Basically corrupt conservative 'er' exploiters governments, are looking to implement laws to hide corruption at all levels of government. Of course never to forget sheer incompetence. So basically it's all about creating a raft of laws to bury corruption and incompetence in government under national security.
You know what's really funny about this, this is exactly what corporations try to do with NDA's. Of course who is doing the corrupting of governments, why it's the multi-national corporations, where else do you think the incompetent corrupt fuckers in government got the idea from. Expose the corruption in government and you'll expose the corporations behind it. Hmm, not so funny after all.
Actually espionage is now becoming more about governments keeping secrets from their own citizens rather than anything to do with foreign governments. The warped and twisted idea that governments need to keep ever more and more information about it's actions secret from it's own citizens, seems to be the real route driver for espionage.
The more secrets the Government keeps from it's citizens, the more deceitful and undemocratic it becomes and the more neighbouring nations need to spy on them to find out what is going on and how much of a threat that government is becoming.
It would seem the current reality of the situation in the number of secrets the US Government is keeping from US citizens, makes the US government the number 1 threat in the world that should be the main focus for all other countries espionage agencies. In fact the best way to reduce the threat of a corrupt government is to release as many of it's secrets as possible to it's own citizens so that it's own citizens can take corrective measures to reduce corruption in government by getting rid of it's worst politicians.
Actually the new principle that reflects actual reality should be the Corporate Psychopath Principle "The ability to be promoted up to the level where you can continue to blame others for your mistakes whilst taking all the credit for their successes" or the Steve Jobs principle. When you reach you peak you cripple your company whilst scamming a golden parachute for yourself.
DUDE, noise, you want to hear what's coming out of the speakers not noises coming out of the computer. Greater volume allows slower air velocities even to the point of natural non-fan forced flows. Compact things up and either reduce power or increase noise. All in ones with touch screens are greater for fixing to all kinds of surfaces but you have to compromise on power. No that really doesn't affect gaming because you can only game for extended periods in certain positions. So for me, a customised overbed table and full sized recliner chair, so whether it's laptop or an all in one or a desktop makes no difference, on usability. So desktop becomes the choice for cost efficient power and acceptable noise abatement.
"ERM" it ain't the wet season at the moment hence you argument is non-germane. As for appropriate seasonal burns, this requires a full funded and effective fire service. You do not start fires and ever just let them burn. Each and every burn is carefully planned, people are notified and fire breaks prepared (to ensure the burn occurs in pre-designed stages). Once the burn starts fire fighters are on hand waiting to control and limit the burn as necessary. It most certainly is not the aboriginal fire stick farming of yore but a costly, carefully controlled and professionally managed activity. One thing of more modern consideration is how ancient fire stick farming practices altered the ecology and whether promoting more fire resistant growths rather than growths that actually promote fires for reproductive advantage, is the more suitable goal.
The more fire fronts that occur the more likely that they are being purposefully started. However due to squeezed funding and ticket quota's no one is out there monitoring and investigating.
Sounds more like M$ needs to break into two parts. The old core windows and office and tighten up on costs whilst screwing as much income as possible for as long as possible as Linus continues to chew away at it's market.
MSN and gaming (and all the cash) needs to get out on it's own well away from the disastrous rank and yank which eats away at creativity like a cancer instead promoting the plotters and schemers (it's mental focus idiots, either they are focused on creative output or on career advancement). That's where the real failure is MSN was way way ahead of Google at one stage and was progressively screwed over by incompetence. It's brand devalued by Live and of all things bloody Bing (B for Ballmer how stupidly egoistic can people become).
From a rebuilt MSN comes the new direction and the new products, it's all about the 'N', networking, connecting the pieces and the pieces that get connected.
Oversight. Don't you get it at all. You are being handed another charade. NSA is meant to secure and gather intelligence, not act upon it, it was never set up that way.
You are being handed the "BIG LIE", what counts is what other agencies who received private information from the NSA, who had access to the electronic interception established by the NSA, did with that illegally obtained information. They are now looking to through out a few scape goats, a smoke screen to hide the others well beyond the confines of the NSA.
How much information did the US Department of Homeland Security receive from the NSA. What was the nature of the information, who had control over it and what did they do with it. The NSA are a direct feeder of information into the CIA, again, what information was received, who had access and what did they do with it. Next up the FBI, how much were the FBI in bed with the NSA, why did the FBI allow agents of the NSA to freely break the law. What information did the FBI receive and what did they do with it.
