Slashdot Mirror


1981 Personal Computer Catalog

edibobb writes "I just fired up my scanner and uploaded the 35-page 1981 (+/- 1 year) personal computer catalog from American Small Business Computers. 16K RAM for $22; 10 megabyte hard drive, 5 meg fixed and 5 removeable, with 14-inch platters; 25-character per second printer. Things have changed a bit since then!"

437 comments

  1. Made in USA? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I notice is that 20+ years ago alot more high tech development seemed to have been happening all over the USA, instead of being highly concentrated in just a few places as seems to be the case now. Printers from Florida? Word Processors from Oklahoma? I remember reading the the original MOS chips were manufactured in PA in the 1970s! If I bought a printer today and the box said that it was manufactured anywhere other than Taiwan or China, let alone Florida or Oklahoma, I'd be shocked!

    1. Re:Made in USA? by xs650 · · Score: 2, Funny

      As soon as they made some money, they left those places.

    2. Re:Made in USA? by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well part of that is due to the fact that you can lower your costs by moving your buisness nearer to your customers/supplyers, so it is good for everyone involved if they all move to centralized locations.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Made in USA? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Yeah cuz it would be a shame if cpu's were designed in the states and Israel, fabed in the states, Ireland and elsewhere [intel], Germany [AMD], states, Canada and elsewhere [IBM] and later assembled in various plays [yes, including the asian countries...] ...

      Such a shame...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Made in USA? by Sanksa+Wott · · Score: 1

      sort of offtopic, but...

      Has anyone looked at the entire site linked in the post? Friggin' amazing how much time this guy has spent (since '99) collecting information about, well, stuff. All types of stuff, but mostly geek-type stuff. I thought it was fascinating. Go Bob.

    5. Re:Made in USA? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think alot of people misunderstood my post. Probably my fault as I wasn't entirely clear.

      I don't think it's a shame that this has happened. I just think it's interesting. It's a throwback to a different era, when even little nowhere towns in the middle of Pennsylvania could fabricate chips, and tiny tech startups were happening in Florida and Oklahoma and everywhere. I really have no position whatsoever on whether or not it's better this way or that way, I just thought it was interesting.

    6. Re:Made in USA? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      OMG...I thought I'd never see another one of the POS Florida Data printers. When I first joined this company, 22 yrs ago as a computer technician, we had about twenty of them. Half of the damn things were always broke (mostly awaiting parts...print heads were constantly dying), and that was in spite of the fact that we had cannibalized parts from others in order to keep as many of them alive as possible.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re:Made in USA? by deadboy2000 · · Score: 1

      LOTS of things are still made in America! Check out the Travel Channel series "Made in America" for some great examples!

    8. Re:Made in USA? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      The difference is the technology. It was probably much cheaper to make 1 - 0.5 micron transistors than it is to make the 0.09 micron transistors used today [even if you ramp the value of the dollar back in time].

      As for other commodities like printers and monitors they are made in the US as well but for the most part economics plays a part in that. It's cheaper to pay slave wages in another country, slap a picture of a happy [white] user on the front and sell it in the US. :-)

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:Made in USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about the Goatse hello.jpg? Becasue it looks likes he could shit equipment.

  2. Blast from the Past by General+Sherman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't see what's so special, it's just like taking the tour inside NASA.

    --
    - Sherman
    1. Re:Blast from the Past by irokitt · · Score: 1

      My father works at a nuclear plant, and I got to tour the control room for a (deactivated) reactor that was built in the late 50s. Looks just like NASA, complete with blue-green pastel paint and old IBM mainframes.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Blast from the Past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, cause you know what the fuck you're talking about.

  3. the story as given in the synopsis by treat · · Score: 0, Interesting

    would imply that this is duplication and distribution of copyrighted material without the knowledge, consent, or license of the copyright holder.

    What does this imply about the intersection of copyright law and natural rights?

  4. Oh the hair and the suits. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those guys in those suits. Did we really dress like that? Fuck I'm old.....

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:Oh the hair and the suits. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it's any consolation, it's not so much their clothing as the dorky mustaches.. ^_^

    2. Re:Oh the hair and the suits. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      hehe. Midwestern used car salesmen still dress like that.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    3. Re:Oh the hair and the suits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget the suits, look at the haircuts and facial hair!

      And I thought it was just 80's pornstars that looked like that :)

    4. Re:Oh the hair and the suits. by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Gramps??? Is that you?

      --
      Sig it.
    5. Re:Oh the hair and the suits. by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      If it's any consolation, it's not so much their clothing as the dorky mustaches.. ^_^

      30 years from now they'll be talking about our "dorky goatees."

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    6. Re:Oh the hair and the suits. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      But, but, goatees are cool, man! ;)

  5. Blame the mouse... by quinkin · · Score: 1
    Blame the mouse...

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  6. spot the geek by ksheff · · Score: 3, Funny

    In this picture which one do you think is the compsci geek and which one is in league with the devil (aka the Marketing guy)?

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  7. MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 3, Troll

    If you click on any of the images from the site that he has mirrored, you get the goatse.cx photo. Parent poster is a retarded child.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by consolidatedbord · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's times like these that I wish I had modpoints. It's a shame that your post will be stuck at Troll. Oh well, it's only karma I guess.

      --
      while true ; do echo this is my sig; done
    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      sorry, but I don't see this on a single picture. are you sure you're not the troll here?

      looks like someone offered a mirror and when someone said it was goatsex, they didn't even check before modding you up and the poster down.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by inkfox · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sorry, but I don't see this. I loaded the page earlier and went through all the pictures again just now. I think you are karma trolling or trying to get back at the parent poster for something personal.

      Did anyone else bother to check before moderating this guy up?

      --
      Says the RIAA: When you EQ, you're stealing bass!
    4. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is definitely there. He's been turning it off and on, off until it's modded up, then on until a bunch of people complain, then he turns it back off to make the people who are complaining look stupid.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by adler187 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they don't trust someone named Darl McBride?

      or Maybe they just didn't want to check wether it really was a link to goatse.cx

    6. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check others' comments as well. The grandparent poster (that I originally responded to) is changing the linked-to photos to be either goatse.cx or the correct photos as needed to get moderator points. If you go there at the wrong time you will definitely get a nasty photo. People who do this are socially retarded.

    7. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by falsified · · Score: 0

      Okay, so...it's been determined (Go look on anti-slash.org) that Bryan Ischo was telling the truth. Someone mod him underrated a few times so he gets his rep back. (I know I'm off-topic but I figured it might help to get someone with decent karma on his side rather than anti-slash ACs.)

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    8. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are using a mirror tool that redirects to goatse and other similar sites, randomly.

      http://anti-slash.org/tools/mirror/

    9. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They offered a mirror, yes. A very special mirror.

      This one.

    10. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - DISGUSTING PHOTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't expect any positive moderation, but for crap's sake how is this a troll post?

  8. Remember Bill Gate's quote? by spangineer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, I'm quoting Bill Gates. It won't happen again. But it's relevant and interesting:

    "No one will need more than 637 kb of memory for a personal computer." (SaidWhat)
    (early 1970s)

    1. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must be the last guy on earth to believe he actually said that. He didn't.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by BTWR · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that proven a myth? I can't find the exact snopes link right now, but I'm fairly sure I read that it's untrue...

    3. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Yes, I'm quoting Bill Gates. It won't happen again. But it's relevant and interesting:

      At least it would be if A) we hadn't already read it a thousand times already, and B) it weren't apocrypal.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god you're making fun of Bill Gates. I almost made it through an entire set of comments without noticing this one. Then I'd be forced to look at yesterday's stories for typical and redundant MS/Gates bashing.

      Bless you, kind sir, for reminding me what this site is really about.

    5. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by spangineer · · Score: 1

      Oh well, I learn something new everyday. See? Reading /. really is educational.

    6. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I said something so stupid, I'd lie about it too.

    7. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Apple conference, 1981.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by pben · · Score: 1

      The quote I remember from Bill Gates is:

      As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you steal your software. Hardware must be paid for, but software is something to share. Who cares if the people who worked on it get paid?

      I would appreciate letters from any one who wants to pay up, or has a suggestion or comment. Just write to me at 1180 Alvarado SE, #114, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108. Nothing would please me more than being able to hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market with good software.


      Some things just don't change, Bill still can't get enough programmers to get his OS out on time.

    9. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by cometman · · Score: 1

      didn't everybody actually really not so much visualize him as saying it, as to relate his attitude to DOS's memory limits (you couldn't get beyond 640k without gyrated-mem, or mem-contort, or some such) this is probably something that's already been dealt with & may be like a Soviet Russia joke, if so I'm a Wanker http://www.bundyology.com/bpeg.html

    10. Re:Remember Bill Gate's quote? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats nothing. I was never quoted (since I'm not famous) but I once said around the same time that we would never needs modems faster than 300 baud. My reasoning? I cant read faster than 300 baud. When the 1200 baud modems came out, the text would scroll by so fast that I couldn't keep up. Obviously, I didnt forsee downloading graphics and music, let alone the web.

  9. 1981? Not Later? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I suspect that was actually from later than 1981.

    In 1980, I spent $269 for 16k RAM for my TRS-80.

    That was 4116s, too. I can't believe I spent nearly an order of magnitude too much, since I watched prices in 80-Micro and Byte like a hawk.

    My (ahem) memory could be failing, but I think this may have been more recent than 1981...

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
    1. Re:1981? Not Later? by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      Check out the MTBF on the printer:

      1 year at 75% duty cycle. That's AWFUL....unlike my modern Lexmark, which only cost me $40, I mean that thing lasted.....oh wait

      At least todays crappy printers don't weigh 44 freakin pounds..

      --
      Kiss my shiny metal ass
    2. Re:1981? Not Later? by korgull · · Score: 1

      no way, I didn't spend that much.
      I build my 16k RAM board myself and the 4116 didn't cost that much I think (at that time I didn't even have that sort of money, so it couldn't cost that much).
      btw: still having that thing plugged in until this very day and I'm still amazed that it works well after all these years.

    3. Re:1981? Not Later? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here's my re-creation of Commodore's Spring 1980 Products Catalog.

      That was before the PC, where the "big three" were Commodore, Apple and Radio Shack or Atari.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    4. Re:1981? Not Later? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Ditto, I spent $200 upgrading my Atari 400 from 8K to 16K... man the power!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:1981? Not Later? by CityZen · · Score: 1

      I agree. Around that time I (my father, actually) spent $100 to do the same upgrade (8 4116 chips) for an Apple II (not II+ or IIe). I believe the original Apple price for the 16K upgrade was $400. Third parties were initially selling the chips for $200. I held off until the $100 price point.

    6. Re:1981? Not Later? by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      And Heathkit.

      David Chance wrote lots of stuff for TRS-80, Apple and PET, and even a few books, seems like this was before 1980. I learned a lot from him.

      -cp-

    7. Re:1981? Not Later? by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      At least todays crappy printers don't weigh 44 freakin pounds..
      Speak for yourself. The thermal printer next to me weighs roughly 60 pounds and has a MTBF of 2 years at 50% duty cycle. It's probably 10 years old and has had one broken part since my employer bought it.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    8. Re:1981? Not Later? by LDorman · · Score: 1

      The third from end page has an advertisement for Moon Lander which was not released until 1982.

      --
      Bush makes our troops prey...
    9. Re:1981? Not Later? by thedillybar · · Score: 1

      Hey, I still have that 300 baud modem in my closet.

    10. Re:1981? Not Later? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would tend to believe it's a little later too. But not much.
      About 1983-4 I used a shiny new Corvus Constellation in a room filled with AppleII's. The Corvus stuff is only mentioning TRaSh 80's here so probably a bit before the AppleII interface came out. But even then the Constellation was still new and with that 10Mb drive it was uber-cool. The drive box is a dead ringer for the one I remember.

    11. Re:1981? Not Later? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      I bought the memory with the full earnings of a summer job doing mailing lists for a local boutique.

      Previously, I'd built a memory upgrade board with 2102s, which was a lot more work. I did a lot of wire-wrapping that year.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    12. Re:1981? Not Later? by midol · · Score: 1

      um, I think the chips were 1 bit wide so you'd need eight of them without parity

    13. Re:1981? Not Later? by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      The third from end page has an advertisement for Moon Lander which was not released until 1982.

      That might also show that vaporware existed in 1981, too.

  10. Too Pricey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not upgrading my memory until it drops to a buck per K, a few months from now.

    1. Re:Too Pricey by Atryn · · Score: 1
      I'm not upgrading my memory until it drops to a buck per K, a few months from now.
      That really made me laugh... Here's the bill for your new 160GB hard drive: $160,000,000.00
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
  11. Re:A link on swbell.net? Oh, that'll last. by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 0, Troll

    Parent is a troll, Page 27 is the infamous hello.jpg

  12. Here I sit by GlassUser · · Score: 3, Informative

    Watching it die. Didn't finish the index, so I decided to let it load one image. 33% and it seems to be decreasing exponentially.

    1. Re:Here I sit by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nice mailto, Ass In Gap. That's your Indian name from now on.

