Slashdot Mirror


Political Pop-ups, and Follow the Money

finelinebob writes "Now we know why Bush wants broadband for everyone: The Republican National Committee plans on bringing the campaign to Internet pop-up ads. From the article: 'Internet experts said that Republicans have entered a new realm of campaigning. Pop-up and pop-under ads of any variety haven't been around long, and little data exist to suggest how voters might respond to uninvited interruptions.' Okay, folks -- get your pop-up blocking browsers now!" While you're waiting for your first pop-up, pop on over to a website that tracks campaign contributions: vVF4N writes "Fundrace 2004 lets you enter any street address and see what people at or near that location have contributed to a presidential candidate, along with their addresses and occupations. The data is based on reports that campaigns regularly file with the Federal Election Commission. You can also look up a name and get the same information. The Washington Post (registration required) has more. Find out who your friends and neighbors are contributing to."

380 comments

  1. Pop ups by krymsin01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So instead of using the Internet to rally and energize the American public into voting for them, they are going to use it to furthor alienate and annoy us with pop-ups? Are they that out of touch that they believe pop-ups are actualy going to give them some sort of edge?

    --
    stuff
    1. Re:Pop ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will someone please explain why this is offtopic?

    2. Re:Pop ups by TomV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      or: As well as using the internet to rally and energise the American Public into voting for them, they are going to use it to further alienate and annoy everyone outside the US without a vote in the US elections with pop-ups? Are they that out of touch that they believe these pop-ups are actually going to be limited to US voters only?

    3. Re:Pop ups by Cally · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm really looking forward to the first one of these I see, when I shall send a lengthy email of complaint about how I'm unable to vote in the election, not being American. Hopefully that'll suck up a few minutes of time of some campaign worker and help drain away the Bush funds. Just doin' my bit...

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    4. Re:Pop ups by mcocke · · Score: 1

      Anyone not using privoxy, mozilla, or similar to filter pop-up/unders get what they deserve. If you don't vote, you don't get to complain. Vote "NO" to pop-ups/unders!

    5. Re:Pop ups by stry_cat · · Score: 1

      If popups didn't work they wouldn't be used.

      While they'll alinate the /. group the average AOLuser is going to say "Oh they care enough about me to advertise here, I love Dubbya. I will vote for him so he and and his big government socalist friends can keep me safe from those nasty slashdotter terrorists"

    6. Re:Pop ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...

      Just like the fscking pop-up that greets me when I open slashdot?

      (The site you are accessing requires flash player, would you like to load an updated version....)

    7. Re:Pop ups by WindowlessView · · Score: 2, Insightful

      -->Hopefully that'll suck up a few minutes of time of some campaign worker

      It will suck up the .003 seconds of computer time that it takes to strip your info off the email header, send out a form letter, and put you in a database so you can be harassed by American politicians until the end of time.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
    8. Re:Pop ups by blazerw11 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Republicans don't care about people outside the U.S. Have you not been paying attention?! :)

      The above was meant to be humorous toward the parent poster and a slight slam against our conservative leadership, which, if I may make an intelligent argument here, suck.

      --
      A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
    9. Re:Pop ups by Cally · · Score: 0, Troll

      OK, I'm game - we'll see who can waste more of who's time. Hint: there are five and half billion-odd of us and only 250-something million of you. Why should my valuable time be consumed by fuckheaded US politicos that personally I'd be happy to see burnt at the stake?

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    10. Re:Pop ups by phillymacmike · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ah, but non-USAians won't see them -- these popups are for the Diebold voting machines....

      What? Didn't you read the article? What?

      --
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _>8
      Too many errors in one post (make fewer).
    11. Re:Pop ups by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is as bad as bloodforoil.org sending me spam. Which I have gotten numerous e-mails from today. Pop ups, while a bad marketing decision are paid for placement advertising. They're probably on sights like foxnews.com that has a conservative audience that will repsond to them. Blood for Oil is indescriminately spewing out full color images that fill the screen of most viewers when opened. I personally believe their political views are misguided, and now know their technology use is even more misguided.

    12. Re:Pop ups by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm game - we'll see who can waste more of who's time. Hint: there are five and half billion-odd of us and only 250-something million of you. Why should my valuable time be consumed by fuckheaded US politicos that personally I'd be happy to see burnt at the stake?

      Fine--the solution then is to stay away from any fuckheaded US web sites, right?

    13. Re:Pop ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are just trying to compete with Kerry's overweight flash ads I've been seeing all over the place.

      Look at it this way, click on them like crazy if they have to pay per click :) Just dont' donate

    14. Re:Pop ups by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Dubbya has "big government socialist friends"?

      --Joye

    15. Re:Pop ups by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      Sure, they aren't the same as the Democrat's "big socialist friends", but they like to spend our money just the same, only on different things.

  2. Yay! by ColourlessGreenIdeas · · Score: 5, Funny

    An oppertunity for the republicans to annoy everyone. That's what I like to see.

    --
    In soviet russia stale jokes recycle you!
    1. Re:Yay! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Spammers for Bush! Surefire way to become as populatr with the public as, say, X-10!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Yay! by robbyjo · · Score: 1

      Well, let's wait a while... if it makes them unpopular, they'll stop it for sure. They can't afford losing their supporters. I guess they're just experimenting on a new idea, just like sending spam is. I personally never received their spam yet, but some people actually welcomed it. Unsure about the pop-up ads though.

      --

      --
      Error 500: Internal sig error
  3. *groan! by manavendra · · Score: 4, Funny

    As if pr0n pop-ups werent enough, we'll now have Dubya and others popping up and asking to vote for them.
    Wonder if the internet usage policy will classify Dubya with his silly grin as "distasteful, objectionable content" :-)

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:*groan! by WWWWolf · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wonder if the internet usage policy will classify Dubya with his silly grin as "distasteful, objectionable content" :-)

      According to some porn filters, yes, pictures of GWB are vile pornography. =)

    2. Re:*groan! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Although last election I found these test pop-up's quite entertaining...

      Gore Vs Bush

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:*groan! by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Worse yet... a Bush (as in President) pop-up appearing right next to a bush (as in sexy teen virgins) pop-up from the same website. Seeing those two pictures side by side could give you definate sexual dysfunction.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  4. Oh bloody hell by NemesisStar · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this means I get "Vote for Bush" popups in Australia I'm going to be very upset.

    I'd prefer a 12" penis any day!

    1. Re:Oh bloody hell by krymsin01 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Would you like to know more?

      --
      stuff
    2. Re:Oh bloody hell by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, the annoying thing is... whoever wins this election will be deciding what my country's foreign policy is going to be. Yet I don't get a vote in it. Isn't it great living in a vassal state?

      And now, just to rub it in, they're going to pop up their campaign ads at me. Brilliant.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Oh bloody hell by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      you mean you wouldn't rather have a 5'+ dick?

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    4. Re:Oh bloody hell by Nighttime · · Score: 1

      If this means I get "Vote for Bush" popups in Australia I'm going to be very upset.

      Seems that they don't realise that the first two double-ewes stand for world-wide. Is there any way that the web server can tell which country the request is coming from and not display the ad?

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    5. Re:Oh bloody hell by Trailwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ..living in a vassal state?


      Don't get too excited by this, we have fifty of them here.
    6. Re:Oh bloody hell by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many ad companies already do use location targetted ads - I often see Sainsbury's, Switch etc ads on US sites. Of course this isn't 100% foolproof, but it did even work with my old (pre-RIPE) IP.

    7. Re:Oh bloody hell by Surlyboi · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're in luck then, because if you vote Bush, you get Dick for free!

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    8. Re:Oh bloody hell by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Or a +5 longsword of babemagnitism? ;)

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:Oh bloody hell by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > Don't get too excited by this, we have fifty of them here.

      Except for the fact that the peopel livign in those 50 can still vote.. not that it really makes a difference this time.. (hmm. come to think of it, it didn't matter much last time either)

    10. Re:Oh bloody hell by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 2, Informative
      Many ad companies already do use location targetted ads - I often see Sainsbury's, Switch etc ads on US sites. Of course this isn't 100% foolproof, but it did even work with my old (pre-RIPE) IP.
      In my experience this is quite random. In my case (I'm Swiss), I get quite a variety of adds, beside the one for the US, I get some for France and some for Germany, nothing for Italy yet (Italian is the third langage spoken in Switzerland). At least I seem not to get proposals to move my money to a Swiss bank account anymore...

      I suspect the system used to select adds is quite primitive, and I'm simply too strange a case to get tailored adds.

    11. Re:Oh bloody hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd prefer a 12" penis any day!"

      I bet you would!

      I'd prefer if you keep your sexual dysfunctions/preferences to yourself!

    12. Re:Oh bloody hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What vassal state?

      Do you live in France or Germany?

    13. Re:Oh bloody hell by WyldDot · · Score: 1

      how about a 12" pop-up? :)

      --
      Question Authority before it questions YOU ...
    14. Re:Oh bloody hell by sanctimonius+hypocrt · · Score: 1

      Yet I don't get a vote in it. Isn't it great living in a vassal state?

      Next you`ll be griping about taxation without representation.

      If you don`t like how the government in Brussels treats you, get out.


    15. Re:Oh bloody hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Big Fat Dick...

      Cheney? :)

    16. Re:Oh bloody hell by highwindarea · · Score: 1

      The worst part is I've read your comment several times and still can't guess what country you're from.

      --
      I think this internet thing sounds like a good idea
    17. Re:Oh bloody hell by kiwimate · · Score: 2, Informative

      Next you`ll be griping about taxation without representation.

      What, you mean like Washington D.C.? From the pages of the first site that popped up when I googled:

      District of Columbia citizens have no representation of any kind in the US Senate and only a nonvoting delegate to the US House of Representatives. US citizens who live in Washington, DC, have no voting representation on the national issues considered by Congress. Furthermore, since Congress also acts as Washington's "state" legislature, local citizens are also denied voting representation in a state legislative body-something that all other Americans enjoy.

    18. Re:Oh bloody hell by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Not that anybody actually wants to live in D.C. anyway...

    19. Re:Oh bloody hell by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Oh bloody hell

      That's mostly a British expression, but of course it would have spread over most of the inhabitable planet (and Canada) back in the days of the British Empire, so I can see your problem... :)

    20. Re:Oh bloody hell by sanctimonius+hypocrt · · Score: 1

      ...taxation without representation.

      What, you mean like Washington D.C.?

      Yes, entirely like that. If the people of D.C. want greater voting rights, let them fight and take them, not whine to be given them.

      If the people of Europe want to control their own destiny, let them establish, maintain, and pay a military force that will allow that.

      What I`m unwilling to do is maintain an army and allow someone else to dictate its use.


    21. Re:Oh bloody hell by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      If this means I get "Vote for Bush" popups in Australia I'm going to be very upset.

      I'd prefer a 12" penis any day!


      Ouch.

    22. Re:Oh bloody hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind if Australians did vote bush into office, we don't need him anymore.

    23. Re:Oh bloody hell by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the U.S. doesn't have it's own top level domain that gets used much. You see lots of sites ending in .uk, or .fr, or .au, and so on, but not a whole lot ending in .us - instead the US sites just use the main original heirarchy of .com, .org, .net, .edu, and so on - which unfortunately a lot of other countries also use. There is no guarantee that a non-usa site will end in a country TLD, and so no guarantee that a .com or .org address is or is not in the US.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    24. Re:Oh bloody hell by Andux · · Score: 1

      No problem. Just look up the IP on ARIN. If they tell you to look it up on RIPE/APNIC/whoever, it's from overseas; otherwise, it's generally from the US.

      --
      (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
    25. Re:Oh bloody hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know...for the last four years people have probably been snickering over the leaders of our country being named Bush and Dick. Naturally, I JUST got it.

      And no, this isn't the first time it has taken me a few years to get a joke.

    26. Re:Oh bloody hell by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Unless you live in FLorida, and your name is Chad... Wasn't that how it went?

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  5. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... everyone who has a net connections gets immensely pissed off at Republicans and Bush gets the boot. Yay.

  6. MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The intro to this article mentions Opera and Mozilla - forget it, there's much better out there. I've tried every browser out there, and for nearly 6 months now I've used MyIE2. It "takes over" IE2 and runs as a seperate program - not only does it do pop-up blocking, it also does _content_ blocking. My eyes are open, the internet (and slashdot) no longer has ads - try it, try it, try it (if you're stuck in Windows).

    Freeware. http://www.myie2.com

    1. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Alternatively, you could just download the Google toolbar... No popups in IE... Sorted.

    2. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by linuxci · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would you want to do that when you can get the cross platform Firefox that doesn't have the inbuilt holes that anything that embeds IE has.

      Also IMO Firefox has a nicer interface.

      Note: MyIE2 does also support the Gecko engine in recent versions but enabling it isn't obvious and there's a few bugs in the integration.

    3. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's probably worth noting that IE will do popup blocking itself beginning with SP2. Microsoft has already released SP2 RC1 for public download, for those of you that like to live on the edge. In addition, it upgrades the Windows Firewall to what I think of as a ZoneAlarm lite, which isn't half bad considering it's a freebie for windows users.

      I'll personally stick to Firefox, but in the few days I've been running the SP2 RC1 on my windows box, I have to say I'm impressed, and it's a step in the right direction.

    4. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      I downloaded Firefox, hmm it was OK, not too bad looking and the type-ahead find was cute.
      Unfortunately, when I tried to download new themes I found out that it's buggy. If you try to download more than one thing, it says it's finished as soon as you click on the second thing. Then after a while it crashes.
      Not my idea of a "nicer interface"...

    5. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by mandalayx · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The intro to this article mentions Opera and Mozilla - forget it, there's much better out there. I've tried every browser out there, and for nearly 6 months now I've used MyIE2. It "takes over" IE2 and runs as a seperate program - not only does it do pop-up blocking, it also does _content_ blocking. My eyes are open, the internet (and slashdot) no longer has ads - try it, try it, try it (if you're stuck in Windows).


