Slashdot Mirror


User: Lawrence_Bird

Lawrence_Bird's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,075
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,075

  1. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! on 1981 Personal Computer Catalog · · Score: 1

    " that and using alot of assembly code with peaks and pokes
    to touch the hardware rather then using a bloated library."

    brings up the point.. why are they so bloated? Wouldn't it
    be better to have more smaller libraries? Sure you might end
    up with the same net result, but with some careful
    consideration you could reduce program bloat.

  2. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! on 1981 Personal Computer Catalog · · Score: 1

    clearly I needed to reboot after a bioBSOD!

  3. hmmm Fasssst Memory! on 1981 Personal Computer Catalog · · Score: 1

    200 ns! 16K modules.. easy to install! those were the days.
    I still have a bunch of old Apple magazines from about the
    same error. Computers were a lot more fun then. People
    spent a lot more time hacking hardware rather than figuring out why the OS just bsod again.. oh well

  4. Re:Put 'em away, kids... on Military Develops Liquid Body Armor · · Score: 1

    What wars were won by any of them.. I'm reaching back to
    Napolean here..that was 200 yrs ago.. WWI neeed Americans
    to break a long stupid stalemate. Spain? mmm.. no dont
    think they won anything for a long time though they seemed
    to have kept getting into skirmishes with the US (and losing). Even when the Brits had us by the balls in 1812
    we *still* managed to get out of it.

  5. Re:You forgot something...Re:Put 'em away, kids... on Military Develops Liquid Body Armor · · Score: 1

    See correction - meant Japan & Germany. In any event, I said
    nothing about the Soviet side of Europe, but if you want
    to drag them into it.. they had what..1 'uprsing'.. the
    Prague Spring.

    The point is both countries were crushed to the point there
    was no fight left in them. What we did in Iraq was to
    crush the military (yes you can debate how many are acting
    as guerillas now). But we left the rest of the country
    intact. Remember that to some what we view 'humanity' is
    viewed as 'weakness'.

  6. Re:You forgot something...Re:Put 'em away, kids... on Military Develops Liquid Body Armor · · Score: 1

    ooops.. it was very late when I posted that.. clearly I
    meant Japan, not France. Both of those countries were
    basically hammered into submission to the point where they
    had no will left to fight.

  7. Re:You forgot something...Re:Put 'em away, kids... on Military Develops Liquid Body Armor · · Score: 1

    You forgot something. You may have beat Iraq, but now who's bleeding? US soldiers die daily in iraq you idiot ! Power!=Arrogance.

    Yes and for each one down about 10 or 15 Sunni or non-Iraqi arab go down. Hey you got something right... power does not equal arrogance.

    It provides a larger target for the enemy to attack. Where were you when USS Cole was bombed?

    Assuming the enemy can get there. Personally I think I was in bed when the Cole was hit. By the way.. it was in port.

    The conventional forms of warfare are Gone. Kaput!

    You know what pisses me off most? Not naive idiots like you, but that George Bush was a pussy. If we had treated Iraq like we did Germany or France at the end of WWII there would be *no* uprisings, car bombs, or anyother getting out of line. But no. Jr. had to go and do a 'humane' war. Dont bomb infrastructure.. dont bomb civies. Uncle.

  8. Re:Put 'em away, kids... on Military Develops Liquid Body Armor · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That would change very quickly if you were to attack one of them. You would certainly be fighting a unified Europe as I can't imagine anyone who would help you conquering it. Hell, I wouldn't even be too sure about Israel.

    Unified Europe? Under French command I hope! Ha what a joke. We know for sure the French and Belge will be hiding under the nearest convenient rock.. the Germans, being German, will wake up to things fast and realize they can take France again on way to USA, but if they stop before the ocean they can keep it this time. The Scandinavians are fierce, but tend to prefer beer and vodka. Oh and Spain. All you need to do to stop them is threaten to set off a bomb.

    Face it.. Europe is not, and will not likely ever again, be a military force of any kind, individually or combined. They haven't the equipment, the trained men, nor the will. Frankly I think the Brits could kick Europes ass on their own if they wanted to.

    And as far as countries that have collapsed militarily.. well its quite funny you put USA on brink to be in same boat as continental Europe has been for.. oh.. 2 or 300 years.

    I wonder how low this can be mod?

  9. Legal Question (was Re:Good idea but...) on Shifting From P2P To Stream Ripping · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given the reasonable assumption that the 'fair use' guidelines would permit me to make a copy of a CD I have
    bought, what then happens if I sell or give the original
    away? Am I somehow legally obligated to destroy my copy,
    be it a duplicate of the original cd or mp3s ripped from it?

  10. Re:So I guess Slashdot on Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money · · Score: 1

    dude.. go look at the history and stop moaning about it.
    The court didnt 'elect' Bush. They stopped the recount.
    And its been proven countless times that they could have
    recounted them 1000 times it still would have come out
    Bush. Had the court done nothing all it would have done
    was delay the eventual outcome for another month.

    Its not the one or two comments that pin you, its the
    content and tone of them. Jumping up and down, shouting,
    whining and using rhetoric instead of facts is a hallmark
    of the left in America.