    2. Re:Here I sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up - comedy gold!

    3. Re:Here I sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Ol Ass In Gap is right--dead as a doornail.

    4. Re:Here I sit by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Holy shit

      That is the FUNNIEST fucking comment EVER. I have preserved a screenshot in case it ever changes at http://www.simple-sam.com/ass_in_gap.png

      I am so drunk..... (because I took off work tomorrow). WAIT! I'm not drunk enough to not qualify my statement.... and I made the link into a link.... so I'm... uh... not drunk?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:Here I sit by ambienceman · · Score: 0

      gl[ ]user is pretty funny too. g-loser. is that the new 50 Cent song and the G-Unit on chrome spinners?

    6. Re:Here I sit by ambienceman · · Score: 0

      omg use a mac. text is so uglyyyy

    7. Re:Here I sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's his Indian name. "Text So Ugly".

    8. Re:Here I sit by GlassUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh hell, that's absolutely amazing.

    9. Re:Here I sit by GlassUser · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have modified my sig for the first time in forever, to honor this.

    10. Re:Here I sit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm completely sober and I also declare that to be the wittiest jape of the season!

    11. Re:Here I sit by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      Screw your sig, with a quote like that you should be registering a new username!

      --
      Why is anything anything?
  13. Phone number by kavachameleon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The phone number given is now the phone number for Upperspace. They make CAD software.

    1. Re:Phone number by zjbs14 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Same company, different products. Back in the later 1980's they released Design CAD as a low-cost alternative to AutoCAD. My parents' company actually used to by Corvus stuff from these guys.

      If you've ever been to Pryor, OK, you'd be amazed that anything technical would have come from a town like that.

      --
      No sig, sorry.
    2. Re:Phone number by edibobb · · Score: 1

      Yep... essentially the same company evolved through about 4 names and various owners. The CAD business was recently sold to IMSI.

    3. Re:Phone number by Alethes · · Score: 1

      Considering the guy that posted this catalogue stuff is at bob@upperspace.com, that would make sense.

  14. Check out those hairdos and moustaches... by isny · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do you think? 1970s Pr0n stars or computer salesmen? You be the judge!

    1. Re:Check out those hairdos and moustaches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be both.

      Boot me baby boot me yess yesss yesssss! Gimme that hard drive, pump me full of your sweet sweet data! Oh 1 Oh Oh Oh 1 Oh Oh! Ram me! Yes yes! Put your floppy in my drive baby! Show me your hardware! Plug me into your interface....

      (yadda, yadda, yadda, you get the idea, repeat moan track here)

    2. Re:Check out those hairdos and moustaches... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! I have my hair cut like that and wear a brown suit!

    3. Re:Check out those hairdos and moustaches... by ragnar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The thing that really shocks me is the forthright and honest wording in the page. In the third paragraph they admit that sometimes they were in too far over their heads, but they are trying their best. Good luck finding any company stump material today that doesn't proclaim them to be the infallible Word of God concerning technology X.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    4. Re:Check out those hairdos and moustaches... by Graemee · · Score: 1

      Brown suits?

      Man, I'm beating they're baby blue suits.

    5. Re:Check out those hairdos and moustaches... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      What do you think? [xpda.com] 1970s Pr0n stars or computer salesmen? You be the judge!

      OMG, I think you're right. Look at the size of his hard di$k! That's got to be at least 12 inches!

      (Now let's see, where's the "post anonymously" box... oops!)

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  15. Not bad, not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Amazing, appearantly he can switch the goatse redirection on and off. It's currently off.

    1. Re:Not bad, not bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not switching it on and off, just rotating it to other places. A minute ago it was catalog34.jpg

  16. a blast from the present by ChipMonk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Things have changed a bit since then!

    Yeah, the Slashdot effect hadn't been invented yet.

    1. Re:a blast from the present by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 0

      Hey!

      The slashdot effect HAD been created - it took all 3 users to make it happen!

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:a blast from the present by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      Nah, I think they're just serving pages with a 1981 2k modem.... (Okay, I pulled the number out of my ear, but cut me some slack.) Or they could still be using morse code... 10 wpm anyone? :P

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    3. Re:a blast from the present by ThePuD · · Score: 0

      10 wpm anyone? :P
      i can pull about 30 on a little microswitch on my qrp rig i use to save weight while i'm backpacking. coming from a fully tweaked out bug at my home shack, i'm very proud of that.

    4. Re:a blast from the present by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The slashdot effect HAD been created - it took all 3 users to make it happen!

      They were so happy when it grew from one user to two so that they could have "First Post!" fights. And Goatse was still using ASCII art.

    5. Re:a blast from the present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goatse was still using ASCII art

      His first picture:

      ( O )

    6. Re:a blast from the present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh, that's so cute

    7. Re:a blast from the present by wayne606 · · Score: 1

      2K modem??? Try 300bps, complete with a telephone handset cradle... I had one of those connected to my trusty ADM3A back then.

  17. Oh, that'll last. by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Me thinks he is hosting his site on some of that very same hardware from the catalogs. The site is /.ed with only 5 comments, this might be some kind of record.
    BTW thanks for the mirror, quick thinking.

    I think I will start selling /. insurance

    1. Re:Oh, that'll last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The site is /.ed with only 5 comments

      No, it's not, actually. Peforming fairly well at the moment.

      Would the next person who plans to comment about a site being /.ed please suck on the business end of a shotgun... and also ask someone to check to see if it really is /.ed, and shoot you again for good measure if it's not?

    2. Re:Oh, that'll last. by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      I think that Akamai beat you to that service!

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
  18. Oh man by ryanr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really wanted one of those Corvus drives about that time. You could hook your Apple ][ up to them, several simultaneously, in fact. They functioned like a rudimentary network. If I coulda had a whole 10 *MB*... that would have been like having 70(!) simultaneous 143K floppy disks worth. The warez board I would have run....

    That remind me, I should pick up a few more drives, and finish off my home Terabyte...

    1. Re:Oh man by netringer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I really wanted one of those Corvus drives about that time. You could hook your Apple ][ up to them, several simultaneously, in fact. They functioned like a rudimentary network.
      AND as I recall as Local Area Networks began viable Corvus took that file sharing idea and became known as....guess who?


      .......Novell!

      Ethernet was WAY too expensive. At first we used 4mb/sec Arcnet. It had a maximum of 256 nodes and you had to set the address of each one by hand on DIP switches.

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    2. Re:Oh man by ryanr · · Score: 1

      Really? I didn't do any Novell until about 2.0A, I didn't realize that's what happened to Corvus. Cool.

    3. Re:Oh man by rasper99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Arcnet was a whopping 2.5mbits not 4mbits. I worked on some in the early 90's.

      A quick google search for:
      arcnet glossary

      Arcnet

    4. Re:Oh man by netringer · · Score: 1
      Arcnet was a whopping 2.5mbits not 4mbits.
      Right. I remembered and went to correct that when you beat me to it.

      I was thinking it was a token passing protocol like Token Ring which IS 4 mb/sec.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    5. Re:Oh man by zjbs14 · · Score: 1
      AND as I recall as Local Area Networks began viable Corvus took that file sharing idea and became known as....guess who? .......Novell!

      Nope. Corvus (Omninet) and Novell (Netware) competed for a while in the 80's, but Corvus went out of business at some point before 1990.

      --
      No sig, sorry.
    6. Re:Oh man by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      Standard Arcnet ran at 2.5Mb. Arcnet Plus, which is rarer then hens teeth outside of some industrial applications, runs at 20Mb.

    7. Re:Oh man by g00z · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats nothing, check out the Corvus ad on page 23 --

      "This corresponds to a conservative baud rate of 1.1 megabaud...."

      Megabaud? WTF? Is that some arbitrary unit of measurement that they invented to sound like this was wicked fast?

      In it's defense, 100 megabytes of removable storange in 1981 was like 2 terrabytes of storage today.. so that was pretty cool.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    8. Re:Oh man by Kardamon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Baud: Pronounced bawd, the number of signaling elements that occur each second. The term is named after J.M.E. Baudot, the inventor of the Baudot telegraph code.
      At slow speeds, only one bit of information (signaling element) is encoded in each electrical change. The baud, therefore, indicates the number of bits per second that are transmitted. For example, 300 baud means that 300 bits are transmitted each second (abbreviated 300 bps ). Assuming asynchronous communication, which requires 10 bits per character, this translates to 30 characters per second (cps). For slow rates (below 1,200 baud), you can divide the baud by 10 to see how many characters per second are sent.
      At higher speeds, it is possible to encode more than one bit in each electrical change. 4,800 baud may allow 9,600 bits to be sent each second. At high data transfer speeds, therefore, data transmission rates are usually expressed in bits per second (bps) rather than baud. For example, a 9,600 bps modem may operate at only 2,400 baud. (Definition from webopedia)

      --
      -- Qu'est-ce que la propriété intellectuelle? It is thought control.
    9. Re:Oh man by iamacat · · Score: 1

      And to think about how slow are todays dialup modems, cellular networks and even Cable/DSL. 2.5mbps. Yum!

    10. Re:Oh man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard Arcnet ran at 2.5Mb. Arcnet Plus, which is rarer then hens teeth outside of some industrial applications, runs at 20Mb.

      Mmm. I think the OP is getting Arcnet confused with IBM Token Ring - we had some TR cards as late as '95, and they were a bitch to install and configure. ISA, DIP switches, yum..

    11. Re:Oh man by bjb · · Score: 1

      I remember a product for The Sider hard drive that allowed you to multiplex it with 4 other Apple ][ computers. Cost a few hundred bucks (not to mention the interface cards), but wow that would have been sweet for my BBS back in the 80's :-)

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    12. Re:Oh man by vasqzr · · Score: 1


      In 1981, an Apple 5MB HD was $3,000! $600 bucks a meg!

      Today on TigerDirects web site you can get a a 200GB drive for $99 (with rebate). 50 cents a gig!

      Today for $5,999 you can get 1TB of disk storage (Apple XServe). Adjusting for inflation I'd assume that's pretty similar to $3,000 back 23 years ago.

    13. Re:Oh man by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Baud == 'symbols' per second; one symbol {meaning in this case a recognisable state} often, but not necessarily, corresponds to one bit. The Plain Old Telephone System samples to an accuracy of 7 bits, 8000 times a second; giving a theoretical absolute maximum of 128 symbols at 8000 baud, or 56000 bits per second. This is topped up with parity bits to 64000 bits per second, and sent down a B-channel. 30 B-channels, plus 2 composite channels consisting of all the associated D-channels together, are combined using Time Domain Multiplexing into a single E1 line (2048000 bits per second; 4 bits are sent down the line using 3 three-state symbols, giving 1536000 baud. Some of the 16 possible 4-bit words are represented by more than one of the 27 3-trit words, the idea being to ensure that more than three "-1" or "+1" symbols are never transmitted in a row and equal numbers of "-1" and "+1" symbols are transmitted overall. This allows the signal to be capacitively coupled. For example, 1111b can be sent as ---t or +++t, and the transmitter will choose which form based on recently transmitted data) ..... but we're digressing here. The point is that if you try sending more that 8000 symbols down a phone line in one second, some will be missed; if you try sending two symbols with less than 1/128 of full signal strength difference between them, it will not be enough to register as different levels.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  19. Wow by krray · · Score: 2, Funny

    You did all that ... and then posted it on /. ?

    I will say ... you have a bigger set (or more bandwidth) than me!

  20. Definition of server masochism (n): by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny

    A desire to cause pain to one's server, primarily though the Slashdot linking of an article that consists of nothing but large .jpg images. This condition should be treated immediately with extensive psychiatric care (the glowing and smoking remains of the server can be hosed down once the heat dies down enough to allow approach).

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Definition of server masochism (n): by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointless troll: Notice how nobody except this troll responded to your post, maybe your idea isn't so great

    2. Re:Definition of server masochism (n): by edibobb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've already been harassed by our network guy.

    3. Re:Definition of server masochism (n): by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      No, masochism is when YOU enjoy pain. It's called sadism when you enjoy inflicting pain upon others.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    4. Re:Definition of server masochism (n): by drcagn · · Score: 1

      A man and his server are one.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
  21. Mirror... by Copperhead · · Score: 5, Informative
    I mirrored the site here since his site doesn't seem to be weathering the storm. If you see broken images, it's because I'm still wgetting it.

    I'll take it down if he wants me to, of course, but I thought it would help.

    --
    Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    1. Re:Mirror... by edibobb · · Score: 1

      You're welcome to mirror anything on there -- thanks for the help! (That anonymous post is a fake.)

    2. Re:Mirror... by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the effort, Copperhead!

      Though it looks like there's about six images that got truncated.

    3. Re:Mirror... by Copperhead · · Score: 1

      Thanks! They should be fixed, now...

      --
      Your reality is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. - Baron Munchausen
    4. Re:Mirror... by d3jp_ · · Score: 1

      And, mirrored one more time, just in case...

      http://myweb.dal.ca/jwpearce/asbc/

    5. Re:Mirror... by stefanb · · Score: 1

      And another mirror, for your enjoyment...

    6. Re:Mirror... by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1
  22. marketing by shams42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To me, what is even more striking than the change in computer technology is the change in marketing! Everytime I see an early 80s advertisement, I just want to laugh at the naivete. Is this presentism, or have modern ads really become that much more compelling?

    1. Re:marketing by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Everytime I see an early 80s advertisement, I just want to laugh at the naivete. Is this presentism, or have modern ads really become that much more compelling?

