May I suggest a Cat 5e cable from said router to your console. I know it isn't as cool as bits moving through space, but it is a whole lot more reliable and not subject to the whims of neighbors.
Show me functional Public Mass Transit in my area and I will use it. The systems in most cities are barely functional lip service to say that they do something about a problem they have no intention of fixing.
Because throwing money at the problem fixed Africa and other third world countries where first world countries dumped money on them after World War II. Just like dumping American corn and produce solved world hunger and did nothing those countries' economies.
As an owner of a Nikon Camera who had to send their equipment in for repairs to their repair center, the experience was horrible. 3 months without the camera and a cost that almost was the price of replacing the body itself. Had we not been already invested a lot into the glass for it, I would have told them where to deposit the camera I sent them.
I counter that it was the impossible games of the past that are to blame since it sent everyone to find a walk-through for it. Taught young gamers that they could beat a game without puzzle solving, just the latest guide.
Because it is much easier to have all the tech news from multiple sites show up in a stream that is more interactive as Twitter, but can be isolated easy from friends and family. It is also nice I can just put in a search term and see the public trends on the topic, or just see what others are talking about.
People make the mistake of seeing G+ as Facebook, but it is not. It is more like a blending of Facebook and Twitter.
The Civil War was about many things, slavery was one of them. The south did not like that Congress ruled that any new territories had to be slave free and the potential loss of influence that would bring about. The south was also angry that the Federal government was unfairly taxing them to fund projects in other parts of the country. There also was the issue of State's rights versus Federal government, did the Federal government have the right to abolish slavery in the sovereign territory? Did the federal government have the right to unfairly tax some states?
Yeah, the "Cival" War was an extremely complex issue. However, the victor authors the history books.
The Chinese also don't have a bunch of environmentalist nutjobs that block and hold up every initiative they have to save their pet environmental subject or piece of dirt. So when they say they are going to convert 100 square miles to a giant wind farm, it happens. Here, we would be stuck in the court systems arguing for years over bird migration paths and displaced trees squirrels.
Or on the other side of the equation there are no super rich people in China that sue to block wind farms located miles off the coast because it blocks their view. While here, we have armies of lawyers suing to stop progress because someone believes they can see over the horizon.
I never said it was cheap. The point is there are alternatives to what was implied, and Schwan's prices are probably about the same that you would spend at a fast food joint (and probably more nutritious).
You are correct those can be barriers/limitations, especially if you are not willing to adapt to those barriers/limitations. To my knowledge places like Schwan's still do home delivery of a multitude of fruits/vegetables, meats, and complete meals. And before you protest, Schwan's can be ordered online, by phone, or just by having a sales person stop by, and they deliver by truck, freezer bag, or UPS. Along those lines, most people can invest and should into not only a refrigerator but a small stand up freezer (most larger cities have used appliance stores and even new a freezer is only about $150 or about the cost of the smartphone you just had to have).
Instead of going out for food, let the food come to you. Another option instead of buying your groceries daily/weekly, plan ahead and buy bi-weekly or monthly. Buying in bulk (with coupons) saves money and reduces the overall time that you need for shopping so that you can reasonably plan (babysitting, taxi, friend to help, etc.). In fact, the savings brought by planning ahead and buying/preparing your own food vs. McDonald's will help pay for the items above. Invest in freezer containers and have a meal preparation day (ie. cook and then freeze the food to be reheated when the week is busy), and learn that it is okay to eat the same thing for a few days.
I agree it is not easy to be a single parent in a low income situation. However, planning and making good use of what time you do have can go a long way to take some of the pressure off your back. If you can find time to watch television, then you have time that you could be doing some of the above. I know it's not fair, but the question is, "What are you willing to sacrifice so your children can have a better future?"
But I also agree with something another poster said. Our public schools/society fail to teach us what should be considered basic life skills. No one should walk away from school not knowing basic homemaking (cooking and cleaning), budgeting (balancing a checkbook and living within your means), and basic mechanical skills (car care/maintenance, home care/maintenance). And these are lessons that should start early in education.
When we gave our son the first round of vaccines required by the state of TN, he reacted badly to them including a rash and just all around not being himself (our son is naturally an easy going child versus his high-energy sister). We were concerned and we spoke to our doctor regarding the symptoms. Despite feeling uncertain, we let them give the next round of vaccines. The reaction was worse, including needing to use an anti-histamine to counter the side effects. We didn't know it was a allergic reaction specifically (we were starting to wonder if it could be, we had discovered our son was sensitive to wheat, dairy, and soy at this point) but we were concerned.
