My guess is there are other types of trees or plants that will grow just fine in the California climate (orange, peach, apple, pear, date, etc, etc, in other places), which will also provide as many calories a day, take far less maintenance, provide food *far* more palatable to people than algae, plus have the benefit of looking beautiful rather than like you have an ill maintained fish tank in your window.
If you live in an apartment and need it now, ok, go for the nasty tasting algae. Want to think ahead for your kids or future generations? Plant a tree.
I think growing a maple tree or two in the back yard and tapping them would produce about the same amount of calories he's taking in, with a lot less maintenance, and much better tasting product.
If you are talking UK, sure. If you are talking US, no. Not by a long shot. An unlocked handset does a geek about zero good in the US because the other carrier you might want to switch to either uses another technology, or another frequency than the carrier you were with before.
They don't listen to you because you say dumb things. A bunch of dried up old teeth sitting around in a drawer are going to provide viable stem cells later in life. Riiiiiiight.
An ACID compliant RDBMS can't even get read access to the user, car, friend, picture and pet_survey_answer table set as long as any of the million users of the system is making a change to his data, even if the application only locks one table at a time for write access, let alone the problem of a million users trying to gain write access to the same table at the same time.
Wow. Just wow. Any serious ACID complient RDBMS can do that with no problem.
It's hard to guess that it's sarchasm when there are so many morons out there who actually believe that. Just witness the vast numbers of "take away all my rights, just protect me from the terrorists" right wing idiots out there.
Look for them on planets like Neptune. Cold gas giants. Plenty of hydrogen for fuel, and plenty of cooling for the heat sinks on their supercomputer brains.
Don't forget that the chemicals that they are pumping in to break up the rock formation include carcinogens, neurotoxins, and other nasty, nasty chemicals. They 'assume' they will not come back out and contaminate the aquifers. This is a bad, bad practice.
Where exactly is the medium? You never answered my question, you just gave a snarky reply. And I never brought up MADD, and have never been associated with that group. Nice shot at avoidance though.
Every time you get into a car drunk and endanger other innocent people on the road. Exactly how many times am I supposed to let your old girlfriend try to kill me and/or my family before we crack down?
Because you opted to have this installed so you wouldn't be still sitting in a jail cell sitting out your time. But you'd have known that if you'd bother to RTFA.
Also I wish that people would stop looking at how race cars do things and assume that it is good.
No one said a negative camber is good in all circumstances just because most sports cars use it. Heck, on Indy cars, they often have positive camber on one side of the car because they always turn one direction. Even among racers, they adjust the amount of camber by what type of course they are going to be racing on. In many cases for every day personal cars, 0 or close to 0 camber is the best setting, for others a slight negative camber is going to work best. The point was not that every car should use negative camber. It's that saying "negative camber is a a design defect" is moronic.
You're not actually going to solve anything, though, are you? The "asshole" will become the victim, and, depending on how the punched reacts, you're going to be the one inviting the arrest record and all which that implies. All because you've pathologically taken on a perceived emotion of the griever and translated it into anger.
No, I've not taken on the perceived emotion of the griever. I am not grieving. I am witnessing someone verbally assaulting an innocent person who is already wounded. I'd punch the idiot in defense of the person he's assaulting, and as dissuasive measure to make it less likely for him want to do it to others. If it didn't fix the perpetrators insensitive ways, I'd do it again. I'll take my chances with the arrest record to do what I think is the right thing in that situation.
And I'd expect the puncher to be dealt with in the same way as any puncher is dealt with when he isn't acting in self defence. "But I wasn't feeling myself and someone said something nasty," is not a get-out clause in society for being violent, even if others might sympathise for why you're not feeling yourself. If you are the sort of person to turn your grieving into anger, you need to sort yourself out before the next personal tragedy.
I'm not grieving, but I'd punch someone in the face if they walked up to someone I knew who had just lost a child and told one of those jokes. The only thing I'm sorting out is assholes.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, just ask those folks in Afghanistan how things are with little real government. Not so good either.
My guess is there are other types of trees or plants that will grow just fine in the California climate (orange, peach, apple, pear, date, etc, etc, in other places), which will also provide as many calories a day, take far less maintenance, provide food *far* more palatable to people than algae, plus have the benefit of looking beautiful rather than like you have an ill maintained fish tank in your window.
If you live in an apartment and need it now, ok, go for the nasty tasting algae. Want to think ahead for your kids or future generations? Plant a tree.
I think growing a maple tree or two in the back yard and tapping them would produce about the same amount of calories he's taking in, with a lot less maintenance, and much better tasting product.