      I think modern adverts are much more serious; Back in the 80's everything was much more laid back and relaxed. I've got a collection of old Byte magazines from this time; For those adverts in color, the advertisers usually took the companies name literally (Eg. Smoke Signal Systems would have a company meeting with everyone looking as if they were having an 1850's fancy dress party). If that didn't work, then a beautiful woman in cocktail party dress was an alternative. Alternatively, using D&D characters (wizards, trolls) wouldn't be too bad either.

      A good retro web page is TheOldComputer.Com

    2. Re:marketing by Quill_28 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or who they are marketing to.

      I am guessing you were marketing to a more informed crowd.

    3. Re:marketing by allrong · · Score: 1

      Modern computing adverts compelling? Maybe the rendered graphics for gaming equipment, but not ads in general. Maybe it's just me choking with cynicism at Microsoft home user and HP ads (HP innovation? Now?), but MS .Net and IBM ads are simply lame. The only people that they could possibly compel is a PHB with no brain (okay, so there a quite a few of them around). They don't even bother to translate them from American here in Aus.

      The only thing they compell me to do is throw up.

      --
      What is the inverse of the Matrix?
    4. Re:marketing by TwinkieStix · · Score: 1

      Just read the second page on the site. It's an "about the company" article that says, "There have been times when demand was better than supply, and service has fallen behind".
      First, marketing 101, you never talk about your faults unless you are trying to refute some sort of negative assertion or claim. Second, the phrasing of the sentance indicates that they still have a customer service problem. They should have used "had" not "have" or "has".

      How about this one? "If you want a simple, no-frills printer; if you don't want to buy features you'll never use; if you want... we're afraid there's only one logical choice." I'm pretty sure that they could have said that better. I mean, you don't talk about what the product CAN'T do, you talk about what it CAN do and how much more value you get for the things you DO want to do.

    5. Re:marketing by Propagandhi · · Score: 1

      Back in the 80's everything was much more laid back and relaxed.

      By laid back and relaxed you mean coked out of their minds, right?

      Seriously, two white guy 'fro's with mustache in one andvertisement! Don't even try and argue coke wasn't involved..

    6. Re:marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80s computer ads seemed to feature a lot of really bad cartoons.

      Just have a drawing of a bignosed business man astounded at a chart shooting past 100%. Instant software ad.

    7. Re:marketing by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      sorry but the WANG ad from the mid 80's was the best ever... even today computer ad's suck compared to it...

      a man and woman lying on the couch as she start to remove his shirt she says... "I want to see your WANG" the text... Wang computers..... on screen..

      too bad it was banned right away. although I remember seeing the print ad's in byte and catching the ad once on TV.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Smoke Signal Broadcasting. Some of the hand-drawn cartoons were amusing though.

  23. Re:1981? Not Later? (geezing!) by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    n 1980, I spent $269 for 16k RAM for my TRS-80.

    Ugh, that's way worse than me first populating my Apple II 1mb RAM card at about $100 per 128k with those silly bank of 8 chips. I was forever bending those little feet. I almost got a woody when Macs with SIMMS came along. :)

  24. Things were a lot different then.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No threat of some lawsuit company charging you $699 for innocently using a nifty free OS.

    Virus checker? Who needs it.

    No DRM either

  25. Coincidentally... by griffitts · · Score: 2, Funny

    The gear shown in this catalog is the only equipment that current Corel products will run flawlessly on.

  26. ah, the trs-80 color computer by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    i had one of these, with 4K of memory... i remember programming john carmack's game of life in assembly language on that one, the 6509 instruction set... geez...

    trs-80 color computer

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ah, the trs-80 color computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Er...that would be John Conway's Game of Life. Less fragging.

    2. Re:ah, the trs-80 color computer by richkh · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt! Not quite - you mean the 6809. 6509 sounds like a bastard stepchild of that and the 6502.

    3. Re:ah, the trs-80 color computer by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

      [...] i remember programming john carmack's game of life...

      Not John Carmack, but John Horton Conway, a renowned British amateur mathematician. He developed the "Game of Life" in 1970; it's still the best-known example of a cellular automaton. Its first appearance was in Martin Gardner's "Mathematical Games" column in the October 1970 issue of Scientific American.

      Congratulations for having the testicular fortitude to program that in assembler. I did it in BASIC and it was a hair-puller.

    4. Re:ah, the trs-80 color computer by Jerf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eh? With modern computers, I can attain a frag rate of millions per second with Conway's Life running at full tilt. You must play a mean game of Quake.

  27. Joke I played by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I found an old Fry's Electronics San Jose Mercury News ad section in a box of old papers at my father-in-law's house once a couple of moths ago. As a joke I replaced the ad in that day's newspaper with it. It was funny seeing his reaction later that evening when he browsed to the Fry's section to check out the day's deals as he normally does. It took a little while before he realized what was going on. Fry's ads from 1989 look almost identical to those of today, but the 386's listed for $2500 and dot matrix printers for $500 eventually tipped him off to the joke.

    It's a stupid story, but I thought it was funny.

    1. Re:Joke I played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of moths ago? Is that some kind of esoteric measure of time? How long do moths live, or are you eating them?

    2. Re:Joke I played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nerd's Bunch.

    3. Re:Joke I played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, a three digit Slashdot ID. You must be old

    4. Re:Joke I played by TVmelissa · · Score: 1
      Fry's ads from 1989 look almost identical to those of today, but the 386's listed for $2500...

      I can always remember, in the 1989 Radio Shack catalog, the top of the line machine was a 386SX-16 with 1MB of RAM, dual floppies (1 5-1/4" & 1 3-1/2"), no hard drive, a VGA card, and a monochrome monitor, all for the low, low price of CDN$9,999.99. Our dollar was stronger back then, too, so that was probably something like US$8-9 grand.
  28. Credit Cards by Traxton1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Holy crap, people actually paid more to use credit cards back then? People don't even carry cash anymore. I wonder how freaked out people would be now-a-days if I told them I was adding 3% to their purchase.

    1. Re:Credit Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that the contracts for most of the credit card things now, the merchant has to deal with it and can't chrage the consumer extra for using a credit card. Although this might just be something I heard somewhere and can't source.

    2. Re:Credit Cards by Quill_28 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      hmmmm... I have actually shredded my credit cards and have one debit card used for gas and internet purchases.

      Cash makes the perfect budget, can spend what you don't have.

      Just remember I think it is Sears that makes more money on financing than they do selling stuff. My understanding is that this is becoming the norm.

      Yes, I know my post if offtopic.

    3. Re:Credit Cards by jfdawes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try asking for the 3% back if you pay by cash. I once bought something for around $900 and insisted that if they didn't give me the 3% back I'd use American Express (6.4% at the time from memory)

    4. Re:Credit Cards by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Australia, the banks are over charging for their merchant accounts so much that we are all having to pay 3% or so on our credit card purchases. In fact our National Carrier Telsra just announced it for landline phone services...

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    5. Re:Credit Cards by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Clearly you've never been to a Marketpro computer show. When I went, most vendors listed their prices for cash sales only. Credit card users like me pay a 3% premium. Most respectable businesses absorb the merchant fees, but some of the bargain-basement shops pass them directly on to the consumer.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:Credit Cards by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Up until recently Memory Express in Calgary charged an extra 3% on Credit Card purchases, no one seemed to mind.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    7. Re:Credit Cards by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, people actually paid more to use credit cards back then?

      Get a clue, you still do. Or more precisely, most stores will raise the price on everything to cover the credit card company fees. That 3% is still there.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:Credit Cards by loserMcloser · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all computer stores (except the big chain stores) here in Toronto charge 3% extra for credit card transactions. The competition is too stiff to go adding in a 3% blanket mark-up to everything just to cover credit transactions, so they only charge it for people who insist on using credit.

      Nobody cares because everyone has a debit card, and the 3% premium doesn't apply to debit -- the banks charge the card user, not the merchant for debit transactions...

    9. Re:Credit Cards by Trejus · · Score: 1
      one debit card used for gas and internet purchases

      Gah! Debit cards are the devil! It's the bad part of credit cards with all the insecurities of cash.

      Just think about it, when you use a credit card, you aren't spending your own money. Which means that when some internet company or restuarant or whatever double bills you, it's the banks money that got spent. The same goes when someone jacks your number. But on your debit card, that money is gone from your account, and you have much less recourse for getting that money back. Granted things are better now than a few years ago, with provisional credit and all, but it could steal lead to bounced checks and other nasties. With a credit card, pretty much all you have to do is call the issuing company, file a complaint and fax any relevant recpiepts. Much easier, and your bank account doesn't even get touched.

      If you really have that hard of a time managing money, just write debit on some masking tape and stick it on your card. Then treat it like one. That way, you are protected from fraud and theft, but safe from finance charges, since you won't spend more than you have.

      --
      "To save the planet, I had to go to the worst spot on Earth, and that was Philadelphia." -- Sun Ra
    10. Re:Credit Cards by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      This still happens. Thats how credit card companies make money. As an example, at univ of texas austin if you want to pay tuition by credit card theres an additional 1.5% (i think) charge.

      It wasnt all that long ago that many places on narrow profit margins (like fast food) wouldnt even accept credit cards because of this. These days they're so ubiquitous everyone just raises prices to cover it.

      --

      -

    11. Re:Credit Cards by thogard · · Score: 1

      Be kind on the guy, he either has no self control or has fallen for his banks advertising.

      I know I prefer to have a banks money at risk over my own but the rise in debit cards means many people prefer to manage that risk themselves. It must be good to be the bank :-)

    12. Re:Credit Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Sears sold off their CC services. Outside of tools this was their only profit center - everything else loses money. Watch for Sears to do a Monkey Wards in 3-5 years.
      Just like *BSD

    13. Re:Credit Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The credit car vendors are responsible for the change. It is not against most of their terms of service to add a credit card surcharage or equivalently a cash discount. So this just means everybody pays the 3% extra; if they pay with cash the merchant gets to keep the 3%.

  29. THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Things have changed a bit since then!

    SOME OF US DO NOT HAVE THE FANCY MONEY TO SPEND ON 300 BAUD MODEMS AND EGA SCREENS AND HAVE TO MAKE DO WITH WHAT WE HAVE GOT. I RECENTLY SAVED UP TEN BUCKS TO BUY A 32K EXPANSION PACK FOR MY COMMODORE PET. IT IS NOT PRETTY BUT IT WORKS.

    BEFORE YOU ASK HOW I AM ON THE ARPANET, I AM ACCESSING VIA PACKET RADIO SERVICE. MY NEAREST REPEATER IS 25 MILES AWAY AND THEN THE NEXT REPEATER ON HAS A FOURTEEN POINT FOUR KILOBIT MODEM CONNECTION TO THE ARPANET. I WAS SENT THIS MAIL BY A FRIEND OF A FRIEND WHO HAS WINDOWS AND HAVE READ IT AND AM WRITING THIS REPLY ON MY COMMODORE PET USING KA9Q AND PINE.

    BEST REGARDS AND 73S
    PETER COOPER
    STATION WS47X

    1. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Junis?

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems that the Caps Lock key is broken on newer computers.

    3. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Kufat · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I saw this many caps in one place, I thought I was going to be seeing a request for my assistance in helping money leave a small country.

    4. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Fake! The post mentions a friend emailing from Windows, but this was the era of 300 baud modems and EGA screens.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    5. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      You would have been much more convincing if you had kept your column width to 40...

    6. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Didn't say which version, though. Windows 2.0 supported EGA. :)

    7. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      The era we're talking about is roughly 1985 (300bps, EGA are considered 1337). Was Windows 2.0 even around then? Windows 1.0? Frankly I can't remember. The Mac had just barely arrived on the scene, and since Windows "copied" that, I don't think it was.

      But so what? Even my brand new FreeBSD 5.2.1 supports EGA :-)

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      I think Windows 1.0 came out in 1986 or so. I got to play around with it on my dad's work computer. I was only about 8 years old, so I don't remember too much; but I think it probably blew chunks. It's a safe bet, anyway. :-)

    9. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have original disks of Windows 1.03 here (in a frame on the wall, actually). The copyright notice says 1987.

    10. Re:THINGS HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL. by denzo · · Score: 1

      The callsign (WS47X) is also fake. Dead give-away is the fact that it has two numbers in it. Amateur calls only have one number.

  30. The hair in the pic.. by api_syurga · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh my Gawd!!The hair!!Noo!!!

  31. Re:A link on swbell.net? Oh, that'll last. by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Parent is indeed a troll. Shot of goatse man instead of catalog page. (Blurred for your protection) It appears he is rotating the goatse man. Please mod down parent. Seems as though someone has way too much time on their hands and absolutely no life.

  32. Re:A link on swbell.net? Oh, that'll last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has any of the mods actually LOOKED at the mirror site? Picture by picture? For instance picture #22 (catalog22.jpg)?

  33. Tech specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Did anyone else notice how incredibly detailed the specifications for these devices were in the catalogue. I mean these days a floppy drive listing rarely exceeds 2 sentences.

    1. Re:Tech specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They knew that only engineers, scientists and other specialists were in charge of finding out what they needed to do their job and purchase it themselves... Not like today when some guy (a consultant, sitting 3000 miles away) buys you a brand new machine to replace your "old workhorse", thinking it will do because some vendor told him so...