When we voiced that concern to the doctor again, we were informed of the policy regarding vaccinations (if your child is not vaccinated on our time-table, you must find another physician). This was the stance they held until our son ended up in the ER after coming into contact with eggs and broke out in hives and started swelling (his ears swelled to double their normal size). Even then the nurse on call treated us as if we were idiots when we initially called regarding the reaction, and spent more time criticizing us for what we did versus helping us respond correctly to the situation.
It was only after all this nightmare, that his doctor finally suggested they would make an exception to the policy and that was only to delay the next round of vaccines until we could consult an allergist (which will happen in a few weeks). But had my son not had to go to the ER, we would still be facing a doctor's office that refused to listen to reasonably concerned parents.
I find it ironic that one of the groups that are dependent on herd immunity (Vaccine Component Allergy) is one of the ones that said doctor will kick out of his practice. My son is highly allergic to eggs, which is in many vaccines. We were informed by our doctor that if we did not allow him to inject our son with something that he is highly allergic to we would no longer be allowed to be a part of his practice.
It isn't that we don't want our son to be immunized, it is just we would rather not give him something that results in violent reactions. Especially at the young age that he is.
I prefer the "Copyrights Raping Average People" Act. The CRAP act would allow the designated representative from the RIAA to enter the home and literally rape you instead of just the emotional, psychological, financial or mental raping they currently are entitled to do.
See you are still operating under the mistaken idea that you are entitled to have an opinion. You are only entitled to espouse the opinion of News Corp., Comcast/NBC, Viacom/CBS, Disney/ABC, Time Warner, or the mega-corporation of choice. You must pay your subscription fee, tune in and espouse our gospel. There are no other "opinions". There are no other "options". You little people shouldn't need to be bothered with things such as thoughts, unless it is to decide with new super-hyped piece of bling you will buy from our advertisers or who the next American Idol will be.
And to further that line of thought, the issue was that the second person was using the first person's photo without paying copyright. When he was sued, he went out and produced a photo as close to the original as possible to avoid paying licensing fees. So the intent has a lot to do with the ruling.
My way of explaining it to people is this: SOPA/PIPA is like building a Death Star to kill the three rebels hiding in the population of a small planet.
There was also the fact that originally the lightsabers were supposed to be difficult to hold/control. They were told in episode 4 specifically not to fight in a traditional fencing style because they needed both hands to control the power of the blades. Then there were the also mentioned issues with the props themselves breaking.
I am sure when Lucas gets around to re-shooting the original trilogy using obi-wan from the first one (hey, there are only 10 more years to go more or less), the lightsaber fights will be much more involved.
Yes, but the issue is. Verizon knows once you get on autopay, you are going to stop watching the bill. The 10 days will pass and the money will be gone, and you will be left with no options.
For me, autopay worked great until payroll was messed up and I was accidentally deleted instead of the person that was supposed to be terminated. Payday came with no direct deposit followed by all those wonderful autopays triggering. When the dust settled I was in the hole for over twice what I paid out. So there is no autopay in my life anymore except for my mortgage and my auto insurance, two things that I must have to function.
Isn't this what Open Source code is about. You put the code out there and allow anyone to tinker with it, as long as they give the tinkered code away? I could download Linux Mint's version and program it to deposit all proceeds into my bank account and make my own Distro called "Make me $0.50 Linux" and as long as I offer my code changes up, there is little that can be done.
Apparently cleaning out the White House of the leftovers of the previous administration counts as extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. We all know they kept a small nuclear arsenal in there for when Cheney got bored.
Well, I would argue that we are genetically coded with morals built in. But you are correct it is not a question with a simple answer. But to offer my own personal opinion.
- No, all life is sacred and all people have the chance of redemption. Whether they accept it or not is part of their free will, but I shouldn't make that choice for them. - Yes and No. Should the government prevent the such a union between consenting adults? No. Should the government be interfering in someone's religious beliefs of marriage? No. If you want to marry, go to it. However, don't infringe on my religious freedom to believe it is wrong. And before you object, no just because I object doesn't mean that I have a right to discriminate based on that objection (outside of my religious practice). My faith teaches the most important thing is to love the creator, followed by loving all of His creation. - Yes and No. Should you be allowed to take drugs? Yes. Should be allowed to harm others in the process? No. - Yes. All life is sacred. To me the hardest part of this is when there is danger to the mother. - I think the method that gets the point across with the least amount of harm to the child should be used. You can just as easily cause permanent harm mentally or emotionally as you can physically and I would argue those are much harder to fix. - Yes. A gun is a tool, much like a hammer. Both can be used to do something horrible, but it is the person using it that makes that decision. - That is a matter of personal choice. In the case of parents and children, as long as it provides the nutrients for the kid what is the harm?