Now you would think it would stop there, but oh no, it get's far far worse. It is public knowledge the corporate security contractors had full access to the information being gathered under the NSA auspices. Private for profit individuals with total and full access to all the intelligence information, now what the hell did they do with that information and who else did they give it too. What politicians and their backers had access to what information, to leverage power.
Now you are getting a pretty little song and dance about a couple of NSA agents being naughty, all the while else the NSA provided access too with out any control at all and no record of what they did and Uncle Tom Obama the choom gang coward pretending it all stops at the NSA's door. The intelligence gatherer and not at the CIA's, Department of Homeland Security, FBI's et al (basically the whole US military industrial complex and it's financing banks). Those are the organisations that act upon the information provided by the NSA, they were all in on it, they all knew it was going on and they all had access to the information.
Re:Hah! Slashdot likes Ballmer more than the Press
on
Ballmer To Retire
·
· Score: 1
Uncle Fester may be annoying byt for years and years has has been by far the best tool (sic) in Linux and FOSS toolbox. Nasty sure but for his services to Linux, in all the various mistakes including permanently offending the majority of Linux supporters by publicly slandering them at any and all opportunities, well done. Of course Bill deserves full blame for putting and keeping his buddy in power.
All those Ballmerites of course are now living in fear, cleaning house after Uncle Fester is gone means all those yes men are doomed as well.
Punish and intimidate, seriously? You know how cheap hard disk drives are, this is a company, a Friday team lunch costs way more than those (already backed up drives). It was a seriously stupid, completely and utterly pointless thing to do. The government spent more money sending those officers there than those drives cost. This smells more like the rebuke was going back in the other direction to the politicians rather than anything targeted at the Guardian. Those British agents purposefully went out of their way to make the UK government look bad in it's sucking up to the US government.
The art of propaganda the repeated lie. You might as well say no crimes were exposed because everyone is innocent until proven guilty and no investigations and no prosecutions were carried out, hence not trials and no one found guilty, how does that suit your little propaganda twist and swirl. The US military industrial complex is going to blatantly and shamelessly maintain the lies in order to protect all those criminals tens of thousands of them up to including Uncle Tom Obama the choom gang coward who were accessories after the fact in hiding and lying about criminal acts. A culture of incompetence and criminality, is now going to point to it's own kangaroo court and say the person who exposed the crimes is the criminal because he was found guilty (as blatantly predetermined by the commander in cheif) and the criminals who he exposed are not criminals because they were not prosecuted as criminals and hence are innocent of crimes, under the law of bullshit and corruption. You might as well just spout blah, blah, blah, we know it, you know it and only the most gullible and foolish do not know it.
The old privatise and save 'er' profit thing comes to play. So the privatised the recycling which was going to save money. Promptly cabals formed and prices sky rocketed. As for the recycling, well, apparently they just took all that consumer sorted rubbish and chucked it all into one bin and then sent it overseas. Highly profitable pseudo recycling brought to you by the lowest most corrupt tender.
As long as it remains voluntary at alls levels. Any hint of compulsion and it's true corporate control of all individuals accessing the internet is exposed.
Real names is designed to do one thing and one thing only, promote corporate approved commenting. There are huge numbers of people who cannot comment in the way they would prefer simply because it goes against the preferences of their autocratic employers and this quite simply will silence them, which is it's intent.
Of course this will be the death knell of the Huffington Post, turning it into a hollow echo chamber commenting to it's own corporate propaganda. It's comment deletion system has long since shown at bias to the corruption at the top.
Australian's can take pride in a more ethical police force because what happens after the incident is far more important than the incident. That some police officers will commit crimes is a given, that they are fully investigated and prosecuted when they do so is the difference between a corrupt police force and a police force citizens can take pride in supporting.
Don't ever take the corporate marketing line, hiding crimes makes everyone look better. Always demand the law and justice line, all government crimes should be exposed and prosecuted, that is how the value of justice is proved by it's repeated application not by covering up criminal activity.
The problem being that the wikileaks targeted voters are not single issue voters and hence wikileaks is very unlikely to gain many. Single issue voting is mind bogglingly stupidly destructive. Pay attention to the bulk of the policy directions, pay attention to the track record of the politician and either vote out the worst or try to vote in the best, OVERALL. Never, ever single issue vote that is exactly what turns the majority of conservative voters into victims, rather than contributing citizens. Wikileaks dead in the water without a full range of policies and being able to contribute to Australian Politics in a meaningful way.