      You do realize, right, that the point of using Mozilla Firefox is not just popup blocking. In fact, it's going to be hard to market Firefox on the aspect of pop-up blocking when you have options like you mentioned and the Google toolbar.

      For me, the point of using Firefox is having a browser that I don't need to worry about. When I use IE, I'm not sure whether the next link will take me to an exploit. Or some annoying script. I don't really have that worry with Firefox....not yet..
    6. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure, unsubstantiated, handwaving, anti-MS FUD.

    7. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla Firefox does content blocking also, with the Adblock extension. It's easy to install and rather effective. See http://texturizer.net/firefox/extensions/#adblock

    8. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      You people are funny. Probably because you use gator. ^ ^

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm laughing at you...

    10. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 3, Informative

      yes its a bug... but then again, FireFox is not YET v1.0

      If you download an extension/theme, you have to immeadiately restart the browser to clear the install queue.

      Otherwise when you download the next one, you will get *TWO" restart messages (and increasing each time)

      This bug WILL be fixed by 1.0, and is hardly what you call serious, and better by far than IE, which requires to you restart the system at times.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    11. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not serious? The browser crashed! When does IE require me to restart the system?

    12. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Hmm, interesting... you'd think that bug would be easy to reproduce.. yet its not, at least not on the firefox I'm usign here..

    13. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I hope you're not suggesting that I'm lying. See the other reply to my post, where someone admits it's a bug.

    14. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is such a happy place. ^ ^

      --
      It's been a long time.
    15. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I'm not implying you are lying, I am implying that it is a bug that should not be hard to spot, and it surprises me. Bugs in OSS software are entirely possible ;)

    16. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not serious? The browser crashed! When does IE require me to restart the system?"

      At minimum everytime you patch any kind of hole in IE. At maximum? Whenever IE bombs so completely it kills your computer (98/ME) or just leaks all over the place (can still happen in 2k/xp)

    17. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL... More FUD!

    18. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That wasn't FUD, I USED IE and it actually did behave that way at times (Having IE explode and take down the 9x kernel was always fun, especially when doing homework/essays) fortunately the NT/2k/XP kernel is significantly better armored than the 9x kernel but IE does still Explode sometimes and when it does it has a habit of leaving messy pieces all over.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    19. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fudfudfudfud

      FUD F D FU
      F F D F D
      FU F D F D
      F F D F D
      F FUD FU

      fudfudfudfud

    20. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Internet junkbuster does this also for EVERY COMPUTER IN YOUR HOUSE or office. even better if you have a linux machine available.. use privoxy

      easier, faster and you can issue rules to all broswers instantly

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    21. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your browser a-splode!

    22. Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because yo fat momma sat on it... Hehehe

  7. Let Me Guess... by illuminata · · Score: 3, Funny

    Soon, we'll find that John F. Kerry tries to counter this with 30 second flash intros. Listen to that thumping techno beat and kick ass effects!

    Oh, what about Nader, you ask? He won't use computers. Apparently they pollute or something. He wants monitors banned because of their adverse health effects, too. But, his rumbling will be heard across the world anyways, so don't you worry!

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  8. Okay, folks -- get your pop-up blocking browsers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Under provision 911.666 of the PATRIOT II act, any method of circumventing the delivery of any advertisement form is considered an act of terrorism, punishable by life imprisonment in a forest labour camp, or summary execution. RFID signals broadcast from advertisements will be used in conjunction with the RFID tags now secretly being placed in your contact lenses to permit 24 hour total penis enlargement awareness.

  9. Found My Boss on there by Stubtify · · Score: 3, Funny

    And he donated the max ($2000) Geeze I guess times we're *that* tough this year.

    1. Re:Found My Boss on there by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

      My favorite part is how Donald Trump donated 2 grand to both Bush AND Kerry. Either he's just a generous guy or talk about playing the field....

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    2. Re:Found My Boss on there by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Ah, is this him?
      William H. Gates - George W. Bush - 1 Microsoft Way
      CEO -------------- $2,000 --------- Redmond, WA 98052
      Microsoft Corp.
    3. Re:Found My Boss on there by jjares · · Score: 2, Funny

      Name, Occupation, Employer Contribution Address Steve Wozniak CEO Wheels of Zeus Howard Dean $2,000 300 Santa Rosa Dr Los Gatos, CA 95032 Talk about competition Though I didn't find any Jobs in there

  10. it's all making some sense... by monkease · · Score: 5, Funny

    cia: there are weapons of mass destruction in iraq!
    bush: okay!
    cia: and americans love pop-up ads!
    bush: okay!

    1. Re:it's all making some sense... by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      more like:

      cia: We can't find any evidence for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
      bush: Find some!!

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:it's all making some sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like:

      UN: If you don't follow the cease fire agreement we will send more resolutions your way!!
      Bush: 12 years of defying the cease-fire he signed?? Since the democrats/UN has NO SPINE, I guess we will clean their mess up, as usual.

      Slashdorks: Its about finding the WMDs man!!!!

      Idiots.

    3. Re:it's all making some sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you guys call Kerry a flip-flop.

  11. Thanks Bush by linuxci · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like he'll be doing the first useful thing in his presidential career...

    Giving people a reason to ditch IE and run Firefox! :)

    Still he's not getting my vote, well as I'm English I couldn't anyway!

    1. Re:Thanks Bush by groot · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Internet:

      That which Gore giveth, Bush shall take away. So shall be scripted, so shall be so.

      -- This should definetly result in the loss of my artistic license.

      --
      "Just remember, it takes a village idiot." -- The Motley Fool.
    2. Re:Thanks Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!! Me too!!

  12. coming up next: campaign spam by slart42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    v.ote for b.ush!!

    asfhjku hdsjhkf hdfhbio

    1. Re:coming up next: campaign spam by goatan · · Score: 1

      I would rather vote for penis enlargment and viagra.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    2. Re:coming up next: campaign spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering all the meet single ads, I would say that people have already voted for bush.

    3. Re:coming up next: campaign spam by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      OK, this is a bit off-topic, but still... That random character thing:
      asfhjku hdsjhkf hdfhbio

      reminded me about the password generator that Honeywell's Multics system had back in the 80's. For each letter it generated it would check against some built-in rules to make sure that it didn't do silly things like put too many consonants together, and such.

      I was wondering, has anyone done anything like that for spam-detection?

  13. follow the money by ashot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    looks to me like a very interesting graphical representation of voter contributions, it seems a little scary though that I can access the name and address of everyone in my zipcode who contributed x amount of money to x candidate; I can see why it is necessary to keep these records public, but I can also see some potential for mis-use. Anyone else have this thought?

    --
    -ashot
    1. Re:follow the money by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 1

      Clarify the potential for misuse please. Are you saying, for example, that I should be afraid of my boss finding out who I contributed to and retaliating because of it?

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    2. Re:follow the money by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That would be one way of missuse, another would be some hellbent fanatic going on a killing spree because his canidate didn't get elected.

      Yet another and more practicle scenario could be were the elected official kept regular tabs on this and prefered certain contractors for certain jobs because of it.

      All of these scenarios seem ileagle but whats stoppignthem. I mean there isn't and check on who's checking. could be done at any time by any person. the scary part is how hard it would be to prove nay allegation like this.

    3. Re:follow the money by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 1

      Ok, time to take off the tinfoil hat. ;) Any wacko who's going to go on a killing spree because his candidate didn't get elected is more likely to do it randomly or find a rally for the opposing politician at which to wreak havoc. He doesn't need contributor info for that. And, as for the candidates themselves, they already have that info, it comes on the checks they get and they're the ones providing it to the FEC, who then makes it available to sites like that.

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    4. Re:follow the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helps people who like to vote by other means. I like to go out the night before elections with a valve-core remover. Anybody with a Bush-themed bumper sticker on their SUV gets their tires rendered useless so they can't vote in the morning. Much more effective than those "ballot" things that you can only get one of.

    5. Re:follow the money by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      well the tinfoil hat is off but, the killing spree was just thrown out thier as an option. as far as the canidate having the info? well he has the info about his contributers but not the oposing canidates. It kind of goes back to the "political machine" in chicogo were this actually happend.

      I'm not really saying anything like this will happen just that the possability is there and it may be harder to catch because there isn't any formal record of the canidate requesting the information.

    6. Re:follow the money by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 0

      Duh. Here in rural right-wing rural America, people knowing that I contribute to a "liberal" candidate puts me on a lot of shit lists. In some places I could see having to move due to lack of work if you're self-employed. Not Democracy in action!

    7. Re:follow the money by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      I can see why it is necessary to keep these records public, but I can also see some potential for mis-use.

      Not unless you contribute to a Republican so I have an excuse to burn your house down :-).

      Actually, this type of info is very important to have, but I'm not sure that it's a great thing to have it so publically accessable. The access could easily be used to target individuals supporting either side. For those of us who do want to be involved with the political process monitarily, this could at some point become a very scary thing. OTOH, I've never been particularly quiet about my political beliefs in the past, so I doubt this would stop me.

      So, yes, I'm concerned, but I'd try to rely on the good will of my neighbors with the backup of the authorities if needed for the time being.

      --
      That is all.
  14. what are these "pop-ups" of which you speak? by DrSkwid · · Score: 0


    Some kind of junk breakfast cereal?

    Oh, is it part of the world of commerce?

    Sorry, my OS doesn't do advertisment, it's not aimed at "consumers" for whom using it is an "experience".

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:what are these "pop-ups" of which you speak? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Pop ups are thoise things that get everyone made at for happening but nom madder how many time you tellthen what to do to stop it they look at you like your crazy.

      "but it said click here? why would it say that if i wasn't supposed to click there?" and my favorite of all time. "well my pc clock gets about 5 minute behind after a while, i need that program installed so i don't work extra time, can't you just stop the pop-ups? it seems i spend more time closing them than i do working"

    2. Re:what are these "pop-ups" of which you speak? by nomso · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know.

      Windows sucks, doesn't it.
      I feel the same way.

      --
      there is no spoon
  15. Reminds of of their "anti-spam" provisions by fuzzybunny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wasn't there some discussion about provisions in the CAN-SPAM act to exempt "informative" political messages?

    At that level, I wouldn't be surprised if popup blockers and filters against political spam were somehow to run afoul of DMCA (circumvention devices!) and friends. You MUST view this popup, we're checking! Honest! :)

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    1. Re:Reminds of of their "anti-spam" provisions by espo812 · · Score: 1
      Wasn't there some discussion about provisions in the CAN-SPAM act to exempt "informative" political messages?
      This is something I don't get about the /. crowd and my peers in general. Many desire for the government to solve all social problems, be it feeding and educating our children to funding and regulating all political campaigns (all four are policies that can be found in Europe.) With all of this comes more power for the government - yet that seems to be acceptable...

      Until the government decides to do something they don't like, such as allowing political spam (or the DMCA or PATRIOT.) What do people think those giving themselves power (the government) want to do with it?
      --

      espo
    2. Re:Reminds of of their "anti-spam" provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the scarey part is, the feds will know wether you blocked or not, due to patriot act. Ashcroft will then deem you to be a terrorist.

    3. Re:Reminds of of their "anti-spam" provisions by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      What happened to the government mandated handicap access regulations, do Bush's popups work properly with a screen reader?

  16. No don't block popups! by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

    How else is my browser-based instant messenger supposed to work?

    1. Re:No don't block popups! by iapetus · · Score: 2, Informative

      By allowing specific sites only to popup windows. Certainly possible with Firefox, probably with Mozilla. Not sure about Opera, though it makes sense that it would support it too.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    2. Re:No don't block popups! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to get a clue first.

      any popup that is not created from a hyperlink click should be blocked.

      javascript abuse needsto be curtailed.

  17. So now ... by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Which part of 'this won't work' don't the republicans get? If the pop up works, it annoys, and they lose. But most of the time wouldn't this be blocked now?

    I's bet the majority of us have browsers that block pop-ups, even IE now blocks pop-ups.

    So are they aiming at the people to dumb to upgrade browers? Uh, hang on, this is starting to make sense.

    "Republicans, appealing to the lowest common denominator since 1978."

    1. Re:So now ... by DietVanillaPepsi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Republicans, appealing to the lowest common denominator since 1978."

      Democrats do the same. Most politicians within this two-party system do the same. They appeal to the lowest common denominator.

      I used to feel that my intelligence was insulted everytime I heard a politician speak on an issue. Over time, I have realized that politicians must appeal to their bases: people who are fanatical about the political party to which they belong, which makes them too blind to examine the issues beyond taking their candidates proclamations as gospel and people who are too dumb to examine the issues in any way, shape or form and vote for a particular party because that's what they've always done. The rest of the electorate is forever voting for the lesser of two evils.

    2. Re:So now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell was this marked flamebait? Insightful, OK fine, Funny, well yes but that's clearly not the goal.

      Flamebait? Mods sort this out as this is crazy.

  18. fundrace is interesting... by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 1

    OMFG it's late but I couldn't resist playing with this thing. Hmmm...

    Bill Gates gave Bush $2000.
    Couldn't find anything on Jobs, Allen, McBride, Schwarzenegger, Mel Gibson.

    Searching for Bush shows George HW, Barbara, and Jeb all chipped in $2000. Donations from random "Bushes" seems to be skewed towards Bush. Searching for Kerry shows every "Kerry" contributed to Kerry.

    What other interesting names can be discovered in here?

  19. So I guess Slashdot by FatAssBastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is now michael's personal forum for his political views? FWIW, I've been planning on voting against the current president for a long time now. Someone like David Duke would have to have received the Democratic nomination in order for me to fail to vote Democratic in November, 2004.

    That being said, that's two articles on the current main page posted by michael that have an anti-Bush tone to them. I guess michael doesn't care about being "fair and balanced" as a journalist.