If you are talking UK, sure. If you are talking US, no. Not by a long shot. An unlocked handset does a geek about zero good in the US because the other carrier you might want to switch to either uses another technology, or another frequency than the carrier you were with before.
They don't listen to you because you say dumb things. A bunch of dried up old teeth sitting around in a drawer are going to provide viable stem cells later in life. Riiiiiiight.
Good parts? Joisey? What exit?
No, not near junior enough. He wanted a Ph.D. for the 'junior' programmer role. What a tool.
You get killed by them, you don't play them and shoot American soldiers. That's the difference.
An ACID compliant RDBMS can't even get read access to the user, car, friend, picture and pet_survey_answer table set as long as any of the million users of the system is making a change to his data, even if the application only locks one table at a time for write access, let alone the problem of a million users trying to gain write access to the same table at the same time.
Wow. Just wow. Any serious ACID complient RDBMS can do that with no problem.
The major planets are light blue, not green. I certainly don't want you as a reviewer.
It's hard to guess that it's sarchasm when there are so many morons out there who actually believe that. Just witness the vast numbers of "take away all my rights, just protect me from the terrorists" right wing idiots out there.
Robots made from carbon and hydrogen won't use hydrogen as fuel for fusion?
Robots made from carbon and hydrogen won't generate heat as their brains function?
Look for them on planets like Neptune. Cold gas giants. Plenty of hydrogen for fuel, and plenty of cooling for the heat sinks on their supercomputer brains.
Because no police union would ever protect bad cops. Right. They are just as worthless as the rest.
Don't forget that the chemicals that they are pumping in to break up the rock formation include carcinogens, neurotoxins, and other nasty, nasty chemicals. They 'assume' they will not come back out and contaminate the aquifers. This is a bad, bad practice.
with apple you pay for crappy graphics and a nice monitor
with Wintel you can buy nice graphics but the monitor won't be as good
Bogus argument.
I buy IPS monitors with my Wintel machines.
Putting a limiter on the car is one hell of a lot cheaper than paying to house them in a jail for a year.
He can also chose to take surface streets rather than the highway.
Listen, there's a happy medium here.
Where exactly is the medium? You never answered my question, you just gave a snarky reply. And I never brought up MADD, and have never been associated with that group. Nice shot at avoidance though.
. where do we draw the line?
Every time you get into a car drunk and endanger other innocent people on the road. Exactly how many times am I supposed to let your old girlfriend try to kill me and/or my family before we crack down?
Because you opted to have this installed so you wouldn't be still sitting in a jail cell sitting out your time. But you'd have known that if you'd bother to RTFA.
Also I wish that people would stop looking at how race cars do things and assume that it is good.
No one said a negative camber is good in all circumstances just because most sports cars use it. Heck, on Indy cars, they often have positive camber on one side of the car because they always turn one direction. Even among racers, they adjust the amount of camber by what type of course they are going to be racing on. In many cases for every day personal cars, 0 or close to 0 camber is the best setting, for others a slight negative camber is going to work best. The point was not that every car should use negative camber. It's that saying "negative camber is a a design defect" is moronic.
On a poorly designed suspension setup you could get more grip in corners thana narrower tire
like this, but that is in effect a design fault.
Just about every sports or race cars out there ( including Formula 1) have negative camber. You are saying that is a design default? Righhhhhht.
You're not actually going to solve anything, though, are you? The "asshole" will become the victim, and, depending on how the punched reacts, you're going to be the one inviting the arrest record and all which that implies. All because you've pathologically taken on a perceived emotion of the griever and translated it into anger.
No, I've not taken on the perceived emotion of the griever. I am not grieving. I am witnessing someone verbally assaulting an innocent person who is already wounded. I'd punch the idiot in defense of the person he's assaulting, and as dissuasive measure to make it less likely for him want to do it to others. If it didn't fix the perpetrators insensitive ways, I'd do it again. I'll take my chances with the arrest record to do what I think is the right thing in that situation.
And I'd expect the puncher to be dealt with in the same way as any puncher is dealt with when he isn't acting in self defence. "But I wasn't feeling myself and someone said something nasty," is not a get-out clause in society for being violent, even if others might sympathise for why you're not feeling yourself. If you are the sort of person to turn your grieving into anger, you need to sort yourself out before the next personal tragedy.
I'm not grieving, but I'd punch someone in the face if they walked up to someone I knew who had just lost a child and told one of those jokes. The only thing I'm sorting out is assholes.