hardware."


    Only in the computing industry... I have some of my dad's powertools (10 years old), drive my grandmother's car (39 years old), got some of my great granddad's hand tools (70? years old). The computing model really annoys me, this is just not sustainable, the world is drowning under a sea of thrown out crap. Why can't we build stuff to last a bit longer? or more significantly design systems that can work with older kit... Me, sick of software bloat. Even new distros of linux assume 2Gb hard drives and 128Mb Ram minimum. All my mum wants to do is email, and word process. I'm sure I managed this ten years ago. Surely must be achievable without hardcore linux geekhacking skills. We realy should try to develop a more long term design philosophy. I've got a three year old mobile phone, Ericsson, shockproofed, gortex lined, you can drop it in a pond and fish it out and use it, no problem. They don't make them any more. My guess is - because people like me buy them and don't need to buy another one six months later. We really need a big paradigm shift...(imho)

    1. Re:5 years lifespan for hardware good??? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Because the industry and the stuff is NEW.

      The powertools, cars, hand tools that were made when they came out originally died were junk in 5 years too.

      PC's are basically a 20 year old peice of technology, that is still growing at a huge rate.

      Give it another 30 years to mature and PC's will start lasting 10, 30, 50+ years.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:5 years lifespan for hardware good??? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Because the industry and the stuff is NEW.

      HP has been making Inkjet printers for years, and they were great quality. Now they fall apart about a week after the freakishly short warranty (90 days???) expires. You can't honestly say that HP forgot how to make them, but you CAN say that they became greedy and started using crappy parts and very bad designs -- probably by choice.

      If your printer's only motor relies on a 2mm piece of nylon under constant stress to work (and then you make sure there are no replacements available), your design is horribly flawed -- or your morals.

      (I tried fixing my DJ 3820 today, in case you are wondering where that came from.)

    3. Re:5 years lifespan for hardware good??? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      You can't honestly say that HP forgot how to make them, but you CAN say that they became greedy and started using crappy parts and very bad designs -- probably by choice.

      No, you can say that the consumer is so interested in saving a buck that when HP was making long lasting printers, Canon, Epson, and some other discount manufacturers were kicking their ass. HP's choice was to keep making top shelf printers or to compromise and get their prices down.

      HP may not be blameless, but their hand was forced.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:5 years lifespan for hardware good??? by mvpll · · Score: 1

      Too true.

      How will consumers deal with the dual concepts of price and quality (especially when one is not really indicative of the other)? Heh, they will (generally) buy the cheapest and bitch about the quality.

  96. Huh? by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would imagine that TV repairmen were originally regulated because they had to know how to safely work on open TV cabinets containing dangerous high voltages, operate test equipment on those high voltage circuits, and install suitable replacement parts that wouldn't catch on fire.

    So you're saying that the government should require anyone who cracks open a TV set to have a license? No more fix-it-at-home episodes? Billy Bob can't drink a six-pack, get out the screwdriver and augment his gymnastics skills with the flyback transformer?

    Licenses are required to protect consumers from ripoff artists. Otherwise, you'd have corner shops with con artists "fixing" TVs.
    Back in the old days of tube TVs, it was very easy to take a damaged TV from a naive client, declare it a total loss by "demonstrating" how badly the TV was broken, and offer to buy it for $25 as a "parts" chassis.
    Then, put all the tubes back in, fix the original minor problem for $10, tune it up a little and sell it for $200 to someone else. Then wait for the next moron to walk through the door and attempt to swindle them too! A state agency with a licensing plan has a complaint system. Several complaints, and an inspector stops in, maybe to suspend the license.

    Back in the 60's and 70's, you could find tube testers at the hardware and grocery stores. Anyone with a screwdriver and some patience could at least get their TV up and running by bringing in dead tubes, checking them in the tube tester, and replacing them. Tuning was a bit more tricky, but it was possible if you learned a few tricks.

    Editorial Mode: ON
    PCs are simply a pain-in-the-ass. After chasing hardware and software problems for other people for the past 15+ years, I tell you, it's not worth $75 an hour to do it. The calls never stop, and most people generally believe that each incident is directly related to the first service call. They feel that they should only have to pay $75 once, and that everything after that is free. If you enjoy peace and quiet, strict enforcement of the $75/hour fee is required. If you perform one favor, somehow, everyone hears about it and you've got dozens of others who expect the same treatment. It's not worth it.

    The only thing worse than fixing PCs is fixing someone else's stovepipe network!

    --
    -- No sig for you!
    1. Re:Huh? by schon · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that the government should require anyone who cracks open a TV set to have a license?

      I read his post, and nowhere does he say that.

      What he said was TV REPAIRMEN (you know, the guys you hire to fix your TV when it stops working) require a license.

      And it has MUCH more to do with making sure someone isn't a danger to himself (or others) than it does making sure someone isn't a swindler.