But these are mostly dealing with societal norms, not so much with morality.
We are quickly finding ourselves in a society where we lack an absolute morality authority. Therefore what is immoral for you may or may not be immoral to others. In other words, we are reaping the fruits of a society where all ideas are given equal worth. Where we are not to condemn someone because what they do is right from their point of view.
I dual boot Ubuntu and Windows 7. Ubuntu boots so fast that if I am not paying attention it is up before I realize it and log in is just as responsive. Windows 7 on the hand takes about double the time to the log in screen, and then there is a wait at least as long for the machine to become responsive enough to use.
Granted, this on a machine with only 2 GB of RAM. But running the same applications on each OS presents a world of difference (Remote Support Client [supports both OSes], Lotus Notes 8.5 full feature, Chrome Browser, Skype, plus a RDC client). Linux responses and functions, while I generally have to wait and be patient for Windows. Needless to say, I find myself only using Windows when I must (Microsoft Access mainly, but occasionally the RDC client since it supports Windows 7 and Server 2008).
But then to be fair, I am forced to run the bloated piece of crap called Symantec Endpoint Protection on the Windows 7 side of life. However, it doesn't excuse the poor performance prior to it starting.
There is a difference between morals and mores. Legislating penalties for breaking morals is a good thing and should be encouraged as society should be moral.
Legislating mores is on the other hand is not necessarily a good thing and should be done very carefully. Otherwise, it is just forcing everyone to conform to a arbitrary standard that would otherwise naturally adjust and change to the times, and it is how we end up with absolutely retarded laws on the books such as the law in Huntington, WV that decrees "It is legal to beat your wife so long as it is done in public on Sunday, on the courthouse steps."
Slashdot Mirror
May I suggest a Cat 5e cable from said router to your console. I know it isn't as cool as bits moving through space, but it is a whole lot more reliable and not subject to the whims of neighbors.
Show me functional Public Mass Transit in my area and I will use it. The systems in most cities are barely functional lip service to say that they do something about a problem they have no intention of fixing.
Because throwing money at the problem fixed Africa and other third world countries where first world countries dumped money on them after World War II. Just like dumping American corn and produce solved world hunger and did nothing those countries' economies.
As an owner of a Nikon Camera who had to send their equipment in for repairs to their repair center, the experience was horrible. 3 months without the camera and a cost that almost was the price of replacing the body itself. Had we not been already invested a lot into the glass for it, I would have told them where to deposit the camera I sent them.
I counter that it was the impossible games of the past that are to blame since it sent everyone to find a walk-through for it. Taught young gamers that they could beat a game without puzzle solving, just the latest guide.
Because it is much easier to have all the tech news from multiple sites show up in a stream that is more interactive as Twitter, but can be isolated easy from friends and family. It is also nice I can just put in a search term and see the public trends on the topic, or just see what others are talking about.
People make the mistake of seeing G+ as Facebook, but it is not. It is more like a blending of Facebook and Twitter.
The Civil War was about many things, slavery was one of them. The south did not like that Congress ruled that any new territories had to be slave free and the potential loss of influence that would bring about. The south was also angry that the Federal government was unfairly taxing them to fund projects in other parts of the country. There also was the issue of State's rights versus Federal government, did the Federal government have the right to abolish slavery in the sovereign territory? Did the federal government have the right to unfairly tax some states?
Yeah, the "Cival" War was an extremely complex issue. However, the victor authors the history books.
The Chinese also don't have a bunch of environmentalist nutjobs that block and hold up every initiative they have to save their pet environmental subject or piece of dirt. So when they say they are going to convert 100 square miles to a giant wind farm, it happens. Here, we would be stuck in the court systems arguing for years over bird migration paths and displaced trees squirrels.
Or on the other side of the equation there are no super rich people in China that sue to block wind farms located miles off the coast because it blocks their view. While here, we have armies of lawyers suing to stop progress because someone believes they can see over the horizon.