Then again be a hero or be a zero. What Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden have done for the people of the world will be remember for a very, very long time to come and remembered positively, long after pseudo celebrities, corrupt politicians and the rich and greedy have disappeared into by-lines remembered only for the worst things they did.
A reminder that secrets always have a way of coming out and being the hero that released them is far better than being another minion zero accessory skulking in the background waiting to take the fall for the benefit and profits of the lead conspirators.
Basically yes, that is the whole idea. Every on duty interaction between the police and the public would be live streamed back to the station to be recorded, to ensure proper procedure on the part of the police officer and to ensure the citizen has an unbiased by the police officers preferential memory of that interaction.
In order not to totally freak out police officers, they would need to be able to turn them off, when they spend those 4 hours a day on salary sucking down doughnuts and coffee between 'er' random targeting of likely drug users to keep their arrest quotas up (why else do you think they freak out when you waste their time, you reducing their doughnut time).
However failure to turn them one would reflect really poorly upon the police officers testimony most likely reducing it to equal or less that those they are testifying against as they had the opportunity and legal requirement to record the event.
Also for better police forces that share mutual respect with their fellow citizens in the communities, the safety benefits of a live stream is really beneficial. Police officers can have heart attacks, can suffer bad falls etc' in high risk environments and, can be attacked. As far as officer safety goes a truly beneficial device especially when hooked up to bio monitoring device for alarm activation. Realistically only one type of cop will hate the device, they're called pigs and give police forces all over the world a bad name.
Heads up display also gives them immediate access to number plate records and, facial recognition. The ability to record investigatory observations for latter review will also be invaluable in investigation. It will also teach those officer the benefits of privacy, when they get to take off the devices when they go home.
So does my brain hurt or are you starting to talk about tracking naughty planes with stealth electric snowmobiles, WHY?
This sounds more like a designed tender to feed money to an insider family company, already associated with the Canadian government, basically a tender only one company can win and where the research conducted can be used in other areas.
Seriously $620,000 dollar snowmobiles. OK so say a company of high tech snow mobilers. So say five thirty man platoons, each one needing a snowmobile and say 20% spare snowmobiles, that's already $111.6 million dollars. No maintenance, no troops, no base etc. I seriously think cheaper ways can be found.
Actually this fracturing of advanced study programs in computing could actually launch the start of something very new in computer education. The big shift to medical school like training, where learning is conducted at a major educational hospital and for computing learning would actually be at a tech services centre.
So is the best possible learning for computers to be based around an on the job tech centre, where students work and learn and can specialise in centre tech specialities, software, hardware and networking.
Will the new big and best computer schools be the ones that employ students full time and, generate income from the labour to subsidise education cost. The most efficient not even charging students but paying them an allowance based upon their usefulness.
So no crap admittances to bleed students dry for the rest of the lives with loans but major tech centres only recruiting those students that will pass and students making immediate use of what they learn. Referrals in this case being able to demonstrate real world skills and work ethic.
Actually that is far more likely to be true than funny. This seems very much like a core psy vs spy configuration change, whether it was to take something out or put something in remains to be seen. In light of recent exposure taking something out seems more likely.
At the end of the day, this should be a major wake up call for Google and having a more regionally distributed system, which of course is what the internet was originally designed to be so that no single point of failure can take down the entire system.
False economy might make a centralised system look more appealing but a major failure can bring those savings crashing down and turning into a massive cost. Additionally more regionalism designs allow for testing new products, methods et al in smaller markets or even customising to suit particular markets.
A complete system wide failure certainly puts a black mark on Google's future value.
However the scientific literature in this case is a crock of shit. Those studies were based upon calorie controlled meals ie take a full days calories appropriate for the test subject and divide that into say five calorie meals.
Now supply the individual with exactly the calorie limit for that single meal in a high sugar ratio and not one calorie more and seriously is any one going to sugar high. Reality here, those studies are junk science funded by sugar industry Public relations Arse holes.
Children are not getting sugar highs on a calorie controlled limited meal ie half a chocolate bar but on unlimited calories as much sugar as they can eat meals. A high carbohydrate snack, plus a full chocolate bar, plus a bag of chips, plus a large soft drink, plus some candy ie sugar rush city the reality. Not some Public Relations junk science limited calorie ration being presented as a typical childs unlimited calorie, stomach capacity meal.