    --
    /.: why the hell am I here?
    1. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So.....in order to be "fair and balanced"..... ......you have to.....silence.............stories that.........make people that make bad decisions like this......look....bad.....

      Just shut up and go home, you damn hippy. Nobody wants or needs your brand of "fair".

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm doesn't require that many periods.

    3. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect?
      Should he not say anything anti-nazi so that he is fair and balanced? There is a limit to what people can be expected to tolerate.

    4. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      no, but it definitely helps. This *IS* slashdot, and some people just need a little reminder. :)

      --
      It's been a long time.
    5. Re:So I guess Slashdot by jarich · · Score: 1
      I agree.

      Any idiot who thinks the Republicans are the only ones planning to use the internet (or any advertising available to them) is just plain dumb... or just has their head in the sand.

    6. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      please find me *any* even remotely negative story about
      any of the Dem contenders or the previous administration on
      slashdot.

      If you are so naive to believe that the Dems "have your
      interests at heart" or aren't just as much in bed with
      special interests, you really should come out of your cave
      more often.

    7. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Its obvious that the Democrats can do no wrong on Slashdot. There has never once been posted anything that could be considered disparaging to the Democrats.

      You know its not balanced, and you like it that way, tipped in your favor. If there was a new study done on the murder at Chappaquiddick by Teddy Kennedy, using technology for crime scene investigation, it would not get posted. But the Bush campaign uses a form of advertisement that just about everyone uses, and all of a sudden he is a propogator of spam on the Internet.

      You can post all of the liberal tripe you want on Slashdot. But if you try to call it balanced, you're only making a fool and a liar out of yourself. At least admit the truth.

    8. Re:So I guess Slashdot by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      If you are so naive to believe that there isnt any difference between a democrat and a republican, go back in your cave.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    9. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you think that there isn't a difference between our President and the Nazi party of Germany, then God save us all.

      Sadly, I know many in your party actually feel this way.

    10. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please see stories on:

      DMCA
      RIAA
      MPAA

      Thankyou.

    11. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please see stories on:

      DMCA
      RIAA
      MPAA
      Basically every internet censorship bill "for the children" from '92 to '00

      Thankyou.

    12. Re:So I guess Slashdot by kableh · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Repubs and Democrats are both wh0res to corporate interests. At least the interests the Dems wh0re for don't have a clear financial interest in dragging us into uneccessary wars.

      If you really think that Bush has your interests at heart then you're a gay-hating asshole, and as such, I hope you enjoy burning in hell with your other hate-spewing cohorts.

    13. Re:So I guess Slashdot by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let the races begin!

      Data Quality Act
      Trial Begins Over Library Censorship
      How Corporate Lobbyists Colonized the Net
      White House Files Amicus Brief Favoring RIAA
      Clinton Frowns on Anonymity
      Feds Want Access to Your Machine

      Government Wants to do Massive Internet Monitoring

      That's back to only July 1999 and only on negative articles that mention Clinton. I didn't even bother to go further back or search specifically for stuff like Senator Disney and the DCMA. So, just because you forget stuff that doesn't fit your perseption of reality doesn't make it true.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    14. Re:So I guess Slashdot by kableh · · Score: 1

      If you come to /. expecting "journalism", well, you'll get what you deserve =)

    15. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >If you really think that Bush has your interests at heart >then you're a gay-hating asshole, and as such, I hope you >enjoy burning in hell with your other hate-spewing cohorts.

      So the 50% of population voting R are 'gay-hating assholes' who spew hate. Wait.. are you Al Franken? Clearly the
      life on Mars has been found, its you and your fellow far
      lefties. Sadly, its not intelligent life. And its always
      interested me how you guys resort to name calling and
      conspiracy theories whenever somebody doesn't hold the same
      view as you. You guys are all for freedom of speech, diversity, and progressiveness *only as long as its yours*.

    16. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      "If you think that there isn't a difference between our President and the Nazi party of Germany, then God save us all."

      Well, one big difference between Bush and Hitler is that Hitler actually fought in WWI; Bush of course sat out his Guard duty during Vietnam ...

    17. Re:So I guess Slashdot by SlipJig · · Score: 1

      "Fair and balanced", if you take it to mean always giving both extremes equal coverage, does not equal "right". There is the possibility that one side is right and the other is wrong. IMO a real journalist is one who strives for accuracy, not necessarily equal representation. Of course a quest for accuracy requires research into alternative viewpoints, but it doesn't follow that they should always be presented as equally correct, if they're not.

      All of which says nothing about whether any given forum presents an accurate picture of reality (/. included). Unfortunately, I think most people have made up their minds beforehand, and see what they want to see. I think perceived bias is usually a measure of the difference between the reporting and the viewer's prejudice.

      And for what it's worth, I want Bush out too :)

      --
      Read my keyboard review.
    18. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Correction: 49%.

      Yeah, remember? He didn't actually win?

      And if you can't remember a certain story about the former president spread all over the press, a huge mistake on his part which dented the moral fabric of the space time continuum, you're probably too stupid to read.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    19. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      the truth that the republicans are in power with a vengance? Yeah, you stupid hippie, go back to your little hole, where you pretend to be conservative, you stupid wanker.

      p.s. I'm as conservative as they come. That's exactly why I think the current administration is bad. Sorry to burst your bubble freind, but those blokes aren't conservative by any stretch of the imagination. They're just religious mysoginistic fag haters. Religious mysoginistic fag hating does not a conservative make, as the largest defecit in US history shows.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    20. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Gore 50,996,116 48 % 21 266
      Bush 50,456,169 48 % 30 271
      Other 3,874,040 4 % 0 0
      winner declared results as of 1/6/01

      But sadly, you clearly didn't go to school or you would
      understand that last column - 271 vs 266, and that fact
      that it is President Bush and Mr. Gore.

      You lefties *really* have to get over 2000. Or do you
      want to do the recount again to prove again that Gore
      lost Florida?

      Devote your energies to getting rid of the electoral
      college.

    21. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just really stupid, I suppose. After all, it wasn't that vote that got bush in, it was the court.

      And if you're accusing me of being left just because of one or two comments, you're a fucking moron.

    22. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      dude.. go look at the history and stop moaning about it.
      The court didnt 'elect' Bush. They stopped the recount.
      And its been proven countless times that they could have
      recounted them 1000 times it still would have come out
      Bush. Had the court done nothing all it would have done
      was delay the eventual outcome for another month.

      Its not the one or two comments that pin you, its the
      content and tone of them. Jumping up and down, shouting,
      whining and using rhetoric instead of facts is a hallmark
      of the left in America.

    23. Re:So I guess Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd better tell the prez, he's been using it to get all his bills passed. :P

  20. Viarga Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can definitely see Kerry in Viagra "Popups"

    My wife..er.. financier strong recommends it... :-)

  21. If I were Bush, I would be a bit wary about by mandalayx · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If I were Bush, I would be a bit wary about Internet marketing. Clay Shirky makes an interesting and insightful dissection on what went right and wrong with Dean and his internet campaign here:

    What follows is a long musing on the Dean campaign's use of internet tools, but it has a short thesis: the hard thing to explain is not how the Dean campaign blew such a huge lead, but rather why we ever thought that lead actually existed. Dean's campaign didn't just fail, it dissolved on contact with reality.


    Extensive reading, but just read line by line.

    Of course, though, we know that the GOP has done better in communicating their message, while the Democrats continue to fail Influence 101...a sad sight.
  22. Bill is a cheapskate by amigoro · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    William H. Gates
    CEO
    Microsoft Corp.
    George W. Bush
    $2,000
    1 Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052

    GWB saved Gates' shiny white hind, and all he gives in return is 2000 dollars. Ingrateful sod!

    Moderate this comment
    Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
    Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

    --


    Nothing to see here
    1. Re:Bill is a cheapskate by umofomia · · Score: 2, Informative
      GWB saved Gates' shiny white hind, and all he gives in return is 2000 dollars. Ingrateful sod!
      That's because the hard-money presidential campaign contribution limit is $2000 per individual.
    2. Re:Bill is a cheapskate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you think the grand parent was meant as a joke?

    3. Re:Bill is a cheapskate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True... tho not everyone on slashdot may know that fact... especially the non-americans.

    4. Re:Bill is a cheapskate by hughk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it won't list the $10000/plate campaign dinners though will it?

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:Bill is a cheapskate by bjackrian · · Score: 1
      But it won't list the $10000/plate campaign dinners though will it?

      Well, there are two kinds of dinners like that. There are the $10000/plate dinners that PACs can host, and those wouldn't be included since there's no reporting requirement for PACs. The PACs can't directly campaign for a candidate, though, so you can't really call them campaign dinners

      On the other hand, candidates often hold $2000/plate dinners to raise money (that's what Bush does very frequently). They can only collect $2000 because of campaign finance limitations, and that money does have to be reported. While you won't be able to see that Bush raised $100,000 at a dinner party hosted by person X, you will be able to see the names of each person who attended that dinner party and donated $2,000.

    6. Re:Bill is a cheapskate by Anenga · · Score: 1

      You mean like this doozie? (See the video!)

  23. Republican Popups Taking Over Your Screen by billstewart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Single popups are bad enough, but just wait until the Republicans try those rapid-fire take-over-your-screen can't-hit-the-X-fast-enough popups. "Terrorists might be hiding under your bed!" "Democrats are Liberal Liberal Liberal!" "Weapons of Mass Destruction!" "Our Enemies are EEEEVILLLLL!" "Yellow Alert No, Orange Alert! No, Yellow Alert!" "Pink Alert - Gay People Might Destroy Your Marriage Unless You let Us Repeal The Constitution!" "Don't Vote Democrat or Terrorists Will Squish This Hamster!" "Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid!" "Don't Worry, Republicans Will Protect You!" "Pay No Attention to the Web Bug Behind This Window!" "CLick the Dancing Osama To Fight Terrorism!" "Click the Dancing Osama to Vote Republican!" "If you Don't see the Fnords, they won't eat you!" "Homeland Security works if We All Cooperate!"

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Republican Popups Taking Over Your Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is funny stuff!

      Mod it up again, please!

    2. Re:Republican Popups Taking Over Your Screen by b-baggins · · Score: 0, Troll

      And then a bomb goes off and kills 200 people on a train in Madrid and people realize just what an ass folks like you really are.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    3. Re:Republican Popups Taking Over Your Screen by RobinH · · Score: 1

      And then a bomb goes off and kills 200 people on a train in Madrid and people realize just what an ass folks like you really are.

      Buddy, you're an American and a republican... as if you know where Madrid is!

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  24. Dean is a Traitor!!!!! by amigoro · · Score: 1

    HOWARD M. DEAN
    RETIRED
    DEAN FOODS CO.
    George W. Bush
    $2,000
    716 SOUTH OAK St HINSDALE, IL 60521

    --


    Nothing to see here
  25. defences & backfires by Avishalom · · Score: 1

    Many people here claim that this will backfire mainly because it will annoy everyone.
    this is not true,
    let me demonstrate with a little gedanken experiment.

    1) would these popups annoy you ?
    2) would you have considered voting for GW if it were'nt for those popups?

    I think that this campaign is better targetted than one may think.
    Remember that if spam & aggressive marketing were not economically viable, they would not exist
    ---
    i'll stop here, because the next conclusion is not PC, (actually though i believe that conclusion, it would (rightly so) be considered flamebait)

    --
    now, (OT) since nobody mentioned THIS favorite blocker... (i also use it to block flash advertisement, which is the best feature in the history of browsers)

    1. Re:defences & backfires by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >Remember that if spam & aggressive marketing were not economically viable, they would not exist

      Yes, but only for scams and high profit items like cheapo plastic penis pumps that cost pennies to produce and sell for 20-100 dollars.

      On top of that, the spam you get in your mailbox is usually from an open proxy, thus it probably wouldnt be profitable if the senders actually paid for their own bandwidth, opt-out servers, etc.

      Legitimate ads aren't that profitable and spam is rarely profitable outside of a select range of items (fake viagra, herbal scams, etc).

  26. brotherly love? by aarku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Governor John Bush only gave his brother $1000?
    Zing!

    1. Re:brotherly love? by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he forgot that they slipped that donation increase into McCain-Feingold to further stick it to the Dems.

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    2. Re:brotherly love? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Mrs. Heintz couldn't even spend a cent on her husband.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    3. Re:brotherly love? by matuscak · · Score: 1

      Dunno who this "Heintz" is, but FWIW John Kerry's wife calls herself "Teresa Heinz Kerry".

    4. Re:brotherly love? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Nod.. my bad typo this morning...

      She still does not come up.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  27. Ah! A Democrat plot! by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 1
    It's obvious. Some liberal masquerading as a Republican has suggested to the GOP that they use this tactic. Now the Republicans will piss everyone off and lose votes.

    But not as much as when they start sending spam.

    --
    Mod parent up!
    1. Re:Ah! A Democrat plot! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a republican YET that wasn't a liberal in disguise.

      Hello? 'No strings attached' "liberation" from fascist right wing dictators, replacing said dictators with a form of government designed(in theory) to allow equality and freedom for all? tens of billions of dollars given for free, no strings attached to this desert country in the middle of nowhere? Largest deficit in US history?

      Son, you've been DUPED. The republicans are just a bunch of useless pinko lefties in disguise.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  28. Great news for Kerry voters by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

    Keeping digging your own grave, Rove.

    If they want to alienate voters and come off as money-hungry vultures, then pop-ups and spam are the way to go.

    Its pretty ironic when Bush has over 100 million sitting in his war chest, which has broken all previous records. Thats what you get for pandering to big business for almost four years, a nice return on your investment.

  29. California's Bill Jones Spammed last time by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative
    Bill Jones is a California Republican who's running for Senate this year against Barbara Boxer. Back in 2002, when he was Secretary of State and trying to get the Republican nomination to run for governor (Bill Simon beat him, and lost to Gray Davis, who was later recalled and replaced by Ahnold), his campaign sent out a bunch of email spam, and got spanked by the net.