I never said it was cheap. The point is there are alternatives to what was implied, and Schwan's prices are probably about the same that you would spend at a fast food joint (and probably more nutritious).
You are correct those can be barriers/limitations, especially if you are not willing to adapt to those barriers/limitations. To my knowledge places like Schwan's still do home delivery of a multitude of fruits/vegetables, meats, and complete meals. And before you protest, Schwan's can be ordered online, by phone, or just by having a sales person stop by, and they deliver by truck, freezer bag, or UPS. Along those lines, most people can invest and should into not only a refrigerator but a small stand up freezer (most larger cities have used appliance stores and even new a freezer is only about $150 or about the cost of the smartphone you just had to have).
Instead of going out for food, let the food come to you. Another option instead of buying your groceries daily/weekly, plan ahead and buy bi-weekly or monthly. Buying in bulk (with coupons) saves money and reduces the overall time that you need for shopping so that you can reasonably plan (babysitting, taxi, friend to help, etc.). In fact, the savings brought by planning ahead and buying/preparing your own food vs. McDonald's will help pay for the items above. Invest in freezer containers and have a meal preparation day (ie. cook and then freeze the food to be reheated when the week is busy), and learn that it is okay to eat the same thing for a few days.
I agree it is not easy to be a single parent in a low income situation. However, planning and making good use of what time you do have can go a long way to take some of the pressure off your back. If you can find time to watch television, then you have time that you could be doing some of the above. I know it's not fair, but the question is, "What are you willing to sacrifice so your children can have a better future?"
But I also agree with something another poster said. Our public schools/society fail to teach us what should be considered basic life skills. No one should walk away from school not knowing basic homemaking (cooking and cleaning), budgeting (balancing a checkbook and living within your means), and basic mechanical skills (car care/maintenance, home care/maintenance). And these are lessons that should start early in education.
When we gave our son the first round of vaccines required by the state of TN, he reacted badly to them including a rash and just all around not being himself (our son is naturally an easy going child versus his high-energy sister). We were concerned and we spoke to our doctor regarding the symptoms. Despite feeling uncertain, we let them give the next round of vaccines. The reaction was worse, including needing to use an anti-histamine to counter the side effects. We didn't know it was a allergic reaction specifically (we were starting to wonder if it could be, we had discovered our son was sensitive to wheat, dairy, and soy at this point) but we were concerned.
When we voiced that concern to the doctor again, we were informed of the policy regarding vaccinations (if your child is not vaccinated on our time-table, you must find another physician). This was the stance they held until our son ended up in the ER after coming into contact with eggs and broke out in hives and started swelling (his ears swelled to double their normal size). Even then the nurse on call treated us as if we were idiots when we initially called regarding the reaction, and spent more time criticizing us for what we did versus helping us respond correctly to the situation.
It was only after all this nightmare, that his doctor finally suggested they would make an exception to the policy and that was only to delay the next round of vaccines until we could consult an allergist (which will happen in a few weeks). But had my son not had to go to the ER, we would still be facing a doctor's office that refused to listen to reasonably concerned parents.
I find it ironic that one of the groups that are dependent on herd immunity (Vaccine Component Allergy) is one of the ones that said doctor will kick out of his practice. My son is highly allergic to eggs, which is in many vaccines. We were informed by our doctor that if we did not allow him to inject our son with something that he is highly allergic to we would no longer be allowed to be a part of his practice.
It isn't that we don't want our son to be immunized, it is just we would rather not give him something that results in violent reactions. Especially at the young age that he is.
I prefer the "Copyrights Raping Average People" Act. The CRAP act would allow the designated representative from the RIAA to enter the home and literally rape you instead of just the emotional, psychological, financial or mental raping they currently are entitled to do.
See you are still operating under the mistaken idea that you are entitled to have an opinion. You are only entitled to espouse the opinion of News Corp., Comcast/NBC, Viacom/CBS, Disney/ABC, Time Warner, or the mega-corporation of choice. You must pay your subscription fee, tune in and espouse our gospel. There are no other "opinions". There are no other "options". You little people shouldn't need to be bothered with things such as thoughts, unless it is to decide with new super-hyped piece of bling you will buy from our advertisers or who the next American Idol will be.
And to further that line of thought, the issue was that the second person was using the first person's photo without paying copyright. When he was sued, he went out and produced a photo as close to the original as possible to avoid paying licensing fees. So the intent has a lot to do with the ruling.