Now add further shenanigans, like calorie negative foods, where consumption of certain foods types actually consumes more calories in the digestive process, than those foods will actually release once digested. There are also many food types which will alter mood so hmm hot chocolate a whole lot of calories but it's going to chill you out more than speed you up. There are a whole range of herbs and spices with various metabolic activities that aren't going to be in the calorie count but will most definitely alter the results in any way that lying shit head Public Relations types want them to go.
Whoa there buddy, "calorie-controlled", whether sugar or carbohydrates or proteins or fats, once there is a limit on calorie consumption there is a bloody limit. So cut the crap, sugar highs are real because there is no fucking "calorie control" children are consuming as much as they are capable of before discharging it on the spot.
So this study and other studies like it are blatant bullshit because they all rely on calorie limits to work and are not based around filling an empty stomach till a person feels satiated, be they a minor or an adult, or until they feel a little off from having shoved too much in there.
By volume concentrated calorie foods, will mean a person, adult or child is well and truly able to consume well beyond their whole daily recommended calorie intake (and far, far, fucking beyond those bull shit scam studies, the scam being people are ignoring the "CALORIE CONTROLLED" part)
So do children go on a sugar rush, of course they do, because they are consuming not on meals calorie requirements but several days worth in one sitting sometimes to the point of vomiting from excess consumption of extremely calorie concentrated foodstuffs. The devil is always in the detail, calorie controlled indeed, what a scam.
Not to forget, lie detector test have zero impact on psychopaths, so basically the worst of the worst will pass, kind of making the lie detector scam pointless, or more accurately the question reaction flim flam show pointless. This being the reason they are banned in most countries. This really stinks of the FBI intending to use fake like detector tests to incriminate any one they want too and these plans are threatened by the exposure.
That is a blatant lie ie a lawyer appointed by a person to carry out their last will and testament is bound by contractual law to honour that contract. Same for leaving estate to pets et al. Face it Yahoo are a bunch of douche bag shits heads for what they have done and the stink of an ex-google bimbo is all over it.
As for some of the reasons the dude committed suicide, reincarnation might obviate the exercise and even worse place him in even worse circumstance;D.
Slashdot Mirror
Basically corrupt conservative 'er' exploiters governments, are looking to implement laws to hide corruption at all levels of government. Of course never to forget sheer incompetence. So basically it's all about creating a raft of laws to bury corruption and incompetence in government under national security.
You know what's really funny about this, this is exactly what corporations try to do with NDA's. Of course who is doing the corrupting of governments, why it's the multi-national corporations, where else do you think the incompetent corrupt fuckers in government got the idea from. Expose the corruption in government and you'll expose the corporations behind it. Hmm, not so funny after all.
Actually espionage is now becoming more about governments keeping secrets from their own citizens rather than anything to do with foreign governments. The warped and twisted idea that governments need to keep ever more and more information about it's actions secret from it's own citizens, seems to be the real route driver for espionage.
The more secrets the Government keeps from it's citizens, the more deceitful and undemocratic it becomes and the more neighbouring nations need to spy on them to find out what is going on and how much of a threat that government is becoming.
It would seem the current reality of the situation in the number of secrets the US Government is keeping from US citizens, makes the US government the number 1 threat in the world that should be the main focus for all other countries espionage agencies. In fact the best way to reduce the threat of a corrupt government is to release as many of it's secrets as possible to it's own citizens so that it's own citizens can take corrective measures to reduce corruption in government by getting rid of it's worst politicians.
Actually the new principle that reflects actual reality should be the Corporate Psychopath Principle "The ability to be promoted up to the level where you can continue to blame others for your mistakes whilst taking all the credit for their successes" or the Steve Jobs principle. When you reach you peak you cripple your company whilst scamming a golden parachute for yourself.
DUDE, noise, you want to hear what's coming out of the speakers not noises coming out of the computer. Greater volume allows slower air velocities even to the point of natural non-fan forced flows. Compact things up and either reduce power or increase noise. All in ones with touch screens are greater for fixing to all kinds of surfaces but you have to compromise on power. No that really doesn't affect gaming because you can only game for extended periods in certain positions. So for me, a customised overbed table and full sized recliner chair, so whether it's laptop or an all in one or a desktop makes no difference, on usability. So desktop becomes the choice for cost efficient power and acceptable noise abatement.