      Has anyone tried being productive in CATIA on a machine equipped with the fabulously powerful Intel integrated graphics chips... (CATIA breathes OpenGL!!!).

      Please, give me back my "old" HP 9000 Series 700 workstation so that I can get some work done!

  34. Idiot... by afabbro · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you don't have the bandwidth, don't submit it.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Idiot... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      blizzard.com has been slashdotted

      think before you start calling people idiots.

  35. Slashdot effect by JustinXB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks to the Slashdot effect, you get to see the catalog at 1981 speeds!!!

    1. Re:Slashdot effect by Geekbot · · Score: 3, Funny

      How long until his server gets the Zmodem protocol so I can at least resume my failed download?

    2. Re:Slashdot effect by Gontrand · · Score: 1


      ZModem! OMG I had forgotten that! There later was a GZModem too If I recall...

      I was running a BBS in those days... My fidonet address was 1:163/544... I'll always remember THAT!

      Louis

    3. Re:Slashdot effect by edibobb · · Score: 1

      Dagnabbit! I always get those tools mixed up.

      Sorry about the slow link. My server seems to be bogged down tonight for some reason...

    4. Re:Slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was no zmodem in 1981.

  36. Re:A link on swbell.net? Oh, that'll last. by NsinR8R · · Score: 2, Funny

    Catalog19.jpg on the skittlebrau mirror was "wholly" unexpected....

  37. pffft ... $ 2500 for a 386 machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when they sold for $15,000+

    1. Re:pffft ... $ 2500 for a 386 machine by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Oh yah well i remember when back in the day... our computers had to computer uphill both ways... and computers didn't teh exist!

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:pffft ... $ 2500 for a 386 machine by Nutria · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I remember when they sold for $15,000+

      In 1990, The Family Business paid ~8,000USD for an HP system that ran SCO Xenix, FoxBase+ and had:

      • 486DX25
      • 8MB RAM
      • 2x 340MB HDD
      • QIC-02 120MB tape drive
      • an 8-port multi-serial card
      • an HP dot-matrix printer
      • 8x dumb terminals
      Worked great for 8 years. HP made durable stuff back then....
      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:pffft ... $ 2500 for a 386 machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, what kind of karma do you need to post at 0 with a regular user account?!

    4. Re:pffft ... $ 2500 for a 386 machine by gareth6889 · · Score: 0

      Just "bad" :-/

      i got marked flamebait on ONE post and now im a "0" poster too

      pfft 8-)

    5. Re:pffft ... $ 2500 for a 386 machine by gareth6889 · · Score: 0

      SCO Xenix? wasnt Xenix what Microsoft had before Windows????

  38. hmmm Fasssst Memory! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    200 ns! 16K modules.. easy to install! those were the days.
    I still have a bunch of old Apple magazines from about the
    same error. Computers were a lot more fun then. People
    spent a lot more time hacking hardware rather than figuring out why the OS just bsod again.. oh well

    1. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! by agm · · Score: 1

      What error was that again?

    2. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      clearly I needed to reboot after a bioBSOD!

    3. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You had to hack.

      Those were the days when a hacker would do things like write dates in only 2 variables instead of 4 to save memory. People today get confused by that but if you had only 16k of memory to run your program you end up doing crazy shit to get it to run. ... that and using alot of assembly code with peaks and pokes to touch the hardware rather then using a bloated library.

      Every bit and cpu cycle was cherished. Hell my old man knew the guy who made the first cp/m based bbs. No joke. He actually hacked the winchester hard drives to spin only when needed when a user logged in, in order to save wear and tear and cpu cycles by having the os do it. Crazy world back then.

      Perhaps cs students today should have requirements like make your program under this amount of memory and no more.

      This would force them to hack and come up with clever algorithms. Imaging running a server os with 2-4 megs of ram for almost 100 users? This is why BSD came to what it is. They had to invent crazy mathmatical algorithms to do it.

    4. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      " that and using alot of assembly code with peaks and pokes
      to touch the hardware rather then using a bloated library."

      brings up the point.. why are they so bloated? Wouldn't it
      be better to have more smaller libraries? Sure you might end
      up with the same net result, but with some careful
      consideration you could reduce program bloat.

    5. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Here is the intellectual argument.

      Which costs more? Having more programers create a product with a longer time cycle and cost more money, or have them created with bloated VB or C++.Net in 1/4th the time and end up buying more computers and upgrading?

      In the old days a. More time and programers are required would be alot cheaper. You only had so much K or megs on your mainframe. Today its b. bloat thanks to pc's thousands of times more powerfull with endless memory.

      Not to sound greedy, but the customer spends the cost of the upgrade, so the software publisher doesnt have to spend a dime.

      Last people who dont upgrade their hardware wont upgrade software either. So whats the point of targetting the 486 market?

      I do wish X and gnome/kde were not so bloated. They make Windows look like lean machine.

    6. Re:hmmm Fasssst Memory! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Ill preface this with fact that my coding days were long
      ago, but I don't see how making smaller more modular
      libraries would really increase time or cost in any
      significant way? Ie, library XYZ is broken down into
      most used, not often used, and rarely used.

  39. My ENIAC boasts unbreakable security! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 5, Funny
    16K RAM for $22; 10 megabyte hard drive, 5 meg fixed and 5 removeable, with 14- inch platters; 25-character per second printer.

    You think that's advanced technology, eh? You should come to my place sometime and check out my ENIAC. You have to be the 1337est of the '1337 to operate this thing. No hard drive. No mouse. No graphics... hell, there ain't even a CLI for cryin' out loud! (Real Programmers don't need no stinkin' user interface.) To enter commands into this baby, you gotta connect hundreds upon hundreds of wires, kind of like they did in the old telephone switchboards, where a human operator connected your call.

    And best of all, this computer does it all.

    • Want to multiply two numbers in just 3 milliseconds? Done.
    • Want security even the likes of OpenBSD can't beat? Done.
    The designers of this system knew what they were doing. The inability to store a program means that this system CANNOT get a virus, ever, period. Of course, then Von Neumann had to come along and invent stored programs, and the next thing you know, Outlook automatically executes email attachments...
    1. Re:My ENIAC boasts unbreakable security! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has got to be the funniest post on slashdot ever. The tears on my keyboard are causing little sparks.

    2. Re:My ENIAC boasts unbreakable security! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to be the most easily amused Slashdot newbie ever.
      HAHA TEH ENIAC!!!1 COMPUTAR MACHENES CUOLDNT EVNE PALY QUAKE 1 IN TEH 1940S!!11

  40. Stuff hasn't changed that much.... by Tyir · · Score: 1

    I think his server would have had the same likelihood of surviving if it was using that sort of hardware after that hit....

  41. Awwww... by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    I don't care what anyone says... Computer nostalgia is coolio, y0...

    Thanks for sharing!

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:Awwww... by MeNeXT · · Score: 1
      nostalgia??? You consider them the GOOD OL' DAYS?

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  42. Re:Debsux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW - they are beta testing the latest. :-)

  43. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey, it's the price list from the Apple on-line store!

    1. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo! Come up with your own joke.

  44. That number by daishin · · Score: 0

    is also being slashdotted as it is now always busy...I wonder how fast slashdot would kill a fax machines toner.

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
  45. Sorta... by poptones · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, the coco DID run a 6809, not a 6509. But don't think there weren't 6509s, too. The 6501 was the original as in the CAT single board computers and early apples, but when the 6502 was on the big screen in all those commodores Rockwell (and others) licensed the tech and had whole families of chips oriented toward embedded systems. They were the 6503, 6504, 6505, 6506, etc. and had fewer pins (24-28 pins). Then there was the 6510, which was a 6502 core with a multiplexed parallel port where part of the address bus would be on the 6502, etc.

    So... what would you expect the 6509 to be used for? It didn't have the math instructions of the 6809, but it (and the 6510) did have certain useful features when it came to making "personal computers" of the day.

    1. Re:Sorta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the 6510 had a 6 bit dedicated 'user port' on it. The addresses to use it were 0 and 1. But the physical pins were not multiplexed with anything.

  46. mirror anyone? by netnerd.caffinated · · Score: 2, Funny

    it looks like the webhost is actually running the hardware from the catalogue

    --


    You tried your best, & you failed miserably,
    The lesson is:
    Never Try
  47. What's interesting.... by varith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is that on their company backgroung page they actually 'fess up to service problems and mistakes as their company grew. It's hard to imagine a company - even a startup - doing that in these current days.

  48. $22 for 16k of RAM... by Doppler00 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So if you were to buy 1 gig at those prices it would cost: $1,048,576.

    Prices sure have come down huh?

    1. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it would be $1,441,792. 22 * 1024^2 / 16. You forgot to multiply by 22/16. Close, though!

    2. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you adjust for inflation? It's about $3022333.27 in 2002 dollars (unless my math is bad (which happens sometimes)).

    3. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by cgori · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's worse, that I knew you did your math wrong because I immediately recognized 1048576 as 2^20, or that I intuitively knew you typo'd the price as $32 instead of $22.

      I love binary.

    4. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it would be $1,441,792. 22 * 1024^2 / 16. You forgot to multiply by 22/16. Close, though!

      Math nerd!

    5. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the old chips those days could only see 20MB at a time, unless you hacked around a special doohickey.

    6. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20MB? 64KB, I am afraid. Go, ask Bill :) ....

      20MB rings a bell with me, though. That was the huge capacity of my first HD attached to the Atari 1040 STe capacity.

    7. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by BESTouff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I'm sure that with such a quantity you could deal a bit and pay only $1000000 or something like that.

    8. Re:$22 for 16k of RAM... by bovinewasteproduct · · Score: 1

      Ok you could get a Gig for a million bucks. But the hardware to do all the bank switching (Z80's had a 64k address limit and even then you could only expect a 32k to 48k area to be usable (The other 16k was your OS in a ROM/EPROM)) would cost another half mill...

      BWP

  49. Some things haven't.. by opusman · · Score: 2, Funny

    The pictures are loading about as fast as they would have from a BBS in 1981!

  50. What is that I smell? by MacBorg · · Score: 0

    why, it's a dying server. mmm... plastic-y

  51. Awwww...Beagle Bros. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I hated losing the contents of my storage locker. I had a big collection of Radio Shack catalogs, as well a Beagle Bros. catalogs.(1) Anyone remember the pocket computers?

    (1) Byte's with the GOOD covers. Books on the PDP.
    Ahhh, the good old days, when men were men, and computers weighed alot.

  52. Ah, the daisy-wheel printer by Jack+Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember printing pages of BASIC source code with one of these things. At 25cps I could usually type faster than this thing count print.

    I once reprogramming the horizontal and vertical motion rates and printing lots and lots of periods to print really ugly bitmap images.

  53. Catalog of Value by dj245 · · Score: 1
    Its a catalog of values

    as opposed to the catalog of scandalous corruptions that we have to live with today. Computer memory prices go up? Computer device prices should always be going down in comparison to what you get. F*ck the cartels.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Catalog of Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      F*ck the cartels.

      Go on, say it. Scandalous.Corruption. FUCK THE CARTELS!

  54. Things have changed? by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Things have changed a bit since then!"

    They have?

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I've still got a terminal from '81 still up and working within arms reach of me. Poor thing doesn't even know vt100, fortunately some OSes still have qvt in their termcap (most don't :-( )

    I've got a new Tandy Color Computer 80 with monitor in my closet (new in box, only opened and used once!). (I can also get a hold of one that is still in mint condition, outer box hasn't even been opened.

    If it wasn't for the multi-GHz computer I'm tying on, it would still be 1981 around here...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  55. Your 1981 computer... by thedogcow · · Score: 1

    ... For only $699!*

    *This post not intended to give Darl any ideas.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
  56. Woah! by dacarr · · Score: 1
    --
    This sig no verb.
  57. More like OEM'ed to the USA by Hobart · · Score: 1

    That "Pro/Writer" printer was one I had for my Atari back in the 80s.

    It's made by C.Itoh in Japan. It's originally the C.Itoh 8510A , it's also known as the Apple Imagewriter.

    Of course, Japan itself has moved a lot of its production to cheaper Asian countries by now. :)

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
    1. Re:More like OEM'ed to the USA by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      The StyleWriter is the Cannon BJ-101 right? I have one of those and they take the same cartridges.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    2. Re:More like OEM'ed to the USA by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      The Apple ImageWriter and the C. Itoh ProWriter share the same mechanicals. The ImageWriter electronics were by Apple; the ImageWriter had a high-speed serial interface. The ProWriter had a Centronics parallel interface.

      Apple used other companies' mechanisms in their printers. LaserWriter engines came from Canon. I forget who the StyleWriter (ink jet) engines came from.

    3. Re:More like OEM'ed to the USA by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
      The ImageWriter firmware was by Apple. The printer wasn't designed to do graphics, but it was so well-built that it handled them with no problem.

      High-speed serial interface? Yeah, 9600 baud was REAL high-speed. The only ImageWriter with a "high-speed" interface was the ImageWriter II if you installed the very optional Appletalk option board. And the original StyleWriter was also from Canon. The ink cartridges are interchangeable.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  58. Wish I had bought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft stock in 1985! :)

  59. Oblig. Apollo 13 quote by Wheaty18 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We even have computers that can fit inside a single room!"

    1. Re:Oblig. Apollo 13 quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky you didn't say that you have computers that can beat our computers. I'd have been obliged to hurt you in that case.