    So here in California, the Republicans already have lots of practice annoying Internet users. Let's hope they keep it up!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  30. oposite effect? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    So if i wanted another canidate to loose then i should start sponsoring adds for them as pop-ups instead. interesting,

    Maybe they are going to use some agency that has them convinced that people ask for the pop-ups when they installed thier spyware (insert covert marketing name here)

  31. block ads with a hosts file by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

    Very, very simple to do and if you must use IE, just get the google toolbar for pop-up blocking.

  32. more *groan! by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pop-up and pop-under ads of any variety haven't been around long ... ???

    They've been around TOO long. More specifically, they have been around, period.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  33. Could be worse by Phekko · · Score: 1

    Imagine a NUDE Dubya pop-up ;)

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    1. Re:Could be worse by manavendra · · Score: 1

      Oh hell no! that would be laughing matter! :-

      --
      http://efil.blogspot.com/
    2. Re:Could be worse by csteinle · · Score: 1

      I thought I couldn't, but now I have. And it's your fault. I'm going to hunt you down and make you pay for making me come up with that image.

  34. They must not actually use the net... by JLeslie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The use of pop-up ads really seem to suggest that they don't ever use the web. Or at least not ofen enough to know how annoying, and pretty useless, pop up (or pop under) ads are.

    It's similiar to how so many of the top spammers admit to being computer illiterate before discovering spam as a way to make money. And it's the same reason scalpers are rarely fans of the band or sports team they sell tickets for. Anyone with a vested interest in the activity will not want to destroy it.

    Alright, I'll admit that pop ups are not destroying the web, but I stand by the fact that those who advocate their use must rarely surf the web themselves.

  35. DMCA by epcraig · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Vote for Kerry, vote for the DMCA.

    Vote for Bush, vote for the DMCA.

    Nader ran against the DMCA in 2000, I can't see why he'd change his mind in 2004.

    Kucinich, too, ran against the DMCA. Pity nobody cared.

    --
    Ed Craig "Who cares what you think?" George W. Bush, 4th of July 2001
    1. Re:DMCA by droleary · · Score: 1

      . . . DMCA . . . DMCA . . . DMCA . . . DMCA . . .

      The only thing worse than the two-party system is all the one-issue voters.

    2. Re:DMCA by epcraig · · Score: 2, Interesting
      USA-PATRIOT, war on Iraq, DMCA is just my longest standing grudge against the Demoblicans and Republicrats...

      After all, only a conspiracy theorist would point to Skull and Bones. ;-)

      --
      Ed Craig "Who cares what you think?" George W. Bush, 4th of July 2001
    3. Re:DMCA by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      If you want real freedom, vote Libertarian.

      But with freedom comes responsibility. This land of children living off the nanny state cannot handle that, I am sad to say.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Vote for Kerry, vote for the DMCA.

      Vote for Bush, vote for the DMCA.

      Nader ran against the DMCA in 2000, I can't see why he'd change his mind in 2004.

      Vote for Nader, vote for Bush. Ugh.

      We really need to change the way Presidential voting is done in this country.

    5. Re:DMCA by epcraig · · Score: 1
      Nope, a vote for Nader was a vote against Gore and a vote against Bush.

      Nearly half the eligible voters in 3000 cast no ballot, you going to claim them for Bush too? No wonder he was elected.

      --
      Ed Craig "Who cares what you think?" George W. Bush, 4th of July 2001
    6. Re:DMCA by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vote for Nader, Get Bush!

      Much as I dislike Kerry's positions on a number of issues (including the DMCA and Globalization) he is far, far, far better than Bush. Since Nader has no chance in hell of being elected it is important to vote for Kerry (even if you don't like everything he says) in order to keep Bush from winning.

      In 2000 a lot of people (myself included) voted for Nader because they opposed Gore's right-of-center positions on many issues and the result has been record deficits, prepetual war, general outrage from the international comunity and the gradual roll back of our civil liberties and constiutional rights.

      Recent polls predict that Nader will get far less than the number of votes needed to get federal matching funds for the Green Party and that "his 2004 candidacy a much greater threat to the Democratic Party's candidate than to George W. Bush" (Source: The Gallup Organization, Summary, subscription required to view full article.) So don't kid yourself a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush and the last thing we (the people of the US) need is four more years of King George II.

      ReDefeat Bush in 2004! Vote John Kerry for President

    7. Re:DMCA by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1

      In 2000, nearly 95000 people in Florida voted for Ralph Nader.

      Exit polling showed that roughly 40% said they would have voted for Gore if Nader wasn't on the ballot. 20% said they would have voted for Bush. 40% said they wouldn't have voted at all.

      Bush won Florida by less than 600 votes.

      Without Nader on the ballot, Gore wins Florida.

      Facts are facts..... You have a right to your own opinion, but you don't have a right to your own facts. Whatever their reasons for doing so, the people of Florida who voted for Nader gave the election to Bush.

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    8. Re:DMCA by comedian23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your post is the reason our democracy doesn't work. If you vote for Nader enough and the Democrats loose enough times they will finally catch on and attempt to realign themselves with their alienated voters. But if you vote for them they are going to keep putting up degenerates like Kerry over and over again. And they are going to assume you like his politics since you voted for him.

      Take a long view on this, not a short view. Your vote is the only thing that matters to your party. Don't give it to them if they don't give you something you want(like a candidate worth voting for).

      Of course, I don't think the majority of Dem's want Kerry to win anyway. He strikes me as a candidate set up to fail miserably, to allow for a Hillary run in '08, but that is just my opinion.

      -Comedian

    9. Re:DMCA by Keebler71 · · Score: 1
      I think you highlight one of the reasons that BOTH sides of the political specturm are labeled as 'extremists'. The fact that you refer to Gore as having 'right-of-center positions on many issues' just demonstrates that the far left in this country has no idea where the 'center' is. Similarly, the extreme right seems to think that anything short of teaching evolution (exclusively) in schools is left of center'. Yes, Gore may have been to the right of the politcal center of, say, SF... but 'right of center' of the US populace? Was this really what you meant or did you mean his views were to the right of the median of his (liberal) voting base? (that statement could actually be feasible). Which positions specifically were right of center?

      really not a trolling, just trying to better understand 'your perspective'.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  36. Nothing changes by Karem+Lore · · Score: 3, Funny
    Don't know about you, but this won't change a thing. I've had popups offering me BUSH for years...

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
  37. now i know who my neighbors vote for by jtcm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I had a knee-jerk reaction to browsing this database filled with no less than a dozen of my friends', families', and aquaintances' political affiliations with corresponding addresses. My inner-self cried "INVASION OF PRIVACY! ABORT! ABORT!"

    I then took a mental step back, collected my wits, and clicked the "Privacy" link. lo and behold:

    All the information presented on Fundrace.org is part of the public record and provided by the Federal Election Commission of the United States.

    Anyone who contributes "hard money" to political campaigns must provide personal information. This requirement limits the political influence of wealthy, anonymous individuals and allows the public to track financial contributions that may influence the political process.

    Upon further investigation it becomes apparent that this site is a Very Good Thing(tm). It is a bastion of democracy.

    Fundrace, I salute you.

    --
    @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
    1. Re:now i know who my neighbors vote for by superflippy · · Score: 1

      Upon further investigation it becomes apparent that this site is a Very Good Thing(tm). It is a bastion of democracy.

      I typed in my zip code to see which presidential candidates got the most contributions in my area. The list went something like, "Bush, Bush, Bush, Edwards, Clark, Bush, Edwards..." and so on. I wondered whether anyone at all had donated to Kerry's campaign. Because of the disclosure requirements, I discovered that the only people nearby who donated to the Kerry campaign were local Democratic politicians.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    2. Re:now i know who my neighbors vote for by WiggyWack · · Score: 1
      Anyone who contributes "hard money" to political campaigns must provide personal information. This requirement limits the political influence of wealthy, anonymous individuals and allows the public to track financial contributions that may influence the political process.

      Upon further investigation it becomes apparent that this site is a Very Good Thing(tm). It is a bastion of democracy.

      Because the privacy of the rich doesn't matter?

      --
      Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
    3. Re:now i know who my neighbors vote for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When donating money it doesn't. It's a matter of accountability. If donations were private, how can you tell whether or not Mr. CEO Moneybags really stayed under the legal limits on donations.

      Campaign finance is a very serious issue that requires the greatest amount of accountability possible, and there is no greater accountability than public accountability.

  38. Re:follow the money -- it's a good thing... by BadElf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's potential for mis-use, but talk about an eye-opener. How many average citizens would take the time to request this data from the FEC?

    A quick lookup of my street address was extremely insightful. I recognized many of the names from my years in the business community and guess what? Most of the Republican donors are owners and officers of companies who have been laying off workers (and outsourcing their work) with most contributing $2000 checks from every person in their household. The Dems, on the other hand, had more contributors, but they were much smaller contributions ($50 - $500) and mostly from small business owners and average Joe's -- many retirees.

    Now I can see for myself why the Bushies have over $100M at their disposal, while Kerry's only at $22M or so. Knowing where the money is coming from helps show where government will be going -- and if Bush wins, it will be going into Big Business's back pocket.

  39. Fundrace by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    Showed lots of contributions in my town, but not mine. So very cool, but not 100%.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Fundrace by markt4 · · Score: 1

      When and how much did you contribute? Fundrace's info is as of February 29, 2004 and campaign finance law only requires this information be collected for contributions of $200 or more.

    2. Re:Fundrace by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I gave $50 to Howard Dean's campaign late last year. I saw other contributions from my town in the $100 range, so I don't know one way or the other whether my meager sum should show up.

      Figures, though. First your vote doesn't count, now your bribe doesn't even count. Hmmph.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    3. Re:Fundrace by Ubernurd · · Score: 1

      Good artists copy; great artists steal.
      -- Me


      No.. not you. Pablo Picasso. A pretty funny (IMO) misquote of which is

      " Bed artists copy. Good artists steal. -Pablo Picasso"

      --
      Stack overflow: pid 352258, proc httpd, addr 0x11f7ffff0, pc 0x12000195c Segmentation fault (core dumped)
    4. Re:Fundrace by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      The good/great form of it is generally attributed to Steve Jobs. The "I said it" trick is something I ripped off from Elwood P Dowd. I didn't know about Picasso having said it originally, so thanks for that.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  40. Easy fix? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    If they have to pay per advertisement served or clicked... lets write a bit of perl and try to lighten their warchest a bit ;P

    1. Re:Easy fix? by upnarms · · Score: 1

      I spent some time looking for a comment like this.
      It's pay-per-click, folks! Let's make 'em pay!

  41. Safari! by haskins_sam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only do Opera, Firefox, and MyIE2 all block popups, but so to does the Apple web browser Safari! It is also the standard browser.

    1. Re:Safari! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what proportion of Mac users were likely to vote Bush in the first place?

    2. Re:Safari! by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      ...but so to does the Apple web browser Safari! It is also the standard browser.

      It is but pop-ups are not blocked by default.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  42. Our favorite neighbors... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, this is going to be very fun!.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  43. Gates doing evil stuff ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. A touch of irony... by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 3, Funny

    In an article about pop-ups, three sponsored links to pop-up blockers ... and a pop-up!

    Ho hum...

  45. Err by Seven001 · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, yesterday I saw a flash side-bar ad with Bush's face on it and asking "Should Bush be reelected". I don't think it was a campaign ad, but still, his picture was quite disturbing.

  46. Now I have two reasons not to contribute by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (1) As was said in The Hunt for Red October,"I'm a politician, which means I'm a cheat and a liar...when I'm not kissing babies I'm stealing their lollipops." I don't support any organized political party because politicans are representing their represented citizens less and the ideals of the party more.

    (2) If a contribution is going to reveal my HOME ADDRESS then you can fuggeddaboutit!

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  47. the political funding database is incomplete by thebeast25 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It doesn't list the Bin Laden family contributions???

    1. Re:the political funding database is incomplete by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a guess who they'd like to fund if they aren't already. I mean, if you were bin Laden, would you vote for someone trying to:

      Kill you?
      Erase your organization from the earth?
      Reward assassins $50 million for your death or capture?
      Rain fire down upon your comrades?
      Yell at you?

      (OK, so I ran out of ideas at the end.)

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  48. What's near your zip code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's Charles Cawley's address, the CEO of MBNA America (a credit card bank you might be making payments to). There's also his neighbors, most of which are CEOs or owners of their own companies. You can see if you search around the 19807 area code how high a % is red... Anyone have a really Democratic or really Republican zip code?

  49. How about let's cut out the political speech here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is at least the 4th story in 2 days; that has jabs at the Republican party or at George Bush. I understand that the majority of people here at /. are liberal or democrat, but this is NOT a political website - to polarize readers. It's starting to get on my nerves.

    Republicans and conservatives (on slashdot) are traeted like the Klan treated ... well ... I'll lket you fill in th rest. It's already bad enough that this will either get modded into troll oblivion or offtopic just because I said the words "republican, conservative" - I guess I'll get 100% troll/flamebait if I say I use Macs too!

    Trust me, if Bush does something, and enough people like it, the democrats will do it too!

    Let's dispense the truth - the real story here is "ALL politicians would like to see broadband so as to push political agenda on the nation faster and cheaper."

    A Republican website could read: "Slashdot subtlely brainwashes and force conforms its readers into being liberal ... majority of slashdotters have broadband, is there a link?"

  50. Why fight it... by jakoz · · Score: 1

    ...when you can get even?