      Or are you saying that someone who learns to fix TV's and pays $55 is more trustworthy than someone who learns to fix TVs and doesn't pay $55?

    2. Re:Huh? by cayce · · Score: 1

      Exactly where do you get paying customers with a $75/hr rate?

      I need to move down there ASAP.

    3. Re:Huh? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      We had a TV repairman say the whole chassis was hosed and it would cost $200 to replace.

      We got another TV repairman who replaced the dead diode. Parts cost was under $1!

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  97. Sort of ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You can actually buy marijuana tax stamps, which you are required to place on all bags of the stuff.


    While it is true they require you to have the tax stamps, they haven't actually sold the tax stamps in a whole lot of years.

    Since they never actually issue the stamps, nobody can ever be in compliance with the law. Therefore, they effectively make it illegal since they don't give you a (real) route to make it legal.

    Go ahead, try and get yourself some of those stamps. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  98. What other taxes and fees... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    will pop up?

    Let's see, under how many areas can prople try to claim computers as part of their realm of profiteer--err, regulation?

    1. recording and playback (tv/radio repair)
    2. office machines (copier/fax repair people)
    3. telephony device (Ma Bell et al)
    4. instructional aid (school boards and councils)
    5. text comminucation device (courier and package services)
    6. timekeeping device (clock and watch repair)
    7. publishing device (newspaper/magazine/book industries)
    8. video & music composition & production (music, movie, and TV industries)
    9. lighted case mods could be argued to be lamps...
    10. etc... etc... etc..

    There's no end to what a GENERAL PURPOSE device can be used to do. Therefore, if one board that's over anything besides general purpose computers can tax and license, then pretty much every board who covers anything can. That way, no one can afford to be a repair technician, and the idea of disposable OEM PCs becomes a reality and not just a nightmare.

  99. The reason was high volatage, but... by mzs · · Score: 1

    In old TVs there was no power supply. Just three to five tubes (I am talking vacuum tubes here) hooked-up in series where they would total 117V. This was true of old radios too, particularly 'three-way' radios (powered by AC, batteries, and 117V DC). In this case you could consider the whole of the TV set to be one huge power supply from the standpoint of servicing. In fact on those sets the entire outside was make of insulator (wood and particle board). Unlike modern sets where you can open them, and there is a power supply that you can remove and replace, the situation with the old sets was very different. That was the reason, you open up an old set, and it was a high-voltage affair. Today even though the internals of the power supply are exposed and there are hugh capacitors exposed, there is an honest to goodness power supply that can simply be replaced. If you did not know what you were doing with the old sets you were a danger to yourself and to the people and property for which you had performed the service. Think fire or think if you wired the power wrong, that third prong isn't ground any more then...

  100. Re:Farrier and Ferrier by curtoid · · Score: 1

    Yes, define: would work, but most people would just use a spell checker. The problem is that they are BOTH legitimate words,
    so they would both pass the spell checker - and the google search tried by the poster.

    Interesting how personal research has changed with the Internet: We have lightning fast access to data of unknown quality.
    And it's getting faster. And there seems to be less and less information, but more and more data.

  101. Irrelevent...since... by hurfy · · Score: 1

    We won't be allowed to use our computers as 'recording or playback devices' soon anyways ! :/

  102. Re:isn't that against the law? -Timothy Leary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In the late 70's Dr Tim was arrested coming into this country with a bag of marijuana. He SUCCESSFULLY appealed his conviction, and i believe his defense was something like this:
    In order to buy the stamp, i have to declare the marijuana.
    But if i declare it, it is self incriminating!
    Therefore, by the rights granted under the 5th amendment, you cant make prosecute me for not making a self-incriminating statement.

    The supreme court found for Dr. Tim.

  103. Who, me? by Quila · · Score: 1

    So, I'd be listed as a registered TV repairman although I have no idea how to fix a TV? Interesting.

  104. New Orleans LUG discussion thread by smartfart · · Score: 1

    I know this is absolutely going to kill my server, but we're the ones that are going to be affected by the licensing board's actions, and have been discussing the issue on our mailing list today.

  105. Electrocuted geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if you licensce some idiot who doesn't know how to discharge a flyback transformer. Personally, I routinely fix stuff without having to resort to opening a f*ing monitor. I do know how to discharge the capacitor but I will not do it for pay. If it's my own hardware, no problem but really there's a serious and significant safety issue involved. It appears on the surface that the whole issue is motivated by the greed of the Louisiana Radio and Television Technicians Board.

  106. TV Repair by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

    How much of a market is left for TV repair these days? I see perfectly good TVs getting placed down next to dumpsters all the time. I salvaged two myself (one doesn't work perfectly, but good enough). Why would anyone pay to repair one unless it was a big-screen model?