  11. Re:Building from tarballs can be problematic on Build From Source vs. Packages? · · Score: 1

    I've rarely had problems building from tar balls on my
    slackware machines. I think many of the problems people
    have are related to the non-standard placement of files
    by many of the more popular distributions.

    I think the whole source vs package thing isn't so much
    for performance (except in rare cases) but a matter of
    controlling what goes where and what options are enabled,
    if they can be modified at compile time.

  12. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? on Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money · · Score: 1

    great thank you man for finding that!

  13. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? on Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money · · Score: 1

    but what about as a private individual, ie Joe Voter has
    some spare cash from his lotto ticket and wants to run a
    full page ad supporting his candidate. Is this illegal?

  14. Re:So I guess Slashdot on Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money · · Score: 1

    Gore 50,996,116 48 % 21 266
    Bush 50,456,169 48 % 30 271
    Other 3,874,040 4 % 0 0
    winner declared results as of 1/6/01

    But sadly, you clearly didn't go to school or you would
    understand that last column - 271 vs 266, and that fact
    that it is President Bush and Mr. Gore.

    You lefties *really* have to get over 2000. Or do you
    want to do the recount again to prove again that Gore
    lost Florida?

    Devote your energies to getting rid of the electoral
    college.

  15. Re:So I guess Slashdot on Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    >If you really think that Bush has your interests at heart >then you're a gay-hating asshole, and as such, I hope you >enjoy burning in hell with your other hate-spewing cohorts.

    So the 50% of population voting R are 'gay-hating assholes' who spew hate. Wait.. are you Al Franken? Clearly the
    life on Mars has been found, its you and your fellow far
    lefties. Sadly, its not intelligent life. And its always
    interested me how you guys resort to name calling and
    conspiracy theories whenever somebody doesn't hold the same
    view as you. You guys are all for freedom of speech, diversity, and progressiveness *only as long as its yours*.

  16. Asbestos all over again? on Buckyballs Kill Fish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think there might have been a post along this line in regards to nanotubes, and a portion of this link has some information on conflicting research on health risks. Given the nightmare that asbestos turned out to be, it seems to me (a big supporter of science and technology) that we need a 'go slow' approach with this stuff. There is no earth shattering compelling need for anything made of nanotubes or buckyballs today that can't wait a few years for accurate and conclusive testing.

  17. Can I buy a banner ad? on Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money · · Score: 1

    So if I wanted to make a banner ad for my candidate, do I
    first have to form my own PAC? And what about having it
    accepted by one of the sites that serve up the ads? Cost?

    As you can tell, I don't know much about whats involved in
    online advertising (never had to), but if its not too much
    $ would definitely consider doing something like this.

  18. Re:So I guess Slashdot on Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money · · Score: 1

    please find me *any* even remotely negative story about
    any of the Dem contenders or the previous administration on
    slashdot.

    If you are so naive to believe that the Dems "have your
    interests at heart" or aren't just as much in bed with
    special interests, you really should come out of your cave
    more often.

  19. how about a wired.slashdot section? on Meet the Nasalnaut · · Score: 0

    this way /. can catalogue all the stories from the
    last print issue just a few days before the new issue
    is sent to subscribers.

    It just seems hardly 'newsworthy' to link to stories
    that have been out for three weeks already in print. If
    you are going to play the 'oh look at these cool stories
    in wired' game (or any other print pub). then at least
    get it over with when its fresh.

  20. Re:Solar problems on Mars Rovers Update · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn it! Rudy Giuliani made it to Mars first and
    got rid of all their squeegee guys!

  21. acutally its Mercury... on Venus: The Forgotten Planet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    thats become the forgotten planet. The outer planet have
    all had multiple probes in the past 20-25 years. Same
    with Venus, and Mars.. well we can't throw enough junk
    at that rock. AFAIK, Mariner 10 was the one and only,
    and that only made 2 or 3 passes after getting a boost
    after a Venus rest stop.

  22. Man, people get a grip.... on Apollo 11 Launch Tower Rescue Effort · · Score: 5, Insightful

    there are some things that are just not worth saving,
    especially when they cost many millions of dollars. This
    is like somebody doing spring cleaning and refusing to
    toss out that favorite letter jacket from high school.
    Think about it: $40 mio is what they want to raise.
    Yet two (failed) Mars probes - Polar Lander and Climate
    Orbiter cost $165 and $125 mio. Its time we stop all this
    nostalgia bs - there is plenty of video, tech specs and
    what not already. If you want to contribute something to
    the space efforts, make it something that pushes things
    *FORWARD* not back.

  23. Re:Prediction for SCO's Future on SCO Complaint Filed -- Including Code Samples · · Score: 1

    fines and jail time

  24. The original reason not to service hubble was... on NASA Engineers Dispute Hubble Safety Claim · · Score: 1

    that the ISS and DOD had all missions available up to the
    point where NASA would need to *recertify* the shuttle fleet.
    NASA has no plans to do this due to the multi billion $ cost
    over the necessary overhauls.

  25. Yes Timothy, its fair on BBC Buys Google News Keywords In Kelly Case · · Score: 3, Informative

    The BBC misrepresented Kellys statements and views (largely by ommision) and created the furor that led to him losing his grip. If you are going to claim the Iraq dossier controversy pushed him over the edge, then you have to put a lot of the blame on the BBC for turning what was a difference of interpretation into worldwide controversy. REF