"ERM" it ain't the wet season at the moment hence you argument is non-germane. As for appropriate seasonal burns, this requires a full funded and effective fire service. You do not start fires and ever just let them burn. Each and every burn is carefully planned, people are notified and fire breaks prepared (to ensure the burn occurs in pre-designed stages). Once the burn starts fire fighters are on hand waiting to control and limit the burn as necessary. It most certainly is not the aboriginal fire stick farming of yore but a costly, carefully controlled and professionally managed activity. One thing of more modern consideration is how ancient fire stick farming practices altered the ecology and whether promoting more fire resistant growths rather than growths that actually promote fires for reproductive advantage, is the more suitable goal.
The more fire fronts that occur the more likely that they are being purposefully started. However due to squeezed funding and ticket quota's no one is out there monitoring and investigating.
Sounds more like M$ needs to break into two parts. The old core windows and office and tighten up on costs whilst screwing as much income as possible for as long as possible as Linus continues to chew away at it's market.
MSN and gaming (and all the cash) needs to get out on it's own well away from the disastrous rank and yank which eats away at creativity like a cancer instead promoting the plotters and schemers (it's mental focus idiots, either they are focused on creative output or on career advancement). That's where the real failure is MSN was way way ahead of Google at one stage and was progressively screwed over by incompetence. It's brand devalued by Live and of all things bloody Bing (B for Ballmer how stupidly egoistic can people become).
From a rebuilt MSN comes the new direction and the new products, it's all about the 'N', networking, connecting the pieces and the pieces that get connected.
Read the companies own blurb http://www.orica.com/News---Media/Orica-invests-in-CO2-capture-research-project. Carbon certainly has lots of uses but our current methods of getting it and burning it seems to be the most wasteful and destructive use.
Oversight. Don't you get it at all. You are being handed another charade. NSA is meant to secure and gather intelligence, not act upon it, it was never set up that way.
You are being handed the "BIG LIE", what counts is what other agencies who received private information from the NSA, who had access to the electronic interception established by the NSA, did with that illegally obtained information. They are now looking to through out a few scape goats, a smoke screen to hide the others well beyond the confines of the NSA.
How much information did the US Department of Homeland Security receive from the NSA. What was the nature of the information, who had control over it and what did they do with it. The NSA are a direct feeder of information into the CIA, again, what information was received, who had access and what did they do with it. Next up the FBI, how much were the FBI in bed with the NSA, why did the FBI allow agents of the NSA to freely break the law. What information did the FBI receive and what did they do with it.
Now you would think it would stop there, but oh no, it get's far far worse. It is public knowledge the corporate security contractors had full access to the information being gathered under the NSA auspices. Private for profit individuals with total and full access to all the intelligence information, now what the hell did they do with that information and who else did they give it too. What politicians and their backers had access to what information, to leverage power.
Now you are getting a pretty little song and dance about a couple of NSA agents being naughty, all the while else the NSA provided access too with out any control at all and no record of what they did and Uncle Tom Obama the choom gang coward pretending it all stops at the NSA's door. The intelligence gatherer and not at the CIA's, Department of Homeland Security, FBI's et al (basically the whole US military industrial complex and it's financing banks). Those are the organisations that act upon the information provided by the NSA, they were all in on it, they all knew it was going on and they all had access to the information.
Uncle Fester may be annoying byt for years and years has has been by far the best tool (sic) in Linux and FOSS toolbox. Nasty sure but for his services to Linux, in all the various mistakes including permanently offending the majority of Linux supporters by publicly slandering them at any and all opportunities, well done. Of course Bill deserves full blame for putting and keeping his buddy in power.
All those Ballmerites of course are now living in fear, cleaning house after Uncle Fester is gone means all those yes men are doomed as well.
Punish and intimidate, seriously? You know how cheap hard disk drives are, this is a company, a Friday team lunch costs way more than those (already backed up drives). It was a seriously stupid, completely and utterly pointless thing to do. The government spent more money sending those officers there than those drives cost. This smells more like the rebuke was going back in the other direction to the politicians rather than anything targeted at the Guardian. Those British agents purposefully went out of their way to make the UK government look bad in it's sucking up to the US government.