    If you find a page that hosts these, go ahead and spend all day clicking on it

    ...after all... I assume theyre paying by the hit... ;)

  51. Vote Republican by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you want us to stop.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Vote Republican by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the target audience? Intelligent people are fed up with pop-ups and the rest already votes for Bush... :)

  52. Classic Star Trek Episode by adzoox · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of my favorite classic Star Trek episode. They visit a planet that has warring races. Captain Kirk brings a leader from each side onto the Enterprise to negotiate a peace treaty - they refuse to get along. Finally, Kirk says, "You know, I don't understand, you guys seem to really like each other and not have any differences at all... so what's wrong?" One leader says, "I thought you knew, it's so obvious, Kirk I am offended... is that question a joke? Can't you see, he's black on the left side of his face and I'm black on the right side of my face." When standing opposite each other you didn't notice, but side by side you could.

    Point is - debate politics but don't polarize your friends and ESPECIALLY try not brainwash or force your political agenda down people's throats. I'm wondering if my obviousness of conservative or Republican belief has anything to do with my story submissions being rejected or accepted.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  53. Be sure to click! by DaRobin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Certainly do not use popup blockers for this, on the contrary, bring them up, click, bring'em up again and click click until you're tired -- it'll cost them money for each click... I reckon we could even have a "Click The Bush" campaign in which good net citizens would click on those ads several times a day to help rid the world of this pestilence :)

    --
    Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives.
    1. Re:Be sure to click! by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1
      "Click The Bush"

      Oooh, porn popups to try and influence the presidential election by draining campaign contributions. Very funny. But really, do you expect that to put a dent in Bush's $1,000,000? And you don't want any swing voters trying to help out in this way and getting sucked in by Bush's evil lies.

    2. Re:Be sure to click! by DaRobin · · Score: 1

      Well how many hits are typically generated by a good /.ing, especially one that is slightly porny sounding? Multiply that by say 25 (for the number of times people do it) and then by n cents. It could represent a fair amount, especially as online advertising usually represents a small part of the marketing budget...

      --
      Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives.
  54. Seriously.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    you think either the Republicans or Democrats are that concerned about where the money comes from.

    Now that's optimistic! If you've got a prostitution ring in Thailand that specializes in the anal rape of baby monk seals, you just have to launder the money before you buy the politician.

    Randomly enough. They admit this is an experiment and they don't know what they're doing, but they've got, and I shit you not, so much money, that it makes it a perfect time to run the experiment. That's their actual, said it to the camera, position. It doesn't matter how much they piss people off, they've got enough extra money to fix it.

    But I'd check the outrage if I were a European. The Republicans couldn't by a better publicist than the EU. Remember, if you look like you hate America, anything that pisses you off looks like a good idea. If you want Ohio and it's electoral votes to go to the red team in November, keep it up.

  55. My thoughts. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    The republicans want to use popup campaign ads eh?

    *Cues up Mozilla*

    In the infomus words of your incumbent candidate, "Bring em on!"

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  56. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

    If you could give us an exact definition of "political speech" I'm sure someone could write a filter for you.

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  57. Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by mumblestheclown · · Score: 4, Interesting
    for those arguing for 'accountability' in political donations, consider this.

    Jane works in a law firm. Jane likes dennis kucinich. Jane's boss, a partner, likes GW Bush.

    Jane's boss can only contribute up to the maximum personal limit of $2000 or whatever it is. But, he can strongly suggest to jane and others that it might be in jane's career interest to do the same.

    now, the boss can check up on jane with this handy web site. of course, nobody has forced jane to do anything, but still, the boss can check up to see what kind of 'team player' she is.

    this is TRULY scary. do a search of your loal neighborhood and see how many lawyers' names come up.

    1. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by goldspider · · Score: 4, Informative
      'But, he can strongly suggest to jane and others that it might be in jane's career interest to do the same."

      Nope, 100% illegal. We have labor laws in place that prohibit such coersion. If "Jane" feels that "Jane's Boss" is pressuring her to vote/contribute a certain way, that's grounds for an open-and-shut lawsuit.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yes, but of course jane's boss is not so stupid to leave a paper trail. open and shut case if and only if there is clear evidence, which there will not be in such a case.

    3. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by goldspider · · Score: 3, Insightful
      IANAL but you don't need a paper trail to meet the burden of proof in a civil case.

      For example, other employees who given similar "career advice" could testify oh Jane's behalf.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    4. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 1

      this is TRULY scary. do a search of your loal neighborhood and see how many lawyers' names come up.

      I did notice a lot of lawyers names when I searched. Interestingly enough, however, when I did a search by my zip code no names came up for my town, or any town within 40 miles. At 50 miles a few names came up and at 75 miles hundreds of names came up. So much for finding out how much my "neighboors" donated...

      --
      I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
    5. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by CXI · · Score: 1

      do a search of your loal neighborhood and see how many lawyers' names come up.

      Yup, at they're all voting democratic around me, proving yet another lie coming from Kerry's mouth. You see, the "wealthy" are supposed to be in Bush's pocket and the democrats are for "the people", but I guess all these lawyers around here didn't get the memo.

    6. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that all sounds good, but if there's no more "Jane's Boss", there's no more "Jane's Job" either. Putting your employer in jail is a poor way to keep your job.

    7. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

      Uh... its always been a matter of public record on who donates to which campaigns. This is nothing new.

    8. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so. A friend of mine works for one of the big investment banks in New York. A lifelong Democrat, he was forced to attend a $1000-a-plate dinner for GW Bush last year. Maybe he should have thrown away his career in a he-said-she-said lawsuit against a major investment bank...? But back here in the real world, he swallowed his pride and went. blech.

    9. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by jea6 · · Score: 1

      And based on the example above, I can't think of a worse lawsuit target for a working stiff than a law firm.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    10. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he could contact the "liberal media."

      (media isnt liberal or conservative, its self gratifying)

    11. Re:Fundrace 2004 = VERY VERY SCARY by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Jane must be a dumbass lawyer then. She'd be suing her boss for all kinds of shit.

      Besides, do we want contributions to be secret?

  58. Oh but you can help determine who's president. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're hating on America, Americans instinctively want to shit on your birthday cake. But if you want to be our pal, we feel obligated to help you move, let you crash on our couch if your girl is PMSing, and generally do right by you. We're going through a tough time, and are many other countries and peoples. What you DON'T do is kick your friend when he's down, even if he can take it. Doing so makes one out to be an Ass-clown who practices Ass-hattery. Thus inviting people to shit on his birthday cake.

    So if you're sympathetic, but not combative, Americans will be more likely to view our overlord welcoming vassals as good people. And when the administration puts upon good people, the administration will be bad. Because then we're the ass-clowns. And that's bad, and must be rectified.

    You've only got to swing a couple of states to assure a new administration. Ohio would be a good start. Small wonder the administration saved up the oil for food corruption probe until just months before the election despite the abuse being well known for years. The french are going to take it up the ass, and guess which nationality Hussien's lead defense attorney is. I can't even imagine what would be more hated in America than a French Lawyer, OH YEAH, the one defending Hussein, and plans to trot out the Geneva conventions for a man who's soldiers summarily excecuted US soldiers. The french will just be lucky if president doesn't mention their country in the same breath as, "... the missles are on their way." And you know us Americans and our trails of the century.

    But can so many people give up their national pastime to act in their own interests? Haha, yeah that's a rhetorical question. Maybe you should just write letters of support for Condileeza Rice's decision to not testify under oath and in public.

  59. The only difference is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this Bush really will fuck you.

    1. Re:The only difference is... by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1

      what do you mean "WILL"? He's been doing it for the whole of his last term...

      --
      When all is said and done, nothing changes...
  60. pretty funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --punched in my x/y in the lobby/bribes lookup engine list and got a (non) surprise. All the top contributions look suspiciously like some company ordered every employee they have to contribute 2 grand apiece to... drumroll, please.... the reelection efforts of the current political lackey allegedly in charge! I mean, right down the page, so and so employed by xxx corporation.

    Yep, we need campaign bribery reform. Badly. And this obvious corporate control over the nation needs to cease and desist. It's gone from innocent capitalism to hijacking the politics. Greedism rules it appears.

  61. Just hope they don't do it in Switzerland, too... by DrYak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Alienating the Americans ? How about alienating the Swiss ?
    Each couple of month, in Switzerland we're supposed to vote about a dozen of laws, laws change and other subjects.
    Just imagine the desktop mess if swiss politician start to make pop-up like the american : not just two pop-ups for two candidate, but dozens of pop-ups about pro and cons for each subjet.
    Now THAT'S going to make a big wreckage on the desktop ! I think people will start to hate democracy... or make Mozilla the official nationnal browser for it's ad-blocking...

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  62. Google bar missing some popups by SpaceRook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've noticed the Googlebar has be allowing some popups through lately. I wonder what the new technique is. In my own experiments, I've found I could launch unwanted popups with an onMouseOver() method in the [body] tag. That tricked Mozilla and the Google bar.

    Will the political campaigns be that mischievous? Republicans might, because apparently they don't understand the internet. Democrats won't be so dumb. The primaries were an excellent crash course in internet fund raising, and they are way ahead of the game.

  63. Look out for the program installs. by InvaderSkooge · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you want to install and run "Diebold Electronic Voting Machines" signed on 01/24/2004 12:04 PM and distributed by:

    Diebold, Inc.

    Publisher authenticity verified by Karl Rove.

    Caution: William Diebold asserts that this content is safe. You should only install/view this content if you trust William Diebold to make that assertion.

    [] Always trust content from Diebold, Inc.

    [Yes] [No] [More Info]

    --
    Erik
    YOU ARE SAYING IMPUDENCE TO ME! THAT IS IMPUDENCE!
    1. Re:Look out for the program installs. by Excen · · Score: 1

      Do you want to install and run "Diebold Electronic Voting Machines

      You know, if I had control over the electronic voting booths, there sure as hell wouldn't be another 4 years of Bush.

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
  64. 1000 of european users sue Bush over Pop ups by jamiguet · · Score: 1

    I mean... We already have a problem with Bush and the war and american tourists over here.... so the last thing I want is to have a pop up on my computer saying vote Bush... I may sue them for kicking my monitor with a very blunt object if I see one...

    --

    Where is my mind?

  65. They are sponsoring pop-up for their *opponents*! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Funny
    they are going to use it to furthor alienate and annoy us with pop-ups?

    That's the point. They are sending pop-ups for their opponents, stupid!

  66. Some of the IT big players bids by monkeywork · · Score: 1

    Steve Wozniak
    CEO Wheels of Zeus
    Howard Dean & John Kerry
    $2,000 each

    William H. Gates
    CEO Microsoft Corp.
    George W. Bush
    $2,000

    SAMUEL J. PALMISANO
    CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT & C.E.O. I.B.M. CORPORATION
    George W. Bush
    $2,000

    Carleton S. Fiorina
    Chairman & C.E.O. Hewlett-Packard
    George W. Bush
    $2,000

    Brian L. Roberts
    President Comcast
    George W. Bush
    $2,000

    Craig R. Barrett
    C.E.O. Intel Corporation
    George W. Bush & Joe Lieberman
    $2,000 Each

    Meg Whitman
    President/C.E.O. E. Bay Inc.
    George W. Bush
    $2,000

    Seems to be alot of support towards Bush.

    --
    --------- If its possible it will happen, If its impossible it will just take longer
  67. Gates & Ballmer by Bigby · · Score: 1

    Surprise. Is one entity only allowed to contribute $2000? Gates, Ballmer, and George Sr. have each contributed $2000. Did MS's other 1000+ employees magically contribute $2000 too?

    1. Re:Gates & Ballmer by tybalt44 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Under campaign finance laws, any person or corporation can donate a maximum of $2000 to one candidate.

      How sad is it that I, in Canada, know this, yet all these Americans don't?

    2. Re:Gates & Ballmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you put your tin foil hat on before you post! They can read your thoughts! =^O

    3. Re:Gates & Ballmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, last I checked corporations cannot donate at all. Their PACs can donate though. Also, going back to the top post, if any of Microsoft's employees donated, it was by their own volition. Campaign finance laws forbid a corporation's PAC from soliciting donations from that corporation's employees. I think the only exception is that certain levels of management can be solicited. Any Microsoft employee who has donated to the Bush campaign has done so entirely of his own free will. Any evidence to the contrary is grounds for legal action.

    4. Re:Gates & Ballmer by tybalt44 · · Score: 1

      Ah, see, I didn't know about it after all. Thanks, AC.

  68. Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by goldspider · · Score: 1, Insightful
    When was the last time you saw a story here about Bush or Republicans that wasn't given a negative spin?

    I'm not saying that Bush or Republicans are perfect by any means, and that by and large most Slashdot readers (and posters) tend to lean left. But editors should at least try to maintain some semblance of objectivity in the headlines. Otherwise they risk becoming a partisan political action website, not "News for nerds."

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by 4of12 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      editors should at least try to maintain some semblance of objectivity in the headlines. Otherwise they risk becoming a partisan

      You mean like the objectivity of AM talk radio that floods the airwaves?

      I do like to see opposing viewpoints presented intelligently.

      For /. or for the right-wing talk radio shows, you notice that if intelligent expressions of opposing viewpoints get modded down or call-screened out, that the overall quality of the experience is diminished.

      It's pretty boring if all you hear is the "party line", no matter which party it happens to be.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    2. Re:Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by goldspider · · Score: 1
      AM talk radio shows rarely (if ever) claim objectivity. A website that calls itself "News" should be expected to adhere to some stardard of journalistic integrity.

      Perhaps Slashdot should change their slogan to "Commentary for Nerds..."

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, if you would take the time to actually listen to any of those AM talk shows you might actually see that there is quite a bit of independent thought going on.

      For instance, both Rush and Sean were vehimently against the Bush plans for the amnesty plan for illegals, also both were against Bush's prescription drug plan. The talk radio actually is not a bunch of yes-men on the air, they hold more true to conservative principals than our leaders.