  60. whithe rthe MX-70 by Spatula+Sam · · Score: 2, Funny
    So I've been scouring Epson's site, and I can't seem to find the driver software for the MX-70 printer anywhere. And office depo doesn't even have the print heads in stock. What gives?

    seriously though, I wonder what would happen if you were to call Epson tech support about a problem with your TRS-80 and the MX-70 printer.

    1. Re:whithe rthe MX-70 by thogard · · Score: 1

      MX-70? Forget it that old junk. Now if its a more modern MX-80 than I know I can still get parts for that.

    2. Re:whithe rthe MX-70 by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 1

      So I've been scouring Epson's site, and I can't seem to find the driver software for the MX-70 printer anywhere. And office depo doesn't even have the print heads in stock. What gives?

      You didn't look hard enough. www.epson.com not only have drivers for the MX-70 Impact Printer, you can also get the manual in PDF format.
      CUPS for Linux has native support for the MX-80.
      And yes ribbons for the MX-70 are readily available.

      seriously though, I wonder what would happen if you were to call Epson tech support about a problem with your TRS-80 and the MX-70 printer.

      Epson still offers support for the MX-70 and MX-80 printers.

    3. Re:whithe rthe MX-70 by Spatula+Sam · · Score: 1
      My god... it's true... it lives!

      Now if Apple will only get on the ball and release the OS X drivers for my imagewriter...

  61. Corvus Drive on Ebay by tekrat · · Score: 1

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=4610&item=4127896097

    Yes, I'm the one selling it of course. I know nothing about it, but it's been sitting in my closet for a zillion years. Looks pretty complete to me. Go ahead, it's nostalgia!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  62. you had catalogs!?! by pyrrho · · Score: 5, Funny

    when I was young we had to signal our computer orders (usally replacement beads for the abacus) with damp blankets using smoke signals.

    And we liked it.

    --

    -pyrrho

    1. Re:you had catalogs!?! by tadas · · Score: 1
      when I was young we had to signal our computer orders (usally replacement beads for the abacus) with damp blankets using smoke signals.

      This is even funnier than the moderator probably thought -- if you were around in those pre-IBM PC days, you might remember that a company called "Smoke Signal Systems" was a "big player" -- they had a 6800-based system, if I recall correctly...

      --
      This page accidentally left blank
  63. Old computer magazine by slapout · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slighty off topic, but related:

    the classic computer magazine archive at http://www.atarimagazines.com/ has the text from some issues of Antic, STart, and Creative Computing magazines.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  64. Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. for people who don't have enough sense to manage their money.

    I have had a credit card since I was 18, I charge over $1000 on my cards a month.. I buy everything on credit card, including pay my bills. This way I maximize the free "points" my credit card gives me.

    Guess how much I have paid in finance charges the past 6 years? I would say a max of 25 dollars *total*??? ( and that was only due to purposeful "letting it ride" for a few weeks since I was on vacation ).

    50 dollars in finances for well over 600 dollars in rewards.

    Seriously, credit cards are only "the devil" to people who have no will power. Just because I have thousands worth of credit in my pocket, doesn't mean I am about to go buy a car on my visa.

    Not to mention if you charge something and you break it or it is stolen in the first 3 months, you can usually get a free replacement.. or if you get ripped off you can contest the charges. Try that with cash.

    1. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by QuaZar666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I completly agree with that. I had my credit card since i was 18 and put almost everything on it and then pay it off almost every month and every few months get points to turn in for free stuff. I personally hate cash because I find that its so easy to spend and will even avoid places that don't take credit cards.

      - Qua

    2. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by joggle · · Score: 1
      I agree, but it's still a good idea to carry the minimum number of cards with you, in case your wallet is lost/stolen.

      I've seen female customers at some department stores with at least a dozen cards in their wallet! Can you imagine how long it would take to figure out which cards were in there and then how long it would take to cancel them all? Some of them would probably be maxed out by then.

    3. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      The problem is most people seem to lose their "sense" or "willpower" when it comes to credit cards.

      I am not one of those people.

      But cash allows allows me to set up a budget in the beginning of the month and not stray, or my wife. Using cash it was easier than anyway i have found.

      I only used credit cards before i was married and paid off the bills every month, no problem.

      But being married I find that a cash system works great.

      I don't know how you spend but i would guess setting up a budget and sticking with it, you would have saved over $600 during the same time.
      I understand very well be wrong.

    4. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Man. After reading your post about your credit card, I'm beginning to think that now that I have a job, pay bills, etc., it may finally be time for me to get a new credit card.

      Currently I have one of those cards that seem to be typically marked to studens/higher risk customers where finance charges are calculated some funky way where they are calcualted on the average balance over a 2 month period or something like that. What it meant to me was the one time I made a mistake paying my bill, I was raped. I had a $1,000+ bill which I paid online. Except I was drunk and in a hurry to leave since it was my birthday and I was going out. I accidentally paid .03 cents short (typing mistake, .45 instead of .48) and was charged a total of ~$15 over the next two months. Talk about highway robbery.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    5. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by FriedTurkey · · Score: 1

      Most of the "points" cards have a annual fee. Unless your spending a lot of money it doesn't seem worth it. Plus I have to choose what to do with the points from stuff they offer. Doesn't seem like a good deal to me. If you have a card that offers points without an annual fee please post the link.

    6. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Discover... cashback no annual fee.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    7. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.... but what are your annual fees? Most of those cards have fees in the $50/yr range. If you do not pay a fee... please inform us as to what card you are using.

      You charge over $1000/mo? Wait... you spend over $1000/mo? You might not be getting charged interest, but maybe you would be better off putting some of that in a 401k or IRA eh?

    8. Re:Bah, Cash only makes "the perfect budget"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, an excellent idea.

      Credit score of Quill_28: ~400

      Credit score of brunes69: ~700

      Guess which Slashdotter will be able to get a mortgage, move out of their Mom's basement and into a real house first?

  65. That's because by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The credit card compaines got on them about it. Declared if you didn't offer credit for same as cash pricing, they'd yank your verification system so you couldn't take cards anymore. There are actually several ongoing lawsuits about this (companies claiming this an unfair practice).

    1. Re:That's because by realdpk · · Score: 1

      It is unfortunate. What the credit card companies have done is increased the prices of goods 2-3% across the board. Considering that some retail businesses are only going to see 15-30% margin after expenses, that is significant.

      Debit is appealing to merchants because often they can let the consumer pay the convenience fee. I'm definitely a fan of that. I'll pay for the convenience of not having to carry cash all the time.

    2. Re:That's because by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      It is unfortunate. What the credit card companies have done is increased the prices of goods 2-3% across the board. Considering that some retail businesses are only going to see 15-30% margin after expenses, that is significant.

      There is a pretty compelling argument that the expenses involved in handeling cash are greater than those 2-3%.

    3. Re:That's because by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      There's nothing unfair about it. The merchant knows what the terms are and they are free to not take credit cards if they object. Sure, their sales might suffer, but that's the price you pay for more exposure.

    4. Re:That's because by k8er · · Score: 1

      The markup on a lot of retail merchandise dwarfs the credit card surcharge. Poeple will spend more, plain and simple, if they can charge it. I can't imagine that the average retailer doesn't make a lot more profit because of credit cards. Since customers want to use credit, they probably feel (or felt) that they can charge more. If the CC companies hadn't made them get past their short sightedness, we wouldn't have the easy going use of plastic that we have now. IMO

  66. BSOD by Morologous · · Score: 1

    Better yet, nobody knew what the blue screen of death was, as the screens were green on darker green/black.

  67. Just look how advanced we are! by chevybowtie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since the average guy has to run the spam filter, virus scanner, Service Pack 12, pop-up blocker and spy-ware removal tools, his new Dell runs about the same today as those did. Why did we have to go from 4.77 Mhz to > 3000 Mhz and and not see near 1000 fold increase in snappyness? Because of all the freakin' 3l337 haxor d00d, because-I-can-spammer's, Gaim a**holes, MS programming school of buffer mangement & X10 snakeoil salesmen.

    1. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by dmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't forget all of the eye candy, abstraction layers, and the replacement of assembly and C with high level languages...which are probably running on a virtual machine. And we can't blame it all on MS either. Everybody is operating that way.

      For all that developers have a bit too much ease of use vs efficiency, today's PC has apps that just weren't possible with that old gear. Non-linear video editing and audio compression just isn't going to happen on a 12 Mhz 286.

      In another 10 or 15 years, I believe that computing will cease to be sexy in any way shape or form. Don't get me wrong; advances will still be occuring but they won't be hot topics. Most major applications will have well understood methodologies for accomplishing them. APIs and architectures will be settled down more. That is the point where there will be value in making things a bit more efficient and maintainable. Hell, I even think the IP tulip mania will be mostly over with by then. But things will stay chaotic as long as Moore's Law still has steam in it.

    2. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In another 10 or 15 years, I believe that computing will cease to be sexy in any way shape or form.

      10 years? More like 3 years ago. Look at it this way... your average 14 yr girl can get around a modern machine as well as some pro-coders could a decade ago and they think its cool. They also think that boy bands are cool.

    3. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by DharmaDog · · Score: 0

      Use OS X. No Problems. Yet.

    4. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha!
      Yes. Almost everyone does it.

      I'm currently writing this on an 800MHz Amiga running a betaversion of AmigaOS 4. Let me tell you one thing. This baby actually *feels* like a more than 10 times faster than Amiga 500.

    5. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this still doesn't explain why IE or Mozilla take so long to launch. We are talking two-dimensional text layout here, not video editing, and Opera is not near as bad. Has to be sloppy programming, not any fundamental reason.

    6. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no "800MHz Amiga". There will be no more Amiga hardware. You're probably referring to the $500 Mai Logic Teron PX motherboard, which is also sold for $800 using the licensed trademark "AmigaOne".

      Neither is there a beta version of AmigaOS 4. To most people in the industry, "beta" means software in it's final (or "release candidate") stage, when everything is implemented and only needs this "beta" testing before going gold. Not everything on the current AmigaOS 4.0 "feature list" (roadmap) has been implemented, not even fundamental stuff like JIT 68k emulation or the "let's-call-it-partial-memory-protection", and the list is constantly being changed and updated. Remember when all of a sudden the graphics driver subsystem was thrown out the window to be replaced by SNAP? This was, what, almost 2 years ago? Still it was being referred to as "beta" (alternatively "90% done", 3 years ago) by the more insidious marketroids and clueless fanbois already back then.

      Everything in the GUI (except file listings in load/save requesters) of the latest "developer pre-release" (heh) version of AmigaOS 4 on a Teron PX (aka "AmigaOne XE") 800MHz PPC750FX is not only noticably but considerably more sluggish than AmigaOS 3.9 on a 25MHz MC68040 Amiga 4000 from 1993. It's nothing but embarrassing.

    7. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      audio compression just isn't going to happen on a 12 Mhz 286.

      Huh?? are you on drugs???

      Lame runs JUST FINE on a 12mhz 286. Yes it takes a really freaking long time but it still compresses.

      and NLE was not done until recently. In the era of 286's we use AB tape roll editing and used the 286 with a targa16 card to create the CG.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by oshy · · Score: 1

      Try running old software on a new PC.
      I stuck on an old C compiler. I hit compile, but nothing happened. Tried again but still nothing. Had a look in the output directory and found it had compiled it and built it into a nice little .exe for me.
      The popup screen for compiling had popped up, listed all the lines it was parsing, all the stages of the build and that it was outputting the file and vanished too fast to be seen.

      So it doesnt have the built in help and syntactic highlighting. I can always load it up into a new editor and compile on the old software.

    9. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Non-linear video editing and audio compression just isn't going to happen on a 12 Mhz 286.

      No, but I seem to remember Amiga users of that era being able to do that stuff...

    10. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      And then there are the games. Back in the '8088 days I was a huge Robotron fan. Last time I tried it was back on a '486. Absolutely insane speed, way too fast for me to play it.

      Oh, the joy of coding timing loops in software!

    11. Re:Just look how advanced we are! by oshy · · Score: 1

      Got that problem at work at the moment. To talk to an old bit of hardware I have to use an old program. Need to blow the dust off one of our 386s to be able to run the thin due to codeing tim loops.

  68. 1990 Computer Shopper by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Somewhere in my parent's house is a 1990 issue of Computer Shopper with the world's only 4GB hard drive at the time (by IBM). price: $20,000

    I kept that around just to look back at times like this.

    1. Re:1990 Computer Shopper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should read: "Somewhere in my parent's basement (where I lived for twelve years) is a 1990....

  69. Save time - read the obligatory Slashdot comments by mrklin · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Is the site hosted on a the original server with 16K RAM and a 10 megabyte hard drive becase it is Slashdotted!!!!!"

    "Yes, but does it run Linux?"

    "Bill Gates said 640K ought to be enough for everyone." which is then followed by 10 variations of "Actually, Gates never said that."

    "I actually owned one of those (insert archaic by modern standards technology here)" which is followed by another 10 variations of "That's nothing. We didn't even have those abovementioned technology because Big Bang just occurred and we only had hydoren and helium available, you insensitive clod!!"

    Snooze...