The art of propaganda the repeated lie. You might as well say no crimes were exposed because everyone is innocent until proven guilty and no investigations and no prosecutions were carried out, hence not trials and no one found guilty, how does that suit your little propaganda twist and swirl. The US military industrial complex is going to blatantly and shamelessly maintain the lies in order to protect all those criminals tens of thousands of them up to including Uncle Tom Obama the choom gang coward who were accessories after the fact in hiding and lying about criminal acts. A culture of incompetence and criminality, is now going to point to it's own kangaroo court and say the person who exposed the crimes is the criminal because he was found guilty (as blatantly predetermined by the commander in cheif) and the criminals who he exposed are not criminals because they were not prosecuted as criminals and hence are innocent of crimes, under the law of bullshit and corruption. You might as well just spout blah, blah, blah, we know it, you know it and only the most gullible and foolish do not know it.
The old privatise and save 'er' profit thing comes to play. So the privatised the recycling which was going to save money. Promptly cabals formed and prices sky rocketed. As for the recycling, well, apparently they just took all that consumer sorted rubbish and chucked it all into one bin and then sent it overseas. Highly profitable pseudo recycling brought to you by the lowest most corrupt tender.
As long as it remains voluntary at alls levels. Any hint of compulsion and it's true corporate control of all individuals accessing the internet is exposed.
Real names is designed to do one thing and one thing only, promote corporate approved commenting. There are huge numbers of people who cannot comment in the way they would prefer simply because it goes against the preferences of their autocratic employers and this quite simply will silence them, which is it's intent.
Of course this will be the death knell of the Huffington Post, turning it into a hollow echo chamber commenting to it's own corporate propaganda. It's comment deletion system has long since shown at bias to the corruption at the top.
Australian's can take pride in a more ethical police force because what happens after the incident is far more important than the incident. That some police officers will commit crimes is a given, that they are fully investigated and prosecuted when they do so is the difference between a corrupt police force and a police force citizens can take pride in supporting.
Don't ever take the corporate marketing line, hiding crimes makes everyone look better. Always demand the law and justice line, all government crimes should be exposed and prosecuted, that is how the value of justice is proved by it's repeated application not by covering up criminal activity.
The problem being that the wikileaks targeted voters are not single issue voters and hence wikileaks is very unlikely to gain many. Single issue voting is mind bogglingly stupidly destructive. Pay attention to the bulk of the policy directions, pay attention to the track record of the politician and either vote out the worst or try to vote in the best, OVERALL. Never, ever single issue vote that is exactly what turns the majority of conservative voters into victims, rather than contributing citizens. Wikileaks dead in the water without a full range of policies and being able to contribute to Australian Politics in a meaningful way.
Then again be a hero or be a zero. What Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden have done for the people of the world will be remember for a very, very long time to come and remembered positively, long after pseudo celebrities, corrupt politicians and the rich and greedy have disappeared into by-lines remembered only for the worst things they did.
A reminder that secrets always have a way of coming out and being the hero that released them is far better than being another minion zero accessory skulking in the background waiting to take the fall for the benefit and profits of the lead conspirators.
Basically yes, that is the whole idea. Every on duty interaction between the police and the public would be live streamed back to the station to be recorded, to ensure proper procedure on the part of the police officer and to ensure the citizen has an unbiased by the police officers preferential memory of that interaction.
In order not to totally freak out police officers, they would need to be able to turn them off, when they spend those 4 hours a day on salary sucking down doughnuts and coffee between 'er' random targeting of likely drug users to keep their arrest quotas up (why else do you think they freak out when you waste their time, you reducing their doughnut time).
However failure to turn them one would reflect really poorly upon the police officers testimony most likely reducing it to equal or less that those they are testifying against as they had the opportunity and legal requirement to record the event.
Also for better police forces that share mutual respect with their fellow citizens in the communities, the safety benefits of a live stream is really beneficial. Police officers can have heart attacks, can suffer bad falls etc' in high risk environments and, can be attacked. As far as officer safety goes a truly beneficial device especially when hooked up to bio monitoring device for alarm activation. Realistically only one type of cop will hate the device, they're called pigs and give police forces all over the world a bad name.
Heads up display also gives them immediate access to number plate records and, facial recognition. The ability to record investigatory observations for latter review will also be invaluable in investigation. It will also teach those officer the benefits of privacy, when they get to take off the devices when they go home.
So does my brain hurt or are you starting to talk about tracking naughty planes with stealth electric snowmobiles, WHY?
This sounds more like a designed tender to feed money to an insider family company, already associated with the Canadian government, basically a tender only one company can win and where the research conducted can be used in other areas.