      Also, the talk shows claim to be right/conservative oriented. Slashdot simpley is left oriented, but claims to be news for nerds. With michael behind the wheel it is less and less about nerds and more about michael's political agenda.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    4. Re:Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      "AM talk radio shows rarely (if ever) claim objectivity. A website that calls itself "News" should be expected to adhere to some stardard of journalistic integrity."

      Oh, you mean like Fox News?

      Puh-leeze.

    5. Re:Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by goldspider · · Score: 1
      Fox News is an AM talk radio show? That's news to me!

      Besides, I doubt you've ever even watched Fox News. And it's only natural that, after a decade of news entirely from the Left, anything representing both sides is going to appear Right in comparison.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    6. Re:Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      Grandparent post: "AM talk radio shows rarely (if ever) claim objectivity. A website that calls itself `News' should be expected to adhere to some stardard of journalistic integrity." (Emphasis mine.)

      Goldspider's allegedly snarky reply: "Fox News is an AM talk radio show? That's news to me!"

      No, you dumb fuck, Fox News purports themselves to be a news program, and according to the grandparent post, "should be expected to adhere to some standard of journalistic integrity."

      More Goldspider snark: "Besides, I doubt you've ever even watched Fox News."

      Actually, I have -- which is why I agree with those who state that they are biased, and certainly not "fair and balanced."

      More GS: "And it's only natural that, after a decade of news entirely from the Left,"

      ..and where is this leftist news coming from?

      "anything representing both sides is going to appear Right in comparison."

      Back to the right-wing AM radio talk shows: the only use they have for mentioning "the other side" is to denigrate it. However, all of their arguments are baseless, except if you consider that their ill-informed, blowhard points-of-view are, in fact, a base for reasoned discussion. Of course, they have no use for reasoned discussion, since they clearly do not care about facts.

    7. Re:Mod parent up, he speaks the truth! by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      >Back to the right-wing AM radio talk shows: the only use they have for mentioning "the other side" is to denigrate it. However, all of their arguments are baseless, except if you consider that their ill-informed, blowhard points-of-view are, in fact, a base for reasoned discussion. Of course, they have no use for reasoned discussion, since they clearly do not care about facts.

      Speaking of facts, do you have ANY to back these statements up at all? Don't you realize that conservatives feel THE EXACT SAME WAY about CNN, ABC, CBS and all of the mainstream news(except Fox) that you do about talk radio? Get down from your high horse and realize just because you believe something doesn't make it right. Rush, Sean, Michael Savage, et al use facts to back up their opinions frequently on their shows(which you would know if you listened to them).

      A common thing they do is read a news article, and then tell THEIR OPINION on it. And it is VERY clear to anyone over a gradeschool education where the facts end and the opinion begins. So you can listen to the news and then think about the articles yourself while you are listening and decide if you agree or not.

      Not like mainstream(excluding Fox which is slightly right of center) media where they slant articles to the left but never claim to have an agenda. I still remember a Katie Couric interview about 6 months after the US had taken Bahgdad when Katie's question to the interviewee was "So how bad are things in Iraq?" The don't make leading questions much worse than that...

      -Comedian

  69. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I absolutely agree with the above poster. The majority of Slashdot readers are overwhelmingly liberal. What good does it do to post inflamatory articles about Bush and the Republicans, just so that 85% of the Slashdot crowd can sit around and glad-hand each other?

    I'm sure that someone will respond saying that open debate is healthy. I am inclined to agree. But show me the open debate here. When people with a dissenting view are forced to post anonymously for fear of being moderated down, just for having a difference of opinion, that's not an open debate.

    And the last time I checked, this website was "Slashdot: News for Nerds." How is this an article about News for Nerds? This is nothing more than a vehicle for attacking President Bush, thinly veiled in some article about pop-ups.

    Mod parent up. Mod article down.

  70. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine you got a popup that had an image of Goatsx/TubGirl with the caption, "This is what you get if you vote for FooBar. Vote for FooBar now".

  71. Can I buy a banner ad? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    So if I wanted to make a banner ad for my candidate, do I
    first have to form my own PAC? And what about having it
    accepted by one of the sites that serve up the ads? Cost?

    As you can tell, I don't know much about whats involved in
    online advertising (never had to), but if its not too much
    $ would definitely consider doing something like this.

    1. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      If you are a PAC you can take any amount in contributions.

      But you cannot endorse a single candidate, instead you have to campain for a party or for issues.

      Or something like that. :)

    2. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      but what about as a private individual, ie Joe Voter has
      some spare cash from his lotto ticket and wants to run a
      full page ad supporting his candidate. Is this illegal?

    3. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I think it counts as supporting that candidate.

      After all, what if Mr. Joe^H^H^HBill Gates wanted to run a few billion dollars worth of ads for his candidate?

      I'm not sure on the rules, though. See the F.E.C for more info.

    4. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      See page 11 of this publication.

      It says that if your advertisements are truly independent, then you can spend as much as you want.

    5. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      great thank you man for finding that!

    6. Re:Can I buy a banner ad? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Use your power for good!

      No "Bob Goatse for President," please.

  72. Constitutional amendment by cprincipe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Next thing we'll see a constitutional amendment banning Firefox!

    --

    bun-fhuinneog agam!

    1. Re:Constitutional amendment by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

      Why go through the trouble of a Constitutional Amendment when you can pass a Federal Law declaring Open Source software as a "National Security Threat" and "possible tool for use by Terrorists."

      Juicy material for PATRIOT III? Stay tuned.

    2. Re:Constitutional amendment by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh.
      There is already an exception to the Do Not Call List for political ads. It's my phone yet I can't block these calls.

  73. Re:follow the money -- it's a good thing... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked! People that run businesses are donating to republicans, and old people are backing the dems.
    HOLY SHIT!

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  74. Dean supports Bush!! by zillyorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to this, it appears that Howard Dean has given up on the Democratic Party altogether and now supports George Bush for President.

    1. Re:Dean supports Bush!! by spood · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down. Dean has publicly pledged his support for Kerry. The Howard Dean referenced by that link is the president of a company called Dean Foods in Alaska! One would have to be pretty oblivious not to know that the Howard Dean that was running for president not only lives in Vermont, but is the governor!

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    2. Re:Dean supports Bush!! by spood · · Score: 1

      Oops, not Alaska, Illinois. I must have subconsciously pulled the AK off of the Oak in Oak Street. In any case, this is still not the correct Howard Dean.

      Only two Howard Deans made contributions, neither from Vermont.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
  75. It Gets Better by John+Blake · · Score: 1

    Oh Yes of course, Once they get "Everyone" Internet then they will be able to "control" the internet.

  76. Of Pop-ups and Privacy by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "Fundrace 2004 lets you enter any street address and see what people at or near that location have contributed to a presidential candidate, along with their addresses and occupations. The data is based on reports that campaigns regularly file with the Federal Election Commission. You can also look up a name and get the same information."

    Wait, wait, wait.... You're worried about political pop-ups (not exactly new news or specific to only Bush) but this isn't on your right to privacy radar warning buzzer?? Nice to know where our priorities lie...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  77. Re:Just hope they don't do it in Switzerland, too. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    But on the plus side, this may actually help spread laws and ideas. While I will almost certainly dispise the american politicians that do this, I will probably read the swiss stuff and think about it. Well, probably only for the first time.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  78. Punch the monkey by jmj_sd · · Score: 1

    Ads for Bush on the web ? Great !

    It's been a while since I've seen a "Punch the monkey" ad.

  79. Our Favorite Characters by Ridgelift · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gee, this Fundrace thing is fun...and kinda scary. Especially if you normally don't want people to know your home address. Here's some of the giving habits of our favorite cast of characters:

    Bill Gates - CEO Microsoft - Republican
    Steve Ballmer - President Microsoft - Republican
    Hilary Rosen - Consultant & President RIAA - Democrat
    Jack Valenti - President MPAA - Democrat
    Darl McBride - President SCO Group - Thankless Bastard

    1. Re:Our Favorite Characters by mzs · · Score: 1
      I have not checked those links but one thing got me just now. I looked for Michael Eisner and I do not think that I got the Michael Eisner from Disney that we hear about here all the time. The thing is that I remember a story about FundRace on either NPR or PRI (possibly MarketPlace) and I am almost certain that the story claimed that Disney's Michael Eisner contributed $2000 to the Kerry campaign. It now seems that the reporter just did a search for 90210 just to be cute and see what turned-up and did not check the facts too carefully about what was reported.

      Also, I did a neighbor search and "Mona Lisa" turned-up. I know the people who live at the address and they are an elderly retired couple. The husband started a company and his daughter now runs it. I did some more searches on the family and at least the daughter turned up, but with a bogus address. Both had maximum contributions. This seems fishy. Shouldn't real names and addresses be used? If this is wrong, how do you report things like this?

    2. Re:Our Favorite Characters by Illserve · · Score: 1

      It's not kinda scary, it's incredibly scary. When donating to someone in a neighborhood dominated by the opposition, you have to give serious thought to the possibility of getting a rock through your window.

      I'm all for disclosure of funding, but this information should be regulated in some way. Maybe only released in complete detail to specific organizations?

      It ain't pretty no matter what solution you lean towards.

    3. re: Our Favorite Characters by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh great! Do I vote with the RIAA/MPAA or with Microsoft, hmm... Thanks a lot for exposing our two party system for what it is.

      --
      I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
    4. Re:Our Favorite Characters by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Darl McBride - President SCO Group - Thankless Bastard

      Shouldn't that be Darl McBride - President SCO Group - Litigious Bastard?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    5. Re:Our Favorite Characters by incom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check this out. I can't beleive that somebody actually payed that much money for a lame prank.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  80. Neither by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would guess a lot of /. would-like me-consider themselves to be independents or like libertarians. I'm closest in political terms to being a "paleo-conservative",vote third party or independent or just use write-in, but in no way would I vote for anyone in the capital R party with just a few exceptions, rep ron paul and tancredo come to mind as decent guys. The D party is chock fulla scumbags as well, again, maybe a few exceptions. I wasn't reading slashdot during the clinton crime years, so can't comment on your charges of coverage, but IMO clinton should be doing hard time at club fed, accepting foreign bribes at a minimum, and lying to a grand jury, pretty serious felonies, and kennedy should be investigated for that death, as well as the "friends of bill list" of the clinton "coincidences" surrounding so many deaths.

    Slight change of subject

    This guy Clarke has been getting a lot of press lately about 9-11, surely a major political event since it occurred, along with being just a dastardly crime. Now, how about if there was even more evidence of government malfeasance and prior knowledge of the 9-11 event? Would that be good fodder for the political debate? Some stuff the mass media is mostly ignoring?

    Check out these two URL's:

    http://www.infowars.com/transcript_schippers.htm l

    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=2 50 08

    Too bad this guy isn't getting any press on the subject, maybe we could REALLY start to clean up politics in the US and break the stranglehold the D and R criminal cartels have on the process.

    zogger

    mods, sorry about the sliding off topic

  81. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would guess that there are those on this site that did not have bush their entire life.

  82. Internet revenues, and the fish vote by expro · · Score: 1

    It is good to see all that money I thought was being wasted in the campaigns being spent to prop up internet sites. I think Firefox needs a new feature where it downloads the ad, but does not display it, so that the ad money can still be paid out but the user is not annoyed. That way the web site doesn't have to think of ways to circumvent the blockers.

    The geographical maps of contributions: I assume they would look quite different if displayed by contributor instead of by dollar contributed. In any case, the fish in the great lakes seem to be going democratic -- must be all those buckyballs they have been consuming lately.

  83. Bush won't be happy blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any bets on how long it will be before popup blocking is a violation of the DMCA?

  84. Bill Gates by _iris · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates contributed $2,000 to Mr. 666.

  85. Slashdot editors don't need filtering just common by adzoox · · Score: 1
    ...sense.

    Micheal has been the main culprit - he should just "know better" - no filtering required.

    See the above post - it makes no sense to incite a one sided debate.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  86. Carl Vogel by _iris · · Score: 1

    You would think that the President of a huge Cable company would want to keep George Bush's FCC around.

  87. New Democrat slogan by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    Mozilla Firefox: Now More Than Ever!

  88. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by xeaxes · · Score: 1

    A Republican website could read: "Slashdot subtlely brainwashes and force conforms its readers into being liberal ... majority of slashdotters have broadband, is there a link?"



    Have you read OSNews.com lately? That site has turned into exactly of what you speak. They even practice heavy censorship.

    --

    "BEHOLD, CORN!!" - Dr. Weird, ATHF

  89. What a Political Strategy!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe it!! The politicians have actually found a way to NOT get my vote.

    --Auger

  90. Swiss law is open-source, kind-of... by DrYak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I will probably read the swiss stuff and think about it

    In a way swiss law are open source : at least the voting document always come with the exact text of the law you're going to vote for.
    Same can't be said about amercan politicians

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Swiss law is open-source, kind-of... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      They send the laws that you are voting on to you in the mail before hand. At least if you are a registered voter.

      They don't give you a copy when you vote that's true.

      How many people would read them anyways? Why don't we require there to be television shows that just state the actual text of the laws instead of having people talk about their opinions?

  91. Fine with me by mwood · · Score: 1

    What's a popup, again? It's been so long since I saw one that I don't remember what they look like.

    Honestly. Wouldn't they get more exposure for their money by printing their ad.s on the inside of automobile tires, or stitching them into pocketing, or some other equally (in)visible medium?

    Then again, most political parties could save huge wads of money by not buying any advertising until they have something significant to say.

  92. Fundrace 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how come when I go to Fundrace 2004 all I get is a message from Big Business saying "All your politicians are belong to us"?

  93. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by meadowsp · · Score: 1

    Why does being modded down frighten you?

  94. Re:follow the money -- it's a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, people running HUGE CORPORATIONS are donating to the Republicans and small business owners are donating to the Dems. You seem to show the same reading comprehension as the editors at Fox News.