  70. no promotions anymore by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember 15+ years ago when a lot of products would feature in advertisements that they were made in the USA? A lot of it was a reaction to perceived threat from Japan and the thought of NAFTA. In current times that is a rarity, globalization aside. Even though people are buying Mercedes made in Alabama and tech support from India, it would be interesting to see a return of promotional campaign designed to promote goods made in the US. Perhaps there can be a similar campaign designed to promote companies that don't use overseas labor?

    1. Re:no promotions anymore by TwinkieStix · · Score: 1
      Even though people are buying Mercedes made in Alabama and tech support from India, it would be interesting to see a return of promotional campaign designed to promote goods made in the US. Perhaps there can be a similar campaign designed to promote companies that don't use overseas labor?
      I think that a company trying this would shoot itself in the foot. Every element would need to be mined from the US, all of the "Intellectual Property" would need to be US-based, and I mean every single little piece. Or else, there would be a 20-20 episode on the vast "Made In The USA" conspiracy. These days, small parts like transistors are so hard to find in dependably large quantities from ANY country that it's nearly impossible to ensure a steady flow of huge quantities of product from only US parts.
    2. Re:no promotions anymore by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 0

      Think Saturn.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:no promotions anymore by asv108 · · Score: 1

      When I think "made in the usa" I mean the bulk of the manufacturing taking place in the US, not the origin of individual components.

    4. Re:no promotions anymore by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Sure, but a little twisting in the media and the company will look like the bad guy for using people who's ancestors immigrated

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    5. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *All* our ancestors immigrated. Including the "native peoples".

    6. Re:no promotions anymore by devilspgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congrats, you successfully identified the point I was trying to make. Good job, have a cookie.

      If you advertise something as "Made in America", unless every single component was developed, manufactured and assembled in America, you'll get torn to pieces on a slow news day.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    7. Re:no promotions anymore by tracer-bullet · · Score: 1

      My Bike (Trek if you care) claims to be handbuilt in the USA with foreign and domestic parts. I think thats pretty much as close as you can get. Speaking of which, I'm Canadian, so I don't really care where it was made, cause it sure ain't from here. Maybe the build quality is higher though. I think I'll tell myself that.

      --
      leeloodallasmultipass
    8. Re:no promotions anymore by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I think you'd have a hard time finding a US citizen who's ancestors didn't immigrate to North America at some point.

    9. Re:no promotions anymore by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      I think that a company trying this would shoot itself in the foot. Every element would need to be mined from the US, all of the "Intellectual Property" would need to be US-based, and I mean every single little piece.

      It wasn't all that long ago that Toyota had commercials showing the fact that most Toyotas sold in the US are actually built in the US. Of course much of the steel came from Japan, but many American car companies had by that point also started using Japanese steel; it was cheaper and higher quality in many cases...

      ...but I don't believe that Toyota tried to imply that every component was USA-born either, they were mostly stressing the fact that they created a lot of jobs for US workers since at the time, many people wouldn't buy foreign vehicles for that very reason.

      Of course these days people don't seem to care about that, so the campaign hasn't been necessary. People buy cars made in Japan, Korea, and elsewhere if they find a good deal (and I think that's a good thing, really).

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    10. Re:no promotions anymore by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People cared about American jobs. Today people car about their wallets. Americans today are more greedy then back then.

      It was Ronald Reagan that started the phase anyone who taxes or offers a higher price is a theif and that corporatism is a reward for sucess and creates jobs, etc.

      The second factor is percentage of Americans who own stocks. I know former hard core democrats who are voting for Bush/CHeney, because they have 401k's and Ira's and want corporate rights upheld and lower taxes. They feel the greed system is for them and not the top 2% of all Americans sadly.

      Anyway this is why the made in USA does not work. People want lower prices and view those who dont outsource as theives from their wallets as well as 401k's and Ira's.

    11. Re:no promotions anymore by zepher-109 · · Score: 1

      all the citizens of all countries are immigrants, execept native people from africa.

    12. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. That's the kind of thinking that generates anti-American sentiment all over the World. Stop being so bloody xenophobic and realise it's ok to share with everyone else on this planet.

    13. Re:no promotions anymore by trentblase · · Score: 1
      From http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/madeus a.htm

      Example: A company produces propane barbecue grills at a plant in Nevada. The product's major components include the gas valve, burner and aluminum housing, each of which is made in the U.S. The grill's knobs and tubing are imported from Mexico. An unqualified Made in USA claim is not likely to be deceptive because the knobs and tubing make up a negligible portion of the product's total manufacturing costs and are insignificant parts of the final product.

    14. Re:no promotions anymore by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      not likely to be deceptive in who's eyes? I'm sure it will be of great comfort to the company after a "news" agency roasts them alive.

      Don't get me know, I don't believe it IS deceptive, but I wouldn't put it past a media company these days.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    15. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the hell would you specifically care where a product was made? Personally, as long as it's not made by children, or slaves, I'm fine with it. What's more, 'Made in the USA' is not a guarantee of quality, there are shit companies in the US aswell, just like any country in the world.

    16. Re:no promotions anymore by trentblase · · Score: 1
      in who's eyes

      The FTC... who regulates the validity of Made In USA claims (under the guise of truth in advertising, I'd guess). If the FTC says that a company can legally make such a claim, then the media hubbub would probably surround problems with FTC policy itself, rather than a single company's perceived transgression. Of course, I wouldn't put ANYTHING past a media company these days.

    17. Re:no promotions anymore by nharmon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Made in the USA doesn't work because we live in a global economy and there are industries that cannot be profitable in the United States. People need to learn to adapt. Why should I pay more for a sub-quality domestic product?

      It's like saying you should buy Microsoft Windows XP instead of SuSE Linux (even though SuSE is now American) because Microsoft is an American company.

    18. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, my parents were made here from scratch by a mad scientist. So we were spawned here.

    19. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They feel the greed system is for them and not the top 2% of all Americans sadly.

      You just nailed it . . . the Republican Party basically just comes out and says they are the "party for the rich" . . . problem is, lots of people want to think they are, or will soon be, "the rich" . . .

    20. Re:no promotions anymore by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Oh great - a drive to promote expensive, poorly-made goods. Wouldn't the world be sooo great if everyone drove around in hummers, doing 1mpg, breaking down every 2 yards.

      There's a reason these people haven't brought production back to the US - the US has out-priced itself, and can't produce the goods any more (metaphorically and literally speaking).

      This isn't flamebait or trolling or whatever, just economics.

    21. Re:no promotions anymore by betong · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, you're a Raelian ;).

      --
      . ~/.sig
    22. Re:no promotions anymore by kabocox · · Score: 1

      What is this thing with "Made in the USA?" Don't get me wrong I like my country, but I'd much rather have a "Made in Texas", "Made in Arkansas", "Made in Washington", "Made in New York", or "Made in Flordia" sticker. If I saw groceries with a grown in my state sticker, I'm more likely to buy them. (They "should" be cheaper too.) I know almost everything has a "Made in China" or "Made in other Asian Country." Why can't we market our states stuff like that? Those in China may had the USA policies and lastest trickes, but have they ever heard of Arkansas, Oklahoma, or Kansas? There are companies that make things out of states other than TX, FL, CA, and NY. Those four states are by my guess the most globally recongized. We may be able to sneak our products in if they aren't labeled as "Made in USA."

      Even those of in the USA aren't happy with our government's decisions. No wonder we buy things made in China. China's government must be doing things that those in the US like. Otherwise, we wouldn't support their economy for moral reasons.

    23. Re:no promotions anymore by Atryn · · Score: 1
      Even those of in the USA aren't happy with our government's decisions. No wonder we buy things made in China. China's government must be doing things that those in the US like. Otherwise, we wouldn't support their economy for moral reasons.
      LOL... right... As soon as I read you comment, I picked up the calculator by my computer on my office desk. It is fancy, and came in a nice wooden frame with my company's name, logo and URL on it. I didn't buy it. Both pieces (calc and frame) were Made in China.

      But I'm SURE that someone in marketing took all of their moral considerations into account when making this purchase... right....
      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    24. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhhh, excuse me, but I drove to work today in a Honda Civic that was built in Ohio. Your generalization of anything made in America as shoddy or a symbol of gross consumption is utter bullshit. If you really had any grasp of economics you might place some of the blame for America's production moving overseas at the feet of the morons who design and engineer such things as Hummers that you seem to think all of us drive instead of a VERY small percentage of the public. For 20 years the culture of corporate greed that started under the Reagan administration has shafted the working people of this country while executive salaries get obscenely large. I've worked my way through college by working in the manufacturing industry, and I deeply resent any kind of assertion that American workers are somehow any less productive in the right workplace than any other countries. As W. Edwards Deming (who taught the Japanese companies how to make quality products after WW2) asserted, all workers WANT to do a good job, but the management of the company has to let it happen. If you feel that Americans can't "produce the goods" anymore you're either a typical Slashdot geek who never had to do an honest day's work, a gloating non-American who is enjoying our economic problems, or a garden variety fuckwit troll. I apologize to the other readers for succumbing to this flamebait trash, but this just pushed the wrong buttons for me this morning.

    25. Re:no promotions anymore by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's not greed; it's intelligence. Why pay more for less? Americans produce shoddy products at high prices; others produce fine products at lower prices. Would you pay $1 for a moldy pear when the grocer's down the way sells good, tasty pears for a dime a dozen?

      And the ownership economy is for everyone. That's a good thing. It means that workers have a voice because they are also owners. It's a better solution than unions, that's for sure. Ask my co-worker, who was once kicked out of a union (and thus lost his job) because he dared to work through his break.

    26. Re:no promotions anymore by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Here in Colorado, we have ABC: Always Buy Colorado. For my part, I'd like to be able to avoid goods made in New England and patronise those made in the South and West. It'd be cool if products were labeled.

      I'm a Coloradan, a Texan, a Virginian and only then an American.

      China's government must be doing things that those in the US like. Otherwise, we wouldn't support their economy for moral reasons.

      We buy from China because it's cheap, not because they're a good lot. Heck, even American leftists admit that they're brutes, which is an improvement over what they'd admit about the Soviets.

    27. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been drinking the Kool-Aid my friend. For most people ownership is a pie-in-the-sky idea, a carrot dangled in front of us by rich fat aristocrats.

      Have you looked at the rising price of home ownership lately? Most people have a mortgage or car payments for their entire adult life.

      And how is your definition of intelligence not to be confused with greed? Especially when Wallmart sells t-shirts for $8 that were created by people who work in 12-16 hours per day in indentured servitude? Being concerned about price has led US corporations into making slaves out of the 3rd world.

      I am not saying the free market system is not without flaws. Competition good; it can create a lot of great innovation. But innovation should not be confused with moving factors of production to places where the indigenous labor force is abused. My point is that I think your viewpoint is naive, free-trade is not better-off for everyone. And your pear analogy is weak too.

    28. Re:no promotions anymore by Baikala · · Score: 1

      That's what the "Assembled in ..." is for.

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    29. Re:no promotions anymore by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Funny,Apple and HP use to make good products before they were outsourced.

      Go read the latest news from a week or two ago about the Ipod mini's or read the comments from the HP calculator story?

      American products are supperior quality. Its just that Walmart and shareholders force them to do shoddy labor in China.

    30. Re:no promotions anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, numerous spelling and grammatical errors (reflecting the extremely simple-minded post itself), and some nitwit moderator labels it 'insightful'. Nice even-handed job there. Says more about the moderator than the poster.

    31. Re:no promotions anymore by TwinkieStix · · Score: 1

      A company produces propane barbecue grills at a plant in Nevada. The product's major components include the gas valve, burner and aluminum housing, each of which is made in the U.S. The grill's knobs and tubing are imported from Mexico. An unqualified Made in USA claim is not likely to be deceptive because the knobs and tubing make up a negligible portion of the product's total manufacturing costs and are insignificant parts of the final product.

      This is true, legally. But, on a slow news day, some "expose" will uncover the truth about the knobs and tubing, and how the grill manufacturer is exploiting a loophole for increased sales.

  71. No. This would be an idiot. by craXORjack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Posted by michael on Thursday April 29, @09:44PM
    from the never-attended-skool dept.
    idiotbob writes "I just fired up my scanner and uploaded the 1650-page (+/- 100 pages) 1998 Fall/Winter catalog from Sear and Roebuck in 300dpi, 24bit color, even the b&w pages! 100% Cotton V neck T-shirts (3 pack) for $12; Black and Decker cordless screwdriver, 40" Big screen Color TV, with remote control; Kingsize polyester bedspread ensembles in solid or floral pattern! Hosted on my home ISDN connection. Wow, things were different back then!

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  72. Something similar by danuary · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out this unix ad, also from 1981 (hi Bob! -dp). Brought to you by Bell Labs. It's amazing how times have changed......

    1. Re:Something similar by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Very nice. I particularly liked the reference to "FORTRAN 77 and high-level 'C' languages" as well as the notice that UNIX is "as-is" with no maintenance or tech support.

      --

      Enigma

    2. Re:Something similar by zoid.com · · Score: 1

      Yes, I love the "High level C" language. I remember back in the days I heard about that "C" language and thought that it was a plot to make all of us assembler and BASIC programers obslete. I was right. Anyone use OS9 on a Coco?

    3. Re:Something similar by thogard · · Score: 1

      The real os-9... The 1st operating system designed for a processor that was designed to run that OS. Too bad Motorola didn't take it seriouly and keep up with the good work on the 68000. It would have made it a much better chip.