Seriously $620,000 dollar snowmobiles. OK so say a company of high tech snow mobilers. So say five thirty man platoons, each one needing a snowmobile and say 20% spare snowmobiles, that's already $111.6 million dollars. No maintenance, no troops, no base etc. I seriously think cheaper ways can be found.
Actually this fracturing of advanced study programs in computing could actually launch the start of something very new in computer education. The big shift to medical school like training, where learning is conducted at a major educational hospital and for computing learning would actually be at a tech services centre.
So is the best possible learning for computers to be based around an on the job tech centre, where students work and learn and can specialise in centre tech specialities, software, hardware and networking.
Will the new big and best computer schools be the ones that employ students full time and, generate income from the labour to subsidise education cost. The most efficient not even charging students but paying them an allowance based upon their usefulness.
So no crap admittances to bleed students dry for the rest of the lives with loans but major tech centres only recruiting those students that will pass and students making immediate use of what they learn. Referrals in this case being able to demonstrate real world skills and work ethic.
Actually that is far more likely to be true than funny. This seems very much like a core psy vs spy configuration change, whether it was to take something out or put something in remains to be seen. In light of recent exposure taking something out seems more likely.
At the end of the day, this should be a major wake up call for Google and having a more regionally distributed system, which of course is what the internet was originally designed to be so that no single point of failure can take down the entire system.
False economy might make a centralised system look more appealing but a major failure can bring those savings crashing down and turning into a massive cost. Additionally more regionalism designs allow for testing new products, methods et al in smaller markets or even customising to suit particular markets.
A complete system wide failure certainly puts a black mark on Google's future value.
However the scientific literature in this case is a crock of shit. Those studies were based upon calorie controlled meals ie take a full days calories appropriate for the test subject and divide that into say five calorie meals. Now supply the individual with exactly the calorie limit for that single meal in a high sugar ratio and not one calorie more and seriously is any one going to sugar high. Reality here, those studies are junk science funded by sugar industry Public relations Arse holes.
Children are not getting sugar highs on a calorie controlled limited meal ie half a chocolate bar but on unlimited calories as much sugar as they can eat meals. A high carbohydrate snack, plus a full chocolate bar, plus a bag of chips, plus a large soft drink, plus some candy ie sugar rush city the reality. Not some Public Relations junk science limited calorie ration being presented as a typical childs unlimited calorie, stomach capacity meal.
Now add further shenanigans, like calorie negative foods, where consumption of certain foods types actually consumes more calories in the digestive process, than those foods will actually release once digested. There are also many food types which will alter mood so hmm hot chocolate a whole lot of calories but it's going to chill you out more than speed you up. There are a whole range of herbs and spices with various metabolic activities that aren't going to be in the calorie count but will most definitely alter the results in any way that lying shit head Public Relations types want them to go.
Whoa there buddy, "calorie-controlled", whether sugar or carbohydrates or proteins or fats, once there is a limit on calorie consumption there is a bloody limit. So cut the crap, sugar highs are real because there is no fucking "calorie control" children are consuming as much as they are capable of before discharging it on the spot.
So this study and other studies like it are blatant bullshit because they all rely on calorie limits to work and are not based around filling an empty stomach till a person feels satiated, be they a minor or an adult, or until they feel a little off from having shoved too much in there.
By volume concentrated calorie foods, will mean a person, adult or child is well and truly able to consume well beyond their whole daily recommended calorie intake (and far, far, fucking beyond those bull shit scam studies, the scam being people are ignoring the "CALORIE CONTROLLED" part)
So do children go on a sugar rush, of course they do, because they are consuming not on meals calorie requirements but several days worth in one sitting sometimes to the point of vomiting from excess consumption of extremely calorie concentrated foodstuffs. The devil is always in the detail, calorie controlled indeed, what a scam.
Not to forget, lie detector test have zero impact on psychopaths, so basically the worst of the worst will pass, kind of making the lie detector scam pointless, or more accurately the question reaction flim flam show pointless. This being the reason they are banned in most countries. This really stinks of the FBI intending to use fake like detector tests to incriminate any one they want too and these plans are threatened by the exposure.
That is a blatant lie ie a lawyer appointed by a person to carry out their last will and testament is bound by contractual law to honour that contract. Same for leaving estate to pets et al. Face it Yahoo are a bunch of douche bag shits heads for what they have done and the stink of an ex-google bimbo is all over it.
As for some of the reasons the dude committed suicide, reincarnation might obviate the exercise and even worse place him in even worse circumstance ;D.