Yes, in fact you can know that. You really should read the report and the supplement.
Specifically notice "Kaskawulsh Glacier began to retreat in the nineteenth
century, with retreat accelerating in the late twent ieth and early
twenty-first centuries. Between 1956 and 2007, for example, the
glacier retreated 655 m (ref. 9). Roe et al.
12
recently developed
a method to test a glacier’s retreat against the null hypothesis
that retre at was due to natural climate variability. Applying this
analysis to the Kaskawulsh Glacier (see Methods and Supplementary
Fig. 1), we f ind there is only a 0.5% chance that retreat over the
past century—and by extension, the observed piracy—could have
happened under a constant climate. We therefore conclude that
retreat of Kaskawulsh Glacier is attributable to observed warming
over t he industrial era."
If you have enough background to understand the contents then review the supplement with which shows conclusively the exact opposite of what you say, and in fact supports the fact that anthropogenic global warming (human-caused) is the trigger mechanism for the melting of the ice wall bounding the source lake for this river; the destruction of that caused the re-routing and all fallout damages.
No, the timing of the relocation decision following a strike at the Washington plant such that the relocation was a punishment to those workers for the act of organizing and striking is what made the action illegal. Read it all again, and the NLRB page.
You really need to read that article again, starting with the summary at the top. You are either illiterate or biased and missed the point that Boeing was violating federal labor laws by actively choosing to re-locate an existing plant to another state. Regulation of such actions is the squarely the NLRB's job. Details of the actual complaint are here.
How does the plight of the US middle class influence global orders for US manufactured planes? On the contrary, loss of global orders due to cancellation from suddenly increased uncertainty is normal business risk management. And yes, that does mean Trump's parade of idiocy is responsible.
Winning the cold war? Maybe part 1 by default, but part 2 since 1990 was lost as soon as the West failed to contain Russia from creating the war in nagorno karabakh and profiteering by supplying weapons to both sides simultaneously.
I'm sorry wikipedia is a shitty source for anything, but it's understandable that you depend on it and don't understand the difference between it and real knowledge. Try getting a real education at university and beyond once you graduate. Then get some work experience you little slacker.
Don't be an idiot. You need to learn more about time-series analysis and forecasting and observational surveys before you can criticize research methodology. Everything is mathematically and scientifically rigorous. Your personal distaste for the results and reality of their implications doesn't matter.
As a catholic it is still more complex. You need to famliarize yourself with the concept of Just War. Lots of soldiers, probably even most soldiers world-wide are Catholic if they are not Muslim, and have been throughout history since the establishment of Christianity.
Yeah advertising, but also through subsidized fare prices; even ignoring driver's real costs and allowing for surge pricing, the operating costs + interest on all the loans, etc. exceeds the value of what is charged to customers. The Uber management has failed at tactics, and also at strategy - it is in the process of eating itself to death. It will not be the scion of sci-fi/fantasy driverless cars, and for that matter neither will Tesla as they ignore user experience and the entire human-machine interface. Uber will inevitably follow the same short-gains model due to lack of experience or insight. It is one of the horrors of the modern age that IT companies were ever viewed as capable, much less the best at anything outside of their limited domain.
No, this is about identifying all abuse of their services. Experience now shows abuse increases when users approach elections, as those seeking money don't care what they do to get page clicks and users are more easily inflamed during elections. This is simply reality as the Internet and physical worlds become more meshed, they interact and firms in either sphere must adapt to prevent abuse.
Mines are indiscriminate in targeting children, and last for decades such that local economies are destroyed. That makes them immoral weapons and is why they are banned by mutual agreement of most countries.
In the regions where land mines are buried, knowing the exact area or field where the mines are is the biggest problem. Because of the unknown area, there is no way to apply this in sprinking the bacteria except with a crop duster, and then it is useless when there is any overgrowth.
Then the whole "use a laser" bit limits this to formerly advanced economies e.g. the balkan nations, not the areas where there are major issues Thailand, Myanmar, etc.
For background read this and this. Notice the different dates on these articles and that gives some idea of the difficulty in actually finding and removing these immoral weapons.
In the regions where land mines are buried, knowing the exact area or field where the mines are is the biggest problem. Because of the unknown area, there is no way to apply this in sprinking the bacteria except with a crop duster, and then it is useless when there is any overgrowth.
Then the whole "use a laser" bit limits this to formerly advanced economies e.g. the balkan nations, not the areas where there are major issues Thailand, Myanmar, etc.
Liability. Just because something is "gated" doesn't give extra rights to kill beyond personal defense. There is no personal defense with a drone, so some remote operator killing with one is just committing the crime of murder.
Exactly! Decisions form economics are not difficult to understand, but fans ignore what they find distasteful and substitute fantasy instead. This applies to nearly every area of the geek/nerd culture, and is what pollutes communication making them impervious to all real learning. They are fools.
SpaceX is based on materials science that doesn't exist and risks payloads as long as they don't have to pay for them, all based on ignoring all contrary evidence. Read to the end of the abstract.
Tesla will never be safer than regular cars, and it will never even be as safe as regular cars. It is statistically impossible.
You mean, the launch reliability of a rocket isn't important? Not even for the Spacecom satellite? A business model based on re-using equipment that isn't fit for reuse is a failed model relying on luck to avoid disaster.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, in fact you can know that. You really should read the report and the supplement.