Hey, they probably built those martian pyramids that VHS tape I bought in the 80's told me about.
My way of explaining it to people is this: SOPA/PIPA is like building a Death Star to kill the three rebels hiding in the population of a small planet.
There was also the fact that originally the lightsabers were supposed to be difficult to hold/control. They were told in episode 4 specifically not to fight in a traditional fencing style because they needed both hands to control the power of the blades. Then there were the also mentioned issues with the props themselves breaking.
I am sure when Lucas gets around to re-shooting the original trilogy using obi-wan from the first one (hey, there are only 10 more years to go more or less), the lightsaber fights will be much more involved.
Yes, but the issue is. Verizon knows once you get on autopay, you are going to stop watching the bill. The 10 days will pass and the money will be gone, and you will be left with no options.
For me, autopay worked great until payroll was messed up and I was accidentally deleted instead of the person that was supposed to be terminated. Payday came with no direct deposit followed by all those wonderful autopays triggering. When the dust settled I was in the hole for over twice what I paid out. So there is no autopay in my life anymore except for my mortgage and my auto insurance, two things that I must have to function.
Isn't this what Open Source code is about. You put the code out there and allow anyone to tinker with it, as long as they give the tinkered code away? I could download Linux Mint's version and program it to deposit all proceeds into my bank account and make my own Distro called "Make me $0.50 Linux" and as long as I offer my code changes up, there is little that can be done.
Apparently cleaning out the White House of the leftovers of the previous administration counts as extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. We all know they kept a small nuclear arsenal in there for when Cheney got bored.
Well, I would argue that we are genetically coded with morals built in. But you are correct it is not a question with a simple answer. But to offer my own personal opinion.
- No, all life is sacred and all people have the chance of redemption. Whether they accept it or not is part of their free will, but I shouldn't make that choice for them.
- Yes and No. Should the government prevent the such a union between consenting adults? No. Should the government be interfering in someone's religious beliefs of marriage? No. If you want to marry, go to it. However, don't infringe on my religious freedom to believe it is wrong. And before you object, no just because I object doesn't mean that I have a right to discriminate based on that objection (outside of my religious practice). My faith teaches the most important thing is to love the creator, followed by loving all of His creation.
- Yes and No. Should you be allowed to take drugs? Yes. Should be allowed to harm others in the process? No.
- Yes. All life is sacred. To me the hardest part of this is when there is danger to the mother.
- I think the method that gets the point across with the least amount of harm to the child should be used. You can just as easily cause permanent harm mentally or emotionally as you can physically and I would argue those are much harder to fix.
- Yes. A gun is a tool, much like a hammer. Both can be used to do something horrible, but it is the person using it that makes that decision.
- That is a matter of personal choice. In the case of parents and children, as long as it provides the nutrients for the kid what is the harm?
But these are mostly dealing with societal norms, not so much with morality.
We are quickly finding ourselves in a society where we lack an absolute morality authority. Therefore what is immoral for you may or may not be immoral to others. In other words, we are reaping the fruits of a society where all ideas are given equal worth. Where we are not to condemn someone because what they do is right from their point of view.
I dual boot Ubuntu and Windows 7. Ubuntu boots so fast that if I am not paying attention it is up before I realize it and log in is just as responsive. Windows 7 on the hand takes about double the time to the log in screen, and then there is a wait at least as long for the machine to become responsive enough to use.
Granted, this on a machine with only 2 GB of RAM. But running the same applications on each OS presents a world of difference (Remote Support Client [supports both OSes], Lotus Notes 8.5 full feature, Chrome Browser, Skype, plus a RDC client). Linux responses and functions, while I generally have to wait and be patient for Windows. Needless to say, I find myself only using Windows when I must (Microsoft Access mainly, but occasionally the RDC client since it supports Windows 7 and Server 2008).
But then to be fair, I am forced to run the bloated piece of crap called Symantec Endpoint Protection on the Windows 7 side of life. However, it doesn't excuse the poor performance prior to it starting.
There is a difference between morals and mores. Legislating penalties for breaking morals is a good thing and should be encouraged as society should be moral.
Legislating mores is on the other hand is not necessarily a good thing and should be done very carefully. Otherwise, it is just forcing everyone to conform to a arbitrary standard that would otherwise naturally adjust and change to the times, and it is how we end up with absolutely retarded laws on the books such as the law in Huntington, WV that decrees "It is legal to beat your wife so long as it is done in public on Sunday, on the courthouse steps."