      Ever notice how much os-9 basic from the mid 1980's looks very much like visual basic? OS-9 even had a way you could sign your binaries so they wouldn't load if they were messed with. It was quite cool even though it used weak crc.

      Anyone from the Tulsa 0S9/os9k club around?

    4. Re:Something similar by wandazulu · · Score: 1

      What I find amusing is that "No maintenance, no technical support" is worthy of the limited amount of text, instead of being omitted entirely and buried in the eula. They almost make it sound like a feature:

      And now with No Maintenance! And even No Technical Support!

  73. Interesting phone # changes by suso · · Score: 1

    Speaking of which, it's interesting to go back and call some of those old numbers (like for BBSes) and see who is there now. Make sure when you do that you ask them how much their Midwest Micro 486/DX4 is.

    I wonder if there is a site on the net somewhere that documents this kind of stuff.

    1. Re:Interesting phone # changes by huchida · · Score: 1

      Browse textfiles.com, lots of old BBS #'s there, including a few I remember fondly. I don't know what the point of calling would be, unless you want to ask the parents of an ex-C64 warez trader whatever happened to "NinjaPhreak."

  74. I was building my own computer in 1981 by pjwhite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was building my own computer in 1981. It had a 1 MHz 6502 processor, 1024 bytes of RAM, Teletype terminal, and paper tape program storage.

    1. Re:I was building my own computer in 1981 by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Didn't we all? Best of all, it still runs. (One of these days I might finish the IDE hard drive interface.)
      EXPLORER-85 VER 1.4
      COPYRIGHT 1979
      NETRONICS R&D
      NEW MILFORD, CT.
      The tapes don't load, but that's probably a level problem.
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  75. Modern Bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, sir, you should consider upgrading your webserver from the 1981 model.

  76. Re:Weird.... Al by jtev · · Score: 1

    Linux doesn't run on a 286. It needs the task switching and memory protection of a 386 or better. So yes, if you're running a 286 it's "don't make me laugh" time. Freedos OTOH will run on a 486.

    --
    That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  77. That's Speedy RAM by DJ+Super+Dulce · · Score: 2, Funny
    Man, things have changed. I can't believe RAM back then had an access speed of 200ms. You might as well remember the damn information yourself with speeds like that.

    I got it... 1...01...1...

  78. Things have changed a bit since then! by LoocSiMit · · Score: 1
    News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.

    Things have changed a bit since then!

    We noticed.

    --
    Intellectual Property
    Intellectual: of the mind
    Property: that over which one has control
  79. Also a weapon by Nooloo · · Score: 1

    That is if you could even lift it....

  80. Great Software at a Steal!!! by dmomo · · Score: 1

    At the bottom of the third to last page:

    New product for the color computer ... Moon Lander by Greg Zumwalt

    In this exciting new adventure for the Color Computer, you attempt to guide your moon lander to a safe landing. Watch out for hills and valleys, and don't run out of fuel! Tough, Challenging, and Exciting! You wont want to miss this one ... ONLY $14.95

    1. Re:Great Software at a Steal!!! by physick · · Score: 1

      What! $14.95 for a moon lander. I wrote one of those for an Olivetti "desktop" that was the size of small washing machine, and only had the four functions, square root and 10 memory locations when I was 14. AND it took account of the fuel mass decreasing with time.

      Damn. I should have tried to sell it. I might have been rich by now.

  81. Wikipedia by cos(0) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wikipedia is amazing -- it even has an entry for The Magic Wand word-processing software advertised on one of the catalog's pages:

    Magic Wand (software)

    1. Re:Wikipedia by crazysim · · Score: 0

      Look in revision history. Chances are, a slashdot user wrote that after this was published.

    2. Re:Wikipedia by ashot · · Score: 1

      yes; in fact whichever reader this is has decided that this is a "historically important program" because it appeared in this catalog.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_processor

      --
      -ashot
    3. Re:Wikipedia by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      Why is it less historically-important than everything else from that long list?

    4. Re:Wikipedia by ashot · · Score: 1

      looks like we found our slashdot reader!

      =]

      --
      -ashot
  82. Mods--see Anti-slash.org by bonch · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Mods should visit Anti-Slash daily to see a running list of posts to avoid. They have a list of trick posts on their front page for their amusement.

    You'd be amazed at the amount of duped +5 posts from the past that get modded up again and again, thanks to their database tool that stores +5 posts from every article. Trolls repost past +5s to get more karma for their troll accounts.

    1. Re:Mods--see Anti-slash.org by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      s/Slashdot/Internet/g

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  83. For MORE Vintage Computing goodness... by blakespot · · Score: 2, Informative
    For more Vintage Computing Goodness (VCG) - check out the new:

    ByteCellar.com

    Lend your support!


    blakespot

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
    1. Re:For MORE Vintage Computing goodness... by kmh071 · · Score: 1

      Cool link.. lost myself in the nostalgia there for quite a while. I remember when my dad brought home a Pet computer and I played that old Dungeon style game on it for hours. All the monsters were ascii characters. :) Good schtuff

  84. The 70's... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I dunno what I hated the most from the 1970's... The disco music, or the moustaches????

    1. Re:The 70's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bell-bottom trousers.
      And today they're back to haunt humanity again! AAAARGH! When will we ever learn from our past mistakes?

  85. MOD PARENT DOWN - ANTISLASH MEMBER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is intentionally trying to confuse moderators into modding up the goatse link! He works for anti-slash!

  86. Things may have changed a bit by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1

    But bits haven't changed a bit.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  87. Seagate HDD Make in OK City by JohnMadison · · Score: 1

    Seagate's got a big clean room still in OKC, so you can get yer hard drives from Oklahoma, but probably not yer Office package.

    --
    ciao
    1. Re:Seagate HDD Make in OK City by robslimo · · Score: 1

      You're right. The plant started as a CDC (Control Data Corp.) operation. A few years back I had an HDD (Imprimis brand, I think) whose label said it was from that plant.

      I believe that they no longer manufacture anything there anymore. From their website:

      Seagate's Oklahoma City operation enjoys a 40-plus year history in Oklahoma City. The facility makes a significant contribution to corporate business objectives and strategies by serving as the company's worldwide center for customer technical support and by employing a significant Information Technologies staff.

      So they're mostly a support operation now. Who knows how long that will last.

      Interestingly, Creative Labs North American tech support operation is here in Stillwater, Oklahoma.

  88. Re:A link on swbell.net? Oh, that'll last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wait. When I visit the mirror, I don't see goatsecx. But you show goatsecx in your link.

    I was confused until I realized what this is: You're making people look at goatsecx *and* getting moderated up for it!

    Someone submit this troll to the site admins. :(

  89. Sears by Nf1nk · · Score: 1

    Sears sold off its credit card division this year to citybank, so now the only thing they get from it is free processing.

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  90. Interesting how prices changed... by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But check page 31.

    Microsoft charged quite a bit 20+ years ago for a compiler and still does.

    Amazing how they get away with their pricing.

    Thank you Linux and GCC for saving my butt :-)

  91. amazing by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Here we are 24 years later, with computers that are twice as powerful as these, a hundred times as large, and so expensive that only the richest kings of Europe can afford them. Makes you think.

  92. Re:Phone number - CORVUS???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corvus? Holy shit. I forgot about that stuff. Try about 1984, corvus was doing networking. TI PC no doubt, not just the IBM stuff. We are talking a network that was before appletalk, but really similar. Serial, multidrop.

    Oh, and tape backup? How about pumping your data to a VHS VCR? And the first NAS box? That was a 10 megabyte or 20 megabyte (if you had lots of $$) hard drive that had a built in controller, just put it on the network!

    TI-PC was the first machine that had 4 serial port capability, not the standard 2 ports.

    WOW, was I really that geeky??

    Troy

  93. HA! THAT IS FANCY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'M WRITING THIS ON A DEC TERMINAL, DIALING IN ON A 110 BAUD ACOUSTIC MODEM. NOW IF YOU'LL EXCUSE ME MY SON NEEDS TO USE THE PH&4\ {S+/~ [CARRIER LOST]

  94. von neumann? by dollargonzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    funny that you mention eniac and von neumann in the same post. i know it's humor, but von neumann published what eckert and mauchly *couldn't* publish since they were under military classification at the time. so, naturally, everyone forgets about them.

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
  95. Re:Save time - read the obligatory Slashdot commen by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    It's worth noting that the above reduction covers the comments on *all* Slashdot stories. Perhaps this should just be posted at the top of each page?

  96. Copyright Violation !!! by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    You have circumvented the DMCA by scanning in example code and copyrighted material from 1984.

    Prepare to be raided...

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  97. Very funny by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I am trying to find that parts catalog from 1842 so I can get this Analynic Engine to work. It is not the same since Ada had a hissy fit and quit making those punch cards for me.

    Then I need that 1642 catalog so Blaize can work out the bugs in his thingamabob whatever he called it but it don't work too well either.

    So they make computers using electronics now? Interesting to say the least. My 10 baud tin cans and kite-string modem works, but it is just too slow for me and it is the fastest that technology can go. It took me a day and a half to post this message.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Very funny by NewWazoo · · Score: 1

      But pray tell, if you put in the wrong figures, will the right answers come out?

  98. Re:Save time - read the obligatory Slashdot commen by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Dont forget the lithium, guy. What whould the post-big bang universe have been withouth lithium?
    Like C64 without warez....

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  99. Re:Save time - read the obligatory Slashdot commen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we only had hydrogen and helium available

    Pshhh, helium. You youngins are so spoiled.

  100. ObPython by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 3, Funny

    Helium! Such luxury!

    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:ObPython by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Heck yes, back in my day we didn't have no fancy bottled helium. We had to make our own helium by banging hydrogen atoms together.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    2. Re:ObPython by jaltoids · · Score: 1

      In my day we were happy to get a proton

    3. Re:ObPython by Lovepump · · Score: 1

      Helium? We had raw Ether. Nothing atually ran, but we didn't actually care...

    4. Re:ObPython by deimtee · · Score: 1

      hah, we didn't have none of them fancy high-falutin' particles, we had to get by on quark soup!

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    5. Re:ObPython by Otto · · Score: 1

      Heck yes, back in my day we didn't have no fancy bottled helium. We had to make our own helium by banging hydrogen atoms together.

      Well, of course, we had it tough. All we had was chaos. And not even well defined chaos at that.

      And you try and tell the young people of today that... and they won't believe you.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  101. na, don't matter to me! by Stevyn · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm running gentoo so these old computers seem like athlon 64s, but def not those pentos!. I just found a UFO off SETI cause my computer is so fast.

    yey gentoo!

    (joke!)

  102. 1989 RadioShack PC for under $9000 sans monitor by adrianhensler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Check out this picture at HardOCP that I actually uploaded awhile back (they spelt my name wrong damnit!)

    For a paltry $8499 in 1989 at RadioShack (Canadian dollars in 1989?) you got:
    20 Mhz 80386
    VGA graphics
    2 MB RAM (up to 16MB capacity)
    Cache memory.
    Monitor and mouse not included.

    I may actually still have that piece of paper somewhere. Not sure what that says about me.

    1. Re:1989 RadioShack PC for under $9000 sans monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fucking ripoff. Any slashdotter worth his salt could could screw together that system for a mere $7500, and no M$ Tax.

  103. That is cheap! by rspress · · Score: 1

    I remember paying 600 bucks for a 16k upgrade for an apple II.

  104. while we are on the subject of old computers... by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 1

    anybody have the video pin outs for a amiga 500? I sent my athlon 2600 over to a friends house to do video editing and I want to see if I can get the damn thing to go online, or something like that.
    Yes, I know it's off topic, but hell, it's close

    --
    Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
    1. Re:while we are on the subject of old computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  105. Typesetting was a bitch in the early 80's. by huchida · · Score: 1
    To me, what is even more striking than the change in computer technology is the change in marketing! Everytime I see an early 80s advertisement, I just want to laugh at the naivete. Is this presentism, or have modern ads really become that much more compelling?

    Yes, modern ads are more compelling. This comes from before the days of desktop publishing, remember-- it's easy to forget (especially if you weren't there) how easy Quark and Illustrator have made it for even the smallest company to produce professional looking ads.

    1. Re:Typesetting was a bitch in the early 80's. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      This comes from before the days of desktop publishing, remember-- it's easy to forget (especially if you weren't there) how easy Quark and Illustrator have made it for even the smallest company to produce professional looking ads.

      I think the term you are looking for is overuse Comic Sans ;)

  106. Text smoothing by RadRafe · · Score: 1
    If you wanted to preserve the moment, you should have at least shined it up with a little text smoothing.

    Yes, I am a picky bastard.

    1. Re:Text smoothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was thinking the same thing... "What the heck is that? Is that Slashdot? So uuuugly!"

    2. Re:Text smoothing by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Someone else took the screenshot. I haev smoothing on.

  107. Vintage "Local Area Network" Specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If eighties vintage Ethernet was too expensive you could always build your own. Here are the specs:
    Ethernet Blue Book

  108. One Dollar per Byte by BrianMarshall · · Score: 1
    Back when I was in high school, in 1976 or '77, I had the popular electronics magazine with the picture of the first computer you could build from a kit - I think it was called the Altair 6800 (or something like that).