  95. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by Deslock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is at least the 4th story in 2 days; that has jabs at the Republican party or at George Bush. I understand that the majority of people here at /. are liberal or democrat, but this is NOT a political website - to polarize readers. It's starting to get on my nerves.
    You're overreacting. This story simply links to articles that describe how the RNC plans to use pop-up advertising and tell of how anyone can easily look up who's contributed what. That second article applies to both parties, so I assume it's the pop-up portion of the story that bugs you. Frankly, I don't see how it takes jabs at Bush or republicans. If the the DNC had announced that they were going to use pop-ups, I expect /. would've posted about it as well (along with the standard "time to change your browser" remarks).
    Republicans and conservatives (on slashdot) are traeted like the Klan treated ... well ... I'll lket you fill in th rest.
    I don't think comparing something as trivial as political bias to the KKK is going to help your case. On the contrary, it makes you look like an overly sensitive partisan who can't keep things in perspective.
  96. Interesting: One Microsoft Way 98052 by handmedowns · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's funny..

    If you look at all the people who donated to Bush from Microsoft, its all VP's and high level management that get paid the big bucks and donated the max of $2000, but most the ones that contributed to other candidates are all lower paid blue-collar from programmers to trainers and could only donate $200-$500 dollars..

    What does that tell you about a "bush" economy.. other than those that are benefiting are the ones that are already able to retire..

    I'll be glad to see bush go.. not that I'm a Kerry supporter.. but I'm just tired of all the crap.

    SCO attacks IBM w/o proof.. Bush attacks Iraq w/o Proof... which one do you think will get away with it, without any consequences?


    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
    1. Re:Interesting: One Microsoft Way 98052 by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      When did programmers and trainers become BLUE COLLAR?

      Blue Collar is MANUAL labor. I may manually lift the C++ ISO standard but that's the bulk of my manual labor when it comes to programming.

  97. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh, another anonymous whine.

    So typical... I thought liberals were the whiners.

  98. Finally, a Pop-Up I'll click on... by milliyear · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and click-on, and click-on, and click-on, and click-on.

    I Promise to single-handedly make any web site feeding a Bush pop-up rich beyond their wildest dreams with click-thru revenue.

    Of course, I'll vote for Anybody But Bush.

    I'll waste his money and put him out of a job just like he wastes my money and keeps me out of a job.

    That's the only way we can stop political pop-ups: No Return On Investment. Let's give them some 'hard data' to show them it's not worth it!

    1. Re:Finally, a Pop-Up I'll click on... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Anybody but Bush?

      Really? Are you serious?

  99. limits? by drteknikal · · Score: 1

    I thought the personal contribution limit was $2000. I ran my address, and one of my neighbors made two $2000 contributions to GWB.

    Is this anything to worry about since the site runs on data that's already been publicly reported?

    --
    http://drteknikal.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:limits? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      $2000 per person. Is your neighbor married?

      His wife may very well come under his name by accident, as in Mr. & Mrs. James P Jones.

    2. Re:limits? by drteknikal · · Score: 1

      identical, down to title and job description.

      Christine M. Schabacker, 2515 N. Lincoln St.

      http://www.fundrace.org/neighbors.php?type=loc&a dd r=1736+n+quebec+st&zip=22207&search=Search+by+Loca tion

      Even better, she's a government counselor.

      --
      http://drteknikal.blogspot.com/
  100. Democrats Respond by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    I'll wager the Kerry Campaign will turn around with a "Punch-the-GWB" flash/banner ad.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  101. another good "follow the money" site by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    The Transparency-Project
    Has some neat tools to do a FOAF (friend of a frienc) or in this case six degrees of campaign contribution, and how certain politicians "relate" to others and certain interest groups. *shrug* it's a neat demonstration of the concept at least...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  102. IT PAC... by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

    Every other group has a PAC, why doesn't IT have one??? They would be able to lobby congress for the things that WE want and eventually weed out the best candidate for our needs...

    This is the only way you get things done in DC...the closest we have to a PAC might be the EFF, but that's not all they do...what we need is a group who's soul designation is to lobby for our needs and our wants.

    The only way to get the politicians to listen to us is to put our votes on the line...

    Ok, I'll get off of my soap box now...I just thought it might be a good time to mention it considering how much what they do will effect us...

  103. Fundraising Heaven by Natchswing · · Score: 1
    I currently am a member of an organization that survives off of donations. This is a absolute gold mine of data. Take, for example, the following mail merge:

    Dear %NAME%, Thank you for your generous donation of %AMOUNT% to the presidental campaign of %CANDIDATE%. I, like you, have a strong concern in the proper leadership of this great nation for the next four years.

    I have another issue that I think you might be interested in. %NONAME ORGANIZATION% is working hard to promote good wholesome %VALUE% in your community.

    A donation of $100 would be greatly appreciated. We will gladly list you as a GOLD donation member in our event book and keep you informed of upcoming events.

    %PREFERRED DEITY% bless %CANDIDATE% and %COUNTRY OF ORIGIN%!

  104. Re:Its all from MICHAEL; chief propaganda officer by dankdirk77 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The guy is used as a pupet. The Democrats feed him propaganda and he posts it here. I actively combat his propaganda by commenting on every article he posts. You can do the same... help expose michaels pinko roots and yellow journalism!!

    --


    SCO: 800-726-8649
    Verisign: 800-361-8319, 888-642-9675
    Diebold: 800-433-VOTE (8683)
  105. Democrats? by Xhad · · Score: 2

    If I had to peg a political party for the people here, it would be Libertarian...yes a lot of people here don't like bush, but look how much free-market rhetoric also gets tossed about here. ...not that it's fair to make statements like that. Generally you see +5s from either side of any argument, unless it's something just blatantly stupid like Bush using pop-up ads.

  106. Re:follow the money -- it's a good thing... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    I own a small business and I donate to Bush. Taxes are too high, and I want terrorists hunted down and shot to death, not treated like a "law enforcement problem" like Kerry wants.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  107. MIssing the point? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    Is he ( Bush ) or is he not promoting this?

    Is that not inflammatory?

    Why shouldnt he be handed his head? If it was a democrat, you ( as a group, perhaps not as an individual ) would be posting the inflammatory "gosh, there they go again" stuff.

    And just for the record, I am tired of the attempts to stigmatize anyone who has an opinion "on the left". Where is the "open debate" there? You know what I mean.

    Are the Republicans above bashing those with dissenting views? Are they for open debate? That has not been my experience.

    "How is this an article about News for Nerds". Well, it is about a political use of the internet. Seems to me that it applies in that /. has had an opinion about *any* use/abuse of popups/popunders along with any unsolicited messaging. Also seem to apply from the "your rights online" category.

    "This is nothing more than a vehicle for attacking President Bush...". See top of my post, but also, is he perfect? Seems to me that according to your wish for "open debate", this is very topical. It shows how public policy is being distorted to promote a particular agenda.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  108. repeatatron by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    And then someone uses the word "folks" to mean "enemies" and people realize that you're a Republican repeatatron. When al Qaeda bombs a capital, and that government hijacks the backlash to attack a preferred enemy instead, Spanish folks take back their government to ensure security. In November, American folks will do the same.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:repeatatron by Ktulu_03 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the terrorists are really going to stop bombing attacks because President Bush is out of office. yep. that makes sense.

      Wake up people. The terrorists are against western civilization, and they aren't going to stop just because we elect some peacenik president.

    2. Re:repeatatron by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Al Qaeda will be stopped more effectively when the President is focused on them, uninhibited by Saudi sponsors, and sensible enough not to kick the hornets nest for his hidden agenda. If you think that Kerry, a Silver Star winning Vietnam vet, is a "peacenik", then you understand war, and peace, as poorly as you understand terrorism. Ask a frontline veteran sometime about peace - that'll wake you up.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:repeatatron by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Appeasers feed the crocodile, hoping he will eat them last.

      --
      Winston Churchill

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    4. Re:repeatatron by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Republicans fed Saddam. Fed bin Laden. Feed Bush at your peril. Who exactly is being appeased, by whom?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:repeatatron by mi · · Score: 1
      that government hijacks the backlash to attack a preferred enemy instead

      Aznar did not do that. With what little was known then, ETA may well have been behind the attack. He promised a thorough investigation. Contrast that with Putin's reaction to explosions in Moscow subway: "We know, it is the Chechens," -- he said -- "There is nothing to investigate." He got 72% of the vote soon afterwards...

      Spanish folks take back their government to ensure security.

      The reaction of Spanish electorate to the carefully timed attack in Madrid has reminded the world, how dangerous the "government by referendum" is. Without the "checks and balances" of some sort, a democracy is just as prone to the irrational greed, stupidity, cowardice, and other human flaws as, say, a monarchy.

      The first well known example of this is Socrate's conviction in the democratic Athens...

      In November, American folks will do the same.

      I just hope, Al'Qaeda will not succeed in bombing US right before the elections, the way they succeeded in Madrid...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    6. Re:repeatatron by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Your unabashed hatred of democracy invalidates your attempts to compare naive Russians with sophisticated Spaniards in their exercise of their democratic rights. And stop calling Americans "folks" - we know you warmongers use it as a term of contempt. Like when BushCo manufactures another terrorist event, by refocusing on some other neocon agenda instead, and try whip the American electorate into a mad frenzy to attack "the folks whut did it". I can only hope Americans are as perceptive as the Spanish, rather than the Russians, although you apparently do not.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:repeatatron by mi · · Score: 1

      Wow! What energy! I can just see your saliva hitting your monitor...

      I don't "hate" democracy -- I merely suggested, it needs "the checks and balances," as, for example, the US model provided since US' very inception.

      And I never called Americans "folks" (not that there is anything wrong with it, IMO) -- your vision must be impaired -- pull whatever it is out and relax. "Mad as hell" has been out of fashion for well over a month now :-)

      And when you cool down a little (assuming it happens within a few days), please, describe a single terrorist event, that did not really happen, but was "manufactured by BushCo". Put up, or shut up?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    8. Re:repeatatron by mi · · Score: 1

      Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats (Clinton) fed Saddam nor bin Laden in order to appease them. Whatever their reasons were, appeasement was not one of them. So your counterargument is wrong and without merit.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    9. Re:repeatatron by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      As we find out for certain every time a Bush veteran finds their conscience in this Republican utopia, the WTC/Pentagon planebombings were manufactured by deprioritizing al Qaeda despite the utmost warnings from experts, inside and outside both the previous and current administrations. That's no accident - that's willful ignorance, to reap the sick harvest of the "Pearl Harbor event" desired in published blueprints from the Project for a New American Century. If that doesn't make you mad, I suppose it's explained by a corollary to "there's none so blind as those who will not see": there's none so numb as those who will not feel. I guess that's the only way to remain partisan in face of the mountain of evidence of BushCo evildoing, but you're serving a thankless master at the expense of your country, and your own personal safety.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:repeatatron by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Blame Canada for their leftwing conspiracy theories about PNAC blueprints for a "new Pearl Harbor".

      BTW, Lieberman's a "Democrat" just to the left of Zell(out) Miller. It is sad that the country has come to that.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:repeatatron by mi · · Score: 1

      WTC/Pentagon planebombing happened 9 months after Bush took office, after 8 years of Clinton's presidency. From what we already know about this attack, preparing it took much longer than 9 month.

      You accused "BushCo" of manufacturing the attacks. I asked for evidence, and this is all you can come up with? The "mountain of evidence" is in your mind only, once you try to convey it, it turns into a mole-hill. One can hardly get more partisan than you, that's for sure...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    12. Re:repeatatron by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I cited the PNAC blueprint. But I guessed right about your willful blindness - you'll never read it, or admit it steers our country, and our world, into the inferno.

      What a week for the power of the truth - your boys (and the occasional girl, like Rice) are sinking fast, with Clarke's book a mountain the size of the Titanic's iceberg. Any rebuttal to the man set by Rice and Bush as crisis manager when the planebombs finally hit? I am party to truth, justice, and the American Way of liberty - and a registered voter with party affiliation of "none of your business". You rightwingers goosestep to the BushCo rhumba, chanting "partisan" whenever your agenda is threatened, even by Republican insiders like Clarke, O'Neil, Lindsey, Whitman, and everyone else with a shred of dignity fleeing your sinking ship before it drowns us all.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  109. timing of posts on USA topics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do not post topics on the US elections on weekday early mornings, since snarky Europeans wake up earlier than us. Try later in the day when mostly Americans are at work, or on weekends, since it seems few Europeans work or post to slashdot on weekends.

  110. privacy by WiggyWack · · Score: 1
    "Fundrace 2004 lets you enter any street address and see what people at or near that location have contributed to a presidential candidate, along with their addresses and occupations.

    If this let you search your neighbor's RFID tags from Wal-Mart, the Slashdot crowd would be saying what a major privacy breach this is.

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  111. A Culture Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should tell these politicians that irritating pop ups are a dumb move. They're quite easy to block. Since I abandoned the aging IE for Chimera (now Camino) and then Safari, I've not been troubled by a single one of the pests. If only spam could be eliminated as easily.

    Sigh, this is yet another indication of the cultural divide between those who "get it" and understand computers and those who don't. The Democrats are as bad as these Republicans. Gore left me with a disgusting feeling that he thought I was too stupid to get a computer or get online without a "Federal Faciliator of Computers" benevolently looking over my shoulder.

    --Mike Perry, Seattle
    http://www.inklingbooks.com/

  112. This is a STUPID idea: EVERYONE hates Pop Up Ads by Salis · · Score: 1

    Yes, like I'd vote for a guy who keeps sending me something I hate.

    A better strategy would be to use pop ads to attack your opponents (leaving out your name completely). You get angry at the pop up ad and, of course, irrationally blame the guy who the pop up ad criticizes.

    By the McCain-Feingold (Feinstein?) Act, that would be illegal. But that never stopped spammers, did it?