Specifically notice "Kaskawulsh Glacier began to retreat in the nineteenth century, with retreat accelerating in the late twent ieth and early twenty-first centuries. Between 1956 and 2007, for example, the glacier retreated 655 m (ref. 9). Roe et al. 12 recently developed a method to test a glacier’s retreat against the null hypothesis that retre at was due to natural climate variability. Applying this analysis to the Kaskawulsh Glacier (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1), we f ind there is only a 0.5% chance that retreat over the past century—and by extension, the observed piracy—could have happened under a constant climate. We therefore conclude that retreat of Kaskawulsh Glacier is attributable to observed warming over t he industrial era."
If you have enough background to understand the contents then review the supplement with which shows conclusively the exact opposite of what you say, and in fact supports the fact that anthropogenic global warming (human-caused) is the trigger mechanism for the melting of the ice wall bounding the source lake for this river; the destruction of that caused the re-routing and all fallout damages.
And if you can't follow legal documents here is the law protecting those worker rights, from 1935.
No, the timing of the relocation decision following a strike at the Washington plant such that the relocation was a punishment to those workers for the act of organizing and striking is what made the action illegal. Read it all again, and the NLRB page.
You really need to read that article again, starting with the summary at the top. You are either illiterate or biased and missed the point that Boeing was violating federal labor laws by actively choosing to re-locate an existing plant to another state. Regulation of such actions is the squarely the NLRB's job. Details of the actual complaint are here.
How does the plight of the US middle class influence global orders for US manufactured planes? On the contrary, loss of global orders due to cancellation from suddenly increased uncertainty is normal business risk management. And yes, that does mean Trump's parade of idiocy is responsible.
Winning the cold war? Maybe part 1 by default, but part 2 since 1990 was lost as soon as the West failed to contain Russia from creating the war in nagorno karabakh and profiteering by supplying weapons to both sides simultaneously.
That is completely wrong. Did you actually read the research paper or just decide to come here and foam at the mouth like so many others?
I'm sorry wikipedia is a shitty source for anything, but it's understandable that you depend on it and don't understand the difference between it and real knowledge. Try getting a real education at university and beyond once you graduate. Then get some work experience you little slacker.
Don't be an idiot. You need to learn more about time-series analysis and forecasting and observational surveys before you can criticize research methodology. Everything is mathematically and scientifically rigorous. Your personal distaste for the results and reality of their implications doesn't matter.
As a catholic it is still more complex. You need to famliarize yourself with the concept of Just War. Lots of soldiers, probably even most soldiers world-wide are Catholic if they are not Muslim, and have been throughout history since the establishment of Christianity.
Yeah advertising, but also through subsidized fare prices; even ignoring driver's real costs and allowing for surge pricing, the operating costs + interest on all the loans, etc. exceeds the value of what is charged to customers. The Uber management has failed at tactics, and also at strategy - it is in the process of eating itself to death. It will not be the scion of sci-fi/fantasy driverless cars, and for that matter neither will Tesla as they ignore user experience and the entire human-machine interface. Uber will inevitably follow the same short-gains model due to lack of experience or insight. It is one of the horrors of the modern age that IT companies were ever viewed as capable, much less the best at anything outside of their limited domain.
No, this is about identifying all abuse of their services. Experience now shows abuse increases when users approach elections, as those seeking money don't care what they do to get page clicks and users are more easily inflamed during elections. This is simply reality as the Internet and physical worlds become more meshed, they interact and firms in either sphere must adapt to prevent abuse.
Good near future sci-fi flick turns out to predict technology a decade later.
There are these things called trees, especially in these places called jungles, which make that process itself impossible.
Mines are indiscriminate in targeting children, and last for decades such that local economies are destroyed. That makes them immoral weapons and is why they are banned by mutual agreement of most countries.
In the regions where land mines are buried, knowing the exact area or field where the mines are is the biggest problem. Because of the unknown area, there is no way to apply this in sprinking the bacteria except with a crop duster, and then it is useless when there is any overgrowth. Then the whole "use a laser" bit limits this to formerly advanced economies e.g. the balkan nations, not the areas where there are major issues Thailand, Myanmar, etc.
For background read this and this. Notice the different dates on these articles and that gives some idea of the difficulty in actually finding and removing these immoral weapons.
In the regions where land mines are buried, knowing the exact area or field where the mines are is the biggest problem. Because of the unknown area, there is no way to apply this in sprinking the bacteria except with a crop duster, and then it is useless when there is any overgrowth. Then the whole "use a laser" bit limits this to formerly advanced economies e.g. the balkan nations, not the areas where there are major issues Thailand, Myanmar, etc.
Do you understand how a progressive tax system really works, or are you just a fucking idiot?
Liability. Just because something is "gated" doesn't give extra rights to kill beyond personal defense. There is no personal defense with a drone, so some remote operator killing with one is just committing the crime of murder.
Exactly! Decisions form economics are not difficult to understand, but fans ignore what they find distasteful and substitute fantasy instead. This applies to nearly every area of the geek/nerd culture, and is what pollutes communication making them impervious to all real learning. They are fools.
SpaceX is based on materials science that doesn't exist and risks payloads as long as they don't have to pay for them, all based on ignoring all contrary evidence. Read to the end of the abstract. Tesla will never be safer than regular cars, and it will never even be as safe as regular cars. It is statistically impossible.
He hasn't taken quality control seriously in any of his ventures, that is why they are all get-rich-quick schemes.
Reply, don't just hide the truth of Musk avoiding responsibility.
You mean, the launch reliability of a rocket isn't important? Not even for the Spacecom satellite? A business model based on re-using equipment that isn't fit for reuse is a failed model relying on luck to avoid disaster.
He hasn't taken quality control seriously in any of his ventures, that is why they are all get-rich-quick schemes.
Why is the mathematics profession dying?
Fixed that for you. Short answer: It's not. Long answer: Purists don't like applied mathematics, but the modern world is applied not theoretical.