    Several months after that, I saw a big ad in Popular Electronics or Byte for a 1 KB board for $1000 - a dollar a byte.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST
    1. Re:One Dollar per Byte by blitz1725 · · Score: 1

      Actually that's .9765625 cents per byte, but who's counting.

  109. OT: Walmart promotions by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    Back 10 or 12 years ago, wasn't WalMart one putting American flags all over everything and a big part of "Buy American" campaigns? I could be mistaken.

    It's just odd to see how they are now actively killing off American companies, or forcing them to offshore their production or sell to WalMart at a loss to compete. See Vlasic pickles, Master Locks, Dial soap, Levi's (although I think that might have been their own fault somewhat), etc.

    1. Re:OT: Walmart promotions by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, they did that. Till the media found out that most of those 'American Made' goods where made overseas and ChinaMart was lying about it. 20/20 I think was the one that broke the story and did a primetime story about it.

    2. Re:OT: Walmart promotions by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard them claim Made in USA since Sam died. This is probably why. But many people still percieve Wal Mart to sell American products just because they did at one time. Now, it seems like they go out of the way to buy nothing domestic.

    3. Re:OT: Walmart promotions by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why my wife and I explicitely don't shop at walmart.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  110. Yeah, but unfortunately is still has bugs by iamacat · · Score: 1

    You now, the variety that commits suicide between two of the hundreds of wires and changes the behaviour of your program. You also might want to keep a cat to take care of mice that chew insulation.

  111. Linux Networking HOWTO Admendmum by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    When generating high yeilds of HTTP trafic which mimicks that of vast floods of ligitimate requests, there are a few commercial packages available, however the same effect can be achieved by posting to slashdot a news story with a link to your website under test.

  112. I dont get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont get it.

  113. Wirewrapped Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, the good old days. Anyone remember the Model 16 with dual 8 " floppies, and a Winchester HD, running XENIX? Their pocket computers were also popular (I believe they had a magazine just for them). Ah the days of Deskmate and OS9.

  114. Amiga Video Pinouts. by deimtee · · Score: 1

    I tried to post a list, but the lameness filter didn't like it - too many junk characters. Check my journal.

    --
    I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
  115. Re:Save time - read the obligatory Slashdot commen by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    They should add Bayesian filtering to the slashdot posting filter. Anything getting a high enough "annoying post" score gets modded down automatically.

  116. speaking of Moore's law... by poincare · · Score: 1

    It's been 23 years since 1981. Thus there have been about 15 18-month doubling periods. Based on the advert and Moore's law, one would expect 16k * 2^15 bytes (aka 2^29=512MB) to be available on computers these days.

  117. Says more about Marketing than Technology by Queuetue · · Score: 1

    The ad for Magic wand ("ALMOST PERFEC.") is about what software marketing used to be - "Crashproof and completely reliable", "command structure is simple logical and complete", "have not included any feature that is not thoroughly implemented."

    Now, marketing is more like "Now with Blue!" or "We give kickbacks" or "Buy it because it's the same as what you already have!"

  118. Big deal, just find and old BYTE magazine by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If you still have your old late 70's BYTE magazine, or Popular Electronics ( back when they were still worthwhile ) take a peek.

    Packed wall to wall with 'history'. And you even have timeless articles to read, not just 'ads'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  119. TRS-80 by selfabuse · · Score: 1

    Damn. Just 2 days ago, I got rid of my old TRS-80, and 5 boxes of Radio Shack catalogs, Manuals, TRS-80 Magazines, I still even had the damn recipt. circa 1979, I think. If I had though anybody cared about old catalogs, I would have scanned them all before giving them to that insane art student.

  120. Similar experience a few weeks ago by kpogoda · · Score: 1

    I was filtering through some old catalogs myself from the early 80's. I was amused at the ads for graphics and printers of the time. The idea of color was a long way off. The video game ads were also extremely entertaining. We have come a long way since then, and also taken may steps backwards. I wonder what I will be thinking about catalogs from today in 2024?

  121. The more things change the more ... by RageEX · · Score: 1

    Wow. PCs were just as boring in 1981 as they are now.

  122. I'm From Oklahoma! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya'll a bunch of insensitive clods!

  123. $50 for 1K of RAM by peter303 · · Score: 1

    When I was designed circuits in MITs digital lab in 1975, 1K of RAM cost $50 ($200 in 2004 dollars). There was only bi-polar static RAM then. It was relatively fast too.

  124. Where are they now? by dharash · · Score: 1

    Any idea what Bob & Bruce are doing now?
    And what happened to their company?

    1. Re:Where are they now? by Meowing · · Score: 1
      ASBC eventually morphed into the software business. For a while they were known as Viagrafix (unfortunate choice, given what else appeared under a similar name), and today they still sell DesignCAD and some other stuff under the name Upperspace.

      They're still in Pryor OK, and even kept the same phone number over the years.

    2. Re:Where are they now? by edibobb · · Score: 1

      http://rwebster.com/resume.htm

  125. Re:no promotions anymore (USA japan) by kjamez · · Score: 0

    let's not forget that half the stuff that says 'made in USA' is actually made in the small manufacturing town of USA, japan. buy products made in the u.s.a. ... i believe it was a wwII era thing, but i may be mistaken.

    --
    you can't have everything, where would you put it?
  126. digits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when we only used 8 fingers, and using the thumbs too was considered a major capacity increase. Then Alan Turing came up with the idea of using the toes too and with that doubling, Moore's Law was established and the modern era began.

  127. Long advertisements by jayminer · · Score: 1

    Did anyone also recognized that old advertisements have long and informative texts. I also have many computer magazines from 80s and the strange thing I notice is not the prices but changes in today's advertisements.

    Today's advertisements include nice logos, running technological sprites all over the screen, a big motto and some "WE ARE THE BEST" sentences.

    1. Re:Long advertisements by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Did anyone also recognized that old advertisements have long and informative texts.

      Back in the late 80's/early 90's I was working for a small computer company that also advertised in Byte and our ads (some done in part by yours truly) were just like that. The reason was that at the time most such companies were selling to engineers and other technical people who wanted *specs* above all. Pictures were nice, but they wanted technical details. If we skimped on detail and tried to insert product photos instead, we were deluged with customer support calls asking if we could fax over spec sheets to interested readers.

      This was at the very beginning of PC desktop publishing. The memory in our Canon laser printer cost more than the printer itself. I would write ad copy in XyWrite, the owner took product photographs then the bunch of us would sit around a big table with a hot wax roller and X-Acto knives and paste up the ad. Then downstairs to the big Agfa stat camera to produce the final incarnation which was then mailed off to the magazines. I sure learned a lot of odd stuff at that job for a 23 y-o electrical engineer :-)

      When the company was sold (to a group of morons headed by the canonical PHB), we were told that our ads were too dense and hard to read, so they brought in all these marketing consultants who prepared jazzy colorful ads at 2x the cost (we paid $20,000 for a 2page B&W ad in Byte and it easily paid for itself every month, the ads they produced cost over $50,000 .. for a company doing only $1M in sales that bites!)
      Needless to say, the new ads sucked in terms of response. The PHB would not accept that the ugly ads designed by engineers for engineers were actually resulting in more sales than his expensive ones and refused to go back. Sales plummetted, company lost tons of money, went tits up. Been there, done that, got my T-shirt ripped off!
      We actually had one ad (we even had a copy under glass!) that cost $80,000 in marketing and placement fees and resulted in exactly ZERO product inquiries. The only thing they did right was to track ad responses!

      OK, done with that particular rant for the moment :-)
  128. Oblig. Princess Bride quote by trentblase · · Score: 1
    Re: The word obligatory:

    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

    1. Re:Oblig. Princess Bride quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. No one's _forcing_ him to quote Apollo 13. In Norwegian we have the word 'obligat' (tradition, custom, habit), as opposed to 'obligatorisk' (mandatory), but alas most people nowadays haven't heard of 'obligat' and use 'obligatorisk' in both senses.

    2. Re:Oblig. Princess Bride quote by DarcSeed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Inconceivable!!

      --
      Best death? What, die from a naked lady avalanche?
  129. Re:Think Saturn by OSgod · · Score: 1, Interesting

    OK -- sub par car's? Car's that consistlently fall in the bottom of reviews? American car's that perform in the lower half of the curve?

    Or -- from the recent auto show locally -- SUV's who's body panels don't line up so badly that you can't open the doors? (That car should never have been at the auto show -- why did the dealer bring it?)

    Poor build quality?
    Outdated technology?
    High price/low functionality?

    Do you have a better example?

  130. Traffic by edibobb · · Score: 1

    A interesting footnote -- Far more people have viewed that catalog in the past several hours than in the entire 1980's!

  131. I concur! by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    Things haven't changed one whit. My first computer took forever to load the word processor because I couldn't afford the extra $500 for a hard drive. Now I have over 200 times more memory and millions more KB's of disk space, and the word processor takes forever to load because I am too cheap to buy a faster computer with the memory needed.

    OTOH, maybe things have changed after all. Now I am memory bound, not disk I/O bound. Oh, and that was 1988, come to think of it. In 1981, my notion of high tech in the word processing department was an IBM Selectric II that could erase my typos.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  132. GIGO by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    We made a fix for that, if the wrong figures go in, now instead the machine plays your favorite MP3 file from the nearest file sharing network, downloads the latest spyware/adware, and then accepts a supeona from the RIAA for you to appear in court.

    So make sure that you type everything in correctly this time... ;)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  133. 1981 by thebra · · Score: 1

    thats the year I was born. All you older folks sure used to pay a lot for some text on a screen.

  134. Copyright by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Larry Lessig should use this as an example of how dumb our copyright laws are. As the RIAA and MPAA and most of Congress would have us interpret the law, this is a copyright violation.

    Does that make ANY sense in the real world?

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  135. Re:1981? Not Later? (geezing!) by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 2, Informative

    One bank of 8 chips would have been 64K or 256K, not 128K.

    The Mac Plus was the first one with SIMMs; four slots, you had to put SIMMs in in pairs (they were 8 bits wide, and the Mac had a 16-bit data bus), and you could put in 256K or 1Mbit SIMMs.

    I have, in my attic, an Apple II computer with a little over a Meg of RAM (1 MB RamWorks card, plus 64K on the motherboard, and another 64K buffer on the printer card), and a Mac Plus with 2.5 Mb of RAM. I should plug them in and see if they still work...

  136. Re:A link on swbell.net? Oh, that'll last. by josh3736 · · Score: 1

    No, he is changing which picture links to the goatse man in an attempt to get modded up. That shot is from when the picture happened to be on that page. And I'm not trying to get people to look at goatse, that is why I blurred it out.

  137. Re:Think Saturn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of all the apostrophes used in that post, only one was correctly used. Can you guess which one? Of course not.

  138. Footnotes by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What amazes me is that the catalog is more "sincere" that modern ones.

    Look at the footnotes, most of them are trademark acknowledgements (like "CP/M is trademark of the Digital Research Corporation"). Basically you get what you see.

    Computers these days are really sold as black boxes, without specifications anywhere and with all kinds of hidden "features" (as in DRMed CDs).

    Today, the footnotes would say something like "This device is not sold, it is licensed. Requires windows. Interface is proprietary and protected by DMCA. You agree to give us your soul by using the Product" in 1pt font in a hidden corner.

  139. Re:Think Saturn by OSgod · · Score: 1

    My apologies for the ' debacle. I'll never do it again. Not.

  140. Take a look at this then: by kunudo · · Score: 0

    Terrabyte array (interesting reading, ugly box)

    also, 160 gig drives are the cheapest per gig at the moment. I just finished last week :)

  141. More nostalgia... by axlrosen · · Score: 1

    An ad introducing the Macintosh, in Newsweek in 1984. I love how it introduces you to the "mouse" and "cut and paste". And the glowing endorsements from Bill Gates, Mitch Kapor, and Fred Gibbons. (Who?)

  142. Original Mac promo insert from Time + old mags by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

    I've got an original Mac promo insert that was included in Time Magazine. It's kind of a cool retro thing to keep around with my old magazines with programs that you had to type in. The latter kept my brother and myself out of my parents' hair for endless hours. I think my folks must have gotten twenty times the cash benefit out of that knowing that it kept us busy each month for hours on end when it came in the mail.

    Later on, I think they were thrilled when we discovered that we could program dice rollers and character sheet programs for AD&D. The couple of months I spent programming a text adventure must have also been a treat to them.

    Gah! I've been a dork for a long time...

    GF.

  143. so what? by bensagenius · · Score: 0

    I'm still supporting most of this stuff at work!

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
  144. Re:Think Saturn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't and can't - I found two.

  145. A more informed crowd? Understatement of the year. by driehuis · · Score: 1

    You're absolutely right. In those days, computers were just becoming affordable to small businesses or even home users, but anyone buying one either had a real compelling business need for one, or was a wizard already. Or both.

    In those days it wasn't uncommon that "installing" a device meant modifying the code to be able to use it, especially if you mixed and matched gear.

    Among the things you weren't surprised to find in the shipping box were complete schematics, engineering drawings (with exploded views of some hard-to-service mechanical bits), and a hard-copy listing of the monitor software. I think it was the TRS-80 that was the first to do away with all those user-unfriendly bits of paperwork.

    --

    Bert Driehuis -- All I asked was a friggin' rotatin' chair. Throw me a bone here, people.