    --
    Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
  113. trapped in the past by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Clinton retired undefeated in 2001. He's not running for anything in 2004.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  114. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GMontag? Is that you, you neocon Coulter ass-licking loonie?

  115. Democrats by WiggyWack · · Score: 1

    The Democrats are still waiting to see what their lastest focus group says about pop-ups before deciding how they feel about them.

    "I supported pop-ups right before I voted against them!" - John Kerry

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
    1. Re:Democrats by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      "The Democrats are still waiting to see what their lastest focus group says about pop-ups before deciding how they feel about them."

      You're an ass.

      Consider why congressmen are called "representatives." They represent their constituents! As such, they should always be mindful of what the people back home think is important, and a rep's votes ought to reflect their community.

      And if the representative's votes and actions run counter to the community's ideas, then (s)he's voted out at the next election. This, of course, is exactly what happened in Spain, where the overwhelming majority of the people were against the misadventures in Iraq, and they voted the bastard out.

      There's a reason it's called a Democracy.

      This is as opposed to, say, a coup or an installation, where the leaders aren't beholden to We The People, but rather the forces that installed them. In those instances, history has shown again and again that these leaders are interested in one thing only -- enriching themselves and their close circle, to the obvious detriment of the citizens.

    2. Re:Democrats by WiggyWack · · Score: 1
      Consider why congressmen are called "representatives." They represent their constituents!

      Yeah right. They represent their own ideals. Just like the legislative branch.

      This, of course, is exactly what happened in Spain, where the overwhelming majority of the people were against the misadventures in Iraq, and they voted the bastard out.

      What happened in Spain is terrorists swung an election.

      This is as opposed to, say, a coup or an installation, where the leaders aren't beholden to We The People, but rather the forces that installed them. In those instances, history has shown again and again that these leaders are interested in one thing only -- enriching themselves and their close circle, to the obvious detriment of the citizens.

      Yeah, good thing that doesn't happen in a democracy....

      --
      Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
    3. Re:Democrats by peachpuff · · Score: 1
      "The Democrats are still waiting to see what their lastest focus group says about pop-ups before deciding how they feel about them."

      Good.

      Someone in the RNC is going to be fired for doing this without asking regular people whether it's a good idea. (Answer: No.)

      --
      -- . . ramblin' . . .
  116. Re:Okay, folks -- get your pop-up blocking browser by Salis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    RFID signals broadcast from advertisements will be used in conjunction with the RFID tags now secretly being placed in your contact lenses to permit 24 hour total penis enlargement awareness.


    Funny. Very funny.

    --
    Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
  117. Re:Mod grandparent down, he's a candy-assed whiner by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 0, Troll
    When was the last time you saw a story here about Bush or Republicans that wasn't given a negative spin?

    You make the fatal assumption that the Republicans actually do things that can have a positive interpretation without lying about it. Spin is one thing - lying another...

    --
    That is all.
  118. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is the difference between a republican and a conservative or a liberal and democrat? The words conservative and liberal were invented to imply there is some philosophy besides vote pandering that guides the parties. Also why the hell do these words--conservative, liberal, left, right--imply a line of thought with magnetic poles at the end. What would a person be who was against abortion and the death penalty? Half liberal/half conservative?

    Propaganda and talking points.

  119. Uncle SPAM by bmcent1 · · Score: 1

    Personification of the United States government, 21st century style!

    --

    "Hey Albert, Good luck exploring the infinite abyss."

  120. Ok, chuckles. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

    "Its obvious that the Democrats can do no wrong on Slashdot. There has never once been posted anything that could be considered disparaging to the Democrats."

    "please find me *any* even remotely negative story about
    any of the Dem contenders or the previous administration on
    slashdot."

    Please tell me again how my reply is irrelivant to this thread and how I am the one stuck in the past?

    Hey, and maybe the reason the dem candidates haven't much negative press on /. is because they haven't gotten much press on /. at all.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  121. Fundrace.com already slashdotted by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    ...but you can read all about it here.

    According to the article Opensecrets.org provides a similar service...

    Anybody who says the Internet "hasn't changed politics" (re: ex-candidate Dean)...well, I'd point to this a solid real-life example that it has.

  122. unstick by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "That's back to only July 1999 and only on negative articles that mention Clinton."

    Your Clinton fetish is showing. He's not a candidate in 2004. Why don't you focus your angst on someone you can do something about, make your life better: dump Bush in November and get a competent government to clean up the mess we've got.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:unstick by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Methinks someone is trying to play both sides of the field on me.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    2. Re:unstick by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      naw, just playing STUPID. seriously. Of COURSE you're going to focus on him when talking about the democrats! He was the leader of the last majority democratic government! Are people so stupid they don't understand that? No, I think they just don't like being wrong so they change the subject.

      This would be like blaming the press for only covering Liberal Party scandals in canada. Why only liberal scandals? Why don't you go over the conservatives too? BIAS!!!

      Oh wait. The liberals are the ones running the government. See? Stuff like that.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  123. NO DIFF by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    It has become increasingly evident that there
    needs to be either (1) restrictions on the
    issuing of Viagra (et.al.) to politicians,
    or (2) a combined FDA/Nat. Academy of Science
    study on the impact of loss of blood flow
    on the mental facilities (and party agenda).
    (double entendre intended)

    Ques) At what point during Senator Dole's
    presidential campaign against Bill Clinton
    in 1992 did he effectively lose interest?
    Ans) When he got his 1st Viagra prescription
    (ed. note: Dole later became the USA poster
    child for "Viagra For Politicians")

    Ques) At what point did Alan Greenspan (Fed.
    Reserve) lose his financial acumen?
    Ans) When he married a babe 40 years his junior,
    and needed that Viagra prescription.

    A proper formal investigation may well determine
    that it is not in America's best interests for
    ANY politician to make new laws in any period
    less that 72 hours AFTER taking Viagra.

    1. Re:NO DIFF by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      A proper formal investigation may well determine that it is not in America's best interests for ANY politician to make new laws in any period less that 72 hours AFTER taking Viagra.
      I can just see the warning label...

      WARNING: As long as you are feeling drowsy or dizzy, do not drive, use machines, pass laws, or do anything else that could be dangerous if you are dizzy or are not alert.

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
  124. Re:follow the money -- it's a good thing... by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

    "A quick lookup of my street address was extremely insightful. I recognized many of the names from my years in the business community and guess what? Most of the Republican donors are owners and officers of companies who have been laying off workers (and outsourcing their work) with most contributing $2000 checks from every person in their household. The Dems, on the other hand, had more contributors, but they were much smaller contributions ($50 - $500) and mostly from small business owners and average Joe's -- many retirees."

    That may be true where you live, but according to the FatCats index on fundrace.org, Kerry has more wealthy contributors than Bush.

    I am not a statistician, so I wouldn't put too much faith in these results.

    --
    Sigs are for losers
  125. Politician Residency Requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what effect it could have on a politicians career when a Mass. Senator claims NY as his home. Edward M. Kennedy

  126. Diebold's Senior VP by josh3736 · · Score: 1

    huh, I was looking at the citysearch on fundrace, and... *drumroll* as it turns out, the Senior VP of Diebold lives 20 minutes from me. Fundrace Page Suprise, suprise, he gave $2,000 to Dubya.

  127. Re:Conspiracy? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    Hmm....so THAT's why the Bush people let MS off so easily, they wanted to keep people using IE...so, that people could not easily block their pop-up ads...

    Yeah...it all makes sense now...

    See, a good Slashdot article..conspiracy, bashing MS, and a shot at the Republicans...

    :-)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  128. Don't forget about the Google Toolbar.... by Business+King · · Score: 1

    The toolbar is a great addin into Internet Explorer. So far it has blocked 1284 ads for me! If you use IE, I would highly advise downloading it at:

    http://toolbar.google.com/.

    Happy Blocking!

  129. Click on the little X... by Shoten · · Score: 1

    Taylor, the RNC spokeswoman, said the party is simply trying to expand its reach. She's heard the knocks on pop-up ads but said they need not be an annoyance.

    "If people don't want to read it, they'll just click the little `x'" to close the ad, she said.


    If only we could click on a "little x" to close this presidential term as well...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  130. For pop ups of any kind. by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    The inventor of the pop up should be tied to a tree and fed exlax for a week. Anyone who uses them for advertising should be tied to a tree a fed exlax for a month.

    Just because it's there doesn't mean you have to use it.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  131. Unpaid interns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're the ones who read the mail.

  132. No, Dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was the courtesy reach around. He's saving the fucking for a second term. We're all going to look like the goatse.cx guy....

  133. Proof by example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations. You just proved the (great-grand)parent's point.

  134. Re:Okay, folks -- get your pop-up blocking browser by lotho+brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Forest Labor Camp? Nah, they're going to strip them bare with the "healthy forests act" We don't need no stinkin forests here!

  135. you CAN hit the X fast enough by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Aside from popup-blocking browsers, the thing to realize is that most often, they won't open 15 million popups, they'll open one or two for every one that you close.

    This is just the last time I checked, of course. Now I use firefox on Linux, so I have no real knowledge of viruses or popups -- I just don't get them.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  136. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Republicans and conservatives (on slashdot) are traeted like the Klan treated ...


    Hey Republican: If the hood fits, wear it!

  137. Is There A Point To This Posting.. by thelizman · · Score: 1

    ...I mean other than michael to push his wing-nut politics on people?

  138. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    Yup, I know the feeling. I got modded as "redundent" and "offtopic" today for posting almost the exact same thing (pointing out the blatant left-slant /. has been taking). This isn't the fucking drudge report, this is /. and if they keep using it to promote a political agenda, I'll be the first to boycott it.

  139. Re:How about let's cut out the political speech he by fm6 · · Score: 1
    I certainly agree that politics have gotten too polarized. But for a conservative to complain about it on a "liberal" website (which isn't quite my perception of Slashdot!) is pot and kettle territory. Watch or listen to opinion shows, read the editorial pages, browse political web sites, and catalog bumber stickers. Total these up. How many of these accuse everybody of opposing views of being stupid, ill-informed, malicious, treasonous, larcenous, greedy, or just plain gross? And of these, how many express right wing views and how many express left wing ones?

    You are right about one thing: Democrats do tend to copy the Republicans. And unfortunately hot-button deliberately offensive brainless rhetoric is at the top of their borrowings. But at least they haven't gotten quite as good at it yet.

  140. alternative by falsification · · Score: 1
    Does someone have an address for a Slashdot alternative that doesn't suck?

    TIA.

  141. Re:Just hope they don't do it in Switzerland, too. by k98sven · · Score: 1

    Hey! Some of us do try to follow the Swiss referendums.

    How did that one on the carrier-pigeons back in 1996 end?

    I kind of forgot to follow-up that one.

  142. Boradband access...in which direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you say "Telescreen"? I KNEW you could!

  143. click-through rate by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


    The question is whether Bush can win the elections if he gets similar follow-up votes on pop-ups that spammers do when peddling their wares.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  144. MOD DOWN - WRONG HOWARD DEAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry

  145. easy way to reliably block ALL pop-ups by Madwand · · Score: 1

    Turn off JavaScript support in your browser.

  146. Re:They are sponsoring pop-up for their *opponents by InvaderSkooge · · Score: 1
    --
    Erik
    YOU ARE SAYING IMPUDENCE TO ME! THAT IS IMPUDENCE!
  147. Surely... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    And I thought that most of Slashdotters used non-IE browsers like Mozilla and Opera that blocked pop-ups...

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  148. mozilla kicks by jasjonrac · · Score: 1

    its a DAMN good thing mozilla blocks pop-ups. I've heard enough republican bs advertising already.

  149. Vote Bush!!! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    I can't stand pop ups, pop unders, and other forms of invasive garbage. Also, why would Bush want to do this? I thought the patent on this kind of campaign technology was owned by Al Gore, who happens to have invented the Internet.

    Just kidding... I'm voting Bush in the next election.

  150. Um... by Groovy2 · · Score: 1

    wrong.. [opensecrets.org]

  151. Well.. by Groovy2 · · Score: 1

    Seems the 200+ number is slightly higher in R that D but once you pass 1000+ D starts winning out. [opensecrets.org]

    Among the biggest dollar contributions D rein supreme. [opensecrets.org]

    Wow, take a look at that top 100 donors - Dems kicking and collecting much booty; wonder what Kerry's problem is.

  152. Mr Pitek! Go waggoner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gary Pitek
    Retired
    Not employed
    Howard Dean
    $30 1028 Adams Ln
    Winters, CA 95694

    HAHAH my elemtary school teacher was a Dean supporter LOL. I would have guessed him as such, he used to make us fingerpaint like motherfuckers. I think he is still a teacher there, I dont know why he put 'not employed'. Good ol Mr. Pitek

  153. Take me to your lizard. by I+am+Jack's+username · · Score: 1
    > So don't kid yourself a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush and the last thing we (the people of the US) need is four more years of King George II. -- OMEGA Power (651936)

    Douglas Adams, writing in "So long, and thanks for all the fish", chapter 36:

    "It comes from a very ancient democracy, you see..."
    "You mean, it comes from a world of lizards?"
    "No", said Ford, who by this time was a little more rational and coherent than he had been, having finally had the coffee forced down him, "nothing so simple. Nothing anything like so straightforward. On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people."
    "Odd", said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy."
    "I did", said Ford. "It is."
    "So", said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't the people get rid of the lizards?"
    "It honestly doesn't occur to them", said Ford. "They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates to the government they want."
    "You mean they actually vote for the lizards?"
    "Oh yes", said Ford with a shrug, "of course".
    "But", said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?"
    "Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in. Got any gin?"
    "What?"
    "I said", said Ford, with an increasing air of urgency creeping into his voice, "have you got any gin?"
    "I'll look. Tell me about the lizards."
    Ford shrugged again.
    "Some people say that the lizards are the best thing that ever happened to them." he said. "They're completely wrong of course, completely and utterly wrong, but someone's got to say it."